Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 23, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas

01:57:31

POLICE STATE HONEST REVIEW | Reality Rants with Jason Bermas

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
	Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
	We think too much and feel too little.
	More than machinery, we need humanity.
	We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat, as if that's the way it's supposed to be.
	We know things are bad, worse than bad.
	They're crazy. Silence!
	The great and powerful Oz knows why you have come.
	You've got to say, I'm a human being!
	Goddammit! My life has value!
	You have meddled with the primal forces of nature!
	Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder!
	Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men, machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
	Thank you, you're beautiful.
	I love you, yes.
	You're beautiful.
	Thank you.
	It's...
	Showtime!
	And now, reality hit with Jason Hermes.
	And who loves you? And who do you love?
	Oh!
	Good morning, good morning, good morning.
	I am Jason Bermas. This is Reality Rants.
	We are going to be reviewing the new film by Dinesh D'Souza that actually drops in theaters today.
	You may be able to watch it today.
	I believe the 25th there are screenings and it has now been extended from just two days in theaters which I think is awesome because overall Spoiler alert.
	Very good film.
	Has its blind spots.
	We're going to go over those blind spots.
	We're going to go over the really nice aspects about the film.
	And then we're going to do something we've never done on the show.
	And quite frankly, I really debated back and forth whether I was going to do it or not.
	But I figured I kind of had to do it this time.
	Because I'm talking about a film that I actually interviewed the guy that did it.
	And when I brought up my point of us moving away from a constitutional republic post-World War II, I think he gave the wrong answer.
	Now, whether or not you think he's given a canned answer or he has his own blind spots, and here's the thing, guys.
	He is vehemently and fervently against the Democratic Party.
	In many cases...
	Very much believes in the two-party delusion.
	But even when I talked to him, he talked about about 100 years of a uniparty during what was the beginning in the FDR era.
	So, when I hear things like that, it's like, well, Dinesh, come on.
	And then you realize Dinesh also did Prison Time, after he did the Barack star documentary, I'd almost pretty much forgotten about.
	But he did this 2016 Obama film, and then the Obama Justice Department went after him for campaign donations.
	And that's another thing that I don't think a lot of people can get.
	And I'm not sure I actually get it because I've got to tell you right now.
	I've certainly never donated a vast amount.
	I'm not even sure what the amount was to any kind of political campaign.
	Number one, I don't have that kind of money to throw around.
	But there is a certain number of people out there that do make those kind of like what you and I would consider severely heavy donations.
	And for that, you know, he ended up catching a felony.
	And this is well before the COVID-1984 nightmare.
	So I think that he's skewed there.
	We've got the trailer for the film.
	We're going to be playing that. And like I said, overall, I was down to the last...
	It's almost a two-hour film, okay?
	And these are all kind of spoiler alerts because we're going to go into a lot of different aspects of what's good about the movie, what's not good about the movie.
	But the overall film for me jumped from like an 82%, which I was going to say, you know, it's good.
	If you get a chance to go watch it, I'd bring somebody that might not be aware of these things.
	But it jumped to an 87, not quite like a 90 or a 90 plus.
	At the very end, because it does briefly talk about the quote-unquote Great Reset and the World Economic Forum and the You Will Own Nothing.
	And another thing that's very strong in the documentary is that it plays news clips along with the narrative that it's setting.
	And we'll get into that narrative set in a minute.
	But... I'm always a big fan of not only historical footage, but footage that backs up what you're saying with first-hand, verifiable, not-out-of-context video clips.
	And... Very, very well done here.
	Very well done. So I'm briefly going to pause to tell you to thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
	And then just quick housekeeping.
	I know last week I promised two premiums because I'd been doing one.
	And then you got no premiums this weekend.
	I just want to say this.
	I had an incident, family incident, early afternoon on Saturday that totally changed my whole thing for the weekend.
	I don't really want to get into it much more than that because I'm going to be really honest with you.
	Not the easiest of situations and had me seething.
	Not only just trying to fix the situation, but had me in an emotional state that I don't like to be in, quite frankly.
	I don't think I always make the best decisions in those emotional states.
	Although this is work and I treat it as such, I had other things that I just had to do.
	And I don't want to get into it beyond that.
	I've reached out to a bunch of people to try to make it up to you guys this week.
	And I do want to thank everybody who's given their continued support.
	But I do want to point out also, for all the people that are really just fiending for a ton of Burmese, thank you guys again for all the support via Red Voice Media, RVM, all that other stuff.
	If you go to my personal website, Rumble page.
	Or you're a Rockfin supporter.
	There's literally, especially from last night, I think I put up six or seven videos over on Rockfin already.
	And on the Rumble, they're timed out.
	Now, what's great about RVM is some of those videos that I reposted are premiums.
	Right? That... After two weeks, they go free.
	Red Voice Media has already put out a lot of the premiums, even before I get the chance to, via a third hour here.
	Which is just super cool, man.
	They get that the information is relevant.
	And another great thing about those type of things, let me give you an example.
	Zach Voorhees has done the show a few times here since I've been at RVM. And Zach Voorhees is the Google whistleblower.
	I really enjoy having him on.
	And they often play what I think is extremely still.
	Every time I've had Zach on, it's information that's relevant then, was relevant prior to the interview, and is relevant for months, if not years later, because it is technology-based, and it is document-based, right? And it's insider-based, right?
	So, Zach is in Police State.
	That's why I brought him up.
	And his segment, I think, really does say a lot about the entire film.
	And why, overall, it's a super...
	It's a really good film for those who don't know what's going on.
	And it's a good gateway film for people to go to other people's information.
	And why I bring Zach up in particular is because during one of the segments with Zach, which is more towards, I think, the middle half and towards the second half of the film, He brings up the big tech lockstep censoring of Alex Jones.
	Now, they don't show Alex.
	I don't even think Infowars.com is mentioned.
	There's nothing out there beyond even that.
	But it's an incredibly powerful segment.
	And I'm like, I like that.
	Because D'Souza is at least acknowledging, acknowledging, hey, that's not right either.
	He doesn't make, um, he doesn't really make any kind of comment on it, not only personally, but in the film after that.
	So, kind of slick.
	I do like that.
	Um, Some of the things that I thought were a little off.
	Because there's a lot of positive about the film.
	And when I say a little off, or maybe even behind the times, I'm not trying to toot my own horn, but I go back to...
	And this is actually a hat tip to Alex, because...
	I didn't do it first by any means.
	And even certainly Alex in a way didn't do it first by any means.
	But he started to do it in a manner where people were taken.
	No, remember Alex Jones did the Police State series.
	I was actually there in Austin as Police State 4 was being made.
	Which, I mean even Alex will tell you, is more of like a clip show of His shows.
	It's not quite the documentary, in my opinion, that the other three are in the series.
	And for their time, they're going to go down to history as cult classics, in my opinion.
	But... The Reichstag Fire.
	In this, the Reichstag Fire is more equated with January 6th than anything.
	And they do a really good job...
	Of just the baselines around January 6th.
	And remember, this is an hour and 50 minute long movie.
	So I understand that you can't, and it is pretty stock full of information, you can't get everything in there.
	But there's no mention, for instance, of the pipe bomber.
	And one of the things that critics are going to be able to go after in this film is that it is presented from a very right-wing perspective.
	All the talking heads, Revolver, Darren J. Beatle, who's interviewed in this, they're all kind of conservative baseline.
	So you're already going to have the parrot parade out there just dismissing it.
	Like I told you guys, Dinesh actually...
	Took clips, put them on Twitter of our interview.
	And the bot, random loser, anonymous, not showing my face hate in talking points is over the top.
	It's over the top.
	Right? Like, everybody's talking about Russia, Russia, Russia.
	These are bot losers.
	Right? And a lot of people think that like when you say bot, you mean, oh, this is automated AI. I mean, that isn't the rarest of cases.
	No, this is a person with like 37 Twitter accounts, okay, that are all make-believe.
	They're one person with a big agenda and they actually get paid to do this.
	It's a job.
	It's a job. Even the people that aren't paid to do this are somehow brainwashed into wanting to do that so they can be right.
	It's the most bizarre thing.
	And they're protected by that blanket of anonymity.
	So... Look, 10,000 Mules, which I'll be honest, I did not watch, so I cannot give you my opinion on it.
	My boy, Pasta Jardula, who actually had just posted the premium of our latest interview, but you might have already seen it on the third hour over at RVM Rumble, where the second and third hour live, Monday through Thursday.
	So, he watched it.
	And was of the opinion that the solution of this was not good.
	It was like more surveillance.
	Now in this film, there's a high critique of surveillance.
	Which is good. And it even gets into the social credit score aspect.
	I mean, there's a lot of good in this film.
	That's why, again, we're giving it an 87 out of 100 is the score on this.
	And maybe some people are going to give it a 90 plus 95% deal.
	But again, go back to the Reichstag fire.
	And for those that don't know, this is the false flag of false flags for the Nazis.
	Although there seems to be a ton of other false flag work before that.
	But this is the burning of the parliamentary building by the communists.
	And many people have stated that, you know, there was an underground tunnel.
	It seems to have been lit by the officers.
	They don't believe... I think it's Vanderloob is who they accused of it.
	Some people say he set the fire.
	Some people say he didn't set the fire.
	In this film, it actually does a good job of showing FBI provocation.
	Right? But we'll get into that a little bit in the next segment.
	So... The whole thing is, that's January 6th.
	No, no, no, no. Jones was getting it right when he was equating it to 9-11.
	Even Michael Moore, in his latest 9-11, 11-9 film, the one on Trump, right?
	He now acknowledges that the Reichstag and 9-11 have much more to do with each other.
	Now, don't get me wrong...
	January 6th, especially the way they've portrayed it, is that next step in trying to legitimize what they'd already built, which was an infrastructure of total and complete control and zero accountability that can call anybody a domestic terrorist it likes and wanted to widen the swath of people that it could immediately target.
	And I've warned about this for years.
	And that's one of the reasons we're going to play the Dinesh clip.
	Because, yes, there's an acceleration post-9-11.
	Big time. But really, it's...
	After World War II. And D'Souza at least acknowledges in our long-form interview, I don't think we're going to be playing that part of the clip, but I could be wrong.
	It might be in there. That he was one of the people that cheerleaded it on.
	And he does seem to still believe the 9-11 narrative, but then in another section, actually decimates the FBI terrorism al-Qaeda narrative.
	In this. And another plus point for the film.
	Police State in theaters today.
	Also on the 25th.
	Beyond that. Maybe you want to check it out.
	We're going to go to a word from our sponsor.
	We're going to go over more about the film.
	We've also got the trailer to the film.
	We've got that piece of an interview that I did with Dinesh that we're going to play.
	That to me illustrates his blind spot.
	You're not going to want to miss it.
	Thumbs it up. Subscribe. And share.
	It's Reality Rants.
	Attention Americans.
	Breaking news. Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
	Don't be fooled.
	It won't benefit you.
	Take action now.
	The Federal Reserve phased deployment of FedNow began on July 1st, 2023.
	Be prepared. This may catch many off guard.
	Your hard-earned assets are in jeopardy.
	But there's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
	Reach out to American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar in volatile markets.
	visit protectfrombiden.com. This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k
	into precious metals without any tax consequences. Be smart, don't let Biden force you into using the
	government's new digital dollar. Visit protectfrombiden.com to get your free guide and get started.
	Again, that's protectfrombiden.com.
	All right, we are back folks So, The film, again, when I say that it does a good job of covering a swath of issues, one of them happens to be FBI setups of losers that have nothing to do with terrorism.
	And it makes the point very clear that the need to find terrorists far outweighs the actual terrorist threat.
	Well, that's good. But now so many people are on this mantra...
	With people going over the border.
	Well, look, that may be the actual case.
	When you look at, for instance, the 9-11 hijacking squad, it does seem like somebody like Ada or maybe somebody like Al-Madar, possibly Al-Shieri, is in the know of what's going on, at least to a certain extent.
	Realizes they're part of a network.
	The other guys are like tried and true and they're just kind of the goons.
	Right? They're the yes men.
	Now in so many of these cases what the FBI does in the case they illustrate here is they find somebody that's desperate They pretend to be an Al-Qaeda operative.
	They lead the guy the entire way who is desperate and needs money.
	And then that guy is planning on robbing the other guy.
	Because it's an Al-Qaeda guy.
	And the other guy is going, I need you to pledge allegiance to Al-Qaeda.
	And this guy is like, sure, I'll pledge my allegiance to Al-Qaeda.
	It's going to give me money, right?
	See how that works? And so, they show you this case.
	Very interesting. Now, here's a problem with it.
	And this is maybe a preference thing for me.
	Although it's done extremely well here, and I think to good dramatic effect.
	The dramatic reenactments.
	Now, for me, I'm not a big fan of dramatic reenactments.
	Okay? I get it.
	They're tried. They're true.
	They can have impact. Let me say this.
	The first scene and really the last scene of the film...
	Are powerful, but I couldn't help myself, especially at the end, when I thought to myself, boy, this would be so much more powerful with their end scene if it wasn't a dramatic reenactment of somebody in a cell and instead it was actual stock footage of some of the more egregious instances of the police state.
	Which, in turn, they sometimes do show you.
	They show you The guy who has an entire SWAT team come to his house, and he beat it in court by the way, and him taken.
	And they talk about the optics of the perp walk.
	And, you know, they talk about a guy who was just at the Capitol.
	He didn't go up on the grounds and was completely and totally humiliated.
	The FBI ransacked his house, his mother's house.
	He just, I mean, an old man with a cane crying his eyes out.
	Can't believe this happened because he dared question the 2020 election.
	Just like you dare question whether or not Joe Biden is conscious half the time.
	I mean, am I allowed to just...
	Am I not allowed to say it's very apparent that he doesn't run anything and has not run anything at all?
	And that's another great point that they make in this film.
	That... When you have something like what's going on right now, there's nowhere to directly point because no one knows who's really in charge, at least publicly, because the media just won't talk about it.
	The media, and they give great examples in this film about direct media lies.
	So going back to the reenactments, okay?
	The first reenactment of a family being raided And then the way they close it out with, after the credits, basically after the raid, after the arrest of the husband, of going up to the woman of the house and having her sign off so that they can leave, so they destroy your home, blah, blah, blah, is a lot more effective than I thought it would be.
	Like, I watched that, and at first I'm not in love with it, And then by the end of it, it was done in such a cinematic and clever fashion that I was actually on board.
	Got on board with it.
	Okay? Now, the final raid that they show you, also pretty effective.
	Not going to lie. Again, all done very well, shot well.
	The actual interviews, you know, Rand Paul is in this.
	He's very good in it.
	I'd say there's about a dozen to maybe 15 or so, you know, solid interviews throughout this.
	When you talk about the...
	However, there were... Let me put it this way.
	We were also talking about the FBI and the reenactments.
	There is the reenactment of the Hunter Biden laptop.
	And actor Nick Searcy is playing like the head FBI goon.
	Like the head bureaucrat that's kind of directing all of this.
	I actually have Searcy on the broadcast today on my other show.
	The one you're going to see the small part of the interview from Dinesh.
	And first of all, good actor.
	And this plays a very good role, but you just give the other side, and when I say the other side, I mean the left in this case, because so much of this is pointed out to the persecution of the quote-unquote right, but it's anybody that stands up to the great narrative.
	Yes, are Christian conservatives being targeted?
	Sure. That's because they're a large swath, and they're politically active, With a certain individual, Trump, love him or hate him, acknowledge it or not.
	They don't like that.
	They don't like being out of political control.
	And actually, William M. Arkin, same guy that wrote that incredible Newsweek article we constantly go to, is the author of this cover story that we have covered.
	And we may or may not read the whole thing today.
	It's another extensive piece, really important.
	I remember when I read...
	This bad boy...
	It was like an hour-long broadcast.
	Second hour, by the way...
	RVMRumble.com RVMRumble.com RVMRumble.com That's where you're going to catch it.
	Uncensored. There's a lot of videos today...
	About the...
	That I can't play in the first hour.
	That I do want to get to in the second hour also.
	But... This film...
	Is important.
	I wouldn't have dedicated...
	The thumbnail and really like the entire first half of the broadcast, which, you know, there's still plenty to talk about on the movie, to it if it were not because people have to realize this is coming for everybody.
	So a lot of the examples they cite, and by the way, can we get a hundred thumbs up over on the Tubins?
	And if you're over on Rumbled, same thing.
	Come on, let's go. They show you the school boards.
	So they established that, yeah, during the lockdowns or whatever, this did awaken a lot of parents to what their kids were being taught that they didn't quite understand because of the remote stuff and more of the interaction with their kids.
	Now, number one, hey, you've got to be involved in your kid's life.
	But number two, that was a quick mobilization.
	And then they show you just a couple of mothers that stepped up to the plate and did the right thing.
	And the community is clearly behind them.
	And they become the targets.
	So really, I can't think of an issue that is covered in this film that has not been covered ad nauseum on this broadcast.
	I don't even know that there's a clip in here because, you know, we showed part of the raid on that, I believe it was a pastor with all those children.
	I think in this we showed clips that they didn't even show, right?
	Let me give you another example of where I think they could have been a little bit more effective.
	When I talked to you about...
	The entrapment of the Al-Qaeda terrorist, right?
	The Al-Qaeda terrorist.
	A guy who's going to be on a terror watch list for like 30 plus years, had nothing to do with terrorism.
	Went to prison the whole nine.
	They rolled out the scary, ooh, bad Muslim terrorist.
	All of that is a reenactment.
	Now, I would have liked for them to at least slip some of the archival footage that was presented in trial that he could have got access to, maybe even had access to.
	I think that's more effective.
	That's just me. I think that's more effective.
	So, you know, we talked about the old man at January 6th.
	Talked about the school boards that they cover.
	We talked about historical references.
	With the Reichstag and the Nazis, and obviously China is in there, and Mao is discussed briefly in some historical footage, but into Xi Jinping, social credit score, right?
	And to me, this is actually where Bongino shines.
	Now, Dan Bongino and I believe his wife are producers on the film, so they're in it early.
	He's in it very late. But Bongino, to his credit, man, like, I think...
	I think Dan is a...
	Man, even though he's taken the Rush Limbaugh spot and he's been fast-tracked, you notice they took away his Fox show.
	And they didn't give him a nightly show.
	That's a good sign they took away his Fox show.
	And I know that he is...
	I think he's on the board of Rumble.
	Again, Peter Thiel I'm very suspicious of.
	But my Rumble numbers are now double to triple what my YouTube numbers are.
	Every time. Every time.
	And that should tell you something alone.
	I mean, my YouTube is just trash.
	I lose subscribers every day.
	That has not changed. And like I said, this thing covers the censorship.
	One of the other really interesting aspects...
	And this was a story that I wasn't aware of, but it wouldn't have been something that was in the news.
	It was this North Korean defector who had basically been sold into slavery as a child, explaining that system and how it worked, and then getting out of that system and going to Columbia University and explaining how...
	She felt like the indoctrination there, especially in gender ideology, that no longer recognized biological males and females and what they were trying to force her to believe was even more extreme.
	Again, I'm glad that this is out there.
	So, 87 out of 100, Two thumbs up.
	I'm supporting this film.
	I want people to see it.
	We come back after the next break on the other side.
	What we're going to do is we're going to play the teaser trailer that shows you some of the drama and shows you some of the clips.
	We're then going to play the part of the interview where I try to articulate to Dinesh Why it's not just this administration or the Obama administration, etc., etc., that has allowed this to happen.
	Really, it's a long slide, incremental slide.
	And what kills me is he's talking about World War II and he's talking about Nazis, but it's not like he acknowledges paperclip.
	You can't have it every which way.
	And again, you can't slip it all in there.
	And nobody acknowledged exclusive inside the military's secret undercover army.
	Same guy. Same deal as this one.
	That article also, we're going to go in depth after we play the trailer and then the clip of me talking to D'Souza.
	Thumbs it up, subscribe, share, and we will be back after this word from our sponsor.
	When I invented my pillow, my passion was to help each and every one of you.
	And 20 years later, all of your support is what keeps us going.
	Because of you, we've been able to create thousands of USA jobs and help millions get the best sleep ever.
	To thank you, my employees and I are bringing you a limited edition MyPillow.
	The Giza Elegance MyPillow is made with my patented adjustable fill, the most amazing cotton, and a two-inch pipe cusset.
	It has four custom loft levels, Machine washable and drivable, and you get my 60-day money-back guarantee and 10-year warranty.
	Go to MyPillow.com or call the number on your screen.
	Use your promo code to get your limited edition 20th anniversary MyPillow queen size.
	Retails for $69.98, now only $19.98.
	That's right, get a queen size MyPillow for only $19.98.
	From all of us here at MyPillow, face America!
	Oh, thank you, Mike.
	Thank you, Mike. And look, Mike Lindell.
	He's not mentioned in this film, by the way.
	He's nowhere in it. But he's another target of this modern-day police state waging warfare against you.
	Let me give you an example.
	When the old man starts crying, I mean crying, he went to the Capitol on January 6th, He didn't break anything.
	He wasn't violent.
	He didn't go past any barriers.
	He's like, no lawyer would touch this.
	No one wanted to go.
	They're scared shizzless of the D.C. justice system.
	A half a million dollars up front.
	A half a million dollars up front to fight these people.
	That's on a low-level case.
	What do you think they did to the pillow man?
	They're like, we're putting you out of business, bro.
	And quite frankly...
	One of the only reasons that they haven't been as successful to do that against someone like Alex Jones is because this is what people want to hear from Alex Jones.
	I get it.
	Frank's speech and Mike Lindell has done a lot of motivational talks.
	He didn't make his bones as somebody who was doing that.
	That wasn't the model.
	That enriched him financially.
	This did enrich Alex.
	So, you know, even if you cut out Alex's tongue at this point, just him writing.
	I mean, it would be hard to eliminate Alex Jones media.
	He'd probably just go more hardcore on films than ever.
	Maybe bring that back.
	I mean, again, I'm a documentary film guy.
	Another reason that we did this.
	It's because I especially like to get behind movies that I think can help make a difference.
	And I certainly think that this film can help make a difference.
	I mean, we're hanging on by a thread and this recognizes it.
	So, we're going to play the teaser trailer for this.
	We're going to hope there's not going to be some kind of a copyright strike.
	I guess we'll see.
	I guess we'll see. We're braving it.
	Then we're going to play the clip of me talking to Dinesh D'Souza a little over a week ago.
	Almost a week. Probably a week and a half ago or so.
	About the release of this film.
	And me challenging the notion that this is some kind of a modern day thing.
	And that's the other thing, man.
	Like the film actually...
	I know I'm ranting here on Reality Rants.
	Actually talks about Ruby Ridge and Waco.
	So they do the pre-9-11 thing as well.
	Now, a lot of people, when they talk about Ruby Ridge, they want to talk about the racial overtones of it.
	Look, you don't have to like Randy Weaver to be like, hey, they shouldn't have shot and killed his kids.
	Or kid. Sorry, kid.
	I want to get it wrong.
	So let's play the trailer and then after the trailer we'll play a little D'Souza.
	Chief Division Counsel DOJ approved a no-knock breach.
	Beach.
	Bye.
	We want the subject to be on display.
	Doing the walk of shame, full visual impact.
	Any questions? Are we becoming a police state?
	Government told American citizens they couldn't go to church on Sunday.
	For the first time in my life, I'm saying to myself, am I going to get a knock at the door?
	The Patriot Act and FISA were used against Donald Trump.
	These individuals have commissioned the biggest propaganda play in U.S. history.
	They don't go after the people that rigged the election.
	They go after the people that want to find out what the hell happened.
	We don't need to have a crime.
	What we need is a person to look at.
	And then we go find out what crime you did.
	Our focus is shifting.
	Our main priority as a bureau is going to be domestic terrorism.
	It really paints anybody who's right of center.
	If you're a pro-life, pro-family Catholic, they define you as radical.
	These are anti-government.
	We are freedom of religion and freedom of rage.
	Violent extremists, and they must be dealt with.
	We can do anything we want.
	So, again, drops today in theaters.
	And I think you get a good taste of how much of it is actually acted.
	They did a good job mixing this.
	Jim Jordan also featured, also a polarizing figure.
	I guess Rand is going to be, I'm much more of a Rand Paul fan.
	Cash Patel. There's a guy that, again, walked off my show.
	The one we're going to show you, not this particular show, but Walked Off the Show, is featured in this.
	For me, literally quoting this article on air while we showed it.
	So the irony is not lost on me that there are major blind spots out there.
	And I'm not trying to make this about a right or left issue.
	I would say, like, you might be able to reach...
	Some of the moderates out there and maybe some of the people that aren't like hardcore lefties.
	Maybe just to identify as Democrats by watching this movie.
	I mean, it is extremely well done.
	Now, with that being said, we're going to play this clip of D'Souza on my program.
	And let me just mute it over here as we do it live.
	So we can bring it right up to the point that I want.
	And... Look, I'm not in love with his response here.
	And I think that I did a really good job of articulating how I think we've gotten here since after World War II. But you decide.
	We are back with Dinesh D'Souza.
	And Dinesh, I talked about how this has been a gradual thing.
	And I would argue that really we moved very far away from a constitutional republic beginning post-World War II where we took compartmentalization and we built black sites and had born classified and started building and empowering these intelligence agencies.
	And now these intelligence agencies, whether they be the NSA, the FBI, or the CIA, when they're exposed in clear criminal conduct, they seem to be completely and totally unaccountable.
	Well, I think that the more recent change is that we have a A Democratic Party that I think starting in the Obama years began to become gangsterized, began to be mobilized in a sort of very conscious way against political opponents.
	The IRS investigating Tea Party groups, for example.
	And this has only escalated under Biden.
	So now the Democrats say to themselves, and I think they're pretty clear about this, we're going to protect the FBI from its crimes and the FBI will protect us from our crimes.
	So this is why, for example, the police agencies of government, they all surround the Biden family and they run protective cover for them.
	Why? Because it's kind of like they're a mafia.
	Protecting, you know, the Don, Don Corleone or whatever you want to call him, who's running a very mafia-style racket and was right out of the vice president's office.
	So you now have a party of the police state, which means that there are some people right now in America who are safe from the police state.
	In fact, people will say, well, Dinesh, you know, I'm never going to get banned on social media and the FBI is never going to come knocking on my door.
	And I go, yeah, that's because you're helping to build the police state.
	So, obviously, first of all, I talk about gangsterized government all the time.
	But to, like, again, ignore the gangsterized government aspects outside of the Barack star and the Biden administration is absolutely absurd and obscene.
	Right? Right.
	And he does hit a lot on the censorship and the targeting, but he's just so involved in this, you know, two-party right-left illusion.
	I'll let him speak a little bit more.
	While police states are in the making or under construction, they need to have a constituency that helps them get consolidated.
	Now, once a police state is fully established, they're not scared of anybody.
	They will go after everybody.
	Even the people who built them will not be safe.
	This is the way, for example, that Stalin would go after rival communists.
	He'd go after socialists.
	So all the people who helped build the Bolshevik movement weren't safe at some point.
	But they were safe in the beginning until the police state got built.
	So the question then becomes, as they get more powerful, and they've now indicted a president in four separate cases, if they jail their political enemies at the top, somebody like Trump, we're in unprecedented territory.
	What does that look like in this country?
	And is that the full formation of a police state if they put them behind bars?
	So, so many people still do not want to acknowledge That they're getting ready to put Trump in prison.
	Right? And even the response here, a little bit contrived.
	Just going to say, Sidney Powell just cut a deal.
	The other lawyer just cut a deal.
	On tape saying he's guilty.
	They are trying to gag him.
	There are now talks of whether or not this thing is going to be a live circus show.
	Or if they're just going to tape it for posterity.
	Both of those pose a problem, in my opinion.
	But that's another thing altogether.
	Let's see how D'Souza...
	And by the way, I'm putting a lot of the big right-wing pundits, when I get them on these shows, on the spot about that question, because somebody has to.
	It's a real question.
	It's not coming at a place of some like, you know, TDS derangement.
	It's coming at a place of where's our country if we jail a former president against only war crimes or crimes.
	We're not committing enough war crimes and exposing the medium military industrial complex.
	Yes. I mean, Trump is sort of the poster boy.
	He's the primary target.
	He's the guy they want to get most of all.
	And this is a very classic police state operation.
	Now, interestingly, they're not out to get the Republican Party.
	They're not out to sort of shut down the two-party system.
	Why? Because it helps to have the facade of a two-party system, even if you're a one-party state.
	Look at Iran right now. They have elections all the time.
	But the point is that they only allow opposition that is controlled, that is subordinate to the regime.
	China has elections as well.
	So the presence of elections does not by itself mean that you don't have a one party state.
	I think Trump is the single greatest danger to the Democrats establishing the one-party state.
	Even when they do, they'll still want some Republicans around to make it look like you've got an opposition, but it won't be a real or effective opposition.
	And I would argue that that system is already in place and has been for a very long time.
	So look, Man D'Souza, to his credit, At least didn't give the delusionary answer, there's no way Trump's going to prison.
	I often see that in comments.
	Oh, you don't get it.
	They're going to put him in jail.
	There seems to be no doubt in my mind.
	I'm 99.999% certain.
	I mean, one in a million chance.
	That they don't not only convict him in the court, but try to perp walk his ass to jail right there.
	I mean, they're going for it.
	Period. And, you know, D'Souza, to his credit, there, does talk about the illusion of the two-party system and basically what people will call rhinos.
	Thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
	Last segment of the first hour coming up after this.
	Still plenty to go over just on the D'Souza Police State film.
	Again, 87 out of 100.
	If it's in your neighborhood, I would suggest you bring somebody that might not be in the know.
	Buy the popcorn.
	Buy the Coca-Cola.
	Sit down and watch an actual film about an actual issue that does affect us all.
	We'll be back after this.
	We interrupt today's programming to bring unfortunate news.
	Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
	Don't be fooled. It won't benefit you.
	So take action now.
	The Federal Reserve's phased deployment of FedNow began on July 1, 2023.
	Be prepared. This may catch many off guard and put your hard-earned assets in jeopardy.
	But here's the good news.
	There's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
	Speak to someone and at American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar and volatile markets.
	Dial 833, the number 2 USA Gold.
	Yes, call now, 833-287-2465.
	This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax consequences.
	Don't let Biden force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
	Call 833-287-2465.
	Final segment of the first hour here at Reality Rants.
	Remember, redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored to support the broadcast.
	redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
	rvmrumble.com for the second hour.
	I've got this EU clip that's like 30 minutes.
	We could do a watch-along on.
	The things they're saying is, whoaza!
	I do have this Dr.
	Drew clip that we are going to be going over that we can't go over here.
	What else do we have over here?
	Oh yeah, we have this Israeli study.
	It's a reference to an Israeli study.
	I think maybe at the Tennessee house that we can't talk about here.
	There's so much you can't talk about here.
	And this film does a good job about exposing that censorship.
	And then it does also a really great job Of the fact that the media itself projects lies and says that it is Trump that wants to bring in the authoritarian police state.
	And Trump ain't perfect.
	And I'll tell you right now, Trump wouldn't be perfect on this...
	Far from it. On this latest conflict in the Middle East.
	Some of my biggest criticisms...
	Were his policies with Israel, and especially the Jerusalem debacle.
	I mean, they put Trump on a coin over there.
	We did a whole video on it.
	Maybe we brought it up several times, but I remember we did a whole video on the Trump coin back in the day when we were doing like three to eight videos of a much smaller...
	Scale, you know, they were 10 minutes or so, sometimes a little bit more.
	But, yeah, no, lots of problems with Trump in that regard.
	Doesn't mean that the Justice Department hasn't mobilized against him, in particular.
	Doesn't mean they're not gunning, because they're gunning for him.
	Again, Trump, just really quickly, before we get into reading the article, Trump announces Florida rally as he prepares to skip yet another GOP debate.
	I've been telling you that it was very clear they were trying to push Pence and Nikki Haley, and now it's Nikki Haley that is the one that is really being pushed.
	Out there. Trump denounced his report.
	He shared sensitive information with billionaire Anthony Pratt.
	Remember, this is the scandal.
	Supposedly, this is the guy they shared those classified documents about submarines with.
	The classified documents with the submarines.
	Just... Cartoon level, but they're doing it.
	But he's the guy that's bringing in the police state.
	Trump's bringing in the police state.
	To his credit, he was not doing that.
	Just pointing it out.
	Just reality. So, Arkin put this out now almost three weeks ago.
	Still hasn't really gotten enough play, in my opinion.
	The federal government believes the threat of violence and major civil disturbances around the 2024 U.S. presidential election is so great that That it has quietly created a new category of extremists that it seeks to track and counter.
	Donald Trump's army of MAGA followers.
	So let's make it clear what that is.
	People that would vote for him for president and tell other people to vote for him for president.
	And really, it's a wide swath.
	I'm no MAGA guy.
	How do you think I'm being portrayed?
	Uh... Speaking at the Reawaken America Tour.
	By the way, it is official.
	I will be speaking at the Reawaken America Tour on the, I think it's December 14th and 15th out in California.
	Very excited to be doing that.
	I'm excited every time I get up there and I do my best to fit As much as possible into a 15 minute segment.
	Although I'm always talking about transhumanism.
	I am always trying to add something newer to the presentations.
	And different. So that you're not just getting the same old thing every single time.
	There are some people that just go up there and wing it.
	There are others that present the same information again and again and again.
	I look at this as an opportunity.
	To maybe reach people that by this time will have seen Dinesh D'Souza's police state.
	And I can somehow...
	For instance, they talk about...
	The TrackTrace Database Society.
	Well, I can start talking more about the biometric aspect of that.
	And, you know, they talk about at the end of the film, CBDCs and digital currencies.
	And now I can get into the aspect of blockchain.
	And I can talk about blockchain people and get bigger on the World Economic Forum.
	You understand? It's a great opportunity to...
	All the time. But it doesn't matter.
	You don't think that I'm on this same list or something even worse?
	Or have been? His army of mega followers!
	Just wow! Just out and out in your face against political enemies.
	And Trump is mainstream.
	He was the President of the United States, for God's sake.
	The challenge for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the primary federal agency charged with law enforcement, is to pursue and prevent what it calls domestic terrorism without direct reference to political parties or affiliations, even though the vast majority of its current anti-government investigators are of Trump supporters.
	According to classified data obtained by Newsweek, the FBI is in an almost impossible position, says a current FBI official, who requested anonymity to discuss highly sensitive internal matters.
	The official said the FBI is intent on stopping domestic terrorism and any repeat of the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol, sure.
	But the Bureau... Must also preserve the constitutional right of all Americans to campaign speak freely and protest the government.
	By focusing on former President Trump and his MAGA, Make America Great Again supporters, the official said, the Bureau runs the risk of provoking the very anti-government activists that the terrorism agencies hope to counter.
	No, it's what they want.
	They want you to know this.
	They're trying to send a chilling effect to you.
	Alright? They're letting you know.
	And they're also creating a system of predictive programming.
	You know, we talk about the 6th.
	Again, D'Souza doesn't talk at all about the January 5th pipe bomber.
	The pipe bomber they never found.
	The person that could have caused actual violence and carnage and death.
	And possibly the most surveilled place on the planet, let alone the country, Washington, D.C. It's just like, again, believe what you want about the Pentagon, man.
	I'm not even trying to weigh in here.
	But if you don't think that the Pentagon...
	Has a ton of security footage of what actually happened that day.
	You're in La La Land, man.
	You are in La La Land.
	Every angle you can imagine.
	Every angle you can imagine.
	Especially at a time when the White House is facing congressional Republican opposition claiming that the Biden administration has weaponized the Bureau against the right wing.
	It has to tread very carefully, says the official.
	I mean, there is no doubt.
	And again, this film does an excellent job of illustrating that.
	But as I've said from the very beginning, when it was overtones of Christian conservatives and quote-unquote right-wingers, it's everybody.
	It is everybody and anybody.
	And you know, D'Souza, to his credit, in that clip with myself, does explain how nobody is safe.
	And how they will turn on their political enemies.
	You betcha. You betcha.
	It's exactly how it works.
	Newsweek spoke to over a dozen current or former government officials who specialize in terrorism in a three-month investigation to understand the current domestic security landscape and evaluate what President Joe Biden's administration is doing about what it calls domestic terrorism, most requested anonymity because they were not authorized
	to talk publicly, no kidding, and were reluctant to stray into partisan politics or fear
	the repercussions of speaking frankly.
	We've already seen what happens to people that blow the whistle.
	In fact, this film, if you just saw in the trailer, has internal whistleblowers.
	Newsweek has also reviewed secret FBI and Department of Homeland Security data that tracks incidents, threats, investigations, and cases to try to build a better picture.
	While experts agree that the current partisan environment is changing uniquely dangerous with the threat not only of violence, but in the most extreme scenarios, possibly civil war.
	Again, things that the media are trying to promote.
	There is no chance at an actual civil war in this country the way civil wars happen.
	It can't happen.
	Now, can there be violence and lawlessness and riots and groups pitted against one another?
	Absolutely. In varying degrees, absolutely.
	Will the media then play that up as a civil war to try to bring in more authoritarianism?
	Absolutely. Is this?
	No. Many also question whether terrorism is the most effective way to describe the problem.
	No kidding. Or that the methods of counterterrorisms developed over the past decade in response to Al-Qaeda, not over the past decade, two decades now, and other Islamist groups constitute the most fruitful way to craft domestic solutions.
	Again, the MIAC report showed us and the fusion centers showed us it was already American citizens then.
	Already American citizens then.
	We're well over a decade past that.
	The current political environment is not something that the FBI is necessarily responsible for, nor should it be, says Brian Michael Jenkins, one of the world's leading terrorism experts and senior advisors to the president of the Rand Corporation.
	Isn't that lovely? The Rand Corporation.
	Ooh, yeah. Rand.
	I love it when we go over those RAND documents about human-brained interfaces.
	Just top-notch. In a statement to Newsweek, the FBI said, The threat posed by domestic violence extremists is persistent, evolving, and deadly.
	The FBI's goal is to detect and stop terrorist attacks.
	And our focus is on potential criminal violations.
	Potential criminal violations.
	You don't have to commit a crime.
	Violence and threats of violence.
	You don't have to commit any violence.
	Anti-government or anti-authority violent extremism.
	What? So far I haven't seen any crimes.
	Anti-government or anti-authority violent extremism.
	Well, since they now think that words are violent and speech is violent and extremism is questioning lies, well, again, I haven't seen any crimes yet, FBI. But it's one category of domestic terrorism, as well as one of the FBI's top threat priorities.
	Top threat priorities.
	We're going to take one final break in the first hour.
	I'm going to come back to YouTube and tell you where you can find that second hour free of charge and really a third hour to rvmrumble.com.
	Back after this last word from our sponsor.
	If you're like me and you want to be prepared for the unexpected...
	That's where the wellness company's emergency medical kit comes in.
	Over 40% of Americans say that they would avoid a doctor or a hospital unless it was a catastrophic situation.
	Medical emergency kits with...
	The kit contains eight potentially life-saving medications for you to keep on hand in the event of natural disasters, supply chain shortages, medical emergencies, or like an apocalyptic situation.
	These are the actual medications that you would need in the event of certain situations.
	So they've got emergency antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics.
	All right, folks, second hour, we're going to continue with this article.
	I don't know if we're going to get through the whole thing because I do got clips that I do want to hit that I think are important that we couldn't play in the first hour over here at YouTube.
	So again, rvmrumble.com right now.
	Support the broadcast.
	Support that broadcast.
	I love everybody that does. Oh, he had the Illuminati eye!
	No, I was trying to get both. Can't see both.
	There's both. I love you guys.
	I will see you all on the flip side.
	Second and third hour. Free.
	RVMRumble.com Support the broadcast.
	RedVoiceMedia.com Slash Uncensored.
	Boom. Alright.
	We're off the Tubins.
	That's right. Off the Tubins.
	Boom. Always important to get off that Tubins when we've got to do it.
	Um... Again, D'Souza, not perfect.
	Film, definitely worth watching.
	The framing of these things by the FBI shows you what they want to happen and what they are doing.
	Okay? So after they tell you about all this domestic threat priorities, it says, we are committed to protecting the safety and constitutional rights of all Americans.
	No, they're not. It's absolutely not true.
	That is the most untrue statement out there.
	If that were true, then the FBI would criminally be going after the National Security Agency and Five Eyes and Norris Insight Systems and all the tech companies that are openly spying on you and sharing information with law enforcement entities.
	You understand that?
	That's how you would protect our constitutional rights.
	They're not doing that.
	They're not keeping you safe either.
	That's imagination land.
	Okay? Of all Americans.
	Again, you can't keep all Americans safe.
	And it will never open an investigation based solely on First Amendment protected activity, including a person's political beliefs or affiliations.
	Total and complete lie.
	They've already done it. They've already prosecuted people successfully because of that.
	Forget about just opening an investigation.
	Like, what upside-down universe do you live in that you could believe that statement by the FBI? It's clearly illustrated in the film that we went over today that that is indeed not the case.
	I mean, without a doubt, illustrated that way.
	The White House has declined to comment.
	The Trump campaign was given an opportunity to comment, but did not do so.
	Wish they had. What the FBI data shows for the President down the Biden administration has presented Trump and MAGA as an extremist threat to American democracy and talked up the risk of domestic terrorism and violence associated with the 2024 election campaign.
	Donald Trump And MAGA Republicans are a threat to the very soul of this country, President Biden tweeted last September.
	Again, to Biden's credit, there's no way he actually tweeted that because he can't talk.
	He can't tweet.
	That's somebody representing the Biden administration doing that, which should scare the shit out of people.
	The first time he explicitly singled out the former president.
	MAGA Republicans aim to question not only the legitimacy of past elections, but elections being held now and into the future.
	There should be audits.
	There should be voter ID. There should be no machines.
	It should be paper ballots.
	There should be accountability for election fraud and voting fraud.
	Like, that's real.
	That's a good thing.
	But again, in the post-truth world, they're trying to frame that as a bad thing.
	Biden's Homeland Security Advisor, Lee Sherwood Randall, said, The use of violence to pursue political ends is a profound threat to our public safety and national security.
	It is a threat to our national identity, our values, our norms, and the rule of law, our democracy.
	It's a constitutional republic.
	And when we talk about the threat of violence, the use of violence, that's what you do.
	You hurt people.
	Yeah, violence is more than a punch in the face, a kick in the ribs, a Molotov cocktail, or a gunshot.
	Violence is people showing up to your house with the guns, cuffing you, and then caging you like an animal.
	Violence is putting you in a situation where you didn't do anything, Other than question the unreality, the upside down.
	And now you're surrounded by murderers, rapists, people that have violently assaulted others.
	A criminal element you can only imagine.
	That you're the bastards!
	For Attorney General Merrick Garland, attacks by domestic terrorists are attacks on all of us collectively.
	Aimed at rendering...
	Yeah, it has to be rendering...
	The fabric of our democratic society and driving us apart.
	I mean...
	Sigh...
	Though the FBI's data shows a dip in the number of investigations since the slew of January 6th cases ended,
	FBI Director Christopher Wray still says that the breach of the Capitol building was not an isolated event.
	And the threat is not going away anytime soon.
	In a joint report to Congress this June, the Bureau and the Department of Homeland Security say that threats from DVEs, domestic violent extremists, were DVEs!
	It's about as bad as DVDA. DVEs have increased in the last two years.
	No kidding. And any further increases in threats likely to correspond to potential flashpoints such as high-profile elections and campaigns or continuous current events.
	So anything! Continuous current events.
	Anything! The world's a-turning!
	Anything! I mean, that's carte blanche.
	Whatever. The FBI and DHS report concludes, sociopolitical developments, such as narratives of fraud in the recent general election, The emboldening impact of the violent breach of the U.S. Capitol, conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and conspiracy theories promoting violence will almost certainly spur some domestic terrorists to try to engage in violence.
	It's almost certain that if you question the COVID-1984 nightmare that you're bad.
	It's almost certain.
	That if you emboldened the violent breach of the U.S. Capitol, well, you're a DVDA. DV. My God.
	Oh, the threats listed in that paragraph are all clearly associated with America's right and in particular with Trump's MAGA supporters.
	Right after January 6th, the FBI co-authored a restricted report.
	Domestic violent extremists emboldened in the aftermath of Capitol breach elevated domestic terrorism threats of violence likely amid political transitions and beyond, in which it shifted the definition of agave, anti-government, anti-authority, violent extremism, From furtherance of ideological agendas.
	Ooh, ideological agendas.
	To furtherance of political and or social.
	So you got an agenda? You're into politics?
	Nope. You're a DVE. You're a domestic, violent extremist.
	For the first time, such groups could be labeled because of their politics.
	It was a subtle change, little notice, but a gigantic departure from the Bureau.
	Trump and his army of supporters were acknowledged as the distinct category of domestic violent extremists.
	Even as the FBI was saying publicly that political views were never part of its criteria to investigate or prevent domestic terrorism, where the FBI sees threats is also plain.
	From the way it categorizes them.
	A system which on the surface is designed to appear non-partisan.
	This shifted subtly days after the events of January 6th when it comes to what the Bureau calls agave.
	No, no, no. This was a planned shift.
	They were able to pull it off after the January 6th event and their narrative hold of that event.
	Despite the fact that most people don't buy their narrative nonsense.
	Just putting it out.
	We cannot and do not investigate ideology.
	Ideologically motivated individuals are in the counter-terrorism playbook that we revealed in 2020.
	Well before that, like 2018.
	The 2018 to 2022 is under the Trump administration.
	I wonder if I can find that document.
	Let's see if we can do that one live.
	We may or may not have that one, guys, because I've got all these hard drives attached, but we're going to try right now.
	Let's see. We'll do it live. Okay.
	We'll do it live!
	Fuck it! Do it live!
	I'll write it and we'll do it live!
	Yup, and it's taken a little while to fire up the old hard drive.
	It's on one of those big mechanical disks.
	Okay, let's type in counter.
	See what we got. While that's working on it, and we'll see where it goes, we're going to go back to this article here.
	See if we can bring that up.
	Because again, this was all in place prior to January 6th.
	This is something I was covering again, and again, and again, and again, and again.
	Nope, not there. That's piss poor.
	Let's go with PDF. Okay, hold on.
	Now we got a lot of things here.
	That doesn't mean I'm going to be able to find it.
	Nope, that's that. There's a lot of Rothblatt, Martin Rothblatt, Douglas MacArthur.
	Oh, I think I saw a C. A C would be good, guys, by the way.
	There's a B. There it's not.
	Articles. Man, this is killing me.
	I wonder if it would be under Defense Department.
	There's Future Warfare.
	There's the Disinfo Dozen.
	Hmm. I'll tell you what.
	While I look at this and I try to find it because I might just be able to find it.
	What? That's right.
	It could be National Defense.
	Let's do that. National.
	Yes! Yes!
	I was about to play a video.
	I don't think I even got her.
	Is that it right there?
	That's domestic summary.
	Here's a couple different documents.
	Let's see. Okay, that's the 2018 one.
	Assembly, assembly, assembly.
	I don't think either of these are the ones that I actually wanted.
	But I'm pretty sure they're going to work.
	So let's do this.
	These aren't the ones with ideologically motivated individuals in there, I don't think.
	Okay? But it might be.
	Let's see. Control F. Ideal.
	Dude, why do I need these suggestions?
	I hate that. There it is.
	Ideology. Dude.
	Okay. Why am I saying dude?
	I need to turn that off.
	Like suggestions and whatever.
	Here we go. Driven by ideology.
	It's all in there.
	Ideology, an unstable political and economic structure, despite the defeat of ISIS, physical caliphate.
	So that's ISIS still.
	Let's see about this one.
	Let's go to 100%.
	Hmm, this could be it, actually.
	I mean, this isn't the exact one, ideology.
	Dude, again, I don't want, like, I don't, get out of here.
	I'm not trying to enable anything.
	I don't want your cloud-powered search.
	Get out of here. Trying to, oh, I'm so mad right now.
	There we go. Domestic terrorism, both persistent and evolving.
	So again, this was happening under the Trump administration.
	There's no doubt about it.
	I have to go into my settings to get rid of that garbage that pissed me off.
	But neither of these are even the documents I was looking for right there.
	I had something totally other than that one.
	Let's see if I can find.
	There's defense. Let's go with defense.
	And I guess the next thing that I would do is terror, but that's no good either.
	Yeah. Alright, let's keep reading this.
	There's some videos.
	Alright. We cannot and do not investigate ideology.
	Yes, they do. It's in their documents.
	Yes, they do.
	Yes, they do. And yes, they do.
	We focus on individuals who commit or intend to commit violence or criminal activity that constitutes a federal crime or poses a threat to national security.
	So no crime has to be committed.
	They're very clear about that every time.
	But the FBI went further in October 2022 when it created the new subcategory Agave slash Other of those who were a threat but do not fit into its anarchist, militia, or sovereign citizen groups.
	Introduced without any announcement and reported here for the first time, the new classification is officially
	defined as domestic violent extremists who cite anti-government or
	anti-authority motivations for violence or criminal activity not otherwise defined,
	such as individuals motivated by a desire to commit violence against those with a real or perceived association
	with a specific political party or faction or a specific political party.
	You realize how broad?
	And, you know, word salad garbage.
	All of that is.
	All of it.
	Not some.
	All of it.
	Trash. Total and complete trash.
	Like, that should upset everybody.
	Now this is all in the public arena, and still, some people aren't even going to acknowledge it.
	I'm just going to put that out there, too.
	Go back to PDF, because, boy, I wanted to find that one thing.
	You know, I'm going to take a break from this.
	While I take a break from this, I've got this clip.
	of an ex-member of the World Economic Forum basically talking about the grain of rice, track trace database, digital money enslavement system that the powers that shouldn't be the predator class want to put into place via their mouthpieces like the World Economic Forum.
	The idea had been by central banks to introduce this, as we said, central bank digital currency.
	But have you ever seen an article or a video or, you know, whatever description of what it actually looks like?
	I mean, with central bank paper money, we know what it looks like, right?
	Bank digital currency, we know, and, you know, we've used it ourselves, we know what it looks like.
	But what does central bank digital currency look like?
	You see? So they never talk about that because people won't actually like the looks of it.
	Because it apparently looks, and several central banks apparently, as I heard from my sources, have already fully developed the final stage of CBDC. I mean, it comes in stages initially likely through your mobile phone, but it's only an intermediate step.
	And the final stage is, you know, it's small and it's the size of a grain of rice.
	Now, why is that? And that grain of rice is your entire wallet?
	Yes, it's your digital ID, your wallet, can be your passport, your key.
	Now, of course, what we found with our debit cards or credit cards is they've already now moved to the system in RFID chips, RFID chips.
	Technology where you just wave the thing, contactless.
	That is sort of conditioning us in this direction.
	In the future you'll just wave your hand because you've got the microchip implant under your skin.
	And each step there's a rational reason.
	It's easier just to wave this, isn't it?
	It's much faster because we always have to wait in the queues as everyone types in their numbers and all that.
	So just wave it, it's quicker.
	But the next rationalization will be, well, but you can lose your card.
	Somebody can steal your card.
	And then you're just waving.
	That's kind of risky. Well, wouldn't it be nice if you couldn't lose it and nobody could steal it?
	But it's clear that it is almost a step too far for a lot of people because it is a violation of human dignity to actually inject something like that under the skin.
	So that's where you need some more persuasion.
	And it's interesting that this concept of universal basic income has been around for around a century.
	Where everyone should get some kind of citizen's payment.
	But the billionaire elites have so far not liked that.
	But since 2015, they've all come out.
	I mean, all the big billionaires and World Economic Forum have come out.
	Oh, this is a good idea.
	Universal basic income.
	Well, why suddenly now?
	Because now we have the technology for the microchip implant.
	And so in 2017, Bill Gates came out and said that universal basic income is a good idea, but it's too early to introduce it.
	Now, what was still missing, so we had the technology for the microchip implant, but what was missing was the digital ID hadn't been introduced.
	Now this is where this whole COVID agenda had become very useful.
	And that's how they got there.
	That was the next step. By the way, absolutely found the article and absolutely had national in the title of the document.
	But for some reason, because it was a dash, couldn't find it.
	So this is Trump.
	I want to make sure everybody sees it.
	This is Trump too.
	You know, I mean, they were defend American democracy against foreign influence, counter the exploitation of the U.S. economy.
	So this is it right here.
	This should have alarmed people when it was put into place and this language was used.
	Let's Let's zoom in a little bit more.
	Let's go 200%.
	Bring it right here.
	Let's read it to people.
	The number of actors targeting the United States is growing.
	Russia and China operate globally, use all instruments of national power to target the United States, and have a broad range of sophisticated intelligence capabilities.
	Other state adversaries, such as Cuba, Iran, and North Korea, non-state actors such as Lebanese Hezbollah, ISIS, and Al-Qaeda, as well as, and here we go, transnational criminal organizations and ideological motivated entities such as hacktivists.
	Leaktivis and public disclosure organization also pose significant threats.
	Also, foreign nationals, with no formal ties to foreign intelligence services, steal sensitive data, and intellectual property.
	Everybody knows about the foreign nationals.
	Okay, let's get that out of the way.
	They just put hackers...
	Leakers, in other words, people that blow the whistleblowers, and public disclosure organizations, WikiLeaks, or anyone else that would what?
	Put out raw material in the same sentence as Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Hezbollah, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and China.
	Public disclosure organizations.
	Hacktivists. It's a made-up term, by the way.
	Leaktivist. Made-up term.
	This was under the Trump administration.
	He set himself up for what's happening right now.
	Whether he realizes it or not.
	Anybody can...
	And again... None of this is new.
	This has been going on a very long time.
	This is the 2008 MIAC report.
	Anarchist movements.
	So everything we're talking about, everything we're talking about today is already put out there.
	Anarcho-communism.
	Like, the Ron Paul supporters all in here.
	They're always trying to make you, yes, into a Nazi.
	It's not a new playbook.
	Back then, the Black Bloc, though, wasn't being used as much.
	They morphed into Antifa, right?
	Copwatch. Yep, can't do that.
	Oop. Can't hold police brutality accountable.
	Just not a good thing at all.
	Uh-uh. And where is it?
	Where's the...
	This might actually be a truncated version.
	I'll be honest, this does look like a truncated version.
	Anti-capitalism.
	Because I know that I showed other...
	Other parts of this in my film, Invisible Empire, a new world order to find.
	In fact, it must be that maybe it's a different date than that one.
	I just want to throw that out there. All right.
	Again, this is an extensive article.
	We could spend the entire hour finishing that up.
	Only got about 30 minutes left in the broadcast, and I do want to hit some of these other videos, especially in light of the chip thing.
	So this one's a pretty simple one.
	Pretty easy. By the way, I got a lot of stories, too, that we didn't hit yet.
	Including Elon Musk reveals Twitter is launching two new tiers.
	Isn't that lovely? And says users will have to pay for a premium to avoid ads.
	I already pay to have the blue checkmark that I don't get any more traction on at all.
	Let me repeat that. At all.
	There's no more traction.
	One is lower cost with all features, but no reduction in ads.
	And the other is more expensive, but has no ads.
	Again, like...
	Let's just go to my Twitter right now.
	Let's see what we got.
	Let's see where we're at.
	Like the average posts.
	Again, I pay for it.
	I have 36,800 whatever followers.
	Tough to even gain on this.
	Less than a thousand people see it in an imprint.
	Three likes. One retweet.
	One! One!
	I mean, these are direct video posts, by the way.
	And, you know, I love the unfit statesman.
	Somehow he can get with literally 1,200 followers.
	Okay, okay. 1,200 followers.
	A video like this, and you know, he's a little bit savvy, gets what?
	Almost 6,000 impressions.
	33 hearts, 17 retweets.
	More engagement. I mean, I can't take pictures with BJ Penn.
	I mean, this is a retweet for Jeff Wilson, but come on.
	I mean, come on.
	By the way, this is a story I wanted to hit.
	Jake Shields. Two weeks ago, the UFC lifted their flag ban.
	We saw many people represent their country, including Israel.
	This week, the UFC said the flag will be banned after learning multiple fighters plan to come out with a Palestinian flag.
	Bad move, UFC! You know, it didn't stop your Muslim fighters once they won from mentioning the conflict and calling for peace.
	That happened at least twice during the broadcast that I saw.
	So, you know, it shows that you kind of go with the wind.
	It's not a good idea.
	Not a good idea.
	By the way, this is The Economist from December 2012.
	Is this an example of predictive programming?
	They've got Hamas on the paraglides.
	The devil paraglides up against, I think that's Bibi Netanyahu right there.
	I thought it was interesting.
	Right? Something we'll post.
	We'll quickly cover.
	Did want to point out, Pfizer not doing so good.
	Not doing so good.
	And that has a lot to do with things like this.
	700,000 people in the study in Israel, just so you know, that showed that the double vacs were 27 times more likely to get reinfected.
	So it's not, the vaccine, even if we just talk about that, is not stopping infection, it's not stopping transmission.
	If you look at the studies in England, in Scotland, in the northern countries in Europe where they get real data, that they're actually the triple vaccinated, the most likely to die.
	So, bottom line is that as we go forward, The natural immunity is long, broad, and durable.
	And I don't know if he mentioned it, but we have SARS-CoV-1 patients who still had immunity 18 years later.
	Let that sink in. 18 years later, we still had immunity from SARS-CoV-1 to SARS-CoV-2.
	This is long, broad, durable immunity.
	So what I want to say in closing is natural immunity should be considered legally to be at least equal to vaccinated immunity, and immunity is likely lifelong.
	Thank you. Yeah, you can't talk about natural immunity.
	You can't point out studies like that.
	You're a bad guy for doing so, because eventually they'd love to get rid of you and bring this in.
	Isn't this cool? Huh?
	Don't worry. It's the Amazon warehouses.
	Yay! This is the great replacement, everybody.
	This is it right here.
	Doesn't matter what gender you identify as.
	None of it. It's the whole shebang diddly-ango.
	Right there. Getting replaced by that thing.
	With the weird velociraptor hind legs craziness.
	Meanwhile, you know, you just saw that study.
	Listen to what Dr. Drew has to say about some of the latest data.
	It's more common than we thought.
	People are like, well, it's mild, it's mild, it's no big deal, it's self-limited, blah, blah.
	Look, they're talking about myocarditis after taking hate and lie shot.
	And this is a Megyn Kelly, who's also ultra-terrible on a ton of issues.
	But this is real.
	In my world, throughout my entire career, 40-year career, myocarditis is a medical emergency.
	It's a dire problem.
	A publication just came out five days ago in circulation, a major cardiology journal, an excellent study, and it showed it took my breath away.
	I didn't know why it wasn't headline news.
	It's a large study, and it showed that about approximately half of the young males that got myocarditis had permanent heart damage.
	Yep. It's permanent.
	That means that we don't know what percentage are going to be disabled by this as they get older, are going to develop heart failure, or are going to need cardiac transplants, some of them.
	It's breathtaking, this study, and why it wasn't a big headline.
	I've sort of centered around a little bit, because I don't understand why people aren't reacting to it.
	So, in a 27-year-old male, the illness is a nothing.
	So the vaccine is all risk.
	Why the push?
	Why are we pushing? And I think, put your legal head on for a second, that universities are going to be in big trouble for having mandated young people to get that vaccine.
	Because people are going to get sick, and they're going to have long-term consequences, and they should sue those schools for having forced them to take a medical intervention.
	100% they should sue. And if anybody tries to force you from this point forward, get a fake card.
	It's not that hard. Go ahead and Google it.
	Get a fake card. Don't comply.
	We have a good treatment. We have Paxlovid.
	Why? And people have all kinds of feelings.
	I'm just saying you have to say you've gotten the shot to get in.
	Get a fake one. Just Google it on the internet.
	It's bullshit. If they're going to create these bullshit rules, you can create your bullshit way around them.
	It's all just like a theater.
	So let's, okay, let's act.
	I'll act like I've gotten my 50th booster and you can act like you're satisfied I'm telling you the truth.
	You know, again, I think we have to directly confront it.
	You do have to sue. All those things.
	All right. So, I've got two other...
	This one's actually really long, and I couldn't rip it for some reason with audio.
	It wasn't working. You know how that's going.
	It wasn't working. And it's this EU panel.
	That has apparently declared that they got these things done illegally and that they're causing harm.
	Shocking. Shocked.
	Well, hello everybody. I'm John Loughlin, director of FVD International, Forum for Democracy International.
	We're in the European Parliament today.
	I'm delighted to welcome as my guest today Marcel de Graaf, member of the European Parliament for Forum for Democracy, Joachim Koos, member of the European Parliament for Alternative for Deutschland, and Willem Engel, who is a campaigner and chairman or president of Virus Truth, Virus Wahrheit, which is a pressure group that campaigns on On the issue of vaccines and COVID-related policies.
	We are discussing today the letter which Marcel de Graaf, Joachim Coos and other members of the European Parliament have written to the European Medical Agency.
	In this letter, which is a Now, again, this is a big deal.
	Is there going to be criminal accountability?
	More than likely not.
	And quite frankly, I think that the damage is mostly done.
	Like you just heard from that, it's the triple vacs that were the most likely to not make it.
	Some people literally took five or six shots.
	There are some people I still see here in Iowa masking up right now.
	Getting ready for another Bobby Booster.
	Boosting it up. Boosting it up.
	This stuff...
	Breaks through on social media, makes more people aware globally, okay?
	And helps eradicate the facade of this great narrative, okay?
	So again, even in the worst of organizations, whether they be the United Nations or even something like the EU, the European Union, which I'm not a fan of, which...
	Again, through Brexit, people wanted in Europe to get out of.
	In France, wanted to get out of and they still push.
	They still can't get everybody to be totally and completely evil.
	Just want to put that out there.
	There's still some people that are like, hey, this is too much.
	The arguments concern procedures, procedures which were either not followed or which were deliberately violated or changed in advance.
	Other arguments concern the use to which the vaccines have been put allegedly wrongly.
	There are also arguments concerning the harmful nature of the vaccines.
	And even arguments concerning alleged confusion between the batches which were used for testing and the batches which were actually used on people.
	Marcel, among all these arguments, perhaps you'd like to tell our viewers what has brought you to do this letter and what are the most important points, do you think?
	Yes, well, to start with, and that's why Willem Engel is here, I got a copy of the letter that Willem sent to the Dutch Medical Agency.
	With a lot of the same arguments that we used in that letter, because I contacted Willem and I said, well, we'd like to use your letter as a concept, and we had to rework it, of course, because we have a completely different legislation for the European Medical Agency as for the Dutch Institute that approves medicines.
	So we had to rework it, but I got this letter, And I was shocked because we already know a lot of things about these COVID vaccines.
	We know that they're not effective.
	I mean, if a vaccine is effective, then why got four of them or five or whatever, because they still don't work after the first time, which In my time, when I was young, a vaccine would create immunity immediately.
	Well, you made a video about this not so long ago.
	You said if they worked, you wouldn't need boosters all the time.
	Yeah, exactly.
	So we knew that already.
	And we know that the details on the contracts are not given to the public.
	So it's all...
	It's secrecy and hidden SMSs and money going to places where we don't know if it's used well or not, taxpayers' money.
	So we already had...
	It's total immunity.
	Okay. It's crony capitalism.
	It's techno-biomedical fascism with these contracts.
	Okay. Okay.
	And at the end of the day, when you militarize something like we did with this technology, the possibilities are endless on how bad it actually is.
	I just want to put that out there.
	I had an idea that this whole thing was messy and in some way corrupted.
	But then I got this letter and it basically said, well, this approval...
	And the way we got to this approval is also completely messed up.
	And messed up in a way that really shocked me because if you approve a batch, a certain vaccine or certain medicine, then you expect that the medicine that is approved is the medicine that is applied to patients or to citizens.
	And if there's a difference between that, then you are basically being vaccinated with a non-approved...
	With something that wasn't approved.
	What every substance. So, well, that really shocked me, and that was why I was so enthusiastic about the action of Willem, and that I said, well, we need to take this to a much higher level, we need to take this to a European level, because every European citizen is being exposed to something...
	They shouldn't be exposed to it.
	Well, one of the points that struck me, I mean a number of the arguments are rather technical, they concern procedure and so on, but there's one detail that I think anyone can understand and that is that the descriptions, the official descriptions of these vaccines run to respectively 574 pages and 224 pages.
	The descriptions of the hate and lie shots are hundreds of pages long.
	And then they gave you blank inserts when they first started distributing them.
	And doctors are supposed to read these thousands of pages to decide whether or not to administer these vaccines.
	Joachim, is that for you the most important point?
	That struck me as an example of the European Union, because this is tolerated by the European Medical Authority, actually creating illegality.
	It's actually creating a regime of illegality.
	It's a gigantic machine for generating legislation, as we know, the European Union.
	But here it is creating objectively a system of illegality because no doctor has the time to read these 500 pages for each medicine that he prescribes.
	What led you to sign this letter?
	I think it's many things.
	As Marcel said, there are so many things which are going really wrong in a very big scale.
	Therefore, it's so unbelievable what we find.
	We look On one aspect, and then you find thought or something else.
	Something really so hindrances and big, big mountains, you cannot surmount them.
	You must go outside of them and beyond them.
	And therefore, it's so many things which are really stunning and stunned me.
	It began at the beginning.
	It was in the first year.
	I mean, there's mountains.
	It's just so stunning.
	How did we allow this to happen?
	Well, there's a lot of cowards out there.
	That's for sure. There's a lot of money movement out there.
	That's for sure. There was a lot of censorship out there.
	That's for sure. The European Union is amongst the worst in censorship and continues to be.
	So that's another reason.
	When the things went wrong, it didn't change.
	And I, as a member of the parliament in the committee of budget and budgetary control, I was very much involved with money.
	It's a money issue, you know, and it went wrong.
	So wrong for me as a very frugal person who thinks you must pay for all things and now they have money.
	Billions of billions of euros throwing to the pharmaceutical firms about things which are not proven, which are not safe, and which are safe for themselves.
	We cannot say it's safe.
	And that was, for me, it was...
	An enlightenment when one of the directors of Pfizer told the committee who was looking into it that he said We didn't know it and therefore we have no proof that it is safe.
	That's right. That's so insane and therefore I was very alert and I spoke a lot about the thing and about vaccination and at last I was a little bit annoyed about Our president, Metzeler, when she wrote letter after letter that we should be vaccinated again.
	Yes, yes, yes. That was for me thinking, and we wrote to her and said it's not okay.
	We should not be coerced to be vaccinated.
	Well, coercion is the...
	I mean, it wasn't just coercion.
	They outright forced people.
	Like, it's beyond coercion when you can't keep your job, when you can't stay in your university.
	It's beyond coercion.
	I'm sorry. And it's beyond coercion when shedding is a reality and you shoot a bunch of people up with hate and lies that then distribute it to the rest of the population at a micro level.
	It's just massive criminality.
	It's the most massive global bioweapons attack ever.
	Ever. Ever.
	Period. At least interference is the key.
	I mean, I'm very interested in the procedural aspects.
	I was struck as well by the evidence you found.
	I imagine you found this, Willem, that the European Medical Authority tried to accelerate the procedure.
	In other words, instead of sitting there neutrally and waiting for providers to come to them and show that their product is safe.
	So these procedural things fascinate me.
	I suspect our viewers are more interested in the substantial medical issues.
	Are they safe or are they dangerous?
	You claim they're dangerous.
	They're clearly dangerous because they did not follow, and one of the procedures that was overlooked or fast-tracked, it's called a major objection, and it has a lot to do with the good manufacturing practice.
	That says that you have to have the procedure down to the minutia so you know that the product is always the same wherever you produce it and whenever you produce it.
	That was clearly not in order and that probably has led to the differences between those batches.
	So some groups of batches have a very high incidence of Of adverse effects.
	But you do not know beforehand which ones.
	So the precautionary thing here to do is to say, we have to regard all batches as unsafe.
	So that's the first thing.
	And you cannot change it to say, well, only 4% of the batches is unsafe, so that's an acceptable risk.
	And why are the different batches...
	We're talking about vaccines erroneously.
	This is a new platform.
	It's an mRNA platform.
	Exactly. It's not a vaccine.
	And it appears that the amount of the quote-unquote mRNA In these shots, and again, this is not me, this is what actual experts and scientists are saying, the more and the heavier the dose, the more likely the injury.
	From which technically and scientifically and also legally is considered advanced medical therapeutical products.
	So, in a sense, it's gene therapy.
	Now, the scale it has been produced has also never been done.
	The adjuvants that were used has also never been done.
	So this is a worldwide experiment.
	And if you go down to those clinical trials on which the SMPC documents are based, you clearly see that some of them read real-world data.
	We are the guinea pigs.
	There's no going around.
	It's an experimental gene therapeutic product that was fast-tracked by changing the rules, bending the rules and trying to cover up those changes in the directive of 2021, on the 24th of March.
	And what you see there is on every level a little bit of tweaking the process.
	So you get a completely unapproved, completely unsafe product on the market.
	And again, unapproved, unsafe.
	No, you get a massive distribution of a military...
	Created bioweapon that is distributed by its biomedical techno-fascist partners in Big Pharma and legitimized through shill politicians, organizations, and media outlets.
	The procedural side, why are they...
	I understand. We understand.
	Why are they dangerous?
	You mentioned myocarditis, you mentioned pericarditis, you mentioned heart disease, particularly affecting young men, apparently.
	And even fatalities.
	So let's concentrate on the substantial...
	Yeah, if we look at the adverse effects, and for the record, I was trained as a pharmaceutical scientist, so this is really my field.
	Now, if you look at the adverse effects, it's very broad, and we've discussed this with immunologists, infectiologists, also with pathologists, and what they find is that it is because of the choice of the target of the antigen.
	So the antigen, the spike protein, is divided in two units, and one of those units is actually toxic.
	So when that distributes all around the body, in every organ where it accumulates, And that can take months and months until your next jab.
	So you get this inflammation in all these organs.
	And that's why we see such a vast array of adverse effects.
	The most important one is of course the vascular system.
	Yes.
	Because it goes through the body and this is one of the things that was missed because
	it was unjustly categorized as a vaccine.
	If it's categorized as a gene therapy, you have to do this distribution studies.
	In Japan they did it.
	That's why we found out that it accumulates in every adipose tissue.
	So again.
	Despite the fact that it was public knowledge they were using lipid nanoparticles, aka bio-nanotech, and that this would what?
	Go past the blood-brain barrier at times.
	I mean, designed to.
	And then they told you, well, it wasn't even going to leave the initial site, and it went throughout not only the whole body, but then seemed to attack reproductive organs.
	Look, you have to acknowledge that that is by design.
	By design. They are destroying humanity by design.
	It's bone marrow. Well, if it's in bone marrow, that heightens the chance on all kinds of cancers.
	If it's in the arteries, that heightens the chance of aneurysms, on tias, on myocardial infarcts.
	We clearly see that not only the target that was chosen, but the platform that was chosen, and the delivery, the lipid nanoparticle, which makes it distributable all over the body, were all very, very ill-advised.
	One of the points you make in the letter to the EMA, and which I imagine comes from your Your case against the Dutch Medical Authority is that the rules on genetically modified organisms were changed.
	Are these vaccines genetically modified organisms or are they organisms which modify genes?
	Are they modified themselves or do they then modify genetics?
	Both of those actions or mechanisms are in play here.
	So again, they told you that they weren't and they lied to you.
	And he's explaining, yes, no, both of them are in play.
	This letter was only directed towards the injections that are based on the mRNA platform.
	Normally, when we do gene therapy, we use a viral vector.
	So AstraZeneca made an injection, which is also gene therapy, but this was specifically focused against mRNA.
	Now, the argument of the proponents was, well, there is no chance it will shed because it will not replicate.
	Although there is a batch that actually does the SA self-amplifying mRNA to mitigate the risk concerning normal gene therapeutic platforms.
	But what we see now is that it's also contaminated with DNA strands.
	And these DNA strands actually contain parts of other viruses, the simian 40 virus.
	So, I mean, I was talking about SV40. In relation, not to these shots, but the polio shots from back in the Dizzy.
	And how it caused what?
	Cancer in what?
	Apes and other hominids, aka human beings.
	And there were even multiple, I mean, a ton of cases talking about the SV40 and the human cancer connections and them winning those cases back in the day.
	For SV40 to be encoded biomolecularly through these printing processes of companies like CureVac partnering with Tesla shows the genocidal nature of this.
	The genocidal nature of this.
	Which is associated with cancer?
	Perhaps you could explain for our viewers RNA, DNA. I know it's very basic for you.
	So normally what you carry as hereditary molecules, that is basically the program of you, your body and your function, It's programmed in DNA. It's double-stranded, it's not prone to mutation, but to get from there to a function or to a protein, we need an intermediary, and that's RNA. So the whole idea was to hijack the signaling system to make your body produce something that is designed in a lab.
	So the whole idea is a great idea, but you have to test whether it's safe.
	And when you look at genetically modified organisms, there is a regulation 2001-18 for the European Union.
	This was bypassed in 2020 to make the clinical trials legal because they don't know what ends up in the environment.
	When he's talking about the shedding, what ends up, they know.
	They tested all this stuff on a micro level.
	Okay? When he talks about GMOs, that's what directed evolution is.
	And they've already done GMOs well beyond just your produce, now into your livestock.
	And with this, GMO humans are just like everywhere now.
	Everywhere. It actually happened.
	Folks, that's going to do it.
	That's going to wrap her up.
	I'd love for you guys to thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
	Check out all the documentary films for free.
	Loose Change, Final Cut, Fabled Enemies, Invisible Empire, A New World Order Defined, and Shade the Motion Picture.
	Remember, the third hour is stocked.
	It is some of the great interviews we do over on the premium, redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored that are a couple weeks old.
	Remember, it is not about left or right.
	It is about right and wrong. I absolutely love you guys.

▲