Jan. 14, 2026 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
37:03
The Supreme Court Confronts Gender Madness
Dr. Jerome Corsi delivers a sweeping analysis of cultural upheaval, institutional breakdown, and geopolitical realignment as the United States and the world enter what he describes as a decisive historical moment.Dr. Corsi begins by examining a pivotal U.S. Supreme Court oral argument on sex-based protections in women’s sports, highlighting the legal confusion surrounding modern gender ideology and its implications for equal-protection law. He argues that the Court’s struggle reflects a broader cultural crisis where biological reality is increasingly denied in favor of subjective ideology. CN 1 15The discussion expands into a broader critique of neo-Marxist ideology, activist media narratives, and the collapse of traditional feminist principles. Dr. Corsi connects these trends to the erosion of family structure, rising social instability, and the loss of objective standards in law, education, and public policy.🔥 Key Themes CoveredSupreme Court debate over sex, gender, and equal protectionThe ideological roots of modern gender theoryThe impact of cultural radicalism on women’s sports and civil lawMedia-driven emotional narratives versus biological realityUN and WEF efforts to suppress debate on climate policyThe collapse of global climate orthodoxy and censorshipImmigration policy, ICE enforcement, and urban unrestNGO funding, activist movements, and manufactured protestElection integrity, voter fraud, and citizenship enforcementU.S. withdrawal from globalist institutions and treatiesGeopolitical pressure on Venezuela, Iran, Cuba, and ChinaEnergy independence, economic instability, and precious metalsDr. Corsi also analyzes the return of sphere-of-influence geopolitics, arguing that the United States, Russia, and China are reasserting regional control as globalist institutions weaken. He explains why energy policy, border enforcement, and economic sovereignty are now inseparable from national security. The episode concludes with a warning that unchecked ideological extremism and institutional decay threaten constitutional order, and that restoring truth, accountability, and moral clarity will determine whether Western civilization stabilizes or continues toward disorder.🌐 Website: https://www.corsination.com📰 Substack: https://jeromecorsiphd.substack.com/🌐 The Truth Central: https://www.thetruthcentral.com💰 CORSI NATION SPONSORSMyVitalC — ESS60 in Organic Olive Oil👉 https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/Swiss America — Precious Metals & Wealth Protection📞 800-519-6268👉 https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.phpBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/corsi-nation--5810661/support.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court held oral arguments on the whole question of men or boys in women's or girls' sports.
And I think the key issue, the pivotal moment, was questions that Judge Alito asked of the woman who was trying to defend this gender madness.
And it's very interesting to hear this clip.
Chris, we've got to queued up.
Let's play the clip.
Is it not necessary for there to be, for equal protection purposes, if that is challenged under the equal protection clause, an understanding of what it means to be a boy or a girl or a man or a woman?
Yes, Your Honor.
And what is that definition for equal protection purposes?
What does it mean to be a boy or a girl or a man or a woman?
Sorry, I misunderstood your question.
I think that the underlying enactment, whatever it was, the policy, the law, we'd have to have an understanding of how the state or the government was understanding that term to figure out whether or not someone was excluded.
We do not have a definition for the court.
And we don't take issue with the, we're not disputing the definition here.
What we're saying is that the way it applies in practice is to exclude birth sex males categorically from women's teams and that there's a subset of those birth sex males where it doesn't make sense to do so according to the state's own interest.
Well, how can a court determine whether there's discrimination on the basis of sex without knowing what sex means for equal protection purposes?
I think here we just know that we basically know that the that they've identified pursuant to their own statute.
Is it not okay?
So she's completely now lost in her again on an ability to tell you what a man is or a woman is.
It's ridiculous.
And the reason is because, and if you'll read my book on the truth about neo-Marxism, cultural Maoism and anarchy, I cover this very extensively with Judith Butler, who started all the nonsense by saying gender was different than sex.
Sex are your sexual organs biologically and genders however you perform your acts of sex.
And what it amounts to is a virtually like a schizophrenia.
Your gender is whatever you want it to be.
You can be of an animal or a past life or an inanimate object or whatever you want your sex, your gender to be.
And that's subjective and it can change.
So therefore you can say, well, I'm identifying as a woman, even though you're biologically a male and your pronouns are, then you say she or her, not him or his, and that we're all supposed to acknowledge that until you decide that you're really a furry, you're an animal.
And that's your gender, or that you switch back to becoming a male.
Well, the problem is from the court's point of view, these laws are written to say you cannot have discrimination on the basis of sex.
And of course, the meaning in these laws up until this current Democratic Party madness was that sex was biological.
And so therefore, women, females, could not be discriminated against because they were female.
Okay, and that was part of the whole feminism to get equal protection laws passed or laws passed that would enable women to have jobs that men would typically hold and compete on those jobs on an equal basis and not lose the jobs or be fired or whatever because they were women who were competing with the man for the job.
Now, at the core of what the Supreme Court was arguing yesterday was it was clear that there are winners and losers.
In other words, if you're going to allow men into women's sports, then women are not going to be in those sports because the man is taking a woman's position.
And is it sufficient to say that the man is discriminated against if he believes he is a woman or is undergoing a sex change therapy or whatever other madness the person is engaged in?
And the court was struggling, except for a couple of the far left members who were in this gender madness, which is bizarre because again, the court was struggling with, well, how many transgenders really are there?
And what are we doing to protect the small number of transgenders when in fact these laws have been written to really allow women's sports to thrive?
Prior to a lot of these laws being passed, colleges, universities, even high schools did not provide very much for women in athletics.
And today we have robust athletics programs for girls and for women in which girls and women participate.
And to have a biological male participate means that that's a disadvantage because clearly men are typically stronger than women.
Now, I can remember I was in the 1960s was at a meeting in Dartmouth and I was asked basically what the difference between men and women was.
I said it's essentially a question of overlapping normal distributions.
In other words, there are going to be some women who are stronger than some men.
But in general, the median on a bell-shaped curve for men in terms of measurement of physical strength is going to be exceeding the mean of women because men are biologically stronger.
We're built to be more rugged in terms of physical strength.
And it doesn't really take a genius to figure this out.
But again, we're dealing with a left who thinks that a man can have a baby, a man can have a period, a man can do biologically things that a man is not equipped to do.
And so the fundamental analysis of what's happened to the left is that they've gone insane, that they've begun embracing a whole set of ideas which are ludicrous, if not just outright laughable.
And Chris, I want you to come on and comment about this because I want to get a little bit of a discussion going on this for the audience.
But the point is that once we enter into this domain of uncertainty of gender, everything else becomes uncertain in terms of how we establish various categories of participation in sports and other activities.
And how are we supposed to have a special category of transgender men who then receive privilege because they are transgender?
What about transgender women?
We don't talk much about transgender women wanting to be in men's sports because obviously it wouldn't make any sense.
Chris?
No, that is for transgender women are not going to want to play in men's sports.
You're not going to solve this problem very easily because what happens in public school, the public school domain and the public circle domain, social media domains, are these are emotional arguments.
They don't really carry any factual weight or logical weight, but they carry emotional weight, which the media loves to play up that drama for clicks, for attention, for eyeballs, and that gets other emotionalists involved.
They scream loudly and start saying things like, corporations aren't people.
Nobody's illegal.
People aren't illegal.
And of course, all trans men are women.
They just chant these things without understanding what's really going on.
They don't peel off the surface and see the young girl who's worked for 15 years to become an Olympic golden Olympic gymnast or a girl who has improved herself in high school and college as a swimmer to become an NCAA contender as far as maybe a champion or somebody who will try out for other major national international games.
But oh, oh, oh, oh, the female weightlifter.
Now you see a lot of these records being shattered by biological men.
It's nice for the people, the wine-consuming Chardonnay liberal women with the Judith Butler haircuts and the big Renee Rachel Meadow glasses to chant and say, hey, this is great.
But the fact is they really seem to not care about the ones who worked, the real women who worked hard.
And worst case of it all is the feminists are the ones who are arguing for these males to compete against women, which, if I remember correctly, back in the 70s and 80s, this would go against feminist principles, right?
Well, the feminists have switched a lot of what they have believed over the years in terms of, you know, the original idea in feminism was that women should be able to have jobs and compete with men in the workplace and shouldn't be confined to being homeowners.
Homeowners and raising children was demeaned by the Betty Friedan group in the 1950s and 1960s.
And so therefore, you had a whole, and Phyllis Schlafly, who I worked with very closely while she was alive, you know, pointed out that women were going to lose their special status as being able to bring children into the world uniquely and raise children.
If in fact women were made to compete with men and try to take a masculine position, it leads to the breakup of marriages.
We're finding women who are in long-term marriages, including my own, divorcing after having affairs.
I mean, it's things that were the family is breaking up now, not just because people aren't forming families and having children, but long-term marriages are breaking up because women are feeling that they're not satisfied.
They weren't fulfilled.
They didn't experience all the Betty Friedan promised glories of feminism.
The point is, the point I'm driving at here is that the left embraces bizarre ideas.
There's also a good Gatestone Institute today on the subject.
And I want to just touch on it briefly, which is saying essentially that this UN meeting that occurred in Brazil that President Trump pulled out of and is not going to participate in, have doubled down on attacking climate denialism.
Okay, so We're in a period of time where this, you know, this in this age of disinformation, and I'm the books I'm writing right now, this trilogy, the truth about energy, global warming, and climate change, is exposing these climate lies in an age of disinformation.
So, what's happening is that the UN and the World Economic Forum agendas on climate change are identifying that the denial, denialists,
those of us who know that it's nonsense science that hydrocarbon fuels are causing global warming, we are to be defeated regardless of our scientific credentials or the fact that our arguments are scientifically valid.
So, Bajorn Lonberg, who does a lot of good writing on the environment, president of the Copenhagen Consensus, New York Post, March 6, 2025, wrote, The United Nations is trying to control what people can hear, read, and think about climate change, just when social media companies like Meta are reversing their years-long policy of quote fact-checking climate change policy debate,
which Meta admits results in censorship.
The proposal that taxpayers spend hundreds of trillions of dollars on poor climate policies is surely worth debate.
The UN has no place suppressing that discussion.
Now, I think that's right.
And I think that what we're finding today is that whether it's the Democratic Party supporting Somalian illegal immigrants who don't work and steal billions of dollars from the U.S. Treasury or running their cars in the streets to block ICE,
which is trying to deport illegal immigrants, when both Obama and Clinton and all the Democrats up until now have acknowledged as part of normal U.S. policy is to deport illegals who are here without proper status.
And again, the Democrat Party is now supporting only lies, cheating, stealing, fraud, extortion.
And Minneapolis is probably the test case of the insanity of the government officials calling a ICE agent defending his life as a murderer.
These mobs, which are screaming obscenities and making it impossible for ICE to do their work, that's their goal.
This is an insurrection.
It's not political protest according to Martin Luther King's standard of civil disobedience.
But again, we're in an era where these insanities are dominating a political party to its ruin, to its detriment, to make it look absurd, to make it look silly.
Chris, you want to comment on that?
Well, yeah.
The other thing I was thinking is a lot of these things that the left is supporting are basically fads.
Feds they want to keep holding onto for political reasons.
You talked earlier about the transgender situation.
Well, a lot of the younger generations are using the, or I guess becoming queer or t or whatever, transgender for attention.
As far as the climate change fed is concerned, that was a pretty big deal with primary school in the 70s and 80s.
A lot of people grew up with that.
And then the global warming fed changed to global cooling, if you remember, because, well, it wasn't convenient anymore.
It started out as global cooling and then it changed the global warming.
But there were companies and pundits that were lining their pockets.
They were getting major speaking engagements, paid speaking engagements, just to talk about this.
They had to keep this running for another, I don't know, a few decades until they passed on.
Even Bill Gates got sick and tired of it recently, for that matter.
But that, my friend, is rather telling because he was lending his pockets over this for a very long time.
Yeah, well, Axios is reporting, you know, the world's great climate class on climate details.com, Mark Morano, the world's great climate collapse.
The climate agenda's fall from grace over the past year has been stunning in speed and scope.
And Donald Trump has now withdrawn America from the UN climate framework and the UN's IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
And so this has got the climate bureaucrats at the UN reeling because they know it, you know, as we pull out of the 1992 UN climate treaty, it's a loss of funding.
Right.
So that's the big one right there.
And Trump pulling out of the United Nations, which I've been encouraging for years, get out of the United Nations, get out of NATO.
These organizations will fall apart without U.S. money.
We don't fund these things.
They're dead.
And why should we continue to fund them when all they do is produce anti-American lies?
And it makes no sense to me at all.
Donald Trump is right that America first means extending our interests around the globe.
And I want to go to a couple of things being covered today on the conservative treehouse.
I find Sundance over the is often very, very worthwhile following.
He covered Trump's tour yesterday of a Ford automobile plant in Detroit, and it was a great visit.
Trump even threw a finger at Hengler.
I mean, you know, that's Trump was not putting up with any nonsense.
The New York State bird.
A New York State bird.
That's right.
So, and Trump was saying to, you know, this treaty with Mexico means nothing to him.
And he's not going to pay any attention to all of the treaties that have shipped our jobs overseas.
He's utilizing his ability to impose tariffs to make countries come and do a dealing fairly with the United States, not with this free trade in which basically the United States subsidized the shipping of our jobs overseas.
And it was detrimental to our, you know, I continued through 25 years ago arguing.
I remember specifically when President George W. Bush was in office, arguing that Security and Prosperity Partnership in North America, which wanted to create these massive super highways connecting Mexico and Canada for cargo containers from Mexico, brought from China to come to the United States through Mexico with cheap goods.
If Americans' middle class was not working, who was going to buy the cheap Chinese goods?
And that's been the problem with the Democrats.
The Democrats have had policies as Biden did, inflation out of control, which basically destroys the middle class.
Obama policy, which was that we were not going to have single-family homes anymore, which has caused all of this building of condos and townhouses, trying to make housing unaffordable.
And Trump is reducing that.
The attack of the middle class, the opening of the border, all the ideas that the Democrats have used, the defunding the police, opening the cities to criminals, supporting Venezuelan gang members and El Salvadorian MS-13 gang members, which the Democrats are fond of.
These are not policies that are winning policies for middle America.
And it makes the Democratic Party appropriately look like it's a fringe nutcase party, which it is, but it's become a communist nutcase party.
which will head towards totalitarianism if it wins.
And also then everybody who doesn't agree with it gets killed.
And the society deteriorates because the ideas upon which it's funded are lies and are fundamentally stupid.
Chris?
I'm with you on all of that here.
Yeah, I was working behind the scenes at this point.
But again, Donald Trump is basically standing up to the globalist establishment.
Like you were saying before, pulling out of these climate accords, like the climate accords, like the Paris Accords, telling the UN, hey, we're not going to fund you anymore because on the banks of the American taxpayers, not only are you pushing anti-American propaganda, but you're funneling money to all these companies who, or NGOs, if you will, or maybe other interests around the world who are lurking to circumvent and take down the free world.
Not just the U.S., but the overall free world.
Yeah, Europe is going down the censorship path and Europe is bankrupt.
We'll cover that in just a minute.
Yesterday also, President Trump and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Christy Noam ended the temporary protection status for Somali immigrants.
Now, this was put into place, which affected several thousand Somalis currently living in the United States and several hundred currently living in Minnesota under this protection.
Temporary meant temporary, is what Noam said.
Conditions in Somalia have improved to the point where it no longer meets the law's requirement for temporary protected status.
Okay, so effective on March 17th, 2026, there'll be a termination of Somalia's designation for temporary protected status, which means that again, the ability of the Somalis to stay here is going to be limited.
Somali nationals do not have a legal status other than TPS, temporary protected status, that would allow them to remain in the United States should they use the Custom and Border Protections home mobile app to report their departure from the United States is what they should do.
That app is a safe way to self-deport, includes a complimentary plane ticket, $1,000 exit bonus, and the opportunity for potential future legal immigration.
But Minnesota is now protecting these Somalis as if they were citizens with a right to stay in the country, even though they're engaging in massive fraud.
I think the whole thing of the attack on ICE, which is a manufactured attack, packaged, paid for, leftist, insurrectionist attack, which has all the characteristics of George Floyd.
You know, it's again, it's a repeat drama, which we've seen before with paid actors and scripts and training and manuals as to how to be insurrectionists.
You know, this again is abhorrent to the American people who understand that the hard left has lost its mind.
And if Minneapolis wants to become a Somali nation, maybe, you know, Waltz and the mayor of Minneapolis ought to just move to Somalia because again, they don't understand that the United States as a sovereign nation has a right and a duty to protect our citizens and our borders.
Okay, Chris, a comment on that.
Well, think about this.
Walz and Jacob Frank would be perfect for a Somalia because they tried to, well, they were pretty happy when during the St. Floyd riots, they were turning the these rioters were turning Minneapolis into Mogadishu.
Right.
And, you know, the Minnesota House is now moving to impeach Waltz as governor.
And, you know, the hypocrisy of the left in which they are championing criminals and, you know, compared to the J Sixers, where they, you know, the guy who shot Ashley Babbitt was wearing a mask and, you know, all the things that they're saying that DHS is doing, yet they didn't consider that guy a murderer.
Because again, the politics determines what the, if it's anti-Trump, if it's anti-American, the Democrats are on that, even if the idea is ludicrous or the idea is inherently false, climate change, or the idea is inherently going to destroy America, like just allowing all the Somalis to be here and have free reign on looting the treasury.
Okay, so, but again, the pressure is mounting on Pam Bandi.
Rand Paul is out there saying that she's refusing to prosecute Anthony Fauci for obvious crimes he committed during the pandemic, lying, crimes are legion against humanity.
And again, Pam Bandi is not taking action.
So I think as the criticism of Pam Bandi mounts, I think her time in office is short.
I don't think she's going to be there for very much longer.
Okay, a couple of other stories I think are gaining as well.
Yesterday, it was revealed that Danish intelligence had warned President Trump that the Russian and Chinese military have ambitions on Greenland and the Arctic, which is increasing Donald Trump's enthusiasm to grab Greenland before it goes to China and Russia.
And that's hemispheric Western hemisphere, our natural sphere of influence, has to be within the pro-American sphere.
This is again the Donald Trump, the Donroe, not the Monroe doctrine.
But I've been supporting this for years, saying that Russia will have its sphere of influence, China will have its sphere of influence, and so will we.
And so I think now the pressure on Cuba, pressure on Colombia, the pressure on Mexico is going to intensify.
And Donald Trump is talking about taking military action against Iran.
And certainly his support of the Iranian people have kept the rioting going on against this evil regime in Iran, which I've been fighting since I wrote Atomic Iran in 2006.
Chris, and I think we're in an era where Donald Trump is now going after these evil empires and he's dismantling them so that even the Chinese and Russian ships which are going to Venezuela to try to get oil are turning back because they know that they're not going to be accepted.
They're not going to get into Venezuela.
And the United States is going to be dealing with Venezuela's oil for the benefit of the Venezuelan people.
And Donald Trump's meeting of the oil executives in the White House made it clear that we're going to have a policy of strong development of hydrocarbon fuels with an emphasis upon looking to the future for nuclear, including fusion, as sources of energy.
So Trump recognizes that without the development of substantial energy resources, this modern industrial global world that we've created can't survive.
And the Democrats as a depopulation will get what they want.
They will kill billions of people and not care about it.
Chris.
Well, again, what they've also, what Trump has also done is rendered the Democrats to supporting these evil dictators.
It's almost, it's like Pavlov's dogs.
When Trump says something, the Democrats automatically are programmed to support the opposite.
So now they're supporting not only Somali fraud, transgenders and sports, they're supporting protesters who preach and perform violence.
They train themselves for violence, but they're also supporting China.
They're supporting Maduro.
They're supporting, we already know about Luna, but they're also supporting the Colombian dictator at one point.
This is, it's almost like they're going to self-destruct, but they seem to believe that they still have that Mitt Romney 40% who will, 47%, excuse me, who will always follow them.
Yeah, well, that's not going to happen for very long, but in terms of once we get, if we have an executive order coming down from President Trump that will require proof of citizenship to vote, the Democrats will lose races all over the country.
The Democrats can only win by stealing elections.
I live in New York.
I'm pretty sure that there will be a directive in a lot of these blue states to just not take the voter ID and hope that nobody notices.
Yeah, well, Donald Trump, I think, is building the case and partly capturing Maduro with Venezuela assisting China to intervene in the 2020 election, which the evidence is growing on that.
And the evidence is growing that China did interfere in the 2020 election.
There's massive fraud.
It's getting revealed every day from the White House of, you know, this house where 135 or 235 people are all registered from one house, which they don't live.
And we've got gold today at $4,646 an ounce, silver at $91.93 an ounce.
I'm going to try to work with Swiss America, continue to work with Swiss America and devise some new programs.
But I really encourage people to get a hold of some silver because again, silver is going to appreciate at a faster percentage than gold simply because it's at a lower price.
And silver is going to go to $180 an ounce a lot faster than gold is going to go to something like $10,000 an ounce, which gold eventually will reach.
We're finding that the Western nations are in fact bankrupt and including increasingly the United States is at a point where We cannot sustain the kind of deficits that we've been having.
We just can't continue to sustain them.
There's an article on Zero Hedge this morning that in 2025, Germany saw bankruptcies hit a 20-year high.
Okay, so the latest economic figures from Berlin are dramatic, revealing that 2025 saw more companies file for bankruptcy than at any point in the last two decades, all despite a promised economic turnaround with a Christian democratic government.
Well, of course, they shut down three nuclear power plants.
They opened the borders to Muslim invasion, and now they're worried about whether or not German schools need to teach only in the German language.
Okay, so the German economy is no longer struggling with minor problems.
The German economy is bankrupt.
And the same time, the EU is going to be sending more money to Ukraine, which will just be stolen.
And Zelensky's fraud now is, I think, obvious.
But yet, Zelensky will not hold elections.
And Zelensky continues to manipulate the anti-corruption forces in Ukraine to make sure he and his cronies are not investigated and no one serious runs against him if an election is held.
But again, without the United States' money and support, the Ukraine war is going to collapse.
And Russia continues to up the amount of massive attacks on Kiev, making it clear, you know, there's no way that Ukraine is going to take back the territory that Russia occupies without a nuclear war.
And Trump realizes this.
So that war is going to have to come to an end.
Trump is going to announce, I think, here quickly, what forces are going to govern in Gaza.
Palestinian authority is not going to like it.
And I believe that you'll see the Israeli government poised for another sweep through the Gaza to try to eliminate Hamas.
And this, again, is the major shift.
The Obama policies are failing.
Obamacare has proven to be an economic disaster, much as, again, I said it would be at the time.
It was passed.
And thank you, John Roberts, for bending in and saying that Obamacare was constitutional.
I still continue to wonder what blackmail the Democrats had over John Roberts.
But the point is that Obamacare, I'm even seeing stories about the birth certificate proliferate again.
And on Substack, we're rerunning.
I'm getting ready to write an Obama 2 indicating how many of the problems we've currently got came from Obama being an intelligence agent whose job was to destroy America.
All right, so I think what we're finding here is that we're in a transformative period of time.
I myself am transitioning from the home of which I lived for 35 years and after this disastrous divorce occasioned by my wife's infidelity.
We're now on the process of moving.
And hopefully in February, I'll be much more settled.
But what we're seeing is worldwide, we're seeing the left exposed for its insanity.
We're seeing Donald Trump gaining continued support for the economic improvement we're seeing, which is just beginning.
The fact that Donald Trump will have to get a hold of the budget here.
That's going to be a requirement very soon to deal with economic issues.
But the fact is, we're getting jobs back in America.
And I think the left's behavior in Minneapolis is disgracing the left in a massive way.
So the left is now exposed to not only a communist party, but a treasonous anti-American party willing to engage in insurrection.
The Democrats seem to want nothing more than to cause violence and to have a shooting civil war occur in cities like Minneapolis with the Democrats supporting the Somalian illegals who are engaged in massive fraud, stealing money from the federal treasury.
And these are positions on which no political party can long stand.
This is Dr. Jerome Corsi today.
It's Wednesday.
It's January 14th, 2026.
In the end, God always wins.
God will win here too.
And in the spirit of 2 Chronicles 7, 14, I continue to ask you to join me in getting on our knees and asking God to forgive us for letting the country get into this insanity.
God will hear the prayer and God will heal our land.
And I think we're on the brink of seeing Trump intervention in Iran.
I think we're going to see Trump doing more attacks on rebels or insurgents in Syria, in Somalia, in the Houthi rebels in Yemen.
I think we'll see possible military action against Iran and the tightening of the noose around Cuba and other countries in the Western Hemisphere that are not, that want to embrace communism and want to embrace anti-Americanism.
I think their future is limited, including Panama Canal.
I think that's another issue that's going to be back on the agenda before too long.
Dr. Jerome Corsi, thank you for joining us in CourcyNation.com.