All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 8, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:56:45
The Raw Deal (8 February 2021)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
or if the bomb that drops on you gets your friends and neighbors too
Thank you.
There'll be nobody left behind to grieve.
And we will all go together when we go.
What a comforting fact that is to know.
Universal bereavement, an inspiring achievement.
Yes, we all will go together when we go.
We will all go together when we go.
All suffused with an incandescent glow.
No one will have the endurance to collect on his insurance.
Lloyds of London will be loaded when they go.
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal, where I'm very pleased today to give you a review and update on the latest news developments.
And then during the second hour, I'll be glad to take your calls.
I'll remind you, refresh you of the number at the time.
Jonathan Turley has explained that House Democrats are threatening to trash the Constitution to ensure the conviction of Donald Trump in this completely Fantastic, inappropriate, unconstitutional second impeachment where he observes that attempting to use against the president that he's not going to testify before the whole house not only contradicts just our constitutional principles but centuries of legal writing
Presidents have historically not testified at impeachment trials.
It was likely viewed as undignified and frankly too risky.
Most defense attorneys routinely discourage clients from testifying in actual criminal cases because the risks outweigh the benefits.
Moreover, Trump is arguing the trial is unconstitutional, and thus he'd be even less likely to depart from tradition and appear of a weakness which would indeed be granting it legitimacy.
Nevertheless, House impeachment manager Jamie Raskin of Maryland wrote that Trump and his lawyers, the former president, should testify under oath next week, saying if Trump did not show up, it could be used against him.
A similar tactic was used during the first impeachment.
Despite the historical precedent for presidents not testifying, Raskin made an extraordinary and chilling declaration on behalf of the House of Representatives, Turley explained.
He wrote in a letter to Trump, if you decline this invitation, we reserve any and all right, including the right to establish a trial that your refusal to testify supports a strong adverse inference regarding your actions and inactions on January the 6th.
Remember, this is all about the fabled storming of the Capitol, which we know was actually 226 Antifa members dressed as Trump supporters under the control of John Sullivan, whose brother James has outed him.
And where, incidentally, we now have the FBI confirming that they had multiple reports that it was a pre-planned event using social media for coordination.
And I would add, where it's obvious that Nancy Pelosi, who controls the Capitol Police, was in collusion here with the mayor of Washington and the members of Antifa to try to embarrass the president to disrupt the discussion of voter fraud that was taking place at the time and to create a basis for a completely fraudulent second impeachment.
I would notice, by the way, that this evidence from the FBI of having been pre-planned vitiates the entire single allegation of incitement to insurrection, which is abusive language all by itself because an insurrection is an attempt to overthrow a government.
There was no attempt to overthrow the government.
This was just a noisy, intrusive event That was kind of grandstanding or for publicity purposes to benefit the Democrats politically.
And in order for there to have been incitement, it would have had to be to perform a specific act with the intent of promoting lawless, imminent lawless action, which of course was not the case.
Not only did Trump not incite, he told them to be peaceful and patriotic in launching their protest, and it took them about 45 minutes.
I mean, we're talking about a million people, where Trump didn't finish speaking until 1-11, and his first reporter seemed not to have shown up for around 45 minutes later, and all the excitement and going on had already taken place.
So anyway you want to cut it, whether it's in terms of the law or in terms of the evidence, the Democrats have nothing here.
Turley wrote this idea of using the president's non-testifying As evidence against him, conflicts with one of the most precious and revered principles of American law that a refusal to testify should not be used against an accused party.
The scholar who offered testimony during the first impeachment, known as the Fifth Amendment, declares no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.
It's true.
This is not a criminal trial.
It is a constitutional one.
As such, the Senate should try and accuse it according to our highest traditions and values.
That includes respecting the right to remain silent and not to have inferences drawn from the fact that, like prior presidents, Trump will not be present at the trial or give testimony.
Not only that, but we know it's outrageously unconstitutional because it states in the Constitution, read it for yourself, that if the impeachment is of the President, then the Chief Justice shall preside.
It doesn't give any options.
But the Chief Justice has declined to preside, no doubt because it's obviously blatantly unconstitutional, since the penalty is removal from office and the President no longer, you know, Holds the office.
I mean, how ridiculous can you get?
Something clearly is going on here, and I would suggest it's to distract attention from all the really aggressive, outrageous actions, executive orders being signed by Joe Biden.
Meanwhile, meanwhile, right in Washington, D.C., BLM and Antifa are marching and threatening to burn down the city.
Black Lives Matter and Antifa protesters march in the streets of Washington where demonstrators scuffled with police and the crowd shouted threats to burn down the nation's capital.
That sounds a whole lot more serious than anything Donald Trump did in telling his supporters to peacefully and patriotically protest the theft of the election.
On Saturday night, members of BLM and Antifa protested in D.C., where they're regularly chanting, if we don't get it, burn it down.
If we don't get it, burn it down.
During the FTP march, an acronym for F the Police, the mobs shouted their anti-police battle cry, ACAB, All Cops Are Bastards.
How ridiculous is this?
How insulting!
The Democrats stopped near a Rove restaurant where protest leaders delivered lectures about race, black and indigenous lives to nearby diners.
But you're not going to hear a peep from Nancy Pelosi or Chuck Schumer or anyone else at the Capitol on the Democratic side objecting to this outrageous conduct.
Just as you heard, no protests are objective to them for the rioting, the looting, and the arson that was taking place for month after month after month in Minneapolis, in Portland, Seattle, where they were actually out there encouraging it.
Meanwhile, House votes to remove Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene from all committee assignments.
The vote passed with a margin of 230 to 199, with 11 Republican members siding with a Democratic majority.
It passed just a few hours after she took to the chamber floor to express regret for some of the, they're calling them
fringe views she had peddled, but I'm going to go through the views she was peddling and
it appears to me based upon my research, she had it right. House Minority Leader Kevin
McCarthy had hoped to avoid the vote, which forced Republicans to take an on-the-record stance on
the resolution aimed at condemning her conduct.
She claims, of course, she recently spoke with Trump and has his support, which I believe.
On the other hand, other prominent Republicans have been less supportive.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, for example, Ridiculously blasted Greene's loony lies and conspiracy theories, calling them cancer for the Republican Party in our country.
We'll have more to say about that as well.
Greene, before being elected, promoted a litany of other radical conspiracy to extreme statement Skepticism, belief that a plane did not hit the Pentagon on September 11th.
She suggested school shootings had been staged, mocked a survivor of the Parkland school massacre, that suggested wildfires in California had been caused by laser beams.
Frankly, as I'm going to explain, she's correct on all of these grounds.
She's right.
And they never offer, of course, an iota of proof.
They simply commit the fallacy of popular sentiments by appealing to what most people believe.
And the fact that most people believe the shootings are real, or most people believe that a plane did hit the Pentagon, or that most people believe her having a clue about what caused the wildfires in California, doesn't make her position wrong.
It's just outrageous.
Never let House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer sit on the floor before the final vote.
To do nothing would be an abdication of our moral responsibility to our colleagues, to the House, to our values, to the truth, and to our country.
Which is just frankly absurd, unless her values don't include freedom of speech and the right to your own opinion, which of course she's exercising.
This is just grotesque.
Meanwhile, the Democrats are eager to present her as a poster child for the GOP.
McCarthy has chosen to make House Republicans the party of conspiracy theorists and GOP, Pelosi said in a statement.
And Representative Greene is in the driver's seat.
Well, actually, Marjorie has called out Nancy Pelosi as well, and for good reason.
Meanwhile, here's what she said on the floor of the House.
And I can't imagine why anyone, after hearing this, would have voted against her.
Listen to her demeanor.
Just an exemplar of contrition.
Madam Speaker, my Democrat colleagues, Republican colleagues, my district back home in Georgia 14, to the American people, to my mom and dad, and my husband and my children.
I've been here for one month and a day.
And I've gotten to know part of my conference, my Republican colleagues, but not even all of them yet.
I haven't gotten to know any of my Democrat colleagues, and I haven't had to have any conversations with any of you to tell you who I am and what I'm about.
You only know me by how Media Matters, CNN, MSNBC, and the rest of the mainstream media is portraying me.
What you don't know about me is that I'm a very proud wife of almost 25 years, that I'm a mother of three children, and I consider being a mother the greatest blessing of my life and the greatest thing that I'll ever achieve.
I'm proudly the first person to graduate college in my family, making my parents very happy and proud.
I'm also a very successful business owner.
We've grown our company from one state to 11 states.
I'm a very hard worker.
I've always paid my taxes.
I've never been arrested.
I've never done drugs, but I've gotten a few speeding tickets in my day.
What you need to know about me is I'm a very regular American, just like the people I represent in my district and most people across the country.
I never ever considered to run for Congress or even get involved in politics.
As a matter of fact, I wasn't a political person until I found a candidate that I really liked and his name is Donald J. Trump when he ran for president.
To me, he was someone I could relate to, someone that I enjoyed his plain talk.
Not the offensive things, but just the way he talked normally.
And I thought, finally, maybe this is someone that will do something about the things that deeply bother me.
Like the fact that we're so deeply in debt that our country has murdered over 62 million people in the womb.
The fact that our borders are open and some of my friends have had their children murdered by illegal aliens.
Or perhaps that maybe we can stop sending our sons and daughters To fight in foreign wars and be used as the world's police, basically.
Or maybe that our government would stand up for our American businesses and our American jobs and make the American people and the American taxpayers their focus.
These are the things that I care about deeply.
So when we elected President Trump, and then I started seeing things in the news that didn't make sense to me, like Russian collusion.
Which are conspiracy theories also, and have been proven so.
These things bothered me deeply, and I realized just watching CNN or Fox News, I may not find the truth.
And so what I did is I started looking up things on the Internet, asking questions, like most people do every day.
Use Google.
And I stumbled across something, and this is at the end of 2017, called QAnon.
Well, these posts were mainly about this Russian collusion information.
A lot of it was some of what I would see on the news at night, and I got very interested in it.
So I posted about it on Facebook, I write about it, I talked about it, I asked questions about it, and then more information came from it.
But you see, here's the problem.
Throughout 2018, because I was upset about things and didn't trust the government, really, because The people here weren't doing the things that I thought they should be doing for us.
The things I just told you I cared about.
And I want you to know, a lot of Americans don't trust our government.
And that's sad.
The problem with that is, though, is I was allowed to believe things that weren't true, and I would ask questions about them and talk about them.
And that is absolutely what I regret.
Because if it weren't for the Facebook posts and comments that I liked in 2018, I wouldn't be standing here today and you couldn't point a finger and accuse me of anything wrong because I've lived a very good life that I'm proud of, my family's proud of, my husband's proud of, my children are proud of, and that's what my district elected me for.
So, later in 2018, when I started finding misinformation, lies, things that were not true in these QAnon posts, I stopped believing it.
And I want to tell you any source, and I say this to everyone, any source of information that is a mix of truth and a mix of lies is dangerous, no matter what it is saying, what party it is helping, anything or any country it's about, it's dangerous.
And these are the things that happen on the left and the right.
And it is a true problem in our country.
So I walked away from those things.
And I decided I'm going to do what I've done all my life.
I'm going to work hard and try to solve the problems that I'm upset about.
So I started getting involved in politics.
You see, school shootings are absolutely real.
And every child that is lost, those families mourn it.
I understand how terrible it is because when I was 16 years old in 11th grade, my school was a gun-free school zone, and one of my schoolmates brought guns to school and took our entire school hostage.
And that happened right down the hall from my classroom.
I know the fear that David Hogg had that day.
I know the fear that these kids have.
And this is why, and I say this sincerely with all my heart, because I love our kids, every single one of your children, all of our children.
I truly believe that children at school should never be left unprotected.
I believe they should be just as protected as we were with 30,000 National Guardsmen.
Our children are our future and they're our most precious resource.
I also want to tell you 9-11 absolutely happened.
I remember that day crying all day long watching it on the news.
And that's a tragedy for anyone to say it didn't happen.
And so that I definitely want to tell you, I do not believe that it's fake.
I also want to tell you that we've got to do better.
You see, big media companies can take teeny tiny pieces of words that I've said, that you have said, any of us, and can portray us into someone that we're not.
And that is wrong.
Cancel culture is a real thing.
It is very real.
And when big tech companies like Twitter, you can scroll through and see where someone may have retweeted porn, this is a problem.
This is a terrible, terrible thing.
But yet, when I say that I absolutely believe with all my heart that God's creation is He created them male and female, and that should not be denied.
When I am censored for saying those type of things, that is wrong.
You see, here's the real situation.
I decided to run for Congress.
Because I wanted to help our country.
I want Americans to have our American dream.
I want to protect our freedoms.
This is what I ran for Congress on.
I never once said during my entire campaign, QAnon.
I never once said any of the things that I am being accused of today during my campaign.
I never said any of these things since I have been elected for Congress.
These were words of the past and these things do not represent me.
They do not represent my district and they do not represent my values.
Here's what I can tell you.
I am beyond grateful for this opportunity and I'll tell you why.
I believe in God with all my heart and I'm so grateful to be humbled to be reminded that I'm a sinner and that Jesus died on the cross to forgive me for my sins.
And this is something that I absolutely rejoice in today to tell you all.
And I think it's important for all of us to remember, none of us are perfect.
None of us are.
And none of us can even come close to earning our way into heaven just by our acts and our works.
But it's only through the grace of God.
And this is why I will tell you as a member of this Congress, the 117th Congress, I'm a passionate person.
I'm a competitor.
I'm a fighter.
I will work with you for good things for the people of this country.
But the things I will not stand for is abortion.
I think it's the worst thing this country has ever committed.
And if we're to say in God we trust, how do we murder God's creation in the womb?
Another thing I will say to this body I want to work with all of you for our people.
It should be America first, always.
Always.
And there's nothing wrong with that.
And if this Congress is to tolerate members that condone riots that have hurt American people, attacked police officers, occupied federal property, burned businesses and cities, But yet wants to condemn me and crucify me in the public square for words that I said and I regret a few years ago, then I think we are in a real big problem, a very big problem.
What shall we do as Americans?
Shall we stay divided like this?
Will we allow the media that is just as guilty as QAnon of presenting truth and lies to divide us?
Will we allow ourselves to be addicted to hate and hating one another?
I hope not.
Because that's not the future I want for my children.
And it's not the future I want for any of your children.
I yield back my time.
Thank you.
Well, I thought that statement showed, among others, that your later positions are not always superior to your earlier positions, because the school shootings clearly are fake, and she was right to call them out.
And of course, 9-11 was real, but it was also orchestrated.
It was an inside job.
So, but after listening to that, how could anybody vote against this wonderful woman?
I disagree with her about abortion.
I believe a woman does have a right to abortion, but that's a complicated argument.
Where it seems to me the pro-choice position is the one that gives every woman the right to decide for herself, based upon her own conscience and her own principles, whether or not to carry a fetus to term.
And that The fetus doesn't properly qualify as a person with any rights until the end of the second trimester, which I think is, I take to be the core of the Roe v. Wade decision by the Supreme Court, which I believe is among the wisest it has ever rendered.
Because a pro-life position would require women to carry the term an unwanted fetus.
We know from sociological investigations that unwanted children become juvenile delinquents and typically become criminals, placing a huge burden on society.
Every child deserves a loving family environment when they're being raised, and I therefore embrace the pro-choice position.
Because no one is required to act other than in accordance with their conscience.
Meanwhile, McCarthy on the Democrats stripping Marjorie Dream of her committee assignments, you may regret this a lot sooner than you think.
We reviewed this with a parliamentarian, McCarthy said, never before in the history of the House has a majority abused its power in this way.
Never in the entire history of the House have you abused your power by the majority party interfering with a minority party's assignment of committees to its members.
As for the member in question, let me be very clear.
Representative Greene's past comments and posts as a private citizen do not represent the values of my party.
As a Republican, as a conservative, as an American, I condemn them unequivocally.
I condemn them when they first surfaced and I condemn them today.
But where I will explain, he ought not to, if truth is one of his values, When Democrats attack Congresswoman Greene, they not only ignore the infractions in their own party, but reward those members with prestige and influence, members who have done the same or far worse.
She also fired a warning shot by quoting Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.
You'll regret this and you'll be regretted a lot sooner than you think.
Meanwhile, showing a lot of spunk, Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted the following.
The next day.
I woke up early this morning literally laughing, thinking about what a bunch of morons the Democrats plus 11 are for giving someone like me free time.
In this Democrat tyrannical government, conservative Republicans have no say on committees anyway.
Oh, this is going to be fine.
Well, I think she's simply terrific.
Now, two of my most recent blogs are going deeply into the issues.
The first debunking the AAP fake news about Marjorie Taylor Greene, and the other explaining that conspiracy theorists are investigating crimes.
No wonder they want to shut us up.
These are two highly relevant blogs and I want to encourage you to check them out.
I know we're coming up against a break.
Let me squeeze in a few comments, preliminary, about debunking the AP and the charges they brought against her, where I'm showing actually Marjorie Greene is in the right and the AP in the wrong.
I began.
Democrats are so scared of Marjorie Taylor Greene that they have taken the unprecedented step of stripping of her committee assignments.
The first time the majority party in the House has interfered with a minority party's rights and privileges, which reinforces the point that they are the undemocratic party.
Better rename the party of despotism.
Meanwhile, the AP has documented a few of her positions, but not on either Sandy Hook or the Parkland school shootings, no doubt because they're afraid of encouraging the public to take a closer look.
Both were staged events where nobody died.
For those in doubt, check out on Sandy Hook and on Parkland, giving links to studies I've done on both.
Here I offer additional sources substantiating your take on those they do cite.
So if you go to my blog and check out my piece, Debunking the AP, you'll find the links to Sandy Hook and Parkland as well.
We're about to hit our break, so I'll continue when we return.
So, let's get started.
This is the Revolution Radio, Freedom Swiss.
Doc, come on, we'll be right back after this message.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhordes during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com What the heck is the truth, Jihad?
Hey, I'm Kevin Barrett, host of Truth Jihad Radio.
Federal prosecutors, Department of Homeland Security agents, and curious passers-by often ask me, just what is this Truth Jihad thing, anyway?
Well, everybody knows what truth is, but jihad is a misunderstood term.
Jihad means effort or struggle.
The greater jihad is the struggle to be a better person, while the lesser jihad is the struggle to defend the community.
Prophet Muhammad, peace upon him, did say that the best jihad is a word of truth flung in the face of a tyrant.
And that's what we do here at Truth Jihad Radio!
Every Friday, 8 to 10 p.m.
Eastern, 5 to 7 Pacific, right here on Revolution Radio!
Find some comfort at Willow's World, a variety of news, commentary and poetry, at Willow's Poetry Corner, where there are comfy cushions and a tempting selection of delectable comestibles.
A show that's quirkily and quintessentially British, with a unique twist, featuring Willow Andreassen, your host.
Join Willow, Mondays and Thursdays, 2 till 4pm, Eastern Time, Studio A.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener supported radio,
and now we return you to your host.
And I'm...
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
Picking up where I left off, we have established, you know,
they're faulting her also for raising questions about what happened in Las Vegas.
But we've established that Las Vegas was a movie with a pre-recorded soundtrack of machine gun firing and coordinated special effects of lights flashing on the fourth floor of the Mandalay Bay Hotel.
When the sheriff insists there's no evidence of any shots having been fired, then from the 32nd floor of the West Wing, Mona Alexis Presley has discovered that the obituaries were based upon persons who died in different states or on different dates or from different causes of death.
She even found the Las Vegas PD crime map for the square mile around the concert area, which shows minor infractions, burglary, assault and battery and such, but no shooting incidents.
And the local hospitals confirmed that no shooting victims were admitted following the incident, which one referred to as having been a drill.
The AP does no research and doesn't know the difference between fantasy and reality.
Meanwhile, she also suggested that lasers had been used in the California wildfires.
Where I observed there appears to be no alternative explanation for the destruction of the homes, reduced to cinder ash, while the surrounding trees and shrubbery are virtually completely unaffected.
They do not appear to be natural fires, but to be man-made, where the use of lasers would explain the phenomena.
MTG, Marjorie Taylor Greene, is hardly the only person to suspect the use of directed energy laser devices.
But that's the impression the AP wants to convey as a form of the special pleading fallacy of only citing evidence favorable to your side.
Another has to do with her attacks on Ilhan Omar.
A nice example of a straw man by offering an exaggerated or feeble example of a position to make it easier to attack.
MTG has been pointed in taking on members of the Squad, where she has savaged Ilhan Omar for having married her brother, which is only one among her many outrageous acts.
Not only has Omar committed far more serious offenses than any committed by MTG, but she claims MTG committed incitement of insurrection, which is the same charge launched against Donald Trump for his second impeachment, which experts have observed has no basis on either count, since incitement must be specific and with intent, and there was no attempt by anyone to overthrow the American government.
They also falter for making observations about Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin having abused, actually murdering, a young girl in a satanic sex event, which I have been reluctant to even describe, but which the Associated Press actually puts into print.
The videos on Anthony Weiner's laptop, which James Covey suppressed in relation to the 2016 election, just as Christopher Wray did of the Hunter Biden laptop in the 2020 election, are so horrific that I have hesitated to say publicly what the AP has published here, but which appears to be accurate as I have documented in my Pizzagate, Real or Fiction, the American franchise PedoGate, This does not appear to be disinformation, but gruesome fact.
You can find it online.
I'll give you the link.
WikiLeaks revelations have included that Barack Obama spent $65,000 flying pizza and hot dogs from Chicago to the White House for a private party.
What you need to know is that the White House does not accept food from outside sources to circumvent the prospect of food poisoning, that actual hot dogs and pizza flown from Chicago would be soggy and inedible, and That, in the language of pedophilia, hot dog stands for little boys and pizza for little girls.
Meanwhile, she also talks about Nancy Pelosi as a traitor.
Well, I can document that in spades with an example of which most Americans are completely unaware.
Most Americans are aware that Nancy Pelosi tore up Trump's State of the Union speech after it was broadcast live on television in January of 2020.
And most Americans are aware that Deep State would like to remove him by any means necessary, just as JFK was taken out in Dallas on 22 November 1963 by assassination.
Where Circumstantial Evidence Implicates Nancy Pelosi at the State of the Union.
And I link there to a very substantial article in the Duran, which many may know is a very responsible journal.
A lip reader discovered that members of the House and Senate were discussing life after Trump in knowledge of a plot to assassinate the president by Nancy Pelosi using a poison patch on her hand, which he extended in an odd way so Trump would not notice.
But he had been tipped off and refused to shake her hand.
The situation was so serious a bad lip reading diversion was created and published.
She also claimed no plane had hit the Pentagon.
Well, she's in very good company.
Even Jamie McIntyre, CNN's best correspondent on the scene at the Pentagon that day, Corrected his anchor by pointing out, from my close-up inspection, there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon, which tells us that the EAP does no more research than politicians who have long since been co-opted by Israel and the deep state she has been calling out.
Notice that even the photo, the AP included here, does not show any debris from a plane having hit the Pentagon.
Indeed, all four of the 9-11 crash sites were faked, albeit in different ways, which I even confirmed with Major General Albert Stummelbein, U.S.
Army retired, who was formerly in charge of all U.S.
military signals intelligence, And who therefore also stands in agreement with Marjorie Taylor Greene.
She got it right again and again.
I'm very impressed.
That's a good one to share as the following.
Perhaps it was having reflected on Marjorie Taylor Greene's exposés across the board, That I was thinking about, you know, conspiracy theories and that what conspiracy theorists are doing really is investigating crimes.
So you'll see what may be one of the most important blogs I've ever published.
Conspiracy theorists are investigating crimes.
No wonder they want to silence us.
The CIA's denigration of citizen investigations may be the greatest PSYOP in American history.
When you've stopped to think about it, why should anyone be opposed to new research on the assassination of JFK, the atrocities of 9-11, the death of Senator Paul Wellstone, or the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School?
After all, if the official narratives we've been given by the local, state, and federal authorities were true, then those who are doing research are simply spinning their wheels in a pointless endeavor Because the truth is already known.
So if those who are doing this research are being subjected to one attack after another, think of Jim Garrison, New Orleans DA, who wanted to establish the who, the how, and the why of the death of JFK, but was even lampooned by Johnny Carson on The Tonight Show.
You have to ask why.
He was getting too close to the truth, so they used Johnny to shut him down.
Yeah, every American was glued to their television set the weekend of 22 through 24 November 1963, where the networks were reporting in real time the results of examinations of the body at Parkland Hospital.
Which included that the president had been hit by a small clean puncture wound to his throat, which Malcolm Perry M.D.
described three times as a wound of entry during the Parkland press conference.
The bullet was coming at him, and subsequently, That it was a simple matter of a bullet right through the head, as Malcolm Kilduff, Acting Press Secretary, announced at 1pm, actually Central Time, where the bullet entered the right temple and exited the back of his head, a finding attributed to Admiral George Berkeley, who was JFK's personal physician and broadcast around the world on radio and television that day.
So if you put together those published reports, With a shot to the back and to the back of the head affirmed by the Warren Commission of 1964, then you get at least four hits to JFK, which is as simple as 2 plus 2 equals 4.
And it becomes obvious because the authorities don't want you to solve a crime that they did not solve for the equally obvious reason that they were complicit.
So in relation to the assassination of JFK, the CIA authored a memorandum on how to discredit serious students of JFK by suggesting that they had nothing new to offer, that they were benefiting financially, and more.
...without addressing the evidence they uncovered, which has remained the case to this day.
They were targeting men like Mark Lane, who challenged the magic bullet theory, and many others, focusing on those doing the research to put an end to research.
David W. Manning, MD, PhD, the leading expert on the medical evidence in the case of JFK today, performed a simple experiment by plotting the official trajectory of the bullet that officials claim passed through JFK's neck and entered Texas Governor John Connolly's back and discovered that it is anatomically impossible because cervical vertebrae intervene.
When the bad guys control the evidence, they can manipulate, fabricate, and prevaricate to their heart's content.
In this case, for example, the whole movies of the assassination, especially the Zapruder film, Had to be fixed to conceal the blowout at the back of the head.
So they blacked it out in early frames, but overlooked that it might be visible in later frames, such as Z-374 and Z-375.
David Bandheak conducted meticulous studies using a technique from physics known as optical densitometry to determine the relative density of objects whose exposure to radiation had created the images on the x-rays and found that they had been patched But where his area P bore a striking resemblance to the blowout visible in those later frames, where the pink extension was a skull flap blown open by the use of a frangible or exploding bullet, but where that correspondence is striking, save for part of the wound covered by hair.
These are objective scientific investigations based upon observation, measurement, and experiment.
And they demonstrate that, once you separate the fake evidence from the real, cases like these are not especially difficult to solve.
Check out, for example, JFK, who is responsible and why, with a link to a recent video study of mine.
So how can it be the case that more than 50 years after the fact, the mainstream media leaves us in the dark and still insists that JFK was killed by a lone, demented gunman who cannot possibly have been in two places at the same time to fire shots both from behind and from in front?
Indeed, we have established that Lee Oswald was standing in the doorway when the JFK motorcade passed by, which means that he not only cannot have been the lone gunman, but cannot have been one of the shooters I've identified six, my name rank and serial number, and Ole Damogar the seventh, where there now appears to have been even an eighth on the South Knoll, whose identity remains unknown as of now.
Since we have only limited resources, but the government has vast, The government can only have failed to establish the truth because the government wanted to conceal it.
We have been played for suckers and saps.
We hear a lot about following the science, especially in relation to the coronavirus phenomenon.
But when we follow real science, the empirically-based, data-driven science, As opposed to what passes for science in the mainstream media, we discovered that there has been no increase in deaths in any age group during 2020, which would be preposterous if we were really undergoing a pandemic.
Less direct evidence also substantiates that if the hospitals were overflowing with patients with upper respiratory diseases, then there would be a surge in the use of oxygen in IV bags and stands But that is not the case, which proves, directly in the case of no age group variants, indirectly, in relation to the purchase of medical equipment required, that we are being played by a humongous medical-political deception.
And when the social media giants act in coordination with the deep state by censoring and suppressing discussion of issues of immense importance to America, such as whether or not the CV pandemic is real, Whether or not the 2020 election was stolen, and whether or not mask wearing is killing us slowly, we have seriously lost our way in our ability to learn the truth.
Our future and our lives are at stake.
We therefore must understand that those who are suppressing freedom of speech and freedom of the press, where Amazon.com has banned six of my books about Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, and even the moon landing, it's not because I and my collaborators got it wrong, but because we got it right.
But Amazon.com is not alone in disgracing itself by suppressing research, exposing these events as crimes, including fraud and theft by deception, not just involving millions but billions in the case of the Apollo Moon mission deception.
But then resorting to the courts, the social media, or even acts of Congress to silence and suppress those who are seeking to expose them.
The treatment of Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, is one especially daring example.
The attempt to punish Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, is another.
We know there was no incitement by President Trump Nor any effort to overthrow the government of the United States.
Yet the Democrats are trying to impeach him for the second time when he is no longer in office.
There are reasons for these bizarre events, and they have everything to do with those who are attempting to stop them.
Let me add now, I have quite a few more stories, so it looks as though I will be more likely to announce the number for callers after the bottom of the hour, the second hour, than at the top.
For example, Representative Mace questions AOC's story that her life was at risk on January 6th.
It appears from reports of heracity of AOC's claim that her life was at risk on January 6th is in question.
Specifically, Republican Representative Nancy Mace is calling AOC's claims into question.
Here is what Representative Mace tweeted.
AOC made clear she didn't know who was at her door.
Breathless attempts by media to fan fictitious news flames are dangerous.
My office is two doors down.
Insurrectionists never stormed our hallway.
Egregious doesn't even begin to cover it.
Is there nothing MSM won't politicize?
Meanwhile, remember, she was claiming they were banging on her door, calling out, where is she?
Where is she?
And she sought refuge in her bathroom and was worried that she was going to lose her life.
Even Newsweek is reporting about it.
AOC is now being raked over the coals for alleged exaggeration.
And I'm loving it.
Sebastian Gorka tweeted, she lied about where she grew up.
She lied about where she was on January 6th.
She lied about being in danger.
AOC will lie about anything.
I think that's right.
Meanwhile, just in.
AOC was not in the Capitol Building during her near-death experience.
She claims to have been in her office, which is located in the Cannon Building.
Rioters did not breach the Cannon Building.
Here's more where AOC's account stands in sharp contrast to Mace.
Reporting on AOC's recollection, Ocasio-Cortez said rioters actually entered her office, forcing her to take refuge inside her bathroom after her legislative director, Geraldo Banila-Chavez, told her to hide, hide, run and hide.
And so I run back into my office, Ocasio-Cortez said.
I slam my door.
There's another kind of like back area to my office, and I open it, and there's a closet and a bathroom, and I jump into my bathroom.
Ocasio-Cortez said she was hiding behind the door, and then I just start to hear these yells of, where is she?
As members of the mob banged against the door, Ocasio-Cortez believed.
This was the moment where I thought everything was over.
And the weird thing about moments like these is that you lose all sense of time, she continued.
In retrospect, maybe it was four seconds, maybe it was five, maybe it was ten, maybe it was only one, I don't know.
It felt like my brain was able to have so many thoughts.
In between the screams and the yells, Ocasio-Cortez added, I mean, I thought I was going to die.
According to Mace, however, it appears AOC was nowhere near the trespassers.
She was in the Cannon Building, which is quite a ways from the Rotunda and House Chamber.
Republican Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina, whose office is two doors down from Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, noted that insurrectionists never made it to their hall when the U.S.
Capitol building was breached on January 6.
Mace made the note while hitting the media for their attempts to fan fictitious newsflames about the breach.
You seriously cannot believe one word that comes out of Sandy Cortez's mouth.
She has a history of playing fast and loose with facts and the truth.
Here's another tweet from Candace Owens, who's very, very good.
On a day in which Alexandria Ocasio-Smollett is trending, please never forget the time that AOC staged a photo shoot dressed all in white at a parking lot to spread lies about immigrant children in cages.
Faking her own attempt at murder was the next logical step.
Meanwhile, AOC herself tweets, this is the latest manipulative take on the right.
They are manipulating the fact that most people don't know the layout of the Capitol complex.
We were all on the Capitol complex.
The attack wasn't just on the dome.
The bombs Trump supporters planted surrounded our offices too.
She's trying to justify herself in spite of it.
This is embarrassingly bad.
She continues, people are trying to rush and infiltrate our office buildings.
That's why we had to get evacuated in the first place.
The attempts of attackers and publicly available communications show how they try to gain access and share location information on finding members for physical harm.
It is also very damning and revealing that the GOP is now digging both heels in a discrediting campaign.
It's because they know they are implicated.
So they're pivoting to, again, the classic abuse playbook of, it's not as bad as they say.
It was that bad.
It was actually worse.
Yesterday, AOC did a video in which she disclosed she's a survivor of sexual assault and has had traumas.
She explained some people are telling her to just move on, which makes him like every other abuser who just tells you to move on.
But what's so stunning here, what's so stunning here, is not only that this is outrageous, that the Democrats won't do anything to condemn her for these blatant lies, but that the FBI is now reporting that they had picked up social media exchanges about planning the assault on the Capitol, that the assault on the Capitol was pre-planned, which makes the very idea of Trump having instigated an insurrection, completely ridiculous, provably false, politically completely absurd, but of course politically expedient in relation to Nancy Pelosi.
Who, for reasons best known to her, wants to distract attention from all the absurd moves being made by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
Remember, this is the fake Biden, about whom I shall have more to say for her own political purpose.
Trump cleaned their clock with the election.
I remind you that Sidney Powell released a map of the actual politics, the outcome of the election, where Trump took all but about five states, including California and Minnesota, which went to Trump.
410 electoral votes.
Nancy Pelosi would only like, if at all possible, there should be a conclusion that he'd be disallowed from ever running for federal office again, lest he clean their clock once more.
But I think the situation, in fact, is actually even worse.
And when we return from our break, I will review the bidding, but begin with Democrats filing the first of many anti-rights bills aimed at gun owners, which are just about as outrageous as they could possibly be.
And I will remind you, I've done a study about this issue entitled, The Second Amendment and the Politics of Gun Control, which you can find at jimtheconspiracyguide.com.
Jim, the conspiracy guy.com, the second amendment and the politics of gun control, which is
where we will pick it up when we return.
So let's get started.
Revolutionary.
I'll be right back after this message.
In breaking news, a visiting Syrian diplomat reported today that their population is evolving
rapidly and advancing into a fifth dimensional consciousness.
They are seeking peace with all cosmic cultures, which may mean that the Earth will be asked to join the prestigious Galactic Federation of Light Alliances.
Please join Debbie West and Michael Hathaway on Lost Knowledge, Saturdays 3 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time in Studio A for the latest breaking news on the Star Visitor's peaceful contact and the ongoing project of cleansing the Earth.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job and Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later.
Because of explosives planted in the building, Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American Newt on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
Thank you for watching.
This is Thomas, a.k.a.
Mad Painter.
I'd like you to join me Monday nights, 10 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time for Open Canvas.
Don't forget to bring an open mind.
Yes, folks, that's right.
Bring an open mind to an open canvas.
Again, that is Monday nights, 10 p.m.
Eastern.
You are opposed to government corruption.
This is Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com.
You don't need to expect us.
We're already here.
I'm going to go to the bathroom.
Where's your horses?
Scheduled to be on Revolution Radio every Saturday night, 6 to 8 p.m.
You get outer space.
You get honest answers.
Real researchers.
Truthful answers and a place to engage with questions.
Take part in the discussion.
Revolution Radio on Things6.com hosts a collision course every Saturday from 6 to 8 p.m.
Eastern, 5 p.m.
to 7 p.m.
Central, 4 p.m.
to 6 p.m.
Mountain Time, and 3 p.m.
to 5 p.m.
5 p.m.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs and its website by the hosts, guests and call-in listeners
or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio.
And now we return you to your host.
Well this may be one of the major reasons Nancy Pelosi wants to distract us with a completely
fabricated baseless impeachment operation that's going to consume the public airwaves.
Democrats file the first of many anti-rights bills aimed at gun owners.
Democrat politicians have said they want to disarm us.
Remember Beto O'Rourke saying, hell yes, we're coming for your guns?
The Democrats didn't wait long.
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said President Biden would love to see action on gun Well, Texas Representative Sheila Jackson Lee has filed two gun control bills, House Resolutions 125 and 127.
This is exactly what we expected from Democrat politicians.
House Bill 127 requires the registration of all firearms and ammunition held by civilians.
Bans 50 caliber ammunition.
Requires a mental health exam for you, your spouse, and your family, or at least two additional friends who can attest to your mental state.
Requires that the government license those mental health professionals who can perform mental health exams for firearm ownership.
Bans all ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds.
Establishes a national ammunition registry so the government knows what you own.
Establish a national firearms registry so the government knows what you own.
Mandates gun owners purchase civil liability insurance.
Taxes gun owners $800 each year.
Of course there are exceptions to these requirements.
They don't apply if you're a politician or paid by the government to carry a gun.
Here's her Bill 125.
Calls for a seven-day waiting period before taking possession of a semi-automatic firearm, firearm muffler, ammunition, or magazine, except if you are paid by the government.
Outlaw person-to-person transfer, except if you're paid by the government.
That's just a warm-up.
Now it gets really crazy as she lists her justifications for the bill.
She claims There was nearly one mass shooting per day in the United States, 355 mass shootings in 2015.
Since December of 2012, there have been at least 1,518 mass shootings, with at least 1,715 people killed and 6,089 wounded.
Since December of 2012, there have been at least 1,518 mass shootings,
with at least 1,715 people killed and 6,089 wounded.
To reach those numbers, you have to call the nightly carnage in Chicago and Baltimore,
mass shootings.
Each day, 92 Americans are victims of gun violence, resulting in more than 33,000 deaths
annually.
We're supposed to ignore that most of these are suicides or victims of drug gangs in our Democrat-controlled cities.
There have been, she claims, zero mass shootings stopped by armed civilians in the past 33 years.
This is a press release rather than a factual document.
It is against the law for us to lie during sworn congressional testimony.
Evidently, however, it's allowed for Congresswomen to present falsehoods as facts.
Let me refresh your memory.
Remember, almost all of our mass murders were in gun-free zones where honest citizens were disarmed.
The FBI's own numbers show there were at least eight mass murders stopped by civilians.
I've counted over a dozen.
Let me remind you of a few.
Think back to the armed citizen Stephen Williford who lived next door to a church in Texas.
He stopped mass murder with his AR-15.
Remember Jack Wilson who was part of a church security team and stopped a murder in his church.
Remember the armed citizen who stopped a mass murder at a California synagogue.
We know the number of people murdered when an armed civilian is present is fewer than three.
That number soars to about 15 when we wait for the police to arrive.
Time is the enemy, not your honest neighbor next door who owns a gun.
Exposing Representative Lee's lies is as easy as researching our history.
Distracting ourselves with Lee's outrageous lies misses a crucial point.
Honest U.S.
citizens defend themselves with guns by the thousands every day.
Our best estimate is that honest gun owners use a firearm to prevent a murder or violent crime over a million times each year.
Over a million times each year.
If it were you saving your family at night, then each event might save several lives.
That estimate includes tens of thousands of sexual assaults that never became rape.
When we disarm the good guys and gals, then millions of our neighbors become the victims of violent crimes.
Honest U.S.
citizens defend themselves by the thousands every day.
Disarm her and grandma doesn't chase away a home invasion robber.
Instead, the robber beats grandma.
The coeds don't stop the sexual assault by an intruder in their home or their dorm.
Instead, they are raped and beaten.
That's what Representative Lee invites.
Democrats need violence to justify a police state.
This isn't progress toward greater human rights and freedoms.
This is a return to feudal barbarism, where the strong rule the weak and ordinary citizens are disarmed.
Back then, only the rulers and their henchmen were allowed to own weapons and bear arms.
For their protection, not ours.
That is what we see from politicians today.
We don't have government agents protecting us.
We don't hire teams of armed security until help arrives.
It's up to us to protect the people we love.
The mainstream will echo Lee's lies.
It's up to us to spread the truth.
Remember, it takes up to 20 minutes for the police to show up and So if you're waiting on them to come because they have guns and you don't, then in the meanwhile, your daughter may have been raped, your wife may have been killed, you may have been mugged.
If you can't defend yourself, and especially when you have the Democrats wanting to defund the police, I mean, give us a break!
There's no wonder that Donald Trump just walloped Joe Biden by a 4 to 1 ratio.
Really stunning stuff.
Meanwhile, Missouri subverts Biden gun laws, nullifies federal statutes, so of course the Democrats are calling this sedition.
House Bill 85, the Second Amendment Preservation Act, sponsored by Representative Jared Taylor, proceeded to a closing health floor hearing Wednesday in a 107-43 mostly partisan vote.
The measure would nullify federal laws or other action deemed to infringe on a person's Second Amendment right to bear arms.
While claiming not to trespass on federal authority to enforce federal gun laws in Missouri.
All Missouri gun laws will persist under the bill, which is one step from approval by the chamber and transfer to the Senate, where a comparable Second Amendment Preservation Act awaits a first floor hearing.
This is a very good move, and I'm very favorably impressed that Missouri is moving in this direction.
Wonderful!
Splendid!
Taylor's originally filed Second Amendment Preservation Act held individual law enforcements accountable to fines and lawsuits if found to knowingly enforce or attempt to enforce federal gun laws nullified in Missouri.
Wednesday he obtained approval for an amendment shielding individual law enforcement officers from financial liability through allowing those deemed illegally infringed to sue police departments with violations incurring minimum fines of $50,000.
Representative Peter Meredith found Taylor's amendment to make police departments accountable for paying violation fines and exposed lawsuits a bit ironic.
In other words, if we don't like the way a department is behaving, we should defund the police?
No, Taylor said, but when police violate citizens' constitutional rights, they must be held accountable.
We're not preventing those funds from going to the department.
We're not imitating the absurd policies of the Democrats.
Meanwhile, get this.
There were 4.3 million firearm background checks in January of 2021, the highest month ever in American history.
4.3 million firearm background checks.
And I have heard from other sources, and I 100% agree, That this is an issue that for a certainty would precipitate a civil war in the United States if they actually tried to confiscate our guns.
Whereas I have observed on many occasions, when they come for our guns, the time has come to use them.
Hopefully, that won't ever occur.
But were they to make that move, we cannot allow it to happen.
Now, I found a blog, a Pentagon blog, quite bizarre, warning that freedom leads to populism, which undermines national security.
Now, think about it.
How can freedom, which leads to populism, which is really the ordinary people becoming involved in politics, right?
People politics is another meaning for populism, undermine national security.
We'll get this.
The military-industrial complex is doubling down on its crusade against free expression, warning the First Amendment should no longer be tolerated because it threatens national security.
This is quite bizarre.
Citing the January 6th insurrection, which we know it was not, As proof, Devanya Ramji and Elsa Kanaya, writing for the Pentagon's Defense One blog, contend that all online free speech needs to be filtered by a ministry of truth in order to prevent the type of disinformation and incitements to violence that led to the Capitol false flag attack.
Well, I got news for them.
Just talk to Nancy Pelosi, talk to the FBI.
It was all planned in advance.
This was a deliberate effort to derail the discussion of election fraud and to tarnish Trump supporters who weren't even at the Capitol at the time these events took place.
So here you have a couple of morons, W. Ranji and Elsa Kanaya, writing for the Pentagon's Defense One blog, absurd and total bullshit.
Absolutely repulsive.
Undermining democracy in the name of national security.
The events of January 6th, they write, showed existing approaches to quell disinformation and incitement to violence on social media platforms have failed badly.
They don't seem to understand that the FBI found they were using Twitter and Facebook and so forth in order to coordinate the attack, which was all planned in advance.
Even though the companies that run these platforms are displaying a new willingness to police them, up to and including banning the worst offenders, which is precisely the opposite way we ought to go, we ought to let every opinion bloom.
The only way we can actually figure out the truth is by rational debate and criticism entailing presenting all sides of an argument.
Short of the actual abdication of violence or, you know, pornographic images, which, however, turn out to be like, I'm told, 50% of the reason people use the internet to watch pornography. 50%!
Even though the companies that run these platforms are displaying a new willingness to police them, up to and including banning the worst offenders, claims that U.S.
tech companies can self-regulate and moderate dangerous content comprehensively should be regarded with extreme skepticism.
Twitter recently announced the rollout of a new bird watch feature that allows the leftist mob to snitch on other users who spread wrong things.
This, however, is still not enough for the Pentagon.
Twitter's recent launch of Bird Watch, a crowdsourcing forum to combat misinformation, and hell the hell do they know what is and isn't misinformation, which of course is false information, Look at the way they were attacking Marjorie Greene for position after position, where what she had said was right and what they were claiming was wrong, where the misinformation was coming from the mainstream as another example of fake news, and where what she was observing was correct, as I have substantiated.
Twitter's recent launch of Birdwatch, a crowdsourcing forum to combat misinformation, is a welcome measure, but at best a partial and imperfect solution to a more systemic problem.
Instead, it's time at long last to regulate—meaning regulate—freedom of speech and freedom of the press.
No matter what anti-free speech measures they try to impose upon users, the tech giants always seem to come up short in the eyes of the Pentagon.
The only solution, according to this deep state behemoth, is to restructure fundamentally how social media platforms operate.
New rules must be introduced for the algorithms that decide what users see and for the data these companies collect for themselves, as well as data scraping by third parties, Ramji and Kanaya Content.
Another tool is AI.
But we know, of course, Twitter already uses AI to promote the best tweets that are considered more relevant, meaning Content that is government approved.
All other tweets are buried or shadow banned for deviating from the right-speak narrative.
This is just completely absurd.
I find it shocking and embarrassing that the Pentagon should have anything to do with this.
Meanwhile, more evidence Israelis are using placebo COVID vaccines and have changed the PCR test to prove the vaccines are working.
Frankly, this does not surprise me.
According to a new study in Israel, an astonishingly low number, 0.06% of those who have received the second round of the Pfizer COVID vaccine reported sick, and none of them seriously.
New data released by the Macombie Healthcare Services has confirmed the effectiveness of the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine.
as of Thursday, only 254 out of the 416,900 who were already a week after the second Pfizer shot
got infected with a virus. Over the same period, some 12,944 new cases emerged in the control group
of 740.
A comparison show the vaccine is 91% effective, seven days or more after the second injection.
Well, you know, this has got to be complete and total bullshit!
Complete and total bullshit!
I just find this unbelievable!
The data continue to be very encouraging to show the effectiveness of the vaccine is high and stable, said the head of Maccabi's Information and Digital Health Division.
The findings clearly indicate that as the days go by, after the second dose, the immunity becomes stronger.
Well, Louisa, with whom I did a show earlier today, said they skipped reporting on the animal studies involving ferrets and others that bear a similarity to human beings.
Because while they survived the shot, when they encountered a virus from the natural wildlife community, it killed them.
They all died.
They all died.
So, of course, they're not included.
Because it means even if you survive the shots, when you encounter a virus in normal life, it's going to kill you.
Wow!
If we believe the Israeli experts, the Pfizer vaccine is miraculously stopping people from actually becoming infected or testing positive at all, which is in complete defiance of vaccine science.
But when it comes to this pandemic, there seem to be a lot of miracles happening in Israel, like the complete disappearance of the seasonal flu.
There's absolutely nothing about the Pfizer vaccine that would stop people from testing positive for COVID.
99.9% of those who test Positive for COVID or asymptomatic?
Well, a recent study in China with 10 million subjects proves there is zero transmission of COVID.
Zero transmission of COVID in asymptomatic people.
So the only way for vaccinated Israelis to no longer test positive for COVID is for the health ministry to have lowered cycling threshold for the PCR test from 35 or 40 to under 25, which is exactly what the World Health Organization recommended two weeks ago.
Not only that, the second round of the Pfizer COVID vaccine allegedly has a stronger dose than the first, and according to the Israelis there have been no serious side effects or deaths reported, even though over 300 deaths have already been reported from the first Pfizer in America.
All these miraculous results coming out of Israel can be explained very simply.
Israelis are receiving placebo vaccines and they have changed the PCR standard to make it falsely appear the vaccines are working, just as we predicted they would do over six months ago.
Certainly, we cannot blame the Israelis for giving their own citizens safe placemos.
That's what any responsible government would do.
Especially don't gang elderly and frail Holocaust survivors.
As we previously reported, it would be absolutely unconscionable and irresponsible to subject Holocaust survivors, of all people, to dangerous medical experimentation with these untested vaccines.
International laws against such experimentation were implemented after World War II for that very reason.
Unfortunately, these fake successful results in Israel will be used to convince hundreds of millions of Gentiles in the West that these dangerous, even deadly, vaccines are safe and effective, and many people will become disabled and die after they take hot doses of the real vaccines.
There's a lot more going on where the Biden administration is getting very hard-nosed about Israel.
Let me move to what's going on the latest on the fake presidency front.
We have, you know, video from the Oval Office soundstage where they're shooting the so-called President Biden using Hollywood FX.
We even have a video of what's going on there in Culver City.
It appears Amazon Studios has a mock-up of the Hollywood set now.
A friend of mine who was a stuntman in Hollywood for around 20 years has confirmed for me he's familiar with a set in Culver City.
I have another correspondent, whom I do not know particularly well, warning me that it's not actually the Amazon Studio set in Culver City that's being used here.
But get this.
We now have a report from Simon Parks where you can see a photograph of the fake Biden sitting next to Nancy Pelosi.
And get this, the corner wall of the office is coming apart.
I mean, how bad is that?
It looks as though someone is attempting to leak that this is fake.
Meanwhile, we have General Michael Flynn actually telling an interviewer who is asking him, is it time for him to give up the bottle of wine he built on Trump becoming president rather than Biden?
And Michael Flynn tells him, I'd hang on to that bottle of wine for the time being.
Meanwhile, here are some thoughts from Carl Herman, a colleague of mine, just a brilliant guy, Chess games devoted to fewer and fewer possible moves.
Both sides are almost out of moves.
This is Juan07, says Trump is back by April 1st.
Stock market will crash next from inside trading tricks.
Fraud collapse coming from Charlie Ward.
Military is in total control, allowing the deep state and the Democrats to flounder in their own lies.
Purpose to equal?
Maximize enemy destruction plus protect Americans from violence.
Cover story?
Determine election fraud facts that transfer back to civilian power.
Meanwhile, corporate media will fail because they allow Biden to play president in Culver City, California studio, and refuse to report on the U.S.
military, informing the corporate media that most of the government is currently under arrest for election fraud and the COVID hoax to crash our economy and attack our people.
Biden and Deep State are just buying time to find an escape.
They have no power.
The 2020 election will not stand.
It was a 4-1 vote in favor of Donald Trump.
I'll add a few more thoughts, but in the meanwhile, we'll take a break, and I'll be glad to take callers the number 540-352-4452.
540-352-4452. 540-352-4452.
540-352-4452.
you We'll be right back after this message.
Were they conspiracies?
Doc, come on, we'll be right back after this message.
Hey, Marty, Dave here.
Were they conspiracies?
Vehicle has landed.
Have you ever wondered if we really did go to the moon?
If Paul McCartney died in 1966 and was replaced by an even better musician,
did you know that Saddam Hussein died in a B-1 bomber strike on 7 April 2003
and was replaced by one of his doubles, who was put on trial and hanged in his place?
Or that Osama Bin Laden died in Afghanistan on the 15th of December 2001 and was buried in an unmarked grave in accordance with Muslim traditions?
That the raid in Pakistan was faked?
There's more, including four chapters about the end of World War II, which prove that events we've been taught were very different than we have been told.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
Looking for a nightcap to fill your little snag needs?
Come join us on Spaced Out Radio with me, Dave Scott, right here on Revolution Radio.
Monday through Friday for three hours a night, starting at 9 p.m.
Pacific, midnight Eastern, we will take you down the supernatural path.
From E.T.
contact to the paranormal and all of the spiritual, cryptid, and conspiracy stories in between, you can find us right here on Revolution Radio at spacedoutradio.com On Twitter at Spaced Out Radio and on Facebook at Spaced Out Radio Show.
Spaced Out Radio.
It's a night of talk and interaction.
Are you experienced?
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it.
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes.
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building.
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American News on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts,
guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener supported radio, and now we
return you to your host.
Well, before I invite Paul to comment, I'd just like to observe that one point I have
Related with regard to the intrusion into the Capitol was mistaken when I said they did not have nameplates on the doors of the offices.
They actually have very handsome nameplates.
I'm looking at one now for Representative Joe Cunningham of South Carolina.
So that was simply wrong on my part.
Meanwhile, Paul joined the conversation.
Okay Jim, I got the title for your newest book coming out and nobody died in the 2020 pandemic either.
How do you like that?
Does that work for you?
Well, people are being killed by the vaccine, Paul.
But it is a monster fraud because they're just declassifying people who are dying from all these comorbidities, meaning other real causes of death.
It turns out, and I previously explained how the DCC changed how you report the causes of death in order to promote COVID as a cause of death, even when it was not.
Where Edward Hendry has just done a series of really brilliant pieces about this, you can find on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
Go ahead.
Right, well, so there actually are a couple of things that got my standard up today, and one was just within the last few minutes, and I want to attack it immediately because, you know, while it's fresh in my mind, and this idea that I've heard you and others say, I'm not blaming you, I've heard it elsewhere, about This vaccine that makes these people so sensitive, quote, when they encounter a virus, they die.
OK, this is what you said recently, and it's what other people have said.
OK, it's complete and total nonsense.
What scientific criteria are used to determine if you encounter a virus?
How is that possible to determine if you've encountered a virus?
It's total bullshit.
Why don't we just see?
Let me finish.
I got a rant in me.
Thank you.
Why don't we just say that the vaccine killed them, period.
Okay?
That's all we need to know.
And I'm going to give this, I'm going to put this asymptomatic bullshit to rest with my simple analogy, which I've been using to some effect.
And I think you'll like it because it's how I look at things.
Let's line up a hundred men.
Okay?
This is science, right?
We'll get a hundred men.
We'll stand them up against the wall and each one gets a swift kick to the groin.
Okay?
Are you picturing this?
Okay, now we do the interview afterwards.
We got the hypothesis, so now we say, hey, did that hurt?
And each one of them is going to say yes, right?
Now, you go ahead and you say you make the conclusion.
Getting kicked in the nuts is painful.
Now imagine how stupid this idea is about these people that are having a virus, or they're carriers, or they're super spreaders, but 80% to 90% feel nothing.
They feel nothing, okay?
So how much sense does that make to then correlate the idea that a virus is responsible for anything?
The virus is nothing.
It's endogenous to the body.
The virus is not exogenous.
Sophia So Smallstorm, on your show back in March or April, made all these things clear.
I further looked into it, including Dr. Thomas Cowan.
Well, I just wish you weren't so bloody obnoxious when you say these things, Paul.
It really pisses me off.
I give you plenty of time, I let you say your piece, and you come on with this arrogant, condescending attitude.
Frankly, I don't like it one bit.
So just train yourself in, buster.
You come across like you think you're so effing super smart and the rest of us are a bunch of morons.
I was explaining that a colleague of mine was reporting how they skipped the animal studies.
And they skipped it for a good reason, because the animal studies were showing that those who had received the inoculation had suffered adverse effects, not from the inoculation per se, but what it had done to their immune system in the consequence, and in the wild they died.
Now, I grant you, I hadn't verified the study she was citing, but I know her well enough to believe that she was citing it accurately.
And so, look, Paul, this is between you and me.
Just don't come on and act like an obnoxious a-hole, okay?
Otherwise, I think you're great.
Your content is good, but your manner, condescending, obnoxious, arrogant, I don't like it at all.
Yeah, you know, okay, I can apologize for that.
It's something I've had for a long time, way before I started calling your show, but here's the thing.
I'm at my wit's end.
I'm frustrated by this nonsense, okay?
I mean, I'm entitled to be frustrated by this ridiculous nonsense.
I'm going to make a couple of quick comments about Marjorie Taylor Greene.
I do agree with some of your points that you make and your admiration for her.
However, I heard her talk.
I heard her backpedal.
I played it!
Paula, I played it!
I played it, and we all heard her backpedal on several issues, and that's why I said this is proof that a person's later positions are not always superior to their earlier position, because she was right before, and she was wrong when she backpedaled.
But she's got more spunk, and she's more outspoken than any other member of Congress.
She's got more balls than anyone else there on Capitol Hill.
I agree, but I just can't stand when people do that.
I don't recall ever doing it in my life, because I guess I'm so goddamn obnoxious and arrogant.
Well, look, I've taken a lot of hits.
I've got a friend who told me that the way they run the universities these days, that I would never have survived if I were doing this kind of research on the main campus of the University of Minnesota.
It was an advantage to me that I happened to be on a satellite campus in Duluth, Where I was, you know, just kind of a publication machine.
I mean, I was doing so much research, but where I actually even had the support of the university and my research on JFK, It was only six months before my retirement that I founded Scholars for 9-11 Truth, so the university didn't even have the opportunity to respond to that development, which they might or might not have received with equal enthusiasm.
But the fact is, there was an associate dean in the graduate school on the Twin Cities campus who really liked my work on JFK.
And where I was able to secure university funding for two conferences, one on the death of JFK held in Minneapolis in 1999, and then another on the Zapruder film on the Duluth campus in 2003.
So I actually had very cordial relations with the Twin Cities at that time.
But I do believe things have changed so dramatically.
Take James Tracy as a perfect illustration.
He was a tenured associate professor at Florida Atlantic.
He was, I have no doubt, one of the best teachers they have ever had at that institution.
He even had among his course responsibilities on conspiracies in the media.
And the fact that he did a blog about the oddities of Wayne Carver's press conference Which was among the very first scholarly articles to appear about Sandy Hawk, and then was trashed and banned and actually lost his tenure position as a consequence.
That was a stunning development, and I think most of us were profoundly disturbed.
Go ahead.
Well, in regards to, you know, my respect for the positions that you take contrary to the powers that be, the
lying, deceiving powers that be.
Of course, I have complete admiration for that. Like I said, I'm happy to personally
put your Nazi party pin on the lapel in a candlelight ceremony. I think you've qualified.
Just kind of having a little fun with that. But listen, you know, the thing that bothers me
is the fact that so many people...
I just watched, I picked up a link from one of these sites, and I watched Del Bigtree give a little presentation about his interview with a Fox reporter, and he played the interview with the Fox reporter in which, you know, he's, oh no, I'm not an anti-vaxxer, and he did all these little sort of half-step and, you know, almost a little bit of a, shall we say, a diplomacy, and I'm just past the point I think that we gotta hit these people square in the face, square in the mouth with a clenched fist, okay?
There isn't any way that vaccines have ever been safe and effective.
You've heard many people say it, including Giuseppe, and I know you respect his opinion.
There aren't any vaccines that we need, period.
End of story.
And the idea that these people offer little, shall we say, concessions, okay?
To me, it's just so infuriating to hear.
Yeah, I think all things considered, Paul, I'm far closer to you than we are apart on almost all of these issues.
So it's really just a stylistic objection I'm raising, much more so than to the content.
I think you're usually spot on and almost always highly relevant to the issues.
Let's go back to Marjorie Taylor Greene.
I mean, look, don't you think she's truly admirable for what she's doing here in spite of the fact that there was some slippage?
I agree, and I wouldn't have recommended she do that, but she's showing a lot of spunk, and I love this thing where she put this tweet the day after About how absurd they were, what a bunch of morons they are.
Let me repeat it.
Her tweet, I woke up early this morning literally laughing, thinking about what a bunch of morons the Democrats, plus 11, are for giving someone like me free time.
In this democratic, tyrannical government, conservative Republicans have no say on committees anyway.
Oh, this is going to be fun.
That's a great attitude, it seems to me, of debunking them and, you know, Really lampooning what's going on there because it's such a horrific mess.
Right, okay.
So, you know, as I made clear, of course, I admire any sort of, shall we say, stance in the face of this lying tyranny.
So, yes, she is to be respected.
However, you know, I just don't think that much is going to come of it similar to Zendaya McKinney as much as I admire her.
You're right about her having more balls than most men, but we need men with balls.
Do we not?
In other words, so, this idea, and I read and heard that when she talked about the fact that, well, you know, it's a big mistake on their part to give me all this time.
Well, but what did you do with that time?
Okay, instead of saying, well, I'm not saying the school shootings still didn't happen, that's ridiculous.
Why even talk like that?
Okay, we got another caller.
Paula, we got another caller with another point of view.
We got Scaredy Cat.
Scaredy Cat, go ahead, give us your thoughts.
Hi, Tim and Paul.
So, I was accused, I know, exactly of being obnoxious.
This was more than 40 years ago, and I remember it, and your conversation right now reminded me of it.
And I was 15 or 16 years old, and an older girl, maybe in her 20s, She accused me of being obnoxious.
I was totally taken aback because I thought I was just being enthusiastic.
Yes!
So, of being enthusiastic, Jim, and when I think of her, I still hate her!
Because of making a totally wrong Diagnosis?
You know, accusation.
Yeah.
Accusation, because I was just, you know, animated.
So, these are statements I'm giving you, Jim.
Scaredy Cat, I agree with that.
I mean, I'm a very...
I'm a very enthusiastic guy, too, and so is Paul.
So, I don't mean to overdo it.
It was just I thought Paul was a bit much, that's all.
But, you know... No, and you know what?
Yeah.
I'm gonna give you something here, Jim, and Scaredy Cat, I want you to listen to me.
I really do appreciate you, the things that you say, and of course, including your defense of me.
But there's no doubt, Jim, Jim is correct here.
I raised my tone, okay?
I raised my volume.
I take a certain stand.
I've been accused of being obnoxious since I was probably in my late teens or early 20s.
I use my bulldozer method of getting people to go with me, go my way, listen to what I have to say.
I use my 2x4 upside the head to get people to pay attention to me because in many cases, as I said earlier, I am completely frustrated at my wit's end by how Uncourageous and stupid most people are, and it's frustrating for me, but Jim was correct in that.
I was a little too pushy, so thanks.
Well, let's go back.
Let's go back to Scaredy Cat, because she has more to say, and we both want to hear it.
Go ahead, Scaredy Cat.
Yeah, not to belabor this, but just to put the finishing touch, I think.
Okay, so I see the book.
And I think what we have to do, Paul, is use the Japanese culture of the, you know, the judo martial arts.
Take somebody's momentum.
And I think, I think we're talking about trying to be effective and letting, or making, beating apart For the good guys to win.
Because every minute of every day, something that a bad guy wants done, gets done.
In terms of passing a law, or something big happening in some country across the world.
So, we all want the good guys to, teeny tiny little steps even, let's see some good guy wins.
So the Judo method is, when we get punched, Or something, an attack is happening to us, is to just slightly move backward.
In other words, explain things according to their vocabulary.
Whatever attack is happening in the language, either the language of violence, physically attacking, harm and death, or the language of literal words, Let's go with their explanation, but in ourselves be strong and deliberate and dedicated to how we can turn that punch that's coming towards us into, you know, entangling his
Yes, yes, yes.
Well, let me give you an illustration.
Let me give you an illustration, Scardia, where I think that's going to happen.
This impeachment trial is going to backfire on the Democrats massively.
Meanwhile, we've got Chicago Brew joining us.
Brew, join the conversation.
Yeah, the impeachment trial, they carried this through.
Now, however, they're allowed to carry it through.
I mean, given there's no precedent for it, and allegedly there's no, the guy's not in office, allegedly, they're not supposed to be able to, what it will do is set a precedent for impeaching those that are out of office, and they'll be able to use that to impeach 44.
44.
Sir, yeah.
You mean, what was that, W?
What, oh, you mean Obama, Obama, yeah, sure, 44, yeah, yeah.
Well, I think, I think, I think Obama's going to go down big time one way or another regardless.
But that's a worthwhile observation, Bruce.
Sure, sure, sure.
Paul, very concisely, then scaredy.
Paul, real concisely, because we're getting to hype.
Okay, as concise as I can be.
My passion derives from maybe a little too much knowledge and perspective on some of these things.
So, the whole vaccine thing makes me sick.
Once I discovered, you know, what I call the unavoidable truth, you could find, I could find the link and I could send it to you of this doctor online being interviewed in a deposition of a lawsuit admitting that they use the chopped up organs of aborted fetuses as culture.
Culture.
Yeah.
These vaccines.
Yeah.
Right.
And Paul, I believe the fact that there's aborted fetal tissue in these vaccines is a ground to decline to be vaccinated.
of this kind of crap.
So that's why I'm comfortable.
And Paul, I believe the fact that there's aborted fetal tissue in these vaccines
is a ground to decline to be vaccinated.
I think that's a perfectly legitimate.
And of course, you can ask for all the pros and cons because they cannot give you a vaccine
under international law originating with the Nuremberg Code unless you have fully informed
consent.
That means, you know, all the risks and hazards.
And if they run the risk of having multiple drug interaction that could cause you serious harm, which is true of all of them, that's another ground on which you can refuse to be vaccinated.
Scaredy, go ahead.
Come on back.
So, just to footnote what Chicago Brew is saying, so what inspired me from, this is a little bit funny, just the famous, the more famous men's locker room talk, I'm inspired by my own gym class, you know, sports class, high school sports class, girls' locker room talk, where The girl used to talk about B.O.
So I call him President Body Odor.
Because he stinks.
To my surprise, somebody was saying that his girls, there's some rumor that his girls say he actually literally stinks.
And that was to my surprise that that's actually happening.
But he thinks in a much worse, you know, human, causing harm to humanity.
He, and I just want everybody to know that he came up as a Muslim because of his middle name, Hussein, and actually there's a much worse thing of his name.
Barak means, is the word blessing in Arabic.
You know how we say Merry Christmas?
Yeah.
It would be like saying Barak Christmas.
So that blessed name of Barack, he sullied it, he dirtied it and filthied it up, and he's the, according to my mom, and I believe her, she used to say long time ago, this is going back whatever, I don't know, it's a decade and a half maybe, I'm losing track of time, but she said that he's the worst president for the Muslims.
Christians can see that he's bad, and I'm using Christian in a greater Christian sense.
Sure.
You know, the descendants of Europe, her descendants.
So, Muslims saw it, but it never got, that view never got aired, haha, as the window should be when he's around.
Yeah.
You know, to let pressure in.
That view never got aired.
Yeah.
And he's the worst Just take Obama.
Just take Libya.
That's it.
And the Three Witches.
Hillary.
And Susan Rice is back.
And Samantha Power.
My late father used to call them the Three Witches of Obama.
And he stings.
And remember that.
Well, remember, remember, remember, Scaredy, Obama has mused that he'd like to be, you know, have a third term where he was just behind the scene, you know, pulling the levers and pushing the buttons and wasn't out front, and that's what he's got here.
Brew, brew, really quick, just, you know, 30 seconds.
Well, you know, I got a couple things here.
So we hit it real quick.
So anyway that the we had the discussion about the two presidents this entire time Trump was in office prior here.
Obama was behind the scene.
He was the second president.
We had two presidents going on.
So allegedly Obama was calling shots from behind the scene because most people in the bureaucracy and so on were actually taking his orders and so on and so forth.
They hit on Paul's vaccine thing, you know, allegedly when I heard is that they actually have one specific baby fetus that they've been using over time for for quite a number of years.
One specific baby fetus that they use for all these vaccinations.
All of them.
And regarding the vaccinations regarding FOPG, we'll go back to HIV.
HIV in itself could have been a curable disease, a virus, or whatever they want to call it.
But it was the pharmaceuticals that they used the AZT which actually made
it a full-blown epidemic. That is what was killing people by breaking down their immune
system and so on. We have a repeat of this right now with this COVID thing. It wasn't COVID taking the
right precautions building your immune system and eating healthy and so on that was going to kill
you. It's the fact that now they got their pharmaceutical out that will break down your immune system.
That is the real death as a repeat with the HIV epidemic. Yeah I think you're exactly right,
Ruth.
That's 100% correct.
And of course, the fact that HCQ is around and readily available and cheap doesn't enhance their profit margin.
That's what's going on.
We got the absurd impeachment beginning tomorrow.
Here's the latest statement from Trump's lawyers.
The impeachment against him for allegedly inciting a breach of the Capitol is constitutionally flawed, will not result in a convention, and infringes on his First Amendment rights.
▲
Export Selection