Conservative commentator Candace Owens has publicly criticized Donald Trump for abandoning his “American first” pledge in favor of Israel and against free speech. In a recent episode of her podcast, “Candace,” she voiced concerns over the administration’s actions against universities, particularly regarding free speech issues. Owens stated, “I never thought that I would see a day where I would be rooting for a university above Donald J. Trump and his administration. But I don’t recognize this administration right now.” She highlighted the administration’s actions against Harvard University, which is facing threats of federal funding cuts for not complying with certain demands. Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger discuss how Trump has betrayed virtually every fundamental pledge he made to his MAGA base. Plus segments on actor Russell Brand’s recent arrest on decades-old sexual assault charges and Health & Human Services director Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s announcement that all new vaccines will only be approved after more rigorous studies involving placebos. Also featuring Stef Zamorano and Mike MacRae. And a phone call from Douglas Murray!
Hello, this is Douglas Murray on democracies and death cults.
Is this Jimmy Doar I'm speaking with?
Yes, it is.
Right.
What can I do for you, Mr. Murray?
Well, as you probably are aware, recently I appeared on the Joe Rogan podcast.
I believe he's a friend or at least an associate of yours.
Yes.
And I perhaps rather foolishly agreed to debate, if you even want to call it that, on the topic of the Israel-Palestinian conflict with a comedian named Dave Smith.
Yeah, well aware.
Well aware.
Right.
Well, as you are no doubt also aware then, thereafter in the course of making my various media rounds promoting this book, I gave voice to my fatigue brought on by people who are professionally described as comedians suddenly coronating themselves in what I assumed to be a Napoleon-like ceremony of some kind as experts in some of the most complex issues of our
time.
Yeah, uh-huh.
And this was received to some acclaim on these various platforms.
God damn it.
You are a douchebag.
Which I have always found to be more receptive and welcoming stage from my point of view.
No small thanks to Mr. Maher himself for that.
Yeah, do you realize that Bill Maher himself is also a comedian?
Right.
The salient difference here is that he agrees with me.
He agrees with me.
Yeah, that's it.
Yeah.
He is, for the most part, at least, staunchly on the side of Israel in this conflict and has no problem whatsoever conflating Hamas with the entire civilian population of Gaza, including children and infants.
After all, it is called an infantada.
Babies can hardly be blameless in an endeavor thusly named.
I don't think, look, he's still a comedian.
That's my point.
No, you see, you simply don't understand.
He is on the side of Israel, so he's correct.
So that is his nature.
Dave Smith is wrong on this topic, and therefore comedian is his nature, philosophically speaking.
They may both be in nominal sense comedians, but only in the case of incorrect thinking does that become the primary signifier, the ding anzik, the thing in itself.
I assume you're familiar with the manual cart.
No, not really.
Okay, I'm sorry.
But how can you possibly understand a topic as complex as Israel Palestine without a background in Kantian philosophy?
You're telling me you just look at images and videos of atrocities in Gaza, survey the destruction there, and blithely conclude that you are seeing ethnic cleansing.
I'm sorry, but no.
Next, you're going to tell me that you have an opinion about Ukraine and Russia without having read Friedrich Nietzsche's Jeinsites on Gutenberg.
God damn.
Yeah, I do.
As a matter of fact, I do.
Okay.
Okay, look, I'm sorry.
Can you tell us why you're calling?
I basically just picked up the phone and some British guy started laying it into me.
Well, that's sort of the point.
My lamentations about comedians turned pundits seem to resonate so keenly, especially during my appearance on comedian turned pundit Bill Maher, that I decided to spread this message proactively rather than reactively.
Meaning what?
I have a list in front of me of comedians with opinions about current events, and I am calling them one by one to berate them.
Yeah, and I'm just next on the list.
Precisely.
This strikes me as rather an odd project, douchebag.
No, I'll tell you what's odd.
Coming from an Oxbridge educational background, working professionally as a journalist for three decades, being sent around the world and shown only what those in power want journalists to see.
And then from there, to enter the strange ecosystem of new media punditry that one must engage with anymore to sell books or to even be heard, and to have it disproportionately guided, if not dominated, by current or former comedians with not one iota of credential to give way to their assertions, other than one time they received a standing ovation at the Chuckle Hut in Cincinnati, Ohio.
The comedy club in Cincinnati is called Go Bananas.
Oh, a thousand pardons.
Has it ever occurred to you that this phenomenon might be because the gatekeepers are gone?
And people have always known comedians to be truth-tellers?
That comedy, by definition, doesn't work unless telling the truth?
That the court jester has unique license to tell the truth?
Basically, people trust us and not you.
I am sorry, but trusting people simply because they tell the truth is perhaps the most juvenile instinct one have and should be the last one encouraged by the media.
Well, why should the public trust someone then?
Credentials, educational backgrounds, British accent, all the things media literacy demands one respect and things that you lot lack altogether.
So the idea that you can look at images from Gaza without ever having been there that seem to very clearly depict genocide and then call it genocide is irresponsible to the point of criminality.
I mean, how dare you?
Have you even read Schopenhauer?
Hey, you know, you know what, Mr. Murray?
I and most people live in a world where we can look at a thousand upon thousands and thousands of images and videos and get a pretty good idea of what's going on without relying on 19th-century German philosophers to guide us.
But you have fun living in your world, and I have a show to do.
Good day, sir.
Fine, be that way.
Yes.
I've got plenty more people on this list to call anyway.
Let's see who's next.
Ah, Bill Burr.
Something tells me he'll be a little more receptive to my lecturing.
Tata, Ben.
Yeah, Todd Todd.
Establishment media sets of artists fighting.
Good luck, bullshit we can't afford Life's fomenting this Watch and see as the jet Golf the medium speeds And jumps the medium And hits them head on It's the chimney torture.
They're talking about student groups that did not get violence but are opposed to Israel's agenda, which is totally fair because this country is not Israel.
It's not Israel.
You are totally allowed to retique Israel.
I mean, it's an absolute nonsense.
We're allowed to critique our own government.
We're allowed to say our government are terrorists.
We're allowed to say our government is criminal and crooked and corrupt.
We're allowed to say all those things.
In fact, Elon Musk is making a career of doing so right now, showing you all the corruption inside the USAID and the NED right now.
But you're not allowed to do that with Israel.
Candace Owens on Harvard defying the Trump administration.
You want to hear what she had to say about it?
Here you go.
How could Trump be such a free speech enthusiast and being allowing these things to happen, going after college universities, trying to suppress speech while pretending that you're not suppressing speech, while pretending that you're fighting DEI?
It's so messy.
It's so obvious.
Everyone knows what you're doing.
People who are still trying to grift, I suppose, are not willing to challenge you on this, which is ridiculous, because when you are out of office, we are going to have to live with these consequences.
Our children are going to have to grow up in this America.
Okay.
So first of all, I just want to say, so she's accusing people who consider themselves on the right and Trump supporters not correctly holding his feet to the fire on his crackdown on free speech, which is, by the way, even worse than what the woke left did.
They just censored you on social media.
What Trump is doing is trying to make it literally illegal and trying to bar you from doing business, from getting government contracts, and deporting people who are here illegally following the rules.
These are not the people that people voted for Trump to deport.
These are people who would be at the end of the line.
They're not even in the line.
So what she's saying is that the people like over at the Daily Wire, people like Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro, that they're not, they're grifting now off the fumes of Trump and MAGA because they're not holding to their own principle.
Well, that's been clear since day one on October 7th with Ben Shapiro, but it's becoming very clear now.
And she's saying that that's what I heard her say.
Did you hear her say that?
Just now?
Yeah.
But wait, Jimmy, what about the fact that Harvard is now a madrasa?
Okay.
The Wall Street Journal.
God did.
Hang on.
He threatened our speech.
It's not worth it.
So you have pom-poms and go hurrah for a couple of years, then go, okay, well, yeah, now it kind of stinks because, oh, we're getting arrested for wrong thing at David Freeman.
Yeah.
So she's saying, so you're just going to go rah-rah for a few years while Trump is president because Trump is going to not be president faster than you can imagine.
It's going to go like that.
Right.
So after the midterms, he's basically a lame duck anyway because they're going to flip it because believe me.
And so he's a, so he's really got maybe another year and three quarters left.
And then it's over.
And she's saying, oh, so wow, we go rah-rah-rah while Trump is president.
Then the Democrats take over.
And then they start arresting people using the same.
So the exact same thing I said about Barack Obama was that, oh, yeah, they let him take away habeas corpus, meaning that Barack Obama could now imprison anybody he wants indefinitely.
It's called indefinite detention without charging them.
So that's what tyrants did.
That's why the founding fathers put habeas corpus.
That's what.
So, and I said, and I warned people then, well, you think it's okay now because you like Obama, but who do you know is going to be the next president?
Maybe it'll be someone you're not with fucking Trump.
And so now all of when Barack Obama was killing American citizens, by the way, young, not even adult American citizens, he killed a 16-year-old American citizen without a trial, without charging him with anything.
And he did it on purpose.
And they never apologized for it.
So when we allowed that to happen, when we allowed them to throw people in jail, all they had without a charge, without a trial, and all they had, all the president had to do was say, oh, well, he's a terrorist.
I said, they're going to call everybody a terrorist.
And now they are.
So now just writing an op-ed in a newspaper gets you kicked out of the country for a thought crime.
People who are playing by the rules, people who are here showing up to immigration meetings because they want on their path to citizenship, exactly what we asked them to do.
And she's calling them out for them.
And she's saying, guess what?
When Trump's not president anymore, they're going to start locking us up.
You fucking idiots.
They're going to start locking us up for speech.
It's going to be used against us, which is exactly what's going to happen.
Here we go.
Well, just like I said about the law fair, I said, you know, you're doing lawfare against Trump.
You don't think when Trump becomes president, he's going to come right after his enemies?
That's exactly what he's doing.
And you can't say shit about it because you did it to him.
And that was the case I was making to Cornell West on the show.
If they can do this to Donald Trump, an ex-president of the United States, they're going to do it to you if you become a threat.
They're going to do it to Bernie Sanders.
They'll do it to Jill Stein.
They'll do it to anybody who does.
They did do it to him.
Yeah, they did.
Here we go.
Rustom.
Arush Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens.
Get them.
I love it.
Everyone can see what's happening left and right.
So, to give you the background, obviously, after October 7th, there were tons of student protests all across the nation.
Some got violent, some didn't.
But what has happened is people started demanding that universities start, you know, taking on their own sorts of definitions for anti-Semitism, particularly the IHRA new updated definition of anti-Semitism, which I believe was, I think it was drafted by the ADL, if I'm correct.
If I remember correctly, the ADL put this together.
Nothing good comes from the ADL.
Their backstory is they were initially a gang that went mainstream and their job is to suppress speech and to smear people, not to defend people against defamation.
They are actually the defamers.
That's why they think they're clever by calling themselves the anti-defamation league when they actually routinely engage in defamation.
Anyways, this is Harvard received notice that they had to comply with Trump administration's demands, okay?
And essentially telling them how they would have to change things on campus.
And they're, again, trying to, the administration is trying to paint this as they're coming and fighting DEI on campus.
And they're not doing that.
I'm going to show you it so you can see it with your own eyes.
On Monday, Harvard became the first university to openly defy the Trump administration as it demanded sweeping changes to limit activism on campus.
Activism is like synonymous with campus, okay?
The university frames the government's demand as a threat, not only to the Ivy League school, but to the autonomy that the Supreme Court has long granted American universities.
And do you remember what Ben Shapiro used to say when they were banning right-wing speakers on college campuses?
He would say that you're not entitled to a defense of your hurt feelings.
Facts don't care about your feelings.
And when you go to college, you're supposed to be exposed to all different kinds of opinion and stuff that actually challenges you and it might even bother you.
That's the whole point of college.
They completely threw all that out the window because they have no principles.
Those type of people have, they're unburdened by their principles.
And so they don't.
So that's what she's exactly what she's saying.
So you remember that, right?
You remember the videos we showed over and over of Ben Shapiro saying that you're not, you can't be a snowflake.
You don't deserve a safe space.
College isn't a safe space.
If you want a safe space, stay home.
College is supposed to be for robust debate and ideas that challenge you and make you uncomfortable.
Well, now Trump doing the bidding of Israel and the Zionists is now turned all that on their head.
And so it's, by the way, Ben Shapiro, same thing with Jordan Peterson, completely revealing themselves as charlatans who are unprincipled.
And that's what she's calling out.
Wow.
They said in a quote, the university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.
That's what the university lawyers said on Monday.
They continued, neither Harvard nor any other private university can allow itself to be taken over by the federal government.
The federal government says it's freezing more than 2.2 billion in grants and 60 million in contracts to Harvard, unless essentially we are going to hold your funding unless you comply with these demands.
And I'm going to show you, because Harvard has released it, what they're asking them to do.
First, I should tell you they've already complied with adopting the IRHA definition of anti-Semitism, which is ridiculous.
But so, how you have to read this is everywhere.
And Scott, if you don't want to make that a little bigger for me, everywhere.
Imagine if Joe Biden and Kamala Harris made colleges adopt language that made it illegal for you to dead name a trans person, made it illegal and called it hate speech for you to criticize Black Lives Matter protests or Black Lives Matter.
Imagine if they did that.
This is the exact same thing that Trump is doing, which they never did, by the way.
They never threatened to take away people's funding.
They never deported people over it.
They never arrested people over it.
They never did any of that stuff.
They never threatened people's government contracts business-wise.
So what Trump is doing is actually way worse.
Where that you see the word anti-Semitism, you have to ask yourself what the definition, the new definition of anti-Semitism is, because now we're at critique of Israel, the foreign state, essentially.
So as they frame it down there as the discontinuation of DEI, which would be a good thing, saying that we want people to be merit-based and to let go of DEI-based policies, that would be a great thing because that is how the nation should run.
They are actually asking them to reform programs that have egregious records of anti-Semitism or other biases, telling them to look at specific programs.
Scroll down, Skylars.
I want to get to them essentially just framing this as them needing to take a look at who they're even allowing to come to Harvard on foreign visas and whether or not they disagree with Israel's policies.
Like you have to adopt new policies about student groups or clubs that forbid or endorse certain activities.
They're talking about student groups that did not get violence, but are opposed to Israel's agenda, which is totally fair because this country is not Israel.
It's not Israel.
You are totally allowed to critique Israel.
I mean, it's an absolute nonsense.
We're allowed to critique our own government.
We're allowed to say our government are terrorists.
We're allowed to say our government is criminal and crooked and corrupt.
We're allowed to say all those things.
In fact, Elon Musk is making a career of doing so right now, showing you all the corruption inside the USAID and the NED right now.
But you're not allowed to do that with Israel.
A foreign country.
So these aren't even offenses against your own country.
They're doing it for another country.
This is not America first.
This is make Israel great again.
It's telling them that these people need to be suspended, that they can't be allowed on campus.
Again, making us think that Bibi Netanyahu must be the president of the United States and Trump has no idea what's going on.
I tend to think that there is a person who tells Trump that the press is irritable, that they love this, people are loving it.
Trump's not on YouTube.
He's not on X. He says something to someone and they tweet it.
Somebody decides what articles to put in front of him every morning.
I know that for a fact.
Okay.
So he who is picking that article, he who is telling him what tweets to look at is the person that is shaping Trump's understanding of what his base feels.
So she's saying Trump's out of touch with his base.
My experience is that is correct.
And he's being lied to by his advisors.
I've done videos of it.
YouTube.
Stephen Miller, right on camera, lied to Trump about the 9-0 Supreme Court decision, which went against Trump.
He said it was in their favor, in Trump's favor.
I showed it, YouTube suppressing the shit out of this show right now.
It only got maybe 30,000 views on YouTube.
It got like 40,000, 50,000 views on Rumble, which is, it's funny.
Things are switching now.
I'm getting more views on Rumble than I am on YouTube because YouTube has changed their algorithm to crack down on shows like this even harder because we're considered borderline content.
But I've showed this to you before.
And by the way, Trump's not doing anything about Google cracking down on people.
He's not demanding that the algorithms be made public and that everybody be treated the same.
He's not doing any of that.
In fact, he's bringing in a whole new level of authoritarian censorship at the behest of another country.
And he's creating a protected class, and they're called Jewish people.
But most of the Jews I know don't want anything to do with it.
Most of the Jews I know are against Zionism, don't want anything to do with Israel.
So it's not just Jewish people he's protecting.
He's protecting Zionists, not even Jewish people, Zionists.
Is that it?
How could Trump be such a free speech enthusiast and being allowing these things to happen, going after college universities, trying to so here?
Here's one more.
So, by the way, all tyrants go after intellectuals first.
Right?
You know that, right?
Just like Pol Pot killed everybody who wore a pair of glasses.
Right?
So, what type of glasses, any or like that kind that I do with me?
All tyrants go after intellectuals because intellectuals see through tyranny while everybody else is eating Cheetos in front of their TV.
The problem is he went after Ivy League schools thinking he would find intellectuals there, but they're mostly gone except for Harvard.
The rest are only there because their parents could afford it.
Yeah.
So, here we go.
It seems to me a backseat.
And I would say, by the way, as an extension of that, also the MAGA movement.
It sort of feels like they're doing the bare minimum for Americans and what we actually put them in office for, and then doing the absolute maximum for like Bibi Netanyahu's entire agenda.
So, when she says the MAGA movement is doing the bare minimum, she means the people in power.
She doesn't mean the actual grassroots MAGA movement because I meet those people all the time at my shows.
I met them when I went to the defense that rally in Washington, D.C. I forget the name of it now.
Rescue the Republic rally.
They were all there holding Free Palestine placards.
They were saying free speech for everybody.
When I said free speech for everybody, including Nazis, they cheered.
They understand that free speech is an absolute, that it doesn't come from the government, that it comes from God, and that the founders of the country, the writers of the Constitution, said free speech is a right that comes from God.
It's not a privilege given to you from the government, because if it's given to you from the government, that's not a right.
That's a privilege that they can take away, which Trump is trying to do right now.
And what the founders of the government and of the country and the writers of the Constitution actually said was that free speech is a right that comes from God, and the government will not interfere with that right.
While being like, oh, but look, we did, at least Tom Holman did get out 2,000 criminals in the border.
We've stopped it.
We've asked you for a lot more.
The mandate was a lot more.
And you seem to have in just three months done so much for Israel.
You know what I mean?
If we could dedicate that same energy to what you promised everyone that you were going to do for Americans, that would be great.
But once again, we're left feeling like this is just a slave colony.
Yeah.
And the fact that the movement is called America First originally, and that is a stroke of genius because it is so hard.
They're trying their best, but it's so hard to make what they're doing look America first.
And they're trying to do all these backwards arguments.
Like, how is passing speech laws that could like in some cases criminalize or at the very least, you know, kick you out of school, pull your federal funding if you criticize Israel?
There are no laws about racism in America.
There's no, if you Google right now, there is no recognized definition of racism by our government.
But if you Google America's official definition of anti-Semitism, there's a whole page on the State Department's website about anti-Semitism.
And so how do you call this America first when we are explicitly going against our first amendment of our Constitution on behalf of a different nation?
And inside of those guidelines, they specifically say that saying that people, Jewish people would have more allegiance to Israel than to America because they're Jewish, that's anti-Semitic to say, while out of their mouths, they're saying, we need to do these things for Israel or like, I am a Jew first above all else, things like that that are like, what are we, how are we going along with this cognitive dissonance?
So anti-Semites would actually make the accusation that Jews don't have loyalty to America, that Jews have loyalty to Israel.
Well, that's exactly what Trump is doing.
And that's how he's perverting the MAGA movement to have more loyalty to Israel and Zionism than to the United States and their First Amendment and our Constitution.
So isn't it ironic and perverted that they're now taking what actual anti-Semites used to say and do, and they're now spinning it, and they're adopting that.
They're conflating Zionism with Jewish people.
They're saying all Jews.
It's funny.
You know who does that?
Zionists conflate Zionism with Jews.
And you know who else does that?
Anti-Semites.
Well, Jimmy, you got to have the anti-Semitism to feed new immigrants to the safe space that is Israel.
Yeah.
So it's very helpful to stoke.
You know, you'd be like, hey, I would think cracking down on people's rights they get from their own constitution, that might feed the anti-Semites a little bit.
Yeah.
But that's good because then they'll see there's only one safe space, this one unsafe space.
So they know that doing this, cracking down on free speech of Americans, violating our First Amendment and every value we ever had at the behest of a terrorist state, they know that that's going to create actual anti-Semitism and they love it because then they can point to it and say, see, we need to have these laws that protect a protected class of people.
We need to have this, see?
So they're the ones actually inciting and fomenting and energizing anti-Semitism so they could go, look, it exists.
Isn't that it's how lucky woke right tactics.
Yes, that's right.
And that's why the crackdown on Joe Rogan came so swiftly and so overwhelmingly because they can have the number one show in America telling you the truth about Israel.
They're afraid of the truth.
Censorship is not there to protect you from misinformation.
That's there to protect you from information.
And you know what we want from donald trump we want him to start funding the united states instead just so we can have our own genocide as we take over canada that's all so here look at this so if you're maga you side with trump period no you don't your allegiance isn't to a person that's what they do in north korea They have allegiance to a person.
In the United States, we have allegiance to the Constitution and we have allegiance to our values and free speech.
The reason why people back Trump is for his ideas, not because they like the cut of his jib.
People have allegiance, people had allegiance to Trump's ideas, just like Bernie, just like I had allegiance to Bernie Sanders' ideas, not Bernie Sanders.
And as soon as Bernie Sanders did a 180 on his on his own beliefs and I turned, I called him out on it.
I didn't have allegiance to Bernie Sanders.
I had allegiance to the ideas that he was pushing, which a lot of, by the way, a lot of MAGA agreed with.
Steve Bandit came out of the show and said Bernie Sanders is great at identifying the problem.
Jimmy, that guy, cool Christian Engineer, I promise you that some that's a bot.
Well, I was a bot might be a guy who's right in that because I got like weird attacks coming to me where I don't think a bot wrote it.
But you see how he goes, if you're mad, you side with Trump, period.
So this is cool Christian engineer at I'm Cool Christian.
That sounds like some Israeli guy trying to think how a Christian would make things.
That's exactly what it sounds like.
And you would never side with Trump, period, if you were that Christian.
You would be suspicious of that.
And we just exposed, or the Gray Zone just exposed or reported here that there was over 100 ex-IDF spies working for Facebook and Meta and Instagram, making sure that everybody gets censored.
You don't think there's just as many at Twitter?
I mean, Elon Musk is a huge fucking hypocrite on free speech because he's a Zionist himself and he bends the knee and fillates Benjamin Netanyahu, just like Trump, just like Marco Rubio, just like everybody in the Trump administration.
They're betraying MAGA.
They're betraying the Constitution.
They're betraying what they campaigned on.
Candace Owens has gone completely off the rails.
Yeah, by being consistent.
Yeah, she's gone completely off the rails.
You mean the rails she's always been on?
She's went off the rails concerning Jews in Israel.
No, it's not concerning Jews in Israel.
It's concerning Zionists.
Lots of Jews are against almost all the Jews I know are not on board with Israel or Zionism.
It looks like an AI.
Also, Dog 13 Young.
These aren't real people.
These are Israeli bots.
She has become a Jew hater.
No, she's not.
I can't stand to watch or listen to her anymore.
Sad because she's smart and I used to watch her.
Yes, she's smart and you're a bot.
Sergeant Shitpost, now that's a real person.
Yeah.
Says she's pointing out that Trump is serving Israel and most of us didn't vote for that.
That's right.
Exactly.
Even Marjorie Taylor Greene has tweeted out what Trump bombed Yemen at the behest of Israel.
Nobody voted for this.
Nobody voted for this.
This is not what people voted for.
This is what Israeli bots want you to think they voted for.
This is not what they voted for.
And Trump is being misinformed 100%.
I saw it happen right in front of my eyes.
And then that gets suppressed by Google and YouTube because they're also in bed with the Zionists and the intelligence community and the CIA.
That's why.
That's why we're being suppressed like a maniac right now.
We're completely demonetized on Facebook.
We can't even, I can't even buy an advertisement to promote my tour on Facebook.
That's how much we're suppressed on Facebook and Meta because there's 100 IDF spies working for Zuckerberg and Facebook.
That's why.
So this is what, and Trump isn't stopping any of that.
He's helping it.
And you don't think the same people are working at Twitter?
You don't think the same people are working at Meta and yes.
And that's why they want to ban TikTok.
We all know it.
It's not even debatable anymore.
They admit it on camera that the reason why we got to get rid of TikTok is because of Israel.
So they're taking away your, so when they take away TikTok, they're not taking away TikTok's ability to spread information.
They're taking away American citizens' ability to hear information.
I have a right to hear someone.
So when you silence and censor someone, you're also censoring my right to hear them.
All right.
The first thing you said, Jimmy, was the best thing, which is Trump's only there for what, a year and a half before.
He's a lame duck.
Yes.
Okay.
And then they're going to use this.
Yeah.
Palantir is forever.
That's right.
Palantir.
And I showed you before the video.
I don't have time to show it to you now, but the head of Palantir, which is another CIA cutout, works for the CIA.
What he said, the head of Palantir said, Alex Karp, said that the battle for the narrative around Israel on college campuses, that is the fight.
Why is that the fight?
Why do we have to win that?
Why do we have to censor them?
Why do we have to completely stop their free speech?
Because if they win this battle, which by the way, they're winning, even though they're being censored, we'll never be able to deploy an army in the Western world ever again.
That's from the head of Palantir, which is like it's coming right from the CIA, which is like it's coming right from Mossad and Netanyahu, and it's coming right from the Trump administration right now.
Hey, you know, here's another great way you can help support the show is you become a premium member.
We give you a couple of hours of premium bonus content every week, and it's a great way to help support the show.
You can do it by going to jimmydoorcomedy.com, clicking on join premium.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
And it's a great way to help put your thumb back in the eye of the bastards.
Thanks for everybody who was already a premium member.
And if you haven't, you're missing out.
We give you lots of bonus content.
Thanks for your support.
Anything to say, Mr. Brand?
So, really, the cops can't clear out a pathway for him.
So, when he gets, when he shows up at the court, they can't clear out a pathway so he could walk in.
They have to make him sit there and get heckled.
So, Russell Brand has been charged officially, and he had his first court date.
And so, let me just play this.
So, let's just remember, what is he charged with?
He's charged with the R-word.
I don't want to say it because it'll get demonetized.
He's charged with indecent assault and the S-assault.
So, three different things from some of them 30 years ago.
It sounded like the same thing.
I heard one of them was like he, one of them was that he touched a boob of someone.
I think that's the indecent assault.
So here he is.
So, what is the point of asking him that question?
Why would you ask that question?
But anyway, that's the beauty of corporate news.
Now, let's remember where these charges came from.
These women didn't go to the police.
This came from a hit job, a coordinated hit job in the UK press after Tucker after Russell Brand came out against the establishment and told the truth about COVID.
That was his big sin.
They went to find women.
So, the newspapers went and interviewed every woman who ever knew him for the last 30 years, and they got four of them to come and say something anonymously, by the way.
They were saying it anonymously in the newspaper.
So, it's all anonymous.
They didn't go to the newspapers.
The newspapers went to them and ginned this up.
MI5.
So, yeah, please don't tell me this isn't exactly what they did to Julian Assange.
Do you remember what they did to Julian Assange?
No, I can't remember anything more than a month ago because I'm a good American.
They did the exact same thing to Julian.
This is the playbook.
Yeah, it's so obvious.
Remember, for years, people are like, oh, he's a creep.
He raped those women.
Do you know what?
Prince Andrew is free.
Prince Andrew is free.
Your king, King Charles, used to hang out with Jimmy Savile and Lloyd, whatever.
The three of them have special black berets made that only they have.
They're not military, whatever the hell that means.
I bet it ain't good.
They allowed grooming gangs to exist.
I've heard about this, I mean, for like 10 years.
Everybody knows about this, that they don't and they don't even want to talk about a grooming gang.
They don't even want to talk about it.
Not only do they not prosecute it, they don't even want to talk about it, but they got a star for stuff that he allegedly did 25 and 30 years ago.
That isn't none of it, which I did read the article.
None of it counted as anything, even what they had there.
It was all stuff to make you go, ooh, but there was nothing.
I'm like, where's the crime here?
There wasn't any.
So now they're trying to, they ginn something up.
They're probably holding something over somebody to make them because you would have thought when Me Too happened, that's when all the Russell Brand accusations would have come out, wouldn't it?
No, it came out.
That was a free-for-all, wasn't it?
No.
There were none.
You're in the Me Too times because this is 30 years ago it happened.
This exact time.
This is the playbook of the establishment.
Julian Assange, perfect example of that.
And of course, those charges all just went away because they were all bullshit.
And they did the same thing.
And by the way, this is no defense of Trump, but they did the same thing to Trump.
And the reason why I bring it up, because if they can do it to Trump, they'll do it to you or anybody.
So you know how they got?
You know how they brought Trump back on that?
They didn't criminally prosecute him for rape, Trump.
It was a civil case from that woman, Gene Carroll, right?
Because he said she's not even my type.
So you know what they did?
You know what they did?
They got the New York state legislature to change the Constitution.
So there was a statue of limitations on that kind of accusation.
They gave a one-year holiday for that.
Well, anybody who has an accusation, we're going to lift this.
And they did that specifically so that woman could accuse Trump of that in a court.
That's why Diddy got caught up.
That's it.
That was a loophole.
That's exactly why they did that.
Do you see how far they'll go, the establishment will go to get somebody?
And of course, they did it under the guise of we're doing this for women.
They did it so Gene Carroll could do that.
They got the judge.
You know, the judge in that case for Trump?
The judge in that case was the judge that put Donziger on house arrest.
Steve Donzinger.
Steve Donzinger took Shell Oil and the oil companies to Chevron to court for polluting the groundwater, which they did.
He won.
He won like a $7 billion settlement ever.
For indigenous people who got poisoned by Shepard.
For the Indigenous people, was it in South America or Central America?
So then they get this corrupt judge to put Steve Donzinger after he wins the lawsuit in jail.
And of course, it was all garbage and all.
It took years and years and years for him to win.
And I'm sure hundreds of thousands of legal costs.
The liberals knew about it.
Breaking points mentioned him.
A lot of people knew how wrong that was.
Everybody knew how wrong he was.
They don't remember this judge.
So everybody knew how wrong that was, Steve Donzinger.
They got the same judge somehow to preside over Donald Trump.
So they found the most corrupt judge in the country.
They had to completely overturn the New York Constitution, give this kind of holiday on statute of limitations so this Gene Carroll could then do that lawfare to Donald Trump.
So you saw all the law.
So you see what they do.
So if you don't, so this smacks exactly of that, what they're doing to Russell Brand.
Exactly.
That's why I predict he's going to go the way of Jordan Peterson at the end of the day because he's in a hard place with nonsense laws come at him.
So then you've got to make a friend.
And what did Jordan Peterson do?
His friend is Israel.
And his friend is Israel.
And now I understand why Russell was doing that stupid thing with Shapiro where Russell Brand confronts Ben Shapiro about Christ.
I'm like, who made this?
Why did you make this?
And Russell looks like Jesus out of casting.
And he's, you're not talking about Gaza, though.
You're going to argue about Christ.
So that reeks of a PR propaganda thing to me.
I mean, it reeks of it.
So let's just see him walk in.
Out of the way, please.
Get back!
Anything to say Mr Brand?
Get back!
So, really, the cops can't clear out a pathway for him.
So when he gets, when he shows up at the court, they can't clear out a pathway so he could walk in.
They have to make him sit there and get heckled and harassed by asshole corporate media pricks, by the bottoms, by bottom feeders.
This is all on purpose.
Remember what Kamala did to that black single mother who was in the hospital and her daughter couldn't go to school?
Legit excuse?
They made sure that she got perp walked in front of him.
That's right.
This is their perp walk for him.
what this is Yeah, there's no other way in.
Are you beating us out?
Yeah.
Jimmy, I just want to point out that Kevin Spacey is making his way back into everybody's good graces right now.
And nobody had nothing about Russell Brand during the Me Too times, which was that was your time to just bring out something from a long time ago and try to make it into a real crime.
That was your time.
That's over now.
The only way it's coming against you now is intelligence doesn't like you.
So he's going to cozy up to Israel, is my prediction because I don't know what choice he has because they're going to try to put him in prison.
Just like what's his name?
And I haven't heard Russell talk about Gaza like that.
Have you?
Or am I wrong?
I haven't heard.
But here's the this is from the Times.
It says Russell Brand accused of the R-word after Labor Party conference.
Russell Brand has appeared in court for the first time, accused of an offense, including Ring a woman after a Labor Party conference in Bournemouth.
Wearing a black shirt, jeans, and brown boots, the comedian and actor who's 49 did not enter pleas at Westminster Magistrates Court, but previously he said that he is innocent.
Suki Dada for the prosecution told the 12-minute hearing that Brand faces two charges of the R-word: two charges of sexual assault and one charge of indecent assault.
The allegations relate to four women.
Brand arrived at court with Oliver Schneider-Sikorsky, the solicitor who successfully defended Kevin Spacey.
Brand had traveled from his home in the United States for the hearing.
The court heard that Brand is alleged to have Red a woman in September of 1999.
Dude, have you ever heard of such a thing of prosecuting something like that from 1999?
What is the year?
25.
That's 26 years ago.
If you went to any normal circumstances in justice and you were like, I'd like to bring, they would tell you, like, well, how are you supposed to prosecute that?
It is, here's the listen to this allegation: it is alleged that while the woman went to the bathroom, Brand removed some of his clothing and asked her to take photographs of him.
So asking for consent.
Go on.
Brand then allegedly pushed her onto the bed, pulled down her trousers and underwear and R'd her.
He allegedly left her.
He allegedly left her with an email address.
That's what rapists usually do after they, hey, email me.
I don't believe this story at all, just hearing it how it's written down.
I have to tell you, I don't believe it.
Call me crazy, but I've seen so many fake stories in the last, I don't know, 15 years.
The prosecutor said the second complaint.
I mean, I had a fake cash too last night, me by Anna Kasperian from.
You did one of the best things I've ever seen.
And it was actually quite inspiring to me because I was told if you're ever accused like that, you can't get ahead of it.
And you have to wait till they destroy your life and have no choice and sue them.
But thank God that idiot wrote you her intentions to use this.
That she was going to blackmail me to shut me up.
And then you said, you've been running your mouth.
That's going to end.
Honesty's the smart move.
Now, with this shit, this is 25 years old, so I don't know what he's supposed to do.
I don't know how he's supposed to defend all those charges.
They're anonymous.
And of course, I see him going through this, and I'm like, that could happen to anybody.
That could happen to me.
That could be me.
That could be you.
That could be anybody.
They made a new Louis C.K. documentary on HBO.
I couldn't believe it.
And the dipshit comics involved that.
Are you stupid?
This is like P. Diddy Times.
And you got the nerve to relitigate that?
Are you out of your mind?
Yeah, Democrats and Labor Party people.
They're all global, homo, global homogeneity, and they're all stupid.
The prosecutor said the second complainant, a television worker, accuses Brand of indecent assault and alleges he tried to drag her into a men's toilet in London in 2001.
He tried to, but he didn't.
How would that even come up?
Dude, they have grooming gangs in England that they don't handle.
So you mean like they have machete crime way up.
They don't handle it.
They're worried about 30 years ago.
You heard from someone who we can't know who they are that he tried to put him in a bed.
Sounds like the Kavanaugh hearings.
That nonsense?
The third alleged victim, another television worker, claims Brand orally R'd her and sexually assaulted her at a Soho bar in 2004.
So that's the most recent one.
It is alleged that he grabbed the complainant's breasts and pulled her into a toilet.
Forcibly ate her out.
Where he made her perform a sex act on him.
The fourth complainant, a radio worker, claims that in 2004 or 2005, while Brand was working as a presenter on the TV show Big Brothers Big Mouth, he grabbed her by the face, sloppily kissed her, and grabbed her breast and buttocks.
Oh, I wouldn't throw that one in with the other ones that sound like actual crimes.
This is how I know I'm smelling bullshit because they start padding the stats with stuff that does not equal the other stuff.
So if you force someone in a bathroom to do some kind of sex act, that's a serious crime.
You're throwing in this other stuff?
Like, why would you do that?
I'm just piling charges on.
Because none of these things, by the way, after 25 years, any real prosecutor would never even bring that to trial.
Bill Cosby was released because of how insane what they did is legally with him, even though I think Bill Cosby is guilty, by the way.
The wine seam's probably going to get out too, by the way.
Yeah.
The police investigation followed an investigation by the Times, the Sunday Times, and Channel 4.
So they all colluded together.
That seems normal, huh?
That's what I thought.
I was going to say, like people would accuse me of being a conspiracy guy, but it is what happened.
The things I think happened, they're saying is what happened.
British police are worthless.
They did.
So the police didn't do this.
It was a couple of newspapers that, by the way, the women didn't go to them.
They went to the women.
They interviewed, I'm sure, hundreds and hundreds of women, and they found this.
This is what they found.
Uh...
And to Brand's alleged mistreatment of women, he denied the allegations at the time.
Brand was so the police investigation followed the hit pieces by the corporate media.
The UK is a joke, and their police are the biggest joke that has ever existed on the planet.
I want to really broadcast how much I don't respect UK police and look down on them.
And it makes me chuckle the thought of them ever trying to enforce the laws that they enforce over.
Because remember their chief in London said, well, we're going to get people in America for inciting things here.
Are you?
Are you?
No, you're not.
They got America's armed, even a small percent of the population, because the bullshit England does, they only get away with because they don't have guns.
They have to be a wizard or get like a ninja sword.
You can't even have a ninja sword now.
They banned them.
What a joke of a country and a joke of a pig police force they have.
RFK Jr. has announced plans to radically change the way vaccines are tested.
You mean he wants to do normal testing on them that all the other drugs have to go through?
That's radical.
Placebo testing, people that know nothing about science are testing.
That's right.
They know that the placebo test, in fact, I'm surprised to learn that they're even saying placebo because I thought it was implied in testing.
It's automatically a placebo test.
No, they don't test it again.
They test it against another vaccine.
So RFK Jr. once said, not a single one of these 72 vaccines now administered to our children have ever been tested against a placebo.
So not a single one of the vaccines, the 72 vaccines now administer to our children, have ever been tested against a placebo.
And I, in fact, sued HHS in 2016 and said, show me any placebo studies that you have for any vaccines.
And they were unable to do so.
None of them have been tested.
And you don't have to sue them like I did.
Anybody can go on their cell phone and look up manufacturers and insert hepatitis B vaccine, Gardasil vaccine, polio vaccine.
Do you know how many days the current polio vaccine?
Do you know how many days it was safety tested for, Alan?
48 hours.
The hepatitis B vaccine, the Glaxo version was four days.
The Merck version, five days.
That means that if the baby they gave that to had a seizure on day six, it never happened.
If the baby died on day six, it never happened.
If the baby got food allergies or diagnosed two years later, it never happened.
If the baby got autism, which is not diagnosed till four years of age, 4.2 years of age, it never happened.
Autoimmune diseases, you cannot see those if you have these short-term studies and you can't see any risk if you don't test against the placebo.
And my question is, nobody knows because of that.
Nobody knows the risk profile for any vaccine that is currently on the schedule.
And that means nobody can say with any scientific certainty that that vaccine is averting more injuries and deaths than it's causing.
And my question is, how in the heck can we be mandating to children that they take a medical product for which we do not know the risk?
And to me, that is criminal.
Wow.
He's now the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
Now, his FDA puts up placebo testing requirements for new vaccines, potentially hitting COVID shot makers the hardest.
No.
No kidding.
No kidding.
Amid a slew of recent shakeups at the FDA, including the agency's reduction in force and high-profile leadership exits, the regulator is ushering in radical changes to how it signs off on new vaccines.
Under Secretary Kennedy's leadership, all new vaccines will undergo safety testing in placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure.
A radical departure from past practices.
The Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement to CNN, it isn't immediately clear which new vaccines will be affected by the policy.
Flu and COVID-19 vaccine shots are updated annually to match the latest drains and variants.
So manufacturers do indeed roll out new shots based on their existing platforms.
For novel vaccines against completely new viral targets, placebo testing is a regular part of the RD and regulatory review process.
Really?
Because it sounds like it wasn't.
That was his problem.
And why would he have to roll out new regulations if they're already doing it?
So I'm a little skeptical.
I'm a little skeptical.
72.
Yeah.
An HHS official told CNN the new policy.
I wonder how much money CNN gets from Big Pharma.
I'm going to guess about 70% of their budget.
An HHS official told CNN the new policy pertains to COVID shots rather than flu vaccines.
Flu shots have been tried and tested for decades.
Yeah.
Whilst COVID-19 works go see our other, go see our other video we did on the flu vaccine.
Flu shots have been fake.
Maybe we could put a link underneath this to our last flu.
The flu shots have been, there's a word called negative efficacy comes up.
I don't know if you've heard.
That's what we got after we tried and tested them.
We learned they have negative efficacy.
Flu shots have been tried and tested for decades while COVID-19 vaccines are new and must have more gold standard science to ensure safety and efficacy for the public.
You think you'd think.
For years now, the FDA has allowed COVID-19.
I mean, the FDA, which is now run by, which was at the time run by people who are now getting millions of dollars from Pfizer as they sit on their board.
You mean like those people?
For years now, the FDA has allowed COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers to leverage prior clinical efficacy data rather than results from new trials.
When routinely, it's routine.
There's no long-term studies on the COVID-19 vaccine, but they call it routine.
No, there are.
They just did it directly on you.
Yes, that's right.
You don't get to see the results.
But they are doing the experiments on kids.
When routinely updating their shots to match the latest variants.
When the FDA, this is how this is how CNN talks.
When the FDA endorsed updated COVID vaccines last summer, for example, the agency said it considered manufacturing and non-clinical data.
What?
What?
I don't even.
You tell me what that means.
Last year, FDA advisors recommended variants for the updated shots in June.
And the agency endorsed the tweaked vaccines in August.
It's not immediately clear whether COVID-19 vaccine makers, do people still take COVID-19 boosters?
Do they actually do that?
And who's still wearing a mask besides fat people who work at the airport?
Anyone?
It's not immediately clear whether COVID-19 vaccine makers could meet the agency's new requirement in order to release their updated vaccines by the time virus circulation.
So they don't have the time.
They don't have the time to do that.
They don't take that crap ever again.
Even people that believed in it ain't going to take it no more.
They're just not going to admit they're wrong, but they're not taking that shit again.
Kurt, I have to remind you that the COVID vaccine is certainly safe and effective.
And it will keep you from being seriously ill, hospitalized, or dead.
You know this.
I thought Susan's dead.
Speaking with CBS News Chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett earlier this week, FDA Commissioner Marty McCari said the FDA is taking a look at whether to approve the new set of COVID-19 shots this year.
While the statement alone raised some eyebrows, McCarry went on to add that companies are being asked to run a basic clinical study so we can educate the population and have information to work with.
Could you just do a basic study?
No.
Before that interview, Novavax, isn't it?
It's a bad idea to put the word no in the name of your vaccine.
Novavax had a high-profile regulatory mix-up.
Oh, no kidding.
They had a mix-up with its COVID-19.
They're dealing with themselves by mistake.
That was the mix-up.
With it, with its COVID-19 vaccine.
The company believed and still does that its shot was ready for approval by April 1st.
When the day came and went with no action from the FDA, reports emerged that the agency had issued a last-minute request for more data.
Later, McCari commented on Twitter that the company was trying to introduce a new product with the study of a different product from 2021.
He added that the Trump administration would prioritize the gold standard.
I love how CNN says the company believed, and they still do.
Oh, well, that's science.
Your beliefs.
Your inside Gnostic beliefs.
Why don't you just quote their feelings?
You know, the pharma company.
You know, big pharma's truth is that it was tested.
Manufacturing.
Non-clinically.
I mean, the flu shots are the gold standard, much in the same way Boeing Airline is the gold standard for flight safety.
Am I right?
The great doors on planes.
The way Katy Perry is the gold standard of astronauts.
You know how science works.
The more you pay them, the better the science is.
Am I right?
Come on.
Yeah, you are.
I mean, you are literally right.
In response to the Novavax situation, former FDA officials Phil Kraus and Luciano Borio.
Sounds like they're right from the mafia.
Jimmy, that's anti-Italian.
They wrote in BioCentury this week that the agency should stick to its normal processes and trust its review teams.
That's what the guy says.
A mind of you business.
Yeah.
Olden Colada said RFK Jr. just revealed that all new vaccines will require placebo tests.
This is what Maha voted for.
The spokesman said none of the vaccines on the CDC's childhood recommended schedule was tested against an inert placebo, meaning we know very little about the actual risk profiles of these products.
HHS is now building surveillance systems that will accurately measure vaccine risks as well as benefits.
There's Senator Brian Schatz.
Watch that name.
Tough growing up with a name like Schatz.
So you had a horrible childhood and you hate humanity because everybody was mean to you.
Okay.
RFK Jr. has announced plans to radically change the way vaccines are tested.
You mean he wants to do normal testing on them that all the other drugs have to go through?
That's radical.
Placebo testing, people that know nothing about science are testing.
That's right.
They know that the placebo test, in fact, I'm surprised to learn that they're even saying placebo because I thought it was implied in testing.
It's automatically a placebo test.
No, they don't test it again.
They test it against another vaccine.
Come on, Shatz.
What do you got to say?
He wants to require placebo testing for all vaccines, even those for well-researched diseases like measles and polio.
That's not what he said.
In fact, that's not what I said.
I read on this article.
Let's do that too.
I say let's do that too, but the article said it's for all new vaccines going forward.
That's what I was told.
That's what that article said.
So, guess who's giving you the misinformation?
It's the senator.
This is the guy.
Government, of course.
This is a dangerous move.
I mean, having safety testing on new drugs, new vaccine.
Really?
That's dangerous.
It's counter-intuitive, Jimmy.
Yes.
That will undermine trust in vaccines.
No, it will actually give you more trust.
Do the exact opposite.
Senator, can you explain how that would undermine my trust?
That knowing that you tested the thing before you put it in my body, that would undermine trust.
Kaylee Means there's an RFK Jr. will order placebo testing for new vaccines.
Alarming health.
That alarms health experts.
Really?
Kaylee Means says: Can someone please explain to me why health experts would be alarmed at conducting science on new drugs?
Because the numbers ain't good, Kaylee.
That's why the numbers ain't going to be no good.
We can't run the risk of not poisoning someone.
Hey, does anybody still think America and American democracy is real?
You're a real idiot if you do.
Yes.
I can never forget this shit from the last three years I've been watching them do.
And how many ways they got to tell you that they want to literally hope you at least just die from the experiment or your kids do, and they don't want you to have anything.
I mean, they're saying it to your face every day.
I'm all for safety testing of vaccines.
Extreme, Jimmy.
I know that sounds radical and extreme.
Oh, so you want the kids to have tested vaccine?
Oh, well, let me guess.
think they have a right to water.
Hey, become a premium member.
Go to JimmyDoorComedy.com.
Sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
Don't freak out.
All the voices performed today are by the one and only the inimitable Mike McRae.
He can be found at mikemcray.com.
That's it for this week.
You be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.
