All Episodes
Oct. 20, 2025 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
29:32
The 'No Kings' Protest Fizzles, Trump Denies Zelenskyy and Xi Cleans House

In this hard-hitting episode of Corsi Nation, Dr. Jerome Corsi breaks down three major global stories that reveal the collapse of the globalist playbook — from Washington to Beijing:💰 The “No Kings” Protest Fizzles: The latest so-called “pro-democracy” march — funded by billionaire-backed NGOs — turns out to be another astroturfed color revolution stunt. Dr. Corsi exposes who’s funding these fake movements, why the media is covering for them, and how the American Left keeps repackaging Marxist uprisings as civil rights events.🔗 Read more🚫 Trump Refuses to Arm Ukraine: During an October 17th meeting with Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President Trump declined to provide Tomahawk missiles, signaling a major shift away from endless foreign wars and toward American strategic independence.🔗 Details from The Gateway Pundit🇨🇳 Xi Jinping’s Massive Military Purge: China’s Communist Party expels two top generals in a sweeping anti-corruption campaign that reveals deeper instability inside the People’s Liberation Army. What does this mean for the global balance of power — and America’s future security?🔗 Full report from ReutersDr. Corsi connects these stories into a single truth: the world’s elite power structure is cracking, and the globalist class is losing control — even as they double down on propaganda and chaos.🌐 Visit Corsi Nation: https://corsination.comSupport our partners:• MyVitalC: https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/• Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.php📬 Join Dr. Jerome Corsi on Substack: https://jeromecorsiphd.substack.com/📖 Get your FREE copy of Dr. Corsi’s new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin:How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush — Call 800-519-6268🐦 Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on X: @corsijerome1🔔 Subscribe for real geopolitical truth — not the media’s manufactured version.👍 Like, share, and comment: Did Trump just outsmart the Deep State again?#Trump #JeromeCorsi #CorsiNation #Ukraine #Zelenskyy #XiJinping #China #MilitaryPurge #Globalism #NoKings #DeepState #Geopolitics #NewsAnalysisBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/corsi-nation--5810661/support.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is your own course in today.
It's Monday.
It's October 20th, 2025.
We're going to cover uh several stories today.
Gonna start with the uh no-name uh protests that were going on across the country.
Then I want to do uh a discussion about Russia and Ukraine and what's going on in Trump's now attempt to settle the war, and uh then we're gonna end up with a little bit of discussion about China and whether or not G is losing control over China.
China seems to be in some pretty difficult economic positions.
Uh, let's start right in with the uh no-name protest.
And Chris, I want you to comment on this, but in a minute, so I'm gonna go.
There's a very interesting article in Zero Heads this morning, and uh what they're featuring is that evidently a lot of the uh people who attended these meetings were the geriatrics.
I mean, they were they were the old aging hippies who uh it you know this that this was a supposed to be a big big protest nationwide democratic uh dark money NGO network, which left-wing billionaires uh funded for a color revolution style nationwide mobilization on Saturday.
These are the same tactics US intelligence agencies have used to overthrow regimes with the help of George Soros, but the uh terminated that you know, as it terminated, it was a flop because the turnout wasn't dominated by young unhinged leftists or gender-confused woke warriors,
but by the uh baby boomer liberals, and um it was Mike Benz described it as the coup de flot, the that uh coup de flat, you know, in other words, it was nothing, it was didn't go over.
So, Chris, what do you think?
I mean, I see all the signs and everything, but by the way, yes, the communist party also supported it, but here you've got all the I mean, these are the people who attended it, they're grandmas and grandpa's grand Tifa.
That's kind of funny.
Yeah, I remember back uh in I live in the Hudson Valley.
We had in the 80s, I guess, the anti-Bush old ladies call them calling themselves the raging grannies.
Right.
A lot a lot of these people are ex-hippies who want to go out and try to protest again.
They want they realize they didn't make much of a difference before.
I I don't think they really understand how full-on communist this movement is.
Some of them others just want to go out and do something, they're bored.
They just did you see the last No Kings parade?
There were a bunch of elderly is banging on pots and pens.
It reminds me back in my when I was younger.
Um, my my brother, sister, and I would go to my would go to this place in Maine called Point Cepego.
It was a resort campground, had everything to do.
The T the toddlers, the two to four-year-olds would have uh a weekly pots and pens parade.
They'd walk around with bang spoons on pens and pots and things like that and make noise around the beach.
That's what that reminded me of.
Well, you know, it it's the thing that concerns me is that all this dark money network that funds it, the Arabella Network, Soros Network, the Gates Foundation, Ford Foundation, Tides Foundation, Rocky.
Yes.
And you know, Peter Schweitzer and Seamus Bruner, the government accountability institute called them riot Inc.
You know, the permanent protest industrial complex.
And this is No Kings 2.0.
So these protests are far from organic.
This movement is manufactured, coordinated, and very artificial.
And uh, there's an interesting thing about um say they don't want no kings, they want their kings, which is really the truth.
But um, Schweitzer and Bruner calculated that they traced 294 million dollars to the official No Kings 2.0 partners and organizers, All funneled through the same riot ink dark money networks.
So Arabella gave 79 million, Soros 72 million, Ford 51 million, Tides Foundation, 45 million, Rockefeller, 28 million, Buffett, 16 million.
Well, you know, the left has got all this money.
The right has virtually it's impossible.
I mean my foundation God's five stones.
We're lucky to have you know a few thousand dollars in the that these people are getting millions to protest against Trump and against you know, I guess this is also the late-night television crowd.
Is that right?
Uh the funny thing is you were talking about this off-air.
A lot of the protesters are elderly.
Now I'm I'm pretty much approaching that demographic in a bunch of years anyway.
But the fact is, it's funny.
I I suppose the younger people, some of them got a little bored with the attention.
You might uh there are studies that young males in generation Z are leaning more towards the right.
Young females are out there screaming because that's just what they're gonna do.
Um but it it looks like the aging hippies are out there trying to uh their their last grasp at glory, if you will, or or I'll go with this too.
There's a there were there are several studies of people who have let's just say a certain level of intelligence who cannot separate television and television characters and/or personas with real life.
Donald Trump has always been portrayed as the playboy.
Well, he kind of was in the 80s and the 90s, and and of course, his uh his apprentice is his mean his demeanor as far as firing everybody right and left.
A lot of people kind of associate him with his character and his flamboyance, if you will, rather than the j the actual policy, which they'll find funnily enough that they agreed with maybe 10-20 years ago in a lot of cases.
They just want to be out there.
I suppose it's just something to do.
Others are just others, as we know, are getting paid.
I don't think the raging grannies here aren't.
Well, it's interesting because I think we're going to see uh you know, this exposed more for the money than anything else.
Yes, and uh this is going to be interesting to see how you know the left is putting money into all these anti-Trump anti-America causes, and um, you know, it's really uh it's ridiculous.
And it's Marxist oriented.
There was a Marxist at the No Kings protest who called for um murdering ice agents, one of the protests, and then of course, turns out he was a university staffer, of course.
I mean, you know, the the uh the protesters of progressive labor party calling for ice agents to get shot and wiped out.
Well, Progressive Labor Party is another just name for communism, and in Chicago, they were saying that you know, calling for ice to get shot and wiped out and all these things, getting away with it.
These are these should be crimes, there's should be threats that have to be taken seriously, and they do lead to people acting on them, whether or not they're you know, it's like they call dog whistles.
The message is put out there, and it's kind of gives authority or okay to people who are fringe wacko anyway to go out and do violent things to ice agents.
It's irresponsible to do this.
I mean, whether it's criminal or not, or whether it's free speech, but the point is you can't be encouraging people to take violent action when it's likely that some are gonna listen and do it.
That's irresponsible, maybe criminal.
So, you know, Chris, I it was I think the whole thing was a flop, but again, it indicates that the left is really is out to see and doesn't know what it's doing, supporting causes that nobody else supports in this government shutdown, I think is just backfiring against Schumer and the others who are looking ridiculous that they don't want to they want to fund illegal aliens and all their other crazy programs are holding out to fund a bunch of programs the Americans don't care about.
Uh uh agreed there, and the fact is uh Democrats are trying to show the nation they have numbers.
The numbers were down from expected.
Remember the hype about this being the largest protest in the history of America.
Oh, yes.
This is the 600,000, somewhat plus group, and as we know, mostly the Kimmel and Colbert watchers that that sort of thing, although that's kind of down to 120,000, if I'm correct.
Yeah, but they're I think they're getting fewer than some YouTube channels get.
That's true.
A lot of YouTube channels get a lot of views.
I gotta tell you.
But uh, but you're right about this.
It's it's funny.
Uh these people just I don't know.
I guess some of them are looking for something to do, others uh I maybe want to fit in, do something they perceive as cool, or it's just a blind hatred for Donald Trump, regardless of uh the policies.
And it's a media-induced hatred, by the way, and maybe even peer-induced.
Well, uh let's let's uh shift gears and go to the second topic.
I want to call talk about Russia and Ukraine.
A lot is happening here.
Um Trump appeared to decide in September that he was going to give Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine capable of striking deep into Russia.
Now, those, of course, that would escalate the war.
And yet uh last Friday, October 17th, Trump uh refused at a meeting with Zelensky to provide the Tomahawk missiles.
It was a contentious meeting, and uh Trump insisted that Zelensky must surrender this Donbas region in southern Ukraine, even though Kiev still holds a quarter of the Don-esque province.
Uh it's largely a Russian-speaking province, but it has not yet been taken over by Russia.
If it did, it would provide a clear path into Kiev.
Now, the turnaround the policy seemed to be here a phone call that Putin prompted with Trump the day before, and in that Trump that was evidently a long conversation, and um Putin suggested and Trump agreed to meet in Budapest, Hungary, for another round of talks.
But um, you know, the that Trump backed off from his statements with Zelensky at the General Assembly suggested that you know when he suggested that um Trump would could win the war,
but now Trump is returned to his original, you know, to a more sane position, calling upon Kiev and Moscow to stop the war immediately, suggesting that in a peace deal, Russia would retain the territory its military has gained.
Uh, Trump, when he landed in West Palm Beach after the meeting, um uh said you go by battle line, whatever it is, after the meeting with uh.
Now, I think um Medvedev on October 13th made the statement that um essentially, you know, if you see these tomahawk missiles flying, you don't know whether they're nuclear or conventional, and uh Trump would be starting a nuclear war to get these missiles there.
Also, you know, the idea that it's uh a proxy war anymore.
If we if if we in fact they are missiles and we're firing them through NATO and all the rest of it, it's hard to maintain that this is not a more direct war that we're involved in.
Okay, so what what is the case is that um I think this comes from General Kellogg, who's been warmongering against Putin in Ukraine, and um a conflict between uh Kellogg and Special Envoy Steve Whitkop,
who's met with Putin five times this year, and uh I've I've heard Kellogg in private briefings compare Putin to Hitler arguing that Trump must not repeat the Nebel Chamberlain mistake in 1938 Munich Agreement trying to appease Hitler.
So Kellogg is insisting that we must provide Ukraine with weapons needed to win the war.
And Calog did not attend the White House meeting on October 17th, but White House told the Ukrainian delegation that Zelensky must give uh the entire Don Tesk region back to Russia to stop the fighting.
Now, this whole issue of the Tomahawk missiles goes back to September 29th when Vice President J. D. Vance suggested that we were seriously considering Ukraine's request for these long-range tomahawk missiles.
And that same day, Kellogg gave a uh, I guess a press statement saying that Trump had authorized NATO members to deploy missile systems provided by the United States into non-NATO Ukraine.
Kellogg insisted that Trump had authorized NATO to strike deeply to Russia with Miss supposedly Tomahawks brokered in NATO by the United States.
So Kellogg had to understand that authorizing NATO to strike Moscow with U.S. missiles would instantly transform the Ukraine war from a uh from a proxy war between NATO and Russia.
And um it this is, I think the the key is that um you know the idea that we're just going to be able to provide these missiles and and turn back the tide of the war is ridiculous.
It's just not going to happen.
So you know, we've got to have some sense in here to understand that if we do uh if we do ramp up the violence and escalate the war, we're risking nuclear war again.
And both Russia and China, I think would be willing to go to nuclear war over Ukraine.
I think they both feel like they've got some strategic advantage.
But the coincidence of Vance and Kellogg's statements on September 29th suggests that Kellogg was the author of the suggestion that Trump should supply Zelensky with Tomahawk missiles brokered by the United States to Ukraine through NATO.
Now, Trump's got to realize that the Ukraine problem goes back to Obama and Biden, together with the CIA and Soros were the real aggressors.
And I cite a book in called Provoked How Washington Started the New Cold War and the Catastrophe of Ukraine.
I've got the book here.
It's about 670 some pages long.
It's a really good book.
It's called Provoked.
Right here, this is the book.
And it's by um Scott Horton, H-O-R-T-O-N.
And Scott Horton is um head of the Libertarian Institute, and he and he is the editorial director of anti-war.com.
Now, I thought he it by the way, it's a very, very good book.
Very detailed, very well footnoted, and it goes through the Russian collusion, you know, my role in the Russian collusion, all of the fact that I was did not have a tie to Assange, all the things that went on,
going back through the uh starting out with Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush, all this whole idea that we needed to expand the NATO to the border with Russia, which was the democratic idea.
There's one paragraph I quote in an article I'm going to publish in American thinker.
I want to read it to you because I think it's really a very good summary of a lot of what we're dealing with.
Uh Hinton wrote that the current fear campaign against Russia in the American media is no different from the demonization of any of the U.S. government's enemies here and around the world.
Virtually all virtually the entire popular narrative is fake.
That's the problem.
But the older generation is used to hating Russia, and the young has been so aligned about Russian aggression through eastern Europe for years now.
There's also harm done by the Russia gate hoax that claimed the dastardly Putin inflicted President Trump upon our land, which has seemingly forever damaged the brains of American Democrats and made peaceful coexistence for them unthinkable.
I think the Democrats have hated Russia ever since the fall of the Berlin Wall when Russia was no longer communist.
The Democrats loved Russia when it was communist, going back into 1917.
But once it was no longer communist, the Democrats had no use for it.
So what I'm saying is that I think Trump is finally coming to his senses, and that the reality is that we're not going to get this territory back from Russia unless we have a nuclear war.
So the only solution is really to stop funding Zelensky and NATO if Trump needs to do it that way.
That's the only real solution.
And that will force, in fact, the end of the war.
So I'm writing an article about it.
I'm about almost done with it.
I've got to make some changes in it.
I want to refine it just a little bit more, but it's, I think, an important article examining the predicament that we're in.
And Chris, do you have any comments on this?
I mean, we've been got this war now for years.
It's uh not going to be ended with Russia withdrawing from Ukraine.
And uh, we've got to really uh uh accept our culpability with the Democrats having prompted this through the Maidon rebellion, you know, and all the other things that the uh Democrats did to intensify the violence uh between Russia and Ukraine.
Any thoughts, Chris?
Um again, this this war's been going on yeah, this war's been going on for way too long.
And uh and I understand it has to end, but like we're saying, the media is trying to uh push these this idea that Ukraine, even though because Trump flooded it, that's part of the reason, but that Ukraine can beat Russia.
I I suppose one can say a nation has a puncher's chance against another nation.
Now you're talking about a uh uh uh a country which is trying to work with EU nations to call back its citizens to fight in the war because they're running out of manpower.
We already know they were trying to commission older people, people who really wouldn't be able to fight on a regular basis to whip them up in time to fight against Russia.
Russia has the population.
I think have a uh a president who doesn't really care about the population he has, and they're and it's gonna just uh as you said, it's just gonna keep going until Ukraine gives up those two regions.
And it's and again, this is not a Neville Chamberlain thing, just like you said before.
This is something that that just has to be done.
Russia, and we also have to keep in mind, Russia also wants to reinstate or at least reform the old Soviet Union, mainly in his image.
He wants to be the guy that does that before he passes.
So he's gonna set his sights on another nation or let's say another republic after this.
Is he gonna wait till Trump's gone, or is he gonna do it when Trump's president?
That's a good question.
Well, I think um, you know, this is this is gonna this is coming to, I think, a point where it's gonna be resolved.
And I think that's gonna have to uh hand happen pretty soon.
Um I I'm uh seeing this drama playing out, and I I think it's really coming very, very closely to um to a conclusion.
And I'm hoping that this meeting in Hungary will make some sense and I but I do think Trump's gonna have to say I'm done funding it.
If we're done funding it, the war ends, because NATO doesn't have the resources to fund it.
Europe is already in desperate economic situation, and I don't see the war continuing.
Okay, I want to move on to a couple more stories.
Um, we're following very closely, and I continue to follow price of gold, and today gold is at $4,282.
Now, gold has gone right through the $4,200 barrier.
And uh it I've said it would be at $4,000 by the end of the year.
It looks like it'll be at 4,500 by the end of the year, and silver is at $52 and 28 cents right now.
So if you take a look, and we've revamped the Corsey Nation website a bit to tune it up, take a look at the at the tabs at the top, and Chris will show you.
I think you can see that we've got gold prominently figured there.
Chris is showing you right now our website on the God's Five stones, and we're we are advancing things on the voter uh registration issues.
That's coming to a head as well.
Uh, by the way, as I kind of predict it would happen, the White House looks like it's hired uh this um uh uh Kurt Olsen, former congressman, whose task is going to be to start getting information out uh about uh the voter integrity issue and much more on the uh the fraudulent practices,
including the algorithms which we've shown on God's Five Stones allow the creation of these millions of false voters that yet get legitimate state IDs and can be used in mail and ballot schemes.
Now, the gold and gold and silver, if you go back to that Swiss America website, take advantage of this 250 um coins you can get of these walking liberty half dollars, they're almost pure silver.
And silver is a good buy at this time.
This is a one-time offer for new customers of Swiss America.
And if you just click the if you click the fill out the form here, Swiss America will contact you.
But if you get some of these, you'll have some metal which will appreciate in value.
And silver is more affordable, and a lower price, it'll double in value quicker than gold will.
So it may in some ways be even a better buy.
But the point is that you need to talk to Swiss America and get self-directed IRAs.
If you have IRAs, so you can put some of your IRAs in gold and silver.
You have to do it the right way.
And Swiss America keep your tax exempt status.
America will set up a depository account for you in Delaware where you can hold your gold and silver.
You'll get a Lloyd's of London guarantee that the gold and silver is really there, and it uh your gold and silver will appreciate income tax-free in this setting.
It's a good way to take dollars that could be in the stock market, which are risky, even though the stock market's done well.
It could collapse this fall when Europe is facing a debt crisis, and I believe Europe will also call Swiss America to get a free copy of this book.
The book is how a coming global crash will create an historic gold rush.
I'm gonna give you the 1-800 number here in a minute that you can call to get this book.
It uh Chris will show you, Chris is showing you right now the book.
I've co-authored it with Dean Heskin, the head of Swiss America.
The toll-free number is 1-800-519-6268.
Write it down.
1-800-519-6268.
I'll call them and get your free copy of the book.
Now, one more story I want to cover has to do with this um Xi Jinping, who is the head of China, and um one of the most senior of the nine officers who are acts,
he's axing people in the military, and it you know, this this one particular general was one of the more popular generals, and it indicates this is a purge that Xi Jinping is doing on the military.
The question is he losing control of China's military and of China itself.
So China is an economic uh hardship, an economic difficulty.
And if um uh ping Xi Jinping is this concerned about the internal disruption within the communist party in China, it means his leadership is a question.
And within the communist system, he can be replaced.
Now, China is gonna be, I think, another force that we're gonna see.
We're gonna see a world emerging where the United States, Russia, and China are all gonna vie for power.
And I don't think the United States, especially with our you know, rapidly approaching 40 trillion dollar debt, is gonna be in a position for long to be the world's policeman.
I think we're gonna have to realize that we can't afford to have conflicts, even regional conflicts, because they very easily escalate into nuclear war.
And so, therefore, uh, I'm watching very closely, but I think Trump is right now masterfully in charge.
Uh over the weekend, we had more violence from Hamas, including the killing of a couple of the IDF Israeli defense force military, and Netanyahu launched some strategic strikes, air strikes against Hamas in order to enforce the ceasefire.
And I'm sure that was coordinated with President Trump this time.
So I think the ceasefire will hold, but the point is Hamas yet remains in Gaza.
Until Hamas is removed, you're not going to have stability in Gaza.
Hamas is just going to try to return and eventually go back to the same determination to destroy Israel and we'll do it all over again.
Unless Trump can emerge with his prosperity through peace and get it the Abraham Accords extended.
Abraham Accords will require the Muslim nations to say they will accept Israel as a Jewish state, will work economically to develop Israel.
That's really the only solution I can see.
And this warning is being put out by Gordon Chang, who I deeply respect.
I've no Gordon Chang, but his work on China is outstanding.
Okay, so summing up today, I think we're getting into another another contentious week.
Going to be a very interesting week to see how these develop.com.
In the end, God always wins.
God's going to win here too.
And uh I encourage you in the spirit of 2 Chronicles 7 14 to join me in getting down on our knees and asking God to forgive us for letting this insanity, the woke insanity, dominate our land.
If we do that in sufficient numbers, uh God will hear our prayer and heal our land.
And I think with Donald Trump in the office, a president, we have a great chance of making progress during his remaining time, and hopefully setting the stage for Supreme Court decision, which will not allow districting or voting by race, which would mean that the Democrats will probably lose a third to half the seats they have in Congress.
Thank you for joining us.
We'll be back tomorrow.
Export Selection