June 24, 2024 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
46:48
Snopes Finally Acknowledges 'Very Fine People' Hoax -- But Why Now?
It took them seven years, but #Snopes.com finally acknowledged the media-pushed "Very Fine People" Charlottesville hoax aimed at President Donald Trump is complete bunk. We all knew this and, most likely, so did the Snopesters. The hoax was the staple of Joe Biden's 2020 campaign against Trump and a large portion of Americans fell for it. Still, Snopes could have done published this at any time, including when the hoax was perpetrated. In turn, they also did not have to post it. Thus, the question: Why now? Why was this "very fine people" hoax finally called out by Snopes on the week of the Biden-Trump debate Number 1 and in the middle of a heated election season? Dr. Jerome Corsi breaks down the situation on today's The Truth Central.Also:A Swiss company is powering computers with mini-human #brainsThe number of #homelese among #Chicago's population tripled over a yearThe George Floyd Effect: DEI, University Protests and the dark underbelly#California's #job gains are phonyEven the Washington Post denounced no-growth Enviro-CommunismIf you like what we are doing, please support our Sponsors:Get RX Meds Now: https://www.getrxmedsnow.comMyVitalC https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.phpGet Dr. Corsi's new book, The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis: Forensic Analysis of the JFK Autopsy X-Rays Proves Two Headshots from the Right Front and One from the Rear, here: https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-President-John-Kennedy-Headshots/dp/B0CXLN1PX1/ref=sr_1_1?crid=20W8UDU55IGJJ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.ymVX8y9V--_ztRoswluApKEN-WlqxoqrowcQP34CE3HdXRudvQJnTLmYKMMfv0gMYwaTTk_Ne3ssid8YroEAFg.e8i1TLonh9QRzDTIJSmDqJHrmMTVKBhCL7iTARroSzQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=jerome+r.+corsi+%2B+jfk&qid=1710126183&sprefix=%2Caps%2C275&sr=8-1Join Dr. Jerome Corsi on Substack: https://jeromecorsiphd.substack.com/Visit The Truth Central website: https://www.thetruthcentral.comGet your FREE copy of Dr. Corsi's new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush by calling: 800-519-6268Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on X: @corsijerome1Our link to where to get the Marco Polo 650-Page Book on the Hunter Biden laptop & Biden family crimes free online:https://www.thetruthcentral.com/marco-polo-publishes-650-page-book-on-hunter-biden-laptop-biden-family-crimes-available-free-online/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-truth-central-with-dr-jerome-corsi--5810661/support.
You can find me on X at CorsiJerome1, and on Substack at jeromecorsiphd.substack.com.
We cover quite a few stories today.
I want to start out today with a story on Snopes.
Evidently, Snopes is finally coming around to admit that they lied.
Surprise, surprise!
Snopes is a fact checker, but their fact checks are all leftists.
They're liberals.
All they do is destroy any story that would help Trump or any conservatives.
So, this whole story about the The riots and Trump saying that these were white supremacists who were very nice people.
I guess this was when they were tearing down the monuments and all of that.
Chris is showing you the story.
The cruel significance of this is why now, before the debate, and actually before the election, is Snopes changing its position, undermining Biden?
Cause this is one of the, Biden used this, this, you know, this Charlottesville incident as the basis of his campaign saying, you know, Trump is a white supremacist.
He had sympathy for the devils.
He was with the white supremacists and the Confederates and he liked slavery.
And so all these other things that they're trying to save this, this whole racist attack of Trump on the basis of, you know, he, I made a comment about the very nice people, the neo-Nazis and the white supremacists.
So the headline in Stokes is, no, Trump did not call neo-Nazis and white supremacists very fine people, because they twisted it.
The typical thing a left does is it takes something that Trump says in one context and puts it in another context and then says he's a white supremacist.
This whole idea of white supremacist and DEI and all this other nonsense is still dominating leftist democratic party politics.
I'm sorry, leftist democratic communist party politics.
Chris, I'd like you to comment on this one because we're going to be getting into the debate this week and this is an interesting way to start out the week.
What would you say?
Isn't leftist democratic communist party redundant?
Yes, it is.
Okay, there we go.
Having said that, this is funny.
Why now?
Why right before the debate?
Why right before election season?
Are they anticipating a terrible debate?
Are they looking to pull the old switcheroo as far as candidates and finally saying, well, um, let's, let's make it okay now to cover, uh, cover this properly.
Nobody's going to switch over to Trump because of this, because, um, I believe there'll be plenty of Democrat voters or base voters who will look at this and say, eh, Snopes is lying.
They're going to bury their heads in the sand over this.
But the idea is, as you said before, Joe Biden opened and based virtually his entire campaign on Donald Trump saying there were very fine people in the neo-Nazi ranks.
Where in fact, as you know, he was saying there were good people on both sides of this argument to keep the Confederate statue or to take it down.
I mean, I think the Democrats are getting ready to dump Biden.
Right.
That's the question.
I think he's clearly showing increasing signs of senior dementia.
One of the big challenges is, can he stand for 90 minutes?
Is he going to wander around the stage?
What's he going to do?
I don't know how many drugs they're going to give him, but if he comes out angry like he did in the State of the Union, which seems to be the only way they can pump him up for that period of time, they've got to do a very fine chemical balance, because they can't have a halftime and take him back inside and give him new drugs.
There's no halftime in this debate.
You stand up there for 90 minutes and answer questions.
You saw Rocky IV, right?
That's the movie Rocky IV.
Remember when they were, the Russians were drugging up Ivan Drago?
Yes.
They're pumping him up and making sure he'll perform at top level.
Well, that's what's happening to Joe Biden.
Of course, he's not going to be, uh, uh, boxing or anything.
He just, they're just trying to do this to get him to be able to stand and yell every once in a while and whisper.
He has to have the energy to whisper and yell, kind of move that back and forth during the debate and say, come on, man, you're a racist.
So you call these Nazis very fine people.
Yeah, I mean, that kind of stuff.
He's going to do the come on man and all the nonsense.
He's going to try to, but he'll probably come out with the dog face pony soldiers before he's done.
Corn Pops is a tough dude.
Is he going to, um, what was it?
He was once an astronaut or something like that.
You know, he'll make up another past for himself.
Well, is he going to, uh, promise shoobing and on a shoobing and on an oppression and better calf care again?
Yeah, that was a good one.
Well, my, my personal favorite was, uh, when he was yapping on about this whole thing and, and, and bringing up Charlotte and then saying, we're going to, I want to get rid of the poor boys.
Yeah, he actually said this during a debate, the poor boys.
No, nobody pointed this out, but I'm thinking this, uh, this super group tribute band who raised money lanes appeal for arms, Willie and the poor boys.
He's trying to get rid of these nice people.
Uh, no, he's trying to get rid of the proud boys, obviously, but it gets a little confusing at this age for him.
There's no way he's getting rid of Charlie Watts anyway.
He's losing track of where his billions of dollars are.
He just wants his beach chairs, sleep on the beach.
Like a beached whale.
Okay, let's move on.
Enough Biden.
Biden, I think, is about to be history.
Let's go to the next story.
This, I thought, was pretty amazing.
I've been talking about this and predicting it, and I've been saying that they're going to use human beings for our energy, our ability to produce energy.
So, there's a Swiss company That is powering computers with mini human brains.
They're actually taking human brain cells and they're developing these brain clusters, these mini brains that fit into the neural platform to produce some of the energy required to power a computer.
That's not science fiction, they're really doing it.
So this is a platform adopted by nine institutions, which integrates hardware, software, and biology to construct a processing system that is energy efficient and high performing.
So they call it Final Sparks.
It's the name of the company.
And Fred Jordan and Martin Cutler, who are the two founders, hope to harness the human brain's compatibility with silicon chips.
To make a greener future in the tech industry.
So the neural platform is made up of 16 spherical brain, they call them organoids.
Our miniature human brains grown in a lab, and the organoids that give the neural platform power are each about 10,000 living neurons derived from stem cells taken from human skin tissue.
Okay?
And these tiny spheres, which are about 0.02 inches wide, very, very small, Are kept in sterile incubators at body temperature, provided with water and nutrients, and connected to an electronic grid, electrical grid structure with tiny electrodes, and they provide some of the power that makes the computer go.
Now, I mean, this is another bizarre story where it's the prelude, you know, it's like one of the scenes from the Matrix movies at the end or the beginning where they encounter this whole farm of human beings who are obviously not there mentally, spaced out in these pods, and what they're doing is mining their energy for the Matrix.
So again, the only value of human beings is going to be for their energy.
This is a dark view of human future, which has nothing to do with human rights or whether or not we are in any way capable of being worthy of dignity.
There's no God in this.
It's just, you know, take the brain cells.
Are these brains thinking?
Are they conscious?
Do they have any mental activity going on?
Probably not.
They're just simply organisms that were created out of a lab from stem cells, and it's like a Frankenstein movie.
Well, in fact, it makes you think that the Frankenstein movie was just predictive preparation of the battlefield for what was coming.
And probably that's the case, that this whole vision of human beings being essentially worthless, us going post-human, as this Noah Harari, the Yuval Noah Harari would have us say, is that we need to be a deus human, god humans, because we can combine ourselves with machines, and we can then have a consciousness in the cyber world that will be eternal.
It's a bizarre idea, and I think it's completely godless, I think it's atheistic, and I think it's Nietzschean.
You know, we're going to be superhumans, and it's one of those things that human beings attempt and will fail, but it is dark.
It's dystopian.
It's the idea that woke is designed to destroy, and following woke will come the transhumans, and we human beings will not be necessary.
There's Harari.
I developed these themes in my book on Neo-Marxism, Cultural Maoism, and Anarchy, and we're right now in the anarchy stage of this transition.
What you see with guys like Harari is they're telling us that the future is going to be—this, by the way, is part of a trilogy.
The first book was The Truth About Energy, Global Warming, and Climate Change.
Then I show you that shows that they lie.
This one shows you why they lie.
They're post-modernists, they're Marxists, they're building their own idea of the future based on what they want it to be, not necessarily on what it is or any truths, just they're going to posit their, you know, John Lennon.
What if there was no God?
Then we'd have no religious wars.
No borders, and we'd have no wars between nations.
You may say we're dreamers, but we're not the only ones.
Well, nonsense!
They can't make up their own.
They don't want a God.
Then how about a world with no John Lennon?
I think that's probably God's response to John Lennon.
And John Lennon isn't around anymore, but God is.
So again, he can be dreaming all he wants in hell, for all I care, because you're dealing with a situation where these people are producing a dystopian reality today.
And that reality is growing in power, it's growing in speed, they're rushing to the finish line.
The third book in this series will be The Truth About Transhumanism, Artificial Intelligence, and Perpetual Life Extension.
And by the way, we've created the Anti-Globalist Alliance.
Over the weekend, I just finished editing the Anti-Globalist Manifesto.
The subtitle of that book is going to be Ending the War on Humanity, and it will be published by Steve Bannon's War Room Books in August.
The book is now finished in editing, and it's going to go into production.
We will be creating the Anti-Globalist Alliance.
We'll be having a website, and it's going to be an international movement and organization.
Okay, let's move on to cover a few more stories.
I published quite a few today on TheTruthCentral.com.
Take a look at the website, there's new stories.
We're posting them hopefully every day.
The number of Chicagoans who are now homeless have tripled over a year-long period, from early 2023 to now being 19,000.
So, the latest point-in-time study finds that the homelessness Chicagoans have jumped 200% over a year-long period beginning in early 2023.
So, this is pretty amazing because according to an annual survey used by the federal government to track these trends, researchers note that more than 35,000 migrants poured into Chicago during 2023 and the number of individuals living in city
shelters or in city streets tripled, the number of long-time homeless residents spiked by 25
percent.
Okay, so you're finding that nearly 19,000 people in Chicago lacked a permanent place to sleep by
the time of the survey. The number of unhoused individuals across the city had largely held
steady over the prior decade, but almost nine in ten of all the unhoused individuals belong
being long-time residents.
of the world.
They don't know.
The only does not know how it's going to deal with this crisis.
They say, I think this is according to what for representative Leshawn Ford is saying to the press.
See, I think that the response to the housing crisis for the migrants is obviously a model for American citizens to have the same treatment.
You see, what happens is when the migrants come into a city, Chicago spends nearly a billion dollars caring for them.
This is the migrants providing them shelter, food, health care, other costs.
But for a long time, Chicago residents who are homeless, and they're American citizens, they don't get any of these benefits.
The government's not making a comprehensive approach, so lawmakers should be mad.
This is what this Representative Ford is saying.
Those that are homeless must fight, and I think that we must not settle for this treatment.
Okay, so now they want to have complete coverage paying people to be homeless.
That's what it amounts to.
And again, the homelessness very quickly deteriorates into drug use, into near suicidal behaviors, into depression.
You cannot have people living in the streets.
And it destroys the cities.
It makes the cities miserable for everybody else.
Where are these people going to deprecate?
How are they going to find any money at all?
They begin to become dependent on drugs and fentanyl.
This is a death cycle.
And it's understood to be a death cycle, and it's programmed to be a death cycle.
And this is what the Democrats are doing.
We're seeing our cities now swamped with illegal immigrants.
We're seeing our cities deteriorating from the homelessness.
We're finding our cities going bankrupt.
Businesses are closing, we've got increasing violence in the cities, and the Democrats aren't capable of doing anything about it except for spending more money and more money and more money, producing more and more dependents, encouraging more and more people to live in the streets.
And when you break up with a fundamental family, traditional family's gone.
So when these people have broken marriages, they begin to have domestic problems, they don't have any family structure to rely on, they get old, there's no one to care for them, there's no traditional, generational, multi-generational family living together.
It's a disaster, and this was an intentional communist destruction of American values and American society, and we see now its results, and its results are satanic.
They're reducing human beings to be not worthy of consideration in terms of their lives.
Well, that's a great offense against God.
God created their lives, God created life in general.
God did not create life for Satan to reduce these people to a state of dependency and godlessness where Satan is going to harvest their souls.
That's what's happening.
Okay, let's move on.
All the stories today are pretty much going to be emphasizing that we need to do something here to reverse this.
We're doing what we can.
The anti-global society is going to have, I think, a major impact internationally.
All right, now, American universities with this DEI.
Now, Harvard and MIT have both abandoned the requirement that job applicants submit these really rather hateful diversity statements as part of a job application.
Okay, now, this is really not the end of DEI.
It's the end of the DEI mandatory statements for employment.
And DEI is going to live on beyond this, that's for sure, because DEI is rampant on the universities today.
Diversity, equity and inclusion.
What it means is that you have to demand and show, if you want a job at one of these universities, you've got to show that you're opposed to white Privilege.
You are, you know, acknowledge white supremacy.
You want minority.
DEI means we got to have people of color.
We got to have what, you know, again, this, these terms the left has made up.
Isn't white a color?
White's not a color.
Okay.
Well, that's in DEI talk.
DEI talk.
It doesn't matter whether the person is qualified for the job.
It demands whether the right race.
Well, how many races are there?
Or that the race gender.
Well, how many genders are there?
You know, if you can have a gender that's anything you want to imagine it is, I guess there's an infinite number of genders.
So there may be an infinite number of races.
Because, you know, we don't all blacks have a certain color of skin, all whites have a certain color.
These are gradients.
The gradients are not easily defined because you could have, you know, depends on how finely you want to divide the gradients, it can become infinite.
But you can't have infinite DEI because you've only got so many positions.
Now, the shift in terms of how much DEI is going to impact the university, and as it takes hold, these universities build these big DEI compartments and they come around and they're enforcing DEI this, DEI that.
D.E.I.
in the classroom, D.E.I.
education, D.E.I.
graduates, cross-sectionality.
You can get a Ph.D.
in cross-sectionality.
What does cross-sectionality mean?
It means how many of these oppressions can you put together?
In other words, okay, so you're a woman.
That's almost inherently going to be considered a disadvantage.
You're discriminated against because you're a woman.
Then if you're a black woman, but now you're a minority woman.
That's two intersectionalities.
It's like Venn diagrams.
You've got race, minorities, and then you've got the intersection with that, and women.
And then you go further.
Well, how about women who really are transgenders?
Okay, so now you've got a gender, and a woman who transgenders who think that they are from a past life or an animal.
Now, that gets you pretty high up on the cross-sectionality scale, and it's going to improve your DEI so that if you can get an application in to become a faculty member, you're going to have a much better chance of getting the job.
Now, in Republican colleges, in Republican-controlled states, there's a push to have DEI outlawed as a hiring program Because in a sense, it becomes to introducing a racial discrimination factor to actually make the selections.
It's, you know, you can't have race to exclude blacks, but you can have race used to exclude whites.
That's okay.
Yeah, well, that's, this is all nonsense.
And so therefore, if they don't abolish the departments, you'll still have the culture in the universities.
So the situation is improving in universities because they're beginning to realize that these statements of diversity on job applications don't work.
They get you a faculty that is much less qualified to actually teach the subjects.
But again, as long as the programs stay around, the white supremacy, the other issues that are packaged under DEI, are going to continue to support policy in the university.
And they tell a story in this article of one of the people who got rejected, and they try to virtue signal, they try to say, you know, this was an article, by the way, in Revolver, and it's called the secret George Floyd effect, DEI rot in universities is deeper and darker than you think.
Well, it is, because again, you've got these people, self-righteous, totalitarian, they're not going to tolerate any disagreement saying that they are going to get rid of the whites in universities and put it down to a mix of all these different, bizarre, critical theory categories.
Chris, you want to comment on these couple of stories?
I think we're showing the ultimate breakdown of all the systems that have made this country great, and they're going pretty fast.
Think about it this way.
These colleges pride themselves on their diversity hires and how many boxes they can check off on whoever they hire to run their school.
You might remember when they were called to task about all of this during the protest.
Here's what happens.
You get all these people together.
You say some people's point of views are horrible and you're teaching them to demonize these people.
They're They're considered colonists or colonizers or whatever else.
And all of a sudden, something like what broke out on October 7th, these people have become exposed.
We've learned what these colleges are trying their best to teach these people.
Remember when Claudine Gaye here was questioned by Elaine Stefanik, or at least Stefanik and the House?
Is that really Claudine Gaye?
No, it's not Claudine Gaye.
Who is that?
It's not Claudine Gaye.
That's Steve Urkel, the character from...
Put up a picture Claudine gave if you can find one.
Yes, because I always consider Steve Urkel and her like a separate person.
And that's why I want you to find a picture of her.
Yeah, we're going to do this.
All right, ready?
And I can see it too.
I mean, right here.
We'll take it right from the actual congressional hearing.
There we go.
I can see it's like, did I do that?
Yeah, I mean, you know, look, it is a remarkable similarity.
And of course, there we go.
Well, she resigned.
She is no longer the president of Harvard, but she has a huge salary as a professor.
That's right.
But she didn't resign.
She just stepped down from the position.
And with all of her plagiarism.
Of course, she has been a plagiarist, and she has been caught in plagiarism.
That's okay.
We can't expect you to do actual academic work.
No.
Because you weren't hired to do academic work.
You were hired to be black.
The founder of critical race theory was a plagiarist.
Yeah, Judith Butler?
No, the other one.
Abraham X. Kendi.
Oh, him, yes.
Well, these guys are... Where do they get these people?
I mean, it's, you know, the ideas in their heads are so scrambled.
The very idea of plagiarism, which, you know, is theft, Here's something for you.
they want to stretch the rules. I mean, it's they're looking for everything being AI is
searching now for plagiarism. Here's something for you. The watching people like clothing
gay and some others and all these and Abraham Kendi and and hearing Judith Butler speak
and all these people talk about how social justice has to be pushed forth despite qualifications.
It shows a difference between equal opportunity and equal outcome.
Equal outcome is what DEI actually is.
Equal opportunity was whereas you have opportunity zones like trying to prop up some of the urban areas or the rural areas that businesses don't generally search for talent and try to give them the opportunity to shine.
Whereas you have to check off a series of boxes when it comes to equal outcome.
And then you feel good about yourself and you get whatever rate or approval by the establishment, if you will, to move forward.
That's where the problem lies.
Outcome versus opportunity.
Well, and again, they don't care about any longer of the—it's not whether or not these people can advance education, whether they can advance knowledge, they're advancing racism.
Their whole career is based on the fact of the color of their skin.
And this is completely antithetical to the affirmative action laws that we've had in place.
Which again were a mistake, because they were trying to give special advantage, this was the beginning of it, special advantage because of skin color.
Well, now we see them as just anti-white from the beginning, because they're not being fair in terms of skin color should not be an issue.
Skin color is becoming the only issue, and if our universities are going to be that racist, which is what they are, Then again, the Supreme Court is going to be completely confounded with a whole series of cases that have begun to be heard saying you can't use affirmative action criteria in hiring, because when they see how it's really applied, anti-white, they're beginning to realize what it was from the beginning.
Which was not an attempt to uplift this disadvantaged group, but to tear down a group that had advantages because of their qualifications being superior.
Oh, this is kneecapping people to, instead of, instead of helping others get a little, get a little bit of a leg up when it comes to opportunity or opening a few extra doors, this is basically kneecapping people who would otherwise get the job.
Well, and when you're, you are a white person and eminently qualified for the job and you lose to somebody less qualified because of the color of their skin, you've got a legitimate argument.
Right.
Okay.
Now, but again, that argument today in the DEI court is not going to be heard because all the, you're guilty to start with because of the color of your skin.
And so they would consider this conversation racist because we're two white guys.
Now, two black guys having the same conversation, they would say, well, those guys aren't really black.
That's right.
You ain't black if you don't vote for Biden, by the way.
Okay.
Let's move on.
I think we've beaten this horse down pretty well.
It, but it keeps rearing.
It's not gone yet.
It won't be gone for quite a while.
It'll ultimately die an ugly death, but it's not going to be for today.
Okay, so let's go to a couple more stories on the truthcentral.com.
I posted one earlier today on the California and the jobs setting.
What's coming out now and some analyses are being done to show that really we're getting a lying statistics, surprise, surprise, surprise, from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that keeps saying there's a strong job market and Bidenomics has really succeeded.
We've got 200,000 new jobs created.
Well, when you take a look at the statistics after they revised them, Which they do.
You'll find that, for instance, in California, they're saying, well, the jobs really declined 23,000 in 2023.
So you don't have job gains.
You've got job losses.
And the jobs that are going are going to the minorities.
They're going to the immigrants coming in.
People are having to run, hold two or three small part-time jobs in order to put together enough money to support their families.
But this shocking revelation that the inflation-sparking Bidenomics is a disaster, that won't be fully recognized until well into Trump's second term, if he ever gets it.
So by 2025, when they begin saying the economy is falling apart, they're going to try to blame it on Trump, if he does win.
Okay, now, I want to show the free book that people can get from Swiss America.
This, I think, is extremely important.
This book is a good book.
I wrote it several months ago, and what I wrote about is happening today.
The book is how the coming Global crash will create an historic gold rush, and that's what's going to happen.
You get a free copy of this book by calling Swiss America 1-800-519-6268.
1-800-519-6268.
Now Swiss America will send you this book and I really recommend you talk to Swiss America
about getting some of your money into gold, especially your IRAs and your 401ks.
Stock market's gonna crash, and if you don't wanna be stuck with having to wait a long time for your value to come back, don't have your retirement assets in the stock market.
It's gonna crash.
We've got too much debt in the world.
We've got too much competition on the dollars in international reserve currency for international trade.
The BRICS nations are forming and gaining substantially as a major economic force.
Russia and China are both in the BRICS.
It was beginning Brazil, Russia, India, and China.
Gold today is trading at $2,337 an ounce.
And let's see what silver's at today.
Silver, I'll pull it up here in just a sec, get a real-time quote, $29.96.
Silver's a real value right now.
And if you talk to Swiss America, they are expert on strategies for precious metal investing.
And there's a lot on the website.
You can get a free copy of this new report on the Secret War on Cash by filling out the form on TheTruthCentral.com website.
You can also get the Walking Liberty half dollar offer.
250 of these coins, minted when they were really silver, As a one-time introductory offer to talk with Swiss America, you can buy up to 250 of them at virtually the cost of what they're worth in silver.
These are all on the website.
You can search the website.
There is the Walking in Liberty half-dollar offer.
Just fill out the form.
And it's the same with the offer to get this free pamphlet, which is the secret government war on cash.
And we tell you exactly how the government is going with central bank digital currency and the control of your money.
It's extremely important to follow Swiss America.
Again, 1-800-519-6268.
1-800-519-6268. Okay, I want to cover one more story that I think is of particular importance,
which is this Washington Post has actually had an editorial.
I'm surprised.
The Washington Post is under a revolution right now, and the revolution is one in which you're seeing that the newspaper is losing money hand over fist with its constant leftist critical race theory drivel.
And what you're finding is that there is a pushback There was a book on this degrowth communism, and I've got a copy of it here.
I'm going to hold it up and show it to you.
This is the book on degrowth capitalism.
You can see it's Marx in the Anthropocene.
And it's by a Japanese guy named Kohei Saito.
The subtitle of it is, Towards the Idea of Degrowth Communism.
Now what they are really talking about here is what the agenda of the Green New Deal is, which is to depopulate by destroying capitalism.
Now, this book is so—when you try to read this Marxist literature, Critical Race Theory, you're entering into a new strange world.
I'm going to read a paragraph, and I'm going to show you how these people are pseudo-academic.
They've invented their own language, they've invented their own terms, they've invented their own concepts, and their concepts just don't work.
And they're impossible to read.
There's a chapter four of this book, it's called Monism and the Non-Identity of Nature, whatever the heck that means.
And it reads, as discussed in part one, the concept of metabolism is critical for a Marxist analysis of the global ecological crisis in the Anthropocene.
You know, the Anthropocene, and that's part of the book, Marx and the Anthropocene.
The Anthropocene is an era in which We're currently in the cycle of Earth's time and history in which they are suggesting that human beings destroy human beings, that we are the cause of our own extinction.
After all, we exude carbon dioxide, and since that's greenhouse gas, we're causing ourselves to have the environment be so hot that we're all going to die.
Climate change and dramatic hurricanes and tornadoes, all that nonsense.
And listen to how they write.
However, persistent criticisms are directed against those eco-Marxists who seek to develop the concept of metabolic rift.
These criticisms have been reinforced recently as those political ecologists who problematize the concept of Anthropocene as an anthropocentric and Eurocentric narrative also maintain that Ecomarxists are not only productivists but also dualists.
According to critics, the dualist notions of nature's, quote, revenge and, quote, metabolic rift are unable to properly grasp the historical dynamics of ecological crises caused by capitalist accumulation.
Now, if you got through that paragraph, good.
But the whole book is written that way.
And what they're really trying to say is that Marx had a theory of the ecology in which he found that capitalism was counterproductive to our positive future, not only because it was alienating, but because it was in conflict with the nature of the way that the Earth's ecology and weather operate.
And so, therefore, to get in tune With the nature, we have to stop using hydrocarbon fuels, that's always their conclusion.
Now, all these concepts are just, so they go into Lukács, okay, and he wrote a book called History in Class Consciousness, which is one of the big classic studies that they, this is, if you go to college today, you're going to have to know who Lukács is.
So, in his most prominent essay, Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat, Lukács criticized modern science by revealing the problems that rise from its contemplative attitude.
Vogel summarizes Lukács' critique of natural science in four points.
The first principle of natural science is immediacy.
Nature appears as given and can be objectively known as pure facts.
The immediately given form of the objects, the form back to their existing here and there now, in this way, belongs to the primary, real, and objective.
Second, this creation of pure facts is carried out through the total quantification of the world.
Modern science aims at quantifying everything in a mechanistic fashion so its objects of study can be comprehended with regular, universal, and predictable laws, which allows humans to manipulate them.
There is principle simplicity.
For sake of simplicity, the complicated appearance of the natural phenomenon must first be broken down into simple elements, then they can be combined to explain more complicated phenomenon.
The fourth is ahistoricity, a mechanistic view of nature as opposed to be eternal and unchanging over time.
Okay, so Lukács rejected these naive presuppositions of modern science by arguing this kind of formalism reflects the world of reification created by capital.
That is the world of quantified things that appear alien to human beings.
This is fundamental Lukács.
It's fundamental to what they're arguing.
And what they're saying is that essentially We have to reject this method of natural science as if it's rationalization, it's numbers, it's presuppositions that we can't influence, that nature is more powerful than human beings, and therefore what they want to do is they want to say that Lukács is saying we have to re-imagine, we have to go back and re-examine
The scientific dualism, so that we can comprehend that nature does have a rhythm that is not consistent with human needs on a mass scale to produce goods.
So, therefore, we've got to produce fewer goods, we've got to degrowth, And therefore, we will get nature back into the balance that Marx thought was fundamental to this Earth's homeostasis, the Earth's process of balancing itself out, which it will do naturally without human beings.
All this is nonsense.
Okay?
Because in fact, there are impacts on the Earth that do change climate.
They're called summer, fall, winter, spring.
Those are fundamental and they're massive impacts.
There are volcanoes that erupt.
Those are massive impacts.
There are comets and asteroids that hit the earth.
Those are massive impacts.
There's just shifts that occur from the variations in our orbit around the sun, including the Milankovitch cycles when we go out to be very, very elliptical.
And our most elliptical, we have ice ages because we're farthest from the sun at that point.
These are not the kinds of changes that the Marxists have in view.
What the Marxists want us to do is to stop using capitalism and kill billions of people.
And finally, the Washington Post and others are catching on.
And again, we're dealing here with an ideological definition that is fundamentally godless and anti-human and doesn't see any value in human beings.
He sees us as the blight of the earth, except for those chosen few who are the Marxists and the transhumanists, who have the right to build gates as the Klaus Schrabs to make themselves transhuman and then dominate the rest of us.
Chris, any final comments as we wrap up today?
This is a strange week if you think about it.
The Washington Post, who has pushed virtually every borderline communist and over-the-line communist cause over the last, I don't know, how many decades at this point, says degrowth communism is terrible.
I believe what, and of course you have Snopes saying that the Trumps, the very fine people hoax was actually a hoax finally, we all knew that.
The thing is these Again, we ask ourselves, why now?
It's election season.
It sounds like the communists are trying to make themselves, um, uh, a little bit more, make themselves seem a little, make this themselves and the Democrat party seem a little more, uh, what's the word?
Uh, palatable.
That's the word at this point.
Uh, they might pull the switcheroo with Biden.
That's the first one, but this particular incident with the Washington post trying to say, Hey, we're not that bad.
We're not communists.
Underlying they might be, but the fact is they're trying to tell you we're not, and if you vote Democrat this November, it's not going to be as bad as they're telling you, because they're right-wing nuts as we've been pushing for the last, I don't know, 20, 25 years anyway.
Well, what they're trying to do is, again, separate the Democratic Party from communism.
Correct.
Yeah, that's the easy way.
That's the right.
That's exactly what I was trying to say.
I said it in a million words.
There we go.
They're trying to say that we're not communists.
Right.
We're here to save you, but we're not communists.
We're here to take your children and have their genders changed by sex operations such that they can't reproduce, but we're not depopulationists.
Right.
We're going to produce vaccines to kill you, but we're not depopulationists.
The wolf puts on grandma's costume and says, no little red riding hood, I'm not going to eat you.
There we go.
That's what happens.
Yeah.
I mean, it's, it's, and so it's apparent what they're doing, but again, it's evil because their intent is to destroy and to kill.
This is Dr. Jerome Corsi.
Let's wrap up.
And by the way, take a look at the website.
We've got the GetRxMedsNow.
The website is launching.
We are able to work with you to get prescriptions for you by talking with the doctor.
We have it set up and we'll do some more podcasts on this and explain how it works, but we are launching it.
Additionally, we've got, I'm selling books, e-pipes, which are very interesting technology.
I've got a whole page.
GetRxMezNow.com.
Take a look at my authors copies.
I'm selling authors copies of my books.
I have quite a few, but when they're gone, I'll be done selling authors copies.
This is your one chance to get a signed copy of one of the books I've written at reasonable prices.
The price includes handling and shipping.
And I'm selling not only the current book on JFK's assassination, which has done extremely well and continues to do extremely well, but the book I wrote 11 years ago, who really killed Kennedy.
My first book on abiotic oil, which is Black Gold Stranglehold.
And I, just a number of other, the good books I've written, Bad Samaritans, the ACLU, the LGBT Agenda, No Greater Value, The Battle of Bastogne, coup d'etat, the continuing attempt to destroy Donald Trump.
In the end, God always wins.
God will win here, too.
We're in a battle against evil.
Satan is on the rise around the world, but we're going to combat it.
We're creating the Anti-Globalist Alliance.
You'll be hearing much more about that in the next few weeks.
I encourage you to join me in the Spirit of Second Chronicles 714.
If we follow the gospel's advice, we'll get on our knees.
We'll repent for having let the world get to this point.
So many babies chopped apart in the womb by abortionists who want their body parts.
That's against God's law.
God only God can give life.
We don't have the right to take it away.
The same with taking God out of our schools, out of our lives, our marriages.
So many divorces going on today.
It's tragic.
But in the end, God will win.
God is sovereign.
God has written the end story.
And in the end story, Satan goes back to hell.
But there will be a judgment of God.
We're going to go through it.
It's begun.
And it's not going to be fun, but if we follow the advice of 2 Chronicles 7.14 and have a global revival, God will hear our prayer and heal our land.
Dr. Jerome Corsi, today is Monday, June 24th, 2024.
We're doing podcasts on TheTruthCentral.com every weekday.
