Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 21, 2022 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas

01:00:51

Zelensky To Grandstand In DC - Reality Rants With Jason Bermas

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
	Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
	We think too much and feel too little.
	More than machinery, we need humanity.
	We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat.
	As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
	We know things are bad, worse than bad.
	They're crazy. Pilots!
	The great and powerful Oz knows why you have come.
	You've got to say, I'm a human being!
	God damn it! My life has value!
	You have meddled with the primal forces of nature!
	Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder!
	Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men.
	Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
	Yeah, thank you. You're beautiful.
	I love you. Yes.
	You're beautiful.
	Thank you.
	Ha ha.
	Shh.
	It's showtime.
	And now, Reality Rant with Jason Burmess.
	And who loves you? And who do you love?
	ROAR Good morning! Good morning.
	It is Reality Rants.
	I am Jason Bermas.
	This is Red Voice Media.
	And it is my pleasure to announce that I will have the founder and head of Red Voice Media on the program about 30 minutes in.
	We're going to be doing 30 minutes on the YouTube side and then we can talk about the real stuff on the other side.
	Last night I actually was going to put a video on YouTube and I just couldn't do it guys.
	I just couldn't do it.
	We had released from two weeks before a piece I had done on the Faustian deal with the media and the military industrial complex and yes the Twitter files are becoming more and more of a big deal as more and more of them are released and more and more journalists are getting access to them and According to Timothy Shea, who you will see me interview tomorrow on the broadcast, the last broadcast before Christmas, by the way.
	Merry Christmas, everybody. He claims that Musk has said that after he's done with all these media stories, he's going to do a straight dump of all the files.
	Okay. But still, what bothers me about that is there will already be an established narrative of those that actually cover it.
	And it is absolutely 100% super shameful that the vast majority of the mainstream media has not touched this, or when they have talked about it, they've said it's a nothing burger.
	It's anything but that.
	It shows the psychological operations against the American public.
	Psychological warfare being waged on, on you, your family, and your friends on behalf of a predator class agenda.
	That's reality.
	That's what we cover here.
	And I played a piece from like four years ago that I did on reality and how Karl Rove essentially talked about it was really his ilk that creates reality and you just gotta sit back Take the ride, and maybe you can comment on it.
	Maybe you can't in this environment.
	But you'll take a look back at it, and essentially you'll write what you will.
	That's all. Because this is their ministry of truth.
	And I'm going to play a couple of sequences, like one and a half, one minute spots, from another couple of videos I did about four years ago, warning about This authoritative narrative and the ministry of truth.
	And really what's so bombshell about the Twitter stuff is not so much that now it's in the public arena and people are finding out exactly what people like myself and others have been warning about and saying was happening actually was happening and we have the documentation.
	It's still occurring in all the other social media platforms and big tech networks.
	And it's still happening on a micro scale via their own software that goes even beyond the commercialized stuff like Alfonso, which is auto content recognition.
	Okay? And it just takes it all.
	Content recognition.
	It's not really listening to you because it's not a human being.
	It's not really recording you because it's not recording that.
	Just interpreting things in real time and building algorithms.
	In a metadata nightmare, the likes of which we discussed yesterday when we played what?
	Google's Selfish Ledger.
	Okay? And in that great narrative that's being spun to us, it's freedom and democracy versus the scourge of Russia.
	Of the pootster. Of poot poot indeed.
	Okay? That's what we're being sold on constantly.
	That's what they're talking about.
	And now the Rambo-esque movie star.
	And he is an actor.
	He played the president before they installed him.
	That's how society works.
	That's part of the psychological warfare.
	And it's not just against the United States, it's against the global populace.
	I mean, do you realize how low the photographer had to take that shot to make Zelensky look almost as tall as the soldier that's clearly in the backdrop towering over him?
	I mean, he's smaller than everybody there, but he's Rambo!
	And Mr. Zelensky is coming to Washington.
	He's on his way here!
	He hasn't left the front line of that conflict yet.
	He's stayed the course.
	But now, as we approach a year, we're about 10 months deep.
	10 months deep. And by the way, they're talking about sending Patriot missile defense.
	It ain't even a proxy war at this point, folks.
	More and more, the United States is just outwardly there.
	And remember, they've already built up the unquestioned mercenary infrastructure in which you can just take a privatized military, hire them from some shadowy network that has plausible deniability against the United States, and still direct it, despite the fact it's been pretty obvious that That via Starlink and obviously Blackjack and all these drones, they've already been working with the United States.
	And I would say the U.S., because they have their satellite infrastructure there, has more command and control than Zelensky ever could.
	So even if Zelensky wanted to be the big dog and say, oh, I'm going to run this the way I want.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	Easy, partner. Easy, Chip Riverdale.
	That's not how it works.
	You know, they may have propped you up.
	Like you're the dude, right?
	He's not in the t-shirt there. It's a little chilly out.
	But come on. But this is it.
	This is the narrative they're selling you on.
	Okay? So, I got a couple stories I want to bang through.
	And then I'm going to play these clips.
	I'm going to comment on them as well.
	Because on one end, you have this ministry of truth that was outwardly being constructed, authoritative source style, back in 2018, way before the COVID-1984 nightmare.
	Period. It was there.
	I was warning about it.
	We know that signature reduction, which is heavily embedded in these companies, again, this is a psychological warfare program, at least a decade old.
	At least a decade old.
	And the fusion centers go well, well beyond that.
	So, you know, again, we have to be grown-ups.
	We can't be children about this.
	And somehow, someway...
	Something has to be done.
	And I would say that people need to be prosecuted at Twitter.
	And then they also need to be prosecuted at these other companies.
	But that's not going to happen because they're working with the Department of Justice.
	And it's the Department of Justice that would have to prosecute these people.
	It's business as usual.
	It's how the military works, son.
	So we're going to play those clips.
	And then I've got these MKUltra clips.
	Because it's coming back in the lexicon.
	And I was actually really, really happy for Tucker Carlson to begin to talk about the fact that not only does it look like the CIA murdered John F. Kennedy.
	Big, big deal.
	Big deal. No one else seems to be covering it in the media, right?
	Although I've heard people have been sending DMs that Jesse Waters tried to blame it on Russia via some other documentation.
	Don't buy the hype, folks.
	Don't buy the Russia hype. Come on.
	Give me a break. No mas.
	No mas. Ridiculous.
	But he talked about the MKUltra aspect of it.
	When he said it, he didn't just use the tagline LSD. He talked about psychiatric drugs.
	Psychiatric drugs.
	That's a big deal.
	Because that's really the birth of Big Pharma in a big way.
	That these psychiatric drugs were mass-tested on people without their knowledge or permission.
	Or they were just completely and totally misled.
	So, you know, forget about just animal testing.
	What they have done to human beings, US citizens, military and otherwise, children in some cases, is beyond obscene.
	Especially when it's done under the guise of what?
	Helping humanity.
	And instead...
	That technology, in large part, at least in my opinion, has been utilized to make the vast majority of the populace confused, docile, incoherent, unable to critically think for themselves and exercise the God-given free will that all of us share?
	It's a blocker on free will.
	Now, I'm not saying in some extreme cases some of these drugs don't have a medical value.
	I'm a big, big, big, big, big proponent that there is a thing called crazy.
	That people can in fact have mental illness and severe mental illness and perhaps they should be medicated with something.
	But when you make medicine a for-profit business, you need customers.
	That's a huge conflict right there.
	That's number one. And number two, more and more and more, aside from the last few years, over the last really few decades, if you look at the history, if you start looking at it, I'm not so thrilled with the medical community.
	I'm not so thrilled with the drugs they've given people and the results they've had.
	We've all been promised, at least I was promised so many times when I was a little kid and then into college, all technology was going to be there, that, you know, we're going to double lifespan, you know, the kind of things that the Cush Cush said, where my generation might be the first to live forever.
	And now... They're feeding the kids the idea that they're going to merge with machines and become superheroes.
	Superheroes. They're going to have superpowers.
	And in general, if they acquiesce to the next level of MKUltra and the next level of brainwashing, and merge with these machines of psychological warfare, They'll believe they do have superpowers.
	And in some cases, it may mimic on a low level what we think of or have seen as superpowers.
	But it ain't super.
	And it is certainly not powerful to be beholden to a technology that you have merged with That controls you as a human being.
	So, I've ranted enough.
	I know it's reality rants.
	That's what we do here. Thumbs it up.
	Subscribe and share. Get 100 thumbs up over on the YouTube.
	And I want to play this clip.
	This is from 2018.
	This is when YouTube outwardly, outwardly started really instituting their ministry of truth as a Trojan horse civilian system.
	And what's particularly interesting about this clip is that the authoritative sources were things like Wikipedia, Encyclopedia Britannica, and partnering with universities like, oh, what's in the news right now?
	Stanford. Stanford that wants to get rid of the term American.
	Hey Stanford, what if I'm describing the delicious cheese on my grilled cheese sandwich?
	A. Is that bigoted, Stanford?
	There's a list of these things.
	They said it took like 18 months.
	It's beyond just controlling the language.
	It's also set to infuriate a certain sector of the general populace, obviously.
	So let's play this clip right here.
	Now, next on the list of changes for this ever-restrictive platform is that they are going to begin providing context to help people make their own decisions.
	And when they say context, they mean links to Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica.
	And what kind of subject matter can we expect to have these type of hyperlinks?
	Starting today, users will begin seeing information from third parties, including Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica, alongside videos on a smaller number of well-established historical and scientific topics that have often been subject to misinformation like the moon landing and the Oklahoma City bombing.
	And perhaps the most startling of all, they are now investing in digital literacy education.
	And they are projected to reach over 1 million teenagers.
	Digital literacy education.
	And everybody who thinks that Twitter is some bastion of free speech right now, and oh, look at all the files they've released, etc., etc.
	Listen, we'll give credit where credit's due, and it's great.
	But I just got this text.
	I mentioned it on air.
	This week, several times, the last American Vagabond got his Twitter account back, right?
	Well, guess what? I just got a text from Ryan, a DM. I just did it on my Twitter.
	Well, that was quick. At TLA Vagabond was just suspended.
	No joke. For ban evasion.
	You know, the ban at Elon Musk just explained was unjust and we voted to overturn.
	I got the account back and they ban it because I was using other accounts to circumvent the unjust ban.
	Makes sense. We got to get Ryan on the show.
	We got to get Ryan on the show.
	But we've got Ray coming up of Red Voice Media in a moment.
	I want to finish this piece up.
	So again, Stanford University now restricting language, restricting words we've used for generations.
	All right. It's gotten that bad.
	And here they are. This is digital literacy four and a half years ago.
	See how this works?
	Now, this is being done in conjunction with Stanford University to support MediaWise, a US-based initiative designed to equip one million teens with digital literacy skills.
	Now, YouTube has picked six of their creators, including John Green, Ingrid Nelson, and Mark Watson, to work with MediaWise to bring awareness to this issue of digital literacy and help Educate teenagers.
	Does this sound like brainwashing to anybody else?
	Sure sounds like brainwashing to me.
	And when we talk brainwashing, I want to play this clip right here, which I think is important.
	And this is from an old, old school investigative journalist piece, a real one.
	I think it's either late 70s or early 80s.
	It might be like 81, 82, 83.
	On MKUltra, and they begin with talking about the Korean War and how a bunch of these confessions of US soldiers, supposed confessions, that were talking about the United States using biological warfare were really them being brainwashed.
	Well, we find out later that it's the Central Intelligence Agency, all right?
	It's the military-industrial complex that comes up with that terminology when this occurs, to flip the script.
	And at first they were going to call it a mindicide, I believe, according to Annie Jacobson.
	But let's play this clip right here.
	It was the Cold War, and especially the trial of Joseph Cardinal Menzenty, who was forced to testify in a Hungarian court that he was a spy.
	And then later, the Korean War were the coerced and mainly fraudulent confessions of American servicemen that would spark intense interest in intelligence circles about brainwashing.
	The CIA secretly commissioned a study of Communist brainwashing methods at the Cornell University Medical Center.
	A leader of that study was Dr.
	Lawrence Hinkle. He explains first the Russian method of controlling and breaking a person.
	Absolutely isolated from everyone else with one man whose job it is to get you to write the extent to which you are a criminal.
	In this setting, you can get people to do most anything, do you see?
	Because you don't have to lay a hand on it.
	And by the time you get through and you go up before the judge, the fellow says, were you a spy?
	He says, yes, I was a spy.
	The Chinese Never really had this kind of a state police system.
	They would get him in and all this fellow does is ask you to write, rewrite, rewrite, and talk to him about your whole life.
	Graduated from pilot training in 1949.
	While the purpose of the study was to find out about communist brainwashing techniques, CIA documents show that the agency was interested in developing mind control methods of its own.
	So think about that.
	You know, and again, maybe...
	These soldiers were quote-unquote brainwashed by the communists and all of their quote-unquote confessions were fake.
	It's possible. I don't know enough of the historical context.
	But they come up with this idea.
	And then what?
	They have to do the same thing.
	In order to compete.
	That's the excuse. So essentially, we're going to do even worse things because the ends justify the means.
	To precondition and control Chinese living in this country to be sent back to their homeland as CIA agents.
	What do you think they were looking for?
	Well, I think they, no, they weren't looking for, they weren't looking for agents or anything like that.
	Yet the agency's perception of the work you were doing, in CIA documents we have examined, it says that the project that was being done here They intended to use everything learned about the new agents to induce them to, quote, to perform acts of a complex, purposeful nature. Yeah, but that was never done.
	The effects of which may be out of keeping with the individuals...
	That sort of thing was never done.
	Those people were not...
	That was...
	When they first came here, the first people they sent up to see us, do you see, were operational type people from the CIA with some rather...
	Rather wild ideas.
	Now, again, this is back in journalism when you challenged somebody and you said, and yet.
	And then you followed it up.
	And the guy, you notice that he closed his eyes and shook his head.
	He never looked him in the eye.
	What does that tell you?
	You think this gentleman is an honest guy?
	You think he's... Done some maybe unethical type of experiments on human beings with that demeanor?
	I don't know. I don't know.
	I don't want to make a rash judgment.
	This is their perception of it, if I could just continue.
	No, it wasn't their perception of it either.
	Dangerous to his being contrary to any previous consciously expressed intentions and interests, contrary to the good of the individual and subversive to the goals for which he was consciously working.
	Yeah, I understand all this talk. But the situation-wise, you see, those things were never done because of wise people on both sides.
	We're not able to do this nor interested in it.
	They were, though. Some of the low-level people were, but the high-level people were not, to tell you the truth.
	So, again, some of the low-level people really wanted to do the bad stuff, but the high-level people saved us all, just like they always do.
	But documents clearly show that the CIA was attempting to develop agents over whom they had as much control as possible.
	Agents who would perform tasks contrary to their own good.
	Is a Manchurian candidate controlled by others to do things against his will possible?
	It was a remarkable film because as far as I'm concerned, it made something totally impossible seem absolutely credible.
	I would say the answer is yes, but there are many qualifications to that.
	Dr. Milton Klein, a psychologist, a clinical and experimental hypnotist, and unpaid consultant to the CIA. The qualifications would be the subject selected to produce the kind of behavior that you wish, the amount of time, The procedures that are utilized and the motivations of the people who are designing, executing, and administering the procedures.
	You're asking whether an individual can be, under hypnosis, influenced, coerced, persuaded, shaped to perform an antisocial act, or a destructive act, or an act of violence.
	My answer would be yes.
	And you think of what they were able to do with individuals and drugs, but now think about how they've utilized a lot of the same methods in mass on the general populace.
	And some people are more susceptible to others, but you have to accept that this is a reality.
	And it has been scientifically studied and utilized, okay, for decades now.
	How valuable a tool can hypnosis be in the intelligence field?
	None whatsoever. It has absolutely no use because nobody's ever been able to do that that I know of, do it in an operationally feasible way.
	I'm not in any way saying that hypnosis It doesn't place.
	I'm not saying there's nothing to it.
	I would say that most government agencies concerned with intelligence operations have been looking to hypnosis as a tool for a variety of purposes.
	One of which is to carry out and to execute certain intelligence operations on a basis where they would not have to rely completely on some of their own emotional reactions.
	Actually they're- Would that entail murder?
	It could if you consider that an act of killing someone under circumstances of war is murder.
	I think one has to define what that means.
	I'd call that murder.
	Yeah. Even this guy right here is trying to be as straightforward as possible.
	Look at that little glimmer, huh?
	Look at that little... Huh?
	Under circumstances of peace, it would be murder.
	And I would also argue it would be murder, not under circumstances.
	Especially what we define as war or conflict at this point.
	You know, I talked about this again and again and again.
	When we're talking about the war of terror, you're talking about enemy combatants being defined as 16-year-old males.
	It's hard to say in this environment what that would mean.
	Via the transgender explosion out in the Middle East.
	That's sarcasm, folks, by the way.
	A CIA agent says that Fidel Castro at one time was considered as a possible target for a Manchurian candidate.
	Castro was naturally our discussion point.
	Could you get somebody gung-ho enough that they would go in and get him?
	But if you have 100% control of a guy, you have 100% dependency.
	If something happens and you haven't programmed it in, you've got a problem.
	So in the end, it was decided that a Manchurian candidate was not feasible.
	But the search for mind control continued.
	Covering a span of history such as we are in this report, one can get sidetracked by the so-called glamour and mystery of espionage work, or by the exotic qualities of some drugs.
	But what you can't lose sight of is what all of this would mean in terms of individual human beings.
	There would be deaths, there would be long-lasting and harmful effects.
	So I'm gonna cut it right there.
	There's another seven minutes or so of the clip on electrodes.
	One of the reasons I want to talk about that is because a lot of these brain chips are utilizing that technology just much smaller and we have to remember even in the last presentation via the muskernuts and Neuralink they had One of these subjects, I believe it was a pig, which had two of the chips and one in the spinal cord.
	And via the spinal cord, they were essentially sending electronic impulses into that in order to get the motor neurons working in the back legs.
	Now, the question is, can you do that on a macro level and truly allow somebody to walk again?
	Because I'm all about technology that empowers humanity.
	But a lot of these are bad magic tricks.
	Okay? Big time.
	And we also have to realize that the technology has advanced so much.
	And really, in my opinion, has always been the horse in front of the cart.
	In other words, it's kind of always been that way when you look at special effects and you look at entertainment that it's able to fool people.
	And now, with AI and deepfakes, it's gotten...
	It's gotten to the next level.
	Alright! I am excited here.
	So folks, without further ado, we have the man, the myth, the legend, the guy who brings you Red Voice Media himself.
	Ray Dietrich is with us for the next hour or so.
	You know, Ray and I have only known each other a few months.
	I'm not even really familiar with the genesis of Red Voice Media, so this is going to be a fun interview for me, and I think that's kind of the place to start.
	When did Red Voice Media start, and what was your motivation, Ray, for starting this media operation?
	Well, thanks for having me on the morning action, getting me going early today.
	I appreciate it. RVM got started, it's actually two years ago this week.
	My partner Zach Heilman and I, he's the guy behind the keyboard 14 hours a day that nobody sees.
	We were running, you know, because I was in law enforcement for about 20 years.
	Got sick of it, got out, and we were running like big law enforcement pages like pro police kind of kicked off after Ferguson and this whole war on police kind of kicked off and we built up these big fan pages on Facebook, right?
	Great place to build something where you don't own it.
	We ran that to like 2 million followers.
	We were doing really well with monetized video, like full-time income for a couple people.
	And we got censored out of existence.
	They flipped a switch on us and we went from so many K a month to zero K instantly.
	And never to be had again.
	So we're like, okay, well, the censorship thing sucks.
	So what can we do?
	And, you know, we just, we built a sensor-proof platform, right?
	Like we, the servers are protected, the email's safe, like all the things that big tech can't do to like just dismantle you.
	And we decided to build a platform 100% on free speech, right?
	And just, You know, fuck the world, let's go.
	That's pretty much where we are at RVM. And I love that.
	Let's talk about that because one of the more absurd things that came out of the COVID-1984 nightmare, I want to be...
	I want to be careful. We're still on YouTube right now.
	You know the deal. Was that all of a sudden there was this mantra of defund the police.
	And I've always been a big accountability guy.
	I've always said, look, when you have abuse and you're going to have abuse in any kind of human-run organization, especially ones that have power...
	That's a big deal. We need to get rid of that.
	I always thought police brutality can be a problem.
	When they started more and more associating that with race over the last decade plus, when it really cooled down after the 90s.
	I would say that period after Rodney King, late 90s, early 2000s, It wasn't really emphasized that much.
	It doesn't mean it wasn't there, but it certainly didn't have the racial aspect to it.
	And it wasn't until after the Barack Obama presidency kicked off that you started gearing up.
	But we had never gotten to a level where they started saying, we're just going to defund the police.
	We're not going to have law enforcement anymore.
	And I was always, that's absurd.
	And, you know, one of the big, big problems I've always had, Ray, with anarchists, right?
	And, you know, Luke Rudowski is a good friend of mine.
	He's one of these no-government guys.
	And so even some of these libertarians and all this stuff is, look, guys.
	We're way beyond that, number one.
	And if you really want to get down to where our government started, you have to look at sheriffs and law enforcement as a pillar of what the United States was because they also realized they needed mediators and law enforcement.
	And you want human beings, hopefully those with training and discernment, to be in those positions.
	And I thought at this point, number one, they wanted to automate you out.
	They'd love to get more robots, more surveillance, more drones, more big tech in there.
	But also, they want to take the human element out of policing altogether and be able to get rid of somebody on a whim, not just deplatform you from Facebook, but deplatform you from your job because of your viewpoints and decisions that maybe even go past something like that.
	Yeah, I mean, it's...
	The war on police, right?
	It's what people called it.
	They wanted to dismantle policing.
	And when you're talking about defunding the cops, nobody likes to get speeding tickets.
	I never wrote a traffic ticket in 20 years.
	I'm not that guy. I was going after dudes who were trying to hurt people.
	That was my thing.
	You know, it's one of those ideas that gets some traction maybe, like as, oh, screw the cops, defund the police.
	But that's just a society breakdown waiting to happen.
	Like, if you want people just to be violently attacked in the streets, like, go ahead and defund the police and see what happens.
	They dehumanize them, right?
	And I came up in the late 90s, early 2000s.
	You know, I started patrol in South Central LA in 02, right?
	And that stuff, there wasn't these racial issues, right?
	Because it wasn't pushed to the media and it wasn't the narrative.
	And like you said, like when Obama came and Ferguson fired up, they used the media To just slam these total false narratives and started this divide that, you know, it quickly unraveled.
	Like, I would say 2014 was a real turning point, you know, and since then, you know, All the lies of hands up, don't shoot, and this and that.
	And I could pick apart probably the top six police shooting cases that the Ben Crumps of the world, the attorneys out there, really took and ran with to jam this narrative down our throat.
	And most of it's based on lies.
	But when you have the media pushing these same lies, It's sad because half the country believes all the lies that are shoved down their throat about policing.
	And that's where we're at now.
	And now you're seeing the retention and recruitment.
	People don't think about what a problem that is.
	It's the same in the military.
	They've pushed out with jab mandates and just the narrative war on cops and the lack of support for cops doing their thing.
	They've pushed out a lot of the good people.
	And those people aren't referring others into these agencies.
	So now, The scariest part of this whole movement is what's going to happen next because they're still going to fill these slots.
	Like if there's a patrol shift and it takes eight people, there's going to be eight people out on that shift no matter what, right?
	So now they're going to have to hire people that shouldn't be cops.
	People who should never be trusted to take people's freedom away are going to be hired because they have to fill these positions.
	And the ones who probably should be doing these jobs Aren't going to be coming in and doing these jobs.
	What do you have left?
	You have these badge heavy idiots who will get us in more trouble and create more incidents and do more stupid things because they're lowering standards.
	And I don't know if it's not by design, right?
	Like it's You push out the alphas and you get people who will probably go along with orders they shouldn't.
	You know, you saw that in some of the COVID and some of these departments, like NYPD, right?
	Made me sick, absolutely sick to see them in there arresting people for VAX mandates, right?
	I'm pro cop as they come, but I'm not pro trampling on the Constitution and people's freedom.
	And that's where I draw the line. I would never do it.
	I took an oath and I would walk away before I did those things.
	But you're seeing these departments just go along with it.
	Because they don't want to lose their job.
	They don't want to lose their pension.
	It's hard. Like, this will affect my family.
	We're getting to a point in some of these jobs, like, you know, police, military.
	Military is harder to get out of, but like, especially in law enforcement, where, look, if you're just going along with the program, like you're seeing with the FBI, right?
	Like, what's going on with the FBI? And I don't really consider them cops.
	I could never stand most of these idiots when I ran into them.
	The only good ones were ex-cops that ended up at the FBI. But you're seeing these people stay on this department that is completely corrupt, spying on Americans, doing all this stuff.
	All these Twitter files are dropping.
	It's stuff we already knew, but now it's out there.
	Let alone all of the other things they've done, you know, like people they've killed in their wake and all this that they've got.
	But these people need to be strong enough to walk away and do things hard and go, you know what, I'm not going to be the Stasi arm of the DNC and go out and investigate people who attended a rally, right?
	They need to be able to walk away from that, but...
	I'm not seeing it. I'm not seeing a lot of walkaways from like the federal policing agencies that are just completely out of control.
	And that's a problem. And that's where it starts to turn to where what's law enforcement going to look like in 10 years if we continue this path, right?
	Like it could get very nasty.
	You know, the police won't be your friend in 10 years if we continue this path.
	And that's terrifying for someone like me who's a multi-generational cop, like my entire life, my whole family, into my grandparents were cops, right?
	Like, that's what we did. And to see it kind of turn, it's kind of a scary time.
	Well, you mentioned the FBI, and I would argue on a lot of levels, the FBI's never, at the upper echelons, really been a friend of the people, obviously.
	But on the lower levels, the idea that you're openly advertising to get people that are mentally ill...
	Into your organization.
	And people, for those that don't know, that's not a joke.
	They were at a national spot where I believe they had a woman of color, Ray, narrating and the main, I guess, person, but they showed a bunch of people, talking about their mental illness while at the agency.
	The thing is that when you grow up as a kid, at least in my generation, we're similar ages,
	one of the things they always kind of threaten you with is your permanent record or if you
	wanted to join an agency, you kind of had to have a squeaky clean thing because they're
	going to call people that know people that you know that never met you and they're going
	to do a background check.
	There was a certain presence or way you had to carry yourself to be one of these agents,
	especially at the lower levels and a lot of that is because they do want people to obey
	as they go up and up and up and they do want good investigators and people with a work
	ethic, you know what I mean?
	People that can follow orders, get up early, etc.
	I get that.
	But now, it's like phone it in.
	It seems like everywhere, it's just like, phone it in, take the pills, we want you here, we don't care, and then they purposely put these government figures out as the face of the government, you know, like the Brentons of the world, or I forget what the Assistant Secretary of Health or whatever, the Sea Commander.
	Admiral Levine. The Levine, the Admiral.
	They put the Admiral out there, and it's like, I don't think people get how many people work in these bureaucracies.
	Why are they putting these people out there?
	It's because they want to infuriate some of us, but they also want to say...
	Come on in. And I really truly believe that they're doing that to not only delegitimize these agencies and organizations, but get us ready for automation.
	And just like less people are going to be working.
	And you don't have to be that adept.
	And you are going to have to kind of normalize this UBI system.
	And I don't know.
	You've been around. I've been around a long time.
	I've headed up a bunch of different jobs where I had people under me.
	I've gradually seen people get worse, but are you seeing the same thing where there's just,
	people just don't wanna work, they don't really have a purpose.
	They don't have a drive for anything, and they're just kinda like there waiting around.
	It's weird, right?
	Yeah, everything's handed to them now.
	I think social media. We're old-timers.
	We can talk about pre-social media, right?
	I think that's changed so much, how we're wired, how we talk, how we're connected, and it's making a bunch of weak people, unfortunately.
	And when you have these agencies recruiting, that's who they want.
	They want the yes-men. They want somebody who's never going to fight back or question anything.
	You know, and you're talking about the backgrounds that they used to do.
	Like when I came on, you know, with LA County Sheriff, the famous thing they used to do is send 10 letters to people that you recommended to recommend you, right?
	So you'd give 10 letters and then they'd send letters to your neighbors, like all the way around in all directions.
	And then they would ask for other referrals from those people.
	So there would be like a letter tree that would come up and all of your skeletons would end up coming out in the closets because somebody would rat from the The person who told the person, oh, he used to smoke weed, and then he'd be out.
	That stuff is going away.
	Oh, it's gone!
	I think they're intentionally putting in weak people who are tending to go with leftist ideas.
	It's to push the people like me out who question things and look at what's right and wrong.
	The right and wrong people who actually Critically think about things.
	They don't want them. That's not who they want.
	And you're probably right about the automation.
	Less is more and they have more control.
	I don't know where we're headed, man, but it's not a pretty picture and it's not going great so far, right?
	No, it's not going great so far.
	And they've kind of beta tested these things in larger areas.
	They had the robot dogs walking around New York City at one point.
	People got upset. They had only lasted for a few weeks.
	Gone. The San Francisco robot dogs, though, they're staying.
	But we're writing up legislation.
	They can't carry lethal weapons.
	Excuse me? Excuse me?
	And then you look at a culture like Singapore.
	Where, you know, I constantly talk about this sustainability agenda and how it's a code word for our standard of living going down as the Asians come up.
	But you look at Singapore and during the whole thing they had robot dogs in the park.
	And not only do they have the dogs in the park, it wasn't six feet there.
	It was three feet there.
	But if you were within three feet of another person, the robot dog, which had facial recognition and movement recognition, would turn to you and tell you to get away from that other person.
	It's weird how it works. There's another three feet leeway when the robot dogs are on the street, as long as you're listening to them.
	That's terrifying, right?
	I saw that story in San Francisco, and they run a horrible department anyways.
	Look what's occurring in that city.
	And then for them to talk about doing lethal options on a robot dog, right?
	It's crazy.
	There's things to be said about, you know, with like the SWAT teams, they use like some kind of robots to get camera views, right?
	And I'm okay with that because that's better than somebody getting shot in the face to get eyes on a bad guy they're trying to get.
	But when you're starting to weaponize, you know...
	This kind of tech, that's just crazy.
	And I hope that that trend goes away, but I think you're going to see way more of it.
	I think they want the drones flying, checking QR codes at the checkpoints like you see in China.
	There's all the drone teams popping up in law enforcement agencies all over the country.
	They're embracing it. And, you know, and part of me is like, you know, that could save some lives and help some response.
	There's some good that could be done.
	I think they were using them in Chicago with, like, the ShotSpotter, so, like, drones would go to the sound of gunfire.
	There's something to be said for that, maybe, but the problem is when you give them that much power and you're giving them new surveillance tools and techniques, they're going to use them.
	Like, 100% they're going to use them, right?
	That's how cops work. I used to work dope, and we would push all the way to where it was legal.
	All the way on the line of legal.
	Whatever tools we could have, they're going to use.
	Government never doesn't use tools if they can.
	So as we roll out these new things for our agencies, we really have to watch that, man.
	Because where does that end once we have drones and robots and all the things?
	That's going to China real quick.
	And it's not just China, so I'm going to play this clip for those that haven't seen it.
	This is, again, 2020 Singapore.
	And you notice these things have different mount systems.
	Okay, so it's telling everybody about the social distance.
	Walk right up to you.
	Spot patrolling the park in Singapore.
	Can you imagine being, and again, these are people that were outside, and it sensors, you know, it uses sensors to see them and moves them.
	And then, yeah, it rolls up on them and tells them whether or not they can be next to one another.
	Let's keep Singapore healthy.
	For your own safety, and for those around you, please stand at least one meter apart.
	So one meter, there it is.
	Stand at least one meter apart.
	If we got the robot dogs, you get another meter.
	So maybe we should have the robot dogs, especially because apparently we're going to have pandemics forever, Ray.
	The other thing about that device is...
	On a larger scale, it was developed via the military.
	They were utilizing those in Iraq and Afghanistan.
	They were called big dogs then.
	They weren't spot, so they get smaller.
	It's cuter. But then you equip this with an android operating system and a multitude of mounts.
	And some of those mounts are now lethal weapons.
	But otherwise, these mounts...
	Can automate out a lot of jobs.
	These things can walk upstairs.
	They can carry loads.
	They can open doors.
	I hate talking about the automation stuff, but it's real.
	It's coming. And you just saw the Biden administration come out and Powell agree that somehow a million new jobs were created.
	Last night Tucker Carlson challenged that and said they couldn't find 10,000 new jobs that had actually been
	created if this stuff is already kind of going on in the background and we have any type of a
	Financial collapse. Do you do you think that they would not only you utilize the CBDC?
	But kind of have a rollout and a coming-out party for this technology
	Yeah, because they're not gonna say no That's the big terror when you're talking about this kind of technology.
	If you can replace a cop with some machine that never says no and doesn't have this thing with compassion or can follow the spirit of the law versus the letter of the law, you're in trouble.
	Right? That's like a yes-man army.
	And that's like the last thing you want in the government.
	That's the formula for disaster is what that is.
	It's really the last thing you want in any type of institution that's important to humans.
	And they want it in the, I guess, most...
	Pervasive of ways, not only in law enforcement, but they want it in medicine.
	They want it in education.
	And that should tell people something.
	You know, imagine a world where you don't have Peter McCullough's or others with the ability to challenge a narrative because they're robots.
	And they're automated. Imagine a world where you can't have a whistleblower inside the school board or a good teacher just step out and say enough is enough, especially with the madness that we've seen now to give really children autonomy over their parents if they all of a sudden identify with a specific listed mental illness.
	Everything I said, there's a fact.
	It's still listed as a mental illness, but if they identify that they have that mental illness, then all of a sudden they have autonomy over their parents.
	I don't know if you're a dad, Ray.
	Talk about that a little bit.
	The fact that your rights as a parent, within the media at least, have seemed to be circumvented and they've tried to institutionalize that through the education system and the media.
	You know, I've got three kids, and when I see these congressmen out on Twitter talking about what a stupid idea it is to have the parents lead in what they want their children educated in, I know there's a problem, right?
	Like, when you're talking about, like, they want to do this trans, you know, This trans craziness where they're transitioning these kids or honoring their pronouns or giving them chest binders in middle school and not talking to their parents about it or not notifying their parents.
	That's crazy. The government is not this big...
	Well, it is a nanny state, but it shouldn't be.
	As a parent, it is crazy what they've done to try to control kids, to try to indoctrinate kids.
	And that's the way I look at this.
	I sent two kids to college already, and damn straight I didn't send them without speaking about my beliefs and my values and my way of thinking.
	Not thinking they're going to latch onto it and exactly go with it, but I'm not going to let some professor, some leftist, woke idiot talking about everything that I don't believe in get into my kids' heads Before I can.
	At least they have a chance to hear another side of it.
	And I think that's what this really boils down to.
	That's the only way you can protect your kids in this environment is you have to have these conversations and let them know how you think and why you think that.
	Not just like, oh, you're going to do this and you should think this, but really dive into these issues with kids.
	Because I don't think parents do that.
	And when they're not doing that, that's why you're seeing just this craziness in the school systems and in college and How far it's skewed in one direction.
	It's not a place where, you know, conservatism is even accepted.
	Like you have a TPUSA, which I'm not a big massive fan of or anything, but if you have one of those stands at a college, you're probably going to get attacked by the local Antifa chapter, right?
	And nothing will happen. So, you know, it's...
	I kind of got off on a rant, but that's the show, right?
	But, you know, it's scary to see what's happening with kids, how much they're trying to control them, kill the family unit, and all that.
	But I think it really does fall on parents, and I don't think that's happening enough.
	Like, you have to indoctrinate your kids before they can, is the way I look at it.
	Well, I would say indoctrinate them with the idea that biology is real, that there really is no stronger unit than the family unit, that love is the ultimate truth, and no one is going to love you like your family, despite all your faults, All your missteps, all your problems, family is that unit.
	And I think that's the ultimate thing that you kind of have to get across to your kids.
	And the more I think that they are invested in that and understand that, they're going to at least respect your opinion and at least take a look at it, or it'll be in the back of their head.
	And people don't understand how much of an effect you can have on somebody, even if they're Acting a certain way or saying something different, especially if it's somebody that you love and they love you and they know that there is a chance you can bring them back or that it doesn't have to get as bad.
	There's plenty of redemption out there.
	We don't act like it, but we need to.
	We have to really reach out to other people.
	And that's the other thing. I talked about medicine for a minute.
	We have to have empathy.
	And we also have to find points of agreement.
	You just mentioned Turning Point USA. And one of the first conversations we had, I'm like, wait, I'm no conservative.
	I hate everybody.
	They are not my friends.
	I'm not a liberal's friend.
	I'm not a conservative friend. Any of that.
	But I look at Turning Point USA, and I look at Charlie Kirk and how he's one of the biggest voices out there talking about transhumanism and getting really into the nuts and bolts of it.
	And then he has Steve Bannon on a few months ago at an event, and he's talking about transhumanism, cancer moonshot, something I'm not seeing anybody else but me talk about.
	You know what I mean? I'm like, okay, great, awesome.
	And then at this last event, they had Tim Cast out there, my good friend Luke, doing panels.
	They've had Alex Jones on there.
	It's come a long way.
	It's come a long way.
	So many people were on me about my Roger Stone interview, or I'm talking at the Reawaken America tour.
	I don't understand that.
	I want to talk to as many people as possible.
	I want to be as respectful as possible when I talk to those people.
	I want to not shout over them or tell them what they are, but give them a chance.
	To discuss their viewpoint and maybe we can all learn something.
	Maybe we can get into a conversation where we don't have to agree.
	Imagine that. And other viewpoints can get out there and at the end of the day you might think about that viewpoint and maybe think that person Has a point.
	And maybe we should move in that direction.
	Or they might think that about what you said.
	And that's few and far between.
	And I don't see that a lot even in the alternative media with interviews.
	I see a lot of echo chambers.
	And I don't see people that are willing to...
	Interview the controversial character, but if they're on one side or the other, kind of just go along with the narrative.
	Like, no offense, General Flynn's done a ton of interviews.
	It's rinse and repeat, right?
	No one's asking them real questions.
	What are your thoughts on that space?
	Because obviously... You're in that space too.
	You do a show.
	You've got other creators over at redvoicemedia.com.
	And by the way, redvoicemedia.com slash Jason.
	In four minutes, guys, you're going to want to sign up.
	$1 for the first 10 days, $10 a month, or get the gift that keeps on giving this Christmas.
	Lock in for a year, $100.
	Can't beat it.
	What are your thoughts on what I just said in interviews, reaching out, and echo chambers?
	I think we need much more of that type of interview, right?
	And I'm guilty of it too.
	I don't know. I think it comes down to just some basics where if you have a platform and you're doing interviews, it's easier to have somebody on who shares your same viewpoints and kind of parrot it back and forth a little bit.
	I think there is some of that. It's easier to do that.
	You know, one of the reasons why we were excited to get your show on is because, you know, you're not right-wing or left-wing.
	Like, that is something we're trying to do at RVM more.
	Now, I'm not going to platform people I completely disagree with and can't stand.
	That's not going to happen. Because, like, you know...
	Wait! No Sank yogurt?
	No Chunk yogurt? No Sank yogurt?
	No, no TYT here?
	You're kidding me, Ray. No, you know, but I think there needs to be more of it.
	I think there's more common ground than we expect when it comes to like the other side, you know, coming from like the right wingers like me.
	I think there's more things that we could be on the same page with and probably do better interviews and create even better content with.
	But it's hard because it's controversial or adversarial and you don't know where it's going to go.
	And I think when it comes to the creators doing that stuff, I think they want a little bit more control.
	That's probably why you don't see it.
	And I don't want echo chambers.
	That doesn't help anybody. I mean, if new ideas don't pop up, even if they're the wrong new idea that you can squash, that's great too.
	Bring a bad idea and dismantle it on a show.
	That's perfect, but you might be surprised and agree with more.
	What's funny is the truth-er stuff that you've done.
	I have a quick funny story on this, actually.
	You actually turned my wife woke with loose change and I didn't know it was you, right?
	So like, and I was actually kind of pissed off at her back in the day.
	So this is probably 08, 09 and she's talking about 9-11 stuff and she walks this documentary and she showed one of my daughters and I'm like, what do you mean the government is involved or it's not the truth?
	You know, but Having that viewpoint, and obviously it took me many years to get to where I am now, but that kind of information should be out.
	That's why we're excited to have different viewpoints with you.
	I watch your show in the mornings while I'm working and I agree with you more than I don't.
	Am I the ultra right winger or am I just someone who likes freedom and loves the country and wants to live a certain way?
	It's complicated, though, right?
	Like, do you want the right-wing guy to bring on a lefty and fight and have that kind of thing on air?
	Or can you get to a good discussion point where good information is coming out?
	Some people can pull that off and some can't.
	Yeah. You know, one of the better debates is actually Tucker Carlson versus Sank Uygur from quite a few years back now.
	But they sat up on stage and I thought Tucker handled himself very well.
	And one of the reasons that I've been playing these interviews or speeches from back in the day like Cindy Sheehan or my Naomi Wolf interview is because you see even back then what they were talking about is a lot of the same things we're talking about now.
	And there is that cohesion of quote-unquote right and left.
	All right, guys. It's official.
	The first hour is over.
	So one at a time, we are going to leave the platforms.
	That's my cue to the producers.
	So we can go full throttle, redvoicemedia.com slash jasonredvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
	Rocking goodbye. YouTube, Arrivederci.

▲