DARPA BIOWEAPONS Moderna Madness And The Faustian 4th Industrial Revolution - Reality Rants With Jason Bermas
|
Time
Text
Hey everybody, Jason Burmus here.
And what you're about to watch is a segment from the second hour over at redvoicemedia.com from a couple weeks back.
Now I want to remind everybody, every two weeks, the full thing goes free over at redvoicemedia.com, uncensored, even if you're not a premium subscriber.
If you want to listen to it in real time, you can still do so over at theinfowarrior.podbean.com.
But four days a week, that means even if you're not, A premium member, that's almost two hours of content.
And this one was just too damn important, in my opinion, not to share after the fact.
Now, if you're watching on Rockfin and Rumble, it's completely uncensored and you get the full second hour.
Unfortunately, if you're watching on YouTube, there's a lot of content in there that might go against the misinformation standards of today.
You know, from the Ministry of Digital Truth.
So, I hope you enjoy this segment.
It's an important one.
You want to support me, go to redvoicemedia.com slash Jason.
Try the first week out for a buck.
And that's ten bucks a month.
Or lock it in right there.
Really support me.
At redvoicemedia.com slash Jason and get a year for $100.
We're not going anywhere.
In fact, you'll see me bright and early, 8 a.m.
Eastern Time tomorrow morning.
Let's get back to the tuck.
And Amy, you know what?
I want to roll it back. Because we did a little bit of fun ranting there.
But let's have her talk about that Faustian bargain.
What if everything's a little darker?
And I believe it's even darker than this because they have their own people on the inside as part of the signature reduction program working on behalf of this agenda.
Content that nobody wants on anywhere on their platforms, this inciting content that is wrong, was unfortunately everywhere, as you've read in stories this week from the Washington Post and elsewhere.
I assume most of them are just greedy, soulless little robots who will do whatever it takes to continue to loot the country.
It's not like they have an ideological agenda.
Whether they have agenda or not, here's one of the things that I think is going on, at least with the bigger tech companies.
People have been talking about collusion.
Is there collusion involved?
But what if the truth is actually a lot worse and that Parler is just the latest casualty in a sort of Faustian bargain that big tech has made with status government?
And by this I mean that big tech has made itself dependent on immunity.
With respect to its two major prongs for monetization that it depends on.
So one of them is this content moderation removing pieces of content.
They have immunity for that under Section 230.
And that also includes the curation of feeds and the algorithms that they use to do that that increase engagement.
Those are all just immune from scrutiny and from liability.
And then the second, of course, is the data pillaging, as we like to call it.
At Parler, we don't believe that you should be making money by monetizing personal data of people.
And both of those things have become part of this bargain.
I don't know if you saw the Wall Street Journal piece.
It was the big tech versus the Constitution.
Save the Constitution from a big tech.
And they talked about the fact that the immunity of 230, when combined with the pressure from people in Congress Telling Facebook and telling Twitter that they need to remove more hate speech and do more about misinformation, this is in effect censorship by proxy.
And then with respect to data, if you look at the consent decree between United States and Facebook, the FTC and Facebook from last year, you could see in that that Facebook was allowed to continue its data mining practices that Help, you know, monetize it.
And at the same time, maybe the FTC and the DOJ can get back doors into data under the terms of that consent decree.
Her analysis is so spot on.
She almost goes all the way.
She almost goes all the way.
But this is, again, part of the TrackTrace Database Society, the Internet of Things, soon to be the Internet of Bodies.
This is why the censorship...
Is so important.
And once they get under the skin, man, this great narrative is going to be hard to fight.
Because they're going to have you biologically by the balls.
You get it? This is a very cozy relationship that I think is very disturbing.
And Parler's model doesn't depend on either of those things.
Cozy doesn't even describe it.
It's scary. It's really scary.
Apple helped write our current immigration law.
Some of the liberal children in the current White House considered giving the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Tim Cook of Apple, who hates the White House and the country.
Tim Cook of Apple, again, who's in the news, and I talked about this on Mixed Martial Mindset yesterday.
Look, Fox News far from perfect.
They're the only ones in the hallway with Tim Cook saying, hey, why are you shutting down apps that allow Chinese dissidents to protest their government?
Hey, is this the model?
Hey, everybody, once again, not new.
Not new. They have a trust rating.
You have a social credit score with your Apple devices.
And I mean, I barely use any Apple devices.
I'm sure I got one too.
And I mean, bare bones on the Apple devices.
Not a fan. I'm an Android man.
It's not like Google's any better.
If you don't think they have a trust score and a social credit score ready to go on you, give me a break.
But hey, they love Tim Cook.
They love the model. They love the techno-fascism.
I was going to tell you that with respect to this particular fight, I see Apple as an ally.
I don't know if you saw that Tim Cook has said that Parler could come back on to the App Store after we improve our content moderation.
See, again, this is bending the knee to these pieces of filth.
Don't bend the knee. No, no, no.
And no. So, earlier in the broadcast, there was this clip of Klaus Haus.
I want to play this clip right here of him explaining the fourth industrial revolution.
It is Klaus Nutschwab.
This is really fascinating stuff.
What you're looking at right now is a paralyzed man using his mind in order to create the words that appear on the screen.
This revolutionary speech neuroprosthesis research at the University of California, San Francisco, is allowing the gentleman to communicate in complete sentences by translating signals from his brain to...
Now obviously this is not that clip.
I had this one queued up after I clicked the wrong one.
This is the human brain interfaces.
We've been doing a lot more work on that.
This is Klaus Nutschwaub.
The difference of this forced industrial revolution is it doesn't change what you are doing.
It changes you.
If you take a genetic editing, just as an example, it's you who are changed.
And of course this has a big impact on your identity.
And offers certain kinds of Possibilities that have to be careful about, you know, when you began to do that kind of gene editing, some people worried that you were changing what it means to be human.
That's the problem.
Of course, the new Industrial Revolution offers us many opportunities, but it raises many-fold questions on the ethical, but even legal implications.
They could give a rat's ass about the ethical implications.
What can they do lawfully?
They're always going to present it to you as benevolence, but what can they get away with legally?
That's what they care about.
That's really what they're concerned with.
And we have to be prepared for it and that's what we want to do in Davos next year.
Talk about technology and the ways it can be deployed, you know, that contribute to growth rather than exacerbate unemployment.
How will that It's a big question, Mark, because there is a fear that technology, robots, just to take one element...
You get productivity from machines.
Exactly. And it replaces maybe the workforce or jobs faster than we can replace them with new jobs.
Not everybody can be a robot polisher and so on, so there will be new jobs.
Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
You want to polish the robot?
Not enough people play that part of the clip.
There's a Bilderberg attendee, you know, establishment guy, Charlie Rose, with a big show on PBS, interviewing Klaus Nutschwaub.
How do we make it positive, Klaus?
How do we make it rockin' and rollin'?
How do we take advantage of it?
Well... Well, we might not be able to do that.
Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Let's bring it on back. Don't worry.
Just get ready for it.
Because we got dancing robots with BTS. Now I got another thing on the other side of this.
Your cousin from Boston.
Him partying with the robots.
Working for Boston Dynamics.
MIT. DARPA. Right?
Right? That's the reality.
You gain productivity from machines.
Exactly. And it replaces maybe the workforce or jobs faster and we can replace them with new jobs.
Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
Not that everybody could be.
I mean, I don't polish the robots.
I don't know if my staff can polish the robots that work for me.
But not that everybody can be a robot of polisher.
Again, this is the flip.
This is the inversion of reality.
And this is America. In 2022, selling you on this idea.
Long day, huh?
Happy hour. Thank you.
Hey, buddy.
You want a Sam Adams?
All right. The robots want a drink.
Yeah! Hello.
Your cousin from Boston.
Wicked hazy, wicked tropical.
Wicked double. You know, because we're partying with robots.
That's it! You guys know how to party!
Get it, girl. Oh!
He wasn't lying!
Robot! Robot!
Robot! I love you guys!
I should text her, right?
Take it. We're gonna live forever.
Even got that nice little transhumanist aspect in it.
Again, getting you ready to be replaced.
It's a party, the robots are there.
Not everybody can be your cousin from Boston, the robot polisher.
Not everybody can be him, but it's not a big deal, right?
That is security See, they dance, they party, they drink Sam Adams.
They're part of DARPA. It's 2022.
So, one of the good things that came over this last year...
Is that you had people like Glenn Beck come almost full circle.
And really has come full circle.
The Blaze is pretty decent.
At the same time, you know, of having Whitney Webb on this year, he's also praising Netanyahu.
So I guess you could say not quite there.
But they did better work on DARPA and COVID-1984, right, than anybody else.
Anybody else.
And I warned people during this nightmare that if you took these shots, there was a chance that you would develop HIV. And it wasn't because I was saying it.
It was because it was in the media.
So you had these DARPA-run bioweapons, in my opinion, being injected massively.
And then this happens...
Okay. In one of the trials.
So let's just start right here.
Australia has dropped development of a local vaccine candidate after trial participants came back with false positive test results for HIV. It says it won't rush approval of vaccines because it wants people to have full confidence in immunization.
I'm sure. They didn't rush anything, just a bunch of people getting false HIV positives.
No big deal! No big deal.
So... Here's part of that relationship between DARPA being discussed by Glenn Beck and Tucker Carlson.
I wish they had talked more about the 2013 partnership.
I think that's extremely important.
It's something that constantly gets overlooked.
It's on their own website.
It's their own press release.
It's right here.
October of 2013.
Also two and a half years later, they're patenting a cancer drug that ends up having a 12-sequence DNA nucleotide of the virus itself.
Of the virus itself.
Right? They partnered to fight pandemics with mRNA drugs.
Clearly, they distinguish that mRNA drugs are different than quote-unquote vaccines.
But let's let Glenn Beck and Tucker Carlson talk it up.
However you feel about the corona vaccine, imagine your children being given powerful drugs without your knowledge by unionized teachers.
What's appropriate response to this?
Glenn Beck, our old friend, is the host of the Glenn Beck radio program.
Of course, he joins us tonight on this story.
Glenn, thanks so much for coming on.
So you're a parent. How would you respond to something like this?
I file a lawsuit with the teachers' union myself.
I can't believe what's going on, Tucker.
It is completely out of control.
And you have to ask yourself, why?
Why are they pushing this like this?
What do they have to gain?
Because it's not our health.
I really don't believe that.
Well, certainly not in the case of children, where there is a demonstrated and actual risk.
It's not, you know, not to every child, but there is very little risk from coronavirus.
So this is like crazy. So you've done some reporting on this, on some of the incentives we may not be aware of behind these drugs.
If you'll tell us what you found.
Okay, so this is a two-hour chalkboard that is condensed into about four minutes.
So if you want to see the whole thing, it's at FauciLied.com.
But I'll try not to sound crazy and tie this together.
Gain of function, which Fauci says never happened.
Happened in November of 2015.
It happened with Dr. Barrett.
It was a published paper, November 2015.
The USAID and Fauci with EcoHealth, they were funding it.
It was happening with the Wuhan people, so we know that.
But what you may not know is in November, the same month that published paper comes out, the United States begins a partnership with Moderna, and they are searching for Really, again, the partnership on their therapies, all right, starts in 2013.
Not 2015.
And that partnership is a strategic collaboration with AstraZeneca, Merck, Vertex, BARDA, DARPA, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Karolinska Institute, and the Institute Pastor.
And they clearly say, right here...
Okay, I want to read it so people can understand.
This grant is part of a DARPA program called Adept Protect.
Autonomous diagnostics to enable prevention and therapeutics prophylactic options to environment and contagious threats.
The goal is to develop platform technologies, because that's what mRNA is, that can be deployed
safely and rapidly to provide the U.S. population with near-immediate protection against emerging
infectious diseases and engineered biological weapons, even in cases when the pathogen or
infectious agent is not known.
Okay?
So let's go back to Beck and the tuck.
Thank you.
you But wait, it gets worse.
In this time, we skip to 2018, DARPA receives a proposal from Dr.
Barrick, U.S. guy, Dr.
Xi from Wuhan, and Peter Daszak from EcoHealth, or EcoHealth.
And DARPA sees this and says, this is far too dangerous.
We're rejecting your proposal.
We don't know what happened from there, but we do know, just about 12 months later, in Wuhan, where Peter Daszak, Dr.
Xi, the Bat Lady, and Dr.
Barrick were all doing research on coronaviruses, about a year later, there's an outbreak.
And the outbreak actually begins, according to documents that we have that have been smuggled out of China.
That there were 10 hospitals involved by October with patients that we now know are corona-like virus symptoms.
They didn't know what was going on.
And again, I believe this to be in the United States in October at the latest.
You're not allowed to talk about that.
You're still not allowed to talk about natural immunity.
Certainly not allowed to talk about DARPA being involved.
And that a lot of this stuff was not just happening in China, but outside of China.
Nope. Not allowed to talk about those things.
Now that was in October.
Remember, we didn't know anything about this in December.
We were starting to get rumblings.
China said there was some sort of an outbreak on December 31st.
Dr. Beric signs a government deal with Moderna.
I want to read it exactly to you.
This deal was made.
It's confidential.
It's 158 pages long.
If I skip to page 104, they are entering a specific private confidential agreement.
The NIH appears to be transferring technology to Dr.
Barrick, but what they're making clear is, quote, mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed and jointly owned by NIAID and Moderna.
Now this is weird because it's two weeks later that we know there's a problem.
They signed that deal two weeks before and they sign it with the doctor who happened to be a partner with the Bat Lady in Wuhan.
Here's where it gets really dark.
These are the same group of people that in the end of January begin to have meetings and they shut down and begin to smear anyone who's looking into the lab leak theory.
They establish that's not true, don't even look there.
It appears to be collusion.
We've passed this on to several people in Congress and the Senate.
We know Rand Paul is on this, and Dr.
Fauci has some answers to give.
And again, I doubt we're going to get those answers.
Last night, Tucker Carlson had the initial whistleblower from China who said that this was, in fact, a Chinese program.
And she actually talked about it.
I was surprised. She only got one segment.
Now, that may be because she speaks...
Pretty quick. Broken English.
You gotta really pay attention.
But she discussed now how the investigation isn't just of a leak, but possibly the intentional release.
Let me repeat that. The intentional release of the virus, a.k.a.
the bioweapon.
Well, I just want to affirm what you're saying.
You're the reporting, the amazing reporting you've done on this.
Here's a clip of the recently departed NIH Director Francis Collins admitting on camera that the U.S. government has a stake in the vax.
Watch this. Who's going to own that vaccine?
Does the federal government own it?
One of the vaccines, the one that's furthest along, was started actually at the federal government in our own vaccine research center at NIH and then worked with a biotechnology company called Moderna to get to where we are now with very impressive phase one results and getting ready to go into a large-scale trial as early as July.
That guy's a demon singing to you, poof, coronavirus.
That's the guitar guy with his crazy wife in the background.
And of course, we do have some particular stake in the intellectual property.
I mean, you are not making this up.
What you're saying is true.
Really quickly, why is this not a front-page story everywhere?
All of the documents, we spent about a year on this with people like Charles Rixley from Drastic, with Judicial Watch.
They were all FOIA'd. These are documents that prove beyond, I think, any kind of reasonable doubt.
Something very wrong is happening here.
Moderna had been turned down for any kind of vaccine research by everyone publicly over and over again.
And now this test is being done on our children.
This is the only time that anybody will admit they were doing any kind of testing on coronavirus research for a vaccine with Moderna.
It's just beyond belief.
And I'm glad, finally, that someone is saying this out loud.
Glenn Beck, I appreciate your reporting on this.
Thank you. It's great to see you tonight.
Thank you. Now you can see that Glenn Beck is pretty upset about this.
Glenn Beck didn't think the world was this dark.
Well, Glenn, I hope you revisit 9-11, going back to what I really started with the broadcast on.
So here it is.
This is one of these CEOs, I believe it's the Pfizer CEO, being asked about this Moderna slash COVID relationship in this bioengineering clear, in my opinion, bioweapons nightmare, including the virus, not just the hate and lie shots.
Now scientists find the virus contains a tiny chunk of DNA that matches sequence patented by Moderna three years before the pandemic began.
Your reaction, Stefan? What can you tell us?
So, my scientists are looking into those data to see how accurate they are or not.
As I've said before, the hypothesis of an escape from a lab by an accident is possible, you know.
Oh, and it's always an accident.
Not what was said last night.
No one ever wants... Why can't we talk about this being intentional when it's developed in bioweapons labs?
Let's do it again.
Oh, we're taking a look.
Okay. Now scientists find the virus contains a tiny chunk of DNA that matches sequence patented by Moderna three years before the pandemic began.
Your reaction, Stefan? What can you tell us?
So, my scientists are looking into those data to see how accurate they are or not.
As I've said before, The hypothesis of an escape from a lab by an accident is possible.
You know, human makes mistakes.
So is it possible that the Wuhan lab in China was working on viruses enhancement or gene modification and then there was an accident where somebody was infected in the lab and then infected their families in France?
It is possible on the claim you just mentioned, the scientists are analyzing to know if it's real or not.
Oh, if it's real or not.
I'm still waiting on the data, Mr.
Bonesell. Still waiting.
Weird. Haven't heard from you.
Not too quick to want to incarcerate yourself.
So I want to shift gears a little bit because we are talking about 2022 in review.
And 2022 is the year...
That Ghislaine Maxwell got prosecuted and now is being punished for some of her crimes.
But essentially what we got was a cover-up.
And nothing...
Could scream that louder than this clip right here of Bill Barr, okay, talking about keeping her alive and laughing when being asked about the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein.
And then what I'm going to do... Because this year I was actually allowed on UK mainstream television to play a clip of me just eviscerating the official narrative.
And I was actually on two shows.
I think we're only going to play one of them.
But let's start here with the hilarious Bill Barr clip where the media is laughing right alongside with him with this idea that Epstein killed himself.
It's a big joke to these people.
They laugh right in your face constantly.
I want to make sure I pronounce her name correctly.
Jelaine Maxwell is now in federal custody.
Number one, can you ensure that she will make it to trial?
Jeffrey Epstein died in a suicide situation.
Now, look at his face as soon as he says, suicide situation.
How hard that was for him to say, even with a straight face.
Can you ensure that she's going to be okay?
Again, 2022 in America, folks.
Get ready. Here's Bill Barr back in the day.
Now, again, she got prosecuted successfully this year.
This is why we're playing it.
But this should have let you know the fix was in.
Are you locked in on this to make sure that doesn't happen, sir?
Yes. Can you give me a sense of what you think?
I mean, again, they can't keep...
He thinks it's hilarious!
He tries to keep a straight face.
He can't even keep a straight face.
Look at this! Are you locked in on this to make sure that doesn't happen, sir?
Yes. Can you give me a sense of what you told the people in charge?
You know, we have asked them to tell us specifically the protocols they're following, and we have a number of redundant systems to monitor the situation.
And how angry were you at the Jeffrey Epstein situation?
I was livid, obviously.
I believe very strongly in that case, and I was very proud of the work done by the department.
Yeah, he's so livid that he actually worked for Epstein via Kirkland and Ellis prior to that and had to talk about possibly recusing himself.