All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 5, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:10:17
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report Episode 124 - 04 February 2021
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm very pleased to be joined today by David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador and Carl Herman in San Ramon, California.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
♪♪♪ And there's a lot going on.
Marjorie Greene-Taylor, Marjorie Taylor Greene, the new freshman representative from Georgia who's been creating a sensation because she's so outspoken.
Blast the hate American Democrats who are planning to vote her from her committees today, this afternoon.
Very disturbing.
Perhaps already knowing Democrats have little interest in compromise, she tweeted, It wouldn't matter what McCarthy did to try and appease him.
It would never be enough for the hate American Democrats.
She went on to suggest she's actually being targeted due to identity politics.
If Pelosi were the minority leader, she'd pull every identity politics trick in the book to defend her member.
She is herself a white woman, wife, mother, Christian, conservative, business owner.
These are reasons they don't want me.
It's my identity and my values.
Think about it.
The hypocrisy Marjorie Greene mentions may entail that of how Democrats handled incendiary rhetoric from one of their own, Ilhan Omar, House Republicans announced earlier they're pushing for an amendment to the Green vote that would oust Omar from her committee assignments as well.
Here's some statement she's made about the fake news media that obviously are disillusioning them, talking about how guns are being justified on the basis of shootings that actually were staged in advance.
How Ilhan Omar herself has actually provided material support to BLM and Antifa domestic terrorists, where Omar has a rich, detailed history of anti-Semitic statements, as well as her own conspiracy theory regarding 9-11 terrorist attacks, to some people did something.
The Democrat emerged unscathed, nevertheless, and has even been elevated as a member of the squad while sitting on the House Budget and Foreign Affairs Committee.
Mitch McConnell, in my judgment, disgraced himself by attacking Greene for embracing what he called loony lies and conspiracy theories.
Labeling her a cancer for the Republican Party.
But when you look at what she's actually said, I've done research on virtually all of these, and she appears to be completely right.
California fires do appear to have been caused by lasers.
Hillary and Huma did, Murder a child during a sex scene and instilled fear into her for the sake of adrenochrome.
The Las Vegas massacre was completely different than portrayed.
Boat plane hit the Pentagon.
Marjory Stoneman High School was a planned event.
Seth Rich did leak Hillary's emails and was murdered in revenge.
The world is run By cabal of Satan-worshiping pedophiles, Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett do appear to be Muslims.
I strongly suspect Ruth Bader Ginsburg, for at least a year, was replaced by a body double.
And she wasn't the person who posted a call to assassinate Nancy Pelosi.
I know nothing about that.
But I will tell you, when it comes to incitement and improper behavior, the Democrats are way out in the lead.
We have this bald woman.
There needs to be unrest in the streets.
Kamala Harris protesters should not let up on vaccine waters.
If you see anybody from the Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, in a gasoline station, You ought to get out and create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they're not welcome anymore anywhere.
And even Nancy Pelosi.
I just don't know why there aren't uprisings all over the country.
Maybe there will be.
In my judgment, all those actions are more deserving of punishment and being stripped of their committee assignments or removed from Congress than anything done by Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, the big picture here is they're essentially trying to punish somebody for enacting their right to free speech.
It doesn't matter if you agree with all the points she made.
It's really up to her voters.
If they don't like what she says, then they won't re-elect her, will they?
But instead, they want to say, you can't say these things.
This is a threat to our democracy.
That's the new mantra.
It's a threat to our democracy.
And it's kind of funny.
I heard one of these, you know, outraged Congress critters talking about how anyone who could possibly question the 9-11 attacks in our country just is a threat to our democracy and can't be in office.
They keep talking, too, about how she's threatened physical violence against other Congress critters, but they don't say specifically what she said.
I think they're making that part up.
And the other part that I find funny is they're having trouble keeping a lid on all these obvious conspiracies that are part of our daily lives.
It's like the little Dutch boy trying to stick his fingers in all the holes in the dam.
Eventually, you run out of fingers.
And I think that you're going to see more people like Green come forward.
It's part of what I call the Trump effect.
They're going to have trouble keeping the lid on everything, Jim.
And, you know, it's funny how they're portraying Liz Cheney as the adult in the room.
You know, she's the reasonable one.
The daughter of, you know, Dick Cheney, a.k.a.
Satan.
So I think they're going to have trouble keeping all their lives straight and keeping all the pieces in the right order from now on.
I think those are very nice points.
In fact, Dick Cheney appears to have been the executive director of 9-11 from a bunker beneath the White House, as Michael Rupert explained in Crossing the Rubicon, all based on publicly available sources.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, we're seeing just ridiculous tragic comic political theater pushing for a one state solution.
And all of this hate speech is projection by the Democrats.
Now, I find it interesting that you have this Congresswoman Greene, just one person, and she is just receiving this blast of criticism, but also publicity as well for These facts that she is pointing to.
Now, could this be a form of disclosure by the White Hats, who I still think are just waiting to maximize the effect of the arrests and the plan that they're going to enact?
Or is this just the prelude to the most farcical reversal for injustice to go ahead and continue?
We shall see from the political theater.
Well, those are just great points because she is stirring up the pot.
I mean, this one woman has created such waves.
I just love her.
She's wonderful.
And regarding the Pentagon, you know, not having been hit by a plane, I actually went over all the evidence I amassed that all four of the 9-11 crash sites had been faked, albeit in different ways.
With none other than then-retired Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S.
Army, who'd been in charge of all U.S.
military signals, including photographic intelligence.
In other words, this guy was our top military guy on photographic analysis.
And General Stubblebine not only agreed with me on all four of the crash sites, But added additional reasons how we knew they had been faked.
So I would, you know, welcome pursuing these issues.
In fact, any of those she has read, I've reported on virtually all of them, including the most horrific about Hillary and Huma at JimTheConspiracyGuy.com.
Check out my program on Pizzagate, American franchise of Pedogate.
And you can review the evidence for yourself.
But Jim, could I just make one point?
Yeah, absolutely.
I think you made an excellent point that, you know, of course, Dick Cheney was directly involved in directing this 9-11 conspiracy.
And that really, it makes sense that they're trying to put Liz Cheney forward as this reasonable adult to cover for the fact that Dick Cheney was directly involved in all this.
It all kind of makes sense.
And just as a brief side note, you know, Jim, there's a friend of Mike Gaddy's, a retired pilot.
He was one of the first pilots to fly out of New York City after 9-11.
And when he flew out about four to five days after the, you know, the towers were demolished, he actually flew directly over the site.
And he said that the entire site was glowing red when he flew over.
And I don't think that happened from thermite or jet fuel.
No, you're absolutely right.
Yeah, it was a nuclear event, but this is one of the most suppressed, because, I mean, these 19 Islamic terrorists, so-called, didn't have access to nukes, I can guarantee, and 15 of them were from Saudi Arabia.
I mean, the whole thing was manufactured and outrageous, so I really would welcome, bring it on!
Let's talk about these issues.
Meanwhile, get this.
You want to talk about scurrilous behavior?
AOC has gone on television, made this very emotional statement.
I watched it last night.
Claiming how she narrowly escaped death.
She heard people banging on the door to her office.
How she had to hide and she was in fear of loss of her life.
But guess what?
Turns out she wasn't even in the Capitol building where all the action was going down.
She was actually in the Cannon building.
Nearby, but a different building.
Many didn't get the logistics and just assumed she was actually in the Capitol building.
She did make it clear she didn't know who was at her door.
Breathless attempts by media to fan fictitious news flames are dangerous.
My office is two doors down.
Insurrectionists never stormed our hallway.
Egregious doesn't even begin to cover it.
There's nothing the mainstream media won't politicize.
You know, it was all phony.
When she was confronted with it, having her tall tail exposed, she said she was still in danger because the buildings are connected by an underground tunnel system, which was never breached.
We are all in the Capitol Complex, AOC insisted!
This is absolutely unbelievable and embarrassing!
As a reminder now, House Majority Whip Steve Scalise was actually shot by fanatical Bernie Sanders supporter James T. Hodgkinson in 2017 and never made much of a drama out of it.
The same goes for other Republicans who had to run from the bullets.
The only person who was killed in the Capitol building was the unarmed Air Force veteran Ashley Babbitt, who was supposed to have been executed by a Capitol Police officer, but where that too appears to have been fake.
almost a month since January 6th and the discussion has still not progressed any reevaluation
of censorship purges, civil liberties infringements, and or militarization of DC, but instead how
traumatized lawmakers are, owed by the public to have their experiences validated embarrassingly
bad.
Meanwhile Candace Owens has observed on a day in which Alexandria Ocasio-Smollett, meaning
another fake, is trending.
Please never forget the time she staged a photo shoot dressed in all white at a parking lot to spread lies about immigrant children in cages.
Faking her own attempt at murder was the next logical step.
I mean, this is embarrassing.
This is one of their darlings.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, this reminds me of Hillary Clinton's harrowing story of running from the snipers when she was in Bosnia.
More complete fabricated bullshit.
And, you know, Ocasio-Cortez didn't stop there.
She said that, you know, she was the victim of sexual assault.
And when this all happened, all the trauma from that came back.
And they actually did a therapy session, you know, in the Congressional building, doing a therapy session about all the trauma that all these people went through, just to try to keep this narrative going that, you know, this group of people that were let into the Capitol building and essentially took a self-guided tour of the building, taking lots of selfies of themselves.
Somehow that amounts to this insurrection.
Jim, this is just the culmination of more and more fakery, and this one is embarrassingly bad, as you like to say.
We should take a deep dive into this Capitol Guard that was killed.
I don't have his name in front of me, but this guy that they say was killed, he was an ex-military guy, and they're making a really big deal of it.
They had a big ceremony with the guards.
Like that, you know, and really make it a big to do about it.
I'd like to find out if this guy was really killed because I don't think so.
They said he was killed by someone hit him over the head with a fire extinguisher.
I just don't believe it.
I think we should look into it and get to the bottom of this Jim.
Well, you got the right word.
Bullshit.
This is just a monstrous steaming pile of bullshit.
And of course, we know Bill Clinton introduced the policy of separating children from their parents at the border.
Barack Obama implemented it and it had hundreds of children in cages.
In fact, it was embarrassing.
When they tried to out Trump by showing photographs of children in cages while Barack Obama was president, Trump inherited the problem and did his best to resolve, but this is all Democratic doing.
I mean, it is disgusting how they try to play the American people again and again.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, AOC is just a controlled opposition.
She's just a symbolism for progressivism.
So all these people just lay down where it matters.
They are not playing politics.
They're not demanding hardball.
They're not getting anything.
They're just window dressing.
The most effective roast of AOC is comedian Jimmy Dore, who is a progressive.
And he has, just look up Jimmy Dore, D-O-R-E, on YouTube.
And with AOC, and he'll give the entire history of all she does is just pretend to care, but she is just part of the show as best demonstrated in that excellent Candace Owens tweet.
Yeah, she's a spoiled rich girl pretending, you know, she grew up in New York City.
I mean, it's just embarrassingly bad, embarrassingly bad.
That's not the end of it, however.
There are greater threats on the horizon.
Look at House Rule 127.
A new bill would literally end your Second Amendment rights permanently.
This new bill, were it to become law, Might mean the Second Amendment is still a part of the Constitution, but for all practical purposes, the rights you have would be dead and gone.
It would create a national firearms registration system that would literally be accessible by anyone, including the general public.
So if your neighbor, a co-worker, someone wanted to rob your home or your weapons, Wanted to know how you were armed?
All they'd have to do is look it up.
The bill would also apply retroactively.
Within three months, you'd have to report to the government where you bought all your guns, when they were purchased, where they are currently being stored.
Needless to say, if the government knows where all your guns are being stored, that would make it much easier for them to grab.
It would require all gun owners to be federally licensed.
That means owning a gun is no longer a right.
Instead, it's a privilege the government can take away at any time.
And get this, a licensing procedure would include a psychological evaluation.
The licensing requirement mandates the license applicant undergoes a criminal background check.
And then submits to a psychological evaluation to determine whether the person is psychologically unsuited to possess a firearm.
Successful licensees must show they have an insurance policy that'll cost 800 bucks.
I know a lot of guys who definitely not want to go through any sort of psychological evaluation by a government-approved psychologist.
According to the bill, spouses and other family members would be interviewed as well.
A licensed psychologist will interview individual spouses and at least two other family members to determine the state of the mental, emotional, and relational stability of the individual.
The goal, of course, is to make owning guns as difficult as possible.
It would also greatly restrict the type of ammunition you can own.
I know it sounds ridiculous, but the restrictions in this bill actually sound very, very similar to what Joe Biden has been publicly proposing in the past.
During the 2020 campaign, he promised a long list of gun control regulations.
There's a reason Michael Bloomberg spent $125 million helping Biden in Florida and over $600 million nationally.
The agenda includes classifying semi-automatic rifles and magazines holding more than 10 bullets as Class III weapons, which can require nine months or more for approval and a $200 fee.
National gun licensing, red flaw laws that let judges take away people's guns without a hearing, baton round checks on the private transfer guns, bans on some semi-automatic firearms that happen to look like military weapons that are among the most versatile and popular weapons in the nation.
and control is high on his agenda.
So if it isn't this bill, it'll be another.
They're coming for our second amendment.
Meanwhile, all this is happening when murder rates across America are going through the roof.
We have seen major city murder rates jump by an average of 30% in a single year.
This has a whole lot to do with the whole democratic agenda of defunding the police and letting criminals go by a catch-and-release system.
It's absolutely stunning what consequences they think would ensue from a program of defunding the police.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, I think they want to defund the police with a covert goal of establishing a national police force.
That's something that Obama tried to squeak through, but it was such an unpopular idea at the time, they couldn't possibly get it done.
And it just shows how these people don't care the kind of havoc and destruction That is left in the wake of their agenda.
As long as they get their agenda fulfilled, you know, the ends always justifies the means in these people's minds.
It's really disgusting.
And, you know, I think they're going to need another false flag shooting, you know, before they try to get this bill rammed through Congress.
We'll see.
You know, it's going to have to either involve children or maybe some crazed person attacks a hospital because he doesn't believe in COVID.
That might be a good story for them to write, you know, kind of tie the two agendas together somehow.
And Jim, I don't know if you've looked into this shooting that happened in Muskogee, Oklahoma.
You know, which is, of course, the location of a famous song by Merle Haggard.
But, you know, it seems to have dropped off the radar very quickly.
Supposedly five children were killed and one adult.
And it's just sort of dropped off the radar.
It's not gotten very much press coverage at all.
I'm wondering why.
Maybe something logistically went wrong with this false flag to make it completely disappear from the radar.
I don't know if you've looked into it.
I haven't, but what you say is highly plausible.
If it somehow got botched and exposed, they're going to want it to disappear as rapidly as possible.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, Scorpio, that's a great idea for that false flag of gunmen coming in with assault weapons and shooting up a hospital because he's against COVID and the vaccines and the lockdowns.
I wrote satire for years just based on stories like that, just to point it out.
So HR 127, I'm with Jim, like, bring it on.
Yeah, let's talk about this.
So this is all that our opponents do.
They just roll us with the most ridiculous power grabs.
And the origin of the Second Amendment is with the American colonists to stop a A tyrannical government who refused to support the rights of their own government and the American colonists patiently went through the stages to try to reconcile their rights, but the revolution began in 1775 at Lexington and Concord from
If you take a look at it from how they would talk about it, our own government wants to steal our guns and our cannon?
That was covered to arrest the founders, send them off to London, and then hang them as whatever they would have called them at the time, but basically for domestic terrorism.
So, all of this stuff, people have to stand.
They have to stand and then switch this argument Okay, well, why don't we take away your guns?
You're the ones who are operating these lie-started, illegal wars of aggression.
Let's go ahead and arrest you for actually murdering people that we can quantify since World War II and these lie-started, illegal wars of aggression against communism or Whatever it is you want to do with terrorism.
They have murdered literally more than the Nazis did in World War II.
The quantification of the people killed is somewhere around 30 million from the American military in these interventions since World War II.
Let's take their guns away.
I can't think of a single instance or action that the Democrats could take that would be more likely to precipitate a civil war than a gun confiscation program like that.
If that were to become law, all hell would break loose.
Meanwhile, get this, catching up with election fraud.
New York judge flips House seat from Dem to GOP after the judge allows a signature check.
Three months after the November general election, a congressional seat in New York had still not been certified after Supreme Court Justice Scott Del Conte ruled that dozens of votes were invalid.
Some of the biggest batches the court invalidated 128 ballots from voters who voted in the right election district but wrong polling place, in addition to 20 ballots cast in the wrong county.
85 ballots from voters who are listed in the state voter database as purge.
51 ballots from voters who dropped their absentee ballots in a ballot drop box outside their election district.
The ruling guarantees that Republican Claudia Tenney will win the seat in the House for the 22nd District, the only undecided congressional race in the country yet to be called.
This is also a great example Why Democrats and judges have refused to allow signature checks and other election audits.
The Democrat had originally won the seat by a measly 20 to 50 votes prior to Republicans submitting more than a thousand instances of fraud to the court.
This adds another flip Democrat to Republican House seat to the GOP, making the new 117th Congress membership breakdown by party, Democrats 222, Republicans 213.
Meanwhile, defending Trump and mega-loyalty has benefits still, as Senator Josh Audley has just discovered.
He has netted a million dollars in January, 12,000 new donors, campaign now has 2.1 million on hand as he's aiming to be reelected in 2021.
This is a good man.
It's crystal clear that a strong majority of Missouri voters and donors stand firmly with Senator Hawley in spite of the continued false attacks coming from the radical left.
His team explained the fundraising haul appeared despite aggressive attacks by national Democrats after he imposed certifying Pennsylvania on January 6th.
Several Democrats have claimed Hawley's objection directed to the storming of the Capitol.
Although the objection is completely legal under the Constitution, incomparable objections have been lodged by Democrat lawmakers.
Just more gratuitous bullshit.
The same is also true of fundraising data we've seen over the past month.
Despite much ink being spilled about corporate political action committee support being paused and three doors separating from Senator Hawley, they have seen a surge in financial support With thousands of new donors, I think this is highly commendable.
A poll of Missouri voters early discovered 57% agree that Hawley was within his constitutional duty to oppose Pennsylvania's 20 electoral votes having been miscast.
For his part, Hawley denounced the violence at the Capitol.
Stated he'll never apologize for giving voice to the millions of Missourians and Americans who have concerns about the integrity of our election.
That's my job and I will keep doing it.
I'm very impressed with Josh Hawley.
I expect him to have a long, very successful political career.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Yeah, you know, Hawley is taking a lot of heat, too, for the stances he's taking.
I saw an interview on the PBS News Hour with some famous, I mean, former senator from Missouri
who said that supporting Josh Hawley was the biggest mistake of his life.
You know, getting very dramatic and how awful this is.
But if you think about it, if you want to have valid elections,
we need to question elections.
You can't just say, hey, this is a great election.
You can't question it or else you're a domestic terrorist.
That's not a path towards having good elections.
And so, you know, what's interesting too is that these people in the establishment,
like this former senator from Missouri, his name escapes me, they don't realize how much they are loathed
and hated by the average American.
And this sort of hatred towards the establishment is only going to grow as they try to push this agenda forward.
They don't see it because they live in their own little bubble, their own little ivory tower away from the hoi polloi.
And I think this is only going to increase as we move forward, Jim.
And, you know, it's funny how this judge said, you know, allowed for the signature check.
Of course, they're going to say that's racist to allow for signature checks.
You know, anything they don't like is racist.
And, you know, it's funny, too, how the Democrats are always saying, well, it's it's against black people.
It's racist against black people to to require voter IDs.
As though black people are too incompetent and stupid to go and get themselves an ID.
The reality is that saying that black people can't do that is in fact a racist statement.
So I think a lot of their strategy is going to end up backfiring on them, Jim, as we continue forward.
I think you're 100% correct, and I think this trashing of Marjorie Taylor Greene is going to backfire on them too.
I mean, this friend of mine who called me with the latest report said he was outraged.
He doesn't agree with her on those issues.
Although I do.
I've done sufficient research to vindicate her stance on each of those.
But he was outraged, nonetheless, as a gross infringement of her freedom of speech.
He, too, believes it's going to cost them dearly.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, I think that Scorpio and you are right.
And that may even be the plan, that to expose these hypocrites and these psychopaths for what they are, because they do live in an echo chamber.
So anybody who thinks that this was a fair election either has been deprived of the data or is mathematically incompetent.
The vote total is going to be somewhere between 3 to 1 to 4 to 1 in a ratio for Trump.
And that is the listening audience to this ridiculous hypocrisy.
Of course you have to stand up and challenge it.
So you have all these contested states unprecedentedly stopping The one thing that they're supposed to do under the most specious BS reasons.
And then when they resume the counting, you get mathematically impossible results.
And again, I made it say it's like seven times or something, but Pennsylvania claims that when they started counting the votes, they had 600,000 for Biden, 3,000 for Trump.
A 200 to 1 ratio?
That is like flipping a coin and getting 200 heads before you get a tail.
The mathematical odds of election fraud produces a number with like 60 zeros behind it.
And to put that into reality, the odds of winning the Powerball lottery, you are more likely to win three consecutive Powerball lotteries than it is for that not to be election fraud.
Of course people have to stand and say the truth.
Excellent, excellent, Carl.
I love your use of mathematics to make these key points.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
This rather sums it up, I think.
Am I president yet?
The guy was in a basement.
He couldn't draw a crowd.
It was absurd.
He even told us what was going on, that we put together the biggest Voter fraud operation in history and later.
I don't need your help to be elected.
I only need your help after I'm elected.
Because he knew the fix was in.
Meanwhile, we've already reported how the CDC revised its guidelines for reporting deaths in order to massively exaggerate the number of COVID-19.
We're using the new guidelines.
they got 161,392, where if they'd simply applied the old guidelines used for 17 years,
it would have been only 9,687. Hardly enough, however, to fulfill the psychological function.
Where's the flu?
In the age of COVID, the flu has been reclassified as coronavirus, reports an epidemiologist.
We all knew this is coming from an expert.
A few months ago, infectious disease experts were warning it would be extremely difficult for frontline healthcare providers to determine if sickness was due to the novel coronavirus or the old-fashioned flu.
The reason, they said, flu symptoms could and would mimic COVID-19 symptoms.
But, according to one epidemiologist, the problem's been solved by the powers that be.
Simply reclassify flu cases as COVID-19 illicit.
That way, flu cases go down this year, Well, Joe Biden's authoritarian Democrats get to continue justifying perpetual lockdowns and theft of our liberty and freedom on the basis of the number of COVID.
Get this.
Rates of influenza have remained persistently low through late 2020 and into 2021, cratering from levels a year ago and raising the puzzling specter of sharply reduced influenza transmission rates, even as positive tests for COVID-19 have shattered numerous records over the past several weeks.
So where have all the flu cases gone?
Epidemiologist Newt Witkowski thinks he has the answer.
Influenza has been renamed COVID, the former head of biostatistics epidemiology and research at Rockefeller University told the outlet.
There may be quite a number of influenza cases included in the presumed COVID category of people who have COVID symptoms but are not tested for SARS.
Such patient may also have some SARS RNA in their nose while being infected with influenza, in which case the influenza would be confirmed to be COVID.
Just like when you die from a gunshot wound or a car accident but just happen to test positive for the noble coronavirus, it's listed as a COVID death.
Don't take our word for it or that of Witkowski.
The government's own data shows something fishy is going on.
According to the CDC, cumulative positive flu rates from late September to mid-December only stand at 0.2%.
According to clinical labs, that compared to last year's typical 8.7%.
Weekly comparison from data last year and this show an even starker district.
A year ago, the positive flu rate was 22%, but this year it's just 0.1%.
Some have attempted to explain the humongous difference in flu infections by claiming mask-wearing, social distancing, and lockdowns are making the difference.
Timothy Sly, an epidemiology professor at Ryerson in Toronto, told the outlet, the reduced incidence of seasonal flu is almost certainly due to the protection that a large portion of the population have been using for many months, designed to be effective against any airborne respiratory virus.
Holden Mecker, a professor of microbiology and immunology at Stanford, agreed.
Really?
Mass social distancing and hand washing are all effective countermeasures against colds and flus?
It's just BS.
If it were true, COVID cases wouldn't be spiking at all anywhere, especially in liberty-free zones like New York and California.
Macker had an explanation for that too.
That's why it continues to spread, but the highly contagious flu isn't.
I think it's because there's less pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2, and the SARS-CoV-2 virus seems to spread more easily.
Once again, bullshit.
We're being lied to again about COVID.
So the authoritarians in our society can continue to justify the elimination of our freedoms.
There's just no doubt about it.
Meanwhile, India's COVID-19 cases are dropping, but experts say the pandemic is far from over.
Indeed, I believe it's supposed to never go away.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Jim, I think you're right about that.
You know, there's a document that came out, I'll have to send you the link, that's from the John Hopkins Institute for Health and the Bloomberg School of Medicine and GAVI and the World Health Organization, you know, all the usual suspects.
And it talks about, you know, it's one of these war game plans, sort of like Event 201, right?
And the scenario is, is that after four years of COVID, COVID 20, 21, 22, 23, in 2025, there's a new disease called SPARS.
And supposedly SPARS stands for St.
In 2025, there's a new disease called SPARS.
And supposedly SPARS stands for St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome.
And this is all, you know, a war game, essentially, right?
Like, event 201.
And so this, so they've got four more years of COVID until 2025, and then they already have this thing called SPARS planned until 2028.
So people need to see they do not plan on letting this go.
So many people think that, oh, if we just take the vaccine, things are going to go back to normal.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
And we really need to stress this to people.
This is planned to be a long-term event.
You see the signs of it everywhere.
I saw some footage from New York City where there's a vending machine, the super high-tech vending machines that they're putting around the city.
Uh, where you can buy masks and, you know, hand gel and all this other crap.
And, you know, this is an expensive vending machine.
It's, you know, video, big video screen and, you know, it's permanent.
It's not something that you're just going to throw up there for a couple months and then take it down.
And, you know, this whole thing is just, there's so many layers of lies to it, Jim.
And it turns out that COVID really is deadly, because it killed the common flu, and the common cold doesn't exist anymore.
So, I think people need to stop trusting the experts, stop trusting our politicians who are really criminals, and start thinking for themselves.
Those are great points, Scorpio.
And I do think, if we emerge from this intact, there's going to be profound skepticism.
We're not going to be vulnerable to this kind of bullshit.
After all, historically, you deal with pandemics by isolating the sick.
You do not quarantine the healthy.
It was an inversion of the appropriate measures to take.
And I believe, if there's any justice in this world, we'll eventually see Dr. Anthony Tony the Rathoushi hanging from a rope.
And Bill Gates right there along with him after we give them a trial.
Needless to say, Carl.
Yeah, that was a great article.
Robert David Steele also published it on his website as well.
And this just points to the whole playbook of our opponents, this ministry of truth.
They do whatever it is that they want to do, and then they construct rhetoric To allow for it to happen, which often includes the changing of definitions.
So it's no longer a war.
It's a intervention for peace, or bringing peace, or bringing democracy.
And that's all that they ever do, is that they go ahead and shift and change.
They're just slimy and this is kind of the also the origin of all the lawyer jokes is that they're just the most slimy.
You just don't even want to touch them because they just say whatever to get whatever.
And the American people need to, again, Until there's a demand to arrest these people for what we can quantify as annual crimes that kill millions of people, harm billions and loot trillions, they're just going to play these sick games and laugh in our faces.
Yeah, you're absolutely right, Carl.
We've got to put an end to this.
It's insanity.
But it's very cleverly designed, as Scorpio has been emphasizing.
Meanwhile, FBI ordered to produce documents on a dead DNC staffer, Seth Rich.
How appropriate.
This is one of the issues that Marjorie Taylor Greene has been raising.
On July 10, 2016, 27-year-old Seth Rich was gunned down in Washington.
His death led to theories it was somehow related to Hillary Clinton's emails being published on WikiLeaks because he was working for the DNC.
The claim here, the allegations have never been proven, but on the contrary, I have put together evidence that proves that there's really not a lot of doubt about it.
However, nearly five years after his murder now, he's back in the spotlight, because on Monday, February 1st, U.S.
District Judge Amos Mazzon ordered the FBI to produce documents related to Rich's murder after Texas resident Brian Huddleston Filed a Freedom of Information Act request in April of 2020, demanding the Bureau hand over documents related to Seth Rich and his brother Aaron.
Federal authorities dragged their feet, which is when the judge, whom Barack Obama had appointed, stepped in.
He said, allowing the case to continue to be drawn out, would thwart FOIA's basic purpose of opening agency action to public scrutiny.
It's not clear why the FBI was dragging its feet.
After all, if there's nothing to hide, why not honor the request?
Obviously, the answer is because there's a great deal to hide, and they're doing their best to hide it.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, you have to ask the age-old question, Key Bono, and of course, you know, who benefited from Seth Rich's murder, which of course was Hillary Clinton and the DNC covering up their dirty shenanigans.
Again, if just one of these so-called conspiracies is exposed, it's going to open the floodgates and they know it.
So they're going to really do all they can to clamp all this down because, you know, once the cat's out of the bag, it's hard to get it back in.
And I think we're going to see a lot of scrambling and a lot of hyperbole to try to stop people from looking into any of this stuff.
To try to use fear and, you know, derogatory terminology like conspiracy theorists and all this.
So I think it's all going to wear a little thin and more and more people are seeing what the game is, Jim.
I agree.
And look, you got 75% of her constituents voted Marjorie Taylor Greene into office.
75%.
And she was known for being outspoken.
They like that.
They like that.
But the Democrats want to set an example by punishing her for having thoughts that wander off the conventional reservation.
That threatens them profoundly.
Especially, no doubt, what she's had to say about the staged school shootings at Sandy Hook and Parkland.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, my one published academic paper is titled The Emperor's New Clothes, and that is the condition that we have, and Scorpio nails it, is that they have to contain, they have to do damage control.
However, that said, this particular FOIA application was denied because the applicant failed to provide an anal swab test for COVID first.
That was the only reason why.
That makes sense.
Yeah, isn't it absurd?
They're doing anal swabs for COVID?
Give me a break.
I mean, this is lunatic.
Lunatic.
Just bend over and take it, big guy.
The inmates really are running the asylum.
Meanwhile, this is a pretty big deal out your neck of the woods, Carl.
Republicans take an aim at California run for governor if Newsom recall succeeds.
And I dare say, remember, California went for Trump.
I believe it's going to succeed.
Los Angeles Times reports businessman John Cox, former San Diego Mayor Kevin Faulkner, registered independent Mike Cernovich, all intend to challenge Newsom.
Cox, who lost to Newsom in the 2018 governor's race, cited the Democrat governor's failed leadership as reason to step up.
Falcone, former mayor of San Diego, whom the Times describes as the most prominent challenge to Democrat Newsom, has already raised a million dollars.
It's time to restore balance and common sense.
People don't really care about partisanship right now.
What they care about is leadership.
Somebody is going to fix things and get results.
Former mayor of San Diego, Mayor Kevin Faulconer, is going to shake things up in Sacramento.
Cernovich acknowledges chances of winning were remote, but declared he had a different goal in mind.
There's a zero chance I could win the election, he says.
I have no delusion about that.
But if I can get enough of a basis of what I can force Newsom to answer for his war crimes, is human rights violation.
Very good.
There are now 1,350,000 validated signatures to put Gavin Newsom's recall question on the ballot.
Only 150,000 more to go before March 15th.
We are close.
If you live in California, register to vote, sign the petition at recallgavin2020.
They're going to make it easily.
They're going to make it easily.
They're going to have over 2 million signatures, I predict.
The recall petition must receive 1.5 verified signatures by March 17th, a number well within reach.
It accuses him of favoring foreign nationals in our country illegally over our own citizens, mentions California suffers with the highest taxes in the nation, the highest homeless rates, and the lowest quality of life as a result.
California's Newsom is losing voter support amid struggles to contain the pandemic, with just 46% approving his performance, down from 60 just four months ago.
I say Gavin Newsom's gotta go, and it's going to happen.
Scorpio, your thoughts.
Yeah, actually, it's pretty amazing, Jim.
Just two or three days ago, they had 1.2 million signatures.
And now, as of today, you're saying they're already up to 1.35 million.
So they're getting these signatures quickly.
Gavin Newsom is toast.
And let me tell you, man, I've got most of my family lives in California.
Newsom is probably the most hated governor in at least 20 years, since the last recall.
And, you know, isn't it funny that these signatures have to be verified?
Well, wait a minute.
I thought verifying signatures was racist, and it threatened our democracy.
But, of course, there's two sets of rules, and that's becoming increasingly obvious to more and more people.
Newsom's toast.
He's out of there.
This is going to be great.
That's a wonderful point, Scorpio, about the verification of signatures for the recall as opposed to vote for President of the United States.
Carl, your thoughts?
In the current system, nothing is going to change, gentlemen.
If I recall correctly, the recall has two stages to it.
So one, if you get the threshold of the signatures and they vote and the vote is a simple yes, no question, should the governor be recalled?
And then there's a second one.
So if so, who should be there in his place?
So I'm with Scorpio that the man is so unpopular.
I think that the elite is going to have to throw him out.
Remember, it's the Dominion voting machines who are going to be doing the counting, so they'll just put another person, like maybe AOC's long-lost twin, will go there and rail and complain and say Newsom is bad, and then just go ahead and do the same thing.
Without victory over the system of psychopathic criminal looters and liars, they're just going to put another puppet in there to play us.
Well, you make a great point, Paul.
I know an attorney who's involved in this, and I'm going to speak to him.
They cannot use Dominion machines.
My take was they let the Georgia senatorial races go forward so that Trump could show the Joint Chiefs how the Democrats were stealing the election.
I still believe that to be the case.
But it cannot be that they are allowed to be used again.
I mean, they're provably designed to steal elections.
That's a whole reason they were manufactured in the first place.
So your point is really a good one.
The time for the U.S.
to return to the nuclear deal is not unlimited.
He has reiterated Tehran's position it can immediately return to compliance if the U.S.
lifts its sanction.
Tehran has been loosening its commitment to the PAK since Washington nixed the deal in 2018.
That was Donald Trump pulling out.
But he said Iran's decreased compliance is a response to the U.S.
withdrawal, and it was still in accord with the rules of the agreement.
The United States is not in the nuclear deal, and it's not in the nuclear deal because of its own decision to withdraw.
Meanwhile, NBC released excerpts from an interview with the new U.S.
Secretary of State Tony Blinken, which the top American diplomat said Iran is shortening the time it needs to acquire enough enriched uranium for a while, but this is a Zionist line, have no doubt about it.
The News Network quoted Blinken as saying Tehran is months away.
Could be within weeks.
We've heard Bibi say this for year after year after year after year.
So it's fair to say Blinken is the spokesman for Israel, not for the United States.
Whereas Zarif has observed, if we wanted to build a nuclear weapon, we could have done it some time ago.
It's not clear from the preview of the yet-to-be-fully-aired interview what Blinken meant exactly by his comment, and if the timeline he projected is under the current circumstances or under further possible breaches by Iran.
Still, Zarif was told by CNN that his American counterpart had said that Iran was weeks away from having enough enriched uranium for a nuclear weapon, which he categorically denied.
Iran does not seek a nuclear weapon.
If we wanted to build a nuclear weapon, we could have done it some time ago.
We decided nuclear weapons will not augment our security and are in contradiction to our ideological views.
The State Department released a transcript later on Monday showing Blinken was warning against the effects of a possible escalation of Iran's nuclear program, which he said could eventually reduce the time needed for Iran to amass enough enriched uranium for a weapon to a matter of weeks.
Meanwhile, Tucker Carlson thinks Joe Biden is about to start a war with Iran because of what Blinken's saying, and I think Tucker is on the right track.
Remember, they want to reverse everything that Donald has done.
We know the president, Reagan, had started several wars.
George H.W.
Bush, five.
Bill Clinton, three.
George W. Bush, five.
Barack Obama, seven.
Trump, none.
Zero.
Zilch.
Nada.
They don't like that.
I predict Biden is going to start a war, and Iran is the most likely prospect, and putting people like Blinken in positions of power is a guarantee that's what's going to happen.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Yeah.
Frankly, you know, I think that Iran needs to get nuclear weapons as quickly as possible and make it, as soon as they have it finished, say, look, this is purely for defensive uses.
It's to prevent our country from being attacked and invaded.
That's the only reason we have it.
And I think that that's what they're going to end up doing eventually.
And, you know, why is this horrible thing?
If Iran has a nuclear weapon, Pakistan has nuclear weapons, for God's sake.
So does India.
What makes Iran this horrible boogeyman?
It's only because Israel has had a beef going with Iran for a long time.
So from the point of view of an Iranian who wants to keep their government sovereign and prevent an attack, that's their best strategy.
And I think, honestly, I think that's what they're trying to do.
And I don't see a problem with it.
And the idea that, oh, we have the right to tell Iran they can never have a nuclear weapon, that's absurd.
And I don't buy into it.
And, you know, you brought up Tucker.
Jim, I was very, very disappointed with Tucker.
If you watch his show from last night, he said that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy and blah, blah, blah.
He went on the whole official story, hook, line, and sinker, the whole story.
I was disgusted.
I know Tucker does some good work sometimes, but that really had me out of my chair.
I was just like, ugh, I couldn't believe it.
You're 100% correct, Scorpio.
I wrote a letter to Tucker saying that his ignorance was on full display, that I published four books with experts on JFK, and that his defense of the Warren Report was really completely absurd.
I mince no words about it.
It was embarrassing.
And as regard Iran, I've had very cordial relations with Iran.
I've appeared over a hundred times on press TV.
I do interviews with Iranian newspapers.
And among the most recent, I was asked to address these issues about the difference in the Trump and Biden administration.
And I explained that, in my opinion, Iran would be far better off to acquire nuclear weapons because that would bring stability to the Middle East, just as between the United States and the Soviet Union we had decades of mutually assured destruction.
For the only time I can recall, they edited my statement and took that sentence out.
And when I objected to it, they said because it disagreed with the Supreme Leader's stance.
And I wrote back and said, well, I'm not speaking for the Supreme Leader.
I'm speaking for myself as to what Iran ought to do.
I was quite incensed.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, Iran has really been the victim.
Nation for this and I took the case of Iran fairly seriously as a historian and constructing a 40 page white paper for Congress.
For the support of impeachment of Vice President Cheney and President Bush with the lies told to really maximize the oligarchs profits of their oil resources, 90% of which occur near the border of Iraq.
And so everything that we see is disinformation from them.
It's really the U.S.
that is out of compliance with NPT, the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Under the terms of that treaty, anybody can have nuclear capability for medicine and for energy.
And people need to know that IAEA, the watchdog agency, all of the refinement positions, labs in Iran
are under 24 seven monitoring for the refinement capability.
And they can tell if anything is refined past the capability for radioactive isotopes for medicine.
Um, so...
So really it's more disinformation.
And to benefit Israel that has God knows how many hundreds of nukes they have.
They don't even pretend to, to be a part of that and to accept for any inspections of their nuclear weapons.
So, but this again, this rhetoric for war until the oligarchs are arrested and removed from power, we're just going to be threatened.
And this is just fear mongering.
And if they think they can get away with it, yeah, sure.
They'll bomb.
Yes, yes, yes.
whoever they think they can and steal their resources and drive this planet into more
more danger and damage.
Yes, yes, yes.
I was invited by the way to speak at a conference on the death of Qasem Soleimani, which was
a grotesque misjudgment by Trump and I believe was initiated under pressure from Bibi Netanyahu.
When I explained to them that in spite of Trump having done some dumb things, the reason
a mainstream media, which is completely controlled by Israel, went after him so aggressively
was because he was not willing to bomb Iran.
And that they should not be lulled into a false sense of security because you have this new administration, because they're going to go about conducting business the way Bibi Netanyahu wants them to, which is why they enjoyed the support of the mainstream media in the first place.
That they should not be played.
We'll find out whether they take my advice seriously or not.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
We have Edward Henry writing, this is a completely brilliant guy, talking about the gun registration statute we were discussing.
This proposed federal law requires anyone who possesses a firearm or ammunition to have a federal license.
If the person does not have a federal license as required by statute for the possession of the gun and ammunition, the person shall be fined.
Not less than $75,000 and not more than $150,000 in prison, not less than 15 years, and not more than 25 years or both.
Get that!
Understand that the minimum prison sentence for possessing an unregistered gun or ammunition is 15 years in prison.
This is clearly unconstitutional.
In the meantime, one will be sent to prison for 15 years while the courts dilly-dally over its constitutionality.
Registration is a precursor to seizure.
If this passes, we'll be just one agent provocateur shooting away from an all-out ban on seizure of all guns, which I guarantee is going to precipitate a civil war.
Meanwhile, anti-vaxxers are alleged to misuse federal data to falsely claim COVID vaccines are dangerous, except the data shows the COVID falsehood data does show they're dangerous.
It didn't take me long to find a glaring falsehood in the article, and this is again Edward Hendry, who's just publishing a series of completely brilliant pieces.
Take the following paragraph.
Rogers, a political economist associated with the anti-vaccine movement, claimed that VAERS data represents an estimated 1% of actual vaccine injuries and has killed many thousands more than reported.
This is a common talking point.
That VAERS data only shows 1% of actual adverse events, and it's as false as it is oft-repeated.
It also doesn't really make any sense.
As Paul Offit, an attending physician in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the director of their Vaccine Education Center pointed out, how would they know that?
What gold standard are they applying?
How do they know what the real number is?
First, they set up a straw man Rogers and claimed that he is repeating a baseless statistic that the VAERS system only reflects 1% of adverse vaccine events.
What Vice deceptively does not reveal is that 1% figure came from a Harvard study that was commissioned and funded by the CDC.
The CDC spent millions on that study.
Attached to this email for your reading enjoyment, it states fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.
This means that approximately 9,845 adverse events reported for 2020 for the COVID-19
vaccine in the vaccine adverse event reporting system actually represents 984,500 adverse events
from COVID-19. Yet with that damning data, establishing the COVID-19 vaccine is unsafe.
The mainstream is still reporting.
CDC is representing to them that.
Initial safety data shows everything is going well.
How outrageous.
This is the very show where Tucker talking about JFK, Scorpio.
I was completely shocked and dismayed.
Anyone who wants to understand how far off is Tucker, how his understanding of the assassination is decades out of date.
Massive new research debunking every aspect of the Warren Report.
Objective and scientific data.
Check out JFK, who is responsible and why.
I had that up already in 2018, but it's still good as gold and demonstrate Tucker has no idea what he's talking about.
Meanwhile, let me recommend checking out the False Like and Conspiracies 2020 archive.
24 experts On a whole range of false flags and conspiracies, this is information you need to know.
Go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
Falseflagconspiracies2020.com and check it out.
Remember, the secret of freedom lies in educating people.
The secret of tyranny, in keeping them ignorant.
Meanwhile, our final thought, Scorpio.
Well, going back to the issue of Iran just briefly, you know, it needs to be brought up every time this subject comes up that Israel has illegal chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons that are stored in the Negev Desert.
They probably have hundreds of nuclear weapons, all illegally, against all the treaties.
So, you know, it's funny how we're supposed to think that if, oh my God, if Iran gets nuclear weapons, It's the end of the world.
And let us not forget, too, that if America hadn't overthrown Moshe Dak in the 1950s, Iran would be a very different place now anyway.
Because if you recall, Iran was on its way to becoming a very westernized country.
If you look at some photographs from earlier in the 1950s, 1960s, it was a very different place.
And the radicalization that happened there was the result of American meddling.
So we should not forget that either.
And on the issue of the vaccines, I was called an anti-vaxxer by somebody a few days ago.
And I said, not really.
I'm just not going to allow myself to be injected by a witch's brew of chemicals and a biological experiment on humanity.
Nobody, even if you buy the whole official story, they don't know what this vaccine is going to do to people for sure.
It's a big experiment.
I just don't want to be used as a lab rat and I don't want anyone else to either.
And you know, Tony the Rat Fauci is already saying that, oh, we have these mutant strains.
I love that term, mutant, like it's really scary.
We have these mutant strains and they're already saying that they may have to enhance the vaccine for future use.
So they're already planting the seeds for us that you're going to need a new vaccine every single year.
This is not a one-time event.
People need to wrap their heads around that and stop thinking that, Well, if I just take the shot, everything will go back to normal.
In fact, the exact opposite is true, Jim.
Well said, Scarpio.
Carl, your final thoughts?
Yeah, that last speech with H.R.
127, we really are going into either Civil War 2.0 or the American Revolution 2.0.
If you have to register your guns, people are not going to do it.
That is the precursor to confiscation.
And then, if you want to go ahead and Invade somebody's home to arrest them for 15 years and to bankrupt their family?
Shootouts will start.
That is a certainty.
Now, the American military are not going to support that.
So that is why the big picture is that I'm confident that the American military have already seen through this, and that this is some sort of a show.
To demonstrate to the American public of the dystopia that they would have on a permanent basis if this election fraud was allowed to stay.
So, for the viewers, just go ahead and stay strong in the facts and your faith, and do not accept this oligarchy of just psychopathic liars and looters and criminals.
Wonderful.
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison thanking David Scorpio from the exotic land of Ecuador and Carl Herman from San Ramon, California for their insightful and penetrating commentary.
Let me say, we're watching a clown show in Washington, D.C.
One representative is speaking the truth about a vast range of issues as being condemned and demonized and may be stripped of her committee assignments.
When many other members of Congress are committing really serious acts that don't merely represent freedom of speech and freedom of thought, but criminal activities they've been encouraged on the part of members of Antifa and Black Lives Matter.
They are the members who deserve to be exorcised and removed from Congress, not Marjorie Taylor Greene.
And let me add, if the American people wanted to have a demonstration of the lunatics running the asylum, look at all the actions by the Democrats since Joe Biden, a fake candidate, won a fake election during a fake inauguration and is now operating from a fake White House To break damage on America and the American people.
This cannot be allowed to stand.
And this House bill to potentially confiscate our weapons with its absolutely absurd penalties is going to be the straw that broke the camel's back.
Stand by.
We're going to report more.
All the news you need to know.
Thank you for joining us today.
▲
Export Selection