All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 18, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
59:50
Fauci's First Fraud Exposed By Ken McCarthy | MSOM Ep. 811

Watch it first Monday - Friday at 6pm Eastern only at http://AmpNews.us

|

Time Text
Disinformation's New Frontiers 00:15:02
Welcome to Making Sense of the Madness.
I am Jason Burmese and for the next hour we're going to find out about Fauci's first fraud and beyond with Ken McCarthy.
Buckle up and get ready to make sense of that madness.
Now, as our country falls further and further down the hole of a banana republic with these ridiculous, outrageous RICO charges against ex-president Trump and his associates for daring to what?
Audit an election, not overturn one, but you know, check the machines, check the ballots.
We have a system that refuses to go after the true criminal class in any events, especially when we're talking about the pandemic, the COVID-19 44 nightmare.
Rand Paul is currently struggling to have charges brought against Fauci.
And instead of going to Merrick Garland, who seems to be inactive, no, we don't have a weaponized Justice Department.
And we haven't for the past several decades, right?
He's trying to get a local judge in Washington, D.C. to go after Fauci.
I say good luck.
But one of the most important things out there is to bring forward truthful information into the court of public opinion so we can at least shine the light on the darkness of these figures and hopefully someday find a way for true accountability and punishment for this out-of-control predator class and their minions in the military-industrial complex.
That includes the media as well.
And that's why we need more people out there telling the truth and doing this.
And that's why it is a pleasure to introduce Ken McCarthy.
He is the author of Fauci's First Fraud.
He is an internet pioneer and a veteran independent journalist.
Before we get going on the Fauchmeister, tell people how you first came into the arena of independent journalism.
Okay, 1995, San Francisco, a year after I put on the first conference on the commercial potential of the World Wide Web, the very first one ever held, I put on a conference on local, using the internet for local media and local reporting.
And that was in 95, hoping that people were going to pick it up.
And nobody really did, even though I was in San Francisco and you would think everybody was super digital.
So in 1997, as a demonstration project, I started doing local, intense local reporting about San Francisco, 1997, and I called it Brass Check.
And at that point, I concluded that San Francisco, and remember this was 1997, was a digital banana republic.
I heard you use that phrase earlier and it's apt.
I called San Francisco a digital banana republic in 1997 and I've been doing reporting ever since as a sideline.
So why is that?
Now, I assume it's because winners are kind of picked.
Yes, you have the venture capitalists.
But even if you look at the history of a company like Google, where were they seed funded out of Incutel, which is the central intelligence agency's investment arm.
So, you know, you have the intelligence arena that makes a multitude of these investments to kind of hedge their bets and make sure that they control their winners and losers, correct?
Exactly.
And interestingly enough, historically, that's the way it worked politically in San Francisco.
And it probably works that way everywhere, but I was more aware of San Francisco because I lived there at the time.
The criminals that run everything in San Francisco just back both parties.
They always have since the foundation of the city.
So they have always controlled the government there, which is why the San Francisco government has always been just an unbelievably corrupt place.
So, yeah, backing all parties is a good idea.
You know, the internet got away from the military-industrial complex briefly.
And for a while, we were free range, you know, and then they figured out, okay, how do we lock this down?
They took over Google, they invented Facebook, they invented Twitter, they corralled everybody into a handful of websites and then controlled those websites.
But those of us that are old enough to remember, you know, pre, let's say, 2005, it was free range.
Anybody could do anything.
There wasn't much censorship to speak of.
I started to be censored in 2008, but pretty much we had a free hand until Facebook and Twitter showed up.
Until Eric Schmidt took over.
Go ahead.
Eric Schmidt.
No, no, no.
I'm glad you brought up Eric Schmidt, and I'm glad that you're bringing the fact that these, and we'll talk about Eric in just a second.
We'll talk about how these companies were kind of corralled because, yeah, I am kind of from that era where 2005 is when we first released Loose Change.
So YouTube at the time didn't really have a platform for a full movie unless you had a director's channel.
And it was not owned by Google.
So Google steps in and they create Google Video, and you could put long-form videos on there.
And one of the ways we went mega viral was through Google Video, the don't be evil company that you're talking about.
Now, Facebook, for those that are unaware, again, whether or not it was started as a government program, the government with DARPA started with the Total Information Awareness Network in the late 90s and then developed the life log program that suspiciously is like Facebook and ends on the day that Facebook launches.
And then you can just look at two people that are really at the core of Facebook's success outside of Zuckerberg.
And those two people would be Sean Parker, a person who supposedly created Napster, the file sharing app on his own, somebody who was recruited by the CIA, but supposedly did not work for them.
And then, you know, and a Bilderberg attendee, Schmidt, you know, who we'll talk about in a moment, he's actually a steering committee member.
But another steering committee member comes in on Facebook, Peter Thiel, somebody who's involved in global security to this day in the upper echelons via Palantir.
So, you know, we could talk about Twitter as well.
But as far as being a government-controlled Trojan horse civilian system, as I like to say, Musk is really a military contractor.
That's where he's making the vast majority of his money.
And, you know, Ken, I bring this up because most people don't know about the program.
Are you aware of the signature reduction program?
I don't know that one.
So a lot of people right now are debating within these companies with all the censorship that you were just discussing.
Well, it wasn't really the government that censored anybody, right?
Outright.
They just told the companies about the misinformation and the disinformation.
And then the people on the inside then censored those people.
It's just like YouTube didn't really censor anybody on behalf of the government because it's like this.
They did it.
They did it.
It's all plausible deniability.
And you constantly hear about the former FBI, CIA, and NSA members.
But Newsweek published an article, which we feature here rather often because people are unaware of it, called America's Secret Military.
And it's about two and a half years old at this point.
I believe it's May of 21 that it first came out.
And it talks about a clandestine service of 60,000 people, larger than the clandestine forces of the Central Intelligence Agency, running foreign and domestic programs online and outside of online at some of the biggest companies and consultancies in the world.
Sometimes in uniform, sometimes not.
But they also have access to all databases so they can create identities or change them.
So, in other words, any kind of internalized social security program, et cetera, et cetera, DMV, they can go in there anytime.
They then have masked identities, both online and out.
So they actually show you somebody in a mask and even have masked DARPA gloves for your hand that can have, and again, you've got to look this up afterwards, that can hold anybody's fingerprint and emit human oils.
So it can put anybody's biometrics on top of all of it.
And it's an art form called signature reduction, and it's been in place via these intelligence agencies for over a decade.
Never had a congressional hearing, never had a Senate hearing.
So you're absolutely 100% spot on when you say that basically the military-industrial complex created and run these programs that took everybody from message boards and independents and different programs like AOL Messenger, Yahoo Messenger, very decentralized, and combined them, corralled them into platforms that then could be controlled.
That's exactly what happened.
I mean, imagine what would have happened to Loose Change if it had launched this year.
We never would have heard about it.
I mean, that's the trick.
I mean, you know this better than anybody.
I mean, it was the free-range quality of the internet that allowed us to get the truth out about 9-11.
Had they had their systems in place, they would have shut it down.
And most people probably wouldn't realize what really happened that day.
Well, you know, that was the big talking point.
When I was getting smeared in the media as a conspiracy theorist, I would make the argument that, well, eventually they're going to censor you too.
Eventually, I won't even be able to say these things.
And people laughed.
Oh, you can say anything you want.
They would never.
And now we've gotten to the point where mainline Americans who are trying to speak up at school board meetings or city council meetings, they've now been corralled into this domestic terrorist arena.
Well, that was always the plan.
If you go back to the literature of the Patriot Act, it was very broad on who they could call a quote-unquote terrorist.
They just waited to build the infrastructure to let you know.
And Homeland Security, before having their little domestic terror reports recently on MAGA Republicans, had their fusion centers and talked about things like the Gatston flag, Ron Paul supporters, people that discussed the new world order as domestic extremists and terrorists well over a decade ago.
Now they're mobilizing and they're mobilizing to the point of thought crimes.
So I guess, you know, I know we're here to talk about you, but what are your thoughts on these indictments of Trump, especially the ones involving DC January 6th and the quote-unquote disenfranchisement of voters?
Because it seems like they're inverting reality and flipping the meaning of words and then criminalizing them.
That's exactly what they're doing.
And they have a vast infrastructure.
I don't know if you've noticed this was something also kind of under the radar, but starting with COVID, the academic world has gotten super involved in combating disinformation.
And now, if you're an academic hack that can barely hold on to a job, if you declare yourself a disinformation specialist, you now have a career path in academia.
And there are now hundreds of these people not only doing research, but also training lots and lots and lots of people, censors, basically, to go out and, under the guise of fighting disinformation, surveil and censor conversation, public conversation on a whole wide variety of topics.
I mean, the indictments of Trump are insane.
You know, this whole thing.
By the way, one of the things I did in San Francisco was I fully documented an election fraud that took place in 1997, stage managed by a guy named Willie Brown.
And Willie Brown is the political protege of Kamala Harris.
He brought her in, trained her up, launched her on the world, made her his mistress.
Well, I don't think he had to work that hard.
I don't think he had to work that hard too.
Also funny about Willie Brown, Bohemian Grove member, he had a call on the morning of 9-11 not to fly, talked about it, then was confronted later on because a lot of people didn't get that call.
And then Willie said, I don't know what you're talking about.
I didn't get any call.
And it was his quote in the paper that he got a call not to fly that morning.
Willie Brown, he's such a, yeah.
Sorry.
Well, I'm getting it.
Yeah, he's such a bragger.
Back in 1997, you're talking about rigged elections involving Willie Brown.
Yeah, we've had election corruption since we've had elections.
That's why we used to be able to audit them and have a system of checks and balances, Ken.
We got to take a break.
When we come back, I want to talk about that.
I want to talk more tech censorship.
I want to talk misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, one of the tools that was used during the COVID 1984 nightmare and more.
It's Making Sense of the Madness back after this.
Banks are supposed to be the safest placeholders for cash in the world.
But in 2022, that changed.
The Federal Reserve pulled out $2.5 trillion of liquidity out of the banks, and the Fed also changed the requirements so banks don't need to keep any funds on hand.
This means banks are starved for liquidity and have now become very dangerous places to hold your assets.
Get out of this system with the world's safest and most private assets, silver and gold.
call kirk elliott phd at 720-605-3900
ChatGPT's Accuracy Concerns 00:07:21
brasscheck.com is the website Ken McCarthy is here to talk.
Fauci and more, but you were talking about these new information specialists or disinformation specialists.
A lot of people also don't understand that infrastructure was building up before COVID.
For instance, YouTube had partnered with Vox Media, VOX Media, to spot misinformation and disinformation.
And they started putting out these cheesy little videos of how you can discern what's real from the authoritative, I mean, authoritarian sources and how you can't trust the mainstream media.
And then that escalated to the point where they started using terminology like malinformation.
In other words, truthful information, but it hurts an overall agenda or narrative that's being pushed by the mainstream.
That in itself is one of the most Orwellian terms and moves I think that we've ever realized in human history, Ken.
Yeah, I mean, we've shot way past Orwell.
We're way beyond Orwell now.
I mean, Orwell was just down with the fact that the screen looked back at you.
Well, now all these screens not only look back at you, they track, trace, and database your every moment.
They have a geolocator.
They have an audio device that can obviously listen in on our conversations, and they're running mass algorithms against us.
You know, I know this is kind of off topic, but I got to get your opinion on the fact that we're now in this algorithmic society where they're pushing AI further and further.
You know, you mentioned Eric Schmidt.
For those that don't know, Eric Schmidt was the CEO of Google and then Alphabet, the parent company for some time, was forced to kind of step down when people cared about censorship.
And it started to come out that Google was creating the censored version of Google, Dragonfly, over in China.
It was a big deal then.
No one seems to care now.
And when they ask about it, he's like, you know, I'm not there anymore.
It's Sergei's problem.
Go ask Bryn.
Nobody cared.
But now this past year, Schmidt and Sam Altman gave a speech in front of Congress, both of them basically saying more government regulation for AI.
The only difference is one says put a stop on it for six months.
The other one says we can't.
Otherwise, it's just regulate, regulate, regulate.
They're both at Bilderberg this year.
The chat GPT guy gets to become a Builder Bro.
And now we have AI taking off in the media.
Like, for instance, Doffner, another steering member with Axel Springer Media is now bringing in AI.
Is this AI future inevitable?
And how do we challenge that great narrative?
Gotcha.
So, you know, AI is a huge topic.
And I think when people are talking about AI, they're mostly talking about chat GPT, where you kind of ask questions and it answers you or you ask it for information.
That's already completely subverted and controlled.
I mean, I've done an absolutely thorough test on it, I think, as others have done too.
I mean, the woke are in control of the results from ChatGPT.
I think that's, so it's already gone.
It might have had a few brief moments of semi-objectivity.
And it's amazing how inaccurate it is.
I mean, forget the ideological nonsense, but it's flat out wrong, like a lot.
And it speaks with absolute authority, right?
You know, you ask it a question and it goes, oh, da, da, And then you look it up and you find out, or you already know the answer.
You're an expert in the subject.
And you realize this thing's just making stuff up.
And when I dug into it, it's only designed to be 80% accurate, which is not good enough, right?
You don't want to imagine a dictionary that's 80% accurate or encyclopedia that's 80% accurate or whatever, a user manual that's 80% accurate.
So it's a big smoke screen, in my opinion.
It's a bunch of baloney.
It has its limited uses, but primarily it's going to be used as an ideological control tool.
I think that to me, that's already like baked into the cake.
I noticed I was asking it a lot of questions six months ago about COVID topics and other topics.
And it was answering me, frankly.
In fact, someday I'm going to do a book on the questions and answers I had before ChatBPT got shut down because now when you ask those same questions, you don't get straight answers.
People need to know that there are human beings monitoring all the dialogues.
And a lot of it's done on algorithms.
So there aren't 10 million people reading every interaction.
But things get triggered, right?
And a human being then comes on and starts to read the dialogue and says, is this going the way we want it to go?
And I mean, they have thousands of people behind the scenes.
I don't know if people are aware of this.
I think I wrote a book on AI.
If you look at under my name, Ken McCarthy, Amazon, it's just sort of a primer on AI.
And one of the things about AI is it's not, well, let me put it this way.
Years ago, there was a thing called the Turk.
This was like in the 1700s.
And some guy said he invented a robot that could play chess.
And in reality, there was a little guy inside the box that the robot was sitting on and a magnet.
And the guy was moving the magnet.
It's not that ludicrous with ChatGPT, but it's kind of close.
There's a lot more human intervention with ChatGPT than you might imagine.
So a bunch of baloney, a bunch of hype, and it's going to be used for ideological purposes, just like everything else.
Well, I'm glad you talked about the aspect that this thing is programmed, that people are monitoring it, that basically it's garbage in, garbage out.
So again, you challenge the great narrative, you find a loophole, it presents information it shouldn't, and they're going to sew that up.
At the same time, you have that plausible deniability angle because it doesn't have to be 100% accurate.
And they're already calling those inaccuracies, quote-unquote, hallucinations.
I think that those are baked into the cake to still continually push the narrative that they've already been programmed in these large language models to promote and put out there and then suppress anything that would go against that narrative.
And that kind of think about it.
Go ahead.
If you don't mind, think about it.
If a guy like me, which I did, sits on ChatGPT for hours and asks it pointed questions, an algorithm is going to be fired and they're learning what the questions are and how to counteract them for the future.
So when I realized I was helping train ChatGPT inadvertently to counteract intelligent questions, I stopped using ChatGPT for that purpose.
I still use it sometimes for plain vanilla stuff, you know.
But anyway, sorry to interrupt you, but I just want to say that.
Oh, no, you're right.
It's a tool.
All these things are tools.
I do my own thumbnails and graphics.
I use the AI and Photoshop that's in beta right now to create some of my thumbnails.
Kennedy's Chapters Revealed 00:06:20
It's coming.
But at the same time, we can't put our trust in any of these tools because, like any technology, it can be used to empower humanity or enslave humanity.
A hammer can build a house or it can bash someone's head in.
And we have to be very, very aware of that, that the people right now in control of it are extremely suspect.
And one of the biggest suspects is a guy named Anthony Fauci.
Now, for those that are not in the know about the Fauchmeister and the fact that he has a long storied history of fraud within the medical establishment, let's start before the COVID-19 44 nightmare and your book.
Why did you even do this book?
Okay, so the book, and I'm a self-promotional kind of guy.
Here's what it looks like.
The book is derived from a film that I put out exactly three years ago, August 2020, August 2020, not 22, not 21, 20.
And it was called Fauci's First Fraud.
And I did a deep dig, and the film, I started releasing pieces of it in April of 2020.
The reason I did it was purely, I'll be honest, for propaganda purposes, because Fauci was clearly the front man for the COVID con, right?
And everybody was praising him, and he's a saint, and he's a genius, and he's America's doctor.
And as long as that was believed, we were in deep trouble.
So my strategy was to go after Fauci.
Coincidentally, at the same time, the same month, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was starting to write about Fauci.
That was April 2020.
My film came out in August of 2020.
Completely ignored, by the way.
Like, I've had 10 million YouTube views pre-censorship era.
I did a film, a very short film called, what do I call it? The 9-11 Solution.
And basically, I won't go into it, but it had so many views, I lost count.
People were copying it and posting it, which I loved, and it was shown all over the world.
This film, Fauci's First Fraud, could not get arrested.
I invited some guys in Africa to put it on their YouTube channel.
They got 300,000 views in 18 hours in Africa.
Couldn't get anybody to watch it in the U.S., right?
But that's a whole nother story.
So I learned that Kennedy was writing a book about Fauci.
I learned that in March of 2021.
Is that correct?
Yeah, times are all melding together.
And so I wrote him and I said, you know, Mr. Kennedy, I've got stacks of data on Fauci, plus my film.
You might be interested in it.
To his credit, of all the bloggers and podcasters and influencers and resistance people that I contacted and I contacted every single one of them.
By the way, American Media Periscope was one of the small handful of people that was interested in my work when it mattered, right?
But Kennedy, as busy as he is, he looked at the data that I gave him and it changed the course of his Fauci book.
If you look at the Fauci book, the core of it is five chapters on AIDS.
Celia Farber, who was a journalist from back in the 80s, also contributed to that.
I don't want to brag to say we changed the direction of his book, but we showed him information about this older history from the 1980s, which most people weren't aware of.
And it caused him to re-look at everything he was doing.
And five of his chapters are about Fauci.
And one of his chapters, 10% of the footnotes, are my film.
If you can remember back, Fauci in 2021 was still a hero, you know, as late as the fall of 2021.
Kennedy's book finally came out in November 2021.
And it sold over a million copies in all versions, hardcover, softcover, paper, all the different audio.
I believe that's what finally broke the back of Fauci's popularity, which was a very important thing for all of us, because as long as that guy was taken seriously, we were all kind of doomed.
So this book is the transcript of that film.
Plus, I added a whole bunch of other material stuff, you know, just all kinds of things.
The Rem Desivir fraud, lots of things, lots of things.
So it's basically, and it's sort of like a graphic novel in that as you go through it, there's a picture on almost every page with a caption.
So you can go through the book and actually just read the pictures and the captions and you'll get the sense of the book.
And if you want to actually read the book, and by the way, everybody can watch this film for free.
It's at Fauci'sFirstFraud.com.
Fauci's firstfraud.com.
In the spirit of loose change, and you guys were my heroes, by the way.
You know, we're making all this free and we want people as many people to see it as possible.
So, so this is so there's a pretty deep backstory to this book.
It actually had the film that it's based on had a big influence on Kennedy's book.
And of course, Kennedy's book really, I think, knocked Fauci off his pedestal.
Now, we got to take a break, but when we come back, I want to talk about some of the questions surrounding HIV, AIDS, how it was handled.
Years and years ago, I watched the documentary House of Numbers, and it had some very, very startling information about what was HIV or AIDS.
We're going to dive deep into Fauci's involvement in all of that with Ken McCarthy.
BrassCheck.com is the website.
We'll be back after this to make sense of the madness.
Hello, I'm Mike Lindell, and my employees and I want to thank each and every one of you for your continued support.
With everything going on right now, your rest is so important.
That's why we're having the biggest MyPillow sale ever.
Not only are my bed pillows as low as $19.98, but you can get the best body pillows ever.
Making Sense of Blood Transmissions 00:11:59
Regular $89.98, now only $29.98.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Please order now while quantities last.
Get more out of your AMP news experience with AMP Insider with seven pillars of focused information, including wealth strategies.
Find comprehensive videos on understanding precious metals and start building wealth the right way.
Support the mission of AMP with a subscription for $9.95 per month.
Get the first month for $1 by using promo code AMP888.
Welcome to a new era of Connecting Patriots, Amp Insider.
We are back.
It's making sense of the madness.
And Ken, one of the first chinks in the armor for me as a kid anyway, in the HIV story was Magic Johnson.
Because, you know, up until the point that Magic Johnson had gotten HIV, there was just so much hype surrounding how everybody could get this.
In the very beginning, they weren't even sure whether it was sexually transmitted or through hard drugs.
Are there any specified groups that had it?
Much of the media focused on Ryan White, who was a child who somehow contracted that disease.
A lot of us not knowing that Bear had had live HIV virus in factor eight, their hemophilia drug, and actually injected a bunch of people in it with it.
You looked at Magic Johnson, however, and in short order, I mean, the guy was still playing basketball.
He ended up on the Olympic team.
And lo and behold, you know, that happens in the 90s.
He's still alive to this day.
So all of a sudden, some people started thinking to themselves, wait a minute, if you have enough money and maybe enough power, maybe this thing isn't as lethal as everybody says.
You know, can you kind of speak to that?
I mean, obviously, you're a little bit older than me, but that was the tone during that time in a pre-internet world, right?
Oh, absolutely.
You know, I was in my 20s in the 80s.
So, you know, just when we were starting to have fun, we were told that sex was going to kill us.
You know, that was kind of a downer, you know.
So I lived right through it.
And I lived in New York City, which was, which was ground zero for both the phenomenon and also for the propaganda.
So many things to say there on Magic Johnson.
The good news, now I'm not a doctor, and I'm definitely not your doctor, folks, and I'm not giving medical advice.
But the good news is you don't have to be a super rich person to avoid the ravages of AIDS.
So let's talk about who did get AIDS in the late 70s and early 80s.
Intravenous drug users, got it, people that inject drugs, junkies, you know, it's not a very polite word, but it paints a picture.
Hemophiliacs.
And then the other group, and by the way, the people that were getting an AIDS-like disease, that disease has been around, that syndrome.
And by the way, they honestly, rarely, are they honest, but they were honest in this one case.
They called it a syndrome.
It's never been called a disease.
It's been called a bunch of stuff.
That's what a syndrome is, right?
AIDS was known or a syndrome like AIDS or looking a whole lot like AIDS was known 100 years ago by intravenous drug users.
Why?
Think about it.
If you're injecting dubious substances directly into your bloodstream five to 10 times a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year, do you think it might affect your immune system?
You don't need to go to Harvard Medical School to know that, to know the answer to that question.
So intravenous drug users were having immune system collapses.
The other group that was getting this problem were what's called the fast lane gay lifestyle.
And these were guys in the 70s, and they still exist, some of them.
Every community, whatever it is, could be Christians, could be gays, could be fascists, could be patriots, always has a small percentage of the population that really overdoes it, right?
They go out too much, they drink too much, they take too much drugs, too many drugs, they have too much sex, they're just reckless.
And there was a percentage of those people in the male homosexual community.
And a typical day in the life for a guy like that would be to snort some speed, go to the bathhouse, hit the clubs, drink, snort a lot of poppers, go home, take some, oh, have sex with a bunch of people you don't even know the names of, unprotected, contract multiple sexually transmitted diseases every year, just like normal, you know, just like it's a normal thing,
be on all kinds of courses of antibiotics, take antibiotics prophylactically.
Hey, I'm going out tonight.
I better take some antibiotics.
For a small, and by the way, Kramer, I can't remember his first name.
I want to say Larry, and it's wrong.
He was a great, one of the great gay rights activists, AIDS activists, and so on.
He wrote a book pre-AIDS in the 1970s called, and I didn't write this book, and I didn't name this book.
He did.
It's called Faggots.
And he wrote it about the insane lifestyle of a small percentage of that community and what they were doing.
And it's in a book.
You know, this is not something that you're doing.
You were correct.
It is Larry Kramer.
I just looked it up for you.
It's 100% Larry Krishna.
What's his name?
Larry Kramer.
It is Larry Kramer.
So that book, you don't have to take my word for it.
You can read that book written by a gay and so-called AIDS activist who documented what life was like for a small percentage.
Now, listen to me.
If you are taking speed, if you're drinking, if you're smoking, if you're contracting numerous sexual diseases every year, if you are, and some of these guys, when they would survey, they would say, how many sex partners did you have this year?
Hundreds?
Over a thousand?
This is the data.
Now, if a heterosexual person tried that lifestyle, what would happen to them?
Their immune system would collapse.
So instead of saying, hey, look, guys, you got to tone it down or you're going to die, they said it's a virus.
And then they said, you're not protecting us from the virus because you hate gays.
And so there were demonstrations, bring us the drugs, bring us the drugs.
So what Fauci and friends did said, hey, you want drugs?
We'll give you drugs.
And they found this thing called AZT, which was a failed cancer drug, failed chemotherapy.
It had been banned for human use because it was so deadly.
And using the equivalent of emergency use authorization, because AIDS was an emergency, they jammed through this drug that was never meant to be used for human beings and they gave it to millions of people all over the world.
A lot of gay men and a lot of Africans and a lot of poor African-American women living in the United States and a lot of their babies.
And you saw the film, The House of Numbers, and I was inspired by The House of Numbers and a lot of other great documentaries.
If you simply read the warning label on AZT, it says essentially can cause AIDS-like symptoms.
So basically what they did was they took a bunch of people, scared them out of their minds, gave them a bogus HIV test, and we could talk about that, told them they had AIDS and that the only solution was for them to take this rushed drug called AZT.
And one researcher who's a gay guy himself, he's not anti-gay, he's not anti-home, he's not a homophobe.
He was a gay activist, John Lorrison.
He's recently passed away.
He was also a Harvard-trained statistician.
He said he estimates AZT killed at least 300,000 gay men in the United States alone.
And that's not counting the Africans it killed or the African and the African American women.
They targeted poor women in the United States.
They targeted Africans and they targeted gay men.
Another group of people, Ken.
You mentioned another group of people that I'm curious about because you said hemophiliacs and Arthur Ashe would be another one other than Ryan White.
Now at the time, they were saying that essentially people who were HIV positive or had AIDS were sharing blood and it was through blood transfusions.
And then the factor eight information comes out.
Now, obviously, it seems like they fraudulently identified this as a virus, right?
And you talk about house in numbers.
In some countries, you're literally filling out questionnaires and your answers to those questionnaires will decide whether or not you're HIV positive.
What was going on with the hemophiliacs?
You know, it's a very hard disease.
It's hard on the system and the treatments they use for hemophilia degrade the immune system.
That's it.
It's not much more complicated than that.
But you're right.
They said, oh, it must be it's in the blood.
It's in the blood transfusions we're giving them.
Therefore, it must be a virus.
And then with the, I mean, again, the logic of this, if you're injecting substances directly into your veins multiple times a day, substances made probably in an oil drum in the jungle somewhere.
I mean, they're not pharmaceutically pure.
Don't you think that would have an effect on your immune system?
Right?
So you don't have to think about dirty needles.
And by the way, believe it or not, to be a junkie is a very hard job.
And you have to be very well organized and do some research on this.
Yes, they are people who are having severe problems and they're kind of social, they're kind of personal disasters, but they're organized.
Why they need to get heroin every day?
So they're very organized people.
They're also very careful people.
The idea of junkies sharing needles, that's a myth.
There may be a few.
Most of them are very careful with their needles.
And as, I mean, this is sort of a sidebar.
So it wasn't, you know, sharing needles that caused it.
It wasn't having, I mean, what destroyed the immune system of that early generation of gay liberated men was the fact they were getting sexually transmitted diseases constantly and they were taking antibiotics constantly.
If you, you know, antibiotics are a powerful thing and if you need them, you need them for emergencies.
But if you're taking them daily, that's a recipe for destroying your immune system.
So the real cause of this thing called AIDS was the destruction of immune systems.
It wasn't the transmission of blood.
There was actually a doctor.
I found the video somewhere.
I don't know if I can put my hands on it.
He actually did a live transfusion of blood directly from a so-called AIDS patient directly into his own blood because he was so unafraid of this myth called the AIDS virus.
So it's pretty stunning.
Jesse's Patriot Business Playbook 00:11:13
We got to take another break, Ken.
When we come back, I want to go further down this rabbit hole of the drugs that were prescribed to people.
People made a ton of money and just like you said, could cause AIDS-like symptoms if you were paying attention to the hate and lies shots.
And even Sandra Freihoffer of the American Medical Association, she was breaking down that the shots were going to cause COVID-like symptoms and they were going to be extremely tough.
Weird, huh?
We'll be back after this.
it's making sense of the madness.
Hi, this is Sean Morgan, and this is an AMP Consumer Report, where we interview Patriot business owners who are creating a parallel economy.
I'm here with Jesse Siegel of Card Solutions.
And Jesse, we've had a big problem with financial institutions debanking patriot business owners.
This happened to me.
It happened to AMP News.
So it's good to know someone in your industry actually stands for freedom.
So if a Patriot business owner already has a payment processing company, why should they switch to you?
Simply because I'm going to eliminate their processing fees.
Expensive credit card processing fees are hurting patriot businesses.
Right.
And tell me about the customer service because how does it work with the other companies?
Do they have to wait on the phone and wait for someone from a foreign country to talk to them?
Yes, the sales rep generally is not responsive.
They're not returning phone calls.
I handle it differently.
I'm available seven days a week for my customers.
That's great.
Seven days a week.
Usually that's not possible.
So tell me about the other aspect, the point of service in the merchant account.
I'm not familiar with this model, but you were telling me that you have one umbrella where it's tied together.
That's super important.
So a lot of times merchants are using an outside third party for their software hardware.
And I make it much better because it's one relationship.
The processor has a relationship with a point of sale dealer.
And so it's under one umbrella and they get a better experience.
This seems like a no-brainer, especially if the alternative is a company that doesn't share patriot values.
So thank you for helping us build a parallel patriot economy, Jesse.
And if you're a Patriot business owner and want a free consultation with Jesse, just call or email him with his information below.
We are back and we were talking about the medications that were used to supposedly treat HIV and AIDS.
And AZT seemed to be one of the most lethal ones.
Now, in 1996, I believe, and because I think I was a junior in high school and I was paying attention, Dr. David Ho was time man of the year for supposedly bringing this cocktail of protease inhibitors.
And I remember specifically reading the article to this day that at the time it was a drug regiment that was around $80,000 a year, that I think every four to six hours they had to take these pills in order to subside the HIV virus and not get AIDS.
What was going on there?
Well, Dr. Ho is very well named.
He is really a scientific medical hoe, if ever there was one.
Well, they knew they were, it became too hard to cover up the fact that people were taking AZT and dying.
And just so you understand how sinister this was, because this is important.
And by the way, the reason I put this book out is to show people that the COVID thing, they use the same playbook for COVID that they use for AIDS.
It's the exact same playbook.
They just cast a wider net and injured more people.
The playbook is simple.
Declare a new virus.
Oh, I've just discovered a new virus, never before seen.
It's unlike anything we've ever known before.
You know, BS, right?
Number two, infer or claim the virus is deadly.
You get it and you're gone.
No hope.
Tell people it's easily spread.
Tell people that you could be 100% healthy and walk down the street and you're leaving a stream of a virus that's going to kill grandma.
That's the next part of the lie.
And then tell people there's no possible treatment for this thing and we have to do a crash course to come up with the solution.
Now you've terrorized everybody.
And speaking of terror, Oprah Winfrey in 1988 on her program, which had 60 million viewers, she told her people, by 1990, one out of five people in this audience will be dead from AIDS.
That's the level of terror that was rained down on the population.
Sound like COVID?
New virus, never before seen.
Deadly, can be easily transmitted.
No possible cure.
People can transmit it unknowingly.
Same exact playbook.
All they did was change the name of the disease.
Then while they had everybody terrorized, they were now anxious for the cure.
So when their so-called cure appeared, a large number of unfortunate people who were terrorized jumped on the bandwagon, took it, and in the case of AZT, were died.
In the case of these injections, because they ain't vaccines, even the manufacturers called them gene therapy.
And they're not even that.
I don't even know what the hell these things are, but we'll call them injections.
We certainly know a lot of people that have been injured by the injections.
And of course, yeah, they prepared you, just like with AZT.
Oh, well, you know, you might feel a little sicker than normal.
And then the terrible thing is these guys thought they had AIDS.
They were given, oh, that's the other missing piece.
They were given a completely bogus test.
The inventor of the PCR technology, not a test, by the way, a technology, Kerry Mullis, won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for that technology.
He said this technology should never be used for diagnostic purposes.
And he said it over and over, and it's in his book.
He said it live because it was meant.
See, if you're going to do genetic experimentation, you may have a small amount of material to start with, right?
So you got to wait for it to grow, okay?
He figured out a way to fast-grow genetic material.
So you could take a little piece, double it, Now you got a whole bunch of genetic material to work with.
That's what it was meant for.
If you use it for diagnostics, that means you could find like the tiniest little genetic fragment in somebody, multiply it 40 times, cycle it 40 times, and declare that that person has AIDS or that person has COVID or whatever.
So it's they use the same exact formula that they used to trick people into taking AZT, terrorize people into accepting it that they used to terrorize people into accepting the injections.
Now, what makes it worse is they took control of the media.
Now, they actually had pretty good control of the media messaging around AIDS.
Celia Farber, who's one of the great journalists on the subject of AIDS that really came out with the truth very early on in the 80s, can tell you that all the things they're doing to us today, they were doing to AIDS dissenters in the 1980s.
They came after these people with a ferocity that you cannot even imagine.
No, I remember it, you know, because at the same time that this was going on, I specifically, you know, talk, talk TV was big.
You mentioned Oprah Winfrey, but I specifically remember Donahue having a family on in which I believe it was the mother had somehow gotten HIV or AIDS and the father was fine.
The kids were fine.
You know, obviously he was still having a sexual relationship with his wife.
And this was the huge push to my generation.
Like you said, if you had sex even protected, there were no guarantees.
You could get AIDS and die.
I still remember the after school special that they played in school.
It wasn't just after school with Ben Affleck, who was this jock that had sex one time and then all of a sudden got HIV, AIDS, and died after that one sexual encounter.
The propaganda was extremely fierce and dissenters were absolutely not tolerated.
And that went to a steroid level with this COVID 1984 nightmare.
You know, you mentioned the shots, and you're right, they used to refer to them as gene therapy.
I can only say I know that they are bio-nanotech driven by the Defense Department.
It's DARPA that developed these shots with Moderna and then the others and their strategic mRNA collaboration.
And they're just hating live shots as far as I'm concerned.
And that's all they ever were.
And they continue to try to push them on people or a new variant as such.
We got to take one more break.
When we come back, I want to wrap it up.
What are the most important takeaways from this book and from the nightmare we've all lived through?
And how do we make sure that we never live through it again?
It's making sense of the madness.
Ken McCarthy and his site, brasscheck.com.
Fauci's first fraud is the book.
Go check it all out.
Stay informed at ampnews.us.
Making Sense of the Madness with Jason Burmes, exposing the technocratic agenda.
Unrestricted truths with James Grundvik's research on the deep state of narrative warfare.
Counter narrative with Christy Lee, interviewing the power players who are revolutionizing the truth movement.
About George with Gene Ho, a show about a new magazine for a new era of truth.
Subscribe to our Rumble channel and watch these daily shows live on ampnews.us Fauci's first fraud is the book.
Ken, you mentioned before that you made the documentary based on the book first for propaganda purposes.
I want to let my audience know that's not necessarily negative.
He just realized there had to be an information barrage to take down, if you will, this image that this guy was America's doctor and he was here to save us.
Of the messages in this documentary and this book, what are the main ones people really need to take away from it?
Good.
Main Messages Unveiled 00:02:53
First of all, there are a hundred plus different things that can trigger a positive HIV test that may have nothing to do with HIV at all.
Second, there have been people with HIV who never got AIDS, and there have been people with no HIV that did get AIDS.
So the whole science of that whole AIDS thing is a complete scam.
And now they're telling young gay people, hey, you're gay, you're high risk, so you need to start drugs right now, forever, for the rest of your life.
This has kind of gone off the radar.
But the fashion is off my radar.
Hold on.
I got to talk about that because everybody's important.
No one's talking about that.
It's so important.
Thank you that you're on it too.
Let's talk about it because it's insane.
If you watch nighttime TV on major networks like the History Channel or Discovery Network, Truvada, K Truda, and these are for prep and they're hip commercials with young people and not always the homosexual community, although obviously they're leaning towards them and the trans community.
But sometimes it is still young people or just black women in heterosexual relationships.
And there's about four of these products and they started launching them pre-COVID 1984, by the way.
I started seeing them in about 2019 and thinking to myself, wait a minute, how many people really have HIV in this country or AIDS or aren't being treated with something where it's almost gone away?
You know, you had documentaries over the past couple decades, not even about HIV.
One of them was called, I believe it was bigger, stronger, faster on steroids.
And basically you had, you know, this homosexual man who had been given a death sentence and somebody said, hey, you need to start getting on steroids and start working out.
And 20 years later, there he was, the key of health, no more immune disorders.
Weird.
He took care of his lifestyle and built up his immune system.
And all of a sudden, he was okay.
But now it's the complete inverse.
And like you said, they're trying to hook these people on these drugs as a preventative, even though they admit in the commercial, they don't really prevent anything.
Yeah.
You know, in the fine print.
But they're being pushed on the public with these hip names and this huge marketing campaign.
The question is why?
Well, money.
This is what a money maker.
You know, get them started at 18 and keep them for as long as they're sexually active.
What a business.
I mean, if you're a criminal.
And by the way, maybe, since I know we're kind of wrapping up, I think we all have a fundamental question to ask.
And I'm, you know, kind of answering it finally for myself.
Are these people criminals?
You know, just garden variety criminals, but on a larger scale, or are they traitors?
There's a difference, right?
And I'm finally, because I'm slow to come to conclusions.
Are They Criminals? Or Traitors? 00:04:59
Finally, I'm coming to the conclusion.
people are flat out traitors like they they they they actually are seeking to destroy american society for i absolutely it's not just a matter of they want to rip us off i mean that's part of their game and they want to enrich themselves but they are actively undermining the foundation of american society and i honestly i wouldn't have said that until the last couple of years and now it's like crystal clear to me this is not just criminality this is these are traitors Well,
then I would encourage you to check out both my films, Invisible Empire, A New World Order to Find, and Shade the Motion Picture.
That makes that extremely clear.
And to me, what you essentially have is this predator class at the top that believes they should rule because they do.
They're not just Darwinists.
They're social Darwinists.
And they use every single tool in the book to manipulate.
And quite frankly, of course, there's always been deception.
There's always been good and evil.
But in this country, I feel like they've been on a long road to eviscerating our constitutional republic, the idea of checks and balances.
And post-World War II, after their Manhattan Project and compartmentalization, they had the model.
They had the model of born classified black sites and a executive within an executive that's only expanded through their continuity of government program, which is now partnered in large part with Big Pharma and other billionaires.
We got a few more minutes.
Let people know how they can get the book, how they can watch the movie, how they can support you.
And I love the fact that you want people to make copies, show the film to others, and hold screenings.
That's the way to go with these things.
Let's get the information out, Ken.
Great.
So go to FauciFirstFraud.com and there you can watch the original movie, which came out three years ago this month.
And then if you're inspired, you can get the book, which has the, yeah, this has brasscheck.com.
Yeah.
We put out a different video every day and have done since since 1997.
But go, we have a special website specifically for the film called Fauci's FirstFraud.com.
You can watch that film for free.
You can order the book if you're interested.
The reason I'm getting into the book game is that you can't dematerialize a book.
Like once the book exists, like I can put it in the bin at the library and maybe somebody will see it, you know?
Or I can hand it to a friend.
You can't hand a friend a film as powerful as films are.
You can't hand a friend a website, right?
But you can hand a friend a book.
So, and again, unless they start doing Nazi bonfires, like, you know, bring that, if they, they may bring that back too.
Who knows, you know?
But for the meantime, they're letting books run.
They're letting books run free.
So I'm putting my information into books.
But go to Fauci's FirstFraud.com.
The film is there.
You'll get it.
You know, we tried to pack a lot of sort of technical detail into this call, and I think we did a pretty good job.
But it really takes about an hour to unfold the whole thing.
And it's not just a technical film.
We show the politics of this.
Both parties, both crooked parties, were all big fans of Fauci from, by the way, George Bush Sr. put Fauci in power in case people.
Well, George Bush Sr. is one of the finest human beings ever, and he never went out there and promoted a new world order or the rule of law under the UN and not the rule of the jungle.
He's the best.
We love that.
Look, Ken, this has been an absolute pleasure.
If people didn't realize I was being extremely sarcastic, that guy is one of the godfathers of the modern day new world order.
We're going to have to have you back on.
Just a great conversation.
And folks, this is an issue that is well beyond left or right.
It is always going to be about right and wrong.
And this guy continues to have influence and power in our world without accountability.
Let's bring Fauci to justice one way or another, whether it's in the court system or the court of public opinion.
It's up to us.
Thanks for joining us.
It's been Making Sense of the Madness.
Genocide Jab by John Michael Chambers is now an Amazon number one bestseller.
If you've not yet read this critically important book that exposes uncomfortable truths, you should get your copy now.
or bundle with the World Awakens Volume 1 and 2 and get a 20% discount at ampnews.us.
Export Selection