All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 14, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
01:20:21
Need to Know: The Fetzer Report Episode 85 - 11 December 2020
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, with Michael Ivey in Asheville, North Carolina, and Chris Weinert in Detroit, Michigan.
We're here to share with you all the news you need to know.
So, let's go.
This is the Daily News.
We begin with an update, 21-7.
21 states now support the Texas lawsuit.
42% of America is suing 8%.
It's fascinating.
The states that have joined together include Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Indiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Ohio, West Virginia, and Florida.
The battleground states are filing fiery condemnations.
These are responses to the case being brought against them where the Pennsylvania filing describes the move by Attorney General Ken Paxton and supported by President Trump as using a cacophony of bogus claims in support of a seditious abuse of the judicial process Resting on a surreal alternative reality.
As though the case had no basis in fact or law.
There's a wonderful summary of the lawsuit by Robert Manson on my blog.
Check it out there.
This is so important I'm going to go through it.
It's very concise.
Texas claims that presidential elections as held and directed by government officials outside the legislature In Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan, all flagrantly violated their own election laws by materially weakening or doing away with security measures.
Further, according to the U.S.
Constitution, the legislature, representing the citizens of each state, has absolute authority and responsibility for how presidential electors are chosen, the will of the legislature being expressed through state law.
Texas claims that the violations of state law and the election law in these states created an environment where ballot fraud was enabled and likely to occur.
The lawsuit lists the violations of law in each of the defendant's states, produces evidence of fraud, including the number of ballots handled unconstitutionally in each of the states, sufficient to change the outcome of the ballot count.
That's important to note.
Were it not the case that the result of this election would make a difference to the outcome, the Supreme Court would not take it.
Now, for each state, they break it down into facts, violations, and evidence.
Pennsylvania, facts.
Vote tally.
3,445,548 for Biden.
3,363,951 for Trump.
A margin of 81,597.
Requests for mail-in ballots.
3,363,951 for Trump, a margin of 81,597.
Requests for mail-in ballots, 70% Democrat, 25% Republican.
Mail-in ballots increase, get this, from 266,208 in 2016 to over 3 million in 2020.
Bye.
Violations of election law.
The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court changed the existing deadline for receiving mail-in ballots from 8 p.m.
the day of the election to three days after, and adopted a presumption that non-postmarked ballots be considered as valid.
Election officials in Pennsylvania and Allegheny counties did not follow state law permitting poll watchers to be present for the opening, counting, and recording of mail-in ballots.
The Secretary of State directed election officials to remove ballots before 7 a.m.
on the day of the election in order to cure or correct defective mail-in ballots.
But this was done only in Democrat-majority counties.
Election officials did not segregate ballots received after 8 p.m.
Election Day, breaking the promise it had made to the U.S.
Supreme Court, making it impossible to identify or remove those ballots.
Take special note.
Evidence of fraud.
Ballots with no mail date, 9,005.
No evidence they were sent to a voter.
Ballots returned on or before the mail date.
58,221.
That's pretty nifty.
Ballots returned one day after the mail date.
51,200.
Perhaps not impossible, but highly unlikely for the average voter to receive a ballot, fill it out, place it in the mail, and have it returned the following day.
Plus, on November 2nd, the day before the election, Pennsylvania reported 2.7 million ballots had been sent out.
On November 4th, however, that number had increased to 3.1.
More than 400,000 mail-in ballots in addition at election time, with literally no reasonable chance of them being used by legitimate voters.
Georgia.
Facts.
Vote tally.
2,472,098 for Biden and 2,458,121 for Trump.
A margin of 12,670.
Mail-in ballots.
2,098 for Biden and 2,458,121 for Trump, a margin of 12,670.
Mail-in ballots, 65.32% for Biden, 34.68% for Trump.
Mail-in ballots increased from 200.
Over 800,000 additional mail-in ballots.
in 2016 to 1,305,659 in 2020, over 800,000 additional mail-in ballots.
Violations of election law.
The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated signature verification requirements for mail-in
ballots.
The Secretary of State authorized opening and processing mail-in ballots up to three weeks before Election Day, when the law prohibits that until after the polls open on Election Day.
The Secretary of State materially weakened the security requirements for ballot rejection based on signature verification or other missing information, evidence of fraud.
Mail-in ballot rejection rate for missing or inaccurate information or for non-matching signatures decreased from 6.42 in 2016 to 0.36 in 2020.
4.2 in 2016 to 0.36 in 2020. Rejecting 2020 ballots at the same rate as 2016 would have
yielded a net gain of 25,587 votes for Trump, twice the number needed to overcome Biden's count,
with a six-fold increase in the number of bail-in ballots.
Reason would indicate that the rejection rate would increase or at least stay the same
with so many first-time mail-in ballots.
Michigan.
Facts.
Vote tally.
2,796,702 for Biden.
2,650,695 for Trump.
796,702 for Biden, 2,650,695 for Trump.
Margin, 146,007.
In 2016, 587,618 voters requested mail-in ballots.
In 2020...
In 2020, 3.2 million votes were cast by mail-in ballots.
Staggering.
Democrats voted by mail at a rate approximately twice that of Republican voters.
Violations of election law.
The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.
The Secretary of State sent out unsolicited ballots to all 7.7 registered voters, contrary to election law, which requires a voter to request a mail-in ballot through a process that includes a signature to be matched with a voter registration.
The Secretary of State also allowed absentee ballots to be requested online without signature verification.
Local election officials in Wayne County, containing 322,925 more ballots for Biden than for Trump, opened and processed mail-in ballots without poll watchers present.
Local election officials in Wayne County also ignored the strict election law requirements of placing a written statement or stamp on each ballot envelope indicating that the vote signature was in fact checked and verified with a signature on file with the state.
Evidence of fraud.
174,384 mail-in ballots in Wayne County have no valid registration number, indicating they likely resulted from election workers running the same ballots through the tabulator multiple times.
71% of Wayne County absent voter counting boards were unbalanced, where the number of people who checked in did not match the number of ballots cast.
Wisconsin.
Facts.
Vote tally.
1,630,716 for Biden.
1,610,151 for Trump.
1,630,716 for Biden, 1,610,151 for Trump, margin 20,565.
Margin, 20,565.
Mail-in ballots increased from 146,932 in 2016 to 1,275,019 in 2020.
That's an increase of over a million.
violations of election law.
The Wisconsin Election Commission, WEC, positioned hundreds of unmanned illegal drop boxes to collect absentee ballots.
Use of any drop box, manned or unmanned, is directly prohibited by Wisconsin statute.
Any alternative mail-in ballot site shall be staffed by the Municipal Clerk or the Executive Director of the Board of Election Commissioners.
Ballots cast in contravention of the procedures specified in those provisions may not be included in the certified result of any election.
The WEC encouraged voters to unlawfully declare themselves indefinitely confined in order to avoid security measures like signature verification and photo ID requirements.
Nearly 216,000 voters said they were indefinitely confined in 2020, nearly four times as many as 2016.
Strict laws requiring mail-in voters to certify by signature, including the signature of an adult witness, were ignored or circumvented by election officials.
Evidence of fraud.
100,000 ballots were supposedly missing and directed to be found after election day.
Conclusion.
Significant violations of election laws that were put into place to protect against election fraud is sufficient to invalidate the results of the elections, apart from whatever evidence is able to be gathered in a short time to show the actual number of fraudulent ballots.
Reason would indicate that there's a high number of fraudulent ballots that are impossible to identify, which is why the election laws pertain to mail-in ballots were established to begin with.
There is no remedy to crack the November 3rd election because ballots that did not adhere to election law cannot be identified and separated from those that did.
An accurate account of legal ballots that were cast cannot be made.
Therefore, as directed by the Constitution, it falls to the legislature of each state to choose electors as has been done in the past.
Failing that, each state may determine not to submit any presidential electors.
A further thought from Colorado.
Attorney General Phil Weiser called the Texas lawsuit a Hail Mary attempt to undermine the presidential election and overturn the will of the voters.
But it's obvious with a massive voting fraud, the will of the voters was overturned by election fraud.
There doesn't appear to be any doubt about it.
Michael, your thoughts.
I'm going back to that first slide.
Oh, wait a minute.
I think I just found another Biden voter.
I'm sure that the election officials won't mind if I helped her sign her ballot.
That's right.
That's right.
They won't mind.
On a serious note, going back to that first slide, the 42% suing the 8%, is that by population of the states involved?
Yeah, I believe it is.
Yes.
All right, and it struck me that it was extremely hard to make the claim.
What was the claim of the four states?
That it was a bogus claim?
And a seditious abuse of judicial process.
That's a laughable claim in itself when you've got this many states jumping on board saying, yes, we believe in this and we want to see this through.
Well, Michael, you're 100% correct.
I mean, the Democrats have been nailed, caught with their pants down.
They've got to fabricate something.
They don't have any real arguments or they're just using spin language to denigrate without any evidence or law to support it.
Chris, your thoughts?
Michael, I'll come back to you.
Chris.
Well, I think the Democratic Party has always had a tradition, maybe not a proud one, of using peer pressure to turn coal into diamonds, and in many cases, Well, I think what they're doing here is almost like they're doing some sort of occult magic where they announce their magic deed in advance and almost have to turn out like three parts of the magic trick as it goes along.
Like the pledge, the turn, and then the prestige.
At this point, they have to get away with the deception or the illusion that they've pulled off.
And in many cases, it's by putting the observer or the onlooker on the defensive.
And that is really how they often do this is, you know, a Clinton tactic accusing them of their own misdeeds, you know, preemptively so that any sort of counter accusations of the real deal would seem absurd or seem like you're mimicking them at best.
So, yeah, there's a lot of stuff that Could be brought to light with, you know, Biden only winning one out of six counties across the country.
That's pretty wild.
I'd have to say that the term of the MSM using baseless claims is something I hear them say all the time.
Unwarranted claims or accusations of election fraud.
Well, there's so many instances that you've named, and these are just the instances that have been exposed.
And how many more have they gotten away with or have not been scrutinized by the correct due process?
So there's a lot of Wow, concerns that I would have to say about this.
And if you look at, like, say, the concept of, like, gaslighting in the mainstream media and how they use these inversions and, you know, the full court press, the concept of the press itself is, I think, derived from the concept of impressment.
And it's almost like how they used, you know, press gangs or things like this to impose people into service or voluntary or involuntary servitude of partisan lines based by, you know, More or less lead pipe diplomacy.
So yeah, from Boss Tweed to August Belmont to FDR to LBJ, these guys got a lot of these new advancements in by such similar tactics with the full support of the media.
And really, I think this is not a new tactic, it's just they're doing it with a new sort of technocratic feudalism they're trying to impose, and it's creating new innovations in terms of old formulas they've always used.
Very nice points, Chris.
Michael, I know you want to add.
Yeah, there was a couple of points.
Number one, it was my understanding that the Supreme Court has already agreed to hear this case.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Okay.
And the second one was that the huge jumps that you were going through a minute ago in the mail-in ballots will, of course, they'll try to blame that on the pandemic.
And no doubt that was part of the plan all along in maintaining lockdowns for as long as they have.
The agenda in general is worldwide, so it's no doubt multifaceted.
But here in the United States, I bet part of that agenda would be to facilitate removing Trump from office, and having all these mail-in ballots is obviously a way to do it.
But of course, yes!
In fact, the whole CV was to give the cover for the mail-in ballots they intended to steal the election, you know, as though we were a third-world country.
And on a bigger scale, Fetz, if you don't mind me jumping in here real quick, to get back to that, they almost ran this COVID thing as a cover fire.
I was talking with Michael offline about a bill that was passed in Michigan in June of 2019, Yep.
about this very COVID type of protection that they have just a state law that was passed in.
So they knew this was coming six months before event 201 or the perbride or any of the other stuff.
This is something that they've had lined up for a while, the life in the post-truth world,
the World Economic Forum's reset.
So there's a lot of convenient things that are being delivered by the smart virus,
which is conveniently or selectively applied in terms of fear or concern or manipulation.
So great points, Michael.
And I'm sorry to jump in on you there, Fetz, but I just wanted to add that to your points.
No, no, no.
You guys are doing terrific.
You're welcome.
Meanwhile, Eric Swalwell, Refuses to admit wrongdoing over a top-secret friendship with a Chinese spy, Fang Fang.
Demands a probe into who leaked the story, while refusing to say if he slept with her, which obviously means he did.
Eric Swalwell said Wednesday he wants a public probe into who leaked, in other words, shifting attention from the message to the messenger, regarding his relationship with Chinese honey trap Honey Pot really spied Christine Fang Fang.
He claimed the timing of the leak was questionable as it was in 2019 when he was working on impeachment against President Trump.
I hope it's investigated into who leaked this information.
Notice he's not denying any of it.
Swalwell said he cut off ties with Fang in 2015 when he was briefed by the intel community on concern over Fang's behavior with California politicians.
Fang liked the video posted by Joshua Swalwell featuring Eric in November 2016.
Flowell refused to say whether he had a sexual relationship with her.
The lawmaker was unmarried at the time he knew Fang from 2012 to 2015.
The California congressman is just one of a group of Democrats targeted by the Chinese spy, where she is known to have had sexual relationships with two Midwestern mayors.
Here she is, Fang Fang, fetching young woman, Congressman declared Wednesday there'd be an investigation into who leaked.
I hope it will be investigated.
Trying to get himself out of the snares of an awful, awful scandal here.
Here's another photograph on her Facebook friend.
She's still in contact with Swalwell's father, Eric Sr., and brother, Joshua, on Facebook.
Meanwhile, here's what we know and what we don't.
Who is Christine Fangfang?
If that's a real name, arrived in the U.S.
as a Chinese national student at Cal State East Bay in 2011 as an undergraduate.
Even though she appeared to be in her late 20s or early 30s already, she became president of the Chinese Student Association, used her position to become part of the area's democratic political scene.
How did she meet Swalwell?
Sometime in 2012, exactly how is unclear, she was almost ubiquitous at political events, not just Democrat ones, in the Bay Area from 2013 to 15.
Swalwell won his district in 2013 and before that was a member of the Dublin City Council.
Pictures of them together at political events in the area.
He refused to say whether the relationship was sexual, saying it was a matter of national security.
I mean, this is as absurd as denying access to information about the assassination of JFK on the grounds of national security.
If, in fact, the official account were true, that disgruntled ex-Marine Lee Oswald got off a couple of lucky shots, then there is no national security aspect to it.
This is clearly covering his misconduct.
If the FBI was following her and bugging her, they have a good idea of whether the two did or not, but they could not legally have eavesdropped on him as a congressman if they did so intentionally.
That would be a major breach of the law.
Swalwell was divorced from his first wife by 2012, married his second, Brittany Watts, in 2016.
How'd the FBI find out about her?
She seems to have been monitored since she was a student, but exactly when FBI surveillance operation started is unknown.
It is known she had contact with a suspected Chinese intelligence officer stationed at its San Francisco consulate.
Diplomatic communications are routinely monitored.
Whom else did she ensnare?
Feng had sex with two unnamed mayors, one of an obscure Ohio city, anywhere with a population of more than 5,000, Ohio is a city, and one an older mayor from the Midwest.
They had sex in a car, but he claimed he was teaching her English.
Both encounters were overheard by the FBI.
She's also Facebook friends with current and former mayors and attended get-togethers for urban leaders.
Why was she not arrested?
It's unclear, but counterintelligence operations by the FBI are often intended to simply disrupt enemy spying and get them out of the country.
Fang seemed to have known she was compromised when she vanished in 2015.
Did Swalwell do anything wrong?
So far, the leaked FBI investigation in Swalwell's own account is clear that he acted properly cutting ties with her when the FBI told her she was a danger to national security.
However, her lingering presence in his family's Facebook friendship circuit must raise questions about the extent to which he cut ties.
Why haven't we known about this before?
The FBI keeps its secrets close to its vest, and disrupting a spy who is targeting at least two members of Congress would have been a major coup for its counterintelligence agents.
Letting China know just how much the agency had come to understand of Feng's activity in her four years in the U.S.
helps them hone their espionage in the future to make it more difficult to detect.
Let me just add that Nancy Pelosi has been defending Eric Swalwell, and frankly, this is getting very, very embarrassing.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, on the surface of this story, which I haven't paid a lot of attention to, it looks like business as usual with a spy in a honey trap with a politician that's in a good spot to know things.
And I have really no interest in the lurid details that keep being brought up about, did they have sex?
I don't know.
That doesn't mean anything to me.
And what makes me curious is that I don't have much confidence in the FBI as a viable entity that is what it poses to be working for the American people.
So it makes me curious why this story came up at this time, and it makes me think that there might be a backstory here.
Because Basically, the basic setup is that she was a spy, and he was on the House Intelligence Committee.
So, that's all I got.
Well, Nancy Pelosi had put him on the Intelligence Community, and of course, this is not the first time.
Dianne Feinstein turned out to have a chauffeur who'd been a Chinese spy for 20-25 years.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, since the late 70s, you've always seen the open door policy and this group of people that have been delivering this UN colonialization agenda through Rockefeller and Rothschild, delivering this type of outsourcing of United States production of goods and labor.
And then, of course, when it goes horribly wrong, they want us to go and back them up to enforce their intellectual property.
And in the case of this honey trap and conditioning these operatives, it's probably two of the oldest professions in the world.
And you got to really look at, like I said, this UN and UK colonialization model where they do condition and train these Janissaries, not only in their own countries to betray their own kind and kinfolk, but then to come to America and really deliver in these unconstitutional, supposed new absurdities, which we're calling the new normal.
So, you know, whether it's wearing a mask or, you know, political corruption or things of this nature, they always seem to go hand in hand and always seem to be funded by the same group of people.
So I'm really looking at this from a 5,000 foot view, maybe.
But yeah, I think that it's kind of a formula that seems to be pretty consistent.
What are your thoughts?
Oh, yes.
Oh, yes.
As Michael says, it's business as usual, but very, very embarrassing to the Democratic Party and to Nancy Pelosi in particular.
Well, Kevin McCarthy has called for the removal of the congressman.
He's demanding he be thrown out.
California's Eric Swalwell.
Very appropriate.
It doesn't bode well for Mrs. Swalwell.
We don't yet know exactly the nature of his relationship, but Republicans are not sleeping on this story.
House Minority Leader McCarthy is demanding answers and he wants Swalwell removed, not just from the powerful Intelligence Committee, but from Congress entirely.
The Daily Wire wrote, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, Republican of California, called for Representative Eric Swalwell, Democrat of California, who sits on the House Intelligence Committee, to be removed from Congress.
Following an explosive report this week about his connections to a suspected Chinese spy, McCarthy noted members of the House Intelligence Committee get classified information that other members of the Congress do not get.
That should trouble most Americans.
What did Swalwell know on this important committee that he might have passed on to Fang?
And if he really was that close to the spy, is it possible she was influencing some of his decisions?
McCarthy seems to think so, pointing to recent decisions by the committee to axe his China task force.
Removal from the Intelligence Committee should only be the start.
It's good politics, but also, I think, good national security to pursue this.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, just as an adjunct to the story in general, what I found of interest in what you just read is evidently this committee deep-sixed a China task force that McCarthy had been running, and that brings up some motivational characteristics.
Oh, no doubt about it.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I think that sometimes there seems to be a case of, like, selective ethics or even ethnics in case of this scrutiny in terms of national security.
And if national security in, let's say, China and Israel are two different things, you know, it's amazing to see that China has got the molehill when the mountains are staring us right in the face.
I think it's kind of a distraction away from that at a conveniently placed and conveniently time when like most of these events really are that are sensationalized by the mainstream media and that of course it's like red meat being thrown to these politicians who are whose lives are on the line too so I think it's kind of funny how these guys just just zoom in and zoom out whatever they want and at whatever they want and I I think if they were really concerned about national security, they would be dealing with not only election fraud, but this COVID fraud and the surveillance state and this technocratic feudalism that's trying to be imposed upon us and really try to deliver justice to the people and not something that is just some of the sensationalized rhetoric.
I'm talking about actual justice.
Yeah, I'd like to see something.
The first thing Chris said there was very good and that was we've got a country that's basically being run by dual Israeli citizens behind the scenes and with money behind the scenes and that they keep demonizing China in one way or another so it is like a giant distraction from the elephant in the room.
Yeah, Russia too.
Yeah, you're making an excellent point.
Get this, CNN finally covers the Hunter Biden story, omits the name of the key witness, faces a backlash for waiting until after the election.
Where was this report in October?
After going quiet months before the election, CNN is now actively reporting the federal investigation into the business dealings of Hunter Biden.
Now that the election is over, a media reporting of Hunter Biden's business deals with foreign governments has entered a new phase as federal prosecutors in Delaware, along with the IRS Criminal Investigation Agency and the FBI, have issued subpoenas and are seeking interviews in their investigation.
Biden's finances are being scrutinized as federal authorities want to know whether he or his associates violated tax and money laundering laws in their business deals with China and other foreign countries.
No doubt about it.
Two sources speaking with CNN said he has been under investigation at least since 2018.
CNN credited Sinclair Broadcast Group with reporting the existence of the FBI investigation on October 29.
CNN did not cover it when it was reported just days before the presidential election.
They also ignored the Smoking Gun New York Post report about emails obtained from laptops allegedly belonging to Hunter Biden.
Showing Biden pursuing lasting and lucrative business ties with a Chinese energy company, and of course a host of other allured, scandalous activities.
To the extent to which CNN did cover the story, the network sought to discredit the Post's reporting by alleging the emails were part of a Russian disinformation campaign.
Where have we heard that before?
They certainly ignored Tony Bobulinski, who came on to Tucker Carlson with the largest, highest rated show in cable history, 7.8 million.
To hear what Tony Bobulinski had to say about it, this is really stunning.
Others have criticized CNN's lack of coverage on the Hunter Biden story, including Richard Grenell, former acting director of national intelligence.
Responding to CNN anchor Jack Taper after Taper shared this story, demanding to know if he was instructed not to report the Hunter Biden investigation when the story broke.
Actually, the FBI has had the laptop for practically a full year.
It's really outrageous.
Journalist Piers Morgan, a self-described liberal and former CNN employee, bashed his former employer in a blistering op-ed.
Criticizing the mainstream media for its shameful dereliction of journalistic duty driven by inherent liberal bias.
Noting that he publicly said so at the time as a liberal himself.
If I were appearing on Steltzer's show this Sunday, I might ask him if he's still comfortable that CNN refused to pursue the Post story before the election.
And what would they have done if it had been about Donald Trump Jr.
instead?
This is all very serious stuff.
Glenn Greenwald has added they spread two CIA lies.
First, the docs were disinformation, and two, this came from Russia.
That's a choice the media outlets make.
They got the election outcome they wanted, but their reputation and legacy will have to live with the choices they have made.
Michael, your thoughts.
I want one of those t-shirts that that woman had that says, is that true or did you hear it on CNN?
I have a special enmity for CNN because I was kind of a CNN junkie to some extent before 9-11 happened and my realization that the entirety of the media was controlled for message and since then it's only gotten worse.
Um, that the fact that they come up with some information on Hunter Biden now is, uh, you know, it's just too little too late.
It's trying to maintain a.
A patina of being good journalists.
And that statement by Piers Morgan might be the best thing I've ever heard Piers Morgan say.
A shameful dereliction of journalistic duty driven by inherent liberal bias.
That's a pretty good phrase right there.
Nice.
Very nice, Michael.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I'd like to point out that there's been a systematic effort to try to dumb down the cognitive abilities of the next generations of Americans through the Common Core and educational systems, and especially through the dialogue that's being offered by the mainstream media as well.
These guys are collaborating with these war crimes and really ushering in this type of perception management.
And really anybody that questions it is gaslit as some sort of conspiracy theorist
or something of this extent.
And something couldn't, I guess that couldn't be farther from the truth,
but I guess given who it's coming from, you gotta look at it and take it with a grain.
These guys are really covering up for some Olympic level perverts
that have fallen upwards into positions of nepotism and things like this.
So I think it's pretty disgusting to see the vested interest as well as the,
well, let's just say the interest to avoid the public scrutiny and justice.
They really have to maintain the illusion of diligence, but not the actual deliverance of it.
So I think that's really what this whole thing's about.
And then maybe with the metrics and Cambridge Analytics and social media, they can see how far they got to push the theatrics to, you know, bring this this optic in.
Excellent.
I love that phrase.
Olympic-level perverts.
Did you like that, Michael?
That's exactly what I was going to say, Jim.
That's another good turn of the phrase.
It is.
Perfect.
Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi.
Republicans are focused on Eric Swalwell to distract from QAnon.
I mean, this is about as inane as it gets.
This is ridiculous.
He's trying to deflect attention from the fact he has QAnon in his delegation over there, and I think is a danger in terms of our debate here, she said, alluding to Republican Congresswoman-elect Marjorie Taylor Greene in Georgia.
Axios reported Wednesday that a suspected Chinese spy, Fang Fang, helped fundraise for Swalwell and even placed an intern in his office.
Swalwell's office has refused to respond to questions about his relationship after Fox News host Dr. Carlson reported that intelligence officials believe the Democrat congressman had a sexual relationship with her.
And Michael, actually, the fact that someone's having sex with someone else makes them far more likely to share information that would be normally regarded as inappropriate.
So I don't think it's irrelevant.
Meanwhile, Hillary, the election was not close.
No evidence of fraud.
Think about that.
Maybe they should run her down to the Supreme Court to argue the case on behalf of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia.
The emperor has no clothes.
Republican electeds who continue to humor him have no spines.
Hillary, of course, is as despicable as they get.
She never would acknowledge her loss in 2016.
She's been a major power behind all these ongoing efforts to discredit the Trump administration and drive him out of office.
Others have given testimony at public forums, including a USPS subcontractor who gave testimony on observing that his trailer, which carried thousands of ballots, went missing.
Over the week, two dozen lawmakers signed a letter to President Trump urging him to direct Attorney General William Barr to appoint a special counsel Here we have Representative Lance Goodham tweeting, Last week I asked that real Donald Trump instruct the Attorney General to appoint a special counsel to investigate election irregularities.
Now 26 Republican colleagues have joined me in calling for an independent investigation to restore faith in our elections.
So, what do we have here, going into the holidays?
Treason greetings!
Hunter Biden, Eric Swalwell, and their ho ho ho, fang fang.
Very nice image, how appropriate.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, let's see.
This thing that Nancy Pelosi is on here saying, I don't even know what she's talking about.
Republicans focused on Swalwell scandal to distract from QAnon?
What?
I don't even know what the connection is between those two things.
And it's more of the same.
What can I say?
I agree it was a very stupid remark by Nancy Pelosi, but I don't think she had much else she could add.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I had the pleasure of watching a documentary on Nancy Pelosi called The Dark Crystal.
It was on Netflix.
Pretty interesting thing to watch there.
I don't know if you guys had seen that or even caught the joke.
Anyways, I'd also like to point out that they're trying to sensationalize the concept of sex, you know, the stuff that people used to have before this COVID panic disrupted every household, tore it in half, and has every man on earth being hand-pecked to death by the sense of collaboration with this lunacy.
The brave new normal, you know, brought into exploit the feeble-mindedness of cowards, into some irrational and unwarranted sense of absurdities
that has been embraced in the place of common sense.
So I've seen, you know, pretty much up is down in this brave new world.
So it doesn't surprise me at all what Hillary Clinton and all these people are saying.
It's bizarro speak like they always do.
Oh, one more comment.
That tweet by Lance Gooden talking about 26 Republicans trying to get William Barr to do something
about election irregularities.
That's what the latest article by the great John Rappaport is about.
Normally, he only handles medical stuff, but this time he took on the election fraud.
And if you'll indulge me just a minute, let me Read this list that he lays out.
Go ahead.
Ballots.
This is from Rappaport's last, and he's taking William Barr to task for having said that in general, well, I don't see anything that would change the election.
And so here's the list.
Ballot stuffing, invented ballots, backdated ballots, failure to allow observers to monitor vote counting, statistical anomalies showing impossible vote results.
Vote switching from Trump to Biden, electronic machine vulnerabilities, software backdoors, fractional vote counts instead of raw number counts, Dominion and Smartmatic connections to foreign entities, the vote count apparatus connected to the internet, background, battleground states stopping the vote on election night, After which huge numbers of votes changed from Trump to Biden.
Alarming numbers of affidavits from poll watchers attesting to fraud.
Boarded up windows to block observers.
Observers intimidated and ordered to move away from vote counting.
Reputable data analysts stating vote fraud was occurring on a large scale.
And he sums that up by saying, other than that, there's no hint of impropriety.
Yeah, I like that.
Frankly, that was an absurd statement from the Attorney General and completely expanded any lingering confidence I had in him.
Chris, did you have a further thought?
Yeah, I wanted to jump in there and say just one of those instances in themselves would be, to my opinion, would be a very base full claim, you know, and the fact that this has happened in multiple instances in a 50 state solution across the country in many different ways.
It would probably indicate that there is not only malice aforethought, but the cover-up is more absurd and outrageous than the actual misdeed itself, in my opinion, because of the insurmountable evidence that is accumulated here, and how quick they are to dismiss this as irrational, while they put the irrational out there and expect people to embrace this.
It is truly, the mainstream media has become public enemy number one here, and I don't think they're really doing anything good for the people with what they're doing right now.
And these people that are going along with it, I think it should be, you know, part of the test.
And I think they're really should be judged accordingly.
And the Attorney General, I think, thereby completely discredited himself.
We're already hearing reports he will not be serving in the next administration and that he may retire from the office early.
Very, very bad.
Meanwhile, We'll be right back, but get this, explosive Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau requested Chinese troops be stationed in Canada.
This is astonishing.
Justin Trudeau invited Chinese People's Liberation Army to send its troops for cold weather training in Ontario, and Trudeau raged that the Canadian Armed Forces were canceling the training After China kidnapped Canadian citizens Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig.
I mean, this is outrageous.
The documents the government handed over have been posted at the China Files.
Ezra Levant provided a comment.
I don't think any Canadians knew that Trudeau has been training the Chinese army here on Canadian soil at Canadian force bases.
It's shocking to me Canada would train a communist dictatorship in winter warfare techniques that could theoretically be used against us and will surely be used against our ally India as well as against Chinese citizens and Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong.
The anti-American language in the secret documents is deeply worrying, as it shows China is reorienting itself away from our traditional democracy allies and toward the world's worst tyrants, much like Pierre Trudeau tried to do during the Cold War.
Wow, that hurts.
Meanwhile, days after Trump signs America First executive order, his presidential approval rating gets a bomb.
I have mixed feelings about this.
No matter how the election turns out, Trump will go down as the America First president, continue to fight and work hard for the American people.
He just signed an order that will ensure Americans get first access to the COVID vaccine.
He previously promised it would be available free of charge.
Since signing that order, his approval ratings came out from Rasmussen.
The Rasmussen Daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows 50% of likely U.S.
voters approve of President Trump's job performance, 49% disapprove.
The latest figures include 39% who strongly approve and 39% who strongly disapprove.
This gives him a Presidential Approval Index rating of zero because they cancel out.
As we've seen, Trump continues to score high approval numbers despite four years of endless negative coverage from the mainstream.
Americans approve of what he's doing to ensure a vaccine made available and the China virus becomes a thing of the past.
Why would Americans give him such high marks if they really wanted Joe Biden to replace him?
And why would they approve of him as he fights court battles to challenge the election?
Meanwhile, I think You know, he's doing something here with COVID, but I'm not 100% confident what it is.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, the way that I read that is that Americans are looking at what their choices are, and they like Trump better than the alternative, because You know, like Chris said earlier, the mainstream media is the worst enemy of the American people.
And the way that they've trashed Trump for four years for him to still be getting 50% approval rating means that they're not believing the mainstream media and they're looking at what their choices are and thinking the other side is way worse.
He appears to have defeated the alternative by 15 million votes, Michael.
Chris?
Yeah, yeah.
And otherwise, I can't believe that so many people are so brainwashed that they would want to have this vaccine, and yet Trump keeps... Oh, that's another thing.
When Trump was on the campaign trail in 2016, one of the things that he said that really got my attention was that he was going to have a vaccine safety That was a great idea, because Bobby Jr.
has been doing brilliant work in this area.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and that never happened.
Somebody got to him on that particular subject.
That was a great idea because Bobby Jr.
has been doing brilliant work in this area.
Chris, your observation.
Well, I'm very concerned about anybody that's willing to take any sort of vaccine
for this pandemic hoax that they've had put in.
it seems to be a problem reaction solution and the solution is maybe a final one
that should be considered to the likes of what Hitler had tried to suggest.
Maybe it would just more technocratically efficient, logistically efficient means to the same ends.
So I can't really support anybody that's in favor of this or even seriously putting this out as an option.
I almost think that this is a theatric that's being created to muster support around Trump.
Like I say, about the selective persecution of him over absurdities and over, like I say,
molehills compared to mountains.
If you're really trying to take the guy down as a political enemy, quote unquote,
that they could go after him for more serious things and they never did.
And just like Michael said about Trump running on the campaign of lock her up
or even the vaccine panel with RFK, none of these things have been delivered
and I'm really concerned about these things.
I think that his base gives him a pass too much and I think that really, these are things that are,
like I say, I think theatrics that are intended to mobilize support towards a binary discussion.
The Lesser of Two Evils is an obvious no-brainer in this situation.
However, there seems to be a lot of brainless people that are diving into other options and I almost think that it's an optic management or consensus management.
Yeah, yeah.
The actual vote appears to have been around 74 million for Trump and 23 million for Biden.
A gap of over 50 million where even California and Minnesota went for Trump.
I don't think that the support behind this vaccine is as prominent as it is.
And I think that's why they got this full court blitz on in the way that they do.
Yeah, yeah.
The actual vote appears to have been around 74 million for Trump and 23 million for Biden.
A gap of over 50 million where even California and Minnesota went for Trump.
No doubt.
Keep your job but lose a jab.
For anyone concerned, they may have to take a COVID-19 vaccine in order to keep their jobs.
This is on my blog.
This seems like pretty important information from an airline pilot.
I really like my job.
I'm incredibly grateful to still be employed.
I don't want to stop doing what I do.
I like the company I work for.
I know I will not be consenting to this new vaccine under any circumstances.
So to anyone worried about the prospect of mandatory vaccinations at work, here are some pretty watertight arguments to use.
One, you must be vaccinated or you will lose your job.
All vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus are still officially on trial.
Pfizer won't be completed until January, though it seems they're moving it up.
They're also all, by definition, novel.
No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months.
Several utilize novel technology, Not previously used.
There is therefore no long-term safety data whatsoever which can be relied upon or to form the basis of an argument in favor of mandates.
Anyone having the vaccine, once it's rolled out, will be part of a wider ongoing experiment.
I will not go into the finer details of the Nuremberg Code, but the essential premise is that voluntary consent In any medical experiment is absolutely essential.
This means the person involved has the legal capacity to give consent and should be so positioned as to be able to exercise free power of choice without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.
And should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter, meaning the pros and cons, the risks and benefits, to enable him to make an enlightened decision.
In simple terms, informed consent to afford someone the absolute right to say no, threatening less of employment or other privileges, constitutes coercion.
Your right to autonomy over your own body and to not be part of an ongoing experiment doesn't include your right to infect others.
In response to this hypothetical, pseudo-scientific, and very manipulative, but quite likely guilt trip, I put forward this article from the British Medical Journal that clearly explains that none of the trials clearly underway are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcomes, such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths, nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.
Additionally, Moderna's chief medical officer says they do not show that they prevent you from potentially carrying this virus transiently and infecting others, which means why in the hell would we need it?
The reality is, according to their own data, there's only a 0.76 risk of reduction in the end user against the onset of mild cold symptoms.
Against a total of 2% of all participants who reported significant systemic adverse effects akin to influenza.
3.
Asymptotic sweat is real and dangerous.
In response to this pathologization of perfectly healthy people, I should put forward two large and official epidemiological stories showing zero transmission from so-called asymptomatic carriers.
Dr. Anthony Tony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, has said, in all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks, which is always a symptomatic person.
If an entity wants to persist with its biologically implausible position that you, a perfectly healthy person, show no symptoms whatsoever or risk to others when the onus is on them to meet your evidence with actual scientific studies showing otherwise, you should reject them.
Four, I understand where you're coming from, but sadly we're constrained by the requirements of other countries and organizations, which means you cannot fulfill your role unless you're vaccinating.
The MHRA has stated they're expecting high volumes of adverse effects.
Employers have a duty of care to their employees, which means they should take all steps which are reasonably possible to ensure their health, safety, and well-being.
Demonstrate concern for the physical and mental health of your workers shouldn't just be seen as a legal duty.
There's a clear business case, too.
It can be a key factor in building trust and reinforcing your commitment to your employees and can help employ staff retention, boost productivity, and pave the way for greater employee engagement.
Legally, employers must abide by relevant health and safety and employment law, as well as the common law duty of care.
They also have a moral and ethical duty not to cause or fail to prevent physical or psychological injury, and must fulfill their responsibilities with regard to personal injury and negligence claims.
So if there's a requirement from a third party outside the organization that employees be vaccinated, it's up to the company to provide a dispensation against such measures.
Fifth, you can also back up these arguments by asking your company provide evidence that SARS-CoV-2 even exists and is proven to cause a syndrome known as COVID-19, as there have now been several FOIA documents showed no government body holds this information.
Additionally, there's the ethical standpoint the vaccines not only contain or produce using human fetal tissue, but also involve the widespread use of horrific animal experimentation.
To therefore coerce someone to have a medical intervention as part of an ongoing experiment with potentially extremely serious side effects Where neither the safety profile nor efficacy has been established, and for which there is no data or scientific evidence even suggesting a reduction in transmission, is quite simply untenable.
This could be presented in various formats depending on the situation, but a letter of conditional acceptance seems to be appropriate.
Here you agree to the measure, in this case the vaccine, on the proviso that not only does your company provide you with the evidence to your fair and reasonable request, but also they will be liable for any harm or damage as a result thereof.
At the moment, a lot of people are complying with rules they don't believe in for the sake of a quiet life.
A lot of these same people do not want to take the vaccine.
However, believe me, it is far easier to not comply with the current rules than it will be to change your employer.
So now really is the time to start drawing the line.
Stand up for what you believe in.
I also suggest everyone does to start accumulating a database of any official articles, papals, and peer-reviewed studies that support the basic tenets outlined above.
Make your case watertight.
Those who don't want the vaccine but are resigned that they will take it to keep their jobs, they need to do this with the understanding that the jackboots of a group of self-appointed billionaire corporate rulers will be on their neck for the rest of their lives.
Well said, I thought, and I therefore wanted to share it.
Michael, your thoughts?
That's a terrific article.
I need to find where that is.
I need to send that out.
This is one of my subjects.
I've been studying vaccines for about 20 years, I guess, and I now consider the entire paradigm of vaccines in medical context as what we're told they are.
to be a deceptive medical practice with horrible effects on the population, especially on children who are now made to take something like 60 to 70 separate shots before the age of 16.
This current vaccine tyranny, what they're talking about shooting into people is not even a vaccine in the traditional sense of the term of Having an attenuated pathogen that allows the body to practice on it and develop an immunity, which is bullshit in the first place, but that's not what they're talking about here.
This particular vaccine tyranny, I have suspected for quite a while that they already had something on the shelf that has nothing to do with immunity or viruses It has everything to do with the control of the human population, and they're making a show of having to develop a vaccine in response to a chance outbreak.
Yeah, well I think it's all completely despicable, manipulative, and intended to promote the Great Reset.
Chris, your thoughts?
I agree with you both on that, and I think that it's good to see more people starting to wake up to this reality, I'll just say.
So great points, Michael.
I think you were being a little too polite.
I almost would call this like a mass Fauci-cide, which is like a eugenics program meets some sort of bizarre nanotech experiment with vaccines.
This is truly unacceptable what they're doing to the human species under these precepts.
So yeah, I think that there is a large degree of duress that has been imposed by the mainstream media as well as the people that have some immense vested interests.
And they always seem to be advocating for big pharma, you know, 65% of their ad revenue comes from them.
But is there any sort of advocation for the common man or the safety of the people, or even to point out the number of victims that have already been damaged by these type of processes, which are arguably more harm than good?
You know, they always want to isolate, or always have some gall of enterprise if they can't isolate the virus.
You know, that's another thing.
You know, suppose they want to vaccinate against something they can't even prove arguably exists.
So you can't play both sides of the fence here, although they try to, like hell, and it's crazy to see what they're doing with this.
And coercion is probably a polite word to use for this as well, because this is really something more sinister, like I was saying.
And I just want to add to your point, 2023 is when Pfizer will actually be actualizing their tests on that vaccine.
Just to add that in, it was December 2023.
So yeah, that's a long ways out for this warp speed rush that they're trying to put on.
Well, they're showing the manufacture of massive doses of a vaccine.
Maybe it's only role B. You know, maybe it's not actually the COVID-19, but it's sure getting a hell of a lot of play on TV these days, where the Democrats really have used that as their primary motivation for supporting Biden over Trump.
Meanwhile, the Pittsburgh Medical Center will not make COVID vaccine mandatory for their staff.
This is significant, in my opinion.
The reasons are several-fold.
According to their Medical Director of Infection Prevention and Epidemiology, for starters, there's general uncertainty over the vaccine.
And while the 21 billion non-profit organization that employs 89,000 people as a mandatory flu vaccine policy is based on decades of experience with the influenza vaccine, But there's no comparable data for a COVID-19 vaccine or whether a mandate is the best way to get a large number of people to be vaccinated.
The first COVID-19 from Pfizer is expected to soon receive emergency approval.
A second from Moderna is also expected to soon receive emergency approval.
Distribution of at least one is expected to begin this month.
Snyder said that the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center is very excited about the preliminary information about how safe it is and how it will work.
Still, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center will conduct its own review of the vaccines before injecting any of its employees, very consistent with what we heard about the general considerations that apply here.
Until we learn more and build our own experience with this vaccine, plus until we see the uptake of the vaccine in our communities and have an understanding about the role it has in ending the pandemic, it's not the right thing to make it mandatory.
Tuesday, UPMC outlined their plans for receiving and distributing while planning a launch and information campaign to persuade the public to get vaccinated Despite their own hesitance over the jab, perhaps it has something to do with several University of Pittsburgh Medical Center employees having participated in vaccine trials only to report fever, fatigue, or arm pain, with some needing to take a day or two off from work.
According to Snyder, this is a normal and healthy immune response.
Employees at the highest risk of exposure will be offered the vaccine first, along with high-risk residents of long-term care facilities after that, those over 65 years of age with comorbidities.
We're optimistic we'll be able to provide vaccine for frontline health care workers who wish to receive it before the end of January.
They've begun to make a combination for Pfizer's vaccine, which requires ultra-cold storage, which I frankly do not understand.
Based on public enthusiasm for taking the brand new vaccine, the doses may be in cold storage for quite a while.
Meanwhile, look at this, Build Back Better, the Biden-Trump COVID-19 vaccine, I think That's right.
Biden is taking responsibility right now, it would appear.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, public enthusiasm.
I'd like to show them some public enthusiasm.
Yeah.
It's a really good sign that this Pittsburgh Medical Center is even in a compromised way standing up against making these mandatory for their They're employees.
My daughter-in-law is a medical worker in a hospital in Texas, and she's been fighting the forced flu shot every fall for about five or six years now.
And it's just a horrible agenda being imposed upon healthcare workers like that
with other workers to follow.
I agree with what you said on several occasions, Jim, and that is, I used to think that the Apollo moon landings
were the biggest hoax ever played on the citizens of the world,
but this has gone beyond that.
Absolutely, 100%, Michael.
No doubt about it.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, I think that in the last segment you brought up a good point about, you know, if you're forced to take a vaccine to continue your employment or as a contingent for your employment, then I would definitely put the onus onto your work, your employment place.
have them sign off that they are accountable for any and all damages that occur. Maybe you can go
get a physical if you're I mean if you're dumb enough to take the vaccine in the first place
and you got to do it this way I'd suggest be smart enough to at least do that. You know I would I'm
not advocating taking a vaccine at all I just have to put that on the record as well I think that is
absolutely snake oil sales at best and I think it's it's really sinister what they're doing here
and how they're imposing these type of choices onto the people given what is being brought upon us.
I think we, I think we all agree 100%.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you send us fan mail pro or con to live need to know at gmail.com live need to know at gmail.com.
We do have some reports.
Here's the app.
Say you have allergies and no shot even if they try to force it.
I do not believe Trump would willfully harm the American people if he's really for this vax.
He's been suckered.
Some people will fall for all glitchy and clean and polished and scammy newscasts are.
They are brazenly pushing all the lies.
No mention of state lawsuits against fraud here.
The newscast comes off as something prepared for fourth grade level low information morons.
It literally has frame sequencing and transition just like children's educational programs.
I do not expect I have to tell my readers to avoid this and all other vaccines from this point forward.
I was opposed to the chance supposedly from a manufacturing process engineer who said they are adding ingredients to the vaccine in small amounts that are not on the package label.
He said it was to modify the DNA in the gonads to cause the next generation of women to become infertile much earlier in life.
And I think that's only part of it.
In case you missed it, all forms of the Corona Vax rewrite your DNA permanently.
If you're okay with that, go ahead and remove yourself from the gene pool, I guess.
Meanwhile, this is from John Remington Graham, who's a retired professor of law to the Attorney General of Texas.
To introduce myself, I attach a short resume.
I've practiced in the field of constitutional law for 50 years, including service as a public defender, law professor, and chief public prosecutor.
My publishing credits include a treatise, 40 years in preparation, on the original meaning of the United States Constitution.
It's framed in 1787, implemented in 1789, And amended in 1791, 1798 and 1804.
I am now retired and living with my French-Canadian wife in the province of Quebec, Dominion of Canada.
I am not just another lawyer.
I have important information to transmit for your consideration.
Your suit invoking the original jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court and joined by 20 other states is historic.
It offers the United States an opportunity to avoid revolution or civil war.
I thank you for this gallant, statesmanlike, and patriotic effort.
I do not doubt the meritorious evidence offered by Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell.
But the power dynamics of courthouse politics renders it impractical to ask for judicial findings of massive electoral fraud, however factual and true, in a presidential election.
Your effort turns on abstract principles amenable to judicial decision and offers a practical chance for success.
Meanwhile, feedback from Jason Miller83.
Great show from a daily listener.
James, your encyclopedic knowledge, research, logic, and broadcasting is needed now more than ever.
Keep it up!
Check out the book, Kings Dethroned, by Gerald Hickson, for a deeper dive into the most immense deception that the moon landing hoax attempted to provide credibility for.
David, very great delivery of realistic insight, counterbalance, and informed and respectful commentary throughout each show.
Check out History, Fiction, or Science, by N. Tolley Formenko, sometime.
Far surpassed is Velikovsky's revision and is much closer to the truth.
Giuseppe, Great work on spreading the message of true medicine, naturopathy, providing critical analyses, and exposing the internationalist Jew as the agent provocateur.
Simply wonderful.
Check out the China Study by T. Colin Campbell for a nutritional deep dive into holistic dieting.
I'm very grateful to Discovering this show, and I'm learning something every day from it.
Shared with friends and family, yours truly.
Thank you, Jason.
Meanwhile, Evelyn Jackson.
Dear Mr. Fetzer, I love your show.
Please note where you can get info so I can go back and use it to convince people.
Have your co-hosts do that, too.
I tell people what you all say, but they want to know the resources, as the truth is unbelievable.
For example, I would like to have article names for your article, states on the inventor of the PCR test, so I can find and keep on file and share.
Thank you, great help.
Well, Evelyn, many of the articles I cite are published on my blog at jamespetzer.org.
Also, if you just have a sentence from an article or the title, you can do a Google search and turn it up.
That'll work in virtually every single case of what we report here.
Just check out the title of the stories we're reporting and use the title for a search.
Meanwhile, Time Magazine has, in my opinion, absurdly cited Joe Biden, Kamala Harris's Times 2020 Person of the Year That distinction is to go to the person who, for better or for worse, had the most impact on events during the year.
Without any question, that person would have been Donald J. Trump, not Joe Biden or Kamala Harris.
Interestingly, the fact that we got a Biden double, who's on the cover of Time Magazine even, is being picked up in the Twitterverse, that we got Biden and not Biden.
It's very interesting.
They seem to be following up.
Here's Biff Pontchartrain replying to Jace Green 13 and be nosy.
Wow, what a difference.
One has nice blue human eyes, one has cold dead fish eyes.
Scary the thought of what they really do to these people.
Mind-controlled Manchurian candidates.
Here's another Maggie, a dog lover.
Where is the real Joe gone?
Gitmo?
To be Biden or not to be Biden?
That is the question.
I will be featuring John Remington Graham, who authored that commentary, Professor Emeritus of Law, on the Conspiracy Guy Show this Sunday from 8 to 10 p.m.
Central Time, Sunday, December 13th.
The Texas lawsuit.
Can the Supreme Court save America from revolution or civil war?
With John Remington Graham.
Meanwhile, final thoughts on Michael, yours.
One of those commenters made reference to Cary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR tests, and it reminded me of how suspicious it is that he happened to die in August of 2019, and I still haven't found anything about that death, whether there should be anything suspicious about it, but the timing certainly is.
And just last week, there was another person like that, not of his status to maintain the scam, but a woman named Brandy Vaughn, a former Merck drug representative, who had found out from the inside what was going on with Big Pharma and the harm that they were doing.
On the basis of profit only, and she turned into a very well-known anti-vaccination person, and she was just found dead in her home by her nine-year-old last week.
We reported that yesterday coincidentally, Michael.
Yes, you're absolutely right.
Go ahead.
Just on a little bit of a silver lining note to end on, there are groups of people who are forming, who are understanding what's going on with this whole pandemic bullshit, and I found out about a quite a big one here in Asheville just two weeks ago.
There's supposed to be 500 people Connected via Facebook and another 175 or so via an email list and they're taking it off of Facebook, thankfully.
But just the fact that I've been into this stuff all along and I just found out about a very large group here who's on the same page and supporting each other was quite heartening.
Excellent, excellent.
Chris, your final thoughts?
You're muted.
Sorry about that.
I think it's good that people are finally coming together in the face of this.
There seems to be a lot of insurmountable evidence that seems to be coming to the forefront and somehow being dismissed by the mainstream media.
I think it's essential that we almost maybe look at this for what it's truly worth and really at some point in time
make the dedication as citizens to ditch our surveillance devices that really gather
basically our plans of resistance against this to go dark possibly, to really look at points
of what we're experiencing now and put it into parallels of historic context
and understand that this would have far surpassed the 1776 revolution and the invasion of privacy
and the violation of constitutions and things like this.
And I think that really people need to appraise this for what it is because the mainstream media is there
to just play on your fear and to steer you into their controlled opposition dialogue.
And I think that really people need to come together I've been telling people this is what World War III looks like.
It's not nation against nation.
and our children as well because this is a war that's been waged against us and
the people that are supposedly giving us creating the problem are the same ones
creating the reaction and the solution so I think we need to go outside the box
here. This is a war I've been telling people this is what World War three
looks like it's not nation against nation it's a global oligarchy against
the people of the world. Yeah, Pike wrote it back in 1888.
It seems to be coming apart right now, like exactly how he wrote it.
Well, everyone can see why I'm so thrilled to have Michael Ivey from Nashville, North Carolina and Chris Weiner from Detroit, Michigan as colleagues here on Need to Know.
My own final thoughts, I think the election now is going to be resolved properly by the Supreme Court.
If we have a 9-0 ruling by the court, as I fully expect, given what I've outlined of the evidence in this case and the law, Then the legislatures will decide how to cast their electors.
The Democrats can't complain that people did not follow the Constitution.
A lot of illegitimate voting and manipulation will have been defeated properly, and there will be no good reason for the Democrats to protest that their man lost fair and square after all of their desperate efforts
to steal the election on his behalf were reversed in accordance with the Constitution of the
United States.
That won't keep them from doing it, but it will certainly make it clear to every clear-thinking
patriot in the United States that what they're doing is wrong.
Once we have Trump secure in his re-election, I believe he's going to take measures to clean
up the COVID mess, to get rid of mass lockdowns and social distancing mandates, and continue
to work vigorously to advance the interests of the American people.
That's my take.
It's a testable proposition.
We'll see as events unfold in the next couple of weeks whether I'm right or wrong.
And mind my words, the fate of the nation hangs upon it.
Thank you all for joining us today.
We'll be back on Monday with all the news you need to know.
▲
Export Selection