Trump Gives Cancer Causing Glyphosate Pesticide Manufacturer TOTAL IMMUNITY! w/ Zen Honeycutt
Zen Honeycutt, founder of Moms Across America, exposes Donald Trump’s 2025 executive order granting glyphosate manufacturers—like Bayer (Monsanto)—legal immunity while pushing its use in military tech and GMOs, despite $17B in lawsuits and links to cancer, miscarriages, and heavy metal contamination in school lunches, military meals, and even Girl Scout cookies. She warns the Farm Bill’s February markup could permanently block local bans, citing Palantir’s Al Karp and dystopian surveillance tools like Ring cameras and AC-powered TVs that screenshot activity every half-second. Corporate capture and weaponized tech risk erasing public health safeguards entirely. [Automatically generated summary]
Hey, come see me on tour in Lansing, Milwaukee, San Antonio, Albuquerque, Houston, Dallas, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas.
Go to JimmyDoor.com for a link for tickets and don't go anywhere else because if you do, they'll charge you more.
establishment media sucks all gaslighting so good luck bullshit we can't afford fomenting this watch and see as it's jacked off the median speeds and jumps the medium and hits them head on it's the Jimmy Tore show up right now we have Zen Honeycutters with us
She's the founding executive director of the nonprofit Moms Across America and author of Unstoppable: Transforming Sickness and Struggle into Triumph, Empowerment, and a Celebration of Community.
She's a former consumer representative for the Organic Products Advisory Committee to the California Secretary of Agriculture and is a board member of GMOSScience.org and the Maha Moms Coalition.
Welcome to the show, Zen Honeycutt.
Hi, Zen.
How are you?
I'm doing great, Jimmy.
Thanks so much for having me on.
It's great to have you.
Now, the reason why we have you on is because Trump signed an executive order today, or maybe yesterday now.
But here is what they promised.
Here's what Donald Trump promised with RFK when they were running and trying to get you to vote for them.
This is what they were promising: millions and millions of Americans who want clean air, clean water, and a healthy nation have concerns about toxins in our environment and pesticides in our food.
That's why today I'm repeating my pledge to establish a panel of top experts working with Bobby to investigate what is causing the decades-long increase in chronic health problems and childhood diseases, including autoimmune disorders, autism, obesity, infertility, and many more.
We want every child in America to grow up and to live a long and healthy life.
So that was easy to cheer for.
And I remember I covered that at the time when he said it.
That was in Arizona, I'm pretty sure.
And I was saying, Well, here's Trump and RFK getting a room full of right-wing red state Republicans to cheer for things that liberals should be saying, that used to be saying, Hey, we got to clean up our water, we got to clean up our food, we got to tackle this chronic disease illness with our children.
That sounds like stuff that a liberal would normally say, but here that was Trump and Bobby Kennedy say it.
Banned Herbicides and Supply Chains00:15:34
And so it shows you that there's lots of things that the left and the right could actually come together on.
There's things that we actually agree on, except the problem is Donald Trump was lying to you.
That was a big lie.
What he planned on doing was what he actually did today.
Here it is.
Let me go back.
So there's a bill called the Pesticide Immunity Shield.
It's the shield.
They already went through this once and they took it out of the bill.
Yes, 453 in House of Appropriations.
Yes.
So they're putting it back in this bill.
But what Trump did, let me just show you.
He signed an executive order today.
promoting the national defense by ensuring an adequate supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides.
This is real.
I'm just reading from his executive order.
Elemental phosphorus is pervasive in defense supply chains and therefore crucial to military readiness and national defense.
It is a key input in smoke, illumination, and incendiary devices, and it is a critical component for manufacturing the semiconductors that are central to numerous defense technologies such as radar, solar cells, sensors, and optoelectronics.
It is also increasingly important in modern lithium ion battery chemistries used in a multitude of weapons supply chains.
For these and other reasons, on November 7, 2025, the Department of Interior, acting pursuant to the Energy Act of 2020, designated phosphate as a critical mineral.
Elemental phosphorus is also critical precursor elements for the production of glyphosate-based herbicides, which play a critical role in maintaining America's agriculture advantage by enabling farmers to efficiently and cost-effectively produce food and livestock feed.
Now, let me just go to you, Zen.
Is that true?
Is glyphosate herbicides, do they play a critical role in maintaining America's agriculture advantage?
They play a role, and that's because 80% of GMOs are engineered to withstand glyphosate.
That doesn't mean they need to have it in order to grow, but they're engineered to withstand it so that an airplane or a tractor can spray the entire field, say corn or soy or canola or sugar beets, and it'll kill all the weeds, but it won't kill the crop, right?
So that crop is engineered to withstand glyphosate.
So 80% of GMOs are engineered to withstand glyphosate, and 85 to 95 to 100% of our commodity crops are GMO.
That's corn, sugar, soy, canola, sugar, you know, sugar beets.
And these are a massive amount of the American agriculture exports.
For instance, a lot of people don't know this, but 80% of what American farmers grow is exported primarily to Asia to feed their pigs and cows and chickens, right?
Some of it's used for fuel, some of it's used for plastic.
But 80% of what American farmers grow is not feeding Americans.
Only 20% is feeding Americans.
So a huge amount of American agriculture does, I don't want to say rely or can use glyphosate, but it does, right?
So that's the thing is we want them to transition to regenerative organic agriculture, which is not dependent on glyphosate.
And Trump did not do that with this executive order.
This was basically a love letter to glyphosate.
Yeah, exactly.
So let me just keep reading a little more.
It says, as the most widely used crop protection tools in United States agriculture, the part that he leaves out of this is that it gives people cancer.
That's the part that he's leaving out, is that it's actually a carcinogen and glyphosate gives people cancer to the point where they already had a $10 billion settlement years ago.
And right now, Bayer, which owns glyphosate, they bought it from Monsanto.
So Bayer, which if you know anything about their history, they're the biggest criminals in the world.
They are now trying to force a settlement with all the people who had gotten cancer from glyphosate for $7.25 billion.
And it's going to the Supreme Court, and it's not sure if it's going to go through.
But as Donald Trump is signing this executive order to shield glyphosate from at the same time, the manufacturers of glyphosate are presenting a $7.25 billion settlement for all the people that they gave cancer because of it.
So just keep that in mind.
This is a toxic carcinogen that we're spraying on our food.
Everybody knows this, yet it's still being sprayed on our food.
I don't understand how that could happen.
How could that happen, Zen?
This is happening because of corporate corruption, Jimmy.
You and I have seen this for years.
The corporate, the corporations, the chemical companies, which, by the way, you know, Bayer is a German company, but they have production in China.
Also, 85.7% of all the glyphosate that's made is made is owned by Chinese companies, made by China companies that are owned by China.
So this is part of Trump's move to get glyphosate in the United States is, oh, well, we need to have it made in the United States instead.
It's still going to cause cancer.
It's still going to cause miscarriages and birth defects and liver disease and kidney disease and neurological disorders and nervous system damage and sperm damage.
It's still going to do all that.
And we have to move away from this system right now and move into regenerative organic agriculture.
But this administration has been heavily influenced by these corporations.
You've seen this time and time again.
And, you know, this is the same thing that's happening again.
It's outrageous.
This is basically the middle finger to Maha.
The people who voted for him, Republican and Democrats, right?
This is just yet another.
He's running out of, he's long run out of middle fingers to give to Maha.
When he gave $35 billion to the makers of Ozempic, so they could give that to Americans who don't need it and they don't know it's highly toxic and that it causes blindness, it causes paralysis in your digestive tract, it causes pancreatite, all kinds of bad things come from Ozempic.
And as soon as you go off it, you gain the weight right back.
And the weight you lose is muscle.
A lot of it is muscle.
So that's just one of the biggest middle fingers they gave.
But here's another middle finger right here.
And let me just read a little bit more from his executive order.
He says there is no direct one-for-one chemical alternative to glyphosate-based herbicides.
Lack of access to glyphosate-based herbicides would critically jeopardize agricultural productivity, adding pressure to the domestic food system, and may result in a transition of cropland to other uses due to low productivity.
Now, is glyphosate used in Europe?
Is it used in Italy?
Is it used in other places besides where is it not used?
It is, but it's restricted in many of those places.
You can't use it as a drying agent in many of those countries the way that we do here in the United States.
It is banned in other countries, not all of them, but in some other countries.
And it's not as essential as he's, it's essential for this type of, not essential, it's utilized in this type of GMO monocrop farming.
But that's a choice, Jimmy.
Farmers can farm with regenerative organic ag.
They can farm, you know, conventionally.
They don't have, think about it.
This has only been used, this type of farming, for the past 30 to 40 years.
For thousands of years before this, farmers have been feeding massively populous countries like China and India without GMOs, without toxic chemicals.
This is merely more convenient for them.
And I am tired of every single administration pandering to these pesticide companies and catering to the convenience of chemical farmers.
That's what's happening.
And we moms who have sick children who have chemical sensitivities, autism, autoimmune issues, cancer, we have kids who, you know, they're wiping their feces on the wall in the middle of the night because their autism is so severe, they can't walk, they can't talk.
We're tired of farmers and regulatory agencies saying that they need glyphosate basically because it's more convenient for them.
So enough is enough.
So when you're talking about how they use it as a drug, so in other countries where a lot of other countries, it is, could you check Grock and ask what other countries has banned glyphosate?
But in the countries that do, they use it at the beginning of the growing season.
But in the United States, they use it at the end of the growing season as a drying agent.
Is that correct?
Do I have that correct?
They can.
Yes.
And not just on GMO crops, but on wheat and peas and beans and legumes.
That's why you have high levels of glyphosate in pizza, in spaghetti, in hummus, you know, on bagels and all types of food that we eat on a daily basis.
So basically, every meal you're going to eat will have glyphosate on it.
If you have wheat, peas, beans, legumes, corn, or soy, unless you're eating organic.
And even 20% of organic can have contamination of glyphosate because of fraudulent labeling.
So we're eating a huge amount of glyphosate.
280 million pounds of it are used per year on our crops.
And this has to stop.
We have to transform how we are growing our food.
We could transform to these soybean farmers could grow hemp instead.
We could transform to regenerative organic.
And, you know, our military, whose food we just tested is highly toxic, they could be getting food from America that's regenerative, organic, grown by American farmers instead of overseas food that's highly toxic.
You know, we've got a lot of changes to make.
Nobody's saying it's going to be easy, but somebody has to stand for it.
And we are so disappointed that this administration has not been doing that.
It's been a full year, Jimmy, with no major changes to pesticide reduction for exposure to our children and our family members.
Even though it was an explicit promise, it got a lot of people to vote for them.
They would not have won without this.
They would not have won.
They wouldn't have.
They said the word pesticides, childhood chronic diseases, just like you saw.
And there were Democrats and Independents who have never voted Republican before and who didn't even like Trump, right?
And they voted for him anyway because of that.
Because of that.
Because specifically because of that.
Yes.
Exactly.
And how we expect those people to now vote for Republicans during the midterms in order to keep a majority of that housing.
How's going to happen?
I'm telling people not to vote in the midterms.
I told people stop voting.
But so what you're saying is they don't need to do this.
They don't need to use glyphosate.
They just do it because it's cheaper and it makes them more money, even though they're giving us polluted food, literally, and the chronic illnesses in the United States are off the 50% of kids have a chronic illness or Americans.
So he's just telling you what he's doing it for.
Here it is.
Given the profit margins growers currently face, any major restrictions and access to glyphosate-based herbicides would result in economic losses.
So it's just about, so we're going to poison you with cancer because it makes more money for the big agribompies that use it.
There's a little bit more.
Ensuring an adequate supply of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides is thus crucial to the national security and defense.
Can you believe this?
Including food supply security, which is essential to protecting the health.
It's doing the exact opposite.
You're protecting a polluted carcinogen, cancerous food supply.
You're not actually protecting a healthy food supply that will keep us healthy.
You're giving us a food supply that will make us sick.
That's what they're doing.
And not just us, Jimmy.
We're exporting 80% of these crops to Asia to feed their chickens and cows and ducks and all that.
So we're polluting our American soils and our water and our air in order to export the majority of these crops to other countries.
So he's couching this as national defense.
So he says that I accordingly find that consistent with the Department of the Interior's designation, elemental phosphorus is a scarce material that is critical to the national defense and security.
Wow.
So he's really, that's the way he's couching this.
What this is is a giveaway to Big Agra and Bayer that makes.
that makes it.
But before we got to this, before he issued this, this was today, right?
He issued that.
Yesterday.
Yesterday.
But there's a bill right now.
So now a lot of people are saying that that executive order will not hold up in court.
What do you think?
Well, there are lawyers that are telling us it's not legal.
So there is a possibility that it'll be sued or struck.
Congress could attempt to strike it down.
It could be reversed in some way.
But the problem is the impact on the Maha movement, the optics of this, that he is siding with the pesticide companies like this is massively damaging to Maha and to the health of Americans for generations to come.
So it's a major problem.
So I just want to very quickly, some of the countries that have banned glyphosate, Vietnam, fully banned.
Lots of have restricted it heavily, but the ones who have banned it totally are Vietnam and then places like Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Oman.
Isn't that amazing?
Isn't that amazing?
Those places, they know.
So the Arab countries, they know, Vietnam, they know.
Isn't that funny that they know that they're not going to poison their people because they have to give their people health care and they don't want to give their people health care because that's going to be costly to take care of all those people with cancer.
So they're like, hey, let's not give our people cancer so we don't have to pay for their health care.
So there are countries with partial bans or significant restrictions like Austria.
They have a partial ban on use.
Belgium banned it for household use.
France banned it for household use and certain formulations.
Germany has restricted it and banned it in public spaces and protected areas, domestic gardens.
Luxembourg attempted a full ban in 22.
Netherlands banned it for household and non-commercial use in 2014.
Bermuda also has restricted it.
Countries with past bans that were overturned lifted, Mexico had banned it.
Sri Lanka had banned it.
Colombia and El Salvador, Thailand, all had banned it.
So places like Canada, Australia, India, and others, restrictions exist, but not nationwide.
And Jimmy, that doesn't include the thousands of locations across the country that our moms at Moms Across America and other people have gotten to ban it in their area, like their homeowners association, their county, even their state.
I mean, the city of Los Angeles, Miami, countless numbers of homeowners associations and counties across the country have restricted or at least prioritized organic landscaping methods.
Pesticide Immunity Shields00:15:05
And this farm bill that you're showing right now, the pesticide immunity shields in the farm bill, will take away those local restrictions of glyphosate and other chemicals.
It will wipe out states' rights and the countless hours of months and years that some of our volunteers have worked on in getting glyphosate to not be sprayed around schools, that would go away because of this farm bill.
So what they're doing is the exact opposite of what conservatives are supposed to be politically.
So conservatives always argue that the best place to make a law is local.
And so Trump has flipped it on its head and he's saying, no, we're going to take the power away from local municipalities to pass their own laws regarding glyphosate.
We're superseding them and we're making it illegal for local governments, local city councils to put any kind of restrictions on glyphosate, which causes cancer.
So that's the opposite of what a conservative politically normally does.
They normally want to take the power away from the federal government, which is thousands of miles away and put it right in their backyard into the power of their own citizens.
And Trump is doing the exact opposite.
And they always claim that's what the liberals want to do, but that's exactly what Trump's doing.
He's not only doing it with this, but he's doing it with AI.
You cannot have any, he did the exact same thing too.
He overrode states' rights when it came to regulating AI.
So that Trump is doing the exact opposite of what he campaigned on, on what RFK campaigned on, and on what a normal Republican campaigns on.
He's doing the exact opposite of it.
And it is going to destroy Maha if not Maha isn't already destroyed.
So this bill takes away all that, supersedes it, gives it the power to the federal government.
And is this bill, is it in Congress?
Is it in the House or is it in the Senate?
What's the status?
It's in the House.
It's the Farm Bill.
And GT Thompson is the one that wrote in this pesticide immunity shield clause.
One of the parts of it extends the reviews of pesticides for five years to 2031, meaning they couldn't even start to review these pesticides in order to restrict or ban them for another five years.
So basically, we're going to do nothing for the next five years about pesticides, what it says.
It bans the local restrictions, just like we've said.
It loosens restrictions on water, adding pesticides into water.
It loosens the restrictions.
It's the exact opposite of what Trump said he would do.
And then it makes the label the law, which in a very specific way, meaning it overrides any type of state's rights or courts, even, even courts, to make the EPA label the law such that if it doesn't say that a particular chemical like glyphosate causes cancer, then if somebody sues for failure to warn, the defendant, which would be Bear, right, could say, well, we couldn't warn you because the EPA label is law and they didn't say it causes cancer.
So we are, you know, immune from your lawsuit.
So that's how it would, and it would override courts as well.
So this is, this is an F you to our entire court and justice system written into the farm bill as well.
So again, so again, this takes away people's local municipalities, city councils, counties, government states.
It takes away their power to protect their own citizens from the cancer causing glyphosate.
So Trump is taking, stripping that away.
Not only that, but he's not allowing any government agency to even review it to see, hey, maybe we should update our recommendations on glyphosate.
Let's take a look.
He's saying you can't even do that until 2031.
This is the biggest FU.
I mean, this is, you know, this is like the equivalent of starting a war with Iran as far as a betrayal of MAGA and MAHA.
This is right up there.
But not just glyphosate, Jimmy.
57,000 chemicals that are covered under FIFRA.
So it's not just glyphosate.
It's all of the chemicals that are used.
So nobody for any chemicals.
Yes.
No local governments can.
So they're going to supersede all this.
So basically what this is, is you can, a Bayer, the producers of Glyphosate cannot be sued anywhere, nor can you create a law restricting it.
So this is 100%.
This is like a vaccine shield, but it's for people who make pesticides that give you cancer.
So he's giving you, they're giving him a complete legal immunity shield.
That's what Trump is doing right now.
And not only that, but stopping anybody else from trying to protect their own local citizens and municipalities.
That's what Trump is doing.
Yes.
Well, I want to be clear that the executive order doesn't give immunity from failure to warn.
It gives immunity for the corporations because it's a government contract, right?
But the farm bill would.
If the farm bill goes through, it would.
And, you know, our elected officials have been trying to sneak this clause into states.
There are eight states who fought this and won.
Like they didn't want it.
So the federal would be overriding those eight states who already said they don't want this.
And our elected officials tried to put it in house appropriations, right?
They're trying to sneak it into other bills.
They are doing whatever they can to stop these lawsuits.
And this is because over 200,000 people have sued and they've set aside $12 billion one time, an additional $7.25 billion, right?
They just said they're going to put additional, and they've already paid out another $10 billion.
So this is billions and billions of dollars that Bayer has been hemorrhaging.
And I could understand they want to stop that.
So they're trying to do whatever they can.
But you know how they can stop this, Jimmy?
They can label the product as a carcinogen and then all of the failure to warn lawsuits go away because it's actually labeled.
Or they could just use a different formulation.
They're already using a vinegar-based formulation in the UK.
They don't have to use this glyphosate-based herbicide.
And so what do you formulate?
Do you have any connection with RFK?
Does he have a response to this bill or to what Trump's latest executive order?
I have not talked to him personally in a response to this, but I do know that he feels that the administration felt that they had to do this because, you know, 100-something farmers have gone to them and said they're going to go out of business and they're broke and we're losing farmers every day because of the whole, how expensive it is.
And if they don't have glyphosate, they're going to go out of business.
So they felt that they needed to do this.
And the fact is, again, they don't have to farm that way.
They can farm hemp.
They could farm other types of food.
They don't have to farm this way.
And we know for a fact that even Bayer, the makers of glyphosate, have admitted that it causes cancer because this is from More Perfect Union.
Bayer has paid out $10 billion in Roundup Cancer lawsuits.
That's for glyphosate.
They've already paid out $10 billion for giving people cancer.
And right now, today, they are putting forward to the Supreme Court a settlement that would stop all future lawsuits against them for cancer right now.
And they're offering an extra $7.25 billion.
So that would be almost $18 billion that they've already paid out or are ready to pay out for causing cancer.
So they know this.
But it's just like when they had, was it Celebrex?
So when Big Pharma had a drug that they knew was going to kill 50,000 people, they knew it.
But internal documents revealed they said, yeah, we'll have to pay a fine, but the money we make, like we'll have to pay a $5 billion fine, but we're going to make $50 billion.
So let's go ahead and kill 50,000 people with our heart medicine.
And who cares if they die?
We're going to make more money.
So this is basically the same thing they're doing here.
Yeah, we're going to pay out $17, $18 billion, but look at all the billions of dollars we're going to make anyway by killing people and giving people cancer.
That's really what's happening right now, right?
And it's over the next 10 or 20 years.
I forget what the time span is, but so they put a cap on it, right?
So somebody could maybe get $165,000 for cancer.
I don't know about you, Jimmy, but my child or my father's life is worth way more than that.
And there's no amount of money that's, you know, replaceable for your loved one.
It's absolutely insane.
And the number one cause for bankruptcy is medical debt, right?
So we've got people now in Georgia and North Dakota that can't sue.
If you live in Georgia or North Dakota, you cannot sue, you know, Syngenta or Dow or Bayer or anybody for any type of chemical causing your cancer.
And you can't reclaim your medical costs, which could be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for kids.
One, one farmer that I know, Mark Doodla, his dad got cancer from using agrochemical chemicals.
They spent a million dollars to get another year of his, of, of a lifetime for him.
Maybe it was one to three years, but they spent a million dollars.
And when they got the chemo for his dad on the box of the chemo, it said Bayer.
The same name of the company that sold them the agrochemicals is selling them the chemo to get his dad better with a million dollars worth of cost.
So that's, I think that's called a scam.
When you create a problem and then you sell someone the solution to that problem you created, that's called a scam.
Yeah.
And they're doing it in multiple ways.
They're destroying the soil.
Glyphosate destroys the microbes in the soil, right?
Now they're genetically engineering bacteria to put back in the soil and they're calling that regenerative.
Now they want to sell the farmers the bacteria to put back in the soil to regenerate.
They sell them the idea on cover crops.
That's why regenerative is on the front page of Bayer.
And then they say spray those cover crops with glyphosate.
So regenerative to them just means more cover crops that you can spray with glyphosate.
They're benefiting from this on all sides of this, from selling the drugs, from selling the GMO seeds, from selling the chemicals and from selling the genetically modified bacteria.
This is a major racket.
What do you think the chances are of this bill passing the Congress, the Senate and being signed by Trump?
Well, it'll definitely be signed, but what do you think the chance?
Do you have any predictions?
I don't think that it's going to make it into the farm bill.
I think it's not going to go forward because the farm bill has been delayed so many times, but we have to speak up.
We have to be loud and we have to speak up to the House Ag Committee and all of our House representatives.
Those are the first ones that we need to, that people need to talk to.
Okay.
And so they already was, it was in another bill earlier.
It was last year.
It was in House of Appropriations and it got shut down.
That was a major win for us, but now it's in the farm bill.
They need to hear from us this week, next week, the March, sorry, February 23rd through 25th is the markup.
And they're going to vote on it on the 25th in the House Ag Committee.
If it goes through, then it'll go to the full floor.
All of the House members will need to vote on it.
We have a better chance of killing it there, I believe.
And if we do kill it there, then it won't go forward.
Like the Senate won't put it in the bill and, you know, it'll, we'll kill it.
But we really have to speak up because as you can see, we never know what's going to happen.
Nobody, we were completely blindsided by this executive order.
This is, you know, we never know what's going to happen.
So people need to speak up and it matters that you call your House representatives.
It matters that you email them.
And when they hear from you, they know that their position, right?
They're at risk of you not voting for them if they if they side on the side of pesticide companies.
Okay.
You know, it's always a it's it's it's always a struggle for me to get people to watch videos like this.
I can get people to watch.
I can get people to watch a million people to watch videos about other things.
But for some reason, when it comes to stuff like this, which we know is super important to a lot of people, I don't know if it gets suppressed by the YouTube algorithm.
I'm guessing it does, but we'll see what happens.
I'm going to put this video up tomorrow and we'll see what happens.
And hopefully people get involved because we won before.
So it's just like you said, last year when it was in the appropriations bill, people rose up and screamed about it.
At least I saw them do that on social media.
And the next thing I knew, they took it out of the bill.
So that's amazing.
And now this is the Trump's try.
He's trying to do an end run and he's trying to get it put back in a bill.
And he's also doing an executive order.
This is the, I'm honest.
I tell people the last time the government was this unresponsive to its people, George Washington picked up a gun and started shooting his oppressors.
Now, I'm not saying that that's what they should do now.
I'm just saying that's what George Washington did back then.
But it's obvious we're going to need a real revolution at some point because our government is completely captured by the criminals who want to kill you and poison you.
And your people who represent you don't represent you.
They hate you.
They don't care if you get cancer as long as they can keep their pockets full and they can keep being reelected.
So we are ruled by criminals and that is not an exaggeration.
And they don't care if you get cancer as long as the people keep making money.
That's what this is about.
So yes, I urge everybody, call your congressman, your senator, because it actually does work.
Say something about it on social media.
Share this video with people.
Any last words you'd like to say, Zen?
Yeah, what we're seeing out of this administration is that the EPA is business first.
That's their motto, right?
Clear away regulations and allow a pathway for innovation.
What we're seeing out of the USDA is farmers first.
That's literally the name of their program.
But what that means is chemical farmers first.
That means bear first.
What we're seeing from our representatives and elected officials mostly is campaign contributions first, right?
Whoever's giving them money is going to have that.
That's how they're going to do their policies.
What we at Moms Across America is saying, it's time to put children first, health first, and safety first.
And the concept of Maha is health first.
And actually, if we do that, if people make decisions, businesses make decisions based on health first, they're going to have long-term loyal customers.
If the elected officials put health first, they're going to be re-elected.
If the EPA puts health first, they're actually going to be doing their jobs and taking care of the environment and people, right?
The overriding umbrella should be health first.
And we need the courage to make that happen.
And the only way we're going to do that with this type of corruption that's going in our government is if the people rise up and we say enough is enough.
We speak up to our elected officials.
We tell them their jobs are on the line and we take matters into our own hands.
Health First Advocacy00:02:32
We grow our own food.
We connect with each other in our own neighborhoods.
We take our health back for ourselves.
And that's what needs to happen right now.
So I want to urge people to go to Moms Across America.
Please look up our testing.
We just did military food testing.
We've done school lunch testing, fast food testing.
Look at the truth about what is in your food because when we know better, we do better and we've got to know the truth.
So please go to momsacrossamerica.org and support us, donate for more testing and join us on our Monday Night Moms Connect calls as well.
I mean, it's to the point where literally a Girl Scout cookie is just a chemical assault on your immune system.
It's filled with glyphosate.
It's filled with heavy metal.
It's unbelievable what's in Girl Scout cookies.
I mean, just for an example, not to pick on Girl Scout cookies, but it's in almost all our food.
Well, it's the same as military food, 100% positive for pesticides and 100% of those pesticides are made in China, Jimmy.
95% positive for glyphosate, 100% positive for heavy metals are military food.
Veterinary drugs and hormones, one of them is an aviary contraceptive.
Some of them, you know, they cause death, right?
They cause neurological damage and heart conditions.
We've got toxins in the military food that should not be there.
And some of these foods are either coming from other countries or these chemicals are being used illegally.
So we need to turn that around.
And we need our American farmers.
I would hope our American farmers would be excited about the idea of growing food for American soldiers and American students.
And it's the biggest market out there: 30 million meals a day for school lunches, 1.5 billion meals for the military.
That's a guaranteed market for our American farmers.
If Trump were to support that transition to regenerative organic farming and food, we could feed the military and our students with AI research right now less than 2% of the $1.5 trillion budget.
That sounds reasonable to me.
It could happen.
Sounds reasonable.
I don't know.
Sounds reasonable to me.
Fingers crossed.
Everybody's got to be loud.
Be loud on social media.
Be loud when you call your representatives.
Okay, Zen Honeycutt everybody, check out momsacrossamerica.org.
Go to momsacrossamerica.org.
Lots of resources and information there.
Zen, thank you very much for coming on.
I appreciate all the information.
Thanks so much.
Hanging Car Mystery00:15:42
Okay.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show: you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
Here's what you uncovered, which I find fascinating.
You got a hold of the police scanner of their recordings, what they were saying.
And there was a cop car following Charlie Kirk's SUV as they were taking him to the hospital.
And here's what the cop said: he says, 212, everybody get off the radio.
I've got a black SUV northbound on Wolverine Way, passenger doors open, someone trying to hang out of it.
212, everybody get off the radio.
I've got a black SUV northbound on Wolverine Way.
Passenger door is open.
Someone's trying to hang out of it.
That broadcast right there was less than four minutes after the Big Bang.
So they had already gotten Charlie Kirk from the scene of the incident into the SUV and were flying up the highway with someone hanging out of the car.
Here is the bit of confusion, our first little bit of confusion that enters.
This is where they think they have another victim because of someone else hanging out of the car.
I assume possibly another victim.
They've got one hanging out of the car.
So there was some confusion there.
Hey, maybe.
So we've never, no one's no, no, no one ever reported this.
You found this amazing investigative work you're doing, really.
Honestly, swear, this is amazing.
And that, and so now we have a cop, two cops saying that there's two different cop reports.
I don't know if it's two different cops, but it's two different reports from cops saying that there appears to be a second victim because it looks like a victim is hanging out of the car.
And why would he say that it looks like a victim unless it looked like somebody who was somehow shot or injured?
So what do you make of these two reports saying that there is a well, there's actually one more report.
Let me play that.
But We have yet another broadcast discussing someone hanging out of the car.
This is a third broadcast that someone's hanging out of the car.
Probably 25/30 in a vehicle, 50 South 1200 West.
And or they have one hanging out of the car.
We're not sure if they're a patient or if they're just trying to get out of the area.
So that's three reports from three different police reports broadcast saying, Hey, there's someone hanging out of the car.
And so when I heard that, I thought to myself, was Charlie dead?
And it seemed to me like he might have been fighting for his life.
And that's why he's hanging out of the car.
He was trying to get the hell out of that car because the people in the car were trying to kill him.
That makes more sense than anything else.
What do you think?
I really don't know what to make of it, Jimmy.
It's such a bizarre radio transmission, especially in light of the fact that they didn't really publicize that it existed.
And there were several radio transmissions that we covered that night on that program that were new to me when we discovered them.
The news media just never covered them.
And a lot of the audience came to the same conclusion in the comments.
A lot of the audience that watched that broadcast that night came to the same conclusion that it sounds like to them the police are describing someone fighting back or somebody trying to escape or something else.
Because you saw how Charlie was inserted into the SUV.
It was his feet hanging out as they drove off.
I get that.
But I don't understand if he supposedly died at the scene, like Frank Turek describes in his different discussions, as Brian Harpaul described.
If he supposedly died at the scene, just fold him up and close the door.
Why are you risking someone falling out of the car at highway speeds?
Well, exactly.
That doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
You just bend his legs.
It's not like he's got rig of mortis yet.
That takes a while to set in.
So you just bend his legs and you close the door.
Why would they're going 65, 70 miles an hour for 12 minutes?
And you got multiple three police reports of someone hanging out of the car and they think it's a victim.
What in the hell else could that mean?
I don't, I can't.
Go ahead.
Well, I want to say that I believe that when Brian Harpole went on the Sean Ryan show, they may have been anticipating this because they would have known these broadcasts existed if they'd have done any kind of research.
And I think they anticipated that people would hear about this.
And so Brian Harpaul goes on the Sean Ryan show and Frank Turek goes on the Megan Kelly show and they describe that, oh, on the way there, they were holding each other.
You know, Charlie is such a tall man, they couldn't close the door behind him.
So they're holding on to each other and people are, you know, trusting each other that they don't let each other fall out of the car.
I'm looking back at that and saying, no, that sounds to me like you guys were setting up a story that you knew we would eventually trip over these calls.
And you guys wanted to preempt any reasonable conclusion and go ahead and try to plant your own version of events.
It sounds to me like, well, here's what you, here's what you concluded.
If you wonder, and as I have, if you wonder if the finishing off, and this is a dark, twisted, drab way to think about this, and I hate to even raise the issue, but I have to because I've mentioned it, that there could have been a fatal incident inside the car.
That I, you know, my working hypothesis is that Charlie Kirk was not just taken down one way.
So, can you expand on your working hypothesis?
Yeah, I can.
There are so many things that went wrong, starting with the t-shirt moving in the way it moved, that is totally and wholly inconsistent with a gunshot to the neck.
You know, the whole t-shirt comes up, a medallion on his necklace fries into his neck.
His hands, the way they grip the microphone, looks to me like he got electrocuted.
His ring disconnected from his ring finger and then sticks to his pinky finger for about a full second.
Doesn't it's not affected by gravity, almost as if there's some sort of an electromagnetic pull on that ring.
And then you have this medical report of a broken series of vertebrae from the C1 or 2 all the way down to the C7 or T1.
And then you had the couple of wounds on his arm that almost look like a taser or some sort of puncture wound.
I just think that they brought Charlie into that, what looks like a death arena and said, we're going to go after him four or five different ways, and then we're going to break his neck in the car.
And he's not walking out of this alive.
There's a 0% chance he leaves Oram Utah alive.
And that is my working hypothesis: that yes, something exploded under his shirt.
Yes, something went wrong with the microphone and caused an electrification.
Yes, something punctured his neck.
I don't know if it was a bullet or what it was.
Yes, his neck bones were broken.
Something happened there.
Yes, something wounded his arm.
There's just too much going on.
It's like they didn't want to risk him being rasputen and live through one or two attempts.
They wanted to make sure he was finished off no matter what.
And I think what they're describing in the police, at least a way to interpret it, what the police are describing on the way to the hospital is a guy fighting back.
A guy struggling is what it sounds like to me.
I don't know.
It's what immediately sounded like to me.
And, you know, if you look at it, it does look like he's electric shocked.
And you've talked about these two wounds on his forearm.
Can you talk about that?
Yeah, if you look at the photos that Charles McClintock Wilson took in the immediate aftermath, I'm talking 20 or 30 seconds after the Big Bang.
They're carrying Charlie Kirk to the car.
I don't like to play them on YouTube because YouTube gets mad at me and threatens me every time I play any kind of footage like that.
So I hesitate to play them on air, but I direct people to them.
They're on his website.
Charles McClintock Wilson took some excellent photos before, during, and after the event.
And after the event, it looks like almost snake fangs, but they're about an inch inch and a half apart.
It's two little puncture wounds on his forearm.
They're not moles because we have clear imagery of him before and during the event, and they're not there.
They don't look like blood splatter.
They're just too small and perfectly placed there.
And it looks to me like he might have gotten hit with some sort of a taser or something under the table, either to make sure he was finished off, like, does he respond or to subdue him further?
I don't know.
I mean, it enters the realm of speculation at that point.
And I don't like to speculate too much, believe it or not.
But something happened to that arm that was not present right before the Big Bang.
Something happened to that arm, and I don't know what it was.
So, yeah, I think there was, I mean, we had all we are left to do is speculate because the story that the establishment is giving us doesn't add up.
The story that we get from Dan Harple, Dan, from Brian Harpel, Dan Flood, Frank Turek, the Andrew Colvet, Boyer, Mikey McCoy, Rob McCoy.
None of their stories add up.
None of them.
Erica Kirk, the story that Kakash Patel tells, none of the stories add up.
They don't make any logical sense.
They contradict each other constantly.
And so we're left with nothing else but speculation.
We have to speculate because the things that we're speculating actually make more sense than the establishment story.
So even though it sounds crazy, it makes more sense than a 30-odd six that didn't take his head off, than a 30-odd six didn't have an exit wound, and that it was one guy who somehow never been to that campus, was able to get up on a roof, and nobody saw him.
The security team didn't see him.
The cops didn't see him.
The campus police didn't see him.
Nobody saw him, except people in this crowd actually did see him, just like in Butler, Pennsylvania.
People saw the shooter, but the cops didn't see him.
Nobody in charge saw.
And so he's up there.
Somehow he gets up there.
He has to put together, he has to take the gun out wherever he had it, which I firmly believe the gun was up there already because there's no way he could have walked up there with it down his pants and it didn't fit in his backpack.
So, but they said he got up there, takes the gun out, puts it together.
They say he puts it together, lines up the shot, takes the shot.
Nobody sees him, takes the shot, then he takes it apart again.
And that it just doesn't, none of that makes sense.
And then he happens to drop the gun off, puts it back together without the screwdriver.
He puts it back together and he leaves it in the backyard of a house owned by Palantir.
And then nobody fought.
So it's just, we're going to get to a lot more about that, but there's just nothing about that story that makes sense.
And so I don't even know if he was actually even shot.
It looks like exactly what you said.
Something happened underneath his.
Well, I'll show you this.
So watch his t-shirt.
Watch this.
There's the Dan Flood hand signal.
And watch his t-shirt.
What?
What?
What is going on there?
Exactly.
You see that, right?
That's his right.
He's supposed to be getting shot over here.
His right t-shirt goes up like that.
That doesn't make any sense.
Also, Frank Turek is supposed to be FaceTiming, and it's obvious he's not FaceTiming.
Correct.
So do you, any commentary on that?
Yeah, I mean, I said a long time ago, if I had to try this case, and I've tried criminal defense cases in the past, and going back to what you were saying earlier, that's why we criminal defense attorneys tell people, stop talking.
Don't talk to anybody.
Because it's too hard to tie down a story perfectly that's going to exonerate you.
So just shut up and let us do it at trial.
But what I would do, if I was the criminal defense attorney, as I'm doing my opening statement, I would have the images I intend to introduce as evidence of the t-shirt puffed up in all these ways that are inconsistent with a gunshot.
Because all I'm trying to do is prove that he didn't die by 30-odd six from the Loci Center.
That's it.
I don't care how he died.
But if the t-shirt is inconsistent with a 30-odd six from the Loci Center, then my guy goes home.
Have you heard of any explanation about the t-shirt doing that?
Has anybody tried to give a lie about that yet?
Yeah, I mean, a million people have tried.
I don't say a million.
A lot of people have tried to shoot dummies and mannequins and try to get t-shirts to do that with a bullet.
It doesn't work.
The best explanation I've heard, the one that they'll probably go with at trial if it's raised, is that the neck cavitation would create some sort of pull on the chain and the t-shirt sufficient to cause it all to move simultaneously like that.
I don't buy that.
I think it's ludicrous.
It defies, in my opinion, physics and common sense.
It doesn't look like the t-shirt's being pulled by neck cavitation.
It looks like it's being blown open by some sort of gas or some sort of charge or discharge under the shirt.
And if anybody knows how to make pagers explode, we know of a certain Middle Eastern country that knows how to do that.
And it seems like that that's exactly what happened.
Any commentary on Frank Turek lying about him being him FaceTiming?
I think Frank Turik is a fundamentally dishonest person.
He has been caught in so many lies over the course of this thing.
That's clearly not FaceTime.
Everyone knows that.
He actually was seen FaceTiming on the other side of the courtyard earlier, and it looked like he was FaceTiming.
It looked plain as day.
You could see the images on the screen.
You could see the transmission.
There's nothing on that screen right there.
I have no idea what he's doing.
I don't know if he's using his cell phone as some sort of wireless tether to provide a better signal.
I don't know what he's doing.
I saw another person analyze this very video, and they said that you can kind of make out at certain points what's on his phone, and it looked like a feed from a drone that was because they matched up the picture on his phone with the picture that they had from this other drone.
And so that's what someone, I don't know if you've ever seen that.
Have you seen anybody saying that?
I have.
I don't know that I buy it.
Okay.
Routers Watching You00:03:32
But I, but I know that I don't buy FaceTime either.
Yeah, it's not FaceTime.
So the Gray Zone did a great investigative report about how things in your house are spying on you.
You think I'm kidding?
Oh, here.
I know.
You're being spied on.
Here we go.
So I'm sure many of you saw the Ring Super Bowl commercial where they showed how Amazon's Ring cameras basically surveil entire neighborhoods through this feature called Search Party.
The way it works is a user will upload an image of something that's lost, and then all of the Ring cameras in the vicinity will scan through their footage to see if that thing passed in front of them.
Critical observers were quick to point out that this could be used to surveil everyone, but it's not even just Ring that's watching us.
Here are some common consumer items that you probably didn't know are watching you right now.
Modern TVs have something in the terms of service called automatic content recognition, which basically just means the TV screenshots everything you play on it, whether it be YouTube, Netflix, video games, or even something you watch by plugging your laptop into it.
And disconnecting your TV from the internet won't turn this feature off.
Just last month, major TV manufacturers were sued in Texas for screenshotting users' screens every 500 milliseconds.
Your car.
Modern cars are basically like 100 different computers mounted on wheels.
They track everything from your location, how fast you drive, how hard you break, but also things like your race, your health, your weight, your sexual activity, even your trade union membership.
The Halt Drunk Driving Act mandates that by 2026, all new cars will have a mechanism that automatically turns the car off if it deems someone unfit to drive.
Your router.
Xfinity recently rolled out its Wi-Fi.
And there's nothing you can do.
You just have to take it.
So, right?
I mean, if I buy a car, they can turn off my car.
Well, doesn't it make you actually want to buy older cars, older vehicles?
It does now.
And like, doesn't it make you actually want to get rid of your cell phone and use an answering machine?
I mean, it makes me want to go back to what?
The early 90s?
It makes me want to go back to, I don't know, at least 2010.
How about that?
I'll go 2010.
Obama was president.
Everybody was feeling good.
We're getting healthcare.
Yank.
Remember, Obama's going to get his healthcare with a public option.
Yank.
Okay, here.
Five motion feature, which essentially turns your router into a motion tracker.
It works by monitoring the signal strength between your router and its connected devices, like your computer.
If someone walks past your router and disrupts the signal, the router detects this, essentially turning it into a motion tracker.
Several ISPs are rolling out similar features, and it's being marketed as a home security feature.
Smartwatches.
People use smartwatches to track their health, to monitor their heart rate or how many steps they've taken.
But this information can just as easily be used to create a detailed map of one's life.
For example, you could use this data to figure out when someone eats, when they sleep, when they're nervous, when they're lying, what kind of drugs they take, etc.
Smartwatch data has actually already been used as evidence in several criminal cases.
The point is, the Orwellian surveillance state isn't going to be announced one day in a presidential address.
Surveillance State Secrets00:03:14
It's already being set up in our homes with our quiet consent under the guise of convenience and security.
The average American has 17 smart devices in their home already, and a lot of these companies have cooperation agreements with law enforcement.
All it would take is some catalyzing security event for this infrastructure to be weaponized against us.
So, this is really a sobering reminder that while we fight about Super Bowl halftime shows and Democrats versus Republicans, under the national surveillance state, they see us all as equals.