Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 14, 2020 - Jim Fetzer

01:41:32

The Conspiracy Guy (13 December 2020): John Remington Graham on the Future of the Nation

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer.
	I'm the Conspiracy Guy.
	I'm very pleased to have my featured guest today, a retired professor of law with a distinguished career who's been reflecting on the Texas suit and the election and the fraud and how it can be dealt with by the court.
	And I'm just super pleased to have him here, John Remington Graham.
	We're going to begin with a reflection about the case generally.
	SCOTUS, it appeared, was going to hear the Texas election case, where the South had rode in like the cavalry.
	17 states initially had filed amicus briefs in support of the Texas case.
	It would turn out that 21 would eventually join, whereas Samuel Adams has observed a true patriot keep the attention of his fellow citizens awake to their grievances and not allow them to rest until the causes of their just complaints are removed.
	So we have 21 states supporting Texas Listen to the list.
	Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Indiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Ohio, West Virginia, and Florida represent 42% of the American population, suing 8%.
	The battleground state fired back with a lot of inflammatory language but a complete absence of evidence.
	Here was the Attorney General, Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Pennsylvania describing the move by the Texas Attorney General Ken Paxson in support of Donald Trump as using a cacophony of bogus claims in support of a seditious abuse of the judicial process, resting on a surreal alternate reality
	Which is about as absurd and removed from the evidence as it could possibly be.
	In fact, we have a wonderful summary of the case from Robert Manson, which is also available on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
	Jack, I'm going to review this wonderful summation and then invite your commentary.
	Texas claims that the presidential elections, as held and as directed by government officials outside the legislature in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan, all flagrantly violated their own election laws by materially weakening or doing away with security measures.
	Furthermore, According to the U.S.
	Constitution, the legislature, representing the citizens of each state, has absolute authority and responsibility for how presidential elections are chosen, the will of the legislature being expressed through state law.
	Texas claims that the violations of election law in these states created an environment where ballot fraud was enabled and likely to occur.
	The lawsuit lists the violations of law in each of the defendant states and provides evidence of fraud, including especially the number of ballots handled unconstitutionally in each of the states sufficient to change the outcome of the ballot counts.
	Otherwise, of course, if it could not be shown to change the outcome, the court would decline to review.
	In each case of each state, They mentioned facts, violations of election law, and evidence of fraud.
	Explain how they're sufficient to overcome the margin of victory allocated to Biden.
	Facts.
	Pennsylvania.
	Vote tally.
	3,445,548 for Biden.
	3,363,951 for Trump.
	3,363,951 for Trump, a margin of 81% of the total.
	The United States has a margin of 80% of the total.
	of $81,000.00.
	So that's the target, 81,597.
	Requests for mail-in ballots, 70% Democrat, 25% Republican.
	Mail-in ballots increased from 266,208 in 2016 to over 3 million in 2020.
	2597. Requests for mail-in ballots, 70% Democrat, 25% Republican. Mail-in ballots increased
	from 266,208 in 2016 to over 3 million in 2020. That's an increase of approximately
	2,750,000. Violations of election law. The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated
	signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.
	The Pennsylvania Supreme Court changed existing deadlines for receiving mail-in ballots from 8 p.m.
	on the day of the election to three days after the election and adopted the presumption that non-postmarked ballots be considered as valid.
	Election officials in Philadelphia and Allegheny counties did not follow state law permitting poll watchers to be present for the opening counting and recording of mail-in ballots.
	The Secretary of State directed election officials to remove ballots before 7 a.m.
	on the day of the election in order to cure or correct defective mail-in ballots.
	But This was done only in Democrat-majority counties.
	Election officials did not segregate ballots received after 8 p.m.
	on Election Day, breaking the promise made to the U.S.
	Supreme Court, specifically Associate Justice Alito, thus making it impossible to identify or remove those ballots.
	Evidence of fraud.
	Ballots with no mail date, 9,005.
	No evidence they were ever sent to a voter.
	Ballots returned on or before the mail date, 58,221.
	58,221 ballots returned one day after the mail date.
	51,200 perhaps not impossible but highly unlikely for the average voter to receive a ballot.
	Fill it out, place it in the mail and have it returned the next day.
	Notice already we're talking about 109,000 plus 9, 118,000 ballots already considerably greater
	than the margin of 81. And on November 2nd, the day before the election, Pennsylvania reported
	2.7 million ballots had been sent out.
	But by November 4th, the number had increased to 3.1, an increase of 400,000 mail-in ballots at election time, with literally no reasonable chance of them being legitimate votes.
	So they clearly exceeded the threshold.
	Remember, 81,597.
	They already had 118,000, now 400,000, more over 500,000 disputed ballots that appear to be illegitimate.
	Georgia, facts.
	Vote tally, 2,472,098 for Biden, 2,458,121 for Trump.
	more over 500,000 disputed ballots that appear to be illegitimate.
	Georgia, facts, vote tally, 2,472,098 for Biden, 2,458,121 for Trump.
	The margin, the target number, 12,670.
	Mail-in ballots, 65.3%.
	Mail-in ballots increased from 213,033 in 2016 to 1,305,659 in 2020.
	That's an increase of approximately 1.1 million.
	per Trump. Mail-in ballots increased from 213,033 in 2016 to 1,305,659 in 2020. That's an increase of
	approximately 1.1 million. Violations of election law. The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated
	signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.
	The Secretary of State authorized opening and processing mail-in ballots up to three weeks before Election Day, when the law prohibits that until the polls open on Election Day.
	The Secretary of State materially weakened the security requirement for ballot rejection based on signature verification or other missing information.
	Evidence of fraud.
	mail-in ballot rejection rate for missing or inaccurate information or for non-matching
	signatures decreased from 6.42 percent in 2016 to 0.36 percent in 2020. Rejecting 2020 ballots at
	the same rate as 2016 would have resulted in a net gain of 25,587 votes for Trump,
	twice the number to overcome Biden's count, with a six-fold increase in the number of mail-in ballots.
	Reason would indicate that the rejection rate would increase or at least stay the same with so many first-time mail-in ballots.
	Michigan.
	Facts.
	Vote tally.
	2,796,702 for Biden.
	2,650,695 for Trump.
	796,702 for Biden, 2,650,695 for Trump.
	The margin, the target number, 146,007.
	In 2016.
	In 2020, 3.2 million votes were cast by mail-in ballots.
	That's an increase of over 2.5 million.
	requested mail-in ballots. In 2020, 3.2 million votes were cast by mail-in ballots. That's an
	increase of over 2.5 million. Democrats voted by mail at approximately two times that of Republicans.
	Violations of election law.
	The Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated signature verification requirements for mail-in ballots.
	The Secretary of State sent out unsolicited ballots to all 7.7 million registered voters, contrary to election law, which requires a voter to request a mail-in ballot through a process that includes a signature to be matched with a voter registration.
	The Secretary of State also allowed absentee ballots to be requested online without signature verification.
	Local election officials in Wayne County, containing 322,925 more ballots for Biden than for Trump, opened and processed mail-in ballots without poll watchers present.
	Local election officials in Wayne County also ignored the strict election law requirements of placing a written statement or stamp on each ballot envelope indicating that the voter's signature was in fact checked and verified with a signature on file with a state.
	Evidence of fraud.
	174,384 mail-in ballots in Wayne County had no valid registration number, indicating they likely resulted from election workers writing the same ballots through the tabulator multiple times.
	71% of Wayne County absent voter counting boards were unbalanced, where the number of persons who checked in did not match the number of ballots cast.
	Observing that 174,384 mail-in ballots that appear to have been tabulated multiple times
	exceeds the margin of 146,007. Wisconsin, facts, vote tally, 1,630,716 for Biden,
	1,610,151, that last one being my own for Trump, margin 20,565, target number 20,565.
	Mail-in ballots increased from 146,932 in 2016 to 1,275,019 in 2020, an increase of around 1.1 billion.
	1,232 in 2016 to 1,275,019 in 2020, an increase of around 1.1 billion.
	Violations of election law.
	The Wisconsin Elections Commission, WEC, positioned hundreds of unmanned illegal drop boxes to
	collect absentee ballots.
	The use of any drop box, manned or unmanned, is directly prohibited by Wisconsin statute.
	Any alternative mail-in ballot site, quote, shall be staffed by the municipal clerk or the executive director of the Board of Education Commissions.
	Quote, ballots cast in contribution of the procedure specified in those provisions may not be included in the certified results of any election.
	End quote.
	The WEC encouraged voters to unlawfully declare themselves indefinitely confined in order to avoid security measures like signature verification and photo ID requirements.
	Nearly 216,000 voters said they were indefinitely confined for the 2020 election, nearly four times as many in 2016.
	Strict laws requiring mail-in voters to certify by signature, including the signature of an adult witness, were ignored or circumvented by election officials.
	Evidence of fraud?
	100,000 ballots were supposedly missing and directed to be found after Election Day.
	Notice, that alone would greatly exceed the margin of 20,565.
	Conclusion.
	Significant violations of election laws that were put into place to protect against election fraud is sufficient to invalidate the results of the elections apart from whatever evidence is able to be gathered in a short time should show the actual numbers of fraudulent ballots.
	Reason would indicate that there is a high number of fraudulent ballots that are impossible to identify Which is why the election laws pertain to mail-in ballots were established to begin with.
	There is no remedy to connect the November 3rd election because ballots that did not adhere to election law cannot be identified as separate from those that did.
	An accurate count of legal ballots that were cast cannot be made.
	Therefore, as directed by the Constitution, it falls to the legislature of each state to choose electors as has been done in the past.
	Failing that, each state may determine not to submit any presidential electors.
	Jack, I think that's really quite stunning stuff.
	Yeah, it is.
	It provides overwhelming evidence of election fraud, so that given that the court denied on the basis of standing, I'm very interested in your reflection.
	It seems to me the case was overwhelming and compelling, and the court ought properly to have accepted, nevertheless rejected based on standing.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, okay.
	Standing is... What do you mean that Texas doesn't have a right to demand that other states, in a presidential election that is common to both states, Texas and the other states, should be lawfully and uprightly conducted?
	Now, of course, the decision on standing was just a way of evading the merits.
	And it was patently dishonest.
	It's not the first time the United States Supreme Court has let us all down.
	We think of, go back to Dred Scott versus Stanford, where they declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, contrary to the law, as it was assumed by the framers of the Constitution, based on a decision of the King's bench in 1771.
	They just overlooked that case.
	Now what they overlooked in this case was the case of Foster v. Love, 522 U.S.
	at 67.
	That case holds that where a state counts and allows or receives and allows votes on a day other than the day set by Congress, Which the Constitution specifically allows.
	Those votes are that receiving and allowing is unconstitutional.
	U.S.
	Supreme Court held that in 1997.
	So if they had just applied that one case, that would have reversed the election in four states and 62 votes that went to Biden would go to Trump.
	That means that Trump would then be ahead and Biden would be behind the mark of 270 electors needed for election.
	So the election was patently unconstitutional on an abstract principle of constitutional law previously articulated by the The United States Supreme Court in 1997.
	So what?
	And to say that Texas and 21 other states don't have a right to protest that other states conduct their election according to their own laws is manifestly absurd.
	It's irrational and it's irresponsible.
	So, I mean, that's where, if they had just applied Texas vs. Foster vs. Love, the whole election would have gone the other way.
	And look at this, Jack.
	Colorado has joined a 23-state coalition opposing the Texas lawsuit, where Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser called the Texas lawsuit a hail-mary attempt to undermine the presidential election and overturn the will of the voters.
	But if it was a fraudulent election and illegal votes were counted, how could it possibly represent the will of the voters?
	Obviously that's a spurious argument and not serious.
	Yeah, very embarrassing.
	Here's a nice comment by Edward Hendry, who's himself a lawyer.
	Why are so many states joining Texas complaint in the U.S.
	Supreme Court?
	Because the Texas complaint is a fine analysis of the election fraud and makes a rock-solid legal argument.
	I have attached the complaint for your reading enjoyment.
	Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, Brett Webster, First Assistant Attorney General of Texas, and Lawrence Joseph, Special Counsel to the Attorney General of Texas, should all be heralded for their fine legal work.
	It is truly an amazing document.
	I leave you with just one tidbit from the complaint.
	The probability of former Vice President Biden winning the popular vote in the four defendant states, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, Independently, given President Trump's early lead in those states as of 3 a.m.
	on November 4th, is less than 1 in a quadrillion, or 1 in 1 followed by 15 zeros.
	For former Vice President Biden to win those four states collectively, the odds of that happening decrease to less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power.
	That's one over one followed by 60 zeros, Jack, which is an extraordinarily small number.
	As you have commented, the evidence of Massey fraud on November 3rd has been identified and explained in the report of the Gatestone Institute on November 17th and the press conference by Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Paul on November 19th, both internet accessible.
	I've never seen in American history or my career anything like what is now happening.
	This material is shocking, includes election fraud caused by computer software controlled by foreign and domestic enemies of the United States, and Old-fashioned ballot stuffing.
	The evidence is so spectacular and sophisticated that we did not notice other, more manageable grounds for contesting the election, which Trump probably won handily.
	This evidence has been ignored on pretext of pseudo-technicalities such as standing lotches and lack of jurisdiction, because judges do not want to do the work of considering it on the merits, because they are corrupt and because they are afraid.
	And the major news media of the United States, which have always spoken for the Bilderberger Group, housing powers of high finance, which want one world government, banking and currency, have done their best at cover-up.
	In any event, about 40% of the American electorate believe the election was rigged.
	I would suggest jackets as high as 60.
	As an example, my son in Minnesota plays poker with friends and their wives and he knows nobody who thinks the election was not rigged.
	So the question of electoral fraud is not going away anytime soon.
	It will not be possible to have a peaceful transition of power on January 20th, 2021, until this evidence is fairly considered and clarified.
	One way or another, sooner or later, we're going to find out what happened.
	I would not want to be Joe Biden at that moment.
	And the more newspapers tell us not to be concerned, the more concerned we become.
	The election fraud cannot be covered up.
	It can be studied and facts can be found, but we cannot cover up any longer.
	We now have a development nobody, including myself, of any political orientation, both Republican or Democrat, saw coming.
	On December 1st, the state of Texas commenced a suit within the original jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court As she can do under the second section of the third article of the United States Constitution against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, and Wisconsin, which all received and counted massive mail-in ballots after the date established by Congress for federal elections on the first Tuesday after the first Monday on even-numbered years, as Congress can do under the fourth section, first article, and first section, second article of the Constitution.
	Since Texas began this suit, the case has been docketed, number 220155.
	Responsive pleadings are due by the end of the day today, and 17 states have joined Texas because the legal merits have become apparent to students of the case, while the major media of the U.S.
	have protested too much or tried to cover up, although the effect of adding 17 states will make the suit more respectable.
	I've never seen anything like this situation in American history or in my career.
	The United States Supreme Court must now decide whether to antagonize the American laugh or lose respect of the American people as a whole, including many Democrats.
	I wager that the court will accept the case and not try to dismiss it on a pseudo-technicality, because such a course would cause more risky ...than accepting the case and finding the truth and doing justice, which establishment Democrats in FIFA and Black Lives Matter would not like.
	Which would you rather antagonize, BLM and FIFA and the DNC or the American people?
	Meanwhile, you wrote to the Attorney General of Texas.
	To introduce myself, I attach a short resume.
	I have practiced in the field of constitutional law over 50 years, including service as a public defender, law professor, and chief public prosecutor.
	My publishing credits include a treatise, 40 years in preparation, on the original meaning of the U.S.
	Constitution as framed in 1787, implemented in 1789, and amended in 1791, 1798, and 1804.
	Implemented in 1789 and amended in 1791, 1798 and 1804.
	I am now retired and living with my French Canadian wife in the province of Quebec, Dominion
	of Canada.
	I am not just another lawyer.
	I have important information to transmit for your consideration.
	Your suit, invoking the original jurisdiction of the U.S.
	Supreme Court and adjourned now by 21 other states, is historic and offers the United States an opportunity to avoid revolution or civil war.
	I thank you for this gallant, statesmanlike, and patriotic effort.
	I do not doubt the meritorious evidence offered by Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell, but the power dynamics of courthouse politics renders it impractical to ask for judicial findings of massive electoral fraud, however factual and true in a presidential election.
	Your effort turns on abstract principles amenable to judicial decision and offers a practical chance of success.
	Meanwhile, the court rejected the Texas lawsuit challenging Biden's election win in four key states.
	The Supreme Court of the United States Friday redacted a bid launched by Texas and backed by President Trump that sought to challenge President-elect Joe Biden's election wins in the key swing states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
	The nation's highest court rejected Texas Attorney General Ken Paxson's lawsuit, assessing that the motion grounds to sue, known as standing, under Article 3 of the Constitution.
	Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its election.
	All other pending motions are dismissed as moved.
	And here is, in fact, the rendering by the court.
	Meanwhile, Stephanie Powell has sent an ominous message after the Supreme Court rejection.
	She tweeted out a message telling Americans to pay attention to the emergency filings he made after the Supreme Court rejected the Texas case last night.
	She means business.
	We the people will not allow rigged election.
	The bottom line is Sidney Powell knows the truth and is like a dog on a bone to expose it.
	She wants to prove that there was massive fraud in the 2020 election.
	She spoke with Greg Kelly last night after the Supreme Court rejected There's lots going on here, Jack.
	Pay attention, Tweet Sidney.
	We made emergency filings in Supreme Court tonight for Georgia and Michigan.
	We'll be filing Arizona-Wisconsin shortly.
	These cases raise constitutional issues and prove massive fraud.
	Our plaintiffs have standing.
	Meanwhile, an Arizona case just filed.
	Recent records will be uploaded at defendingtherepublic.org and at SidneyPowell.com and other suits Meanwhile, Dershowitz, I found this surprising, Jack.
	Supreme Court just didn't want to get involved.
	Retired Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz said Friday's decision by the Supreme Court to turn away a lawsuit from Texas and 17 other states, actually 21, challenging the election results in four battleground states on the justification they didn't have standing, indicates the court just didn't want to get involved.
	Appearing on News Mac TV, Stinchfield, Dershowitz agreed with Justice Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, who indicated that Texas did have standing, saying they get the better of the argument, but the court just didn't want to deal with what may be perceived as political.
	The Supreme Court decision sends a message, or so it said.
	The majority included the three justices appointed by President Trump, and they all said, we're not going to hear the Texas case.
	We're not going to get involved in this election.
	I think this sends a message.
	It's not a legal message, but it's a practical message.
	The Supreme Court is out of this game.
	The Texas suit Claimed officials in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Georgia use fears of the outbreak of the novel coronavirus as a justification to disregard election laws with the Constitution grants only to the various state legislatures.
	It argued by weakening laws intended to curb fraud, the officials in the four states denied citizens of Texas and other states equal protection of their vote.
	Dershowitz said he believed the argument was valid, but the Supreme Court of Essex said citizens in other states were not harmed by the actions of officials in the forum.
	Meanwhile, Trump has filed retooling the Texas-style election challenges, according to Rudy Giuliani.
	We move immediately and seamlessly with Plan B, Which is to bring lawsuits now in each one of the states.
	We had them ready.
	They're just a version of the one that was brought to the Supreme Court.
	So last night the president made the decision, said Rudy Giuliani.
	Trump's team is going to file suits or already has filed in four suits as well as Arizona and Nevada.
	The suits incorporate the allegations of the complaint filed by Texas If the states don't have standing, surely the President of the United States is standing, and certainly the electors in the states have standing.
	So they will be bringing those very cases right to the court starting today, Giuliana said.
	And let's see what excuse they can use to try to avoid having a hearing on that.
	Courts have been using the matter of standing to dodge the facts, he alleged, adding nobody wants to face the reality that this election was stolen.
	This is outrageous what they're doing.
	The American people should have the benefit of hearing these facts.
	The facts have been kept from them, he added.
	Not a single decision is at a hearing yet.
	They haven't heard from a single witness.
	They haven't looked at a single tape.
	They haven't listened to a single recording.
	There are thousands of them.
	They haven't even bothered to look at the tape in Atlanta, Georgia, which is dispositive.
	It shows an ongoing voter theft of 30,000 votes by itself, enough to change the election.
	Dozens of election-related lawsuits filed by Trump and others have been rejected in court.
	Some were appealed.
	Others are still being decided.
	Surveillance footage, to which Giuliani alludes, from State Farm Arena showed poll observers being led to believe the ballot count was ending around 10.30.
	Once observers and media left, a handful of workers resumed counting.
	Georgia officials have claimed nothing in the video is irregular, concluding observers simply left on their own while ignoring a verbal announcement the counting was done for the night.
	According to certified counts in Georgia and five other battleground states where election results are contested, Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden beat Trump.
	Trump won all but Nevada in 2016.
	Biden's team didn't respond to a request for comment.
	Now, Jack, that's covering a lot of territory in order for you to have a clean sweep here the way it's going.
	My understanding was they would refile with the Supreme Court with Trump as the plaintiff.
	But now it suggests to me, reading this in detail, they're pursuing it through each of the individual courts.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, I mean, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction where a state is a party.
	And that would be a case between one state and another state or more than one state.
	Interstate suits.
	That is where they have original jurisdiction, otherwise they have appellate jurisdiction.
	So Trump's effort to retool the Texas case, the grounds of the Texas case, which would be disposed of in Foster vs. Love, a 9-0 decision, absolutely decisive, and swinging 62 electoral votes, switching them from Biden to Trump, in changing the result of the election nationally has to be by appellate jurisdiction, and they have to commence these suits in the four states.
	And that's what, as I understand, is going to be attempted.
	My concern is that the decision of the Supreme Court on Friday was just political nonsense.
	What do you mean we don't have a right to say that in an election of the President of the United States that all states follow the law as established by their own legislatures?
	And when it is already clear that any state practice or law which allows receiving and counting of votes on a day other than the day established by Congress is unconstitutional, and all those votes have to be stricken from the record.
	That in and of itself would switch 62 electoral votes from Biden to Trump.
	This is a very simple case that should have been handled, and it wasn't because the court doesn't want to get involved.
	That's what Dershowitz said.
	It's a political thing.
	It isn't It isn't a legal principle involved.
	This is, as I say, not the first time that the U.S.
	Supreme Court has let us all down.
	I mean, they did it in the case of Dred Scott v. Sandford, and they're doing it again in this case.
	So what we have is a situation.
	This recent attempt by Trump to retool a Texas case Starting in the federal district courts of the four states in question.
	Unless that succeeds, we will have an inauguration on the 20th of January, which is of someone
	who won election by voter, a massive electoral fraud and states acting contrary to their
	own laws and acting contrary to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in a 9-0
	decision.
	All of the states stopped counting at the same time, Jack.
	In other words, there was a conspiracy here to defraud the American people, the voters of each of their independent states, but it was clearly a coordinated effort.
	Well, Anglo-American legal tradition includes a constitutional right to a free election, a free, lawful, and proper election.
	of their own will through a legitimate ballot process in accordance with the Constitution.
	Well, Anglo-American legal tradition includes a constitutional right
	to a free election, a free, lawful, and proper election.
	That is articulated in the eighth article of the English Bill of Rights of 1689,
	and it's protected by the Ninth Amendment. So what has happened here is that the Democratic
	Party, the major news media of the United States, speaking for the Bilderberg Group, which
	wants to destroy the United States and set up a one-world government, have deprived the American
	people of a free election. It's just, It's an unacceptable situation.
	The question now is what can we do about this?
	Well, the answer is not so much what we can do about this as what is going to happen in light of history.
	If you follow history, we're going to have a revolution in the United States.
	You might as well count on it.
	And if we have a revolution, we have a choice.
	We can either have an armed revolution or we can have a peaceable constitutional revolution of the kind that occurred in England when the House of Stuart was reinstated and restored in 1660, or the kind of peaceable constitutional revolution which the Hartford Convention in New England accomplished during the War of 1812.
	They then threatened to secede from the Union They thwarted an effort to draft armies for an invasion of Canada and they forced the government to make peace and bring the war to an end.
	I'm going to work as hard as I can to assure that lawful remedies are attempted and hope for the best.
	But right now we have a We have a very tight situation, very serious.
	We're going to have a reaction in this country.
	If 40 to 50 percent of the country doesn't believe that the election was honest, we can't have a peaceful transition of power.
	That's a political impossibility.
	Jack, based upon my research, Donald Trump received 74 to 75 million votes.
	Joe Biden, I'm talking about legitimate votes, Joe Biden received 23 to 24 million.
	In other words, the Democrats manufactured some 50 million votes in order to steal the election and claim Biden had won by 80 million to Trump's 73 or 74.
	I mean, on that grand a scale, And it's very clear from the record where they stopped the voting.
	They had to adjust.
	They had to dump in hundreds of thousands of additional ballots to put Biden in the lead and then to temper or adjust the rate at which he would continue to remain in the lead on the order of say 51 or 50.5 percent to 49 or 49.5 percent.
	to 49 or 49.5% in other words, just to give him this lead by a giant shift that was totally unreasonable
	and obviously illegal and then maintain the lead with this slight preference where the machines
	they were using, these Dominion machines, Jack, can only switch votes from Trump to Biden.
	And we know of no instance in which a vote was shifted from Biden to Trump, but also weight the Biden votes
	heavier than the Trump votes.
	They have an adjustable weight ability.
	So they could weight a Democrat vote 1.3 versus a Republican vote 0.7.
	And then when you combine the weighting, it's equal to two ballots, but they're not equal.
	Because the greater weight was given to the Democrat.
	This is among the kinds of fraud in over and beyond those that I've already articulated based on the Texas lawsuit.
	I am frankly floored to realize now that that Trump cannot directly approach the Supreme Court as
	having standing in lieu of Texas, that it was only because Texas was a state bringing a case
	against other states that the Supreme Court had original jurisdiction. I now believe
	the probability of a violent revolution is growing greater by the day. Well, I'm afraid
	that we are faced with a revolution in the United States.
	I don't know how to divert it unless we can create a way for a revolution to occur in a constitutional peaceable way, like the Hartford Convention in 1814, 1815, or the restoration of the House of Stuart in England in 1660.
	But the Democrats aren't going to compromise, Jack.
	They're claiming, and the media is asserting, that it was all legitimate, that there was no fraud, that claims of election fraud are manufactured because Trump wants to reverse the outcome and thwart the will of the people.
	YouTube!
	YouTube has now declared it's not going to allow any contesting, any arguments, any evidence about election fraud on any of its videos, Jack.
	YouTube tried to silence doctors who were speaking about the use of hydroxychloroquine.
	Yes.
	And opening the country up from the coronavirus.
	Yes.
	Dr. Erickson and Dr. Masihi in California.
	Yes, for example.
	Shut them down.
	So YouTube is not an honest news media.
	Not only that, Jack, but YouTube, Google, and the other social media giants
	throughout this whole campaign suppressed important information that was detrimental to Joe Biden,
	especially about his son Hunter's laptop and the evidence it contained,
	in order to ensure Biden wouldn't be harmed by those revelations.
	And now Biden is announcing his intent to appoint officials from Google, YouTube, and Facebook to his administration.
	Yeah, sure.
	Sure.
	And this is why it's so very dangerous.
	But if a third to half of the people of the United States think that the election was rigged, you can't have a peaceable Trans, transfer of power.
	And the Democrats are simply acting delusionally.
	They're, they're, they're delusional if they think that this is going to happen.
	I don't believe that it will happen.
	And I, Biden may be re-inaugurated, but who is, if half the country doesn't think he's was legitimately elected or a quarter or a half or a third of the country doesn't believe that he was lawfully elected.
	How can he govern the country?
	Jack, I have declared repeatedly that if Biden were to be inaugurated by some god-awful set of circumstances on 20 January, that would be the trigger for a new American revolution, and that the tree of liberty must be nourished by the blood of patriots.
	And I stand with Patrick Henry.
	I regret I have but one life to give for my country.
	Yeah, well, no, Thomas Jefferson said about the Tree of Liberty must be nourished from time to time with the blood of patriots.
	Yes.
	And he said that, he was talking about Shays' Rebellion in Massachusetts in 1786.
	Now, if we're going to, unless this matter is resolved judicially, And I thought that our best shot was the Texas lawsuit because it could be resolved on abstract principles of constitutional law that are amenable to judicial decision.
	It was our best chance and the Supreme Court let us all down.
	So unless this can be repaired by the suits that are going to be commenced tomorrow in four states, I don't know How we can avoid a revolution?
	I can only hope that the revolution will be a peaceable constitutional I now hold the Supreme Court in contempt now that I realize that Trump, because he's a person and not a state, does not have original jurisdiction and therefore cannot simply refile the Texas case because he does not have standing for original jurisdiction because he's not a state.
	And this is disgraceful of the Supreme Court, Jack.
	I am outraged.
	Well, you could be.
	You should be, but this is not the first time that the Supreme Court has let us all down.
	They did this in Dred Scott versus Sanford and the result was the American Civil War.
	I don't unless this problem can be resolved.
	With the four suits tomorrow, we're going to have a revolution.
	I hope it's a peaceful constitutional revolution, but if it isn't.
	I'm afraid that we'll have an armed robbery.
	I don't think there's any prospect of a peaceful resolution if the Supreme Court does not grab this case and deal with it appropriately, Jack, because the evidence of fraud.
	I thought this Texas case was a masterpiece.
	It was a masterpiece.
	And as I say, it all turned on Foster versus, just applying the case of Foster versus Love.
	U.S.
	67.
	That would have settled the whole thing in a simple, beautiful piece of constitutional principle where Congress establishes a day for federal elections.
	Any practice or law of any state which allows receipt and counting of votes on any other day is unconstitutional.
	That would mean all those illegal votes that were received and counted after the 3rd of November would not be counted in the election.
	That in and of itself, without going into all the pain and suffering that we would have to endure
	to listen to the evidence of massive election fraud, you could lay that aside and just settle it
	on a simple principle of constitutional law that was decided nine to zero.
	In 1997 by nine to zero vote Jack.
	Yeah, yeah, I mean, that would do it right there.
	And the Democrats are acting in a delusional manner and they are acting as if nothing was wrong.
	But that's the way, it's like when you catch Johnny in the kitchen.
	Right.
	Taking cookies out of the cookie jar.
	He said, Mommy, I'm not eating cookies.
	Well, that's what they're doing here.
	And now I see the importance of Sidney Powell asking the Supreme Court to immediately order the states to decertify their election results.
	Powell said she'd filed emergency requests to the nation's stop court asking the justices to order officials in Georgia, Michigan, and Arizona to immediately decertify their 2020 election of vote results and prevent the state's presidential electors from casting votes in the Electoral College.
	An emergency filing is also anticipated for her Wisconsin case.
	The filings aim to maintain the status quo to give the Supreme Court time to consider the allegations presented in her lawsuits.
	We hope that she's successful.
	We hope that the Supreme Court will think more deeply on this matter and realize the consequence of not Becoming involved.
	They became involved and saved the day in the 2000 election.
	The announcement came on the same day the court rejected Texas' request to sue four battleground states, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, over allegations they violated the Constitution and treated voters unfairly in their handling of the 2020 general election.
	Jack, I thought it would be on the basis of the 14th Amendment that the votes cast by Democrats And Democrat ballots were not treated the same as votes cast by Republicans or Republican ballots, but you make an impeccable point.
	We already have a precedent here.
	We already have a precedent here in the form of the love decision that no ballots accepted after Midnight or the date specified on the day of the election can be counted, which is sufficient in and of itself to change the outcome.
	That alone would do it.
	That alone would do it.
	And if they had accepted the Texas case, and I wrote the Attorney General of Texas, and I have written Jayna Ellis, who is a Works with Giuliani.
	Yeah, yeah, she's quite brilliant, Jenna Ellis.
	Yeah, she's actually the head, I think, of the legal team.
	Yeah, she's a very bright gal, yeah.
	And I wrote her, and I sent her my letter to Paxton, and I pointed out that there is a constitutional right to a free election, and if they don't take it, the court doesn't take this, Anyone, if you have a constitutional right to a free election, then any participant has a right to protest an infringement of that right.
	And of course, using computer technology and ballot stuffing and just counting votes, other than on the day that Congress is established for the election.
	All of those are grounds And deprives us of a free election.
	The right of a free election is a constitutional right of every voting citizen of the United States.
	It's protected in the Ninth Amendment.
	It's articulated in the eighth section of the English Bill of Rights of 1689.
	It is basic, basic, basic stuff.
	What the court did yesterday was a tragic, a tragic thing, because it means that the only way we can get out of this thing is by revolution, hopefully a peaceable and constitutional revolution.
	But if not that, then Jack, I'm telling you, Antifa, Black Lives Matter have always shown their hand.
	They're the parent military arm of the Democratic Party, which has been taken over by globalists.
	They're here to subjugate the entire United States, and they're using violence as their method.
	This is their preferred technique, Jack.
	And I'm telling you, law-abiding citizens of the United States, including myself, who have been very patiently waiting for a legal resolution of this matter through peaceable mechanisms established by the Constitution, Now we'll feel we have no alternative, Jack, but to take up arms to depose a tyranny that will be inaugurated on 20 January.
	Jack, I stand 100% with the patriots here and the militias.
	And the U.S.
	military, which I believe holds no stock in Joe Biden.
	He's got a corrupt history of dealing with a Chinese communist.
	This is, in effect, a Chinese communist takeover of the United States of America.
	We will not stand for this, Jack.
	Well, I'm afraid what happens if you lose your corrective mechanism.
	We had a corrupt and illegal election.
	But our corrective mechanisms have failed thus far.
	Let us keep hoping that the corrective mechanism kicks in with the suits that are going to be commenced tomorrow.
	But otherwise, it's a tragic thing.
	If your corrective mechanisms, if your legal remedy is no longer present, then what have you got?
	Here's some further observations from Sidney Powell.
	The 2020 general election was tainted by unconstitutional election fraud on a scale never seen before, at least not in America.
	Hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of illegal, fraudulent, ineligible, or purely fictitious ballots were cast for Biden, along with hundreds of thousands of Trump votes that were intentionally destroyed, lost, or switched to Biden, changing the outcome from a Biden loss to a Biden win.
	The lawyers allege in many of these cases that election officials change election rules without going through their state legislatures, with loopholes enabling intentionally or unintentionally fraudulent processes to be introduced by poll workers, the voting software dominion, and potentially third parties.
	While no decision of this court can repair the fractures in our society, only a fair and open inquiry that allows a truth to be discovered can do so, for it is a truth that will set us free.
	Conversely, closing down any inquiry into the merits of the unconstitutional and illegal conduct of this election would be a slap in the face to millions of Americans who believe it was a stolen election.
	Our common bond requires answers on the merits, not procedural evasion.
	And I agree with her.
	I mean, I think that Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell are gallant lawyers, and the same is true with Kenneth Paxman.
	They've done their best, and I'm going to continue to support them as long as I can.
	But I'm afraid that if all of these efforts Which are still ongoing.
	Fail.
	What is the result if you have a grievous assault on the constitutional right of the people to a free election?
	And there is no legal remedy.
	What's going to happen?
	Look at history.
	And you'll see what's going to happen.
	I no longer think it's avoidable, Jack.
	I no longer think it's avoidable.
	Meanwhile, Trump was hit with a decision about voter fraud left his Trump boiling.
	This is that YouTube made the decision they will remove content about election fraud, even though there are court cases about election fraud going through the system at this very moment.
	Audio is free speech.
	The bannings are coming.
	This is completely outrageous.
	Critics blasted YouTube's decision on the death of free speech as their now official content moderation policies for what political points of view are allowed to be discussed online in America.
	Came just days after Trump threatened to veto the National Defense Authorization Act over the bill not containing language repealing Section 230 of the 1996 Communications and Decency Act, which grants big tech companies immunity from lawsuits as long as they act as viewpoint neutral platforms.
	I hope House Republicans will vote against the very weak National Defense Authorization Act, which I will veto.
	Must include a termination of Section 230 for national security purposes, preserve our national monuments, and allow for 5G and troop reductions in foreign lands.
	This decision makes it clear that YouTube, which is run by Google, is a publisher with a liberal ideological point of view.
	There's no reason tech companies should be allowed to possess immunity that grants them monopolistic powers when they disobey the law.
	Jack, this is very, very troubling.
	Well, it is troubling, yes.
	Because we are on the decision of the Supreme Court And taking away a lawful remedy sought by Texas within the original jurisdiction of the United States Supreme Court, supported by 21 or 22 other states, what could be more respectable than that?
	And I mean, the court, you could say, well, the court doesn't want to become involved in claims of election fraud.
	Well, those are very painful to hear.
	Time-consuming, but that's why they are the Supreme Court.
	And in this case, it could all turn on one 9-0 decision of the United States Supreme Court.
	Yeah, they already had the perfect precedent for this case, Jack.
	The perfect precedent.
	Already decided by a prior Supreme Court that wasn't loaded with Trump appointees.
	That would be objective.
	It would show the objectivity of the decision.
	I am disgusted that they showed cowardice That they failed their obligation to the Constitution and to the American people by declining to hear this case, Jack.
	This is a disgrace.
	This is like Dred Scott versus Stanford, which declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional without regard or even mention of Somerset's case decided by the King's bench in 1771 and assumed to be the law by the framers of the American Constitution.
	Just recognizing Somerset's case would have set Dred Scott free.
	We would have avoided a civil war.
	But they did that in 1857.
	They're doing the same thing in 2020.
	This is not new.
	The Supreme Court has let us down before.
	This is disgraceful.
	Here's Matt Bracken.
	There will be blood.
	The impossible situation that the non-politician outsider Donald Trump found himself in was that he had to fight all of the dem social rats and at least half the GOP.
	Nominally Republican Governor Kemp and George is a classic example.
	Early in 2020, he signed a $110 million contract to buy 30,000 Chinese-made fraud-o-matics, vote-switching machines, placing them in every Georgia precinct.
	He reportedly inked the contract two weeks after he visited the Chinese Communist Party spy nest in Houston that was recently forced to close.
	It's safe to assume family kickbacks were involved.
	Camp, His Republican Attorney General and Republican Lieutenant Governor do not want their financial connection to the CCP revealed.
	This Georgia corruption was endangered by swamp drainer Trump and will be protected by Beijing Biden.
	Trump lost Georgia, and with a few other corrupt states, he lost the White House.
	What happened in Georgia was a classic example of Trump's dilemma.
	Like Republican Brian Kemp, half the GOP goes into politics for the legal family graft.
	Happy to play the designated loser, aka the Washington generals, to the dim-so-rat globetrotters who are assigned by the overall system to win majorities.
	Witness a sellout consent decree election deal the Georgia GOP made with Stacey Abrams, which guaranteed a rat victory and the unexamined continuance of the Georgia GOP graft machine.
	The GOP grifters want the graft without the hassles and accusations of being part of systemic white racism and so on, so they're eager to roll over on their backs for their dem-so-rat shot callers.
	Hunter and Joe Biden were not unique.
	They are typical of both sides of the political aisle.
	If a bit fragrant in their grifting.
	You can't give an American politician a million bucks, heaven forfend, that's a bribe.
	But you can give it to his son or to his brother after creating a fictitious job for him.
	Then he buys a couple of mansions and lets you live in them.
	Great work if you can get it.
	And you can only get it by becoming a made member of the ruling elite.
	Trump upset this legalized political graft formula, so he had 75% of Washington out to bury him from day one.
	All of the rats and half of the GOP impossible math to overcome.
	And it's not only the politicians.
	It's the bureaucrats, generals, admirals, intel and DOJ bosses, leading academics and top MSM figures.
	Our ruling class elites are all in on the scam, moving through a continuously revolving door of doing political favors.
	Switching jobs and obtaining seven-figure financial rewards, all while protecting one another, plus getting their undeserving brats into Ivy League schools, and then up into the ruling class nomenclature.
	Chelsea Clinton was not unique.
	She was just a high-profile example.
	Please examine the career paths of James Comey, Eric Holder, and Loretta Lynch that saw them hopping between the DOJ over to corporate payoff, do-nothing jobs for millions per year at the very same grifting corporation they oversaw, well, at DOJ, then over to top-level, damn-so-rat law firms, more millions for no work, then back over to the federal government as DOJ or FBI bosses.
	Oh, it's very cozy for our ruling class nomenclature elites.
	In each position they do favors for their friends and punish their mutual enemies.
	It's the polite but all-encompassing American version of plume o plata.
	In Mexico, the new mayor gets a visit from a cartel gangster with a suitcase full of money.
	It's opened on the new mayor's desk, and there's a loaded Mac-10 on top of the cash.
	Plomo Plata, lead or silver, play ball with a corrupt machine, or the corrupt machine will bury you.
	Donald Trump threatened this entire legalized draft arrangement with his efforts to drain the swamp and in return he got the so far non-kinetic but very real plumbo of all political and propaganda gun barrels fired at him from every player in this profoundly rotten system.
	I don't need to run down the bill in particular, as it's familiar to all, right up to the election stolen in front of our faces.
	So the swamp won, for now.
	And if the election bath was bad in 2020, considering the now SCOTUS-approved use of CHICOM fraud-o-matic vote-switching machines, plus truckloads of bogus mail-in ballots with no witnesses at the counting, then just imagine 2022.
	Twenty million at least illegal aliens will be amnestized and given a damn social rat voter registration card on the same day.
	Implicit will be vote rat and the rats will welcome the rest of your foreign family into the USA with no hassles.
	That's the rolling Dems so rat snowball becomes an unstoppable avalanche.
	This is how the Golden State became a one-party Kalazula in one generation.
	Motor voter at the DMV for all comers, no questions asked ever.
	This is how America will become America's Zoella.
	This is the proven Dems so rat playbook being exported nationwide.
	But patriotic Americans will not calmly accept becoming powerless serfs, Amerizuelans under an obviously fraudulent POTUS in the form of the senile and soon-to-be-gone Beijing Biden and his VP, soon-to-be-POTUS, Kami Harris.
	It has become glaringly obvious, even to a blind man, that these two grifting non-entities were illegitimately installed at the top of the American power pyramid by our bipartisan ruling class, come in Klaytura to protect their beloved swamp.
	Patriots will not accept this election theft, and the socialist tyranny that is sure to follow it is if left unchecked.
	There will be blood.
	Jack, I tell you, here's a sign of it.
	These are protesters, Proud Boys in Washington, D.C.
	What's up, YouTube?
	There's about probably 20,000 Proud Boys right now in Washington, D.C.
	and Patriots gathering.
	We're going to have at least a couple hundred thousand, I think, tomorrow.
	Hey, it's time, guys.
	Let's go.
	Good job.
	Let's protect the nation.
	Let's fight for the freedoms.
	USA!
	It's coming, Jack.
	It's coming.
	I guarantee it.
	I feel it in every fiber of my being.
	And goddammit, I support it.
	We cannot live as serfs and slaves.
	These Democrats are monstrous.
	They have lost their way.
	They're supported by the Chinese communists and by the globalists who want to destroy America to turn it into their own private preserves.
	As they do, they want to take ownership of the entire world under the Great Reset, Jack.
	It's an obscenity, and I will not consent!
	What I'm working on doing is to assure that the coming revolution, and there will be a revolution, I mean, it's no longer a question of what we should do, because we're going to have a revolution.
	Because the deprivation of the American people, of a free election to the American people, is too obvious.
	The only thing we can do is to work to make sure that the revolution that we do have is a peaceable constitutional revolution.
	That has happened before in American history and in English history and we can do it again.
	But we have to be very watchful for any opportunity to bring about a peaceful constitutional revolution such as as Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, and Jane of Ellis are
	working for. And we just have to, and Ken Paxson.
	Jack, I want to ask you about a couple of other issues here.
	Rumor, Trump will invoke an executive order that will destroy the steep state,
	and he needed to groove trees and all the way to the top the supreme gourd.
	Gee, that rumor is looking somewhat solid after this tweet.
	This is not an old tweet.
	It was posted on the 12th.
	We have just begun to fight.
	Jack, does that make any difference to your take?
	Well, I mean, I think if Trump's Present effort works.
	We will have a peaceable, orderly, constitutional revolution and reform.
	If he fails, we will have an armed revolution or a civil war.
	I'm afraid I don't know what else to say.
	So I, there are a lot of people who are praying, praying every day.
	I say the rosary every day for a peaceable, orderly revolution.
	Like the restoration of the House of Stuart in 1660 or the English Revolution of 1688 and 1689.
	I just hope that we have an opportunity to effectuate that.
	Jack, there are a couple other aspects of this I want to consider.
	There's a nurse showing AstraZeneca vaccine.
	This is the COVID vaccine.
	It has ingredients that alter your DNA and sterilize women.
	It's a COVID-19.
	It's recombinant.
	Check it out.
	Recombinant.
	This is talking about methods of changing our DNA.
	The sterilization program is a major component.
	It also turns out the COVID test is a dangerous fraud.
	This is from a frontline nurse practitioner who was speaking out on Facebook.
	Basically, you'd have to be brain-dead already to submit, but judging from the number of people willingly restricting their oxygen intake, I'd say there are already many who will and are offering themselves up for this invasive procedure because it's not a test for COVID.
	We are testing for two things.
	Your submission to willingly have your body violated and for the pretense of finding fragments of previous cold fragments.
	It's not for COVID-19.
	The assault is dangerous.
	What they do, Jack, is using their PCR tests at too many cycles.
	Barry Mullis, who invented it, said it was not for diagnostic purposes.
	We all have fragments of past colds or the flu.
	All kinds of stuff in our navel passage.
	When you magnify them up to 40 cycles, that no longer is reflective of anything significant.
	It's totally misleading.
	It's giving us a 98% false positive rate.
	They're not distinguishing between having a positive test and actually being sick.
	They're trading on a fallacy of ambiguity by talking about cases, Jack.
	It's totally fraudulent.
	This is an elementary fallacy.
	I taught my students 35 years to avoid.
	Brain access, by the way, is through the nose.
	The test, therefore, has another purpose than what the drug pursers say.
	Insert a test bar deeply into the nose.
	It causes hematocephalic barrier damage.
	It can also damage endocrine glands.
	That's why testing hurts so much.
	The purpose of this deep violation is to break the barrier and create an entry into the brain for every infection.
	When wearing a mouth and nose mask, bacteria and CO2 is collected and transported into the brain through the nose.
	The barrier's task is to protect from brain neurotoxins, heavy metals, bacteria and other toxins.
	If endocrine glands are damaged, symptoms such as muscle weakness, blood circulation, visual disturbances may develop.
	There is no legal basis for this physical intervention.
	It's a mass violation of physical immunity.
	Wake up to the assault.
	You are being violated along with your rights.
	No wonder so many COVID survivors have long-term issues.
	Anyone would after being subjected to this most sensitive body violation.
	Anyone who would submit to this needs to wake up.
	Jack, let me continue.
	The COVID tests are absurd.
	Pawpaw, that's a fruit, and growth tests have proven positive.
	Where the president of Tanzania conducted tests on animals' fruits, and even motor oil tested.
	He found the animals and the fruits tested positive.
	Only the motor oil did not.
	Meanwhile, here you have him reporting on it.
	Sample from the car oil.
	We took samples from the farm, from the condo, from the paddy, from the oil of the car, and other samples that we took to
	the market without them knowing.
	We collected the samples.
	The oil samples were found in the car.
	The sample from the car oil?
	We needed to jabble him as a 30-year-old male.
	The results came back negative for motor oil.
	The sample from a jackfruit, a durian, Sarah Samuel, 45 years old, female.
	It came back inconclusive.
	We took samples from a pawpaw.
	Elizabeth Ann, 26-year-old female.
	The results came back positive for COVID, that it had the coronavirus.
	That means the liquid from the pawpaw is positive.
	Samples from a bird type called the coltware.
	The results came back positive.
	We took samples from a rabbit.
	The results came back undetermined.
	We took samples from a goat.
	And the results came back positive.
	We took samples from a sheep.
	It came back negative.
	And so on and so on and so on.
	So when you see this, when you have taken the samples and say it's human and the results came back positive that they have coronavirus, it means all the Bobons should be in isolation.
	When you take goat samples and they're also positive.
	That means all the goats we have here, by assumption, maybe the goat, the sample which should be taken, should also be in isolation.
	When you take the jackfruit, the duranin, it's also a liquid from the jackfruit, which we named Elizabeth.
	Meaning Elizabeth the jackfruit.
	That means all the jackfruits should be in oscillation as well.
	So when you notice something like this, you know there's a dirty game being played with these tests.
	That there are unbelievable things happening in this country.
	Either the laboratory workers there are bought by people with money, Or they are not well educated, which isn't true because the laboratory is used for other diseases.
	Either the samples which are brought in, because even the reagents are imported, because these swabs are also imported.
	It's a must that something is actually going on.
	Jack, here's another.
	Here's a test here.
	Get this.
	This is a fruit smoothie, baby.
	and a fruit smoothie.
	♪♪ ♪♪
	So even blended fruit, Jack, even blended fruit comes back positive.
	And get this, that mask is giving you lung cancer.
	This is from Guy Crittenden, who for 25 years headed the trade journal Hazmat Management.
	Get this, I happen to know a thing or two about masks and safety.
	Why?
	Because for 25 years I was the editor of an award-winning trade magazine called Hazmat Management.
	It covered such topics as pollution convention and compliance with health and safety laws.
	We routinely published articles on masks, gloves, respirators, other forms of personal protective equipment, PPE.
	Let me tell you a few things about the mask you're wearing.
	Please note that what I'm about to share is also stated in the most recent edition of Del Bigtree's program, The High Wire, where OSHA mask experts spoke to the fact that the kinds of masks people are wearing were never, never designed to be worn for long periods, and doing so is very harmful.
	A blue typical mask depicted in the photograph contained Teflon and other chemicals.
	A facemask friend reminds us.
	1.
	Masks are sterilized with ethylene oxide, a known carcinogen.
	Many teachers and various school boards have been experiencing significant symptoms as a direct result of the effects of this chemical. 2.
	The mask contained, not sprayed with, PTFE, which makes up Teflon, along with other chemicals.
	I found in a post at the U.S.
	PET to allow manufacturers to use PTFE as a filter in commercial masks.
	Breathing these for extended periods can lead to lung cancer.
	Don't agree?
	Argue with the expert at OSHA, which is the main U.S.
	agency, that is, its Occupational Health and Safety Agency.
	The masks are worn only for short periods.
	Like, say, if you're sanding a table for an hour and don't want to inhale sawdust.
	They don't do anything whatsoever to stop the spread of any virus.
	And the emerging science of virology now understands that viruses aren't even passed person to person.
	I know that sounds incredible, but it's the case that the virus is in the air you breathe.
	There's no way to prevent it short of living in an oxygen tank.
	And if you have a strong immune system, you'll be fine.
	And if you have a weak immune system, you may have to deal with the effects of your immune system working to restore balance within your metabolism.
	So let's say you don't wear the blue package mask and instead wear a homemade cloth mask, the kind people wear over and over and hang on their rearview mirror and so on.
	Those masks are completely useless against the virus and are also very dangerous.
	OSHA would never condone a person wearing a mask of this kind for other than the shortest time.
	Re-breathing your own viral debris is dangerous to health, and the oxygen deprivation children suffer wearing such masks all day certainly cause brain damage.
	I'm not making this up.
	Again, you might say, well, guys, You're not a doctor.
	True.
	But I did edit that magazine for 25 years.
	That's a long time.
	And many articles on mass and PPE.
	I've attempted many numerous OSHA conferences and listened to experts discussing these matters.
	You may hear people say that surgeons and nurses wear masks like this all day.
	No, no they don't.
	They're trained in the proper use of masks, which is use them in the OR and then dispose of the mask when they leave the room.
	Our OR operating rooms are actually supplied extra oxygen to compensate for the reduction in oxygen required for mask wearing.
	To my mind, it's criminal!
	Not hyperbole to force question children to wear masks all day, setting aside the very real psychological effects.
	We're going to have a generation of brain-damaged children.
	Ever heard the expression, not enough oxygen at birth?
	That's a joke at the expense of the mentally challenged person, but that's literally what we're doing.
	We're told it's to keep us safe.
	We're told this by doctors who don't actually know about PPE and low people who have no clue.
	So, You can choose to believe me or not, but I was the editor for a quarter century of a magazine that had strong occupational health and safety mandates.
	And I can tell you that the mask wearing currently mandated by governments and private businesses offers no health benefit whatsoever.
	In no way protects you or anyone else from the virus.
	It actually does you damage beyond wearing it for a few minutes.
	Got that?
	Good.
	Now please share this message and get the conversation going with parents who must end this mask wearing of children immediately.
	This is a very serious matter.
	And related to that, let me say this doesn't end for me when the lockdown ends or the masking ends.
	No, this ends for me when every politician and bureaucrat who inflicted this travesty, this crime against humanity, On the population of Canada and other affected countries is in the dark and faces their misdeeds in the court of law.
	And for those of you who have put masks on young children, I will have a long memory on that score, a very long memory.
	End note, the CDC and the NHL have acknowledged that asymptomatic people do not spread the virus.
	So the case of mass for such people is moot in the first place.
	And look at this, Jack.
	This is from deagle.com, which is offering projections about the population of different nations in the world five years in.
	For most, there's only a modest change up or down.
	Brazil gaining 3 million.
	Nigeria dropping 3 million.
	Bangladesh gaining maybe 20 million.
	Russia dropping a million.
	Mexico Staying about the same.
	Philippines increasing $10 million.
	Egypt increasing about $7 million.
	Japan dropping maybe $20 million.
	Ethiopia dropping maybe $5 million.
	United States of America Going from 300 million, so less than 100 million, Jack, going from over 300 million, 326 million, 620, to 99 million, 553.
	Vietnam picking up 3 million, Iran dropping a million, but the United States losing two-thirds of our population in the next five years, Jack.
	The next five years.
	Your thoughts about all of this.
	Well, the global warming scare and the coronavirus scare are news media generated crises.
	They're false crises and they are meant to stampede us into one world government.
	That's what this is all about.
	The reason why Trump has become such a target is that he wants to stop this drive toward one world government.
	That's the whole... Trump wants strong nation-states.
	The Bilderberg Group wants one world government, banking and currency.
	And that's the primary struggle of our time.
	I believe The coronavirus crisis is largely manufactured and greatly exaggerated.
	It's the same as the global warming scare, which has no scientific basis, if you study the problem carefully.
	And these are just meant to stampede us into one world government.
	That's my basic thought.
	And look at the damage, however, that the face masks and the social distancing and the lockdowns are doing tremendous damage to the country, Jack.
	It's outrageous.
	And here you got Deagle projecting we're going to lose two-thirds of our population in the next five years.
	I believe a major instrument will be ourselves killing us slowly.
	Under the fake belief in a coronavirus that is no more significant than a seasonal flu.
	In fact, they've stopped counting the seasonal flu, Jack.
	They're lumping them all into coronavirus to inflate the numbers.
	That may be so, yeah.
	I mean, what could be more ridiculous than taking medical advice on a complex medical problem?
	Or scientific?
	advice on a complex scientific problem from the New York Times or some other newspaper.
	And Jack, the gross aspects of this are outrageous.
	In the past, you would isolate the sick, not the healthy.
	They're isolating the healthy.
	They're quarantining the healthy, not just the sick.
	And then you take some provisions to protect those who are most at risk.
	This is just obscene.
	I have many blogs about it at jamesfetzer.org, Jack.
	Yeah, well, there's no doubt a lot of I ran into two very bright young people who are hipped on the crisis over global warming.
	And we point out that climate is a very complex subject matter.
	What they're trying to tell us is that human emissions of carbon dioxide, which is so small a factor that it's barely identifiable or measurable.
	One factor, a minor, insignificant factor that causes climate is going to cause catastrophic overheating of our planet in the next century.
	That doesn't add up.
	As if all the other factors like solar activity and so on were not operative or effective.
	Well, the Democrats and the globalists are using all this nonsense to dramatically reduce the population of Earth.
	I have no doubt that these vaccines have anti-sterility properties and others that are horrific for those who receive them, Jack.
	It's a monster.
	I have one final issue I want to invite you to consider.
	Which is the following.
	Hillary used body doubles in her campaign.
	She used six or eight.
	She even used a body double to debate with Bernie Sanders and with Donald Trump.
	Joe Biden has followed Hillary's lead.
	He's reported to have had a skull implant so he didn't need to wear a wire.
	His anti-dementia medication has the unfortunate side effect of incontinence.
	They actually had staff meetings to discuss which brand of adult wiper he should wear.
	They requested breaks every 30 minutes, which the Trump campaign declined.
	No, Biden was given the debate questions in advance.
	That's not surprising.
	Donna DeMille Brazil did that for Hillary.
	Biden to reverse his course, declines to have his ears inspected pre-debate despite agreeing days ago.
	This is because when they turned down the 30-minute breaks to change his diapers, they had to go with plan B. Joe Biden's campaign agreed to inspection for electronic earpieces at tonight's debate several days ago, but they're now declining, a familiar source reported.
	Biden campaign requested a debate break every 30 minutes.
	It's only for a 90-minute event, but they use the same body double.
	They brought out a body double, Jack.
	They use the same body double for the second debate.
	Notice the double doesn't have the earlobes of the real Joe Biden.
	He doesn't have the Joe Biden smile even when he's family.
	Some of the photos reveal how unlike Joe Biden is his body double.
	This major deception by the DNC could invalidate the election for Joe to win.
	Look at the difference.
	Here you see he has a pendent earlobe.
	His ears attach up.
	Here the ears attach down.
	He has a narrower skull.
	He has a wider skull.
	Joe has a rounder chin.
	He's got a very dimpled chin.
	Joe uses a double winder.
	He uses a single winder.
	Get this!
	The double even has brown eyes.
	Joe Biden has blue jack.
	There's even a difference in the color of their eyes.
	The second debate, it was the same guy.
	Not surprising once they went with him.
	Here you see the real Joe and his ears.
	Here you see the fake Joe and his ears.
	Here's one very clear about how the ears attach to the side of the face.
	Not Joe Biden.
	I decided to look for body language in relation to the family.
	And I found that the body double is not Relating to Jill, the wife, the way Joe Biden did.
	Look at the difference.
	When Jill is with her husband, she's smiling, even glowing, smiling, even growing.
	They're usually hand-in-hand, arm-in-arm.
	The body double, no, they're detached.
	She looks solid, he's not smiling.
	Joe Biden always had this shit-eating smile on his face.
	Here you got, again, the double.
	You got the real Joe, Jack.
	And they put him on Time Magazine at the time, Man of the Year.
	That was insulting beyond belief.
	It's supposed to be the person who, for better or worse, made the biggest difference to the world, which is obviously Donald J. Trump.
	Not Joe Biden, who hid in his basement and wouldn't come out, couldn't get 10 people to a rally.
	Here are very significant contrasting photographs of the real Joe Biden, the deep state traitor and pedophile, versus the actor Joe Biden, the comedy genius secretly saving America.
	Do you really think Trump would allow this criminal to run for president, get away with it?
	This has now been picked up on the Twitter.
	Biden, not Biden.
	Notice a difference in the ears.
	Here's another.
	Wow, what a difference.
	What is nice blue human eyes and what is cold dead fish eyes.
	Scary the thought of what they really do to this people.
	Mind-controlled Manchurian candidates.
	More of the different Where has the real Joe Biden gone?
	To be Biden or not to be Biden?
	That is the question.
	Jack, I'm convinced they brought out the body double just like Hillary.
	They're going to inaugurate a body double on the 20th of January?
	Can nothing be done?
	Wouldn't the use of this body double invalidate the entire Democratic campaign?
	And lead to the win of the election, the campaign by Trump, by default?
	Well, I'm not an expert on this question.
	I haven't studied it.
	So I want to suspend judgment.
	But what you're saying is supported by persuasive circumstantial evidence.
	And it could be true.
	It simply adds to the burden of the suits that are to be commenced tomorrow by President Trump in four states on a retooled Texas-style suit.
	Hopefully we can wake the Supreme Court up and get them to examine the evidence and do something about this.
	Well, John Remington Graham, Jack, my dear friend, I want to thank you so much for participating with me about these very, very crucial issues.
	I wish I had confidence that there's a peaceful resolution.
	But I'm afraid the Supreme Court has cast this nation in another fateful direction, as in the case of the Dred Scott decision, Jack.
	And that, I'm afraid, violent revolution has now become all but inevitable.
	Well, certainly the chances are increasing.
	And it's very troubling.
	And that's why those of us who are Interested in trying to bring about a peaceful constitutional revolution.
	Have to work hard and never give up and take every opportunity we have.
	Because I think the odds are against us right now.
	But what could I do?
	I'll do everything I can.
	But I fear that we may not We may not succeed, and it's a problem.
	You're a wonderful guy, Jack, and I admire you beyond words.
	I reiterate the words of Thomas Jefferson, the tree of liberty must be nourished from time to time by the blood of patriots.
	I stand with Nathan Hale.
	I regret that I have but one life to give for my country.
	I will not live as a slave.
	I say to all one and all, 20 January, if this man is inaugurated, this imposter, this phony, this fraud, that will trigger the second American revolution.
	And I say, finally, in my final thought, even though I'm an agnostic, God bless Donald Trump and God bless America.
	This is Jim Fetzer, The Conspiracy Guy, thanking Jack Graham, for being my special guest tonight, and all of you for watching.

▲