March 27, 2024 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
55:59
Questions Raised About the Baltimore Bridge Collapse; The Men Behind JFK's Assassination
Questions are being raised about the cause of the cargo ship collision resulting in the destruction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore. After looking at the footage of the crash and finding the vessel had two power outages, some analysts are saying terrorism should not be taken off the proverbial table despite the federal and Maryland governments' immediate denials. The Port in Baltimore is an important hub for major companies, trade and cruise ships. In addition, the Francis Scott Key Bridge is a transport artery for hazardous materials at times. Dr. Jerome Corsi looks deeply into what you are not being told on The Truth Central.Also, Dr. Corsi refers to his book, The Final Analysis, as he delves into the men behind President John F. Kennedy's assassination from LBJ to Allen Dulles and throughout the Deep State. Speaking of the U.S. Deep State, Dr. Corsi also examines the U.S. Government's role in the partnership with and deployment of Ukrainian Terror Gangs amid its war with Russia and its impact on both the conflict and foreign policy.Get Dr. Corsi's new book, The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: The Final Analysis: Forensic Analysis of the JFK Autopsy X-Rays Proves Two Headshots from the Right Front and One from the Rear, here: https://www.amazon.com/Assassination-President-John-Kennedy-Headshots/dp/B0CXLN1PX1/ref=sr_1_1?crid=20W8UDU55IGJJ&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.ymVX8y9V--_ztRoswluApKEN-WlqxoqrowcQP34CE3HdXRudvQJnTLmYKMMfv0gMYwaTTk_Ne3ssid8YroEAFg.e8i1TLonh9QRzDTIJSmDqJHrmMTVKBhCL7iTARroSzQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=jerome+r.+corsi+%2B+jfk&qid=1710126183&sprefix=%2Caps%2C275&sr=8-1Join Dr. Jerome Corsi on Substack: https://jeromecorsiphd.substack.com/Visit The Truth Central website: https://www.thetruthcentral.comGet your FREE copy of Dr. Corsi's new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush by calling: 800-519-6268Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on X: @corsijerome1Our link to where to get the Marco Polo 650-Page Book on the Hunter Biden laptop & Biden family crimes free online:https://www.thetruthcentral.com/marco-polo-publishes-650-page-book-on-hunter-biden-laptop-biden-family-crimes-available-free-online/If you like what we are doing, please support Our Sponsors:MyVitalC https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.phpThe MacMillan Agency: https://www.thetruthcentral.com/the-macmillan-agency/Pro Rapid Review: https://prorrt.com/thetruthcentralmembers/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-truth-central-with-dr-jerome-corsi--5810661/support.
We're just a few days from Easter, and I hope everyone has a blessed Easter.
I'm certainly going to look forward to it myself at the beginning of spring.
I think we're getting through with a winter that's been mild here in the Northeast, but other parts of the country, with the shifting of these ocean currents in the Pacific, have had unusual snow.
So it's not global warming because it's a little bit warmer this winter in New York and New Jersey.
You can follow me on Exit at CorsiJerome1 and on Substack it's jeromecorsiphd.substack.com.
My book is doing extremely well.
I want everybody to take a look at the assassination of John F. Kennedy and you've got to put that in the title to find it on On Amazon, the final analysis.
It's only on Amazon right now.
We have not printed for the bookstores yet.
We want to get this out to start making an impact on the June elections coming up in Europe, and the book is getting attention in Europe, and will get more attention in Europe.
There's going to be an Italian edition of it published.
The point of the book is that the forensic analysis done by Dr. David Mantega, the x-rays, the JFK x-rays, there's only three extant remaining x-rays of JFK's skull after the assassination that are in the archives.
All the rest are gone.
What Dr. Mantic did is he is a PhD in physics and an MD practicing as a radiation oncologist for over 40 years.
That's a doctor who studies x-rays for cancer patients.
It's particularly a demanding specialty.
Dr. Manning is a brilliant guy.
For 30 years he's been working on the x-rays.
He did optical density measurements of the x-rays and what he found, that's using a densitometer, which is a scientific instrument that you put an x-ray into the densitometer.
It has a little arm you put down onto the x-ray.
A beam of light is cast through the x-ray and the An instrument, the densitometer, measures how much of the light that's emitted gets through the x-ray.
It allows you to tell you more precisely what you're looking at.
Another thing is it has a natural range and it's logarithmic, so between 0.5 and 4.0, which is,
you know, no lights getting in 0.5, a lot of lights getting in at 4.0.
But if you take a look at the image that you're seeing on the screen here, the cover,
you see there's an incredibly bright patch in the back of this lateral x-ray, taken from the
side of the head, and that white patch is fake.
You don't have that white a bone in your head.
The most white bone is the petrius bone by the ear, and this is brighter than the petrius bone.
It's obviously a mask that was placed there in order to disguise something or to draw attention
to the big empty space at the front of the head.
The problem was that the Parkland Hospital doctor saw shots from the front.
Lee Harvey Oswald was apprehended while the Air Force One was flying back from Dallas to Washington with JFK's body.
And it was clear that the Texas School Book Depository was behind the limousine when the shooting occurred.
So if Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gun assailant, all the shots had to come from behind.
But yet, you can see, and Dr. Mantic has documented, there were two shots from the front and one shot from behind, and they are all evident in the x-ray.
So, in that blue arrow, a shot came in at the forehead and left a trail of bullets across the top of the head, which you can see.
The largest fragments were in the back.
Largest fragments travel the farthest because they're the heaviest and have the most momentum.
Yet the shot did not exit the head.
And then at the red arrow, a shot hit in the temporal bone right in front of the right ear.
And it was an oblique shot at an angle to the head.
So it didn't go through the head squarely.
It kind of went through the head obliquely, tangentially.
And it blew off the back of JFK's head.
But when it entered it had a keyhole fracture, which is a telltale sign of an oblique shot.
The yellow arrow was a shot at low angle to the back by the knob in the back of your head.
And again, that's probably from the Daltex building, but none of these three shots are angled either to come from the driver, which everybody constantly says the driver killed Kennedy.
No, the x-rays do not show any near blast to the head.
The gun would have been very close to JFK's head if the driver had shot him.
Didn't.
And none of these shots have any angle from that vantage point.
Of a driver holding a gun, aiming it at Kennedy's head.
These shots came, the one at the top, the blue arrow, came in and went, as it were, his head was probably angled down, but the shot was at the top of his head.
And it was probably a mercury bullet.
This, Dr. Manting has analyzed because it wasn't removed, and there are some clear blotches which look like pooling of mercury.
If it had been a real lead bullet, probably in the pre-autopsy surgery that was done, which again was illegal and hidden, and was done at Bethesda in order to mask and change frontal wounds into looking like they were rear wounds, Uh, and the one, the oblique shot from the ear.
So the, the one from the top of the head, uh, may have come from the same shooter that shot through the windshield with a shred of glass likely going into JFK's throat, which was seen at Parkland as a frontal wound.
That shooter would be across from the other side of the Ghillie Plaza from the Grassy Knoll.
There was a railroad yard above the triple underpass, and there was a shooter at that far end of the Railroad Yard behind a concrete gate at the top of the Triple Underpass at the Railroad Yard.
That would have been an angle from the left through the windshield.
The red arrow is from the Grassy Knoll.
And again, that's at an oblique angle, but the arrows and the head orientation, it has to have come from the Grassy Knoll.
And the yellow is likely a low angle shot, so the red points to the Daltex building.
Three shooters are a conspiracy.
None of the shots come from the Texas School Book Depository, which reinforces the idea that Oswald was, as you said, a patsy.
This is a very disruptive book.
It's having a major impact, and it's 564 pages.
It's fully illustrated, so everything we're talking about in the book, you can see all the illustrations are making it clear what we're talking about.
There's the Harper Fragment, for instance, which was the piece of the head blown out of the back.
We've worked on this book, Dr. Mannix has been working on this for 30 years.
He's widely known in the JFK community, but his writings have been very heavily scientific.
And so what I've endeavored to do is my second book on JFK.
My first was Who Really Killed JFK?
And that book is doing exactly, extremely well and it continues to sell.
And this book is headed towards being a, I think, a bestseller.
And also it's going to be around for a long time because it is definitive.
It's the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the final analysis And that's by David Bantik, M-A-N-T-I-K, and myself, Jerome Corsi.
And we will be doing more interviews on it.
I was on Coast to Coast AM on Monday night going into Tuesday morning, and that got enormously positive reaction.
That's George Norrie's late night time show, and the book is establishing that the government has lied to us for 60 years, covering up the government's complicity in the crime.
From the very first moments after the shooting, when the limousine, JRFK's limousine, pulled into Parkland Hospital, the Secret Service can be seen taking buckets of water and washing down the back seat, remove the blood there, altering a crime scene.
There was a bullet hole seen in the windshield of the car.
It came from the front of the limousine because it punctured the limousine and the beveling on the glass was in the backside on the inside of the windshield, meaning the shot came from the front.
When that was seen by people at Parkland, the Secret Service made sure the limousine was cordoned off and gotten out of there as quickly as they could get it out of there.
That windshield was replaced in Dearborn, Michigan and we documented it.
The book is not only strong on the scientific evidence, which makes there no doubt that Jack Kennedy was shot twice from the front, and that the alteration of the x-rays mean that we do not have the originals in the archives.
These x-rays have always been in the control of the government.
So the government altered the x-rays, the government altered the evidence and lied about it.
If that's the case, what else has the government lied about?
That's what the Deep State has been in charge of this nation, going back to the 1960s.
And that's, I think, something that's becoming apparent today.
Now, I want to cover several stories in somewhat more depth, perhaps, than often we do, but these are important stories.
The first has to do with this bridge collapse, the Key Bridge in the Baltimore Harbor.
Now, Chris is going to key up a video here.
That we will describe, but the video, Tom Fitton has posted this from Judicial Watch, and what's clear is that this ship was a cargo ship, one of these massive cargo ships with a lot of containers on it.
It was leaving the port, and it appears to have lost power.
Now Chris, if we can play this video, I'll narrate it, so you can see basically that the ship is coming towards the bridge, this cargo ship, and it looks okay, it looks fine, it's functioning just normally, the lights are on, it's propelling itself, and then suddenly a power loss is seen, and the ship goes dark.
It goes completely dark.
They lost their GPS, they lost their steering, they lost their power.
Then it suddenly recovers.
The power comes back on the ship as it's nearing the bridge and thick smoke can be seen coming out of the back and it has a second power loss.
Then it crashes into the bridge and the key bridge collapses.
Okay, so it's a very, very dramatic collapse and there was evidently no Cars on the bridge when it collapsed.
There we go.
See the collapse.
You can see the massive catastrophic failure of the bridge once the cargo ship hits one of the major supports going down into the river and to hold the bridge up.
So it's collapsed and this is a major disaster because this bridge, Baltimore Harbor, is very important to the supply chain.
A lot of companies rely upon The Baltimore Harbor are getting materials in and out of it, including a lot of automotive parts that come in and out of that harbor.
So the question is, and General Flynn gave an interview yesterday in which he suggested that a cyber attack or terrorism could not be taken off the table.
Now, Chris is showing you the article here, a Black Swan event, General Flynn raises questions about the Baltimore Bridge collapse.
And what the article shows is that, again, the Dispatchers knew that there was this huge container ship, cargo ship, was approaching the bridge and losing power.
So the police dispatcher told the officers on either side of the bridge to stop the traffic.
Otherwise, there might have been hundreds of people killed.
You know, something like a 20-foot drop into the water, and it would not have been survivable.
So, General Flynn is raising the issue whether or not this is a Black Swan terrorist attack.
It turns out that the, I believe, the pilot of the ship was Ukrainian.
There's a lot of questions that are going to have to be answered about this.
Biden is going to deliver, or has delivered, some remarks about this.
I'm sure they'll be incoherent.
I've got a comment on Biden as well in a minute here.
But as this article goes on, you can see that we're looking at the companies that are affected by it.
You can see where the bridge is missing now in the harbor from that red space.
This is a picture of the harbor.
The bridge is gone.
This is a major blow to the Baltimore recovery of their port.
Baltimore is emerging and has been emerging as a major East Coast port.
Now, Baltimore itself is in disarray.
A black mayor, they have defunded the police in a massive way in 2020.
The city is going into chaos.
And you can see here with the bridge collapse, this part of the article is pointing out, this is American sugar refining company that relies upon that bridge to get supplies.
There's two or three major companies in this Baltimore area.
They're going to be in a hard place with no bridge to be able to transport the materials they need in the supply chain in order to keep functioning.
And it's clear that the power went out on this ship.
There's Tom Fitton's video that we just played.
The article is a very good one.
It's on ZeroHedge.com and I recommend everybody take a look at it.
There's also a problem because They were using this bridge to transport hazardous material that are not allowed to go through the tunnels.
Hundreds of times, driven through the Baltimore port, going from New Jersey, where I live, to Washington, D.C.
You go right through Baltimore, right past this port.
I've seen that bridge hundreds of times.
It was always a massive... I've driven across that bridge.
That bridge was a major, major fixture of the Baltimore Harbor, and now it's gone.
Black Swan event, another disruptive event, and we don't know yet how to piece it together.
But it is extremely disturbing to see this major infrastructure piece again be eradicated in one day.
And it reminds us about how vulnerable our infrastructure is, especially if we go through terrorist attacks or domestic violence or chaos economically.
The country and the world is going through an extremely chaotic and violent period of time.
It certainly looks like the beginning of World War III.
I want to transition to another article.
Chris, do you want to comment on this?
I'll give you a chance to comment as you're getting the videos all there.
You did want to talk about Joe Biden's comments.
I, in fact, watched him yesterday as he spoke.
What did he say?
Did you play them?
I can pull some up, but I only have clips of them, and I think the two most important points, aside from playing him, you probably don't want to hear from him anyway.
I don't want to hear from him.
Three points, actually.
Three things I should bring up from this speech that are very important.
He says he wants the federal government to pay for the entire bridge repair.
Okay, well he's printing more money so he can print more money.
Okay, he will maybe in the future hold Singapore, not Singapore, the company responsible.
Okay, the shipping company responsible or something like that.
I think it was a Maersk ship.
Maersk, yes.
And I think the major insurance on it was held by Chubb.
I mean, this is a major company.
This is going to be a huge loss to sort out and it's going to be probably a lot of litigation over it.
Go ahead.
Well, generally, a president would say he'd want to hold those responsible responsible, but no, he wants the taxpayers to pay first and then maybe hold them responsible, which, again, plays to the questions that were raised earlier on this program.
Now, let's also go to the idea that Biden decided that he commuted via train over the Over the Francis Scott Key Bridge.
One problem with that, Dr. Gorsi.
The train doesn't go on that bridge.
Correct.
You've been on the bridge, you've seen that.
There's no train on that bridge.
Thirdly, he did answer maybe one or two questions semi-coherently, and when a reporter asked about Netanyahu not canceling the meeting between he or his administration and himself, he said, he walked off, said, I don't want to talk about Rafa, and then there's other time to talk about that and left.
Yeah, he also was in North Carolina, evidently, and a reporter asked the White House press secretary whether the president has dementia, and that was dismissed as just an insulting question.
Well, of course, it's an irrelevant question because the special prosecutor, this guy Hu, You know, it reminds me of the Abba Costello jokes about who's on first, you know, the prosecutor.
To be fair, you're asking the mouthpiece for the president a question that she really can't answer.
Right.
Because you're trying to trap her.
I mean, I know that.
I know the trick.
It's done on both sides.
I don't like it because you should ask somebody else who actually has an expertise or in the field and can answer that question.
Well, I think it's fair because of, I mean, I have a little bit different view of it because I think it's fair given that the special prosecutor said he was, Biden was so demented that he couldn't be prosecuted, strongly suggesting there were crimes and how he handled his classified documents as vice president.
So only being excused because he's demented.
So it's legitimate to say, how can somebody who's demented be president of the United States?
If he's demented, he ought to go get care and, you know, some medical care somewhere and get out of the public sphere.
He shouldn't be having major responsibilities as president if he's got obvious signs of dementia.
You could have asked the same question with physical issues at the end of Woodrow Wilson's presidency.
So keep that in mind.
Well, they should have because he was in a stroke and his wife was running the country.
Well, look, again, just like, funny thing, just like back in the Wilson era, the vice president was rather useless, at least to the people who were handling the president at this point.
We have the same situation here now, don't we?
Another useless vice president.
Okay, now one more point and then I'm going to move on from this.
The point is that, again, Through the Trump presidency, they were constantly saying, is Trump demented?
He had to go through a memory exercise to show people how he was mentally, you know, acute yet.
He was very sharp, but yet it was fair for the Democrats to raise these issues, but it's not fair for anybody in the press to raise the issue, despite the special prosecutor saying that Joe Biden is suffering signs of senior dementia.
This is ridiculous.
This is, again, not reporting the truth.
It is not reporting the news.
It's political reporting.
And again, we go back to the Jack Kennedy assassination, where the government creates a narrative and it sticks to its narrative.
And I'm objecting to that very strongly.
I think that's exactly what destroys the country.
So, any comment, Chris?
I'm with you on all of that as well.
And let's put it this way.
They also covered up the RFK assassination.
Same thing.
And Martin Luther King.
And how many other things have they done?
Right.
I worry about this whole thing.
And again, whenever something happens and any politician quickly speaks out and tries to sway you from thinking one way, instead of just trying to pull the facts out, you have to question that, to be honest with you.
I mean, it's immediate.
It was immediate.
Hey, no, it was immediate.
The government said no terrorist attack.
It was take the terrorist attack off the table as you will.
Yeah.
Well, the terrorist attack is on the table and I don't think the government can take it off anymore because I don't think anybody trusts the government or the mainstream media.
Yes.
And that's that.
There's no reason to trust either one.
They both lie all the time.
Okay.
Let's go to the price of gold.
Gold is again today at $2,186.
It's challenging the $2,200 level.
We've been telling you for a year that gold is going to go through an historic gold rush.
Why?
Because the global economy is in the process of collapsing.
And it's going to start accelerating the collapse and gold is going to... I don't think there's a way to stop it from collapsing.
And gold is going to start increasing even more dramatically in the future.
The time to get in on this is now.
If you wait too long, you're going to find that it's going to get extremely expensive.
If you get on now, you're going to ride to a higher peak in gold.
So I'm saying, get a hold of this free book, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush.
I wrote this book months ago.
It's with Dean Heskin, who's the head of Swiss America.
It's predicting that when we have economic downturns, gold doubles in price.
And that's the case going back to the 1970s with Jimmy Carter and his disastrous presidency with the OPEC oil embargo and then his high inflation, which we're experiencing today.
Again, we're having an international energy crisis brought on by this green nonsense.
And then the subprime real estate bubble bursting in 2008, 2009.
That's when gold went $1,000 to $1,426 an ounce.
Remember, gold for decades was $35 an ounce while we were on the gold standard.
And again, there have been dramatic increases over that period of time, given 1971 when Richard Nixon took us off the gold standard altogether.
And then COVID, gold went to $2,074.60 on March 8, 2022.
You get this copy of this book by calling Swiss America 1-800-519-6268.
Do it today.
Call Swiss America 1-800-519-6268.
two, you get this copy of this book by calling Swiss America 1-800-519-6268. Do it today.
Call Swiss America 1-800-519-6268. Think about getting some gold. It will increase in price.
I've been predicting this, I've been right about it. Get on that train right now with
with your IRAs, your 401ks.
You can have them gold-backed if you do it the right way, but you need professional advice.
Call Swiss America 1-800-519-6268.
1-800-519-6268. Okay, let's go to the next story I want to cover, which has to do
with the, again, this Ukrainian involvement in the Russian attack and the State Department's
involvement.
Now, this is another remarkable story.
Okay, so Russia experienced a terror attack where some terrorists with weapons opened fire during a concert and killed people.
They appeared to be pretty systematic in how they did it.
By the way, just on the economics, the dollar's down 20% since Biden took office.
We've lost 20% of the value of the dollar.
That story's out today as well, and it goes with what I'm saying about we're seeing an intentional destruction of the dollar, and the Federal Reserve, by printing money, Treasury printing money, Federal Reserve buying our debt.
This whole nonsense is getting out of control.
We're now rapidly approaching $35 trillion in debt.
We're adding new trillions of dollars in debt on a too fast basis.
It's accelerating and Biden is just, you know, the Democrats, once they've started just spending money, modern monetary theory, they're not going to stop.
Okay, let's go to the Ukraine story.
What is developing here?
And I'm following it very closely, is the idea that the State Department is involved in the terror attack.
Again, your first thought is going to be, this is preposterous.
How could this be?
But yet there's reporting from Pepe Escobar, who is an independent reporter.
He's very good.
And he's reporting that there is a chain of evidence here, which strongly suggests that the State Department was involved and may have actually orchestrated this entire attack.
Now, this is another theme I've been covering.
NATO appears to be, and the United States appear to be, escalating the war in Ukraine and increasing the involvement of the NATO countries, including the United States.
So what Pepe Escobar is following is a chain of events, so that December 4th, 2023, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, and you remember him, he, during the Trump administration in 2020, when Black Lives Matter was in the streets burning down Washington, General Milley refused to allow the troops to be put into the field under an act which gives the President sole authority to use the military to stop an insurrection, to stop violence in the cities, to control domestic violence.
And Milley He said he wouldn't do that because he wanted to take a knee to Black Lives Matter.
Milley is a woke general.
He's as good as this admiral wearing a dress.
Okay, so December 4th, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Milley, only three months after his retirement, told the Washington Post, which is regarded by Pepe Escobar properly as a CIA mouthpiece, Quote, there should be no Russian who goes to sleep without wondering if they're going to get their throat slit in the middle of the night.
You got to get back there and create a campaign behind the lines.
Now that's pretty provocative.
So then in an interview with ABC News, the spy chief, this guy named Budarov, lays down the road map.
He says, we're going to go deeper and deeper into Russia.
And January 31st, Victoria Nuland, and she's been in the state department for a long time.
And she is one of the prime movers behind the Russian collusion theory.
She was a prime mover on the Biden attempt to, I mean, Trump impeachment, because Trump dared in a conversation with Zelensky to bring up Joe Biden's son and corruption.
So Victoria Nuland on January 31st traveled to Kiev.
And she met Budorov.
Then in a press conference at night, in the middle of an empty street, she promises nasty surprises for Putin.
That's code for asymmetric war.
In other words, for terrorism.
On February 22nd, Nuland showed up at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington and doubled down on the nasty surprises in asymmetric war.
And that could be interpreted as a definitive signal for Budenov to start deploying dirty ops.
Now, Chris has a clip of Budenov, and let's watch an interview with Budenov so we can see what he's saying.
He's a Ukrainian spy master, as it were, and I think his comments in this interview are very telling.
So, Chris, go ahead and play it.
Did Ukraine strike a Russian airbase?
I can't give you an answer right now on this question.
Okay.
Only after ending of this war.
After the war, you can answer that.
I think so.
What's your reaction to it, even if you don't claim responsibility?
I'm very glad to see this.
That's my reaction.
That's your reaction.
You're happy to see it.
Yeah.
Do you think there'll be more?
I think so.
Inside Russia?
Deep inside Russia?
Deeper and deeper.
And in Crimea?
Crimea is a part of Ukraine.
It's our territory.
We can use any weapon on our territory.
Is Putin terminally ill?
Okay, we can stop it right there.
That's the key point that he's making, is Budenov, who is a spy chief in Ukraine, is making it clear that Ukraine is planning to launch attacks into Russia.
That's expanding the war.
And you can see the article we posted.
I believe that what they did is they recruited some of the ISIS over telegram and offered them money and supplied a cache of weapons.
So you have these terrorists who showed up at the concert in Moscow and began killing people.
And they're all apprehended.
They've been tortured.
I think you're going to find that they are going to suffer pretty dramatically at the hands of the Russians.
Russians are not going to put up with this particularly easily.
These people are, their lives are over.
They'll probably face massive torture before they're executed.
The chain of events looks to me like that the CIA has had a hundred stations along the Ukraine-Russia border.
On February 25th this year, the New York Times published a story about the CIA cells in Ukraine.
Of course, Russia, I'm sure, knew about those cells and has been watching them.
But on March 5th, there was a critical shadow play that was in effect a privileged scenario.
Nuland was a key dirty ops plotter alongside the CIA and the Ukrainian Budinov, and these rival deep state functions decided to get rid of, you know, Nuland, one way or another, Russian intel, I'm sure, was going to expose her.
She became a liability.
So she retired and then didn't retire until finally our genius Secretary of State Blinken made it clear that she was going to retire.
Blinken on March 5th formally announced Nuland's retirement, quote-unquote retirement.
But by going and getting these ISIS factions, I believe even from Pakistan, I think this is where they came from, or Turkey was involved.
Again, not all the details are yet clear.
But what's emerging is that we've got a State Department, CIA organized operation to launch asymmetric war, namely to have terrorist attacks within Russia.
We've also been having Ukraine attacking Russian oil facilities.
I commented on that yesterday, that that threatens to expand not only the energy crisis, but expand the war.
Now, Putin's been warning That if the war expands and if NATO increasingly gets directly involved or the U.S., then it no longer is a proxy war.
It's actually a war between NATO and Russia or between U.S.
and the EU and Russia, and that could go nuclear.
And I'm raising the question and putting on the table whether these demons in the State Department and the CIA, the same cabal that I believe got together to get rid of John Kennedy.
I'm going to explain that in a minute.
That they are now going to say that we will have as our October surprise nuclear war with Russia.
If that's what it takes to prevent Donald Trump from being president, if it looks like Donald Trump is going to have such a overwhelming majority that the Democrats can't steal the election without it becoming obvious to the American public.
Then a nuclear war would cancel the election.
And the fact that the different forces that are building here, the back-channeling that is being done by Russia, getting Tucker Carlson to come to Moscow, and Medvedev and Putin are doing an orchestrated release of information, saying that they have intelligence, obviously, that the EU is preparing to be more directly involved in the war.
And if that's the case, We're headed towards a nuclear World War III, and it could happen in October.
Again, this is an election year, and I don't think the Democrats have a candidate that they can win on.
If we have this story developing such that the U.S.
State Department and CIA were involved here, it's going to be a major, major impact on the presidential election.
Now, I want to go into a little bit more detail on this cabal between the State Department and the CIA.
And it goes back to the 1950s.
And Chris, you might pull up some pictures as we're talking here.
John Foster Dulles and his brother, Alan Dulles, the brothers.
This family was very prominent in American history.
John Foster Dulles, whom Dulles Airport is named after in Washington, D.C., With Secretary of State under President Eisenhower, and Allen Dulles was head of the CIA, his brother.
Now, in the run-up to World War II, in the 1930s, the Dulles brothers were part of a Wall Street gang, Brown Brothers Harriman, very prominent old investment firm.
Prescott Bush, the father of George H. W. Bush, was involved.
There's the two Dulles brothers.
You have Alan on the left, and on the right is John Foster Dulles.
You can see an old prop plane behind them.
And 1950s, wearing hats like they did in the 50s.
Suits, three vests, you know, a vest or a sweater with a suit common in the 50s.
These two guys were architecting the global New World Order.
They really did not believe in the United States.
They believed in destroying the United States to create their global government.
They were globalists from the beginning.
Now, during World War II, prior to World War II, these two guys, together with Prescott Bush, the father of George H.W.
Bush, Brown Brothers Harriman, they were funding Hitler.
Wall Street funded Hitler.
Hitler's rise was funded by Washington money.
Why?
Well, because they believed in the 1930s that Hitler was taking Germany out of the Depression, and Germany had a formula these guys liked for globalism.
Namely, he had a small, self-appointed oligarchy.
The Nazi party at its center was a small cabal.
You know, you had a very few people around Hitler who would rise to power.
Hess, Goebbels, you know, very small group of people.
And they took over the country through building this movement, the Nazi movement, Which was fundamentally a racist movement.
It was an idea that we could have a higher order human being.
The Nazi superhuman.
Based a lot on Nietzsche, a philosopher who thought we should go beyond good and evil.
We should have a new higher set of values.
We should become Übermensch, which means superhuman beings.
Okay, so they funded Hitler.
Thinking that this oligarchy, together with the multinational corporations, could control the world, and that the people would be essentially the worthless masses, and they'd keep them happy with a little bit of socialism, because the Nazis were national socialists.
They were on the left.
They were not on the right.
The fascists really refer to the Roman symbol of fascis, an axe surrounded by these bundles of wood, which became the symbol for Mussolini when he was reviving the Roman Empire in the 1930s in Italy.
And they were on the left.
So the people would get a little bit of medical care paid for by the government.
They would get government-paid vacations.
They could get Volkswagens, which were cheap, and they could ride them on the Autostrada, which Hitler built with public funds.
Wall Street funded it.
During World War II, Alan Dulles went to Bern, Switzerland.
He was one of the last people to get into Bern, Switzerland, after the Nazis closed off the Swiss border.
And he worked directly with Martin Bormann, who was the Secretary to Hitler.
At the end of the war, Alan Dulles, the guy on the left, helped the Nazis get their gold out of Europe, submarines back to Argentina, despite it being loot that they stole from other countries in Europe, that they had stolen from the teeth of the Jews, the Holocaust going into the ovens.
And they got the money.
And all the artists they could get out of this, and a lot of the art went on the submarines too.
The money, Allendalz invested in the stock market of the United States.
It was part of the post-war boom, was with Nazi money that Allendalz funneled in.
Allendalz took a whole group of the Gestapo under Galen, brought them into the CIA.
Okay, so this was the New World Order crowd, and instead of the multinational corporations, the companies that Hitler was working with, just think about the World Economic Forum.
It's a redo of the Nazi formula.
And you've got people like Harari, there's no Harari, writing books, Sapiens, and Ecco Homo, saying that we should become transhuman, merge with our machines, and that we can have all the robots do all the work, we don't need all these people.
Replace them with AI and with machines.
You don't need a minimal worker because you don't have to pay these machines.
You just turn them on.
Okay, that's the future these guys are architecting.
Why did they kill Kennedy?
Christopher, I'll show my first book on the Who Really Killed Kennedy, the cover of that book, please.
That book argued that John Kennedy wanted to establish peace.
He did not want to go to war.
These demons believe you need war as transformative in order to destroy existing order, create confusion, demoralize the people.
They want to create a godless.
These two guys don't believe in God.
They think they are in control.
They're both dead now.
So there's their utopia.
They're dead and probably rightly in hell.
For what they brought forth on the earth, which is Satanism, who really killed Kennedy?
In that book, I wrote it 10 years ago, and I said that Kennedy would not go to war in the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 when Khrushchev moved nuclear missiles into Cuba 90 miles away from the Florida shore.
Our Joint Chiefs of Staff, Curtis LeMay, who had done firebombing in Dresden in World War II, he learned how to bomb so intensively and in a particular way that all the oxygen was sucked out of the city.
People died of asphyxiation as well as being burned to death.
Then he firebombed Japan.
The houses were paper, virtually, and he was killing civilians.
There was no intent to do strategic bombing and military targets.
Curtis LeMay was just bombing Japanese cities and burning them to the ground.
There's Curtis LeMay.
It was always distinguished for his cigar.
By the way, LeMay and his cigar were commented as being present at the JFK autopsy.
And he was gloating over it and the generals were giving orders to the doctors about what they were permitted to do and what they weren't permitted to do.
Cuban Missile Crisis, he wanted desperately to go to war with Cuba, which meant go to war with the Soviet Union.
And LeMay and the other generals and joint chiefs at that time believed we had a strategic military advantage, first strike capability, and we'd suffer massive losses in a nuclear war, but we would beat the Russians.
And he wanted to nuke the Russians into oblivion in 1962.
Kennedy said no.
Kennedy thought it was outrageous.
Thought these guys were monsters.
He realized he'd lost control of the CIA.
He'd lost control of the State Department.
The State Department was always this leftist, globalist faction, as it is still today.
And these generals wanted war.
They were also going to retire into the arms producers.
Enormous amounts of money were going to get made in the war, producing the war material.
World War II took us out of the Depression.
And this General LeMay wanted to go to World War.
Kennedy back-channeled with Khrushchev.
He gave a speech at American University, in which he said, in the final analysis, and that's in part, we're signaling that and echoing that, in calling this book here, on Mattick's book, you've got to search for it, The Assassination of John F. Kennedy, The Final Analysis.
Kennedy said, in the final analysis, we all live on this small planet.
We've got to coexist.
Before he died, Kennedy was giving orders that we were going to pull out of Vietnam.
And that again, the generals wanted to go to war in Vietnam.
Uh, Lyndon Johnson, uh, was willing to go along with the generals.
Ben Kennedy had issued this national security memorandum.
We're pulling out of Vietnam.
Bell Helicopters is in Fort Worth, headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas.
Lyndon Johnson's from Texas.
Uh, the army wanted at that time to re-engineer our military forces to be more air cavalry with helicopters.
Wanted to get the kind of army we have today, a mobile army.
Not one that is a mobile army capable of fighting terrorists, asymmetric warfare.
Not the Patton Army of World War II with tanks and infantry and cannons that we fought a conventional land war.
What we're seeing in Ukraine is that conventional land wars are outmoded.
They're almost like video games today with all the electronics.
And by the way, With the ability to have cyber attacks, you've got to wonder if there was a cyber attack on that ship in the Baltimore Harbor.
Now that we see how the government lies, how it architects these Black Swan events, killing Kennedy, massive impact on the public, government narrative, push the people into more government control.
So the great country mourning after Kennedy died will kind of prevent assassinations in the future.
So the Secret Service gets more power, You know, we get more orientation of police.
9-11 happens.
Buildings collapse that were not hit by the airplanes.
This looks like a controlled explosion, detonation.
I've seen controlled detonations of buildings.
It looks like they fall down like pancakes.
Buildings don't typically topple that way.
And structurally, it would have been very difficult for the Twin Towers to come down if it weren't that way, if they weren't a controlled explosion.
Yet we have the Patriot Act.
We give the government more authority.
So the government has architected a narrative, we're living in a Jim Carrey Truman Show, where we think we're living reality, but all we're doing is we're actors in a CIA play being manipulated, psychologically, and it's PSYOP.
It's going on continuously.
And you can see what we're experiencing today, it's continuing.
So, the war in Ukraine, again, did not need to be fought.
We pushed NATO to the edge of Russia.
This has always been considered to be antagonistic.
Russia needs Finland to go through the north to the Baltic Sea, and Ukraine through the Black Sea.
That's their north and southern routes to the Atlantic.
Geopolitics, you don't deny a major power their sphere of influence and their access to the oceans.
That's explosive formula.
And the State Department knows it.
The CIA knows it.
They want disruption.
They're using the Neo-Marxism, the woke, as their implement to do the final destabilization of America.
Now, I wanted to cover more, but I think I'll save the Newt Gingrich article for tomorrow.
I want to play one more video, Chris, if you can show this little video of this, what they're calling the Great Replacement.
You've got to understand these people on the left planned 50, 60 years ago.
They planned for 50 years ago.
Our side likes to, you know, it's going to not happen for 50 years, let's not worry about it, let's deal with today.
But the communists, the left, thinks, let's start today something which will have dramatic impact, even if it takes 50 or 60 years, to fundamentally change.
And the Great Replacement means that all this anti-white, you know, this white supremacy, all that our Justice Department now thinks that whites, Catholics who like the Latin mass, they're the real terrorists.
Let's just play this little video here, Chris, and you can see how the United States in 1961, 97% white, and as it goes along, here's 1971, the percentages are changing, we begin to get Asian, we begin to get other mixed races, so that by 2021, The almost 97% that were white in 1960, now we are, let's see, 60 years later, and we're down to 36.8% white, the traditional British white that came in with the colonists, and we've got these increasing percentages of black, other, Asian, etc.
The Great Replacement is replacing white people with these various races.
Now, why?
Communists believe that if you change the demographics, you change the politics.
Bring in people who do not have American fundamental values, are not educated in our Founding Fathers' values of limited government, or that our rights are, by God, inalienable, not bestowed by a state.
So you end up with Harari, I don't know who is godless and says you cut a person open where you see the heart and the blood and the lungs and everything but you don't see human rights, you don't see God, you don't see a soul.
None of these things in the material sphere exist for these people.
They're trying to create a utopia on earth that's perfect.
It won't work.
This place is not perfect.
Earth, we all die.
Or they think, well, we can have perpetual life extension.
You know, Bill Gates, I think even Elon Musk with his investment in these firms that are planting chips into the people to let the chips make us superhuman so that we can think and we can move things just by thinking about it.
We have the intelligence of a supercomputer wired into our brain.
We become computer code, and thus we become immortal.
I think Bill Gates' final idea is he won't die, he'll just be a computer program somewhere.
That'll be his ultimate Microsoft.
This is insanity.
It's godless insanity.
And it's going to produce World War III.
Uh, it's going to be, I've been urgently trying in my life to prevent this.
I was walking across the, another key bridge in Washington, DC, 2004, when I coauthored with John O'Neill, uh, Unfit for Command, the book about swift boat veterans speak out against John Kerry and his military service in Vietnam, which was, I think, less than honorable, which those swift boat veterans documented.
That book became a number one bestseller.
And so walking across the Key Bridge, I remember it was a warm summer evening, I was going over to Georgetown to get something to eat from the Key Bridge Marriott, where I was staying at the time, and somehow God said, look back at the city.
I looked back at the city, and I saw the city destroyed in a nuclear attack.
Like a vision, I could see it destroyed.
And the impact God had on me at that point was that this could happen.
In your lifetime, my lifetime, and that a mission was to try to prevent it.
Well, I don't know if we're able to prevent it.
Certain things are written, and they are a book of, you know, St.
John's Apocalypse, and these things are prophetic, and God will have a judgment on the earth.
Chris, I'm going to wrap up in a minute.
Do you want to comment on everything we've covered today?
I am looking forward to your analysis of the Newt Gingrich article tomorrow, because you're looking way back into history to get into the minds of the anti-Trump Republicans, the Lincoln Project et al.
There are probably a lot of other reasons for this, but history can teach us a lot of lessons, and that's where we are today.
We'll start now with that tomorrow.
I do want to add that, Jerry, you will be talking about your book and the JFK assassination on my program this evening.
It's called Unleashed, The Political News Hour, and that's going to be on the America Out Loud Talk Radio Network, available live at seven o'clock this evening, Eastern Time, on the America Out Loud Talk Radio Network as a podcast later on during the week as well.
Well, I enjoyed that interview.
That was a good interview.
It was fun.
It was fun.
And I think people are going to like the... This book is gaining ground.
It's going to take a little bit of time.
It's transformative.
It's disruptive.
Because this is hard evidence, scientifically, that the three JFK skull x-rays in the National Archives are all fakes.
They're all doctored.
They are JFK's skull.
The teeth do match a pre-mortem skull x-ray that JFK had taken, and it is now in the archives of the JFK Presidential Library in Boston.
The teeth match, but the x-rays have been altered.
They're duplicates.
These are not the originals.
And yet they do show two frontal shots, which are unmistakable.
And no, one of the shots was not from the driver.
I think there are three gunmen.
One was the Grassy Knoll.
One was on the railroad bridge on the other side of Triple Underpass.
And the third was from low angle behind.
There may have been more gunmen.
There were shots that missed.
The shot that hit Jack Kennedy in the back.
Dr. Manik, I think, correctly analyzes as having been shrapnel from a bullet that missed and hit an Elm Street.
We don't know how many shooters there were.
Who were the shooters?
I don't think that's the key issue.
These guys were, whoever they were, they were the best shot they could find.
These were cold hearted killers.
And they knew it was the President of the United States.
Most people couldn't handle even the idea of shooting at the President of the United States.
Whoever did these shots was cold-blooded about it, and they didn't miss.
They got the head in a vehicle moving, albeit slowly, But that part of Elm Street is about a three angle down decline from the turn of Houston Street onto Elm Street, which is a very sharp turn.
Slows the car down almost to a stop.
And then it's also winding.
So you've got a winding, declining target, which is very, very difficult to hit.
Whoever were the shooters hit JFK three times in the head, each shot would have been fatal alone.
These were good shooters.
So we're now deconstructing the fact that we are living in this constructed reality, and the goal here is to destroy.
This Neo-Marxism is being used as a tool by the transhumanists, and their plan is depopulation.
They don't need us.
It's anti-God, it's evil, it's satanic, and we're going to start seeing Satan exposed in all different branches of our culture and society globally.
But as I say, in the end, God always wins.
God will win here, too.
It's not going to be easy.
It's not going to be pretty.
We're going to have a judgment of God.
A lot of people are going to suffer and die.
But in the end, God will win.
And I'm urging all of us to be on God's side.
I think the key passage in the Bible is 2 Chronicles 7.14, where it says, if we get on our knees and repent, God will hear our prayer and heal our land.
And I think we're in need of divine intervention.
I wrote another book on that, which is called No Greater Valor.
It was about the Battle of Bastogne.
And I wrote that book to determine, does God intervene in human history?
And I decided, yes, God does.
And God will again.
Dr. Jerome Corsi today, it's Wednesday, it's March 27th, 2024.
