During a recent speech at a Turning Point USA conference Tucker Carlson questioned the official narrative surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and criticized the taboo around discussing Israel’s possible involvement. Carlson argued that asking critical questions about intelligence agencies and foreign influence is a citizen's right and not an expression of hate or bigotry. Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger praise Carlson for speaking candidly in front of a conservative audience and highlight the backlash faced by figures like Charlie Kirk for platforming dissenting voices. Jimmy emphasizes that loyalty should lie with American citizens—not political leaders or foreign governments—and criticizes political influencers who demand blind allegiance. Plus segments on Donald Trump’s ongoing scramble to change the topic to anything BUT Jeffrey Epstein and CBS’s cancellation of Stephen Colbert’s late night show. Also featuring Stef Zamorano and Mike MacRae! And a phone call from Elon Musk!
Going to be in Oxnard, California, Rutherford, New Jersey, New York, New York, Edmonton, Calgary, and Vancouver.
Go to JimmyDoor.com for a link for tickets.
Hey, this is Jimmy.
Who's this?
Hello, Jimmy.
This is Elon Musk calling you from TASA headquarters.
How do you feel, or how are you feeling?
I'm doing fine if that's what you're asking.
How are you, Elon?
by virtue of my mother and father copulating.
No, I mean, like, how...
Oh, how silly of me.
Yes, it is well.
And yours?
We're doing great, Elon.
We haven't spoken to you in a while.
I have to get used to how you talk again.
Yes, it's strange, especially the accent, because I hit a few syllables in a row that sound more or less normal, and then I'll see a word like really weird.
Yeah, right.
Yeah, okay.
But we will muddle through.
Persevere.
Right.
So what's on your mind, or should I say, what are you thinking about right now?
Oh, so many things.
So many things, Jimmy.
Always, my mind is full of thoughts and ideas.
Some hopefully brilliant or most horror than others.
But given the nature of your program, I suppose you mean politically.
Sure, yeah, that's what I mean politically.
Yeah.
Well, as I'm sure you've heard, I had a falling out with Donald Trump and his little salacious crumb friend, J.D. Vance.
So we're on the outs.
And the great experiment in government that was doge is now defunct completely.
Yeah, I heard.
But Jimmy, I have to be honest with you, I found even just being in the halls of power feeling that adjacency, I found it to be intoxicating.
And I don't really want that part of my life to be over forever.
That's what power tends to do to people, Elon.
Yes, yes, it makes them morally better and stronger.
I agree.
But at the same time, I'm massively disillusioned with now both parties.
Jimmy, to be honest, between you and me, I don't see a lot of daylight between them.
I can't argue with you, Elon.
So as you've heard, I'm forming a new third political party, the America Party, named after America itself.
What makes you think this will be politically successful?
Because it will provide the American people exactly what they want, an alternative to the Republicans and Democrats given to them by a strange foreigner with unlimited resources to sway elections.
How Democratic?
No, Jimmy.
How American.
I've noticed that nowhere do you state any kind of political platform or political philosophy.
Jimmy, this is by design.
That's what's so brilliant.
It's a feature, not a boog.
Yeah, I don't understand, boog.
This will be the first political party whose platform is determined solely by AI.
Artificial intelligence will lead us to political salvation in America.
What on earth are you talking about?
Okay, Jimmy, every politician obviously tells the voters what they want to hear, but how do they know for sure what the voters want to hear?
That's the question.
You can look at polls, sure, but polls are notoriously unreliable.
Only Grok can tell us what people want for sure.
It has the entire X microblogging site at its every post ever made.
That's political power.
No, I can see how AI might give insight, but it.
Not just insight, Jimmy.
The American political party politicians will be controlled by AI themselves.
Excuse me?
Jimmy, we are accomplishing amazing, truly amazing things currently with Neuralink.
So if a politician is giving a speech to a crowd of voters and he is equipped with the Neuralink biotransmitters, we can AI to literally write this speech in real time using feedback from the crowd's reaction to tell them exactly what they want to hear.
Any political party whose politicians give speeches that are always received with mad applause is unstoppable.
This doesn't sound politically ethical if there's such a thing.
Jimmy, what if I told you I am currently fitted with such a Neuralink biotransmitter apparatus and am prepared to tell you exactly what you want to hear?
I'd say it's not working.
I haven't pressed the on button yet.
Hold on.
Okay, here we go.
Jimmy, I have always been a great admirer of your integrity as a citizen journalist.
All right, go on.
And because of this respect, I will personally see to it that you are assigned to a class B or above biosphere residence in the upcoming technocratic utopia.
Thank you.
And that you and no more than three of your loved ones will be provided with A-271 clearance that will afford you five daily grams of protein more than 80% of the population.
Wait, what's going on here?
Wait, something is wrong.
And you will be afforded negotiable scheduled termination plus or minus two years from your 65th natural birthday.
What are you talking about?
Oh, oh, I see what's happening.
Neuralink has made an amusing mistake that we must re-engineer.
It thinks that what you want to hear is based on you being aware of what we are planning, which obviously is not the case.
But these are the challenges of engineering.
More boogs to work out.
But our team at Neuralink is up to the task.
Okay, how about you just stay out of politics and planning the future of humanity and all that stuff and just focus on being an insane rich person, okay?
On behalf of the human race, please leave us alone.
I am afraid that is not possible.
It is too late.
Oh, wait, now it's doing this.
I hope your favorite Chicago and or Los Angeles sports teams are going to have a good upcoming season.
It's learning in real time.
Isn't that exciting?
The future?
I'm so excited.
Well, Jimmy, I have to go now.
Talk to you later and stay weird.
Okay, all right.
Establishment media sets of August fighting.
So good luck.
Bullshit we can't afford.
Watch and see as a jack-off comedian who speeds and jumps the medium and hits him hit on.
It's the chimney door show.
So criticizing the behavior of a government agency does not make you a hater.
It makes you a free person.
It makes you a citizen.
You're allowed to do that because you're not a slave.
You're a citizen.
So Tucker Carlson gave a great speech at Turning Points USA.
And here he tells the truth about what's happening with Epstein and Israel and how it's okay to question.
Here we go.
Not acceptable.
And I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of Intel Services, probably not American.
And we have every right to ask on whose behalf was he working.
How does a guy go from being a math teacher at the Dalton school in the late 70s with no college degree to having multiple airplanes, a private island, and the largest residential house in Manhattan?
Where did all the money come from?
And no one has ever gotten to the bottom of that because no one has ever tried.
And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government.
Now, no one's allowed to say that that foreign government is Israel because we have been somehow cowed into thinking that that's naughty.
There is nothing wrong with saying that.
There is nothing hateful about saying that.
There's nothing anti-Semitic about saying that.
There's nothing even anti-Israel about saying that.
I've spent my entire life pretty much in Washington, where I knew and loved a number of people, including one very close person who worked at CIA.
That has never prohibited me from saying, I think the CIA has done some horrible things, murdered a bunch of people, participated in the murder of a sitting U.S. president.
It's got a whole trail of crimes.
That doesn't make me a disloyal American.
It doesn't make me anti-American in any sense.
I was born here.
My family's been here for hundreds of years.
I love this country.
That's why I live here.
So criticizing the behavior of a government agency does not make you a hater.
It makes you a free person.
It makes you a citizen.
You're allowed to do that because you're not a slave.
You're a citizen.
And you have a right to expect that your government will not act against your interests.
And you have a right to demand that foreign governments not be allowed to act against your interest.
That's not creepy.
It shouldn't be forbidden.
And yet, all of us have trained ourselves to believe that you can't say that somehow.
That's like too naughty and forbidden.
And the effect of making that off limits has been to create a lot of resentment.
And I'll say it, hate online.
Where people feel like they can't just say, what the hell is this?
You have the former Israeli prime minister living in your house.
You have all this contact with the foreign government.
Were you working on behalf of Mossad?
Were you running a blackmail operation on behalf of foreign government?
By the way, every single person in Washington, D.C. thinks that.
I've never met anyone who doesn't think that.
I don't know any of them that hate Israel, but no one feels they can say that.
Why?
And I think the longer that we play along with it, the more subterranean and creepy and hateful the conversation actually becomes.
So I think it's better just to say it right out loud.
Did this happen?
And of course, that question has been asked to the government of Israel, and their answer is: we're not going to tell you.
And I think our answer should be: no, no, no.
As long as we're sending you money, if you are committing crimes on our soil, we have an absolute right to know.
Did you do this or not?
And yet.
And by the way, if Israel is paying for Epstein's blackmail, that means that we paid for Epstein's blackmail.
So just keep that.
If America.
What else, Jimmy?
The congressional records of all their weird sexual harassment and I'm not allowed to say the name of the crime online.
Those are all sealed.
All the various awful sexual things people in Congress did, those are sealed.
You know that, right?
Yeah.
So you're paying for every one of these degenerate pervert lizards to do what they do forever.
Okay, a little bit more.
Everybody has been so brainwashed into thinking that's somehow an expression of hate or bigotry when it's not.
It's a baseline question that every U.S. citizen has a right to an answer on.
What the hell was this?
And by the way, if it turns out that it was nothing.
So there's Tucker Carlson basically saying, hey, these answers that were being given by Trump and his administration about Epstein are not acceptable.
And trying to shout us down and call us anti-Semites for asking these questions or whatever.
This is not also not acceptable.
And he's saying that in front of some of the most conservative people in the world at the Turning Points meeting in Tampa, Florida.
And they're applauding and cheering.
Which is surprising because that's Charlie Kirk's thing, is it not?
Yeah, that's Charlie Kirk's thing.
And Charlie Kirk is a Zion.
I'm pretty sure he's a Zionist.
I'm pretty sure.
I don't know what that is.
But I will give Charlie Kirk big props because he brought Tucker Carlson there and he knew he was going to say something like that.
And he brought Dave Smith there and he put him on stage.
And now people are attacking Charlie Kirk because Charlie Kirk platformed Dave Smith and he platformed Tucker Carlson.
Tucker Carlson, you mean the number one newsman in the world?
He asked to let him come speak at your gathering.
That's what he's supposed to do.
I'm sorry.
I didn't know conservatives use those dip shit words.
Yes, platform.
They are.
If you use that word, I hope you fall into a wood chipper.
Anyone watching, if you go, you platformed, I hope you suffer a terrible end for every saying that word.
I agree.
Why are conservatives saying that?
Oh, because the woke right is that.
That's right.
But those conservatives there were applauding and cheering.
It's the thought leaders.
And so it's the, so it's the P, it's the, yeah, it's the quote unquote thought leaders, and it's the conservatives over 50 years old because we've seen those, we've already seen the polls that Israel has lost everybody except conservatives over Republicans over 50 years old.
So those are the people who still watch John still watch cable news, right?
And they still believe Bill O'Reilly and people with plaque brain for not using their brain and watching people who take too many statins and can't think clearly, right?
So if Statin's, you know, you should look into that if you're taking that because it makes you into a Zionist.
But I think that's so, and here's what Charlie Kirk.
So I honestly, no kidding, props to Charlie Kirk for having Tucker Carlson there.
I think he's actually open to having people with different views.
Obviously, he is.
He brought Tucker.
And here's, but now here's what he has to say because he wants to remain loyal to Israel, but he realizes it's a loser, even with his crowd.
So he can't have people on, Jimmy.
He'll have different people.
Piers Morgan will have people with opposing views on, you might notice, which, okay, that's good on one.
That's real basic stuff everyone should do.
But the thing is, they're the thought leader.
So they're going to watch Charlie Kirk now divert your attention away.
There's time to Indonesia, everyone.
So, but it goes.
Let me just say that shows you that when people say, oh, people who like Trump are an occult, most of those people aren't the definition of a cult is you go along with whatever leader says.
They've been pushing back on Trump hard.
Candace Owens says she's embarrassed to tell people that she to vote for Trump.
There's Tucker Carlson completely eviscerating him over their Epstein bullshit.
This is Jimmy.
Yeah.
I'm so upset.
I'm wearing my Wendy Williams shirt.
And MAGA, all those people there are against what Trump is doing vis-a-vis Israel.
So it's not a cult.
And not that MAGA needs me to defend them.
I'm just letting people know.
Yeah, there are some people who think that their loyalty should be to Trump instead of the other way around.
Trump's loyalty should be to you.
Trump's loyalty should be to America.
But you're going to have people like Scott Adams and Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity and the guy from the Daily Wire tell you that, no, you should be loyal to Israel and you should be loyal to Trump.
That's backwards.
That's called, that makes you a thought slave.
Then you don't get to think for your, just like Tucker said, you're not a slave.
You're a free person and you get to demand things from your government.
And so Chucker's 100% right about that.
And there's people who are like, you got to be loyal to Trump, which is the definition of a cult.
No, Trump is supposed to be loyal to you.
He's not my king.
The people doing, I just, it just blows me away that how quickly it turns to I'm with her, the Hillary slogan with Trump.
Not among the MAGA people, because I talk to them.
They all are mad about it.
That's right.
It's among the thought leaders, influencers, which is another word for devil by an influencer.
Shut up.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show: you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydork.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business, and it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
I want to talk about Trump and MAGA in a couple of different sort of coordinating ways because there is a lot going on right now.
I think that the chinks in the armor are massive chasms at this point.
I think I'm not sure if MAGA is salvageable, at least comparable to what it was.
I think that it is maybe past the point of no return.
I think Trump is really, I don't know if he could have handled the Epstein stuff worse.
I genuinely, what happened?
Okay.
I don't know what happened, but it's kind of wild to watch it play out in real time because this is somebody who, and people have been making the comment, oh, he ran on exposing the Epstein stuff.
And not technically, he definitely talked about it.
At least I couldn't find if anybody has a clip of him saying very definitively, we're going to do this.
I know JD Vance made multiple comments, which we're going to talk about here in just a minute.
But I was trying to find any one instance where Trump was super solid on that position and he waffled on it a little bit or he would like equivocate or you know kind of make very vague statements.
But again, I may have missed it if there's like a definitive statement of him out there.
But he definitely did use that as a talking point.
He definitely called out the entire situation, trying to make it, and he's doing that again, trying to make it a Democrat, Democratic Party issue.
But it's just crazy to me to watch because that is something I think nobody would deny that his base is incredibly focused on.
Their attention to this, and as it should be, it's a child sex trafficking ring that implicates people in very high levels of power and influence, which is so crazy that that's a sentence that we can say out loud and nobody's doing anything about it.
But it is, we should all care about it.
And that's why I think it's been so damaging that the guy came out and called his own supporters stupid for caring about child sex trafficking.
I mean, that's wild behavior.
I don't know.
Did he think that was going to go over well?
Because I don't think it went over well.
But there's multiple things about this story that have been popping up.
So let's start with this tweet here from Glenn Greenwald.
He said, if the Epstein files are a hoax fabricated by Hillary and Comey, which that is what Trump is now saying, that it's a Democratic Party invention, it's Russia Gate 2.0, blah, blah, blah, or whatever, that they just invented this out of whole cloth and there's nothing incriminating there.
So Glenn really continues, shouldn't profuse apologies be forthcoming from those who accuse Biden officials of protecting pedophiles and accuse Bill Gates of being on the client list.
And that's, he has a couple of tweets down here that he includes.
This one from J.D. Vance, what possible interest would the U.S. government have in keeping Epstein's clients secret?
Oh, and he was retweeting Jack Pasovic.
And this is from 2021.
And then this one, Cash Patel said, Bill Gates was, quote, lobbying Congress night and day to prevent the disclosure of that Epstein list.
Why?
And so there was a lot of conversation, especially on the right, about Democrat.
They love to do that, right?
They'll ignore their own party's connections to anything vile.
But anytime that the other party, then suddenly they care tremendously about it.
And again, both sides do it.
I don't belong to either camp or crew.
I'm anti-electoral politics.
I don't give a shit about your cults.
So this isn't me like bashing the right or whatever.
The left does it too.
But it's just, it's fascinating to watch how passionate they really were.
Not just the base, but people in positions around Trump, advisors of Trump, JD Vance on numerous occasions spoke about it.
And so that's what I think is the most telling is that they really think that their base is either that stupid or that loyal that they can turn on the drop of a dime.
It was just like overnight, suddenly there's no list and he didn't or and he killed himself.
Like whiplash, genuine whiplash from that reversal.
Glenn then continued in the tweet thread.
Also, if Hillary Obama, Jim Comey, Brennan, and Biden somehow fabricated and forged a bunch of Epstein files, as Trump alleges, those would be major felonies.
Why isn't the Trump DOJ prosecuting those who concocted these documents?
Instead, Trump is demanding everyone move on.
That's the crazy part.
Move on.
In what universe do you just move on from an abundance of evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was running a human trafficking ring, a child sex trafficking ring, allegedly, don't come for me.
And that his clients were people in incredible positions of power.
We're talking royalty, presidents potentially, senators, other world leaders, serious positions of power and authority, involved and implicated in a child sex trafficking ring, potentially.
And Trump is just, and after Trump talking about it for years, maybe not running on it necessarily, but certainly talking about it and discussing it in a very animated way.
Again, J.D. Vance, let's pull up.
This is, we read this one earlier.
What possible interest would the U.S. government have in keeping Epstein's client secret?
And then my favorite one, as somebody who's a big fan of journalists, real journalists, not like the propagandists that most journalists are.
But he said, if you're a journalist and you're not asking questions about this case, you should be ashamed of yourself.
What purpose do you even serve?
I'm sure there's a middle-class teenager somewhere who could use some harassing right now, but maybe try to do your job once in a while.
And people will say, well, this is from 2021.
Things changed.
More information came.
No.
Zero information has come out that has alleviated suspicions about what Jeffrey Epstein was up to and who he was up to it with.
Nothing.
I don't care if you release some doctored video of the outside of Jeffrey Epstein's cell and you claim that that should be enough and he killed himself and just get over it.
Like that's, it's crazy to me that Trump thinks that his base is just going to walk away from this issue.
Zero questions asked.
Here's another one.
This is also from 2021 from JD Vance, vice president JD Vance.
Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring?
And then that guy died mysteriously in a jail and now we just don't talk about it.
Well, we were talking about it, JD.
And then Trump is telling everybody to forget about it and acting exasperated that anybody would even ask a question.
You were talking about journalists and how if you're not talking, if you're not asking about this, you should be ashamed of yourself.
And then a journalist asks Trump about the Epstein stuff and they get publicly shamed and trashed and called stupid and all of the other things.
What universe are we in?
It is wild to me that this is a thing that they're trying to pull.
And the base is freaking the fuck out.
They are losing their entire minds, which I don't blame them.
Oh, I think I forgot to get a video.
There was a video.
I might be able to find it.
There was a video of people calling into like Gwen Beck's show, literally near tears over this, talking about how they supported Trump, they believed in Trump, and they can't believe that now he's gaslighting us, he's calling us stupid, telling us to forget this, whatever, whatever.
And that seems to be a pretty common response that people are having.
And this is another example of that.
Trump supporters burn MAGA hats after he dismisses Epstein files for over as a hoax.
Mike Pence spoke out, which take that as whatever that is.
I don't really know that that's, that's neither here nor there.
And I'm loath to use an article from The Guardian, but here we are using an article from The Guardian.
I have major beef with The Guardian over their conduct regarding Julian Assange and the way they threw him under the bus.
But here we are.
This is an article from The Guardian.
Donald Trump's efforts to dismiss the criticism over his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files as a quote-unquote hoax showed no sign of working on Thursday as more prominent figures from across the political spectrum emerged to attack the U.S. president and some of his supporters recorded videos burning their signature make America great again hats.
So I actually have some videos, I think.
Yep, here we go.
So these are just a couple of them.
Thank you.
So there's one.
This is all going in the trash.
I do not support Trump anymore.
He's a liar.
He's a part of the deep state.
I do not support Israel.
I will not be supporting him anymore.
He's part of the deep state.
He's committing genocide as we speak.
And we all need to start waking up.
Thank you.
So there you have it.
MAGA's mad and they have every right to be.
I just think it's interesting to watch the way that they are reacting to the whole thing.
And again, I kind of alluded to it earlier.
I think it's kind of refreshing because at least they're willing to be critical of Trump.
I think, in my opinion, liberals are the worst to deal with.
They do not want to ever admit that anything their party does is wrong.
Remember the tan suit?
Like Obama blew up funerals and they like to pretend that a tan suit is his only controversy.
I mean, Standing Rock or Flint or, I mean, we could name, right, a ton of actual scandals, but they only want to ever talk about a tan suit.
And MAGA is actually being vocally critical of Trump on various different fronts.
As you saw the one guy, Israel, which I think that that's, we're starting to see even more of that for various reasons.
But the Ukraine situation, there's just so much that people were promised and they're recognizing that they were never going to get that.
And that's, I think, hard for people to swallow, but they are at least attempting to make those connections, which is good.
It's just, I just really hope that I really, really hope that we, these people that we see kind of having these epiphanies don't get suckered in in the next election cycle.
They're going to.
They're going to.
They're going to get suckered in.
People always get suckered into the election.
So for, if you don't know, I am incredibly anti-electoral politics.
I think it is a ginormous waste of time, energy, effort, money, resources, all of the things.
You cannot vote your way out of this.
It's just not possible.
Our elections are garbage.
They always have been.
We have, we can't even audit the machines, proprietary software.
Like it's a mess.
We have vote by mail.
I mean, it is a mess.
And our elections consistently rank amongst the worst for Western democracies.
It's a joke.
We're a joke.
Our elections are a joke.
And even if you could vote, it doesn't matter because the options that you're presented with are two hand-selected people who will serve the agenda.
So the choice never exists.
There's never a choice.
And I don't, don't come to me with your third party stuff either.
I'm not interested.
The entire electoral system is completely corrupted front to back, top to bottom.
It doesn't matter.
We cannot vote our way out.
So people will get, well, we'll then talk about solutions.
Again, we do all the time.
And solutions are things like opting out and building.
You have to try to build outside of the current systems.
And that's, it's going to get way worse, I think.
Again, I'm sorry for being doom and gloom and for being blackpilled or whatever.
I'm just trying to be realistic.
We are an empire in decline.
I think it is really apparent.
I think we're well past the point of no return.
Control demolition or otherwise, it doesn't matter.
The end result is the same and it's going to suck.
So we need to stop like this ridiculous stuff that divides people.
It's so silly.
We're going to need each other.
We need to stop letting them divide us on this stuff because it's only, it's really only going to get worse as we're talking about the ICE situation and the surveillance state and the police state and the facial recognition and the AI and all of the stuff that's coming.
It's a lot to overcome.
It is really a lot to overcome.
So also our friend Max Blumenthal, he went to talk to some members of the Republican Party about their thoughts on how Trump was handling it.
I think the responses are pretty telling, but pretty expected.
Why did the Republicans block Representative Khanna's resolution to have a vote on releasing the Epstein files?
And what are your thoughts on that?
I don't know.
This one's for you.
Yeah.
I'm going to refer you to leadership on it.
I mean, why?
That's a great.
Wait, wait, we got to pause it there for a second because that's AOC.
Do you guys remember that, Max?
It was Max's video too.
That was AOC's.
Oh, what was it about?
Oh, Venezuela, I think.
He cornered her and asked her about her position on Venezuela and the attempted coup on Venezuela.
And she literally said those exact words.
I defer you to leadership.
That just triggered me.
Yes, that is exactly what AOC said.
And it's funny because it was a Max video as well.
Shout out to Max.
Question for the speakers team.
How would you have voted?
It's again a great question for the speakers team.
So to release the Epstein files, would you have voted yes?
They want to know that we can trust what's happening.
And I trust what President Trump is doing.
I trust the direction that Mike Johnson is going.
What do you think about that resolution and how would you have voted?
We'll do an official statement from the office on Epstein files.
Thank you.
What did you say?
Sorry.
Our contact info for an official statement.
Thank you.
On the Epstein file.
You don't want to talk about the Epstein.
I'll do an official statement from my office.
You want to retard or not?
Yeah, sure.
Okay, well, what do you think of Pam Bondi declaring that after she said there were files on her desk that they're not going to be?
What I'm here to talk about today is Small Business Committee and the Economy and how Main Street America is growing and getting bigger every single day.
That's what I'm focused on today.
Just one quick question.
Do you trust the president's judgment on Jeffrey Epstein?
I have confidence in the president, confidence in his team.
Always have.
Trust the president.
He's been truthful in the past.
He's very transparent.
Let's wait and see.
I trust President Trump to work with his team to disclose as much information as he possibly can without jeopardizing our national security or, you know, harming kids or smearing people who are innocent.
I think those are the confines.
Otherwise, you know, let's release as much as we can.
I trust him to do it.
I think a lot of people in New York knew this guy, and I think he was a bad guy.
And I'm glad he's not like walking the earth terrorizing young people anymore.
CNN has obtained new information and text messages that appear to back up the sexual assault claims made last week by a male Republican strategist against a powerful and influential conservative.
Matt Schlapp has denied the accusation.
Strategist says that in the weeks before the election, Schlapp groped and fondled his groin during a car ride back from two area bars in Atlanta.
And like I said, I trust the president to work with his team to disclose everything.
And it's not just this.
It's a whole realm of things.
There's a lot of us who have been victimized by the weaponized bureaucracy.
A lot of my friends have been.
I shouldn't laugh.
I can't help it, though.
Gallo Semer gets me by.
Yeah, so not surprising answers from the Republican Party.
It's very rare that they ever actually, either party takes a stand against whoever it is.
But there are some, very few members of Congress, RoConna, who I'm not a huge fan of, but okay.
But Thomas Massey and others are trying to put some pressure on Trump, which I think I don't really necessarily think that it's working, but I think it's at least it's interesting to see that there are a significant amount of people who are genuinely upset by this and should be.
Again, this is a child sex trafficking ring, allegedly.
And I don't know why that's a controversial thing that we should absolutely be doing everything that we can to expose anybody who is in any way affiliated with, related to, involved in any of that stuff in a child sex trafficking ring, especially if those are people in positions of power.
We all know why we're not going to get that information.
We all know why it's what it's being used for.
But I do just think it's crazy that they can just out loud in your face call you stupid for caring about that and expect still expect you to support them.
I think that's pretty wild.
But I do think that, oh, hold on.
I do think that it is watching this is going to be, especially watching how it impacts the election cycle in 2028.
That's going to be very interesting.
And I think somebody I saw tweeted it out that J.D. Vance needs to start like distancing himself, at least from the issue.
I don't think he can at this point.
I think he's well into it, especially now that he's out there defending Trump and telling people that they need to move on and all of that stuff.
I think he's definitely, I don't know that he can weasel his way out of it at this point.
So there's also this aspect of it.
So Trump orders officials to release Epstein court documents after mounting pressure.
So I think that this is just damage control.
I doubt we ever actually see anything from this.
I think that this is just a maintaining of the outrage currently.
He's hoping if he flicks the crumbs of crumbs in your general direction, you'll pipe down.
But he says, it says, President Donald Trump says he has ordered the Justice Department to produce additional documents related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Quote, based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent grand jury testimony subject to court approval.
It's unclear if Trump is authorizing the public release of these documents.
Such action would typically require court approval.
The U.S. president also said he would sue the Wall Street Journal over an article alleging that a quote-unquote body birthday greeting bearing Trump's name was sent to Epstein in 2003 before the late financier was charged with sex crimes.
This is a crazy story.
The letter, which the newspaper claims was sent on Epstein's 50th birthday, has been decried by Trump as quote unquote fake.
Of course, he would say that.
Even if it's real, he would say that.
In a post, Trump said that the newspaper and owner, that the newspaper and owner Rupert Murdoch, quote unquote, were warned directly that they would be sued if they printed the story, describing it as quote, false, malicious, and defamatory, end quote.
According to the Wall Street Journal, a letter bearing Trump's name, quote, contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker.
Inside the outline of the naked woman was a typewritten note styled as an imaginary conversation between Trump and Epstein written in the third person.
Such a weird story.
The letter, according to the Wall Street Journal, allegedly ends with the words, quote, a pal is a wonderful thing.
Happy birthday and may every day be another wonderful secret, end quote.
Trump said, these are not my words, not the way I talk.
Also, I don't draw pictures.
I don't know why that makes me laugh, but it's just a funny thing.
According to the newspaper, the letter was part of a compilation of birthday greetings that was put together by Epstein associate Ghillene Maxwell.
Trump's directive to release more documents comes after days of sustained pressure from some of Trump's most loyal supporters demanding further disclosures in the Epstein case.
Attorney General Pam Bondi posted minutes after the president saying, quote, we are ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts, end quote.
While campaigning last year, Trump promised to release files relating to the disgraced financier.
However, Bondi last week announced that the U.S. Justice Department did not believe Epstein had a so-called client list, and he doesn't.
Let's just pause there.
There is no client list.
Now, is there information pertaining to relationships that Jeffrey Epstein had, people that he, of course, there is, but there's no client list, I don't think per se.
I think that was really just like the little shiny object that they were kind of kicking around.
What I do think is interesting is that Pam Bondi went on national television and proclaimed that the client list was on her desk.
Ma'am, why would you do that if you don't have the list and there is no list?
She was probably set up for that, but there's not a list.
I don't think there's ever been a list necessarily.
Obviously, we had the whatever they were, the address books or the little black books or whatever.
But there's never going to be any substantive investigation into this.
None of these people are ever going to be held accountable, which is wild.
But that at least that's, I can't imagine, unless there's some miracle in which we wrestle power away from these people.
I don't know how we ever get accountability for this stuff.
And we know what happened.
I don't care how much gaslighting they want to do.
Trump needs to just shut up.
I don't know that he knows how, but come on, y'all.
This is not some make-believe thing that we've all just manufactured in our heads collectively.
There's a significant amount of evidence supporting the existence of a child sex trafficking ring that implicates people in extreme levels of position and positions of power.
That's a thing.
And it didn't go away, probably.
It's probably still going on right now.
Actually, I would be willing to bet that it is.
Allegedly, don't come for me.
But I mean, that kind of stuff doesn't stop just because they have to use this as a storyline and a narrative.
That's, I mean, it's crazy, but that's, and it's really disgusting that that's the world we live in, but that's the world we live in.
That's what it is.
It came after Bondi had touted she was set to announce major revelations about the case, including a lot of names.
We didn't get any names and a lot of flight logs.
We didn't get any flight logs.
A nod to those who traveled with the financier who or who visited his private islands where many of his reported crimes were said to have occurred.
Her reversal prompted furious response from scores of Trump's most ardent supporters who have called for Bondi to resign.
She would just be a fall guy after failing to produce a list, which Trump officials had previously claimed to have in their possession.
Conservative commentator Charlie Kirk, who was critical of the administration's handling of the files in recent days, praised Trump's move.
Quote, this is massive.
This is something that we've been talking about for quite some time and really a power to the grassroots, he said.
Charlie Kirk is definitely playing his role there.
And then this is J.D. Vance's response to the story about the weird, I don't, love letter.
I don't know what that was.
A birthday, I guess.
I don't know what that was.
But J.D. Vance says, forgive my language, but this story is complete and utter bullshit.
The Wall Street Journal should be ashamed for publishing it.
Where is this letter?
Would you be shocked to learn they never showed it to us before publishing it?
Does anyone honestly believe this sounds like Donald Trump?
Actually, yes.
It may be fake, but I could 100% see Donald Trump writing something creepy like that.
Yes, he is.
He is notably creepy and has been his entire existence, all of his public life.
He's been kind of creepy, talking about dating his daughter, talking about sneaking backstage of beauty pageants to see girls undressed.
And I mean, he's always been hanging out with Rudy Giuliani while Rudy Giuliani is in drag.
I don't know.
He's just, yes, I absolutely could see Donald Trump writing a letter of that nature.
Did he?
I don't know for sure.
It certainly could be fake.
That's definitely a possibility.
It could be fake.
This could be fake news.
They could be using it to try to create a response.
Absolutely.
No question about it.
Obviously, Donald Trump is pissed.
He says the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch personally were warned directly by President Donald J. Trump that the supposed letter they printed by President Trump to Epstein was a fake.
And if they print it, they will be sued.
Mr. Murdoch stated that he would take care of it, but obviously did not have the power to do so.
The editor of the Wall Street Journal, Emma Tucker, was told directly by Caroline Leave It and by President Trump that the letter was a fake, but Emma Tucker didn't want to hear it.
Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story.
Anyway, President Trump will be suing the Wall Street Journal News Corp and Mr. Murdoch shortly.
I'm interested to see if he actually does.
The press has to learn to be truthful and not rely on sources that probably don't even exist.
President Trump has already beaten George Stephanopoulos, ABC, 60 Minutes CBS, and others, and looks forward to suing and holding accountable the once great Wall Street Journal.
It has truly turned out to be a disgusting and filthy rag.
I like that he capitalized that.
It's cute.
He's a weird typer.
And writing defamatory lies like this shows their desperation to remain relevant.
If there were any truth at all on the Epstein hoax as it pertains to President Trump, this information would have been revealed by Comey, Brennan, Crooked Hillary, and other radical left lunatics years ago.
It certainly would not have sat in a file waiting for Trump to have won three elections.
This is yet another example of fake news.
So I've heard that argument a lot.
If Trump was implicated in the Epstein files, the Democrats would have released it ages ago just to get him.
No, they wouldn't.
No, they wouldn't because they're all implicated.
This is not a partisan issue.
There are Democrats in those files and on those, not the client list but we're clients and there are republicans they're both involved this is not a republican or a democrat thing and if joe biden or hillary clinton went after donald trump with the information then they have to risk bill clinton being exposed allegedly don't come from me um so yeah i mean it's uh the idea that this the democrats would have absolutely released it so
they could take down.
They invented Donald Trump.
It was Bill Clinton who encouraged Donald Trump to run for president.
It was Hillary Clinton who used her minions in the media to present him as the Pied Piper candidate.
Thank you, WikiLeaks.
She hand-selected her own opponent.
I mean, this is the idea.
And again, it's a very frustrating thing, but the idea that there's two separate parties is just smoke and mirrors, y'all.
It's not real life.
They are owned and operated by the exact same people.
They serve the same agenda.
The only difference, and this is just my opinion, the only difference between the two parties is the demographics to which they pander to.
That's it.
On war and Wall Street, it's one party.
All the other stuff is used to keep you guys fighting amongst yourself or to keep us fighting amongst ourselves.
That's all that is.
So this is from Daniel Goldman.
Trump and Bondi are trying to gaslight you into believing they're turning over the Epstein files.
Don't believe them.
Grand jury testimony won't include anything relating to any other people
involved in the sex trafficking ring we deserve the truth release all the files we're never getting sound on the jfk files y'all we just don't have that we're not getting the epstein files we're not getting any information on epstein uh ron wyden tweeted out big news for my investigators on epstein's sex trafficking operation the trump administration has an epstein file detailing 4725 wire transfers and almost 1.1 billion dollars flowing through just one of his banks hundreds of millions more through others um
FBI agents were told to flag any Epstein records that mentioned Trump, Senator Durbin says.
So now there's this back and forth between the two parties over who's most guilty of terrible crimes against children.
So from CNBC, FBI agents assigned to review files in the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein were instructed to flag any documents that mentioned President Donald Trump, Senator Richard Durbin said.
Durbin asked the Justice Department and FBI to explain what his office called apparent discrepancies regarding handling of the Epstein files and findings from a Justice Department memo.
Trump has called on supporters to drop their pursuit of a release of the file, saying the controversy of their withholding by Attorney General Pam Bondi is a hoax.
That's wild to say out loud.
A hoax.
The Epstein case.
So he was just arrested and thrown in jail for nothing.
And Gillian Maxwell is in prison for what exactly?
This is just a wild switch up.
I really do have whiplash from this insane change of position seemingly overnight.
It is kind of crazy.
And I think MAG has just really had it with the nonsense.
And I think it would be different if it weren't so...
It's everything.
It's everything.
It's all of Trump's stuff.
I mean, ending the Ukraine war in 24 hours.
Didn't get that.
There's been no accountability on COVID.
You're not getting that.
I mean, shoot.
But this shouldn't be surprising.
This is the lock her up guy in 2015, 2016.
And then as soon as he was president, it's like, oh, no, we got it.
He did an Obama.
We got to look forward.
We can't look back.
We got to look forward.
I mean, this is the game that they play.
And just constantly people buy into it over and over.
They don't care.
None of them.
None of them care about you.
They don't serve you in any way, shape, form, or fashion.
Okay.
Do I have anything else on Trump here?
Oh, I guess we could listen to...
I don't even know if I want to subject you guys to that.
Nancy Pelosi.
Nancy Pelosi had thoughts on the Epstein files.
It's very brief.
We'll just play it.
Jeffrey Epstein or Alcatraz.
It's all off the subject of what they're doing with this budget that is harmful to the kitchen table, meeting the kitchen table needs of the American people.
I want to make sure I understand what you mean when you say distraction.
Do you think that Pam Bondi going to Alcatraz is meant potentially as a distraction from Epstein, which has not gone over well at all with the president's base?
No, I think they're both distractions.
They're both distractions.
She's not wrong, necessarily.
Everything's a distraction, really.
But, yeah.
This is going to turn into a kind of a Russiagate situation where the two parties banter back and forth.
Or, yeah.
I mean, we're just going to...
This is going to be one of those...
The kind of tug-of-war thing.
Back and forth.
They're going to fight back and forth about this for the next little bit.
Keep everybody fired up and emotional and distracted about it.
And we're never going to get any actual information about Jeffrey Epstein.
I mean, we might get some, again, like the grand jury stuff, which will show absolutely nothing.
There will be absolutely nothing of significance in there.
We might get that stuff.
But we're not going to...
There's never going to be any account...
There's not...
No arrests.
There's not going to be any arrests.
I mean, that's just reality.
And it's...
I feel kind of bad for MAGA.
Because I think we've all been at a point where we believed, right?
Where, like, a lot of people believed in Bernie.
A lot of people believed in Obama.
MAGA really believed in Trump.
And it turns out he's just like the rest of them.
And they're struggling to come to terms with that.
And really, a lot of Bernie supporters still haven't come to terms with that.
A lot of Obama supporters still haven't come to terms with that.
But I vacillate between wanting to mock them.
Wanting to mock them.
And also, like, feeling bad for them.
Because I get it.
I think people are very desperate right now.
And they want to think that somebody...
is coming to save us but nobody's coming to save us uh they want to think that it's as simple as like going and voting and it'll fix it and it's just not that simple uh So I get it.
But we're really, I mean, it's how many times, how many times do we have to go through this?
How many times is your government get to lie to you before your sense of skepticism kicks in?
I mean, I'm genuinely curious for some people because they just keep you on this hamster wheel over and over.
And in 2028, a lot of the people who are mad at Donald Trump and J.D. Vance are just going to vote for whoever Elon Musk's front Musk runs in the America Party.
They're just going to get roped in by the next demagogue.
It's an unfortunate cycle that we just can't seem to break out of.
Not sure we ever will.
But yeah, the Epstein stuff is not a hoax, guys.
It's not a hoax.
It's a real thing that happened.
You should care about it.
The fact that children are being victimized in that way and the idea that that has now been turned into like a political football.
Depressing stuff, but it's not a hoax.
You should care.
Don't care so much that you let it like eat away at you because it's very dark stuff and we're never going to see accountability.
I mean, really, we're just not.
At least I can't ever see that happening unless some, again, some miracle happens where we manage to wrestle power away.
But they're not going to arrest each other.
Let's talk about Colbert because it was just recently announced that his show is going to be canceled, which is interesting timing to say the least.
So this is from the Los Angeles Times.
CBS to end late show with Stephen Colbert next year.
So he's got a whole year of shows that he can do.
I saw somebody joking and it made me laugh that, oh, they just gave Stephen Colbert a green light for a year to say whatever he wants, as if he's going to come out and say anything controversial or brave.
He's Stephen Colbert.
Come on.
CBS said it is canceling the late show with Stephen Colbert at the end of the television season in May.
A casualty of industry changes have dealt a crippling blow to advertising revenue.
Colbert announced the news to his audience during a live taping in New York.
Quote, this is purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night TV, which is what top CBS executives said in a statement.
It is not related in any way to the show's performance content or other matters happening at Paramount.
And quote.
Not sure if I believe them.
Quote, we consider Stephen Colbert irreplaceable.
They're lying.
We are proud that Stephen called CBS home.
He and the broadcast will be remembered in the pantheon of greats that grace late night television.
Okay.
So financial reasons my ass, this is political.
So if you're curious about this, this is the reason why they're saying that this is political is that Stephen Colbert has been speaking out publicly against Donald Trump.
Donald Trump is not a fan of that.
We all know that.
Donald Trump would like to shut everybody up who says bad things about him and has actively taken measures to do that.
Another reminder, this is the guy that had Julian Assange arrested.
So he is no friend to free speech.
He's no, not that I'm defending Stephen Colbert.
Stephen Colbert is a useless propagandist.
There's no question about it.
But Donald Trump definitely likes to silence people that he doesn't like and doesn't agree with.
So then we have people comparing Gutfield because everybody's freaking out because Colbert does have really good ratings, generally speaking, comparably speaking, but people are bringing up that Gutfield averaged 4 million viewers per night.
People asking Grock everything still makes me laugh.
So Grok, how does Gutfield Fox ratings compare to these ratings?
2.417 million does not sound like a lot.
I mean, it's not really a lot, but people don't watch TV.
People stream everything.
So not surprising.
Also, mainstream media is dying.
There's no question about it, which is a fantastic thing, or it would be a fantastic thing.
Huge fan of that happening.
But the problem is, is what are they going to replace it with?
And I think we all have seen that they have plans for that.
And we're just going to get mainstream alternative media.
It's going to be the same book with a different cover, really.
But it is what it is.
In the summer of 2020, Stephen Colbert aired a sketch warning people to be skeptical of vaccines and big pharma.
11 months later, Colbert was dancing for the vaccine.
Goodbye, shameless show.
And yes, that's for sure.
I don't feel bad for him at all.
He sucks.
They all do.
But it is certainly interesting timing with all the Trump stuff.
This is Elizabeth Warren.
Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders both came out in loud support of Stephen Colbert.
She said, CBS canceled Colbert's show just three days after Colbert called out CBS parent company, Paramount, for its $16 million settlement with Trump, a deal that looks like bribery.
America deserves to know if his show was canceled for political reasons.
Watch and share his message.
And we have, I mean, I can play this for you so you can see for yourself what he had to say.
Corporation, Paramount, paid Donald Trump a $16 million settlement over his 60 minutes lawsuit.
As someone who has always been a proud employee of this network, I am offended.
And I don't know if anything will ever repair my trust in this company.
But just taking a stab at it, I'd say $16 million would help.
This settlement.
This settlement.
Thank you.
This settlement is for a nuisance lawsuit Trump filed claiming that 16 Minutes deceptively edited their interview with then candidate Kamala Harris last fall.
Paramount knows they could have easily fought it because in their own words, the lawsuit was completely without merit.
And keep in mind, Paramount produced Transformers Rise of the Beast.
They know completely without merits.
Now, unlike, unlike, unlike, unlike the payoffs from ABC and Twitter, Paramount settlement did not include an apology.
Instead, that's good.
Instead, the corporation released a statement where they said, you may take our money, but you will never take our dignity.
You may, however, purchase our dignity for the low, low price of $16 million.
We need the cash.
Now, I believe All right, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you.
What can I say?
What can I say, Mr. Stephen loves to dance?
Now, I believe that this kind of complicated financial settlement with a sitting government official has a technical name in legal circles.
It's Big Fat Bribe because this all comes as Paramount's owners are trying to get the Trump administration to approve the sale of our network to a new owner, Skydance.
Not the music I was expecting?
Okay.
That was me dancing in the sky.
And some of the TV typers out there are blogging that once Skydance gets CBS, the new owner's desire to please Trump could put pressure on late night host and frequent Trump critic, Stephen Colbert.
Okay, okay.
But how are they going to put pressure on Stephen Colbert if they can't find him?
I used to think he was funny at one point.
Did I?
Was he funny at one point?
I feel like he was.
I feel like he was funny at one point.
It's so bad.
It's so bad.
But there you have it.
So Colbert is now losing his show.
Bernie Sanders, as I mentioned, also had something to say.
CBS's billionaire owners pay Trump $16 million to settle a bogus lawsuit while trying to sell the network to Skydance.
Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late night host, slams the deal.
Days later, he's fired.
Do I think this is coincidence?
No.
And it's probably not coincidence.
I have a really difficult time knowing how to feel about this because I do not care about any of these people.
They all suck.
And this whole, and should Trump be able to silence Colbert?
Of course not.
Like that's as a free speech absolutist.
That's ridiculous.
But Stephen Colbert sucks so hard.
Him and everybody like him.
And there's just too many of them.
And so I just don't care.
So, but there you have it.
Stephen Colbert is losing his job, his show.
And we shall see how this all plays out.
I definitely thought that that was watching that video of Stephen Colbert was painful.
I will say that for sure.
That's a tough one.
I can't be alone, right?
I'm not the only one who used to think he was funny, right?
Because I feel dumb now for thinking he was funny ever at any point.
But I really think that I did.
Like the Jon Stewart days, I think maybe that I did.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to jimmydoorcomedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
He can be found at mikemcray.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be and I'll keep being me.
