CAUGHT On Hidden Camera: DOJ Official ADMITS Epstein Coverup!
James O’Keefe’s latest undercover sting involved a set-up “date” with DOJ Deputy Chief Joseph Schnit, who admitted on camera that they Epstein files will be redacted to shield Republicans while leaving Democrats exposed. He also confirmed Ghislaine Maxwell’s cushy prison transfer violated Bureau of Prisons policy, implying she’s being rewarded for keeping quiet. Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger ridicule the charade that the DOJ promised full transparency under Trump, but later reversed course, claiming videos were “just Epstein’s own child porn” and warning about “revictimization.” Inside the administration, DOJ and FBI brass are reportedly split, with Kash Patel and Dan Bongino pushing release while Pam Bondi allegedly blocks it at Trump’s behest. Plus segments on Fox News host Chris Wallace’s dismantling of James Comey’s lies right to the former FBI Director’s face and the serious threat posed by Keir Starmer’s proposed Digital ID plan. Also featuring Mike MacRae and Stef Zamorano. And a phone call from Kash Patel!
Come see me on tour in Hermosa Beach, Sacramento, San Francisco, Melbourne, Australia, Sydney, Australia, Brisbane, Burbank, California, the day after Thanksgiving, and Potsdown, Pennsylvania.
Go to JimmyDoor.com for a link for tickets.
Hey, this is Jimmy.
Who's this?
Hey, this is Gash Patel.
Oh, hello, Director Patel.
Thanks for calling.
What's up, my brother?
What's on your mind today?
Well, Jimmy, needless to say, the FBI is strenuously and assiduously investigating the deplorable shooting today at an ICE facility in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
We are working with state, local, and regional law enforcement agencies and entities, both seen and unseen, in and around the Dallas-Fort Worth area.
And are working around the clock to resolve this situation and bring anyone to justice who still living needs to be brought there.
Amen.
Amen.
Can you give us an idea of where this investigation currently stands?
Yeah, totally.
Absolutely.
Well, the shooter, the sniper, we have their bullets or the part of the bullet that stays behind when the bullet is fired.
You mean the shell casings.
Yes, exactly.
The shell casings.
So we have those.
And messages were written on them, and the messages contain helpful information to the investigation, which our investigators, FBI investigators, are currently investigating.
Okay.
What kind of message?
Well, first of all, Jimmy, I'd like to remind everyone this is a rapidly developing situation.
A lot of conflicting information has come to light.
But to answer your question, these shell bullets.
Shell casings.
These shell casings had, quote, anti-ICE written on them, which indicates to our top investigators and forensic experts that the shooter may have harbored anti-ICE sentiments.
I see.
I see.
So boom, right there, left-wing violence.
Like JP Vance tweeted out, it said right there on the casings, anti-ICE.
How much clearer could this get?
But the shooter didn't kill any ICE agents.
He shot detainees.
Yeah, that's weird.
That is weird.
We're definitely looking into that.
That's also being investigated currently.
Why would a leftist shooter target vulnerable immigrants who are being detained and deported?
Yeah, yeah.
Well, he could just be really bad at shooting, possibly.
That's one.
Also, maybe he hated ICE so much that he knew that their favorite thing was being mean to Mexicans.
So if he killed Mexicans, he would rob ICE of the opportunity to be mean to them, which would ruin their day.
Are you being serious right now?
Dude, I don't fucking know, okay?
I don't have all the answers presently.
All I know is that this was left-wing violence.
How do you know this was left-wing violence before the case has even been concluded?
Because it is, okay?
It always is.
It's always left-wing violence.
I'm sorry, do you have a windbreaker that says FBI director on it that makes a Down when you walk up to a podium, give a press conference about some serious ass FBI shit.
No, I didn't think so.
Look, I'm not saying he's not.
Why this mad rush to steer the narrative before getting all the facts?
Because this is the Trump DOJ, dude.
It's a lot less, man.
You think I'm qualified for this job I'm in?
Absolutely the fuck not, dude.
But guess what?
I got the fucking Windbreaker wearing it right now.
I have this job because I'm good at talking shit, but I'm not good at solving crime.
No idea what I'm doing.
Whatever, who cares?
I'm still getting laid than more than probably anybody.
Okay.
My job is to immediately start tweeting out evidence to the public in the beginning stages of an investigation in the most inconceivably irresponsible way imaginable.
Former FBI directors criticize that.
Suck my dick, dude.
Where are you now?
Not running the FBI anymore.
That's where.
Enjoy going to Applebee's in the DC suburbs with your family's losers.
I'm drinking Chris Stahl up in the club, bitch.
Shouldn't the FBI director be a little more circumspect than that?
Don't even know what that means.
Don't even care, dude.
All I know is Trump gives me a raise every time a shooter is left wing.
I'm here to make bank, not make friends.
Maybe I'll investigate your fucking ass.
Me?
Sure, why not?
I'm Cash Patel, bitch.
Well, what would you investigate me for?
I have no idea, but we're the FBI.
We can deaf cook something up.
We can cook something up by EOD if need be.
EOD.
Yeah, I think you'd be pretty bored if you investigated me, actually.
Oh, boring?
You know what's not boring?
These bullets I just found in Jimmy Dore's garage that have this.
This is for the trans girlies written on them and lipstick.
Oh, dang.
Looks like Jimmy Dore's trans Tifa.
See how easy this is?
This job fucking rules, dude.
Okay, well, thank you, Mr. Pretell, for...
Okay.
Well, thank you, Mr. Patel, for introducing yourself to us and giving us a little insight on how the FBI is currently run.
Please don't investigate me.
Just don't say anything we don't like.
That's all.
Won't be no shit if you don't start no shit.
Okay, well, we've got to go now.
Peace out, brother.
Maybe I'll see you in Valhalla too along with Charlie Kirk, John Claude Van Damme, and Megatron from the Transformers.
Goddamn, I fucking love cocaine, dude.
Bullshit, we can't afford fomenting this world.
Watch and see as a jack-off comedian who speeds and jumps the medium and hits him head-on.
It's the chimney tour show.
Boy, this James O'Keefe guy, this is amazing.
It's amazing what slubby-looking guys will say when a beautiful woman pays them attention.
And it's not just straight guys, too.
It's gay guys also.
No, gay guys and fat, straight guys will go for anything.
Yeah.
So James O'Keefe has done it again.
World exclusive bombshell, a senior Department of Justice Epstein investigator reveals on an undercover camera that Epstein was CIA.
Of course, this is stuff we all know, but it's nice to have it confirmed by a CIA guy on an undercover camera.
He confirms that grapes occurred while Bill Clinton was on the plane.
Says of President Trump, he's protecting a lot of other people.
He's not protecting himself because there's nothing there.
This is what this guy said on an undercover video.
So let's talk about the effort soon come out that he was a CIA.
So he's saying, so they met this.
So some woman, I'm going to guess some very beautiful woman, meets some slubby guy who works for the FBI.
She knows he does because he's got, he's got this, or the Department of Justice, he's got this badge on his backpack.
So she goes over, starts trying to honeypot him, talk to, and he just starts blabbing to her.
And then they go to lunch after and he keeps going.
So what he just said, it's not talked about yet, but it's soon to come out that Epstein was a CIA informant.
That's what he just said right there.
Oh, no.
What about Massad?
He didn't mention that, right?
So he was a CIA information.
He wasn't a CIA.
I think he's protecting a lot of other people.
He's not protecting himself.
So he says, I think Trump is protecting a lot of other people.
He's not protecting himself because there's nothing there, but he's protecting a lot of people.
That's worse.
Which is worse.
Trump's protecting other people and not himself.
Why are you doing that?
Why would he be doing that?
He's protecting a lot of people.
Because Trump's now saying it's a hoax.
That's the guy.
Trump's now saying it's a hoax.
The case is like a hoax.
The case is like a hoax or something.
You know, it's not a hoax.
He's been on the plane many times.
So Trump's been on at the Lolita Express many times.
He was just never on the plane with kids.
He was never on the plane with kids.
I've seen the itineraries and I've interviewed all of the victims.
There's never been an instance where Trump was on a plane with these kids.
And a grape.
So he said, I've read all the, he's looked into it.
He's read all the things.
And there was never an instance when Trump was on a plane when these kids were graped.
I can't be said for Trump.
He says, but that cannot be said for Clinton.
And it can't be said for others.
Is there any word on the 13, the woman who was 13 that said she was with Trump, with Epstein?
Is there any word on that?
Was that, I mean, it could be a thing they made up at the time to smear Trump, but I've never, did they follow up on that?
I'd like to know more about that.
I'd like to know more about it.
Here is more to this.
It can't be said for others.
While the Clintons were on the plane, while Bill Clinton was on the plane, there were grapes of children that occurred.
That's what he's saying there.
And of course, I say grape, so I don't get this demonetized.
That doesn't mean what society is in.
Take the G away.
Here we go.
Overheard at Phoenix Airport on September 8th, 2025.
A senior Justice Department investigator who personally worked on the Epstein case tells all.
Glenn Prager, who has reviewed Epstein itineraries and has interviewed Epstein's victims, drops a bombshell.
He says that the DOJ did not want to go after Epstein because he's a CIA asset.
That the evidence from his investigation confirms that Bill Clinton was present for alleged rapes on the Lolita Express and that President Trump was not present for the rapes that Glenn Prager investigated, but that he is protecting a lot of other people that were.
How about this whole Epstein thing?
It's like, okay, I worked in that case.
I used to interview all the victims.
He said, I worked in that case.
I used to interview all the victims.
And then my picture was.
My picture was 20 to 30 victims in Palm Beach that I was interviewing.
20 to 30 victims that I was in a room and dealing with stuff like that.
And then Ready to go to trial?
They would flip.
So then they would get ready to go to trial and all those witnesses would flip.
I wonder why.
Epstein would just pay them off.
Epstein would just pay them off.
And they were just like these little kids.
They pay off their family.
They're all broke kids with poor families.
That's why Jeffrey Epstein targeted poor kids because they're easy to pay off.
So he didn't target rich kids.
He targeted poor kids.
Yeah, once everyone's poor, everyone will be very easy to pay off.
And they were just like little kids.
They're all broke kids and poor families.
So you pay them off anywhere from $150,000 to $500,000.
Nothing in that guy's father.
So you pay him off with $150,000, maybe $500,000, which is nothing to an international trafficker who's got the biggest single family residence in Manhattan, which is Jeffrey Epstein.
Prager there describes how the victims that he interviewed were paid off by Epstein right before going to trial.
Prager has worked as an investigator inside the Department of Justice for over 20 years.
According to Prager's LinkedIn About page, it says that during the tenure at DOJ, Prager served as an inspector overseeing sensitive investigations involving major DOJ components, including the FBI, DEA, Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Marshal Service, ATF, and the U.S. Attorney's Offices.
This seems to corroborate what Prager told us.
He was tasked with interviewing Epstein's rape victims and investigating flight logs.
On his backpack in the airport, we spotted an embroidered FBI patch, which caught the attention of our citizen journalist.
I'll tell you this because nobody knows it's not talked about yet, but it's soon come out that he was a CIA.
He was a CIA.
Or he wasn't a CIA.
Although many have suspected it to be the case, this is the first time a Department of Justice official has confirmed that Epstein worked for the CIA and is a foreign asset.
So DOJ probably was settling a case and we were just letting him do house arrests and they minimize his arrest.
Part of that is because all the victims kept on flipping and they didn't have anyone to go to trial with.
The more importantly part is they didn't want to go after him.
He's a, you know, he's an asset for the United States and Israel.
For the CIA.
So there it is, Kurt.
He did mention Israel.
He goes, he's an asset for the United States and Israel, for the CIA.
So he does say it.
I just know that's what he was.
And that's why he was prepared to seal it off for this.
And people turned a blind eye on all this garbage that he was doing at these days.
So he says, people have turned a blind eye to all the garbage Epstein was doing.
He had a lot of secrets, you know, with more about Israel stuff than anything else.
Well, who could have?
I know, more about Israeli stuff than anything else.
I mean, he was doing stuff for Israel and the United States.
He was doing stuff for Israel and the United States.
He was, you know, he was working for both of them.
You know, he's working for both.
Glenn Prager, the Department of Justice investigator on the Epstein case, then talks about whether President Trump was involved.
Many are trying to tie Trump to Epstein, but what Glenn Prager says is that Trump wasn't present during the inappropriate sexual behavior that he was investigating.
But Prager does say that Bill Clinton was.
Backed up by his experience interviewing the victims and reviewing the Epstein Lolita Express itineraries, quote, they killed the Epstein list to protect the Clintons.
They claim that, you know, that Trump's involved in the rapes and all that stuff that he wasn't.
I've seen the agendas.
I've seen the itineraries and I've interviewed all of the victims.
There's never been an incidence where Trump was on a plane with these kids and the rape.
But that can't be said for them.
That can't be said for all this.
I remember that it was being killed because I know friends were there.
The Clintons were on there.
And while the Clintons were on the plane, while the Green Clinton was on the plane, there were rapes that occurred.
And that's what I'm saying.
Although as many flights as there were and all that kind of stuff and on the island and all stuff, he was never there during a civil legs rape.
Clinton, for sure.
And that's where the big cover-up was.
So the big cover-up was around Clinton.
Why is he covering up for the Clintons?
Anyone?
Because he has handlers.
Donald Trump has a boss, and they want to cover it.
That's it.
Department of Justice investigator inside the Trump Justice Department says that while Trump may not have been present during the crimes that Prager investigated, it is clear that Trump is, quote, protecting a lot of people.
I don't know what's new that I have never seen that he's so hesitant to now show what's going on releasing all these files.
I think he's protecting a lot of other people.
He's not protecting himself because there's nothing there, but he's protecting a lot of people.
The citizen journalist boarded American Airlines Flight 1634 and landed in D.C. Monday at 8 o'clock at night and proceeded to go to dinner with this man, this DOJ investigator, at a restaurant called Blue Duck Tavern.
Didn't we eat there?
How does that sound familiar?
Said that the Hyatt, that restaurant?
It sounds like it.
Is that where we went to dinner?
Glenn Prager dislikes the Blue Duck Tavern.
I think we went there.
It sounds like that.
The fact Trump said the Epstein scandal is a hoax.
But he also says, according to the evidence from his investigation, that Trump is not covering up for himself.
Trump's now saying it's a hoax, the case is like a hoax or something, I mean, come on, you know it's not a hoax, he does a lot, he says a lot, he's been on the plane, you know, many times.
It's just he was never on the plane with a kid.
People want to tie it to him and say he's covering up for himself, but he's not.
Now, this is a very good thing for President Trump and seemingly exonerates him from many people who claim that he was doing something inappropriate himself.
This dinner went on for an hour and 45 minutes as this Department of Justice investigator revealed things to a stranger that the leadership of the FBI and the Department of Justice has not.
Prager revealed more information about Trump's hesitation to be fully transparent with the Epstein case, gave us some details about internal gripes against FBI Director Cash Patel from within the FBI, and he detailed a developing feud between Cash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi.
If you'd like to see more of that conversation in the restaurant, you may subscribe to OMG and find it on our website.
Who is like the one name where you're like, oh my God.
So then he tried, so he calls this guy.
So James O'Keefe calls that guy, that FBI guy.
Here he is.
Hey there, is this Glenn?
Yes.
You work for the Department of Justice, correct?
No.
You don't work for the Department of Justice.
You had a patch in your backpack that said FBI, Federal Bureau of Investigation in the airport.
Yeah.
And you talked about how you interviewed the Epstein people, all the Epstein victims.
Do you recall that conversation?
How can I help you?
I wanted to confirm that you, in fact, do work for, did work for the department.
Hang on up the phone.
He hangs up.
Calls him back.
Let's try calling him again.
Glenn?
I'm not talking to you.
I'm not talking to you.
You already did speak to my friend.
Hangs up again.
Now stop talking.
I don't know who you are.
I'm a journalist.
I need your help, sir.
I'm not talking to you or any journalists about anything.
He interviews the Epstein victims.
Can't talk to you.
On the heels of releasing.
So, anyway, that's, I mean, in case anybody needed more confirmation, boy, this James O'Keefe guy, this is amazing.
It's amazing what slubby-looking guys will say when a beautiful woman pays them attention.
And it's not just straight guys, too.
It's gay guys also.
No, gay guys and fat, straight guys will go for anything.
Yeah.
Hey guys and fat, straight guys.
So again, I don't know how James O'Keefe gets this stuff, how they get people to talk like that, but they do.
And apparently, Virginia or Washington, D.C., apparently, you don't need to disclose that you're taping, which is very helpful.
D.C. I've never been in New York.
Why in California do you have to?
California, you have to tell people you're recording.
So I remember whenever I would, I would, whenever I interviewed somebody, I would go, hey, I'm recording this.
So you have to let them know.
But you'd have to do that, I guess, in New York.
And you'd have to do it in Washington, D.C. Is that Virginia?
Maybe.
No, well, D.C. is its own thing.
It's like the city of London or something.
You know, not London itself.
So here's a little more.
So I'll talk about yet, but I'll see you come out.
Anyway, no, we got it.
Department of.
So he says, so the guy reached out.
The Department of Justice investigator reached out offering a response to our report.
You want to hear what his response is?
Ready for this?
I was approached in what I believed was a casual, non-professional context.
Yeah, that's why you let your guard down and told the truth.
And I later learned the individual was misrepresenting themselves.
How dare they do an undercover investigation where they misrepresented?
Because the FBI never does that.
They never pretend to be someone else when they're infiltrating a group to get evidence, right?
They would never do that.
Thinking it was simply personal banter, I responded in kind.
Why would you make all that stuff up then?
So I always, when I'm just having a casual conversation with a stranger, I just make up all this stuff about the Epstein case.
Any remarks from that exchange should not be interpreted as accurate statements because I'm a liar.
That's what he's saying.
Or reflective of my actual work, conduct, or opinions.
I want to ensure there is no confusion caused by the misleading interaction.
Oh, it's misleading.
So this is what's called a gaffe in Washington, D.C., when you get caught telling the truth.
I thought this was fake until I saw this.
Please stop.
I thought it was fake until I saw this idiot put this out here like this.
He says, please stop calling and texting.
It's approaching harassment.
Printing any story related to my opinion is misleading and or is completely inaccurate.
To make it perfectly clear, I was not involved in any way, and any opinions are based on public information.
So that's what he's saying now.
Here's what Jessica Vaughn, immediately underneath this post on Twitter, Jessica Vaughan says, wrap James O'Keefe in guards and prayers.
Roseanne Barr says, excellent work as always.
Roger Stone, this is completely consistent with the research I did for my book, Clinton War on Women, Clinton's War on Women, and its extensive chapter on Epstein.
Luke Rodkowski, friend of the show, says huge.
Huge.
Ginny, I don't know who she is.
She says another conspiracy theory proven true.
Luke Rodkowski doing good, big 1.2,000 likes on it.
Is it really like a thing that, again, this is like that disclosure bullshit?
Like you really needed to wait until one of them let it slip trying to get laid that that's what it was?
The thing we all know.
I mean, no, this is, but this is just, I don't need it, but this now gives reporters and everybody else ammunition when they want to confront Cash Patel or they want to confront Donald Trump or Pam Bondi or Dan Bonjin.
They have now, they have ammunition, real hard evidence of this guy saying this stuff.
So remember what, first of all, they could just show this video of Cash Patel.
This is before he knew he was going to be FBI director.
This is what he used to say to Glenn Beck.
So who has, for instance, who is currently holding this way off the topic, but who has Jeffrey Epstein's black book?
FBI.
The FBI.
But who?
That is.
I mean, that's under direct control of the director of the FBI.
Director of the FBI?
Like the manifesto from the Nashville school shooting of the Catholic schools?
We still haven't seen that, right?
It's not the Nashville police or PD saying we don't want this out.
The FBI airmailed into that operation and said, this is not getting out.
Because they do that because this is another government gangster operation.
All these local law enforcement communities get funding from the DOJ and FBI for local programs.
And if you don't cooperate, you're not getting your million dollars for this.
And you're not getting your, and that's a lot of money in these local districts.
That's how they play the game.
That's why you don't have a black book.
But the black book, it's not just sitting.
I mean, that's Hoover power times 10.
And to me, that's a thing I think President Trump should run on.
On day one, roll out the black book.
And not just that.
On day one, roll out all of the text message communications we were told were deleted.
On day one, play the rest of the video of the pipe armor.
On day, you know, he needs one of the reforms I talk about in Dominic Gangsta's is you need a central node to be continuously declassifying.
It's another thing they do.
They overclass classify.
And I'm telling you, as the former number two in the IC, they overclassify 50% of the stuff there to protect the deep state.
Oh, no, you can't see that.
Nothing to see here.
Gino is a master at it.
That's exactly what they said about the Epstein files, him and Dan Bongino.
Well, I've seen it.
He killed himself.
I saw it.
I saw all the other records.
We'll release all the records.
I don't care if he killed himself.
Who was going to his island and doing stuff with kids that still works there?
That's what I wanted to know.
Hey, why don't you release the black book that he's screaming about here with Glenn Beck that he's saying that it's directly in control of the FBI director?
Well, guess who's the FBI director now?
Him.
Why are they saying the black book?
That's the thing Nick Bryant had that he wrote his book about.
He told us on the show.
The flight logs, is that what they mean?
The black book is what Nick Bryant has.
He's the one more than in the binder they've had.
Nick Bryant had that black book.
And I remember him getting it from the FBI.
So let's watch.
Well, according to the FBI director now, in 2023, the guy who's currently the FBI director was saying that the FBI director has all the pertinent documents.
He has the Hoover power times 10.
J. Edgar Hoover Power.
He's got the blackmail stuff.
The FBI director does.
Has he released any of that stuff?
Absolutely not.
He said that they should release everything from doing it.
And so that's one of those rare videotapes where Cash Patel, where his eyes don't look like he caught him tugging it in the bathroom, if you know what I mean.
Here's what Donald Trump says about it.
Mr. President, I know you've urged people to move on, but I'm curious, why do you think your supporters in particular have been so interested in the Epstein story?
I don't know upset about how it's been handled.
I don't understand why they would be so interested.
He's dead for a long time.
He was never a big factor in terms of life.
I don't understand what the interest or what the vaccination is.
I really don't.
And the credible information's been given.
Don't forget we went through years of the Mueller witch hunt and all of the different things to steal Dossier, which was all fake.
All that information was fake.
But I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody.
It's pretty boring stuff.
It's sordid, but it's boring.
And I don't understand why it keeps going.
I think really only pretty bad people, including fake news, want to keep something like that going.
But credible information, let them give it.
Anything that's credible, I would say let them have it.
Mr. President, a question on AI.
How do you want Americans to think about it?
This is a former deputy director of the CIA.
He says, Israeli spies have done more harm and have damaged the United States more than the intelligence agents of all other countries on earth combined.
They are the gravest threat to our national security.
That's Admiral Bobby Inman said that, former deputy director of the CIA.
Did he really say that?
I don't know.
Let's ask Rock.
Did he really say that?
Well, here's Jillian Assange.
The reason the FBI wouldn't let the Epstein client list come out in court is because if they did, their blackmail would no longer be useful.
And the CIA would lose their control over all the powerful people they spent decades setting up.
So that's why.
That's why they can't let any of this information out.
That's why they have to make it's a hoax.
There's nothing there.
He didn't work for a CIA or the Mossad.
He was just some guy who was a creep.
And that's that.
And he's dead now.
Just like, just like Bill Gates said, well, he's dead now.
So we don't have to talk about it anymore.
I'm waiting for Michael Tracy's take myself.
I'm waiting for Michael Tracy's take.
I'm waiting for that small, fat, oily man to tell me to forget what I saw.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show: you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
When the prosecutors, the career prosecutors, according to the Yahoo News story, say that there's no case there to be had.
We couldn't prove it.
Chris Wallace nailed this guy to the wall a million different ways in a five-minute interview.
You want to watch it?
So I'm going to show you.
So they say that, oh, this is just a political prosecution.
The career lawyers in the Department of Justice said that this we could never prosecute this.
This is wrong.
We don't have the evidence.
Well, we couldn't prove it to a jury.
Here's Chris Wallace.
Chris Wallace, the bad Wallace, is going to destroy James Comey.
Let's watch.
I don't see the disconnect between the two of us, and I'm sorry that I'm missing it.
Here are you and the Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, answering the same question.
Do you think this is vindication?
It is.
I mean, the FBI's had to wait two years while the president and his followers lied about the institution.
Finally, the truth gets told.
Does your report vindicate Mr. Comey?
So they're talking about when the inspector general did an investigation into Russia Gate and they found out that they had lied to the FISA court 17 times and Russia Gate was all built on a house of lies.
And so they ask, do you think that your report, they're asking the inspector general, do you think your report about Russia Gate vindicates James Comey?
Because James Comey just said it did.
Here's what the inspector general says.
It doesn't vindicate anyone at the FBI who touched this, including the leadership.
The IG says you should feel no vindication.
Well, maybe it turns upon how we understand the word.
What I mean is that the FBI was accused of treason, of illegal spying, of tapping Mr. Trump's wires illegally, of opening an investigation without justification, of being a criminal conspiracy to unseat, defeat, and then unseat a president.
They did all that.
It was a criminal conspiracy to frame the president as a traitor to the country we all know was made up now.
They did that.
And you don't have to like Trump.
Again, this is about the rule of law.
This is about if they can do this to a sitting president, they'll do it to anybody.
They'll do it to Bernie Sanders.
They'll do it to Elizabeth Warren, do it to Cornell West.
They'll do it to anybody.
Okay.
All of that was nonsense.
Here is what you said about the FISA process and what the Inspector General Horowitz said this week.
Take a look.
I have total confidence that the FISA process was followed and that the entire case was handled in a thoughtful, responsible way by DOJ and the FBI.
So do you see how he answered that question?
Hey, did you guys do everything lawful when it came to the FISA application to get the phone tap for Trump?
He didn't say yes.
He goes, I have full confidence.
That's a guy who knows how to give himself wiggle, just like Fauci.
They know the weasel words and the way to not actually answer a question so they can come back later and he can say something like this.
So they did not follow the FISA process.
In fact, they lied 17 times to the FISA court to get that phone tap on Donald Trump to start off the Russiagate investigation.
And so when they asked the inspector general about this, here's what he says.
Identified significant inaccuracies and omissions in each of the four applications.
Seven in the first application and a total of 17 by the final renewal application.
So 17 times they lied.
So after Comey said, I have full confidence that we follow the rule of law.
Watch how he answers this.
17 significant errors in the FISA process, and you say that it was handled in a thoughtful and appropriate way.
Yeah, he's right.
I was wrong.
I was overconfident in the procedures that the FBI and justice had built over 20 years.
He was just too confident.
He was just too confident.
It wasn't, he was, oh, you know what?
I was overconfident.
I'm not lying.
I wasn't lying.
I was just overconfident.
The head of the whole thing is not that cynical.
He's a...
He's a Pollyanna, the guy who leads the entire corrupt organization.
That's the guy who's least responsible of anyone.
Yes.
So let's watch.
There's more.
Again, here's your version.
And again, here's the Inspector General.
My recollection was it was part of a broader mosaic of facts that were laid before the FISA judge to obtain a FISA warrant.
And we concluded that the Steel reporting played a central and essential role in the decision to seek a FISA order.
So they're talking about the Steele dossier.
And he said, no, it was just, we didn't rely on the Steele dossier to get the FISA phone taps on Trump.
It was just part of a mosaic.
There was a bunch of things.
Well, the Inspector General says, no, it was the central thing.
That's what you guys used in front of the FISA court was the Steele dossier, which we now know was just opposition research paid for by Hillary Clinton.
So now we know this.
The steel dossier was completely made up because Hillary Clinton paid for it and then lied for a year, by the way, that she did pay for the steel dossier.
And then it came out that she did.
She had to kind of shake out a slap on the wrist for lying about it for a year to the FBI.
So here's the Inspector General completely contradicting James Comey.
Horowitz says it wasn't part, as you told Brett Baer, it wasn't part of a broader mosaic.
He said it played an essential role in establishing probable cause.
In fact, he says, if it hadn't been for the Steele dossier, the FBI probably wouldn't have even submitted a FISA application.
Attorney, he and I are saying different things.
There's the issue of how reliable the Steele dossier, in fact, was.
On January 6th, 2017, in the Trump Tower, you brief Donald Trump, president-elect, about the Steele dossier.
That same month, the FBI talks to Steele's main Russian contact, the main person on whom he based the dossier, who says, according to the IG report, quote, Steele misstated or exaggerated the primary sub-source's statements in multiple sections of the reporting.
Director Comey, not only do you fail to go back to the president-elect or president after January 20th and tell him, oh, you know, that report I briefed you on?
Turns out it's bunk, but the FBI goes back and renews its FISA application three more times.
And by this point, the FBI knows that the Steele reporting is not credible.
Did you know all of this?
All of what?
Everything that we're talking about.
All of what?
Did you know all this?
All of what?
What I just told you.
So that's a liar.
So that's the guy who's lying.
Is he cheating on Chris Wallace?
It's like a cheater does that to buy time.
Out here.
Did you know that, in fact, the Steele report was the key for probable cause?
Did you know that the FBI had talked to the Russian contact and he said what Steele said he had told him was not true?
Did you know this?
You're the FBI director.
First, again, the report will speak for itself.
I don't believe the FBI concluded that Steele's reporting was bunk after talking to a sub-source.
But no, I didn't.
As the director, you're not kept informed on the details of an investigation.
So, no, in general, I didn't know what they'd learned from the sub-source.
I didn't know the particulars of the investigation.
This isn't some investigation, sir.
This is an investigation of the campaign of the man who is the president of the United States.
And there is, I've left for last, the worst misconduct.
In August of 2016, just two weeks into the investigation, the CIA tells the FBI that it actually has a relationship with Carter Page, that when he has these meetings with the Russians, he actually goes back and he tells the CIA about it.
But you never tell the FISA court that.
And in fact, in 2017, an FBI lawyer doctors a document.
The CIA said, oh, Carter Page, he's a source.
And he puts in the application, he's not a source.
Yeah, I got the issue with one of the, I'll answer the question, but one of the predications of your question, the Inspector General did not find misconduct by any FBI people.
He found mistakes and negligent and oversight.
No, no, no, that's not true.
In the case of Kevin Kleinsmith, he has referred it for a criminal investigation.
Right, but that's not been resolved, this business with the lawyer changing some email to a partner on the team.
I mean, you make it sound like it's not much.
It's not important.
No, no, it's very important.
It's very important.
A source to not a source is a big problem.
Remember how we got here?
The FBI was accused of criminal misconduct.
Remember, I was going to jail and lots of other people were going to jail.
People on this network said it over and over and over again.
The Inspector General did not find misconduct by FBI personnel, did not find political bias, did not find illegal conduct.
Inspector General found significant mistakes, and that is not something to sneeze at.
Really important.
But the American people, especially your viewers, need to realize they were given false information about the FBI.
It's honest.
It is not political.
It is flawed.
It's unclear what the motivations were.
On the one hand, gross incompetence, negligence.
On the other hand, intentionality.
Gross negligence, or they intended to do it.
They intended to lie to the Faisal Court.
So he's got him lying.
And every Chris Wallace dismantled James Comey.
Everything he says is contradicted by the Inspector General's report.
He was lying with the Inspector General, just like the press did.
They lied about the Mueller report when they said, oh, they can't.
It didn't exonerate the president.
That's not what the report's supposed to do.
The report says there's no evidence.
Exonerate your bullshit charges you brought against them.
Then the press repeated it.
And James Comey, well, it doesn't exonerate him.
Yeah, that's not.
Yeah, by the way, it does, assholes.
Exactly, it does.
It completely did.
And so they had to spin this.
So that's what he's doing.
And Chris Wallace is just showing him time and time again how he's just a flat, flat liar.
And that's what James is doing.
It's not gross negligence.
James Comey is a fat liar.
And that's what that is.
So it's either.
So the Inspector General is like, well, it's either gross negligence, gross, negligence.
Not good.
Not a good alternative.
Gross negligence, or they intended to do it.
Of course they intended to do it.
Of course they did.
That's everything, Jimmy.
All the things are gross.
They're not gross negligence.
All these things, I don't know when people are going to stop clinging to the idea that they're just incompetent.
Is that what comforts you?
It's on purpose.
These are rat fuck bastards work at the top.
This is all.
They know everything going on or they wouldn't be there.
So if you're not sure if James Comey is the biggest, one of the biggest liars you've ever seen in your life, Chris Wallace dismantled him.
Everything he said was a lie.
And Chris Wallace easily dismantled him.
And these guys are so used to rolling over corporate reporters that he didn't expect Chris Wallace to come at him that way with the facts and the truth and the proof and evidence that he's lying.
And he did.
And James Comey, you go, so did you know about this?
Know about what?
So when he said that, you know, it's over that he's lying.
This is a high school kid lying.
Did I know about what?
This government will make a new free of charge digital ID mandatory for the right to work by the end of this parliament.
Let me spell that out.
You will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID.
It's as simple as that.
Conspiracy theorists proven correct.
Again, Keir Starmer is mandating a digital ID.
And watch the BS reason he gives you.
It's good for you.
It's always good for you, just like the vaccine.
It's always good for you.
And that is why today I am announcing this government will make a new free of charge digital ID mandatory for the right to work.
Free of charge, Kurt.
Free of charge.
How royal of you.
You know the old saying: if at first you don't succeed, just lock the entire country down and take away everyone's rights.
So they're making it mandatory.
By the end of this parliament.
Let me spell that out.
You will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID.
It's as simple as that.
So they're doing that.
Why would you do it like that?
You won't be able to do it.
Let me spell it out, Jimmy.
No one can trade or buy or sell without the mark of the beast.
That's right.
He literally just said that in a different way.
You won't be able to access electricity.
You won't be able to buy gas.
You won't be able to do anything.
You won't be able to get in your bank account.
You won't be able to do anything unless you have the mark of the beast, which is the digital ID.
Unreal.
Unreal.
And he's saying you won't be able to work.
So they say you won't be able to work because it looks like he's fighting illegal immigration.
I'm pretty sure that's not the people.
So here we go.
Let's watch this.
Jeremy Corbyn and Nigel Farage, so far left and far right, both agree on this.
It's a bad idea.
Jeremy Corbyn says, I firmly oppose the government's plans for compulsory digital ID cards.
This is an affront to our civil liberties and will make the lives of minorities even more difficult and dangerous.
It is excessive state interference and must be resisted.
Must be resisted.
Here's the far right guy, Nigel Farage says, I am firmly opposed to Kier Starmer's digital ID cards.
It will make no difference to illegal immigration, but it will be used to control and penalize the rest of us.
The state should never have this much power.
You know who else agrees with those two guys?
The king?
I'm kidding.
Obviously not.
And you know, something is good for you when it's forced on you.
That's how you know it's good for you.
When it's forced on you.
Just like the vaccine.
Just like the vaccine and lockdowns and masks and social distancing when it's forced on you.
Keep me down, Daddy.
That's what I say.
So here's the Nurses Association from the NHS Nurses in the UK.
They say, we need to send a loud and clear message to Kier Starmer that we do not support mandatory digital ID cards.
This is dangerous for everyone in the UK.
Oh, they're crazy.
Conspiracy theorists.
The nurses at the National Health Service in the UK.
Pick up your sporks and try to do something, England.
Even the nurses.
But you better be careful when you tweet that because that could, if you send the wrong message, they're just going to send two very attractive policewomen to your door and arrest you.
Like in a porn form, like a porn film.
It is like that's what this police force is a porno movie.
New digital ID will be mandatory to work in the UK.
Kier Starmer said the new.
Can I just show you why this is going to be wrong?
Let me get to, let me skip.
I'm going to skip.
First of all, I want to show you this.
If we get this digital ID system working and the public being with us, that will be the bedrock of the modern state.
That was said by Prime Minister's chief secretary.
This will be the bedrock of the modern state.
That's not good.
And will allow for really quite exciting public service reform in the future.
It will also, it says it's going to also offer ordinary citizens countless benefits, Kurt, like being able to prove your identity to access key services swiftly rather than hunting around for an old utility bill.
I can't do that with my old ID.
Is it right?
You go online first and foremost.
The new ID, the new ID will be held on people's phones.
Oh, so what could be, so you'll have your whole life's records on your phone that's easily lost and easily hackable.
What does China have right now?
Anybody know?
Do they have this in China?
If they don't have this, this is going to be real funny.
What could be safer, Kurt, than putting your entire existence on your tiny, easy-to-lose and even easier-to-hack phone?
Hey, why not just have a yard sale with your tax returns?
Well, it's in the cloud, Jimmy.
Once you're on digital, they have the record of you to track you forever.
So I like how they go, there's going to be no requirement to carry it, but if you want to work, you're going to have to get one.
Oh, so just for everybody?
It'll be like, yeah.
Yeah.
They began exploring whether the digital ID scheme could reduce the use of fake documents and provide a more consistent approach to verifying workers' identity.
The government said the rollout would eventually make it simpler to apply for services like driver's licenses, child care, and welfare, as well as the streamlining access to tax records.
And as soon as you do something wrong, they flip the switch and they turn off your digital ID.
So now you can't access your bank, you can't buy gas, you can't pay your utilities, you can't get on a flight, you can't travel, you can't work, you can't do anything.
Another Labor Prime Minister, Sir Tony Blair, tried to introduce compulsory ID cards, but the idea was scrapped by the Conservative Lib Dem coalition in 2010.
They've been trying to do this.
Well, looks like it.
Let me tell you why this isn't going to work.
By the way, they asked young people, Emily Jenkins, 23, is against digital IDs, described the plan as fascistic and horrible.
Eriwan Fox James, 20, says he can see some practical benefits, but is uncomfortable with the idea of a centralized hub of all data.
Amy, 22, said she and her friends would welcome having digital IDs on a night out.
It's the one thing people forget.
But if it's on your phone, people always have that in their hand.
But she also worries about data safety.
Every time these things get launched, they get hacked.
Everyone hacks everything.
Of course.
Of course.
Do you know, Jimmy?
China got the same thing like five days ago.
Did you know that?
No.
And I'm reading on the hill online: China's internet ID push signals a new era of digital control.
Wow, China and England.
What are the odds?
What are the odds?
Well, I'm going to tell you right now why this is a bad idea.
And a million, or I've already told you, but here's even this guy breaks it down.
Chris Littlewood says, Digital ID for every adult is not progress.
It is the end of a free society dressed up as convenience.
I'm a cybersecurity specialist, and this is my take.
They are selling it as a fix for illegal migration.
That's bullocks.
We spend hundreds of billions of dollars a year on cybersecurity, and yet the volume of breaches is breaking records.
The threat is growing faster than they spend.
So, this idea that you could do this cyber in a cyber way is BS because he's saying they spend hundreds of billions on cybersecurity and they get breaches and hacks every day.
Digital ID will not stop boats, boats of immigrants.
They mean it will not stop trafficking gangs.
It will not fix a broken border.
Criminals will work around it.
Honest citizens are going to pay the price.
It builds giant data banks that track where you go, what you buy, what you read, and who you speak to.
It tracks all that.
It links your identity to every checkpoint in daily life.
One breach, and your entire life is exposed.
Look at Jaguar Land Rover and the airports in recent weeks.
Now imagine that a national scale on an ID system tied to everything you need to live your daily life.
Here's the risk that ministers will not admit: ransomware seeded through a supplier or an insider.
It lies quiet for months on your phone.
It rolls through backups.
On trigger day, the register and the recovery sets are both encrypted.
What?
So he's saying on the day they want to trigger it, the register and the recovery sets are both encrypted.
So what does that mean?
So that means that they have control of your phone.
It's encrypted.
That's what I take it to mean.
I'm not a cyber guy.
Payments fail.
So your payments then fail.
Your health and benefits stall.
The borders slow.
Citizens are frozen out until a ransom is paid, or the state rebuilds it from scratch.
Centralize identity and you centralize failure.
So now people don't have to hack into people's individual phones.
They can just hack into the central data hub and shut everything down for ransom.
Do not fall for the pitch.
Function creep is certain.
It starts as login.
It becomes access to money, travel, speech, and public services.
It turns rights into permissions controlled by the state and its contractors.
It creates a single point of failure for criminals, insiders, and hostile states to target.
It will punish the elderly, the poor, and anyone who is not always online.
It will centralize risk and outsource blame.
It will not stop fraud.
It will not stop illegal migration.
It will build the machinery for a social credit system by stealth.
If ministers cared about the border, they would enforce current laws, resource patrols and processing, close loopholes, and remove those with no right to stay.
You do not need a national ID to do any of that.
We scrapped ID cards in 2010 for a reason.
Britain does not need a central register to prove age or status.
Yes to privacy for first proofs, no to a database state.
I'm with that guy 100%.
Does he not get it's on purpose?
It's not a mistake, a terrible mistake they're making.
Yeah, they know.
All the things he's describing are why they're doing it.
That's why they're doing it.
They're doing it for that, on purpose.
And there ain't shit you're going to do about it because you're going to be armed with a spoon or something.
So he's just letting people know this is what's going to happen if they get to institute that stuff.
That's what's going to happen.
So they tell you it's for convenience.
They tell you it's for stopping illegal migration.
They say it's for all that stuff.
You don't need that to do any of that stuff.
But you do need it if you want to have complete control over everybody and be able to.
They're going to deport natives of England soon.
I can't wait for that where they're like people born there are being deported from England.
You do need this if you want to unperson someone.
China has it for that reason.
And now China has it.
At the same time, isn't that interesting?
China and them, every time you hear a dummy talking about the commies and this and that, it's the Fabians, the Fabian Society who is behind that.
Their banner is a wolf.
The oldest think tank in all of Europe is called the Fabian Society.
And it's really just feudalism, but they wanted to incrementally sneak in socialism.
It's not Marxism.
It's their own British colonial thing.
And the whole idea, and H.G. Wells was into it, is, you know, what we have now, a bunch of technocracy, and then they'll dole out what you're allowed to have and what water you can use to wash your cart, all that shit.
And it's been around.
It's the oldest think tank, the oldest one.
It's probably the first one.
Fabians.
That's what this is.
And I think their plan, they're rushing it now.
Because did you hear Kier Stormy, the urgency in his voice?
Yeah.
Yeah.
You want to hear it again?
I'll play it for you one more time.
Right before I play it, I'll remind you to come see me at Hermosa Beach, San Francisco, and Sacramento.
Go to jimmydoor.com for a link for tickets.
That's next week.
Here it is.
And that is why today I am announcing this government will make a new free of charge digital ID mandatory for the right to work by the end of this parliament.
Let me spell that out.
You will not be able to work in the United Kingdom if you do not have digital ID.
It's as simple as that.
Okay.
There definitely is a sense of urgency.
And let's keep in mind, everybody disagrees with it.
Far left, far right, and the Nurses Association and everybody else who has a thinking brain is against this.
Do you know what this is?
Where he's at?
It's the global world leaders of a worried global center left discuss ways to fight back.
So he's there with Mark Carney and shit.
So this is all those assholes.
This is all the fucking kind of West people.
This is the WEF globalists.
This is their idea.
And Kirst Starmer is 100% one of them.
Mark Carney in Canada is 100% one of them.
Everybody's one of them.
Macrone is one of them.
They're all one of them.
They're all the New York Times, Jimmy.
What?
Fickle voters, stagnant economies, and polarizing debate over immigration have left center-left governments vulnerable to right-wing populists.
That's why you're getting your digital ID.
Anything they don't like, they call right-wing.
So if they don't want you to have free speech and you're for free speech, they say that's a right-wing free speech.
Oh, yeah.
Populism is inherently right-wing, Jimmy.
You're a free speech absolutist, they'll say.
If you're for my body, my choice, which is usually a left-wing thing, they'll now say that's right-wing.
And you now you're supposed to be pro-abortion, not my body, my choice, not bodily autonomy.
So no matter what they want, however they want to control you, they call whatever you're doing right-wing.
That's the thing.
Well, that's the purpose of coming up with a nonsense concept like what wing are you?
Notice how we all go along with that ironic idea.
And then they got fighting within your cage already.
Are you right or left-wing?
Why are we doing a thing from the French Revolution still from Robespierre?
Why is that still a thing?
Oh, we don't know anything else.
They had you.
This is why I don't buy kariaku.
They can't do mind control.
What are you talking about?
They do it.
They still do it.
You ever hear a basic training?
Yeah, I wish we had a little more time to go over that with him because it's that, believe me, if they're what he even said.
Anyway, if there's one thing they haven't stopped, it's mind control.
I'll tell you that.
It's one thing they haven't stopped.
Society's based on it.
What do you like?
That's why we have influencers and thought leaders.
They call them thought leaders.
That's why they paid all those people to push the vax during COVID.
All those social influencers.
That's mind control.
That's what that is.
I'll bet you that's why they're giving those pregnant chicks, influencers, money to pop Tyler.
I want to talk about it.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to JimmyDoorComedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
He can be found at mikemcray.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.
