Jewish Group DEMANDS U.S. Taxpayers Fund October 7th Victims!
Guest host James Li and Americans' Comedian Kurt Metzger highlight how lobbying groups like the Anti Defamation League are pressuring Congress to unlock up to $4 billion from an American taxpayer fund, despite October 7th occurring on foreign soil and involving largely foreign nationals. The hosts argue that the proposal would inflame public anger, deepen anti-Israel sentiment, and fuel the political machinery that profits from perpetual outrage and accusations of antisemitism. Ultimately, they warn that this move could tear at America's social fabric while being used to justify expanding surveillance, censorship, and political control. Plus segments on the curious geographic source of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Twitter page, the Trump administration's betrayal of the MAHA movement over pesticides and Trump's threats of execution against Democratic Members of Congress for alleged acts of sedition. Also featuring Chris Keene!
Now it's Black Friday at Kjell's Markiser, and you can spare up to 50% on our bestsellers.
The whole month we give you up to half a price on Norges most solskjerming.
Terrassemarkise, screddersidegardiner, sip screens and plisségardiner.
And you, we have also a dreamer-to-bud on a well-isolered garageport in premium-quality.
Since 1978 has we delivered norsk-produced solskjerming with kvalitet and omtanke.
See the whole campaign and besties gratis-befaring on Kjell's Markiser.no.
Come see me on tour in Pottstown, Pennsylvania, Waikiki, Hawaii, and the Comedy Store in Los Angeles.
Go to JimmyDore.com for a link for tickets.
Watch and see as Jack off the medium speeds and jumps the medium and hits them head-on.
It's the Jimmy Door show.
All right, welcome back to the Jimmy Door show.
My name is James Lee, guest hosting for Jimmy Today.
We also got the great Kurt Metzger here.
And let's talk about what the U.S. government is up to next.
Apparently, there are some people out there that want to make it so that the U.S. taxpayer will have to pay the victims of October 7th.
Not that we're downplaying what they experienced on October 7th, but why would the U.S. want to, or why would the U.S. be responsible for that?
Let's take a listen from one of the 9-11 survivors here, and then we'll discuss on the other side.
My October 7th victims are in my Congress lobbying Congress and writing legislation that harms the rights of 9-11 widows and children.
They're writing legislation to change this government fund that's supposed to be for American victims of terrorism.
From September the 11th to October the 7th, foreigners will get some of this money now.
The world are dual citizens and they're trying to expand the laws.
I don't know much about Israel's Congress or their laws, but like, why aren't they in Israel lobbying their Congress?
Why aren't they in Israel using Israel's?
Why would the United States taxpayer pay the victims of October 7th?
If you want to be compensated, that's fine, but don't harm the rights of the widows and kids.
That's right.
Why would that's a great, that's a great question.
Why would the United States government pay for the victims of October 7th?
Let's take a look at the reasoning for that.
So evidently, this is from Gen X Girl.
The ADL is the one behind this.
They're trying to get U.S. taxpayers to pay $4 billion to Israeli October 7th victims through the U.S. Victims of State Sponsored Terrorism Act.
Okay, so for more information about this, this is from the Information Liberation by Chris Minahan here.
Quote, the Anti-Defamation League is seeking to drain the U.S. victims of state-sponsored terrorism fund of billions of dollars in response to Hamas's attack on Israelis in Israel on October 7th.
The ADL, which successfully lobbied the U.S. government to designate Hamas a foreign terrorist organization, is now exploiting Hamas's terror designation and the fact that some of the Israelis killed in Israel have dual citizenship in America to empty America's fund for U.S. terror victims.
Quote, Iran is the world's leading state sponsor of anti-Semitism and terror alongside Syria and North Korea, and they must be held responsible for their roles in the largest anti-Semitic attacks since the Holocaust.
ADL chief executive Jonathan Greenblatt said in a statement.
Yeah.
And if the defendants are found liable, the plaintiffs hope to tap into the U.S. victims of state-sponsored terrorism fund, which Congress created in 2015 to compensate individuals who have won judgments against state sponsors of terrorism.
Monday's lawsuit seeks at least $1 billion of compensatory damages and $3 billion of punitive damages.
Wow.
Okay.
So that is what they're trying to do.
They're basically trying to, once again, say that we need to pay for their shit.
I don't get this.
By the way, a spy organization.
Did you do the great video about ADL?
Was this somebody else I love?
Yeah, no, yeah.
History is so foul on every level.
Beginning, right?
I mean, it's controversial to talk about with the Leo Frank, right?
He did it.
Leo Frank did it, allegedly, right?
I mean, the deep South were like, hey, how do you frame a black guy?
That's messed up.
You know how evil you got to be for a bunch of white suckers.
Well, they tried to blame.
They tried to frame the black guy, but it didn't work, right?
They still.
He was already convicted when they lynched him.
I guess so.
What they're saying, essentially, if we're to talk about that case, is that the U.S. population, the jurors, were more, I guess, more anti-Semitic than they were more anti-black.
That's kind of what they're insinuating.
You know what?
And they call their group the Anti-Defamation League, not the Innocence Project or something, right?
They call it because that should be fake.
It's Benefit Brith.
It's ironic because all they do is defame people.
They just defame people all day.
That's their job.
That tells you what it is.
It's from Benai Brith, which is the Zionist wing of the Freemasons back then.
So it's a scumbag group.
They've always been spies and filled with, and that guy is the worst, Jonathan Greenblatt.
I mean, Abe Foxman was a piece of shit, but wow, this Greenblatt.
I mean, Jonathan Greenblatt, if his job, if you were to say he's the CEO of the anti-defamation leagues, and supposedly what they do, their whole job is to basically reduce anti-Semitism.
Anti-Semitism, by his account, has skyrocketed, however they want to measure it.
So that's actually really bad.
So you should get fired from your job because you're not actually doing a good job.
You should get somebody else in there that's actually going to fix the problem.
You know how we never win a war and yet they get more money every year?
Exactly.
No, I mean, this is what I covered in my expose is that it essentially functions as an industrial complex, the anti-Semitism industrial complex, and that they need to create more anti-Semitism in order to bring it to the United States.
This is the colonialist of Israel.
It's their fuel.
They need it.
You have to drill for more anti-Semitism like it was natural gas to run that golem that they've created, which is a trauma-based mind control creature that depends on you living in 1948 in your head all the time.
Now it's going to depend on October 7th in your head.
But the problem is, Israelis, if you go look at their news, they know something's up with October 7th.
Only the morons here think it's how B.B. Netanyahu would tell you.
In Israel, they know the difference.
They're remarkably forthcoming in their reporting about the things they do over there compared to here.
Well, this is what, I mean, this is what really grinds my gears is that they keep saying, and then they meaning Israel, that they don't need American support.
They're good on their own.
They don't need any of our money.
And so here's another situation.
I mean, I want to take it.
Why do they need to tap in?
Like, why do we need to give them $4 billion as what?
Restitution for the victims of October 7th from U.S. taxpayers?
Because everything is to do that.
I mean, like, what do you mean?
Why does we have to pay for Ukraine?
Why are we paying for?
I mean, just take your point.
Why are we paying for it?
Ukraine, they can make an argument, right?
That that is for U.S. national security, right?
Because of Russia, right?
It's a defense.
Ukraine is like a proxy for us.
So if it's, we rather have them fighting.
So we're going to give them the weapons.
It's good for our military industrial complex.
You know, I'm just spouting off the neocon arguments.
Okay.
They said it in the thing you just showed.
Right.
So what would be the justification here?
What would be, what's, how is this in our national security interests?
Or how would this be?
Maybe because you're an anti-Semite, you don't get it.
And I don't have to speak to you.
Even if you're a rabid, virulent anti-Semite.
That's anti-Semites.
I just don't see how you could possibly spin this as somehow in our interest to do this, right?
The other ones, okay.
I don't buy the arguments of the neocon, the pro-war guys, but at least there's an argument being made here.
It's just that, oh, because, you know, we want this.
And if you say no, you're going to be an anti-Semite.
So we're going to go ahead and do this to you.
What was the argument to replace Assad with a guy from Al-Qaeda that killed a bunch of Americans?
I mean, take any one of these absurd things.
I have no idea.
Well, it's all the coups and all the stuff.
It's for natural resources, right?
You could say, well, we want a guy in there who wants to give, who's cool with cutting it.
I think this is Tim Dylan.
He's like, we don't care about the terrorists as long as they cut us in on the deal, right?
Right.
That's why we left our stuff for the Taliban in Afghanistan because that's so lithium trying to go out there.
They're cutting us in on the deal.
So we're cool with that terrorist.
If they don't cut us in, we don't like it.
Right.
Well, and plus, a lot of them are assets that we created out of the gate.
And I mean, Boko, all of actually, Bozo, Boko Haram, that's a classic.
It just turned out to be from America.
The one that Give Us Back Our Girls campaign.
We made all of them with Israel.
And they're like job create.
I don't call them terrorists.
I call them job creators myself.
This will be a big problem.
I think this is one of those things that's really going to, once again, further fuel the anti-Israel sentiment, right?
Because under no argument can you make that's reasonable, would you say the American taxpayer should be responsible for this?
Well, it's meant to agitate people and create more anger.
Or that's the other point.
Is it to create more anti-Semitism?
Here's why.
They have to get as many.
The whole reason Israel's there in the first place was because the people, the Zionists behind it, wanted anti-Semitism stepped up because Jews weren't moving out.
They were moving to America.
And they need to make Jews here feel invested that if there's no Israel there, like that Israel keeps them safe, which demonstrably it does not, by the way, has never historically kept any Jews safe.
It's called the Hannibal Directive.
I don't know.
Look it up.
But believing that.
So if they can make you, your American diaspora, Jew living here, hey, I feel anti-Semitic Semitism all of a sudden.
Groups like the ADL are there to do evil, provocative shit like that at all times and be scumbag.
That's what they're there for.
Because then people get mad at that.
And then they say things about Jews.
And then regular Jews that have nothing to do with that can get to feel scared.
Maybe they were like, well, I better support Israel because everybody hates me.
You see the beautiful cycle?
Hawaii King cycle going on.
You know, it's just a very simple thing.
That's how they do it.
They deliberately tied it together these two things.
If you keep saying to people that the Israel, the Israelis are Jews, Jews are Israelis, there's no difference, and that you can't be critical of the Israeli government without being critical of Jews, then they're going to be basically liable for this genocide that has occurred here.
So then, of course, people are going to become more.
I'll be honest with you, the genocide thing, I got a little, I didn't want to call it that.
I wanted to call it ethnic cleansings.
I wasn't comfortable saying that, James.
That's a heavy thing to say.
But then if you look up the definition of it after World War II from the Holocaust that we all believe did, I certainly know happened because that's why they're so violent and awful over there now.
They're fulfilling the definition as defined by survivors of the Holocaust.
So I hope the irony is not lost on everyone.
It is.
Well, apparently the Holocaust, you guys covered this.
The Holocaust education has been bungled, apparently, according to Sarah Hurwitz, right?
Because now people are becoming too sympathetic to victims.
Oh, she's one of the best.
Yeah, right.
You know what Click I'm talking about?
It's what she's talking about how.
She has an amazing clip that I know I'll talk to some friend of mine that doesn't know anything and they didn't see it.
And if I show it to them, they'll just glaze out because they don't want to see it.
But it is truly amazing.
It's the thing that 20 years of not wanting to look into this, the things I watch them say blow my mind.
Not people exposing them, the people from Israel say insane things.
Proudly.
She's an American.
She's.
Yeah, but she's a dual paz woman, you know.
And she says, well, we, it's, it's, we've taken the wrong lesson away from the Holocaust education because never again.
That was the lesson I thought was never again.
No, no, no.
The lesson she wanted you to learn was, no, just for us, not anybody else.
We could do that if we want to other people.
You owe us, frankly, the world.
So that's, that's kind of, I mean, that, that's, I think this is troubling.
I mean, the reason why they think this is an important issue to cover is because this is like literally tearing the fabric of this country apart and people are not going to stand at this point.
It's about time.
This is what's going to cause more people to go into the street and riot because people's material conditions are continuing to degrade over time and they see this money right there.
They're going to get on the streets and then you're going to stop consenting.
Everybody could just stop consenting to other bullshit.
Well, this is how they're going to create the surveillance state, though, right?
This is how, because people are on the streets and then they're going to use that as justification to say, well, this is why we need all of these palantir, you know, made technologies to spawn you to see what people are saying online and everything like that.
Even though they couldn't catch Thomas Crooks, right?
He was saying literally very violent things on the internet.
They couldn't stop Magandi from becoming the mayor, though, all this.
Any last words on Israel before we move on?
I fully support Israel and obviously didn't kill Charlie Kirk.
And they're the last place that you should think would do that.
Yes.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week.
And it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
And it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
Let's talk about this huge fallout on X as far as foreign influence because of this new feature that they've rolled out that allows you to see the various countries where people have registered their account.
And there was one in particular that I think caught people's eye, right?
I'm joking.
There were a lot, which we'll get to, but one in particular that was sort of alarming when we saw that the official account of the Department of Homeland Security was registered in Israel on July of 2008 and connected via the Israeli app store.
Okay.
Very interesting.
Based in Tel Aviv.
Yeah.
Security is knee-deep in Israel, isn't it?
So, I mean, a lot of people say this actually makes a lot of sense, right?
Of course it's based in Israel.
Why not?
Why wouldn't it be?
Our best friend that we can trust.
But, and some people are saying this is fake.
So I just want to show people the screen recording that we have here to kind of prove it.
It's certainly far-fetched.
Yeah.
What the talking about?
Yeah.
So you can see them clicking around on X and it says it right there.
So that explains why there's so many of these new homeland security ICE shock troops that are from the IDF.
Did you see that in Chicago?
You know, they were recruiting people I previously thought with no military experience, just jerk offs with a $50,000 signing bonus.
And that's what those horrible videos we showed them on Jimmy's show of them attempting to round people off this, grab people off the street and the people getting away and they're wearing masks.
So by the way, no cop should be allowed to wear masks.
That's insane.
That's absolutely insane.
No, that is insane because then I could go and wear a mask and arrest people and say, oh, I'm detaining you for an ICE agent in the street grabbing people.
That's not a thing.
A cop's supposed to have their name on their goddamn badge.
So that's already dystopia territory.
Now, I was afraid, I was like, oh, they're just highly unqualified people and then they're trying to cover it up.
And I'm sure some of them are illegal immigrants.
But no, it's even better than that.
A bunch of them are IDF people.
So that'll really help the Beitar shit, right?
If we want these people out of here.
Yeah.
But okay, so here's what Grok.
Here's what, hold on a second here.
Okay, so Grok says that the video that we just saw shows the short-lived feature listing homeland security as based in Israel.
X removed this feature hours later.
We'll get to the, then they reinstated again.
But DHS is officially headquartered in Washington, D.C. with no confirmed operations basing it in Israel.
The listings cause and removal remain unconfirmed by officials.
And this is what I think potentially happened here is that evidently the location actually changes based on where you're traveling to.
So if you register in the U.S., but you're now in a country, it actually updates periodically.
And some people pointed out that this might be bad because it could dock somebody who's traveling.
But the official act spokesperson here, Nikita Beer, said that it's actually randomized and delayed to not make this possible.
So this could be what happened to the DHS because one thing that we do know, oh, before we get to that, it has since been scrubbed.
So now all official accounts that are associated with the government, they are no longer showing this location feature for, you know, whatever reason, national security, whatever.
But you'll see here that July 2008 was when this account was registered Twitter at the time, as it was called.
And who was the Secretary of Homeland Security in 2008?
It was a guy named Michael Chertoff.
He was serving under President George W. Bush between 2001 and 2009, a little bit before my time, but I'm sure people remember him.
So I did.
Back then.
Yeah.
Back then, everybody was saying we got to be more like Israel because these terrorists, the whole 9-11 time with George W. Bush, that's why everything is based in Tel Aviv because that's when they're like, we got to run our airlines, like the Tel Aviv, whatever their airline.
LL, yes.
We got to be like LL.
And then they would have these things where the teachers are armed with rifles in the classroom, which is total bullshit.
But this stuff got merged.
Oh, you know, the invention where you can take control of the plane from the grounds in case terrorists take it over?
That's his technology.
That was patented well before 9-11, unfortunately.
That's not a good detail.
But everything is extreme, extremely intertwined.
All of our security is.
Extremely.
Yes.
And that's by design because it makes it so that we are essentially beholden to them.
If we were able ever, you know, wake up one day and say, no, no, we don't want to be a part of this anymore.
We don't want to continue the same relationship.
All of our security technology and whole infrastructure is basically one with the Israelis.
So it's actually very difficult to even untangle that.
And that's by design.
I think that's the Israelis.
Maybe you can give them their cunning ability to do that.
And that was, I guess, smart of them to do.
I would say, George, because if you think about Clinton, he didn't want to give Pollard back.
And there was still some kind of semblance of we have a country that's not exactly well for Clinton.
They tried to blackmail him with the Monica Lewinsky tapes.
So that leads to obviously a theory is that was Monica placed in there by I say, of course she was.
Of course she was.
What else would that be?
I don't know.
Well, that's that's what I've made that claim before.
Some people think it's insane, but I say, hey, there's do they are they like trying to discredit the most obvious thing that any idiot could see if they look at a little bit of information.
It's not, oh, do you think DHS could have its shit headquartered in Tel Aviv?
Oh, that's so crazy.
That's like UFO crazy, dude.
We're not saying that it was.
I'm not even saying that it's headquartered in Tel Aviv.
I can definitely understand like this whole thing was probably Chertoff probably went over there.
It's like, oh, we're going to set up this new Department of Homeland Security, whatever it is.
And then so we're going to set up our Twitter.
He's over there on some trip in Israel getting all this shit.
And he's like, all right, let's set up that Twitter account now.
He's over there.
Just to look up.
So I just, anyways, I was digging into his past a little bit.
Very interesting that he was born to a Gershon Baruch Chertoff, a rabbi and Talmudic scholar who is the leader of the Congregation of Benai Israel in Elizabeth, New Jersey.
And his mother was a Polish-born Israeli American who was the first flight attendant for El Al.
He just mentioned.
So they're spawned.
Paternal grandparents are Paul Chertoff, a rabbi and professor of Talmud, and Esther Barish Chertoff.
So interesting familial connections.
The Bush doctrine is the Wolfowitz doctrine, aka the neocon doctrine.
As who's that whiny guy?
He's like, it's anti-Semitic to say neocon.
I'm forgetting his dumb name, but dude, that's when that all merged together.
All that creepy ass Christian Zionist thing like really metastasized around 9-11 time, if you notice, well, I remember it doing that.
Yeah.
And so now they're just saying that this is straight up.
People are calling that the post that I, because I made a post that kind of took off about this.
And they're like, oh, no, this is massive misinformation.
Of course, it's not based in Israel.
The Department of Homeland Security came out and denied it.
And I'm like, of course, they would deny.
It's like, you're going to trust that.
Oh, okay, it's closed, I guess.
Hey, Hampstead thing, there was more to it too, but I guess the trail went cold.
It's all the, it's all the 7K per post accounts.
All of them are like, oh, my God, you guys are insane.
Yeah, the 7K Club.
And you could tell who's, I, you know, I don't believe that.
You could tell who's in it because people that were formerly like UFO accounts now are just talking about how Tucker's bad.
That's not suspicious, right?
Well, you can see, and some of these accounts, so you could see through this.
It's not just this whole Israel thing, but now you can see the kind of, I guess you could say, infiltration from foreign countries now officially.
Yeah, they had a little fetal alcohol syndrome head.
Ian Miles Zhong.
That's screwhead Malaysia.
So he would get exposed by that new policy.
That's great.
Oh, America First is in Bangladesh.
And then you got Ultra MAGA Trump 2028 from Nigeria.
Nice.
And this other one, what is this?
MAGA MAGASCOPE BALSO based in Nigeria.
So you can see, I mean, this is because Twitter or X is sort of where the quote-unquote elite discourse happens, where people like battle it out in the so-called public square.
But now you see the people going to battle are literally from other countries that have nothing to do with the United States, injecting discourse and propaganda and all kinds of garbage.
Sucking up to like that Emil Straws is famous for sucking up to Elon on Twitter to like worm his way in.
But yeah, I mean, they're all fake.
Everybody's like, oh, this is a psyop.
The whole thing, assholes, is a psyop.
Everything.
Oh, yeah.
The whole thing, the whole thing is fake.
Now we understand.
Music and movies and all the things, art, all of them.
There's not almost nothing organic around you at all.
I don't know if people get it.
Maybe they do, maybe they don't.
But as soon as you put it together, the better Marjorie Taylor Green can get back in the fight.
Yeah.
And I, so what I, if I were to ever ask Elon a question, I'd be like, what happened to the thing where you're talking about getting rid of bots and all this shit?
Like, none of that happened.
Probably because if you get rid of bots, there's probably like 14 users on Twitter.
You know, you can't get rid of the bots because that's what's driving up all the engagement, right?
He can't post that, oh, wow, look at X.
It's like the most popular app in terms of same thing with why Roblox can't root out all the PDF files because it makes their numbers inflated for their stock price and their investors.
So if they clean it up, it's done.
The children's thing that just lousy with the worst kind of like predators, they can't, and people have independently tried to clean it up and made apps to block them.
And they've ruthlessly suppressed it because it will ruin their numbers.
They all have the same scam.
They've got to inflate what they're doing for private equity.
There's like one scam in the world, you know?
The numbers.
I used to work at this company.
This is like when I was like 22, 23 years old.
I was working in a call center for this company called Nature Box.
And it was like one of those at the time, it was like a subscription box server.
That was like everything could be a subscription box during that age.
And they were like, okay, we're about to go into our whatever it was, Series C funding.
So we're going to like give away free boxes and we're going to count them as subscribers.
And so we can inflate our numbers.
So they sign up for the service.
They have to put their credit card in, but the first box is free.
And then I was like, yo, when it rebuilds them the second month, are they going to be like pissed off that you kind of scan them?
Like, yeah, don't worry about that.
You know, because then I have to deal with it.
I deal with angry customers all day saying, I didn't sign up for this.
And they're like, oh, the whole business.
The whole business was that out of the gate.
The whole business was doing that.
The whole business was like trying to get people to forget about the fact that they had a subscription.
Yeah.
And so there would be days where like, oh, we got to get the subscriber count up.
So we're going to remove the cancellation option from the website and force them to call in.
It was hilarious.
It was like, and they would call him like, hey, this feature was literally there yesterday.
It was on my account yesterday.
It's still going crazy.
Not there.
I'm like, sorry.
Yeah.
They didn't want us.
I know.
I was one of those people.
I was like, dude, I'm sorry, man.
This, this whole thing sucks.
I'm just going to refund you.
We need an AI, James.
We need AI to replace you and your little.
Oh, no.
Literally, by the end, so I quit.
But literally, as I was quitting, they were outsourcing the entire team to the Philippines.
And I think now, well, I don't think the company exists anymore, but I think it's then they went to like some kind of like AI, like chatbot thing.
Yeah.
Who can you play it to?
You can go fuck yourself is what you can do.
So I don't think this feature, I mean, do you think this feature is going to stay?
I think this is, you know, this is not going to work.
Like every other feature, once it interferes with somebody important enough, it will go away suddenly.
Right, that's how everything works, or they just, or they just um, block them because I think, speaking of pastor Mccoy, I went to check out his his um, where he's based.
Not even there, he's exempt from this for some reason.
Oh my yes, have you heard his amazing sermons that uh, Ian Carol was playing?
That they suddenly told, I mean, i've heard little snippets here and there, I I wouldn't want to meet.
He's like the real life uh, somebody said the um, real life gem uh, Eli Gemstone as my co-host.
Well, that's all based on American Psyop, Zionist Christianity that is.
And speaking of cloak, uh and dagger, is Maha, even a real thing at this point?
Because the EPA has just approved new pesticides with PFAS, the forever chemicals in crops.
Okay uh, let's take a look at what's going on here.
The Environmental Protection Agency, the EPA, has approved two new pesticides that contain forever chemicals, with plans to authorize more.
According to the Washington POST, the pesticides not going to pronounce these, but these are the forever chemicals will be used on crops including romaine lettuce, broccoli and potatoes.
Just what we need alongside.
My taint's too big, so that's why I want to get some of these chemicals down there, shrink that taint down to a nice taint.
I don't want them old Gen X taints, you know, oh god.
Alongside the approvals, the EPA also signaled it intends to relax a rule requiring companies to report all products containing pfas.
So we won't even know if they're in there.
There's no disclosure.
You shouldn't get to know informed consent.
What is that?
You know?
It's just a way for the rabble to think that they should be able to make decisions that they're not qualified.
Are you?
Are you a scientist, James?
Answer the question, are you scientists?
No, but I can read, I can you know?
I can read what other scientists have put out there.
Um anyways, many floor uh.
Fluorinated compounds registered or proposed for U.s.
Pesticidal use in recent years offer unique benefits for farmers, users and the public.
The EPA spokeswoman, Bridget Hirsch, told the post, i'm sorry.
Fluorinated compounds okay, they offer unique benefits for farmers, users and the public.
Okay, what's that?
Two Iq points less every year.
She noted that the EPA has approved multiple fluorinated pesticides under administrations of both parties.
Okay, so they're both.
So you know it's good.
Okay, so they're all degree, so you know it's safe.
This is a bipartisan issue.
This this they, they control both parties.
Thank you for letting us know um.
So yes, Joe Biden also did the same thing, just in case anybody's wondering um.
And then CROP LIFE America, a trade group for pesticide makers, praised the move and the Epa's reliance on quote gold standard science.
Do we really have that here?
We science can't even tell us what a woman is in 2025.
Uh, while the EPA said the compounds offer unique benefits, some scientists and watchdog Watchdog groups warned that much remains unknown.
PFAS have previously been linked to several cancers, birth defects, and liver and immune system damage.
Exactly what you need in a functioning society, right?
This is all for the big pharma people, right?
I think those are anti-Semitic charges that they're making.
You might be right about that, actually.
So, just in terms of highlighting the Maha accomplishments here or betrayals, Jason Vassler says, one, legal immunity for pesticide giants.
That's what they've accomplished.
Two, fighting to keep fluoride in water.
Three, creepy wearable tech agenda, right?
They're trying to say people should wear whatever it might be, the ore rings or whatnot to just track where you are.
They're also pushing for MMR measles vaccine and reversing PFAS forever chemical bans, which is what we just talked about here.
So, where is RFK Jr. in all this?
You know what I'm saying?
Is he a doctor?
I don't know.
The view gave the view gave Cheryl Hines a good hiding on that show.
Where is RFK Jr.?
Well, because that's one thing.
It's like, isn't he supposed to be the guy that's like removing the pesticides and the chemicals and the dyes and everything like that?
What is he got that poisonous?
Yeah.
He gets, you know, I think he gets wrongly criticized a lot by the mainstream media for being this quack.
But this quack, I mean, supposedly, he's supposed to be against all this stuff.
So how is this happening under his because that chick is in there, that poisonous person?
I don't understand why she's even there.
Tony Spear.
Yeah.
I think it's who you're referring to.
But okay, so let's listen to Whitney Webb's theory on this as she talks about who's actually in charge of the Trump administration cabinet.
Okay.
My opinion generally is that some figures in the Trump administration were kind of chosen as a PR move and that they're not actually in charge of what they're nominally in charge of.
So like Pete Hegseth, head of the Pentagon, he's kind of a Fox and Friends, you know, he's a TV show host.
And the deputy director of the Pentagon, Steve Feinberg of Cerberus Capital, is most likely the person actually running the Pentagon, not Hegset, in my opinion.
And I think that's true also for RFK Jr. in charge of HHS.
I don't really think he's running.
He's just kind of this figure that connected with Trump's base, particularly during the COVID era and made them think reforms would come.
And those reforms haven't really come, but he's kind of there to give the impression that things have changed.
But the person behind him, the deputy secretary, is Jim O'Neill, who's a career affiliate of Peter Thiel, who's also the power behind JD Vance and, you know, the man that made palant here what it is.
And so, you know, I think it's just a way of sort of masking the people that are actually running stuff.
And I think that's probably true too of Kash Patel and Don Dan Gino, who were basically out there.
You know, they were making the rounds on podcasts and were making these connections and building trust and relationships with the public and Trump space.
But it seems like they're not actually running anything, in my opinion.
They're kind of figureheads in a way, and they're willing figureheads.
I would say.
Yeah, there was that like hostage.
All right.
So basically, it is all fake.
Everything is.
Marjorie didn't want to be fake too, by the way.
Marjorie Taylor Green.
That's why she couldn't get along with them.
Exactly.
I think that's 100% spot on is that she didn't want to be fake.
And if you don't want to be fake, you either remove yourself or they'll remove you either by, you know, maybe some by 11.
Other more forcible means as well.
Mom Domi will be fake.
Why they had a nice meeting.
Because mom Dami you, there's no reason.
He's playing the game.
He's playing the game.
I'll just put it that way.
If you play the game, you are part of the problem, and that's most of the people that are in the game, you know.
That's why.
Well yeah you, I mean, that's why I I, I can't ever run for office because i'm not going to play the game.
I can't even be.
I, i'm barely in media and because i'm your story is wild dude, because you already had that thing of like where you have to decide if you're going to play the game and be cool or not right, so you already had it with a much.
I think that's a much deeper thing, your thing than the average one, because of the the, the farm aspect, you know uh, but let's okay, let's take a look at who um, Jim O'neal is here.
How do I get this on here?
Let's go all right.
So, Jim O'neal, the United States deputy secretary of Health AND Human Services.
He has significant ties to pharmaceutical and biotech industries, of course, including man uh, working as a managing director for Peter Teal's Mithril Capital and serving on the board of Advantage Therapeutics.
So once again, LORD of the Rings.
Yo, this is this Lord Of The Rings thing, and I know that they're thinking that sounds like I mean, it sounds better than Cerberus Capital but um, it's also not good.
Like it's not good I.
I mean, I never uh, read Lord Of The Rings, so I don't know the references of these names.
But well, mithril is this uh, armor that uh uh, Frodo had he had this chain mail that was hard to penetrate because it was made of mithril, this mythical.
And then Andro, the Drone company, that's that flaming sword, that what's his head had, and uh, and then the Palantir was that crystal ball, if you saw the movie, the crystal ball that corrupts everyone who touches it.
But in their world, if you read the book, no only if a bad person touches it, so if a good man like Peter Teal is working it, it's fine yeah, anyway.
So this is.
I think this is important for the public to know, if they don't already know.
This information is that the people who Trump has put in charge of these various departments, these cabinet positions, they're not actually the ones in charge.
It's the people behind the scenes who are actually running the show.
If you and Trump is one of them, he's one of the figureheads, as you can see, i'm sure Trump is really cool.
Well Jd right, Jd is the Peter Teal.
Everybody second in command has some kind of tie to Peter Teal.
Do you think that Peter Teal made Jd Vance fat in a lab?
That's my thing.
I don't know.
Jd Vance might be made in a lab.
I think he's not scrutinized enough.
It's like what?
It's very bizarre.
Like who is Jd Vance?
A hillbilly from a Oxycotton mom who uh becomes an adult Catholic, is a married to a Hindu is a very strange outcome.
And if you look at these uh faith leaders and I would go take a look at them because they're connected to TP USA oh, and Scientology oh, and Mormons oh, and uh the Dominionism uh, it's all the same, uh like fake Christianity.
That's hyper Zionist, insane beyond all means.
It's called the new Appetizer, Apostolic Green Movement, Branham.
I can't remember the guy's first name, but Branham, this guy out of Canada, Jim Jones comes out of his network.
This guy starts up in Canada, and it's always some con man who I always think is being hooked up with Intel.
It's always a con man and Intel are a perfect combination.
And they set up these networks.
And then because it's a network made out of other MLM networks, if somebody turns out to be Jim Jones, it's easy to cut it off.
You know, it's a very perfect pyramidal, you know, it's a very good pyramid system we have.
And this ties, I mean, this ties together with the Charlie Kirk thing is because Charlie Kirk was one of those people who might have had enough power to potentially usurp this whole Peter Thiel, you know.
Well, if you're more valuable, that is obviously being planned.
Yo, if Candace, if France was trying to kill Candace Owens, that would be a big mistake on their part because I can't imagine her being assassinated right now.
Now, Charlie Kirk is interesting because there's only two weeks of them turning on him before he was assassinated.
So he still had value because he's running the largest young conservative movement.
I mean, this is why he had to go, right?
Because he's letting other people.
Well, that's why, I mean, he has actual power because you can argue that Candace is really only a media figure, whereas Charlie Kirk was an operator and he was driving out the votes for young Republicans.
So he had an actual stake in the apparatus of when you find out how it works.
See, I didn't give him enough credit.
I mocked him relentlessly.
I didn't have any concept of what he, the, the Truman show he lived in.
Yeah.
And so that guy has a, and that's a young dude, man, who's got a lot of stuff weighing on him, who clearly was sincere because as he's seeing information, he can't just disregard it like he's being told.
And that's a test right there.
That's one of the initiations to see if you're cool to get to the next level is ignoring obvious, weird, wrong shit.
Can you do that?
Can you turn a blind eye to his majesty's madness like in that movie?
Well, he came up.
The thing is, he came up through this entire ecosystem.
You know, he was Zionist back from the very beginning.
So they wife's a handler for him is what I bet.
I bet Erica Kirk, who bizarrely ran a Romanian military base orphanage that also was a brothel.
It's the most insane thing I've ever heard.
And it's actually, there's a lot of evidence.
Some people say that that's a wild accusation, but it actually looks into it.
There's a lot of evidence for that.
Hey, you know, John Benet Ramsey's dad was a Lockheed Martin man, right?
Well, I did not know that.
Freemason.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Wow.
Okay.
Yeah.
That tells you a lot more about it, don't it?
So that's, that's what I'm saying is so, yeah.
So Charlie Kirk, he was not just like a culture warrior, you know, arguing with people on campus.
He was literally operating this stuff.
And you, and when you basically come up through the mob and you decide I don't want to be a part of the mob anymore, you really, I don't know, it's hard to survive that.
I've done it many times growing up in my thing, my religion, I walked away from, and I don't give a fuck.
I would do it anytime.
But I'm not never been in that high of a where I'm at the forefront of a mind war movement that's very important to the powers that be because everybody has to stay in their lane.
If you watch Ben Shapiro, as you religiously, I watch him and he'll be like, conspiracy used to be the left, but now the right's doing conspiracies because he's trying to herd the sheep back into their pens.
Are you left or right?
I saw a left winger kill Charlie Kirk and I saw, no, you didn't.
And this whole thing, I mean, yeah, this whole thing, just tied back to the PFAS story, this whole thing is always just at the end of the day, some kind of psyop to get you to believe in something, to vote for something, right?
The RFK Jr., the whole thing is to get you on the Trump coalition.
And then once you're in, then they gaslight you.
If you're arrogant like me, and I'm so arrogant and smug, and I think when they work for me, looks what you're supposed to think, but people don't think that.
People are like, my manager fired me, but a manager works for you.
You know, you like, like, if you don't understand basic shit like that, they're going to jujitsu you on the on the opposite.
Like, oh, you're not supposed to, are you not MAGA?
Yo, MAGA don't exist unless I say it does, assholes.
MAGA's supposed to be about the people that live here, not the leaders.
And they're not leaders.
You just said it.
They're managers.
They're fucking, you know, the Hulk Hogan's and Nikolai Volkovs for the Chinese.
These are just TV.
And the whole Trump thing is like a made-for-TV thing.
And there's just Reagan.
It's been like that.
Yeah.
The first movie star that became the president.
And of course, he was controlled by Bohi Dart.
What do you think?
People think he was like in charge.
I bet his brain went screwy when he stopped doing what they wanted.
Well, I mean, a lot of people say that, what, the last president who was actually running things was JFK, basically.
Not hard to believe because he gave that speech about secret societies.
And I view it as a condemnation of Intel in general, which I do condemn.
I don't think they should get to have any, I think they've lost their secret privileges.
To me, I don't know why anyone accepts the idea they can keep secrets from you ever again after the foul shit that you know they've already done.
The experiments they did on people, the poisons they did on you at home on purpose.
They did on purpose to see what it would do to you.
That's all shit you could look up.
The wars they anybody get their dick blown off fighting in Iraq?
And now Al-Qaeda, ISIS guy is shaking hands with Trump.
I know, imagine you're bothering watching that.
It bothers me as if my dick had blown off.
When I see it, I go, why would you believe in this country?
When you witness that, so I'm old enough.
I saw 9-11.
I remember the trauma-based mind control of invading Iraq.
Okay.
And Al-Qaeda's got him.
And Al-Qaeda's bad.
And there's ISIS.
I guess, no, they're not that bad because we're cool with them now.
And Guantanamo, the prison with Al-Qaeda people in it, they're still there.
It's still open.
Nobody, everybody forgot about it because there's a country full of fucking morons.
How do you sit here and watch this over and over again and still go to a fucking hockey game or a baseball game or go vote or go?
How do you still do that?
Are you allowed to run my mouth like an asshole?
And I chew my pipe like this.
You just kind of give up.
Anyways, I never give up.
I never believed in this shit.
I'm from a doomsday cult, my friend.
What else?
I can't believe you guys are alive, though.
You beat people into submission, basically.
Just always tell the truth.
Be a snitch.
Break your oaths of secrecy, whatever you have.
Break the oath and be a snitch and tell everybody.
The only way we get out of this is if you punk, stop keeping secrets for people.
The only way out is to yip, yip, yip, yip, run your mouth.
So all the snitches that everybody don't like.
What do you have?
Stockholm syndrome?
I'm not in the mafia.
I love a mafia.
I love Sammy the Bull.
Good for you, brother.
Tell all the shit.
Why is that allowed to exist?
Everybody's got to stop being a punk.
All right.
Hello, everyone.
Welcome back to the Jimmy Door Show.
I'm your guest host, Chris Keen.
I'm here with Kurt Metzger.
Donald Trump says Democrats are traitors for telling military not to follow unlawful orders.
The president said lawmakers who appeared in a video committed seditious behavior and should be arrested and put on trial for treason.
President Donald Trump on Thursday called for the arrest of Democratic lawmakers who publicly exhorted members of the U.S. military and intelligence communities to disobey any orders they perceive to be illegal.
Seditious behavior at the highest level is what Trump is calling this in an online post.
The threats came in response to a video released Tuesday of six congressmembers with military or intelligence experience who cautioned that threats to our Constitution aren't just coming from abroad, but from right here at home.
It was not immediately clear which orders concerned the lawmakers, but some representatives have said they are hearing from service members questioning the legality of strikes that have targeted people that Trump administration alleges are trafficking narcotics by sea.
So I assume they're talking about these strikes in Venezuela.
Yeah, I don't think that's the first time the U.S. has bombed targets in other countries illegally.
But here we go.
Alyssa Slotkin.
Senator Mark Kelly, Representative Chris DeLuzio.
Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander.
Representative Chrissy Houlihan.
Congressman Jason Crowe.
That was a captain in the United States Navy.
Former CIA officer.
Former Navy.
Former paratrooper and Army Ranger.
Former intelligence officer.
Former Air Force.
We want to speak directly to members of the military and the intelligence community who take risks each day to keep Americans safe.
We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now.
Americans trust their military.
But that trust is at risk.
This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens.
Like us, you all swore an oath.
To protect and defend this Constitution.
Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren't just coming from abroad, but from right here at home.
Our laws are clear.
You can refuse illegal orders.
You can refuse illegal orders.
You must refuse illegal orders.
No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution.
We know this is hard and that it's a difficult time to be a public servant.
But whether you're serving in the CIA, the Army, our Navy, the Air Force, your vigilance is critical.
And know that we have your back.
Because now, more than ever, the American people need you.
We need you to stand up for our laws, our Constitution, and who we are as Americans.
Don't give up.
Don't give up the ship.
I love the John Williams score behind that video.
I don't understand the point of this video.
You can refuse illegal orders.
No shit.
Doesn't everyone know that?
Do we need a video about that?
I don't understand what the point of this was, other than to like virtue signal.
But here we have Donald Trump.
It's called seditious behavior at the highest level.
Each one of these traitors to our country should be arrested and put on trial.
Their words cannot be allowed to stand.
We won't have a country anymore.
An example must be set.
Seditious behavior punishable by death.
So we have the president of the United States threatening to kill members of our government.
Except Jonathan Pollard, right?
Yeah, that guy's fine, but these guys have to go, apparently.
Trump's response elicited.
You couldn't make this stuff up if you tried.
Trump's response elicited a swift rebuke from Democrats at a moment of pitched tensions over rhetoric seen as encouraging political violence, which became a focus of the administration after the killing in September of Charlie Kirk.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told reporters he had alerted U.S. Capitol police to the potential for threats against the makers of the video, which was organized by Alyssa Slotkin of Michigan.
I would hope that people of all backgrounds would agree that threatening death for people you disagree with is beyond the pale for who we are as Americans.
I can't believe this even has to be said.
How are we at a point in our country where we have to say something like that, that threatening death on fellow Americans is a bad thing?
White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt said Thursday that Trump was not suggesting violence against the makers of the video.
Caroline, this morning, President Trump accused six Democratic lawmakers of seditious behavior punishable by death.
Just to be clear, does the president want to execute members of Congress?
No.
Let's be clear about what the president is responding to, because many in this room want to talk about the president's response, but not what brought the president to responding in this way.
You have sitting members of the United States Congress who conspired together to orchestrate a video message to members of the United States military, to active duty service members, to members of the national security apparatus, encouraging them to defy the president's lawful orders.
I don't understand this.
It wasn't lawful or they weren't saying lawful orders.
They were saying unlawful.
They were saying you can deny orders that are unlawful, not lawful.
So I don't know.
You see how she introduced in the BS?
She goes, they were conspiring to commit to make a video.
Right.
Did you hear that?
Yes.
Yeah, I don't.
I don't get it.
These members knew what they were doing, Levitt added, calling the message they were sending very dangerous and perhaps punishable by law.
So saying that you should not do, saying you should not break the law is punishable by law, apparently.
That is true.
Got you there.
Okay.
I'm not a lawyer.
I'll leave that to the Department of Justice and the Department of War to decide, she said, going on to say that every single order that is given to this military by this commander-in-chief and through this command chain of command through the Secretary of War is lawful.
I got a question.
How come there's not other people executed from his last term when he told them to take troops out of Syria or stop doing this and that?
They just didn't do it.
That sedition right there that we know about, that the Republicans supposedly know about.
That's right.
Where's the executions?
Yeah.
Like, yo, hey, dude, he wants people in Congress.
I want people in Congress executed.
He ain't going to do that.
Right.
If you disobey an order and it's a positive thing, I guess I don't know.
Traditionally, the U.S. military adheres to the uniform code of military justice, which holds that service members must obey lawful orders, whether they agree with them or not.
Yeah, lawful orders.
There seems to be a discrepancy here.
They are obligated to not follow manifestly unlawful orders, but such situations are rare and legally fraught.
Members of the military take on an oath to the Constitution, not the president.
Now, if they're going to make that video, why don't they specify what they're talking about?
Like, what laws, what unlawful orders are you talking about?
Because I don't even understand what it is exactly they were going after in that video.
Are they talking about ICE raids?
Are they talking about bombing in Venice?
I was going to ask you.
I didn't know.
I thought I missed it.
Yeah, I don't really get it.
I just think it's if you hate Trump, then you just go, yeah, let's stop the unlawful orders without just like.
You know, the CIA framed, he got impeached because of bullshit from the CIA and all that.
Why aren't those people executed?
I'm down.
Why aren't they?
It's all bullshit.
I mean, this is all nonsense all the time, dude.
Yes.
And here we have this is the loyalty to the Constitution.
The United States boldly broke with the ancient military custom of swearing loyalty to a leader.
Article 6 required that American officers thereafter swear loyalty to our basic law, the Constitution.
While many other nations have suffered military coups, the U.S. never has.
Our American code of military obedience requires JFK when they took over and they killed JFK right in front of your dumbfaces.
All right, someone get Kurt a sedative.
He's losing it.
Our American code of military obedience requires that.
Should orders in the law ever conflict, our officers must obey the law.
Many other nations have adopted our principle of loyalty to the basic law.
This nation must have military leaders of principle and integrity so strong that their oaths to support and defend the Constitution will unfailingly govern their actions.
The purpose of the U.S. military is to provide such leaders of character.
On the Senate floor, Schumer called on every representative, every American, regardless of party, to condemn this immediately and without qualification, because if we don't draw a line here, there is no line left to draw.
I agree that it should be condemned when you're threatening death upon your fellow Americans.
I wish they would do that on both sides.
There were a lot of people that wouldn't condemn it when Charlie Kirk got killed.
And now we have the president threatening death.
I'd like to know what they were getting at.
I still don't understand how the thing where nobody knows what they were talking about.
At least be suspended death threats.
Yes, I don't get it.
But to me, that's why it just seems like this virtue signaling thing of just, see, we're going to speak out against Trump.
And if you hate him, you can get on board.
If you don't like him, you'll get mad.
You're not actually, this isn't actually helpful.
It's not going to accomplish anything.
Is there a real no-kings rally?
Yeah, it's kind of like a no-kings protest.
It's like, well, what is the purpose here?
What are you trying to say?
Get specific.
In a joint statement, members of House Democratic leadership condemned what they referred to as the president's disgusting and dangerous death threats against members of Congress.
House Speaker Mike Johnson on Thursday told reporters that he could not even believe that this is a controversy.
Apparently, this is not surprising to Mike Johnson.
What do you call leaders in Congress to do to encourage young troops to disobey orders?
I mean, think of what the threat that is to our national security and what it means to our institutions.
I just, we have got to raise the bar in Congress.
This is out of control and it's wildly inappropriate.
And for a senator like Mark Kelly or any member of Congress in the House or Senate to be engaged in that kind of talk is to me just so beyond the pale.
I'm not going to say that.
Mr. Speaker, can you comment on this?
It's beyond the pale to say don't obey unlawful orders.
Again, both sides of this just seem idiotic to me.
The people that are, yeah, people.
Is he passing a resolution to condemn Schindler from Schindler's order?
The video marked the latest Democratic effort to focus public attention on orders the president have delivered to the U.S. military that have triggered legal concerns or disputes, discussions that recently have centered on the administration's string of military strikes on alleged drug smugglers on boats in Latin America.
Why didn't you say that in the video?
If you're talking about what's happening in Venezuela, say that.
Administration officials have argued such action is legal because those involved are acting as narco-terrorists.
Oh, come on.
We all see clear and present danger.
Even Tom Clancy, that dickhead, had a whole book about how you shouldn't do that.
Yeah.
I mean, this is typical.
To me, this is typical regime change war type stuff, which both parties are usually totally cool with.
But is that why they didn't want to be specific?
Because they do the same thing?
Exactly.
I have a feeling that is true.
Critics have questioned whether designating drug cartels as terrorist organizations is sufficient legal grounds for the killings.
Some U.S. military officials have sought counsel about whether such orders are legal.
The Trump administration also has deliberated openly about extending those strikes into Venezuelan territory in an escalation that would prompt legal questions.
While the U.S. has for years launched strikes on armed groups it considers a threat to national security, it has typically cited a legal authorization created after the al-Qaeda terrorist attacks on September 11.
Venezuelan officials and cartels have no known ties to such groups.
But Iraq did, apparently.
While Trump has repeatedly accused different groups and individuals of treason going back to his first presidential term, he did not follow through with many threats.
They don't say.
Here we have some.
Now, I can't stand people with Trump derangement syndrome, but we also have people with Trump worship syndrome.
Sounds like the same syndrome to me.
Yeah, it's basically the same thing.
And this is what we have here.
These people cheering this on.
Hang them.
George Washington would.
Sedition.
Insurrection treason.
Why do they have the Templar Cross above there?
I don't know.
Washington statement.
I have no idea.
And here we go.
Sedition.
Activities affecting armed forces generally criminalizes knowingly advising, counseling, or urging any member of the U.S. military to disobey, desert, and refuse lawful orders.
Again, lawful is the key word there.
They made it legal to do whatever the fuck they want, whenever they want.
Well, that's a whole other topic.
Exactly.
What is the punishment for sedition?
It carries a penalty of imprisonment for up to 20 years.
Yeah, Israeli.
Here we have issuing a manifestly unlawful order is a crime, so is carrying it out.
Here are common examples of unlawful orders targeting or harming civilians.
You're going to be anti-Semitic now and read this?
Right, right.
Torturing or abusing detainees.
Gee, I can't think of any time the U.S. has done that.
Not a single one.
We would never have.
Yeah, we would never have an entire prison dedicated to that.
Did the Hotel Hanoi put John McCain in a gay pyramid?
I don't think they did, did they?
Right.
And then we have using military force in violation of constitutional law, for instance, in order to use military to oppress U.S. civilians.
Now, this sounds crazy, but I would argue the military does oppress U.S. civilians because we spend a trillion dollars on it every year while there's people living on the street.
There's 35 million people living in poverty, half a million homeless people, yet we spend a trillion dollars on the military.
How is that not oppressing U.S. civilians?
How about when they run a weird drone operation over while the fire is going to California?
Everybody has to speculate and go nutty about it.
And they go, oh, that was just a test.
They were testing on civilians.
That's what they do with your money.
They test new stuff on you, see how you'll react.
Yeah, so, I mean, the U.S. is not innocent of many of these things on this list here.
Overall, I just feel like both sides, as usual, are being morons.
I don't really understand what the Democrats are trying to do here.
If you're going to make a critique, make it specific, talk about something real and actually introduce something that's going to change something.
Don't make this virtue signaling video.
And then with Trump, I mean, threatening to kill people because they disagree with you politically is incredibly dangerous, as we've seen numerous times in our history.
They're trying to make political hay out of something that they're going to also be guilty of if they're in his place.
Exactly.
And that's a very nuanced, tricky line to walk.
So you got to try to get the emotion without any of the substance of like, oh, don't worry, we won't do that because they're going to also do that.
You have to just be mad that Trump did it.
So how do I get you to feel that way?
Identity politics.
Some appeal to movies you've seen?
I don't know.
It's tough.
Give them a break, man.
They're doing their best.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to JimmyDoorComedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
