NeedToKnow (4 January 2021) with Carl Herman: Crossing the Rubicon
|
Time
Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm pleased to be joined today by Carl Herman from San Ramon, California.
We're looking forward to David Scorpio coming to join us subsequently as we proceed to bring you all the news you need to know.
Meanwhile, Pence is now welcoming efforts by lawmakers to object to the Electoral College vote.
Carl, this looks to me like a CYA move.
He'd previously objected to being identified as having a pivotal role here, but now it seems he wants to make amends so that he's not regarded as a traitor by the Republican Party, even though it's pretty clear to me at this point in time that that is the role he is playing.
Sidney Powell has put together a 270-page documentation of voter fraud with a 21-page executive summary.
It appears to me this is sufficient to trigger the president's executive order of 12 September 2018, allowing him to seize the assets and prosecute the personnel of any foreign entities who are involved in interference where Dominion is based in Canada.
Silla, which was tabulating the vote in Spain, and where of course the raid on the servers in Frankfurt, Germany apparently led to the apprehension of Gina Gaspel, our head of the CIA, who has apparently had the wisdom to turn state's evidence And whose participation is being covered by a fake obituary.
Meanwhile, word on the Hill is that Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi are conspiring on a rule change to block the Electoral College objection.
I find that extremely offensive.
Meanwhile, we have 11 more senators to join Josh Hawley.
So we now have a dozen It includes Ted Cruz, who it would appear is going to lead the delegation.
The senators have proposed Congress appointing an electoral commission with full investigatory and fact-finding authority for an emergency 10-day audit of election returns.
The group includes Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, James Lankford, Oklahoma, Steve Daines, Montana, John Kennedy, Louisiana, Marsha Blackburn, Tennessee, Mike Braun of Indiana, and Senators-elect Cynthia Cummings of Wyoming, Roger Marshall of Kansas, Bill Hagerty of Tennessee, and Tommy Tuberville of Alabama.
Objections are allowed if they're in writing and supported by at least one representative and at least one senator.
If those conditions are met, then objections trigger withdrawal from the joint session in a two-hour debate.
The chambers then vote on the objections.
If they are upheld with a majority vote, then it would alter the outcome.
Your thoughts, Carl?
The whole world is watching the show and in order to transform the planet you need to have the American sheeple, the worldwide sheeple, awaken to the plots that have been going on for not decades but over a hundred years to have Ordinary human beings kept as livestock as slave animals.
The viewers and the American people need to wake up that this election fraud is mathematically certain.
It is established in history with over 10 years of Princeton and Stanford pointing to the obvious that these so-called voting machines are rigged.
These are black box A protected proprietary software that should just count.
And we've already demonstrated through the 2016 primary elections on a paper that was authored by the president of the American Statistical Association that Bernie Sanders won that primary.
That where these machines counted votes, you had mathematical impossible additions to Hillary Clinton.
With this election, the single most powerful data point In Pennsylvania, where Trump was winning, they closed the counting, and then during the dead of night, Biden receives a batch of 600,000 votes to Trump's 3,000.
A 200 to 1 ratio produces odds that this was absolutely election fraud to the magnitude of a number with 50 to 60 zeros behind it.
So, if we have a venue for this evidence to be considered, then the election will be thrown out.
But we'll see.
It seems odd to say, but there's a long time between now and Wednesday.
Carl, I don't like the idea of a commission to investigate.
It's supposed to have five representatives, five senators, and five members of the Supreme Court, but the commissions of the past, like the Warren Commission or the 9-11 Commission, have yielded whitewash.
The members are subject to manipulation.
It's no guarantee of a proper outcome.
I believe the evidence presented during the two-hour hearing is going to be overwhelming.
And everyone who is honest and dedicated to the Constitution will vote to exclude the Biden delegates from the disputed states that have been shown to have been improperly garnered.
but all the corrupt, including most of the Democrats who said to say satisfy that description
are gonna move forward nevertheless to support in spite of the massive evidence to the contrary.
Mark Meadows is also in my opinion, put himself in the crosshairs
as a traitor to the United States by opposing Sidney Powell's appointment
as a special prosecutor along with Pat Sip alone is now observing that over 100 House members plan to object.
We're now well over 100 House members and a dozen senators ready to stand up for election integrity and object to certification.
It's time to fight back.
Louie Gohmert, who tried suing Vice President Pence over his power during the joint session, claimed last week that 141 Republican House members have announced their plan to object.
Objections need to be in writing and support from at least one member, as I've observed.
Unfortunately, the many unlawful actions undertaken by the Pennsylvania Governor's Office, the Secretary of State, and what's been described as a rogue Pennsylvania Supreme Court, exceeded and circumvented the state legislature's clear constitutional authority, said five members Representatives from Pennsylvania itself.
Guy Rathenthaler, Dan Musen, Glenn Thompson, Mike Kelly, Lloyd Smucker, John Joyce, and Fred Keller.
Actually seven of them.
Meanwhile, Mitch McConnell's losing his grip because we have the 12 senators who are opposed.
Here's a joint statement from Cruz Johnson, Lankford, Daines, Kennedy, Blackburn, Brown, and Senator-elect Loomis, Marshall, Hagedy, and Tooberville.
America is a republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections.
Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law.
The overwhelming majority from the disputed states, especially Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, fail that test.
They therefore do not represent the will of the voter.
So all this nonsense about trying to undo the will of the people is completely absurd and contradicted by the evidence.
They continue.
On January 6th, it's incumbent on Congress to vote whether to certify the 2020 election result.
That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.
There's a long precedent of Democrat members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and in 2017.
In both 1969 and 2005, a Democrat senator joined with Democrat House member enforcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the elect or is being challenged.
The most direct precedent arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden race.
Specifically, the electors in three states—Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina—were alleged to have been conducted illegally.
In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss them as radicals trying to undermine democracy.
Instead, Congress appointed an electoral commission—five senators, five House members, and five justices—to consider and resolve the disputed returns.
We should return to that precedent.
I think the precedent is interesting historically, Carl, but for the reasons I've suggested, I'm not convinced that it would be capable of doing more than will be presented during the two hours of debate.
Well, it's exciting, that is for sure.
If the facts matter, if the facts can count, then that'll carry the day.
But the whole world is watching.
It's like a football game that it is more rigged than people can imagine.
That's the problem, Jim.
It would be like we're playing on a football team, and we're on offense, we're approaching the line of scrimmage to run our play, and the defense steals the ball.
The officials claim it was a legal move, like a surge defense, and the announcers say that it's legal.
So it's rigged to that extent, and all we can do is hope that the American public are awake enough, they're bright enough, they have the integrity to stand.
Otherwise, the scenarios can go as dark or darker than people can imagine.
Carl, I think you got it exactly right.
We have further developments.
Trump is urging his supporters to gather in the District of Columbia on January 6th, and I expect hundreds of thousands are going to respond.
Don't miss it, he says.
But we also have a report of Antifa members being bused in already, just as happened in Charlottesville.
Meanwhile, Olli Dommegaard has found clues left behind in Nashville suggesting the next false flag will occur on Capitol Hill, which I believe is correct.
Olli has identified the location.
I'll give you the date, January 6th.
Meanwhile, the Iranian president, unfortunately, whose words have been translated to say that in a few days the life of this criminal Donald Trump will end.
That is extremely unfortunate.
It appears to me to be parallel to when an earlier Iranian president said that the regime in Tel Aviv, the Zionist regime in Tel Aviv, will pass, which was mistranslated to imply that Iran wanted to destroy Israel.
That's completely wrong, but it was used for great political effect.
I'm very troubled this may happen, too.
In precautionary moves, the U.S.
moved the aircraft carrier Nimitz, and it striked back to this region this month.
As of Tuesday, Nimitz was off the coast of Somalia to safeguard the withdrawal of U.S.
troops.
However, the Associated Press reported it was leaving the region, which would be a gesture of reconciliation toward Iran.
Only found signs in Nashville that the next flag would be on Capitol Hill.
I add that it'll be intended to take out Trump and to blame it on Iran.
For Israel, a double win.
I am worried.
Israel has been very upset with Donald Trump because he would not bomb Iran.
And of course, Paul, with the incoming Biden administration, they plan to restore the Iran agreement, which would reduce any incentive.
So I believe the Israelis want to seize the opportunity now, a very narrow window, to launch a false flag that they believe would incite the American people to strike at Iran.
Unbeknownst to them, on behalf of Israel.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, it's a very dangerous situation.
You're right, Jim.
I have heard that the number of Trump supporters will be between 1 and 10 million going to Washington, D.C.
And that stage is set for a false flag.
that would be the most horrible thing to happen.
And that might just push the United States into a civil war.
That's the dark side.
The light side is that between now and Wednesday, if game changing evidence is brought to the American people
with perhaps what, the arrest of Vice President Pence or the arrest of one of these leading people
or that Biden goes ahead and concedes.
So there's a long time between now and then the great majority of the evidence for me
is that the White Hats are in control and they want the whole world to watch.
They have dragged this thing out.
They have made it tantalizing.
This is the most impressive political theater I have ever witnessed, and I hope that's what's happening.
Carl, I gotta tell you, my heart is in my throat over all of this.
Meanwhile, we had another report about Rouhani declaring Trump will be dead in a few days as Iran-U.S.
relations continue to crumble.
Rouhani's speech, excerpts of which were posted in English on the presidential website, called Qasim Soleimani a martyr, a moderate leader with tact.
He was a brilliant guy.
I admired him beyond words.
It was outrageous when he was taken out by a missile attack during a peaceful mission to Iraq at the Iraqi airport.
And it was a violation of Iraqi sovereignty and the destruction of a very important figure in Iranian society who is expected to become a future president of Iran.
I was interviewed actually by an international news agency out of Iran about this.
On the occasion of the first anniversary of the martyrdom of General Qasim Soleimani, the commander of the Quds Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, American university professor and co-founder of Scholars for 9-11 Truth, James Fetzer, said in an exclusive interview General Soleimani was a great military leader and a politician of considerable aplomb who made an enormous difference to the Middle East generally and to Iran specifically.
He was manifestly not a terrorist, but the antithesis by marshalling forces against terrorism, especially actions rooted in Israel.
It was a great loss for the world when he was assassinated by the Trump administration Which I deplore.
Fetzer spoke of Trump's policies in the Middle East, saying although Trump committed a massive blunder by taking him out, his attitude toward the Middle East by taking efforts to remove U.S.
forces from a region where they would not have been introduced But for the false flag known as 9-11, which was brought to us compliments of the CIA neocons in the Department of Defense and the Mossad, the region will benefit from removing those troops.
He further noted the U.S.
intel community concluded already in 2007 that Iran was not pursuing the development of nuclear weapons, which it reaffirmed in 2011, months before even the Mossad agreed Only weeks before Bibi went to the UN and proclaimed the opposite.
Referring to U.S.
sanctions against countries around the world, especially against Iran, the U.S.
political analysts stress the use of sanctions as a form of collective punishment which is proscribed by international law and the U.N.
Charter.
In my view, such sanctions disgrace the United States, where earlier no-fly zones over Iraq led to the death of 500,000 infants.
That was grossly immoral, and the President of the United States ought to know better.
Peaceful negotiations are unlikely to solve the problem created by
Israel's determination to dominate the entire region.
Fetzer also spoke about his prediction of U.S. policies in the future, saying,
if Trump were to continue in office, which I hope with every fiber of my being, then U.S.
forces will be removed from the Middle East and the region will be that much better off.
If Biden should regain control of the government, however, then you can expect a resurgence of the failed policies of the past, where the Middle East will continue to suffer from war and death and everything evil that goes along with it, Because of the influence of the military-industrial complex Eisenhower warned us about.
To my surprise, they did edit one of my observations.
Do you think the Republic of Iran will change its policies?
No, nor should it.
U.S.
intel concluded back in 2007 Iran was not pursuing the development of nuclear weapons, which it reaffirmed in 2011, months before even the Mossad agreed, only weeks before Mibi went to the U.N.
and proclaimed the opposite.
My own view is that.
for Iran to acquire nuclear weapons. It would do more to stabilize the region than any treaties or
other agreements by ushering in an era of mad mutually assured destruction such as existed
between the US and the USSR during the Cold War. When I inquired Carl as to why that point was
omitted, they explained because it was the Supreme Leader's policy that Iran would not
pursue nuclear weapons, which I protested because this is my opinion,
not offering that as a substitute for that of the Supreme Leader.
Your thought?
The Iranian people have been the victims and people need to learn a little history here.
When the United States along with Great Britain overthrew the democracy of Iran in 1950, it was either 53 or 54.
53.
Okay, so they had a democracy and they were asking to have a greater share of the profits of their own oil.
I believe the arrangement back then was that the Iran got 10% of the profits of their oil.
And when they threatened to nationalize the oil companies, that's when this whole thing started.
The democracy was overthrown, the Shah was installed, the CIA trained their secret police, and when we overthrew, when the Iranian people overthrew that government, when the Shah got cancer, and then the U.S.
refused to extradite him back to face crimes against the Iranian people, This has been crazy.
The U.S.
then got our other CI puppet, Saddam, to attack Iran from 1980 to 1988.
Approximately a million Iranians were killed in that war.
So we, unless that we have accounting of that history, the speech in question where allegedly this was a talk about Trump dying.
I haven't read the speech and it might've just said that his regime will be over the same thing as the oft-reported lie that you mentioned that Um, the Iranian president said that, that, uh, Israel will, what was that?
Zionist regime in Tel Aviv will pass.
Yeah, that was what he said, but then it was translated in the U S press as, uh, wiped off the map, wiped off the map.
So there's just no truth.
Um, but for us in the immediate couple of days, it is still super scary.
Oh, Carl, you got it exactly right.
Very nice.
Meanwhile, why the media refused to tell the truth regarding the election.
There's no doubt the 2020 election was rigged in favor of the naughty, listed Joe Biden.
It may take years to dig to the bottom of the testimony and witnesses that have come forward just to find out what happened and how.
But there are statistical issues with the election.
Proof that the Dominion voting machines were programmed to cheat has sources putting in their earplugs because they don't want to face the truth that they are guilty as charged.
The media is the worst because they continue to act like nothing is wrong.
The decade's biggest story is on their desktop.
Not a single reporter is taking up the challenge to dig to the bottom of the truth.
The silent majority is fearful of what could be done to anyone who decides to speak out or let the world know that the Democrats are cheaters and cannot be trusted.
The liberal-loving media has decided to put all their eggs in one basket.
Their options are to report on the fraud and turn against their financial backers or support Biden to the very end.
They cannot afford to betray their billionaire owners.
The power of the dollar keeps the media on a tight leash.
They have no desire to lose their funding.
They are only willing to do as they are told, which is to side with the liberals and hate the conservatives.
The liberals continue to push the same statement over and again, to claim no evidence of widespread election fraud, to brainwash the public into believing no evidence exists.
But there was an amazing amount of proof given already during the Senate hearing.
It ought to have been enough to overturn the election.
But when Democrats and their media are demonically controlled, no amount of evidence will cause them to see the widespread or acknowledge the widespread fraud that took place.
The media refuses to show the Democrats targeted Specific areas to commit their fraud.
These areas were susceptible to fraud and the act of committing it could take place rather easily.
Meanwhile, California is trying to pass a law to fine people for false information.
On 7 December, 2020, the first day of the California Legislature's 2021-22 session.
Assemblymember Ed Schall introduced Assembly Bill 35, which would require disclosure of social media policies, would add a new chapter, 22.4, to Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code, Requiring that a person who operates a social media platform disclose whether or not that social media platform has a policy or mechanism in place to address the spread of misinformation, it would lead to fines of $1,000 a day for misinformation, Carl, I ask.
So, for example, if you publish a report that Lee Oswald did not shoot JFK, Or a report that 9-11 was not committed by 11-19 Islamic terrorists under the control of a guy in a cave in Afghanistan?
Or that Joe Biden didn't win the election?
Would we then be subject to fines of $1,000 a day?
I mean, this is absurd!
It's the implementation of a ministry of truth, just as George Orwell foresaw.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, that's exactly it.
And this is projection, as always, from these black cats.
They want to blame the victims, us, and then go ahead and slap us with fines and then drag us down to the courts and then...
Use some procedural nonsense to go ahead and remove any voices of dissent.
So with all of the black hats are on stage and corporate media is being demonstrated as serial liars to lie by omission and commission regarding election fraud.
And if you really wanted to clean out the black hats, you would need them to all be on stage, including the judicial system.
The point of the judicial system is to resolve A legal argument.
And when that branch of government refuses to consider the evidence, with the most specious BS excuses to toss the cases out, then that demonstrates that the court cannot be used in order to address the greatest problem in this nation's history.
You have dictatorial government violating all of the time limits for these so-called emergency health orders that is destroying the
middle class.
So if you can't go to the courts for that, then the courts have demonstrated themselves
as failing, fundamentally failing in their purpose to be able to resolve an argument.
And therefore, that opens up the door to the Insurrection Act, where the military is going
to have to go ahead and clean it out and have tribunals for treason.
Carl, that may be exactly the direction we are headed.
We'll be right back.
Why was the FBI director helping the Bidens hide their crimes?
New report shows he's implicated himself.
Before rising to his current rank as FBI director, Christopher Wray had a totally different gig.
He was a representative for a Russian energy company beforehand, but from the looks of it, Wray did not share any of this information with anyone else.
Why did he decide to keep this very simple information under wraps?
It was in his biography at King & Spalding, but the data was soon removed.
It's as if Ray put in a few calls and decided there was no reason for it to become public.
If he had nothing to hide, it's hard to believe he would have taken the same route.
He's clearly guilty about the past life he led, and this is his way of compensating for it.
His resume claims he helped lead the department's effort to address a wave of corporate fraud scandals and restore integrity to U.S.
financial markets.
We're not quite sure how he managed to do that, but we're all ears.
What we do know is that then-FBI Director Bob Mueller and the crooked Andrew Weissman were reporting to Wray during the Enron investigation.
These are the same men who are responsible for handling the Russian collusion claims.
They wanted to destroy Donald Trump in the same manner they destroyed Enron, and it should be obvious to anyone who's paying attention.
The Raid bio also brings a few more important pieces of information to light.
It's very clear he was in collusion with the Biden crime family and therefore did not want that information to come forward.
Meanwhile, Donald Gates admitted as early as May that 700,000 people would die from the use of his vaccine if it were administered worldwide.
The total death from his scare tactics at the time was only 263,346, far less, less than half
of the 700,000, assuming only 1% die from his vaccines. In 1976, concerns over a possible
flu pandemic led to a large-scale vaccination program.
45 million people were vaccinated within 10 weeks, but the government stopped the program when no swine flu cases were detected outside the military base where it had originated, and when an unexpectedly high number of cases of Julian Bauer syndrome were reported in vaccinated cases.
Stunning stop!
I do not think 700,000 people should sacrifice their lives for Bill Gates.
And what kind of person would even demand the entire world be vaccinated?
This seems to me to be more of an effort to be exonerated from liability, a complete denial of human and civic right to force people to be vaccinated by a man with no medical background, whose body language of waving his hands in the air appears to be hiding truth behind his scheme.
Embarrassingly bad.
Meanwhile, it turns out the vaccine maker Pfizer paid $2.3 billion in the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history, and yet it's now being entrusted with developing a COVID-19 vaccine.
American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer and its subsidiary, Pharmaceutical and Upjohn, agreed to pay $2.3 billion in the largest healthcare fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice.
Pfizer pled guilty for misbranding Baxter with the intent to defraud or mislead
an anti-inflammatory drug Pfizer pulled from the market in 2005,
where they had promoted Baxter for uses and dosages the FDA specifically declined to approve.
They made a criminal fine of 1.195 billion, the largest ever imposed in the US for any matter,
and also had to forfeit 105 million for a total criminal resolution of 1.3 billion.
As part of a settlement, they agreed to enter into an expansive corporate integrity agreement with the officer of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services.
On the other hand, according to the co-founder of Bit and Tech, Dr. Ugar Sahin, the COVID-19 vaccine He designed for Pfizer, was put together in just a few hours on a single day, 25 January 2020.
No other vaccine in history has been created and manufactured so quickly.
Previously, the fastest ever developed took more than four years.
Earlier, a nurse collapsed on live television at a press conference soon after receiving Pfizer's vaccine at a Tennessee hospital.
Tiffany Dover, nurse manager, had been speaking to the media about the city's worst vaccination of frontline health workers when she collapsed.
Other sources, including the family, have said she died.
In order to cover it up, they brought up a crisis actor to replace her, who looks nothing like her, but was claimed to be Tiffany Dover.
She has a darker, different texture of complexion.
She has a different shape skull, different eyes.
It's all very embarrassing, but also revealing.
A couple weeks earlier, it was revealed in a document released by the Food and Drug Administration, six participants died during Pfizer's COVID vaccine trial.
Meanwhile, another volunteer has died during a trial of the COVID vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and Oxford University.
Absolutely embarrassingly bad.
Carl, your thoughts?
Anybody who has risen to power in the American government before the Trump administration is a criminal.
The United States is the most dangerous rogue state empire in history, with crime-centered and obvious lie-started illegal wars of aggression, bankster looting in the trillions every year, and quantifiable damages that every year millions are
killed through specifically poverty and war murder and the consequences of the debt system that the U.S.
manages to get these foreign countries in debt. Billions are harmed, trillions are looted. So Ray,
of course he's dirty and And whatever that stuff is with optics of his involvement with other countries, that is usual.
It is a global racket.
And then for Bill Gates, I mean, Jim, if you were to think historically of the number one person who would cause a virus, that's Bill Gates.
He lost in court for monopoly practices of inserting code to prevent competitors' programs from working Of, hey, sell me your software.
Those who refused found that their software no longer worked on Microsoft's operating system because of the intentional insertion of code.
So it is just upside down, and until these obvious criminals are arrested, it's scary.
Oh, you make great points, Carl, great points.
Yes, he has no medical background, no qualifications, he's not a virologist, he's not an epidemiologist, and yet he is posing as though he were an authority.
What he's actually doing is practicing medicine without a license.
When we return to Texas versus Pennsylvania, which the Supreme Court rejected on the specious grounds that Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections, which is absurd on its face, Every citizen has an interest, a judicially cognizable interest, in the manner in which the various states conduct their election, because if they're fraudulent, and especially if they lead to the imposition of an administration that was contrary to the will of the people, then they are forfeiting their rights under the Constitution, which the Supreme Court ought to be upholding.
It turns out that the Chief Justice who spearheaded that rejection has claimed to have proof of a conflict of interest as to why Chief Justice Roberts ought to step down.
Answer two simple questions, Linwood asks, and tell we the people all we need to know about you.
We, the people, are entitled to answers.
You work for us, Justice Roberts.
Answer these questions.
They will not go away.
You cannot fly truth away on an Epstein jet.
Here we know, too, earlier during a conversation with Justice Breyer that the Chief Justice had said on the 19th of August he would make sure the mother effort would never be re-elected.
When he had this conversation with Breyer about how to work to get Trump voted out.
Here's the information, too, that we have from Lynn Wood that Roberts arranged an illegal adoption of two young children from Wales through Jeffrey Epstein.
I think we can all agree Epstein knows pedophilia.
If only Jeffrey Epstein were still alive, wouldn't that be something?
Thereby hinting he actually is still alive, And here are the questions Linwood poses for Justice Roberts.
One, you're recorded discussing Justice Scalia's successor before the date of his sudden death.
How did you know Scalia was going to die?
And second, are you a member of any club or cabal requiring minor children as an initiation fee?
And where we know that Justice Roberts flew on the Epstein jet, known as the Lolita Express to his island in the Caribbean
known as Orgy Island. This is truly disgusting and disgraceful. Carl, your thoughts? Yeah, I
encourage our listeners to take the stand that what we're witnessing is anti-courts and anti-judges.
This is an Orwellian display.
I mean, the purpose of having a judicial branch is to settle legal arguments.
And if you have somebody who loves the law, you get a thorny issue and it's like, okay, let's go!
You invite the parties in and you get excited in order to have a fair Wow!
but we don't have a fair game.
And when the evidence points to the crooked rigged system that has been going on for decades,
all they can do is obfuscate and punt.
They won't touch it because they can't touch it.
Now, Lin Wood has been on fire, escalating those attacks and basically calling the Supreme Court Chief Justice
a pedophile.
Wow.
So between now and Wednesday, Oof, we'll see.
Oh, Carl, I agree.
I mean, what Linwood has exposed is already not only sufficient to disqualify the Chief Justice and Associate Justice Breyer from sitting on any election-related case, but to even sit on the Supreme Court of the United States.
If he had any integrity or decency whatsoever, he would resign from his position and allow someone with integrity to take his place.
Meanwhile, We welcome letters pro and con.
We have a comment here from William DeBerg, who has a legal background, who published a wonderful blog on jamesfetzer.org.
Here's what he has suggested.
If the Democrats succeed in pushing through the certification of Biden's victory on the 6th of January, then Trump team could appeal to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court could very reasonably declare only state legislatures have the constitutional prerogative of choosing electors, which none of them has done heretofore.
So SCOTUS can request all seven states in question must have their electors certified by their legislatures within one week.
If not enough state legislatures throw their electors to Biden to get up to 270, then the House votes on a one vote per state basis.
That would force GOP state legislators to vote against the massive fraud, which I don't think a sufficient number will do.
However, if SCOTUS accepts a congressional certification as is, Trump is finished unless he chooses not to leave office.
Then the only constitutional remedy is impeachment.
A lot depends on what evidence is forthcoming in the next few days.
Meanwhile, the reason he believes SCOTUS could rule to direct the legislatures to certify their electors is, first, it does fit within the framework of the Constitution, which specifies that the state legislatures have the sole power to determine how the state's electors will cast their votes, and The dressing ground by the corrupt pedophile Roberts last month pissed off Alito and Thomas and may have done the same with the three new Trump judges to lead them to move forward.
Meanwhile, is 60 Minutes knowingly interviewing a fake Lenny Posner about alleged FEMA false flag event known as Sandy Hawk?
60 Minutes will interview the alleged Lenny Posner last night, who claims to have lost his son at Sandy Hook, but whom some believe to be both dead and a former agent of the Mossad during a program scheduled to be broadcast last night.
Here we have a report about it.
Wow!
60 Minutes interviews Lenny Posner whose son Noah was killed in Sandy Hook, or so many believe.
CBS had to hire specialized makeup artists to disguise Posner because of the threats he faces from conspiracy theorists.
Robert David Steele published a blog about it where I wrote, since the real Lenny Posner, who appears to have been using a fake name from the beginning, has had his photograph published worldwide millions of times, why would he need to disguise his image unless it's not the same guy?
When I challenged his identity in court, the judge would not allow it and awarded legal fees for my attempts at discovery.
See Conspiracy Theory Settled in Contempt of Court on my blog, which reported on the first of several actions by the court.
Below left and right are photos of the original Lenny Posner, compared to a photo of the man who appeared for a video deposition in Dane County under the same name, but who appears to be at least 20 years younger and over 100 pounds lighter, and thus appears to have impersonated the earlier man using that name.
Here are the photographs.
On the left and right, the man whose image has been broadcast millions of times around the world in the middle, the man who appeared for the video deposition, in my opinion, clearly not the same person.
Yet every effort I made to expose this hoax Including repeatedly informing the court that fraud was being perpetrated upon the court, because this man who gave the video deposition was not the same man whom I had discussed in the book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hawk.
The court was unavailing.
Meanwhile, Kelly Watt, Who has been very perceptive.
Notice a striking similarity between Noah Posner, who is supposed to be deceased, on the upper left, and his older stepbrother, Michael Vagner.
So a half a dozen of us went to work on this issue, and we found they had the same eyes, they had the same eyebrows, they had the same nose, they had the same mouth, they had the same shape and skull size, and the same ears.
In other words, it appears that Noah Bosner was actually photographs of Michael Vabner when he was a child, and this is how they faked the children at Sandy Hook.
In fact, Mona Alexis Presley has produced proof that some of the parents even cynically used photographs of themselves when they were children to establish that they had lost children at Sandy Hook.
Wolfgang Halbig, a while back, published a photograph by Michael Duffy of 11 of the grown-up kids, the women, the girls from Sandy Hook, who look very much alive and perky, definitely not dead.
Where we need to appreciate fraud vitiates everything it touches.
Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters.
Fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments.
U.S.
versus Thorpe Morton, 1878.
Carl, your thoughts?
Regarding what's going to happen with the election, who knows?
The trump cards have not been played.
And these are game changers.
You have the contents of the Wiener laptop, of Hunter's laptop.
You have whatever was procured from the arrest of Epstein and Maxwell, even Weinstein.
So, and you can declassify all of the internal communications among all of the criminals who used backless Russiagate as demonstrated in the crimeless impeachment and the illegal prosecution of General Flynn.
So, I am still in the corner that the White Hats are commanding this as a show, and that the name of the game is to get all of the Black Hats standing.
More importantly, for the American people to see how corrupt the system is.
And I think that one of the best case studies on the planet is your court case.
Where this was an absolute show trial to, the same thing with the election fraud, is that they had to stop you from presenting any evidence.
They had to.
Because they have nothing to say about the evidence.
And then this last thing, they needed a better actor, Jim.
That's why they made up that excuse that they needed to put makeup on the guy.
Because they needed to get a better actor to sell it better.
That's hilarious.
But I bet you're not laughing.
It's really embarrassing, Carl.
I mean, this fraud and chicanery is never-ending.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send us email pro or con to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Remember, False Flag and Conspiracies 2020, presented on the 5th or 6th of December, is now available to the public at falsefiedconspiracies2020.com. All 24 presentations are
available, either one by one or collectively. I do all this representing the secret of
freedom lies in educating people, while the secret of tyranny lies in keeping them ignorant.
Remember, it's not coincidental that all corporate media are all in to facilitate the demand and
fear that Democrats need to achieve their objectives.
Thus, there's an alignment of all big government institutions and multinationals to support the same.
Nothing is coincidental.
Everything is political.
It's not about the virus.
It's all about control.
Meanwhile, Moonrock Books.
We have published a dozen volumes, and would you believe, Carl, six of them have been banned by Amazon.
Not only nobody died at Sandy Hook, but also, and nobody died in Boston either, but also from Orlando to Dallas and beyond, but also political theater in Charlottesville, but also the Bargland Puzzle, how the pieces fit together, and even And I suppose we didn't go to the moon either.
That, not because of all the evidence that refutes the very idea we went to the moon, but other essays that contradict the official narrative of the Holocaust and the death camps in Germany, which the ADL asked Amazon to ban, leading to some 2,000 books being banned by Amazon.
Meanwhile, your final thoughts, my friend?
Well, as my friend Buckminster Fuller wrote 40 years ago, is that humanity is in a final exam.
And he framed it as, the exam is simple.
It's that, will human beings have the integrity to tell the truth?
The whole truth and nothing but the truth.
And, you know, in my own spiritual reflection, this choice needs to be freely made.
So we are powerless messengers.
We are doing our best in good faith professionalism as scholars to point to evidence that we professionally stand for is clearly explained, documented, and independently verifiable.
So to the extent that people want to examine the facts, You know, you are the top scholar that I know of on the planet to demonstrate this stuff, but people will have to make that choice for themselves if they want to stand and express and utilize their education, or if they're going to self-identify as a sheeple to be dictated to.
Well, Carl, thank you for those comments.
We have a follower who says he could listen to you endlessly.
He's such a fan.
And I must say how much I appreciate you're doing these shows with me.
You are simply superb.
Let me sum up the situation.
An election was stolen with a massive theft.
It was very blatant, used multiple venues to steal the election, especially Dominion voting machines that were specifically designed for the purpose to turn Trump votes into Biden, to delete Trump votes, to even print up new ballots if they needed because they had a printer as a part.
A legitimate count would show that Donald Trump won the election, With some 73 million honest votes from American citizens that Joe Biden lagged way behind with a max of around 23 million.
They had to make up 50 million fraudulent votes to steal the election from Donald Trump.
This must not be allowed to stand.
If the courts fail us, if the Congress fails us, since the states have been proven to be corrupt, if their legislatures likewise fail us, we the people have no alternative but to take up arms and by opposing end the tyranny that would be otherwise imposed upon us.
I say with all sincerity, we have an obligation to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.
We have nothing to lose but the chains they intend to wrap around us.
This is a time where all Americans must come to the defense of the nation.
January 6th is going to be a pivotal day in the history of the United States, and we may well be crossing the Rubicon.