"Never Again" Only Means Jews! – Zionist Fmr Obama Staffer Sarah Hurwitz
A speech from former Obama staffer Sarah Gurwitz has sparked outrage after she claimed young Jews can't think clearly about Israel because TikTok keeps "flooding their brains" with raw footage of Gaza carnage. Critics have shredded her argument, noting she openly admits to the devastation in Gaza while blaming young people for believing their own eyes instead of Zionist gatekeepers. Guest hosts Russell Dobular and Keaton Weiss of the Due Dissidence show discuss how Holocaust education has been twisted into a justification for Israeli impunity rather than a warning against oppression. The two hosts offer a blistering indictment of U.S. and Israeli propaganda networks, calling out both governments and American Zionist institutions for enabling and sanitizing mass atrocities. Plus segments on Attorney General Pam Bondi's stunning shamelessness in performing a complete 180 on the Epstein Files and Democrats' pathetic fumble in failing to censure US Virgin Islands' Delegate Stacey Plaskett for being a willing puppet of Jeffrey Epstein.
Now it's Black Friday at Kjell's Markiser, and you can spare up to 50% on our bestsellers.
The whole month we give you up to half a price on Norges most sovte solskjerming.
Terrassemarkise, screddersidegardiner, sip screens and plisségardiner.
And you, we have also a dreamer-to-bud on a well-isolated garageport in premium-quality.
Since 1978 has we delivered norsk-produced solskjerming with kvalitet and omtanke.
See the whole campaign and besties gratis-befaring on Kjell's Markiser.no.
Lördag 29 november firar Tuxfors Shopping Center 20 år med en 20 meter lång tårta.
Hos Maxi Mat får du priser som för 20 år sedan.
Ett flak Pepsi Max 69 kronor, bacon trepack 19.90 och Arla Hushållsåst 79 kronor kilot.
Välkommen till Tuxfors Shopping Center.
Come see me on tour in Pottstown, Pennsylvania, Waikiki, Hawaii and the Comedy Store in Los Angeles.
Go to jimmydor.com for a link for tickets.
All gaslighting, so good luck.
Bullshit we can't afford, he's fomenting this world.
Watch and see as he's jacked off the medium.
He eats and jumps the medium and hits him head on.
It's the Chimnitor show.
Now, you might have heard, you might have heard that you can no longer translate from Hebrew on X.
This is indeed true.
This is from Grok.
Translation from Hebrew was disabled because it often amplified inflammatory or policy-violating content like calls for violence to a global audience via inaccurate or literal renditions.
See, it had to throw that out because of whatever Elon did on that fucking island.
X prioritizes free speech for opinions, but limits features that exacerbate harm without suspending originals.
No evidence supports targeting any group.
It's about platform integrity amid documented spikes in Hebrew hate speech.
Yeah, so that is a very APAC-friendly way of saying these genocidal psycho-Israelis keep threatening to commit genocide against Palestinians.
So we had to disable Hebrew so that people couldn't find out what these psychos are actually saying on the platform.
It's very interesting the way it put in all those qualifications that make no sense in the context of what you're saying that what they're saying is genocidal and spreading hate, but it's not targeted at a group.
Then how could they be saying things that are genocidal and hate?
That's just incredible.
That's the new lobotomized Mecca Hitler comes up with things like that.
Petra Schurnhoffer.
Translation from Hebrew was disabled amid documented spikes in Hebrew hate speech.
Translation from Hebrew disabled while the inflammatory originals remain.
Wow.
So they're not.
So you're admitting that's hate speech, but they're not taking down the Hebrew because you know the Israelis aren't going to be offended.
They like that shit.
They like that.
I thought it was the anti-Semites who were chanting genocidal things from the river to the sea and all that.
Wow.
Michael Rechtenwald, PhD.
Now, what's the name of the PAC he runs?
Aza Pact.
It's a new anti-Zionist political action committee that he just formed so they can like raise money for anti-Zionist candidates.
It sounds great.
We're going to have him on our show next Tuesday.
Yep.
Zionist rhetoric is so malicious and genocidal that X turned off translation of Hebrews.
Now, Brianna Joy Gray here points out, it's not enough to disable Hebrew to English translations.
They're going to have to pull all video off this app to keep Zionists from incriminating themselves.
So what is she quote tweeting here?
This is from Chris Manaham.
Former Obama speechwriter Sarah Hurwitz laments to Jewish Federation that people are finding content from Al Jazeera and Nick Fuentes on social media and seeing videos of the carnage in Gaza.
Holocaust education has backfired in part as people see Palestinians as Jews victims, she adds.
They think the lesson of the Holocaust is you fight the big, powerful people hurting weak people.
The lesson they were supposed to get is that it gives Israel the right to commit genocide in perpetuity.
That's not spin, man.
That's not spin, as you will see.
I think that since October 7th, but really before then, there have been huge shifts in America on how people think about Jews and Israel.
And I think that is especially true of young people.
So we are now wrestling with a new, I think, generational divide here.
And I think that's particularly true in that social media is now our source of media.
And this, you know, it used to be that the media you got in America was American media, and it was pretty mainstream.
You know, it generally didn't express extreme anti-Israel views.
You had to go to a pretty weird bookstore to find global media and fringe media.
But today, we have social media, which is a global medium.
It is shaped, its algorithms are shaped by billions of people worldwide who don't really love Jews.
And so while in the 1990s, you know, a young person probably wasn't going to find Al Jazeera or someone like Nick Fuentes, today those media outlets find them.
They find them on their phones.
It's also this increasingly post-literate media, less and less text, more and more videos.
So you have TikTok just smashing our young people's brains all day long with video of carnage in Gaza.
And this is why so many of us can't have a sane conversation with younger Jews, because anything that we try to say to them, they are hearing it through this wall of carnage.
So I want to give data and information and facts and arguments, and they are just seeing in their minds carnage.
Now, she's conceding that they're seeing carnage in Gaza.
She's not even pulling the Pallywood bullshit.
She's not even claiming it's all fake.
These are all movie sets.
It's all makeup.
It's the same actor.
She's conceding it's carnage, but the kids are crazy because, you know, I can explain to them statistically why genocide is okay.
Yeah.
Andrew, look at that free stream for the thumbnail.
You got it.
You had it right there.
There you go.
No, I just want to say before you start the video again, what those videos are are called in journalism.
Those are called sources.
Those are called primary sources.
You actually see the events that's happening.
And what she's complaining about is that we don't get to bullshit people and gaslight them about what they're actually seeing.
It's funny.
This came up yesterday on our show.
It's an inversion of the principle, show, don't tell.
That's what you're supposed to do when you're telling a story.
You're supposed to show something, not tell it.
In other words, it's always more powerful to actually see the thing happen than to hear someone explain it and rationalize it secondhand.
And what she's saying is, isn't it annoying that people see this barbarism rather than hear about it from us?
We're supposed to put in context what that means for them and tell them what to think about it.
And we're not able to do that anymore because they're actually seeing it firsthand.
Yeah, she's complaining that you no longer have Zionist-owned news outlets acting as intermediaries between the consumer and the raw reality of what Israel is actually doing.
Right, exactly.
And I sound obscene.
And, you know, I think unfortunately, the very smart bet that we made on Holocaust education to serve as anti-Semitism education in this new media environment, I think that is beginning to break down a little bit because, you know, Holocaust education is absolutely essential.
But I think it may be confusing some of our young people about anti-Semitism because they learn about big, strong Nazis hurting weak, emaciated Jews.
And they think, oh, anti-Semitism is like anti-black racism, right?
Powerful white people against powerless black people.
So when on TikTok all day long, they see powerful Israelis hurting weak, skinny Palestinians.
It's not surprising that they think, oh, I know the lesson of the Holocaust is you fight Israel.
You fight the big, powerful people hurting the weak people.
I mean, you know, other people have said this, that this clip almost left them speechless.
It really does.
It's stunning because this, you want to see a study in how pickled a Zionist brain is in propaganda.
This is somebody who worked for Obama.
This is somebody who has education, who's presumably somewhat sophisticated in media and politics and communication, who is so brainwashed, so blinded by the propaganda that in all likelihood, if she's like, frankly, most Jews, she spent her whole life stewing in this propaganda that, yes, of course, Israel is right to do what it's doing.
And the problem with people seeing the Holocaust is they didn't understand it as a story about Jews being oppressed.
They understood it as a story of weak people being oppressed by strong people.
And that's not the lesson.
The lesson is that Jews are an oppressed people, which gives them the right to do whatever they want.
They're not making that leap to the Holocaust gives them the right to do whatever they want.
I mean, it's just amazing that she laid that out in that way.
It's something that many critics of Zionism understand is the underlying Zionist philosophy, but they generally won't cop to it.
She literally just cops to that underlying theme.
Yes, the underlying theme that the lesson of the Holocaust is that Jews are special and chosen and can do no wrong.
That is the lesson she drew from the Holocaust.
That is what they want that lesson to be.
And when the Jewish state, right, never again for us, not for you, right?
So I could say this.
I guess I have some license to say this as a Jewish guy, you know, not that they will afford me any license.
The Zionists are most ruthless against, you know, Jews like me who would say a thing like this.
But what that is very strong evidence of is the fact, the unfortunate fact, and I say this as a Jewish guy myself, that yes, Jewish culture breeds entitlement and arrogance.
It does.
It does.
It's an arrogant religion that breeds a culture of entitlement.
I mean, that's what's on display there.
You can't describe that any other way.
You really can't.
Of course.
I mean, how is somebody-the fact that she went on stage and said that?
Yeah, that you go on stage and you say a thing like that, that the lesson of the Holocaust is that you should never criticize Jews.
What?
Right, right.
So some responses, Janine Eunice.
I am almost literally speechless.
Yes, she's decrying the fact that kids' takeaway from Holocaust education has been that we must protect helpless people from powerful people killing them.
The real lesson from the Holocaust, it seems, is that Israel must be able to commit genocide if it wants to.
Hamid Ben Das, craziest part of this is at 140, where she backhandedly argues against Holocaust education because it can lead people to sympathize with American black people and Palestinians.
That was really amazing.
They're seeing it like the blacks in the South.
We don't want them thinking that.
Hassan Piker, Holocaust education is too successful.
It made the kids anti-Holocaust while Israel is trying to do one.
Yes, exactly.
All right.
So not to be outdone, Olivia Rheingold, the famine apologist from the free press.
She went up and they applauded her reporting, which revealed that some of the pictures of children starving to death were of children that had pre-existing conditions that exacerbated their starvation.
And as Manahan points out, they think that makes it better.
Story that I think if I were to die today would be included in my obituary.
It included, there was so much controversy over it, but no one has it on her epitaph.
In 12 out of 12 instances of photos that were alleged to show starvation and famine in Gaza, we actually found that these children had really complicated medical histories.
These were just the first 12 examples that we looked into that were circulating online.
And I got this idea because when I started reading this coverage, this was this past August, I started to notice that the same children were being photographed over and over again.
And they were often photographed by different photographers, which to me suggested a level of coordination.
Obviously, no, there's a modeling agency in Gaza for specialized food, but they're not for our own zone.
And so sometimes that specialized treatment can be incredibly sick and often do need specialized food, but it is a war zone.
And so sometimes specialized treatment can be hard to get a hold of.
Oh, oh, so the children with medical conditions are being starved.
But what are you going to do?
What are you going to do?
It's a war zone.
And as we'll see, by specialized food, she must mean like food.
Yeah, because that's what the Israelis were blocking, food, not specialized food, just food.
People with pre-existing conditions are always the first to suffer the most and die in a public health crisis.
Of course.
Of course.
That's not like, how is that even a fucking point to me?
This is how sick these people are.
They think this is an own.
They think this is an own and not a confession.
Yeah, they were already sick.
That means they're going to starve to death first.
Like, there's not even a point.
Right.
It's way more complicated than these stories allege.
And actually, because of our reporting at the free press, multiple news outlets had to issue corrections.
But still, these images circulate online all the time and have often motivated violence against Jews.
Olivia, thank you.
Where?
Like what?
Where?
Can you give us an example?
Can you give us an example?
Yeah, this is basically like saying, yeah, when they cut the power to the town, the people at the nursing home died of heat prostration first because they were old already.
Right.
Exactly.
So actually, you didn't do anything wrong by cutting the power to the town.
It's just that the old people in their nursing home were old, so they died because they were old.
Mehdi Hassan.
Rheingold claims all of the emaciated kids in Gaza she covered had complicated medical histories.
One of them had part of their head blown off by an Israeli shell.
She omits to mention that here.
Proud wouldn't have like that.
Peter Gow, one of the sickest, most depraved rationalizations I've ever heard.
The kids Israel was starving to death already had pre-existing illnesses.
And again, by special food not available, hundreds of trucks full of baby formula were parked at the border, literally ready to feed children, and the fucking Israeli government was blocking them.
I know Netanyahu will rot in hell, and Olivia Rheingold will be right next to him.
And that's from Lamond there.
And I just want to close out with this because it's a very good point, because, you know, very often we'll see these Israeli maniacs like Ben Gevere or the psycho-Israeli ambassador to the UN who just put out a video complaining that the UN has pictures drawn by school children around the world looking for peace that don't include Israel and demands that they be taken down as an anti-Semitic display.
I shit you not.
But hey, man, none of this would be possible without the complicity of American Zionists, not of all of whom are Jews.
You got your Mike Huckabees, obviously, and your Donald Trumps.
But yeah, man, in terms of the Jewish community's responsibility, this would not be possible without these propagandists.
So Sana Said says here, any conversation to be had on the genocide of Palestinians must include how Jewish American leaders, communities, organizations, and temples have overwhelmingly taken the position of the right to slaughter, displace, starve, and eradicate Palestinians.
Yeah, man.
You got a reporter there, American.
You got an Obama staffer, American.
Polling shows us 80% of American Jews.
And my experience would match that.
Obviously, there's a certain generational thing that's part of what she was complaining about, that it's harder to make this case to younger Jews.
But overall, yeah, man.
Look, there are certain restaurants that there's honest to God.
I swear to God, I like to go to the 2nd Avenue Deli in New York sometimes on Thanksgiving because I don't want to, I'm not going to cook a whole freaking turkey.
I'm hesitant to go there, man, because I am betting you there's going to be some fucking support Israel shit on the wall.
Like, I don't want to be around that, man.
I can pretty much assume that a place that is Jewish in New York is going to have that, is going to have that in it.
That is, that is how much it is the way to bet that anything that represents itself as being part of that community is going to be Zionist.
And I don't even want to be in spaces like that.
Like, I don't want to, it'll, it'll ruin my appetite.
Like, I can't even be around that.
So that's absolutely right, man.
Like, it's easy to look at the Netanyahu's and the Ben Gavirs, but you can look right here.
Look at these sick motherfuckers, man.
They're just as sick as any one of those Israeli propagandists who are directly committing this genocide because they're giving the cover for that genocide in the country that's funding and equipping the genocide.
If all of these mostly Jewish people who are Zionist turned against it and spoke against it, I don't think it would be sustainable.
And then you're cutting off the head of the beast at its source.
Right.
But they're not going to do that.
No, no, absolutely.
No, I feel the same way.
Like when I never even tell this, I don't think I've ever told it.
In fact, I know I've never told the story because I've made a conscious effort not to because I don't, I'm not really comfortable like even expressing myself in this way in like day-to-day life.
Believe it or not, I don't talk politics very often outside of this show here, but my kids have a pediatrician's group that they belong to.
So they don't have one doctor.
It's a medical group.
So they have a rotating, you know, sort of roster of doctors.
And one of them is a Palestinian doctor and he wears a free Palestine bracelet whenever he's working.
And I've only seen him a couple of times because it's a rotating roster of doctors.
You don't get the same guy every time.
And when he comes in, he examines the kid.
Obviously, there's no politics talked about in the exam room.
But on his way out, I make a point to say, hey, I love your bracelet.
You know, rock on.
He says, thank you at least, you know.
And I'm not comfortable doing that.
To me, like, you know, that's like, that's like telling a black doctor, by the way, I voted for Obama twice.
Like, I don't like, it's uncomfortable.
It's get out the Jewish edition.
It's the Jewish get out.
You're sending him to the sunken place.
It's the Jewish get out.
Like, I'm going to cut his brain out or something.
Yeah.
So I just like, I'm very uncomfortable doing that shit.
I really don't like to.
But in this case, I do feel obligated to because he sees on the fucking form that my last name is Weiss.
And I don't want him to think that I'm one of these genocidal sick fucks who's going to judge him for wearing a fucking bracelet.
You know, and I want him to feel secure in wearing the bracelet at work because I think it's great that he wears it.
So I like I so yeah, the point of that is it's something that Jews have to live down.
We do.
We have to live it down.
And that's not like, I don't talk about this to redeem Judaism.
The opposite.
The culture has become completely toxic.
That's how you get people like this going on a stage and saying shit like that.
Yeah.
I mean, look, in hindsight, they were always Zionist.
And frankly, it was easier to ignore that and focus on the stuff that I think American Jews, and particularly New York Jews, identify as Judaism, which is basically shtetl humor and, you know, a certain gallows humor.
You know, I mean, we, we look more to, you know, the Marx brothers as our cultural inheritance than Ben-Gurion.
And this just made it impossible to look at it that way.
And like I said, man, you know, for those of us, I will include myself who didn't pay that much attention to it.
It's not that it wasn't there.
It's just that we weren't looking and it was easy not to look.
It was easy to look at the parts of the culture that we identified with and not look at a lot of what was going on under the surface.
Right.
Exactly.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week.
And it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
And it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
Welcome to the Jimmy Dora show, everybody.
Keaton and Russ from New Dissonance in for Jimmy while he is on the road in Australia.
All right.
So the plot just gets funnier and funnier here with this whole Epstein files debacle.
So here is Pam Bondi today when asked.
So what are the next steps for the DOJ regarding the Epstein files?
Just to catch everybody up in case you missed it.
House passed the vote 427 to 1.
Senate passed the bill through unanimous consent.
And so now the Epstein Files Transparency Act goes to the president's desk where it is obviously essentially a foregone conclusion that it will be signed.
And so that puts the ball once again in Pam Bondi's court.
Doesn't that make you feel just great?
Here she is answering what the next steps are.
Attorney General for the DOJ regarding the what we assume President Trump will sign into law with the Epstein files.
Is this going to be on the Justice Department website?
What are you doing here over the next 30 days as we understand it?
We will continue to follow the law with maximum transparency while protecting victims.
When you say, Attorney General, do you mean that you will provide all the files by 30 days?
We will follow the law.
The law passed both chambers last evening.
It has not yet been signed, but we will continue to follow the law again while protecting victims, but also providing maximum transparency.
Oh, they are such a sad stack.
They are really just a sad lot.
This is a, you know, this is the how it's going meme of the how it started, how it's going.
That's what this looks like.
Look at Kash Patel.
Still a sad look at crazy eyes back there.
Yeah, look at it back there.
Okay, so what she's talking about when she says we'll follow the law is this.
Why the Epstein files won't be released as soon as the law is passed?
President Trump may soon sign the Epstein files bill into law, but don't expect his administration to actually release documents quickly.
The bill's loopholes for active investigations and national security give Trump officials broad cover to delay or heavily redact documents.
The Epstein Files Transparency Act's language outlines how the Attorney General could hold off from sharing the files.
The bill says that any records or information that would jeopardize an active federal investigation or prosecution can be withheld or redacted.
Now, there is language in the House bill that such withholding is supposed to be temporary, but that is a word that could be exploited as much as the executive branch wants it to be.
And the only people who could do anything about it are the congress people who passed the Transparency Act in the first place, meaning they would have to impeach Donald Trump and Pam Bondi, which I would argue is a necessary step if it comes to that.
Pam Bondi should be impeached right now.
And if you have any doubts about that, you have to listen to this answer here.
This is just incredible.
Where she is asked, hey, what changed?
Because remember, you guys released that memo in July saying this case was closed.
And so why now are we releasing more files and doing more investigations?
What happened between now and then?
Madam Attorney General, the DOJ statement earlier this year saying that the files would not release mentioned the fact that the review of the documents and the evidence did not suggest that any additional investigation of third parties was warranted.
What changed since then that you launched this investigation?
Information that has come for information.
There's information, new information, additional information.
New information.
We'll continue to follow.
Complicated case, Maude.
A lot of ins, a lot of outs.
You're not hip to all the new shit.
That's what Kash Patel should have said.
You know, it's a complicated case, Maud.
A lot of ins, a lot of outs.
New information has come to light.
New shit has come to light.
Investigation.
Information that has come for information.
There's information that new information, additional information.
And again, we will continue to follow the law to investigate any leads.
If there are any victims, we encourage all victims to come forward.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That is some of the most brazen bullshit I've ever heard anyone say into a microphone.
And I've now done this for a living for a few years.
I've been following politics since I was a kid.
I don't think I've ever seen anything quite as shameless in my entire life.
New information has come to light.
When?
When?
Because this was the memo that started all of this.
Remember, this was back in July.
You guys started all of this.
It was the DOJ and the FBI that got this whole shitstorm growing when they decided to send a memo saying that Epstein had no client list, died by self-deletion.
And essentially, this is now a cold case.
It's a dead case.
There's no more relevant information that needs coming out.
And now you're saying four months later, the day after the House is forced by the president to pass this bill because Thomas Massey and Marjorie Taylor Greene basically cucked the entire Republican Party into bending the knee.
Now you're saying that new information has come.
Okay, so if new information has come to light, where was the memo?
You put a memo out four months ago saying nothing more to see here.
And now you're telling us that new information has come to light.
So if new information had come to light, why wasn't there a follow-up memo?
Because of course, no new information has come to light.
The information that they have now is the same information that they had months ago.
It's the same information that they are intent on covering up.
That is obviously true.
And so if you're looking at Pam Bondi and Kash Patel now, that answer there, where she says new information has come to light, means either one of two things must be true.
Either this memo was born of shocking incompetence and negligence to declare the Epstein case essentially closed before you had enough information gathered to make that conclusion, or you're covering it up and lying about it now.
So if the former is true, you should be fired.
And if the latter is true, you should be impeached by Congress.
Those are the only two options.
It doesn't make sense that you would do any other thing because for her to say new information has come to light is such an obvious crock of shit.
And even if it isn't a crock of shit, it means this memo should have never been sent in the first place.
It is just really, really shocking, a stunning answer.
And it's such an unnecessarily stupid answer.
All she had to say was, look, we don't think there's anything new to release, but the law was passed.
So I guess we'll give you what we got.
No new information has come to light.
We did our investigation.
We stand behind our work and we'll let you guys see it and make that determination for yourselves.
That may not have gone well in the long run.
I don't think it would have, but it's a more savvy answer than this.
When you say new information has come to light, you're admitting that you either closed the case prematurely or you lied.
That is an unbelievable answer to give.
Well, new information has come to light.
And speaking of crazy eyes, Kash Patel, this is in September.
So this is the interim between the memo and where we are now.
This is him being asked by John Kennedy here.
I think that's his name.
Pretty sure that's his name.
John Paul Kennedy.
John Paul Kennedy.
If there's any credible info that Epstein trafficked people, trafficked victims to others.
In most of the files.
Who, if anyone, did Epstein traffic these young women to besides himself?
Himself.
There is no credible information.
Wow.
If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he cashed other individuals.
And the information we have, again, is limited.
So that was in September.
So a July memo gets sent saying no new information.
He backs that up as late as September.
So you're telling me in the last 60 days, new information has come to light, but you didn't bother saying anything about it until coincidentally the House passed the Epstein Transparency Act and the Senate pushed it through with unanimous consent.
And it's now on the doorstep of becoming law.
This is when, by coincidence, you decide to reveal that new information has come to light.
That is, that is really, I mean, off the top of my head, I can't think of anything more brazen than that.
That is as shameless a load of bullshit as I have heard, maybe ever.
Yeah, Pam Bondi is the two-headed goat in the freak show that is the Trump cabinet.
It is just a collection of freaks, weirdos, and crackpots because nobody with a reputation to protect would agree to work for this president because they understand what the job is going to entail.
They understand how likely it is that they're going to wind up being prosecuted for things that they're going to end up having to do to keep that job for a man who really doesn't give a shit about them, who has destroyed the careers and reputations of anybody who's ever shaken hands with him, really, and come to work in the previous administration.
So who do you wind up with?
You wind up with people with nothing to lose.
You wind up with Bondi, who no real president would ever give that job to, right?
You wind up with crazy eyes Kash Patel, a guy so fucking nuts.
He writes a children's book about himself as a knight protecting King Donald.
Somebody that mentally unstable has no shot at being the head of the FBI.
That's like you took some creepy fan fiction shipper weirdo and you just put him in charge of the FBI.
Literally, that's what he did.
Heg Seth the drunk in charge of the Defense Department.
You can't make it up, man.
It's like a Bill Murray parody from the 70s about Bill Murray as a completely out of control president and appointing his friends to be his cabinet.
And that's what you get, man.
You get what you pay for.
You get the kind of person who's going to be willing to work for a president like that.
And Pam Bondi fits that bill.
Her job there is not to be an independent, credible attorney general.
Her job there is to give North Korea levels of submission to Donald Trump and whatever the fuck he tells her to go out there and do.
And that's what she does.
A lot of these people are going to end up in prison.
I'm increasingly convinced of that, which is not to say, oh, the Democrats are good, but they are setting themselves up in a way that I don't think they're going to get a lot of people from their team to protect them when those prosecutions come.
I think they're going to wind up being such a such a despised embarrassment to the entire political class that there's not going to be anybody there to come save them.
Yeah.
And understand, Pambony is a woman who can ruin anyone of our lives if she wants to.
That's what the Attorney General's job is to do, is to ruin people's lives using the law as a weapon.
She has immense power over every single one of us.
Do we trust a person like that with that kind of power?
Does she deserve prosecutorial power?
A person who just lies like that so brazenly to protect an international sex trafficking ring.
And look, I'm equal opportunity.
That guy who was running for attorney general in Virginia, who wrote the text messages about how he hopes that his Republican kids die.
I don't think that guy should have been voted in as AG.
I think he should have withdrawn.
On either side of the aisle, it doesn't matter.
The attorney general is a very serious responsibility.
They have prosecutorial power over people.
They can fuck your life up whenever they want.
That is their job.
That's why these prosecutors are the most vicious people on earth.
That's why Kamala Harris tried to lock up the parents of Truant Kid.
Like this is what their job is.
And so do you trust a person?
Like, if you have prosecutorial power over people in that way, I think you have to pass a pretty strict character test.
And someone who would lie like that, they're not fit for the job.
They're not fit for the job.
They either need to be fired or they need to be impeached because either that memo was sent out of extreme incompetence or intentional deceit.
I think we all know which of those two it was.
I think we all know which it was.
But either way, she's got no business being there.
And neither does the lunatic standing over her left shoulder there because he's on that memo too.
Well, nobody who would sit at a table with the president, with the press there and gush.
And because of the things that our wonderful president has done, and I want to thank you, President Trump, that that's not qualified.
That's not what an attorney general is supposed to be.
That's not what they're supposed to do.
I mean, we're not naive about this.
We're not going to say that all these attorney generals have been completely independent of the president in the way that they should be.
And there's no discussion behind the scenes.
But at this point, you're completely throwing out any premise or standard of independence.
You're just getting rid of that standard by the attorney general.
It's like, yeah, corporate media might suck, but there is a standard that ostensibly they're supposed to meet that you can call them out for not meeting.
Hey, these are not the facts.
Did you fact check this?
Part of the problem we have now that we can see with independent media is anyone can say anything.
And what you've wanted, what that has led to is not something better than corporate media.
It's like corporate media without any standards.
Right.
I mean, how do you think we got here?
That's our career.
Yeah.
I mean, that's what I mean.
I should probably just shut up now, actually.
Blowing up our whole gig.
I'm blowing up the grip.
This is Russell Dobular with Keaton Weiss filling in for Jimmy Dore, who is touring the beautiful land down under.
So Stacey Plaskett was revealed to have literally taken orders and directions from Jeffrey Epstein during a hearing questioning Michael Cohen.
So we'll take a look at that video here.
And then the aftermath of this revelation.
Newly released documents reviewed by the Washington Post appear to indicate that during a 2019 hearing where Michael Cohen testified, Jeffrey Epstein was texting with delegate Stacey Plaskett, Democrat Virgin Islands.
The Post reviewed multiple video feeds from the hearing and matched the texts, which were sent in Pacific time with the video.
So Epstein texts her, are you chewing?
And while we were once driving through a struggling neighborhood in Chicago.
Not anymore, she says.
That only black people could live that way.
Attorney Klein Privilege, yes, I will turn it over.
Cohen brought up Rona, keeper of the secrets.
This is Donald Trump's assistant.
This is what Epstein's texting to her.
You, as my friend, Mr. Meadows pointed out, misled this committee even today in a written submission that contradicted your testimony.
Rona, she asked.
Did you review it?
Are you going to review it in our next break to correct the record?
Yes or no?
Yes.
Quick question.
Up next.
Is that an acronym?
That's his assistant.
You're O'Connell sitting right there.
He was so close.
Case slipped right under his nose.
Weisenberg and other individuals, Miss Rona.
Who are those individuals?
Are they with the Trump organization?
Are there other people that we should be meeting with?
So Alan Weiselberg is the chief financial officer.
Uh-huh.
You got to quickly give us as many names as you can so we can get to them.
Yes, ma'am.
Okay, so look at what she does there.
She rushes him so that she can get to the person that Epstein directed her to focus on.
Is Miss Rona?
What is Miss Rona's?
Rona Graff is the Mr. Trump's executive assistant.
And would she be able to corroborate many of the statements that you've made here?
Yes, she was her office is directly next to his.
Good work.
Epstein says.
Involved in a lot.
Yeah, it all worked out.
All right.
Now, I like to think that I am no longer a sweet summer child, that I am wise in the ways of Washington and the Democratic Party.
When I saw this break, I honestly assumed they were going to call her and tell her to step down from her committees.
I assumed that that's just they're in the middle of this is the first break they've caught in a long time.
This Epstein thing, it's working for them in spite of whoever is Democrat aligned that might be implicated.
So far, you got a younger generation like Conna, too young to have been on that island, too young to have visited Epstein for donations, unlike Plaskett herself.
But no, no.
Okay, so the GOP did bring to the floor a effort to censure Plaskett, which would have led to her being removed from her committees.
Here is Jamie Raskin, who has been making a lot of noise about the morality of the Epstein files, making maybe the craziest, dumbest defense of this that you could imagine.
They want to take a former United States prosecutor, the representative of the people of the Virgin Islands, and without even going to the ethics committee, much less a court, they want to arraign her on some charges based on a newspaper article that she did something lawful.
However ill-advised it may have been, she took a phone call from one of her constituents.
Now, I don't think it is the position of the very distinguished gentleman, Jeffrey Epstein.
If we find Jeffrey Epstein on the phone with Donald Trump, he should be impeached for it.
Or is that his position?
Is his position that anytime Jeffrey Epstein got somebody on the phone and he got a lot of people on the phone, that person is suddenly guilty?
That sounds like guilt by association.
That sounds like collective guilt.
So we're in the same middle.
He's going like vaguely, vaguely Zionist now.
He's making the same exact case that Mike Johnson made.
He's making the same exact case that Mike Johnson made to defend Donald Trump.
That's the exact same case.
Yes, that is really the level of hypocrisy and just political tone deafness to go to the mat.
I honestly don't understand it.
No.
She's a delegate from the freaking Virgin Islands.
Like, why would you not just withdraw her?
And then you can run on that, right?
Hey, when we found that somebody in our own house was taking direction, oh, he's a constituent.
Oh, the one who at that point had long been recognized as a convicted sex offender.
Oh, that can say, okay, so can all the sex offenders in the Virgin Islands just call members of Congress delegates and tell them how to handle hearings?
Like what?
It's just insane.
Not to be outdone, Crockett, and this is the direction they're going in.
Well, what if we're going to apply those standards to your people?
See, this is the thing, guys.
Most American people's answer to, well, so do you want these people held accountable?
Most Americans who you're supposed to be working for would say yes.
Well, also, I thought this is what we're talking about, that everyone in the Epstein file should be held accountable.
That's the whole thing.
You're trying to prosecute a case here.
Right.
It's like you're trying to prosecute a case against Donald Trump, ultimately, at the end of the day.
So what political sense does it make to basically exonerate him by exonerating Stacey Plaskett?
For who?
For Plasket?
What?
Five.
She doesn't even vote.
She doesn't.
It's not like you can't.
She's a delegate.
We're the minority party.
We need every vote we can get.
We had 218 for Epstein, and so she's our 218th vote.
So we can't let her go.
No, she doesn't vote.
She does you no good whatsoever.
None.
No, it's amazing.
It's amazing.
So here's Crockett, who claims that Lee Zeldon took money from Epstein.
But it turns out that the Dr. Jeffrey Epstein who donated to Zeldon is not that Jeffrey Epstein.
Folks who also took money from somebody named Jeffrey Epstein, as I had my team dig in very quickly, Mitt Romney, the NRCC, Lee Zeldon, George Bush, Wynne Red, McCain Palin, Rick Lazio.
I just want to be clear.
If this is the standard that we're going to make, just know we're going to expose it all.
And just know that the FEC filings, they are available for everybody to review.
This is absolutely ridiculous.
You expose our corrupt politicians.
We'll expose yours is not the winning political Trump card you seem to think it is.
That is not a winning argument for the American people.
That's not appealing to most people.
You might have some MSNBC libs who eat that up.
Well, also strategically, it's completely backwards.
Like I could understand making that argument if you're the majority party and you have the presidency, because then you're telling the minority party, hey, you fuck with us.
We're going to fuck you back.
And we have more people than you.
So we're going to end up on top at the end of all that.
You're the minority party trying to go on offense and prosecute a case.
And you're saying at the other side of your mouth, well, it doesn't matter that she was taking orders from Jeffrey Epstein.
If it's a problem for us, we'll make it a problem for you.
You'll go after your people.
Yeah.
All right.
So here's Plaskett.
Here's Plaskett trying to talk her way out of this.
I got a text from Jeffrey Epstein, who at the time was my constituent, who was not public knowledge at that time.
That's an absolute lie.
He had been prosecuted as a sex offender 11 years before.
The guy was about to be murdered with piano wire in his cell.
The guy was dead a few months after he sent those text messages.
No, nobody.
The idea that this was not known.
That he was under federal investigation and who was sharing information with me.
No, I heard recently.
Okay, so she's trying to take this angle too, that she was trying to maintain the relationship because she was trying to get information from him.
She has not defined what that information was, by the way.
She's just kind of vaguely hinting at information.
We showed this.
We're not going to show it in this segment.
We showed when we covered the first part of this on our own show.
She was the one who really grilled Schellenberger and Taibbi and called them so-called journalists during the Twitter files hearings.
You could not find a more disgusting example of exactly the kind of Democrat that makes people run in the other direction, that makes people vote for anyone who's not a Democrat.
Like you could not find a better example of why the Democrats, even in the face of the disaster that the Trump administration has quickly shown itself to be, have a 26% approval rating.
You could not find a better example of why that is than Stacey Plaskett.
And here they are all rallying around her to protect her when she's been exposed in the most blatant and humiliating way possible, other than being in a sex tape, which she was actually, but not related to Jeffrey Epstein.
All right.
So here she is on CNN and good on them.
They pushed back on a lot of this.
Jeffrey Epstein had information and I was going to get information to get it the truth.
Having a real friendship with him is not something that I would deem to have.
And so I'm just looking forward.
I'm moving forward.
And I think that that's what we as American people should do is move forward.
If individuals are not involved in illegal activity, extending his criminal enterprise or his financial enterprise or all of those things, I think that we need to look at what people are doing moving forward.
Wait, let me just better understand that.
What is that point?
Because at the time he wasn't a sex offender and it had been detailed all the sexual affairs.
There are a lot of people who have done a lot of crimes.
And as a prosecutor, you get information from people where you can.
There are a lot of people who have committed a lot of crimes.
It's like what Trump said about the Syria guy.
Remember, Jelani came.
He says, He's had a rough pass.
It's a lot of killers.
Yeah, a lot of killers.
I am a delegate for the Virgin Islands.
93% of people on the Virgin Islands have been convicted of a crime.
So if I did not take texts from criminals, I wouldn't be able to represent the Virgin Islands.
The Virgin Islands, the pillows are not stuffed with feathers.
They're stuffed with $100 bills.
$100 bills.
Cocaine.
Yes.
I overdosed once staying at a hotel.
So this failed.
Republicans failed to oust Plaskett from House in Tail and shock vote.
And now, this is because not only did every single fucking Democrat, I want you to remember that.
I want you to remember that.
All of these people, RoConna, right?
The squad, all these people who claim they're so horrified about Jeffrey Epstein.
This was the first opportunity they got to turn the page and to start to deflect some of the accusations of hypocrisy around this issue.
Why didn't you do this under Biden?
Why didn't you do this under Biden?
This was their first opportunity to say, it's a new day.
That's it.
Sunlight's the best disinfectant.
We're too young to have been on that island.
We don't care.
Let's first opportunity.
All of them, all of them, all of them lined up to defend this piece of fucking garbage that does nothing, nothing but drive people out of the party.
Nothing.
She does absolutely nothing for the Democrats but turn people off to Democrats.
But of course, you needed some Republican defectors given that unity on the part of the Democrats.
So six Republicans did not support the central resolution.
And this is when you always know the fix is in, when it's just enough to get you over the number.
They made a deal.
It's 214 to 213.
They figured out who's bulletproof in their district.
And those are the ones who were allowed to vote that way.
Surprise didn't get Clay Higgins to stick in.
He's done enough this week for the APAC lobby.
So voted no.
Lance Gooden, Don Bacon, David Joyce, and three voted present to get it right over the line.
Now, the reason they did that was to protect their own corrupt politician who's been accused of domestic violence by his ex-girlfriend and threatening to release indelicate pictures of her.
So the Democrats said, well, if you get rid of Plaskett, we're going to go after him.
We have a tweet summing all this up from Marjorie Taylor Green that we'll read.
But here is Anna Paulina Luna calling out her fellow Republicans and the House as a whole on this.
Purpose does the gentlelady from Florida seek recognition.
I have a parliamentary inquiry.
The gentlelady from Florida will state her inquiry.
I was wondering if the speaker of the House of Representatives can explain why leadership on both sides, both Democrat and Republican, are cutting back end deals to cover up public corruption in the House of Representatives from both Republican and Democrat members of Congress.
Gentlelady has not stated a proper parliamentary inquiry.
Thank you very much, but I think the American people know what happened tonight.
Gentlelady may now shut her bitch mouth.
So here is Marjorie Taylor Greene explaining exactly what happened.
Yesterday, after five ridiculous months of fighting the White House and the Speaker to get Congress to finally vote to release the Epstein files, a deal was made to stop the censure of Stacey Plaskett, a Democrat delegate from the territory of U.S. Virgin Islands, which would have also kicked her off the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that oversees U.S. intelligence activities for texting with Epstein during an oversight committee hearing in 2019.
Plaskett texted with Epstein as he advised her questions during the Michael Cohen hearing, knowing his convictions and record of rape and trafficking girls and women.
This was the reason for last night's censure resolution vote.
What was the deal that was made?
Three Republicans crossed the aisle and voted with Democrats to stop the Plaskett censure resolution and a swap so the Democrats would not bring up the Corey Mills censure resolution for alleged physical assaults and threatening to release pornography on an ex-girlfriend and ethics violations and questionable military record.
Apparently, he pulled a Tim Waltz and claimed stolen valor.
You, the American people, should be outraged by this against both parties.
And you should be asking many questions.
For example, why does Plaskett, who is a non-voting delegate from a U.S. territory, serve on the House Intelligence Committee, Ways and Means, and Budget Committee?
Those are very powerful, influential committees, and she can't even vote on the House floor.
Honestly, when that came up with Schellenberger and Taibbi, I was wondering that.
Like, why is she even on these committees?
Like, why, why would they?
I don't understand.
That never made any sense to me.
And Corey Mills serves on the House Armed Services Committee, Foreign Affairs, and Subcommittees on Intelligence.
So, why did both sides work together to stop both Plaskett and Mills censure resolutions last night in order to protect both Plaskett and Mills?
Members of Congress like me never ever received such protection and never will.
Instead of working to pass legislation that supports policies you voted for, passing our appropriation bills and solving real crisis issues like healthcare, Congress is trapped in the quicksand of the swamp with no intention of getting out.
And according to accounts, Nancy Mace actually screamed at the three Republicans who voted no on the House floor.
So I don't know how reliable this is.
It's coming from Nick Sorter, but he says that Nancy Mace will be moving to censure Corey Mills today.
Several Republican members are livid over alleged backroom deals that killed the censors of Ilhan Omar and Stacey Plaskett in order to protect Mills from investigation.
So we'll see if that actually materializes.
But yeah, it's a big club and you ain't in it, man.
It's bipartisan corruption.
They wanted to protect their own corrupt member.
So they did a quid pro quo.
We'll get just enough votes for you to keep her.
But as Marjorie Taylor Greene lays out there, on both sides, why?
Like, why?
Why are you going this far to protect these two?
I mean, with Plaskett, with the connection with Epstein, and, you know, it seems like a lot of funky shit goes on on the Virgin Islands.
You have to start to wonder, like, why did she get put on these committees?
Like, does she working for intelligence?
Like, what, what, was her relationship with Epstein beyond what we understand right now?
Because it just doesn't add up that you would take a non-voting delegate and put them on these very sought-after, very powerful committees.
Like, why is that?
Um, and on the other side, why are the Republicans going this far to rescue a guy who, look, man, we know Republicans don't care much about smacking your woman around, but they do care about stolen valor.
Like, why, why are you protecting this guy?
The whole thing makes it just makes no sense.
I mean, the Occam's Razor perspective at this point is that, like, all of these people are corrupt and they all have, you know, skeletons in their closet.
And they all know that if the gentleman's agreement is broken, that it's open season on one person, then eventually their number will be up.
Well, that makes sense.
That's like the simplest explanation.
It's kind of the only one that makes sense, especially with it still doesn't explain Plaskett's career, though.
Well, that what is she even doing on those when it comes to the committees and the ranks and stuff like that?
That's where you have to wonder.
I mean, yeah, there's a lot of weird shit in the Virgin Islands.
There's a lot of money in the Virgin Islands.
You know, who knows?
I mean, that's a rabbit hole.
We can't do anything but speculate about that, at least for the time being.
But why everybody goes to bat for each other is because, yeah, I think they fear that, you know, their number could be up one day if people start looking to their side, you know?
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to jimmydorkomedy.com, sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
He can be found at mikemcray.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.
