All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 20, 2022 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
59:47
The Weinstein Stain Shall Not Be Removed - Reality Rants With Jason Bermas
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery, we need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat, as if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy. Silence!
The great and powerful Oz knows why you have come.
You've got to say, I'm a human being!
God damn it! My life has value!
You have meddled with the tribal forces of nature!
Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder!
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men.
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
Yeah, thank you.
You're beautiful.
I love you.
Yes.
You're beautiful.
Thank you.
It's showtime.
And now, Reality Rant with Jason Vermis.
And who loves you?
And who do you love?
So, good morning.
Good morning. It's Jason Bermas.
It's Reality Rants on redvoicemedia.com.
And for some reason, it doesn't seem like I am streaming on YouTube, which is very, very bizarre.
Because it does seem like I'm streaming from my software.
Sorry we're doing this live.
But it doesn't seem like I'm actually on the deal.
So, I am.
So weird. So weird, so I can't monitor it?
Bizarre. And there it is.
Well, I just wasted one minute of your time.
That's what we do here at Reality Rants.
I actually have a jam-packed show for everybody that is probably going to be impossible for me to get through everything I want to get through.
So, really what I want to do here is just lightning hit a bunch of stories that I think are important.
We'll start off with the Harvey Weinstein story because I think that that one really is important as well and that It's often overlooked that we can have victories and even I can be surprised and wrong about things.
I never thought that Harvey Weinstein was going to do any time in prison.
And I can remember specifically when I heard the news where I was and what I was doing.
When I found out Harvey Weinstein was guilty and that he was going to jail, jail.
Like the real jail. I was like, wow, that's huge.
And it was me on the way to DC, almost to DC at that point.
I think I was actually going through some type of a toll booth.
As the verdict was coming in during December and Stop the Steal.
Late December, I believe.
That's my guess if I had to guess the date.
But I know I was in that area and I was just like...
I screamed in my car.
I screamed in joy.
Wow, we did it! Yes!
When I say we, I really do mean humanity.
Because the things Weinstein was doing were vile.
They were vile.
And we've only scratched the surface of them.
And I know that Hollywood's a vile place.
And I know it's very transactional.
And I know some of the people that accused him of abuse went back again and had friendly relationships with Weinstein.
But it's often not discussed.
The other accusations that are out there Via underage girls, including, by the way, Kate Beckinsale saying advancements when she was 17 years old.
The association with Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
It's a win to get that guy in jail.
And it looks like, for real, he's going to spend the rest of his life in prison.
Harvey Weinstein is found guilty of three sex-related counts in Los Angeles.
Court disgraced Hollywood mogul is acquitted of sexual battery, but jury is still hung on three other counts against him.
Now, the point is, the man is 70 years old.
He's clearly not in the best health, although he's playing that up just like Dennis Hassert played.
He's an old man in a wheelchair!
And honestly, my biggest fear at this point is not that he will win in an appellate court.
Okay, a lot of people don't realize, for instance, Bill Cosby, not in jail.
Won in an appellate court, left jail after all of that media against him.
I'm just saying. Gary Glitter to be freed from prison after serving half of his sentence, which was already extremely light for the types of crimes we're talking about.
Ten-year-old girls.
Okay? He had 16 years.
He served eight of them. He's getting out.
The system is rigged.
Okay? It is rigged against you and I and humanity in general.
And especially at this point, our children on massive amounts of levels.
Okay? Just about everything that is geared towards your kid, unfortunately does have an ulterior motive that is no bueno.
And that's why I've really emphasized the Sesame Street and CNN partnership.
Sesame Street...
Was a staple not only in my household and my family, but the culture.
And don't think they didn't prey on my generation.
Okay? Some of which, when they did have kids, had them a little later in life.
Alright? When they were propagating their narrative.
I'll leave it at that. We're on the tube.
Okay? So, in another instance of, I just can't believe it happened.
Other than Weinstein, I specifically remember...
You probably go back.
I want to say this is January 2021.
Actually, it's probably January 2020.
Excuse me. It is January 2020.
So January 2020, follow-up to this a little later.
I believe I was watching the Cowboy McGregor UFC pay-per-view with my brother.
Back in Odeon, New York.
And all of a sudden the word came in that Epstein had been arrested on the tarmac coming into New York State.
Whoa. Again, another moment.
Another couldn't believe it moment.
Leapt up. Cheered.
Actually, went live.
Video's probably still up.
If you look in that time period, I may have to go find that video.
Elated. And you know what my brother said in the background?
He's a dead man. And I thought to myself, you know what, I'm cynical, but how in the world could you kill this guy after all the press that's been around it?
After all the talk, and now he's been arrested, and they're keeping him in the same prison that El Chapo was kept in?
Come on. Come on, there's no way that's happening.
Another example of me being naive and me getting things wrong.
And me being unable to accept it's actually worse than I say it is most of the time.
That doesn't mean we don't have our victories, and we shouldn't savor them, we don't rest on our laurels, but this is a victory, guys.
This is a very high-level guy in the entertainment industry, not a good dude, okay?
I mean, I gotta tell you folks, how many of you guys have ever spent any time in Hollyweird?
I've spent enough of it to tell you I don't like it.
I don't like it at all.
I didn't like it while I was there.
I don't like it now. It's not a great culture.
It's a culture of vanity, of self-service, of sociopathic behavior, of Of decadence where people are things.
Let me repeat that.
People are things.
The type of relationships that many of these people have, okay, on the way up, and even if they hit the apex, is super, super vapid, transactional, and really, in my opinion, anti-human.
Pushing you away from what we really are.
Because it certainly doesn't serve as real love.
Right? I just want to put that out there.
Okay? So let's go down the line here.
We've got some other stories I wanted to get into.
I touched on this really quick last night on Mixed Martial Mindset with John Fitch, which you can find across a bunch of my platforms, by the way, guys.
It's up and about. Chief Twit Elon Musk is ordered to step down as head of Twitter by 57.5% of voters in his own poll.
More than 17 million votes cast in 12 hours.
But will he listen?
First of all, he wasn't going to be the CEO of Twitter.
Forever. A lot of this is for, again, this PR purpose of bringing you a savior.
Think about it realistically for a second, everybody.
Now, in order for companies to be big time, pig time, make the buko buxo, Right?
You gotta have people that are super dedicated at the top.
And even in the case of say Apple, Tim Cook ain't running multiple companies.
Sure there's different divisions of Apple.
That's a totally separate thing.
Alright? We're supposed to believe That this guy heads up SpaceX.
Number one, that's huge.
And it's not about going to Mars or the moon.
They're launching rockets all the time with military cargo on them and their satellite systems.
The bare minimum.
Forget about Artemis. That's a huge deal.
These satellites cost a lot of money.
They surpassed Boeing as the largest for-profit vendor for NASA. Big deal.
Working arm-in-arm, hand-in-hand with the Defense Department.
First of all, again, Musk is the front for that too.
He's not running that.
But if you had that job, you'd be hard-pressed to be hitting all the podcasts.
I want to put that out there.
Two, Tesla. Not just a car company.
Even if it were just a legitimate, capitalistic car company and not an invested-in sustainability front and beyond, by the way.
Also a tool of technology via CureVac and printing the you-know-what in scale.
Made a lot of buco bucks on that too.
If you were just heading either of those divisions within Tesla as the CEO or the CFO or any of that, you wouldn't have much time.
You'd be working 60 to 80 hours a week, again, bare minimum, if not really all the time on call.
Okay? So let's go there.
Now you've got two big companies.
We haven't even discussed the boring company because most people think they're making flamethrowers.
No! They're digging holes underground for the building of more facilities by the military-industrial complex and privatized billionaires, essentially, for their bunkers.
That's the kind of work that the boring company does.
Again, as a CEO, you would be bogged down.
Now, you're going to tell me all that plus...
And now he's going to be the CEO of Twitter.
One of the largest, if not most interacted in this country, at least on a political level, companies out there.
That's embedded with the FBI and intelligence, by the way, and has been for a very, very long time.
So he already knew he wasn't going to be there, guys.
That's the reality.
So this whole poll...
John Fitch floated the idea, it's a bot trap!
It's a trap! No.
It's not a trap. Although, it could have fished out some of the bots too.
It could be multi-purpose.
But Elon never really thought he was going to stay there.
I guarantee it. Because honestly, what this is, is another way to bring in the algorithm and develop Really quote-unquote mind files on everybody.
Through this network, Facebook, which I'm going to show you a piece that I did, man, a long while ago on We Are Change, showing you that we've talked about Apple's social credit score system, but Facebook also had a trust score on you years and years and years ago.
You get it? This has been happening for a long, long time.
And it's been out there for a long time.
So next story down the line.
I wanted to pump this out there.
I discussed this as the feature story on Mixed Martial Mindset.
But here we are.
We're supposed to have the coldest Christmas in years in the United States.
They call it climate change now, but you still hear global warming.
At the same time, while energy prices are skyrocketing, they want a more equitable future and a different type of grid.
That's sustainable.
While they sell you on the idea that it's actually warming out.
And that you're just too dumb to get it.
That they're regulating you based on carbon because that's a life force on the planet.
And it diverts attention away from their real pollutants.
Right? The estrogen mimickers.
Right? The statins.
The poisons in the water.
They're turning the frogs gay.
Right? In the air, in the soil, in the pesticides, the merging of Monsatin and Bayer Pharmaceutical.
I can't believe more people as that was going on didn't have an issue with that.
Oh yeah!
Let's have just crazed, unaccountable, criminally anyway, pharmaceutical and food companies that are genetically modifying things get together.
Let's have that merger go on.
My God. My God.
Let's get down to this story here.
We did the glitter one. Bezos and Gates back Synchron in Drive for Brain Implant Breakthrough.
This is what I need everybody to understand.
It's not just the Musker Nuts.
Okay, he's the public face in Neuralink.
He's giving it a cool, you know, hip...
You can't wait to have it kind of vibe.
This is going on everywhere.
They're all going to be in the game.
They're all going to be in the game.
Because it's the same agenda.
The sustainability agenda.
The automation agenda.
The transhuman agenda.
So I'll probably end up doing a...
A whole story deep dive into that.
But like I said, I have so many clips queued up.
And at the top of the second hour, we're going to have Todd McGreevey on from rcreader.com.
A great publication out here in the Quad Cities.
And also a great website to go check out for real independent journalism.
And what I love about Todd is...
He also grabs stories from Whitney Webb on the 4th Industrial Revolution, on the sustainability agenda, on what it really means, and puts it in print and distributes it out to the good people here in the Midwest.
Mysterious shockwave cracks Earth's magnetosphere that protects our planet from dangerous space radiation.
I just want to say this.
I am in no way qualified to tell you whether this is legitimate or not.
But, when I see this stuff, either it's nature outside of the magnetosphere, or it's man, and we're testing things, and we're doing things.
And since we have been weaponizing space for a very long time, and we are in a big military conflict right now, and there were a bunch of sightings, for instance, in Wisconsin, of different aerial phenomenon that I very much believe could be weapon systems and training inside the US. We have to look at these things because I think we are about to see for the first time some of these things that we thought were science fiction being utilized in warfare on a large scale sooner rather than later.
And now for the bizarro story Big time bizarro.
The bizarro world story.
I don't know what to say about this one, but I have to report on it because it's so weird.
Human heart is found by workers at a Tennessee government salt facility.
Police say adult males' remains could have been there for weeks and call it the most bizarre thing they've ever seen.
Apparently they searched the ground.
They have no, no idea how this happened.
They didn't find any other remains.
And as far as I know, they don't have any leads whatsoever on what this is at all.
So, thumbs it up, subscribe, share.
I've got a line of videos I want to go down.
And now that we talked about that social credit score, I think that the first one that we're going to do is this piece that I did for We Are Change back in the day on essentially this trust score.
Because it again lays out that even though you're getting these revelations from Twitter, now the intelligence apparatus has been embedded in social media for things like this.
That are a build-up to the social credit score.
And beyond that, really criminalizing speech and thought on a level most of us can't even comprehend.
Okay, so...
Give me one second here, and we will cue that right up.
Let's... Bam and...
Bam. Great.
Here we go. Okay.
...media company...
Rating us on a zero to one scale without telling us A what our score is or B what the actual criteria for that score is.
For instance in this article they're saying it's not only your posts but your activity on other posts and whether or not you may flag content As quote unquote fake news.
You see, this program came into fruition, according to them, over the last year, about a year ago, when this fake news hysteria hit the mainstream media.
Is Facebook responsible for Donald Trump becoming president of the United States?
Facebook now under fire.
Critics say it allowed fake news to spread on the platform, potentially reaching millions of people, creating echo chambers and unfairly influencing the presidential election.
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is defending his company against accusations that phony news stories helped Donald Trump win the presidency.
During a conference Thursday, he said the idea that fake news on Facebook influenced the election in any way is a pretty crazy idea.
Zuckerberg now being forced to fend off criticism that the site allows fake news articles about Trump and Clinton to be shared online.
I do think that there is a certain profound lack of empathy in asserting that the only reason why someone could have voted the way they did is because they saw some fake news.
One of my greatest regrets in running the company is that we were slow in identifying the Russian information operations in 2016.
We expected them to do a number of more traditional cyberattacks, which we did identify and notify the campaigns that they were trying to hack into them.
But we were slow at identifying the type of new information operations.
What I think we've learned now across a number of issues, not just data privacy, but also fake news and foreign interference in elections, And they were already talking about giving a trustworthy score to media outlets on their platform.
And now that has reached beyond And into their user base.
Now on top of that, it's also admitted in this article that Twitter itself is now using other people, the people that follow you and you follow, as criteria to decide whether or not your tweets are spread.
Now, a lot of people are likening these systems, especially because they cannot be reviewed and you don't know your actual score, to the Chinese social credit score that is now in place with hundreds of millions of their citizens.
And folks, this is restricting travel, this is restricting the ability to own property, and even restricting the ability for internet access in some of these cases.
It's absolutely astonishing.
By 2020, China plans to give all of its 1.4 billion citizens a personal score based on how they behave.
So some people with low scores are already being punished if they want to travel.
Nearly 11 million Chinese people can no longer fly, and 4 million are barred from trains.
Next week, the program will start expanding nationwide.
The government here says it is trying to purify society by rewarding those who are trustworthy and punishing those who are not.
In some of China's largest cities, a high-tech effort is underway to bust low-level offenders, jaywalkers.
Cameras record them going through intersections, zero in on their face, and then publicly shame them on nearby video screens.
It's all part of the Chinese government's new social credit system, where people's daily behavior is monitored and rated.
I think it's a good thing, this woman said.
It makes people more honest.
When Leo Hu recently tried to book a flight, he was told he was banned from flying because he's on the list of untrustworthy people.
Leo was a journalist who was ordered by a court to apologize for a series of tweets he wrote and was then told his apology was insincere.
I can't buy property.
My child can't go to private school, he says.
You feel you're being controlled by the list all the time.
And although we may not be quite there yet, this has all the earmarks of the same type of thing.
Now, one of the largest questions out there is, who gets to decide what the truth is?
We have liars like Rudy Giuliani saying on television, the truth isn't the truth.
It isn't truth. Truth isn't truth.
And I want to go back to this quote from a 2004 New York Times article.
That's not the way the world really works anymore.
We're an empire now.
And when we act, we create our own reality.
And while you're studying that reality, judiciously, as you will, we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too.
And that's how things will sort out.
We're history's actors, and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.
And of course, they're referring to the media and the people.
And when this article was published, it was only published as an upper echelon aide in the Bush administration.
However, its author later revealed this was Karl Rove.
Those unfamiliar with Rove should know that he spread lies in order to invade Iraq and, currently, he's not only a Fox News pundit, but he has benefited quite lucratively from his past association with the Bush administration.
When Karl Rove announced his resignation from the White House earlier this week, he got some rave reviews.
Here's a sample circulating on the Internet.
We should be congratulating Karl Rove for a long, successful run.
This is a guy who elected a president twice, who's known as one of the most brilliant political uh...
activists of our time if you've ever talked to him he's almost got almost like a blinders on he looks right in the eye and he talks faster than I do really fast right in your face totally intent on you and it's really like talking to a uh...
A fire hydrant.
He's not only the mastermind behind everything, he's the president's senior advisor.
Boy genius, Bush's brain, the architect.
Carl is brilliant, he is funny, and he's a passionate advocate.
Carl Rove is a superstar, he is very insightful, he's a great friend to the president.
There is of course more to be said.
What struck me about my fellow Texan Karl Rove is that he knew how to win elections as if they were divine interventions.
Rove knew in politics to bet on fear and loathing.
Never mind that in stroking the basest bigotry of true believers, you coarsen both politics and religion.
At the same time he was recruiting an army of the Lord for the born-again Bush, Grove was also shaking down corporations for campaign cash.
Crony capitalism became a biblical injunction.
Greed and God won four elections in a row, twice in the Lone Star State and twice again in the nation at large.
But the result has been to leave Texas under the thumb of big money with huge holes ripped in its social contract and the U.S. government in shambles, paralyzed, polarized, and mired in war, debt, and corruption.
Roe himself is deeply enmeshed in some of the scandals being investigated as we speak.
On a final note, I would like to say as technology becomes more and more advanced and in this country we have employees voluntarily taking microchips in their hand and saying they're quite happy about it.
When we came across this and saw it being used in other societies, we said why not us?
Why not us bring it?
And provide a solution that we can use for so many different things, not just opening doors, not just self-checkout in our markets, so many other different things.
We live in extremely dangerous times.
And now is the time to rise up and not allow a technopoly of oligarch, billionaire, digital princes decide what we
think and what we're allowed to say.
Hey Jason, you're muted.
Oh, thank you so much.
I was muted. I am an idiot.
Now, that piece is from four plus years ago, and notice it involves Facebook and Twitter, okay?
And on top of that, what happens there?
You have Zuckerberg who's pushing aside this narrative that somehow Facebook rigged the election via Russia and then totally flipping the script.
All of it. Now, I want to show people this piece again that's years and years old that shows you the track trace database society within not only social media but everything digital which is Google's selfish ledger because Google is honestly in the military industrial complex mind the de facto global brain they don't look at you as having any types of civil liberties Forget about it.
You don't have a Fourth Amendment.
You're not securing your persons or property because they believe you're volunteering all this information.
That's the legalese on that.
And then they always tell you how you have an option to opt out.
This is Google's selfish ledger.
And it was telling you about the future.
This, I believe, is maybe even older ledger.
Than that last piece that I just did.
So let's go to that right now.
This man is Jean-Baptiste Pierre Antoine de Monet, Chevalier de la Marque.
In 1809, 50 years before Darwin published The Origin of the Species, he wrote what is widely recognized as the first comprehensive theory of evolution.
His book, The Philosophie Zoologique, introduced the notion of an internal code within every living thing.
Let me just stop this.
These people are outwardly social Darwinists.
They believe that they are superior to you and because they rule, they should continue to rule.
They can fool the vast majority of the species and control the vast majority of the species.
That is natural selection at work to these people.
Which, when passed down through successive generations, defined the physiological characteristics of a species.
At the center of Lamarck's theory laid what he called the adaptive force.
He believed that the experiences of an organism during its life modified this internal code, and upon reproduction, this modified version was passed down to its young.
Whilst not biologically accurate and ultimately superseded by Darwin's theory of natural selection,
the epigenetic theories put forward by him are beginning to find new homes in unexpected places.
When we use contemporary technology, a trail of information is created in the form of data.
When analyzed, it describes our actions, decisions, preferences, movement and relationships.
So once again, guys, when they talk about metadata, this is the type of thing they're actually talking about.
And this is old.
You know what, I'm gonna type it in right now.
We'll do it live!
How old is Google's Selfish Ledger?
How old are we?
2018, just around that same time as the piece.
This came out in May of 2018.
So again, just around the same time that I was talking about a Facebook trust score.
See how these things are accelerated behind the scenes for a long time.
Okay, this is the verse.
Unsettling vision of the future.
You bet it's unsettling.
Because it's the now.
This codified version of who we are becomes ever more complex,
developing, changing, and deforming based on our actions.
In this regard, this ledger of our data may be considered a Lamarckian epigenome,
a constantly evolving representation of who we are.
This is Bill Hamilton, one of the most significant evolutionary theorists of the 20th century.
His work studying the social structures of ants, bees, and wasps had a profound effect on our understanding of the role of genes in social behaviors such as altruism.
You see that? I mean, they literally...
And look, I get it.
When you're doing science, you want to look at a spectrum across nature.
But immediately, we're the bugs.
And that's seriously how the upper crust, the generational nepotistic bloodlines really look at the vast majority of us.
He believed and went on to prove that the driving force behind evolution was not the individual, but the gene.
He stated that the ultimate criterion which determines whether a gene will spread is not whether the behavior is to the benefit of the behavior, but whether it is to the benefit of the gene.
In the mid-1970s, the British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins built on the work of Hamilton and others to popularize the concept of the selfish gene.
In his book of the same name, he introduced the notion of a gene which, whilst devoid of any motives or will, could be metaphorically and pedagogically described as if it were.
In this model, the individual organism is a transient carrier, a survival machine for the gene.
User-centered design principles have dominated the world of computing for many decades, but what if we looked at things a little differently?
What if the ledger could be given a volition or purpose rather than simply acting as an historical reference?
What if we focused on creating a richer ledger by introducing more sources of information?
What if we thought of ourselves not as the owners of this information, but as custodians, transient carriers, or caretakers?
See, what if we're into stakeholder capitalism?
What if we just openly share everything and even beyond the internet of things and the metadata they're discussing here, but also the internet of bodies and our biological data too?
Oh, it's everybody's.
This is as collectivist as it gets.
Forget the term communism or Marxism or socialism.
This is collectivism 101.
They want to what?
Get rid of the haves and the have-nots, level the playing field, everybody's equal, except for the have-everythings.
Okay?
♪♪♪ Initially, the notion of a goal-oriented ledger
may be user-driven.
As an organisation, Google would be responsible for offering suitable targets for a user's ledger.
Whilst the notion of a global good is problematic, topics would likely focus on health or environmental impact to reflect Google's values as an organisation.
Once the user selects a volition for their ledger, every interaction may be compared to a series of parallel options.
If one of these options allows the ledger to move closer to its goal, it will be offered up to the user.
Over time, by selecting these options, the user's behaviour may be modified and the ledger moves closer to its target.
As this line of thinking accelerates and the notion of a goal-driven ledger becomes more palatable,
suggestions may be converted not by the user, but by the ledger itself.
In this case, the ledger is missing a key data source, which it requires in order to better understand this user.
In order to plug the gap in its knowledge, the ledger begins searching for a device which delivers the required data when used.
I mean, in real time, they're telling you this.
After this I'm going to play you Dennis Bushnell telling you how Google is the de facto global brain Okay, and that they're going to listen to all your calls and read all your emails and text messages and it's going to go into this type of an AI database Not not if but when and how and it really already is When I say when, we're there, baby. It's happening.
From this list, the ledger begins sorting the options most likely to appeal to the user in question.
In situations where no suitable product is found, the ledger may investigate a bespoke solution.
By analyzing historical data, it is increasingly possible to discern qualitative information such as taste and aesthetic sensibility, which may be used in the creation of a design proposal.
With the advent of technologies such as CNC milling and the emergent possibilities of 3D printing, a custom object may be created to trigger this user's interest.
In this way, the ledger is able to plug gaps in its knowledge and refine its model of human behavior.
Refine its model of human behavior.
Advance consumerism and collectivism at once through technology.
User data has the capability to survive beyond the limits of our biological selves in much the same way as genetic code is released and propagated in nature.
By considering this data through a Lamarckian lens, the codified experiences within the ledger become an accumulation of behavioral knowledge throughout the life of an individual.
This is also the basis for which mind files and Kurzweil entities, right?
The age of spiritual machines and the Rothblatt's of the world plan to use.
This is the modus operandi right here.
And remember, Kurzweil works for Google.
He worked for Google when they put this out.
He works at the immortality division, Calico.
Thinking of user data as multi-generational, it becomes possible for emerging users to benefit from the preceding generation's behaviors and decisions.
As new users enter an ecosystem, they begin to create their own trail of data.
By comparing this emergent ledger with the mass of historical user data, it becomes possible to make increasingly accurate predictions about decisions and future behaviors.
As cycles of collection and comparison extend, it may be possible to develop a species-level understanding of complex issues such as depression, health, and poverty.
And you notice they always sell it to you.
Oh, we're gonna solve depression.
We're gonna make you healthier.
We're not gonna have poverty.
Just let us track, trace, database, and regiment your entire lives through our selfish ledger.
Our ability to interpret user data, combined with the exponential growth in sensor-enabled objects, will result in an increasingly detailed account of who we are as people.
As these streams of information are brought together, the effect is multiplied.
new patterns become apparent and new predictions become possible.
Behavioral Sequencing Social engineering.
Since the 1970s, huge efforts have been made in sequencing the human genome.
Today, after many years of research and billions of data points, that sequence is known.
By adopting a similar perspective with user data, we may begin to better understand its role.
Just as the examination of protein structures paved the way to genetic sequencing, the mass multi-generational examination of actions and results could introduce a model of behavioral sequencing.
As gene sequencing yields a comprehensive map of human biology, researchers are increasingly able to target parts of the sequence and modify them in order to achieve a desired result.
I just want you to understand what they're talking about right here.
This is Google in 2018 while they talk about really the Internet of Things and Total Track Trace database and their selfish ledger talking about the modification of your genetic sequencing and DNA. No biggie!
As patterns begin to emerge in the behavioral sequences, they too may be targeted.
The ledger could be given a focus, shifting it from a system which not only tracks our behavior, but offers direction towards a desired result.
So again, they're admitting right here We are already in the track trace database society.
We may want to actually move out of that and actually direct your behavior through this technology.
No biggie. No biggie at all.
No, no, no, no big deal.
We are at the very beginning of our journey of understanding in the field of user data.
By applying our knowledge of epigenetics, inheritance, and memetics to this field, we may be able to make mental leaps in our understanding, which could offer benefits to this generation.
By the way, he said memetics?
Try biomimetics.
That's what Bushnell talks about.
But hey, we have a very calm voice and a piano backbeat telling us all this, very calmly, no big deal.
Future generations and the species as a whole.
Talking about species modification.
Alright, so this is a sequence of about six and a half minutes of Dennis Bushnell talking about Search engines, the global brain, the fact that you're not going to have a choice, you have no Fourth Amendment, period. And at the end of it, which is probably what we'll just get to in the next 17 minutes or so, he talks about essentially, hey, we're going to upload our consciousness, they're going to become us, or we're going to become them.
The best we can hope for is human-contaminated machines.
Human-contaminated machines.
The machines are capable of really good deep learning and that's what most of the current AI is based on.
This is somewhere in the range by the way of about 2016 to maybe 2018.
So honestly right in that range where you're going to see Google's Selfish Ledger.
Current AI is essentially soft computing.
It's neural nets, fuzzy logic, algorithms, and deep learning.
The machines coming up as we leave silicon and go to bio, optical, quantum, nanomolecular, and atomic computing, There's another 10 to the 8th to 10 to the 12th to go.
We've come 10 to the 8th so far.
The machine intelligence, currently, there's the soft computing business, but no one really sees a way to get to humans via deep learning or soft computing.
They just don't.
Not yet. There's no breakthrough in algorithms.
What we are doing, which will get to humans, people now think, and this is what's worrying people, is the biomimetics part.
The biomimetics part.
What we're talking about.
This is the merging of man with machine.
This is where you nanosection the neocortex, replicate it in silicon, and you don't have to understand how it works.
You just have to make it work this way as an artificial human brain surrogate.
An artificial human brain surrogate.
Biomimetics. This is that consciousness that they want to fool you into believing eventually you're going to be able to upload.
They will all go to Google.
So this is now the de facto global brain which will only get better.
Google will only get better.
It is the de facto global brain and what I would remind people Is the new digital age according to Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen, the Google guys, reshaping the future of people, nations, and businesses.
And let, again, Bushnell continue to tell you about it.
And we are busily, with nanosensors and other sensors, networking within 10 years some 3 trillion sensors.
So the global brain will be fed with all of this information, okay?
So not just everything I talk to, but the nanosensors.
And remember, the nanosatellite networks are up there now.
And it's a global skin.
Again, no biggie.
Not really being discussed, but oh well.
And it will have all of the contents of all the libraries, and it will read all of everybody's emails and everything else.
And so you end up with a really big global brain.
That's different from intelligence.
You're right. That's illegal surveillance, Dennis.
Chief scientist at NASA. Somebody around pre-Apollo, all the way back in the Gemini days.
Yeah, yeah. That's treasonous to the American people.
No big deal, right, Dennis? These people that you speak of that are worried about this are worried about the fact that as we develop, which we can now, it looks like via biomedics at least, in the next 10, 20, 25 years, a human level of machine intelligence, there's the conventional rules of we're going to make it friendly to humans.
Well, it turns out That people have now delved into that a bit, and they're not so sure we can do that.
And a really good brain, human level and beyond machine intelligence, could easily produce untoward effects on humans.
It wouldn't have to be malicious.
It would just have to be unthinking.
And wipe us all out, given our huge reliance upon electronics, In everything we do.
In everything we do.
Now I want people to think about that for a second because what Bushnell is telling you there in that conversation is that essentially you could have the Homer Simpson AI. I'll call it the Homer Simpson AI. Dope!
Oh! It just did something which destroyed our entire human ecosystem and devastated the species.
And you can't necessarily make AI benign or benevolent to humans, but let's just keep doing it anyway.
Let's just keep pushing forward.
Let's eventually commercialize it and sell it as the best thing since breakfast.
Sounds great, Dennis! Thank you!
And in fact, what we're developing this talk is essentially a second intelligent species.
We are, with the biomimetics, where we're nanosectioning the neocortex and replicating it in silicon, people alleged we're 10 to 15 to maybe 20 years max out from having a human-level machine intelligence.
So, Max, What he's saying is like 2035, 2040, we're going to have the Kurzweil entities that we create.
Fantastic! I look forward to it.
The NATO robotics is giving all the dexterity, human dexterity, and so forth.
So when one looks in the totality of the human versus the robot, the robot knows more.
The robot has a much better safety record.
In aviation, 85% of the safety issues are human factors.
It's clear if you want a safer system, you have less humans.
If you want a safer system, you have less humans.
Well, of course, if you have less humans, you'll have a safer system.
So we should probably have less humans, right, Dennis?
I love how that gets snuck in there.
Automation is the best.
Humans are bad.
We're constantly bad.
The machines so far are more knowledgeable.
The robot that we're using now to do cancer research and cancer treatments is much better than the human physicians.
So here's where he basically tells you we're going to get rid of the doctors.
We're going to get rid of the teachers and that's all going to go to AI and robotics.
The teachers are in fact more effective, the robot teachers, in educating children.
They're more creative, the child has more control and so forth and so on.
The studies show that children learn four to five times faster than they do in conventional
schools.
Because, you know, you get held back in the conventional schools, especially if you're
smart.
Bye.
And of course our education system hasn't been destroyed by design.
No, no, no, no.
Let's just get the robots in there.
That's because conventional schools, they have a large amount of time keeping order.
The classmates are not always supportive for people who are brainy and intelligent and so forth and so on.
You know, the total education system for the robot teacher tends to be better.
There will be essentially no jobs the machines cannot do.
We currently have creative software that are doing ideation just as good or better than humans now.
The creative jobs will be the last ones to go, but...
I have not been able to discern any jobs that machines cannot do as machine intelligence and all the rest of the autonomous robotics develops.
Oh, look at that. You're going to be out of a job.
So, you know, we've got to give you a UBI and make you subservient.
So, now we're to your question, okay?
What do you do with these people?
There's essentially three options.
You've covered one, which is the guaranteed income.
And the machines can produce the productivity, the wealth necessary to pay this.
It's just the machines do the work instead of the people.
Yeah. Dream on.
Because once the people aren't useful, what are they there for, for the predator class?
Because, look, technology is benign.
For instance, obviously, AI and robotics have a place in medicine.
They just don't have the place.
You want a human being there with empathy, okay, that has discernment beyond programming, period.
Period. But at the same time, you can reach levels of precision impossible with the human hand via robotics.
But at the same time, you also have robot kiosks getting ready to sew brain chips into your skull.
Yes, you have to change the cultural milieu, but this is eventually doable.
This is only one approach.
The second approach is the fact that what's changed since you've last looked at this is the whole technology level, and we humans are now converting ourselves into cyborgs.
We now have artificial retinas, artificial hearts, we have brain chips.
DARPA is working on brain chips for super soldiers.
We can have a high bandwidth com port built in so we don't have to use the sensors and they have very limited bandwidth.
And eventually this all ends up with uploading into the machines and instead of us versus them, humans versus the machines, we become Human contaminated machines.
And I've got to play it because in 2018 he revealed how many people had brain chips.
We're talking the likes of, you know, not retinal implants, not cochlear implants, okay?
The real deal brain chips.
Humans are now becoming cyborgs.
We have cochlear implants to hear.
Artificial retinas to see, artificial hearts to live, artificial limbs to move, artificial organs to function, and brain chips.
There's a couple hundred thousand people wandering around with brain chips now to fix congenitally defective brains and increasingly to fix memory and other things.
DARPA's working on brain chips for super soldiers.
And people are now working, thanks to Musk and other people, funding on direct machine brain communications.
It's not us versus them, us versus the machines.
We're merging. And this is the human evolution of the humans.
There is no more natural evolution of anything.
People are convinced that the human evolution of everything is 10 million times faster than any natural evolution.
And so this is just part of the human evolution of the humans.
Of the humans.
So basically, we're taking hold, and not me and you, But people that this guy works with, and the people that control those people, of the evolution of all species.
And in his document, Future Strategic Warfare 2025, from over 20 years ago, they talk about the genomic repair of the species.
They talk about mine children.
They talk about the virtual age, VR, holodecks.
Psychological warfare in the large.
All of these things.
And guess what?
The Google selfish ledger talking about the same exact thing.
This is a very real agenda that is utilizing Trojan horse civilian systems, aka these private companies, social media and otherwise, to not only socially engineer society by controlling narratives, but behind the scenes with Google and others, actually work on the very technology they plan to use to enslave you.
Just throwing it out there.
Folks, about 200 people over on YouTube, can we get 150 thumbs up?
I want to remind everybody, we are about to start.
That second hour over at redvoicemedia.com.
You go to redvoicemedia.com slash Jason.
Sign up right now for a dollar.
Or lock it in. It's Christmas time.
Support the broadcast.
$100 one year.
Or you can do the $10 a month as well.
You can just try it out for the buck. But in the second hour, we're going to be talking about Ron DeSantis, grand juries, and much more.
I want to remind people, over on the Rumble, you can get the latest Mixed Martial Mindset.
And we also, just to refresh, we also published the Club of Rome This is a Cult of Doom watch-along that's part of that second hour because every two weeks we release the second hour for free 100%.
There'll be a new release.
Sometimes I post the entire link over at my Telegram.
Great to follow me there.
Obviously on the Twitter.
Even though I have my issues with Twitter and these Trojan Horse civilian systems, we're also on Rockfin.
But again, redvoicemedia.com slash Jason.
We're going to have a banger of a show tomorrow and Thursday.
I hope everybody's having a fun holiday season.
We're going to wrap it down so these guys can get ready to go to the premium.
But I am going to begin to log off right now, guys, and get ready for Todd McGreevy, okay, Todd McGreevy, and the rcreader.com.
I love you guys, and I hope you enjoy the interview on the paid portion of the broadcast.
▲
Export Selection