All Episodes
Dec. 1, 2025 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
25:48
What Does The Age Of Disclosure REALLY MEAN?

Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more ETH - 0x90b9288AF0E40F8C90604460973743dBC91dA680 Watch My Documentaries: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4VFYRaltcc&list=PL5vtMLUWgYehCTEfSmgEzAEC9Dvt9FZmc Subscribe on Rokfin https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas Subscribe on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior Subscribe on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior Follow me on X https://x.com/JasonBermas PayPal: [email protected] Patriot TV - https://patriot.tv/bermas/ #BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior Show less

|

Time Text
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery, we need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe, and our food is unfit to eat.
As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy.
You've got to say, I'm a human being!
God damn it.
My life has been.
You have meddled with the primal forces of nature.
Don't give yourselves to brutes.
Men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men.
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
Ha ha.
It's showtime.
It's time to buckle up for making sense of the madness.
And who loves you and who do you love?
Hey, everybody, Jason Burmese here.
The age of disclosure, whatever that in fact means, are we living in it right now?
And are we in a phase where information regarding the UFO phenomenon that has now been rebranded as UAPs, UAPs, UAPs?
And quite frankly, I think that's part of the psyop, that transition to keep people within the narrative and what they are.
Okay, so there is a documentary film that's been around now a couple weeks that I watched last week called The Age of Disclosure that is getting a lot of, I would say, attention, not only in the mainstream, but common people that are watching it are giving it generally favorable reviews.
There are, of course, the diehards out there, the people that believe everything that Alizondo and Grush and people like Putoff are telling them.
Okay, but then there are people like myself who are extremely skeptical in the transition of this information, the evidence that has been presented since these individuals have been made more and more the face of quote-unquote disclosure.
And the fact that you have a government outwardly now within Congress and Senate instead of fighting it, embracing it, while the intelligence community, amongst them, James Clapper and John Brennan, who are in the film, are essentially championing this idea.
So this film is like one of the two films I watched this month.
Maybe I watch 10 or 12 films all year, and I think that's actually more than I end up watching, unless there are several documentary films or it's just a banger of a year.
Those I often do catch.
And we're going to go over the good, the bad, and the ugly regarding the age of disclosure, the people who were involved, the Hollyweird aspect of it as well.
And what this really means and what can we expect regarding this issue in the coming months and years, because I think we are at an accelerated pace for the general populace, especially Westerners, to be bamboozled by this whole issue.
At the end of the broadcast, I am going to go to your questions and comments regarding this issue.
And if you've seen the age of disclosure, now would be the time to jump in there.
Tell me what you thought as well.
We're going to show you an article from somebody that I'm often at odds with.
But on this particular issue, I think there is more agreement than disagreement.
And that would be Michael Shermer of Skeptic Magazine.
But at the same time, on this issue, people like Mick West also, I think I have more in common other than the fact that they try to say that all of these videos are essentially hoaxes or being misidentified as something else.
And I don't necessarily know that that is the case or think that's the case.
I think when we're dealing with a lot of these videos, yes, we are dealing with technologies that the general populace is simply not privy to.
So get ready.
We're going to talk the age of disclosure.
We're also going to mention Richard Dolan, not in the film, but I watched his review of the film because Dolan, out of like a lot of the individuals surrounding the UFO issue, I have some respect for.
And I think that he comes at it from a very honest perspective, even if I happen to disagree with his conclusions.
So let's thumbs it up.
Subscribe, share.
Please check out all the documentary films down below for free.
The 9-11 issue is the issue.
And if you haven't seen my films on that, please check them out.
And then we have the bigger picture, the quote-unquote new world order, globalism, etc., with Invisible Empire.
And of course, Shade the Motion Picture.
Also, can't do it without you guys.
Really need your support now more than ever.
If you enjoy this program in a truly independent perspective, please, please consider donating via the Buy Me a Coffee $5, $10, $15.
It means the world to me.
And if you can, big donors, we need you now more than ever as well.
There is a PayPal down below.
I want to thank MarigoldResources.com.
They buy and sell businesses for supporting the broadcast.
And then, of course, River City Reader, RCREader.com.
Let's get into it.
So on Rod and Tomatoes here, they've got 10 pro reviews.
And I'm not big on the critics.
Normally not a big fan of mainstream movie critics.
I think they get it wrong a ton.
But they got a 30% tomato meter.
Okay.
Look on the right hand side.
Over 500 plus reviews on this thing already.
Okay, like I said, it's been out maybe, I don't even know if it's been out two weeks, just around there.
And it's a 93%.
93%.
Now, I actually think that Shermer does a pretty good job here because one of the things that he points out almost directly is that this film doesn't present a ton of evidence at all.
I mean, almost none.
I want to make that extremely clear.
So, what we're getting in this film is a narrative film that I believe is also produced by Elizondo, this person who we've seen more and more and more of over the last decade via other mainstream outlets,
especially the history channel, right, that just became the ancient aliens channel, things like TLC, National Geographic, but also in the mainstream media circuit via these hearings that he was also a part of, talking about, quote unquote, a tip, a tip.
And over and over and over and over again, I hear about evidence that we are not allowed to see.
Okay, that's great.
I'm not saying that there isn't evidence out there that the public has not seen that could prove this issue to be exactly what they're telling us, right?
Some kind of extraterrestrial or interdimensional beings visiting the planet, okay?
But I haven't seen that evidence, and they don't present it here.
I want to make that extremely and abundantly clear.
And really, when UFOs, also known as things like Foo Fighters during World War II, began to explode in the public consciousness, it is in that wartime era and post-wartime era.
And also when the Central Intelligence Agency, Disney, the military-industrial complex apparatus is trying to get people comfortable with space travel.
Okay?
And going to the moon and going to Mars, all that stuff.
Science fiction explodes.
Now, it had existed beforehand, but now you seem to have a phenomenon that people are seeing, they're filming, they're taking pictures of.
Military personnel are talking about it.
And you obviously have declassified operations such as the Nazi Bell, right?
We're talking about the 40s and different types of energy and propulsion systems.
And then we also have to understand post-World War II, both the Soviets, okay, and the United States recruit a bunch of these people.
You know, even when you look at the stealth bomber, the original wing, all right, that's out of paperclip.
That's former Nazi scientists that built this flying wing, if you will, and much cruder in that same time period.
We're in 2025.
Okay.
So I constantly lean towards the vast majority of the things that people see or film being in the realm of human technology, if not all of it, until I see otherwise.
Now, Grush, who's also portrayed in this quite a bit, has always come off as an emotional mess and somebody to me that could be easily manipulated.
And when I watch other documentary films like Mirage Men and people like Richard Doty, who are using the quote-unquote alien phenomenon to cover up military technology and drive other people crazy, well, again, I remain skeptical.
And I would say this also.
You know, I'm a guy that when I was younger and a kid, I was sold on everything UFO, everything alien, the grays, you name it.
I mean, Fox was the only one that was going to tell us the truth.
The alien autopsy video.
And I often talk about the Time Life series, the Read the Book series that delved into a bunch of these quote-unquote mysteries.
And the big ones like the UFO ones, especially that showed pictures in them, I was enthralled.
It wasn't until I realized post-9-11 how much the Intel lied and manipulated the populace and what they would do to their own people that I really became skeptical.
So what do I think before I dig too hard deep into that angle of the government was good about this?
There were a few moments where individuals talked about the various possibilities of what these things could be, right?
Over and over and over again, the general narrative that is hammered via this film, that anybody, I think it's 20 bucks right now.
You can rent it, the Ages of Disclosure over on Prime Video.
So if you want to go spend your 20 bucks, please, you're welcome to.
But again, it constantly hammers home this narrative that aliens are here, aliens are here, non-human entities, non-human entities, you know, over and over and over again.
However, there are small parts where they talk about the possibilities of even, you know, these beings being humans from the future.
You know, they really play down the idea that this could be human technology other than a brief moment where they talk about a civilization possibly on the planet that is hidden away and we just cannot technologically get to or control or dominate for whatever reason.
That was, you know, these are brief moments of the film because I want to give the good stuff its due.
Then you had another instance where they discuss the mechanisms in which these things travel and show in some videos.
And they give you a hypothesis of kind of like this bubble force field that surrounds these crafts.
And they don't work in the same kind of time, space, physics that we do.
And that is what allows them to move in the, you know, impossible directions, speeds, and have, you know, one of the things they talk about is the g-forces in these things.
There's no way that a human could pilot them with the physics we know because you would just be splattered against the wall.
And g-forces are a very real thing.
You know, I'm constantly pointing to rocket technology and I'm constantly saying, hey, take a look at this and how hard it is.
And look at the individuals that are in space for a very long time and how their bodies are banked up, right?
All these things are, you know, essential when really trying to dig deep into this issue.
So again, pretty good right there.
Marco Rubio, who I am no fan of, but actually does a sit-down interview and is a large part of this film.
Rubio says something, and Dolan commented on this, that I think is wrong, but has a hint of truth to it.
Okay.
For instance, he talks about how many of these positions through the executive, such as the head of the CIA or the administrator of the NSA, et cetera, they're often appointed every four years, eight years, sometimes multiple times.
They change hands a lot.
And he goes, because they change hands a lot, that does not mean that those individuals are aware of the programs that preceded them.
And especially when you're talking about real black operations, black technologies, things involving the contracting network, which they talk about the contractors a little bit here, but it's not like they're naming the Lockheeds, the Raytheons, right?
The really important ones.
The Department of Energy is mentioned just really briefly, but that's another entity, if you will, that I think knows a lot more about this than the general public is led to believe.
He talks about how those people are interchangeable, but the people that stay there for 30, 40, 50, 60 years, they're the ones that are actually in the know because they've been reading on the program, but they're also compartmentalized, right?
So then he posits that since it's the contractors that hold this technology or have been working on it generationally, they're the ones actually in control.
And even somebody like Trump, the executive of the executive, has no real idea what's going on.
Generally, I would believe the part about the president of the United States, the head of the government, not being clued in on it, but I don't believe that the contractors would ever on any, any technology, especially these type of technologies, without the hand of some kind of national security agency, apparatus, oversight.
I just don't buy it.
I just don't buy the idea that these contractors could somehow go rogue under the nose of the government because they are so heavily intertwined.
And that system of compartmentalization has been honed so well over the last, again, almost 100 years now.
Almost 100 years, you know, 80 plus years when we're talking about the Manhattan Project.
So that also kind of brings us into why I'm so skeptical of these individuals and their narratives.
James Clapper is not a good person.
He is somebody that has lied to the American public and spied on the American public and known about it for a very, very long time.
Okay.
Clapper is one of the true ghouls, in my opinion, of the quote-unquote deep state.
John Brennan, another individual we've talked about here.
He seems to have a lot to do with the Russia Gate setup, if you will.
We talk about Hirsch and Hirsch saying that that Russia Gate thing was essentially a Brennan operation.
We played Brennan getting very upset when someone challenged him on the letter that all these lovely Intel, former Intel officials signed via the Hunter Biden laptop.
And that's nothing.
That just scratches the surface.
So Clapper and Brennan pushing this, that gives me the heebie-jeebies.
You know who else is very big on quote-unquote disclosure?
John Podesta.
Now, Podesta is not mentioned in this.
They don't use him.
I would assume, you know, that's because he's a liability because so many people dislike Podesta.
But again, when you're talking about the heads of the CIA, a lot of people dislike them as well.
And we got some insight into Podesta actually from those emails during 2016 that were released via WikiLeaks and then blamed on Russia.
Richard Dolan, when he did his review, to his credit, he actually did call out the fact that he's no fan of people like Brennan and Clapper, et cetera.
But on this issue, sorry, Mr. Dolan, I just cannot agree with you on that.
I think when these people are selling us on a very specific and certain narrative and not providing evidence, because I really got to reiterate that.
This is like storytellers.
There's a lot of cutscenes of the hearings.
There are, even from what I saw, I don't even think there are interviews with any firsthand eyewitnesses of alien life.
I want to make that clear.
They do do, you know, the testimony of, and I guess some interviews of people that have seen the crafts or the technology.
They hone in very much so on the idea that this is a national security threat or a military threat.
Dolan, to his credit, calls this out.
He says, well, they're such a military threat, then, you know, why haven't they moved on us?
Why have we not seen any motion against the human race?
That's a great question.
You know, if this is some kind of entity outside of a nation state and technology or competing nation states, you would think that there would be some type of movement.
But hey, who knows, right?
Like, again, I don't have all the secrets to the universe.
And I'm sure if you read something like David Ike's The Roadmap, which is brand new, and Ike's a little over a month will be on the program.
And you believe in, you know, shape-shifting lizard people or Archons as he, who knows?
I don't personally, I don't personally believe that.
Okay?
I haven't seen the evidence for it.
It's not presented here.
So, you know, it's a pretty long-winded 20-minute review of the documentary, The Age of Disclosure.
Let's see what you guys think.
Let's see if what we got here.
If anybody commented, anybody saw it?
I don't know.
Hey, hey, hey, hey, we got 70 people watching.
Can we get the thumbs up, please?
Let's see.
Yo, Burma's Brigade.
If they're not talking about plasmoids, naturally occurring, spit out of volcanoes and earthquakes, I can't take them seriously, like ball lightning, glowing orbs.
Okay.
Everything about NASA makes me furious.
These nerds didn't land, blah, blah, blah, in the 60s, LMAO, because they liked us and need spaceships.
So it looks like nobody, and again, we're struggling for a live audience here, saw the film.
But I'd wait.
I'd wait till, you know, it's free on the internet.
I don't think it's groundbreaking.
I think it's more of the same propaganda.
I think really that this age of disclosure is an age of deception.
I know there are a lot of people out there that talk about blue beam and fake alien invasions.
My biggest worry is the idea that not only could that occur, but you could create a chimera, or they have created chimeras, that is real biological entities that you could touch and feel, not deep fakes, not AI.
They may even think that they're aliens.
Who knows?
But that would convince the public and they wouldn't need a ton of these entities.
You'd have to roll out one or two in the public arena and saying, this is what we're up against.
And people would buy it.
Hook, line, and sinker.
Now, that's not to say, again, that I know everything, but I don't think that this provides any real kind of evidence.
Folks, I need your support now more than ever.
$5, $10, $15.
It does mean the world to me.
Big donors.
Thank you.
We may be going live a little bit later tonight.
Jama, he said, Jason, I sent you two links on naturally occurring plasmoids accounting for most UFO sightings.
Please.
I don't disagree with that.
I know I've seen the volcanic stuff.
Again, I think some of these are craft.
I think some of these are exactly what you said, natural phenomenon.
And I think there is the possibility that some of these are things that are maybe non-human, but that's a tough one.
So again, thank you for those that have supported the broadcast.
I continue to try to survive in an environment that I really want to thrive in once more.
I really do love independent media, and that is because it's not about left or right.
It's not liberal, conservative issue.
No.
This issue is about the truth, is about right and wrong.
Export Selection