Watch the UNCENSORED second hour live on RVM Premium Mon-Thur at 9AM EST:
https://redvoicemedia.com/uncensoredShow more Not RVM Premium yet? Try it for $1:
https://redvoicemedia.com/jason
Listen Live and Call In at:
https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermas
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/category/bermas-docs
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/c-1647952
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
#BermasBrigade Show less
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery.
We need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe.
Our food is unfit to eat.
As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy.
The Great Unto- No one who got to say, I'm a human being!
God damn it.
My life has value.
You have met all the primal forces of nature.
Don't give yourselves to brutes.
Men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men!
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts!
You're beautiful.
I love you.
Yes.
You're beautiful.
Thank you.
Haha.
Showtime.
And now, reality meets with Jason Burmese.
And who loves you?
And who do you love?
Good morning, everybody.
I am Jason Burmes.
This is Reality Rance with Red Voice Media, and I truly do love all of you out there.
Today, we are going to look to a better day, a better tomorrow, a brighter future, a more positive outlook, because that's the spin that we're getting via the Davos crowd.
We played Klaus Nutschwab's basic, basically his latest hello.
Hello, Davos.
And I love how everybody starts out with Your Majesty's esteemed, they should call them dictators or puppets, right?
But the esteemed emissaries.
All these people, but we're going to have the will of humanity, a bright future, a positive outlook as we transition.
And there's not a ton out there from the new Davos, but you can tell that they're doing like their post-COVID thing.
They got, you know, people singing about the Earth.
Don't worry, we might get into the Imperative 21, which is an offshoot of all of this.
The her!
Now, you know, they got another person singing about how horrible humans are for the earth.
That's how we're going to kick it off.
So you can find that.
And already I can tell you it is heavy on the democracy and fight for Ukraine, democracy, and fight for Ukraine.
So much so that there's two so far on C-SPAN that I've seen.
And it's getting really frustrating because I feel like, you know, five years ago, even three, four years ago, there was so much access to all of these things, right?
It's almost a joke that somehow the press is going to be able to cover Davos better than somebody who can just watch the entire presentation, start to finish, one seminar after another, right?
One forum after another, and then give their take on it.
Really, the only other thing you can have with the press there is very rarely the ability to ask a question on the scene, but then you're just completely and totally pampered, right?
You're eating these wonderful meals, you're staying in this wonderful hotel.
Just so happens there's a lot of prostitutes around.
Gee, I wonder if any of the press partakes in that.
Maybe there's a gift here from a lobbyist or a dignitary or emissary of democracy.
Sounds like a conspiracy theory to me, Jason.
So basically, the forum that they want you to see is not only the European leaders on defending Europe at the World Economic Forum.
So all Russia bad, Putin bad, unprovoked.
And then Ukrainian first lady, Alina Zelenska, addresses the World Economic Forum.
And there's a horrible story about a helicopter crash and possible sabotage.
We're in a war right now.
We, me and you.
Now, globally, fifth-generation warfare has taken place.
And this is not a nation-state thing.
This is a global architecture of which the World Economic Forum is integral because it is the outward mouthpiece for this.
And it is the in-your-face, not only coordination of the plan, but the celebration of it as well.
The ultimate in the gaslighting.
That somehow all these people are legitimate.
Their ideas are legitimate.
And like we played you yesterday, they're here to save the world.
They're a select group of human beings that are almost like extraterrestrials, according to John Skull and Bones Carey.
Against somebody who absolutely 100% runs way more, way more of what's going on in the country and the world than our poopy pants puppet.
And that kind of segues me on where I want to start today.
And that is the gaslighting that somehow Joe Biden is running anything, anything at all.
I'm dead serious.
Is he run nothing from the inception of this guy's administration?
He's not even really good at making it look like he runs something.
Okay?
Let's be 100% honest with ourselves.
Let's look in the mirror.
And yet, we all have to believe, according to the authoritative sources and the powers that be, and the intel community that's been so honest with us and done so many good things over the years, that Joe Biden is the 81 million vote a man.
Got to believe it.
If you don't believe it, somehow, you know, you have a mental illness.
You have to believe that the Trump derangement syndrome was so heavy that it overcame Stadiums and military bases full of people that couldn't wait to hear that man speak.
Had to overcome the vast amount of red hats and MAGA gear and bumper stickers all across the country.
I mean, joke shirts, memes.
You had to believe it.
You had to believe, despite the fact that Joe Biden couldn't speak, okay, was already clearly having signs of dementia, clearly, that that was the guy.
Just like you had to believe that it was okay to get rid of Andrew Cuomo for some grab ass scandal, but nothing really happened in the nursing homes.
You just got to believe all these lies.
And now it does seem like they're getting rid of Joe Biden.
They've got their out, they've got their Watergate-style limited hangout, nothing burger, classified documents bullshit to get them out.
To move them out in an orderly fashion so they can reorganize and figure out how they're going to maneuver the chessboard with their puppets.
Okay.
But in a stark and vast reminder that Joe Biden does not know where he is most of the time and has no idea what's going on.
Here he is forgetting Coretta Scott King's name as he can't wait to sing happy birthday.
See, he's at that phase, that old uncle or grandpa phase.
Like if anybody's seen this, come from a big family, someone in your family as they age.
They have a go-to, right?
They have a go-to.
And Joe loves happy birthday.
Joe can remember happy birthday.
He can sing you happy birthday.
And when you see this, it's hard to watch.
It's sad.
I'm not happy this is going on.
But it shows you again that this guy wouldn't be fit to really hold a day job.
Not that he's ever held a day job outside of politics and being, you know, crooked.
He hasn't.
All right.
He's been an envoy of corruption really for decades.
It's remarkable.
And this is his last gig as the president of the United States, where he likes to sing happy birthday, but then he can't remember who he's singing it to or why he's even there.
That's the utter reality of where we are in a post-truth world.
You've been a good friend for a long time.
It's an honor to spend King Holiday with the National Action Network and with the King family, Martin and family.
And I understand, you know, Martin III, we celebrate a legacy of your beloved father and mother.
They work for the beloved community.
But congratulations today, the honorees, including your wife, who I understand is a birthday today.
Well, look, my wife has a rule in her family.
When somebody's birthday, you sing happy birthday.
You ready?
Happy birthday to you.
Look how excited he is.
He's like, it's my big moment.
I'm singing happy birthday.
Happy birthday to you.
Happy birthday, dear David.
Happy birthday to you.
He's like, I got the end right.
Yeah, man, I forgot the name, but that's all right.
Everybody, everybody forgives Uncle Joe.
I'm the president.
He beat Big Pharma, right?
He beat Big Pharma.
This is the guy.
He beat Big Pharma.
I mean, it's incredible what this man is allowed to say and do.
And especially, you know, you look at Martin Luther King Jr. Day.
Kamala's Echoes00:10:37
And we talked about this after we played the silence's betrayal speech.
And by the way, it was really great to see Tucker Carlson have a relative of Martin Luther King Jr. come on.
And I know that the big hubbub has been about the statue.
And personally, I don't love the statue, but I'm not going to go as far as to other people.
I understand why some people don't like it and are outraged.
And, you know, it's kind of like, in a lot of cases, you know, pseudo modern art garbage.
From certain angles, you know, you get it.
It's, you know, an embrace.
And I've seen the photograph of him.
I'm not here to talk about that.
But he got on there and he said the truth.
The U.S. government, I believe it was his grandfather.
I think he's a grandson of Martin Luther King Jr.
Killed him.
And they killed him.
And he was so spot on, man.
This guy was awesome.
In fact, I should play that clip.
Maybe if I can find it live, I'll bring it in.
But he said, you know, they were fine when he was talking about just the race issues.
But when he crossed the barrier to poor people, white and black, and speaking out against Vietnam, he goes, that was it.
That's when they decided he had to go.
That's when they killed him.
Correctamundo.
Correctamundu.
Because the last thing they want is somebody with that kind of pull.
All right.
And that kind of ability to organize and get people to do the most powerful of la resistance.
Okay.
And that is civil disobedience.
And that's why, you know, when January 6th happened, what I would have liked to see, if there was a concerted effort to have a sit-in on the outside of the Capitol, not break in, not break anything, but just say, we're not leaving until we get our redress of grievances and some kind of an audit or somebody to look at this evidence.
That would have been an ultimately positive thing.
But that was not allowed to emerge.
And really, a lot of those aspects were derailed by provocateurs, assets, etc.
They wanted their insurrection.
You can watch interviews I did with Whitney Webb.
And by the way, we're going to read Whitney Webb's Unlimited Hangout piece on Wuhan Lab really start to finish.
So, I mean, you look at this stuff and it's right there.
It's right there.
She breaks down so many things on this agenda that she's the top.
I mean, I don't think it gets better than Whitney Webb in most cases.
Period.
Period.
She's what most people should aspire to be when it gets to investigative journalism.
Johnny Vedmore, he's another one.
You know, both unlimited hangout, obviously.
Derek Brose, going deep all the time.
He's another one.
You know, without those people, we wouldn't really know what's going on in the bowels.
All right.
What's really, you know, the darkness out there.
So I want to commend all those independent researchers out there that are doing good things.
And without those guys, those independent people, I wouldn't be able to do what I do, right?
Because I need people to break through further than what I'm able to break through on.
What do I mean by that?
Whitney Webb, I mean, people know her Epstein work, and she's done a lot more work on top of that.
You know what I'm saying?
I mean, she's done a ton of it.
And when we look at the World Economic Forum, you know, Vedmore has done amazing things out of Klaus Schwab, showing you, showing you, really, how he's just a mouthpiece.
It's not like he just rose to power.
It's like, no, you know, the intelligence agencies, along with the Kissinger Institute and people like Galbraith and Herman Kahn, get in there.
And, you know, we got to live in this gaslit world where Joe Biden runs the country.
He's the most popular dude ever.
We have free and fair elections.
Russia's the ultimate enemy, right?
All that stuff.
No.
No, I live in the real world.
But to illustrate kind of the gaslighting, I did have a few stories here.
All right.
Outrageous top intelligence chief now admits significant parts of Hunter Biden's laptop had to be real.
No kidding.
Despite signing letter with 50 others dismissing it as Russian information.
And again, Russian disinformation, you know, all that stuff.
It's right there.
You knew it was bullsnap.
Of course, everybody knew that the videos were true that were leaking everywhere.
They throw it in your face.
And this is the Intel community that we're supposed to trust.
You know, the same one, again, that murdered Dr. King.
That murdered him.
And Tucker Carlson said, hey, well, I don't know who murdered Dr. King.
Getting back to that.
But then you look at the House Assassination Committee, right?
And Gates says, basically, this is going to be like a church committee.
And they said that MLK, JFK, and RFK, what?
We're the product of conspiracies.
So who else do you think took out JFK and RFK and MLK when you look at the evidence?
I mean, you know, the government is a broad thing.
And there are proxy networks within proxy networks, and the deep state is real.
But the bottom line is they don't want us coming together, okay, and saying it doesn't matter what religion you are, doesn't matter what political persuasion you are.
These people at the top are doing very, very bad things.
Bad things.
And they're lying to our face.
A guy like this, all right, like, can't wait to lie to your face.
Douglas Wise, a former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, told the Australian he did not regret signing on the October 2020 letter of 51 former intelligence officials doubting the authenticity of the laptop.
I mean, I knew that a lot of it was real.
I mean, all of us figured that a significant portion of the content had to be real, you know, just to make any Russian disinformation credible.
You see how that works?
See how that gasolining works?
Like, well, you know, Russia could have slipped something in there, and we would have never known.
So all those emails, we had to discredit them.
That whole pedo-Peter thing didn't want to report on it.
I mean, come on, man.
So, you know, again, they're laughing in your face.
Laughing, laughing, laughing.
Yes, I mean, happy birthday to who.
Just totally done.
Another clip.
He's calling Kamala Embarrass Cam Allah.
And it is ridiculous because every other minute, Kamala's name changes, right?
Every other minute.
And that's not an exaggeration.
Just changes to whatever they want, period.
I mean, do we have the video of that too?
Yeah.
Yeah, why not?
Why not?
Why not, right, Joe?
Carmel, thank you very much.
Feels like a war home game.
And the toughest ticket in town.
And this has been a tough ticket to get in town.
Nancy Pelosi, where are you, Nance?
Nancy, greatest speaker in our history, and this is their home court right here.
Folks, it's so wonderful to be here.
Paul, good to see you, Paul.
Where is everybody?
There's several other members of the California delegation here are also here along with several city and state leaders.
But as Kamala said, we're.
Kamala!
As Kamala said, I mean, it's Kamala, Kamala, Kamala.
I mean, who cares?
Social climber sleeping to the top, Kamala Embarrass.
That's who she is and what they are.
Okay.
And Biden smirks and laughs at reporters while again refusing to ask their questions on classified files.
As a shocking report reveals the Department of Justice made a deal to keep FBI agents away from the search.
No kidding.
Look, here's the deal: whenever you're running an operation like this, or you just have lower levels of local law enforcement or even within the agency and the institution poking their nose where it don't belong and seeing things that are really incriminating, you want to manage the situation.
Strength in Jobs Growth00:03:47
You need to manage the situation because, God forbid, it goes further than what you want it to.
Now, I mean, Biden, again, he just knows he's in trouble, not to talk about classified whatever.
I see this as a total op.
Now, that's not to say that Biden didn't have these documents well before he was the president of the United States, which he shouldn't have had them.
That's not to say that there couldn't be something in there of some significance, but this is clearly an operation to take him out, to ease him out, bring Ms. Embarrass up, and more than likely, I mean, they like that Newsom.
They like Newsom, VP, maybe.
Maybe I'm being crazy on that one.
I hear the Tuckens say make way for Michelle Obama.
I don't know.
We're in a post-truth world.
We're in a world where this administration has changed the term recession.
We're far past that.
And even the Davos crew is talking about high inflationary rates, et cetera, et cetera.
I mean, I'm going to play the ridiculous clip here, okay, of, again, just totally and completely gaslighting us on inflation.
Next week's a very big week for the economy.
So I read the CEEA blog.
Is the White House trying to change the common definition of a recession?
Because next Thursday, the GDP numbers coming out are going to show that we've been in recession.
So let me say this: you know, the strength of our labor market, along with the other economic factors, is what we generally see in a recession or even what we generally see in a recession or even a pre-recession because we're seeing the strength of the economy and the labor market.
So that's really important to note there because those are key elements as we talk about that, as folks keep asking us about that.
So Americans across the country are back to work at a historic level.
21 states, the most in history, have unemployment rates at or below 3%.
That is an important number to note.
14 states are now at their lowest unemployment rates since this series began in 1976.
And last month, the unemployment rate was a new low in eight states.
So again, the strength of our labor market, along with the economic indicators, is not what we generally see as we talk about recession or even pre-recession.
Look at the growth of the job for the three-month trend.
The growth of job growth in the U.S. is shrinking, it's decreasing.
And 7.5 million people, a growing number, are multi-jobs, meaning they have to work more than one job to afford a living.
So is jobs really a good indicator?
Look, here's what I would say.
We've always talked about the strength of our economy.
We've always talked about how historic it's been, and we've always talked about the transitioning, right?
The transitioning to more stable and steady growth.
And so to your point about the job growth there, this is what we have been kind of stating for the past several months.
Look, you know, the economy created 1.1 million jobs in the second quarter.
And so, and around 375 jobs per month.
Those are historic numbers.
Those are, if you think about the 1.1 million jobs, we are back to where we were at pre-pandemic level.
So that is what we see as strength of the economy.
Again, we're going to transition into a more stable and steady growth.
And so we're going to continue the work that the president has set out to do to make sure that we continue to deliver for the American people when it comes to the economy.
Strength of the Economy00:03:18
All right, folks.
So Joe doesn't run anything.
He doesn't have any ideas for the American economy.
The transition is real, but it's even, it's beyond just the wealth transfer of the COVID-19 e4 nightmare.
It is to transform, okay, your entire lifestyle into one of complete and total subservance.
All right?
Not just in a track, trace, database, internet of things, run society with a social credit score, but one in which they get under your skin in the internet of bodies as well and take it to the next level of not just the social credit score, which they will impose, but the extra level of your carbon allotment, the carbon credit system.
See, they'll put layers of it on there, you know, as part of your social credit score in the beginning, but ultimately, they will use your biology against you.
All right, as they move you to where?
The metaverse, the metaverse, the metaverse, okay?
And that's why, right now, I want to transition into some of the Davos stories.
I want to let everybody know, and remember, lots of prostitutes over in Davos.
Again, we're important.
We own people.
We buy things.
People are objects to us.
And look, I'm not going to get into the sex worker debate and the legalized prostitution debate, et cetera, et cetera.
But you have to understand.
Like when you have a certain wealth or you're, I mean, you look at the Hollywood culture, and people often talk about celebrities collecting people.
They collect the, oh, this is my guy for this, and this is my guy for that.
And it's not really about the relationship with the other human being.
It's what can I get from this person?
How can they help me?
How is this transactionally beneficial?
And in the case of prostitutes, there can be a lot of transactional benefits for the predator class and their minions.
Like I said, a lot of journalists there, the pay-to-play journalists, the establishment journalists, the great narrative journalists.
But maybe you want a certain point to really be hammered home or you want a series to be written up about a certain initiative or topic or agenda.
Boy, you know, getting prostitutes for that person might be a way to do that.
Might be the transactional thing to do.
Just pointing it out.
Davos And The High Horse00:15:03
So again, while they sit there on their high horse and constantly virtue signal and tell us how they're going to save the world, sure are a lot of prostitutes gathering there.
Davos organizers say Elon Musk was never invited to annual meeting of the global elite after the Tesla chief claimed he turned them down because it sounded boring as F. All right.
Musk took to Twitter on December 22nd to outline his reason for declining an invite to the forum, which sees business executives, global leaders, and cultural leaders descending on the Swiss Mountain Resort.
So, and look at the young hip Musk picture they got there with his fake hair plugs.
Listen, my hair's not the best right now, a little fluffy.
Oh, naturale.
A little gray on the sides.
I'm an old man, 43.
But there he is.
He's hip young Elon.
Yeah, hip buddy.
And he's fighting Davos.
I'm sorry.
Whether they invited him or not, the Klaus Nuchwab agenda and the Elon Muskernuts agenda are the same damn agenda.
The same damn agenda of sustainability, the same damn agenda of automation, the same damn agenda of human brain interfaces and transhumanism, the same damn agenda of AI, the same damn agenda of carbon as a economic mechanism, right?
And sustainability via your $15,000 Tesla pod box.
Okay?
Same damn agenda.
But he's the hero.
We never invited Elon.
They invited me.
We never invited Elon.
They invited me.
I mean, come on.
Give me a break here, guys.
We're grown-ups.
And because we're grown-ups, and there's not a whole lot out there.
Again, there's three things I've seen.
We got the rock show.
Yeah, we're rocking, telling you right now that you're bad.
And of course, you know, they got the diverse, like hip, African, kind of like folky/slash soul band telling you how bad you are.
And then the Klaus Nuchwab address.
Since I haven't watched this whole thing and I only watched like the first 20 minutes and it was just so heavy on Ukraine, Ukraine, democracy, democracy, democracy, I'm not going to bore you with a watch along.
But what is important, okay, and what does need to be highlighted is something that we read start to finish yesterday.
And instead of reading this start to finish, what I have is I have clipped up Shaping a Shared Future, Making the Metaverse, okay?
And that was one of two, one of two separate Davos forums on building this global collaboration village.
And I want to reiterate it.
The World Economic Forum has partnered with these people.
So when we talk about this stuff, it's openly fascistic, but it's a fascism with a smile for a better tomorrow, right?
Right?
That we are cordial.
I cordially invite you.
The positive outlook of the human spirit.
Meanwhile, this is a guy that's telling you we're on the multi-crisis.
It's an unprecedented time in history.
The transition is going to hurt.
We have to prepare for an angrier world, the human spirit.
And then he's trying to get you into a metaverse under global governance laws in not only like the ultimate track, trace, and database, but further, you know, taking you away from human interaction and taking the next step from this little bad boy.
Okay?
Not just scroll-y scroll-scroll on your Instagram-y and your Snapchattels.
It's not just Facebook shorts and stories or whatever the hell it is.
I don't even have Facebook on my phone.
You know, if anything is to be scrolled on my phone, it is the Twitter feed.
And I have a News 360 app I use quite a bit.
Okay.
I think, actually, that's one of the few apps that doesn't get a lot of play.
It's been around.
Geez, I've been using that for over a decade.
That's a pretty good app, at least for an aggregator of information.
Always liked, always enjoyed that app.
So, you know, I'm focusing on this because not only is he doing an op-ed, but they tell you from theory to practice, you know, metaverse governance, and that's global government.
I mean, they tell you it's global governance governance right here.
I know it's in little little thing, but that's it.
That's what it says: global governance, leadership, justice and law, justice and law, bum, bump, bump, values.
I mean, agile governance, and that's the setting the rules for the metaverse.
They love their global governance, working in the metaverse, right?
They want, again, they want you wired in, hooked in.
You know, COVID-19 has already made many people a lot more comfortable with the concept of virtual meetings and interaction with colleagues than they have ever been before.
People were doing virtual meetings on the regular long before COVID.
And it was mouthpieces from within this institution that economically devastated not only this country, but the world.
And then they're going to lecture us on the third world, which really got the brunt of it.
And they're going to lecture us, okay, on our carbon allotment and how we're bad.
No.
No.
So the first thing I want to do is I want to show the intro to the future of making the metaverse, shaping a shared future, making the metaverse, and its nice little lovely hip symbolism.
So let's get to it.
Let's start her up.
This is what they led with.
And I believe this was last year's Davos.
And those are all the great thought leaders and global leaders, right?
The guy for the Black IPs.
And that's also part of their hip agenda to make it younger, right?
The Davos Daily.
We've played those videos before, et cetera, et cetera.
And you've got to love it.
You're a star.
You're a star, and we're open to debate.
You can say what you want.
They don't want a real debate.
Again, garbage in, garbage out.
Who programs the AI?
Okay.
Who are the moderators?
Who are the sensors?
And that's one of the big problems with Facebook.
And that's one of the big problems with Instagram.
And that's one of the big problems still with Twitter, right, Mr. Musk?
You still got your FBI, your CIA, and your NSA former employees at high levels within that operation.
Weird.
Weird.
Oh, open minds.
Yes, they're so open.
Windmills, Bitcoin, NFTs, and pyramids.
We are open to all.
We're open to share, connect, exchange, debate.
Oh, yeah, they care so much.
And it's like, you got like the weird smile kind of thing on there.
It's an open forum for who?
For me?
Is it really?
It doesn't feel like it's an open forum.
So again, socializing, mobility, and collaboration.
Oh, the metaverse.
Yes.
You can do so much, but you can shop there too.
That's a big deal inside the metaverse.
The rise of a metaverse economy with completely new enterprises and work roles is emerging.
Got to love that nice huge eyeball.
I love big eyeballs, don't you?
Of course he's going to try...
They're trying to transform our lives.
You can see they're trying to transform our lives.
So this was a really interesting forum.
I've got a lot cut out and labeled.
I haven't done a watch of a lot of these in a while.
But let's talk about language and extremism and extremists, okay?
Because that's something that's brought up immediately.
Just like I said, garbage in, garbage out.
They're telling you they want narrative management and control.
Yes, Bastia Shiro.
I'm a member of Parliament from Switzerland.
Very quick question, also important for democracy.
What we see in social platforms is that extreme people tend to stick together and stay together all the time.
Now, if metaverse is super attractive, people spend the whole time.
And by the way, this guy right here who's asking this question, remember he said he was a member of parliament?
We played a clip of him yesterday.
This guy, and everybody's up in the masks last year.
This is the guy that was selling you on the 15-minute cities.
All right?
So now he's like, how can we protect from extremism?
How can we herd you into 15-minute cities?
How can we make it the easier choice that you don't want to use a car?
Metaverse, isn't there the risk that they don't meet real other opinions and this extreme divide, no, or extreme groups and the divide of the society is reinforced?
Or what can we do to avoid this?
The issue of polarization.
Who wants to take it?
I'll take it first.
I think there's two ways that we avoid that.
The first way is that our virtual spaces, like the real world, need to have in-between spaces where we can meet in between groups.
We cannot, it is very difficult to become extremists when you are in a room containing a number of people who have different viewpoints.
And so virtual worlds can bring people, lots of people together in one shared space.
And by doing that, they can reduce the risk of extremist behavior.
The second one, which we can argue on, is I think that some of the business models like advertisement, unfortunately, have at least cracks that are slipped through where we are amplifying these behaviors through suggesting essentially worse and worse forms of or pushing people farther and farther into polarization.
So no ads and letting people share a single space rather than just be in a small room.
So let's just stop that right there.
That guy is one of the creators of Second Life.
And he's actually one of the more reasonable guys on the panel.
Now, first of all, they're never going to take ads out of the picture other than if they can have access to your biology at this point.
And even then, they probably aren't going to take ads out of the picture.
That's one.
Two, the idea that extremism is amplified through algorithms via advertising is a misnomer and totally and completely false.
And I don't buy into it.
Now, have there been people in the past that have exploited news stories and created completely false ones and clickbait titles for videos and 100%.
100%.
You know, I hated some of these websites that were around, I would say, in the 2010s is really where they took off.
People were sending me all sorts of fake news, and it was really fake.
And I still see some of it today.
You know, some of them are like fake Mel Gibson quotes.
There's a fake quote that still circulates about Nicole Kidman talking to Stanley Kubrick, et cetera.
So much as, you know, everybody is killed by the Illuminati.
And they'll fit some, you know, a few real things in there and then just totally and completely make up a quote that doesn't exist.
And yeah, there were those people, but in large part, the real fear is that if you do have a meritocracy on information and you're not allowed narrative control, you notice how the question was framed and this guy kind of shot it down.
People often can be persuaded with reality.
They can switch their perception of what's going on and then in turn, what?
Change the conversation completely.
And they don't want that.
They don't want what that guy just talked about, period.
All right?
And the next thing we're going to play is a clip about carbon and masks.
Okay.
Just want to throw that out there.
That we could have a Davos, a World Economic Forum, that is completely in the metaverse.
And that if everybody's just sitting on their couch all day long, all the time, how that changes just the personal dynamics that people ultimately have.
Control Your Data00:14:58
There's going to be trade-offs.
I mean, I can imagine a lot more people being here that didn't need to burn a bunch of carbon flying planes and then expose ourselves without masks.
I would kind of prefer that experience in some ways.
That guy, I think that's Chris Cox.
That's the Facebook guy.
That's the guy who continually lied to everybody during multiple hearings on the Hill about censorship and Facebook, telling you how much he'd rather prefer that no one used carbon to fly here and expose themselves, right, via the mask.
The metaverse is the answer.
This guy is one of the worst.
Totally one of the worst.
You know, he laughs at you at one point.
First of all, he starts with a huge virtue signal because this took place, I believe, right after Uvalde.
In fact, let's bring up his little virtue signal.
This guy is a weasel.
He's the guy that wants to exploit anything on behalf of an agenda that will elevate him socially and elevate his power.
That's the type of guy Mr. Smirkles is here.
Only about 60 seconds, maybe 120 seconds, getting a sense from all of you about what the metaverse is.
And to the extent you can add how you think it's going to impact our society, I would love to do that.
And I'm going to start, if I could, with Chris Cox on this issue.
Chris.
Thanks, Andrew.
I wanted to start just with a message of support and condolences to the victims of the shooting in Texas, to their families, to the affected community, and to the people of Texas.
I know a lot of us are sending our hearts and condolences to them, so I wanted to start with that message.
Wear a mask, don't get on a plane unless you're me.
And guns are bad.
And this guy, I'm telling you right now, didn't give one flying rat's ass about what happened there, period.
He's a huge phony.
He's a huge phony.
All right.
And the next clip that I want people to understand is you're not going to own your own info.
That's it.
And, you know, most people are, in fact, ignorant to how much info they're giving up constantly.
You have to work it.
You know, you have to.
If you don't want this little bad boy to be a total and complete spy, you've got to put a lineage OS on there.
You've got to put a graphene OS on there.
Most people don't even know what that is.
And even then, is it really working all the time?
I don't know.
Is it impenetrable?
Probably not.
Anything that's hooked up into these systems, you're giving up a lot.
And people are largely ignorant to that.
So there is this thing.
When you go to university, you have this orientation class.
You get oriented into what is expected from your university and what you should do.
You get that at work.
You get that in life in general.
You don't get that when you use the internet.
So most people are ignorant to what the trade-off is.
And that's why we have these problems of, I did not know that I'm giving this much information and this is how it's going to be used against me to monetize.
There needs to be a way for us to orient people on what it means first to go to the digital world, not even the metaverse, what it means to use the internet.
And this should be something that is in basic education in every single school in the world.
Never happen.
Never happen.
I believe that's the UAE representative.
And it's just like the Second Life guy.
You know, he's offering a viable, not a solution, but at least a pathway to an educated populace that might take a step back.
And because they might take a step back, it's not part of the great narrative.
It won't happen, period.
Because you need to understand that, okay, you can manage your cookies.
You can remove certain things that you don't get targeted.
There are ways for you to actually pay and get that service if there is, if that becomes a business model.
And then it becomes the person's choice.
If the person says, I actually like it the way that it is right now, I go for it for free, and they can monetize everything from me, then it's a personal choice.
Today, people do not have the right for information.
They do not understand what is happening and how they're playing a role.
They don't have, in many countries, maybe in Europe they do, but and probably in the UA, the right of access to access their data and to understand what is being collected and the right to be forgotten these rights in that way.
This needs to happen today for the digital world first and then get implemented into the metaverse.
Only about 60 seconds, maybe 120 seconds, getting a sense from all of you about what the metaverse is.
Oh, sorry, that skipped back through to another one right there.
Sorry about that, guys.
But again, you aren't going to own your own info.
I can promise you that.
That's not a reality.
Is there a way to do it where the user owns their own data?
I mean, one of the sort of benefits of Web3, some of the blockchain things that we've talked about that may exist in terms of layering on top of this, there's this idea that maybe you could own your own data and even maybe sell it to maybe a meta or to other.
How do you see that?
Did you see like his little like, look at his face?
This guy's like the worst guy on the panel.
Not a fan of Chris Cox.
You ready?
Your own data and even maybe sell it to maybe a meta or I mean he can't help himself.
He's like, yeah, yeah, they're going to be able to sell it.
You're going to be able to own your.
No.
To other.
How do you see that?
So first, the user should control their data.
So at any sort of combination of events, the user should have the ability to delete, to understand, and to have controls over how their data is used.
The user should understand that having data aggregated means they can have a much more relevant service.
I mean, the exchange of you can have ads that are relevant to you or ones that are generally irrelevant to you is an exchange that comes along with basically agreeing to have data collected in a privacy-safe and aggregated way.
Bullshit.
Privacy-safe and aggregated way.
Bullshit.
What he's telling you is, essentially, and we'll do this live, brought this up with Clay Clark.
If you are a premium member or you listened to the broadcast, Alfonso ACR software.
Okay?
There it is: Alfonso ACR software.
Smart TV, Alfonso software, but it was for all sorts of apps.
Just all sorts of apps.
Hundreds of smartphone apps are monitoring users through Alfonso.
Like, they bragged about it.
And this has been going on for a long, long, long time.
This isn't new at all.
None of this is new.
Okay?
This company might be listening to everything you watch.
What the hell is Alfonso, and why is it eavesdropping on my child?
And it's crazy to me.
Like, I'm going to videos, and I really just love their own website.
I mean, I could play it again.
If you go to DuckDuckGo and you type in the same thing, Alfonso.
This should show everybody how banned I am on Google.
It's ridiculous.
ACR software.
Okay.
So there it is, Alfonso, and there's their home.
And if we go, we got safe search off, go to videos, no videos all of a sudden.
Really?
What if I take off software?
We're doing it live.
Here we go.
This is what I want.
Although I did one on myself.
This is still up.
Yes, they have their own.
Here we go.
This should be good.
How does it collect TV data?
What we do is we have almost servers sitting in our server rooms which effectively have pipes coming from.
Imagine Comcast or Dish Network pipes for all 200 plus channels and even local channels.
And we are listening to those signals and we take signatures of the content that's playing.
What's happening is we do video recognition, AI, machine learning, and OCR technology to recognize the text on the screen, what that content is about.
If we see a logo for a particular brand, we recognize all that to understand, all right, this is an ad for Mercedes, right?
When we see a logo of Mercedes at the beginning and at the end of the ad.
We recognize this is an offer, this is an ad for Mercedes, which is doing a promotion since we see a 2% APR offer at the end.
So that's what's happening on the server side.
So we do what we call video ACR to understand all the metadata about the pieces of content for shows as well as for commercials.
And we index that and we take a fingerprint and keep it in a server.
So it's all that's playing on live TV as well as historically all content of TV is indexed on our servers.
The next step, which is the more interesting one, which is where I think your question was going, is we now have our technology, our ECR technology installed on smart devices of consumer smart devices.
The consumer smart device is now taking a fingerprint or a signature of the piece of content that's being watched and it's sending that to our server where the match is happening.
And we now recognize, aha, the consumer just watched that Mercedes ad.
So that's how we are collecting data and we're doing that at scale and in real time.
Doing that in scale and at real time.
And it goes even farther beyond that.
Again, look up audio content recognition.
Okay, look up video content recognition.
They access this bad boy, they access the speakers, absolutely the microphones.
What we do is from all those various channels that you just gave the list, which is not just digital, TV, OTT content, we can now understand the reach that a brand had across all those channels, right?
So that the brand has a very holistic view of, all right, we cover these set of audience at this reach and what's the frequency that they were able to reach that audience across all those channels.
And then provide the performance side of it as well, which is how did it work, right?
And what worked.
Which combinations of channels worked?
Which combinations of channels did not work.
And individualizing that.
Man, I had even more than that come up when I was doing ACR and Alfonso.
I wonder if I type in Alfonso Burmese, my piece will come up.
Nope.
Nope, nope, nope.
Man, I got it last time.
But whatever.
You know, Alfonso Burmese.
Hey, how you doing?
We are going to be going to premium in about four minutes, guys.
We're going to continue with shaping a shared future, making the metaverse the Davos haves and have-nots, the dystopian terms that they are using, and so much more terrorist content.
You know, that's what they're talking about.
They also did in 2020 what the When Humans Become Cyborgs panel.
In fact, if this guy bothers you, which he should, when humans become cyborgs, that should bother you further.
I mean, this is the guy right here.
Yeah, Chris Cox.
Yuck.
But we all, and I'm here in Europe with all of you now, and we all just click on the accept, accept, accept the cookie.
And even though we now have more, we now have.
See, look, he goes, well, we don't all do that.
And that triggers his laughter.
He knows you're being spied on.
He knows you're clicking yes to everything.
But more control.
Look at him giggle.
We don't all do.
You should own your data.
You should know when your data is being used.
There should be an aggregated privacy environment.
Well, we don't all click on that.
But we all, and I'm here in Europe with all of you now, and we all just click on the accept, accept, accept the cookie.
And even though we now have more, we now have more control.
We ostensibly have more control, but in some ways we have less control because it's very complicated.
It's too complicated to actually control.
On purpose.
On purpose.
It's too complicated.
On purpose.
So when we go to the other side, actually, why wait to go to the other side?
We're going to start the When Humans Become Cyborg session.
You know, I always wanted to be a cyborg.
I'm waiting for the day to become one, but let's see.
Like, today, we like.
She can't wait.
Metaverse, cyborgs, transhumanism, central bank, digital currencies, blockchain technology, and more.
Okay, folks, I am just so happy that you guys have come out here and you have supported me.
Redvoicemedia.com.
Redvoicemedia.com slash Jason slash uncensored.
When Humans Become Cyborg00:00:57
That's how you can continue to support me.
Now, if you don't want to pay, that's fine.
Guys, please go over to the podbean, look for the info warrior.
You can listen to the rest of the broadcast for free.
Today we'll also release a second hour from two weeks ago.
We've got exclusives over on Rockfin as well.
So Rockfin viewers, you're getting the making sense of the madness stuff where nobody else, I'm not posting that anywhere else.
I think there's some really great interviews.
Sasha Latipova, great stuff.
So this is where I'm going to signal to the producer as we leave these platforms one at a time.
We're going to come back on the other side with Mordavos and DARPA's man in Wuhan.