All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 18, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
59:41
Tracy Beanz At Warp Speed On The 2024 Election! | MSOM Ep. 810

Tracy Beanz joins the show to discuss Operation Warp Speed, Independent Journalism, The 2024 election, and much more! Watch it first Monday - Friday at 6pm Eastern only at http://AmpNews.us

|

Time Text
Andrew A-A-D-R-E-G 00:06:21
Welcome to Making Sense of the Madness.
We've got a great show lined up for you today.
Tracy Beans of uncovereddc.com is here.
We're going to be doing that and a whole lot more.
or get ready to make sense of the madness after this.
What were things like?
Well, they were to a last day of life.
Thanks a lot, man.
I appreciate it.
Okay, thank you.
Thanks.
So, what names are you going to put in here?
You can just put Andrew A-A-D-R-E-G over.
Yeah, thanks.
You're going to read it, Andrew?
Hell yeah, I'm going to read it.
Are you?
I mean, do you think it's okay becoming deceptive at places like this and tell people that you're from Channel Whatever?
I know who you are.
Wait till you see this video that we make.
Okay, so this is going to be on this isn't a documentary thing.
This is for YouTube.
Okay.
Yeah, I promise.
So it's YouTube, but you're not Channel Whatever.
I am Channel 5 on YouTube.
Are you?
Yeah, I'm Channel 5 on YouTube.
Channel 5 on YouTube.
Okay.
Well, I'm just saying, I don't like the deception, man.
I watch your stuff.
Some of your stuff's okay.
But you know, you're coming here to punk these people.
Yes, you are.
100% you are.
Come on, man.
Andrew, what's your most important thing?
In life?
In life.
Probably being independent, not selling out.
That's great.
I mean, this is the guy.
That's why, you know, I highly respect you or Griffin.
I would hate to have you put him in a negative light.
I'll give you 10 grand if he looks bad.
10 grand.
Yes.
Well, that's nice.
I'm Jason Burbank.
I know who you are.
I know you are.
If this guy looks bad, I'll give you $10,000.
All right, well, that's good because, I mean, he's done some great, great things.
No, you're not going to take the $10,000?
I'll take the 10 grand.
I'm just saying.
I actually care about this.
Do you really?
Yeah, I'm interested in alternative education.
Okay, will you do my show?
Would you come on?
Can I get a card?
I'd love to.
All right.
Fantastic.
Yes, I would love to see.
All right.
Thank you.
So that was Andrew Callahan.
And for those that don't know, he's kind of a shock type TMZ gotcha journalist.
And where I was was the Red Pill Expo.
And who you saw right there is a pioneer of independent journalism that I admire really at the foremost.
The man is in my film, Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined, and really defining the idea, not just of communism or socialism or many of the other isms out there that are derived from this, but collectivism and its dangers.
And the book right there was The Creature of Jekyll Island by G. Edward Griffin, somebody who was doing documentary films in the 60s, well before I was born.
So when I saw Callahan at the event, I didn't quite place him.
You know, and this is a great event where we had people like Mickey Willits there.
We had individuals like Paymon from the Freedom Law School and many others.
I was able to interview Joe Bannister, one of the original IRS whistleblowers.
And quite frankly, I've never seen anybody used in the documentary style.
And by the way, he hasn't posted to that YouTube.
He said he's posting it on seven months.
Content that Andrew puts out.
And his last thing was This Place Rules, which was a run-up to the January 6th event and carried by HBO.
To his credit, he says he gave me his number.
I have texted him.
I hope that he does the show.
I did do a 30-minute interview where I fully expect to be butchered.
And that's okay because that's what the mainstream media likes to promote.
Now, Andrew would probably identify himself as independent, but I say it's tough to be independent when you have a leviathan like HBO and big tech companies pushing you.
With that being said, we're going to talk to somebody right now who is not pushed by big tech companies.
It is Tracy Beans.
And just before the show, I had not realized that we had met a decade ago.
Time flies when you're having fun at another event.
with G. Edward Griffin.
And I'm throwing curveballs today, Tracy.
So my first question for you is at that event, did you end up going to the bar with everybody else and partaking in the karaoke that was there with G. Edward Griffin and others?
That was the one karaoke bar event I did not go to.
My kids were home.
They were very young at the time.
And I missed out on that fun.
And many of us have.
I had to ask him because it's one of my fondest memories of the human being that is G. Edward Griffin.
I mean, this is a guy that, you know, I had spoken at an event with him in 2007 at the Freedom Law School event in Irvine, California.
He was gracious enough to be in my film Invisible Empire as a prominent figure talking about roundtable groups, the CFR, his work on the United Nations, even back then with the fearful master.
And here was a guy who was 81 years young then.
I mean, he's 91 right now, who ends up going to the after party, not calling it a night at like 10 or 11.
I think we left at like one or two in the morning.
And I'll never forget taking the elevator back up that night with G. Edward Griffin and just having a great conversation about how much fun we had, you know, getting around all this serious information and the topics that we were discussing and still being human beings.
And to me, that's a huge part of it.
And that's very important because we do need camaraderie, obviously.
But at the same time, we need to have outlets and people need to realize that, you know, we're not going home to our bunkers all the time and we're not living in basins.
No, we're living real lives and we want better ones, not worse ones for our kids and the next generation, really ourselves.
That was Save Long Island.
I guess it was 10 years ago now in 2013.
Authoritative Narratives Define Discourse 00:11:32
A good friend of mine still works with me at Uncover DC.
Gigi Bowman had organized that event.
And I feel like we, you know, we've been doing this for quite a long time, right?
And we've lost that now.
It's so quick.
Everything moves so fast.
It's always outrageous and there's so little discussion or focus on principles and reasons why and real solid plans.
Imagine if we had the mass of people today doing what we were doing all those years ago, how much of a different country we would be in right now.
I bought him lunch at that event and I sat and spent, you know, I don't know, about an hour or so just talking with him over lunch.
And it was the best thing I've ever done buying G. Edward Griffin lunch was amazing.
Yeah, again, I've been able to spend that time at dinner tables with G. Edward and others.
And that's another great thing about these events because you do get to network with other people.
And often people, you may not agree with everything on.
And I think that that's okay.
You know, people have to have discernment.
You know, over the weekend, I interviewed a lot of people that I disagree on subjects.
And instead of attacking them right away, I say, well, here's my question then to you.
And then they answer me and I'm respectful about that answer.
Have they changed my mind?
Maybe, maybe not, depending on the information.
And that's how you have a healthy discourse.
And really the reason that I started with Callahan is because I believe that his media, although it kind of pretends that it's giving that discourse, is the antithesis of that.
So, you know, his documentary, This Place Rules, starts off criticizing both sides of the mainstream media.
And, you know, he makes the left look absurd as well as the right, right?
But he says, look, we have the extremes here and there.
But then he focuses on only the extremes on both sides and only their worst qualities in many ways.
And there is no middle ground, right?
And the middle ground, I believe, even for people that are saying things that might sound outrageous to others is where the majority of us live, even though saying those things.
Yeah, no, I agree.
That's America.
America is not the extreme on either side.
There's a lot of time spent on amplifying the 3%, no matter where they are.
And a lot of that's done on social media.
If you go out to your supermarket or your gas station, start having a conversation with somebody about what's going on around you, you'd be pretty stunned to find out where most people are.
I like to have those conversations without mentioning the names of the people that I'm telling the story about.
And most of the time, people are disgusted, shocked, overwhelmed by the depravity.
And then when you tell them who this story is about, they're even more shocked and stunned.
And that can't be true.
And, you know, I'm like, it's true.
You're just, you know, you're not getting it on your boob tube, that's for sure, but it's true.
And I don't know that I necessarily want to drive people to the internet and social media, given how toxic it is, especially now, but it is one of the only places to find good information if you aren't with your boots on the ground in a community doing events like the ones we're talking about and dealing and having conversations.
We can still do that.
It's still allowed.
We're allowed to disagree and still respect one another.
And there's a lot of that division going on nowadays.
And I think one of the big things is that long-form live journalism is some of the more honest journalism.
And we certainly don't get that with Andrew in many respects.
You know, big edits, shortcuts, stunning words.
And, you know, he asked me, well, how can my, how can my reporting be better?
And I said, well, live stream.
You know, let people see, you know, seriously, like let people see people's warts for sure, but who else they are, right?
Because we all have our moments and we all have something about us or an opinion that's going to offend somebody else.
Woohoo.
You know, that's kind of what our institution was based on is that we're going to protect the speech of the stuff that we don't like, even if it's totally and completely repugnant, because we need to protect everybody's speech.
And sometimes, you know, because we're human beings, we're not gods, we get things wrong and that we figure something else out and we move on.
But so much of the narrative now, the great narrative, is that we need authoritarian control over information.
And even the quote-unquote best of them with Elon Musk, who I'm no fan of, says freedom of speech, not freedom of reach.
So suppressive algorithms are okay.
No, they're not.
I want to know people for who they are.
I want to know what's really out there.
I don't want to be gaslit into what the world is.
I want to have open and real conversations.
And when you're censoring people, when you're deplatforming people, and when you're even using algorithmic control to protect narratives, well, you don't have that.
No, everything's subjective at that point.
Who's making the decision?
You know, who's making the decision on what one person thinks is okay and the other person doesn't.
Like Jen Easterly called it from CISA.
It's called cognitive infrastructure.
They have a name for your thoughts now.
And they've decided that cognitive infrastructure falls under their regulatory purview at CISA and that they're going to be very, very diligent about making sure that people don't get their own facts.
That's a quote.
It's scary if people get their own facts, Jason.
That's what Jen Easterly of CISA said while she was referring to our cognitive infrastructure, which is our well, the new mantra, right, is don't do your own research.
You can't do your own research.
That's kook talk.
And the other thing that's being pushed by, you know, this authoritative, great narrative, if you will, is that AI is going to solve our problems and they're going to give us this narrative.
And yet.
Every aspect of AI, first of all, it's not really AI.
It's programmed by people.
They're large language models.
And because it's programmed by people, the programming is what it's going to be telling other people.
So in other words, certain narratives are not allowed.
We've already seen that with artificial intelligence.
This is extremely dangerous, not only because it's being commercialized and now it's coming into media agencies such as the Axel Springer group, which is owned by, I believe it's Doffner, and he's a big Bilderberg guy.
So now we're going to have AI reporters.
Those are going to be the authoritative narratives.
And it's not going to become from a human being, but human beings are going to pair it and amplify it in the media.
And then the other place they want to take AI other than media is what?
Law, politics, and medicine.
I mean, it could not get more corrupt and in your face, yet this agenda continues to move forward.
Yeah.
And then what happens with the AI?
It becomes a feedback loop, right?
Because it's machine learning, it's learning, it's feeding out one thing people react to it.
It picks up that chatter and then circles it back in like Jen Saki would and turns it into what you're being fed anyway.
Have you ever used chat GTP GPT to look yourself up, Jason?
I have not.
I have not dared to even touch it yet.
And I've talked about it on air.
The AI that I do use is the Photoshop AI.
They brought in image creation.
Now, I've done a little mid-journey with Zach Voorhees, the Google whistleblower, which is, I think, more advanced than the Adobe AI, but the Adobe AI can be pretty impressive already.
And, you know, I played around a little bit with deepfakes.
You know, obviously I'm a graphics guy by nature.
I run my own shows, et cetera.
And I see everything, by the way, as a tool, right?
Even like a chat GPT style AI can be utilized as a tool, just like YouTube, even though it suppresses people like myself and censors certain information.
If I need a tutorial on how to use a certain effect in a graphics program, some 12-year-old Asian kid's going to be there to tell me about it.
You know what I mean?
Some YouTuber has got the perfect thing.
I can get information out of it.
And I can do the same thing with chat GPT.
But the fact of the matter is, when you're not having objective AI, in other words, it's not filled with all they act like it's all the knowledge of the world.
They don't put all the knowledge of the world in there.
They purposely run algorithms to suppress certain knowledge that's troublesome to whatever narrative they have out there.
So in the medical field, you know, the AI doctor is going to be the first to say you can't have ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine and you don't need vitamins.
And no, the flu did disappear in 2021 and 2022.
All of those things are authoritative facts.
So as we drive to this, that's bad.
But like if I needed to write something up for me based on, you know, what we know about the Revolutionary War or perhaps maybe, you know, a fruit or something, it'll do it for me and I can put it out there, right?
Like it is good for certain things, but it's overtaking human beings, which is problematic.
Attorneys used it in a lawsuit recently and they cited the AI cited non-existent cases as case law and precedent for their argument and the judge sussed it out.
And those attorneys got in a lot of trouble.
I actually trained AI.
I asked for it to give me a list of domestic extremists events.
And it put forward a whole bunch of things where they talked about right-wing domestic extremism.
And then I asked it to name five examples of left-wing domestic extremism, which it did because of the way I asked the question.
And then I asked it: so, if there are examples of domestic extremism on both sides of the political spectrum, isn't it more fair to present both of those instead of just one?
And it had no choice but to say that it was correct and amend its response to that question.
So, could we be out there as kind of like counterinsurgents against AI, feeding it what we want to to make sure it's balanced?
I guess if there was a really serious drive and initiative for people of truth of truth mind to do so, it would be successful.
But who's going to do that?
We're kind of busy.
Well, not only that, but you just mentioned the fact that, yeah, no, they want to use it in law and a lot of law clerks are going to end up losing their job.
But at the same time, they're calling the issues that you're talking about right now hallucinations.
And I would argue that they are not quote unquote hallucinations because these things cannot hallucinate because they are not conscious and they will never be conscious.
And that's just kind of a terminology to later sell you on kind of the transhumanist aspect of this.
But it also takes away or gives plausible deniability to the programmers that obviously put something in there to ensure that their narrative is propped up, whether it's through actual information or false information that seems like actual information.
And that just shows you that they've already programmed these things to be extremely deceptive and that they have really no respect for human beings and our intelligence at this point, because a lot of people don't even know that about AI.
And then the terminology they use, Tracy, is extremely troubling.
We got to take a break.
2024 Iowa Election Talks 00:13:23
When we come back, I want to play this clip over at the Iowa Fair of people talking about the upcoming election with a possible Joe Biden versus Donnie T ticket.
And I want to get your take on what you think is going to be happening in the primaries and the run-up to 2024.
that more after this is making sense of the maths the world is about to shift Banks are going cashless globally with the emergence of central bank digital currency, which will bring with it programmable money and the ability to turn on or off your purchasing power based on your digital social profile.
It's like the equivalent of spyware in your bank account.
You need to get out of the system with the world's safest and most private assets, silver and gold.
Call Kirk Elliott, Ph.D. 720-605-3900.
Not interested in seeing Biden-Trump rematch again.
We've done that already.
I think both parties can do better.
I kind of felt like, why are you making me choose between these two people?
Are here at the Iowa State Fair, that bastion of fried food and politics, to talk to voters about how they are feeling about the 2024 election.
The polls are showing us that a lot of the people, the candidates coming through this fair, greeting voters, making their sump speech, really don't have a chance, at least not right now, unless things change.
That this is really shaping up to be a race between a president, Joe Biden, and a former president, Donald Trump, coming back together for a rematch.
And that's really something that voters are not very enthusiastic about.
I do feel like you want options, and it's not like a cut-and-dry thing.
Right.
You did it.
You're done.
Let's get some fresh blood in here.
I would want someone younger who is less committed to the two-party system in the sense that I feel like people run based on party values and not individual values.
We're not getting younger voters, and so the older voters are kind of staying with who they know and what we've seen.
You know, sometimes lesser or few evils.
If the choice is Trump Biden, you guys 100%.
Oh, 100% Trump.
Yep.
I would bite my tongue and go ahead and vote for Trump again.
Would vote Biden again just for our two-party political system that kind of doesn't give us very many options.
So it'll be interesting to see as we move forward whether people do get more enthusiastic about their party's nominee as we get closer to election day, or if we see a contest where turnout isn't quite as high as we've been seeing in the past couple of races.
2024 around the corner is it going to be Biden Trump too?
Does Trump really have a pathway to the nomination with all these indictments?
Tracy, what is your take on this?
Because Biden has basically said that he's going to run again.
I think this actually plays into the establishment Democrats' idea that they do not want debates under any circumstance because they don't want to give platforms to people like RFK Jr.
I think that that's very apparent.
On the other side of that, it seems very apparent that they've tried to prop up somebody like Ron DeSantis as the pick on the Republican side for what I think will be a rigged election.
Now, many people have scoffed at me and say no matter what, Trump will get the primary nomination.
And that's basically because he is wildly popular with his base.
And even those that he's not popular with, as the New York Times tried to highlight in that piece, would still begrudgingly vote for him.
Do you think he gets the nomination?
Do you think he'll be in jail by the time he gets the nomination?
Or do you think that they're going to try to run a DeSantis versus Biden 2024 fixed job or something else?
Geez, how many compartments in that question?
We're in complicated times right now.
You know, listen, first and foremost, obviously what's going on with Donald Trump right now from a legal standpoint is tumultuous and terrible.
Whether, you know, whether you believe he's guilty or innocent doesn't really matter.
He's in a D.C. kangaroo court with a trial date that starts in January as of right now in an unwinnable situation, no matter what.
You know, D.C. jury is not going to acquit former President Trump of anything.
It could be anything.
It wouldn't matter.
The judge who has been so unfair and so ridiculously harmful to J6 defendants is certainly not going to give any favor to a Trump defense.
I'm just being honest.
It's just the way it's going to go.
Thank you, Tracy.
No, you need to be honest because so many people don't understand that.
He doesn't have to actually be guilty of the crime.
And I would also argue that obviously you have the indictments in Georgia coming up as well.
But the case in Florida, I fear that they're going to try to find him guilty again.
They're timing that for August, right?
Just hammering him with these indictments.
And they're making it about these classified documents, which obviously he was allowed to have, and the government itself helped him transport.
But at the same time, you have an actual scandal with Biden that's been marginalized, and they're working with his lawyers where he actually did take classified documents while he was the vice president.
And it seems to be to cover up his criminal behavior.
Now, if you get a prosecution and you get a successful one in that case, you could also make the argument after the election that you were going to prosecute Biden.
But we really don't want to as long as he steps down because I don't believe they would have gone after Trump if he had just stepped back from politics and said, I'm not running in 2024.
I said to everybody, if he tries to run in 2024, they're putting him in jail.
And right now, like you said, in DC at the forefront, that judges already said they're going to limit the evidence.
There are so many hopiots out there that are like, he's going to get discovery.
He's going to be a law for the law.
He's getting no discovery.
He's getting Alex Jones defaulted and shamed and prosecuted.
And they're going to try to put him in jail.
Now, some people have posited, like Roger Stone, that even if that happens, there's nothing in the Constitution that says you can't run from jail.
Okay.
Let's say somehow, some way he gets the nomination.
Newsweek and others are already calling for the Supreme Court to say if he gets convicted of a felony, they should disqualify him.
Who knows what will happen there?
But let's say he does it.
We haven't fixed the infrastructure.
We still have voting machines that are totally and completely unauditable with proprietary software that we're just supposed to trust.
So just like we were going to.
Forget the machines.
What's that?
Forget the machines.
We have ballot harvesting.
We have all kinds of things that are going on with voting.
Even if you just put the machines on the side somewhere, for goodness sakes, it's a mess.
It is.
No, you're right.
I mean, that was just another tool in their toolbox.
In fact, I would argue that the 2016 election, they had tried to also rig for Hillary via the machines, via algorithms, and via their fractional voting that was exposed by Bev Harris and others two decades ago that has never been fixed in the infrastructure.
However, their algorithm did not account for Trump's wild popularity.
If we had a true audit of that, he would have won the popular vote as well by a large margin.
I mean, that's what I visually see around me in here.
Now, I think that they got the slam dunk with 2020 with obviously zero audits, mail-in ballots, ballot harvesting, like you said.
So, so I mean, is 2024 just going to be completely fraudulent?
No, I don't think so, because I think that there's a number of groups that are working really hard right now to get to the nursing home first, Jason.
Get those ballots first, get, you know, get the independent voter back, get some of the disaffected Democrats over because that, just like in 2016, you know, the turnout and the folks that show up that they're not expecting, that they can't take the vote from on the voter roll are going to make a difference.
A lot of people are very furious, like very frustrated thinking that, you know, what's the point anymore, right?
But if you don't vote, you basically just give them that slot to stick whatever vote they want in.
So there's so much going on right now.
And quite honestly, it's so early.
It's five months before the Iowa caucus.
People, like me, for example, I was a die-hard Trump supporter.
I mean, I spent seven years of, you know, seven years reporting on Spygate and all the things that happened during Spygate and, you know, both impeachments and 2020, the election fraud in 2020 and all of that.
And right now, honestly, I am, I'm, as we sit here today, not going to vote for Donald Trump in the primary, which drives people absolutely insane.
But I have several reasons why that's the case.
This, the indictments and stuff like that aren't necessarily one of my reasons why I won't be voting for Donald Trump as of today, but I would definitely vote for him in the general election.
Are you serious?
Of course.
But I really do think that a lot of people, if I'm like this, there's probably a swath of people out there that are doing the same.
And the vitriol and the bickering between us, between people who are picking between a Trump or a DeSantis, is going to be the downfall of it all.
It's exactly what the left wants us to be doing right now, 100%.
Rather than discussing these issues, they want us to hate each other.
And they're succeeding straight up.
They're succeeding.
Well, it seems to me that they've also set DeSantis up for a loss, even if he gets in there.
I just can't see the establishment as many things as he has in common with them.
I mean, he's the torture lawyer for the Bush administration.
He's a guy that very much foreign policy-wise isn't the greatest, but he has done some great stuff on protecting kids from invasive surgeries, aka the butchering of their genitals and giving them hormone therapy.
And I just can't imagine that they would allow somebody to get in on a federal level that might do something there because they're very much on that agenda.
So, you know, DeSantis, I don't know, but they're trying to set him up with a debate versus Newsom, who obviously can't be running because there's nobody running against Joe Biden and there's no debates, but they're going to have a debate.
What are your thoughts on that?
I think it's super interesting that they're deciding to have a debate in November.
I'm still not convinced that Joe Biden is going to be their nominee.
So that's why it's interesting to me.
I mean, this is all speculation and not really what I report on on a daily basis.
But looking at the landscape after being in politics for as long as I've been, it's just super interesting to me that Newsom is like, yeah, let me take my progressive hellhole of California and stand it up next to this bastion of the free state of Florida, who has done more to protect its citizens in the past, you know, four years or so than any other state in the nation, I'd argue.
It's an interesting matchup if it happens.
So I'd argue that Iowa did better.
That's why I'm here.
That's why I moved here from New York.
I think that's it.
First of all, I don't like any point when anybody locked down anything or masked up anybody or tried to put any mandates on at all.
So I think that in large part, everybody failed on some level if they allowed even private businesses to do those things or school systems to do those things and acted like it was out of their control.
However, you know, again, if you had to measure these things, yeah, Iowa, obviously South Dakota, Florida amongst them, you know, Montana, very few states and obviously not publicized in the mainstream media.
And that's why we need alternative media.
So let's get to uncover DC.com.
What's the origin story there?
And, you know, what do you think some of the biggest issues right now are?
Well, I started on Cover DC because I wanted to get journalism, real journalism out to more people.
And I was hitting brick walls with what I was allowed to write about for op-eds places.
You know, everybody wanted everything to be six or 700 words, very like, you know, pundit-y.
And that's not, that wasn't what I was looking to do.
I wanted to do real investigative journalism.
So I was like, you know what?
I'm just going to start my own company and do it that way.
Why Alternative Media Matters 00:04:08
So I did.
We're looking at everything right now.
I mean, we really focus on political corruption first and foremost because there's enough of that to keep us employed for like 70 years, clearly.
But I mean, one of the bigger stories we've been covering lately is Missouri v. Biden.
Also, did, oh gosh, probably hundreds of columns on COVID, the vaccine, and things of that nature.
And election integrity was another set of stories that we paid close attention to.
I mean, I don't think there are very many people outside of Gateway Pundit that worked as hard on the 2020 election as we did.
And we still continue to.
So that's kind of why it blows people's minds when I'm saying that I'm not going to be voting for Trump as of right now, because, you know, a lot of what has come out of the past couple of years, people would just assume you're going to jump on that train.
But we're, you know, we're still, you can be focused on the truth of the matter and what's actually going on and have a different preference for who you think should lead the country.
And that's what we're committed to: integrity and journalism.
No matter who's doing something wrong, we're going to tell you, and then you can make your own decision.
And that's basically what we do.
And that's really important.
And, you know, again, I voted for the guy twice in national elections, but because I didn't really feel like I had a real protest vote, number one.
And number two, I vehemently disliked Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden.
That kind of brings us to Joe Biden.
You know, Joe Biden, somebody I've been talking about and putting my 2008 film Fabled Enemies because he met with one of the money men behind 9-11, laughed about it, helped cover it up, promoted the war of terror.
Horrible establishment politician, the Barack stars, bagman.
I mean, literally a guy you didn't want there when he was just Joey B, gangster in Delaware NDC.
But then they rolled this guy out, dementia-ridden in the primaries and the debates.
And I honestly, you know, this is one of the things that I got wrong.
I'm a human being.
I thought there was no way they were even giving this guy the nomination.
I thought, you know, maybe they'll go with a Corey Booker and a Kamala Embarrass ticket.
That would have been nightmarish.
Or Grandma Oatmeal checks a lot of boxes, Elizabeth Warren, none of those things.
They gave us somebody that wasn't even conscious.
And that kind of gets to my next story here.
You know, Biden is riding around on a bike while Hawaii just got devastated.
He clearly, absolutely, 100% runs nothing.
He runs nothing.
He can barely talk.
That's why he's in there, Jason.
That's why they made him run.
It's never been that apparent.
Like you may have had George Bush Jr., the boy idiot president, but you had Darth Cheney behind him and Donald Rumsfeld and all these people that were vocal.
And you still had a guy that could talk.
And you could talk baseball and beer with the guy.
I mean, you could try talking baseball and beer, but it would get to corn pop and his leg hair and something really weird about a little girl so quick.
You can't imagine it with Joe.
But then you got, you know, the Barack star, Barry Sotero, and obviously somebody who was very intelligent, but groomed for the position, well-spoken, articulate, but largely, obviously, a puppet.
All of these people are.
But this guy can't even talk.
And he's clearly the biggest puppet we've ever seen.
And his vice president isn't even impressive on any level.
Checked all the nice little identity politics boxes, but didn't check anything politically, not even likable.
So, in your opinion, for me, I always talk about John Kerry.
John Kerry clearly is running way more of our foreign policy, and some of which is going to come home domestically because of the ESGs and the SDGs out there.
He's very much a mover and shaker in this administration, way more power than Biden.
But who else is it?
Who's really pulling the strings behind the scenes?
Well, there's Susan Rice, there's Valerie Jarrett.
You know, there's Obama, there's Obama.
I mean, it's the third Obama administration, clearly.
Obama's Mistakes Exposed 00:15:34
They're all out there.
They just raised, what, $312 million for the Obama presidential library that's going to house all kinds of the art that they're curating from all over the world?
You know how they love to launder through their art sales and things of that nature.
It's one big grift, and it's the same players in every single round.
They really just needed a figurehead to sit in the seat.
And I don't think they expected him to deteriorate so quickly because I don't know if you've done this lately, but even if you take a look at Joe Biden on the campaign trail in 2020, the few stops he did make and compare him to Joe Biden today, the difference is so stark.
And we're the laughing stock of the world.
There was an article that came out I read this morning where they're talking about how they're going to wait until the DNC is about to have the convention or the coronation and they're going to say, oh, you know, we can't have Joe Biden run again.
We're going to pick someone else and slide them in.
And the person they choose is Michelle Obama.
And nobody gets to decide that.
They're just going to slip her in there and then run her in the general against whoever the Republican nominee ends up being.
And I don't find that too far-fetched at this point.
Like you said, they don't even hide it anymore.
Like they don't hide any of it.
It's so obvious.
It's so in your face.
Look what they've done to the military.
Look what they've done to all of our institutions.
They don't care what we think about it.
They're just going to do it.
And I don't see why anyone would think that it wouldn't be plausible that Joe Biden gets swapped out from one of their other cronies to keep the dynasty going because that's what it is at this point.
A dynasty indeed, an oligarchy, if you will, a predator class, puppet class that does their bidding.
We got to take a break when we come back.
I want to talk more about the Republican primaries and a possible entry of Donnie T into the debates.
Uncovereddc.com is the website.
Making sense of the madness is the show.
back after this.
Hello, I'm Mike Lindell and my employees and I want to thank each and every one of you for your continued support.
With everything going on right now, your rest is so important.
That's why we're having the biggest MyPillow sale ever.
Not only are my bed pillows as low as $19.98, but you can get the best body pillows ever.
Regular $89.98, now only $29.98.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Please order now while quantities last.
Get more out of your AMP news experience with Amp Insider with seven pillars of focused information, including wealth strategies.
Find comprehensive videos on understanding precious metals and start building wealth the right way.
Support the mission of AMP with a subscription for $9.95 per month.
Get the first month for $1 by using promo code AMP888.
Welcome to a new era of connecting Patriots, Amp Insider.
We are back.
It's making sense of the madness where the Tracy Beans, uncovereddc.com is the website.
Now, Trump has earlier stated that he's not going to participate in any debates in all the polls.
He is largely in the lead.
DeSantis hasn't clicked with a lot of people.
The Vaikuk Ramaswamy has gained a lot of ground.
I actually was talking to Alex Stein earlier today about an interview he did with him where he actually asked him about 9-11 and whether or not it was an inside job.
And he did not adhere to the norms.
And apparently, the media went and attacked him for it.
That makes me like him a lot more.
He's got a lot of good things to say.
Obviously, Donnie T would shake things up in the debates.
Are the debates even really necessary without Donnie T?
I mean, what are your thoughts on that dynamic?
Because again, it's another very odd one that we've never really seen before.
Yeah, the debates are necessary without Donnie T.
I want Mike Pence to show everyone his ass.
Excuse my French.
I want Chris Christie up there making a fool out of himself so that people know what they don't want and what they do want.
You know, I think it's important that people hear everybody's perspective.
We who are involved in this every single day think that everyone in America knows who all of these people are.
And I think that you'd be stunned to find out that a lot of people think, you know, they don't know who Vivekaramaswamy is.
The normal everyday person watching television probably doesn't really know who he is or what he stands for.
They might not even know Ron DeSantis, who is wildly popular inside of Florida, but made some national news, but not really many people know him.
And I think, honestly, for me personally, it would be fantastic to see Donald Trump in these debates because I certainly have a lot of questions that I'd like answered.
And the fact that he doesn't want to debate really infuriates me.
It's almost like he, you know, he doesn't care what he doesn't care enough about the voter or about people out there.
He just wants his crowning.
It bothers me.
I mean, I think we need to get back to some sort of process.
It's almost the same thing that Joe Biden did, you know, not debating at all.
Just go out there.
If you're going to wipe the floor with everybody because you've got great policy in a great direction for this country, show us.
Go out there and do it.
Tell us about it.
After that debate, if everything that you say is true, you will be, there will be no question after that who's going to win the primaries because everybody will have seen you trounce your competition with your policy initiatives and the rest will be history.
So, yeah, and the bottom line is that that was one of his strong suits.
And what made me actually take notice was his debating skills and his veracity.
You know, I'd argue to this day that I still would have preferred somebody like a Rand Paul, but Rand Paul, who is much more reserved, you know, he's just not as America as Don was.
You know, Don knew how to rile people up and make promises.
And the other thing is that Rand Paul, like you said, most people don't know who these politicians are.
We got to remember there's only really about 30% of the adults in the United States that are even involved anywhere near this in the political game.
Democrats, Republicans, names.
And that's that, I think 30% is actually being kind of generous.
So 70% of the people are just totally oblivious and they know the names that have been hammered home Bernesian style on the TV all the time.
So Rand Paul's at a disadvantage there.
He's obviously not going to get as much time in the debates.
He's not going to get as much time in the press.
And, you know, Don, other than him, was saying the right things and continues to.
Now, did he deliver on a lot of those things?
Some, not all.
And I think that, you know, again, you talked about having to tell both sides of the story.
Well, we have to acknowledge that there were certain things the man failed on and is still being pigheaded, in my opinion, to this day.
But like you said, in a national election, oh, it's hands down, hands down.
I'm going with Donald Trump over any Democrat at this point, right?
And that's not true.
Yeah, it's and that's not because I love the two-party system.
I don't.
I kind of hate it.
In fact, they charge Don with disenfranchisement, right?
Disenfranchise, conspiracy to disenfranchise voters.
You look it up, disenfranchisement used to mean that you didn't feel like you were represented by the political system in the political class.
Hi, my name's Jason.
I've been here for 20 plus years.
That's how I felt.
And then they've changed it, you know, to the idea that somehow you're suppressing an individual's right to vote or ability to vote through questioning something.
Okay, so now that's a thought crime.
Maybe he didn't even do that.
But then we no longer have free will to decide for ourselves.
And a lot of this is an attack on our free will, Tracy.
It's a big problem.
I think Don has to get in there.
I think you're right.
I think if he doesn't, it'll be another way for the establishment to try to prop somebody up.
But at the same time, I think a lot of his warts will be able to be shown.
You know, I want to know what you think about Bannon, for instance, coming out and saying somehow on day one, Don is going to declassify RFK, JFK, MLK, Malcolm X, Epstein.
But he already said that.
The whole shebango day one.
He couldn't give us twice.
What?
Right.
I'm just agreeing with it.
He already said that.
He already said that he was going to do that last administration.
I mean, we were supposed to get JFK.
We didn't get it twice.
And then I would argue, you know, when Vivek being put on the spot about 9-11, if you really want to put a dagger into the heart of the quote-unquote deep state that we talk about, the only way to do it is not only to declassify all the 9-11 documents, but then criminally go after the individuals that actually carried it out in the public arena and admit, hey, we had a really bad system.
We had a system where we had an executive within an executive, a conduity government program, an intel community, an international crime cartel that went beyond our nation state and our laws and the idea of checks and balances.
And we're going to prosecute these people for it.
And only when we do that can we actually claim to try to make this a constitutional republic again, one in which people can actually be punished for their crimes.
Remember that line we hear all the time?
Again, Bernesian line, nobody's above the law.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Clearly, that's not true.
No, I feel the same way as you.
I felt that way when I was very hopeful about 9-11 when it came to President Trump because of what he did in the, you know, the lead up to his win.
I feel the same way about COVID.
And that's probably my main sticking issue.
And it's a hotly debated one.
But I'm not even upset about the things that he said he was going to do and didn't get done given circumstances.
He was one of the best presidents, I think, in our lifetimes for what he did get done.
We were thriving, especially with the economy until COVID happened.
My problem is what he is refusing to realize was an absolutely dreadful, terrible mistake with COVID, with the CARES Act, with the policy that was implemented, and most importantly, with the COVID vaccine.
That to me is the sticking point.
It's this almost inability to look backwards and say we made a mistake here or not even admit you make a mistake, but just say we're going to hold these people accountable and fix this.
He didn't do that with Hillary Clinton.
He didn't do that with the JFK files.
And he's certainly not going to do it with the COVID-19 vaccine based on his comments to this day.
And those are important issues to me.
You can't get something if you don't admit it's broken.
Yeah, I have to agree on all those things.
And I want to explore Operation Warp Speed after this next break.
We're with Tracy Beans, uncovereddc.com is the website.
Get ready to make sense of the madness after this break.
Hi, this is Sean Morgan, and this is an AMP Consumer Report.
We We interview patriot business owners who are creating a parallel economy.
I'm here with Jesse Siegel of Card Solutions.
And Jesse, we've had a big problem with financial institutions debanking patriot business owners.
This happened to me.
It happened to AMP News.
So it's good to know someone in your industry actually stands for freedom.
So if a Patriot business owner already has a payment processing company, why should they switch to you?
Simply because I'm going to eliminate their processing fees.
Expensive credit card processing fees are hurting patriot businesses.
Right.
And tell me about the customer service, because how does it work with the other companies?
Do they have to wait on the phone and wait for someone from a foreign country to talk to them?
Yes, the sales rep generally is not responsive.
They're not returning phone calls.
I handle it differently.
I'm available seven days a week for my customers.
That's great.
Seven days a week.
Usually that's not possible.
So tell me about the other aspect of the point of service in the merchant account.
I'm not familiar with this model, but you are telling me that you have one umbrella where it's tied together.
That's super important.
So a lot of times merchants are using an outside third party for their software hardware.
And I make it much better because it's one relationship.
The processor has a relationship with a point of sale dealer.
And so it's under one umbrella and they get a better experience.
This seems like a no-brainer, especially if the alternative is a company that doesn't share patriot values.
So thank you for helping us build a parallel patriot economy, Jesse.
And if you're a Patriot business owner and want a free consultation with Jesse, just call or email him with his information below.
We are back.
It is making sense of the madness.
Now, Tracy, I think that you rightly pointed out the ex-president's ability to have the humility to admit when he was wrong.
You know, I want to get into Operation Warp Speed in a moment.
But for instance, in his recent Tucker Carlson appearance before Tucker was taken off the air, he talked about Assad gassing his own people as if that actually happened in Duma because he gave a military response.
That's a mistake.
You have to own up to that.
Even if you had bad information, there is now no doubt that not only there was not a gas attack there, there was no attack at all.
I believe it was Pearson Sharp of OAN that went there in the days afterwards and showed people not only that an attack had not happened, found one of the children that was on video and has supposedly been gassed in the attack with his father and interviewed them both.
Where he said none of that happened and that some people dumped water on his son and dragged him into the hospital with other kids who began crying because they didn't know what was going on and filmed in the hospital.
You know, he has to acknowledge reality.
You know, another thing is the irony is not lost on me that they've now falsely charged him with the Espionage Act in Florida when his administration was allowed to falsely accuse Julian Assange of the Espionage Act.
It's just like, hey, Don, you should have stood up for Alex Jones when he got deplatformed because guess what?
You got deplatformed eventually as well.
You got to be ahead of the curve, not behind it.
And in the respect of Operation Warp Speed, by not being ahead of the curve, look at the nightmare that we live through.
But I think that he must have the humility to fix that situation and admit that we were literally under a globalist cabal, techno-fascist, biomedical attack as a human species and go after those people as well.
No, it's imperative.
There's no wiggle room with me on that issue at all.
It was the greatest crime against humanity ever.
I've lost family.
I've lost friends.
I'm not blaming him for what the pharmaceutical companies did.
Final Segment: Making Sense of the Madness 00:03:48
People get it twisted sometimes.
I'm blaming him for not recognizing that removing all of the restrictions that stop pharmaceutical companies from creating profit-focused drugs that kill people led to this horrible travesty that has now reshaped the entire medical industry from now moving forward.
Forget how toxic and chemical and terrible vaccines had been up until the point of COVID.
Now we're going to be using this mRNA technology for every vaccine moving forward.
It is absolutely catastrophic.
And if you can't admit that there's a problem with these things, for whatever reason he has for not admitting it, I don't know.
That's a serious flaw for me that I cannot overlook.
Again, people are dying.
People are injured.
This is global in nature.
Millions and millions of people.
It has transformed the world as we know it.
If you can't admit you're wrong because you don't have the humility to do it, at least say we're going to hold these pharmaceutical companies responsible for creating a product that is killing and maiming children, teenagers, grandmas, grandpas, moms, dads, brothers, sisters, everybody.
And we're going to do something to put these people where they belong, put them on trial, hold them accountable for their crimes, and stop this from continuing to harm people for the rest of our in perpetuity.
And he can't do that.
And I have zero confidence in someone who can't do that.
And it's unfortunate, but it's true.
We got to take one more break.
When we come back, I really want to hammer home the fact that, you know, we talk about wanting to have a great military.
Well, unless we hold these people accountable and take back our military, we will continue to have defense-driven bioweapons developed in association with big pharma that are thrust upon the public.
We're going to get into that and more in the final segment of making sense of the madness back after this.
What should
people know about that whole blow up with project Very test?
I read a few people wrong, and that's my fault, but I learned from that, and I think I'll be a more effective messenger as a result of that.
That'll free me up to do the next chapter, the next stage of my evolution, which is OMG, which is decentralizing journalism.
And sometimes things happen for a reason.
That's my goal.
That's my mission.
And I didn't ask for that mission.
I never thought that would be my mission.
It just has become my mission.
And I'm excited about it.
Final segment of Making Sense of the Madness with Tracy Beans.
UncoverDC.com is the website.
We were just talking Operation Warp Speed, but the bottom line is the actual technology that was then thrust upon the public, the mRNA technology, was developed by the DARPA program, Adept Protect, in association with Moderna.
Then that mRNA project or strategic collaboration project expanded to BARDA, Merck, AstraZeneca, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Institute Pastor, and others.
Darpa's mRNA Revolution 00:03:56
Now, unless we can fix that infrastructure where the Defense Department has the ability to not only lie to the public, but then indemnify the companies that they are working with that they can then thrust plausible deniability upon.
Well, we're not going to fix the system.
So we only have a few minutes left.
What is the solution?
Because I see people like Vivek Ramaswamy saying, we're going to get rid of the FBI, the CIA, we're wiping the slate clean.
Love to believe that.
But when you have an executive within an executive that has grown as a leviathan over the last, you know, 60 to 70 years post-World War II, where you have born classified, you have underground black sites and you have classified weapon systems and bio-nanotech.
How do we fight the system in reality?
If I had the answer to all the world's problems, I would definitely not be an investigative journalist.
I don't know.
I mean, it's overwhelming, isn't it?
I mean, accountability would go a long way.
Truth and accountability would go a long way.
And I am a firm believer that the pendulum can only swing one way for so long.
And look, truthfully, you and I have been screaming about this obviously for decades now.
Apathy.
You know, that was one of the reasons why Ron Paul's, one of the slogans we kind of took in was Ron Paul cured my apathy, because that's the truth.
It was, it was once we started looking into all of that, the Patriot Act passed and we started.
It's going to take a large swath of people to stop settling and start doing the right thing when it comes to running for office, electing people for office.
Stop listening to endorsements, for goodness sakes.
They're not always right.
There's a lot of money that's involved with those.
It's up to individual citizens to be involved hyperlocally, as local as you can get, be self-sustaining, do your due diligence.
Understand that, you know, and in terms of big pharma, there's really not much positive coming out of that industry at all that can't be taken care of naturally.
One of the most stunning things that I've seen over the course of the past couple of years is how many of these MDs, very high-profile doctors like Dr. Peter McCullough, for example, have come around to the fact that natural medicine is really, really beneficial and works really, really well.
Peter McCullough is recommending supplementation for vaccine toxicity.
And it's quite something.
So I think we're in the beginning of this revolution where we have a mass amount of people who have woken up to all of this now.
So for all of the negative that has happened over the past decade or so, there are more people aware that they're being conned and lied to today than there were back then.
And it grows exponentially every time they try to pull something absolutely brazen.
We're fighting a leviathan, but we need to keep fighting because there's not another option, truthfully.
And the DARPA thing is crazy with the mRNA technology.
I mean, they had run a trial on eight human participants for the first time ever, just weeks before COVID happened.
And then they rolled this technology out to millions of people.
It would have taken 10 years, if not for warp speed.
But if you give everybody the benefit of the doubt, okay.
Now millions and millions of people are running around using DARPA technology with DARPA technology floating inside of their bodies just because I don't even have words.
I mean, it's terrible.
Because of the Bernesian programming that was thrust upon us through the mainstream media, through the puppet class of the predator class in the military industrial complex.
The website is uncovereddc.com.
The hour flew by, Tracy.
It is great reconnecting.
Thank You for Coming 00:00:55
We'll love to have you on the show once again.
Folks, I want to thank you for coming by here at the AMP News Network, ampnews.us, where the truth lives.
Remember, it is not about left or right.
It is about right and wrong.
We'll see you on the flip side.
Reach a loyal demographic of freedom-loving Americans who vote with their dollars.
Promote your Patriot business on App News.
Export Selection