Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 9, 2020 - Jim Fetzer

01:51:55

The Fetz Presents (8 December 2020): Carl Herman on The State of the Union

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	I'll just make sure we're broadcasting.
	Okay.
	Thank you.
	There we go.
	Welcome to the FETS Presents.
	This is Jim Fetzer, where I'm very pleased to have as my featured guest this evening.
	A man with an excellent reputation.
	He's a distinguished teacher of history, of mathematics, economics.
	His statistical skills are extremely impressive.
	His name, Carl Herman.
	He's from San Ramon, California, and I'm here to invite his reflections on the current state of the union.
	Carl, it's great to have you here.
	My pleasure.
	Thanks for inviting me.
	You are welcome to begin almost everywhere.
	But since you're in California, where I was, of course, born in Pasadena a while back, they tell me, I'd be glad to hear what you think of this Governor Newsom, this Mayor Garcetti.
	I don't know if you know, but this evening on Tucker Carlson, Eric Swalwell, Was just outed as being, in essence, an agent of communist China, where he's been their advocate, and where the Chinese have boasted as having high figures in the American government working for them.
	He, who is on the House Intelligence Committee, appears to be among them.
	I've never had the least enthusiasm for Eric Swalwell.
	He's come across as Massively arrogant and condescending in a giant-sized POS, in my opinion.
	But then, you know, there's so many members of the House from California.
	And they range from, you know, Maxine Waters, you know, to to Dianne Feinstein.
	And, you know, now Kamala Harris, who, God forbid, might even be vice president.
	And then since Joe Biden and actually the guy we're seeing now is a body double, not the real Joe.
	Might become president.
	I mean, that's about as horrifying as I can imagine.
	Carl, there have been a lot of voters who have said that if they'd known about the Biden scandals related to the Hunter Biden laptop that the FBI sat on for a year, no doubt because Christopher Wray himself is involved in some of the corrupt deals they were making with China, Or that Kamala Harris was by far the most liberal member of the United States Senate that they would not have cast a vote for Biden but then practically no one cast a vote for Biden so far as I can tell the actual vote
	Was on the order of 73 million for Trump, 23 for Biden, which is a very close approximation to their Twitter sites, where Trump has over 90 million Twitter followers and Biden around 16.
	I mean, it was never going to be a close race.
	And Nancy Pelosi was only talking about a blue wave because she knew the fix was in with Dominion voting machines, where her chief of staff is the CEO of Dominion.
	And guess what, Carl?
	I just got a blockbuster today.
	Dominion is owned by China.
	Yeah, it's really a flood of information that's coming in, and if you even just consider the name of this so-called voting machine company, Dominion?
	What?
	Who are you going to be dominioning over?
	So, you asked me about California, and the whole DNC and the California control is all based on dictatorial government that is, on its face, illegal.
	Here in California, the lockdowns have accelerated.
	The mayor of LA has attempted to say that more lockdowns and more restrictions, but none of that is legal.
	In the state of California, the Emergency Services Act gave the governor 60 days of power.
	An emergency was declared in March, so it's over.
	And there are not hundreds, but thousands of lawsuits.
	And, you know, I'm excited about this flood of current events.
	The Supreme Court will hear what has happened and the evidence will be presented.
	I think that has been part of the plan all along.
	This presentation I'm going to be giving you as a historian is going to take a look at the slam-dunk case that the U.S.
	cannot be described as a constitutional republic under limited government.
	It is a rogue state empire under dictatorial control, giving lip service to the limits within the constitution.
	But just look at this lockdown.
	There's no authority for that.
	None, zip, zero.
	And you have to expose the leadership of the government is corrupt.
	You have to expose these five companies and corporate media as the propaganda arm
	for these wannabe dictators.
	And you also have to expose within the government, not only the legislators, but the judges
	who are appointed by the political leadership.
	So this is a huge housecleaning.
	It is very exciting.
	And all of the chips are on the table.
	Well, Carl, you're welcome to expand on all those themes.
	I'd love to have your comprehensive critique of how things stand today, because most Americans, I think, are of the least bit bewildered.
	Stupefied, dumbfounded, you know, because so many of these events are enough to boggle the mind.
	The lockdowns, the coronavirus, the face masks, all these are very damaging.
	We're even being told now to not even go outside and exercise, where the cumulative effect of being imprisoned in your own home, wearing a mask, not exercising, is to weaken your immune system to make you more vulnerable to routine environmental threats that normally wouldn't make a difference if you were out and about breathing fresh air, getting some exercise, interacting with other human beings.
	That's the way we maintain a robust immune system.
	And as you well know, The way this so-called pandemic, which is purely political and not a medical emergency, has been handled has been to invert
	The traditional techniques of dealing with it, which are to isolate the sick and protect the vulnerable.
	But in this case, they've isolated, quarantined the healthy.
	I mean, Carl, it's just absurd.
	And I think I'm certainly getting sick and tired of it.
	It's outrageous.
	It has no scientific basis.
	If you followed the science, You'd recognize that the surges and deaths have followed lockdowns.
	There's a new study about it on my blog at jamesfetzer.org, and that wearing masks deprives your body of oxygen because you're re-breathing oxygen-depleted air, that it's killing your brain cells.
	It's putting a strain on your cardiovascular system and potentially inducing all kinds of Bacteria and other diseases in your lungs that turn out to be extremely difficult to get rid of.
	So I believe there's a reason why deagle.com has projected that between now and 2025, the U.S.
	population will go from 332 million, Carl, to 99.
	I mean, that's a staggering change.
	That's 230 million plus that are no longer going to be among us in five years.
	And my surmise is the primary mechanism for exterminating two-thirds of the U.S.
	population is the boiling frog.
	You have the frog and the cattle in it because you only increase the temperature one degree at a time before he knows that he's been cooked.
	I think before we know it, we'll have done ourselves so much damage, we're not going to be able to survive for five years in a mask.
	And they're going to keep moving the goalposts, moving the goalposts.
	Oh, two weeks more.
	I mean, it's just outrageous, in my opinion, and very insulting, and the damage being done to children.
	By not being in school, not interacting with our friends.
	Depression, suicides, all totally predictable.
	And it's utterly reprehensible.
	But the monsters who are attempting to destroy America could care less.
	That's, frankly, their objective.
	So, of course, they're not going to try to fix anything.
	They want it to work their will upon us.
	That's exactly right, Jim.
	And let's see if we can take this time to kind of demystify this.
	My expertise is communicating to the world's most challenging audience, captured teenagers, and we'll display this history and encourage people that they must stand.
	And they already have enough information to do that.
	People already know that this is dictatorial government, but we'll take time to explain, document, and prove it.
	So I did at your invitation to to write about my research.
	I have spent 43 years now since the age of 17.
	I constructed a college major at UC Berkeley for Ending Poverty and I helped grow the Citizens Lobby Group results from a basically a California group.
	I took it to Northern California's UC Berkeley Student, we expanded to 100 U.S.
	communities, seven countries, and we were key voices for two U.N.
	summits for heads of state.
	I helped contribute to about 300 policy briefs for members of Congress.
	So I've had interactions with the leaderships of both political parties for 18 years, to two U.N.
	summits for heads of state, The 1990 World Summit for Children, which at that time was the largest meeting of heads of state in world history, whereby we discovered that the leaders of the so-called developed world and former colonial powers had no intention of ending poverty, even in 1997 with the microcredit summit, small loans to the poorest of the poor, that actually turns
	A profit while ending poverty, the so called former colonial nations are still colonial masters, and they want to extract the maximum amount of profit from natural resources and the human resources that work those natural resources.
	The U.S.
	does not engage for wars for freedom.
	This is just simply colonial powers.
	And they have to control the domestic population within the United States.
	They have to stupefy us.
	They have to weaken us.
	And then once they have the automation, which I guess they feel that they do, they need to cull the flock of sheeple.
	And we really do need to stand now And I hope this presentation will arm people that for sure we have the objective information that is even non-controversial was just never put into the corporate media.
	Or once the lies are put into corporate media for the adults, then they go directly into the school textbooks to cover that empire.
	So would I be able to have the screen to share?
	Carl, we can give it a try.
	Let me make you a host.
	Yeah, I got a screen share.
	Okay.
	Go ahead and give it a shot.
	Let's see what happens.
	Yep, you got it.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Well, as we go over this, jump in with any questions, any challenges, any additional information.
	So in the 43 years that I've been engaged for building a brighter future,
	and as a National Board Certified Teacher of History, Government, Economics,
	also credentialed in Mathematics, and your audience should know that when I was young
	and believed in the system, I won awards by not one, by two Los Angeles mayors
	for being among the best teachers among a population in Central Los Angeles of about 20,000 teachers.
	The average rating on anonymous semester ending surveys of my students was an A plus.
	Your audience should also know that when I, after the 1997 microcredit summit,
	where I really found out that, hey, our leaders aren't gonna end poverty
	even when it turns a profit.
	And then I looked into the Federal Reserve System.
	I looked into the wars and began to communicate data.
	Objective, independently verifiable data.
	I then was fired four times.
	You were fired four times, Carl?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	As a National Board Certified Teacher with degrees from Berkeley and Harvard and an average rating from my students of an A+.
	That's amazing!
	Well, I got attention.
	The people who are our opponents were paying attention.
	It's like when I was denied tenure at Kentucky.
	I had more publications and better journals than any assistant professor they'd had before.
	I'd won the first Distinguished Teaching Award presented by the student government to one of 133 assistant professors, and I'd given 12 talks at eight different departments, which I'm quite certain had never been equal because my background was so interdisciplinary, Carl, but they decided I did not meet their standard.
	Ironically, one of the reasons was that the department head, who'd been hired under false pretenses, they thought he was a specialist in the philosophy of religion, but he actually had a PhD in religion, not philosophy.
	Wanted Kentucky to have a Ph.D.
	program, which I thought was a bad idea.
	We had a very good master's program.
	It was working quite well, getting students on their feet to qualify for a Ph.D.
	program.
	So I think he was eager to have me out of the way that I not be opposing his grand ambition.
	Well, This would be like 10 years later.
	They had their PhD program, and when there was a national ranking of PhD programs, there were like 96 in the United States.
	Kentucky came in at 96.
	What a brilliant idea!
	That's a great way to enhance the reputation of the university.
	Yeah.
	Well, I decided I would break this paper up into- Your voice is soft.
	Can you turn up your- Yeah.
	Yeah, okay.
	So there are three parts to this.
	It's basically the history of the evil empire up to the present.
	Carl, I don't know why, but your voice is still low.
	I don't know what the deal might be, if there's anything you can do.
	Well, I got maximum volume.
	I can speak up.
	Is this better?
	Give it a go, I guess that's where we are, so.
	Okay.
	Let's see, I could close the door and undo the... Let's experiment on this.
	I mean, look, it was a diminution from the beginning.
	Your voice was good and strong in the beginning, and it somehow took a drop.
	Is this better now?
	Perhaps.
	Well, I'm at...
	How about now?
	Yes!
	Oh, good, okay.
	All right, well, let's go for it.
	So, the history, the current, and the emerging greatness beyond words, which I really do see coming, and I'll present this.
	All right, so people need to understand is that for roughly I'll just go back 200 years.
	The U.S.
	has been the vicious, global, emerging leader of empire.
	People know from their high school history classes that we had two world wars that were basically about the Europeans and, in the second world war, Japan, to a lesser extent, attempting to control all the world that they could.
	And the American history books say that the U.S.
	wasn't interested in empire.
	No, the U.S.
	has been a rogue state empire.
	And we can just take a look at some of those case studies.
	I wrote a small book, really, of U.S.
	illegal, the history of rogue state empire.
	In order to prove this, the U.S.
	has violated approximately 600 treaties with Native American tribes.
	So it didn't take long for Article 6 of the Constitution that says a treaty is U.S.
	supreme law.
	So you cannot violate a treaty.
	The intent of the founders was that when a U.S.
	president signs And the Senate ratifies that we cannot abrogate those terms, but when it was convenient and it was easy, we stole the natural resources of the Native Americans.
	We stole almost half of Mexico.
	In the history books, this is presented as a border dispute.
	Well, you know, think about this.
	If you're going to have a treaty with another country, one of the things you make crystal clear in letter and intent is where the border is.
	And that was made absolutely clear at first with Spain.
	Mexico became an independent country.
	That treaty was turned over and renewed by the U.S.
	Senate and the President with the nation of Mexico.
	And the terms of the treaty with Mexico was that the border between Mexico and the U.S.
	would forever be where we have Texas today.
	The eastern border, the Sabine River, Going up and everything that is to the south and to the west was in the treaty, the terms of the treaty, forever to be Mexico, never the US.
	And conversely, the other way around, the areas that were north and to the east of that border were forever the US.
	The Republican Party began, Jim, as a protest party on two issues.
	One was President Polk violating that treaty to steal half of Mexico and then to bribe their government into saying they sold it to us.
	And the other one was to take a firm stand against slavery.
	So we stole half of Mexico, killed 50,000 Mexican, 5,000 American soldiers.
	The U.S.
	stole Hawaii in 1898.
	Again, crystal clear treaty that that is a sovereign nation.
	Under the greed of Dole with Dole pineapple and Dole sugar cane, the U.S.
	Marines overthrew that kingdom's government.
	President Grover Cleveland at the time acknowledged That it was illegal, but the next president came in McKinley, and he just went ahead and annex the territory, Bill Clinton apologized for it, but didn't do what would be the right thing is offer the Hawaiians their land back in 1959 when the state was ratified.
	There are only two options.
	One, hey, do you want to be a state?
	Two, would you rather prefer to be a territory?
	But they were required under the UN to give them the third obvious option, which would be, would you like your land back?
	So I'm framing this as the history of the United States that everybody who studies history at a serious level at the university level or even in some AP books will read this and see it, but the ordinary Americans who are in a US history class.
	or get their history from corporate media will never find this out.
	What I'm telling you is the conservative, non-controversial, non-contested history of what the United States actually has been.
	In the Spanish-American War, the U.S.
	basically did the same thing to steal the Philippines and Cuba.
	In World War I, There was no national security threat.
	The Germans made an offer saying, hey, Mexico, if you'd like to join us, when we win, we'll give you your land back.
	The Americans stole.
	Of course, Mexico declined the offer.
	They saw what it was.
	And all the U.S.
	needed to do to avoid a war was to not declare one.
	This Zimmerman telegram clearly said, we want the U.S.
	out of the war, obviously.
	If the U.S.
	does join the war, will you join us?
	And the U.S.
	just spun that into a reason for war.
	Now, I'm going to start calling that present modern history because now we're talking about both my granddaddies were lied into that war, into the American Expeditionary Forces.
	My dad's dad died relatively young in his 60s from a heart attack And God knows what his heart suffered.
	My dad said that his dad, when the topic of World War I came up, he would turn stone icy and he would say, I do not tell war stories.
	And that would end the conversation in the room.
	And my dad said he had no idea what his dad went through in the trenches, but it must've been horrible.
	My mom's dad on the other hand, he repaired trains breaking systems in Paris and he had a lot of good stories about French food and French women.
	The CIA overthrew Iran in Operation Ajax and this killed up to and then and then we When they got their country back, the U.S.
	armed our other CIA asset, Iraq, for the war between 1980 to 1988, killing a million Iranians.
	So I'm just piling this on.
	The evidence is here.
	Jim, whenever you want to, you can jump in.
	Otherwise, I'll just roll through this.
	I'm just verifying with the chatroom that the audio is good now, which I believe it is.
	Okay.
	I actually turned it up at my end too, Carl, so I think we're okay.
	Yeah, it sounds good.
	I'm glad of that.
	So the U.S.
	has gone into these countries to overthrow democracies.
	Iran had a democracy.
	And when Mosaddegh, the leader, the political leader of that country, tried to renegotiate the terms of the oil deal so that their country would have more than just a 10% share of the profits of their own oil, that's when the CIA came in, overthrew him, And got the Shaw in to be our friendly dictator.
	The Vietnam War, this also agreed to by the UN that Vietnam would be a democracy.
	The North and the South would temporarily split.
	After two years, they would have an election.
	When those two years were up and it became clear that Ho Chi Minh would be more of a socialistic elected leader, that is when the U.S.
	jumped in and provided military advisors to the appointee in the South starting that action.
	Perhaps the most disturbing history and important is that the United States assassinated Dr. King, mostly from his family's analysis to stop his protest of the Vietnam War.
	Dr. King was killed in April of 1968, his last stop, before having the Poor People's March to occupy Washington, D.C.
	until The Vietnam War was ended and those funds were redirected to end poverty within the United States.
	The Empire could not have that.
	Now, when I say the U.S.
	government assassinated Martin, I am telling you the legal courtroom verdict of the King Family Civil Trial.
	Now, for your audience, I am giving you just slam dunk powerful evidence of the Empire.
	Corporate media refused to cover it, despite the overwhelming evidence.
	And this is so important.
	Let's take a look very quickly at this evidence to make this case.
	Because, you know, a lot of people would say, well, I can't believe that that would be true.
	This is an interview I had with Martin in 2016, pretending, giving him a voice since he didn't have one.
	The U.S.
	111th Military Intelligence Group were at the location.
	The 20th Special Forces Group had an eight-man sniper team, which you have more experience than I do, but it's my understanding that having eight guys as a sniper team is kind of the minimum.
	That'll allow you to triangulate the shot, and then you have the commanding officer along with the communication officer.
	The Memphis Police usually has special bodyguards.
	They were ordered to stand down.
	Regular police protection was ordered to remove themselves from Dr. King's hotel at 5 p.m.
	an hour before the assassination.
	Military intelligence set up photographers and a film crew on the fire station roof next door to the assassination site, the Lorraine Hotel, and we know that because the fire captain said, oh yeah, they came in here two days before, and they kind of set this up as an office, including the photographers and the film crew up on the roof.
	Dr. King's room was changed to put him perfectly exposed to sniper fire.
	The manager of the hotel said, yeah, I got this phone call that said it was from the Memphis Police Department.
	They told him to change the room for Dr. King's safety.
	I hate to tell you, but that phone call was apparently made by Jesse Jackson.
	Yeah.
	And he also rushed over when Martin was slain.
	He actually was still alive.
	And made sure he got Martin's blood on his shirt and clothing.
	I think he believed there was an opportunity for him to ascend and become a prominent spokesman for the black community.
	It never quite panned out.
	Martin actually was taken in an ambulance to a hospital more distant than necessary where A physician, an emergency room physician had guaranteed that if they brought him in, he would finish him off.
	And he cleared everyone out of the emergency room and smothered him to death with a pillow.
	Yes, very disturbing.
	And we do know that this is how our opponents play.
	Jesse Jackson was indeed promoted.
	He was, and how they promote him is through corporate media.
	They invite him to the interviews.
	They talk nicely about him.
	So they're just, we really do need to stand.
	So this history extends all the way up into the present.
	You know, if there is a murder or somebody gets even shot, police will go and knock on doors and see if people knew anything.
	Except in one of the most important assassinations in American history, they conducted no investigation.
	They knocked on no doors.
	And then there was the guy, the Patsy, James Earl Ray.
	He was told his story was, okay, I'm a career low-level criminal.
	I was offered some money to deliver a rifle, which I did, and then I left.
	And his court-appointed attorney told him, look, bro.
	You're going to fry, because if you're engaged in any part of a murder, you get hit with all of it.
	This is what you got to do.
	You plead guilty, and then at the trial, you can explain your limited role, and you'll have a limited sentence.
	Pled guilty, he was given life in prison and the King family civil trial cleared that up and the jury for that civil trial found the U.S.
	government and its various local agencies at the state level and at the city level guilty of the assassination of Martin.
	The witnesses pointed across the street at a hillside that was covered in tall grass and weeds
	as the location of the shooter, because a guy stood up from there,
	running up the hill with a rifle.
	When they told the police that, the police called up the city department
	and the city works came in and mowed that hillside overnight
	so that they could say the following day, you know, these witnesses must have been confused
	because as you can see, there's no place on that hillside for a sniper to hide.
	Bye.
	We know that the current arguments for war with Iran are false.
	So that's a little bit of the history.
	I'll elaborate on that.
	I think the Iran deal is very important and relevant.
	I worry terribly about the effort to demonize Iran when it's The most peaceful great country in the world, Iran's civilization goes back thousands of years, of course.
	And as it happens, Iran has not launched a war of aggression against any other state since 1775, Carl.
	And as I point out for historical context, the ratification of the Constitution began in 1787.
	George Washington was elected our first president in 1789.
	So for longer than the United States has existed as a constitutional republic, Iran has not attacked any other state.
	It's stunning.
	Yeah, yeah.
	So the main lie that's easiest to go ahead and confirm Is that we've been told and we still hear this from time to time that Iran has threatened to wipe Israel off the map.
	And this is based upon a speech that was given in 2003 by Iran's political leader Ahmadinejad.
	I'm trying to find it here in this article.
	And in the speech, what he basically said is that Israel needs to be cautious towards the Palestinians because they're denying the Palestinians their rights, which is, he said it very gently.
	But as we know, Gaza is the largest concentration camp.
	And in this speech, he said, look, Israel is going to go the way of the Soviet Union.
	Their government will disappear.
	They're going to go the way of the Shah's government in our own country.
	They will go the way of Saddam's government.
	All of those governments were erased from the page of time, and so will Israel.
	Yeah, he was talking about The Zionist regime in Tel Aviv and saying this too will pass, not that Israel is going to be annihilated or that we intend to wipe it off the map so that the Israelis and their masters at this use the opportunity for a false translation to achieve the political objective they desired of demonizing Iran.
	Yep.
	And you can tell.
	So part of what we're doing here is we're pointing out to you that this speech can be verified by anybody.
	Read the speech for yourself.
	It'll take five minutes.
	And that is damning evidence that corporate media and all of the political leaders who use that to threaten Iran, as well as with a first strike Nuclear weapon capacity.
	That is the most evil, cruel thing that you could say about another country's political leader, that they're threatening to wipe another country off the map when it isn't true.
	So the punchline of a lot of my work is, is that there's no response for an American other than to demand the arrests of these leaders who these crimes, when you quantify, you said that, you know, I'm good with statistics.
	I'm good with the type of statistics that we use in practical applications, like baseball statistics, so that you can really see how we're doing.
	You live in a country, and I live in a country, the United States is the leader for killing millions, harming billions, and looting trillions every year, with a magnitude figure of the total amount looted of roughly a hundred trillion dollars.
	So these are crazy looting liars imperialists.
	Let's jump to the present.
	So in the present, you know, I've laid some of the cases out for the U.S.
	historical perspective, not being limited government under a constitution, but a rogue state empire going all the way up into the present in these so-called wars on terror that Trump has not expanded.
	And let me just say this clearly now, is I do believe that the U.S.
	military has taken a stand.
	They are the ones who have behind the scenes Worked for probably well over a hundred years to get a counter coup.
	And I think what we're seeing is what Q calls the show for the plan to step by step catch and reveal and expose all these looters and liars within the government.
	Within the legislative branch, with Biden as the so-called president-elect, the crooked judges, and corporate media, and our financial system.
	All of that has to be exposed.
	Now, the audience right now is getting most of that case demonstrated right here, right now.
	The ones that I have given are just among maybe a hundred areas, a magnitude figure of a hundred areas of proof.
	You can go into the poisons that are put into our food.
	You can go into the lying public education school books, which I wrote pretty much a small book on that.
	Entitled U.S.
	Public Education Bullshit to Train Stupefied Work Animals.
	And I give examples within our own textbooks for U.S.
	history, government, economics, mathematics, to consider the U.S.
	that our leadership classes are pretty much entertainment committees?
	Come on!
	So in the present, we really are in American Revolution 2.0.
	And if people aren't caught up to speed, please get up to speed.
	What you've seen since Trump has been president, you have seen this factless Russiagate, this crimeless impeachment, and now you're seeing election fraud revealed before your very eyes as the case goes to the Supreme Court.
	The most damning data point that I have in this.
	So you have these swing states.
	Trump is winning.
	They stopped the election, which they can't do, but they did.
	And then in the morning, they just say, oh yeah, Biden won.
	I mean, how much more in your face do you need?
	There are, I've heard that there are now, that Sidney Powell has 5,000 sworn legal affidavits of expert witnesses involved in the election claiming election fraud.
	Thousands.
	The best data point that I know is in Pennsylvania, where you had one so-called batch of votes, about 600,000 for Biden, about 3,000 for Trump.
	Okay, well, you know, I also have a math credential, I can calculate those odds.
	If we assume a 50-50 division between those votes, 600,000 to 3,000 is 200 to 1, where if we just assume a 50-50 matchup between that, 200 to 1 calculates his odds of a number with 50 to 60 zeros behind it.
	People can stand that this is election fraud, not if and but with mathematical certainty.
	So, What we have is a revolution and people need to choose a side.
	This is also the greatest economic attack in our nation's history to call some people non-essential workers.
	This is worse than segregation.
	This is worse than in World War II telling people of Japanese ancestry, y'all got to go to camp until this war is over.
	Now the good news is that we are leading into a future that is brighter than people can imagine.
	People have no idea of the technology that is available.
	I was friends with Buckminster Fuller, the inventor, for the last three years of his life.
	Buckminster Fuller invented the geodesic dome.
	He invented a field of mathematics called synergetics, which is basically three-dimensional geometry, which is a really good idea because we live in a 3D world.
	And he made it his business to pay attention to the statistics of the world's resources and the necessary requirement for human beings to satisfy the economic needs of everyone.
	And he demonstrated it.
	And I took his work and rolled with it and created a UC Berkeley major for ending poverty.
	So we have all of the capacity to solve the problems of the world.
	This American Revolution 2.0 is exactly about that.
	Will we have abundance?
	Will we have the opportunity for the human spirit to be unleashed with beautiful, powerful, unique Creativity, or will we continue to be sheeple under the, uh, dominion of these psychopaths?
	So, the Americans who are paying attention to this, the listeners, God bless you, please stand, please be confident, please have your voice be heard, and if I can be a resource with this information, I am your ally as is Professor Fetzer.
	All right, I've talked a lot.
	Anything you want to jump in for, Jim?
	Well, we have a rather sweeping question from a chat room that you may or may not prefer to address at this very moment.
	They put it this way, who owns us, the queen or the rabbis?
	Talking about the relative influence of the crown on the one hand and The Jewish state or the Zionists on the other.
	So you can say what you like now or return to it later or give us a thumbnail of your general impression.
	Funny you should ask that because that's the next section and I was kind of a little bit hesitant to jump right in.
	So if we want to What I've given you right now is a past that anybody can verify.
	All right?
	Now I'm going to go into the past that really explains the empire.
	And I want to try to build credibility so that people see that this is a rational answer that I'm going to give to this chat question.
	1990 World Summit for Children.
	I had to threaten President Bush Senior to even agree to attend.
	Okay?
	This was all the world's leaders.
	We ended up getting pre-agreement from all of them to save approximately a million children's lives every month dying from preventable poverty.
	And this was a really good idea because all the data points aligned that we should Do this because in every historical case where you end poverty, the population growth rate goes down.
	The CIA director said that the number one statistic correlative to global terrorism is infant mortality rate, which is the top statistic about poverty.
	So ending poverty ends terrorism.
	And all the world's leaders pre-agreed.
	And in 1990 at age 30, I was all excited saying, wow, I thought it would take another 10 years to end global poverty, but we're doing it now.
	And then after the summit, Wow.
	The world's leaders just went silent.
	Corporate media refused to report.
	The New York Times was my favorite coverage at the time.
	They wouldn't cover the World Summit for Children, even though it was at the UN in their own city.
	Until the last day of the summit, they buried the story in the back of the paper under obfuscating and lies, saying that people were complaining about the traffic.
	People were complaining about how much money it cost to hold this meeting.
	And they basically just said, oh, these were just more promises that are going to cost more money.
	They even lied about this was for heads of state.
	They just said generic world leaders were there.
	So I discovered corporate media is on the their black hats.
	And then we found out that all the other so-called developed nations of the world wouldn't call out the US on this lie.
	And they all underfunded it.
	So I began to see An interlocking network of an empire, where the US was just kind of the muscle for it, but really the city of London was a big player, and the Queen was a big player, and the Queen's empire, her dominion over those client states, and then you got to go into the Vatican?
	Huh.
	I've been to the Pope's crib.
	They are not following Jesus's words of give your possessions to the poor.
	It has the richest museum in the world.
	And then if you get into the leaders of the Jewish religion, this is a coordinated network to lie and do the opposite of what churches tell us to do.
	You know, you talk about pedophilia.
	with the Roman Catholic Church and covered up by Catholic political leadership.
	This is a global network.
	So the the question in the chat, this is where I'm going with it, the only way that you could have the suffering and the torture and the empire of the world is it is a global empire.
	So who's in charge of that global empire?
	This goes back to the history of megalithic architecture.
	So As a teacher of history, I learned about megalithic architecture, but I really, you know, so much of this, you got to connect dots as you go and you say, wow, that's something.
	So we know for sure around the world, there are ancient civilizations working with stone that use thousand ton building blocks.
	This is a thousand ton statue in India that is of a stone that is nowhere near the entire.
	I'll show people a picture of it because this is one of my case study.
	Today we're going to explore.
	This guy is awesome.
	So here's the size of this statue.
	Thousand tons.
	It's on top of a steep cliff.
	The stone is different from the surrounding area.
	So somehow they brought this thing up here.
	It is perfectly symmetrical.
	So now we're talking about a cutting ability.
	So 1,000 tons, we have only developed the capacity to lift 1,000 tons roughly within this century that we live in.
	But being able to quarry 1,000 tons, to be able to lift it, transport it, and put it up there, this is beyond modern.
	And yet there it is.
	So this month, this is a actually let me show you the.
	Here's more of the rock face.
	So somehow they transported this thing up this hill.
	And there's just no way to do it.
	The people who have lived there have a ceremony that they perform.
	I think it's every 12 years, maybe, where they were told to pour a combination of materials onto the statue.
	And when modern chemists take a look at the composition, it is perfectly capable of preserving the stone.
	And you might have noticed that this statue is in great shape.
	It's beautiful.
	It looks brand new.
	But what the people didn't know is to paint it on the feet.
	They just poured over the head of the statue so the bottom of the statue has corroded.
	When you ask these people, you know, How did the statue get here?
	They say it was from the gods from the past, and they also told the people to go ahead and to do this to preserve the stone.
	And in that statue, it seems that they're saying something about anti-gravitic properties as well, which we're just beginning to understand today, but they may have had.
	They definitely had some sort of technology more capable than ours.
	People know about the Egyptians.
	You may know about thousand-ton building blocks in Baalbek.
	I'll show you one of these.
	And again, this is materials engineers will take a look at this stuff and say, you know, this is not the Romans.
	Here's the thousand ton building blocks up here at this level.
	So somehow you were able to quarry, lift, transport, and then place so finely together you can't put a credit card between these things.
	And these civilizations somehow were wiped out.
	Ability to drill through stone as measured by the removal rate of the material.
	I'll give you an example here.
	So you get materials engineers who take a look at this, these drill cores, and then you can measure the distance.
	Let's get a picture of one of these if I can.
	You can This isn't rendering fast enough for it.
	But if you take a look at the space cut by the rock, this is like a router that goes through and the rate of removal of the material of hard granite is 50 times faster than the modern equipment that we have today.
	There's evidence of circular saws.
	All right, well, this isn't going to do it.
	So there's tremendous evidence of ancient high technology that somehow got wiped out.
	And the wipeout is what current scientists are seeing evidence of, of about 12,000 years ago, of the end of the Younger Dryas experiment.
	And I recommend these two videos here.
	This guy gives an overview.
	And then Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson.
	Have you ever heard any presentations of those guys, Jim?
	No, no, I have not.
	Yeah.
	Oh, they're awesome.
	So they pretty much lay out the case that 12,000 years ago, a massive asteroid hit... Okay, so the evidence is overwhelmingly conclusive.
	He's right.
	All of the large animals got wiped out about 12,000 years ago.
	And let me show you some of the video evidence.
	So the guy goes through the ice samples to be able to show the degree of a huge impact.
	And then there is the evidence in Canada of a huge meteor.
	Now the fallout of this is in this area described here.
	And in the United States there are, I forget the name of it, There's so much to learn.
	I wonder if this guy actually has pictures of it.
	But geologists know, for this, is that in the United States in the southeast.
	Well, just go with the evidence that I see here.
	There's evidence of a huge debris field from from some impact that went up high into the atmosphere and then rained down.
	And this was game changing.
	And this pretty much immediately caused a 400 foot increase in sea levels.
	Whereby, as we know, most people live by the ocean, by the water, and that would have wiped out all of these civilizations.
	And then the guy is just making the case for it.
	And you can see the evidence of ancient flood areas here, especially in the scab lands.
	So this is in the scab lands, which I believe is in the Washington-Oregon area.
	And this is a comparison of the size of Niagara Falls versus the evidence of this huge flood that cascaded through this area, through to the Pacific Ocean, and that certainly would have wiped out everything there.
	So the question, going back to the question that was asked, so who's really in charge?
	So what are these religious people?
	Well, the religious people are part of the control system, and if you go back into ancient history, of course, religion has always been a part of the control system, and part of the breakthrough of the American Revolution 1.0 was to separate the church from the state.
	In contrast, what had been done, which the American founders were against, was having somebody like a Pope saying, look, you got to give 10% of your money to us and we're backed up by the government.
	And if you act against us, the government will arrest you.
	They'll bring you to us.
	We'll torture you to get the demons out of you.
	And you need to obey the king, because the king is God's appointed leader.
	If you disobey the king, you're disobeying God, and then you go to hell.
	So, the people who are still in the structures and the leadership of religion, still coordinate and attempt to have this global empire.
	And we are in this Revolution 2.0, and people do need to take a stand.
	The stand is simply For the truth.
	For the facts.
	Because the facts prove the history of empire leading up to the present, and right now into election fraud, where you have the corrupt team that has been the rogue state empire, now associated with the Democrats, and let me be clear, that the Bush family were among the most vicious killers on the right, with Papa Bush being among the team leaders to assassinate President Kennedy.
	All right, I'll take a pause there.
	Any questions or comments or challenges, Jim?
	Not at the moment in the chat room, Carl.
	Of course, AFK is a big deal, but I think our focus would be primarily on the current situation, such as you might disentangle the various threads.
	I mean, it's really stunning what we're going through.
	The most promising development on the horizon appears to be a Texas lawsuit that raises a question of constitutional law that is independent of specific cases of voting fraud, election machines, Switching ballots and the like about whether or not the state executive officers have the right to change the procedures for voting when their state constitutions delegate that to the legislatures.
	And the beauty of this is it's completely independent of the details of the way in which the theft of the election was actually carried out, where now eight additional states, Carl, have joined Texas.
	This is going to be, I think, the case that's going to reverse the outcome Because it's focused on four of the swing states and I believe the argument there is impeccable and that the Supreme Court will not be able to evade the issue and where it is so clear cut.
	I expect we could have a 9-0 opinion in support of the Texas case that will essentially nullify the election and send it back to Congress for resolution, where the House will vote on the President, the Senate the Vice, and where each of the 50 states will cast one vote Yeah, yeah.
	anticipate the re-election of Donald Trump because 56 of those 50 states are controlled
	by Republicans, only 23 by Democrats where one is divided.
	Yeah, yeah. And the evidence is overwhelming. So if, and I believe it is released, I can
	say in confidence that all of the evidence that I see aligns with Q being true, that
	this is the show, this is the plan, and the whole world will watch the Supreme Court case.
	Now, they've never done this, but what I would think would be really cool is if they allowed a televised hearing.
	So for people who don't know how the Supreme Court works is that the lawyers will write up what they want to write up and the DNC, of course, will write something up or.
	Or the individual states who are trying to hide the election fraud, they'll write it up and they'll send it in and then you'll get friends of the court briefs and the judges will read all that stuff and then they show up to the Supreme Court and the lawyers will, they'll give them a certain amount of time for each side and then they'll be peppered with questions.
	Wouldn't it be awesome if we finally had a venue for truth?
	With sharp, unavoidable questions that the Deep State could not answer.
	That would be fun for me.
	But they've never done it.
	They've never televised it.
	They've never allowed any live recordings of it.
	But I hope that this would be an exception.
	So that might happen, Carl.
	And this is a suit brought against Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, which appear to be the only four states where the executive changed the rules for voting without any consultation with the legislature, which is a clear violation of their own constitutions and where
	Involving multiple states as it does, this is going to be, I think, the case that is going to reverse the election of Joe Biden, who, as you know, is actually being played now by a body double who appears to be younger.
	He's more coherent.
	He has different ears, different eyes, different chin, different shape of cranium, and yet No one seems to have noticed.
	Everyone has to know.
	All of the Democrats realized this was a stolen election.
	Joe Biden, in over 35 years running for the presidency three times, had not won a single caucus Or a single primary until South Carolina.
	Not one that shows an utter lack of enthusiasm or interest in Joe Biden, which was reinforced by the fact that his rallies drew nobody.
	When Trump came to Kenosha, just two hours from where I reside near Madison, Wisconsin, there was a string of citizens five blocks long.
	When Joe Biden came to Kenosha, one school teacher turned out to meet him.
	And similarly in Duluth, Where I resided for the last 19 years of my 35-year career as an academician.
	While Trump was drawing tens of thousands elsewhere in the state, Joe Biden had a rally at the Carpenters Union in Duluth, and there were 12 persons there, including his security detail, Carl.
	I mean, the idea of there being a wave of enthusiasm for Joe Biden Kamala Harris is just a manifest absurdity and everyone in Washington knows.
	Everybody knows.
	And that is the major responsibility of human beings who care to tune in now.
	You just need to stand for the facts.
	Because all of the facts point out, as you're saying, these legislative branches have set up rules to run the elections.
	And those rules were violated as a matter of fact.
	It's not an opinion.
	They were violated.
	So those legislators have the opportunity of taking action to reclaim or to reject that election entirely.
	The arguments will go before the Supreme Court and Corporate media is five companies.
	Let's go to there.
	So corporate media, I do have a published paper through the Claremont Colleges from a 2015
	conference to about 2,000 people. And all people really need to do is take a look at the examples
	of corporate media propaganda. I've...
	I did it with the wars, the current wars, but it is just ridiculous, crazy, Orwellian opposite of the truth.
	And this was the main part that people can run with, is in 1975 this church senate committee hearings had the director of the CIA testify And then Pulitzer Prize winner Carl Bernstein affirmed that.
	He checked it out and says, yeah, that's what's going on.
	Corporate media wouldn't cover that story, of course.
	So the U.S.
	is suffering under propaganda and everybody who's gone through a public school has suffered.
	The only areas that I feel relatively confident about are the areas where I have some both academic training and professional experience to be able to contrast what I see and know from real world work People have the opportunity to stand and they really should.
	and hopefully this next month, or maybe accelerating before then, the facts of the election
	will go out and people will have a chance to speak up and to voice so that we can have the
	will of the people be known.
	All right.
	I do have a nine-part essay series which really lays out more and more of the case for American Revolution 2.0 to bring the present into perspective.
	I can share this as well.
	The Democrats were absolutely interested in and necessary for the current wars.
	So people need to understand that, that the DNC is pro-war.
	In 2005, I believe, When my colleague Dennis Kucinich, former member of Congress from Ohio, attempted to impeach Cheney and Bush, I contributed a white paper of about 40 pages and 200 footnotes to be able to explain, document, and prove those lies.
	Keep talking while I fetch something to share with you.
	Yep, yep.
	But it was Nancy Pelosi herself who just said impeachment is off the table.
	They wouldn't even prosecute the known torture of waterboarding.
	So to think that you have any type of ethical management on the left is crazy.
	It is just flat out wrong when they refuse to stop illegal wars, they refuse to do anything with torture.
	And then what happened to Kucinich, you may know, audience, is that he was gerrymandered out of his district and forced into retirement.
	Do you recognize this fellow?
	Yeah, there he is and there you are.
	He came to UMD and he walked up in the audience and a radio show host who frequently had me on A city behind us took the photograph, which I treasure.
	I regarded him as the smartest member of Congress, and as you observed, yes.
	They redistricted him.
	He lost his seat.
	Unbelievable.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, you know, when I was young and optimistic and idealistic, I just thought, Jim, at the time when I was working on ending poverty, that the problem was, is that the political leadership was just too cemented into a Cold War mentality.
	Of this us versus them, but I felt that the facts would save the day, and it wasn't true with ending poverty, it was intentionally twisted and and what Americans get is basically disinformation.
	So we have the tricky balance for Americans to try to get their hands on objective data while at the same time knowing that all of the official sources of information are proven liars.
	When I wrote this, so my wife encouraged me to start writing again and I actually had to write because I could no longer, by 2005, I could no longer keep in my head all of the lies and all of the crimes associated with the war.
	So I decided I would go ahead and write this white paper.
	I attempted to get it published and I sent it off to, I think, 200 literary agents.
	And I only had two replies back, Jim.
	The two of them said, wow, this is well-written and it's important, but we can't represent you.
	And we can't represent you because you have no name.
	You have no title that's recognizable.
	And, but then they both, they said that, but we really did want to, to write to you because as you know, people are writing about it.
	And it says, yeah, I know.
	I read like three different books from international lawyers on this subject.
	So we are in this American Revolution 2.0, and are there any questions in the chat?
	See where I might go.
	Just comments, various comments, such as Sidney observing today, elections have been corrupt for many decades.
	Yes.
	But I do believe Trump laid a trap by his executive order of 12 September 2018, that he saw it coming and that he laid A giant snare to enmesh many diverse elements of the deep state, and I believe he's going to vanquish many of this nation's enemies who are deeply entrenched in the power structure within the United States.
	And if I'm right about this, and that he does indeed Become re-inaugurated again.
	I believe this man will go down as perhaps the greatest president in the history of the United States.
	It'll certainly be the biggest turnaround in American history for sure.
	And if you think about if we really did have good people In the military, they probably would have the best vantage point to see the money that was looted, to see the projects that were twisted, and to be able to see the empire literally stealing these resources, going into these countries in oil-rich areas or whatever resource-rich areas.
	Afghanistan has about a trillion dollars of different mineral resources, but just basically to steal it.
	And then the American military being the muscle And then allowing the American military to be killed on random patrols, just as a justification to keep the military there, to keep the pipelines going of resources.
	So if the military really were ready to make a move, they would get a team together.
	And in military planning, you don't want a fair fight, ever.
	No, no, not ever.
	You want to lure your opponent into a trap where there is no escape and the killing is easy.
	And I think that part of what I've come to appreciate more and more about the Q drops, have you been reading the Q drops very closely in these last three years, Jim?
	Yes.
	Okay, so Q keeps on laying out these It's almost, it's not a promise, but just a statement of what's going on.
	A lot of verifiable evidence.
	But if I was a black hat, there was a lot of reason to be concerned with disclosure, such as with the factless Russiagate, the crimeless impeachment, what's on Hunter Biden's laptop.
	What is on Anthony Weiner's laptop?
	So the panic that they must be feeling, and now it seems that if you have the military, you really can be confident because who's going to hurt you?
	Who's going to hurt you if you have the military?
	They are running this show.
	And I do believe, I agree with you, that what has been orchestrated in the show, the plan, has to be able to use the fact that the intelligence is known, they have it all, and then to reveal this show to the American people in the method of their choosing.
	And I think that this SCOTUS battle will be the final battle of the war, whereby you gotta get rid of corporate media.
	I think that after SCOTUS, we will have seen enough.
	If SCOTUS decides to stand for the truth, and to point out that this was obvious election fraud, if BLM and Antifa decide to riot and loot, then we have the Insurrection Act to put that down.
	So, we'll see.
	It's exciting times, and in this next month or so, people will have the opportunity to be Americans.
	Carl, I'm especially glad you mentioned the Insurrection Act, because I was asked in the chat room, what if the courts fail us, what is next?
	And I said, an uprising among patriots, that's likely to be anything but civil.
	But I actually believe there's an intermediate state, which is represented by the Insurrection Act, and whereby Trump could declare A form of martial law in order to have a revote that would be supervised by the military with paper ballots and hand counts and carefully supervised by representatives of both parties.
	I believe that would occur before the necessity of a civil war, but everyone ought to reread the Declaration of Independence.
	Reread the Declaration of Independence to understand that The people have the right to overthrow their government when it becomes tyrannical and denies them the exercise of their inalienable rights.
	So that, you know, all this business about lockdowns, wearing masks, social distancing, that's complete bullshit.
	It has no legal or scientific foundation whatsoever.
	It turns out the latest study from Johns Hopkins they're seeking to suppress shows that the death rates among all age groups have remained the same before and after coronavirus.
	That means it's not causally efficacious.
	It's not making a difference.
	In a story I'll be addressing tomorrow, We're hearing a mess of ear porn about hospitals being overloaded.
	It's all false.
	It's propaganda.
	This was true way back in the beginning.
	The claim was made that hospitals in Europe and here in the United States were overflowing.
	Olli Dommegaard pointed out to me the mortality tables for the European countries have not shown any spike, just as this woman from Johns Hopkins has pointed out the mortality Rates here in the US haven't shown any spikes, which means the whole thing is a mind game.
	They're trying to get us to commit cultural and physical suicide on the basis of what is nothing more than a fantasy, a fiction.
	And to me, it's grossly insulting.
	Well, the media we can see is playing a major role because we have had other previous medical problems of larger numbers of deaths from, you know, disease sources that entailed many, many more deaths.
	And they were not treated with a hysteria that has been Delivered over coronavirus, which turns out to be something that virtually all living things have.
	It's so common, even in dirt, as my dear friend Giuseppe has observed, that you can test practically any animal and get a positive on a coronavirus test, which means that you have to distinguish between Cases in the sense of positive test results and cases in the sense of infected individuals, because while there's a staggering number of cases in the sense of positive results, the number of infected individuals is dwindling, was never very significant, so they're trading on an elementary fallacy of ambiguity, anticipating that the public
	Would not distinguish between positive test results and infected individuals as indeed is manifest in every direction, every article, every announcement from television.
	They're trading on the equivocation in a manner that's intended, calculated to deceive and mislead the American people, just as the claims that our hospitals are overflowing.
	Jason Goodman, for example, was very, very good about this being in New York City, He had heard the reports about Elmhurst Hospital and the Queens being overflowing with patients.
	So he went on down to Elmhurst Hospital and it was basically deserted.
	There was nobody there.
	So don't let yourself be played.
	Don't let yourself be taken in.
	We're surrounded by mountains and mountains of bullshit, but it's all for very evil intent.
	to deprive us of our property or assets, our freedom and liberty, not just temporarily but forever.
	Yeah, yeah. I had about 10 data points as you were talking that remind me of there's no outbreak
	that's been reported among the homeless, despite them being in close proximity, not having any type
	of the equipment that we're told that we need, and the sanitation level being low.
	What's that about?
	There's a German lawsuit going on right now to against these fact checkers.
	In this test, this PCR test, and this is outside of my academic training and professional experience, but my understanding is that they are running the test through so many cycles that it's worthless.
	It is not giving you any data whatsoever.
	The only study that I'm aware of, I think I saw it on your blog first, was a measurement of the life years lost from the lockdown compared to the life years lost in the so-called pandemic.
	And the life years lost was 10 times greater because of the lockdowns.
	And again, the lockdowns are illegal.
	This is dictatorial government.
	This is the contest.
	People have to stand for this, and part of what, you know, our commitment is to give people, as scholars, the necessary facts so that they can stand and begin to speak and engage with confidence with this.
	Given your brilliant calculation that the average age of the supposed Sandy Hook mothers was 10 years out of whack that they were much too old to have children in first grade, and that's because they were faking the children using photographs of older children when they were younger.
	You came up with a staggering calculation.
	Get this one now.
	The Populist Press has just published, Professor Proof's probability of Biden winning less than one in a quadrillion.
	Here, let me, it's very brief.
	In a new lawsuit filed today, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is asking the U.S.
	Supreme Court to block four battleground states, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, from casting unlawful and constitutionally tainted votes in the Electoral College.
	In the brief submitted to the Supreme Court, Texas includes a declaration from Pacific Economics Group member and USC economics professor Charles J. Gesetti, Ph.D.
	According to Dr. Gesetti, his calculations show the probability of Joe Biden winning the popular vote in the four states, each independently, Given President Trump's early lead in those states as of 3 a.m.
	on November 4, 2020, is less than one in a quadrillion.
	Dr. Crescenti's analysis calculates that for Joe Biden to win the four states collectively, the odds of that happening decreased to less than one in a quadrillion to the fourth power.
	I know you appreciate that, Carl.
	That's your kind of statistic.
	It's staggering to show the enormity of the effort here to steal this election.
	Yeah, it's mathematically impossible.
	It is absolute proof of election fraud.
	Going back to the COVID thing for a moment with numbers and statistical analysis, Zero Hedge printed out a very nice article saying that, well, look, you're hearing this stuff from corporate media that their ICUs are overflowing.
	Zero Hedge did a great job of talking to people who are in that industry, and the data points that you're getting from corporate media are, oh, they're at 85% capacity or 90 or 95.
	The people who actually do this say, yeah, if we don't have 85% capacity, we're in danger of going out of business.
	We're geared up by law to go to 200% capacity that fast.
	We don't prepare for it.
	Because it's costly to us to have that level of preparation.
	So this again is a corporate media hype for that there is no there's no spike.
	There's no ICU crisis.
	And again, it's in my area of expertise.
	I can say for sure that in the state of California, the emergency services can only be evoked if and only if local resources are overrun.
	And even then, The authority only exists for 60 days.
	So... Yeah, it's been far more than 60 days.
	That's ridiculous, of course.
	It has been, it has been.
	But I guess... A couple other comments that... Jason also checked all the refrigerated trucks for bodies and there weren't any bodies in the refrigerated trucks which weren't even running.
	And another, if dead people can vote a dead guy can be elected president.
	It may be Joe Biden.
	The real Joe Biden is in fact departed this earth.
	That would not surprise me.
	No, no.
	If In fact, the White Hats were in charge as soon as Trump entered the presidency.
	If that is the case, then all of the data of NSA, and exactly what Q said, we have it all, would be true.
	And part of what I have heard, which felt right and kind of matched the facts, is that when Trump did his tour in 2017 of Europe and made fun of all of the leaders and did things like walked ahead of the Queen, messed with Macron with his lapel and just with his hands on him as if he was just a little boy, Part of the testimony, which I can't verify, said that NSA had a folder on all of the political leaders, and then they went and had a meeting, I believe, with the NATO leaders as well.
	And they just handed out the folders with all the evidence of their financial crimes?
	Of their often crimes with children, with their sex parties, and said, hey, either you work for us now, as we engage in the show, or we're going to use this information and out you, and you're going to be put into prison for the rest of your life, or executed for a lot of the things that you've done.
	According to the testimony, all of the leaders agreed, And this has all been a cover for the U.S.
	military to lead the campaign to go into the deep underground military bases and clear them out.
	Underneath the surface, we're just surface dwellers, but underneath the surface is vast caves and caverns, and also what the military has been building out for something like 50 years.
	So, if that is true, Then all we've been seeing is a show so that Americans can finally embrace how bad it would have been and where it was going.
	And according to this testimony as well, this would have been using the 5G towers for a frequency interference that would have reactivated with the vaccines they would have mandated to do exactly what you said to kill off two-thirds of Americans.
	Yes, yes.
	Well, that would fit the Deagle projection, wouldn't it?
	I mean, you know, using 5G to wipe out the population where the symptoms from 5G are similar to those of the coronavirus, so...
	They could be killed by 5G and the claim would be made they were victims of coronavirus, even though we know that it's not making a statistically relevant or causally relevant difference in fact.
	So it's all just a matter of illusion.
	You know, Henry Kissinger observed a long time ago that the facts don't matter.
	All that matters are perceptions.
	And that's become rampant ever since.
	And that is the case, and that is the final exam for human beings, is that can they tell the difference between objective data and just political spin with lies?
	Can you tell the difference between truth and lies?
	Can you stand for what is good, what is moral, versus what is evil?
	This is a final test, and I think, Jim, that it's a completely fair test, and that We got to distinguish one type of human being that can tell the difference between objective data and not, and can stand for the good of human beings in a cooperative relationship with each other, versus these psychopaths who literally see us as sheeple, as human resources.
	And again, going back into this history, that it may have been that this history has been going on in this planet, Yes.
	Very good.
	be that human beings were genetically designed as a docile slave race. If I had to bet, that's
	what we're going to figure out. Yes. Very good. Very good.
	Americans are so buried in bullshit. You can't blame them.
	Yeah, I think that's right.
	You know, I've many times observed how it's so difficult to keep food on the table and a roof over their head, especially in the era of COVID, that Americans who don't have much inclination or talent for research just accept what they're hearing from the mainstream.
	And if they get it from a couple of different sources, They take it to be true, not realizing they're given the same script.
	You know, every now and then you have one of these documentaries showing that the anchors on 10 different networks are using the same words to report the same story.
	I mean, exactly the same.
	It's just stunning.
	It's just stunning, Carl.
	And if you look around, we've talked about this before, our own family members, our friends, our colleagues, they get their information from corporate media, and it's very difficult to get in any data from that certainty they have that they know what's going on.
	They've read a lot.
	And that is the trick, and that is the trap that we're in, and it requires that our military somehow step in, take charge, and we got to get these corporate media criminals who are complicit to killing millions, harming billions, and looting trillions.
	They have to be removed.
	And it might be that this Supreme Court ruling with that evidence is going to be the show, and then to remove the Antifa looters and rioters afterwards, and then to start disclosing things like the Wiener laptop, Hunter Biden's laptop, for the crimes against children.
	And if people want to know if that's true, I think that your presentation on Pizzagate is the best that I've found, and I also like Fall Cabal.
	Have you seen that one?
	No, but I appreciate, yeah, everyone can find it right here, of course, at Jim the Conspiracy Guy.
	It's about, I don't know, number maybe 20, somewhere in there.
	You go down the list, but I Doing research on Pizzagate is not a lot of fun, but it's very important that everyone should understand where John Podesta appears to be pedophile-in-chief, and he, of course, was Hillary's campaign manager, and they are kindred spirits, where Hillary is one of the great monsters of the 21st century.
	I mean, she is one truly disgusting human being.
	Yeah, I'm looking at what I wrote about it and all of them have been censored off of YouTube.
	Out of Shadows is another excellent documentary.
	Have you seen that one?
	Out of Shadow?
	No, I think I haven't.
	Tell me, that's also on Pizzagate or Pedagate?
	Yes, it is.
	So this is a documentary from a professional journalist who had been an award winner, and she began uncovering some of this stuff that they do with Adrenochrome, and she produced a documentary.
	And at the time that I wrote this, it had 19 million views in five months.
	19 million views?
	Yeah.
	19 million views?
	Oh my god, I love it, Carl.
	That's sensational.
	And then Fall Cabal, which I think is even more powerful, that had over 5 million views.
	And then I got yours here, which is the Pizzagate Realer Fiction.
	So if people want to know what the evidence is, the evidence is there.
	And I don't think that you can make an argument that this is anything other than something where these people should be arrested and they should have been arrested yesterday.
	Oh yeah, I couldn't agree more.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	And when I shared with New York gold shield detective Jim Rothstein, who may be the leading expert on pedophilia in the United States, where he cracked many cases only to see them quashed by the district attorney on political grounds.
	Some of what was coming out from the NYPD about Anthony Weiner's laptop and asked him if he was surprised, he said no.
	Based on his experience, 70% of the American political elite are engaged in pedophilia.
	That's pretty stunning.
	What's heartening about that is there are 30% who are not.
	And interestingly, during the conference this weekend, I got into a fairly intense exchange
	with Tony Meade, who's done some brilliant work on Sandy Hook,
	where he had several chapters in the second edition of the book
	Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, where he showed a photograph of Donald Trump socializing
	with Jeffrey Epstein and then Ghislaine Maxwell.
	And he had about 20 of these photographs.
	So I was explaining why Donald is a threat to the establishment
	because he's not a part of it, that he's not a participant, that he actually threw, it may have been Ghislaine,
	off of his estate, Mar-a-Lago, because of a young girl making
	an entry there that was unwanted.
	And so when Dina Pollard Sachs, who's published two volumes on the godfathers of sex abuse, Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein, and Jeffrey Epstein, spoke in the aftermath.
	There were several questions about her assessment of Trump and whether he was into it.
	And she explained that.
	She'd done quite a thorough bit of research.
	And the fact appeared to be, no, he was not part of it, that he actually was very much opposed to it, which
	I was very grateful to hear.
	Because I believe one of the reasons Trump was willing to become president of the United States
	was to clean it up.
	Richard Nixon, by the way, was also quite intense on snuff films and child pornography and the like,
	and took rather severe measures to terminate those types of operations, apparently
	with a great deal of success.
	Yeah, there's a tape of Nixon talking about, let's see, what is the name of that elite summer conference?
	It's just north of San Francisco.
	It's every like July or August.
	It's like a week meeting and presidents have been there, Nixon has been there, Reagan has been there, the Bushes were there.
	It escapes me for the moment.
	But yeah, this is pretty much business as usual.
	And with the Kennedy family as well, it may be that this is just something that these elites do, and that when people get a close look at it, of course, you have a choice.
	choice. Well, with the Kennedy family, the Kennedy family got a lot of money from President Kennedy's father through
	manipulation of the stock market in order to sell their assets before the 1929 crash.
	And a lot of these rich people wrote and bragged in their autobiographies that, gee, it was just lucky I sold my stocks before the crash.
	And then they swept in later and they bought up assets at pennies on the dollar.
	And my understanding is that Joseph Kennedy purchased significant control over some of the Hollywood studios, or maybe it was just one.
	Now, I don't know if this is true, and I don't want to say anything, but it would make sense, understanding the Kennedy boys' attraction to sexual play, that they got it from their father, Who would go to Hollywood on vacations to audition girls for parts.
	And I think it's easy to exaggerate.
	JFK was apparently being given steroids for his back pain that made him a bit sexually overactive.
	But the fact is, he wasn't a great lover.
	Angie Dickinson said, quote, that her Affair with JFK was the greatest 14 minutes of her life.
	So, you know.
	But Bobby, who I think was basically a very loyal husband to Ethel, apparently had a profound affair with Marilyn.
	I think that they actually may have been in love, whereas I think with Marilyn and Jack, it was just two, you know, exceptional, two extraordinary, marvelous people, so gifted that they were attracted to one another.
	So you get events like Marilyn singing Happy Birthday to Jack, you know, it is a highly memorable event.
	She was actually done in, it appears, By Sam Giancana, that Sam was worried that Marilyn was going to throw a press conference and spill beans he didn't want to have out in the public, and he sent Johnny Roselli with instructions that she must not experience any pain.
	So they chloroformed her and then gave her a rectal barbiturate suppository.
	They terrified the housekeeper who, when the police arrived, was washing the sheets and all that cleaning up.
	It's quite a story.
	There's a wonderful book called At Rainbow's End by Derek.
	I'm trying to recollect the last name.
	It's just a wonderful book about Hollywood.
	All the actors of the time, Brando, Jimmy Dean, you know, the others.
	It's really a sensational book at Rainbow's Inn, and I highly recommend it.
	There's what I take to be an accurate depiction of how Maryland was taken out.
	Bobby had been there earlier in the day, but the Kennedys were not responsible for her death.
	Frankly, that really wasn't their thing.
	But Sam was worried because Marilyn had made a threat one too many times to have a press conference and tell everything she knew, and that was something he preferred not to take place.
	Yeah.
	Well, kind of my point in leading to that story is that all these pictures that people have with Trump, with Ghislaine Maxwell, you would almost need somebody who was close in on the inside and had close personal experience in order to have the knowledge and just the experience, if you were a good person, to be able to become a white hat in that area.
	I'm going to check out the title, At Rainbow's End.
	I think it may be Derek Porter.
	But for anyone, you know, who grew up in this era, which was really the golden era of Hollywood.
	I think this book is really good.
	Yeah, Derek Port, Port, Darwin.
	Actually, I was wrong about Derek.
	Darwin Porter at, at Rainbow's End.
	Actually, Marilyn at Rainbow's End.
	I highly recommend it.
	A really good book.
	And it's a great read.
	This guy knows how to write.
	I mean, it's just wonderful.
	Very informative.
	Run by, Just because I'm curious.
	Darwin Porter is the author at Maryland at Rainbow's End.
	I just highly recommend this book if you want something that's a serious look at Hollywood.
	Now, knowing what we know, in the book is there mention of kind of the price that the stars need to pay in order to to be hired and to be promoted?
	Or is the argument that at that time it was just based on on acting talent?
	Yeah, I don't recall stuff like Harvey Weinstein, you know, apparently treated Gwyneth Paltrow virtually as a concubine, for example.
	I mean, that's not there.
	I don't believe it was much the practice at the time.
	So I think matters evolved and became more sleazy over time, you know.
	Yeah, it's all become more sleazy.
	Well, if it would be helpful, I can give some ammunition to Americans to understand in this article
	that hopefully as we're wrapping things up with that the DNC has been absolutely criminal
	on their behavior against President Trump, that we know that in the factless
	and the crimeless impeachment that the director of national intelligence had to admit
	that there was no evidence of the Trump campaign doing anything with Russia.
	So all of this was disclosed, not that you would know it from corporate media,
	and that the whole thing with General Flynn is that his testimony was altered
	and that the agents who were meeting with Flynn said that there wasn't anything to it.
	There was no crime committed.
	And then they altered the testimony.
	They threatened to arrest Flynn's son.
	And that was the background of that story.
	No evidence whatsoever for any of the Russiagate.
	No evidence of quid pro quo.
	But evidence for Biden, of course, is quid pro quo.
	And hopefully that whole episode of the pay-to-play, which I guess we can talk about this, if you talk to anybody from different countries around the world or who have Grown up in other countries.
	I live in San Ramon.
	I have a bunch of neighbors who have come from India.
	And, you know, we talk politics all the time.
	I walk my dog and I've gotten to know a lot of the neighbors who own dogs.
	And, you know, they ask me questions about it.
	And I tell them, look, if somebody were to say in India that they trusted the government, what would you do?
	And they just crack up.
	They'd say, well, that person would be very stupid We're ignorant.
	Everybody knows that the government is corrupt.
	And I said, okay, so the people who know what's going on, we know the same thing in America, but most of the Americans are just too naive and too gullible, and they just don't understand it.
	Yes, yes, yes.
	Yes, if you could recommend, you know, resources for further research for those who are here, that would be terrific and a nice way to tie together our conversation of this evening.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Well, I wrote this article, Winning Time Now, which is really just in deep appreciation for the synergy among the researchers, and we really are the news, to lay out the background, and for COVID, too.
	The statistical model upon which this whole COVID thing was this, let's see, where is he here?
	This whole article has a whole bunch of powerful information in it.
	Here we go.
	Here he is.
	So the model for COVID was generated by a hypocritical liar from Imperial College.
	Claiming that there were going to be 2 million dead Americans, but you need to know that this guy in he predicted up to 200 million from the avian flu and only low hundreds died in 2009 he said 65,000 dead would be in the UK.
	Okay.
	He was off by $64,500.
	And in 2001, the mad cow disease, his predictions there ended up killing 14 million healthy animals.
	And that was the model.
	And then he ended up having to resign when he was caught having an extramarital affair
	in multiple violations of his own recommendation of a healthy person's quarantine.
	So that was the original model that locked down the economy.
	And people need to know that hospitals have never been overrun.
	And whatever emergency authority has long passed, this is just really a test for Americans to stand up.
	And there are so many data points for people to take a stand.
	And wherever they choose to stand, that is really the test of whether we're going to be a free people or not.
	If we're going to be sheeple or free.
	Let me just add something that may hearten everyone here.
	It turns out that the situation update to covering the case, the Texas case again, being catapulted into the election battle includes a legal analysis revealing that the Supreme Court has already ruled in 1997 Foster versus Love, that all ballots received after midnight of election day are null and void.
	This means that vote stuffing, early morning rigging, and subsequent ballot discovery schemes by the Democrats are all unconstitutional and therefore null and void.
	It also means all the swing states that simultaneously pause their ballot counting on the evening of November 3rd Deliberately allowing post-election ballot fraud to take place shall have their own elections nullified along with all of their electoral votes.
	This is pretty fascinating.
	This looks very good.
	I tell you, we'll see it play out, but I consider that just a terrific development and extremely promising.
	Yeah, I want to thank everyone who came here to listen to Carl and partake of our conversation.
	Carl, always a pleasure.
	Are there any closing thoughts you'd like to contribute before we adjourn for this evening?
	Yeah, I like how you ended it up with that court case, and that makes perfect sense.
	I saw that today, too, and I was very excited about that.
	And it makes total sense that the intent of the Framers was to have an election day to prevent exactly what we're seeing here.
	Yeah, because after the fact, you could know where you needed more ballots to manipulate the outcome, which isn't the case as a rule going in.
	And the fact they had all those fraudulent polls, of course, were purely to cover up the fact that Biden was so massively behind.
	They wanted the public to have the false impression when they stole the election with over 50 million fraudulent votes.
	By my calculation, that they would think it was just the fulfillment of what the polls had warned us was going to come to pass anyway.
	Yeah.
	I think things may be looking more promising than some of us may have thought even earlier today.
	Carl, this is a roller coaster ride.
	It is a roller coaster ride, and it is looking better and better.
	But my view with it is that there's never anything to fear.
	Just tell the truth.
	And that's all that you can do as a human being, is to manage your thoughts, your actions, and your words consistent with the truth.
	And for those who care to know, the facts are overwhelming to be able to win this American Revolution 2.0, to demand the arrest, the lawful arrest, and arrest is a
	legal tool to stop a crime, and there is abundance of evidence that these people who
	had been our leaders are criminal liars and must be arrested. Carl, great thoughts. Let's see
	how things play out.
	I believe this week is going to be a fascinating experience.
	Thank you, Carl, for being my guest here on the Vets Presents and everyone for joining us here.
	We appreciate your comments in the chat room.
	Thursday, by the way, let me announce I have a very special guest.
	Sophia Smallstorm will be here with some really fascinating discussion about DNA, RNA vaccines and how they can seek to transform us into a new kind of, not quite human being, but transhumanism will be the topic.
	So this is one you may not want to miss.
	Thanks for being here.
	Carl, you are terrific.
	Thanks, my friend.
	Oh, my pleasure.
	Thank you.
	We'll do it again.
	Carl thanks.
	Oh, you're welcome.

▲