All Episodes
July 11, 2023 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
40:35
US vs. NATO Allies on Ukraine Membership; California Crime Surges, Arrests Down

While the US continues to hand money and arms to Ukraine, the Biden Administration is battling NATO allies over the former Soviet Republic's admittance to the group's ranks. Dr. Jerome Corsi looks at the possibilities and ripple effects today on The Truth Central.Also:Crime is surging in California, but arrests are downAre the Climate Change Agenda's plans harmful to the environment?The truth about climate and solar activityMore commercial real estate delinquencies bringing the economy downGet Dr. Corsi's new book with Swiss America CEO Dean Heskin, How the Coming Global Crash Will Create a Historic Gold Rush: https://www.thetruthcentral.com/how-the-coming-global-crash-will-create-a-historic-gold-rush/Follow Dr. Jerome Corsi on Twitter: @corsijerome1Our website: https://www.thetruthcentral.comOur link to where to get the Marco Polo 650-Page Book on the Hunter Biden laptop & Biden family crimes free online: https://www.thetruthcentral.com/marco-polo-publishes-650-page-book-on-hunter-biden-laptop-biden-family-crimes-available-free-online/Our Sponsors:MyVitalC: https://www.thetruthcentral.com/myvitalc-ess60-in-organic-olive-oil/Swiss America: https://www.swissamerica.com/offer/CorsiRMP.phpThe MacMillan Agency: https://www.thetruthcentral.com/the-macmillan-agency/Pro Rapid Review: https://prorrt.com/thetruthcentralmembers/RITA: https://members.sayrita.com/truthcentralreaders/Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-truth-central-with-dr-jerome-corsi--5810661/support.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
In October last year, we locked the Kiwi price on healthier goods.
The response was fantastic.
That's why we at Kiwi have decided to continue to lock the price on many healthier goods until November 1, 2024.
We have many healthier goods until November 1, 2024.
At 500 grams of panko-baked cod from Lerøy, we'll be offering the price at NOK 89,90.
And you, prices marked with a price tag, can't go up.
Only down.
Because we in Kiwi never give up.
This is Dr. Jerome Corse and today is Tuesday, July 11th, 2016.
This is Dr. Jerome Corse and today is Tuesday, July 11th, 2016.
Thank you for joining us here at TheTruthCentral.com.
The first story I want to cover today has to do with these climate models.
This is, again, something that's very important to understand in terms of how this global warming hoax is being done.
There was an article that caught my attention.
It was on the Daily Skeptic.
I was pointing out these climate models have dangerous carbon dioxide warming baked into the way the code is written.
The formula is baked into the model.
The prejudice the models are going to show that carbon dioxide is going to cause global warming is built in.
Now this comes from a discussion of the code of one of the most important models.
It was NASA's GISS Model E, which was a program that goes back to the 1970s.
It happens to be one of the more used or basic kind of climate models that the global warmers use.
It was written in FORTRAN.
Which is a programming language that was common in the early IBM days, the early Univac days.
Fortran is not much used anymore.
Basic machine code programming is still done.
But again, there's lots of other languages that are much easier to use when you're programming in general to run today's computers.
Now, there was a Net Zero Watch had an article called this Climate Models and Climate Muddles.
And what they were arguing again is that if you take a look at how the code is written in these programs, you'll see that it is essentially baked in.
Okay, let me explain it to you how it goes.
So when you get a climate model, They basically are iterative.
In other words, you take round one and you get certain results.
Here's the carbon dioxide.
Here's the amount of warming.
And then that's set there.
And number two, it's iterative.
It adds more carbon dioxide and adds more warming.
Now, what they are showing is that these iterative models The output of one timestamp is used to be the input for the next.
So any error in the output of timestamp J is carried over as an error to the input in timestamp K and so on, which makes it easy for the model to spiral down into a snowball earth or to overheat, making the virtual planet go up in flames.
So, they went through different figures, and they show you a couple thousand runs of the program, and the program begins to spin wildly out of control after a certain point because of this iterative problem.
Now, what they did to solve the problem Was that they wrote into the code hard stops.
In other words, when the program began to flip out, it just stopped calculating it.
They used a particular example, which is Polynias, which are these pools of meltwater that form on top of seasonal sea ice at the poles.
They're important in calculating the Earth's reflectivity, which they call albedo, or albedo in the jargon, of sea ice.
And this determines how much of the sun's incoming heat is reflected straight back upwards.
Now, these polyynas have been a big problem.
The model was suggesting they were present for the ice on far too much of each year.
So the model was essentially too hot.
However, rather than work out why, they simply added a hard time limit on the number of days during which melt pools could form.
So looking at this code, it appears that they've done some work in this area because he could no longer find the routine that created the restriction on the number of days.
Instead, there's a new subroutine that says hard limits on the values for the albedo for the sea ice and the melt ponds, as well as specifying constant values for wet and dry snow on the sea ice.
Finally, it also limits the values for visible light, And for bands of near-infrared, the code is shown in block A, where those who are interested in the, you know, you can see, if you can read the code, where these limits are placed.
Now, what that means is they're not measuring the variables.
They're basically creating a model that has a set output.
And the set output is biased towards showing that the temperature is going to rise because there's more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
So I'm claiming, at least it's saying, that if the temperature is less than minus 10 degrees Celsius and the polyena hasn't frozen, make it refreeze.
Without this bit of code, some of the melt ponds might never refreeze, no matter how cold it got.
Okay, well you have to like that kind of physics, water that doesn't freeze.
That's what the climate modelers mean when they say that their model is physics-based.
It's very much like what they say in Hollywood when they say a story is based on a true story.
In other words, it isn't physics-based.
It's based in a way that is just setting up, for instance, He has one code block C, which this routine makes sure the temperature remains within reasonable bounds during the initialization process.
Sometimes the computed temperature is iterated out in the left field someplace outside any reasonable range.
This routine keeps the temperature between the minimum and maximum of the boundary temperatures.
So in other words, when the temperature goes off the rail, don't investigate and find out why, just fix the model so it comes out with the result you want.
Now, this is a major article, it's a major finding, because we have so much of the predictions out there from the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Policy Committee on Climate Change, or Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Is based on these predictions, which are the extreme models, which have a very low probability of ever happening.
Now, we're seeing a lot of articles today.
In fact, you can just, if you just pick up any, I take a look at the Google articles and there's temperature, extreme temperatures in Texas.
Here's, it's so hot over here and all the, this summer, they're blaming that the heat is a direct result of global warming.
Now, the truth is, it's been hot like this before, called summer.
Okay, and in the 1930s, 1936 was a very hot summer, hotter than this one.
Okay, the sun is cyclical.
Now, this is what I've been pointing out in terms of the sun heating the earth.
Is that the sun does not burn constantly.
So when the sun goes into a minimum, we end up having a minimum period for an ice age, a little ice age on earth.
We happen to be in sun cycle, solar cycle 25.
Now it's a little warmer, more sunspots in cycle 25 than cycle 24.
Sun cycle goes about 11 years.
In 11 years, the sun has a certain phase of its activity.
Well, the recent cycles going back, and you have to go back quite a long way on these cycles, so that if you go back on cycle 25, which is relatively young, it's only three and a half years old, We don't know how it's altogether going to turn out, but it looks like it's going to be hotter than cycle 24, which would account for some of the heat that is arising right now across the country and worldwide.
But both cycles, 24 and 25, show significantly lower activity compared to the average of the last 300 years.
Together they represent an extended solar minimum, which is being called the CLILVERD, C-L-I-L-V-E-R-D minimum.
It's based on a paper published by Mark CLILVERD and colleagues.
Which successfully predicted the occurrence of this event.
In other words, that we've been having these lower sun activity in a cycle compared to the previous 300 years.
Contrary to other earlier speculations, likelihood of a grand solar minimum in the 21st century is becoming more remote because cycle 25 is a little hotter.
So we're probably not going to just continue going at a downward trend.
We're probably still in a Minimum look at with geologic time and 300 years is not very much time in 4.6 billion years versus history.
But the point is twofold.
One is that these climate models are rigged because the mathematics of the climate are non-linear.
The variables are hard to measure.
If you get the, depending on how many decimal points you go out, and you can't go out enough because the earth does not need decimal points.
And we have irrational numbers.
Pi is an irrational number.
You're never, it's always going to have an infinite string of decimal points because it doesn't evenly divide.
You know, a rational number is four divided by two is two.
It's even.
So, the problem is with these numbers, very, very small differences on the hundredth decimal place, or the thousandth decimal point, could change dramatically the results of the model.
Because the mathematics that we have to use, our mathematics, we have to operate within the mathematics to create these models.
The Earth doesn't need to.
The Earth just makes these things work.
Earth doesn't care if it's an irrational number.
The Earth is comfortable with a non-linear process, with results that change.
And that's why the climate is not Precisely predictable, and patterns have to be looked at on extremely long periods of time, and it's why the models you're getting, and the headlines you're getting, are just basically nonsense.
Chris, do you want to comment on this?
A lot of times you're going to see these climate activists use these simple headlines and say, We had a warmer summer this year, or it was cooler somewhere else this year.
That means climate change.
El Niño happened some years back, and we have that new one coming.
That means climate change.
Of course it means climate change, but it doesn't mean man-made climate change.
It doesn't mean that the climate hasn't changed over the last, I don't know, 100 million or 100 billion years, in fact.
Like you were saying, the solar system, the Earth, and the orbit around the Sun, all these cycles are very different and they will gradually change the temperatures to a high point and a low point.
Right, so the second story here is very important today in the solar activity and the Sun cycles because it highlights two things.
Number one is to really know How our climate is operating and where the changes occur, you've got to look at geologic time.
One year, two years, this has been a hot summer compared to last.
It means nothing because that could just be a blip in the data.
You know, data is not in a straight line.
The data has to be organized into patterns and you can make, time series is particularly tricky because you can say, well, in this, you know, my mutual fund did extremely well in the last three years.
Well, how did it do in the last four years?
Not so well.
You cherry pick the period of time that makes the argument you want to make in time series data.
When you're dealing with a climate Climate events may occur in 100,000-year cycles, or in million-year cycles, or in 11-year cycles, and there's no rule that says these things all have to balance out.
There's no rule that says it can't change.
The Earth's orbit has changed.
You know, the solar system has probably changed when you go back four billion years.
And, you know, the idea that this is a stable place and it's going to remain stable or that we as human beings can have any great impact on the forces that are at work here is actually silly.
It's hubris.
It's like the entire neo-Marxist movement.
It assumes that we can assume the throne of God, that we can make things perfect.
That we human beings are responsible for everything.
We're not.
We're just the five extinctions that occurred on this planet before human beings ever got here.
Mass extinctions.
Everything that was alive died on the surface of the planet.
We didn't have anything to do with that.
As far as the Earth is concerned, we're just the latest creatures walking on the surface.
And we'll probably be gone too.
Not because of Burning hydrocarbon fuels.
That's where you get to the point where these ridiculous science ideas, and by the way, I see increasingly in the journals, people are publishing fake data.
Because if you're on the right theme in academics, they don't check your data.
If you rig your data, it's okay.
This whole Neo-Marxism is not fact-based.
It's not about truth.
It's about the ideological idea that we'd be better off without hydrocarbon fuels because they fuel industrial activity and there's too many people on the Earth.
Take a look at my book on climate change.
Truth about energy, global warming, and climate change.
The first three chapters are devoted to explaining that we have, in fact, a cycle of, since World War II through today, of the environmental movement was taken over by the depopulation theorists like Paul Ehrlichman, who said there's a population bomb, too many people, we're going to use up the resources of the earth.
We haven't.
And then John Holdren, Obama's science guy, who came and said, well, we better scare people with an existential need, so therefore, since hydrocarbon fuels emit carbon dioxide, since carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, we'll say we have too much of it, and the temperature of the Earth has been highest ever since the Industrial Age.
I'm seeing articles which, this temperature sets a world history, an Earth history, for the hottest day ever.
That's pure nonsense.
For the first 80% of the Earth's history, there was nothing living on the surface of the Earth.
It was too hot, too molten.
Going back into early Earth history, the days were much, much hotter.
And the planet was uninhabitable.
It took, you know, 4 billion years, 80% of that time, to get to where there could be life on the surface of the planet.
And people are not taught this.
They don't understand the mathematics.
And that's why it's very easy to have these ideological themes dominate the news.
Chris, any comment before?
I want to point out a book here, but any other comment?
It's easy for somebody to say, Hey, look at this temperature.
And we just, we said this, I guess on and off for the last five, 10 minutes, but it's easy to look at a temperature and say, this is the hottest day ever, because it's a popular thing to say.
And it evokes emotion.
The idea that the whole climate change movement is based on A. Making money, B. Getting attention, and 3.
A political agenda, and 4.
Evoking emotion.
They want to make sure that people are outraged over the idea that we horrible people are destroying the earth, when in fact Look, I understand we should be good stewards of our planet and throw away our garbage and make sure we don't blow pollution everywhere.
I get that.
But the fact is, using fake science, using popular science, and using lazy research to bring across a point just to gain political power and make money is something that people really should consider.
When listening to some of these advocates for climate change, think about it that way.
Politicians will say and do anything to retain power.
It's the same thing with climate change activists.
Greta Thunberg, every once in a while, she pops up on television.
She says something that makes absolutely no sense, but she shames people.
And that's what gets on the internet.
That's what the climate change movement is all about.
It's all about basically getting attention and gaining political power.
Of course, making some bucks as well.
Well, this book is an extremely good book, and it's one I'm constantly encouraging people to read.
It's called The Psychology of Totalitarianism, and it's by Matthias Desmet, D-E-S-M-E-T.
Okay, now he points out that the quality of research, and here we get a little bit better look at it.
Matthias Desmet.
The quality of research has deteriorated, and science has degenerated into ideology, belief, and dogma.
It is confirmed that the human being, in its subjective dimension, is the central point of focus.
The science, essentially, is bogus.
This is on page 84.
He's talking about How this leads to phenomena such as the Me Too movement, Black Lives Matter, the climate movement, the coronavirus crisis.
Let me read this for a second, Chris.
They are related to real problems, but these problems are not the real reason for the existence of these phenomena.
They arise mainly from the pressing need among the population for an authoritarian institution that provides direction to take the burden of freedom and the associated insecurity off their shoulders.
The government is eager to fill that vacancy.
Little by little, it limits the individual's freedom of choice and makes choices for them.
It imposes tobacco, sugar, and fat taxes.
It determines how health and immunity should be pursued.
No access to public spaces or the workplace without a vaccine.
Determines how much alcohol you can consume when you are in COVID-19 quarantine.
Six beers a day in Australia.
It bans religious symbols from public spaces.
It makes the signs of its own ideology mandatory.
Without a QR code, the doors will remain shut.
The individual will eventually lose even the right to make decisions about his own life.
When parents report suicidal thoughts, therapists are under pressure to proceed to collocutions, basically to confiscate children.
Suicide is not allowed under any circumstances.
However, the government approves you can get permission for euthanasia for reason of mental suffering.
In other words, from now on, the government determines how and when you are allowed to die, The educating and disciplining function of the government is becoming more complex every day, and for this reason, an efficient system becomes necessary.
At first, social credit seemed something that would only be possible in a communist totalitarian China, but even Australia is planning to introduce a new system, and some municipalities in Belgium are already using their own virtual currency, which you can earn with exemplary conduct.
I mean, the point is we're dealing with a totalitarian age, and it's not based on truth.
Chris?
It's based on... The idea is to seek control over the populace by using a noble cause such as saving the planet.
So climate change is an easy answer to almost everything.
If you remember, a couple of climate change activists will slip up every once in a while and say, well, it's the patriarchy.
I remember that Greta Thunberg saying that once as well.
It's basically a push for cultural Maoism and Marxism, but under the guise of doing something nice for the planet and for everybody else around you, when you're really not.
I want to cover a couple more stories quickly now.
The UN is meeting in Lithuania, I believe, in Lithuania this week, and Biden has said that he does not want now Ukraine to Enter NATO until the war with Russia is over.
I don't think Biden even knows where he is.
I think the mental deterioration of Biden is obvious.
You could watch him with King Charles in Great Britain.
He was wandering around like he didn't know where he was.
It was complete embarrassment that this is the President of the United States.
How could you have a demented person be President of a country?
Someone suffering senior dementia, this is senior abuse.
And he's obviously not running the country, thank you Barack Obama.
Now the point is that if we let NATO, and I think the NATO organization is going to push for Ukraine and for Sweden to join, which will only intensify the antagonism with Russia.
Because Russia uses both Finland to get its access to the Atlantic, to the Baltic Sea, and uses Ukraine to get its Atlantic access through the Black Sea, Sevastopol, and Ukraine, Crimea.
These are geopolitical factors that are not going away, and Biden is also, while he's hesitant to put Ukraine in NATO, because that would commit the United States to potentially going to war against Russia, An attack on Ukraine would be then considered an attack on a NATO country, and the basis of the NATO pact is an attack on any country is an attack on NATO, all the countries.
That was out of the Cold War.
It was after World War II when we saw Russia gobble up countries like Hungary and Czechoslovakia after World War II in Eastern Europe, making them communist.
We had an Iron Curtain, which was a phrase by Winston Churchill, and he gave a speech in Missouri.
He said, we've got to contain Russia behind this Iron Curtain, where there's totalitarianism, preserve it for freedom.
Well, today we're going neo-Marxist.
And the Democrats, I think, have hated Russia ever since the fall of the Berlin Wall, when Russia renounced communism.
Democrats loved Russia until Russia renounced communism.
Now they want to go to war with Russia.
Well, Russia's got nuclear weapons in Belarus, and Biden wants to deliver these cluster bombs, which are very, very horrendous weapons.
They drop clusters of bombs in an area, and if they don't all explode, they can be dangerous, and citizens can get killed by finding them and not knowing what to do with them.
And they are considered war crimes in some ways.
Biden himself accused nations of using cluster bombs and committing war crimes.
We are heading on a path which is going to end up with war with Russia.
And I'm warning people about this because I think the idea of us going to war with Russia is absolute insanity.
And the NATO forces seem to be engaged in a self-destructive Mode right now.
Hungary said this week it will not let these camps of migrants be deposited in Hungary as in France.
France is about to be in the middle of a civil war between these immigrants from Africa and the Middle East who do not merge into French culture.
They bring their own culture with them, they bring their own religion, their own rules, and they don't have anything to do, they despise a lot of the French culture.
They're not Christian, many of them.
The churches don't mean anything to them.
In fact, some of them, their religious beliefs are the churches ought to be destroyed, the great cathedrals that were built in the Middle Ages.
We're at the edge of a nuclear war, and China is ready to take over Taiwan, and we're sending all these munitions to Ukraine with billions of dollars that's only being stolen.
It's an insane period of time.
The next story, the crime is surging in California, while arrests are declining.
Defund the police.
And by the way, in New York City, the police are quitting in droves.
They've had it.
You've got people, a very frightening film, someone on a scooter riding around with a gun, randomly shooting and killing people in New York City.
Picked up on the cameras, you know, monitoring the streets.
Well, in California, the crime rates are spiraling and the police are fewer and fewer because of the defund police movements.
So you've got these, especially these grab and run kind of looting of stores,
arrests for robbery jumped 14% for the year, burglary 9%, theft 12%,
criminal activity plagues municipalities across California, and arrest rates have declined by 2.7%
2021 to 2022, representing the 18th year in a row that arrests have decreased.
California is turning into a lawless, homeless, insolvent country, nation,
that has nothing to do with the red states in the United States.
These blue states are going to become democratic hellholes, and cities like San Francisco are rapidly deteriorating, with stores closing, offices vacant, the downtown's not safe.
The last story I want to cover today is on that theme.
Commercial real estate nightmare is beginning to develop in the securities market, which is the mortgage-backed securities for commercial real estate.
Because the delinquency in office rates, in terms of their meeting their bank payments, has the biggest six-month spike ever, and it's just beginning.
Now the problem is a lot of these commercial real estate buildings were financed on interest-only loans because the assumption was they could reduce their payments and when, you know, if they did get to have to, the buildings would appreciate in value.
So when they were refinanced, they could be refinanced at a higher level, more dollars.
And that could then retire the original principal from the previous loan.
The problem is if they're on adjustable rate, interest only payments, the interest rates are increasing and the vacancies are increasing and the cashflow of the building does not support maintaining the property.
Just like in a home, these owners of the commercial real estates are abandoning them.
Now, what I think we're going through will lead to a major bank crisis, and that's, I've written this book about how we're going to enter into a massive economic downturn, which is going to result in, be prolonged, and banks are going to close because these commercial real estate closings impact mortgage-backed securities that are based on commercial real estate.
Which impact the banks which are holding these securities as assets.
So in this kind of a collapse, kind of like I would call it a doom loop, it's really a compounding.
One factor makes the next factor go.
It's like a building which each floor goes and as they go, they go in sequence, building implodes.
This is not sustainable and what people don't realize is that we're undergoing a, this is not a temporary phenomenon.
We are perhaps seeing a point where people are not going to be returning to office buildings.
They don't want to work in these big glass towers in inner cities that are not safe, that are costly to go to.
I saw some of the comments were very good on the, watching some of the comments we were getting yesterday.
And some of the comments in the comments section, I think are pretty perceptive.
I'm gonna read one or two of them, if I can find them here quickly.
But let's just pull up the comments.
A couple of them caught my attention yesterday, pretty clearly.
One here, this was from the Commander.
He said, the average new car payment today, these payments go for 72 to 84 months.
Is $750 per month for a stupid car payment.
Home payments are $2,165 on the average now.
What this means is that the middle class is being priced out of cars and homes.
The middle class is being squeezed just to put food on the table.
And wages are not keeping up with this.
The middle class is, I think, being intentionally taken down.
Globalists have no use for the middle class.
The middle class is too strong, it's too stable, it doesn't bend to their control.
Too well-educated.
You need a group of, basically, serfs with their oligarch world economic forum masters, Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab, who think there's too many people.
Now, what I'm seeing here is the development of a godless society and the consequences of a godless society.
Once human beings quit believing in God and go to this neo-Marxism, all fundamental values get into question.
We don't have men and women anymore because sex is not about procreation.
So have any gender you want.
All the flavors of ice cream, have them all.
And don't have to have marriages.
Marriages are hard.
Living with someone for decades is hard.
So, when it gets uncomfortable, change your mates like you change your suit of clothes.
Why bother with this person you're tired of?
Well, they don't understand the maturity of relationships which can develop, which have been ancient.
That men and women can age together, and live together, and deepen their relationships.
It takes work.
But without God, there's no reason to.
These people say, God is just sky fairies.
Oh, you believe in sky fairies.
No, the whole experience of life is one that is fundamentally spiritual, and is one that's fundamentally driven up, for me, by principles of Jesus Christ, my Lord and Savior, and should be.
Some people have at least got to have religion, a religion that's not destructive, a religion that has, you know, the Bible teaches value, the Bible teaches rules for living that have worked over generations.
If you don't believe there's anything here to this experience except what you can gain out of it, there's no consequences for your behavior, What we get is what we're experiencing today.
Anarchy.
Chaos.
And policies put in place by leaders who intend to cause chaos.
Federal Reserve knows by raising interest rates, it will cause a recession, but they have no other way to control inflation because they can't stop the Biden administration from spending fiat currency that is just printed.
And the Federal Reserve is buying the debt, treasury issues.
Federal Reserve's balance sheet is now over $8 trillion of largely government debt.
And this government could print a 30 trillion dollar coin and say we just paid off the debt.
Well, that's the reason countries are moving away from the dollar.
These are destructive policies.
And they're being justified.
We're de-industrializing based on fear of carbon dioxide.
If you're worried about carbon dioxide, the solution is simple.
Plant more trees.
You know, Michigan used to be full of trees before there were people in Michigan.
Well, repopulate, reforest.
Reforest the United States, which is being done anyway.
People do reforest.
Increase it.
It absorbs carbon dioxide.
And if that's what your concern is, and carbon dioxide is not the temperature knob of the earth, water vapor is much more important.
It's 70% of all greenhouse gases.
Carbon dioxide is a very, very minuscule 0.04% of all greenhouse gases.
We are living in an age of disinformation and insanity.
It's why this program is The Truth Central.
And Chris, I don't want to run any more over time, but any final comments before we wrap up for today?
Carbon dioxide has become the boogeyman of today.
It's become the racist of today.
It's become the, you're this horrible person of today.
The idea is carbon dioxide is the root of all evil.
Man has caused it.
And you have to pay us or fall in line or else you're a horrible person.
And that's how the World Economic Forum, that's how a certain faction of the left and the far left want to gain control of the world, basically through use of shame, emotion, embarrassment, and of course, fear.
Well, let's wrap up.
I always say in the end, God always wins.
God always wins in the end.
It's a little hard to say what the end might mean.
Consequences might not be particularly pleasant.
I foresee the potential of nuclear war.
It's interesting going back to about 2004 when I'd written Unfit for Command.
I was staying at the Key Bridge Marriott in Washington, D.C., and you walk across the Key Bridge, you're going across the The river at that time, you know, right across, the river's flowing right there.
And I look back and see Washington DC.
And I kind of stopped in the middle of the bridge and took a look at it.
Guy said, look, and I could see it destroyed with a nuclear war.
And it was like a real vision of it.
That stayed with me since 2004.
Now that could happen.
And the leadership we have today in the world, everywhere I look, is taking the exact policy decisions that will bring that to be.
That's where our godless world ends up.
I urge people, 2 Chronicles 7, 14, and join me, let's get down on our knees and ask God's, let's repent and ask God's forgiveness that we allowed God to be taken from the schools, that we allowed the legitimization of babies being killed in the womb, that we have not followed God's law, and we have a bureaucracy that's out of control, unelected, we're not following the principles of the Constitution.
The First Amendment is getting harder and harder to defend because you're not allowed to talk about certain topics because the Neo-Marxists I believe that even raising the subject, questioning the legitimacy of an election, is now treason.
These eras are insane.
And when people get away from God, they lose their moral compass.
And the result?
Bad science, junk science.
People are prone to these themes.
That are complete popular delusions, climate change, global warming, and if there is a hundred years from now we'll be looked at as one of the great kind of hypnotic national obsession insanities that a population believed in Despite it's illogic and it doesn't comply with actual climate science or the facts of the Earth as it operates.
So, in the end, God will win, but this is The Truth Central.
We're resolved here to give you the truth.
Thank you for joining us.
This is Dr. Jerome Corsi.
Today is Tuesday.
It's July 11th, 2023.
We're broadcasting every weekday.
We'll be back tomorrow.
Export Selection