All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 7, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
01:11:29
The Fetz Presents (6 October 2020): Susan Bradford, Unmasked: The Coronavirus Story
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
But there's a slight delay in the broadcast, so...
Will any of the viewers have an opportunity to ask questions?
Yeah, through the chat room, yes.
Perfect.
Okay, great.
Okay.
Very good.
Okay.
Thank you.
This is Jim Fetzer on the Fetz Presents, where I'm very pleased to have my special guest today, Susan Bradford, who has an extensive history and career in journalism with major networks and less, but highly varied.
She's been involved in some major exposés, And I'm particularly glad to have her here to discuss her new book about Corona Unmasked, the coronavirus story, where there's so much to it.
Susan, I'm just delighted to have you here.
The timing is perfect.
Thank you so much for having me today, Jim.
I really appreciate it.
So, to give you a little background on the coronavirus, This was actually, as you can imagine, and I'm sure your audience can as well, this was a plandemic.
And the origins can really trace back to the end of World War II, with the silent weapons
for quiet wars, in which the British monarchy decided to manage the world's populations
through technology.
So they had planned to attract and identify each individual and then begin to ration our
resources.
And they had intended, which is climate change is another aspect to this, but to de-industrialize
the world.
So essentially, they were going to have all the world's wealth and power within their
own hands, and then kind of reduce the rest of us to kind of like a subsistence level
existence.
So the agenda really got underway during the Bush administration.
And that's when the Department of Defense and the Department of Health and Human Services
began to merge.
They began to forge deep partnerships.
So essentially, our political establishment was weaponizing health care.
And of course, during the Obama administration, which laid the political foundations to this,
President Obama sponsored the Affordable Care Act.
Now that accomplished a number of things.
And one of the most significant for our purposes is that it bankrupted the individual health
care market, like the exchanges.
So what that did is it forced more people to accept the public option.
And during this time, the they were working on Um, sort of, you know, rationing healthcare and, um, you know, sort of kind of identity or keeping track of, of, of healthcare records.
So we see with, with Google, for example, their operation Nightingale, they began to share healthcare record with private companies and they justified this as an on national security terms.
So they say through HIPAA, you cannot violate a person's healthcare privacy.
But in the instance of a national security crisis, you are justified in sharing health care information.
So they were hoping that with the election of Hillary Clinton in 2016, which thankfully didn't happen, that we could implement this coronavirus pandemic.
And so thanks to Donald Trump, this agenda has been derailed.
So, in 2018, a group called the Perbrite Institute patented the coronavirus and the coronavirus vaccine.
So just to give you a sense of who this the Perbright Institute is, the Perbright Institute
was founded by Henry de Worms, Baron of Perbright.
The organization is funded by the World Health Organization and we know what role that played
with the coronavirus.
It was also sponsored by Bill Gates and the Wellcome Trust.
The Wellcome Trust was founded by Henry Wellcome who had withdrawn developing vaccines as a weapon of war.
So they would use vaccines and chemicals to Exterminate people during times of war and also to experiment on prisoners of war.
So this is one of one of the backers of the the Perbride Institute.
These interests were coming together and we see also that the patents were processed through Serco.
Serco is a company that's controlled by the British monarchy.
The Queen holds the the golden share and Serco also holds the contract for the Obamacare application,
so you can see how they're bringing all of this together.
Serco is also a partner of a company called Kinotech.
It begins and ends with a Q, meaning that the company, in its interest, begin and end with the Queen of England.
Kinatech is a major global fence contracting firm.
They have contracts for the FEMA camps, for the RDIF ships, and for all these different technologies that they were hoping to implement.
With the coronavirus.
So, in 2019, they finally unleashed that the coronavirus, this was at, it was in Wuhan, China, at the World Military Games.
The World Military Games was a celebration of globalism.
And it was financed by the Department of Defense and the Department of Human Services, which were collaborating and coming together to form joint exercises to respond to health emergencies.
So the athletes who participated at these games, a number of them contracted the coronavirus.
So that's what kind of Oh, please do, Susan.
No problem at all.
this and do you mind if I get a bottle of water? Oh please do Susan, no problem at all
and do you mind if I interject questions?
Okay, thank you. Bye.
I apologize for this.
What are your questions, Jim?
This is just wonderful.
My impression has been That the development of the coronavirus was initiated at Fort Detrick, Maryland, and then when that program was shut down, it was moved to North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where I myself taught one year.
And then when it was shut down, it was moved to Wuhan, where Anthony Foushee had it supported with millions of dollars in taxpayer money.
Is any of that right or wrong?
That's a good question.
I don't have any background on those labs.
I know that Fauci did finance that lab, but if you understand that Communist China was created and controlled by the Rothschilds, it wouldn't have wound up there had the Rothschilds not approved of it and somehow facilitated it.
So it may very well have been.
I'm not familiar with those other labs that you mentioned.
Have you seen what appear to be patents for coronavirus from the Rothschilds that appear to precede all of these developments?
Yes, it's actually it's very easy to find it online.
There is a patent.
It's patented to the the Perbright Institute and the Perbright Institute has direct connections to the Rothschilds and there are two ways or several ways.
One is that the Per Bright, the founder of the Institute, is a Rothschild.
And the Wellcome Trust worked with the Rothschilds to develop vaccines, and the patent was processed
through Serco, in which the Queen holds the Golden Crown.
And of course, the Rothschilds are the advisors, and they control the British monarchy behind
the scenes.
So that's the Rothschild connection.
So if there's a war on America, or even the whole world, to destroy the middle class,
a massive transfer of wealth, put us on digital currency, a massive constraint, Chinese-style
social merit system, then the Rothschilds are ultimately responsible behind the scene?
Yes, they are.
And if you notice that they try to blame China for the Wuhan virus, so that creates a national security issue.
So if you have a national security issue, the government can force you to take a vaccine and they can also track you and have access to your health care records.
You know, that was all set up.
And of course, you know, you mentioned the The Chinese credit score, that was developed by Eric Schmidt of Google, who just happened to be Hillary Clinton's campaign advisor for technology, and he was working with Jared Kushner on the coronavirus task force to develop the rollout of the vaccine.
Whoa, Susan!
So down there, girl!
This is unbelievable!
You know, of course, we've just had the breaking news that the President directed the Director of National Intelligence to release the documents related to the Russia hoax.
And they show that John Brennan actually briefed Barack Obama on Hillary Clinton's plan to blame Donald Trump for being involved with Russia in order to distract attention from her email server.
This actually has a precedent where she was very upset in the past at the time of Waco when she was the first lady that her health care plan wasn't getting sufficient attention because Waco was pre-empting and put pressure on Webster Hubble who's actually the father of Chelsea To have Janet Reno attack the compound to settle the issue, which Janet Reno really very reluctantly did, but led to the deaths of some 84 men, women, and children who were burned to death or died from smoke inhalation just because Hillary wanted more publicity for herself.
This sounds to me to be very, very parallel.
It is, and I mean it's disgraceful what happened to You know, the folks at Waco.
And I think I read somewhere that the reason that they were targeted is that they were selling guns there.
And I think that Hillary wanted to crack down on a Second Amendment.
I think it really was her desire for publicity for her health care proposal.
You recall early on, she was very enthusiastic about it.
I would be surprised if it had anything to do with guns at that point in time.
Plus, David Karrasch, who was the leader of the SEC, would walk From the compound into town every single day by himself to get groceries and supplies so they could have easily picked him up en route and not posed any threat to the compound or the lives within.
So this is all pretty despicable stuff.
It is despicable and also Hillary Clinton, I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but Hillary Clinton is married to a Rothschild.
I don't know if you know that.
Bill Clinton is the grandson, no, he's the son of Winston Churchill, illegitimate son of Winston Churchill and Pamela Harriman.
And Winston Churchill is the grandson of a Rothschild.
So he was sired for the purpose of becoming the President of the United States.
So the Clintons were carrying forth this agenda.
The Winston Churchill, I don't know if you recall it, at Yalta, he had planned to have a Yalta conference.
They had a secret plan where they were going to reduce the United States to a bankrupt welfare state and then elevate communist China, which they controlled, to the leader of the New World Order.
And of course, during the Clinton's presidential run back in the 1990s, Bill Clinton was not the favorite candidate because he had a lot of scandal.
The Democrats knew who and what he was.
But they used Chinese money to win the primary and ultimately win the presidency.
And once they got in, of course, they sold our secrets and trade missions to Communist China.
They opened up the door for China to enter the WTO with no conditions.
And the Lewinsky scandal is actually a distraction from their pending charges of treason with respect to China.
So, Hillary has a lot to answer for.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I want to go back over some of this territory.
This is absolutely fascinating stuff.
I had heard That Winston was the son of Rockefeller and Harriman, is that right?
I mean that Bill Clinton was the son of... Bill Clinton.
Bill Clinton, yes he is.
He's the son of Winston Churchill and Pamela Harriman.
Of Winston Churchill and Pamela Harriman.
Pamela, I gather, got around.
Yes, she did.
Yes, she was quite the... Yes, she did.
She did get around.
Well, this is really stunning.
I don't think the American people have ever known these things.
And of course, you know, there's another horrifying aspect of this, which is Oklahoma City, because the records of Bill Clinton's drug dealing in Mena, Arkansas, were held at the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City.
And one of the astonishing reports we got is how the first responders weren't trying to deal with the dead and wounded, but were bringing out box after box of files that appear to have been those related to Bill Clinton's drug dealing in MENA.
I mean, this family appears to be corrupt from stem to stern.
I mean, it's outrageous, Susan.
It is, Jim.
And of course, since they are connected to the Rothschilds, one of the most profitable Rothschild businesses, of course, is drug peddling.
And they had created the intelligence networks not to protect the people, not to enforce the law, but to protect the powers that be.
So I'm not surprised that their attention was focused not on prosecuting potential criminals, but on protecting the files.
Yeah, fascinating.
And that was, of course, a ghastly event, which even killed a lot of children in a daycare center.
I mean, you know, this is the brutality of Hillary Clinton in particular.
Honestly, my assessment of Bill Clinton is he would not have been disposed to do such things, but there's nothing I would put past Hillary.
Nothing at all.
No crime too sordid, too bizarre, too perverted for Hillary Clinton.
Yeah, she really had a will to power.
I mean, she always took pride in the fact that, you know, she was just like the corrupt boys, but worse.
She was more of an extreme.
And she couldn't understand why, you know, she played as dirty as everybody else and why that didn't elevate her to the presidency.
But you're absolutely right.
You know, she had no morals whatsoever.
Nor does she today, I mean, in this revelation.
I mean, the country went through three years of non-stop rubbish, complete nonsense propaganda about Russiagate, and it had no basis whatsoever, and even Barack Obama from the beginning knew this was completely contrived, and never said a word, never spoke out about it, made no effort to put an end to the national anguish over this.
You're absolutely right, Gemma, and I think that Barack Obama was spying on the Trump campaign even prior to his election, and the reason that they're so upset with Russia, this is another, I'm asking, you're obviously not aware of, but of course the Russia sponsored the Bolshevik revolution, and Killed, killing, you know, tens of millions of Russians.
In the 1970s, Russia purged its Bolsheviks and through thanks to our treasonous deep stater, Henry Kissinger, those Bolsheviks were placed in the power within our government.
So now, Russia is trying to kind of reverse or check the, you know, the globalism and therefore poses a great threat to the Rockefeller interest and Rothschild interest and that's why the deep state is so fixated on Russia because we're not we're no longer in the cold war you know Russia really isn't a threat communism isn't a threat and the Rothschilds finance communism so and they're controlling our government right now so that's in part why they're trying to kind of instigate war you know with
you know, with Russia and they're, you know, essentially trying to create these fake scandals
that will give them a pretext to do it. And, you know, thankfully, I think that Trump is very wise,
and I think he understands the dynamics at play and is not feeding into it.
I think he may be the most brilliant political figure of modern American history. And,
of course, he's a genius with regard to the media and public relations, Susan.
I mean, I've never seen anything like it.
I think he drives the media crazy and they're all, virtually all, allied against him by
virtue of his ability to get his message across in spite of their best efforts to thwart it.
I entirely agree with you and I think a lot of people underestimate Trump.
He's a political genius, and I'm astounded each day how he's able to trump the deep state.
But I think he does have a lot of help, because I think there are patriots within the federal government who understand what the fate of our country would be if we were not able to reclaim control and get it on the right track again.
So I do believe he does have a lot of help, but his instincts are brilliant.
He's a brilliant politician.
Yeah, and I mean, he learned so much about the media when he had the show, The Apprentice and all that.
But you know, the guy was a wonderful businessman, really.
And the idea that he was a racist is lunatic.
I mean, you can't succeed as a builder in New York City and be a racist.
You're dealing with individuals of many different races, but especially black.
It was like Hershel Walker coming on during the Republican convention to say, It was insulting for people to describe Donald Trump as a racist because that would mean he had had a 37-year friendship with a racist, which is completely offensive to him and ridiculous in the extreme.
I mean, I've never seen any politician so assailed and from so many directions by such powerful forces and yet somehow survive and succeed and even turn them against themselves.
Yes, he absolutely does do that.
And all those people who've known him for all these decades, I mean, they've said that there wasn't a racist bone in his body.
You know, he was essentially a man of the people, who was as respectful and kind to the taxi driver
right on up to heads of state.
Everybody, you know, he was universally loved with exception of people, you know,
his, with whom he was having public spats like Rosie O'Donnell.
But I know that a lot of the communists had said in their own literature
that they thought that the quickest way to destroy the United States
was to exploit racial division and to pit people against each other.
So I think they're trying to use, you know, racism as a very kind of easy tactic
that can kind of mobilize people to, you know, to not, you know, to betray him
or to turn their backs on him just to avoid having to be accused of being a racist.
You know, it seems to me, What?
Once the Democratic Party began to embrace not just political correctness, but identity politics, they were already committed to this agenda.
Because identity politics emphasizes the differences between people, whereas America, as the great melting pot, Brings us together in terms of our similarities.
So the idea that they're campaigning against Donald Trump because he's divisive is just projection by the Democrats, where they regularly accuse their political opponents of the very acts of which they themselves are most responsible.
Yeah, that's correct.
I mean, they're the ones who created the politics of victimhood, that everybody, women, minorities, every different minority has a different grievance.
So you're absolutely right.
They are exploiting, you know, these differences to their own ends, you know, dividing up the country.
Yeah, it's really astonishing to me.
And because the mainstream is so totally controlled, how do you account for that?
My impression has been that the media has been long controlled by the Zionists.
I have a panel, Susan, of 100 executives from CNN, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
I have a second panel of 100 executives from NBC, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
I have a third panel from the New York Times of 100 executives, every one of whom is a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen.
And the media all appears to be out to Do Trump in, and that means Israel is out to do Trump in, and I've been baffled because I faulted Trump the most for his largesse with regard to Israel, you know, moving the embassy to Jerusalem, declaring the Golan Heights Israeli territory, defunding the UN agency that deals with refugees and helps the Palestinians, even
By executive order redefining anti-Semitism to include criticism of the government of Israel, which is a manifest absurdity.
And yet, and yet, I have read of late statements from Brahminist Jews with the ADL, for example, out to defeat Trump.
I mean, does this make any sense at all, Susan?
On the surface it doesn't, but I can give you an explanation for that.
And also to address the anti-Semitism charge, I think around the 1920s or so when our government began to float the idea of a new Israeli state, A lot of very prominent Jews submitted a letter, a public letter, which was published in the New York Times, in which they were pleading with our government, with the public, to reject Zionism.
They said this is not Jewish, and what they were trying to do betrayed the Torah.
So they were very much against it.
And these are Jews, you know, who are the greatest opponents of Zionism. But in terms of why the mainstream
media is against Trump, the mainstream media, they're controlled by corporations.
The corporations, especially the multinationals and most media organizations,
they are controlled through corporations, interlocking boards of
directors.
All of these companies have public-private partnerships, meaning that they depend upon government and public funds.
They lobby, you know, they have lobbyists that appear before Capitol Hill to get government Concessions and so forth.
So at the very top executive level, they are controlled by Rothschilds and their partners who created these corporations.
And they established the channels for the public-private partnerships.
And also, from the very beginning, and I'm talking about right around World War II, they set up the media to serve as an arm of propaganda.
And this was because entering World War I and World War II were not in America's interest, so they knew that they would have to convince the public to support the Rothschild drive for war.
And one of their methods was through the intelligence networks, and that was through AIG, believe it or not.
AIG was established in Rothschild's China.
Tell us more about AIG.
Do you mean the insurance company?
Talking about the insurance company.
So just to backtrace a little bit, the founder of AIG was a fellow by the name of C.B.
Starr, and he was a poor gentleman, a poor boy, born on an Indian reservation in Montecito, I think I might be mispronouncing that, Montecito County in California.
He became connected to an establishment group that was headquartered in London called the Odd Fellows Organization.
So very quickly, through this connection, he was able to graduate from Berkeley without really having to study, he passed the bar without having to go to law school, and he set up an insurance company.
How is all that possible, Suze?
I guess he had a little call for his friends.
I mean, they like to pick these very unassuming people that nobody would suspect, you know, above anything, and they built him.
So he was somebody that they selected, you know, to run this insurance company.
So after he set up this small insurance company, he relocated to China, in Shanghai, where the Rothschilds were already kind of mapping out the country.
You know, to kind of lay the foundations for our industry and corporations to move over there, as they've done now.
And through insurance, CV Star was able to acquire all the intelligence on the infrastructure, the terrain, all Chinese businesses.
That was then, that provided intelligence to the Rothschilds.
He also worked with Henry Luce, who, you know, the founder of Time and Life magazine, Who was born in China, and the two of them worked together to set up a media, like a local media, that serviced the business community.
So they were kind of working with spying, gathering intelligence, and then providing that intelligence to their own, you know, allies within business.
And then during World War II, they worked with a group called the Office of Strategic Services.
And that was a nascent because kind of like a rogue intelligence agency that was based upon the MI5, which is, you know, the British intelligence group and FDR approved this because we didn't have we really didn't have, you know, such any real active intelligence before then and the OSS drew from its ranks
the children of the elite.
So these were the and they of course serve the you know the corporate executives.
So you have the children of the elite serving as spies throughout World War II that would tell
tell the you know the you know the governments which industries to bomb and those
would of course be rival businesses. They would tell them which you know which industries to
keep and they had they were able to establish different intelligence networks.
These intelligence networks, in turn, form the media.
The OSS became the CIA.
The CIA, in turn, worked with the media and created a number of the journalists that we have today.
And I'm sure you're familiar with Operation Mockingbird.
So a lot of these intelligence assets then, in turn, became journalists for the major news networks and newspapers.
Now tell me why would Jews turn on Trump when he's been so generous to Israel?
I don't think it's Jews.
I think they are a segment of the Jewish population that is affiliated with the Rothschilds and with the Anglo-Zionist empire.
So I think there are a lot of Jews who do not support what they're doing and who are not even
part of the agenda and aren't even aware of the agenda. So it's a very small segment of the Jewish population.
It's very strange to me that when Trump has been so overtly generous to Israel,
for which I have severely criticized him, I think it's all wrong.
Jerusalem has to be, the status of Jerusalem has to be part of a comprehensive peace settlement with the Palestinians.
The Golan Heights is internationally recognized to be Israeli-occupied Syrian territory, where its significance has been enhanced by the discovery of a massive gas deposit beneath the Golan Heights.
The UN Refugee Project is about as worthwhile as the humanitarianism project that exists in the world, and that he should defund it is a cruel act.
And of course, Redefining anti-Semitism on the basis of an executive order is such a blatant violation of the First Amendment and freedom to speak.
Yes, it is.
In my opinion, Susan, if the Democrats had wanted to impeach Donald Trump for an impeachable act, it would have been that.
He violated his oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution by means of an executive order that clearly violated our freedom of speech, in particular to criticize Israel and the government of Israel, which is anything but an anti-Semitic act, as properly understood.
I mean, it's just absurd to me that this has gone this way, and then that there'd be a significant Jewish effort to deny Trump re-election.
You're absolutely right.
Just to provide some clarity, of course Rothschild works both sides of the aisle.
He's with the Democrats through Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and then on the right through some of our own neoconservatives.
Don't forget that Israel was created through the Balfour Agreement, it was initially at the direction of Rothschild, so they envisioned that as they had planned for Israel to serve as the kingdom of Rothschild, not the kingdom or a state for the Jewish people.
So this plan for world domination that they've been trying to implement for a few centuries now, He called it a dictatorship?
Rothschild created it's satanic and they are trying to create a dictatorship. In
fact when I interviewed Baron Robert Rothschild in London he had told me
that his vision for the European Union was to have a dictatorship there and
then eventually he called it a dictatorship throughout the rest of the
world. So the plan is dictatorship. Did he call it a dictatorship?
He called it... I'm not interpreting.
He just said... No, he said that's what his goal was.
His goal was exactly... That's what he planned to do.
How did he put it?
His goal was... What were the words he used?
He said... I asked, what is your vision for the European Union?
And he said, we are planning for a dictatorship.
Really?
He said a dictatorship.
That's astounding!
That's our vision.
I agree with you that any efforts to control our freedom of speech is a violation of the Constitution, but I think it's also an extension of political correctness.
You can't express your views on a number of things that might challenge the Rothschild order.
It's always like their interests and unfortunately I do think they are working behind the Jews like they're using the Jews as Jewish people as kind of like a barrier or like a first line of defense.
So that they're blamed and they're attacked.
And then if anyone dares to blame them, even though they're not, you know, it's the Rothschilds, not the Jews.
If they get blamed, well, they can't actually even attempt to address the issue because that is viewed as hate speech.
And that's how they're trying to frame it.
Well, it was evident to me from early on that political correctness was a form of suffocation of critical thinking.
And if you can't think things through, if you're not allowed to say something because someone might find it offensive, I mean, that's the very opposite of what freedom of speech is supposed to represent.
No matter how much I may disagree with what you say, I nevertheless would defend with my life your right to say it.
That is the appropriate principle.
And we're finding Twitter and Facebook and YouTube massively censoring everything a lot of Americans want to say.
And frankly, it's because what they're saying is true.
They call it hate speech or a violation of community standards, but that would mean their community standards don't tolerate diversity of opinion or that what they hate is revealing the truth.
Call them inconvenient truths.
They don't want to be revealed.
It's just stunning to me, Susan, that in my lifetime I would see the United States turn into this intellectual fascist state.
It's outrageous.
I agree with you.
It's happened so quickly thanks to treasonous politicians like Hillary Clinton.
And don't forget that a lot of these tech companies were created through the intelligence networks and the defense industry, which again are Rothschild controlled.
And so, of course, they would, through these private networks, they would be able to implement their own censorship.
But if I could ask you, when you were a professor, did you feel or did you notice any of this political correctness coming down the pike?
And how did you experience it?
Well, it was starting to creep in.
I mean, I had a 35-year career.
I was in quite a few different institutions.
Kentucky, Virginia, Cincinnati, North Carolina, Chapel Hill, New College of the University of South Florida.
I wound up, for my last 19 years, on the Duluth campus of the University of Minnesota.
That would be from 1987 to 2006.
And it was while I was there that political correctness began to manifest itself.
And frankly, I mean, it was nothing that I could ever support.
I mean, I have a friend who knows the institution very well, having secured a degree on the Twin Cities campus and residing in Minnesota and following politics.
And he said, I somehow slipped through the cracks because I wound up doing all this research on JFK.
I brought together, you know, groups of experts.
The university actually funded two conferences, one in 1999 in Minneapolis and the other in 2003 on the Duluth campus.
For my collaborative research on JFK.
But I founded Scholars for 9-11 Truth in December of 2005, and that was only six months before my retirement the following June.
And I strongly suspect that would not have been as welcome or appreciated on the campus if I had been digging deeper into 9-11.
But on the other hand, you know, I returned on one occasion.
I got a huge turnout.
I mean, it was just wonderful.
This large auditorium hall was virtually completely filled, so there were people who appreciated what I was doing and others, I dare say, who did not.
I think at the time of JFK's assassination, none dare call it conspiracy, but I think a few decades later, I think a lot of people accept that the narrative that was offered was not apt.
Oh yeah, yes, you'd have to be a numbskull today to believe the Warren Report, which is wrong in every respect.
The evidence used to frame Oswald was fabricated.
There were actually multiple shooters.
We've actually discerned eight different shooters.
I identified six, only Domicard the seventh, only the eighth.
Remains recently discovered where he was located and what shot he fired in the effect.
And it was because, you know, the Secret Service, the CIA, the military were all involved in the assassination where the mastermind behind it was none other than Lyndon Baines Johnson.
Well, of course, since he was going to cede to the presidency, he was in a position to control what did or did not happen as a consequence, and to ensure no one involved in taking out Jack would ever be prosecuted or suffer, therefore.
And of course, Lyndon Johnson set the stage for this vast entitlement society.
Yes, he did.
Yeah, he claimed he'd have blacks voting Democrats for the next hundred years.
Well, he came pretty close to achieving that, I think.
I know, it's only now with Donald Trump are they breaking through because blacks are realizing the Democrats have never done anything for them with a surging economy, the lowest Wage earners were having their wages increase at the fastest rate, and that was because of Donald Trump.
His controlling of our southern border meant illegal immigrants weren't able to come over and steal the jobs out from under them.
After the first debate, by the way, Telemundo, which is a liberal-leaning Spanish-language television channel, found their voters, unscientific admittedly, but nevertheless indicative, 66% On the stage, what do you think happened to the real Joe Biden?
Susan, I don't know if you know, that wasn't even Joe Biden.
That was a body double.
You mean on the stage?
What do you think happened to the real Joe Biden?
Is he a two-and-three?
Well, here's the problem.
We knew beforehand that he already had the questions.
We had the report.
He already had the questions in advance.
And Chris Wallace, I have no doubt, would have been compliant with that.
Lester Holt was in the past.
Many of these other people.
It was very, it's very despicable.
In addition, Joe Biden has had an implant imprint in his skull.
He's got a chip so they can be sent messages directly to his ear canal by vibrations of the bones.
They asked for an ear check.
Trump, knowing this was the case, wanted to have an ear check,
which the Biden campaign refused.
The guy they used as a stand-in had a wire, which Joe Biden wouldn't have needed.
He was kind of like a slightly flimsier version of Joe Biden.
He looked a little older.
He kind of had a wispy, the ears are the tail.
Joe Biden has lobes, so they curl back up, right?
This guy has, they come straight down.
Not only that, but Joe Biden has blue eyes.
This guy has brown eyes.
Not only that, but although I haven't worn a tie since 1969, when you wear a tie, you tend to tie your tie the same way.
Joe Biden used a double Windsor.
It's a thicker knot because you go to both sides.
This guy had a single Windsor.
Here was the killer.
They asked for a break after every 30 minutes of the 90 minutes.
I mean, Joe Biden couldn't even go 90 minutes.
Well, how come?
We have a staffer who reported that.
The anti-dementia medication Joe Biden is taking has the unfortunate side effect of making him incontinent.
So they have had staff meetings to decide which adult diaper he ought to be wearing that would be least visible through its closing and make the least crinkling sound when he urinates so that I believe Joe Biden has a future after politics making commercials for the pants.
But the fact of the matter is he couldn't go for 90 minutes without changing his diaper, so they put in the body double.
Wow, and didn't Hillary also have the same problem?
Hillary, you six or eight, Susan.
Anyone here should go to my webpage, Jim the Conspiracy Guy, and check out Fake News Issues of Identity.
It was after her collapse at that 9-11 memorial, Susan, they took her back to Chelsea's apartment.
This was a new apartment Chelsea had because she didn't really need one, but this had a private hospital on the floor.
So they closed the hospital, had only one patient, Hillary Clinton.
They took her back, but they were worried that the public would become concerned about her health if she didn't make an appearance, so they sent out a body double.
She was younger, thinner, far more attractive and vivacious.
I refer to her as the lion double because she reminds me so much.
You know, in fact, there were so many who realize this with a body double that one image up here to the two of them side beside that where we can all breathe a sigh of relief that Hillary Clinton's body double is in good health.
I mean, it was that bad!
And then within three days, they had a different body double on a flight to Charlotte, North Carolina, who was shorter, had a very sloped forehead, very different, with a massive overbite that I refer to as a Mero Streep double.
But even during the debates with Bernie Sanders and with Donald Trump, it was not Hillary.
It was the best of the Hillary body doubles.
It's outrageous.
Do you think Hillary Clinton is still alive?
They've invented a voice box, Susan, that will give you an indistinguishable voice.
So you were hearing the voice of Joe Biden, you were hearing the voice of Hillary Clinton, but it was not Joe Biden as it was not Hillary Clinton.
This means these guys are liars, cheaters, phonies, frauds from top to bottom.
What do you think happened to the real Hillary Clinton?
Is she still alive, do you think?
Oh yeah, yeah, Hillary's around.
I mean, she's, you know, she was just revealed, you know, to have, that her plot, you know, Trump has just had the declassified, the Director of National Intelligence declassified the documents, including John Brennan's own handwritten messages about how he personally briefed Barack Obama that Hillary Clinton was going to blame Donald Trump for involvement with Russia in order to distract attention from her use of a private email server.
So Barack Obama has known all this time, and the country's went through three years of ridiculous convolutions over a completely fake claim, which Barack Obama knew the whole time.
It's really disgraceful.
Hillary had her own Russia problems.
She had Uranium One, and she colluded with Communist China, or at least her husband did, to win the election in 1994 and then in 1998.
So I think it's really very rich of her to have made that, you know, to have made that allegation.
Yeah, yeah, that through Uranium One, a Canadian firm.
She sold 20% of U.S.
uranium reserves to Russia for a $145 million donation to the Clinton Foundation.
I mean, this woman is as corrupt as they get, Susan.
This is maybe the most corrupt woman in the history of the United States.
It's amazing that she's still walking around at large, given all that she's done.
There's a reason why I believe that the FBI cannot charge her with treason, and that's that since we're now under the control of the UN, treason is now legal, but what isn't legal is lying about treason under oath.
So that's why she's been able to get away with this for as long as she has.
Say that again, Susan?
What isn't legal is right under oath, you mean?
Is that why so many people got caught up in perjury charges instead of the offenses themselves?
That's correct.
That's correct.
So treason is legal.
I read that somewhere.
I think that was after we joined the United Nations.
The international law became the law of the land.
And so if you commit treason on behalf of globalism, you're not violating the law.
But then if you lie about it under oath, you are.
So that's another reason why we need to kind of extract ourselves from these global institutions.
Well, I understand Bill and Hill are both CIA and therefore it makes it more complicated to bring legal charges against them that they couldn't claim were in the performance of their duties with the agency.
So I think that's also a part of it.
But I mean, these are really bad people.
Now, Susan, we've had a few new joiners to the chat room.
I wonder if you could give us a thumbnail sketch of the coronavirus hoax, how it played out, who are the beneficiaries, and what was the intent, the master plan, which is still in the works.
I mean, it's not as though we're out of this yet.
We're still in the midst of us.
Tell us.
Give us the results of your research, which can be found in your book.
Absolutely.
So, there are a number of different goals.
One was to eliminate the competition.
So, it was unleashed in China to help wipe out China or weaken China to help elevate, I guess, the U.S.
It was also intended to wipe out mom-and-pop businesses, you know, to enable the elites to consolidate control.
It was used as a cover for the financial collapse, because I'm sure you've heard about the bubble that may burst, and a lot of the elites are anticipating the collapse of the economy.
So the coronavirus was intended in part to be a cover for that, and it enabled them to use that as an excuse.
Also, as I alluded to earlier, the Affordable Care Act bankrupted the health care industry and individual health
insurance markets.
So through the coronavirus, they were able to justify more expenditures, more giveaways
to hospitals, a great boon for the pharmaceutical companies.
They were expecting to make a huge profit peddling their vaccines, their forced vaccinations,
all over the world.
And if you recall, we used to have choice in America.
But first, Obama tried to force us to buy insurance to erode our free will and to determine our choices, which
we then would have to pay, guaranteeing a global market or at least national market for these different products.
So the pharmaceutical companies were trying to guarantee a global market for their vaccines.
And I mean, there are a few other points.
One was that the vaccination was intended to reduce the population.
And the reason for this is that the globalists feel that there are too many of us, and not because we're posing some type of threat to the environment.
But they feel that with more of us, you know, we're talking too much with each other.
We have, we elected somebody by the name of Donald Trump.
We're seeing through their machinations.
England, you know, realized Brexit, you know, where they're trying to pull out of the European Union and into, you know, to serve nationalism.
So that the people are waking up and they're hoping that by reducing numbers, They can ensure that there's more, you know, more controllable.
And with this vaccination, they're going to implement a technocratic agenda.
And that would be to kind of force us to be tracked, you know, with that.
Some type of technology that they would put in the vaccine, and then they were going to usher in these smart cities where the people were going to be kind of relegated to a tech gulag, put into like a very subsistence level of existence, you know, where the elites can ration money, ration resources, and control us and monitor us in these tech gulags.
Um, and, uh, let me see if there's anything else.
Oh, yes.
And also with, um, they were hoping that by, uh, through the lockdowns, by extending the lockdowns of, uh, of the, um, during the coronavirus, um, that they could, um, force, force the collapse of the economy.
Um, basically they're trying to recreate the economic conditions of 2007, 2008, And they believe that if they can collapse the economy,
they can then push through their Green New Deal agenda.
And that's, as we talked about earlier, that's for the de-industrialization of the US.
So that would be like the full- The Green New Deal really is a centerpiece
of this entire operation.
Yes, it is.
Yeah, that's the global warming.
When Trump got Biden during the first debate to repudiate the Green New Deal, he created a dilemma for the Democrats.
And you are, it seems to me, implying that the Democrats are in bed with the Rothschilds.
George Soros, needless to say, clearly involved here.
Antifa, Black Lives Matter.
Would you talk about how all those pieces are related or is it just very straightforward?
Yes, I'll try to make it simple.
So the Green New Deal is an extension of the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, which is basically the Orwellian future, where they want to de-industrialize the world and just kind of push us into these tech gulags and keep all the rest of the lands free and clear.
So the The elites can enjoy them.
They can have the land and the resources for themselves.
Everybody else will have just the very, very, you know, the least amount possible.
These little cubicle apartments as we see in Melbourne, Australia.
Exactly, and even Japan has what's called, I think it's coffin apartments or coffin rooms where all you have is just the ability to kind of lie down and maybe watch TV.
This is like the chicken farms where they have masses of chickens together and they can't go anywhere.
They're all in their little cages.
That's correct.
In fact, if you read the Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars paperwork, they describe the people as steaks on a table and beasts of burden.
So they actually see us as pigs on a farm.
Who could write this way?
This is so inhumane, Susan!
Who authored these pieces?
Evil genius lies behind this diabolical plan.
I mean, I am repulsed.
I'm repulsed, too.
I don't know if genius would be the right word, but definitely diabolical.
This is, again, from the mind and perversion of the Rothschilds.
This was their vision for humanity they sought to bring to us.
But I guess going back to the Green New Deal, so they're hoping that they'll create these, you know, well-paying jobs.
And what that means is they'll pay people for their own enslavement, you know, to build these new tech gulags that are going to be, you know, very sophisticated.
And then, of course, once that has been done, you know, they will have outlived their usefulness.
But it's really about creating a system of control over us.
And it's like the last nail in the coffin for, you know, for the Rothschilds.
Soros is a Rothschild agent.
He was also, I believe, he was an intelligence officer during World War II.
So he worked for them at that time.
And these Black Lives Matter are really like, they're the brown shirts.
So they are funded by the corporations.
And this came about Through, you know, Barack Obama is a community organizer.
So the churches are now controlled by the Rothschild corporations through a global entity called the World Council of Churches.
So they kind of dictate the ideology and the, you know, the central tenets of the Christian faith.
And then the churches in turn, who are working in lockstep with the pharmaceutical companies and the multinationals, are trying to mobilize their congregations to support various radical leftist political agendas.
In fact, they even use Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals as a primer for how to do this.
The churches have been transformed into community organizations thanks to Barack Obama, and they are now being mobilized to burn down our cities and to kind of transform our values.
This is again on behalf of the Rothschild Empire.
Was Barack Obama basically a Rothschild agent himself?
Yes, he was.
Yes, he was.
So that's why he was really anointed as a very kind of reverential figure by the World Council of Churches and by these different entities.
Yes, he was.
And he worked with the United Church of Christ which works hand-in-hand with the World Council of Churches.
He actually mobilized the congregants through the UCC to push through the Affordable Care Act,
to help mobilize the people to vote for him, and to re-elect him,
and to push through his agenda.
What is your analysis of the Affordable Care Act?
I think it was meant to set the foundation for socialized medicine.
So, it achieved that by, it bankrupted the healthcare industry and the individual insurance market.
Therefore, it was able to put more people on the public option.
And so, in turn, that could make more resources available for healthcare.
And then of course, with those resources, the elite would seize most of it for themselves,
and then ration the resources out to the people, you know, as little as possible.
So you're looking at death panels and the elites, you know, giving the elites the ability
to have access to your healthcare records and to control, you know,
who gets what kind of healthcare and under what circumstances.
Susan, it does seem to me that the big pharma and the hospital industry has gotten completely
overboard, that they are ripping off the American people gigantically.
I mean, it's a huge fraud.
How do we bring that under control?
I think Donald Trump is already doing it.
I think with this vaccination, they were expecting to make a windfall.
And so Donald Trump has kind of turned the tables on them and said that, you know, we'll offer the vaccine, but for the least amount of money possible.
So basically, he's eliminating the profit margin.
And I think he's bringing some of the pharmaceutical companies back to America so that we can make them here.
I think there might be some type of regulations that he could impose to ensure that there are price caps on drugs, because essentially the taxpayer pays for the R&D, so we pay to develop the drugs, and then in turn the pharmaceuticals sell them at a huge profit margin, and a lot of these drugs It's like the soft drink industry.
It costs pennies to make a can of Coke, but they sell it at a phenomenal... I mean the markup is enormous, similarly with the vaccines and other medicines.
They're actually relatively inexpensive to produce, but they have a huge profit margin.
And I think they should really be focused more on organic or natural treatments rather than giving us poisons and chemicals to heal ourselves.
Oh yes, I couldn't agree more.
Susan, this has been really fascinating and far-ranging.
Would you like to add further thoughts to tell us where we can find your books?
I know you have several on Amazon.
Absolutely.
So you can find my books on my website.
It's www.susanbradford.org.
And of course, if anybody has any questions, they're always welcome to contact me through my website.
And I don't know if you have any questions from the chat room or if you had any questions.
At this point, no.
I think the members of the chat room are just as blown away as I. I think you've done a wonderful job.
of exposing a whole lot of dimensions of this very complicated situation in which we find ourselves, for which they and I are very grateful, Susan.
Well, it's my pleasure, Jim, and thank you again for the opportunity, and I'll look forward to speaking with you soon.
SusanBradford.org.
And Susan, why don't you mention your other books, because you've done some really important work on a variety of subjects before we part today.
Oh, absolutely.
So I'm sure you're now aware that our Department of Justice is very partisan.
So you can see how the corruption transpires at that level through my book, Lynched.
Which provides a comprehensive coverage of the Abramoff investigation.
And of course, Jack Abramoff was a victim of this partisan... He was a victim of a partisan prosecution.
That was one of the major political scandals of its time, Susan.
Yes, it was.
And you know, Jim, the same cast of characters are involved.
Jack Abramoff had interfered with interests that were affiliated with
Hillary Clinton and John McCain and so they manufactured a scandal and
used the courts and media and Department of Justice to go after him.
So it's really wicked but yes it was one of the largest scandals of our time.
I also wrote a book called The Shadow Dragon, and that reveals how our political establishment sold us out to Communist China, and it also shows how Secretary of State Henry Kissinger set up the linkages that are the underpinning of a new world order, like how he created the interdependencies.
I think this guy is going to go down as one of the great monsters of world history.
Absolutely.
Crimes Against Humanity, you know, and then some.
Yeah, absolutely.
He was a key figure in all of this, in creating, you know, what we're facing now.
And then my next book was The Second American Revolution, and that book reveals how the Russians were able to purge their Bolsheviks and how Henry Kissinger opened the channels for those Bolsheviks and then So you're rather an expert on Henry Kissinger among your other attributes, I would suggest.
I do know a lot about him.
Do you have any questions about him?
We need to do an interview just about Henry Kissinger as one of the malevolent forces of recent American history.
We definitely do.
Yeah, he's definitely that.
And then, of course, I wrote Unmasked recently about the coronavirus, and my most recent book is FL-33C3D, which is fleeced, and that reveals the technocratic agenda and how Elon Musk fits into that.
So that was revealed through this recent landmark Supreme Court case in which the US.
Supreme Court ceded half of the state of Oklahoma to Indian country.
So that's, again, all tied into the British Crown.
And I think my last book, which I haven't mentioned, is The Tribes that Rockefeller Built, and that reveals how the elites forged the deep state through Indian country.
You're suggesting, it seems to me, that there are deep ties between the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, and Henry Kissinger.
Yes, the Rockefellers were created by the Rothschilds, and they eventually had a rivalry, and Henry Kissinger, who was a protege of both of them, Was ultimately a Rothschild agent, so he betrayed the Rockefellers, and you may have known that you don't really hear much about the Rockefellers anymore, because Henry Kissinger helped eliminate them as a threat, and then again facilitating the rise of the Rothschilds, who now control the shadow government within the United States.
So Kissinger was basically always an agent of the Rothschilds?
Yes, he was, and he betrayed the Rockefellers ultimately.
Just as have been the Clintons, too, I take it.
Yes, they have.
I know that Hillary worked very closely with, I think, Nelson Rockefeller.
But yes, they were ultimately, especially since Bill Clinton is a Rothschild, they ultimately owed their allegiance to that family.
Susan, this has all been very disturbing.
You're really laying out a complex network of relationships between powerful figures who are making a great difference to American history and not for the betterment of the quality of life of the American people, sad to say.
I agree, and you know, knowledge is power, and I think as long as the people are able to educate themselves and share that information with other people, I think we are going to be able to reclaim our country.
Susan, I thank you for that wonderful, positive note of conclusion.
We both believe Donald Trump is making a very strong difference for the good for America and the American people.
And to me, it's just dismaying in the extreme to see all the forces of light against him.
He's really in the lion's den, but he seems to me to be masterful in dealing with The massive forces arrayed against him.
I can't think of any other person who could do this, frankly, in all of history.
I agree with you.
I'm looking forward to his second term, and I believe we're going to have that.
I do too.
I think there's going to be a landslide for Donald Trump, especially as the public becomes aware of some of the facts we've been talking about tonight, including that Barack Obama himself was briefed by John Brennan about Hillary Clinton's plan I guess that was the October surprise, wasn't it?
involved with Russia to divert attention from her email scandal. It seems to me
this revelation is coming at a very opportune moment just a month before the
election, Susan. Just long enough time to sink in and make a difference. I guess
that was the October surprise, wasn't it? It may be, Susan.
Well, Susanbradford.org is her website.
SusanBradford.org.
She has multiple books.
You can check them out on Amazon.com.
Susan, I can't thank you enough for joining me tonight.
It was my pleasure.
Thank you as well.
Really been wonderful talking to you, and I look forward to a return engagement.
It would be my pleasure, and thank you once again.
It was my pleasure.
Super, Susan.
Thanks so much.
Thank you.
So, how do you think it went?
It went very well.
I've got to get off of the link and conclude.
Hang on one second.
The Zoom, because I went full, oh, you've got all kinds of thumbs up.
I got one, there's one, two, three, four, five, six, eight thumbs up and eight hearts.
They really like what you have done here.
Oh, that's good.
▲
Export Selection