Nov. 8, 2024 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
17:29
Continuing Research on Suspicious Algorithms in Some States' Voter Roll Databases Post-Election Day
Election Day is over, but the work to research and expose suspicious voter roll algorithms in several states’ voter roll databases needs to continue. That’s what Dr. Corsi, Andrew Paquette and the team at GodsFiveStones.com is working on today and into the future. On this edition of the show, we are broadcasting a recent interview he did focusing on what these algorithms can do and updates on the investigation. –as part of the “The Real Steal” series on The Truth Central. You can find out more about this effort and how to donate to help Dr. Corsi, Andrew Paquette, Dr. Karlene Graves and the team expose this threat and stop “The Real Steal” through the website: https://GODSFIVESTONES.COM If you like what we are doing, please support our Sponsors:Get RX Meds Now: https://www.getrxmedsnow.comMyVitalC https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.phpGet Dr. Corsi's new book, The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis: Forensic Analysis of the JFK Autopsy X-Rays Proves Two Headshots from the Right Front and One from the Rear, here: https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-President-John-Kennedy-Headshots/dp/B0CXLN1PX1/ref=sr_1_1?crid=20W8UDU55IGJJ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.ymVX8y9V--_ztRoswluApKEN-WlqxoqrowcQP34CE3HdXRudvQJnTLmYKMMfv0gMYwaTTk_Ne3ssid8YroEAFg.e8i1TLonh9QRzDTIJSmDqJHrmMTVKBhCL7iTARroSzQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=jerome+r.+corsi+%2B+jfk&qid=1710126183&sprefix=%2Caps%2C275&sr=8-1Join Dr. Jerome Corsi on Substack: https://jeromecorsiphd.substack.com/Visit The Truth Central website: https://www.thetruthcentral.comGet your FREE copy of Dr. Corsi's new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush by calling: 800-519-6268Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on X: @corsijerome1Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-truth-central-with-dr-jerome-corsi--5810661/support.
Jensidie presenterer en vanlekasje på jobben i 1988.
Vi må ha et aller arkivskap på dokumentene.
Kom igjen!
Å, det var tungt!
Og en vanlekasje på jobben i dag.
Nå må vi ta opp serveren og harddisker.
Kom igjen da!
Med forsikring fra Jensidie er bedriften din i trygge hender.
Vi har alltid vært der ved små og store UL, og det skal vi fortsette med.
Tiden går.
Jensidie består.
Nå er det lynkupp hos Kopriks, og på fredag får du nidar smågodt til kun 10 kroner per hekto.
Kun på fredag hos Kopriks.
For it.
It's fast and easy.
Jerome Corsi's producer here once again.
Welcome to the Truth Central.
Yes, Election Day is over, but the work to research and expose suspicious algorithms in several states' voter roll databases needs to continue.
That's what Dr.
Corsi, Andrew Paquette, and the team at Gods5Stones.com is working on today and into the future.
On this edition of the show, we broadcast a A recent interview on The Absolute Truth Show, focusing on what these algorithms can do and updates on the investigation as part of the Real Steel series here on the Truth Central.
You can find out more about this effort and how to donate to help Dr.
Corsi, Andrew Paquette, Dr.
Graves, and the team expose this threat and stop the Real Steel through the website gods5stones.com.
That's gods5stones.com.
Now, here is Dr.
Corsi's conversation on the absolute truth.
On Friday, Jocelyn Benson said that 35% of all active registered voters have already cast their ballots in the presidential election, either via absentee ballot, saying that that totaled over 1.8 million.
But a source analyzing the data in Michigan told the absolute truth that there are more like 2.3 million votes showing up in the system and suggested that Michigan is creating a quote-unquote slush fund of votes.
Here to further discuss the phenomenon of so-called ghost votes is Jerome Corsi, Dr.
Jerome Corsi.
You've been selling the alarm on this issue for a long time.
You've been trying to get people to pay attention for months heading into this election, Dr.
Corsi.
So thank you for joining us today, the day before official election day.
Well, my pleasure.
I mean, at God's Five Stones, which is our website, and thank you for posting it up on the screen, no apostrophe in the gods, and five you have to spell out, and F-I-V-E, and stones is plural, godfivestones.com.
We're showing these algorithms, these codes that are written into the state database.
And what these codes do is they allow for the creation of false voters who are clones or duplicate voters.
There may be purge voters that are restored to the list.
They may be inactive voters that should have been removed.
They might be ghost voters who were simply made up.
And I'm going to show you some results we've got from Georgia in particular.
But the point is what the nature of the scheme is to It's kind of like a card marking scheme.
So the voters are given state ID numbers not by the date they registered, but by a mathematical formula that's determined by the state.
And so therefore, I mean, you know your first child is this one, your third child is that one.
Well, the state says your first child is number one, your second child is number 12, your third child is number 23.
They just add 11 other records between your children.
And they say, well, those records came from somewhere else in the database.
There's somebody else's children.
And by the way, we made up number three and number seven.
They still look like legitimate children.
I mean, they got names and date of birth and where they live.
But you can't, you know, if you're trying to mark cards, you can't just take them out of the Box from the manufacturer, because they're ordered from high suit, high card to low suit, low card.
And so therefore your mark cards, if you just insert them into the deck, are obvious.
They're the ones that are out of order.
So first you've got to scramble, you've got to shuffle the deck.
And then they can start inserting these false records, the false children, as it were, the marked cards, and they begin to use them when they want to cheat.
Now, one of the advantages we've got for today's discussion is that a group called the Georgia Nerds, and then on X there, the G-A-N-E-R-D-S underscore real,
R-E-A-L, the G-A-Nerds real, took the algorithms and they found a series of the kinds of anomalies that occur And I want to detail them, but first I want to make sure you understand that we found these algorithms in four of the border, you know, the battleground states.
Arizona, we found them in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and we're, you know, we're now reporting that we've got them in Georgia.
And so therefore, This is a problem across the board that these are actually codes that are put into the computer system of the State Board of Election that allow people remotely or within the Board of Election, but a very small group can do this, can create false voters and use them at will.
So first of all, I want to make sure that's clear because it's a complicated idea and there's a lot on God's five stones that you can see the algorithms and the mathematical numbers.
But even if people don't understand the mathematical numbers, I think you have to understand that there is a scheme that we've found that is provable by the ordering of the different records and we can show you what happened.
So I'm going to give you one example and I'm going to stop for some more questions.
So, for instance, with these cloned records, they're different from the original record in that they're a double.
And that sometimes the clones come from deceased voters, voters who have moved from the state, inactive voters, even felons.
And the state ID numbers of the illegally cloned records are typically then removed For the Georgia State Board of Election voter registration database once the fraudulent voter has been counted.
Okay, so now the Georgia nerds found over 3,000 absentee ballots and those 3,000 voters were not in the voter registration database.
They found them by looking at who voted in the absentee ballot They went to the voter history of those people, and the voter history shows that they voted either in person or with a mail-in ballot, although it doesn't appear that they showed up in person.
They may not have actually been mail-to-mail-in ballot, and they are not in the voter registration database.
So they were removed as soon as they were voted.
Well, voting without being registered is a prima facie evidence of fraud And the Georgian nerds found this only by comparing the 3,000 absentee votes, which they knew from the absentee ballot list.
3,000 of these people did vote, and these 3,000 were not in the State Board of Election Voter Registration Database.
They'd been removed.
That's clear indication of fraudulent voting.
Do you follow that, Emerald?
I mean, that's findings.
I do.
I want to ask you because this reminds me of a conversation that I had over the weekend.
I talked to another Pretty prominent person in Michigan who outlined an issue they'd found, and I alluded to it at the top of the segment in my open, where the Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson is reporting, as I showed in her tweet over the weekend, this was actually from Friday, so that number would have changed by today, right?
But on Friday, she was reporting 1.8 million votes cast thus far.
Well, the person I was speaking to who was getting daily reports said they've actually found that there's more like 2.3 million, so in excess of 500,000 votes cast, though some of these votes are assigned to one voter ID, right?
Multiple votes assigned to one voter ID, but the person suggested that later on, if they needed it, they likened it to a slush fund being created.
In Michigan, so that on Election Day, once they potentially fall short, you would then assign these votes to a voter who's on the roll who has not voted.
Is that comparable to what you're talking about here, Dr.
Scorsi?
Is that what this person is suggesting as well?
It's that kind of thing that could be found, yes.
In other words, you have to do some digging to find it.
In other words, you're going to find something created that's a false vote.
That's number one.
And then that's going to get assigned, eventually, a legitimate state ID number so it looks like a real vote.
And then that real vote is, that real state ID is used, but since the voter doesn't exist, then after it's used, they remove it from the database.
You can't find that voter registered in the voter database.
Although the voter showed up as having voted in the absentee early voting.
So your number 1111 or 1117 voted in the early voting.
So they submitted an absentee ballot.
But you look up 11117, the voter registration, and that voter is not registered.
Well, that means that that ballot was at one point voted, so it had to have at one point been registered, and then the number was removed because the voter was removed as soon as the fake voter had been counted.
So, for instance, in Georgia, the Georgia nerds found 50,000 of voters who had been in the purged voter file were restored into the Georgia database as active voters.
Okay, now that just can't be, because according to Georgia law, a voter who has failed to vote, with whom there's been no contact in five years, is placed on the inactive list, And then a voter is removed from the inactive list if there's no contact in the subsequent two November general elections.
Okay, now that's the case.
The voter should have been completely removed, erased.
How did they get restored back in?
So it's like they're maintaining two databases, one legal and one illegal.
And they're looking to do double voter registration of these people.
So for instance, one case was someone who had moved to South Carolina, but they had a record that was still in the voter registration in Georgia.
So they cloned that voter, created a duplicate, took the original record out and voted the clone.
Then they restored the original record and voted it and removed the clone.
So they voted it twice.
Okay.
And, but yet the clone had a different voter ID number than the original.
So it looked like two votes, even though it was the same person.
And that person lived in South Carolina.
Shouldn't have been voting at all.
So, who's responsible for this?
Because this is very complex.
It seems like a lot of work to go to all this effort to create these kind of ghost voters, to move them from an active part of the role, to make sure they're so active, and to actually affect an election.
I mean, we're talking about, it's not to the tune of one or two voter registrations, right?
We're talking about millions.
So, who's responsible for doing this?
Is it...
A foreign actor?
Is it an NGO? Is it something a little more organized even?
Well, the basic answer is we don't know.
Because we don't know who put these algorithms in the databases.
We know that we're finding them in about 10 states so far.
If we get more funding, I think we'll find them in all the states or virtually all the states.
This could be an intelligence operation, intelligence agency operation.
Maybe the CIA has decided they're going to start running our elections here.
It could be a very well-funded NGO. Whoever's doing it gets access to the State Board of Election computer.
And that also might not be known to the State Board of Election.
But what I'm saying here is that what we're finding in Georgia, there is so much of this illegal voting, which we can detect, Through these different techniques of looking for clones, of looking for voters that are restored from purge lists, we can find how the algorithms were used.
But again, this is such a complex scheme, whoever did it had to have been very well funded.
And the schemes in every one of the states have the same basic characteristics.
You have to find the ability to shuffle the deck, So they do not use the date of registration to determine your number.
You know, if you register years ago, you should have a low number.
If you register today, the number should be higher.
That's not the case.
They just, all the voters are just scrambled together, which means you can create false records that when you look at it, it's like a marked card.
Since all the cards in a shuffle deck are random, well, one marked card is just going to look like another random card.
So that's a very clever way to hide these votes.
But if you know where they are, and you can call them as the criminal and vote them, and then you can keep track of them through the algorithms and remove them once they're voted so they disappear.
The vote counts, because that absentee ballot is still there.
But when you do the forensics on that voter, you find the voter doesn't exist.
Or the voter exists 20 times in the database.
Or the voter is somebody who moved.
Final question, and we have like a minute left.
How much do you think this algorithm or this phenomenon is going to come into play in this election cycle?
Official election day is tomorrow.
We've been voting for weeks, right, in most states.
How influential will what you're discussing be in the results of this 2024 presidential election?
Well, I think it's going to play a role in several of the contests before certification.
It may even play a role in some of the lawsuits.
I think voters, you know, if you're playing in a casino, as Mark Cards, that casino can't prove you lost a single hand.
If you lose an election in a state that has an algorithm, the state can't prove that the algorithm didn't defeat you, not the voters.
So you've got a claim.
And I think finding this is exposing one of the greatest election scams ever.
It's almost preposterous that someone would put all these algorithms in these databases and they'd all look the same, they'd all work the same, they all have the same criminal purposes.
So I think now that it's known, the remedy is just to have such a huge turnout That they're gonna have to steal so many votes that they can't get away with it.
And now that people know the signs of this, I don't think it'll be as easy to stop voting and come in with trucks full of ballots for Kamala and get away with it.
Well, we're a mere matter of hours from finding out, Dr. Corsi, if enough turnout will overcome such a phenomenon or if they will indeed try to find enough ballots in the wee hours and the days.
Let's be honest, many states are warning about days before they actually finish counting.
And that's what we're about to get more into after this segment.
If you want to learn more about what Dr.
Corsi is talking about, you can go to his website, gods5stones.com, gods5stones.com.
Thanks so much for joining us, Dr.
Corsi.
We'll talk to you after we start getting some results.
Again, it's going to be days from what we're hearing, right?
So we'll catch back up with you in the next few days to see how, kind of do a post-mortem and see if we saw evidence specifically of what you're talking about.
