All Episodes
Jan. 17, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
01:00:28
Davos 2023 A Dangerous Agenda

Watch the UNCENSORED second hour live on RVM Premium Mon-Thur at 9AM EST: https://redvoicemedia.com/uncensoredShow more Not RVM Premium yet? Try it for $1: https://redvoicemedia.com/jason Listen Live and Call In at: https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/ Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermas Watch My Documentaries: https://www.redvoicemedia.com/category/bermas-docs Subscribe on Rokfin https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas Subscribe on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/c-1647952 Subscribe on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior Follow me on Twitter https://twitter.com/JasonBermas PayPal: [email protected] #BermasBrigade Show less

|

Time Text
Machinery That Gives Abundance 00:04:35
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery.
We need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat.
As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy.
Gotta say, I'm a human being.
God damn it.
My life has been.
You have meddled with the primal forces of nature.
Don't give yourselves to brutes.
Men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men.
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
Thank you.
Ha ha.
It's showtime.
And now, reality meets with Jason Burmes.
And who loves you?
And who do you love?
Good morning, everybody.
I am Jason Burmes.
This is Reality Rants brought to you by Red Voice Media.
And let me tell you something right now.
We got a big old show for you.
I've got an interview with my good friend over at rcreader.com, River Cities Reader here locally in the quad cities.
I just got a tip article on top of that via Whitney Webb.
Basically, Whitney Webb was part of a great roundtable discussion with Derek Brose, with James Corbett, with Ryan Christian.
Heavy, heavy hitters.
And we're going to be going over DARPA's Man in Wuhan.
Actually, sent it to me two minutes before the broadcast.
And we already had a pretty big broadcast over there.
And, oh, that's so awesome of her.
She's going to send me a review copy of the books.
I love that.
That's amazing.
Those books are heavy hitters.
I've got to, first of all, I've been covering the Epstein thing well over a decade.
Whitney Webb's articles took the world by storm when they were all the way back in the mint press days.
And I certainly wasn't the first one to read that first article that started to go super mega viral.
I think I read it within the first few days of it going super mega viral because so many people were like, you need to read this.
And not only did I read it, but I was so impressed with the historical nature of kind of build, not just coming at you with Epstein,
but building a context where you understand this isn't a new thing that blackmail is utilized to influence and control people, situations, and resources.
Period.
And Webb did such a good job on Glenn Beck.
I was so impressed with that as well.
Really top tier when it comes to journalism, in my opinion.
Great writer, really head-on straight.
Unlimited hangout, great website.
We've had Johnny Vedmore on the program many times.
In fact, when we talk about Klaus Nutschwab and the gang, Vedmore has done some of the seminal work, kind of showing you once again the background, the infrastructure, how Nutschwab himself was kind of recruited as a high-level bureaucrat frat boy.
The Tractrace Database Society 00:05:07
And what do I mean by frat boy?
Well, instead of the idea of everybody getting together at an alumni weekend and drinking some beer and playing some softball and barbecuing some chicken, what I do with my fraternity, right?
A couple formal dances for the guys that are actually still in the fraternity, right?
That type of thing.
Instead of that, when I say frat boy, we want you to recruit high-level businessmen, banksters, and heads of state, and bring them into this non-government organization.
We're going to meet at least once a year.
It'll be some special things.
And then we're going to have forums on how we're going to run the world and steer society socially, literally, social engineering in front of everybody.
In front of everybody.
And really, we're not coming up with these ideas.
Others in think tanks and roundtable groups behind the scenes will come up with these ideas.
And then we will then become the mouthpieces and then the vehicles for these ideas to come into fruition.
And the overarching idea that we are constantly going to run on is that there are too many people on the planet doing too many things, and we are harming Mother Nature.
Therefore, the people here at Davos and those working with us need to take charge of all of society and promote an agenda of quote-unquote sustainability.
Let me repeat that for you.
Sustainability, which really means, and we'll play the clip later.
We've played it a hundred times.
I'll play it a hundred more.
Your standard of living absolutely plummeting.
Your standard of living absolutely plummeting.
Goodbye.
Gonzo, as the Asian standard of living comes up.
And it's already really come up to the peak of where they'd like it.
They have a social credit score in place.
They have a Tractrace database society.
They have a largely obedient populace.
They'd like them a little more obedient now.
You could always have that, right?
But again, when you look at Asian culture in particular and that culture, they are very lockstep with the message from the party.
Okay.
And the party has started at Davos.
And you want to know how we know it started?
Let me explain to you how we know it started.
Okay.
And we've got a ton of news that we might hit, we might not.
We'll see where we go with this, guys.
We do it live.
Prostitutes gather in Davos for annual meeting of global elite, where demand for sexual service rockets during economic summit.
So let's just pull it back for a second.
Constantly, the promotion by the Davos crowd, the UN crowd, the World Health Organization crowd is one of diversity and equity and empowerment.
And then you see how they really treat people, how they really treat people.
Let me tell you how they really treat people.
They own your ass.
Okay, they own you are a thing at best.
And so these people who have millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, some of them billions of dollars, they don't look at other people the same way.
What they want, they expect to get.
And laws don't apply to them, okay?
And the rules and regulations and 15-minute cities and an ability for you to be able to pay your bills won't apply to them either.
When they tell you an equalization of the haves and the have-nots, they mean third-world peasants and first-world peasants all coming together.
Doesn't matter if you were the upper-middle class, you don't have an upper-middle class.
And there really is no third world because everybody's under a biometric slave system.
That's not only a social credit score based on the Internet of Things, which is the track trace database society that's already been built.
Laws Don't Apply 00:02:22
It's already here.
It's already in our face.
Okay.
But also the Internet of Bodies under the skin technology.
That's what we're really talking about.
And you know what?
They will buy who they want to buy.
They will traffic who they want to traffic because they are above you.
You know, I've seen some things going around supposedly that someone's going to release the Epstein client list.
And I've gotten some, you know, I've gotten some videos behind the scenes.
All I've seen is stuff that I've already seen.
You know, it rehashed.
Parts of court cases, people on the flight logs, people who were in Epstein's black book that we already knew about, etc.
It is hilarious to me.
And a good thing that, for instance, and this made some news, but not nearly enough news.
Bill Gates tried to do, I think it was a Reddit AMA.
Let's do it live here.
I didn't have this one pulled up.
But Gates tries to do a Reddit AMA, and he gets hammered, hammered with Epstein questions.
Good.
Good.
So let's look that up.
Epstein Gates AMA.
This was last week.
And this is what I mean, man.
No one, you know, the fixes in for a guy like Gates are when the New York Post is the number one thing.
That's it.
And then there's, let's see, news18.com under buzz, Reddit.
And then we have to go to TorontoSun.com.
All right?
TorontoSun.com.
After you get to that, none of these are even relevant to the AMA aspect.
Okay?
None of them are even relevant to it.
And that's why, again, when we talk about AI, we talk about technology.
It's garbage in, it's garbage out.
Who controls the AI?
Who's writing the code?
What are and aren't the variables?
Technology's Garbage In, Garbage Out 00:15:41
Because that a mecha speech on channel four in Europe, that's a script.
That's not artificial intelligence.
All right?
That's degenerative, destructive instruction.
That's what that is.
Might have to play that clip as well.
So, again, you know, Davos is kicking off when a bunch of prostitutes are there.
Okay.
And before I play Klaus Nutschwab's initial speech, and this is also another thing out there, guys.
Be careful what you talk about, aka.
You know, what you put out there is fact, or you start sharing immediately on social media.
I know there was a big thing out there that Klaus Schwab was sick.
He's not going to make Davos 2023.
You know, read past the headlines, see what the source is.
Klaus Nutschwab is there, and he has taken it to a next level, cordial, positive plan.
We have to remain positive.
After all, he told you about the angrier world.
And the angrier world for them means, you know, a 5,000-person police and security force protecting them.
Now, angrier towards them, don't worry.
We can afford the people with the guns we don't want you to have, or already in some cases, don't allow you to have.
They have the guns.
You don't have the guns.
They have the private planes.
You don't have the private planes.
They have a freedom of medical choice.
You don't have a freedom of medical choice.
That's really this agenda.
All right.
Because they're looking not only for command and control over your life, okay, but over the life of the entire planet.
And eventually, what they'd like to do is go even beyond transhumanism, which is a topic I talk about all the time.
And according to a piece posted by the Nuts Schwab himself, the Nutschwab, we'll read the whole thing because it's very short.
It's very to the point.
A vision for a global collaboration village.
And this is by our man Klaus right here, the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum.
And you guessed it by the rather crappy, dreamcast-looking avatars, you know, from the PlayStation 2 generation.
And that's just a suck you in.
Trust me, guys.
It's going to get a lot more realistic.
And they already have it a lot more realistic, just not commercially yet.
That they're pushing the metaverse agenda.
So this is an op-ed by the Nutschwab.
I constantly have gone to the fact that this is on their initiatives section, that they're defining and building a metaverse with what?
Governance.
All right.
Societal and economic value.
When you look at the map here and setting the rules, they want global governance, global governance, global governance.
It's always about globalism.
It's always about the collective.
It's always under the veil of them trying to what?
Empower humanity.
So this is Forbes, and this is from the Nutschwab himself.
Oh, I can't, you know, I thought about reading it in a bad German.
But I cannot read like this for the entire thing.
It will not be good.
Many heralded the advent of the internet and the spread of information communication technologies as the enablers of a global village that would unite people across borders, support the exchange of ideas, and revolutionize progress.
Until now, that promise has yet to be fully realized.
Let's stop.
Oh no.
It was on the verge of being fully realized during that post-9-11 era when the algorithms would allow things like loosechange and infowars.com and we are change to go viral.
Okay.
It was a place where social media did bring people together.
All right.
And don't get me wrong, there were problems and there were bots and there was misinformation, disinformation largely spread by, what, government insiders and those that wanted to spoil the pops.
Crazy people exist too, folks, but let's be honest.
But then the censorship.
It was an excuse for censorship.
So now, unfortunately, that promise can never be realized with the current models because we don't have freedom of speech, the most basic of rights on the internet.
And that's not a liberal or conservative or a right or left issue.
It's a straight-up human issue.
Without free speech, you cannot have at least an attempt at truth.
And lies don't make friends.
And the more deception and lies that you are surrounded by, okay, the more negativity you are surrounded by, and the more fear you are surrounded by.
And that is by design, in my opinion, to enact this immobilization of the spirit, the soul of humanity, to try to say to you that you are not special.
You are not powerful.
You are part of a cog in a machine.
You are part of a collective.
And you will do what you are asked of.
Period.
Command and control.
Anti-human.
Almost machine-like, if you will.
And again, that's what they're doing with transhumanism.
On one end, they want to run experiments so they can live forever biologically.
On the other end, they want you merging with machines and your standard of living plummeting so much that you accept this new metaverse.
And you not only accept the new metaverse, you embrace the new metaverse.
With the internet and the later video conferencing, it has brought us together in virtual spaces.
Human connection has been missing.
Instead of generating trust, the foundation for any partnership, the internet has had the deterious effect of increasing polarization.
In recent years, the division has accelerated as misinformation too often has run unchecked.
Again, they're telling you, we want to censor you.
We want to censor you.
They're the ones that sold you on the idea not to be around other human beings.
They caused the actual isolation.
Okay?
And they've run the psychological warfare operations where you're sitting there scrolling and taking 27 selfies a day, you know, and doing a dance routine for no good reason.
Come on.
Come on.
We are now at the beginning of a transformative technological development that could address the divide.
The metaverse.
Metaverse technologies allow us to be immersed in virtual, three-dimensional worlds that offer people the opportunity to see, understand, and imagine our world in a new way.
This may sound like science fiction to some, but certainly not to the more than 3 billion people globally who play video games regularly.
The new form of technology enabled human interactions, enabled human interactions, is on track to become ubiquitous in our personal and professional lives.
Again, they don't want to give you a choice.
And so many of these NGOs that are involved in the World Economic Forum, involved in the United Nations, involved even in the World Health Organization.
What?
They're also involved heavily in the education system.
Period.
And not only are the young people being trained to use it as entertainment, but the very young will be trained to use it via education.
By the way, 200 plus over at YouTube.
Let's get the thumbs up.
Rumblers, let's get the thumbs up.
Let's get King Nutschwab's message out to the people.
He's telling you.
He's telling you.
This new form of technology-enabled human interaction is on track to become ubiquitous in our personal and professional lives.
Billions of dollars are being invested into developing the metaverse, which is projected to become an $800 billion market by 2024.
So within the next, what, 12 months?
Business executives, government officials, and civil society leaders.
Oh, civil society leaders.
These are like the thought leaders they constantly tell you about.
Let me tell you what a civil society leader actually means.
Civil society leaders are people that want to restrict certain speech and activities in the metaverse so that what?
It's not truly free.
And they'll say that it's safer.
In fact, that's in the next sentence.
You know, it's going to be equitable and safe.
And when they talk about civil societies, Klaus Nutschwab has let the cat out of the bag.
China is the model.
That's the model for this.
Okay, so they have to come together to define and build an economically viable, interoperable, safe, equitable, and inclusive metaverse.
Everything's inclusive.
Everything's equitable.
And everything's about what?
Economics.
Like the economics of a bunch of these people at Davos buying prostitutes.
Right?
Trafficking in humans as things.
Without a second thought.
But they're the civil society leaders.
They're the chosen group of people, right?
They're the high-value individuals.
The inside story.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Is that it?
No, it can't be it.
Is that it?
Yeah, I guess that's it.
Oh, no.
I was going to say, I'm sorry, the Papa Jones.
I was going to say, I thought there was a little bit more.
I didn't think it was that long, but geez.
God, I'm losing.
It's a little early.
It's a little early here, guys.
As always, there will be first movers, bystanders, and those who are slower to adapt to change.
And we see with every breakthrough, as we see with every breakthrough technology, there will be leaps forward and setbacks along the way.
To create mass adoption, the metaverse must show that it is not just a replacement for what we already do, but that it enables us to do things in a new and more effective way.
Now, again, huge push at the last Davos.
Two separate metaverse forums.
We've played pieces on this program because what?
It's important.
It's relevant.
It's what we need to be talking about.
A new global village.
Okay, the capabilities of the metaverse create the conditions to make extraordinary progress in global interactions and collaboration.
That's why we established the Global Collaboration Village, the first global purpose-driven metaverse platform created to enhance more sustained public-private cooperation and spur action to drive impact at scale.
This global village will not replace the need to meet face-to-face, but will instead supplement and extend our ability to connect regardless of where we are physically located around the world.
Always got to throw in the sustainability language.
This is more of that Bernesian language, Bernesian talking points, public-private cooperation.
That's fascism.
Okay?
Public isn't you and I working with the big corporations, it's the state.
All right?
And once again, they're like, don't worry, you will be able to see other people.
Don't worry.
But they're pushing Zoom meetings.
They're pushing telework.
They're pushing you into masks and gloves and 15-minute cities.
They want you to be so detached from your biology, your human spirit, what makes you part of the true collective of humanity.
All right?
And push you into a false digital realm in which you are promised limitless happiness and limitless opportunities, right?
And limitless visions, just like a video game.
But I want you to think about something, okay?
Don't get me wrong, there's some fun games out there.
In fact, especially with the morning show and sometimes talking now two to four hours a day, guys, which is a lot.
Okay, I used to do the smaller videos, but talking two to four hours a day, being a high consumer of news.
So when I am watching television, CBC, I'm over at Canada.
I'll check out the BBC.
I'll check out, obviously, Fox and MSNBC and CNN, et cetera, et cetera.
Global CNN.
But I can only do that for so long.
So I'll pick up a video game.
I just beat High on Life, and that was kind of original.
But at the same time, other than the humor and the jokes, et cetera, it's really a lot like Metroid.
So just like, you know, I discussed this kind of with John Fitch again and again.
We regurgitate things.
Although they're going to promise you all these new experiences and new worlds in the metaverse, we know how things get regurgitated again and again and again.
And they become disappointing and they become run of the mill.
I don't know that this technology is going to be anything different.
And I think you have to have a balance in life, right?
I don't think that everybody who plays video games should probably be playing video games.
Like if you don't have a job, or if you're on there 8, 10, 14 hours a day and you're not playing competitively and making money from this thing or you're a streamer or whatever, what are you doing with your life?
You can overdo anything, anything, everything in moderation.
But we have to look at the aspect, again, of the over-promising of all this stuff.
And they always over-promise.
And really, the goal is not to empower you through the technology, unfortunately.
Approaching the Future Cordially 00:09:23
It's to empower themselves as they enslave the masses into this idea of, well, you don't really need to meet up with all these people all the time because you've got the metaverse.
You don't really need to hug grandma or grandpa in real life.
You got the metaverse.
In fact, you don't need a grandma and grandpa because you have the metaverse and you can now identify as a cyan-colored squirrel with a rainbow mohawk in the metaverse.
Why not?
The immersive nature of the global collaboration village has the potential to create a powerful and efficient means to drive global progress.
Inclusive and responsible by design, it will be a creative place to imagine alternative futures, explore ideas and systems transparently and safely, and envision what the future of engaging stakeholder collaboration could be.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, I'm sorry, multi-stakeholder collaboration.
It is a mistake, mistakeholder.
It might as well be, because this idea of stakeholder capitalism is bullshit.
It's enslavement, stakeholder capitalism.
Oh, yeah, you're going to be a stakeholder.
No, that's your social credit score.
That's your carbon credit system.
That's what that is.
For example, people will be able to dive in to an interactive ocean experience that reveals the importance of safeguarding our ocean and challenge us to picture the positive impact we could have through collective action.
Well, like stopping the military testing that's going on in large swaths of the ocean and the actual pollution from corporations that has nothing to do with carbon.
Are we going to take collective action on that?
No.
No.
Who controls what gets programmed into the metaverse?
And they see it's not reality, it's virtual reality.
So talk about subversion of what's really going on underwater.
There's no way to check it.
Right?
There's no way to check it.
They can insert or delete anything they want from their virtual reality.
Again, who programs the AI?
Oh, boy, oh, boy.
Instead of telling us how important mangroves are for coastal ecosystems, it invites us to witness and experience the power of restoration and conservation for ourselves, all while engaging with global experts and innovators who are on the physical front line of this work.
The annual 2023 meeting will be an important milestone as we launch our prototype of the Global Collaboration Village in partnership with Accenture and Microsoft.
I guess that's going to be the one we're going to have to do a watch along with, right?
This has got to be it, the Global Collaboration Village, guys, and supported by a consortium of leading global corporations, governments, international organizations, academic institutions, and NGOs.
As technology continues to evolve, we must come together to shape and grow this global village and realize the dream of instantaneous, inclusive, and impactful cooperation.
So with that being said, let's let the nutschwab speak for himself from Davos.
This is his intro speech yesterday.
Good evening.
And a very cordial welcome to the annual meeting 2023.
I express this cordial welcome on behalf of the Board of Trustees and my colleague Berge Brenda, the president, and all the members of the management board, as well as all the people who are here to make your stay here enjoyable and productive.
We couldn't meet at a more challenging time.
We are confronted with so many crises simultaneously.
What does it need to master the future?
I think to have a platform where all stakeholders of global society are engaged.
Governments, business, civil societies, the young generation, and I could go on, I think is a first step to meet all the challenges.
But what is even more important is that we approach the future with a positive spirit, with a spirit which reflects human creativity and ingenuity.
And for this reason, it's very appropriate to begin this annual meeting with the participation of great artists featuring culture and the arts.
We have to uplift our hearts.
We have to restore a notion despite all the headwinds of optimism.
And we have to integrate into everything which we are doing our hearts.
Only if we are involved with all our passion to construct and to shape the future, I'm convinced we will overcome the present multi-crisis.
So, again, a very cordial welcome, and I...
Everything is cordial.
We have to uplift spirits.
He said cordial how many times?
How many times?
Talked about the culture and artwork.
These are the social engineers.
You know, he damn well knows there's been a huge awakening and backlash to this agenda.
No one wants this great reset monstrosity.
It's not something when you tell somebody, you know, don't worry, you're going to own nothing, but you're going to be happy about it.
Most people are like, no.
No, no, that sounds like a lot of hogwash and a lot of Johnny nonsense.
That doesn't seem real.
That doesn't seem like that's possible.
Why do I trust the guy in the German accent?
Why do I trust billionaires?
Why do I trust people telling me they want me to be in a 15-minute space?
No, thank you.
So what I'm going to do here is we've got about 25 minutes left in the free portion of the show.
I want to remind people that the paid portion is over at redvoicemedia.com slash Jason or slash uncensored.
It is $10 a month or $10, or I'm sorry, just $1 for your first week.
$100 for the year.
Lock it in.
Support the broadcast.
You like what I do.
You came over from InfoWars maybe yesterday.
You want to see a little bit more.
It's the tip of the iceberg.
Okay?
And when they talk about sustainability and they talk about productivity improvement, it means your standard of living plummeting.
It means Malthus 101.
It means automation coming in.
And it means their fourth industrial revolution and great reset realized.
This idea of the multi-crisis they constantly talk about.
But what I want to do is I want to play at least about 20 plus minutes of this interview I just did with Todd McGreevy of the River City Reader.
We talked about a multitude of things.
I'm going to be stopping it before we end the first hour to bring you over to the premium portion of the broadcast.
I do want to remind you, you can listen for free always live over at the infowarrior.podbean.com.
And then every single day, just like this one, we release the premium from two weeks ago.
So if there was an interview or a topic or a video that you did want to see that you knew I was going over, go to redvoicemedia.com and check that out as well.
Without further ado, let us get to my interview here with Todd McGreevy.
Hey, everybody, Jason Burmes here.
And for the next hour or so, we've got the man, the myth, the legend behind the River Cities Reader, rcreader.com.
If you want a consistently honest and insightful news source, I encourage you to go there today.
We have a number of topics, including voter roles being suppressed by the establishment, trying to make it harder for you and I to do an honest audit of anything when it comes to our elections.
Sheriffs and Precinct Strategy 00:15:47
We're going to be talking a lot about the Second Amendment and some sheriffs who have really come to the aid of their populace via that scary thing, the Constitution.
That and so much more with my good friend, Todd McGreevy.
Todd, how are you?
I'm well, Jason.
Very well.
Thanks for having me on to the Red Voice Media and the Burmese Brigade.
Well, Todd, let's start with the Second Amendment because I was in a thread recently where somebody sent me just something from the local sheriff because now you have, I believe it's the Rock Island sheriff saying, no, there's a thing called the Second Amendment, Pritzker and Company, and the people have it.
And for those that don't understand, Illinois has ever more restrictive laws regarding guns.
Now, I would say even past something like New York, where it's almost impossible to get certain types of handguns.
And the people there are concerned because, as you know, we're in the quad cities.
The Mississippi River divides Iowa and Illinois at many, many important points, ours being one of them.
That's why it's the quad cities.
It actually encompasses both ends.
And the culture here is very Second Amendment friendly.
Yes, it is.
It is.
Well, we happen to have the Arsenal Island right here between the two state borders, which is in munitions and weapons manufacturing for over 100 years.
So there's lots of industry in this region that make firearms.
And what we're referring to is HB 5471.
That's the law that was recently passed and signed by Pritzker in Illinois.
And it doesn't go into effect until January of next year.
And there's some kind of stair-step tiers that it goes up to to ramp up to it.
But the biggest picture that there's pushback from local county sheriffs outside of Cook County, there's Sheriff John F. Booker's letterhead.
He issued a news release on Wednesday, or maybe it was Thursday coming past week, saying he was not going to uphold this law, that it was unconstitutional.
And this law includes, among other things, that you have to, if you have a so-called assault weapon, which I haven't drilled down on what all that means, I'm told by many people know more than I do about this, that it means a lot of weapons, many of which everybody has.
If you have one of those, you must register, must pay a fee and register it with the state police.
And if the, you know, if you're the state police going to do come door to door, I mean, they're already taxed as it is.
Most people don't understand that law enforcement nationwide, I was told this by a county sheriff who would know this, that nationwide, forget the defund the police challenge that's going on out there.
Just look at demographics, he says.
In the next five years, because more people are not coming up in the ranks and young people aren't signing up to become law enforcement, and you have the baby boomer, you know, tsunami of people getting old and aging out and retiring and all the nonsense going on on top of it.
He says we are going to have just a dearth of law enforcement anyway.
So add that to the mix.
So let's add this extra onerous law-abiding citizens who've already lawfully purchased your weapon, gone through the motions, got your FOIA card in Illinois.
You now need to go another step and register it with the state government.
That's going over real well.
So well that sheriffs have stood up and said, no, we're not going to do that, Governor Pritzker.
Sorry.
And like you said, it's more than just John F. Booker.
You have a lot of people obviously concerned about this because there isn't quite a, like you said, solid definition of the term assault weapon, right?
And it's amorphous, I think.
I quit trying to figure it out years ago.
Like, I'm going to quit chasing this tail to figure out what they mean this time, you know?
And at the same time, you have this SAFE Act that is supposedly now under effect.
For those that are unaware of the SAFE Act, there were literally other members of law enforcement at high levels saying, look, this is dangerous.
This is telling us that we no longer have the legal authority to remove somebody who's on your property, clearly trespassing at the time or doing whatever.
I guess there's a limit to what they can do, but on trespass alone, we can't really do anything about it.
And then it's up to you.
And God forbid, Todd, all of a sudden, one of these unregistered assault weapons happens to be utilized in your own home or your own business.
Suddenly, that homeowner, that free sovereign individual, is the criminal, Todd.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
If you haven't got it registered and you use it to defend yourself, maybe you're going to be in trouble.
It's really just heavy posturing.
And I think it's just pushing to see how far people can get.
I think we need to give Sheriff Booker credit where credit's due.
He's in Whiteside County, which isn't technically part of the Quad Cities metro area.
It's just an adjacent county to Rock Island County and Henry County and the Quad Cities.
Sheriff John F. Booker.
And I'm going to read you his from his, and we have his news release at our website, but he says, therefore, as the custodian of the jail and chief law enforcement official for Whiteside County, that neither myself nor my office will be checking to ensure that lawful gun owners register their weapons with the state, nor will we be arresting or housing law-abiding individuals that have been arrested solely with non-compliance of this act.
And this gets into the weeds of where I've claimed for many years, since 2013, since I first went to the first Constitutional Sheriff and Peace Office Association convention in Las Vegas.
And I've learned a ton since then about the power of the sheriff to protect our Bill of Rights.
The sheriff typically is also the one who runs the jail.
So if you're a state trooper and you want to arrest somebody or even a city cop and you want to arrest somebody, if the sheriff says, hey, I don't think the arrest you made is lawful, I'm not housing him or her.
That's another way sheriffs can nullify things.
So there's lots of ways a sheriff can make an overzealous executive branch frustrated.
And we're excited to see that other sheriffs picked up the bid.
I sent Rock Island County Sheriff Darren Hart, who recently won election last fall.
He's the first term sheriff in Rock Island County.
Sheriff Booker's news release that morning, Thursday morning, and asked him where he stood on it and if he would include us in his response.
I did not get a response from him, but at another website I managed qcatoday.com.
If you go there, you'll see I think that's the headline that the Quad City Times featured Darren Hart stating he was joining the ranks of other sheriffs like Knox County and Whiteside County that was against this law.
He doesn't go to my knowledge.
I haven't seen his specific statement of what he will and won't do, but he's leaning into not abiding by it.
Yeah, he opposes the law.
Well, okay, yeah, that's one thing to oppose it, but does it mean you're going to uphold it?
That's a different question.
So hopefully we'll get some more clarity on that coming up.
Well, we need clarity on it because right now, the economy, in my opinion, is at an unprecedented point where more and more people are making less and less money, are working less and less on top of that.
And we don't have an 8% inflation rate.
Obviously, the big talking point right now is eggs.
And because we've been conditioned, we're not looking at petroleum as much because they got it to that almost $5 tipping point, sometimes going over in certain areas.
And they brought it back from the precipice.
You see, for instance, Joe Biden even tweeting out: look at this, more families have more money via gas.
But our electric bills are higher.
Some places in this country, if you're talking about California, a New York, and others, it's almost to those European levels where you're seeing three to five times the bill of just last year.
You know, I very much think that we're now at a point where they don't have to admit to crime going up, which it clearly has, especially in urban areas and big cities, New York, Chicago amongst them.
The crime levels are out of control.
I think we're headed to those crime levels continuing to increase, and they want to disarm you.
They don't want people who all of a sudden are now feeling the burn and maybe aren't as beholden to the societal values or mores that we've all been accustomed to in our social contract with each other.
Because, Todd, they have to eat.
It could get that bad.
And this agenda of gun control has been prevalent for decades.
I mean, it's always been on the agenda.
It's been part of Agenda 21.
It's part of all kinds of any tyrannical agenda doesn't want people to have self-defense.
You do wonder.
I mean, he knew this was going to fall.
Pritzker, for those that don't live in Illinois, I mean, Cook County is where Chicago is, and that's where the cesspool of crime is, effectively, in the state.
And beyond Springfield, the white-collar crimes in Springfield, the blue-collar crimes in Chicago.
I used to live in Springfield, so I can speak to this.
And it's called downstators.
You know, people that are outside of Cook County, everybody outside of Cook County is effectively a downstater.
And it's like, no, what?
Try to talk to people on the border of Kentucky and Southern Illinois about this.
I mean, I don't think they need to report on it, that the sheriff's standing up.
That's how commonplace it would be down there to go, no way.
So you got to wonder what the true agenda is.
Is it just a gin up?
Hey, the Republicans need to raise more money.
Let's pass a shitty bill so the Republicans can start fundraising.
I seriously think that happens.
I think it happens as well.
I mean, that's how a lot of these things are, you know, greasing the wheels behind the scenes.
And, you know, you get all this rhetoric.
And what I like right now is, first of all, you're not afraid to talk about the Republican establishment and the Democratic establishment and how they work with one another.
And right now, you're focusing on this voter registration commission.
Tell us about that.
Well, this came to my attention from Kathleen, and it's a South Dakota event that happened yesterday.
The state central committee of the Republican Party of South Dakota met yesterday, and part of the agenda was to change the bylaws so that the delegates in the precincts down at the county level were removed and that they were that the state central committee installed their own slate of precinct people, precinct committee chair people.
Or depending on how you read it, it could be that we're just going to strip this precinct delegates power to vote in any of the processes moving forward.
So there's a kind of couple of things going on at once.
And it's a result of, I don't know if you've heard of the precinct precinct strategy.
There's been a lot of people over the last several years, you know, especially during the Trump run up to talk about precinct strategy.
And there's Tracy Beans talks about all the time.
I don't know if you're familiar with that, but back in the Ron Paul days, we did the precinct strategy organically.
It was the lowest common denominator is at your precinct where you live.
And there's a caucus at the beginning of each electoral cycle.
So the Democrats have a caucus, Republicans have a caucus, Libertarians have a caucus, Greens have a caucus.
The caucus is truly a straw poll.
There's nothing like who won the caucus in the state doesn't really matter.
It's who got elected as the precinct committee people, committee chairs in those precincts, because those are the people that make up the party in the county.
And then when it comes time to move to a district convention, you nominate precinct committee chair people to be a delegate at the district convention.
And these people made it that far.
By these people, I mean grassroots conservatives, call them what you want, First Americas, America Firsters, MAGAs, whatever you want to call them.
Let's stop right there.
These are the people that understand now that the system is corrupt, said, not in my backyard.
Actually believe in the principles.
And, you know, we talk a lot about getting a hold on your state and local levels, whether that be city commissioner or you're on some kind of a board somewhere or a council or even obviously state, senate, Congress, et cetera.
There are ways to get involved.
And these are people that believed in that.
And we already can see the massive amount of corruption that we've had build up over the past 20 years that was highlighted, in my opinion, via the midterms and Kerry Lake and Herschel Walker and Lake Masters and all these people.
I was mixing and matching here because these are two tertiary topics.
You actually, I think, let in with the voter rolls.
I think that's what you want.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
And I jumped over to this South Dakota thing, which is kind of related, but not totally.
And I apologize.
Well, well, I mean, it shows that the manipulation of the system on one end, they want to control who comes in.
It doesn't matter how hard you work and how many legitimate votes you get.
And even if you can audit it at that point.
But then on the back end, they want to ensure if you're somehow able to circumvent that system, Todd, they can screw you big time.
They can fist you lake style.
And then, Todd, they can just say sorry.
No audit.
You have no right to these things, even as a civilian after the fact, to try to show a historical record.
So let's talk about what, so there's two.
So let's table the whole precinct strategy for a second.
And that's about dirty inside politics inside a private party system, which happens to be governed by code, by the way.
In Iowa specifically, I looked it up today, revisited the stuff we did over 10 years ago, and there's Iowa code that governs how precinct committee people are dealt with with regards to being able to convene a convention and so forth.
So that's its own little animal.
Then in Iowa, recently it's come to our attention that let me pull it up here.
It used to be that anybody who asked for the voter rolls could get a copy of the voter roll database in the state that effectively showed who are the registered voters.
And the database will show, and I've actually pulled a database over a million records before from the Secretary of State years ago when I was helping John Narcis run for governor.
I just went back to my project management thread.
I've got all the details about it, and I'm starting to dive back deep into it.
Right now, the voter rolls came up as a major asset and component of election integrity because of all the things going on, all the skullduggery that's going on in the past four and five years.
So people are starting to pay attention to, wow, if you have centralized counting at the Secretary of State level, even though you have 99 counties in Iowa, you know, thousands of precincts throughout the state, when it goes up the ladder into central county to be tested against the voting role at the top level, and then those data gets kicked back to the precincts and the counties to be reported to the public, they can jigger the voting roll up here to show they had more people on the voting roll.
They just added the votes in or they needed less.
There's just too much area of manipulation.
So what people are doing is they're saying, let's get a mark in time of what the voter roll looks like so we can have a effectively, you know, a baseline and see, okay, how did the voter roll change over the next last two weeks?
And there are people who are like really hyper-focused on this.
And a voter roll will show you lots of information.
It'll show you what you're registered.
It'll show if you voted in a primary or not, which is a key thing for people who are trying to get, you know, win a primary.
There's all kinds of data there.
It's, you know, metadata.
It's all public and there's a whole reason why it's public.
And we can thank former New Yorker, not former, Bob Schultz, a fellow New Yorker like you from the Weeded People Foundation who won a lawsuit at the state Supreme Court level when the Libertarians needed a governor candidate because Howard Stern backed out last minute.
Voter Roll Insights 00:07:29
They asked Bob if he would run for governor.
He said, I don't want to be governor.
I hate politics.
He said, but I do want to prove a point with regards to access to voter rolls and voter registration data.
They took it all the way to the state Supreme Court and from there, everybody could have access to the voter rolls.
And it trickled out through all the rest of the states because previously you had to pay for it.
Depending on who was in power, you had to pay more to get the voter rolls.
It's ubiquitous data, has been for a long time.
But now, now that people are starting to pay attention to voter rolls, in Iowa, they're going to change the rules.
They're going to change the rules to, and I'm trying to pull that document up real quick here, Jason, that I sent a link to.
I got you.
Yeah, voter registration commission.
And they're trying to change the rules so that, here we go.
Do you get it up?
I don't know if you do or not.
Oh, okay, cool.
Yeah.
Can we go down to, let's see, where's the detail about the rule change?
Are we looking at purpose of summary right here?
The commission undertook a review of all its rules.
Yeah.
Yes.
Yeah, it says these proposed amendments conform the commission's rules with the Iowa Code, provide updates to citations, and clarify which version of the Iowa voter registration application is, quote unquote, official.
The proposed amendments to chapter three include clarifying that voter list requests must be made in writing and what information the requester is required to provide and providing a clearer definition of political purpose that is already utilized in the Iowa Code.
So you can see how they want to parse political purpose for guess what?
Political reasons.
Seems to me checking the voter rolls for voter integrity is as good a purpose as anything.
I don't know why it's even been coming into question.
It's coming to question because more people are looking under the hood, Jason.
That's why it's coming into question.
I mean, it's an apolitical matter to be able to audit as much as humanly possible your supposedly free and fair elections in a democracy, Tod, in a democracy.
Yeah, yeah.
I've come to the realization, Jason, that it's the government's democracy and it's the people's republic.
And the government wants to protect its democracy and the people have lost track of defending their republic.
I mean, it's even an inversion of what democracy means.
That's the craziest thing.
Because even in the democracy, you have to get the votes.
You know, if 51% of the folks are up against 49%, or even if it's a nutshair of 50.1% to 49.9%, that's at least a true democracy.
I'm sorry.
I don't have faith or believe that Katie Hobbs won in a democracy.
I don't believe she got more votes than Kerry Lake.
Am I bad?
Is that blasphemy?
Is that outrageous?
I don't believe that Joe Biden got 81 million legitimate votes for president and beat Donald Trump.
I don't believe that.
It's the noble lie.
It's the noble lie.
We needed it.
You got to have the noble lie.
Noble lies do not justify ignoble acts, which is one of the headlines in our current issue about the J6 folks.
We can talk about if we have time.
But on this topic, I'm going through this gentleman's email who's on top of this here in the locally in the state.
He's a big-time election integrity advocate who's been at this for many, many months, ever since the Center for Technical and Civic Learning started putting private money into swing states and swing counties like Iowa, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
This guy has been on top of this.
And he's saying also, also in the proposed change to this administrative rule, a signed statement would be required to acknowledge that written permission is required from the Iowa Secretary of State's office before the list could be shared with other concerned citizens.
This is overly restrictive and puts these conscientious citizens in the position of having a single authority in the Secretary of State's office tell us how we can use and share this information.
So let me just stop everybody.
I want to explain to people what you just said.
You go out, you go through the proper channels of, say, a Freedom of Information Act request and you file the paperwork.
You put it in writing, like you said.
Then they give you the documents.
Then only you are allowed to have the documents.
Well, that hasn't been stated yet.
We're at the early stages of this.
Well, you just said you couldn't share them with others, right?
Well, or having a single authority, these conscious citizens in the position of having a single authority tell us how we can use and share this information.
I don't know if that's true or not.
This is why it's all gray.
Well, I mean, that's my point.
If they're telling you not just how you can use it, okay, so or whether you can share it or not.
Yeah, I mean, let's just assume at least in use, you'll be able to view it.
You know, you're not going to just get to taste the documents.
I mean, it's not quite defined, but when we talk about the word share, there isn't a real ambiguous thing going on here.
All right.
Well, it kind of begets like, do we need an Iowa WikiLeaks?
Like, hey, a candidate runs for office, runs for a statewide office that requires, you know, can have access to all of the database for all the state because you're just running for a local county office.
Why would you need the rest of the state?
You're not going to give it to you.
But if you are statewide candidate, which is what John Narciss was when he ran for governor as independent, you got the whole voter database.
So you get it, and then you just dump it on the internet.
Here it is, everybody.
End of administrative rule.
Now, all of a sudden, you're going to have to go to a freaking embassy and hide if you did that.
Well, I mean, look at the precedent they're trying to set with Assange right now.
There are finally some very, very faint voices in mainstream journalism that are...
I do.
Thank you for the mute.
I did mute myself.
Sorry about that, folks.
Yep, there's the old muted.
I do appreciate that.
Whenever I play a video that long, I do.
I got to make sure to check that.
So we're going to the premium end, redvoicemedia.com slash Jason or slash uncensored.
You can still listen if you have the podbean app.
Just look for the Info Warrior.
We're going to be live.
That's a little less than half of the McGreevy interview.
I'm also going to do a Davos wrap-up.
There's several videos I want to go over, including the WEF Open Forum in Harmony with Nature.
We're going to be doing that.
Come on, we got the sound back, guys.
I see it in the chat there.
So, with that being said, guys, like I said, we are going to head on over to redvoicemedia.com.
Watch the rest on Red Voice Media Premium using the link below.
Completely uncensored and ad-free.
Not a member yet?
Export Selection