In response to CBS’s announcement that Stephen Colbert’s late night talk show had been canceled, Jon Stewart railed against the network and its parent company, Paramount, accusing them of prioritizing an $8 billion merger with Skydance and political appeasement over the value of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. Stewart argues that the decision was more political than economic, although he admits that the Colbert show was not cost-effective and outdated, comparing it to Blockbuster Video and Tower Records. Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger mock Stewart’s diatribe, noting that he has long played the role of establishment insider pushing dominant narratives about the Ukraine War, COVID and any number of other topics. Plus segments on Tulsi Gabbard’s explosive Russiagate accusations against President Obama and Rep. Thomas Massie pushing back hard against Speaker Mike Johnson and President Trump to get the Epstein files released. Also featuring Stef Zamorano!
Come see it's in Oxnard, California, Rutherford, New Jersey, Manhattan, New York, Edmonton, Calgary, Vancouver, Appleton, Wisconsin, Rosemont, and Chicago, Illinois.
Go to JimmyDore.com for a link for tickets.
It's the Jimmy Dore Show.
So Jon Stewart reacted to Stephen Colbert being canceled on CBS.
And you know, who's not canceled is Jimmy Doers coming to Oxnard, California, August 3rd.
That's a Sunday.
And then we're going to Rutherford, New Jersey and Manhattan, New York at the Village Underground.
Go to JimmyDoor.com for a link for tickets.
But here he is.
Here's Jon Stewart reacting to that.
Jon Stewart is reacting.
And it's pretty pathetic in a lot of different ways.
So let's play some of it.
And let's hope that we don't get this stays monetized because a lot of times.
Stephen has been canceled for purely financial reasons.
So now because that's what CBS is saying, that they're canceling him because the show is losing tens of millions of dollars.
That's what they say.
No, that face he's making.
Is that the face you make instead of laughing when you watch Colbert?
So, but watch how he contradicts himself.
I mean, so Jon Stewart's saying that's not true because that's what that is.
I don't think that's true.
And watch, he contradicts himself.
And by the way, not just Steven's show.
CBS has canceled the entirety of the late show franchise.
Gone.
Now I acknowledge.
Losing money.
Late 1980 is.
He just said, no, I acknowledge they're losing money.
It's going now.
What?
So you know what you do when you have a show that's losing money?
You cancel that show.
What's that, Kurt?
It's not PBS.
Yeah, it's not PBS.
This is commercial broadcasting.
It has to turn to profit.
And he's even going to go on to explain to you that, yes, the whole genre is dying.
Watch this.
A struggling financial model.
We're all basically operating a blockbuster kiosk inside of a Tower Records.
So he's admitting that this is a failed platform.
This is a failed style of doing comedy.
It's over.
We are a blockbuster.
What's that?
The election should have told him that their format of liberal boohoo is not working out.
That's the word I was looking for.
This format is tired.
It's old, and it doesn't work anymore.
It doesn't.
Who cares about your suit and your Johnny Carson shit?
I mean, I don't care about any of that.
And Stephen Colbert gets less viewers in the demo than this show.
I used to love his show on Comedy Central, dude.
I liked it better than Jon Stewart's show by a mile.
Oh, his old show.
So he's there.
At first, he's trying to say it's not because of money, but now he's admitting, yeah, the show.
He said, admittedly, it's losing money.
I didn't make that up.
I heard him say it.
And now he's saying that our format is like a blockbuster inside of a Tower Records.
Those are two companies that don't exist anymore.
But listen to what he says.
Listen to this.
It's a good joke.
But when your industry is faced with changes, you don't just call it a day.
My God.
When CDs stopped selling, they didn't just go, oh, well, music, it's been a good run.
The fact that CBS didn't try to save their number one rated network late night franchise that's been on the air for over three decades is part of what's making everybody wonder, was this?
So he's saying, well, when people stopped buying CDs, they didn't just stop trying to sell music.
No, when people stop watching that format of comedy, they move on to a new format of comedy.
What are you talking about?
So what they're doing is Stephen Colbert is the CD in that analogy.
Stephen Colbert is the CD.
People aren't buying the CDs anymore.
You stop producing CDs.
People aren't buying that format of Stephen Colbert's comedy.
You stop producing that format of comedy.
That's so he's cut.
So there isn't a logical consistency to what he's saying.
He's making, he's making what?
He just said it was top rated.
He said it was the number one late night show, which I don't think it is.
How is CBS not closed?
Greg Gutfeld.
CBS should be gone.
Greg Gutfeld beats all of them.
Right, Kurt?
You know that.
Mm-hmm.
So that's not true.
He keeps saying the number one rated.
It's Greg Gutfeld destroys them.
On their channel.
I don't know how it could be that, but what's your number one rated in?
Oh, out of late night?
Well, Greg Gutfeld is late night, right?
Oh, yeah.
I don't know what the hell he's talking about.
You're right.
Greg Gutfeld, he actually developed a new format.
Greg Gutfeld has a new format.
And it's killing.
It's a killer format.
It's killing.
And he's, he's.
Look, could you look up Greg Gutfeld's ratings?
So do you see all the mental gymnastics that Jon Stewart's putting himself through to try to defend?
And so now he's going to make it out that CBS canceled Stephen Colbert because they're afraid of Trump.
Good.
And that, and that.
Good.
I want you to be afraid of him, you scumbags.
Wouldn't it be the last time that the, that the broadcasters were afraid?
of the government remember howard stern being fined constantly you remember that that's why you had to go to uh uh satellite radio okay so i got this gutfeld averaged 3.1 million viewers through july 20th compared to 1.9 million for late night with uh cbs show so so he's getting 50 bigger ratings greg gutfeld jimmy kimmel gets 1.5 million and uh jimmy fallion so he gets a hundred percent higher ratings
than jimmy kimmel jimmy kimmel gets 1.5 million he gets three 3.1 million isn't that 100 more and jimmy fallon's 1.1 and seth myers your favorite 751 000.
sethmyers is fantastic.
Nobody can tell me that you're going to tell me people don't like bland, boring white guys with no personality, giving them comedy in the late night.
That show should be on.
Not only should that not be on at late night, that should be on at 6 in the morning, that show.
Yeah, it's a real Martha's Vineyard area.
So now Jon Stewart's going to make the case that this is all about Trump and CBS being afraid of Trump.
As they should be.
All of you should be afraid.
I don't want you not being afraid of Trump, you punks on these channels that did do your job for the last however many years.
I wanted Trump to put you in camp because I'm being honest.
So after every media outlet pushed Russia Gate and every lie possible about the law fair, January 6th, COVID, everything.
Okay, here we go.
Watch this.
Purely financial?
Or maybe the path of least resistance for your $8 billion merger.
With killing him.
So he's saying that this isn't fun.
Now, after saying it is financial, they're losing money.
Now he's saying this is because there's going to be a merger, right?
So there's this guy, what is it called?
Skynet or whatever.
This company's going to acquire Paramount, which owns CBS.
So it's, again, instead of taking this as an opportunity to make fun of Bill Clinton and satirize him for consolidating the media with the Telecommunications Act in 1996, which took us from 50 giant media companies down to six.
Yeah.
That would be what this would be for, right?
But instead of doing that, he turns it against Trump, not against Bill Clinton, not haranguing Bill Clinton for the guy who set all this in motion.
He's Springsteen Democrat.
Yeah.
The fake thing there is.
The most fake working man, bullshit backery kind of politics there are besides Bono.
The only thing worse is Bono.
So now he's saying that because they want a merger, he's afraid that Trump's White House, which is, I guess, appoints the FCC Federal Communications Commission, have to approve the merger, which of course they're going to.
That's why they're doing it.
So it'll make it easier for them to have that merger go through.
If they get rid of the Stephen Colbert, which is critical, every goddamn show is critical of Trump.
That's why it doesn't make sense.
So here we go.
Show that you know wrinkled a fragile and vengeful president, so insecure, suffering terribly from a case of chronic penis insufficiency.
I mean, it's just, I get it.
Israeli is like him now.
What's that?
Israel likes Trump now.
Israel switched to Trump.
So that's why this, the merger in all the media companies, Jon Stewart, you don't know that the Zionists are backing Trump because he's letting them do their genocide.
That's what that's about at the end of the day.
He's trying to keep it like it's just about Trump or whatever.
We've already learned there's a genocide going on, and their intel thing controls our whole government, John.
And I know John Sewer has commented on this a little bit, even if he'd never have the balls to call it out for what it is.
He has talked about it a little bit, hasn't he?
Yes, he has talked about the little bit.
You're right.
So here we go.
So here he is doing cheap insults about Trump having a small penis, which I'm not above doing, but I just think it certainly should be beneath him.
Thank you.
*laughter*
I believe CBS lost the benefit of the doubt two weeks prior when they sold out their flagship news program to pay an extortion fee.
Just said president.
So he's saying that now he's flat out making the argument that CBS is doing this because they're afraid of Donald Trump.
And it's not about that Stephen Colbert, who, by the way, it takes 200 people to produce that show.
You know how many people it takes to produce this show?
I don't know, five, six?
I don't know.
Maybe when we're at full bore, seven.
Where's the Intel people to run the show?
Seven.
This is the other thing.
He has 190.
What's that?
60 Minutes the Flagship Show.
Intel propaganda crap.
So what happened is a new regime came in and the problem with aligning with the CIA, such as Colbert does, right?
Yes.
Ooh, shush Claire Dames.
Don't bring up the CIA runs your everything.
Remember that?
Yes.
So now a new power came in and John Brennan's out.
Yes.
Now the CIA is going to go with the other administration.
That's why you don't get involved with the fucking CIA, asshole.
That's right.
So here we go.
So he's saying that 60 Minutes, CBS, so Trump sued over them selectively editing Kamala Harris's interview to make her look better.
So Trump decided to sue them over that, saying that's, I don't know if he's saying that's election interference or whatever.
It certainly was dishonest.
We covered it here in real time when it happened.
And I think CBS even had to come out and apologize and reveal.
Anyway, the point is, Trump already sued ABC and won.
They sued ABC when George Nufalopagus made some salacious accusations against Donald Trump, saying he was convicted in a court of law of grape.
I don't want to say the word because I don't want to get this demonetized.
And so they had to pay him $15 million.
So ABC already knew they were dead to rights, didn't want to go to court.
They paid him.
So CBS did the same thing.
They're like, you know what?
We don't need the bad press of it being revealed what we actually did.
So we're going to go ahead and pay.
It'd be easier to pay this and get it off instead of going through a very high-profile court case that reveals our bad journalism values.
That's what CBS decided to do.
It was a smart move for CBS to do that.
Jon Stewart now says, no, that is proof that this is being done because they're afraid of Donald Trump.
dummies, the whole news was afraid of the Biden.
Remember we had- You don't think they were afraid of them?
Yeah, it's a nothing burger that we've been suppressing minor accounts on Twitter.
Yes, that went against Joe Biden and NBC was, I mean, like, they were all in on it.
You don't think that the table is going to turn on you?
So, especially on a loser like Colbert.
So, so watch this.
At that time, poor Andy Rooney must have been rolling over in his bed.
That's right.
He's alive.
Did you know Andy Rooney?
To me, that's the biggest news story from this whole segment.
Is Andy Rooney still alive?
What did you say, Kurt?
That's pretty funny.
Yeah.
Andy Rooney is alive.
I probably buried the lead on this entire bit.
Yes, you did.
So then Jon Stewart decides to go into this.
Wait, here.
Let me.
I understand the corporate fear.
I understand the fear that you and your advertisers have with $8 billion at stake.
But understand this.
Truly.
The shows that you now seek to cancel, censor, and control, a not insignificant portion of that $8 billion value came from those fucking shows.
That's what made you that money.
Yeah, and so now those shows don't make money anymore.
So now they have to replace them with new shows that make them money.
What is this?
How hard is this to understand how TV works?
The guy that made 50 million from iTunes with his old show that he didn't want to do, supposedly, you don't know how money was.
Now he's pretending to not understand how this, just like he pretended to not understand how New York real estate works when Trump was being have lawfare against him for his real estate dealings.
He's now pretending he doesn't know.
That doesn't, yes.
So that's guilty crimes himself.
There was a, yeah, exactly right.
There was a time when the CBS late show made money for CBS.
It doesn't make that money anymore.
So they're supposed to just keep funding a losing show because it has any value.
It has any value.
It existed before.
He didn't create a great show on CBS.
I love the old show.
But on that show, he came into a thing that was established.
And turned it into a partisan hack fest.
So he's just following orders.
I'll give him out.
Nobody wants to hear those orders no more.
All right, here we go.
Shows that say something.
Shows that take a stand.
So he's saying shows that say something, shows that take a stand.
You mean like how you didn't take a stand on the Ukraine war?
You mean like how you didn't take a stand on COVID and you lied about it at every turn?
You mean how you didn't take a stand on the vaccine?
In fact, instead, you brought on four vaccine liars.
You mean how you didn't take a stand when you hung a medal on a legit Nazi?
You mean like that kind of stand you didn't take?
How about when you didn't take a stand on Russia gate and tell people the truth that this DNC server was not hacked by Russia?
How about that?
I was able to do that with my five, six employees here.
So what kind of a stand are you talking about?
A lemonade stand?
Because you're for sale now.
And not to believe me, this is not a we speak truth to power.
We don't.
We speak opinions to television cameras, but we try.
We fucking try.
No, you don't.
You effing don't try.
Because if you tried, you would have tried to tell people the truth about the Ukraine war and how Russia gate, and you can draw a straight line between Russia Gate and the people being for the Ukraine war in the United States.
You would have told them that.
You would have told him that the Ukraine war is just as big as lies the Iraq war was.
Just as big as lie the Afghanistan war was, just as big as lies.
You would have told them the truth about Syria and the gas attacks.
You would have told him the truth about Libya.
You didn't tell them the truth about any of that stuff.
You don't take a stand and you don't try at all.
You do the low-hanging fruit and you do the easy stuff.
And that's why I don't respect Jon Stewart anymore.
I respect him for his comedic chops and that he invented a new style of comedy.
Tip of the hat.
He should be in the TV Hall of Fame for that.
But don't pretend that you try because you don't try.
And Condoleezza, I know he didn't want to do the interview, but I would love to do that interview.
I'd talk right into Hillary's crazy psycho, whatever they said she is face.
And Condolina's dumb.
Like, why are you two lizards killing everyone all the time and acting like it's cool?
Yeah, I mean, how hard were you trying when you interviewed two of the biggest blood-soaked, massacring, war-mongering maniacs of my lifetime, Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton?
How hard did you try during that interview?
How hard did you try when you brought on four vaccine liars onto your show to push the fake false COVID narrative?
How hard did you try then?
How hard did you try when you pinned a letter metal on a Nazi?
How hard were you trying then?
You weren't trying hard.
So that's what just, that's what drives me crazy how he gets to pretend that he's trying hard.
Every night.
And if you believe, as corporations or as networks, you can make yourselves so innocuous that you can serve a gruel so flavorless that you will never again be on the Boy King's radar.
Hey, why will anyone watch you?
And you are fucking wrong.
So he's saying that CBS is now going to water down their content.
And why would anybody want to watch them?
I would say the same thing about your show.
Nobody watches the daily show anymore.
They only watch it when you're on.
And they only watch it when you're on because you have comedy chops and because they're partisan.
How do you watch water?
They don't, right?
How do you water down water?
Again, Stephen Colbert did a dance with the vaccine.
He came out and did a dance number with the vaccine.
You guys aren't trying.
If you were trying, you would have been doing what we did at this show and tried to show that if you're going to do lawfare against January 6th and Donald Trump, and if you're going to put Russia Gate against the sitting president and call him treason and say he's a traitor, that they can do that to anybody who stands up against the establishment.
That would have been you trying.
You didn't try.
Well, they didn't try to do what I would have wanted to do, but he did try really hard as hard as he could not to offend the establishment too much.
Of course.
Because he suspected they were wrong.
So that does take effort.
You want to know how impossible it is to say on Horseback's.
He will sue the Wall Street Journal and its owner, Rupert Murdock, who also owns Fox News.
So he's going to say, you know how hard it is.
So he's saying that CBS is doing All this to try to stay on Trump's good side.
And he's saying, you know how hard it is?
He's even suing Fox News.
You know why he's suing Fox News or Rupert Murdoch?
Because of the Wall Street Journal published that letter that was like a love letter between him and Jeffrey Epstein.
Trump says that's a fake letter.
Now, after Russia gate and the fake P-tape and the fake dossier, the steel dossier and the fake Russian everything and the fake bank things and all the fake.
I would have to give Trump the benefit of the doubt here and say that's probably also fake.
Not fake.
It doesn't reveal anything.
And it doesn't reveal.
It's literally nothing.
So, and now Trump's two for two in suing people.
He's been lied about.
I mean, again, you don't have to like Donald Trump.
You can hate Donald Trump and also hate the fact that the media has to make up stuff about him because that's what they've been doing for 10 years.
There's a lot of stuff that you could criticize Trump about.
In fact, they don't ever criticize him about the real stuff he should be criticized for.
They most oftentimes invent stuff like Russia Gate to criticize him or his small penis or his real estate deals or his P-tape or his fake P-tape.
Let's say they found a tape that he went to a hotel room and watched Hooker's Peanut Bed Obama slept in.
Is that the tape that we're talking about?
That's the tape.
Who gives a shit?
So he's saying, so his whole case here is that you can't stay on Trump's good side.
Because look, he's even suing Fox News and Rupert Murdoch.
Donald Trump is suing Rupert Murray.
Okay.
I'm the man of the Biden, maybe most responsible for getting trouble-fucked.
Yeah, I fucking stuck that in there.
Fox spends 24 hours a day blowing Trump, and it's not enough.
Imagine suing someone mid-blow.
Okay, good joke.
Finish up down there and I'll sit on the bottom.
These are all good jokes.
So the jokes are good, but the jokes are that it has to be based in truth, which is what gives it that extra oomph.
And this is all based on a lie that Jon Stewart has propagated.
Is this idiot still pushing that Kamala Harris was qualified to do anything but giggle in a corner?
I mean, so here's the point.
Here's the point.
Here's the point.
You're trying to figure out why Stephen's show is ending.
I don't think the answer can be found in some smoking gun email or phone call from Trump to CBS executives or in CBS's QuickBook spreadsheets on the financial health of late night.
He says, I don't think you're going to be able to find a smoking gun email as to why they're really canceling him.
You know why?
Because it probably doesn't exist.
How about that?
You know, just like Russia Gate, there was no there there, the Moeller report.
We don't have any evidence.
So this feels very much Russia gate-y to me.
Oh, we just know it has to be true, right?
We just know it has to be true.
Look, if there was enough of you for it to make a difference, the smear that they're doing to pretend that Colbert should have been canceled a long time ago, there's not enough people watching the show to pull that off.
Nobody likes that asshole.
The people like him all live near Jon Stewart.
Okay, here we go.
The answer is in the fear and pre-compliance that is gripping all of America's institutions at this very moment.
Institutions that have chosen not to fight the vengeful and vindictive actions of our pubic hair doodling commander-in-chief.
This is not the moment to give in.
I'm not giving in.
I'm not going anywhere.
He's not giving in.
Yeah, well, you gave in during COVID.
You gave in during Russia Gate.
You gave in during the Ukraine war.
As I've said a million times on this show, Jon Stewart will never tell his audience the truth about the Ukraine war.
Ever.
He will never tell you that.
He'll never tell you the truth about COVID.
The biggest fascist moment we're ever going to live through.
Forced medical experiments, forced to take a medical experiment, or you can't go to work and feed your family, or you can't go to school, or you can't go to college and get a degree.
Fake, forced medicine.
That is Nazi stuff.
He'll never tell you the truth about that.
So this thing, and the one thing he is right about is that institutions always knuckle under the government.
They've always done it.
Since before Nixon, when he got the Smothers Brothers canceled, they've always knuckled under.
You know, I just want to weigh in on this situation.
The whole idea that I got from sign a petition regarding Stephen Colbert from Move On, sign a petition so he can keep his show.
And I want to say, are you acting as if there's no choice for him?
Why does it stop YouTube?
But why does it not rumble for him?
So that's another thing I want to say to Jon Stewart.
Jon Stewart, just like Blockbuster Video went away and Tower Records went away and the CD went away, Stephen Colbert's format's going away.
What's to stop Stephen Colbert or you from going on doing a show on YouTube like I do?
Or Joe, the biggest, most popular show right now is Joe Rogan.
Why can't you do a show like that?
Or Tim Dylan or Theo Vaughan?
These shows are Andrew Shaw.
All these shows are very popular.
Tucker Carlson.
Tucker Carlson.
Tucker Carlson doesn't need 200 people to produce their shows.
Tucker Carlson doesn't have 200 people producing his show and he gets way better ratings than Stephen Colbert.
I'll tell you why they can't, Jimmy, because they all feel without being told, just like what's his name said, they don't got to be told.
They all feel like they got to contribute to the propaganda for their party like that prick Mike Johnson does for Republicans.
That's right.
They're looking for a Joe Rogan, but when they say that, there's already a liberal Joe Robert State.
He's already there.
But what they want is a liberal Joe Rogan who is a puppet that follows.
Who is a partisan?
They want to partisan Joe Rogan.
Yeah.
Here.
I think.
So to those institutions, to those corporations and advertisers and universities and law firms, all of them.
If you still think that bending the knee to Trump will save you, I have one.
Well, they bent the knee to the Biden administration and all the advertisers censored everybody.
They did the adpocalypse on YouTube.
They did that.
And then they also censored everybody who had a counter narrative when it came to Ukraine, a counter-narrative when it came to his dementia and counter-narrative when it came to the vaccine or lockdowns or masks or ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine or social distancing or contraction or any of that stuff.
They already did that.
They censored, they deplatformed, they took their advertising.
They've already done all that.
He's acting like this is new under Trump.
This is not new.
This is how advertisers in the establishment and the media.
And so that's how they all act.
Always.
They've always acted that way.
That was great.
He thought it was great to get deplatformed when you don't have the right politics.
He was for that.
Yeah, remember when AOC said deplatforming works?
Do you remember she said when a cucker Carlson got fired from Fox News?
And again, remember he got fired for telling the truth about the Ukraine war and the COVID.
He didn't get fired for lying about the Iraq war.
When he lied about the Iraq war, they lined up to give him a show.
But when he started telling the truth about the Ukraine war and the Syrian war, it's when they had to fire him.
And then AOC said the platforming works.
So I should say.
So here.
I know you're scared.
So here he does a number.
I know you're weary.
I know your plans.
Don't include me.
But these are trouble times.
So sack the fuck up.
So he's yelling at corporations to grow a spine.
And he says sack the F up.
That's his way of saying have some balls and stand up to the president.
That's what he's trying to say.
After he said this was after he admitted that Stephen Colbert shows losing money and that it's as out of fashion as CDs were and blockbuster video and tower records.
He's saying that you should now grow a spine and stand up to the president.
They never do that.
They've never done that.
They've never told the truth about any war in my lifetime, including you, Jon Stewart.
You won't tell the truth about Ukraine or Syria.
Anyway, so this is.
It's a better plan for the corporations.
Why don't you cozy up to Israel how you do, and then Israel tell Trump what he has to do.
How about that?
So, hey, maybe CBS is going to replace his show with a version of Pin the Tail on the Donkey.
Maybe we'll call it Pin the Metal on the Nazi.
You ever think about that?
Yeah, that's a great idea for a show.
So he goes into a number now.
Watch this.
So then he goes into a number.
You want to hear his number?
Here's his number.
Oh, wait.
Did I lose it?
Here it is.
Go fuck yourself.
Bring it down.
Bring it down.
Let me bring it down.
Let it get quiet.
Fuck, fuck, fuck yourself.
Just go fuck yourself.
Everybody.
Fuck the fucking stuff.
Fuck your fuckingself.
Fuck the fucking fuck yourself.
Shut your fucking soul.
Shut the fuck yourself.
Go fuck yourself!
Yeah!
Yeah!
So now I'm not against that type of humor, but what I am against is that that's built on a false premise, which is why it doesn't have the oomph.
It's just partisan pablum that he's pushing buttons on his audience, and he thinks it's ballsy to do a song where he says the F-word over and over and tells you to go F yourself and sack up.
And when he knows that's not how the game works, that they never have sacked up.
They've always, they're the establishment.
They're not some people fighting against the powerful.
They are the powerful.
Are you telling me, Jimmy, that you don't believe that John has really lost faith in big pharma like this?
Right?
This is precisely the kind of partisan, juvenile slop that led to Colbert's unprofitability.
And in time, we'll lead Jon Stewart to the same place.
Yelling expletives at Trump with the gospel choir is not clever or entertaining.
It's garbage.
And I would have to agree.
I'm going to promise you this.
Because it's based on a false premise.
It's based on a false premise.
That's why it's garbage.
Not because he's got a band or because he's using expletives or he's using the F-word.
It's because it's based on this false premise.
What did you want to say, Kurt?
The Gospel Choir is pretty hacky, and I bet a chick wrote it like a New York feminist chick, white woman, because in their head, that's soulful.
I bet you.
I'll bet you.
Well, it's very much like when the Tonight Show writers all wrote letters to Hillary Clinton.
Remember that?
Do you remember that?
I remember SNL, what's her name, sang a song at the piano.
Yeah.
Yep.
So anyway, this.
All right.
So anyway, so now you know why Jon Stewart's show is not worth what it was.
It's a garbage show, just like Stephen Colbert's show became garbage.
It's garbage.
And it's not that he doesn't have good comedy chops.
He does.
The jokes are tight and solid, but they're all built on false premises.
I can't believe that they're not going to fight for centrist neoliberalism.
Yeah, aren't you going to fight for centrist neoliberalism?
Because that's what Stephen Colbert is.
Stephen Colbert was a mouthpiece of the intelligence community, but now the intelligence community is run by Trump.
Uh-oh.
Uh-oh.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
Tulsi has released even more information that she says condemns Barack Obama.
And Trump says it's treasonous.
Here she was talking at a press conference, and here's how she gets asked about it.
Do you believe that any of this new information implicates former President Obama in criminal behavior?
We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents to the Department of Justice and the FBI to investigate the criminal implications of this.
The evidence of Obama?
correct.
The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly point to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment.
There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact.
Ed, go ahead.
Director Gamer, thank you.
So just to two questions, but to begin on that.
The president, yesterday, you've inferred that the former president helped lead a coup.
Based on what you now see, do you believe President Obama is guilty of treason?
I'm leaving the criminal charges to the Department of Justice.
I'm not an attorney, but as I've said previously, when you look at the intent behind creating a fake manufactured intelligence document that directly contradicts multiple assessments that were created by the intelligence community, the expressed intent and what followed afterward can only be described as a years-long coup and a treasonous conspiracy against the American people, our republic, and an attempt to undermine President Trump's administration.
The Senate intelligence.
So she's the hardest thing you can prove is intent.
So you're not going to be able to prove that.
That's not going to happen.
So this is all a distraction.
The second thing is the Supreme Court, I'm pretty sure, ruled earlier this year that the president can't be held accountable for anything he does while he's president and his official duties.
I think that Richard Nixon got in trouble for saying.
Which is true.
Right, which is true.
What the president does is not a crime.
Yes.
Yeah.
And that's pretty much.
That's true.
And that's what the Supreme Court, I'm pretty sure.
I'm not a legal scholar, but I'm pretty sure that's what they said.
That was the gist of their ruling.
And so that would be covered under this.
So this is all a big distraction.
This is a distraction.
They are distracting as hard as they possibly can from the look at the outfit.
From the good guy Tulsi.
She has the white, good guy Tulsi outfit that matches her white hairstreak that she wore to tell the truth at those earrings.
Then when she comes and say nonsense, she wears darker colors.
It's actually, it couldn't be more of a distraction.
So this is from today.
She says new evidence has emerged of the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history.
That did happen.
And it's not the most egregious, by the way.
There's that Epstein thing.
That did happen.
But you're not going to be per President Donald Trump's directive.
I have declassified House Intel Oversight Majority Staff Report that exposes how the Obama administration manufactured the January 2017 intelligence community assessment that they knew was false, promoting the lie that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election.
In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people, working with their partners in the media to promote the lie in order to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump essentially enacting a years-long coup against him.
This is all true that that happened.
Who cares?
We torture some folks.
So, yeah, and we also tortured the folks.
And every president is a war criminal in my lifetime.
So that's not happening.
Was it Obama's least bad crime he ever did?
So here's she's she then she then tweeted out some of the lies and what the truths are, right?
So the lie was Putin and the Russian government helped Trump win the 2016 election.
That's the lie.
The truth is President Obama, former director of the CIA John Brennan, and others fabricated the Russian hoax, suppressed intelligence showing Putin was preparing for a Clinton victory, manufactured findings from shoddy sources, disobeyed IC standards, intelligence community standards, and knowingly lied to the American people.
That's all true.
Like she does about Israel.
They all do right now about a real genocide in front of your dumb faces, right?
Yes.
Here's another one she tweeted out.
So the lie is the steel dossier was not used as a source in the 2017 Obama intelligence community assessment.
The truth, not only did the CIA director Brennan, FBI, Director Comey, DNI, Clapper, and others include the Steele dossier in the 2017 intelligent community assessment, they overruled senior intelligent officials who warned them it was fabricated and should not be used.
So yeah, this is all, again, everything she's saying is true.
This is all being released now as a distraction.
This is a distraction.
You know what else is a good distraction?
Stand-up comedy next August 3rd, Sunday in Oxnard, California.
I'll be there August 3rd, Sunday.
Then I'm going to be in Chicago, in Manhattan, and Rutherford, New Jersey, lots of other places.
Go to JimmyDoor.com for a link for tickets.
So this is all coming out now as a distraction.
So here, I'll show you one more lie and then I'll tell you why this is all.
So the lie is the Obama administration's 2017 ICA was an independent intelligence community product produced with a political analysis.
Okay, it wasn't.
The truth is Obama ordered the intelligence community to create an intelligence community assessment they knew was false, promoting a contrived narrative with the intent of undermining the legitimacy and power of duly elected president of the United States.
So that's all true.
But there's nothing going to happen about it because as we've already told you, the Supreme Court said the president could do whatever, and you can't prove intent.
That's the hardest thing to prove.
So together, the records released on Friday, the June 28th report known as the Clinton Annex, released earlier this week, and the House Intelligence Oversight Report was released today, confirmed that many Americans have already known the Russia hoax was a lie that knowingly created by the Obama administration to undermine the legitimacy and power of the duly elected president of the United States.
So here it is.
Here's that thing.
Here's the oversight investigation and referral.
She's releasing it.
And here's just some interesting parts.
It says the rest of the intelligence community assessment, the judgment that Putin developed a clear preference for candidate Trump and aspired to help his chances of victory did not adhere to the tenets of analytic standards.
So the Department of the CIA ordered the post-election publication of 15 reports containing three, which were substandard, containing information that was unclear, of uncertain origin, potentially biased, and implausible.
And those became foundational sources for the CIA judgments that Putin preferred Trump over Clinton.
The ICA misrepresented these reports as reliable without mentioning their significant underlying flaws.
One scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from one of the substandard reports constitutes the only classified information cited to suggest Putin aspired to help Trump win.
So, again, this is all true.
This is all true.
It's such nonsense, Jimmy, because it's very clear now, especially if they're now, I don't know, three years of covering this.
Putin has no idea who's in charge.
He can't say it enough.
He goes, I make a deal with the president.
They leave.
They go, I can't do it.
And I'm like, okay, the men with the blues dies and the black suits come.
So if he was going to influence something, it would be John Brennan getting his job.
Putin wouldn't waste his time with our puppet president that doesn't matter.
The ICA, the intelligence community assessment, ignored or selectively quoted reliable intelligence reports that challenge and, in some cases, undermine judgments that Putin sought to elect Trump.
The ICA failed to consider plausible alternative explanations of Putin's intentions indicated by reliable intelligence and observed Russian actions.
The DCIA, the CIA, picked five CIA analysts to write the ICA and rushed its production in order to publish two weeks before President-elect Trump was sworn in.
Hurried coordination and limited access to the draft reduced opportunities for the intelligence community to discover misquoting of sources and other tradecraft errors.
And so this is right from the report.
I pulled this.
It says what the ICA says.
It says, we further assess that Putin and the Russian government developed a clear preference for candidate Trump.
We have high confidence in these judgments.
So that's none of it.
That is true.
None of this is true.
CIA and the FBI also assess with high confidence that Putin and the Russian government aspired to help candidate Trump's chances of victory when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton.
We assess that Russian leaders never entirely abandoned hope for a defeat of Secretary Clinton when it appeared Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election.
The Russians' influence campaign began to focus more on undermining her future presidency.
Well, the ICA judgment on Putin's intentions failed to adhere to the following analytical standards within the ICD 203.
Properly describe quality and credibility of underlying sources, properly expressed and explained, uncertain.
So they were taking these unqualified assessments that, and they were saying these were, we have high confidence in them when they didn't.
And base confidence assessments on the quality of the, be informed by all relevant, consider alternative perspectives, be in the, so that's what they're supposed to do.
And they didn't do any of that.
Despite the ICA's significant tradecraft failures, the assessment demonstrated awareness of the ICD standards in a section describing analytic.
So they knew that they weren't following the standards.
It's not a failure.
They're doing what they did with the vaccines and the flu shots and every other thing.
They know their bosses want it to look this way, so they're going to make it look a certain way.
Right.
Yes.
So unlike routine internet and intelligence community analysis, the ICA was a highly profiled product ordered by the president, directed by senior intelligence community agency heads, and created by just five CIA analysts using one principal drafter.
Production of the ICA was subject to unusual directives from the president and senior political appointees, and particularly the DCIA.
The draft was not properly coordinated with CIA or the intelligence community, ensuring it would be published without significant challenges to its conclusions.
So there's more.
It just goes there.
So you get it.
So senior CIA officers said some of the information in these reports had been judged to have not met various long-standing standards for publication.
And that's why it had not been published when first acquired.
Two sensitive reports were not published on DCIA orders.
So they had all this information.
The intelligence community said this information is not reliable, so they didn't publish it.
Barack Obama says, F this, go back, get another report, and they included all this stuff in that report.
And so now they're trying to say that Barack Obama is guilty of treason.
The three reports became foundational sources for the ICA judgments.
So.
You know, why don't we go back and get Bush and Cheney and all them to this when they were going to put Hillary, like lock her up?
Yeah.
And I'm like, they're going to just start with her?
I mean, she did a lot of crimes.
I'm certain of that.
But like, that's just the first one.
You know, the rest of them, how bad they are.
She ain't the top commander of that.
Right.
All of them are doing that.
So the bigger question is: why is Tulsi Gabbard and the Trump administration releasing this stuff now?
Didn't they have access to this in Trump's first administration, Kurt?
Why didn't he have his DNI?
He didn't make nice with them.
He was trying to make nice, and he thought he could still be president, even though he didn't want to.
He thought he could.
Yes.
He wasn't trying to blow up their spot like the second term was supposed to be, right?
He learned his lesson the first term, and now he's blown up, but he wasn't going to.
So then they trot out this fake Epstein thing to push his side of what he's hiding.
So he goes, well, fine.
Now I'm going to say the crime Obama did.
That's what this is.
It did for tat.
Yeah.
And it's all, it's all pageant.
The whole thing's a pageant.
Israel's in a tough jam right now.
We can't have this, guys.
That's right.
Israel's maybe not going to make it.
So Jon Favreau, who's a hack who worked for, does that pod save thing, and he comes right out of the Obama.
He's a movie star guy.
He's no, this is the guy.
he's just a paid mouthpiece.
He says, if any of the people pushing the Trump-Tulsi-Obama conspiracy sat down for an interview with a non-MAGA influencer, the whole thing would fall apart in five minutes.
It did.
It's already falling apart.
What are you talking about?
That's not true.
No, because it's true.
What they're saying is actually true.
It's not a conspiracy.
It's a criminal conspiracy.
It's a conspiracy.
It's a real thing.
They really did all the stuff that Tulsi is saying that they did.
They did that.
He's saying this is a crazy conspiracy.
And if someone pushing that sat down with someone like him, who's not MAGA, that it would fall apart.
Well, it wouldn't fall apart.
What would fall apart is RussiaGate.
RussiaGate would fall apart.
The bullshit conspiracy that Obama and Clapper and Brennan and all those people were putting and Adam Schiff.
That's the thing that would fall apart.
And you know, I know, is because Aaron Mate took up that challenge.
He said, I'm a non-I'm a non-MAGA, and I'd be happy to sit down for an interview with any non-MAGA influencer who was still pushing Russia Gate.
Buying into the Clinton campaign's Trump-Russia conspiracy theory and Russia interference scam was a disaster that is long overdue for a reckoning.
I'm going to predict that doesn't happen because if Jon Favreau brought on Aaron Matte, Aaron Matte would dismantle RussiaGate and dismantle Jon Favreau.
Jon Favreau would fall apart.
And that's why if you did take over the challenge, I predict you go, I don't need to platform anti-Semites like Aaron.
That's right.
Sean Davis says, even after John Brenner was told by career intel experts that the Steel dossier was garbage, Brennan ignored them and forced its inclusion in the ICA.
The ICA just stands for intelligence community assessment.
That's all that is.
Oh, wow.
Yes, but doesn't it ring true?
Brennan reportedly responded after being told the Steele dossier failed to meet basic tradecraft standards.
Yes.
Does it ring true?
It didn't.
Why don't you just bring a package of Charmin next time?
So for years, millions of Trump derangement syndrome-afflicted liberals were just sure that the P-TAP would surface at any moment.
To this day, something like 60% of Democrats believe Russia changed the vote totals in 2016.
You can draw a direct line from this hoax to the current war in Ukraine.
That is the best point about this.
That to me is you can draw a direct line from RussiaGate to the American people supporting our war in Ukraine.
That a direct line.
They needed RussiaGate.
They needed you to hate Putin.
They needed you to hate Russia.
So you would go on board for their war, their proxy war, using Ukraine as the cannon fodder to try to damage Russia.
The amount of damage John Brennan did to this country is incalculable.
He should be in jail.
I agree.
And Clapper lied.
What?
What?
Do you think I shouldn't trust that new UFO documentary where they talk to John Brennan about disclosure?
So again, this is all true.
What Tulsi's saying is true.
The two things, why are you releasing it now?
Why didn't Trump release it in his first term?
And we know the reason why they're releasing it now.
And it's to distract from the Epstein stuff.
They shut down Congress to distract from the Epstein stuff.
And talk about shutdown.
You want to see a comedy shutdown.
August 3rd in Oxnard, California, I'll be there.
I'll also be in Rutherford, New Jersey, Manhattan, New York, Chicago, Appleton, go to jimmydoe.com for a link for tickets.
Anything you want to add to this, Kurt?
Oh, man.
I love that we're finally getting.
It's like my friends text me stuff like, did you know Joe Biden was his brain didn't work the whole time?
Is it all coming out?
So, I mean, there's just stuff like this all over the place.
These standards include describing sources, including their reliability and access to information, clearly expressing uncertainty, distinguishing between underlying information and analyst judgments and assumption exploits.
So this was so Russia Gate was a hoax.
It was concocted by the intelligence community.
They're saying it was directed by Barack Obama.
Can we be, did he, did he order a new ICA?
Yes, he did.
Can we ever prove his intent?
You'll never prove it.
Plus, the Supreme Court says that the president can't be held liable for stuff he does as is an official duty.
So, yes, the spirit is true of what Tulsi Gabbard's saying, but the reason why she's doing it is nefarious.
It's to doing it now is to distract.
And yeah, I'd like to say, I'd actually like to see some people go to jail for Russia Gate.
I would.
The second Trump got in, where's the vengeance he promised that they were all worried about?
And they were all Googling, defense attorney, are you going to murder?
Is that his natural limitations?
How do I kill myself?
That was the big story, remember?
Yeah.
And then what happened?
He tried to make nice with them and make a deal.
Why would you do that if you're not one of them?
Why would you make a deal with them if you're not one of them at the end of the day?
So Trump is one of them.
Trump is the establishment.
So there might be factions of the deep state fighting amongst each other, but Trump is definitely in one faction of that deep state.
Nick Bryant said it.
Gambinos versus Genovese.
Yeah.
That's that.
That's what this is.
So Thomas Massey is pushing for his own private investigation into the Into the Epstein thing.
I'm surprised that 21% of Americans are in Congress.
Like, what?
Who's the percent that said that's the majority, but who said no, don't release them?
He says 79% of Americans support releasing the Epstein files.
Who are the 21%?
Is Congress?
Is most of the people in Congress?
Only 16 members of Congress have sponsored the legislation to do so.
After seven legislative days, I'll be able to collect signatures to force a vote on my bill to release all files and co-sponsors.
That was from July 20th.
So that was going to happen.
By the way, so here is the YouGov poll.
79% of the adults say yes.
5% say no.
85% of Democrats.
Only 76% of Independents say yes.
Isn't that interesting?
Who are these?
I'm glad the numbers are low, but who are they on a list?
These people are kidding.
Let bygones be bygones, I say.
But now, Thomas Massey says Americans were promised justice.
Our binding partisan legislation to release the complete Epstein files now has 20 sponsors.
Soon we can be collecting signatures required to force public vote in the U.S. House.
Is your member on the list?
That was from July 22nd.
Well, guess what?
Then the speaker, Johnson, he retreats on his demand.
Speaker Harry Potter, who's retreating on this one?
Harry Potter says the man for Epstein disclosed.
Trump needs a space.
So he completely flip-flopped.
He completely flip-flopped, said Trump needs a space.
Breaking Mike Johnson said he would shut down the House until September to block a vote on calling for the release.
So this is the one time when Democrats and Republicans actually agree they want to get this Epstein stuff out or they want to vote on it.
Some of them want to, but their heads are not allowing it.
Yeah, so they so that I think it is the Democrats wanted to force a vote to embarrass the Republicans who are going to vote against it to protect Trump.
They both know it can never come out.
All in the meanwhile, they're all doing games because I love this thing that Democrats are like, oh yeah, hey, Mago, aren't you sad?
Because they didn't release it.
Oh, yeah, because Wendy Williams is going to get right on that when she got in.
Yeah, I'm sure.
I used to get suppressed for talking about it when it dems were in.
Remember that?
So here's what he said when he says, so they just suspended Congress early so they don't have to take this vote.
As you all know, I speak to the president multiple times a day on typical day, often, always.
And what I know about the president's heart on this is that he agrees with everything I've said here today.
He wants maximum transparency, but he's also very insistent that we do not subject people who have already been victims of us crimes to further public scrutiny.
And it would be a very dangerous thing to put those people's names out or to do a release of information in a way that is haphazard where they could be easily haphazard.
We only had 10 years.
I think we have a moral responsibility to do that.
We have a moral responsibility to expose the evil of Epstein, and everybody was involved in that.
Absolutely.
And it says here, I'm supposed to smack the podium right now to make it look like I'm really earnest and I really give a shit about anything I'm saying right now.
Oh, yeah.
Smith.
Oh, my fax glasses normally do that, but I got to do this too now.
You just look at my glasses.
Remember Harry Potter?
That's unreal.
Here's what would happen.
If they released it in a haphazard fashion, he kind of just said at the end.
You know, the Walmart fat people, the Rizzler and Co., the family at Raps About Walmart, they would put down their strombolis and run there to tear these people apart limb from limb.
And we could never have that, you know, because Walmart would go under.
So let's watch this.
I was wondering, with the paralysis in the Reese Committee, it seems like they're not going to be meeting again today because of the Epstein amendments.
Have you tatted with anybody about that?
Well, it wouldn't really matter.
Their Epstein bill resolution is non-binding, so it's kind of fake.
The resolution that I have co-sponsored with Rokana would actually bring up legislation that would be binding on the president.
Is your understanding that that will ripen the day after lawmakers get back from August recess?
Yeah, unfortunately, we have six days and we needed seven days for the discharge petition to ripen before we could bring this up before the August recess.
So we'll have to bring it up after the August recess.
But the good news is the speaker has no interest in keeping us here one extra day.
So Speaker Johnson expresses frustration that Thomas Massey is trying to get Congress to move to release Epstein files.
He says he needs scripture to deal with them.
So here's the, so as a leader of my party, I lead the incumbent protection program.
Okay.
That's my job.
I go all around the country.
I travel endlessly, incessantly.
I have to raise over $300 million to do that.
And we want everybody to come back.
And some people, I try to protect them from themselves.
They kick and scream and bite their own colleagues.
Some people seem to enjoy trying to inflict political pain on their own teammates.
I'm not going to address anybody individually, but I'll tell you that some here are much more frustrating than others.
There's a small, small, tiny handful, but one in particular who's giving me lots of consternation.
I don't understand.
I don't understand Thomas Massey's motivation.
I really don't.
I don't know how his mind works.
I don't know what he's thinking.
Thomas Massey could have brought his discharge petition anytime over the last four and a half years.
Over the last four years of the Biden administration, he could have done that at any time.
And now he's clamoring as if there's some sort of timeline on it.
It's interesting to me that he chose the election of President Trump to bring this, to team up with the Democrats and bring this discharge petition.
So do I have some concern about that?
I do.
But you know, me and my way, I try to follow Ronald Reagan's 11th Commandment.
Never speak evil of another Republican.
My gosh, it's hard to do sometimes.
I also try to follow the scripture.
You know, it says, bless those who persecute you.
So let me just say about Thomas Massey, could you just accept my southern, bless his heart?
Okay.
I don't know what else to say about it.
We're for maximum transparency.
We're engaging in that right now.
We don't need political game.
So now you see why this guy, they modded him to be speaker.
He is an expert speak out of both sides of his mouth guy.
And that's what that was right there.
He's like, oh, this asshole Thomas Massey wants transparency.
I'm committed to transparency.
What?
Yeah, I only heard the one side until the transparency part.
So your job, he goes, first he goes, our job is protect the incumbent.
We're here to protect your citizens and kids from being trafficked by Israel.
No, no.
Oh, okay.
And then you're going to bring up scripture because I mean, that is like, how do you not know your leaders are like satanic, whether you believe in that stuff or not?
That's crazy what he said.
He just said, scripture, there's an at-large group of peter ass running everything.
And you, as a Christian, don't feel no need to look any further.
No, I think the timing.
Is the timing interesting?
Yeah, it's interesting to me, too, Harry Potter.
I thought Trump was going to release that shit.
So that's the timing explained.
Yeah, so everybody was convinced that.
Let me just tell Mike Johnson maybe why Thomas Massey is doing it now because it's clear that the Trump administration is trying to cover this up instead of what they campaigned on was release all of it and reveal everything and have transparency, radical transparency.
And now it's obvious that that's not happening.
So Thomas Massey has to go do something about it.
That would be probably why he's doing it now.
And he probably didn't do it over the last four years because he knew that the Democrats were in charge of all that stuff and they would probably suppress it.
Yeah.
Well, the Republicans are in charge of all that stuff now and they're suppressing it.
So that's why he's having to do it right now.
I mean, you can't see it from the beard.
He's got no glasses.
He's growing a full beard, Thomas Massey.
He's probably living in a shack hiding out.
And it's also, it's not party first.
It's country first.
It's supposed to be country first, not party.
The 11th commandment.
Yeah.
So there are good jokes to be made about this.
And if you'd like to hear some of them, August 3rd, I'll be in Oxnard, California, and I'll be in Rutherford, New Jersey, Manhattan, New York.
We'll also be in Chicago, Appleton, Wisconsin, all kinds of places in the Midwest.
Go to JimmyDoor.com for a link for tickets.
Here's what Mike Johnson says: Republicans won't be lectured on transparency by the same Democrats who orchestrated one of the most shameless and dangerous cover-ups in history: Biden's obvious mental and physical decline.
So what he's saying is, yeah, of course we're not being transparent.
Of course, we're covering shit up, but we're not going to be lectured by people who also cover shit up.
That's what he's saying.
You'll be mocked by me.
How about them, Harry Potter?
Thomas Massey says, Speaker Johnson, why are you running cover for an underage sex trafficking ring and pretending this is a partisan issue?
MAGA voted for this.
Perfect response.
That's the perfect response.
Clinton Russell says there were enough votes to pass Massey's binding resolution to blow the lid open on the Epstein files.
All the fury would be directed at Mike Johnson for this move, but he did what he was told to do.
I hope people realize that this was Trump's call.
Of course, this was.
And he does exactly what he's told.
Trump says this: Thomas Massey, the worst Republican congressman and an almost guaranteed no vote each and every time is an embarrassment to Kentucky.
He's lazy, slow moving, and totally discussing Thomas Massey.
He acts like he's talking about Tim Waltz or Hillary.
No, you're talking about someone that is beloved in Kentucky.
That guy's going to have his seat as long as he wants it, Thomas Massey.
Unless it comes out that he's on that list, which he's not.
He's a real loser.
Never has anything.
So it's just like when they called everybody sexist.
It loses its punch, Donald Trump, when you're calling Thomas Massey a real loser.
It just doesn't, it doesn't mean anything.
Never has anything positive to add.
Looking for someone to run.
Yeah, his positivity is that he wants to end the deficit.
I think that's pretty positive.
That's a big deal.
And he wants to expose the Epstein files.
That's also a positive.
So this is.
It's a bad Republican.
Yeah.
Looking for someone to run against this guy, someone I can endorse and vigorously campaign for.
So Donald Trump, that's called about Republican on Republican violence.
And Thomas Massey says, if the executive branch won't release phase two of the Epstein files, we will.
Americans deserve transparency and the victims deserve justice.
Wow.
So we'll see if that happens.
So Thomas Massey fighting against the cover-up of the Epstein files.
That's what Thomas Massey's doing.
And Trump calls him a loser for it.
He's looking great.
Thomas Massey is.
Yeah, he looks.
He lost some weight.
It does look like he lost some weight.
He looks good.
He's got a normal beard.
He doesn't have a beard that people grow to as a substitute for a personality.
I don't know if you've ever seen, you know, I'm talking about the player.
Yeah, David Letterman did that.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to jimmydoorcomedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
Freak out.
Freak out.
Don't freak out.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
He can be found at mikemcray.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.
