March 25, 2025 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
44:16
The JFK Assassination, the Russian Collusion Hoax and the Deep State's Manipulative Agenda
The assassination of John F. Kennedy is a turning point in American history, not only because many Americans were shocked the popular president was murdered, but the government's coverup and narrative surrounding it was when the Deep State officially took over the country. The powerful elite within the government at the time were able to go to great lengths to manipulate evidence, set a narrative, get the media to comply, fix the autopsy and silence anyone questioning the official story. From then on, the Deep State found it could forge a direction toward its overall agenda by continuing this tack.A recent example, as described in his book Coup d'Etat, was the Russian Collusion Hoax and the phony Steel Dossier. While the government tried to force Dr. Corsi, among others, to lie amid the Mueller investigation, it was an orchestrated attempt to spread lies about an anti-establishment presidential candidate (Donald Trump) -- someone they are still trying to destroy. The Left, which have become a large subset of both willing and unwitting Deep State Operatives, wound up believing and spreading the narrative until it was eventually proven to be a hoax.Dr. Corsi looks behind the Deep State's curtain on today's The Truth CentralVisit The Corsi Nation website: https://www.corsination.comIf you like what we are doing, please support our Sponsors:Get RX Meds Now: https://www.getrxmedsnow.comMyVitalC https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.phpGet Dr. Corsi's new book, The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis: Forensic Analysis of the JFK Autopsy X-Rays Proves Two Headshots from the Right Front and One from the Rear, here: https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-President-John-Kennedy-Headshots/dp/B0CXLN1PX1/ref=sr_1_1?crid=20W8UDU55IGJJ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.ymVX8y9V--_ztRoswluApKEN-WlqxoqrowcQP34CE3HdXRudvQJnTLmYKMMfv0gMYwaTTk_Ne3ssid8YroEAFg.e8i1TLonh9QRzDTIJSmDqJHrmMTVKBhCL7iTARroSzQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=jerome+r.+corsi+%2B+jfk&qid=1710126183&sprefix=%2Caps%2C275&sr=8-1Join Dr. Jerome Corsi on Substack: https://jeromecorsiphd.substack.com/Visit The Truth Central website: https://www.thetruthcentral.comGet your FREE copy of Dr. Corsi's new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush by calling: 800-519-6268Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on X: @corsijerome1Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/corsi-nation--5810661/support.
Now today we're going to do a deep dive into this, my book on the Kennedy assassination, and a book I wrote earlier, which is two day top.
Now the final analysis, the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the final analysis is done extremely well, and Archbishop Vigano in Rome has written a new foreword to the book.
It's here, we're going to be posting this foreword.
Up on the Amazon listing, and we'll be doing a new edition of the book, which includes this foreword.
It's extremely well done, but what the Archbishop is saying, essentially, is that this was a coup d'etat, and the book proves it was a coup d'etat, conducted by the CIA, on orders of the CIA.
Kennedy was killed on the orders of the CIA.
He says that basically that this coup d'etat, which is what the assassination of John Kennedy was all about, was the deep state taking over the United States.
And he compares it to the deep church taking over the Catholic Church with Pope John XXIII and the Vatican II, which also occurred in the 1960s.
And so what Archbishop Vigano is understanding, It's that all this confronts us.
He says, the final analysis has the merit of directly confronting the reality of the coup d'etat that was perpetrated by the deep state through the assassination of President Kennedy.
It was considered an obstacle to the achievement of objectives that today we understand were achieved at any case with or without the approval of the sovereign people.
A coup that has led the institutions of the United States of America, not unlike those of other nations and of the Catholic Church herself, to be the unique and totalitarian expression of a subversive power that dangerously combines the individualistic interests of capital with the tyrannical methods of communist collectivism.
This privatization of the state is mirrored in the chronic and irreversible indebtedness of the citizens or called upon to pay the bankruptcy costs The speculation is a very powerful international financial lobby, and it should not escape our notice there is a parallel within the privatization of the Catholic Church,
which has now been taken over by an elite no less subversive than that of the deep state in which positions of power have been infiltrated by heretical and corrupt prelates who use the authority of Christ to guarantee obedience from the faithful.
To me, it is clear to me, and this is the reason why, as Archbishop and former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America, I agreed to write this preface, that this coup necessarily had to avail itself of the ideological support and moral support of the Catholic Church, which otherwise would have represented an obstacle to the fulfillment of the project of the New World Order.
This is why I believe that the events related to Kennedy's assassination should be read as part of one narrative together with those that led the Church of Rome to progressively become the spokesperson for the globalist plan, a plan on which some lobbies were working that today are leading to the dissolution of the social, moral, religious, cultural, and economic fabric of Western countries.
It's a very powerful statement.
And I'm going to illustrate in part...
One other dimension of this, not just the Catholic Church, but that the coup d'etat that occurred when John Kennedy was assassinated by the deep state, the CIA, military-industrial complex, with the complicity of the press, saying Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gun assassin,
all of this together, in the Department of Justice turning a blind eye, the Secret Service destroying evidence, and all of these together indicate a dark force, That has taken over our institutions.
And I'm going to make the point that's continuing.
So I'm going to transition from the final analysis, a book I have just written that is currently a bestseller, to a book I wrote a few years ago called Coup d'Etat, which is exposing deep state treason and the plan to re-elect Donald Trump.
I wrote this book before the 2020 election, and I was...
Aware that the move was going to be underway.
I wrote it in 2020, before the election.
I wrote it starting in 2019, published in 2020.
And the whole idea here is that the coup d'etat is continuing.
And it's now going into the open.
Now, I want to read a couple paragraphs from the introduction here that Doug Horne...
And explain a couple of points he's making in detail.
He says the assassination has been likened.
Doug Horn, by the way, was on the Assassinations Records Review Board.
He became an expert in the medical evidence.
He wrote five volumes on the medical evidence called Inside the ARRB, Inside the Assassinations Records Review Board.
They're outstanding.
Doug Horn said the assassination has been likened to a 500-piece jigsaw puzzle for which 250 pieces have been discarded, thrown away.
The 250 new pieces substituted for the discarded pieces are intentionally fraudulent, designed to create a picture of what happened that is very different from the reality on Elm Street in Dealey Plaza.
The end result has been a puzzle that does not come together at all and will not allow the student of the assassination to create any coherent picture of what happened on November 22, 1963 unless the fraudulent puzzle pieces have first been identified and then thrown out.
I submit that only after the fraudulent pieces of the puzzle are removed can the missing pieces to the puzzle, that is, the real evidence that was suppressed, be rediscovered.
And the pictures, the true picture, reconstructed.
He said, throughout my adult lifetime of research into the JFK assassination, I've come to understand that the fraud and the medical evidence that I'm discussing here includes the following.
And he goes through all of the evidence that leads him to the conclusion that this was a coup d'etat.
I'll read just a little bit of this.
He says, there were four Sets of official conclusions about how JFK was killed, that is, about the wounds on his body, arrived at between November 22, 1963 and December 11, 1963, and all were demonstrably incorrect.
The fact that there are four official sets of conclusions within about two and a half weeks is the surest indicator that finding the truth was not an objective.
They're determining what tale could be sold to the American people.
Consistent with the straight-jacketed, very limited evidence acknowledged by the U.S. government was all that mattered.
The U.S. government has never acknowledged in this case, but the evolving JFK autopsy conclusions can be factually demonstrated and have done so in Chapter 11 of Inside the Assassination Records Review Board in a publicly delivered PowerPoint presentation entitled The Evolving JFK Autopsy Report.
Okay, so what is being laid out here by Doug Horn in the book, prefacing what we wrote here, is that the government has created a false narrative that can sell to the American people.
It's like living in a Jim Carrey Truman show where what you're watching is not reality, but it is a movie.
And it's being directed by the CIA that's supplying the script.
Now, I want to go over to Kunetat, because this is a book that I wrote after I was involved in the Mueller investigation.
And the Mueller investigation thought I had a tie to Julian Assange, and that I had shared that tie with Roger Stone, who shared it with Donald Trump, permitting the Trump campaign to influence how Assange...
Okay, now, the book is really, I think, even more important than when it was first written, because what it shows is that Donald Trump's removal from office was a coup d'etat again.
They didn't shoot him.
They didn't kill him.
But they had staged this entire coup d'etat of the Mueller investigation.
And I was the last witness.
I was the last witness because they believed I had this tie to Assange.
In August of 2016, I had taken a trip to Italy with my then-wife and family to celebrate our 25th wedding anniversary.
By the way, she recently divorced me after 32 years of marriage.
She couldn't take the politics and the strain of the politics any longer.
At least, I believe...
I would have had to have retired had we been married, and I was faithful to her.
I believe God just took her out of my life, and I got back to work.
That's why I wrote this book on the Kennedy assassination, which I probably never would have written had I been married to her again, or still.
I'm not, in the process of being not.
So, in the 2009 bestseller, Silent No More, I wrote how I became a political prisoner of this Mueller witch hunt.
And I spent the time with the prosecutors in Washington, up to 40 hours, in a room that was unmarked.
The FBI would pick you up in an unmarked vehicle, and the beginning of the day at our hotel, me and my attorney, they would drive us to an unmarked building, which is an FBI building in Washington, D.C. We would begin to be interviewed.
The interview would go on probably all day long.
The FBI, when they didn't like what you were saying, would all get up and everybody would leave the room and my attorney would go talk to them.
It was me against four prosecutors and seven or eight FBI all sitting there across the table from us in a grilling.
I did not have a source with Assange.
And the information that I derived, I was almost precisely correct.
Mueller, you know, Assange had Podesta's emails.
That was the second batch he was going to drop.
That was right.
They were Podesta's emails, and I could predict what was in them.
I could say that the emails contained that Hillary was suffering neurological problems, which made her subject to blackouts, and she was really having severe difficulty functioning, that she was a lousy candidate.
It was not charismatic.
And together with the Perkins Coie firm and the campaign attorneys were mishandling campaign funds and violating campaign finance laws.
All of this came out in the emails, plus much additional.
The FBI was convinced I could not have known this unless I had a source.
They finally said they were going to...
See, I was lying to them.
If I had a source, I wouldn't reveal it.
I had to either take a plea deal and go for a little while to prison saying I had lied or they put me in front of a jury in Washington, D.C. that would convict me of whatever they charged me with and I would spend the rest of my life in prison.
I told the Mueller investigation that they'd have to prepare to put me in prison because I would not.
I could not stand before judging God and swear to a lie to keep myself out of prison.
So, after I refused to take the plea deal, on March 22, 2019, Attorney General William Barr notified the Congress that Special Counsel Robert Mueller had submitted the final report of his investigation.
Two days later, on March 24, in a four-page letter addressed to Congress, Barr summarized the conclusions.
He said, number one, the special counsel's investigation do not find the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 election.
That's after four years of Russian collusion and FBI investigations and creating false narratives to sell to the American people, exactly as was done in the Kennedy assassination.
The second conclusion was the special counsel did not draw a conclusion one way or another as to whether examine constituted obstruction of the investigation.
But the key was there was no Russian collusion, despite the fact that Trump's treat was no collusion, no obstruction, complete and total exoneration, keep America great.
And Barr's letter set off of Firestorm, CNN and MSNBC began a daily drumbeat, hyping every tidbit of new information, continuing to suggest that Trump had colluded with Russia.
I was on the media at that time.
I was examined and grilled by NBC, ABC, CBS, PBS, you name it.
Everybody wanted to interview me.
I consistently said that I did not have a source, which was true.
I did not have a source.
And I continually tried to expose how it was the government that was lying.
Now, I want to give you a couple pieces of information that I think are critical to see how these tie together.
Because you have a deep state covert act creating the Steele dossier in order to Create evidence, supposed evidence, of Trump colluding with Russia.
Now, this dossier itself has been completely discredited.
And if I point to a couple of points on this, one is number one, page 29, I point out Christopher Steele, who is the author of the report, had covert ties to the U.S. agencies.
So on page 29, I'm saying, to understand the role that Christopher Steele played in the attempted coup d'etat, it is important to note a few key points about his background.
Steele, a 26-year-old married man, landed in Moscow in 1990 to work as an M-16 British intelligence spy operating under this thin diplomatic cover.
Russian intelligence KGB unit evidently was on to Steele as a British spy from the beginning.
Despite this, Steele had remarkable longevity in Moscow.
He managed to stay in Moscow throughout the days of General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev's attempted perestroika and glosnost reforms, coming to terms with the West.
The Soviet coup d'etat against Gorbachev failed in August 1991, and he was there through the fall of the Berlin Wall.
In November 1991, and through the beginning of Boris Yeltsin's first term as president of the newly founded Russian Federation.
So back in London in 1993, Steele advanced within M16 to the point where he held a position on M16's Russian desk.
Okay, so Steele is an operative.
He's a spy.
And he eventually becomes very involved with U.S. connections.
Hillary Clinton, so basically, after suffering a personal tragedy of his first wife's death in 2019 from cirrhosis of the liver, Steele, then 43 years old, left M16 to establish Orbis Business Intelligence LTD in London.
So around this time, another guy named Simpson was leaving a Wall Street firm, and as Steele was leaving M16, the two met in London, and they formed...
So she hired...
this former spy, Steele, to use his contacts in Russia to conduct opposition research on Donald Trump, her political opponent in 2016.
she hired...
There's Fusion GPS and Orbis.
Orbis became a subcontractor of Fusion GPS, and the two worked together to produce evidence of Donald Trump's collusion with Russia.
Okay, now, Steele is also back-channeling into the Department of Justice.
On 2019, Steele admitted under a deposition taken in London that in developing the Trump dossier, he used unverified reports he pulled from CNN's iReport website, unaware the submissions on that website were made by members of the public and not checked for accuracy.
Okay, so Steele leaks the dossier, and essentially the...
A London deposition Steele admitted that when the Trump dossier was finished, he provided a copy to journalists in order to make it public.
So the information in Trump's candidacy, which was harmful in that dossier, would get repeated by the press.
A Steele leak to Michael Isikoff, the chief investigator for Yahoo News, was particularly damaging.
On September 23rd, 2016, Isikoff published an article entitled U.S.
Intel Officials Probe Ties Between Trump and Kremlin.
Isikoff's article reported that U.S.
intelligence officials were seeking to determine if Carter...
page, an American businessman identified by Trump as one of his foreign policy advisors had opened up private communications with senior Russian officials about the possibility of lifting economic sanctions if the economic, if the Republican nominee became president.
Okay. So now, What you've got is a former spy with ties to M16, forming his own private intelligence agency, hired by the Clintons to develop information that's hostile or detrimental to Donald Trump.
He does so.
He uses unverified sources, which he admits, and he leaks the document to Michael Isikoff, who is an extreme leftist.
Michael Isikoff interviewed me a couple times.
Steele also leaked the dossier to John McCain, Senator John McCain, who was happy to seize upon it.
And McCain had his staff pour over this dossier.
And now he's got the dossier in the hands not only of the press, but in the hands of McCain, who is not a Trump supporter.
And the dossier has no basis in verified facts.
It has things about the famous...
You know, peeing incident where Trump was supposedly hired prostitutes in Moscow and they did a pee ceremony on him naked, etc., etc.
Okay, now, fundamental understanding how the FBI dealt with this case is to understand that the FBI had counterintelligence powers.
Now, the FBI was supposed to, the CIA is supposed to not operate in domestic politics.
And the FBI is not supposed to operate in international spying activities.
But because various laws criminalized the activities of, you know, commit crimes, U.S. crimes, in espionage activities, the FBI developed Counterintelligence Division as opposed to the Criminal Division.
And the CIA, under the FISA law, was able to get FISA court approval to do NSA spying on Americans who they believed were involved in international espionage.
So both powers now are crossing over into the other's field, which means that internationally, the CIA are working with the FBI against American citizens.
These are enormous powers.
And if the law enforcement is politically corrupted, then it's going to be used to politicize justice.
And that's what happened in this case.
And how it became a coup d'etat was the CIA, at the highest levels, together with the FBI at the highest levels, decided that they were going to make sure that Trump...
Did not become president in 2016.
That failed.
Then they wanted to make sure that they could oust Trump.
They were seeking to impeach Trump if they could find the key in Russian collusion.
And why I'm pivotal to both of these is I'm co-authored with Dr. Mantic the book on JFK, which shows how the government operated there to create a lying narrative to cover a coup d'etat.
And here I'm doing the same with Donald Trump, showing how the lying CIA, together with the lying FBI and Department of Justice, created a false narrative to defeat Donald Trump, to impeach him, to remove him from office, and to make sure he would never run again for president.
Now, the key element of entering the Steele dossier, Into the FBI, which triggered the opening of this international operation of counterintelligence,
was that Christopher Steele, who wrote the dossier, and Gunn Simpson, who assisted him, they both had ties to the Clinton campaign and to journalists known to be Clinton partisans.
And so their goal was to get before the American public the narrative that Trump had been working with Russia to steal the 2016 election from Clinton.
And given their blind determination that Clinton was the heir apparent to the 2016 presidency, those working on the Clinton campaign had confidence the public would accept the narrative the mainstream media fed them, whether it was true or not.
So Bruce Orr, senior officer within Obama's Department of Justice, admitted that he and Steele first met in 2007, while Steele was still with British intelligence MI6.
Orr had traveled to London to speak with the British government officials about Russian organized crime, and the U.S. office in London set up the meeting.
Saw Steele in 2008 at an international conference in London on the subject of Russian organized crime.
They stayed in touch.
Bruce Ohr and his wife Nellie played a major role in the Department of Justice's clandestine involvement in the Steele dossier.
So until Ohr's multiple secret meetings with Steele in 2016 became public knowledge in 2017, Orr did his best to remain silent about the role he played in promoting the Steele dossier to the FBI and the Department of Justice.
We now know that Orr parlayed his experience within the Department of Justice to get this document before the top management of the Department of Justice.
You have also Victoria Nuland involved in this.
Victoria Nuland is a State Department official who's been determined to push NATO to the edge of Russia, getting Finland, Sweden, and Ukraine to join into NATO.
She's been particularly active in Ukraine.
Victoria Nuland was the Assistant Secretary of State in 2016 for Eurasian Affairs.
She became a Clinton loyalist.
She served as the principal foreign policy advisor to President Dick Cheney.
You know, and again, she was an operative for the State Department.
The State Department has been advancing goals, the State Department's goals, not necessarily the goals of the president.
Now, Newland's married to Robert Kagan.
A foreign policy expert who is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institute and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
So they're globalists.
Okay, Kagan disassociated himself with the GOP and became a Clinton supporter in 2016.
A reaction to the political rise of Donald Trump, we characterize as a Frankensteinian monster and compared to Napoleon for his embrace of nationalism.
Kagan supported...
Hillary Clinton's for president in 2016.
He celebrated his change of allegiance in an opinion piece he wrote in the Washington Post in which he characterized Donald Trump as a fascist.
Okay, so what happens is Steele cozies up to Orr.
Orr's wife happens to be an expert on Russia.
They plant this dossier with Orr, and Orr brings it in to the top echelon of the Department of Justice, and they say, here's evidence that, in fact, we've got Donald Trump colluding with Russia.
And here's, in fact, how Donald Trump was co-opted by Russia, and he's now doing Russia's bidding.
things.
The counterintelligence operation that was set up by the Department of Justice moved various Department of Justice officials and FBI officials to start operating in Europe.
To get Hillary Clinton's goals advanced of establishing a tie together that would defeat Donald Trump.
A tie between Russia and Trump of collusion, which was the heart of this lying Steele dossier.
Okay, now I want to cover one or two more points on this, and then I want to...
I'll kind of come to the conclusion here.
But as this detailed process worked through, there are two major parts of the setup.
One is that when the emails are stolen from the Democratic National Committee in 2016, the Democrats organize a Cybersecurity firm that was controlled by the Democrats to produce a report that said that there are signs that Russia stole the emails.
And this was done through a certain identification of a metacode in the emails that were stolen.
And it was all a lie.
There was an article published as well in In the nation of all places, and I met some people involved in that article that demonstrated that in the time sequences with which the emails were stolen, they could not have been a hack.
It had to have been an inside job.
But yet the intelligence agency chiefs all came out with a report that said Russia stole the emails.
So when I was before the...
Mueller team, and I said, wait a minute, I've gotten a lot of information about how the Democrats put their computer system together.
I had a source that was an inside source, which I revealed to the FBI, and said that the email servers were not on a campaign server.
They were on an internal server that the DNC used for conducting email traffic.
And that Podesta had been extremely sloppy with his He actually left them on the desk of his secretary and opened to be seen so she could open his emails and read them.
That intelligence report became key to establishing the Russian collusion.
And it was Brennan and the head of the NSA, all these top intelligence heads, said that Russia stole the emails.
Trump had somehow or other arranged to work with Assange to get the emails and to use them against Donald Trump.
Now, the FBI, in trying to make this case, used foreign operatives, people like Stephan Helper, who were running international institutes in London or in Rome, and they went after Carter Page and they went after Papadopoulos,
who were two minor Trump campaign officials who played minor roles and were unsophisticated in international politics and they were set up in these conversations by these operatives in Europe working with the CIA to suggest that Trump had and knew about the emails well before they were released.
The FBI, having spent time with them, these 40 hours in these intense grillings, there were certain assumptions they made that you couldn't challenge.
You couldn't challenge that the Russians did not steal the emails.
It was an inside job from within the Democratic National Committee.
You couldn't challenge that, in fact, that Assange was given the emails and Assange had published the emails.
But Assange had not coordinated with Donald Trump to release the emails in a manner to hurt Hillary Clinton.
Now, Assange himself denied involvement of the Russians in stealing the emails.
In fact, he strongly suggested that it was Democratic operative Seth Rich who stole the emails and got them to...
The Russians.
It got them to Assange, not the Russians.
So on a Dutch television, August 9th, 2016, Assange was asked, the stuff that you're sitting on is an October surprise in there, and Assange said, WikiLeaks never sits on material.
Okay, he said essentially that whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get as material and often take very significant risks.
There's a 20...
Seven-year-old who works for the DNC that was shot in the back and murdered just a few weeks ago and for unknown reasons as he was walking down the streets in Washington.
Okay, so the interviewer said, you know, was the robbery, was the basis of Rich Murders robbery?
And Hassan said, no, there's no findings.
And the interviewer said, what are you suggesting?
He said, I'm suggesting that our sources take risks.
They become concerned to see things.
Occurring like that.
So, in other words, Assange was suggesting he got the emails from Seth Rich.
Now, to tie this all together, what makes it clear is that the FBI and the CIA are no longer respecting their original charters.
They're free to go anywhere in the world they want, or the CIA is free to spy on Americans.
Certainly, they collect all the data.
So we don't look at the data unless it's relevant to one of our FISA warrants.
Well, why are they collecting the data in the first place?
Why do they have the data of every keystroke taken in the United States, every telephone call made in the United States?
Massive data banks.
Snowden has warned us of this.
Why is this data being collected?
And secondly, this creation of narratives, this creation of false realities and lying.
You know, the crowdsource was a legitimate cybersecurity firm, not with ties to the Democrats.
Well, it had ties to the Democrats.
Okay, that the Russians hacked the emails.
Well, there's no definitive proof Russia hacked the emails.
In fact, it was very strongly suggested that it was Seth Rich.
But this story was sold to the American people, and even today in Congress, there are congressmen who will make speeches suggesting that Trump is in collusion with the...
With the Russians.
Now, what is shocking about this book, and I tie the coup d'etat to a small group around Obama, Valerie Jarrett and others, who were influencing Obama and carrying out his axe,
and the entire, I believe, Russian collusion investigation, which was concocted by Hillary Clinton, To cover up her private email server that she had while she was Secretary of State and was actually conducting Clinton Foundation business through her private email server to get people to contribute to the Clinton Foundation because she was Secretary of State in order to buy policy favors.
This corruption is massive.
And if Obama is still in Washington, and we've got Joe Biden as president, who is, according to the special prosecutor, so mentally suffering from mental dementia that he can't be indicted for misusing classified documents, the deep state has exactly what they want.
A president who's a complete figurehead, in fact, whose mental dementia may not even permit him to know day-to-day what he's doing.
We'll read any document put in front of him.
And if we have a government that is not being run by we the people, but is being run by deep state operatives who are hostile to America, and I've argued this about Obama in my book The Obamination in 2008, that Obama was raised in Islam, that Obama believes the United States is a racist country, and his fundamental transformation of America was to make us into a neo-Marxist state and advance this woke agenda.
Which Obama started by picking up on any incident in which a police were interacting with a black male, and it was to black male's detriment, perhaps got killed.
And then the Department of Justice, Eric Holder, would rush in and demonize the police.
Again, a careful planned attack on...
On the United States by not only a deep state, but a counter-state.
And I point out in my book on the truth about neo-Marxism, cultural Maoism, and anarchy that the left and Mao created a counter-state in order to be in control of the bureaucracy and take actions that will defeat Donald Trump and get him out of the presidency and block his ability to do effective executive action of any kind.
And so I think one of the strategies...
Of the deep state, if Trump should happen to win in the 2024 election, will be again to block him.
Right now they're passing a huge number of regulations to get them on the books before Donald Trump takes office, should he happen to take office.
And they intend to resist him through the bureaucratic agencies of the deep state with enormous powers in the CIA and the FBI.
To create narratives that are lying narratives, to have them propagated by the mainstream media press, to have people believe them unconsciously through psychological operations, and to manipulate us into the loss of our freedoms.
It's an agenda that's advancing.
I'm hopeful today because I think people can see, especially now realizing the Kennedy assassination, there were multiple shooters.
Kennedy, the x-rays are CSI forensic evidence.
We now know the Russian collusion hoax was a lie.
We can begin to ask additional questions.
At 9-11, why did buildings that were not hit by the airplanes go down?
Where were the weapons of mass destruction in the Iraq War in 1991 that Colin Powell promised we would find that Saddam Hussein had?
He didn't appear to have them.
Lies, lies, lies.
Now we're going to be faced with a...
Great test here in the next few years as to whether or not we can retain our freedoms.
And probably the way to bet is not, that we'll probably lose them.
But I believe that in the spirit of, we're going to get a judgment of God, in the spirit of 2 Chronicles 7.14, if we get down on our knees and pray, God will hear our prayer and heal our land.
And it's going to take an intervention by God at this point.
Not to have a nuclear war.
With these demons creating war in the Middle East on their narratives there, their narratives in Ukraine, us supporting Hamas with the Clinton administration starting out, moving in that direction, Obama is much stronger in support of Iran and Biden doing everything they can to appease Iran, returning money to them, giving them the means to fund terrorism.
And we're getting false narratives created again today.
The narratives of the crimes that Trump is being charged with.
We're seeing lawfare in the open.
We're seeing these trials against Trump based upon habitual liars like Michael Cohen.
The American public are beginning to see through this.
And as the economy continues to falter, as we continue to have the destruction of the middle class and the destruction of the dollar, I think these demons, and I believe satanic demons, who are intending to Destroy the United States and are taking active steps to destroy the United States.
This is not accidental.
They're conducting a plan that's continuing in the coup d'etat that began with Jack Kennedy's death, perhaps even earlier.
I'm going to look at Pearl Harbor eventually, if I can write a book on that, showing how FDR baited the Japanese into attacking us to get into World War II.
A little long story.
But the bottom line here is that it's a spiritual war.
And that's why I'm so pleased to have Archbishop Begano's support.
This is a moral battle.
And it's one that we will lose our souls if we lose the battle.
So I want to end in this spirit of 2 Chronicles 7.14.
If we get on our knees and repent, God will hear our prayer and heal our land.
I was able to not get indicted under the Mueller investigation and know in detail How that narrative was constructed, which I'm telling you and explaining to you in coup d'etat.
Once we see how the government operates, lying, creating the psychological operations, the government's not going to be as effective as it was because their game is now in the open.
The curtain has been pulled and we see the wizard standing there.
I encourage people to read these books, to think about these issues, and not to be fooled by narratives, by hip-hop, tick-tock.
Or other lying narratives that you hear daily in the White House press room.
I was denied press credentials, even under Trump.
The press does not want the truth.
And my books are all about the truth about energy, global warming, and climate change, the truth about neo-Marxism, cultural Maoism, and anarchy.
The truth is critical to setting us free.
In the end, God wins.
God is going to win here.
God did not create the human race to...
Be a failure.
And we could go through an extremely harsh judgment of God, which I see could include a nuclear war.
And I hope and pray I'm wrong.
If enough of us repent, I think God will intervene and we will be spared the worst that could possibly happen.
I don't think this is the extinction of the human race, although I think the demons who are behind this woke agenda or behind the creation of this world economic I don't believe that dark reality will be fully created before it collapses under its own inconsistencies,
its own lack of belief in God, and its own intention to depopulate the world.
