All Episodes
Jan. 3, 2019 - Jimmy Dore Show
01:05:45
20190103_TJDS_Podcast_0103
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Get ready for an outstanding entertainment program.
The Jimmy Dore Show.
Hey, so let's call freshman Senator Mitt Romney.
Hello.
Senator Romney.
Yes, speaking.
Senator, it's Jimmy Dore.
Oh, hey, Jimmy, please call me Mitt.
How's tricks?
Just fine, Mitt.
Thanks for asking.
We all read your op-ed about Trump.
Very harsh words for the president.
Well, yes, Jimmy.
I don't necessarily care for using strident language, but by golly, there are just some things about Donald Trump that need to be said.
And now that I've been elected to Senate, hopefully I will be able to serve as one of the proverbial adults in the room.
What do you mean?
Well, Trump is hemorrhaging adults at an alarming rate.
Mattis has resigned, as has John Kelly.
And these are only the latest, of course.
Quite frankly, Trump needs grown-ups around him to temper his erratic decision-making.
Like withdrawing troops from Syria?
Exactly.
Perfect example, Jimmy.
Simply up and deciding to end an illegal Middle Eastern war is not something a grown-up would do.
Oh, really?
Yes, which is why his military grown-ups are abandoning him swiftly.
It's a very impetuous, childlike thing to end wars.
Is that so, Mitt?
Well, what would be the adult thing?
To continue them in perpetuity, cautiously, and with many studies and advice from generals, so that future generations will inherit them.
That's what we want?
It is now.
Mitt, the American people themselves don't want these endless wars, especially those of us on the left.
Well, the grown-up thing to do is to listen to the electorate and nod your head, but then sometimes do what people don't want.
It's called making the tough choices.
And as Senator, I assume you'd be willing to do this.
Oh, absolutely.
People have often commented throughout my life what a grown-up person I am.
Even as a child, I exhibited many adult-like qualities.
Really?
How so?
Well, I abandoned all forms of horseplay at a very young age and started and started dressing in suits or casual formal attire.
To this day, I have everything dry cleaned.
I own a lot of leather goods, which I take care of, as opposed to many other leather owners, not naming names here.
Point being, I make sure my shoes are polished.
Also, I read newspapers in the morning.
So these are the qualities of adulthood that you would bring to government.
Absolutely.
Furthermore, for example, I will insist that Donald Trump arrive at Air Force One at least one hour before it takes off.
I don't think Air Force One ever takes off before the president arrives.
You don't know that.
You don't know that.
You can't be sure of it, at least.
It's better to be safe than sorry.
See, these are the types of things that only grown-ups know.
So you would oppose President Trump on many things?
Oh, yes, absolutely.
I've made that clear.
Like the border wall?
No, I support the border wall, actually.
I think we should have one.
What?
Well, the border wall is a very adult thing to want, in my estimation.
Grown-ups love building projects and restricting movement.
Restricting movement is very adult, as any child could certainly tell you.
What does that even mean, Mitt?
Well, we in the grown-up community feel that it is best if people don't move around too much.
I mean, some movement is fine.
But people staying where they are is really the mature grown-up approach to the question of where people should be.
You don't know what you're doing here, do you?
No idea, Jim.
Well, I appreciate you talking to us just the same, Mitt.
Likewise, kiddo.
Well, I gotta go.
This grown-up needs to start getting ready for bed.
Mitt, it's four in the afternoon.
Yikes, better get that milk boiling.
Adulting!
Adulting.
Adulting.
It's the Jimmy Dore show.
The show for...
The kind of people that are...
It's the show that makes Anderson Cooper save.
It's hard to talk to you, T-Wee.
And now, here's a guy who sounds a lot like me.
It's Jimmy Dore!
Everybody, welcome to this week's Jimmy Dore show.
Happy New Year.
It's official.
This year already sucks.
Hey, let's get to the jokes before we get to the jokes, shall we?
Hey, I'm glad Mitt Romney wrote that op-ed.
Did you see Mitt Romney wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post?
Yeah, and it really rips on Trump.
I'm glad he wrote that op-ed so the people who gussed over George W. Bush and Candy have something new to wet themselves over.
Silly me.
Here it is, 2019, and I'm still writing revolution now on all my checks.
Hey, it's 2019, and Louis C.K. is still jizzing on 2018 on all his checks.
Hey, did you know Mitt Romney's stripper name is Jeff Flake?
True story.
Yes, Mitt Romney wrote a scathing op-ed against Donald Trump.
Donald Trump, the man who he once sought a cabinet position from, accepted his Senate endorsement from.
But that was back when Trump was a pussy-grabbing disabled people mocking KKK retweeting fastest-loving grifter trader birther of high moral character.
I think the good thing about Mitt Romney, you know, publishing that blistering editorial against Donald Trump in the Washington Post, it's a big relief for the Democrats because now they don't have to search for a presidential nominee, am I right?
You know, it's times like these when I have to ask myself, what would Jesus' life coach Rex do?
Hey, did you guys watch the Pasadena Rose parade this year?
It was fantastic.
This year, Wells Fargo won the award for most creative imagination in mortgage fraud category.
This kept happening.
This mistake kept happening at the Rose Parade was when the crowd kept mistaking the medieval times float for the Kaiser Permanente waiting room floats.
That's a nice joke.
You have to think about women.
Did you know that last year, ICE paid private prisons $800 million in taxpayer money to cage immigrants?
Or to quote that beacon of hope and change, Nancy Pelosi, we're capitalists.
That's just the Way it is, am I right?
Come on.
What's coming up on today's show?
What is a British spy doing smack dab in the middle of the Bernie Sanders campaign from 2016?
The answer just may surprise you, or will it?
No, it's gonna.
It's gonna surprise you.
And how do you get votes in the middle of the country?
CNN asks losing Democrats how winning Democrats should be more corporate.
Plus, we got phone calls today from Chris Christie, Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer, and all of our New Year's messages from all of our favorite celebrities, plus a lot lot more.
That's today on the Jimmy Dorse show.
Hey, everybody, welcome to Jimmy Dorsey.
I'm here with the miserable liberal Ron Placone.
Hi, Jimmy.
Hello.
Ron's on tour in Florida in January.
Go see him, ronplacone.com.
Guess what?
You know this.
If you watch this show, you know that big majorities, including Republicans, support Medicare for All.
Not only Democrats support it.
Overwhelming.
Some say 84%.
So I round up and I say nine out of 10 Democrats.
That's a little bit of a cheat, but by the time someone facts checks me on it, it'll be up to nine out of 10.
So eight or nine out of 10 Democrats are for Medicare for All and the majority of Republicans.
There's one Democrat that's halfway there.
There's like a 0.5 Democrat.
Like it depends on the day of the week.
You talk to them.
Depends on if they're sick that day.
Yes.
Most people with diseases are for Medicare for All.
So here is Joe Donnelly.
He was on the CNN and he ran for Senate in Indiana.
And here's what he had to say.
They asked his advice on what can the Democrats do to win more elections in the middle of the country.
Because Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama crushed it in the middle of the country.
He crushed it all over the place, right?
So again, this isn't about the Democrats or progressive ideas versus conservative ideas.
This is horrible candidates that no one likes offering them a shit sandwich.
Well, yeah, because just for the record, progressive ideas are crushing it in the Midwest.
Yes, that's right.
So here, well, let's hear what Joe Donnelly has to say.
Lost in Indiana in November.
McCaskill, we just talked about lost in Missouri.
Heidi Heidkamp lost in North Dakota.
Oh, so a bunch of people trying to be Republican light lost.
Let's ask their advice.
This is what's happening.
So you guys lost.
A lot of people just like you lost in the Midwest.
Let's ask you what's wrong.
The Democratic Party was already receding to the coasts, even more so now.
So can the Democratic Party, your party, be viable without appealing to the interior of the country where you live and where you represent?
Boy, I don't know how you do that.
I mean, I was fortunate enough, I got more votes in this midterm than any Democrat in Indiana in modern history.
Okay, that's not really because of you.
That's because it was the biggest turnout for voters in this midterm.
That's why.
It wasn't because I got more votes.
That's not because of you.
Okay.
But it wasn't quite enough because the president came three times in about the last week, six times in about the last month and a half, and said, this is about him.
And he said, if you don't vote, basically you're betraying me.
And we have not made enough of a connection.
I work like a dog.
So again, he comes at us with an excuse immediately.
We lost because the president came in.
I couldn't go against the president.
Even though all my commercials talked about how much I was with the president.
Yeah, we're going to show his commercial in a sec.
Yes.
So doesn't it also highlight then the Democrats will never be able to win against Trump?
Well, it sounds like that's what he's saying.
So let's, it sounds like it.
Sounds like it.
Stop to make that connection, but that the people of my state understand that culturally we want to make sure you succeed, that we're going to fight to make sure that, for instance, on student loans, we'll keep the interest rate at the same rate as a housing loan.
But when you talk Medicare for all, like I heard on the panel earlier, you start losing the people in my state.
Really?
He's just making that up.
He's just making that up.
You just lost.
You just lost your election running against Medicare for All.
And I'm going to show you his commercial.
I probably should have showed at the top.
Hey, can I throw a fun fact in real quick?
You know, the first place I heard about Medicare for All?
Indiana.
Because I was in college.
Oh, really?
Yeah.
Fun fact.
Fun fact.
So he's saying as soon as you start talking to Medicare for All, well, you didn't talk Medicare for All and you still lost.
You went against something that's actually popular and you lost.
And now you wonder why you lost.
And you still keep saying you have to be against something that's popular.
No, Medicare for All is actually popular.
I mean, so why?
So why wouldn't this guy be for that?
So when you ask this question, well, Jimmy, if you know the majority of Republicans are for it and an overwhelming number of Democrats are for it and Independents, why wouldn't why would Joe Donnelly keep saying this?
Because his donors don't want it.
Because he's part of the oligarchy, because he serves them.
That's why he's not getting this from a poll because if he got his information from a poll, the poll would tell him everybody's for it.
So what do you think this guy, so that's what's happening here, right?
I mean, Joe doesn't care about polls unless it's the kind of poll he can fire a gun at.
That's where Joe's at.
Didn't he run on an anti-Medicare for all platform?
Yes, he did, Steph, and lost.
He lost.
And he lost.
So you would think, well, and so this woman doesn't say, what do you think you did wrong?
He just says, I didn't do anything.
I did everything right, except the president came in and screwed me.
That's what he said.
He's not saying what we did wrong.
When we start talking about, hey, we're going to work together with the insurance companies to lower premiums.
That's what connects.
When have you ever heard that in a speech and gone, yeah?
Hey, we're going to work with nameless bureaucrats that keep screwing you over every time you get sick.
Who's for it?
That'll fill stadiums.
I'm for the screwed up system you have right now, but just slightly less screwed up.
That's what people get excited about?
That's Joe Donnelly's, we're going to tell them to cut it out.
That's like that's his, we're going to tell them to cut it out.
Yeah, yes.
So this is, yes, and this is, this is Joe Donnelly pretending that people got excited about Obamacare because that's what Obamacare is.
And the people in your state hated it.
Remember that?
Everybody, that's why the Democrats got wiped out in 2010.
Remember that?
I mean, what the F?
People did.
And so, you know, the talk on the coasts just doesn't get it done in the middle.
And Dana, this presidential election.
What talk on the coast doesn't get Done in the middle.
What talk?
I'm from Chicago.
I lived there for 30 years.
Now I live in Los Angeles.
What talk out here that you guys aren't getting back that doesn't work back there?
Medicare for all only works in California, New York?
What is you?
What is, and by the, of course, the just useless interviewer, useless interviewer.
Here we go.
Coming up, you know, what's going to happen on the coast is already baked in the cake.
This is going to be one in Pennsylvania and Ohio and Michigan and Wisconsin and North Carolina and Florida and Arizona and Iowa.
And that's where the meat and potatoes is going to be.
And if we're talking the other way, we're just not talking to those folks.
Yeah, see, these are the states.
You know, the ones I can't win in.
You know, the ones that Heidi Heitkamp also lost.
All the people who run like me, moderate, like Republican, like we all lost.
All those states have serious environmental issues that they're facing and a lot of job issues that they're facing.
So, gee, maybe a Green New Deal would work there, Joe.
You know, he's so out of touch.
Aren't you just waiting for her to ask him, well, what was your platform that you thought was going to encourage people?
You said you've had more people come out and vote for you.
What was it that attracted them to come out and vote?
Well, here's his commercial.
Oh, boy.
For the most part, I'm an easygoing guy, but not when Mike Braun keeps lying about my record.
I split with my own party to support funding for Trump's borderline.
Wow.
Your first thing in your commercial is how you're a Republican.
How you're more Republican than most Republicans.
But, Jimmy, he's a cool dude with an axe.
He's got an axe.
Kind of into it.
The first thing you tell people is that you're not.
I f my party and I'm for Trump.
And you wonder why?
So why does he have to be in the Democratic Party?
Why be in the Democratic?
What is this party if you attract guys like Joe Donnelly with an axe who wants to support Trump?
The party is dead.
Steph, this is so this is the split in the party.
The liberal left wants to chop defense spending.
No way.
Oh my God.
No way.
If this doesn't excite you to come vote, we're going to keep wasting money on the military that nobody wants.
Nobody wants us to do that, by the way.
Nobody wants the Republicans don't want these wars, conservatives.
A fair fight.
I'm about giving our troops the edge.
I voted to extend the Bush tax cuts.
And Mike Braun, he shifts jobs to China.
We've got to cut that out.
So everything he said he's for in this commercial is a Republican idea.
Bush tax cuts, funding the wall.
And what was the third thing?
I already forgot to know.
I'm Joe Donnelly.
I approve the committee.
And funding the military.
Funding the military.
He's funding the military.
Message.
So that's his message.
So now you know what?
So you couldn't run more Republican than he's running.
You couldn't run more Republican than he's running, and he still lost.
So maybe don't run as a freaking Republican, Joe.
He's a Republican with the best firewood.
Yes.
So here's his commercial where he shits on Medicare for all.
Socialists want to turn health care over to the government over my dead body.
Some in Congress want to let insurance companies deny coverage for pre-existing conditions.
Not on my watch.
The radical left wants to eliminate ICE.
I support ICE in funding President Trump's border wall.
Extremes on the left and right want to cut defense spending.
I don't want our troops in a fair fight.
I want them to have the best.
As President Reagan said, peace through strength.
I'm Joe Donnelly.
I approve this message.
He's running it as Rattle Ray.
He's running as a Republican.
Everyone's afraid to run as a lefty.
Everyone's afraid to actually run as a Democrat.
These aren't Democratic values, Joe.
So that's why you lost.
And here's, she says that's getting harder to argue after Brensnen, Heidi Camp, Heidkamp, Donnelly, and McCaskill all ran as GOP Light and got their asses handed to him.
At least progressives kept it close and even won in many districts.
Only Manchin has been an outlier.
I mean, this is how the guy ran.
And then he says you can't talk about Medicare.
The majority of people are for Medicare for all.
And so this, somebody put this, I saw this called the ratchet effect, how you are being duped by the fake two-party system.
So when the Republicans get in power, they turn everything to the right, and then the Democrats come in and stop it from going back left.
They stop it.
And that's what PAYGO is.
That's what Nancy Pelosi's PAYGO is.
Stops us from ever doing anything progressive.
But Republicans can do everything right-wing, like trillion-dollar tax cuts that bankrupt our economy.
I mean, our treasury.
So there you go.
I just wanted to play this video for you to show.
And then the woman at CNN is asking the loser how the Democrats can come back.
He just lost.
Why not ask someone who won?
And this idea that the Democrats are wiped out in the middle of the country.
You know, there's a Democratic governor of Illinois.
There's a Democratic mayor of Chicago.
It's the third biggest city in the country, right?
Still?
Yeah.
DSA candidates won in my hometown of Pittsburgh.
That's a Midwestern city.
Yeah.
So, you know, again, people need something to vote for.
Joe Donnelly gave nobody.
So if there's a student there and you're a progressive, is there anything that he gave you that you wanted to vote for?
No.
What does that guy give you?
If you went bankrupt because of medical bills, does that guy give you something to vote for?
No.
That guy doesn't give you anything?
Nothing.
Everything that guy's promising you, you're going to get voting against with his opponent.
Everything he says, you're going to get voting with his opponent, right?
My speech to students would be epic, actually.
Like, hey, guys, don't worry about the student loan debt.
It's just going to be like buying a house, something else you won't be able to do.
Vote for me.
Ugh.
I mean, at this point, you know, I get why the Republican won, because at least you know what the Republican really stands for.
Yes.
This guy's saying I'm just like that Republican.
Vote for me.
When given the opportunity to vote for a Republican or a Republican, they choose the Republican every time.
Boy, you know, when I was out standing alone in a corner at a New Year's Eve party, a bunch of people left New Year's messages on my thing.
This is Sean Connery.
You could take your new year and rub it and dog crap, you goddamn son of a bitch.
Hey, everybody.
Happy sixth anniversary of me making the Bush tax cuts permanent.
You're welcome, Wall Street.
What's my New Year's resolution?
The fight to protect freedom of speech from all threats, foreign and domestic.
Except for Saudi Arabia.
My Netflix deal is too sweet to piss off the crown prince right now.
Increments, people.
Increments.
Hey, it's job.
Please clap for the new year.
Oh, come on.
Dad's dad.
But I'll never be rid of his towering presence.
I mean, all his stuff is still here, but I just found a box of old love letters to mom from Neil.
Yeah.
Is that right?
There's a reason you never hear about Neil.
It's because dad said he's the genius of the family.
Where are my corn nuts?
Jimmy, please don't ask who this is.
I know you can't ask because this is a recording.
But don't ask anyway.
Who I am is of no importance right now.
Okay, go ahead and ask.
I can't stop you.
But I do need you to do one thing.
Listen closely.
No closer.
Get really close to the phone.
I'll wait.
Even closer.
Ready?
That isn't Rayleigh Ottawa's real wife in those fintechs commercial.
She was taken.
Those aren't even his real eyebrows.
This is Bernie Sanders.
Elizabeth Warren, are you kidding me?
Whatever.
Yeah, 2018 sure was a great year if you were a big a-hole.
Bill O here with your new year's tip of the day.
Did you know that bringing a smile to one dying eight-year-old is the same as bringing half a smile to two dying 16-year-olds?
Do the math.
Thank me later.
Jesus Christ.
Hey, Sport Judge Clooney here.
Thank goodness I'm not Kevin Spacey, right?
Happy another year of complacency in the face of preventable disaster.
Are those Rayleigh Ota's real eyebrows?
Vayner's back.
Here's a New Year's pro tip for you.
What's the most effective hangover remedy?
Stay drunk.
When you're always drunk, your body doesn't have enough time to go into hangover mode.
But what happens when the Merlot runs out, you ask?
Vayner likes to bounce back with a big-ass can of peteolite.
Thank God for sick children.
Just power through that headache with an oral electrolyte solution used to treat kids with the runs.
Bayner out.
I can't believe it's 2017 already, and I'm still writing applesauce button cake on all my checks.
So how did this Max Blumenthal from the Gray Zone Project?
How did a British former Bernie Sanders field organizer wind up as a key staffer at a military intelligence front that relentlessly smears the left?
Huh?
And why does this internal doc say he conducted a special study on Russian interference in U.S. elections?
So I go to the Gray Zone article about this because there's a lot of different articles talking about this that haven't gotten any attention in the mainstream press.
So we'll go to this guy.
Max says, I don't know how these people.
Anyway, he did great work on this.
This guy's name is Bracey Lane.
He's a 20-something British citizen with no publicly acknowledged experience in intelligence work.
But as Klansberg noted, there are some unusual details.
That's another journalist.
There are some unusual details in the young staffer's bio.
In 2016, Bracey Lane appeared out of nowhere to work in Iowa as a field organizer for the Bernie Sanders campaign for president.
This guy out of nowhere.
By the way, he's a British citizen.
I spent a year, he says, this is him.
I spent a year saving all my money.
Just thought I was going to go on a two-month road trip from Seattle to New York.
And I thought, you know what?
I'm going to stay and work for the Bernie Sanders campaign.
Really?
Never political before in your life.
All of a sudden, on my two-month fun thing, I'm just going to stop and go work for free in another country for someone else's government.
What the effing, F?
That I'm talking right, that doesn't.
The smell test, boy, that smells like a load.
Bracey Lane also claimed to AFP, I'm not sure there's a place for me in British politics.
I've never been struck by an urge to work in my own political system.
But you go on vacation and you decide to work in another country's political system in a state like Iowa?
There's nothing to see in Iowa.
In a state like Iowa, there's nothing there.
I mean, there's farms.
Got to have farms.
There's corn.
There's corn.
I've been to Iowa.
I used to go to Des Moines every year to tell jokes at the Funnybone.
Nothing there.
Nice people.
Riverboat Casino.
Riverboat Casino.
Nice people.
However, a February 1st, 2016 profile of Bracey Lane by BuzzFeed's Jim Watterson said the Brit for Bernie, quote, was inspired to rejoin the Labor Party in September 2015 when Corbyn was elected leader.
But by that point, he was already in the United States on holiday.
It is clearly odd for Bracey Lane to tell one reporter that he had never had any interest in British politics while claiming to another that he had been eager to support Corbyn before he joined the Bernie campaign.
What's more, as Clarenberg reported, Bracey Lane went on to establish a get-out-the-vote effort for various progressive politicians and parties inside Britain's 2017 general election, gaining inside access to a wide array of campaigns.
Boy, for a guy who didn't think it was a spot for him in British politics, he certainly got into it.
And it was weird.
It was right after the contradiction in Bracey Lane's narrative raises serious questions about his real role on the Bernie campaign, as does his suddenly transition from progressive politics to a staff position at a military-backed propaganda farm.
What?
So he went from working with progressive politicians to working at a military BRACT propaganda farm.
Maybe he was working at that propaganda farm all along.
You think?
A propaganda farm that waged a covert information war on Jeremy Corbyn and other left-leading politicians across the West.
So he went on.
I'm going to show you the organization he works for and how they smeared Corbin and how they smeared other left-wing.
And it's all funded.
Guess who's funded by?
Government, Western governments, and NATO.
Yep.
And they're smearing people?
Oh, really?
Governments are funding smears against other politicians and citizens in their country, not foreigners in their own country.
Get this.
This is kind of interesting.
At Thanksgiving, I was asked, why are you meddling?
Brady Lane remarked to Reuters, referring to his work for Bernie Sanders, which is an interesting way to phrase it, but I was happy to answer.
It needs meddling with.
Meddling.
That's coming from this guy.
People were asking me, why am I meddling?
These comments take on an entirely different meaning now that the former Bernie Field worker has been outed as part of a British military intelligence influence operation.
What?
What?
Well, let's start.
Let's back up.
So they keep saying that Russia is doing all these troll farming on Twitter and Facebook.
The CEO of Google testified in Congress that Russia spent a total of $4,700 across all of Google's platforms.
Nate Silver has pointed out that the amount of tweets and other social media engagements by Russia would amount to about 0.01% of all the social media interactions.
And to say that that has an influence on people lacks evidence and goes against common sense.
That's Nate Silver.
And so just keep in mind that the United States government has been doing the exact same thing.
And now we're finding out that the British government has been doing the exact same thing.
We showed you that since 2011, the United States has been doing this social media stuff, as the Guardian reported in 2011 before any of this stuff happened.
There's another.
Recent hack documents have revealed an international network of politicians, journalists, academics, researchers, and military officials all engaged in highly deceptive covert propaganda campaigns funded by the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, known as the FCO, also funded by NATO, also funded by Facebook, and also funded by hardline national security institutions.
Recent hack documents have revealed an international network of politicians, journalists, academics, researchers, and military officers, all engaged in highly deceptive covert propaganda campaigns funded by governments.
What does this sound like?
I remember the church committee report, which was in the late 70s, which outed a vast network of CIA and operatives, which had infiltrated the U.S. media for decades.
That's the United States Senate Church Committee outed them.
They had over 400 journalists working for the CIA in the United States Press Corps.
Nobody ever talks about that.
Look it up, Google the church committee.
Go ahead.
This sounds exactly like that, except now it's international.
International network of politicians, journalists, academics, researchers, and military officers, all highly deceptive covert propaganda funded by the British and British government, by NATO, by Facebook, and other hardline national security institutions.
So this is a big deal.
And by the way, no one's reporting this in the press, in the mainstream press.
I mean, you got to go to places like the Gray Zone to get this or a Jagoff nightclub comedian.
Ben Norton says, well, the Integrity Initiative, that's what it's called, the Integrity Initiative.
How Orwellian.
The Integrity Initiative, yet another monitoring group that tracks disinformation supposedly spread by Russia to destroy Western democracy, just admitted that it is funded by the UK government.
So this is officially British disinformation.
So the Integrity Initiative is actually a disinformation project.
Propaganda.
That's what's happening.
And they're pushing RussiaGate.
Isn't that interesting?
This network of networks, as one document refers to them, centers around an ironically named outfit called the Integrity Initiative.
And it is all overseen by a previously unknown England-based think tank registered in Scotland, the Institute for Statecraft, which has operated under a veil of secrecy.
So the Integrity Initiative, funded by the governments, NATO, they've been operating out of Scotland or out of a think tank registered in Scotland called the Institute for Statecraft.
They're supposed to be a charity, Institute for Statecraft.
They're not.
So these are all PSYOP organizations.
These are all deep state spying shit.
So the Institute for Statecraft Integrity Initiative.
So here it is.
Here's what it says.
The Integrity Initiative.
This is from their website.
And it says the Initiative Integrity Initiative is a partnership of several independent institutions led by the Institute for Statecraft.
This international public program was set up in 2015 to counter disinformation and other forms of malign influence being conducted by states and sub-state actors seeking to interfere in democratic processes and to undermine public confidence in national political institutions.
Boy, this sounds fairly familiar to the story we did yesterday about that organization called New Knowledge that wrote the Senate report on Russian interference in our elections.
And it turns out those guys are grifters.
What they're doing is creating a problem so they can sell you the solution.
We just showed that to you in our other video yesterday from New Knowledge.
And it's all run by former spies and spooks.
And so they're creating a problem.
Russia's controlling everybody's minds and organizations and governments.
Russia is controlling everything.
And now we have the solution for you.
Just give us some money and we'll give you the solution.
So here, so this is doing the same thing.
We're just trying to combat disinformation, except they're the ones doing the disinformation, which I will show you in just a second.
So if we skip all the way down here, it says the Institute for Statecraft is a not-for-profit charity.
What the...
Bye.
Funding for 2017 and 2018 was provided by a grant from the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the FCO.
That's a top British government organization.
So that's the integrity initiative working with the statecraft, what's it called, the Institute for Statecraft, okay?
It's supposed to be charity.
And the whole British operation, the whole operation appears to be run by and in conjunction with members of the British military intelligence.
The Integrity Initiative claims that it is countering Russia disinformation and malign influence.
And indeed, the main players behind it appear intent on hyping the Russian threat to justify ramped up military budgets and a long-term war footing.
And here's one of their retweets.
So this is the Integrity Initiative.
This is their account.
They retweet this warmonger, Michael McFaul, who says, under Putin, Russia has become the world's greatest threat to the sovereignty of other nations.
Really?
How many countries has he remember when Putin and Russia went into Iraq and then Libya and then Yemen and then Syria and had occupied Afghanistan for 20 years.
Remember that?
Oh, no.
But they're the biggest threat, not the United States.
Okay.
The United States, which has the world's biggest terrorist program, according to Noam Chomsky, called our drone program, which kills 90% of civilians.
But it's others, it's another country that's where, oh, this Russia is the.
So this is what then this is what they're tweeting out.
The Integrity Initiative tweeted out for crimes, there must be punishments.
New economic sanctions are a blunt but necessary tool for punishing illegal belligerent Russian behavior.
So that's a great way to get your military budget increased.
And Michael McFaul is a tool of them.
And he's also, you know, I mean, this guy, they're just, they always want more war.
And they'll lie about it to get it.
Here's Ben Norton again.
He says, so here's the kind of work this charity does to try to combat this information.
The UK government-funded bogus McCarthy monitoring group, the Integrity Initiative, repeatedly smeared Jeremy Corbyn while it claims to defend democracy against disinformation.
This is effectively state-sponsored attacks on Jeremy Corbyn and the left.
You want to see him?
So here's an integrity initiative.
Jeremy Corbyn's Mr. Corbyn was a useful idiot in the phrase apocryphally attributed to Lenin.
That's the phrase apocryphally attributed to Lenin that he's a useful idiot.
His open visceral anti-Westernism.
They're talking about Corbyn.
This is the Integrity Institute smearing Corbyn and red baiting him.
His open visceral anti-Westernism helped the Kremlin cause as surely as if he had been secretly peddling Westminster title tattle title title tattle for money.
That's supposed to be Tattletale.
Titletale?
Maybe they say it different over there.
So there they are smearing him as a Russian sympathizer.
And if you can't read this, I'll tell you what it says.
It says Jeremy Corbyn's sickening support of Soviet empire.
Here's some more.
Here's some more.
An alleged British Corbyn supporter wants to vote for Putin.
They're tweeting this stuff.
Hey, somebody supports Corbin.
And they're Russia.
They like Russia.
This is the Integrity Institute or initiative.
And they're getting their money from the fucking government and NATO.
Unlike Galloway, Corbyn does not scream conspiracy.
He implies it.
This is the Integrity Initiative.
This is again.
These are the people saving you from Russia disinformation, the people who are smearing the left.
And I told those motherfuckers who were pushing RussiaGate that when you do this, they use this against the left, you dummies.
Yeah, they're using it.
You're using it against Trump right now because it's because right now it serves your purposes.
But what you're actually doing is sowing the seeds for your own demise.
And here it is.
If you prop up the Russia gate bullshit and you're on the left, they use it against you, you fucking idiots.
And it doesn't take a genius to see it.
Because a dumb guy like me, a C student, predicted this would happen.
And fucking here it is.
This is the government doing it.
That's not some jagoff on Fox News.
That's the government doing it.
That's the Western governments doing this.
The Western spy agencies doing this.
This is NATO.
Now you remember the church committee.
Now you remember the 400 CIA journalists embedded in our here's another one.
Skirt ball poisoning.
It's time for Corbin left to confront its Putin problem.
This is this is the government doing this.
And they're saying they're saving you from Russia disinformation.
Ben Norton says a British government-funded disinformation organization is retweeting outrageous smears of anti-war journalists Ren Ya Kalek and the war nerd and Corbin advisor Suemis Mine amplifying the lies of leftist imperialist Alexander Reed Ross and Pat Hillsman.
So he leaked links to the tweets that smear anti-war journalists.
I've been smeared also.
If you're anti-war and you're on Twitter, you're going to get smeared by CIA operatives.
And that's what that's what this is, all right?
So that's initially integrative.
They're MI6, they're NATO, they're a spy organization.
That's what happens.
And then they have their journalists in Western media, like people who work for Mother Jones, Mother Jones, repeating CIA propaganda.
So that's happening again.
It's happened again.
And the reason why, why did you think you ever see, how about the people who got the Iraq war right?
Why don't they ever have them on the news again?
Why doesn't Phil Donahue have his own show?
He got the Iraq War White, right?
You think they give him his own fucking network?
Jimmy, have you heard anybody say peace on MSNBC?
No, on any mainstream media, anybody asking for peace.
Peace is bad.
Peace is wrong on MSNBC.
Bring our troops home.
Have you heard that?
Bring our troops home.
No, no.
I haven't heard that.
So here, so this, so this is fun to expose this.
But again, mainstream news media will never touch this.
And CNN will smear us as being Russian bots or whatever or a conspiracy or whatever, even though they're pushing the biggest conspiracy of my lifetime that Russia controls our government and that our president is a traitor.
That's the biggest conspiracy theory of my time.
The only second conspiracy was the Iraq war.
So that's a huge conspiracy.
Second one will be this.
But then there were some journalists who went to check out the Integrity Initiative's offices and the statecraft offices.
And guess who they found when they went there?
They got kicked out immediately.
A couple different people went.
And one of them was Kit Klarenberg of Sputnik Radio.
They went to visit the statecraft offices.
Well, here it is.
Kit Klerberg of Sputnik Radio entered the covert propaganda mill's neo-Gothic offices.
As soon as he identified himself as a journalist, he was angrily ejected by an Institute for Statecraft staffer named Simon Bracey Lane, who worked for the Bernie Sanders campaign, who just never was into politics before.
And turns out he's in the basement of this fucking spy organization.
And when a journalist comes in, he kicks them out.
This is from their website, the Institute for Statecraft Expert Expert Team.
Roles and Relevant Experience.
That's what it says right there.
This is their expert team.
This is from their own thing.
Rolls and relevant experience.
Number one, two Temple Place resident team.
That's A. And what does it say?
It says Simon Bracey Lane, Semicolon, currently runs the IFS Integrity Initiative, network communications and network development process, deep experience in democratic election campaign processes in the UK and especially in the United States.
He was a regional campaign organizer for John Wisniewski for governor of New Jersey, USA, January May, 2017, statewide campaign organizer for Bernie Sanders.
I think that it's deep experience, Jimmy.
Deep experience.
And then he was also a special study on Russian interference in the U.S. election, 2016.
I'm sorry.
So the idea where it says deep experience?
Yeah.
To me.
Deep state experience.
That's exactly.
Nobody says deep experience.
So people will call you, people will say, oh, do you have some kind of crazy conspiracy?
No, there are spy agencies that spy.
Then you have to track them down, and that's what this is.
What?
Are you saying that deep state infiltrates certain organizations?
Yes.
Is that what you're oh, come on?
What's the CIA?
The CIA isn't spying on its own people, Jimmy.
Like, well, this Institute for Statecraft honestly sounds like the name of some in a fictional sci-fi futuristic dystopian.
The Institute of Statecraft is here to give you a brain realignment.
You know what I mean?
Like, it sounds insane to me, but the people who are saying the Russians are propagandizing us are actually the ones running their own propaganda to screw with our brains.
That's called the Western Intelligence Agency's Western government's NATO.
Go ahead.
Sorry, I cut you off.
It's funny, though.
And they want it to seem sort of hocus-pocus smoke and mirrors.
You can't really.
They wanted to say, oh, you're crazy.
Yes.
All you got to do is boil it down to the money.
Follow the money.
Bernie and Jeremy Corbin are talking people's populist issues, progressive issues.
That's a threat to the ruling class, man.
So you better smear them.
You better have your Institute for Deep Statery send your guys out and start this kind of nonsense.
And look what they got.
They got some hipster Brit who's just, I was backpacking and I had to jail that.
Get out of here.
I'm just a young kid hippie kid who really got interested because of Bernie.
Why do you, it's, and that's the thing.
This is how, this is how clever they are.
We want to think that the CIA in the deep state is some guy in a crew cut.
No, it's going to be a dude with a tattoo.
It's going to be a hipster.
It's going to be a guy that vapes and listens to metal.
That's who they're going to send.
And if you have, by the way, if you were at Standing Rock, you know that was infiltrated by cops and spooks and CIA and FBI.
They infiltrated.
They infiltrated Occupy Wall Street.
If there's a left, I bet you the DSA has a bunch of spooks inside them.
Yeah.
So if you have a lefty organization, you're going to have CIA and FBI guys inside you.
Well, in this case, if you had Bernie Sanders, you had MI6 inside you.
You had British intelligence in there, which is anti-left wing, you motherfuckers.
And wait a minute now.
I thought we were all up in arms about a foreign country meddling in our elections.
Oh my God.
That's a foreign country.
A foreign spy agency is sending people in a presidential candidates campaign.
That that's not meddling.
Another foreign spy named Steele compiled, talked to people inside the Kremlin to get dirt on one of the candidates running for president of the United States states and then released it.
That's called the dossier, the Steele dossier.
So they had a guy in England, former spy, collaborating with people inside the Kremlin to get dirt on a presidential candidate.
Isn't that exactly what Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democrats accused Trump of doing?
That's exactly what they, oh, they coordinated with Russia to get dirt, which they got those emails that proved that the Democratic Party is cheating their own people.
They never say that part.
So here we are.
This is again, it's, I didn't figure this out.
Max Blumenthal and Ben Norton and several people like that figure this out.
I'm just re-reporting their reporting.
But the fact that I stumbled onto it and say somebody like, I don't know, fucking Jake Tapper hasn't or Rachel Maddow reveals them to be liars, reveals them to be propagandists of the highest order.
And I'm not saying I'm better than them because you offer me $30,000 a day and I'll sell you a bottle of piss and tell you it's truth syrup.
Yeah, you pay me.
You pay me $10 million of your political vigilante is going to be talking about how we need to stay in Syria.
Yeah, we got to stay in Syria.
Stay in Syria.
I just got to stay.
I mean, normally I'm anti-war, but this time it makes sense.
We need an exit strategy, Jimmy.
We certainly do.
You can't just pull out Willie.
You can't just stop killing people willy-nilly.
No, I mean, we can't.
What happens if we stop killing civilians for profit, Jimmy?
What's that going to do for us as a people?
That's not our values.
Right, because it's hard to make profits on helping homeless people in America.
Right?
I mean, it really is.
You can't turn a profit that way.
That's bad for capitalism.
Homeless people are bad for capitalism.
Let's be honest.
Yeah.
Let's get rid of them.
And they're dirty.
So this is how we would do a newscast if we were being paid what racial matter gets paid.
Hey, let's talk about net neutrality.
I'm not really sure about it.
It seems weird.
It seems okay.
It's a big deal.
I know that, but I'm not sure.
Look, Jimmy, there's two sides to climate change.
All right.
So let's just give them both fair play.
We're fair and balanced here.
All right.
Now you know why people get their news from YouTube.
Chuck Schumer's on the line.
Hello.
Good afternoon, fine consumer.
On behalf of Google, YouTube, and the great invasive state of New York of America, I would like to ask you a few important questions.
This will only take a few moments of your precious life.
You'll never get back.
Mightn't I trouble you to help the good people of the resistance?
Mightn't I?
I'm a fan of archaic contractions.
I've said it before.
Mightn't I?
Sure, sure.
Go ahead, Chuck.
Thank you, good sir.
Have you or anyone you know recently purchased an organic brand?
I'm sorry, do you prefer A or An before organic?
I know a lot of people use the declarative hand before a vowel, but I know the vernacular has changed a bit since I was a youngster running around in Knickers.
I don't care, Chuck.
Neither do I. That's why I asked.
I don't want to be any trouble.
Either way is fine with me.
Me too, Chuck.
Okay.
Oh, A or N?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha!
Ann.
Good, great.
And it is.
Because I can do A, too, if you're not comfortable with Ann.
Just saying.
I don't care.
Good choice, got it.
No problem.
Okay, where were we?
Have you or anyone you know recently purchased A or An organic brand of hummus instead of the one made by the Sabra company?
I just usually buy local brands at the natural food place.
Uh-huh.
Aside from that last statement, how often have you engaged in hoodlum-like activities in order to delegitimize the state of Israel?
Yeah, I don't know what buying hummus not made by an Israeli company has to do with what you're talking about, Chuck.
Then you're probably A or An anti-Semite.
May I continue?
I guess.
Have you ever criticized another country's foreign policy, in particular, that of Israel's?
I think I've probably been critical of every country's foreign policy, especially ours.
Well, then, according to the transitive property of smearing people as anti-Semitic, you must be anti-Semitic.
What's the transitive property of smearing people as anti-Semitic?
The transitive property of smearing people as anti-Semitic states.
That if A or Ann equals B and if B equals C, then you must take Jewish people.
Disliking a country's foreign policy doesn't make you an anti-Semite chuck.
And this isn't about slamming someone's heritage or religion.
That's what you think.
Caring about the treatment of Palestinians is a crime against humanity.
And that is why I'm asking you to boycott parts of California in reaction to parts of California boycotting Israel.
No.
Then thank you for participating in our survey.
I hope I did not intrude upon your day.
You may now go about your business.
For I'm not only master of the Senate, I am also master of pointless grandstanding bullshit.
Establishing shot of a lizard eating a small bird followed by screeching hawk sounds in the desert and winds blowing the dead trees, etc., etc., etc.
I don't get that last part.
Oh, he's just trying to evoke some imagery.
Okay.
Let him evoke.
All right, evoke.
What I like about Rand Paul and the libertarian wing of the Republic is they're very anti-war.
He's a non-interventionist.
I'm all for it.
I think this is where the progressive left and the libertarians certainly can come together.
Here he is with Jake Tapper.
And again, as we've told you, and every time they do it, I get upset and then I remember, oh, it makes me look better because I keep telling people that every establishment news outlet will be for every war.
And they are.
Right?
CNN, MSNBC, ABC, New York Times, Washington Post, and for every war.
And so here we go.
So Rand Paul comes on to kind of break down why we should get the hell out of the Middle East.
And of course, the newsman makes the case for war.
Here we go.
President Trump calls Obama the founder of ISIS because he says Obama's decision to withdraw troops from Iraq created this power vacuum in the Middle East.
Does the president doesn't even know that?
I think it's important.
Go ahead.
I think it's important that we get history correct here.
Where did ISIS begin?
They began in Syria in the midst of a civil war.
The civil war got worse as the U.S., Qatar, and also Saudi Arabia were supplying arms to people like ISIS, Al-Nusra, Al-Qaeda, Sunni extremists fighting against Assad.
The problem is, and this is the mainstream foreign policy problem of our country.
We think we always have to be involved.
Maybe when there's two evils, Assad may be an evil, Sunni extremists may be an evil.
We shouldn't always have to choose a side and be involved with war.
But we got involved in that war, and we added to the chaos.
And so the millions of people that left, that's on the hands, the hands of many Americans who said, like Hillary Clinton, oh, we've got to be in there.
We've got to somehow get rid of Assad.
It should not be the job of America to be replacing regimes around the world.
Let me just correct one thing he said that's incorrect.
We didn't join the civil war.
We started it.
So the CIA went in and Saudi Arabia and we funded literally the El Nusra, Al-Qaeda, factions of ISIS.
They call them moderate rebels.
There's no such thing.
And so they fund literally the CIA, Jeffrey Sachs, we did another video.
He explained this to the people on Morning Joe Ball, right?
Which then they completely ignored.
But so the way the Syrian war started was literally the CIA went in and funded these.
We've been trying to overthrow Assad, not just since 2011 in the Arab Spring, but for decades, right?
And so this isn't new.
They just found a new lie to tell you about why they want to do it.
And the reason why we're in Syria is at the behest of Israel and they want to put a pipeline.
Saudi Arabia wants to put a pipeline through Syria.
And so they can sell natural gas to Europe.
And of course, Russia doesn't want them to sell it because Russia supplies that to Europe.
So that's why they're there also.
So I just wanted to clear that up.
This isn't about us joining.
This is about us actually engineering a civil war in Syria.
Okay.
This is what President Trump recognized in Iraq, that that was the biggest foreign policy disaster of the last several decades.
And he's right.
But guess what?
All of these Republicans and all these generals you quote, they still don't get that the Iraq war was a mistake.
And they're wrong.
And I think the people actually know it.
And if this were put to the people, this is polled all of the time.
I think 69% of the people were polled in a pew poll recently and said we should get out of Afghanistan, whether it's sooner or later or immediately.
People are ready to come home.
He's 100% right about all that.
People want to get the hell out of these things.
And, you know, Jake Tapper before the guy quoted, you know, Trump saw his military advisors that he's doing it wrong.
Yeah, these are the people who told us that we should go into Iraq.
The same military advisors who say we should stay in Afghanistan.
The same military advisors who said we should go into Libya.
We should stop.
We've got to stop listening to those guys.
You don't ask Chris Christie when we should close the buffet.
Talking about the way that we're doing it, but I do want to ask you just one philosophical point.
And I don't mean to.
Now, watch this.
This is one of the most underhanded bullshit corporate news tool-y things I've ever seen.
Now, let's remember Jake Tapper for every war and more of it, because he's part of the corporate news media, and they're sponsored by fossil fuel companies and the military industrial complex.
And here's a guy who's actually trying to tell the truth about it.
Watch the kind of BS bullshit he does.
I know that I just repeated myself.
To think that I'm being rude here, but I'm just wondering, in the last 20 years, is there any act of U.S. intervention with military force abroad that you support?
Whenever you start a question off with a disclaimer like that, it means some nonsense is coming.
Hey, I'm not trying to be rude here, but are you always, aren't you up for any wars?
Philosophically speaking, though.
We've got like eight of them for you.
You're not into any of them.
Not even a little.
Have there been any you've been for?
Oh, so you're not for any war?
Okay.
That's what he wants to do, right?
Oh, so you're not for any war?
We get it.
You're that guy.
Ooh, no wars.
So that's what Jake is trying to do here.
Otherwise, why would you ask that question?
Not like, well, I know that, Senator, you're actually, you know, you're not a peacenick.
You're actually for well.
So go ahead and tell.
No, he's like, you're not for any war ever, are you?
There's something wrong with it.
That's what he's trying to do.
That's exactly what he's trying to do.
Except Jake Tapper is as bad of a journalist he is.
He would also be a bad lawyer because he asks a question, doesn't know the answer to.
And on a serious note, if Jake Tapper really wanted to explore that philosophy, what he would have said is he would have been like, you are typically a non-interventionist.
Why?
Yes.
That would have been, if he really just wanted to explore the philosophy, that's how he would have posted it.
Right, but he asked it in the douchiest way possible.
Absolutely.
Yes.
Look at this guy.
He's a comedian.
And he came up with that question.
Right?
Okay.
So, But guess what?
He's not only a bad journalist, also a bad question, askerer, because he doesn't know the answer to that question, and he thinks he does.
So here we go.
Did you support going?
Yeah, I supported...
Yes, after we were attacked on 9-11, I did support to go into Afghanistan.
I would have voted for the resolution, but we're ignoring the resolution.
It said we'd go after those who planned, abetted, aided the people who attacked us.
It never said anything about associated forces, never said anything about war in Yemen, Somalia, Mali, Syria.
None of this was ever authorized by Congress.
So what we are doing, you know, like seven different war theaters right now is unconstitutional, and we shouldn't be doing it.
But I did support going in after 9-11, but I have not supported the nation building.
I would have declared victory long ago and come home.
And so when the president declares victory over ISIS, he's exactly right.
We took back 99% of their land.
Aren't these people going to stand up and now fight for themselves?
Can they not do anything?
And it doesn't work to have Americans there policing Muslim lands.
It just engenders more terrorism.
The longer Americans stay, the more terrorism you'll have.
We are so forward deployed that we can attack on a moment's notice from anywhere on the planet.
So us leaving doesn't mean we don't have to be involved.
You know, we are off.
He said, he just did it with great pieces.
We are so forward deployed.
Meaning, you know, we got troops everywhere in the world.
So this doesn't, this doesn't mean we're not going to be able to attack somewhere at a moment's notice.
We can.
We got submarines and troops everywhere.
That's what he's saying.
So pulling out of Syria doesn't make us less safe.
Sure, under the waters.
We are everywhere around the planet.
There is nothing about us leaving that means that we couldn't be involved if we had to be involved.
But really, the people who live there, the Muslims who live in these lands need to police the Muslims who live in these lands.
If it's Americans, it'll always be seen by those who live there as some sort of religious crusade, and it encourages more terrorism.
So the sooner we get out of that mess, the better.
Thank you very much.
That's it, Lidao's soapbox.
Thank you very much, Rand Paul.
And so I just wanted to show you that because he's 100% right.
We're there illegally.
Again, that's all stuff Jake Tapper will never say.
So that's what kind of gets me is that he'll tell you, we're there illegally.
We're not supposed to be there against the UN Charter.
There's nothing there that says we should be there.
Oh, I forgot that we're there illegally.
They never say that.
He makes the case.
He's so reasonable.
I'm actually glad he was asked the question about intervention.
Me too.
Because all of a sudden, he lists everything and describes exactly how we're not authorized to continue in all of this deployment throughout the world.
The longer that I like how he closed it out.
The longer we stay in the Middle East, the more terrorists we have.
And that's the bottom line.
And he's right.
Muslims have to police other Muslims.
And the only reason we're there, well, there's lots of reasons now, but it had a lot to do with the petrodollar and Saudi Arabia promising to monetize their oil in dollars.
So again, that's something else Jake Tapper will never tell you.
Isn't it funny they never mentioned the petrodollar?
Isn't that something?
Yeah.
Yeah, me and Rand Paul were having a beer together.
We'd be like eye and eye on all this.
Then healthcare would come up.
I'd be like, oh, boy.
All right.
Okay.
Yeah.
I got to go.
Right, right.
But, you know, we could be allies on this, on peace.
Oh, good.
It's our first Chris Christie of the year.
Hello, Chris Christie.
Yeah, what's your end game?
My what?
You end the game.
Hot shot, wise ass pip squeak.
You heard me.
End the game.
You got to have an end game.
Didn't you see me on ABC this week, this week?
Why did you say this week twice?
That's the name of the show.
When is it on?
This week.
So this week is on this week?
No, this week is on Sunday.
And this Sunday, I was on this week.
You understand?
So this week, you were on this week on Sunday.
No, Sunday doesn't start shooting until next week.
This week I was only on this week, which is normally on Friday, but there was a scheduled change.
So what about next week?
Next week was canceled a month ago.
Try to keep up.
So what did you talk about on this week, this week?
You meet this week last week, because I did it last week.
Yes.
Hey, you know, there's a lot more to that phone call, but we don't have time in today's podcast.
How do you hear the entire phone call?
You got to become a premium member.
Go to JimmyDorkComedy.com, sign up.
It's the most affordable premium program in the business.
Today's show was written.
That's right, it was written by Frank Connoff, Jim Earl, Ron Placone, Step Sam Murano, and Mark Van Landowicz.
All the voices today performed by the one and the only of the inimitable Mike McRae, who can be found at mikemcrae.com.
That's it for this week.
you be the best you can be, and I'll keep being me.
Don't don't go bring out it.
Don't you go?
Don't freak out.
You got what you got and do not freak.
Do not freak.
Do not freak out.
Don't bring out.
Don't bring out.
Export Selection