All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 3, 2017 - Jim Fetzer
51:32
FALSE FLAGS AND “FAKE NEWS”: Issues of Identity by Jim Fetzer
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It's
remarkable how many events in recent American history have been affected by issues of identity, whether there have been substitutions of one player for another or false claims of identity.
These include not only in relation to the assassination of JFK, also in relation to the Beatles, also in relation to Sandy Hawk and even the campaign of 2016.
So my objective here is to explain some of the key examples of phony identities being used to mislead the American people.
We begin with JFK, how we know Lee can't have done it.
You'll see the official scenario of Lee Oswald firing three shots from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository.
There are many key locations here that are identified, but everyone in the world, I suspect by this point in time, knows the official account.
If you go to the next, you'll find that the arrest report on Lee Oswald claims this man shot and killed President John F. Kennedy and police officer J.D.
Tippett and also shot and wounded Governor John Connally.
That's pretty remarkable for 1.40 p.m.
since he was only Arrested around two o'clock.
I mean, this is stunning stuff.
He's supposed to have shot Officer Tippett about 110.
He was already in the Texas theater getting popcorn from Butch Barrows.
This just gives you some indication of the extent to which they got ahead of the game in this instance and to frame an innocent man.
The next is a classic example of the Altium 6 photograph, technically the most famous from the assassination.
If you were to look closely where JFK's left ear would be, there's a small round spiral white nebula with a dark hole in the center, indicative of a through-and-through shot that hit him in the throat.
He's clutching his throat.
In the background, almost above him, there's a figure leaning out.
From this distance, it looks as though he might have a towel over his shoulder.
That man is known as Doorman, where his identity has been crucial.
If you look further back, you can see that there's a broom closet window from the Dow text, from which three shots were actually fired that's framed by the fire escape.
And you'll notice Lyndon Johnson, the Vice President's car, already has a door open and responding, even though the agents don't seem to know what's going on.
If you take a closer look in the next slide, you'll see that we have framed the area of special interest.
Notice not only the figure who seems to have a towel over his shoulder, but the figure beside him with his hands raised, whose face has been blackened out in order to protect them from the sun.
And go forward one more slide and we find a close-up that was produced by Robert Grodin Which has become the object of an immense amount of study.
There are those who claim that this photograph has been unaltered, but there are several features that make that claim impossible to justify.
Notice, for example, it's not a towel over his shoulder, there's actually a figure known as Black Tie Man, who's both in front of him and behind him at the same time.
This, of course, is an impossibility.
Assuming he had a clavicle, he had a left shoulder, Notice the face that's been obfuscated just to the right as we look at the photograph.
Look at the man with his hands raised.
His face has been blackened out.
His shirt actually has been obfuscated.
If you go forward to the next slide, you see the clavicle, the key bone in the shoulder, completely missing in the photograph.
So it's not even anatomically possible.
If you go to the next slide, you find that Will Fritz, who interrogated Lee Oswald, solicited from him the answer that he was up with Bill Shelley in front during the shooting, during the motorcade.
This has become an object of intense interest within JFK community, needless to say, for all the obvious reasons.
Uh, because if he was in fact out with Bill Shelley in front, then he not only cannot have been the lone demanded gunman, he cannot have even been one of the shooters.
If you go to the next slide, you see they put Lee into the lineup by taking off his shirt.
Which was because otherwise it would have drawn too much attention to the similarity between the man they just arrested, whom you can see on the right, this long-sleeved, richly textured shirt, and the man in the doorway, where they bear the striking similarities of being the same height, the same weight, the same build, and wearing clothing quite similar in character of this external long-sleeved, rather worn shirt and a t-shirt.
The one in which he was arrested.
If you go to the next slide, Richard Hook has done some brilliant comparisons here.
He's talking about the collar in comparison with the man in the doorway, who's on the right, and all the features of Lee Oswald's shirt that correspond to the features on the man in the doorway.
I believe at this point in time he's found over 70 similarities between the shirts.
Now if you go to the next photograph you see on the left an individual who is clearly impersonating Lee Oswald in Mexico City.
No one serious would ever mistake the two of them.
There are suggestions that this person actually is by the name of Walter Tobinsky.
J. Edgar Hoover actually put out a memorandum to all of his FBI station chiefs that someone in Mexico City was impersonating Lee Oswald.
In my opinion, if you knew only that single fact about the assassination, you'd know the whole thing had been a setup and that Lee was being framed.
If you go to the next slide, you'll find an image.
This is from John McAdams, a notorious loan nutter, meaning a defender of the official account, presented that's intended to lead you to suppose that all the figures here, particularly in the center of Lovelady and on the right, are the same person.
It turns out that's not the case at all.
Notice the profile of the man on the right in the checkered shirt.
He looks to me more like a gorilla.
He has a larger, bigger head than Billy Lovelady.
There's an interesting discrepancy in the photograph of Lovelady there, who's supposed to be wearing the same shirt, that I will identify.
When I first encountered this, I thought the man who had his face scratched out was Lee Oswald, but of course that turns out to be mistaken because He's there in the photograph.
Turn to the next image and you see a difference between photographs that Robert Grodin took of allegedly a Billy Lovelet.
He's wearing the checkered shirt.
And the Gorilla Man.
Notice there's a significant difference.
The Gorilla Man had a big pocket on his shirt.
Uh, Billy did not.
The Gorilla Man shirt was buttoned up to the neck.
Obviously, Doorman's shirt was unbuttoned way down to the waist.
So, you know, it's preposterous that they tried to perpetrate this fraud on the American people.
Look at the next photograph.
The FBI actually invited Billy Lovelady to come in for an interview on the 29th of February, 1964, wearing the shirt he'd worn at the time.
He came in wearing this short-sleeved, red and white, vertically striped shirt.
Which they duly photographed.
They sent off a memo to Director Hoover, who wanted the identity of the man in the doorway, saying that Billy Lovelady had been the man in the doorway, but trading on an equivocation because while he was in the doorway, he wasn't the figure who was extended looking out with a long-sleeved shirt, which was the actual person of interest here.
If you go to the next slide, in fact, you see the actual memorandum that was sent by the FBI to J. Edgar Hoover, where the underlying sentence at the end of the first paragraph, he stated he was wearing a red and white vertically striped shirt and blue jeans.
And, of course, it was short-sleeved, as you see in the photographs.
I think they wanted to pacify Hoover that they not be sent to Siberia, Alaska, whatever.
Larry Rivera has pioneered a method of superposition, you can see in the next image here, of taking photographs, different photographs of the same person and imposing them over one another to determine whether or not they are, in fact, of the same person.
Look, Marilyn on the left and on the right look sufficiently different, you might have doubts, but he, doing his study, Creating a series of gifts he's been able to establish as a mode of validation of his technique that indeed these are two different photographs of Maryland.
So he's applied the same to the next image you see of Doorman.
And because this is a gift you'll study as the image appears and you'll see how Lee Oswald shows very much the properties of having been the man in the doorway.
It's really fascinating to find how new technology has confirmed conclusions of the past, because we are hardly the first to believe that Lee Oswald was the man in the doorway.
You can go back to Harold Weisberg and his series of Whitewash volumes.
Whitewash 2, a photographic Whitewash published in 1966, at the end makes the argument that the Warren Commission staff was going out of their way to conceal the fact that it was Lee Oswald in the doorway.
Even Jim Garrison, the focus of Oliver Stone's Magnificent film.
JFK believed that Lee was the man in the doorway.
If you go to the next image, you'll see how meticulous Larry has been using the principles of photogrammetry, which is the application of mathematical principles to the study and analysis of photographs.
We got a comparison here between Lee and Billy, but more importantly go to the very next.
And here you see where the GIFs demonstrate how similar they are or dissimilar they are.
Where Lee has the ears in the right location, the nose in the right location, the chin in the right location.
Lee fills out the image like hand in glove.
Billy Lovelady on the right, however, it's a completely different matter.
The ears aren't in the right position.
The jaw doesn't work out right.
The nose and the eyes and the eyebrows are wrong.
Clearly, the man in the doorway was, indeed, Lee Oswald and not Billy Lovelady, who, as the next photograph reflects.
Was nevertheless there in the doorway with him with his hands raised, and if you took out the obfuscation of his shirt, and if you colorize it, you get what we see in the very next image Larry has produced.
This is a very close facsimile to what you would have seen had you been there at the time.
Billy Lovelady to the side, Lee Oswald in the reddish-brown long-sleeved textured shirt.
Which, of course, blew the whole cover.
You go to the next slide and you see what Larry has recreated using Blender of that portion of the photograph, which was, you know, taken by James Eich-Alchen, a photographer known technically as the Alchen 6.
And as I observed, and as we demonstrate in the next slide, the book, JFK, Who, How, and Why, Lee Oswald, standing in the doorway as the motorcade went by, cannot have even been one of the shooters, much less the lone, demented gunman.
I now turn to Sandy Hook, how they fabricated the children.
Sandy Hook has been an extremely emotional event for American families, especially mothers.
Go to the next slide and you'll see how Lenny Posner claims that his little boy, Noah, died at Sandy Hook.
He was supposed to be the youngest of the victims.
Uh, killed in the 2012 massacre.
His, uh, parent, Lenny Posner, talks about dealing with the conspiracy theorists and hoaxers who have taunted him ever since, as though they're vicious people who are irresponsible, as the parent of a child who died at Sandy Hook.
If you go to the next image, you see here we have Governor Malloy with a lieutenant governor addressing the public about the shooting, saying that they had been spoken to that something like this might happen.
Leading me to ask, what in the world could he have meant, spoken to, by whom?
Something like this?
There are only really two alternatives.
One, that he'd been warned that someone might go berserk and come into a Connecticut public school and shoot up a bunch of kids.
In which case, as governor, he obviously had the obligation to warn the school districts to elevate their levels of security to ensure it did not happen.
Something that he Didn't do.
Or alternatively, second, that he had been informed they were going to take an abandoned school, conduct a drill, and present it as a live event, which is, in fact, exactly what happened.
And where it turns out that Reuters reported that on the 17th of November, the governor was greeted by Eric Holder, who traveled to Connecticut, To talk about the Obama administration's gun control agenda and, it appears, to inform him they were taking an abandoned school to conduct a drill and present it as a live event.
Now if you go to the next slide you can see it's easy to prove that this was a fabricated event even only from this aerial photograph of the parking lot.
Notice there are none of the familiar white and blue painted parking areas for a handicapped, none of the white and blue handicapped signage.
That would have been necessary had they upgraded the school in 2008 to comply with state and federal requirements related to Americans with Disability Act, which would have necessitated making all of the exits and entrances wheelchair accessible, remodeling the which would have necessitated making all of the exits and entrances wheelchair accessible, remodeling the interior for wheelchair access to
The school was severely damaged by hurricanes, suffered from asbestos and other biohazards.
They declined to do it, but notice here in particular, not only is it not compliant with ADA requirements, which means it could not have legally been operating as a school, But this was a 28 degree Fahrenheit ground temperature day, so that in order to conduct classes, they would have had to heat the school.
But the boilers were so decrepit from non-use since 2008, they couldn't be heated up, which is why you see no steam or heat rising from the buildings.
Our third telling sign is look at the vehicles in the center two rows.
They're all parked facing the building.
That's quite ridiculous because the driving instructions, which you can see coming in from Dickinson Drive, would have you turn right, curl around, then park facing away from the building.
But it was so much more convenient to simply bring the vehicles in a single line and put them in two by two by two, since they were only going to function as props in the expectation no one would even notice that that's how they did it.
If you go to the next slide, you can see how cold it was.
This is actually on the day you see the exhaust from the automobiles.
You would have known that that building had been heated, had that been the case.
If you go to the next slide, here's clear indication it wasn't handicap accessible.
Wooden stairway, no wheelchair could navigate.
There's even a piece of pipe, steel pipe extending that's circled In yellow, that would have popped the eye out of a little kid.
Remember, this was a kindergarten through fourth grade school.
Sandy Hook is a very upscale community.
While Wolfgang and I were there together, we visited a soccer field.
Every blade of grass was carefully manicured.
There's no way, had this been an operating school, it would have been left in this dilapidated condition.
The next slide shows a famous photograph that appeared on the front page of virtually every newspaper in the world of a policewoman escorting children away from the school under emergency circumstances, or so it appears to be.
Notice the image on the left, because if you take a look at the next photograph, it turns out that Shannon Hicks, who was a photographer for the Newtown Bee, had taken an earlier photograph where you can see the presence of parents there with their arms folded, hands in their pockets, while the policewoman rearranges the kids in the line.
Notice here, you have a little girl in a pink sweater and a short skirt.
Turn to the next slide and you see how the change was made.
The bottom, the earlier photograph, little girl in the pink skirt, where the little boy was in the middle, here called boy number one, then he was put up in front.
Now does anyone seriously believe that during an emergency evacuation from a child shooting massacre, you would have stopped to rearrange the kids in the line to get a better shot?
And who called for the parents?
You got someone who's gone berserk shooting up kids and someone says, we gotta phone and get some parents down here.
If you look at the bottom photograph taken earlier between boy number one and number two, there are two parents in the background casually looking on.
I regard this as lounging at the massacre.
It was a fraudulent event.
Here in the next slide you see the location where those kids were supposed to have been at the time of the second photograph, which gives you some idea of what they were in relation to the surrounding environment.
Go to the next slide and you'll see since Stephen Sedensky, who is the state's attorney from Danbury who issued the final report, Claim there were 289 children there.
If you subtract 20, there should have been 489.
There should have been 469 to evacuate, many more than the 15 or so in that one string.
There should have been 469 to evacuate, many more than the 15 or so in that one string.
There should have been strings all over the place.
If you go to the next slide, however, you find that although the police specified locations and times where the evacuation was taking place, dash cam footage from those times and those locations, so nothing of the kind was taking place, We're often told that you can't prove a negative, but that's simply false.
You can prove there's no elephant in your living room by going there and looking for signs of the presence of elephant.
Finding none, you're entitled to infer that's because there was no elephant in your living room.
If you're told there's an evacuation taking place at specific locations and times, you go there and you find nothing, you're entitled to infer that's because there was no evacuation taking place.
And indeed, there was not.
Here's a further part of the report from State's Attorney Danbury Steven Sedinsky.
Especially striking if you see on the next slide that while they were never able to Identify the fingerprints on a .22 caliber rifle with which he's alleged to have shot his mother, Nancy Lonza, in their home, that in fact they had around 150 slugs recovered, reportedly recovered from the classroom.
But as the note says here, 53 astoundingly, no positive identification could be made of any of the bullet evidence submissions noted.
The physical condition of the bullet jacket surfaces were severely damaged and corroded.
They all lacked Individuals tiraded marks of sufficient agreement for the identification process.
In other words, even though they had 150 slugs, they weren't able to match any of them to the Bushmaster that Adam Lanza is alleged to have used.
What this means is that as a forensic study, this was a complete failure.
They couldn't tie together the weapons with the victims with the alleged perpetrator of the crime.
If you go to the next slide, there's a simple explanation.
The whole thing was a FEMA exercise.
We have the two-day drill.
It was conducted with a rehearsal on the 13th beginning at 8 a.m.
and being presented as a live event on the 14th.
Many of the participants became confused and put up donation websites for the event already on the 13th.
Adam Lanza's date of death was initially recorded in the Social Security Death Index as having died on the 13th, making his feat in shooting 20 children and six adults the following day all the more remarkable.
This is completely consistent with the evidence we have about Porta Potty being present, pizza cartons in water at the firehouse, name tags on lanyards, Parents bringing children to the scene, which would never have happened had it been an actual child shooting exercise.
Wolfgang Halbig has sought information on who delivered the porta-potties and been refused for the obvious reason that since they were delivered the day before, revealing when that happened would have blown the whole cover here.
And indeed, of course, we have similar Indication that something was amiss the following day when there was no surge of EMTs into the building, no string of ambulances to rush the little bodies off to hospitals where they could be declared to be dead or alive, no medevac helicopter, even the parents were not allowed to see their children, only to be shown photographs.
Which is terribly, terribly interesting because the photographs were of kids whose clothing appeared to be out of date by about a decade with clothing that little kids in kindergarten through fourth grade were wearing in 2012.
If you go to the next slide, we see what purports to be Nancy Lonza's bedroom.
In fact, we have more than 50 photographs of them furnishing an empty house to serve as the Adam Lonza resident in the book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
Here is the most important among them.
You see there's some red stuff on the bed, but it doesn't appear to be blood.
I think it might be raspberry jam.
The forms on the wooden chest we find in many of the other photographs.
They appear to be keeping records of how they arranged the room.
Kelly Watt, who has a keen eye at her own home and commercial cleaning service, noticed beneath the leg of the bed there's a blue moving pad that in their haste they forgot to remove.
If you go to the next slide, we also have 50 of them refurbishing the school to serve as a stage.
This is by far the most important.
Notice the SWAT team is already there just above the roof.
There's a string of four windows in Classroom 10 you can see.
The flag is at full mask.
There's crime scene tape up for a crime that is yet to be committed.
In close-ups you can see the man reclining against the wall in the background with his arms folded is Wayne Carver awaiting the arrival of his portable mortuary tent.
We initially believed this photograph had been taken on the morning of the 14th, but it turns out to have been taken the evening of the 13th, setting things up for the masquerade.
If you look at the next set of photos, you see the undamaged windows of Classroom 10 on the left, the damaged windows on the right, so you can verify for yourself that photograph was taken before the alleged shooting had taken place.
Bottom left, the perks are drilling holes in the window frame to simulate bullets, And trajectories that are preposterous.
Look on the right with the pink rods.
They're all perfectly parallel at 90 degrees with a window frame.
As a former Marine Corps officer who used to supervise marksmanship training at Edson Range Camp Pendleton with 300 recruits and 15 DIs under my command, I can assure you this is a fantasy.
No real shooter would have had this effect.
In addition, the next slide shows a death certificate that Noah Posner, during a hundred hours of conversation with Kelly Watt, inadvertently sent to her.
It's a fabrication, the bottom half of a legit.
Notice where it's darker in texture, the top half of a fake.
It doesn't have a file number, it has the wrong estimated time of death at 11 a.m.
when the shooting took place, between 9.30 and 9.35.
Suffice to say, if his son actually had died, he would have had a real death certificate to send to Kelly, not a fabricated one.
You see, Infowars actually ran an article about the book having been banned by Amazon less than 30 days after it was put on sale on 22 October 2015, where it was banned on the 19th of November after having sold nearly 500 copies. where it was banned on the 19th of November after
They never explained why, except to claim vaguely that it was a violation of their guidelines when it had been printed by their own subsidiary, CreateSpace, had been up for nearly a month, sold nearly 500 copies.
Interestingly, when InfoWars put up this notice, they used an even more clear image of the one that I have emphasized.
Uh, but I think that it was only up for 38 minutes even though it had 178 comments already because of the image credit to the Connecticut State Police.
They had to get that down as fast as possible and sought to obliterate it from any records.
In the next slide you see how they had known The school was in deplorable condition.
This was known by 2008, so they reprinted a story about it, why they couldn't have simply refurbished the school, because it was loaded with biohazards and asbestos and damaged by hurricanes.
We have plenty of videos inside and out.
It was in decrepit condition.
When Wolfgang and I traveled to Newtown and spoke before the school board, who wouldn't answer any questions but gave us three minutes to speak, I asked of the school board, When did they notify the parents that their children were attending school in a toxic waste dump?
You see the small image of the school already being destroyed where they required those who participated in its demolition to sign lifetime gag orders so they couldn't comment on anything they had seen or had not seen, which would have included no blood on the floors and no pockmarks on the walls.
Now, for those who have any doubt about the objective, the next slide shows Obama signing 23 executive orders to limit access to gun ownership under the Second Amendment on January 16, 2013, with a group of children looking on.
This is a very cleverly contrived propaganda move to create sympathy for those who lost their children and to promote his gun control agenda.
If you turn to the next slide, you see that although Amazon had 20 books about Sandy Hook available then, only one took exception to the official account.
That one had over a dozen contributors, including a half a dozen current or retired college professors, demonstrating conclusively that the school had been closed by 2008, that there were no students there, that it had been a FEMA drill where we even included the FEMA manual as the first appendix in the book.
If you go to the next, you find it nevertheless remains the case that they milk Sandy Hook.
This is an article from the New York Times on February 3rd, 2017, where once again we return to Noah Posner and Lenny, tousled brown hair, lollipop red lips, the youngest of the 16 children gunned down in 2012.
Go to the next slide.
Posner and his then-wife Veronique had moved to Connecticut, 80 miles from New York, for its tree-lined cul-de-sacs and quality public schools.
On the morning of December 14th, he drove Noah and his twin sister to school.
Less than an hour later, he was shot in the face with such force that his jaw was blown off.
His sister's cowered in another classroom and survived.
Well, it sounds tragic, doesn't it?
Tremendous emotional impact.
The words are chosen with great care.
But look here at the following slide.
Kelly Watt was also the first to advance a thesis that Noah appeared to bear a striking resemblance to a fellow supposed to be his older stepbrother, Michael Vabner.
She has shown many pictures, these photographs, of Noah on the left, Michael Vabner on the right, and one after another has confirmed they appeared to be the same person.
Well, go forward and you'll find we've done a study that confirms precisely that.
That the government appears to have been involved here is from the evidence from this passport, which gives a phony date of death for Noah.
If he'd been born on 20 November 2006, he would have been six years old, which would be appropriate to have been a first grader at Sandy Hook on 14 December, but we have multiple proofs that falsify this scenario and confirm that Noah was Michael as a child.
Go forward.
Here's an interesting clip from a video that Lenny has on his own website.
The child is recounting a scene from a Spider-Man movie.
If you listen closely, it includes enough information to indicate the scene is something from the original Spider-Man reboot.
Spider-Man released in 3 May 2002, which means that he would have been too old to have been in the first grade in 2012.
Here's a scene from the Spider-Man movie he's recounting.
If you actually go to the website, you can watch the clip and draw your own conclusion.
Sandy Hook's charade, Noah Posner was Michael Vavner as a child.
We go forward here, we got a lot of photographs.
We did comparison of their ears, their eyes, their faces, their other features.
Go to the next slide.
Dr. O'Reilly crop photos of the two focused on their ears.
Ears, it turns out, are just as distinctive as fingerprints.
Guess what?
It turns out they have the same ears.
Go to the next image and you find we also compared their eyes.
And guess what?
They have the same eyes.
Here we have, then, a brilliant job by Larry Rivera in the next slide, where he not only, of course, has shown that Doorman was Lee Oswald, but I asked him to compare Noah Posner with Michael Vabner.
And here you see the first comparison.
Go to the next slide for the second.
Go to the next slide for the third.
And now, in the next, lo and behold, appreciate what we have here.
We have Noah Posner magically transforming through space and time into Michael Vavner, purportedly his older stepbrother.
There's really no doubt about it, this is another form of fraud perpetrated by playing on identity, creating false identities in order to mislead the public about an event where Noah Posner Uh, did not die at Sandy Hook, nor did 20 others.
Look at the next slide.
Not only do we have one of these kids attending his own funeral, but they've gotten so brazen about it.
Look at the group of little kids down below when they were in first grade and compare them with the adults with the three girls on the left and the little boy second from the right, and you'll see that they have photoshopped this image to try to create the impression That the little kids and the older kids were alive at the same time, which, of course, is not the case.
The older children are the developed young adults from the younger.
And here we have, you know, an appeal from Sandy Hook in the next slide for Donald Trump to help us stop the conspiracy theorists, the problem being that the conspiracy theorists, so-called, are the ones who are right, who have proven the case.
This was an elaborate charade.
In fact, it turns out that Lenny Posner appears to be attempting to defeat research on Sandy Hook because gullible but sympathetic Americans donated between $27 and $130 million to be divided among the 27 families.
So that means they each pocketed more than a million apiece, and if you go to the next slide, Lenny appears to be worried that if it's exposed, the reason why the book was banned, if it's exposed that he might have to return the million dollars and even be prosecuted for fraud.
Check it out.
When the book was banned, I released the PDF for free online at Rents.com.
You can find it there.
Go to Rents.com and do a search for Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
The next slide shows, we're talking about the story that many have heard as a rumor that Paul McCartney died and was replaced by a look-alike known as Paul, for false or fake Paul.
Paul vs. Paul.
Was Paul replaced by a look-alike?
Now I'm a huge fan of the Beatles.
I'm not talking about obvious imposters as we find in this first photograph.
This was in Denmark, where someone who was clearly not Paul McCartney performed.
And no doubt made a bushel basket of money by faking the performance.
Look at the next slide and you see how obviously they are different.
Now I'm talking about the man on the left who is the man we know today as Paul McCartney, not the one on the right.
Is the man on the left actually a successor different than Paul?
Well, go to the next slide, you'll find that on the Real Deal episode number 70, Nick Horstrom and I did a discussion about Paul vs. Fall.
There you can see Paul as a young man with the Beatles, John Lennon in the front, and then you have George and Ringo in the background.
Nick Horstrom has published a book about the life and death of Paul McCartney.
You can find online, he's an excellent guy, and you can watch this episode, the Real Deal episode number 70, Paul vs. Fall.
The next slide shows another comparison between James Paul McCartney, the original Beatle, on the left, and the man I'm referring to as Paul, who appears to have been his successor, whom we're so familiar with today that we tend to think is the real James Paul McCartney.
Go to the next slide, you'll see other photographs to suggest some of the differences between them.
They really don't look that much like the very same person.
No, it appears that a lot of efforts have been made to obfuscate that fact.
If you go to the next slide, here's another comparison.
Between Paul and Fall, they don't even have the same color eyes.
Notice.
That makes it very difficult to conclude that, in fact, they're one and the same.
In fact, here's a profile in the next photograph, rather different.
Different nose, different cheeks, different jaw.
I think anyone just seeing these photographs wouldn't have any difficulty concluding we're talking about two different persons.
It's just that they both have gone by the same name of Paul McCartney.
Here's another photograph indicating that there are differences between them.
This is Paul with Jane Asher to whom he was engaged.
Here is Paul with Jane Asher.
Notice the difference in the height.
Paul is at least four inches taller than Paul.
We can have the same person at approximately the same stage in their life having a four inch height difference.
It's very good that they happen to both be taken with Jane Asher.
Now here's a vehicle owned by Paul McCartney in which he appears to have died.
The official story, as I've been able, well, this is not the official, but the actual story as I've been able to piece it together, they had a jam session, but there was an argument between John Lennon and Paul McCartney.
He left the studio, It was raining.
Driving in the rain, he found a young woman standing, getting soaked, so he invited her into the car.
She was so excited at being in the vehicle with Paul McCartney that she distracted him.
He ran.
A light or a sign was hit and pinned by a pillar.
She got out of the car.
He did not.
It burst into flame.
He burned to death.
And this was on, ironically, 9-11-1966.
Now if you go to the next slide you find two Italian forensic scientists decided they wanted to put the rumor to rest.
They sought to prove that Paul McCartney after 9-11-1966 was the same as Paul McCartney before 9-11-1966 in Wired Italia, which is the Italian language version of Wired Magazine.
In fact, they proved just the opposite.
Look at the next.
You'll find they discovered that the shape of the skull and the size of the cranium were not the same.
That paw and paw appeared to be different.
Here they're actually noting also a little dark mark between a scar and the skin stretched imperfect.
There's a dark area about the outside corner of the left eye.
Go to the next, however, far more decisive.
Paul, on the left, had good teeth and a normal palate.
Paul, on the right, had bad teeth and a narrow palate.
Go to the next, and we have the very first appearance of Fall on 24 November 1966 outside EMI, where the other three members arrived clean-shaven.
This was clearly part of a disguise to conceal who he was.
Here's another photograph of him on that occasion with Mal Evans in the background to give him answers to questions where he might not know what to say.
If you go to the next slide, this is the very first official photo shoot with Fall on January 6, 1967, and notice how the lights are arranged to distract attention from the features of their faces.
This is a highly atypical kind of photograph that was very carefully staged.
If you go to the next slide, you'll see him making a magical mystery tour.
Paul took off his shoes because he was decidedly taller than Paul.
The others kept theirs on.
There were many ways in which they now began wearing their hair longer, mustaches and the like to conceal features because, after all, They have different ears.
In fact, Paul is the only one of them I've ever heard reported that he was wearing a fake earpiece, obviously to conceal.
The next slide is the original Beatles on with Ed Sullivan.
There's no mistaking that they're all approximately the same height.
I mean, just take a look.
John might be slightly taller than the others, but George and Paul are virtually the same height.
Similarly, Ringo.
Well, look at the album here, Sgt.
Pepper.
This is when you study at a funeral, putting to rest the Beatles.
There's a left-handed guitar on the gravesite.
You see the original Four Lads in Dark on the left, but now there is fun new Sgt.
Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band.
Starring the one and only Billy Shears, who's made up looking very much like Paul McCartney, only decidedly taller.
This is a very significant album, and of course in the music, the opening, they introduce him as Billy Shears.
His name William Shepherd, Billy Shears being a nickname because shepherds share their sheep.
Here's a cover of the Abbey Road album in the next slide, where you see that John, dressed in white, symbolizes the clergyman Ringo in black, the undertaker George in denim and shirt, the gravedigger, and Paul, without his shoes, the corpse.
He was asked about why he took off his shoes that day, and he said because it was a very hot day, which makes no sense at all.
Anyone who's ever walked on asphalt on a warm day knows that it heats up.
The last thing you'd want to do would be to take off your shoes.
But he was, of course, trying to minimize the height difference so it wouldn't be so conspicuous.
If you go to the next, you see a photograph of Billy Shepard before his transformation into Paul.
He was actually sent to Africa and had surgery to make him look more like Paul.
When he came back, John took a look and decided he thought this was actually going to work, that it was actually going to play.
If you see the next photograph, this is Billy Shears now with a With what purports to be Paul's limousine recovered.
But of course, this one has never been subjected to a crash.
And if you go to the next slide, it's very interesting.
When David Letterman had a fall on the show, they got into discussions about the rumor that Paul was dead.
And David asked him, well, who replaced him?
And Paul said, Me!
Which, of course, was completely truthful.
It was he, Billy Shearer, who had replaced Paul, and was now going by the name Paul McCartney.
The last slide here shows that if you go onto amazon.com, You can actually obtain a book.
It runs 40 bucks.
A memoir is a Billy Shears.
It absolutely has a ring of authenticity.
It explains his transformation, becoming Paul McCartney, how he had to surrender his own identity under legal obligations.
He cannot identify his actual person.
So this is written, you know, under a pseudonym where he can disavow.
He's got plausible deniability.
And in the final image we see here, I had four chapters about Paul in the book, and I suppose we didn't go to the moon either, which has now, astonishingly enough, also been banned also by Amazon.com, not because of the discussion of the moon landing or Paul McCartney or even the first not because of the discussion of the moon landing or Paul McCartney or even the first death of Saddam Hussein or the second death of Osama bin Laden, but because of four chapters about World War II and how the official
In fact, I was so startled when I discovered a photograph of the UK soccer team at Auschwitz.
I put it on the back cover from Nick Kohlestrom's book, Breaking the Spell.
Check it out, but you won't be able to obtain it at Amazon.com.
Try moonrockbooks.com.
Just to show how contemporary this issue of identity fakery has become, Hillary has used body doubles as another kind of fake news.
Go to the first slide.
Everyone recalls it, leaving the 9-11 memorial.
As she was entering her vehicle, she stumbled and fell and was virtually dragged into this Ambulance masquerading as a deluxe SUV.
She appears to have been taken to Chelsea's new apartment.
A completely unnecessary move since Chelsea already had a wonderful apartment, but it just happened on this one on the floor that was purchased, no doubt, by the Clinton Foundation.
There was a private hospital that was turned into a facility for one patient, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
They were so worried that the delay in getting Hillary back into the public eye might cause concern that, as the next slide shows, they sent out a woman who was 2 to 3 inches shorter, 50 to 20 pounds minimally lighter, 10 years younger, much more agile, limber, and friendly, very much unlike Hillary Clinton.
If you go to the next slide, you can see some of the differences between them with the double on the right, Hillary on the left.
She is so, so much different and reminds me so much of the actress in You Got Mail that I refer to her as the Meg Ryan double.
If you go to the next slide, you find even USA Today picked up on it.
Talked about the internet thinking Hillary has a body double.
Well, we don't just think it.
I mean we actually proved it.
If you go to the next slide, this is one of the classics.
We can all breathe a sigh of relief.
Hillary's body double is in good health.
But that would not be the end of it.
A few days later, they had a third double of Hillary on a plane today.
Too tall, too young, wrong nose and earlobes, skinny legs, wrong forehead, and missing... She not only has a more sloped forehead and the wrong nose, but she's missing two moles Hillary has above and below the right corner of her mouth.
If you go to the next slide, it becomes increasingly obvious this is not Hillary Clinton.
Here's an authentic photo of Hillary to compare with the others.
They aren't even close.
This is stunning.
Go to the next, once again, which voice analysis has also confirmed these are not the same person, the real Hillary versus the second body double, who reminds me so much of her that I refer to her as the Meryl Streep double.
Now, that means we have at least two doubles of Hillary Clinton.
There was another woman who, in the past, had played Hillary for, you know, cabaret performances and the like, and it was a self-identified double.
These two, of course, are supposed to be the real Hillary and a deception being perpetrated on the American public.
But here again, in the next slide, Yeah.
Here we have Hillary on the plane on 9-17, Hillary on the plane 9-15.
I think actually those dates are reversed, because you've got real Hillary on the left and a fake one on the right, so the dates should be reversed, but it's a fake one.
Go to the next, you'll see another.
And now we're getting into the campaign, because this double on the right actually participated in the campaign for President of the United States.
Hillary Clinton exposed no med cocktail, no camera filters, no professional makeup, no booster seat.
But the fact is, the one on the right is a third body double.
Look here on the next.
She even participated in debates with Bernie Sanders.
Believe it or not, they had a fake Hillary Clinton on with Bernie Sanders.
And the deception does not end there.
Go to the next slide.
You see, they even had a fake Hillary Clinton debating with Donald Trump.
Can you imagine a more massive insult, deceit and deception of the American people?
If anyone has any doubts about the core character of Hillary Clinton, Allowing a younger, more attractive, much thinner person to play her role?
When we apparently have a mouth device that makes the voice sound virtually indistinguishable from Hillary Clinton enough that they actually put her in the national debate with Donald Trump?
Go to the next, and you'll see where a student has discovered there's a constant ratio between the distance between the line between the pupils of your eyes and the line at the bottom of your upper teeth, where Hillary has an eye-teeth ratio of 1.12, but her double has an eye-teeth ratio of 1.06.
These are not the same person.
And look at the next.
You see the difference why they want the younger, more vigorous, more attractive candidate running for president rather than the rather weary, tired, in ill health, actual Hillary Clinton running for the presidency.
Get this, I was just astonished that in February of the 20th, 2017, a reporter for the New York Times published an article about Hillary Clinton being in the House at four different Broadway plays, and he put a series of photographs, none of whom are of the real Hillary Clinton.
I actually wrote to the author of this article, Michael Paulson, and pointed out that this was a very interesting report, but that this was not.
The real Hillary Clinton.
You might have thought he would have noticed that she was not surrounded by a Secret Service, nor was the double coming out of Chelsea's apartment.
She didn't have her medical handler present, who was omnipresent with Hillary.
Not even Chelsea came out that day.
The fraud continues.
Get this.
Just understand the extent of the deception.
We now have a new book shattered inside Hillary Clinton's doom campaign.
By two investigative journalists, Jonathan Allen and Amy Parnes, who followed the entire campaign.
And what they discovered, and what they report here, is that Hillary Clinton invented the Russia blame game.
It was a plan hatched by senior campaign staffers John Podesta and Robbie Mook, less than 24 hours after she conceded, quoting from the book.
That strategy had been set within 24 hours of her concession speak.
Mokin Podesta assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn't entirely on the up-and-up.
For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script.
The script they would pitch to the press and the public.
Already Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.
The Clinton camp settled on a two-pronged plan, pushing the press to cover how Russian hacking was a major unreported story of the campaign, overshadowed by the contents of stolen emails and Hillary's own private server in Broglio, while hammering the media for focusing so intently on the investigation into her email, which had created a cloud over her candidacy.
The press boxed the email story for 18 months, one person part of the strategy is quoted as saying, Comey obviously screwed us, but the press created this story from shattered on a phone call.
With a longtime friend a couple of days after the election, Hillary was much less accepting of her defeat.
She put a fine point on the factors she believed cost her the presidency, the FBI Comey, the KGB, the old name for Russia's intelligence service, and the KKK, the support Trump got from white nationalists.
I'm angry, Hillary told her friend, and exhausted.
After two brutal campaigns against Sanders and Trump, Hillary now had to explain the failure to friends in a seemingly endless round of phone calls.
That was taking a toll on her already weary and grief-stricken soul, but mostly she was mad.
Mad that she'd lost and that the country would have to endure a Trump presidency.
The authors detail how Clinton went out of her way to pass blame for her stunning loss on Comey and Russia.
She wants to make sure all these narratives get spun the right way.
A longtime Clinton confidant is quoted as saying, If you want to learn more, check out From Orlando to Dallas and Beyond.
We're in Orlando.
We had another stage event.
The license for the club had expired years before.
It only had a legal occupancy of 150.
If 50 had been killed and 53 wounded, there would have been abandoned vehicles all over the place.
None were there.
A friend who lives in the area even wrote me to say it wasn't even a gay club.
They use crisis actors.
Very shoddy work.
And now the Orlando Emergency Medical Center has announced they're not going to bill for any of the services rendered for the obvious reason it would have been fraudulent.
You'll discover more about Dallas, too.
That shooting was also fake.
And as in other cases, they've even used dummies, mannequins for some of these events.
Look at the photos on the lower left.
Those were two from Nice.
It's stunning stuff.
Well, we have over a hundred photographs of Hillary in her doubles in this book.
Finally, let me close by saying that I, in collaboration with many excellent experts on different aspects of these cases, are doing our best to document and substantiate the actual history of the United States for the benefit of the American people.
If you want to find the truth, you're not going to get it from the mainstream media, you're not going to get it from the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC.
If you want to know what actually happened here, check out moonrockbooks.com.
▲
Export Selection