Pam Bondi COMPLETELY MELTS DOWN Under Thomas Massie's Questioning!
Pam Bondi evades Thomas Massie’s Epstein-related allegations in a congressional hearing, deflecting claims about redacted names—like Les Wexner’s (4,000+ FBI mentions) and Sultan Ahmed bin Salayim’s torture ties—while ignoring victims’ unredacted suffering. Massie links Wexner’s protection to Epstein’s alleged connections with powerful figures like the Rothschilds and foreign governments, exposing DOJ transparency failures. Meanwhile, Erica Franz’s deleted 2013 texts to a 15-year-old girl—including grooming-like language—raise questions about unaddressed trafficking claims, contrasting with Charlie Sheen’s acknowledged abuses. The episode underscores systemic cover-ups and intellectual hypocrisy, where credibility often outweighs accountability. [Automatically generated summary]
Markisemannen has since 1956 been able to get a quality, a good job, and a good result.
We are proud of the way to call us a team in the solskjerm.
Now we're going to get our winter sale.
Set the farge on the morset with up to 45% rebate on several of our bestsellers.
Both in and out.
We do everything from start to finish.
From finish to finish.
See the campaign and buy gratis the best price in today on markisemannen.no Come see me on tour.
I'll be in Lansing, Milwaukee, Albuquerque, Houston, Dallas, Salt Lake City, Las Vegas.
Go to jimmydoor.com for a link for tickets.
If you go anywhere else, you're going to pay more.
Establishment media sucks.
All gaslighting, so good luck.
Bullshit we can't afford.
He's fomenting this.
Watch and see as he's jacked off.
The media speeds and jumps the medium and hits them head on.
It's the Chimitor Show.
Here is Massey gonna completely embarrass the Department of Justice for covering up the redacted names of the PDF files or the alleged co-conspirators with Jeffrey Epstein.
So we now he got it redacted.
They redacted a sultan's name from the Emirates, right?
He's a sultan from the Emirate of Dubai.
Okay.
And so watch him.
Watch.
Massey is going to just wreck her.
Pam Bondi, as they say, unravels under questioning by Thomas Massey.
You want to see this?
This is pretty amazing.
And all she has left is to try to insult him.
And well, let's watch.
Are you able to track who and your organization made this massive failure and release the victims' names?
Are you able to track who it was?
So they already released all these victim names, the Department of Justice, which they were not supposed to do.
But at the same time, they are redacting the co-conspirators, you know, the guys, everybody's names they want to know.
People who are not victims, they're redacting, but they unredacted the victims' names.
And so he's putting the heat on Pam Bondi.
Do you know who did this?
Are you able to track who and your organization did me this massive failure and release the victims' names?
Are you able to track who it was that obscured Les Wexner's name as a co-conspirator in an FBI document?
Do you have that kind of accountability?
I believe Wexner's name was listed more than 4,000 times.
About I had to-yeah, I already told you that.
This is where he's listed as a family.
I'll finish my answer.
Come on, let me finish my answer.
We corrected that within 40 minutes.
He was already acting like everybody's trying to cover up Wexner's name.
Reclaiming, reclaiming my time.
I'm going to answer this question.
Reclaiming my time.
He was how this works.
Can I have my time?
He was.
Mr. Chairman, the gentlelady can give her answer.
The time belongs to the gentleman from the corner.
All right.
I'm reclaiming my time.
I'll get my answer.
So I'm going to put the language of the bill up on the screen.
Chairman, may I get the answer on that?
It's a political joke, and I need to give my answer on that.
We'll let the attorney general respond and then the gentleman can move to chairman's question.
Within 40 minutes, you asked me a question.
Within 40 minutes, Wexner's name was added back.
Within 40 minutes of me catching you red-handed.
There was one redaction.
And we invited you in.
This guy has trump derangement syndrome.
He needs to get you're a failed politician.
Chairman, please restore his time and remind the witness himself.
She calls him a failed politician.
So, what is the definition of a successful politician?
Does that mean they can all be found in a photo with Jeffrey Epstein?
That's exactly what it means.
That's right.
That's exactly what it means.
He's going to show.
So now Thomas Massey shows Kash Patel lying.
Watch this.
And remind the witnesses himself, there is no credible information.
None.
If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals.
So there's Kash Patel lying, saying there's no information that showed that Epstein trafficked to anybody else except himself.
Okay.
So now we know that's not true because the own FBI files list 20 co-conspirators.
Which we all know.
Why did everybody accept this?
Cash's Israeli beard won't let him prosecute, is why he that's right.
Here we go.
Is that your position as well?
So then he asks Pam Bondi, the attorney general, is that your position as well?
That there is no information implicating any other co-conspirators.
My position is any victim who comes forward, of course, we would love to hear from them.
1-800-CAL FBI.
Did you ask Merritt Garland that the last four years?
Did you talk about Epstein?
I'm reclaiming my time.
I'm glad you're asking about Merrick Garland.
You're going to reclaim when I don't answer questions.
This goes over four administrations.
You don't have to go back to Biden.
Let's go back to Obama.
Let's go back to George Bush.
This cover-up spans decades, and you are responsible for this portion of the future.
And that's where the money is.
I want to know at what point, at what point did the FBI and the DOJ decide that Lex Wesner was not a co-conspirator?
Because our Epstein Files Transparency Act requires you, please put it back on the screen, to release the internal decision about whether to prosecute him or not.
And it's not in the files, and it's not in the files for any of these other men.
I'm the gentleman who has expired.
May she answer?
So when they made the decision that he wasn't a co-conspirator, the law states, you're supposed to let us know the reasoning and the process you went through to come to that conclusion.
And they didn't.
They didn't.
And so they're breaking the law.
And here's her response: that her response is to call him a Trump derangement syndrome guy, to call him a failed politician.
This is how she's completely melting down here.
This is a real meltdown.
This is not the way.
The point is, you're supposed to remain cool under fire, Pam Bondi.
Even with your dodging questions, he got her to break, and now she's broken.
Here, let's watch.
And he's a hypocrite because he voted against the ban that we were talking about on deep fake AI porn.
Only two people voted against it, and you're one of them.
It's hypocritical on any level.
I don't even make the connection.
She just changes the subject.
That's it.
You know what?
Without even knowing about the AI fake porn ban, because Israelis own a bunch of the porn, so they're not going to ban porn.
It probably was a thing to not make like my great rap video I made of Kash Patel.
It's probably so you can't make fun of important people.
I bet you the real reason for whatever that fake Israel-approved ban was.
That's right.
So here's what Thomas Massey had to say after that.
I provided the evidence today that shows that his statements were false under oath.
Kash Patel's statements were false.
They are in possession.
They were in possession at the time.
And they're still in possession of evidence that other men participated in the sex trafficking.
Attorney General Bonnie didn't seem to directly answer that question.
What do you make of what she did say?
She didn't answer anything.
She came here just ready to talk about the Dow Jones and the NASDAQ, which seems kind of crazy to me.
And so here she is.
What's this guy's name?
I don't like this guy.
Yeah.
But he's a Democrat.
But watch how she melts down over him.
Watch this.
This is amazing.
They're all just asking questions that should be asked finally.
There are 32 names.
One is redacted.
31 are not.
So someone looked at it and decided to redact something.
And I will tell you that that is clearly intentional to intimidate these survivors and victims.
Now, in a interview last week.
How will you tell me that's intentional?
In an interview last week, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said that any victim that wants to speak with the department has done so, hopefully.
Well, thanks to the incredibly brave people sitting here behind you, we can actually ask them if that's true.
Now, with the survivors and victims who are here, please stand up one more time.
Just by show of hands, how many of you or your loved ones actually have met with the Department of Justice and provided testimony and estimate and evidence?
Zero.
None.
And of those of you who have not met, which is everyone, how many of you have reached out either individually or through a lawyer or representative to offer to provide testimony and evidence?
Oh, all of them.
All of them.
All of them.
And look at her just sitting there.
So this is the face of someone in government at the top of government, the Attorney General.
This is the face she makes when she's being proven to be involved in a cover-up of the biggest child PDF trafficking ring we've ever uncovered in the world.
As all the AGs before her, going back to Mueller, going back to all of them, they only get the job because they helped cover up a big person PDF file scam.
All these pieces of shit.
So this is the exact opposite of what Donald Trump and JD Vance promised when they ran for office, that they were going to be the most transparent administration in history.
And this is them covering up the very thing that his base cared about the most.
is her and him covering up the very thing that's what and so here's all the victims They all reached.
They said, did you hear?
Oh, call 1-800, the FBI.
We want to hear from you.
They did.
And they didn't interview one of them.
And by the way, the files where people did give tips to the FBI, those are the ones.
And some people are my friends and they're just being cautious, I understand, but I don't know why you would be at this point.
They're like, oh, well, this could be just a crazy person calling into the FBI.
Yeah.
You know what?
I think they exaggerate how many crazy people are calling in because it's a good way to hide all the victims of these Draculas that run your country.
Those of you, all of you who have reached out, how many of you were denied or ignored by the Department of Justice?
All of them.
All of them.
And despite the shameful and despicable efforts by Ms. Bondi and her department to intimidate you, how many of you are still willing to speak to the Department of Justice?
All of them.
Well, Ms. Bondi, it looks like you have some more witness time and I yield back.
We will go to the good gentleman from North Carolina, Congressman Knott.
Thank you.
Now watch.
She actually, they give her time to respond to what he just did, him revealing that they're covering this up and they have zero interest in actually talking to any of the victims.
He got her.
He exposed her.
And the only thing she can do is the most schoolgirl, high school level thing you can think of.
She changes the subject and starts to try to insult him.
Yeah, everybody there is a piece of garbage.
It's called government.
But try to stay on topic, Pam.
That's what that punk from the Atlantic Council, what's his dumb name?
Vlad Davidson, when I curb stomped him and they took the thing down, he tried to do schoolyard bullying to me like that.
Yeah.
You're not going to take me with that motherfucker.
Yo, I would destroy this bitch.
So let's watch this.
You have a moment, Congressman.
Did she have a moment?
Thank you.
Here we go.
Here's the photograph.
This is why he wanted to repeat everything that had been said previously on Epstein.
This is his state, New York.
You probably don't even know who this is.
Waheed Mohammed from Afghanistan.
Yes, because I'm no longer a prosecutor.
Convicted of assault.
Wow.
He represents New York.
Wow.
Yet he doesn't care about the illegal aliens convicted of crimes, assault and homicide.
No longer.
This has nothing to do with this hearing.
This is all she can do is deflect, distract, and change the subject.
This has nothing to do with the hearing.
She's talking about illegal immigration.
That's it.
We're a prosecutor, so he doesn't care about his constituents.
Here we go.
So it's not scoring points with anybody.
I haven't seen a meltdown like this in a long time.
You're not supposed to melt down like that, Pam.
You're supposed to stay cool.
So she brought this with her because she knew this was going to be her response to whatever they said, which was a non-response.
So there is your Trump administration at the top of the government.
They're running interference for the largest PDF trafficking ring in the world, and they're doing it right in your face.
And they think we're all as compromised as Cat Turd.
They all think that we have brain rot like Cat Turd does.
They all think that we're syccophants to Donald Trump instead of being loyal to the Constitution.
So there's a lot of creeps out there, Cat Turd being one of them.
He's like the leader.
That's an operative.
He's an operative.
He's an old.
We know that.
It's obvious.
I have a question.
Why does Pam Bondi have that photo ready to go?
That's right.
That's what I said.
She brought because she knew she wasn't going to respond to any of their actual questions or accusations.
She was going to her only thing, Kurt, is to change the subject, which is what she's doing.
And she had nothing about Massey?
Nothing.
She had nothing about, she couldn't defend herself about anything.
They didn't interview any of those victims, even though they lied and said they did.
And she's got nothing to say about it, being caught covering up this ring.
She got nothing to say about it.
So let's change the subject and try to distract you.
I'm going to just throw this wild speculation out there as a shaman.
This guy who's always been a piece of shit and his lame attack, which is not as good as Massey's, I bet this has worked out because he's part of the same people that would also go to Epstein Island and love Israel and all that bullshit.
So one thing I noticed is these people, like, this has been talking to MK Monarch victims who are all fans of Jimmy Doerr, the ones I talk to, they'll always tell me about how these things are worked out to do these little play acting things in these stupid, you know, in these hearings.
And you know, Massey's not in it because they get because they have to improv suddenly.
All right.
Torture Video Revelation00:16:08
Well, there you go.
And the fact that there's a sizable chunk of the Donald Trump MAGA base that completely rolled over on their principles and are loyal to Donald Trump instead of being loyal to the MAGA platform or to policies or to the Constitution show you that what that's called a cult.
So just like when people didn't want to believe that Joe Biden was demented and they lied and they repeated lies, that's a cult.
Same thing right here.
So if you're still going along with Donald Trump and Pam Bondi, you are a sycophant to power.
You have a fetish for Donald Trump.
You don't have loyalty to our country.
You don't have loyalty to our Constitution.
You don't have loyalty to the policies that Donald Trump ran on.
You have loyalty to a person.
That's called a cult.
That's the opposite of what you're supposed to do.
You are the swamp.
So now pieces of garbage like Cat Turd are the swamp.
And they're cheering on swampness.
They're cheering on the biggest cover-up of the biggest PDF ring in the world.
That's what those people are doing.
He always, what do you want to do?
You want to lose the midterms?
I mean, that's the kind of shit people are saying.
Yes, and I want it to burn the fuck down.
But he didn't lose it.
He was always an operative who tricked anyone that thought he wasn't.
He was always part of it.
If people talking this shit are in it, they're not dumb.
They're in on it.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydoorcompedy.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
So Thomas Massey is on a rampage, and he's calling out the DOJ for covering up perpetrators' names.
That's what he's doing.
So here is Representative Thomas Massey.
He reveals that Les Wexner, I don't know if you don't know who Les Wexner is.
He's a goblin.
He's a goblin.
What's the company?
The guy above Epstein.
What's the company?
Victoria's Secret.
He also Amber Crombie and Fitch.
The other guy in that traffic ring got acquitted.
So Les Wexner runs Victoria's Secret, and he appointed the guy who was running Abby Crombrie and Fitch.
I can't talk today.
And that guy who he appointed got arrested for being PDF file.
Well, no, he was trafficking the male model.
I don't know if PDF file is in that one.
It doesn't matter.
He's acquitted, so it's fine.
Yeah, okay.
Massey says the department.
So Representative Thomas Massey reveals that Les Wexner, the head of Victoria's Secret, has now been officially named as a co-conspirator in the Epstein child trafficking case.
Massey says the Department of Justice attorney Todd Blanche was pressured into unredacting Wexner's name after public pressure.
Massey now says Blanche, who's this deputy secretary of the Department of Justice or Deputy Attorney General, is that what they call him, is covering up the identities of four other major PDF files tied to Epstein's trafficking network.
Let's listen.
An example of something.
Maybe it wasn't intentional on their part.
I'd like to hear his take on the redaction of the CEO, who's listed as a co-conspirator in the 2019 child sex trafficking case.
So can I ask you, because, and I want to ask you, this is the same person, Todd Blanche also said about that tonight, that the document you're citing there has victim names in it.
Correct to say that's why there are redactions.
He said, we have just unredacted Les Wexner's name from this document, but his name already appears in the file thousands of other times.
And he says the Justice Department is hiding nothing.
Is that the retired CEO that you're referencing?
It is.
He unredacted it after I found it.
That's a problem.
And I'm glad they've admitted they made a mistake by redacting that.
So you're saying it was redacted when you went in there today.
And after you tweeted that, they unredacted it.
Correct.
Now he's got four other names he needs to unredact.
Did he respond?
So what happened was the FBI prepared the file, and then the Department of Justice went and redacted names that the FBI hadn't.
And then Massey got a look at it and he said, hey, why are you redacting Les Wexner's name?
Why?
And there's other four people.
You shouldn't be doing that.
So then the Department of Justice went in and re and then unredacted it.
So that's what's happened.
Okay.
That there's a list of 20 people, and there's four men in there that need to be unredacted.
Here's another troubling thing that I found.
Can you say who those four men are tonight?
I don't think they're well known.
And so if I did, it wouldn't matter, but I could probably say them on the floor of the house, but I'll give the DOJ a chance.
So the reason why he wants to say them on the floor of the house is because you can say anything on the floor of the house and you can't be held liable for it.
So you can slander someone, you can make false allegations, you can do anything you want, and you're protected because you can say anything you want on the floor of the house and nothing can happen to you.
So I think maybe that's the reason why he wants to make sure he's insulated from frivolous lawsuits.
Okay.
To do what they did in these two examples, where I've discovered something and now they've responded.
Okay.
So in response to my post on X today, the Department of Justice unredacted an FBI file that labels two individuals as co-conspirators.
Unredacted a file that lists several men who might be implicated.
Tacitly admitted that Sultan Ahmed bin Salayim was the sender of the torture videos.
So there is a torture video in the files that someone sent to Jeffrey Epstein.
And Jeffrey said, thanks for the torture video.
Well, now it turns out we know who they redacted his name.
It's the Sultan Ahmed bin Salim.
And find out what country he's from.
I'm going to guess.
And is it from United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia?
Where is he from?
Find out.
You got it?
You got it, right?
I don't think there should be any redactions.
I think every name should be revealed.
Why?
Because you have Trump derangement syndrome, Jimmy.
That's my guess.
Yeah, well, I'm on the list and I didn't have anything to do with it.
Me too.
Hey, I'm just an important, important person.
Okay?
Of course, he targets relevant, important people like me.
The more resistance you put to having your name out there, the more you look like you're on the bad side of this arrangement.
That's all I'm saying.
No, I brag my name's in it because I didn't do nothing wrong, but it's important.
So here is Todd Blanche.
He's the deputy attorney general.
He says the document you cite has numerous victims' names.
We have just unredacted Lex Wesner's name from the document, but his name already appears in the files thousands of times.
The DOJ is hiding nothing.
Well, he got community noted on that.
The cited document is an FBI email thread from 2019 discussing 10 potential co-conspirators in Epstein's case and contains no victim names.
So they're just redacting perpetrators' names.
Wexner's a victim.
So Thomas Massey says this is significant because Kash Patel testified to Congress that FBI had no evidence of other traffickers.
This is the FBI's own 2019 document listing Wexner as co-conspirator in child trafficking.
It wasn't unredacted until tonight.
Wow.
And here it is again.
He says, here, the Department of Justice acts as if they were justified in redacting the men's names simply because the document contains victims' names.
Tonight they learned you can redact victims' names while still publishing the other names per our law.
So he says the document you said, there he says the department is committed to transparent.
The document you cite has numerous victims' names.
We have just unredacted the non-victim names.
The DOJ unredacted some non-victim names in cited file post Massey's.
So after Massey said, hey, why are you redacting these perps names?
And then they unredacted them.
But some remain redacted.
Some still remain redacted.
Past errors exposed victims.
Transparency claim opinion past December 2025 deadline.
Okay.
Here's another one.
We looked at the document.
You know it's an email address that was redacted.
The law requires redactions for personally identifiable information, including if an email address.
And you know that the Sultan's name is available unredacted in the files.
So there was another community.
No, the government keeps getting community noted because they're lying constantly to cover up this PDF file ring.
The claimed justification is inapplicable.
Per the act, redacting language on the basis it's personally identifiable information is allowed only for victim info.
Moreover, the act doesn't require redactions.
It uses May.
So Massey says, until tonight, no one knew who sent the torture video to Epstein.
I went to the Department of Justice, unredacted the email, and reverse searched the email to discover it was a sultan.
Our law requires victims' information to be redacted, not information of men who sent Epstein torture porn.
Jimmy, I thought Netanyahu did it.
And I look like a fool now because of what this Todd Blanche and the rest of them.
So first of all, I'd like to apologize to BB, Netanyahu.
The torture video was not from him, as I thought.
And I'm sorry, BB.
I'd like to apologize to you and your pig wife and your goofy looking kid for that.
So previously known about Sultan, that guy, he's the DP.
He's the Emirate of Dubai.
He's an Emirate of Dubai.
He visited Epstein's townhouse on September 17, 2024.
Same day Bill Gates was logged there.
His name appeared in message pads and some redacted emails.
His ties were framed as post-conviction, business, social contact, no public allegations of involvement in abuse.
What's newly unredacted, revealed due to Representative Thomas Massey's direct pressure on the Department of Justice?
Well, over a decade of close ongoing contact with Epstein's after Epstein's 2008 conviction, emails discussing personal SEX experiences, Masseuse's business networking, including Mandelson and Barack.
So that's Mandelson, the guy who just got sacked in England over this scandal, and Ehud Barak, the former prime minister of Israel.
DNA kits, sacred artifacts, and potential intelligence-linked investments.
Ben Soliaman sent Epstein a torture video email in a now unredacted email.
Newly public photo of Epstein and Ben Solomon examining cloth resembling the Kiswa.
That's a sacred Kaaba covering.
No hard evidence yet that Ben Solomon participated in Epstein's trafficking abuse, but the depth and duration of post-conviction contact is far more extensive than previously understood.
Massey personally reviewed the files, identified the redacted sender, and forced transparency.
Massey is the enemy of lizards everywhere, isn't he?
Yeah.
So James Lee says, I can't think of any other reason why the Department of Justice redacted Lex Westner's name other than, of course, to protect Israel.
Wow, that's James Lee is a financial, fanatical white supremacist, doesn't he?
Isn't he?
His far-right nonsense, Jimmy, and his woke far-rightness, it's becoming a real problem.
What was already known was that Wexner's extensive financial and personal ties to Epstein have been public for years, since 2019, reporting in the New York Times, Bloomberg, and in civil lawsuits.
Epstein had full power of attorney over Wexner's finances for over a decade.
Wexner provided Epstein with the Manhattan Townhouse valued at $77 million.
You know that Epstein lived in the biggest private house in Manhattan, and it was given to him by Les Wexner, apparently.
You know why?
Allegations surfaced in Virginia Guffray's deposition and Maria Farmer's accounts that Epstein used Victoria's secret connections for recruitment.
Wexner's name appeared in flight logs, the Black Book, and prior unreleased docs, but always in the context of association, not criminal conspiracy.
Yeah, so Epstein, they made it look like he victimized this lonely old man with some gay hijinks in the Netflix documentary.
That's how they try to put it out there.
But no, Wexner was initiating Epstein into the thing.
The mega group is above Israel.
Israel exists because of the mega group.
So because Epstein is the spokesman of the Rothschilds, he's going to have to go through some weird shit, and that's why he's given the townhouse.
Epstein, as we've seen, is not really impressive intellectually on any level because he's a puppet.
He's not.
So that's why they're protecting Wexner.
That guy is a demon.
That's right.
So what is new?
Well, what's new is that Massey and Rokana confirmed today that unredacted FBI materials explicitly label Wexner and others as co-conspirators in the trafficking operation.
This goes beyond prior public knowledge.
No official law enforcement document had previously used that terminology for any male associate, calling them co-conspirators.
The fact that the Department of Justice initially redacted Wexner's name, described only as a well-known retired CEO, and then unredacted it today after Massey's public pressure further underscores that this level of detail was not previously released.
Massey also reiterated there are at least six men's names in the materials that appear incriminating beyond mere association, with one tied to a foreign government.
None of these specifics were confirmed in prior releases.
So while many suspected deeper involvement based on the known ties, the former FBI co-conspirator framing and the additional names are genuinely new from today's congressional review.
More lawmakers are reviewing tomorrow, so expect potential further disclosures.
Erica And The 15-Year-Old00:09:43
Wow.
Whitney Webb's, this is a reminder that Whitney Webb in April 28th of 2020, she said, here's your reminder that Leslie Wexner financed the mass grape and trafficking of thousands of American children for over a decade.
And right now, he is sitting in a 26,000 square foot mansion in New Albany, Ohio, thinking that he is above the law.
She said that in April of 2020.
Whitney Webb, always light years ahead of the rest of us.
I mean, she really did put out a lot of great info that is born out to be the truth, hasn't it?
So we got more on Erica Kirk, and it turns out that a lot of people think she was brooming, replaced B with a G, a young 15-year-old girl, because that's what it looks like.
And I'll show you here.
James Lee talked about this a little.
We'll talk about it here.
These are the alleged texts between Erica Kirk and a 15-year-old back in 2013.
Let me call you on.
So Erica Kirk was 25 years old, and she had a relationship with a 15-year-old girl.
And these have surfaced now, these text messages and tweets.
And none of it looks good.
It looks like, you remember how what she was doing in Romania?
People were accusing her of trafficking in Romania at her orphanage.
Well, and that where her orphanage was the center of trafficking in that area.
Well, why?
One place known for Andrew Tate.
Yes, watch this.
And hold, sweetheart.
Give me a sex.
Wow.
Okay, laughing emoji.
Sec, sex too, but not from you, lol.
Holy shit.
You always make me laugh.
Erica responds, I don't bat for the other team.
So let me show you this.
So this is our text messages.
This is Erica.
She's talking to the 15-year-old girl.
She says, let me call you.
Hold on, sweetheart.
Give me a sex.
Wow.
Okay.
She goes, sec, sex too, but not from you, LOL.
What?
Transparent move that she made to go give me a sex.
She goes, dude, and then she goes, I don't bat for the other team just yet.
That's not trad, Jimmy.
That's not very trad of her.
Sounds like, sounds like lesbian brooming.
Shalom Shabbat.
That's crazy.
Did she give her a Shlomiel Shlomael?
So there's more to this.
Just yet.
Once again, this is between a 25-year-old and a 15-year-old.
Here's another text exchange.
You have the most stunning features.
Best compliment ever.
Erica writes, your eyes, your lips, your skin, you're absolutely beautiful.
Jill responds, crying emoji, you're making me cry.
I mean, if that was your 15-year-old daughter, would you want her to be getting these kinds of messages from a 25-year-old?
I don't know.
Jill tweets, why did Erica Franzfe just send me this?
And the meme here is.
So Erica sent this to this girl.
This girl then tweets it out and says, why did Erica just send this to me with all these?
What are those emojis?
It's like the five stages of grief.
I don't know.
They're all different.
And who's the girl's name?
What's name?
But the girl's name is Jill Jill Facon, who's now of age.
So then she says, this Valentine's Day, I'm going to touch your butt.
That's what Erica, a 25-year-old woman, sent to a 15-year-old girl.
Right.
Well, she's after telling how pretty she is, what great skin she has, her lips, her eyes.
Whoa.
Okay, here.
We keep going.
Emo, this Valentine's Day, I'm going to touch your butt.
I don't want to just throw out the term grooming haphazardly, but this just, it doesn't look good.
I forgot to tell you, hydrate tonight, no alcohol, and don't eat a lot of salty foods.
You don't want to look bloated.
Jill responds, thank you.
Erica responds, no alcohol.
Really, Erica?
Age recognition twat waffle.
Apparently, I haven't had my coffee yet.
What the hell, Erica?
Well, on that bite, note, damn you, Siri.
Come on.
Hashtag the struggle.
What are you trying to say?
Spit it out, you twat waffle.
I don't know what that means.
I suppose it could be interpreted a number.
I don't know.
Wasn't Twat Waffle?
Wasn't that the name of the kid they were going to replace Charlie Kirk with?
That's right.
Bryland Twat Waffle.
I think that's what it is.
Twat Waffle.
And he wasn't very careful.
I think Twat Waffles and Saudis, that's her traditional groomer breakfast.
Am I wrong about that?
Her name's German.
Is it not Franz V. That's just Miss Arizona practicing her talent portion of the pageant.
Her talent is duping children into serving themselves up to cannibal vampire elites.
I think that's her talent.
Let's go.
Well, Arizona is a state that is one of the number one for that type of thing.
Yeah.
So you know.
Of different ways from very innocent to not so innocent.
But what I will say is that I would probably not be sending these kinds of messages to a minor.
So either would I.
Yeah.
Either would I.
But I just want, there's some more stuff that he didn't get, he didn't touch on.
Here's another one.
So that's that girl and her friend.
And they tweet out, Erica Franz dying because you're so pretty.
That's what they.
Is Erica Kirk Destiny, the shitty streamer?
And then Erica Kirk responded, but she deleted all her correspondences with this girl.
And so then this girl responds saying, we miss you too.
I'm dying because you're so pretty.
Now, a 15-year-old probably doesn't understand why in the hell a grown adult woman is saying these things to her.
So this is her.
This is Erica Franz's post is deleted.
She says, Erica Franz, I fell in love with the world in you.
Okay, she should go to prison for saying that to a 15-year-old.
No, no, that's what she said.
That's what Jill Falcone said to Erica.
Okay, then Erica has to be put in prison even more now.
That's crazy.
So it looks like, but it's in quotes.
So maybe Erica did say it to me.
No, she said that to her.
So Erica said that.
Erica said that to her.
That's what that means.
Erica said, I fell in love with the world in you.
That's like the kind of poetry you fucking say when you're going to crush on somebody.
You know, usually not a child, but.
Here's another one.
I just want to curl up in a ball and cry because of how perfect Erica France is.
That's what that girl tweets.
Erica responds.
She deleted it.
And then Erica France says, you too love.
So what?
Here's another one.
Quote, Erica France, one day I'm going to wake up, roll over on my side and kiss the love of my life.
Good morning.
Hey, Erica's single now.
There's still time.
What is going on?
By the way, this all got discovered by this woman called Nissy Social, N-I-S-S-C-E-E Social on YouTube.
So she discovered, as far as I know, she's the one who discovered all this.
So here's another one she sent.
Did you see this, Kurt?
Thank you, Erica Franz, for making my whole week.
And I'm guessing this is the thing that Erica had sent her.
And it said, I want to be inside your lady garden.
Noam saying, Noam.
Noam Chomsky, I'm saying.
Noam saying.
Does Erica have a dick?
Is she like the French first lady?
What is going on?
How would she even get in there?
Well, I don't understand what lesbians do, Jimmy.
I'm sorry.
I don't know what they do.
So here's the girl.
So here's the girl.
She's with the guy.
And she tweeted out a picture of her and this guy.
It says, Miss you, Goon.
So she's saying, she's saying to this guy, Miss you, Goon.
And then Erica texted her saying, did Erica just text me?
Hashtag no new friends.
Oh my FG, I can't.
So she's saying that after she tweeted this out, Erica Kirk sent her a text saying no new friends.
Yeah.
If Charlie Sheen sent this to your daughter, there wouldn't even be a question of what this was.
Wouldn't even be.
Here's another.
So, right.
Getting this in the mail from Erica France.
Erica France sent her chocolates and a note for her birthday.
Like something you would send a girlfriend.
And the birthday card says, happy, sweet 16, beautiful girl.
Keep strong in faith and know you're loved.
But most of all, never forget that you are perfect and amazing just the way you are.
I am so proud of you.
Today is the first day of another 365-day journey around the sun.
Enjoy the trip, Boo.
Love you, E. Come on, Boo.
To a 15-year-old girl.
Oh, my goodness.
Here's my.
I told you so to some friends of mine.
I cannot wait, Jimmy.
You have the most stunning features.
Your eyes, your lips, your skin.
You're absolutely beautiful.
Official Records Confirm00:04:27
So that all just seems bad.
That doesn't seem good.
And then I guess the girl didn't bite hard enough and Erica just let her go.
And so now, and so now years later, that girl says that she was never trafficked.
So good.
So there's that.
So that's good.
I thought she escaped the clutches.
Charlie wasn't that lucky, was he?
Somebody made this point.
People notice that Erica Kirk has removed the wedding photo with Charlie Kirk from behind his bookshelf.
So there's Charlie sitting there.
There's their wedding photo.
Here she is.
No wedding photo.
Whoa, huh?
Screenshots compare old episodes of the Charlie Kirk show showing the framed wedding photo of Erica and Charlie Kirk with recent footage where Erica hosts and the spot sits empty.
This comes amid an ongoing feud with Candace Owens, who questions Erica's circle's actions on the day of the September 10th, 2025 shooting at Utah Valley University, alleging warnings went unheeded.
Conservatives remain split, with some, like Stew Peters, echoing suspicions, while others, like Laura Loomer, call Owens' claims depraved.
Official records confirm suspect Tyler Robinson acted alone over political differences.
So this is what Grok does.
Nobody asked you about this.
Grock just throws this in.
Official records confirm what official records?
First of all, no one asked you about Tyler Robinson, Grok.
And what are the official records?
You mean like a law that says innocent until proven guilty?
You mean like that official record?
What are you talking about?
Official records confirm that Tyler Robinson acted alone over political.
So that's, I just wanted to point that out.
I thought that was crazy.
But anyway, there's so there's it's it's it's Erica Kirk again, every bad feeling you have about her is confirmed.
Yeah, I just was texting my friend.
I told you so with a long ha and then I continue it.
Every bad feeling you got about her.
Every time she talks and you feel like you need a shower after listening to her, you were right.
She is the gross of the gross.
She's a nefarious, and I wouldn't doubt if she's MK monarched.
Well, no wonder she celebrated with fireworks.
Her husband's murder.
Yeah.
Is everyone an idiot?
Yeah, you are.
And how does a 17-year-old beauty queen start running an orphanage in Romania that's been linked to trafficking?
Also, she lived in China.
Also, she lived in Puerto Rico.
Also, she lived in Arizona.
Also, she lived in Hermosa Beach, but Venice Beach.
Yeah.
And her scumbag parents worked for Raytheon.
And her cousins are the Ross General Crime family.
And she also had a job in New York City with one of the top commercial real estate players.
So this sounds to me 100% intelligence.
Am I wrong, Kurt?
Not only are you right, Jimmy, I was just texting my friend Kerry.
Shout out to Kerry.
You'll be getting this video as soon as it's up of me going, I told you so.
Carrie, I told you so.
Carrie Smith, I told you.
All right, see you at work Monday.
Okay.
He works on my show.
Oh, okay.
All right.
I was right, Carrie Me.
Christian Parenti is an investigative journalist, academic, and the author of several books, including Lockdown America: Police and Prisons in the Age of Crisis.
He's reported from various locations such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Venezuela, and China.
And his work has been featured in the HBO documentary, Fixer, the taking of Ajoma.
Oh, I can't say that name.
It happens every time.
Currently, he is a professor of economics at John Jay College Criminal Justice in New York City and the son of Michael Parenti.
Please welcome back to the show, Christian Parenti.
Hello, Jimmy, and hello, everyone.
Christian Parenti Reveals00:07:52
So now we did, I'll put a link in the description, a description of this that we did a tribute to your father, who's just, he's a real leftist, right?
And he was a real advocate for the working man, unlike some people.
Well, first of all, let me just, you know, Noam Chomsky turns up in the Epstein files, and it turns out that he was cavorting with the same people he claimed to be opposed to publicly, but privately, he's hanging out with all these people, Ehud Barak.
He's hanging out with Steve Bannon, who he called horrible things, and of course, Jeffrey Epstein.
But a lot of people have brought up your father's name in relation to Noam Chomsky and how Noam Chomsky kind of hung your father out to dry because he was the real doing the real duty of sticking up for workers and working coalitions and socialism.
And Noam Chomsky wasn't.
Do you have any comment on that?
Yeah, I mean, there was conflict between, or you know, intellectual differences between my father and Chomsky that went back to the questions about the JFK assassination.
After Oliver Stone's movie comes out in the late 80s, that initiates, even though it's just a Hollywood movie, that initiates a national conversation about the assassination.
And many left intellectuals weighed in.
And you would be surprised at the number who sought to shore up their credibility with the mainstream by poo-pooing the idea that is, you know, supported by enormous amounts of evidence that the Central Intelligence Agency was involved in a conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy.
And so my father was one of the few Marxist public intellectuals or intellectuals of any sort who went out and put their reputation on the line to say, no, the evidence suggests that the CIA had a large role in this conspiracy to kill the president.
And that's significant for a number of reasons.
For one thing, it tells us, if we look at it and study it, it can tell us something about how power works in this society.
Peter Dale Scott, professor at UC Berkeley, former Canadian diplomat, he was in the forefront of this, but the vast majority of leftists poo-pooed this.
Alexander Coburn, who in many ways I have a lot of respect for, he passed away 10 or 15 years ago, but was very critical of this.
He said in the nation, it doesn't matter how Kennedy died because he was an ardent anti-communist.
And Chomsky, the same thing.
And the fact of the matter is that Kennedy was changing.
And he did stuff like had a unilateral test ban treaty.
He opened a secret channel with the Soviets.
He was opening a secret channel negotiation with Fidel in Cuba.
He really, it seemed, wanted to de-escalate the Cold War and was assassinated in that.
He did not give the CIA sufficient support during the Bay of Pigs, had a conflict in the beginning of his presidency with the CIA over that, said that he wanted to smash the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the wind, fired Alan Dulles, who had been in charge of the CIA.
He was only the third director of the CIA.
He came in quite in the early 50s, quite early in the agency's history, and basically built the whole thing.
And Kennedy fired him.
So anyway, that was the beginning of differences between Chomsky and my father.
And then it also involved the fact that my father supported actually existing socialism, the Soviet Union, Sandinista, Nicaragua.
And it's not because he thought these were flawless societies, not at all.
If you read his book, Black Shirts in Red, you see he has very strident critiques of the Soviet Union, but he was very practical about how he saw the possibility of social change.
And he realized that this was not like some sort of like buffet menu where you could choose exactly the flavor of socialism you wanted and mix and match the qualities that you wanted.
Rather, you received history as it was with all of its flaws.
And my father thought it was not realistic to think that the world was going to be better off without these states.
And also he realized that places like the Soviet Union were evolving, just as the United States evolves, right?
I mean, the Soviet Union had some unbelievably horrible qualities to it, the purges, and which is like, you know, killing members of the party who were loyal to the revolution.
But, you know, that's not, that wasn't the entire history.
It's also evolving towards something more rational.
Same way the United States, if you say the United States, all you need to know about the United States was that it, you know, it had slavery.
It's like you need to know that the United States was built in large part on slavery.
But if you reduce your understanding of the country to that, it's totally inadequate.
The country has evolved for better and for worse.
I mean, in odd ways, you know, it's not that all evolution is good, but I mean, it's changing and evolving, right?
So those are the kinds of positions my father took.
And that was not cool with people like Chomsky, who criticized, who had a kind of like, you know, Chomsky called himself an anarcho-syndicalist or something like that.
And, you know, had a sort of a purist sense of being a leftist and criticized actually existing socialist regimes for their four real faults, but didn't support left forces in the same way here in the heart of the empire, or that's what my father's view of it would have been.
Yeah, that's also my view.
And, you know, of Chomsky dismissing inquiries into the JFK assassination is a red flag.
Just like he said, well, even if it was a conspiracy, who cares?
What?
Who cares who over who committed a coup on the United States government?
Who cares?
Who cares if their own intelligence agency was involved?
Who cares if another country was involved?
Who cares if Lyndon Baines Johnson, his vice president, was involved?
Who cares about that stuff?
That to me was a red flag, meaning that he was Chomsky definitely covering up for something.
He was there's that doesn't make because there's no other thing that makes sense unless he was compromised and he was covering up for that.
Just the way he dismissed all the legitimate inquiries into 9-11 or COVID or anything.
Yeah.
Would you agree with that?
Well, remember, and then he told, yeah, that horrible quote of you know, people who are unvaccinated, you know, it's up to them.
They should isolate themselves, they should be isolated from society.
And that when asked how they get food, he said that's their problem.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That was that was Chomsky's.
Yeah.
But I don't know.
I mean, whether or not, I mean, the whole idea that he was compromised, maybe, I don't know.
I don't, but you know, there's plenty of pressure on intellectuals prior to that kind of thing of being compromised, which is that, you know, folks want access.
They want to, they, they want to be to get publishing deals with publishing houses that are going to invest in their books.
They want to be respected as a dissident.
They want to have it both ways.
They want to be seen as a dissident and they want to have favorable reviews in the New York Times because that's how you get to be famous and sell books and have influence, right?
And so you learn early on, if you have any social sense and can read the room, that there are certain ideological lines that you don't cross.
Radical Academia's Third Rail00:03:10
And that at a certain point, you need to suspend your critical thinking and just realize like that's the third rail.
If you touch that, you are never going to be reviewed in the New York Times.
You are never going to be taken on by a large commercial house.
You're going to be relegated to small, independent publications, et cetera, right?
And my father was acutely aware of that.
And he was pugnacious enough and had a deep enough sense of fairness that, and a deep enough commitment to what he saw as the truth and critical inquiry that he wasn't going to curb, trim his sales to, you know, to try and get in the good favor of the gatekeepers.
I mean, to the father was red baited, was very severely red baited out of academia.
He was, you know, a star student at Yale.
He was part of a very legendary class of PhDs at Yale.
He was doing quite well, and then he became a radical and then a Marxist.
I mean, first of sort of like anti-war radical, but then a Marxist in the 70s.
And he was systematically red baited.
Now, when I say that, what am I talking about?
I'm talking about like how in three different jobs, he had the entire department, the dean, even the president of the university saying, We want to hire this guy.
And then the board of trustees would come in and say, No, can't hire this guy.
That's very rare.
When you have the entire institution saying, We want this person in our faculty, generally the board of trustees stays out of it.
But in three different cases, his candidacies for tenure-track jobs were killed by above the president of the university at the Board of Trustees.
And he was also involved in one incident in University of Illinois, Champlain, Urbana, with two other guys who, one of whom actually was, they were all suffering this red baiting for a number of years.
And then one of them, they were both my godfathers, Phil Moranto and Rocco Lombardi, John Lombardi.
John Lombardi, who was a chemist, and during one job he was applying for, some dean said afterwards, said, You know, we got a letter from the president of Champaign Urbana saying this guy, Lombardi, is a red.
You know, don't hire him.
And then Lombardi got a lawyer that threatened the next job that Lombardi applied for, which was actually City University of New York, CUNY.
And his lawyer said, you know, threatened Champlain Urbana, this president said, you know, we have a copy of this letter, and we're prepared to sue you if there's any interference in this job.
And there wasn't.
He got the job because he's a fantastic chemist.
He's sort of one of the best in his field.
But, you know, that's an indication that, oh, you know, Maranto and my father were also having similar problems.
Probably letters like that had gone around in their cases as well.
But so that's why when I use the term red baiting, when I use the term blacklisting, you know, I'm using it like sort of clinically, specifically, not kind of euphemistically.
Radical Abstraction Limits00:03:01
Right.
And so just to kind of put a button on it with Chomsky, that, you know, Chomsky enjoyed tenure, his whole career at MIT, and which we all know is infested with the CIA.
And so, whereas a fellow like Michael Parenti, your father, who was the real deal, was blackballed.
And in fact, he felt betrayed by academia, correct?
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, he felt he felt, yeah, he was iced out by his discipline, which, you know, he had been much appreciated in his discipline until he crossed a line.
And that line was defending actually existing socialism.
You know, that was, you know, descending from abstractions about socialism to actual elections, saying stuff in the mid-80s, like, you know, the Sandinistas not only in Nicaragua not only hold democratic elections, they hold elections that are more democratic than the United States because they allow all of this observation, you know, and foreign funding.
I mean, I mean, they're much more open than ours are.
You know, that was like, that was too much.
You know, you got to keep it at the realm of abstraction.
You can be quite radical at the realm of abstraction, but you start really pushing back against the actual policies of the government consistently like that.
And it gets much more intense.
And also, you know, defending the Soviet Union.
I mean, he wasn't without his criticisms of it, but that was just like, you could not do that.
And all those kind of frontline third international revolutions in Mozambique, in Angola, you know, the Cuban Revolution.
You know, my father had critiques of them, but he defended their right to pursue their own course of development.
He defended the right of those revolutions to exist.
And he drew attention instead to the U.S. Empire's efforts to murderously and illegally and dishonestly and through conspiracy undermine and destroy those revolutions in some of the most horrific ways possible through terrorism against civilians,
through terrorism against the social service apparatus and developmental economic developmental apparatus of these revolutions, you know, going in, going down and CIA funding the Contras in Nicaragua to go out and kill nurses, burn schools, you know, rape, rape, and kill American nuns.
At one time, that's when they went too far and there was finally some pushback from Congress and limits, some limits put on funding for the Contras in Nicaragua.
But that was going on in the 80s.
Was a whole front line of hot wars that the U.S. was covertly funding and were utterly murderous.
The Inimitable Mike McRae00:00:57
Hey, become a premium member, go to JimmyDoorComedy.com, sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
He can be found at MikeMcRae.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.