All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 9, 2020 - The Truth Central - Dr. Jerome Corsi
01:15:34
Dr Corsi DEEP DIVE Interview 11-09-20: Mathematical Anomalies of 2020 Election Results
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
of the year. And I'm going to be playing a little bit of the song. So if you're ready,
here we go.
I'm going to be playing a little bit of the song. So if you're ready, here we go.
I'm going to be playing a little bit of the song.
I'm going to be playing a little bit of the song.
you So, Dr. Corsi, a lot of people are saying that there were things that happened during the 2020 election that just don't seem to square with things like mathematics.
Can you help us shed some light on that?
I think our guest can.
Kevin Wade, who is joining us, and he has a background in statistics, mechanical engineering.
I mean, he's done a lot of systems work.
I've done a lot of advising, been studying swing states, has applied his mathematical skills as well to politics.
And I think this should be a very interesting discussion.
Kevin, welcome. And if you give us a little bit of background on your, you know, your biography, your resume, and your credentials, that would be helpful to start.
Thank you. Dr.
Coursey, it's an honor to appear with you today.
I'm an electrical engineer and a systems engineer.
And have worked in the field for decades.
I run my own consulting firm.
We've done work from Amsterdam to Singapore.
We've worked in pharmaceuticals.
We've worked in the automotive industry for major car companies.
We've worked with data collection systems.
We're used by power plants to make reports to the Environmental Protection Agency.
We've tracked lab samples used by the National Institute of Health in large databases.
So we have a very broad working experience in the field of computers, statistics, and delivering highly reliable systems that the average people can use.
For full disclosure, I am a full Trump supporter.
And I'm a registered Republican.
And at one time, I was a candidate for the United States Senate here in my home state of Delaware, a long time ago.
And I now stay out of politics, except when I see something so egregious and alarming to me that I need to speak up.
And as a result, I have been speaking on talk radio here in the Delmarva area over several weeks, talking about some of my observations.
So that's my full professional and political background, Dr.
Corsi. Well, that's very helpful, Kevin.
Thank you very much. And now there's so many different areas in terms of these election results to look at from statistics and mathematics, and I'm just going to let you pick where you want to start and then we'll go on from there.
So, serving the ball into your court and take it where you want.
Well, I was stunned, as were many people, looking at the voter turnout In the Badger State up there in Wisconsin.
Now, Wisconsin has a high degree of civic involvement.
It's a state where people do get involved in the local festivals and the school board and community activities, and they also turn up to vote.
But supposedly, we are being told that 88% of all voters registered, according to state rolls on November 1st, 88% turned up to vote And we're legally able to vote on Election Day, November 3rd. This causes me some pause.
In the past, the highest turnouts they had seen statewide were in the range of 60-65%, maybe on some local issues, 70%.
And we're talking about a very, very dramatic increase in the turnout.
Now, I happen to have a mind This seizes on certain facts, and they stay in there like an ingredient in a soup pot.
Years and years ago, I came across the fact, it's repeatable, that in any given year in this country, Dr.
Corsi, we're a transient country.
In any given year, 10% of the public changes address.
Now, it can concentrate in certain age groups.
When you're coming out of school, coming out of the service, you may change your address.
That's quite common.
If you're approaching retirement age, you might want to move to the sunnier states of this union and then move down to Florida or Georgia or Texas.
So maybe in your late 50s, early mid 60s, you're moving again.
But all in all, about 10 Plus percent of the American population moves every 12 months, and it's repeatable and repeatable and repeatable.
That means, unless for some reason the people in Wisconsin are bizarrely different from the rest of the U.S. population, that 10 percent of their population and 10 percent of their registered voters likely moved in the past 12 months.
If you subtract 10% from the 100% of registered voters, you're down at 90% as a theoretical maximum for turnout if you drove them to the polls with WIPs.
Now, there's another statistical fact.
You can get this from actuarial tables.
Somewhere just below 1% of the United States population passes away every 12 months.
So now we're at 90% less one and we're down at 89%.
You take a look at the fact that the voter rolls in the state of Wisconsin haven't been cleaned up since the year 2017 to account for people moving and no longer legally able to vote at the registration address.
You have years 17, 18, 19, and 20.
You have three to four years of people moving without being removed from the voter rolls.
I suspect that these numbers that they are reporting simply don't match up and indicates An artificial means to influence the outcome of the election.
Now, I have since read, because I need to put this out there for your viewers, that the people in the city of Milwaukee who organized the elections say, well, they had, really, they only had about a 70% or 71%, 72% turnout on election day because, as they say, Dr.
Corsi, in Milwaukee, they had a lot of same-day registrations.
Could be. Could be.
But if you take a look at the number of voter registrations you would need to have same day in the state of Wisconsin, in the midst of an election, in order to reach 71% turnout because of the increased voter registration number, same day registration, Dr.
Corsi, you'd have 900,000 new voters registered During the hours, the polling places were open.
If you had that number of people trying to get registered with the adequate ID and the discussion and the completion of the forms, they'd still be standing in line in Wisconsin to get in to vote.
That also doesn't pass any test of reasonability.
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt.
The nature of the same-day registrations and the votes cast against voter registrations, either pre-existing in the records or on same day, needs to be examined thoroughly because there are hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of thousands of votes that Dr.
Korsu, they're very, very suspect in terms of whether they were legal votes.
And I think that stands statistically as the basis for a challenge.
Now, clearly, some of the research techniques, let's say we now say, okay, let's take the issue how many people have moved, and if it's 10% a year and the rolls haven't been cleaned up since 2017, that could be 30% of the 2017 voter registration is no longer in the state.
Right. Now, if we took the people who voted in 2020, and the election board should have a list of who voted.
I mean, in New Jersey, I can go to a website and find out if they counted my vote, which is another question we'll get to.
I mean, mail-in votes, you had to vote mail-in pretty much in New Jersey.
The in-person votes were all considered probationary, and they weren't going to be counted until after the fact.
And they made it difficult to take an in-person vote, by the way.
The point is that if we ran, let's say, electric bills and, you know, various kinds of bills that people get, phone bills, against the people who voted, there are databases of national databases recording who moved in a year.
They try to compile nationwide who changed, moved out of state, moved within state.
There are specific records of this compiled.
And some of these databases are, you know, paid for databases, but they are available.
And you could certainly scrub the database pretty quickly to find out how many of the people who voted most likely didn't live in the state.
Couldn't you do that, Kevin? Dr.
Corsi, I was on my text line on the 4th of November, the day after the election, sending exactly those suggestions to people I know who have access very deep into the Trump campaign.
These are things that can readily, readily be compared.
Just take a look at new cable TV hookups.
Take a look at new water hookups.
You have that. I did some further research and I found that, well, like so many times in life, I think I have a brilliant idea and I discovered the new world, that there's a lot of other bright people out there who may have been working on this problem for a while.
And there's a legal organization that fights for conservative and constitutional principles in Wisconsin that in fact has been the prime mover behind the purge of voter rolls in 2017, where they found that 300 plus thousand voter-registered voters Registered voters had in fact moved, and 91% were confirmed of having moved away from their voting place.
So only 9% of about 336,000 in 2017 were still legally registered at their address.
And I also found, and I'll try to get the name of this institute because some of your listeners might want to look into it, This firm, this organization, Defending Voter Rights, has been in fact in court multiple times with the Board of Elections.
They may have a different name in Wisconsin.
I'll call it Board of Elections.
In fact, the state was ordered to clean up their roles again in 2019.
They had a Democrat governor at the time, and they did not comply with cleaning up the voter rolls.
There is a national database I have determined exists.
The acronym is ERIC, E-R-I-C, Electronic Registration Information Center.
And it's available to state governments on a subscription basis.
And it is a compilation, a database, of people who have used federally acceptable ID in a transaction with the government.
It could be showing your identification when you enlist in the military.
It might be showing your identification when you apply for a federally guaranteed student loan.
It might be showing your ID when you apply for an FHA mortgage.
It could be when you're applying for Medicare or Social Security.
But these things are happening all the time around the country because Uncle Sam has his nose in a lot of different areas.
So people are showing their driver's license and birth certificates and other identifying documents, and that's getting picked up in the ERIC database.
Wisconsin can easily match names, birth dates, socials in the ERIC database to find out who no longer lives in Wisconsin.
That also is a very strong direction for the Trump legal team to go.
There is a database, but the state of Wisconsin has refused to do that comparison since 2017.
I also have done lots of legal research over the years, and one of the things I found out is that, for instance, in LexisNexis, there are lots of databases which are not publicly available.
For instance, they have one database that can get you emails and phone numbers.
It's used by news media.
It's an expensive one, but just about anybody you want to find to do an interview with, you know, you can't, how do we get in touch with this person?
That database will be able, that will have data on them.
You know, it's like these services on the internet where you say, I'm looking for so-and-so and say, well, pay us 25 bucks and we'll tell you who we think it might be.
There's lots of databases out there and this kind of work, if you wanted to really have a list of voters that you knew to be in the state and legitimately registered, A state could do it with reasonable efforts.
I mean, it would not be necessarily outrageously or costly.
Do the states not do this because they are, you know, if I'm moving, I've moved maybe eight or ten times in my life, even out of state.
I've never once thought, you know, there's no incentive for me to call the Board of Elections and take my name off of the voter registration list.
So I'm probably on a lot of voter registration lists going back 20 years.
What incentive do the states have to maintain accurate lists, or is there in fact an incentive to not maintain an accurate list?
Well, Dr. Corsi, it depends upon whether you want to commit voter fraud.
If you'd like to use voter fraud as a way to garner additional votes on Election Day, you don't want to clean up those lists.
In fact, you might even have your own list.
John Johnson, Jack Jackson, who hasn't voted since 1983, but he's still on the voter list.
That makes a handy name to put on a ballot to submit as an illegal vote.
Who has the motivation to allow these so-called dead voters to remain on the voter registration list?
Well, people want to cheat, obviously, do, don't they?
I mean, if you want to submit a fraudulent ballot, you want to be sure that you pick somebody who's unlikely to vote, and certainly somebody who's moved out of state is a good choice, someone who hasn't voted in a long time.
They also won't challenge why they were turned away at 6 p.m., because they were told they voted at 3 p.m., because they're not there to do a challenge.
Right. And, you know, somebody is dead.
Got a lot of dead people who voted these elections.
How does that happen? Well, obviously, this is fraud.
Now, President Trump and his legal team have to, you know, find the evidence that will make the connection, make the difference between a rogue vote counting employee who simply doesn't follow instructions, And those doing illegal actions have to express control and direction of supervision.
That's the pattern of systemic corruption.
It's not finding one dead voter.
It's not finding one voter who's 150 years old.
It's finding a hundred poll workers who each processed a thousand ballots who were specifically told by the county clerk that that's the right way to do it.
That's systemic and that should.
I'm not an attorney. That should be the salient hard evidence That justifies massive intervention by SCOTUS, by the Supreme Court of the United States.
I think we'll get it.
I think this is going to be an election where we finally see the need to bring all these voting procedures into a modern era.
I mean, if I can buy on computer, by mail, by email, put my credit card in, buy something specific, have the credit card Not be cheated, have it show up on my bill and have the item arrive at my doorstep two days later.
Why can't we do voting so we know who's voting?
We have procedures where we can identify that's the person voting and these are the votes they cast.
I would think we'd be capable of doing that technologically today.
No, today you could actually, you could do that.
You could print out a paper ballot You could print out two paper ballots, one to be counted and one to be taken home for your, you know, lockbox.
And your appearance at the polls could also include having, you know, your driver's license and image scanned as part of the record.
Not to indicate how you voted, but to indicate specifically who did vote.
Does this man look like he's 162 years old, yes or no?
So, yeah, we have that technology, but let's not go chasing nuts here.
The focus isn't on trying to improve how elections are run in 2032.
The elections are to the purpose of everyone's investigation now, this kind of open network of people sharing information, and thanks to you, Dr.
Corsi, more ways to share.
We need this network of skilled professionals and technical people and dedicated, you know, conservatives and people who love our country to come together and use their life talents To expose clear evidence of wrongdoing because what we seek to do is to not allow the wrongdoers in 2020 to benefit, to accomplish their mission.
So I don't really have a lot of time in my life now to consider what changes should take place in the future.
We may not have a future if we allow this scheme to be successful across the country.
We take a look in Wayne County, and I understand it's been reported that there are two poll workers who have already signed affidavits and given very clear specific testimony to the fact that, in fact, the clerk of the elections in Wayne County, that's Detroit, Michigan, Specifically gave instructions to all of the workers there to process ballots that were received without any underlying registration being shown,
and in fact asking those workers to create a false registration while they were finding these false ballots.
Further, they, according to the affidavits, and this will be determined in court, according to the affidavits, The people finding these, I'll call them bogus votes, who then created a corresponding bogus registration right then and there that night, used a common birth date, January 1, 1900.
Now, I know that when I work with databases as part of a project for a client somewhere in the world, if we're working with interim data or test data, We'll pick a specific number to use in a certain field so that we can then go back through later on and correct the records.
That's a standard method of identifying things that need to be addressed later.
Hence, by having thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands, of registered voters all born January 1, 1900, I can then take a month or two or three back in the computer offices with some trusted skilled computer technicians to clean up all of those records.
Now, that wasn't part of the affidavits.
That's part of my real-world experience, which is something we need to ask all people who love this country.
Use your real-world experience, wherever that has taken you, to focus on the problems we have identifying a corrupted vote on November 3rd.
I want to switch from the databases that we can look at to determine votes that were fraudulently cast.
People dead, people moved, et cetera, to another more advanced analytical mathematical technique, looking at patterns and looking at how the votes came in.
I put an article in chat, and Craig, I gave it to you also in the instant message.
You know how to get to the chat there?
Kevin, down at the bottom, just get into the chat room, and it's a link, and you can just use that link and click on it.
You want me to do that right now?
Would you please? There it is.
Okay, now this is a very interesting article that is done by some mathematicians.
And what they're saying is that if you look at the, first that graphic there that begins the article with Joe Biden's picture and says there's an undeniable mathematical evidence the election's being stolen.
What this graph says, and the graph kind of makes an F. You see how it ends up there in an F for fraud?
Okay, now the red line is the way the votes were coming in on election night for Donald Trump.
And you can see they were a steadily building curve.
And the blue was the Tracking of the election votes coming in for Biden and you can see they were also a smoothly developing curve and Biden's were clearly all night below the total that Donald Trump was getting which meant that the turnout in person was heavily favoring Donald Trump and it was much larger than anybody expected and so sometime in the night several of these states Just shut down voting, counting. They shut down the counting.
So we're not going to count anymore tonight.
Well then, the reason the line goes up straight, vertically, is because suddenly, like at 4 in the morning, here come 100,000 ballots, and they're all for Biden.
And by the way, 90% of them only vote for the presidential candidate.
They don't vote for anything down ticket.
Which is very rare. And then when the curves resume, now the Trump curve considers on itself on the same trajectory it was before.
And the Biden curve flattens out and stays at this higher level without adding any more really.
And so you see that essentially that's mathematically the argument is what's the likelihood, what's the probability That that kind of anomaly could occur by chance.
And if you scroll down, we've got some scatter charts down here for the different states.
It's pretty far down in the article, but the first one is someone who did a scatter chart for Milwaukee.
And they basically show that you've got these big lumps in outlying voting that show these bulges And doing any kind of an analysis of the likelihood of this, the probability of this, that these are so improbable that it's likely impossible to occur.
Now, what do you think of that type of statistical analysis?
It doesn't represent a natural process.
It's not something that happened Without artificial stimulation.
That's, simplest analysis is, you're weighing something on a scale, but you put your thumb there, okay?
It's the old luncheonette trick.
You put your thumb on the scale, and that spike is where the thumb was applied.
Right, and that's, so suddenly these votes...
Now, after the jump, for example, that voter dump, when they had that voter dump, basically the shape of the Democrat, the Biden votes...
Should have accelerated, the slope should have changed if you understand that.
It didn't. It almost flattened out as if they'd exhausted at that point the number of votes they had produced overnight to dump under the count.
It's not reasonable, it's not rational, it's not natural.
I can't believe it legitimately happened as legal votes appearing.
Even in the most Democrat of precincts in Philadelphia, which has a rotten voting history in terms of accurate precision and legality going back forever, you still get some Republican votes in the mix.
And that looks like it's entirely Biden votes.
And you did touch on the fact that And I'd seen a number.
I don't know the source, so I'm giving something that I can't reference at the moment.
But something along the order of 76,000 votes in the state of Michigan, ballots came in with only a marking for Joe Biden.
They didn't even take the time to mark the Senate race, the Democrat Gary Peters up there.
When you see that only one position is marked on a ballot and not all the things down ballot, not all the things down ballot where you pick your county clerk and so on, that tells me someone was in a hurry just marking paper ballots for one candidate, one candidate, only because they had one purpose in mind in getting a lot of ballots prepared, and that was to get them in to be counted without any examination.
And it's interesting because one explanation for these lines and this trend would be, okay, so let's say in Pennsylvania they plan to cheat for Biden and they plan to do the mail-in votes for Biden.
And they did a certain number of them that they calculated probably mathematically with the number they had to create.
In order to win the election.
And then Donald Trump goes on this big marathon of rallies, five a day, and the turnout is just whipped up and exceptionally large.
And so here you are in the Board of Elections and you're counting and you're saying, Uh-oh, we didn't get enough.
We're going to run out of votes here, and Trump is still building votes, so we better stop the count, let's recalculate how many new ones we need, let's go get them done, and let's cart them in here in boxes in the middle of the night when nobody's watching, and we better do it fast, get it done, so because we've only got tonight, we'll get them in there while nobody's looking, bring them in in suitcases, bring them in and Backpacks, however we bring them in.
And then we don't have time to fill out down ballots.
Let's just fill out Biden, Biden, Biden, because you're doing 100,000 ballots.
I mean, this can take you a while, even to get the little pencil in there, marks filling out the circle for Biden or checking it.
So again, this explanation would be that the stopping of voting was done in order to permit the opportunity to create the recalculated number of ballots needed as artificial mail-in ballots in order to win.
Do you think that's a possible explanation?
Yeah, I understand switching states and in Atlanta, Georgia, as they were counting ballots election night, they had a water pipe break in the facility where they were counting.
I guess water pipes can break.
I believe water pipes can break anytime.
But living where I do, in something of a northern state, and you said you're in the Garden State of New Jersey, we have cold weather in the winter.
And I find in my neighborhood that pipes freeze and break in the depths of January when the temperature just rapidly plunges.
And from looking at people wearing short sleeves in Atlanta that night, it wasn't a weather-related circumstance.
Also, I Did he reported that when the so-called pipe broke, they weren't getting water in the counting area.
It wasn't like they were flooded out and ballots were in danger of being spoiled, but they decided to evacuate everyone at the moment so they could bring the plumbers in.
Now, it just doesn't make sense, does it?
It seems that that creates a window of opportunity for plumbers to come in and other things to come in in large numbers.
So it doesn't wash.
It simply doesn't wash across the board, state by state by state.
I think, Dr.
Corsi, that this will be revealed in time for justice to be done because They were so overreaching and egregious in the different methods that they employed and the magnitude that they used.
If you want to steal 2.5% of the vote, that's one thing.
But if you're trying to create an extra 6% of the vote for your candidate, it's very hard for that to happen without these statistical mathematical anomalies staring you in the face.
In the face!
And it also makes it easier to find the geographic location Where the deed was done.
Take a look at where the ballots came into Michigan.
Take a look at the 89% turnout in Wisconsin, yet the folks in Milwaukee say, no, it was just the low 70s.
Take a look at some of these things and you're going to get directed like a laser to focusing on a county, On five precincts, on 12 management, supervisory people, you're going to get your attention there.
And it's just a matter of finding someone who's willing to stand up, as some of the postal workers have already stood up to explain what happened, because they're looking at years in prison for this federal offense.
Constitution, which I love, guarantees the states the right to organize their own elections.
But the 14th Amendment guarantees that every American will receive equal treatment under the law everywhere in 50 states.
And having my good vote erased by a bad vote, an illegal vote, a stolen vote, is not equal protection to 70 million people who voted for President Donald Trump.
That was a key point in the The Bush v.
Gore Supreme Court decision in 2000, when the Supreme Court, at great length, made the point that, yes, the state legislatures, and by the way, not the governors and not the board of election, get to set the rules for voting, only the legislature.
And the changes made to allow additional days for counting mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania, which was a decision, I guess, starting with the Governor, Board of Elections, and the Supreme Court in Pennsylvania decided that was okay.
None of that's constitutional.
That's why Judge Alito sequestered those votes and said, we're not putting them in the total right now at all.
So even the Pennsylvania declaration of a win for Biden is already in suspension.
But the point is that, you know, the court was saying that the state legislature cannot make a determination of how the election is going to be conducted in a way that is intentionally fraudulent, because every person under the 14th Amendment has a equal right to vote.
And this one-vote, one-person idea, which is fundamental to the...
And there's no more fundamental value in our Constitution than voting because that determines outcomes.
And so protecting votes is fundamental.
We wouldn't have the civil rights laws if it weren't for the 14th Amendment passed after the Civil War to allow Blacks in the South who have been recently freed as slaves not to be punished with poll taxes and educational requirements where they never voted.
They had a right to vote because they were citizens, and it couldn't be denied by other restrictions.
And those laws today, extended civil rights, actually protect all Americans.
And this instance, I think, is going to be a glaring Issue that the Supreme Court is going to say, this just isn't right.
I don't see how the court can do otherwise.
Kevin, do you see any way they could do otherwise?
I think that's such a fundamental principle that when these mathematical anomalies are pointed out, the...
Again, Dr. Corsi, but it needs to be substantiated solidly by the actors involved.
Yes, I agree with that.
That's a very important point.
Right. Because I can't take the theory of gravity and to explain why someone dropped a bowling ball on my head and hurt me.
Right. I have to actually be hurt and show the bowling ball.
That's correct. Now, we are going to find out whether we have even five Supreme Court justices who were honest in their testimony during confirmation hearings that they Read and apply the text of the Constitution.
If they go in and apply their fears or their hopes or their feelings or their emotions or their social sensibilities and not apply the text of the Constitution when they arrive at the ruling, well then all is lost.
So we'll find out if five of nine Supreme Court justices were honest with the American people when they gave testimony during their confirmation hearings.
We will find out, I pray to God, that these were honest men and women.
So do I. And I think, I want to support the point you made about documentary evidence.
Unless you've had some experience with the judicial system, you may not appreciate the power of witnesses.
Now, eyewitnesses even differ on what they've seen, and they don't necessarily see things accurately.
But when someone comes into a court and puts their hand on a Bible, says, I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and hopefully saying it, so help me God, that's very powerful testimony.
Because they say, this is what I saw.
Now, that becomes an interpretation of the statistics.
I saw people do this.
Now, one of the things I'm finding, and it's starting to happen, the whistleblowers are coming forward.
One of the points, we talked about this in our podcast today.
One of the anomalies of this election was that just before the vote was cast, There is some excellent data.
I'm going to give it to you here again in the chat where you can look it up.
And we're going to comment on it in a minute, make sure I've pulled up the right one.
There was an anomaly of the number of people who were doing Google searches in these states like Wisconsin and Michigan Of the penalties.
They want to know the legal penalties for...
Here it is right here.
This is the article I want to get to.
They want to know the legal penalties for election...
What's the punishment for illegal voting fraud?
I want to show you this because this I thought was extremely interesting and I'm going to put it in chat right now so you can pull it up.
Here, Kevin, hold on a second.
Here we go. Okay, there's the article.
It's from, it's a Information Liberation published this.
And it is just a search Google Trends for election fraud punishment surged just before the election in the states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Arizona.
Now, isn't that odd?
What do you think that's all about?
That's in the point of a natural behavior that people weren't expecting to be captured.
And the fact that that surge appears in these swing states, I mean, that gives me a shudder.
I mean, that would tell you that there's been a number of people who are not used.
They're not well adjusted to To big city Democrat vote counting methods who are feeling a pang of conscience.
That's how I would interpret it.
I would too. I know it's amazing and the other thing that strikes me is that okay now I've had a great deal of experience in studying you know criminals and all the rest of this and There's a phenomenon that occurs.
I say this vote theft was about, it looks like, when you really look at it and see the totality of what was done by the Democrats, it's like a group of incompetent, kind of petty criminals who botch a convenience store holdup because they forget that they're being on, all the cameras are, you know, Filming everything going on in the store.
So their pictures are taken. They didn't put on masks.
They wore identifiable clothing.
They can be identified. And they got a total of $20.
Okay. They walked out.
They didn't think that the guy by the convenience store might have pushed a buzzer or anything.
They didn't expect to get outside and find the police.
Or they thought they were going to, you know, they had this great first act.
We're going to come in with guns. We're going to get the money in the convenience store.
We'll grab a few candy bars and we'll run out.
That's a great first act, but the second act is not so favorable when, in fact, their pictures are taken.
Now, the pictures were...
They're pictures of people counting votes, and there may even have been surveillance cameras in the vote counting areas for security.
And these people...
I mean, I saw one poll worker watching up in...
I guess it was in Pennsylvania and Philadelphia who was wearing a...
Biden-Harris mask counting ballots.
Now, there's a law forbidding you to have anything with partisan nature, especially representing candidates in the election, in any precinct voting area or vote counting area.
This guy just got photographed committing a felony.
And here he is, face recognition.
Now, I'd like to put out the word that, you know, we've got a law enforcement.
We're going to take some time.
We've got a Justice Department that's going to come after these people.
And it might be good if you were one of the first to offer state evidence and trade that in for lesser punishment, which is often the way you get whistleblowers.
Yeah, let them talk to their wife and kids before they decide to say it never happened.
I've seen the same photos.
And in the state of Delaware, you cannot wear, for example, I couldn't wear a MAGA hat into the voting station.
I couldn't wear a MAGA hat within 50 feet of the front door.
And that's fair enough.
I appreciate that. And no one wore campaign regalia from either side, nor did any of the polling place workers.
And apparently it not only happened, it was widespread and well photographed in other states, swing states that are having problems.
I just wanted to give a quick shout out to the folks in Wisconsin who are working on this mover-voter problem, voters who have moved and no longer can legally vote.
The group is called the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, and they're a well-established group of conservative attorneys who love the law and love liberty, and they have been fighting the problem with really bad voter registrations, keeping a door open to illegal ballots for some years.
They were successful in 2017 cleaning up, But in 2019, the state would not respond to apparently, I need to read deeper, a court order to repeat the cleanup process.
So they have a website.
It's filled with their motions, their actions, their pleadings.
And their data, Wisconsin Institute of Law and Liberty.
Can I talk a bit, Dr.
Corsi, about the Dominion voting systems?
Yes, I was going to go there next, too.
In fact, I'm going to give you an article here in the chat, and Craig, you can put it up on the screen.
This is in Michigan, where a county flipped from Biden to Trump after this so-called Dominion voting machine quote-unquote glitch was fixed and 12,000 votes went from Biden to Trump in a county with only 17,000 voters.
That's pretty remarkable.
How do you think that happened, Kevin?
Okay. Dominion Voting Systems has its American headquarters, I believe, in Colorado.
But I believe, further, that it's a Canadian firm, hence the name Dominion, out of Canada, and I believe maybe Toronto.
It's a smallish firm.
As firms go, and they specialize in computerized voting system, a touchscreen, a printer, totalizing software.
They probably dramatically overcharge for it because you're selling to governments who really don't care because it's not their money.
But I have worked with all the elements in the system, and my staff are superb in working with all the elements of that system.
Tablet, printers, communications, and so on.
I wouldn't be concerned in the least about the provenance of the management decisions at Dominion if it were headquartered and directed and at the top level staffed by American citizens in Oklahoma or even Albany, New York. But I'm flagged to the fact that the Brain Trust Almost certainly sits in Canada.
And I have become very much aware in the past two years of so many deeply suspicious financial transactions taking place between the sons of prominent Democrat national figures And people in the Ukraine, or people in Moscow, or people in Costa Rica, or people in, well, Western Asian republics, people in Romania.
It seems really international, respected businessmen, brothers and sons, doing these mega deals overseas from the Biden family, from the Biden family.
And you have the sons of other prominent Politicians in Washington doing these mega deals overseas, deals that are primarily funded by either direct American influence, the use of American funds, or the threat of withholding American funds.
Hence, I see this foreign connection, and now my antenna are up, Dr.
Corsi, when I see that Dominion voting is out of Canada.
I'm not saying anything about their American employees, and I don't know for sure about Dominion.
But I suspect that the American staff, the American affiliate subsidiary, probably are people who help with sales, service, installation.
But the actual source code, what is and isn't done within the system, probably derives from the program actions of three or four people in Canada.
And the issue here is that there are ties, by the way, between Dominion and the Democratic Party, including Nancy Pelosi.
Craig, do you know what that tie is?
Do you remember? No, I do not.
Okay, I can find it out.
But she is evidently someone in her family is one of the executives.
There's lots of ties between the two.
I think they, again, the point I wanted to make, and it supports what you're saying, Kevin, here it is tied closely to the Clintons and to Pelosi and the others.
By the way, there was a little video taken showing while they were on the air on election night looking at Pennsylvania, suddenly Trump lost a bunch of votes, 20,000 or 16,000, and they went over to Biden.
And it got seen on television.
You could see the theft of the votes right then.
They can run algorithms.
Now, an algorithm is just a complex mathematical formula that is tracking certain variables and predicting outcomes or telling you, you know, actions likely to end up here.
It's just a predictive kind of mathematical formula based on experience.
And the algorithms can say, well, the way the voting, we better shift these number of votes.
And the computer software, in fact, this Dominion software actually has screens where you can shift votes.
Those have been exposed.
I was not aware of that. I was not aware of that.
Yeah, it actually has some, I'll see if I can find here where I've got pictures of those screens.
They're pretty amazing. And The switching of these votes, the switching of them in terms of the algorithms being triggered, again, I think it was being done in these states, but they had no idea how many they needed.
The algorithms evidently didn't switch enough votes, so they still had to, at the end of the night, come in with a You know, boxes and boxes full of ballots in order to make it turn out the way they wanted it to turn out.
But anyway, the point I'm making is that, you know, these algorithms, which are, the average person is not familiar with how computers work or how the Algorithms etc are calculated, but once you could get into the system and see how the mathematical structure of these were and find portals, I'll try to find this email, but I mean you want to explain Kevin how these algorithms work to trigger that we better shift this many votes now or we better shift that many votes now?
Well there there's a thousand one algorithms you can create.
First of all let me describe an algorithm that many of the viewers will understand.
If I set my speed control on my car to be 65 miles an hour, that is a system that will monitor my speedometer.
If the speed drops to 64 and then 63, its algorithm is to increase the flow of fuel Into the engine, creating more power, and I begin to accelerate.
Once it gets back to the set point that you want, it begins to reduce that addition of fuel to simply hold the speed.
Thereby, it can maintain a speed going uphill or downhill.
It's simply the algorithm makes the automatic adjustment.
So if I want to move some votes in Antrim County, Michigan, where in fact 6,000 votes We're moved from Donald Trump to Joe Biden because it was confirmed in a hand recount.
I would do something in the software that would say, I want every 12th scanned ballot to simply result in Joe Biden getting the vote for president.
No matter what, The selection was by the voter.
When I scan it and process that information, when I scan the paper ballot created by the voter using his touch screen that was printed out on the printer, when that ballot is scanned by the scanner and then totalized, I would like to fiddle that totalizer logic to just take one in every 12 Trump voters and move it to Biden.
I wouldn't want to do 50% or 100%.
That would be glaring.
But if I just took a number and I can dial that number in, I can make a 1 in 12, 1 in 9, 1 in 3, 1 in 33.
It's very, very easy to do.
You just have to have access to the source code and then be willing to break the law of the land.
But if I were living in a foreign country where I was creating that software, you will never face the law of the land here.
You won't be extradited for writing bad software.
Now, it's a hypothetical, of course, but this is how a systems guy would do it.
Now, I understand that many of these systems across the country were updated within days of the election, software updates.
Now, you don't have to work in the world of computers.
To know that before the launch of the mission, you do not make last-minute changes to the software.
If you have corrections about the software being faulty, you scrub the mission.
If you work in accounting and your job is to work up the year-end reports for your business in December, no one in accounting will update the accounting software in the month of December because of the chance You could fail the system.
You could bring it to a standstill.
You don't update flight control software Thanksgiving week on the East Coast.
For fear that some bug unintentionally got into the revised version, the new release, and you failed the entire system.
So if you are in a business where the reliability, action, and precision of your electronic voting system is the basis for your continued ability to be in business, you would never, ever, ever make changes to the software in a new upload, in a new install, Immediately before Election Day, it's unheard of from a business standpoint.
Right, and again, these are the kinds of anomalies, these are the kinds of unusual circumstances that draw attention and make you think, okay, something's going on here.
That we need to take a look at.
Because it's not normal. It's not usual.
We don't usually change software right in the middle of flight patterns being developed.
We don't implement a new routine.
We don't know if it works or not.
That's right. Now, also, Dominion should have a copy of what was installed, what was updated just prior to the election, and a record copy of what was in before the update.
They both can be examined forensically to see what changes did they make in the code.
Precisely.
The best way to determine whether there is a systemic bad count from those machines is to actually do a manual recount.
Let's take Michigan as the template.
Find 25 other counties in Michigan and do a manual recount of the paper ballots to see if it matches up with the totals from Dominion.
That will certainly separate whether it's a one-off quote-unquote glitch in Antrim County or it's again something systemic because again the Trump legal team is looking for systemic And also from a professional standpoint, Dr. Corsi, no one pays me a nickel on the work that we do in my business if there's a glitch at launch.
Your reputation is done.
There's no such thing as glitch.
None. No, glitches are not permitted.
You know, the airplanes crashed because they ran into each other in the air.
We just had a little computer glitch.
The computer glitch is, well, our 757s or whatever they were, Boeing, whatever, they don't fly so well because we moved the engines up forward.
It was the software that was a problem.
I mean, that's what happens to your stock when that occurs.
In my own business, there was a period of time when we were working on emergency shutdown systems for offshore oil production platforms.
Dr. Corsi, there was no room for a glitch.
I'm sorry, the Gulf just filled up with oil, but we just had a software glitch.
We'll fix it in the morning.
There's no glitch. Also, the 150 people working on the platform have no place to go.
It's a long jump down to the water on a burning rig.
So no, there is no glitch.
Professional people don't do that.
It doesn't happen.
Or professional people won't do it twice because they're out of the profession after the first time it happens.
Right, you've got to find a new profession, or you're going to prison, depending.
I want to cover one more issue, and I dropped another article here in the chat.
Craig, can you see it to pick it up?
Sure. Okay, and this is a very interesting article because what you have here is a young...
This person who was working in the polls...
Is this the one from David Harris, Dr.
Corson? Yes, it's the one...
Got it. Okay, and he...
What he says is this is a guy who bragged on Facebook...
I work for Wayne County, Michigan, and I threw out every Trump ballot.
I saw tens of thousands of them, and so did my co-workers.
Now, he posted that on Facebook, bragging about it.
And then, of course, when it was discovered, he said, oh, that was just a joke.
I was just kidding. And he, you know, but he does have here the post, and you can see it in the article, to come clean.
I work for Wayne County, Michigan.
I threw out every Trump ballot.
I saw tens of thousands of them, and so did all my coworkers.
Okay, now I suspect that if we went in and we got the cell phones of the people working in the polls where they're taking pictures of ballots and they're communicating with each other and talking about what they're doing and of course these many of them are young many of them are thinking oh we're punking the system you know is our form of protest they might be found to be bragging about how they were committing frauds.
What do you think there Kevin? Well, I think he's admitted taking part in a fraud, and now he's denying whether he did.
I think it bears some investigation.
I think that someone from the federal judiciary, not the county cops in Wayne, but the federal judiciary, I think an FBI agent should come and talk to him about the consequences and also perhaps get one of those FISA court orders to take a look at his phone records and his texts and his emails that were received after he was so proudly informing the world that he worked for Wayne County.
He was doing this and so were all of his co-workers.
So the first question is, was he lying about working for Wayne County?
That's easy enough to check.
And then you can go from there.
But clearly, this guy has admitted guilt.
He now has to provide evidence that he wasn't involved in a criminal conspiracy.
Dr. Corsi, this isn't one to let go.
This wasn't young and foolish being young and foolish.
He was probably foolish.
Not knowing that as a crook involved in a federal election scam, you don't go on Facebook and talk about it.
He got likes from his liberal friends.
He might get a lot of likes, but it was still a crime when he committed.
He just admitted to it.
And I think this is the key point.
Did Kevin freeze up there? Are you okay, Kevin?
No, I'm fine. Can you still hear me?
I can hear you just fine. Yeah, I can hear you just fine.
Craig, how are we doing on time?
We're up at an hour.
What do you think of this, Craig?
What are you concluding listening to all this?
Yeah, absolutely. So you've got...
I don't call these smoking guns anymore.
These are smoldering cannons and a whole bevy of them.
You've got a whole artillery division full of smoking cannons here.
And there are even more issues.
This is just the tip of the iceberg.
If you take a look, this was a multi-pronged attack.
And the presumptive Democrat president of the United States, the wannabe...
He bragged about it again on video saying that he had launched the most, what words did he use, the most effective and massive voter fraud campaign in history?
Yeah, he called it a voter fraud campaign.
So he calls the police before he robs the bank and says, I'm coming to the bank.
There is something called a Freudian slip where your subconscious must word out the truth in a staged moment.
And although the script said he's employed or he's engaged the nation's largest anti-fraud campaign, the word fraud came out.
Now, that's a typical Bidenism by itself.
But David Harris Jr.
of Facebook... Apparently likes to substantiate the claims of his candidate.
And these, you know, the nature of these poll workers who are the Democrats, it reminds me, I mean, they're so used to committing crimes.
Look at Antifa and Black Lives Matter.
It's okay to break in cities and spray paint everything, commit vandalism, beat people up in the sidewalk.
They think this is normal.
It reminds me of somebody who is addicted to crack and have a crack pipe in their head and they're driving their car and In a city where they stop, they need directions, and they roll down the window and ask a cop for directions, just not thinking that they have a crack pipe in their mouth.
Because it becomes so normal to them that they just go about life and they don't realize that they're committing crimes or they're proud of it and they want to virtue signal, look what I did to help Biden win.
Look at what I did to destroy Trump.
You know, this is what my contribution to the cause.
I threw away ballots.
I did this. I did that.
And so I think if we, and just from the normal poll watching and with all the tools they've got, giving instructions to people, you know, communicating with different ones of the workers or workers communicating amongst each other, I'm sure there's a lot of communications from these poll workers that will be incriminating.
It'll take time.
It's not going to all happen within the time commitments we've got, which is part of the problem.
I mean, sorting out this election, hopefully we'll have law enforcement who will be serious about it, finally, and Trump's second term, hopefully.
But here you're going to have a lot of criminal investigations to do, and I think you're going to find a lot of evidence that people are going to wish they hadn't created bragging on social media about the crimes they were committing.
Kevin, what do you think?
Well, in my ideal world, there's enough evidence, clear evidence of a systemic involvement in defrauding the American voters of a true election that the Supreme Court nullifies votes after a certain point in time in certain states or simply says it is so corrupted we have to have a new machine-only vote in certain states.
But let me say this, Dr.
Corsi. Two things.
If you could get into the jeweler's shop by picking the lock, don't use two sticks of dynamite.
You give yourself away.
Good point. Also, if there's anyone in American history as a political figure Who has the ability to find a needle in a haystack on a moonless night wearing a blindfold?
It's President Donald Trump.
I think so, too.
And I think Donald Trump is one of the...
In 2016, I don't think the Democrats calculated that they were dealing with Donald Trump, and he was not an ordinary thinker.
And I think this year they didn't calculate they're facing Donald Trump, and he wasn't going to feel fear at their threats to investigate his family unless he quit, unless he conceded.
Today, the GSA, when the Biden team said, we want to now begin the transition, we want to be appointed by the GSA to be the transition, the GSA said, not until the constitutional processes are completed.
No way. And now the courts, I think, are getting involved and we're going to see a whole different phase of this where the American people are going to realize the fraud that occurred and the media is not going to be able to advance as if all they had to do is pronounce it.
We've got proof of Russian collusion.
We've got proof that Biden is the elective.
We've got to count all the votes.
We don't worry about legitimate votes.
How can you prove these were fraudulent?
Blah, blah, blah. The press doesn't decide the election.
And now we see the presses how fraudulent they are.
They've exposed themselves to.
This voter theft to me is so patently obvious and detectable that these Democrats were not only criminal, they were bad at it.
I just can't believe how badly they did this.
Kevin? They did too much.
They did too much involving too many people.
And you see this developing, you see the groundwork, the sentiments being created by the networks with the bias in their polls and their predictions that it was going to be a landslide, that it was going to be this for Biden.
And yet, I mean, there had to be a million people stood in line to see President Trump's rallies in the final month.
And cheered him on and were joyful and joyous when they were together with fellow Americans who they'd never met before.
But there really is a unity in this country and it's a unity for love of country and a rule of law and order.
And all of us know we're men.
We lived in a real world.
We know the flaws in the man Donald Trump, but we also see this man loves his country and fights every day for the future of everyone in this country.
And whether CNN reports that the election has been called or not, there are 70 million people passionately committed to finding about the truth of the election of November 3rd, 2020.
I kind of want to end here, and I'll give you a chance for some concluding comments in a minute, but there's now a video that's come up on YouTube And the Democrats are running this, and this is just hilarious.
They're saying Trump's attempt to steal the election won't work.
It's over, Donald, because Trump is trying to get crimes detected and brought to the courts.
He's trying to get the constitutional process of the fact that the election is not final until December 14th when the Electoral College actually votes.
That's like five weeks' time.
And then it has to be certified by the Congress on January 3rd.
So we got a lot of processes here to go, and they conveniently forget about Al Gore contesting the election for 37 days, which the mainstream media in 2008.
Solidly approved of.
So now what the Democrats are doing, stealing the election, they're trying to say that Donald Trump, by using the legal processes available to eliminate fraud or identify fraud in the election, and to actually go through the constitutional process of the Electoral College before we declare Biden or anyone else to be the winner, it's now suddenly Donald Trump who's trying to break the law.
The Democrats are again accusing Others, the Republicans, Trump, of the crimes, in fact, that they are committing.
I think it's hilarious, but tragic.
It's the same pattern that goes all the way back to the beginning.
The Mueller report, right?
The Mueller team claimed unsuccessfully that President Trump was interfering with it.
He was obstructing their pursuit of justice.
He was obstructing justice when, in fact, he just refused To buy the rope to string him up and identify the tallest tree to use.
Acting in your own defense, acting in defense of the country, acting in defense of law and order is not obstruction.
And he's not attempting to steal anything.
He's trying to get our stolen goods, so to speak, our honest votes returned to us to be used in picking the president in November 3rd, 2020 and January 20, 2021.
We want our honest votes back.
That's what we're trying to get to.
Right. We want our votes not completely compromised by theft, by fraud, by crime.
Not compromised at all.
Precisely. Not compromised at all.
That's even more correct. Craig, any concluding comments from you?
Yeah, once again, we talk about this pretty much at the end of every broadcast, Dr.
Corsi, and that is this goes beyond just a fight against flesh and blood.
This is against the ruling of the universe.
This is against these people that want to control all of us.
They're power-hungry.
They don't care what rules they break to get there or what humans they break in order to get there.
And so this is light against darkness.
We have to stay strong and fear not.
Before, you know, God is on our side with this, I believe.
And I think his hand is on Donald Trump's shoulder.
So, Dr. Corsi? Yes, I think that's right.
And Kevin Wade, who's been with us this hour, who's an electrical engineer with great statistical experience and many different things, also having studied the voting data.
Kevin, any concluding comments that you'd like to make?
Yeah, I would ask all patriotic Americans who want to see justice done, who have some life experience, whether it's in politics or law or science or mathematics or computer systems, if your life experience helps contribute to analyzing what happened, the extent of the fraud, the materials and methods that were used, stand up now, use your know-how now, get in touch with the Trump team if you can now, And for the rest of you who don't feel you quite have all the tools in your arsenal to contribute,
I suggest you make a donation to the Trump legal team.
He has tremendous legal expenses ahead of him, and they have to be paid.
Let's not have him be out there without the right weapons.
Thank you for joining us, Kevin.
It's been really fun and interesting.
I wish it was not so tragic and criminal that we're talking about, but what's been To me, interesting is not only learning how all these statistics and techniques work and sharing them with people, but pursuing the truth, supporting the Constitution, wanting to eliminate the criminality and the evil partisanship we see for the Democrats.
They've just gone over the ledge.
They've gone off the cliff.
I always say in the end, God always wins and God will win here too.
His truth will win out.
Let's help him though. Let's do our part.
We've got to do our part first.
God won't do anything until we do it.
If we do it, God will do the heavy lifting.
God will take care of all of it.
We'll have done very little to make this work, but God will wait to see and want to see that we are out there fighting and supporting the right and getting down on our knees and repenting for allowing all this evil to get to the point it has without much earlier being attentive and blocking the communism in the schools blocking this evil ideologies that have led to the democrats thinking it's okay to commit crimes to gain power This to me is...
There is a beneficial lesson in what we've seen.
It's how banal evil is and how out in the open it is once we can flash some light on it.
Kevin, thank you very much.
God bless you and thank you and God bless the listeners for joining us.
Jerome Corsi with my producer Craig and we've been with Kevin Wade.
Today is... Monday, November 9th, 2020.
I guess exactly, what, six days after the election, Craig?
Six days. And we're just at the beginning.
The battle has in many ways just begun.
Thank you for joining us. We'll be back more with some deep dives into these various questions.
Thank you for joining us. God bless.
▲
Export Selection