All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 3, 2020 - Jim Fetzer
01:19:36
Conspiracy Guy, Aug. 2, 2020 / Issues of Identity
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'm Jim Fetzer, the Conspiracy Guy.
Today I have a show I think you're going to find completely fascinating with all kinds of unexpected twists and turns involving some very surprising developments that are nevertheless extraordinarily significant.
Fake news issues of identity.
Lee, Noah, Paul, Hillary, Michelle, and Kamala too.
Let me mention, by the way, that YouTube is taking down some of my videos, so far rebroadcasts, but that if you miss one, you'll be able to find it at JimTheConspiracyGuy.com.
So, be sure to check out My basic blog for these shows, JimTheConspiracyGuy.com, if you're looking for one that you may have missed.
Meanwhile, as most of you are aware, I'm a former Marine Corps officer, a retired university professor.
I offered courses in logical reasoning, scientific explanation, critical thinking for 35 years.
I've specialized in particular since my retirement from the university in 2006 in bringing together groups of experts on different aspects of complex and controversial cases to sort them out.
But I began with JFK, where I've now published four books, including three in 1998, 2000, and 2003.
That shattered the cover up, bringing together the best experts, including a world authority on the human brain who is also an expert on wound ballistics, a PhD in physics, who is also an MD and board certified in radiation oncology, the treatment of cancer using x-ray therapy, so is expert on the interpretation of x-rays,
A physician who was in trauma room number one when JFK's moribund body was brought in and then two days later was responsible for the care and treatment of his alleged assassin and other worthies where we discovered the autopsy x-rays had been altered to conceal a fist-sized blowout to the back of the head
That the brain shown in diagrams and photographs in the National Archives wasn't even the brain of JFK, and that the whole movies of the assassination, including the Zapruder, had been massively edited and revised to conceal the true causes of death.
Today, I'll have other revelations about JFK that are equally noteworthy.
Well, I've made an effort with my more recent investigations to publish them with Moonrock Books, to which I shall return by way of conclusion.
Remember now, as I've emphasized, scientific reasoning entails the four stages of puzzlement, Speculation, adaptation, and explanation.
The cases I'll discuss today are very clear in why there is a puzzling aspect to a situation.
Speculation about the alternatives, where an evaluation yields more support for one than the other, But where additional evidence enables the evidence to settle down, where we're entitled to accept the best supported hypothesis as true in the tentative infallible fashion of science,
Tentative, meaning new evidence or alternative explanations might require us to reject hypotheses we previously accepted, accept hypotheses we previously rejected, and leave others in suspense.
You'll see that here.
And where even the best supported hypothesis might still turn out to be false, where classical Newtonian physics is the paradigm for some 200 years regarded as virtually infallible, and yet it turned out to be, in a strict sense, false as a limiting case of general relativity advanced by Einstein.
Now we're going to start with JFK, the topic being The Patsy in the Doorway.
We'll start with the official narrative of the assassination, which includes that Lee Oswald got off three lucky shots from the book depository.
He first hit JFK in the back of the neck, the second hit Conley in the back, and the third hit JFK in the head.
Actually, it would turn out that they'd have to revise this, given that it turned out that a bystander had been injured by a shot that missed.
So they claimed that one shot had missed, another had hit Jack in the back of the neck, passed through his neck, exited his throat, and gone into the back of John Connolly, and the third hit JFK in the back of the head, killing him.
That of course was the blowout in the back of the head that was from a shot fired from in front that we discovered had been concealed in the autopsy x-rays, but there was indeed a shot to the head in the vicinity of the external occipital protuberance.
When I do a more thorough presentation on JFK, I'll make all those matters very, very clear.
Meanwhile, his arrest report, which was Timed at 1.40 p.m.
is definitive about his guilt.
Wait till you read it.
All the more surprising since his arrest for the Tibbett shooting only occurred at 1.51 p.m.
In other words, they wrote the arrest report claiming he'd shot and killed President Kennedy and Officer Tibbett and wounded the governor before his arrest.
Here's the official narrative.
Lee Oswald firing from the sixth floor of the Book Depository building as the Dallas motorcade passed by.
The other buildings and locations are all significant in a comprehensive review, which will be forthcoming.
Here's the arrest report.
Notice the time.
1.40 p.m.
This man shot and killed President John F. Kennedy and Police Officer J.D.
Tippett.
He also shot and wounded Governor John Connolly.
Well, pretty remarkable.
He was arrested at the Texas Theater.
It has an historical marker that doesn't make the point that at the time he was arrested it was for the shooting of Officer J.D.
Tippett.
Here's a photograph from the arrest.
What's most striking, of course, is the fact that the arrest took place at 1.51 p.m., or 11 minutes after the arrest report had already been written.
You can find a very thorough timeline in the second of my three initial books on the assassination, namely Murder in Dealey Plaza.
By Ira Wade.
It would.
It's a completely brilliant accounting of the timeline.
Very thorough, very detailed.
Ira David Wood.
Meanwhile, the auction six shows a man in the doorway.
This is the most important photograph taken during the assassination sequence.
The doorway area was of special interest with a man peering out at the scene.
There are obvious alterations in that area of the photograph, figures that have been identified as Black Time Man, Obfuscated Man, and Black Hole Man, as I shall explain.
Notice, for example, That the man in the doorway is missing his shoulder bone, his clavicle, which is an anatomical impossibility, telling us something is wrong.
Many puzzling elements here.
This is the photograph, the best version of which I know.
If you were to look very carefully and see, there's actually a bullet hole in the windshield here, where JFK's left ear would be.
If his left ear were visible, it's a small white spiral nebula with a dark hole in the center indicative of a shot fired through the windshield from the front.
Here's the area of the doorway, and this is the figure who appears to be peering out.
Meanwhile, also, we have framed here the broom closet for a uranium mining company that was a CIA asset from which three shots were fired.
And where it appears Lyndon Johnson's security is already reacting to the sequence with an open door.
Even though Jack's detail is looking around as though they have no idea what's taking place.
So here you see a closer up of the area that has been of great interest, captured by AP photographer James Ike Olchins in this extraordinarily important photograph.
Well, we've discovered many indications of alteration, including, for example, you cannot see the driver here through the windshield, which ought to be possible.
Many, many other alterations have been noted, but here we're going to focus on what's in this particular area of the photograph, where Robert Where he was a special consultant to the House Select Committee on investigating the assassination of JFK and Martin Luther King.
In 1977-78, and where many regard him as a leading expert on the assassination, he has several books on the assassination, including The Killing of a President, which has a wonderful compilation of photographs, and The Search for Lee Harvey Oswald, which has what I take to be the best account of the Tippett shooting that I have yet to uncover.
If you notice here, the figure appearing out, there's a man behind him known as Black Tie Man because he's wearing a black tie.
But notice we have an anomaly here because Black Tie Man appears to be both in front of and behind Doorway Man or Door Man, which obviously is physically impossible.
We also have other signs of alteration.
We have obfuscated man.
This man's face has been obfuscated.
And then we have a figure here with his hands raised to protect his eyes from the sun, Black Hole Man, because his face has been darkened out.
These are features that will be important to us as we proceed.
Notice you see how Doorman is missing his clavicle, his shoulder bone, which is of course impossible.
So we have multiple reasons, there are multiple reasons to question the narrative that go beyond the anomalies in the photograph.
For example, Lee Oswald, being questioned by Will Fritz, the homicide detective, told, when asked where he was during the shooting, out front with Bill Shelley, who was one of his supervisors.
They forced Lee to remove his over shirt to take his mug shots only in his t-shirt.
He was the right height, weight, build, wearing a similar over shirt and t-shirt to the man in the doorway.
But obviously, if Lee Oswald had been in the doorway, he could not have simultaneously been on the sixth floor shooting at JFK, which means the entire Warren Commission official narrative hung in the balance in relation to this issue.
Lee had previously been impersonated in Mexico City by a very different guy.
Here are Fritz's notes.
Many students still believe that there were no notes or recordings kept of Oswald's conversation with Will Fritz, but that's clearly false.
Here are Fritz's own notes, and here's the key part where he addressed the question of where he was during the shooting, out with Bill Shelley in front.
Meanwhile, this is what Lee was wearing when he was arrested, and the over shirt here, which is a very richly textured long-sleeve shirt that was quite worn over his t-shirt, is of special interest.
Notice, however, as advertised, they forced him to remove the outer shirt and to have his mugshot only in his t-shirt, no doubt.
Because they were conscious of the resemblance and wanted to obfuscate the fact that he appeared to be the same guy.
Richard Hook has done completely brilliant work about the similarities between the shirt that Lee was wearing when he was arrested and features of the shirt.
On the man in the doorway.
This is merely one of many, many studies he has done, where I commend him for the brilliance of his work.
In particular, here he is noticing the collar tip is the same, the button lip is the same, smooth cloths, aberrations, and shine.
Excellent notification of similarities.
Meanwhile, this is a fellow who was photographed in Mexico City, clearly not the same person as Lee Oswald arrested for the assassination.
Or even J. Edgar Hoover, then director of the FBI, put out a memorandum to his station chiefs reporting that someone was impersonating Lee Oswald in Mexico City.
And I've observed on more than one occasion, if that is all you knew about the assassination, that someone had been impersonating Lee Oswald in Mexico City, where he was purportedly attempting to secure a visa in order to travel from Mexico to Cuba to make what would later be claimed his escape to the Soviet Union.
And you realize this whole thing had to be a sham, that Lee was the patsy and it was a setup.
Now the Warren report claimed the man in the doorway was actually Billy Lovelady.
Billy was a co-worker with Lee who was also in the doorway area.
Billy himself said he thought it was odd they'd be confused because he was 2 to 3 inches shorter and 15 to 20 pounds heavier at the least.
The FBI questioned and photographed him on 29 February 1964.
There have been many attempts to fabricate proof that the man peering out in the doorway area was Billy Lovelady.
Here you see one where I was struck and initially thought the obfuscated man was Lee Oswald, where Ralph Sinque convinced me that when we look at the clothing, the height, the weight, the build, the shirt, and the t-shirt, it becomes apparent that this man, not this, was actually Lee Oswald.
Indeed, I believe this figure here was actually Bill Shelley, the supervisor of Lee, with whom he claimed to have been out in front.
Now, these are some photographs that have been attempted to be made to claim that the man in the doorway was actually a Billy Love Lady.
I'll say more about them.
Here you can see Billy on the left, Lee on the right, okay?
So there's a great deal of research been done on this, especially by Larry Rivera.
Billy was asked to come in by the FBI on the 29th of February wearing the shirt he had worn the day of the assassination.
And he came in wearing this short-sleeved, red-and-white, vertically-striped shirt, obviously bearing no resemblance whatsoever to that of doorman.
Notice a difference here.
Billy's considerably heavier, by his own admission shorter, really does not look like the man in the doorway.
Here's the actual report sent back to J. Edgar Hoover, where the underlying sentence at the bottom of the first complete sentence, he stated he was wearing a red and white vertically striped shirt and blue jeans at the time of the assassination, namely the very shirt he was wearing when they photographed him.
Meanwhile, there was a figure in the foreground, not up in the doorway area, but in the foreground that was wearing a red and black checkered shirt.
I refer to him as Gorilla Man because look at his profile.
But most importantly, his shirt had a pocket.
Now the very same Robert Groton, whom I've complimented here before in his role as a special David Daley : Advisor to the House Select Committee when it reinvestigated the case, but it was these photographs of Billy Lovelady purporting that they were, he was wearing the same shirt as this figure who had been in the foreground at the time.
But it's obviously false.
I mean, this shirt he's wearing here has no pocket.
The shirt the man was wearing there has a pocket.
This man obviously has a considerably greater girth.
He is much huskier than Billy Lovelady.
That was the contribution of Robert Grodin to the HSCA final report where they claimed that the statement that Lee Oswald had been in the doorway at the time of the shooting was just a false rumor based upon the research of Robert Grodin.
Meanwhile, Larry Rivera did a facial feature overlay.
Larry has mastered the essential principles of photogrammetry.
You set the distance between the pupils of the eyes the same, the interpupillary distance, and the facial features will fall into place if they're one and the same.
It turns out the facial features of Lee Oswald correspond to those of Doorman.
The facial features of Billy Lovelady, however, do not match.
Now here's a test example where Larry took two photographs of someone who might be two different people who resemble Marilyn Monroe.
And when he set the interpupillary distance the same, the features fell into place.
And it turned out indeed to be simply two different pictures of one and the same person, whom I have always adored.
Meanwhile, he did the application of mathematics to photographs of Lee on the left, Billy on the right, to get them into a comparable situation where he could do superpositions on the features of the man in the doorway.
Now here you can see when he does a superposition of the man in the doorway using the image of Lee Oswald, it turns out to be a perfect fit.
You got the eyes, the nose, the chin, the ears, they all fall perfectly into place.
This therefore constitutes a stunning verification of Ralston Kaye's observations, based upon his experience as a chiropractor, helping people to work their bodies into better shape so their clothing will fit better, that we knew it was Lee, based upon the height, the weight, the build, the shirt, and the t-shirt, comparison to the height, the weight, the build, the shirt, and the t-shirt, when he was arrested.
We are by no means the first to observe that Lee was actually standing in the doorway.
Harold Weissberg, for example, in his whitewash series in the second volume, Photographic Whitewash, spent the last several pages talking about the Warren Commission staff working very hard to conceal the fact that Lee Oswald had been in the doorway of the book depository when the motorcade passed by and therefore cannot have been the lone demented gunman.
Nor, I would add, one of the shooters because there turn out to have been eight I mean, it's just typical of the way in which we're played that we're given an hypothesis or official report confirmed by what's supposed to be an elaborate investigation to substantiate there was one and only one shooter when the situation was precisely the opposite.
Here's now where Larry compares Both Lee on the left and Billy on the right.
So you see how Lee on the left fits, but Billy on the right does not.
The ears are wrong.
The nose is wrong.
The jaw is wrong.
The eyes don't fit the right way.
So it's very clear that Larry has not only confirmed the hypothesis that Lee was the man in the doorway, he's also falsified the hypothesis that it was Billy Lovelady.
Billy was, however, close to Lee in the doorway area.
Billy was a person identified as Black Hole Man with his face darkened.
He was holding up his hands to protect his eyes from the sun's light.
Larry has reconstructed the doorway area with the figures in place.
He's even provided a color reconstruction model of the Alton Six.
So here you have applying the same technique with Billy Lovelady to Black Hole Man.
And notice how brilliantly this works.
I've got to tell you, this is some of the most important work in the history of the assassination done by Larry Rivera, only in the last five years or so.
In fact, His results are so telling that when he was invited to participate in a mock trial of Lee Harvey Oswald as a witness for the defense, those who were in charge had to manufacture some fake reason to not allow Larry to testify because he would have blown it out of the water.
And I'm very embarrassed to say that that impugned their integrity, because Larry's work is of the highest degree of excellence.
So here you go back to the Groton image.
We got Black Hole Man here.
Notice how they've obfuscated his shirt.
That's because it was that red and white, vertically striped, short-sleeved shirt.
Notice it's short-sleeved here.
So that when Larry reconstructs, you can see how Billy Lovelady would have stood out like a sore thumb.
He would have been very conspicuous to those who were viewing the doorway area and in a color version of the Olshans, which none of us have ever seen.
And here then is a reconstruction of the Olshans from further back, right, as to how it would have appeared in part.
Brilliant work.
You can find aspects of Larry's research here in my book, My Fourth, JFK, Who, How, and Why, where I include chapters by Larry.
Completely brilliant work.
Remember, I specialize in bringing together experts on different aspects of these cases, and this is yet My fourth installment.
But Larry also has a book of his own, The JFK Horseman, which I highly recommend.
Also available at moonrockbooks.com.
Well, the second case concerns Sandy Hook.
How they faked the children.
Many photos were staged.
In particular, the evacuation was fake.
Shannon Hicks, who was the photo journalist for the Newtown Bee, took a photo that was sent around the world of the evacuation.
There was a second photograph, however, taken earlier showing that parents were actually present at the scene, which is highly anomalous if this was an emergency evacuation.
Police claim the evacuation took place at specific times and places, but dash cam footage shows no evacuation was taking place at those times and places.
Here's a photograph sent around the world, usually only in a crop version, something like this, where you do not see a figure here who is casting a shadow.
So we all supposed, and it was advertised as a policewoman leading a string of children to safety during the emergency.
And this photograph, frankly, appeared on the front pages of virtually every newspaper in the world.
Here's the earlier photograph, which shows parents were present.
I mean, who would have thought during a shooting where 20 children and 6 adults are being killed inside the school, gee, I better get on the phone and get some parents down here.
And if parents actually had been on the scene, what parent would not have immediately snatched their child and got out of the vicinity at the quickest possible speed?
I mean, this is simply absurd!
So you have parents, hands in their pockets, arms folded.
And notice here, you got a little girl at the front of the line in a pink sweater and a short skirt.
Well, what that means is they actually changed from this arrangement, this sequence, when the parents are present, to this sequence, with a little boy in the dark sweater and blue jeans, to get a better shot.
Notice too here, I mean you can see boy number one where he was in the line, the little girl's been moved, but boy number two, but notice in between, notice in between you have parents here in the background casually looking on, leading me to describe this photograph as lounging at a massacre.
What could be more obvious?
This is fraudulent.
Now here's the vicinity where that photograph was taken.
But remember, that's only a string of 15 kids.
According to Stephen Sedinsky, the official report for Sandy Hook, There were 489 students there that day, so if you subtract 20 for the alleged deceased, that leaves 469, which means you should have had a scenario like this with all these strings of kids being evacuated right and left.
Well, the police would actually claim that there were specific locations and specific times when the evacuation was taking place, but When you look at dash cam footage for those locations and times, there's no evacuation taking place.
Now we're sometimes told we can't prove a negative, but that turns out to be false.
You can prove the negative that there's no elephant in your living room right now by going to your living room and looking for signs of the presence of elephants.
Finding none, you're entitled to infer that's because there's no elephant in your living room.
Similarly, if you go to the locations and times when the evacuation was supposed to be taking place, but you find no signs of an evacuation taking place, you're entitled to infer that's because no evacuation was taking place.
Kelly Watt now, who's been a very diligent, really brilliant student of Sandy Hook, knows a striking similarity.
That Noah Posner, one of the deceased children, the one supposed to be the youngest, looked a lot like his older half-brother, Michael Vabner.
She shared the images of the two with friends, who agreed, this is the same person at two different ages.
Well, if Noah was Michael Vabner, then Lenny was probably Ruben Vabner.
So that during the lawsuit against me that was brought ostensibly by a fellow who called himself Leonard Posner, I requested that the judge seek DNA from Noah Posner, Lenny Posner, Ruben Vabner, and Michael Vabner to show they actually were
Four different parties, when I was convinced it would show they were actually only two, but the judge refused my request.
He denied my motion.
Meanwhile, this is the fellow who's supposed to have sued me, Lenny Posner on death threats, with photographs of Noah, who is highly photogenic.
Los Angeles Times published about how in this age of alternative facts, a massacre of school children is called a hoax, but you can already see from the photograph I've been addressing that it was a stage photograph, and that is evidence it was a hoax.
Posner claimed he and his then-wife Veronique had moved to Connecticut, that he dropped off his son.
Less than an hour later, he was shot.
Notice, the thesis first advanced by Kelly was that Noah was actually Michael Vabner as a child.
It was these photographs that suggested to her.
In a blog where I and several others went about seeking to assess her hypothesis, Published in Nobody Died in Sandy Hook as Appendix D, where she's actually proposing the hypothesis.
Second edition, 2016.
Here's the key photo from that chapter for everyone Kelly shared it with agreed.
Noah is Michael Fabner as a child.
So several of us pursued Kelly's conjecture.
It turned out they had the same or strikingly similar eyes, eyebrows, nose, mouth.
They even had the same ears, which are as reliable as fingerprints.
Our studies confirm that Kelly's conjecture was almost certainly right.
I would say on our evidence it was already beyond a reasonable doubt.
Even a passport image for Noah that was posted by Lenny on a blog for Kelly turned out to be counterfeit.
Well, here are several photographs of Michael Vabner, top left, and young Noah.
When we went to work, we discovered they had the same eyes, the same eyebrows, they even had the same ear side-by-side comparison.
At first, Noah's left ear appeared to have a smaller lobe than Michael's left ear, but a picture of Noah's right ear reveals a lobe like Michael's.
Our conclusion?
They have the same ears.
If Noah and Michael have the same ears, and ears are as distinctive as fingerprints, then we have a proof that Noah and Michael are one and the same.
According to Lenny Posner, who purports to be his father, Noah was a first grade student at Sandy Hook Elementary and died on 14 December.
Here's a passport image declaring his date of birth to have been 20 November 2006.
If he was born on 20 November 2006, then he would have been six years old, which would have been appropriate to have been a first grader at an elementary school such as Sandy Hook.
But notice the passport photograph.
The Department of State has very specific requirements down to the amount of inches the face can cover.
And this image is in violation of passport requirements.
I actually demonstrated that in evidence in my court case.
That this is a counterfeit passport.
The person who appeared and identified himself as Lenny Posner, whose identity I challenged at the time, claimed that was how they had received it from the Department of State.
But I take that to have been false testimony under oath.
In other words, the commission of perjury.
Meanwhile, Larry Rivera would provide verification.
I sent him photos of the two subjects, but absent any verification.
Larry had no idea who they were or that this had any connection to Sandy Hook research.
None of it.
I wanted him to be completely free from any impressions, concerns, or familiarity with context.
He produced a GIF where Noah Posner turns into Michael Vabner.
Wolfgang Helbig, incidentally, another diligent student of Sandy Hook, where Wolfgang is a former Florida State Trooper, former U.S.
Customs agent, both highly responsible positions, former school principal, nationally recognized school safety expert.
Has been very persevering in his research after having initially reached out with FOIA requests and phone calls to find out what happened for the perfectly innocuous reason of wanting to warn other school systems how they should, what measures they should take to protect themselves to ensure this did not happen to them.
Instead, his FOIA requests were unanswered, his phone calls not returned, and before he knew it, there were two homicide detectives from a local precinct near his gated community in Florida on his porch, telling him they were there on behalf of the Connecticut State Police, and if he didn't stop asking questions about Sandy Hook, he would be prosecuted.
What could be more anomalous than that, by the way?
Meanwhile, Wolfgang has found other photos of Sandy Hook kids alive and well.
Consider the following.
Larry Rivera has done brilliant research proving the figure known as Doorman in the doorway of the Texas School Book Depository was, in fact, Lee Oswald.
As Harold Weisberg and Jim Garrison, too, I should add, and other serious students of JFK have long believed.
So I was sure he could help resolve the issue by superposition.
Here are stages in the images where you can see the similarity going from Noah to Michael Vabner, very much as he went from the one image of Marilyn Monroe to the other.
Meanwhile, here's the GIF.
This, in my opinion, is the single most devastating proof that the Sandy Hook shooting was, in fact, an elaborate hoax.
We proved in the book that it was, in fact, a two-day FEMA drill, technically a mass casualty exercise involving children.
Which undoubtedly is the reason why Amazon.com, after the book had been placed on sale on 22 October 2015 and sold nearly 500 copies, banned it.
At this point, there was an interruption in the recording, so I'm now going to resume.
Where Amazon banned the book on 19 November.
Even though it had sold nearly 500 copies and there were 19 other books on sale.
Meanwhile, Wolfgang Helbig has been able to uncover photographs of 9 or 11 of the Sandy Hook girls.
It's pretty fascinating stuff.
Here's what he says, a picture by Michael Duffy, who is a reporter for a newspaper in Connecticut, showing 11.
Ted's looking surprisingly well, given they're alleged to have died on 14 December 2012.
Meanwhile, here's the book that's now been banned by Amazon.
Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
Paul vs. Fall.
Was Paul replaced by a lookalike?
It's interesting that this issue seems to evoke as much emotion as even Sandy Hook.
Or 9-11?
Or JFK?
Rumors of Paul McCartney's death and replacement have been around since 1966.
Did he die?
Was he replaced by a strikingly similar musician?
There are some imposters who are obviously not Paul McCartney.
Other photos raise disturbing questions about their identity.
I've done shows with Nick Kohlerstrom, Claire Kuhn, Tina Foster about it and there are other studies in the book and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either.
Now here's a guy who was performing in Scandinavia who is pretty obviously not only not Paul McCartney but not even Paul McCartney for fake Paul, shown here, namely the one who appears to be the replacement.
So we can dismiss him.
Meanwhile, here you can see the original Paul with John, with Ringo and George, in an interview I did with Nick Colerston a good number of years ago.
Nick has subsequently published a book about it.
Here you can see just from the photographs that there are reasons to be suspicious.
Notice Paul has a very round boyish look.
Paul, well, Fall on the right has a more oval-shaped face and really doesn't look as naive and spontaneous as Paul.
Photographic comparisons, as observed.
Paul had a rounder head and a more youthful exuberance than Fall.
Paul has an oblong cranium and a more mature face and expression.
Their profiles appear to be surprisingly different and even their ears.
Both were with Jane Asher, to whom Paul was engaged, and yet, Paul towers over her.
Looks very unlike Paul.
Take a look.
Here you see Paul on the left, Paul on the right, They look very different.
These are nice color photographs for comparison.
Here you have Paul on the left, Paul on the right.
Once again, they look very different.
Not even the color of their eyes appears to be the same.
Here's a profile.
Paul on the left, Paul on the right.
And he has gone to considerable lengths, by the way, to conceal his ears, even going so far as to wear a fake earpiece.
How many parties have you ever heard wearing fake earpieces?
Notice, however, from the profile, the nose, the chin, and so forth, these are Pretty obviously not one and the same person.
Meanwhile, Paul was very much in love with and engaged to Jane Asher.
Notice they were pretty close to the same height.
Now, the Asher family had to know that this was not Paul McCartney, but it would appear they played along for the sake of the band.
I mean, the Beatles were a huge bonanza, money-making empire.
Notice how Fall towers over Jane by at least four inches.
Two Italian forensic scientists set out to settle the matter.
They supposed that the rumors were false, so they were going to prove they were false, but wound up instead verifying that they were true.
There are many physical differences between them that cannot be altered surgically.
For example, Paul had bad teeth and a narrow palate, while Paul has good teeth and a normal palate.
There are, in addition, signs that Paul has had cosmetic surgery.
Here's a nice piece about the two of them that was published in the Italian version of Wired Magazine.
I would subsequently publish a piece on my blog, which is there to this day.
Why Ringo's confession, we replace Paul, appears to be authentic.
Which I highly recommend everyone check out if they want to go into aspects of this further, including an exchange I had with Kevin Barrett at the time, who was disputing the source, a Hollywood Inquirer, as I recall, which seemed to be, yes, just a shell, but where you cannot judge a truth or falsity of a report by its source.
That's known as the genetic fallacy.
So as I explained there, Kevin committed an elementary fallacy by discounting the report on the basis of its source.
When the report, Ringo explained that Paul died and was, you know, and he said, well, what about the band?
And they decided to try somebody out only for a little while, but it worked so well, they decided to continue.
Meanwhile, about their report, photos show that Fall's head is more oblong than Paul's.
Gavin Ensi pointed out that some of the early printed photos of Fall must have been compressed and high in order to make his head appear shorter and more rounded.
He said the conclusion is inescapable because the shape of the skull of an adult cannot be altered.
He said there's a simple trick for stretching or compressing photos during the printing process in those days before computer photo editing became available, so it would have been easy to do.
Carlesi, the other of the two, pointed out the line separating Fall's lips is much wider, to the point it was obvious, even when Fall grew a mustache, perhaps in an effort to hide that detail.
Lips can be inflated and increased in volume, but the wideness of their separating line can be altered only to a small extent.
More interesting, therefore, is the position relative to the skull of the point at which the nose detaches from the face, because that cannot be modified by surgery.
According to Carlisi, these points for pollen fault are considerably different.
So here you see the teeth and palate.
You see a fall on the left has good teeth and a normal palate, while Paul on the right has bad teeth and a narrow palate.
Remember, one and the same person cannot have different heights, different teeth, different shape of skull.
Gavin, has any noticed a common feature in Falls early photos as well not seen in recent?
A dark area showing the external corner.
of the left eye.
That area now shows something halfway between a scar and something that resembles skin that was stretched as a consequence of cosmetic surgery, or as Gavazzini suggests, of an imperfect cosmetic surgery.
Nick has the earliest photos of Fall as Paul.
He arrived at EMI to record on 24 September 1966 sporting a mustache.
The first official photo of the group was on 6 January 1967, or should I say, the reconstituted group, the new Beatles, with Paul replacing Paul, and they're all sporting mustaches.
Other efforts to minimize the difference in height between Paul and Paul, such as taking off his shoes, for example, when others are wearing them.
Here he's showing up, November 24th, the very first appearance of the Beatles with Fall.
The other three members arrived clean-shaven.
Here you have a closer up, and that was a Beatles assistant behind him, no doubt, you know, giving him answers to questions he might otherwise be unable to address.
Here's the first photo.
Notice how odd it is Because you have all these lights into the camera lens obfuscating.
Look how very similar in height Paul and George appear to be, when in fact that's not the case as we'll see from other photographs.
Here when they were making Magical Mystery Tour, for example, now, George has on boots, but Paul took off his shoes, which you can see here on the ground near the set of drums with Ringo playing.
Other confirmation of Paul's replacement.
Notice on Ed Sullivan, all four of the Beatles are about the same height.
The Sargent Pepper cover itself was of a funeral for a left-handed guitarist.
At Abbey Road on the cover, we have a minister, a funeral director, a corpse, and a gravedigger.
With Letterman, Fall himself jokingly said rumors that he was dead and had been replaced.
And when Letterman said, replaced with who?
And Fall said, me!
Which, of course, was accurate and true, but humorous in the context.
Notice how similar they are in height, all four of them.
Here, I'd say John even appears to be slightly taller than the others.
Here's the cover of Sergeant Pepper, which is absolutely fascinating.
You have on the left here, this is a Madame Tussauds waxwork version of the Beatles.
Then you have them here resplendent in their Sergeant Pepper's garb.
Sergeant Pepper Lonely Hearts Club Band.
As it were, they're transforming themselves into Sergeant Pepper from the Beatles.
We have a grave for the Beatles.
For a left-handed guitar player.
Now one of the significant differences between Paul and Fall is that, well, Paul was born left-handed.
Fall had to learn how to play left-handed.
There are lots and lots of other clues here and elsewhere that I shall not belabor.
Meanwhile, according to Ringo, The cover of the Abbey Road album was a hidden message to the world, symbolizing a funeral procession.
John, dressed in white, symbolizes a clergyman.
Ringo in black, the undertaker.
George in denim jeans and shirts, a gravedigger.
And Paul, barefoot and out of step with the other members, symbolizes the corpse.
Now, He was asked about this on Letterman and did a very poor job of handling it.
Because he said, well, it was a hot day, so he decided to take off his shoes.
But everyone knows a hot day on asphalt is the opposite of what you'd want to do.
So he gave a flimsy excuse on the spot, wasn't really able to handle it.
Maybe his biggest flub in dealing with these issues of them all.
Here, that occurred while he was on Letterman and explaining to David that the person who was supposed to have replaced Paul was me, Paul.
They announced the replacement publicly, in fact, and Sergeant Pepper, they introduced the one and only Billy Shears as a new member of the band.
He looked a lot like Paul even before surgery and was known as the man of a thousand voices.
Paul actually appears to have died in an automobile accident, oddly enough, on 9-11 of 1966.
Now there's a book that many of us believe is quite authentic, authored by Billy Shears.
His actual name was William Shepard.
We're shepherds shear sheep, so he has a nickname of Shears, and of course Billy for William, where he explains how he's contractually obligated not to reveal the truth, but this is a massive volume just loaded with copious details.
Nick and I and others believe it is authentic.
So here is the earliest photo or early photo of Billy Shepard on the right.
And it also was a certain resemblance to Paul.
Meanwhile, this is the car, the Austin Martin owned by Paul McCartney.
Paul would eventually purchase it.
It apparently had been reconstructed after the accident.
And here you see the image of the memoirs of Billy Shears.
Again, I say I highly recommend it if you want to dig deeper.
Meanwhile, there's a lot about Paul and Fall, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either, where Mike Palachuk, who is my series editor, suggested that as an appropriate title as a sequel to the Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, hearing which one might well respond, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either.
Well, Yes, we didn't go to the moon, and you can find a whole lot of proof in the book, or of course in my earlier Conspiracy Guy show about the moon landing, which is available right on JimTheConspiracyGuy.com.
Meanwhile, Hillary's body doubles.
This is another kind of fake news.
Hillary, many will recall, collapsed following a 9-11 memorial.
This was shortly before the election in 2016.
She was unceremoniously tossed into an ambulance disguised as an SUV.
They were worried because if she didn't make a public appearance that there would be issues concerning her health, and they chose, they decided to send out a double.
She was younger, thinner, healthier.
I liked her manner.
She reminded me of one of my favorite actresses.
I refer to her as the Meg Ryan double.
Even USA Today picked up that something rather odd was going on.
So here we have on September 11, 2016, as Hillary left the memorial, stood at the curbside waiting for her car.
A man paying tribute happened to have his camera on as she walked past, excited he was in the presence of the woman who could be the next president.
He kept recording.
It turned out, however, that she would collapse and be unceremoniously tossed into the vehicle there, which, of course, raised all kinds of issues about her health, because we knew she was having serious health problems, as in the case today with Joe Biden, and was not fit to serve as President of the United States.
So they took her back to Chelsea's new apartment.
Chelsea actually already had a wonderful apartment in New York City, didn't need a new one.
This one, however, had the additional feature that there had been a private clinic on the same floor as part of the apartment.
So they bought it, closed the clinic, so now it had only one patient, namely Hillary Clinton.
Here's the woman they sent out.
She was younger, Thinner, far more gracious and pleasant.
Here are some of the noticeable differences.
Larger cheekbone, smoother neck, smaller stomach, coat looks bigger.
Here we could all breathe a sigh of relief.
Hillary's body double is in good health.
I love this image.
Absolutely perfect.
Capturing exactly what was going on.
Or even the USA reported about it.
The internet thinks Hillary Clinton has a body double.
Here's what it reads in part.
Among speculations that Democratic President candidate Hillary Clinton's health is failing, there's another theory gaining traction online.
She might have a body double.
The only evidence of this theory is photographic taken September 11th, when Clinton ducked out of a 9-11 anniversary ceremony in New York because she felt overheated.
And is a battling pneumonia.
Some say the differences lie in the details.
Cheekbones.
Smooth versus wrinkled skin.
Body composition.
Well, it's very clearly not the same woman.
And you'll notice, too, Hilary came out without her bodyguards, which you would never do.
She was being attended by a guy who is an expert with different degrees in neurology and psychotherapy, who was assisting her.
It's blatant that this is not the same person.
Several other body doubles would follow within days on a flight to Charlotte, North Carolina.
We had a woman I would describe as the Meryl Streep double.
I'll explain why.
She's not the same as the Meg Ryan double and not like Hillary either.
They seem to have perfected a voice box, producing Hillary's authentic voice.
Nevertheless, these body doubles are really relatively easy to identify.
Notice, this is, uh, well, it's being referred to as a third Hillary double because it was a comic act as to do imitations of Hillary, but who was never used.
To impersonate her.
Too tall, too young, wrong nose and earlobes, skinny legs, wrong forehead.
This is a principal reason I refer to her as a Meryl Streep doll.
She just looks a whole lot more like Meryl Streep.
And then Hillary Clinton, just as the other double, looks more like Meg Ryan.
Here you see a comparison.
Here's an authentic photo of Hillary compared to the others.
They aren't even close.
Hence, Hillary has a second body double.
Voice analysis confirms the obvious.
Well, I'm saying they had this voice box, but there were some clips that suggested there were differences, that they didn't work the same person even in terms of voice analysis.
But notice they hit real Hillary, how she looks much, much older, More wrinkle.
This is younger.
I think this is part of Hillary's vanity.
She wants to think she looks younger, so if there's going to be a double impersonating her, it will be someone who is younger.
Here again, you can see that the Mae Gryan body double is not the same as the Meryl Streep body double, and neither of them is the same as Hillary Clinton.
So what's that white thing in Hillary the double's mouth?
As I say, it's a voice synthesizer.
Notice how near are the dates here.
Hillary, this is Hillary on a plane on the 17th, but her body double on the 15th.
I mean, they're clearly, clearly not the same person.
They even used a double during the debates.
This is fairly astonishing.
Better body double debated Bernie Sanders, and no one noticed.
Stunningly, the same body double debated Donald Trump nationally.
There isn't a lot of room for doubt about it.
Just look at the evidence.
And indeed, then in 2017, one or more body doubles took in place on Broadway.
Here's the best, on the right.
Uh, no med cocktail, no camera filter, no professional makeup, no booster seat Hillary on the left.
This is a woman who showed up for the debates on the right.
She may be the best, but there are clear differences between them.
Look at the mouth.
She has a much smaller mouth than Hillary Clinton.
Look at the nose.
She has a more petite nose.
The eyes aren't quite right either, but it's a good try.
So here we have on CNN, Debating with Bernie Sanders.
We have fake Hillary Clintons.
I mean, it's just absolutely unbelievable that they have gotten away with this.
Meanwhile, here we have a fake Hillary Clinton debating Donald Trump.
This is truly shocking, but you can tell they're not the same.
Here you have a ratio.
This is a ratio between a line drawn between the pupils of the eyes and your lower lip.
Your upper lip, and with Hillary Clinton has a 1.12 inch difference or ratio, but here we have a 1.06 ratio.
Okay, it's the relationship between the distance between the eyes and between that line and the upper lip.
With Hillary it's 1.12, with her clone 1.06.
And here, just look, just look, just look.
Does this really leave any doubt in your mind about it?
Hillary's old.
She's looking kind of haggard.
She's way overweight.
She's in bad health.
Much less appealing.
So they send out a younger, healthier version in the hope that voters will be taken in.
Meanwhile, a reporter for the New York Times, Michael Paulson, wrote about Hillary being in the house.
He had photographs for each of her alleged appearances.
He seems not to have noticed that she had no bodyguards.
She didn't have her medical assistant.
It appears to me each of the four is actually a different but I'll only insist that we have here one or more additional body doubles for Hillary Clinton.
So I wrote to Michael Paulson and said that was a very interesting story but none of those at the play at the theater was Hillary Clinton.
I received from him no response.
Meanwhile from Orlando to Dallas includes a section of photographs especially About the first two body doubles you can find from Orlando to Dallas and beyond.
Meanwhile, Michelle Obama.
Turns out Michelle is not the woman you think she is.
It was a transition from Michael to Michelle.
Biden has said he'd have her in a heartbeat and he needs help.
Born Michael LeVon or LeVon, the spelling differs, Robinson, He played football at Oregon State before transferring to Princeton and adopting a female persona.
He has a package most women do not have.
Some show photos without any boobs.
A former physician has explained the deal after walking into her in a trailer near Trenton on the campaign trail, taking a leak standing up as a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill.
Now, Biden has said, I'll add Michelle Obama to my ticket in a heartbeat.
The former vice president told Pittsburgh CBS News John Delano he would put the former first lady on his ticket.
I'd take her in a heartbeat.
She's brilliant.
She knows her way around.
She's a really fine woman.
Not.
After a respectable rookie season with 88 tackles and 7.5 sacks, Michael LaVaughn Robinson dropped out of school.
Fellow teammates observed that he would regularly be heard lamenting how he's a woman trapped inside of a man's body.
According to this report, he underwent sex reassignment surgery at John Hopkins in 1983.
But that does not appear to be the case.
To hide his new identity, he left Oregon State to attend Princeton under his new legal name, Michelle Robinson.
Years later, he met Mary Satoro, known as Mary Barack Obama, a Kenyan immigrant who later became aware of Michelle's true identity.
Very quickly, I'm sure!
They subsequently married and adopted two children below as a photograph around 1981, showing the pre-op Michael Levon Robinson here, number 44.
Further confirmation?
Here's Barack Hussein Obama with his lover at the time, Michael LaVaughn Robinson.
Notice Michael has no boobs.
This is with a young Bill Gates, by the way.
But that's a noticeable defect if he is actually a woman.
I mean, of course, there are modestly endowed women, flat-chested women, but this is simply a man.
Meanwhile, you can see here that Michelle has a package most women do not have.
Here's another photograph where she let her beard go when your husband is no longer present.
Honestly, I don't think there's any room for doubt about this or I wouldn't be talking about it.
Here's where we had the report from her former physician.
This is Dr. Rafael Espinoza, who formerly was trusted with First Lady Michelle Obama's care during the 2006 presidential election.
I know what I saw.
Michelle Obama is not a woman who used to be a man.
Michelle Obama is just a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill.
On the campaign trail, no medical staff were allowed to go near her other than to take video take vitals if she got sick, which she never did.
I know what I know because I walked in on him while he was taking a leak, standing up in a bathroom in Trenton.
They paid me millions for my silence, but after seeing what they've done to this country, I can't keep quiet, let them sue me.
These are the actual parents who were borrowed or adopted, where you can see the older girl looks just like her father, the younger just like her mother.
Obviously, two men cannot have children.
Meanwhile, we have other evidence that Michelle is not a woman.
Joan Rivers told us Obama was gay and that Michelle was a tranny.
Comparisons with Michael Bloomberg support Michelle's masculinity.
She appears to be a completely different woman than Melania, too.
Alleged former classmate described Barack, or Barry, as a homosexual, druggie, foreign student, which would also fit.
So, Joan Rivers was being interviewed, you know, about the election.
Now that we have our first black president, she was asked, will we ever have our first gay president?
And she said, we already have with Obama, so let's just calm down.
You know, Michelle is a tranny, a transgender, we all know, too.
This was just two months to the day of Joan Rivers' outing of the Obamas that she was dead or reported to be dead.
Having stopped breathing during a routine endoscopy, that's very peculiar.
I have, by the way, seen some video footage suggesting that she has gone underground where you could hear a voice sounding identical to Joan Rivers as she was coming down some steps after having attended a theatrical performance.
Meanwhile, here's a comparison between Big Mike and Little Mike.
I mean, look.
Look at those shoulders.
Look at those legs.
Do you really have any serious doubts about whether or not Michelle Obama is or is not a man?
Meanwhile, according to a Gallup poll, who's the most admired woman, Michelle or Melania?
Well, Melania actually is a woman.
So if we're talking about the most admired woman, it would be Melania.
Look how beautiful she is.
All 100% woman.
Compare her with Michelle.
It's not just a question of who wore the dress better.
Michelle can't be the most admired woman because she's actually a man.
But if you want to say she's the most admired man who most people think is a woman, yeah, then she wins hands down.
Here's another photograph of Michael LeVon Robinson.
The First Lady is actually the first man.
Obama on a number of public occasions has referred to Michelle as Michael, and he didn't even seem remotely embarrassed about it.
Meanwhile, A woman who says she knew Obama in high school referred to him as a homosexual, druggie, foreign student.
That sounds about exactly right.
This is Maria Pope, who knew Obama at their high school in Honolulu during the late 1970s, when she knew him then by the name of Barry Satoro.
In this interview on 31 October 2013, With a Reverend and Doctor James David Manning, Pope said, Barry always portrayed himself as a foreign student and very much was within the gay community.
It was common knowledge that Barry wasn't interested in girls, but was strictly into men.
This sounds 100% accurate.
Meanwhile, and this is new and pretty strange, Kamala Harris has undergone a transformation.
With Biden brain damaged, the VP choice turns out to be significant, more significant than normal, because almost certainly, shortly after entering office, Biden will retire for reasons of health and the presidency will devolve upon the vice president in accordance with the Constitution.
Trump has suggested Kamala is a good choice.
Politico has said it's Kamala, but she looks completely different in the latest photographs.
It's very strange.
If I were to bet, I would wager it will be Michelle rather than Kamala.
So here we have Tucker talking about how Joe Biden's VP pick will be the most consequential in history.
Believe it or not, this is Joe Biden's third attempt to run for the presidency.
History is lost when you live in the eternal present as we are now, but it's worth remembering some facts.
Three times, the first time he ran was in 1988.
That was before most people who work on the show were born and he was caught lying about his biography and speeches and forced to drop out.
Biden suggested to audiences he had grown up in a coal mining family in Wales.
That's not true.
Biden was actually from America.
His father sold cars in Wilmington.
Biden went to a Catholic prep school in the suburbs.
So it was pretty embarrassing.
It took 20 years before Biden ran again, and when he did, it did not go well.
In 2008, Joe Biden got a total of 1% of the vote in the Iowa caucuses and dropped out at 9%.
Joe Biden, whatever his strength, turned out to be so bad at praying for president that even Barack Obama, supposedly his close friend, repeatedly refused to endorse him.
He just can't win.
That was Barack's view.
Then the Wuhan coronavirus arrived, Democratic governors shut down the country, millions lost their jobs, the economy tanked, Americans huddled in their homes, cut off from one another, and deeply miserable.
From his basement, strategically cloistered away in silence, Joe Biden shot ahead in the polls.
Not because of anything he did.
He just happened to be there.
As of tonight, Joe Biden could win the brace.
Unfortunately, if he does, Joe Biden cannot govern the country.
He isn't capable of it.
He's all but admitted that.
He said he won't run for a second term.
So Biden's running mate will be the most consequential VP pick in American history.
And soon we'll know who it is.
Apparently the announcement is coming in the next week, though as we all know it's been deferred for another week and then another week.
As of tonight, Senator Kamala Harris of California seems like the frontrunner.
She's certainly the best known.
Harris is a product of the same highly credentialed yet deeply unimpressive world that spawned too much of our media.
Needless to say, they love her.
She's one of them.
The public, though, has been much less impressed, including Democrats.
Harris was so unpopular with Democratic primary voters that she never made it to the first vote in the primaries.
Meanwhile, Politico scrambles and deletes an article revealing that Biden's 2020 VP choice is going to be, guess who, Senator Kamala Harris.
Now, what's bizarre is that we have a series of recent photographs suggesting, well, they use the word clone, but something very, very strange is going on here.
Notice the difference in teeth, the difference in complexion, the eyes.
These are two different people.
Very, very strange.
The recent change in the appearance of Kamala Harris does not seem like it could have an innocent explanation.
Perhaps she's exactly what all modern U.S.
presidents have been—a CIA, U.S.
military-controlled asset, human beings created in a D.U.M.B.
A deep underground, you know, missile base for the dumb masses.
It seems that the original Kamala Harris, whose career reeks of CIA assets, has now been retired.
In her place, I predict there will be a new and more adequately programmed model.
This all but assures she'll be the VP pick.
Don't forget this is scary stuff.
It's amazing to me the public forgives these things without question.
Oh, okay.
Kamala Harris appears to be a completely different person.
Must be the Botox that shifted her teeth around then.
Please, pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
This shot includes the teeth, which are different, and the forehead is dramatically different.
I mean, give us a break.
Keep in mind, these changes occurred just over a matter of days.
On the left, the original Kamala, July 16, 2020.
On the right, the new Kamala, July 18, 2020.
Stunning.
If I had to guess, however, I'm not going to pick Kamala.
I think they're going to go into the convention and they're going to recognize there are serious problems with Kamala.
I think they're going to go for the most admired woman in the world, namely Michelle Obama.
I'd take her in a heartbeat.
She's brilliant.
Now, just to make matters clear, I do not object to Michelle Obama running as Vice President, but I do believe the people, the public is entitled to know the truth, that if they vote for Michelle Obama, they're voting for a man with breast implants and a huge shaving bill.
Once again, I reiterate, we have a lot of marvelous books here that document cases such as those I'm describing here in a very thorough fashion.
You can find them at moonrockbooks.com.
I would particularly highlight Larry Rivera's book, The JFK Horseman, but they're all there.
And would you believe, at this point in time, Amazon has now banned six of the books I have edited.
Not only nobody died at Sandy Hook, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either, and nobody died in Boston either, and from Orlando to Dallas and beyond, and political theater in Charlottesville, and the Parkland Puzzle, how the pieces fit together.
You got to appreciate they have to have a good reason for banning these books.
It's a major scandal and subversion of the First Amendment by the biggest book distributor, indeed the most powerful company in the world today.
This is Jim Fetzer, The Conspiracy Guy, thanking you for being here.
I'll have two sensational guests on The Fetz Presents, Tuesday and Thursday.
And remember, as I mentioned before, if you find that YouTube has banned one of the videos of mine you'd like to see, go to JimTheConspiracyGuy.com, because I'm having them all archived, linked from that website as well, JimTheConspiracyGuy.com.
This is Jim the Conspiracy Guy.
Thank you all for watching.
▲
Export Selection