All Episodes
March 25, 2025 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:37:26
The American Journal: AG Bondi Says Documents Detailing Epstein Abuse Of ‘HUNDREDS & HUNDREDS’ Of Victims, Including Children, Soon To Be Released - FULL SHOW - 03.25.2025
Participants
Main voices
a
alex jones
05:58
h
harrison smith
01:55:25
m
mark warner
07:11
Appearances
j
jon bowne
03:14
Clips
c
candace owens
00:52
j
jay anderson
00:21
t
tom cotton
00:11
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
alex jones
District judges have now signed over 170 injunctions and orders blocking the Trump administration, doing things like deporting illegal aliens who are also violent criminals, rapists, murderers, you name it, that are being let out of prisons in Democrat states and shipping them to El Salvador.
Now, in Article 2 of the Constitution, it's very clear the president has that power, and it's also in the law the Supreme Court has upheld.
Many, many times dealing with criminal aliens.
But now we've got another incredibly cut-and-dry case of out-of-control judicial overreach.
Look at this.
Federal judge in Texas is forcing Texas A&M University to host a drag show on their campus even after the board attempted to block it in accordance with the Trump order.
And all the Trump order has said no government funds going to this, and this was going to be paid for by the university.
When you hear a drag show, it means men in clown outfits, usually pushing the sexualization of children.
Drag queen story time, convicted pedophiles hosting it, the list goes on and on.
Ah, yes, L.H. Rosenthal, senior United States District Judge.
Absolutely kooky.
And that just happened today.
If you read Federalist Paper 80 by Alexander Hamilton that was written...
At the time when they were ratifying the Constitution, he was writing it in consultation with Thomas Jefferson and others, who also wrote our Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson.
It's very clear, it's also clear in the law, that district judges are not supposed to have any ruling power outside of the state.
It's only the Supreme Court that has that power.
It's cut and dry.
That's why, in just the last 62 days, we've had more district judges do more rulings against Trump and attempted injunctions than in all of U.S. history combined.
Because in the past, they all got overturned the times they tried it.
So this is naked.
It's out of control.
It's unconstitutional.
It's naked tyranny.
And you saw Chuck Schumer last week say, oh yeah, we got all these leftist judges in.
Under Biden, and they're doing a great job trying to block Trump.
But troublingly, we have seen Chief Justice Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett and others who are clearly being blackmailed or involved in these secretive law groups where corruption flows, like the Amazon River.
We are seeing them come out more and more and defend this garbage.
So if we thought we had a real majority of the Supreme Court, We're finding out who's who right now, and it's very, very narrow because those two keep voting with the Democrats, with the leftists, to do stuff that is just blatantly tyrannical.
Now, Congress is moving to pass a law that comports the Constitution that the district judges can't operate outside their district, but it's already clearly there in the big law called the Constitution and called the Federalist Papers, and there's also a lot of other moves that can be done as well.
The good news is this tyranny is being brought out in the open.
So many of these district judges, most of them I've looked at, that have been trying to unfreeze funds and things from the EPA and USA and others, literally have it going to their own foundations, their own NGOs, or their wives, daughters, sons, sisters, brothers. I mean, it's just like the Biden crime family.
This stuff is insane.
But look at these clowns, these dudes.
Okay, nobody wants to go see your stupid drag show.
Nobody wants to see that this is supposedly what a woman is, and we're not going to pay for it with taxpayer money.
And you're not going to have men and women's sports anymore if there's any federal funds, or those will be pulled.
It's simple.
This is the globalist religion of upside-down world.
They want you to go against your own logic.
Two men can have a baby.
This is their disgusting cult, and people are tired of it, and they see through it.
So this judge in Texas, this kook woman, she'll be overturned as well.
We have serious judicial tyranny in this country, and this is part of our ongoing peaceful revolution to expose it and override it by law and by higher-level rulings.
We'll be covering it all as things unfold here at RelicShonesOnX and Infowars.com forward slash show.
Of course, we just had a week ago a federal judge saying, oh, the military can't ban transgenders in it, really just people that have mental illness and are trying to steal somebody else's identity.
So again, they can push, they can try to stop us, but they've tried to force their sexual, Perverted revolution on our children, on us.
They want to castrate our boys, cut the breasts off our girls, and we're done with it.
We're done with your DEI.
We're done with it all.
Not in the show, but around the world.
And your global death cult is failing.
unidentified
It's Tuesday, March 25th, in the year of our Lord, 2025.
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
I think it's time to blow this thing back, get everybody in the stuff together.
Okay, three, two, one, let's jam.
harrison smith
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to The American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
Coming to you live this Tuesday morning.
We've got a lot to talk about today.
Including some disinformation that we need to debunk.
Including things like RFK Jr.
A rumor was going around that he was going to ban pharma ads.
Apparently that's not true, but we'll get into why it should be.
Why it absolutely should be true.
Just tons of news across the board, as always.
We'll take your calls today.
Probably a little bit earlier than usual, so stay tuned for that.
And we'll begin today as we do every day with our daily dispatch.
unidentified
*BEEPING*
harrison smith
All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Tuesday, the 25th of March, 2025.
Jussie Smollett 2.0, City Hall employee facing charges over noose hoax.
Pennsylvania woman allegedly placed a noose on her own work desk and told police she was a victim of a hate crime.
An Allentown, Pennsylvania City Hall employee is facing charges after falsely reporting to police and fabricating evidence by claiming she was the victim of a hate crime when a noose was placed on her work desk.
Brown, who's also an Allentown school board member, alleged in January she found a noose on her desk at City Hall.
However, after a thorough investigation, the Pennsylvania State Police used DNA evidence to prove Brown was behind the stunt.
The Allentown Police Department held a press conference to provide an update about the investigation explaining Brown's DNA match to the DNA found on the noose.
Now, I know this article headline says Jussie Smollett 2.0, but I'm here to tell you pretty much every hate crime is a hoax.
It's vastly overrepresented in terms of sheer majority.
Like, the majority of hate crimes that are reported are actually gigantic hoaxes because we don't actually live in a hateful, racist country.
So there's a gap between the supply and the demand for hate crimes.
And you've got to have the hate crimes or else the whole media campaign and DEI drive and demonization of white people, it doesn't make a lot of sense, so you have to fake the evidence.
So that's more like Jussie Smollett 450.0 in just the last few years.
It's like they really want to be hate-crimed and they're just not happening for them.
Meanwhile, Trump's promise to quickly end the Ukraine war gets a reality check after talks end with no deal.
NBC News gleefully reports the war will continue.
President Donald Trump's promise of a hasty end to the war in Ukraine were given a hard reality check Tuesday with Russian officials saying that the latest round of ceasefire talks with the United States ended without a written agreement and the Kremlin continuing to bomb Ukraine.
The media has been briefed to expect a statement following discussions in Saudi Arabia, but no such written conclusion was released.
In an interview with Russian state television, the first deputy chairman of Russia's defense committee blamed the position taken by Ukraine, saying, quote, they sat for 12 hours and seemed to have agreed on a joint statement, Chizov told Rozhia24.
However, this was not adopted due to Ukraine's position, calling the holdup very characteristic and symptomatic.
While both sides have, in theory, agreed to a limited 30-day ceasefire, I don't mean to laugh, but it is funny.
They're clearly not interested in peace because they haven't stopped attacking.
It's like you've got to declare peace first.
First you make the agreement.
And you declare peace, then the fighting stops.
Ukraine is like, we can't have a peace deal while the fighting is still going on.
Like, no, that's the point of the peace deal, actually.
They're like, we can't do a peace deal.
They keep bombing us.
So sign the peace deal.
What are you talking about?
So the war continues, apparently.
And it's, you know.
I don't know what's wrong with the Ukrainians.
They don't seem to understand time.
They don't seem to understand the pattern of events.
Quote, instead of making hollow statements about peace, Russia should stop bombing our cities and end its war on civilians, Ukrainian minister Siaheba said in a statement Monday.
unidentified
It's like...
harrison smith
I don't...
Okay, I don't understand.
I don't understand.
They're like, we want peace, but the war is going to continue until we get it.
Instead of making these hollow claims about peace, they should stop fighting.
It's like make the peace deal.
What do you think a peace deal is?
It's to stop the fighting.
Okay. We can't have a peace deal because we're fighting.
Great. Friends like these, right?
Meanwhile, the Trump administration accidentally texted me its war plans.
That was the headline from Jeffrey Goldberg.
The world found out shortly before 2 p.m. Eastern time on March 15th that the United States was bombing Houthi targets across Yemen.
I, however, knew two hours before the first bombs exploded that the attack might be coming.
The reason I knew was that Pete Hegseth, the Secretary of Defense, had texted me the war plan at 1144 a.m.
The plan included precise information about weapons packages targeted in timing.
This is going to require some explaining.
So basically this guy, Walt, sent a journalist an invite to the Signal chat where they were talking about the bombing in Yemen.
And we can go through the text messages.
We'll take a look at them.
It was J.D. Vance, Pete Hegseth, and a few other higher-ups in the military.
And it's pretty fascinating hearing their discussion.
About the bombing in Yemen.
J.D. Vance was actually pretty reticent to go along with it, but didn't want to cause too much trouble.
How this happens is a little bit questionable.
Again, we'll get into it, but it is interesting.
Jeffrey Goldberg found out about the war plans to bomb Yemen and was like, I'm going to release this information.
Right after the bombing happens.
Let the bombing happen first, then I'll release the information.
I wouldn't want to get in the way of murder.
I wouldn't want to reveal the plans that could actually stop the plans from going forward.
I'm in favor of the bombing of Yemen.
I just want to scoop on top of it.
So, again, we'll get into that a little bit later.
We did just bomb a hospital in Yemen.
That's our contribution to the ongoing genocide.
Around Israel.
So yeah, last night, bombed a hospital in Yemen.
We can touch on the Middle East a little bit today as well.
I think maybe we'll start with that.
I'll drop in some more videos just so we can show you the true scale, scope, and intention behind the relentless horrors in the Middle East that we fund and support and are now actively participating in.
God bless America, right?
Meanwhile, Trump nominates Susan Monterey for CDC director, elevating from acting role.
Donald Trump has decided to pick Susan Monterey to be the new nominee to head the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, making permanent the acting role she served at the public health agency in recent months.
Monterey would be named in place of Dr. David Weldon, a former Florida congressman whose nomination was withdrawn by the White House earlier this month over concerns he didn't have the votes to clear the Senate confirmation process.
Monterey is not...
A great choice, if you ask me.
Very much beholden to Big Pharma.
Very good friends with Bill Gates.
And actually participated heavily in the vaccine rollout under COVID and the ridiculous crap that went on there.
Finally, we have this again in the Middle East.
Gaza relocation plan begins.
70 Gazans depart for Europe.
Oh, joy.
Oh, good.
Oh, good.
So will Israel be bombing Europe next, I wonder?
The defense ministry will oversee Gaza transfers with leadership to be appointed soon.
Critics warn the program could lead to forced displacement as no third country has agreed to take in refugees.
As part of the first phase of the plan to relocate Palestinians who wish to leave Gaza for third countries, which appeared to take shape last Wednesday, 70 Gazans with foreign citizenship or family ties abroad departed from southern Israel's Roman airport on a Romanian military plane bound for Europe.
Israeli authorities said they assisted in the evacuation as part of their immigration policy.
Oh boy.
Yeah, that's a way to put it.
Sorry, let me try to read that again.
Israeli authorities said they assisted in the evacuation as part of their immigration policy.
Yes, and the bank robbers assisted in lightening the load of the bank by several thousand dollars to assist in their getting money policy.
Yeah, yeah.
You're assisting the deportation by putting a gun to their head and saying, leave or die.
I love the way that's phrased.
Israel Authority said they assisted the evacuation as part of their immigration policy.
Wow, they're so helpful.
They're so helpful and generous.
Here they are helping the Gazans.
Boy. The group's departure coincided with renewed military operations in Gaza and mounting international pressure to restore humanitarian aid to the territory, like food and water and electricity.
We are working with all means to implement the U.S. president's vision, and we will allow any Gaza resident who wants to move to a third state to do so, Defense Minister Israel Katz said, referencing a plan developed during Donald Trump's presidency to promote economic development in the region through population relocation.
So they're going to go to Europe.
So the Gazans are going to Europe.
Gazans are going to Europe.
That's not unexpected.
It's just not sensical at all, or even a little bit.
We're told, continually, every Gazan, down to the newborn babies, hell, the Unborn fetuses.
They're all terrorists and cannot be trusted to draw breath.
Must be killed as soon as humanly possible.
There are no innocents in Gaza we keep hearing on a refrain over and over.
Because our world is run by the most sickeningly evil scum you've ever even imagined.
I don't even know if I would imagine something like this.
This type of thing you'd write in a fantasy.
And it'd be rejected by the publisher for being unbelievable.
You can just see the publisher sitting there going, at a certain point, you can't have your bad guys acting like cartoon characters.
They can't just be cartoonishly evil all the time.
They gotta have some redeeming qualities or else it's not believable.
But nope.
Nope, that's not reality.
unidentified
It's, it's...
harrison smith
Truly shocking.
Truly, truly shocking to be just reading this stuff like it's normal or even remotely acceptable.
Israeli Security Cabinet approved the establishment of a directorate tasked with assisting Palestinians in Gaza who wish to locate to third countries.
So it's ethnic cleansing then.
So they're depopulating Gaza.
They're ethnically cleansing Gaza.
It's just, is that the advancement that we've made?
Is it just because the Nazis had to hide what they were doing?
Is that the big difference?
I don't know.
Maybe I need to look into World War II history a little bit more.
But as far as I know, you know, there weren't like very moderate American newspapers just being like...
Herr Hitler is assisting the Jewish refugees in finding new homes and immigrating away from Germany.
The Nazis have set up a task force to assist in the relocation of Jews.
Any Jews that want to move from Germany, they'll actually help.
They're actually so generous and helpful.
unidentified
Hitler is enlisting Jewish volunteers for their war effort.
harrison smith
Yeah, it's a beautiful thing.
Jews being freed from the burden of responsibility by having all of their life needs taken care of in a comfortable camp.
I think it was all in secret.
I think it wasn't until the Nazis fell that we actually saw everything they were up to.
Very strange, 80 years on, the same thing is happening, but it's being done in the open.
Pretty wild.
Pretty wild stuff.
Of course, you can talk about, you know, the fact, I mean, how many times have you heard Israel be like, we are the bulwark of anti-Islam, you know, Europe will fall if Israel falls, because all the Muslims, and it's like, the only reason there are pretty much any Muslims in Europe Is because of Israel.
It was actually not a constantly boiling pot of chaos and war before Israel was founded.
Did you know that?
Did you know that the Middle East wasn't always like this?
Are you aware?
Do you know that it was managed by the Ottomans and largely peaceful for like hundreds of years before 1948?
Isn't that crazy?
1913, really.
1913 really is when it all kicked off.
So yeah, I guess let's talk about this because it seems to be the overriding, the superlative, and just the, in some cases, singular focus of the Trump campaign is what can we do to facilitate and maximize Israel's senseless cruelty.
And that's really what it is.
And I know half of our audience supports Israel for some godforsaken reason.
I don't know.
Whatever reason they've tricked you into going along with this, you're wrong.
You're just absolutely wrong about this.
And I mentioned it a few times, haven't talked about it much, but I think it's time to revisit the whole situation because it continues at a pace.
The onslaught, the...
Just targeted murder of entire families, children and mothers and fathers.
And it's like, you know, 34 people in a single family wiped out.
And like, I don't need to show you the videos because I could, right?
Could show you the videos.
A little five-year-old girl in pink flower dress.
Excitedly jumping up and down because she learned that she's actually going to get to go to school.
Despite living in a series of tents as her family flees the continual bombing campaigns, only for that same little girl in that little flower dress to be dismembered and mangled by a bomb.
It's pretty brutal stuff.
It's the type of stuff that, like if they made a Hollywood movie about it, it would be very impactful, very compelling, it would win Oscars and stuff.
That, of course, is if the movie ever gets to get shown, because obviously here in America, you don't have war propaganda just aired everywhere.
There's a Palestinian filmmaker who tried to show a film about, I believe it was about October 7th, what about the Palestinian plight in Florida, and the mayor stepped in to stop him from airing his film.
I should find the clip because I didn't even watch it, but I bookmarked it yesterday.
But apparently Candace Owens was saying something similar.
And it's like all of us, I feel like I can speak for all of us.
Candace Owens, Ian Carroll, myself, Owen Schroer, like, Israel's not our thing.
We're not Palestinian.
We don't have any family or roots in the Middle East or anything like that.
Not our main gig.
Yeah, Florida mayor drops threat to evict cinema.
Over Israeli-Palestinian film.
Yeah, so he threatened to, like, shut down the entire theater.
After an emotional city meeting, the mayor of Miami Beach dropped his effort to end a theater's lease over its showing of, quote, no other land.
And it's like, first of all, you people need to get your emotions into an emotional meeting.
So a guy wants to show a movie.
And the theater's letting him.
And then the mayor steps in.
So... You can just remove the specifics about this.
Do we want to live in a country where the mayor, government authorities, are stopping films from being aired, from being shown in theaters?
Going so far as to threaten to shut down the theater itself as punishment for showing a film.
That's the type of world you live in when you've got emotional Jewish mayors making these types of decisions.
unidentified
Thank you.
Thank you.
harrison smith
And it's like, you know, I don't have any problem with Jews.
I don't have any problem with Israel as a people.
But I do have a problem with American rights being curtailed relentlessly for their benefit and on their behalf.
And we're going to go through a lot of stories like that.
People being deported for opposing Israel.
Now the Department of Homeland Security is demanding access to social media accounts of all migrants so they can be looked at for thought crime.
You can oppose America.
That's fine.
We'll let you in.
We'll give you a scholarship.
We'll make you Congresswoman in Minnesota.
But you can't oppose Israel.
If you oppose Israel, you'll be denied a green card.
If you have a green card now, you'll be seized, arrested, and deported without any due process.
Columbia University is tamping down on its student protests in a desperate attempt to regain some of the federal funding that's been withheld from them because they allow students to protest, despite that being...
The entire purpose of the First Amendment.
And, of course, all of this is going on while the ceasefire between Israel and Gaza is broken down.
America is bombing Yemen.
We just bombed a cancer hospital last night there.
And something like 700 Palestinians and more have been killed in just the last week since Israel broke the ceasefire, since the ceasefire was broken.
700 people.
I know I've said it before, but it's like, Donald Trump talks about the Columbia faculty hold emergency vigil to protest university response to Trump.
Yeah, we had an article a couple days ago that was like, Columbia is the State Department being like, it's on the right track to regain funding because they're clamping down on wrong think.
Because there are people that are thinking incorrectly and the university is stepping in to make sure they don't express those thoughts.
And I'm sick of it.
I'm sick.
I'm just like...
You can't ignore it.
I could spend the entire show just on what Donald Trump is doing for Israel.
RFK Jr.
Yeah, positive first steps towards regaining aid.
Mafia tactics.
We're going to withhold funding.
We're going to shut down your school unless you crush this political speech.
And they're allowed to do it because they're Jews?
Nobody else would be allowed to do this.
We would never stand for Democrats using the power of the federal government to bankrupt schools to get them to stop teaching about American history or any of their other claims they...
Routinely make.
This is unacceptable.
This can't go on.
And like...
Y'all gotta do something about this.
Y'all gotta get your boys in check.
You can't have mayors of cities shutting down theaters because they play Palestinian films.
In America, that's just not gonna happen.
It can't happen.
unidentified
Alright, we'll be back, folks.
harrison smith
This is the American Journal.
unidentified
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
harrison smith
And let's talk about just the albatross around America's neck.
unidentified
Israel. Just the...
harrison smith
It's... And look.
unidentified
Yeah.
harrison smith
All right, let's just get into what's actually happening.
And how this is destroying our rights here in America, destroying our reputation abroad, wasting our energy and our time and our money and lives.
It's just an endless source of chaos and frustration for America.
The benefit we receive is absolutely nothing.
I don't even know what the argument is as to what benefit our So-called alliance with Israel brings us at all, even a little bit.
It's like, we have an outpost in the Middle East.
It's like, do we want one?
Well, why?
Why would we want one?
It's like, well, the Middle East is, there's a lot of war going on there.
It's like, oh, why is that?
Why is that going on, though?
But why?
But who is waging the wars, I wonder?
It just makes no sense on the face of it.
It's all absurd.
And not to go off on a tangent or anything, but like, it's funny the perspective people have about Infowars.
It's not funny.
It's frustrating.
It's actually not funny.
It's actually very frustrating.
When you see stuff, I was just reading a Daily Mail article the other day, and I scrolled down to the comments.
It was about Infowars or Alex Jones or something.
I scrolled down to the comments, and it's people like, Who needs to hear from Alex Jones?
We don't need to hear about the mole men in the underground tunnels.
And it's like, what are we talking about?
What was anybody talking about?
One of those things, it's like, I can understand how you could have misconceptions about info wars when you have, you know, clips taken out of context and spread around.
People believe it.
But when it's just...
Not even remotely related to what we do.
It's a little frustrating.
When the reality of what we do is just use logic and insist on the truth even if it's uncomfortable or whatever.
Everybody else has this filter that they try to parse information through.
And when it comes to Israel, that filter is impenetrable.
For a lot of people.
And so it's not like, it's not outrageous, it's not speculative most of what we do.
We predict things in the future, and that's obviously speculative, but for the vast majority of what we do, you just look at the facts and you just go, here it is, here's the fact.
And this goes across the board in terms of all the topics that we discuss.
And again, we spent a long time talking about this yesterday with like the brutal Americans or this kind of idea where it's like they're trying to portray just basic assertion of reality as brutal or uncaring.
Right? So if you just assert and insist men are men and women are women because that is fact, that's reality and it's just it doesn't change.
Somebody's feelings are hurt by reality.
That's on them.
It's not on you for Expressing it.
But you got it, but it just, the thing is that when you just apply that basic logic, when you just determine what is true, like Sherlock Holmes or something, right?
You get rid of the impossible, what you're left with, however unlikely, must be true, right?
That's all that we do here.
But when you do that, when you apply that Style of interpretation of a set of facts.
It turns out what you end up with a lot of the times are unbelievable, fantasy-level, insane conclusions.
But it's not that we have to come up with anything.
It's just you go, oh, the virus arose, and it arose here, and that's a lab that has safety leaks.
Okay, so this was a lab created.
Oh, and it happened to arrive at just the right time to lock down the entire world, destroy Trump's economic gains, and allow for mail-in ballots, which are then used to cheat relentlessly.
Like, that's just what happened.
You can call me a conspiracy theorist, but it's like, that is what happened, though.
Oh, a gigantic rise in unexplained deaths immediately following the vaccine rollout.
Oh, 15-year-olds are collapsing on soccer fields.
Two weeks after they got vaccinated, having heart attacks, that was the vaccine.
It's a vaccine injury.
At a certain point, you just have to get away from all the talking points and whether it's transgenderism or the vaccine or international geopolitics.
There's a hardcore reality seed at the center of the fruit and you just got to get to that.
You just got to get to the pit.
And it turns out when you do that, you can come up with some uncomfortable conclusions.
And that's unfortunate, but it's not our fault.
Okay? So you can justify Israel's actions however you want.
At the end of the day, it's...
I don't even want to call it Nazi-level stuff.
Because the Nazis don't deserve that.
When you look at the videos, when you look at the numbers, 700 people have been killed since the ceasefire broke down.
There was a ceasefire.
They said you can all come back.
They set up camps.
Everybody came back.
And then Israel bombed them all to death.
And we have videos of it.
I have a pretty shocking video.
I can show you clip number 11 here.
Tents are being bombed by F-16 airplanes in Gaza.
Now, this video is a little bit...
I don't know.
I don't know if it's actually real.
It looks a little bit computer-generated to me, but we'll show it to you.
Excuse me, clip number 11 here.
So there you see a bunch of tents, and they're bombed.
Y'all see what I mean?
It looks a little bit too, like, perfect, right?
Like, he's filming it exactly right.
So, I don't know.
You know, this type of thing that actually I would, like, the reason I'm even suspicious of is not because I think that, like, the Palestinians are faking it.
Not that they need to.
I mean, definitely this, there was a tent city that was bombed.
You can see the, you can see the videos afterwards where, you know, everything is just lying in ruin.
Something about that just made me think it was a little bit suspicious.
And to me, my mind doesn't go to, oh, the Palestinians are making computer-generated images to make it look like they're suffering.
It's like, they don't need to make anything.
They don't need to fake anything.
They don't need to act like they're being murdered.
They're being murdered.
It just doesn't make any sense.
It's almost funny to imagine a...
A Palestinian editor sitting there making CGI explosions when outside of his window there are actual 10 cities being bombed.
Like, that just doesn't make any sense.
What does make sense to me is that Israel would release a video claiming it was from Palestine so that then later they can go, that was fake.
See, you're falling for fake Hamas propaganda.
That's a type of 4D chess that's being waged right now.
And if it is fake, that's what...
My supposition would be.
And that's because of the endless series of documented deceptions that Israel has spread around the world and still does to this day.
40 babies in ovens.
Remember that?
Never happened.
So I'm just going to say that's real.
I'm going to say that's real, that video of the tents being bombed.
Because whether that video itself is real or not, it is happening.
That is actually what's going on.
Refugee, like the entire place is destroyed.
So they're setting up 10 cities.
Now the 10 cities are getting bombed.
So again, just...
It's just relentless.
And I don't understand how Trump can feel so strongly about the deaths being caused in the Ukraine war.
Putting so much effort, speaking so passionately about the senseless death being wrought on the fields of Eastern Europe.
And he's like, and meanwhile, let's bomb a hospital in Yemen.
They're not people, they're terrorists.
Just insane.
Just absolutely insane.
And again, it does seem to be...
The overwhelming concern of the Trump administration, Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said this yesterday, instead of inspiring universal condemnation, the October 7th Holocaust, it was a holocaust now.
It wasn't the holocaust, I guess it was a holocaust.
It was an holocaust.
Which kind of makes sense, actually, if you think about it.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
Because it didn't happen like they said it did.
Because most of the horrific, really crazy, you know, emotional stories that came out of it were blatant fabrications.
So maybe he's on to something here.
The October 7th Holocaust triggered a global wave of anti-Semitism.
And it's like...
You're not missing anything?
Did anything else happen?
Is there anything you might be missing out in this timeline?
So as it's being presented by RFK Jr., October 7th, Holocaust happens.
Anti-Semitism explodes.
There's nothing in between there.
Nothing Israel got up to that might have inspired hatred against them.
Nothing about their response to October 7th.
It might have justified anger against that nation state.
You can't think of anything.
I'm not making this up, am I?
I seem to remember, correct me if I'm wrong, a massive sustained campaign of terror against everybody in Gaza as bomb after bomb after bomb.
Guided by AI, specifically designed to target people who may or may not have been Hamas, but certainly while they were at home with their families, cutting off the water, cutting off the electricity, calling for a genocide, saying they're Amalek, and have to be treated like Amalek, invoking Old Testament commands to eradicate every man, woman, child, and animal in an area.
I seem to remember there being just like a few things in between October 7th and the rise in anti-Semitism, if you want to call it that.
If that's the word you want to apply to legitimate criticism about a geopolitical conflict between a nation state and a stateless people.
You can call that anti-Semitism if it helps you disguise reality, I guess.
Now, remember when they took bread trucks into places where people were starving and then shot the people for trying to get the bread?
Remember that?
Remember Where's Daddy, the targeting system that made sure the Hamas people were with their families when they were targeted by airstrikes?
Remember, was it Operation, or the Lavender program?
Using AI to where if somebody is near a device once associated with somebody suspected of being in Hamas, Then they would be killed and they had a tolerance of something like 50 civilians per Hamas militant targeted.
So, do we not remember that happening?
Did RFK miss that part of the conversation?
Because as presented, and here's the trick to it, they can't let any criticism of Israel or the Jews be reasonable.
It has to be some sort of inexplicable insanity.
Because it's dangerous and nonsensical and you can't just argue the facts about this.
They're insane.
They're just insane and we just have to crush them.
That's the mindset it has.
So what they're presenting is an act of insanity.
If all that happened was Israel was attacked on October 7th, brutal sneak attack.
Where, in a sense, we're killed.
I mean, mostly by Israel with the Hannibal Directive, firing tanks, using tanks to fire missiles into kibbutzes and killing the whole families there and then blaming it on Hamas, like helicopters, Apache helicopters, machine gunning all the people at the concert.
I mean, that obviously, without getting into the details.
Sorry, let's stick with the official report.
So, October 7th, Hamas.
Totally unexpected.
Israel didn't see it coming.
They reacted super fast and professionally and heroically.
But people died and it was a horrific sneak attack on Israel.
And then everybody hated Israel.
That's insane.
That's an insane thing.
Somebody gets attacked and then they're hated for it?
Wow, this must be some sort of madness that we're dealing with.
But if you include the aspect of the genocide that occurred, then maybe the anti-Israel sentiment isn't quite insane anymore.
Just like if I see a man slap another man, it'd be insane for me to hate the guy that was slapped.
That would be crazy.
But if a guy slaps another guy, and then the other guy turns around and unloads a shotgun into the first guy's chest, Then I'm gonna have some questions.
I'm not so much on the side of the guy with the shotgun anymore.
Even though he was the one that got slapped, I'll admit that.
That was a sneak attack and it wasn't good.
It didn't give him the right to blow the brains out of the guy who slapped him.
And if you leave that out, this is a guy going, I got slapped and now people are mad at me?
I got slapped and now I'm going to jail.
Is that justice?
It's like, wasn't there something in between those two things?
Wasn't there something that happened between the slap and the anger against you that was your behavior that you're accountable for?
This is what RSK Jr. is focused on.
We're not going after Big Pharma.
We're not shutting down the vaccines.
We're not talking about autism.
We're talking about anti-Semitism.
It's a health crisis.
Triggered a global wave of anti-Semitism.
Ivy League campuses became a greenhouse for poison.
Thoughts. For thoughts and speech, actually, is what they were growing there.
President Trump has ordered his cabinet to use every constitutional rule to uproot this divisive weed.
Yeah, talk about divisive.
They're dividing the American populace into people who want our government to be slaves of Israel and people who don't.
Very divisive.
I'm glad Columbia has agreed on the first step and will begin to restore itself as a garden of tolerance, reason, compassion, and respect.
Shut up.
Shut the hell up.
Go do stuff about health.
I'd be way more amenable to this if it was in addition to all the stuff that's happening for America.
But everything they're doing, It is for Israel.
To an insane degree.
Deportations. They took ICE agents off of deportation of violent criminals like Trin de Aragua and put them on thought patrol for college students.
They actively took agents off of hunting down to deport criminal aliens.
To instead go after Ivy League students who disagree with a foreign nation state.
That's unacceptable to me.
You have a mayor in Florida using his governmental power threatening to shut down an entire movie theater because they dared to show a Palestinian documentary.
It's the most egregious overreach of governmental power in America and it's It's done in the open, and that might be the freakiest part about it.
Because right now, it's like, it's just under the thinnest veil, all this activity, right?
They ban TikTok because people, you know, disagree with Israel on it.
And they just have the thinnest layer of disguise where they go, no, it's about China, trust us.
You're like, all right, well, what is China doing?
They're like, ah, we don't know.
We don't know, but there's a ton of anti-Semitism on there, so it's definitely bad.
They fire, they, you know, oust the Ivy League presidents because they're anti-Israel, because they're not shutting down protests.
And they lay over just like a tea cloth, like they just barely cover it by going, no, it's about DEI and plagiarism.
And it's just like, no, it's not.
They're like, yeah, no, it's not.
They don't really care.
But now to the point...
We're like, this mayor didn't...
There are a lot of ways that he could have tried to secretly shut down the movie theater.
He could have sent in a health inspector with a rat in his pocket, shut it down through the health inspection.
But they don't need to do that anymore.
He's just saying, I'm Jewish.
I'm the mayor.
No Palestinian movies are going to be aired in my town.
I'm going to shut down the theater that dared to air a documentary.
Is that not a gigantic, glaring violation of our First Amendment?
Am I the crazy one here?
I want to know.
Maybe I'll open up phone calls on this subject.
alex jones
Thank you.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
Am I the one whose view is warped on this?
I'm not.
I'm not.
My view is clear.
I'm very principled in this stuff.
And again, it's like I wouldn't point out that they were Jewish if they weren't, right?
I wouldn't point out their ethnicity if it didn't have something to do with the point of the story and the reason they're doing what they're doing.
Don't get mad at me for who's doing this.
I'm just the one telling you about it and being against it because I actually favor free speech and I actually want America to be a bastion of free expression regardless of who it is.
The Israeli military said he'd been detained for questioning.
Oh, this story doesn't end.
This story doesn't end.
As far as I know, and there are some sort of shaky details about this, but I believe this guy has been lynched in Israel.
The guy who made the movie.
He was attacked by a bunch of settlers.
We actually have a video of it.
Clip 8. This was supposed to be a group of armed KKK-like masked settlers that lynched no other land director, Hamdan Balal, still missing, caught here on camera.
Clip number eight.
Let's roll it.
So you see these Israeli settlers run up and throw a rock.
That's all we really have.
And they basically took this director away, and he's never been seen since.
And why you gotta throw KKK in there?
KKK never did anything like this.
KKK were...
Teddy bears compared to the Israelis.
I mean, who would you rather be?
Who would you rather be?
Would you rather be a black person in the South in the 1920s or a Gazan today?
I know what I would pick.
I'll take the occasional burning cross over a year of relentless bombing any day of the week.
And, like, this is one of the frustrating parts.
Is like, I understand.
I get that the anti-Israel people aren't my friend.
I don't have to pick a side.
That's the thing people don't seem to understand about this.
I don't actually have to pick a side.
It's actually better if I don't.
I'm just going to point out where the evil is being done.
Who's doing the evil?
Like, you understand the best referee is one who doesn't belong to a team.
The best umpire is one who's not wearing a uniform.
So I'm the American umpire calling out fouls on the teams.
It's just one team keeps committing fouls.
The other team will commit a foul and I'll call it.
It doesn't mean I'm on that team's side.
I'm calling fouls here.
I'm the unbiased moderator here.
And so you've got this Jewish extremism.
Destroying our country.
Like, let's just be honest.
They're driving us towards war with Iran.
We are currently at war in Yemen, bombing hospitals for them for no discernible reason.
And we'll get into the leaked text messages, talk about how this is being, you know, justified or, you know, discussed at the highest rungs of power.
We're facilitating their genocide.
We're now going to be facilitating the expulsion of these people into Europe, which has been the source of all of their problems.
Now I've got Jews in America shutting down movie theaters for showing Palestinian films.
All right, welcome back, folks.
It seems like we could solve a lot of problems in America pretty rapidly with just, like, concerted effort.
And not doing things in a way that leaves opening for things like judicial intervention.
I like a lot of what Trump's doing, what he's trying to do.
I'm not just crapping on Trump here.
I understand he's up against a gigantic network of opposition.
But there are things that they do that it's like, if you just didn't do that, everything else would work really well, and you don't need to do this.
You don't need to do that.
You don't need to...
So, like, we want to get rid of the criminals and the illegal aliens that jumped our border, that were flown into our country by the tens of millions.
It's like, isn't that enough to deal with already?
Don't you already have...
Tens of millions of people who arrived here in the last five years in the priority list.
Aren't those people you have their information, you have their location, you have an app on their phone?
It should not be a difficult charge to go after these people and expel them from our country or imprison them if they don't.
If they won't be accepted back or whatever.
And yet, the Trump administration has decided to prioritize going after people that didn't come here illegally, that came here following the process, that have obeyed our laws, that have not caused trouble, haven't murdered or raped anybody.
They didn't even cross the border without permission.
They applied.
They were approved.
They came here.
They followed the law.
And now the Trump administration is hunting them down and expelling them without due process.
So that's a major opening for a judge to step in and say, this is wrong.
You have to stop.
And we have to figure out how far the bounds of your power goes.
It's got to stop somewhere, right?
I understand, again, if you're the president, if you're the commander-in-chief, you have a duty to wage war on behalf of the United States and if you have alien enemies in the United States, for legitimate concerns for national security, you can't be hamstrung by civil processes that are supposed to apply to citizens, not foreigners.
I get that.
But where's the line?
If there is no line, then how easy would it be for them to say anybody protesting, anybody, any pro-Palestinians at all are enemies of the state.
They're all terrorists.
Doesn't matter if they're American citizens, guests of America with a visa or a green card, or illegal immigrants.
They're all terrorists.
Like, what is the backstop here?
And why focus on something?
Why spend your energy towards something that is so obviously objectionable, so obviously going to be stopped by a judge, give the left endless fodder for being able to call you a brutal and unfeeling tyrant because you're ruining the lives of college students because they oppose a foreign genocide.
Why is that?
Even a thing.
Why is that being done?
It's providing just this massive, glaring opening for the left to destroy your entire agenda by interfering and distracting.
Now we've got to send lawyers to try to argue this case, even though we shouldn't be arguing in the first place because the guy never should have been deported or arrested for lawful, peaceful protesting activities.
And it's not the only story.
I'll bring you some more on the other side.
It's just like there's so much stuff that we have to get done for the survival of our country, and yet our resources and our energy is going towards serving Israel.
And I'm sick of it.
It needs to end.
One way or another, it needs to end.
Welcome back, folks.
unidentified
This is the American Journal.
Again, it's hard to, uh...
harrison smith
To avoid the influence of Israel and the infinite negative impacts it has on America.
So we got to talk about it.
I don't know where this goes, but clearly the influence is not clandestine.
It's pretty much open at this point.
And it's everywhere.
It's absolutely everywhere.
Like this big story, right?
SecDef Hegseth torches anti-Trump hoax peddler Jeffrey Goldberg over war plans conspiracy.
In a fiery rebuttal to recent allegations published by Far Left The Atlantic, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth firmly denied claims that he and other top administration officials inadvertently shared classified military strategies in a group chat.
The Gateway Pundit reported earlier that Jeffrey Goldberg, the rabidly anti-Trump editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, has cooked up a wild tale about being accidentally added to a secure signal group chat with top Trump officials.
According to Goldberg's latest hit piece, this chat allegedly contained sensitive details about military strikes.
You can see Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen, Houthi terrorists in Yemen.
Goldberg claims that heavyweights like National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Vice President J.D. Vance were part of the so-called Houthi PC small group, plotting a long overdue reckoning for the Houthis.
Let's be real, Goldberg's track record is a laundry list full of anti-Trump hoaxes, from the debunked suckers and losers fabrication to his relentless Russian collusion hoax.
See, I don't like this.
I don't like this article.
I love Jim Hoff, love Gateway Pundit, but...
They are very Zionist.
And again, like, this is the thing.
I don't know what it is about Israel.
It makes everybody go insane.
Gateway Pundit, which is normally, I mean, they might be a little, you know, superlative.
Like, they tend to, you know, phrase things in a way that's very opinionated.
I don't blame them for that because I usually agree with the opinions.
But it's like the, it's like Israel comes up and all of the great, you know, patriot America firsters become retarded globalists.
And Gateway Pundit, It becomes the mainstream media.
This whole article, everything I've been reading, is just like the mainstream media does, telling you the truth, believing you, believing a lie.
They're insinuating here that this didn't happen, but it did.
Nobody's denying that these messages were real.
I don't think.
I haven't seen anybody denying it.
But that's the implication they're trying to get across here.
Goldberg's track record is a laundry list of anti-Trump hoaxes.
From the debunked suckers and losers fabrication to his relentless Russia collusion hoax, now he's peddling this tale of stumbling into a supposed digital war room, claiming it all started with a signal connection requested from Mike Walls on March 11th.
Okay, but that did happen, though.
So it's a little bit different than the Russia collusion hoax or the suckers and losers fabrication because those didn't happen.
Those were lies that you're trying to associate with this to insinuate that this is a lie, but this isn't a lie.
Why? So why are you covering for it?
This is what I don't get, man.
Jesus Christ.
I'm like the only one in the world that can just like see this stuff for what it is.
Am I the crazy one?
Genuinely. Denies responsibility for signal security fail.
So Hegseth denied responsibility and insists nobody was texting war plans.
Okay, but that's not a denial.
He's not responsible because he's not the one that sent the leak.
Nobody was texting war plans because they were texting about the discussion around the war plans.
unidentified
They were texting emojis about it, which is...
harrison smith
Gay. Pretty gay.
Which is a little gay.
I'm not saying it's not gay.
unidentified
Like, look at this.
harrison smith
But yeah, all he's doing there is saying, well, we weren't texting war plans, right?
We weren't texting targets and operations.
No, but they were texting about...
Why they were doing it, how they were going to sell it, what the messaging was, what the timing would be.
It wasn't technically war plans, as in it wasn't a document from the Pentagon about the planned operation.
But of course they were texting about the war in Yemen that we have nothing to do with other than Israel.
So I don't get why people can't be consistent when it comes to Israel.
Here's a great example.
ICE is hunting for Yeon Seo Chung, a Columbia student who attended pro-Palestinian protests.
Chung came to the U.S. from Korea with her family at age 7 and was her high school's valedictorian.
She's a lawful permanent resident.
And I'll go through the details of how exactly they're hunting this woman down.
Is this what we want our government?
Is this what we voted for?
I voted because we have Trinde, Aragua taking over apartment buildings and Haitians eating cats in Springfield and overwhelmed educational systems throughout the entire country and New York collapsing under the weight of criminal crime, of immigrant crime.
You're going after a Korean girl, That's been in America for 15 years since she was 7 years old because she attended a protest on her college campus.
She didn't organize it.
She didn't lead it.
She attended it.
That's where your priority is.
So you're going to get stuck in a giant court battle.
It's probably going to get to the Supreme Court.
Spending God knows how much time and energy and resources on pursuing a college girl.
That's a lawful permanent resident.
She didn't cross the border.
She didn't sneak in an 18-wheeler.
She didn't pay a cartel to get here.
She's not living in a hotel in New York, living off the taxpayer.
She's going to college.
She's a valedictorian of her high school.
She's been here since she was seven years old.
So now Trump and Trump supporters...
Are now the ones to be blamed for this obviously heartless, obviously nonsensical, probably illegal, vengeful, spiteful attack against somebody for opposing Israel.
So now that's on us, right?
Now instead of going after the criminals and leaving the Democrats no room to have an argument to say, oh, you're being too brutal.
Really? Well, you're supporting migrants, you know, rapists and criminals.
We can win that argument.
This is not an argument I even want to be in.
unidentified
This is not an argument I want to be in.
harrison smith
And like, it would even be different if it was just like this hardcore for America.
If this had nothing to do with Israel and it was instead just like, yeah, we're deporting everybody.
You got here when you were seven and you're a valedictorian of your high school.
Well, too bad.
Visa's expired.
You're out.
But our government will never Never be even remotely that hard, you know, heavy-handed or hard-hitting for our own interests.
When it comes to Israel, however, we're willing to just like be incredibly brutal and heartless and vicious and vengeful.
And for some reason, that's on us.
That's on us now.
Why is it that the same people, same conservatives who will balk at the idea that, I mean, there's, you know, Trump obviously changed the whole conversation, but certainly before Trump and even now with Trump, you've got conservative politicians going, well, you know, there's a lot of great workers out there.
You know, our companies need workers and, you know, we need to have a pathway to...
We need to allow for temporary visas to let people in.
They're tempered when it comes to things that are affecting America.
And then you're like, well, there's a college girl that doesn't like Israel, and they're like, throw her in prison for life.
Send her to El Salvador.
It's insane.
Nine rioters arrested after violently storming Bernard College this weekend.
All charged with disorderly compact trespassing.
Yeah, that means they were on the college campus.
That's all that means.
It was just trespassing.
unidentified
By stop anti-Semitism.
harrison smith
By stop anti-Semitism.
They're not protesters.
unidentified
They're rioters.
harrison smith
Is it working?
Is the anti-Semitism going down?
Seems to me like it's going up, up, up, up, up.
Here's what actually happened.
Let me tell you what actually happened.
So she's a lawful permanent resident.
She's been here in the United States since she was seven years old.
Brought over by her parents from Korea.
She is a valedictorian and probably an all-A student.
March 9th, ICE HSI agent texts Chung saying, quote, it's Audrey from the police.
Text message mentions Chung was arrested along with many others during a protest for failing to leave an area.
Charged with obstruction of governmental administration, a misdemeanor often dropped.
Like I said, they were on campus when they weren't supposed to be.
It was trespassing.
That same day, Chung gets an email from Columbia Public Safety informing her that the USAO for the Southern District had asked them to inform her of HSI agents seeking her arrest.
March 9th, ICE agents show up to Chung's parents' house looking to arrest her and tell the parents that her legal status has been revoked.
Two federal officers execute warrants at two Columbia-owned residences, including Chung's dorm, on March 13th.
They've revoked her legal status for trespassing on her own college campus.
Again, just, you know, how do you justify this level of action?
It's insane.
Now, do you see how easy that was?
See, I'm a Trump supporter.
I'm a right-winger.
I'm a conservative.
This is my side doing something bad.
And here I am calling it out.
See how easy that is?
Israel supporters, see how easy that was?
See how it didn't make me a traitor?
Or, you know, on the side of the terrorists?
Or an anti-Semite.
Or an anti-Semite.
unidentified
We're very Semitic.
harrison smith
Are we Semitic?
Chung's lawyer stressed that she was not a movement leader like Mohammed Khalil, but only attended a few protests.
She faced a disciplinary process from Colombia which found she was not in violation of any policies.
Quote, Isis' shocking action against Ms. Chung formed a part of a larger pattern of attempted U.S. government repression of constitutionally protected protest activity and other forms of speech, her lawyers write in today's filing.
Absolutely. 100%.
100% true.
Why are we doing this?
Why are we destroying our own side to do this?
Why are they hunting down a college student who's been here since he was seven years old and is a valedictorian?
Why, when it comes to Israel, do Republicans fulfill every horrible stereotype?
That the left saddles with them.
If you take out Israel, there's not a lot to say about the Republican Party that's bad.
Oh, they're deporting criminal aliens.
Great. They're, you know, they're trying to get peace in Ukraine.
Wonderful. Everything Trump's doing is good.
Absolutely good when it's for America.
The moment Israel gets involved, we're bombing hospitals.
We're expelling innocent people who are lawful residents.
Didn't cross the border illegally, haven't done anything wrong or even illegal, haven't ever been charged with anything.
Well, they got charged with trespassing on their own college campus, which only was applied because they were protesting Palestine.
Black Lives Matter could riot all day every day at Columbia.
They wouldn't give a damn.
It's selective application of the law to benefit Israel, and we have to pay the price, and we have to be the ones blamed for this.
Because whatever happens, Trump supporters go along with this crap.
And that's a problem.
And that's unacceptable.
And I'm not going to try to justify it in any way.
It's retarded.
It is the stupidest thing.
I don't understand it.
At this point, it's like...
Other people have said it, but RFK comes out with this statement about October 7th.
And it's just like...
How old was the kid they have you on film with?
There's got to be some explanation of this.
There's no reason why RFK Jr. would say stuff like this because it just doesn't make any sense.
It's just all so nonsensical.
There's got to be a reason.
The only thing I can think of is there's got to be blackmail or something on these guys.
Because they're so good on everything, then it comes to Israel, and they all become clownish slaves.
It's weird.
It's very weird.
We'll talk about other stuff, but it's like, I could spend every day all day on this.
Like, you understand, I could spend every day all day talking about the deportations on behalf of Israel, the war that we're waging on behalf of Israel, the talks about Iran, the...
Jewish mayors shutting down movie theaters for showing their documentaries.
I mean, every day there's this stuff.
I don't talk about it mostly.
Now that I am, it's like I've got months of backlog of just the most outrageous tyranny and oppression, breaking of American laws.
I don't think people maybe understand if you can put yourself in the mindset of some of these people.
Like, for example.
The journalist, Jeffrey Goldberg, who was invited to this signal chat with Pete Hegseth and others talking about bombing Yemen.
They're talking about doing it for Israel because 40% of Europe's trade goes through the Red Sea.
More people should know that the Atlantic's editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg dropped out of an Ivy League university to volunteer to be an IDF prison guard during the first Palestinian infatata.
In his memoir, Goldberg revealed that he helped cover up serious prisoner abuse.
So we have, I mean, what percentage of our media is written by straight-up Israeli spies?
I would not be surprised if it was over 50%.
And does that never strike people as weird?
I mean, I gotta be honest, I worry about this in my personal life, because I have friends who joined the IDF.
And you understand, like, a big portion of the IDF are American college students.
College-age students, just out of college.
And you gotta wonder...
These people, they're still on active reserve duty, who can still be called up by the IDF, who have been trained as killers by the IDF, who have spent time patrolling the border of Israel in uniform.
Then they come back to America.
I gotta wonder, what happens if they get a call from their Israeli commander?
What happens if they get a call from their military authority in Israel?
Who says, you know, I know you're not in uniform right now.
I know you're just in the reserves.
But, you know, there's some people in America that we're really worried about.
We're worried they're really going to cause some trouble for Israel.
And we need you to act on our behalf.
Are you going to say no?
I mean, look at how extreme they get about literally everything.
Again, a mayor shutting down a movie theater for showing a Palestinian.
So you've got all these people that grow up in America, go to Israel, join their military forces, get indoctrinated into their worldview, which dehumanizes anybody that opposes them.
Worse than dehumanizing.
I mean, you know, you have people just openly saying there's a woman.
Popular Jewish woman on X. Literally, there's no such thing as an innocent baby in Palestine.
Even the babies are guilty of being terrorists and have to be destroyed.
They're just saying this stuff openly.
So these people are, you know, the editor-in-chief of the Atlantic magazine is a literal IDF soldier.
You don't think he's getting calls from...
Israeli military chiefs saying you took an oath and for the safety and security of the state of Israel, we need you to act on our behalf.
There he met Rafiq Hijaz, a Palestinian liberation organization leader, college math teacher, and devout Muslim from a refugee camp in the Gaza Strip, whom Goldberg called the only Palestinian I could find.
Who understood the moral justification for Zionism.
That's on his Wikipedia.
So anyway.
Anyway, we can move on.
But like, do you understand how bad this is?
Like how insane all this is?
Again, we just bombed a hospital and I'll give you the exact facts on that here.
If you're interested, since I keep...
Mentioning it, U.S. airstrikes hit Yemen hospitals, stir controversy.
The U.S. conducted airstrikes in Sada-governed Yemen, targeting Houthi-controlled areas.
Among the reported targets was Al-Razul Al-Azam Oncology Hospital, which was hit for the second time in a week, leading to significant damage, according to local news agency reports.
This action has sparked a debate, with Vice President J.D. Vance privately criticizing the decision while Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth supported it.
Why is America bombing hospitals?
This is what I mean.
It's like America and the Trump team, like they're so good when it comes to American things.
They're so good when it comes to Ukraine, when it comes to Europe, when it comes to all this stuff.
They're 100% on the money.
When it comes to Israel, their say children among the 23 killed after U.S.
fighter jets bombed Yemen.
alex jones
Huff. Thank you.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
It's just why do we let Israel make us into monsters?
That's the question.
Why is it that we can be so moderate and so reasonable on every topic and then it gets to Israel and we're bombing hospitals and we're deporting innocent people that have been here their whole lives and arrived legally with legal resident status?
Why is it that our government is so much more stridently in favor of ethnically cleansing Gaza than even just deporting foreigners in our own country?
Why are we now the ones flooding Europe with refugees as it's apparently our program?
That's why reading in the Gaza relocation plan, 70 Gazans depart for Europe.
We're working with all means to implement the US president's vision of flooding Europe with Muslim migrants, the Muslim terrorists that are too dangerous to let live, but apparently now have to have an apartment in Paris.
End I don't get it.
I don't get how more people aren't outraged by everything going on.
And again, I just want to ask you to play a little game in your mind where you imagine any other situation where the mayor of a city shuts down a movie theater because they played a documentary he didn't like.
And what other ethnicity would that be hand-waved away for?
unidentified
All right, look back, folks.
harrison smith
We'll move on, but I did find that video.
We'll just play it here real quick.
I just put it in if you want to pull that in.
It's Candace Owens just expressing the frustration.
The frustration that one feels when not looking for Israel but finding them absolutely everywhere.
Here's Candace Owens.
candace owens
I say this right at the top.
It is shocking to me how when I'm not even trying to look into Israel, they pop up in everything I investigate as people that are blackmailing someone.
Case in point, the Brigitte Macron story, nothing to do with Israel.
Out of nowhere, for those of you that follow that story, we suddenly get to this chapter and we learn that Emmanuel Macron was being blackmailed by Israel because they wanted him to form closer relationships to, I think it was, Morocco over Algeria.
Just every time I'm looking at him, I'm like, oh, there's another story about...
Israel and blackmail.
Completely foolish if you don't believe that Israel blackmails people.
You are out of your mind.
But don't take it from me.
As I said, we're only using Jewish sources today.
I gotta say this right at the top.
It is shocking to me how when I'm not...
harrison smith
Yeah, it is shocking.
And it happens constantly.
So, you're an anti-Semite for not going out of your way to ignore that, I guess.
Alright, we got a bunch of other stuff to talk about.
I'll get into other stuff.
But, uh...
I do have to say, when I talk about Israel a lot, I get a very convenient list of people to block.
It's very nice.
It's very nice.
Proton flipper.
Maybe we bombed the hospital because terrorists in Yemen are hiding and storing weapons in the hospital.
Yeah, maybe.
Maybe, idiot.
Don't bomb a hospital.
What are you talking about?
Yeah, maybe.
Maybe that's what's happening.
So, yeah, I don't believe any of you are legitimate.
I genuinely can't.
For my own safety and sanity, I can't believe that we have people listening to our show.
They're saying they're going, maybe it's a good thing they bombed the cancer hospital.
Why? Because terrorists in a country 3,000 miles away who we have absolutely nothing to do with other than the fact that we have been continually supplying the Saudi Arabians with the bombs they've needed to wage war against the Yemenis for the last 15 years?
Yeah. But no, they might be keeping weapons under the hospital, so we better bomb the Yemeni hospital.
Absurd. We'll move on, but...
You know, everything is just, everything that we actually need to do is being hampered and hamstrung by what we're choosing to do instead.
Let's talk about, well, we have a bunch of crazy videos.
Let's go to clip number nine, because we're going to be seeing this a lot more into the future, and this is one of those things that they've just sort of quietly implemented and hoped that people didn't notice.
And over years, we've seen this policy just sort of quietly and without justification be imposed on people around the world.
Australia was probably the first to actually codify it and set open laws about it.
But it's the restriction of how much of your own money you can get out of the bank.
This is a video of a man trying to get out his own money because he wanted to buy a motorbike for $2,500, and the bank isn't letting him take his money out.
Let's go now to clip number nine.
unidentified
I'm now in Santander Bank, right?
What are you doing, sir?
I'm filming you and I'm recording this conversation.
I'm coming to the bank to withdraw £2,500.
Are you going to let me?
I've got £1,500 in my account.
Are you going to let me?
Are you going to let me have the money or not?
Hey.
Hello? Are you going to let me have the money or not?
You can't remove this restriction?
You can't remove the restriction, okay.
After your colleague told me that I'm a liar, yeah?
So your colleague told me I'm a liar yesterday.
I've come in to withdraw £2,500, yeah?
And you're not going to let me have my money today.
Is that right?
You can still use your card.
Answer the question, please, yeah?
I know I can still use my card.
Are you going to let me withdraw £2,500 for my account today, yes or no, in the branch?
And what is the £2,500 for, Mr Jackson?
To buy a motorbike for my son.
Right, OK, so have you got any evidence of the motorbike?
No, I haven't got any evidence of a motorbike at all.
No, I haven't got it.
I don't know what one I'm getting yet.
Because I've got a budget.
I've got a budget.
I've got a budget of £2,500 for the motorbike.
So that's why I'm withdrawing to withdraw £2,500 from my account today.
So when you find the bike for your son, if you can show us some evidence.
So I need to show you evidence.
So I need to show you evidence.
You cannot take video call off.
So you're not going to give me the money, no?
Absolute joke, this place.
Absolute joke.
You're an absolute joke, this place.
Won't let me draw out my money.
It's a fucking joke.
harrison smith
You know, Orwell said, if you want a vision of the future, just imagine a boot stamping on the human face forever.
That's not entirely accurate.
If you want a vision of the future, imagine forever being stuck in a fluorescent room while a disembodied, heavily accented voice through the speakerphone.
Demands to know why you need access to your own money.
That was actually a more accurate and, to me, more torturous view of the future.
That's what it is.
It's trying to argue with robots.
That's the future.
The future is arguing with robots forever and getting absolutely nowhere.
Of absolutely everything being systematized and placed in these very rigid corporate flowcharts.
That also are completely arbitrary and are totally ignored by everybody in power.
I'm like, my adrenaline is pumping from that.
I don't know how that guy kept his cool.
The idea of some woman on a speakerphone going, well, do you have any proof?
Of the motorbike you want to buy?
My money, you witch?
What are you talking about?
Well, if you don't know how much it is, then how much do you know it costs?
It's like, oh my god, oh my god.
God bless that man for not literally smashing everything in that office.
I'm like genuinely angry.
It would be very, very hard for me to keep my cool.
If I was trying to withdraw money and I had some stupid bent on the other side of the phone line, well, then how do you know how much it costs?
If you don't know how much it costs, then how much do you need?
Then how do you know that's how much you need?
What gives you the right?
Who gave you the right to ask me to justify the use of my own money?
What gives you the authority?
To demand to know what I need my money for.
And it's only going to get worse.
And the reason is obvious.
They can't control cash.
They can't monitor cash.
They can't tax cash if you don't report it.
They want everything on a ledger.
They want everything on a digital record so they can exploit you to the maximum degree.
They want everything on a record so they can surveil.
Your transactions in an effort to control you.
It's obvious where this goes.
I mean, would it be...
Would you disbelieve it now?
If that guy said, I need the money to buy a motorbike and the woman on the other side said, I don't think you really need a motorbike.
I mean, what proof do you have that you need a motorbike?
Don't you have a car?
I don't think you need a car.
I don't think you should have a motorbike because I don't like gasoline motorbikes.
Is it an electric one?
I'll give you the money if it's an electric one.
I mean, what is the difference between what we just saw and like the mark of the beast?
It's a matter of degree.
That's where this goes.
It goes to you have to have permission to buy anything.
Your every purchase will have to be justified to some random stranger who will for some reason have veto power over your use of your money because it doesn't fit their idea of what you should be doing.
that There's got to be a clever way to put it.
The future isn't a boot stepping on somebody's face forever.
The future is a disembodied, heavily accented voice through the speakerphone dictating your life, dictating your reality, dictating your choices that you make.
Just these structures, these systems of control that there's nobody to argue against.
There's no law behind it.
There's no justification for why they should be allowed to do this.
And again, I've said it before, I would rather have a boot on my neck.
I would rather be in an authoritarian gulag than this form of oppression, this corporate HR speak.
Almost like therapy language form of oppression.
Well, of course you can have your money, but why do you need it?
Well, but how do you know that's how much you need?
Don't you think that's a little much?
That's kind of an expensive motorbike.
Are you sure you want to spend that much?
It's my money, lady.
What the hell are you talking about?
You're a functionary.
You're supposed to be a robot.
I could do this out of a machine, but doing it with the humans is easier.
Of course, machines are even worse.
They'll just outright say, I cannot dispense that much.
Can I help you with anything else?
No, I need that money.
I can't help you dispense that much.
Can I help you with anything else?
I mean, we're going into...
It's like Hal, but if Hal from 2001 Space Odyssey was programmed by the HR lady, it's like worse than you could possibly imagine.
I I'm like speechless by that.
It would be one thing if it was just like, sorry, we have a maximum withdrawal amount.
And that's, yeah, this is it.
This is your future.
This is your future.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
Just this this contract violation detect almost just a yeah just this disembodied control matrix.
That's making decisions on your behalf with no ability to speak up against it or respond to it.
Get your hand around its neck.
Total human control.
By the very people that use this same system to like, what is it, Banco Santana's?
Official notice to those who use ATMs, you won't be able to do it anymore.
That's the same bank, the Spanish branch.
Complies with Spanish regulations and sets a cash withdrawal limit from the ATMs.
Right, meanwhile, this is the same people.
This guy has...
Account frozen.
Santander wanted my bed-bound father to visit his branch on a trolley.
After his account was frozen, the bank would not accept anything except an in-person visit for identity check.
It's the same people doing this, using the same system, that will demand you explain, you justify you wanting to use your own money.
I'm insulting the guy even...
Told them what it was for.
What gives them the right?
It's his money.
He puts money in the bank and they demand an explanation for why he wants to take it out and then they won't let him even when he gives them an explanation.
They want him to justify his purchase that he's going to make.
It's up to them apparently.
So to some faceless HR lady in Dubai.
At a call center, she gets to determine what you get to spend your money on.
She gets to dictate how your cash is dispensed.
Utterly insane.
these same people who will withdraw $50 million from USAID to make a podcast that 100 people listen to.
unidentified
Thank you.
Thank you.
harrison smith
That's the beauty of these systems, is when it comes to the regular people, like you and I, we don't even have the ability to talk back to it.
It just delivers us prompts with an OK button, and that's the only button to click, right?
To you, it's just rigid, totally arbitrary, but inflexible, permanent, can't change.
The people who run the system, They literally print money out of thin air.
I call it the manager's prerogative.
When you have these systems that if you're trying to get something done, I'm sorry, sir, the machine is saying, there's nothing I can do.
I know it's unfair, but this is just a system.
Don't blame me.
I didn't write the system.
Oh, you work here?
Oh, then yeah, let me overwrite it right there.
Done. That's the beauty of these systems is they can be completely overridden, totally ignored, applied arbitrarily.
There's no law.
There's no debate.
There's no discussion.
There's no justification.
There's like, yeah, we have your money.
We're keeping it.
unidentified
We're keeping it.
harrison smith
Completely insane.
Here's another thing that, again, I find inexplicable and troubling.
And, like, I wonder...
You know, I always try to imagine, like, who's listening to me, and I always just imagine, like, the nice boomer couple that just watches, like, CNN.
Maybe they accidentally flipped on Infowars or something.
Because I can see with, like, all of this stuff, it's just, like, it's very easy to just be like, well, he should just bring a receipt for the motorbike, and then they'd give him the bike.
Well, you should just comply with the system, because the system is there.
It's just like, none of this stuff, you don't need to comply with any of this.
You don't need to go along with any of this.
These people have no right to dictate to you what you spend your money on.
It's a principle.
It's a ideological concern.
They have no right to dictate to you how and when you get your own money back from them.
They have absolutely no right to impose this on you.
They have no right to know Who the hell are they?
We don't even know.
We don't even know her name.
Is she allowed to do this because she works at the bank?
Is she allowed to do this because she's a government employee?
What gives them the right?
Who gave them the right?
And the point of this is just like, we can't give an inch on this stuff.
We have to fight back against this stuff.
Because we know where it goes.
We know where it ends up.
We know...
Like I just said, I mean, it would not be, it's not a stretch.
Thinking like a year from now, we're going to be hearing conversations just like that, except instead of, well, if you don't know how much it's worth, then how do you know how much you need?
It's going to be, oh, well, taking money out to buy meat is not very earth-friendly of you.
How much meat are you going to buy?
Is that your carbon allotment?
Is that too much meat?
Can't buy meat?
I don't like meat, so you can't buy it.
I don't like gasoline vehicles, so you can't get your money out to buy one.
These people have no right to dictate their morality, their perspective.
They have no right to control your money, or your food, or your life, or your house, or your transportation.
These people have no right.
They're doing it.
Through sheer confidence game.
It's a con game.
It's what they can get away with, they're going to get away with.
So don't let them get away with it.
Don't shrug and sigh and conform to this new reality.
Oppose it.
Fight back against it.
Launch lawsuits.
Do what you have to do to make it clear.
That the bank doesn't have a right to dictate how you spend your money.
Or to even know how you're spending your money.
They have absolutely no right.
And a similar sentiment applies to this next video.
Clip number five.
This is a mother talking about how fearful she is of having to send her son to school To be taught by people who despise him.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Hi, I'm Kaylee Weichbrodt.
I'm a mom of two in Fairfax County.
This is my oldest.
And my husband and I have a difficult decision to make this fall as he is approaching preschool age and we are faced with the decision of whether or not we are going to put our child.
In public school system where Fairfax County has decided to move forward with instituting gender studies in elementary school.
Despite having done a study group, a focus group in the community to see if parents even wanted this.
And when parents said no, the board voted 16 to 0 and said we're moving forward anyways.
This shows clearly That they see parents not as partners, but as an obstacle for their agenda.
And I have a really hard time looking at him and going, here, I'm just going to give you over to people who do not want to partner with me in how you're going to be raised.
School and education is a huge part of a child's life.
An early childhood...
It's supposed to be filled with exploration and creativity and fun, not debating issues that are for adults to handle.
These kinds of topics should be introduced sensitively and by parents who are raising their children with their values, not with an ideology passed down from the top.
harrison smith
Well, but can you explain why you want Control of your son.
Can you justify that for us?
Right? This woman is exactly right.
It is sickening the way these people behave.
And again, I mean, there's just something fundamentally broken in our system.
When you can have the school board voting unanimously to impose something.
That their own working groups and their own policy polls said that parents are vehemently against.
It would be a problem if it was confirmed seven votes to eight.
But no.
16 out of 16 of the school board members voted to impose a lesson plan that was opposed By the vast majority of students and their parents of the schools.
So, I feel like there's a line from the Declaration of Independence that speaks to this, isn't there?
When the means become destructive of the ends, when you have a government that is so willfully at odds, With the people they're supposed to govern?
Can't they be abolished and destroyed?
FTPS facing federal investigation over transgender policies.
What that lady did was exactly right.
I want to give a standing ovation to that mother.
Now, I would have gotten a little angrier.
She didn't have to get emotional with it, which is probably even better.
The only thing You cannot do at this moment is be silent.
The only way the globalists win is if when they stop you from getting out your money or try to teach your kids about perverted crap, you shrug and go, yes, that's the modern world.
Guess I have to deal with it.
You can oppose these things.
These are choices being made.
That affect you.
Don't just let them do it.
jon bowne
In February of 2025, researchers from the CAFRE Research Project, including Dr. Nicole Socolow, Professor Filippo Biondi, Dr. Armando Mi, and Professor Corrado Malanga, announced the detection of extensive subterranean anomalies beneath the Pyramid of CAFRE.
Utilizing SAR technology, or synthetic aperture radar, in collaboration with Capella Space, the team identified chambers, Can advanced technology be lost and rediscovered centuries later?
unidentified
Is it possible that an ancient culture had knowledge of and used electrical power?
When such electrons are given the chance to bypass sections of rock via metal wire, Quite large currents can flow.
Limestone, dolomite, granite.
Supposedly constructed for a tomb are, in fact, analogous to the exact materials we use to make electrical wires.
They also share a relationship with pressure, which increases their electroconductivity.
In 1993, a mysterious and inaccessible room was discovered after remaining hidden for thousands of years.
Appearing to have deliberately been concealed by the structure's engineers, the room came to be called the Queen's Chamber and was finally explored in 2011 with a small remote camera to reveal a long-lost mummy?
Hardly. It contained carefully crafted copper wire.
And more importantly, there were instructions painted as symbols onto the floor which appeared to show a clear wiring diagram.
jon bowne
Is what we are witnessing the unveiling of a massive ancient power source?
Or is there more to this potentially human history altering discovery?
Edgar Cayce, a Kentucky-born psychic who gave 14,000 trance readings in the early 20th century, spoke extensively about a hidden hall of records tied to ancient civilizations, particularly Atlantis and Egypt.
Cayce's take straight from his readings was that this hall of records is a literal time capsule buried near the Great Sphinx at Giza.
He pinpointed it between the Sphinx and the river, saying it holds the history of Atlantis, stashed by survivors around 10,500 BC.
He described three such halls worldwide, one under Giza, another in the Bahamas near Bimini, and a third in the Yucatan.
The Egyptian one, he said, is linked to the Sphinx right paw, with chambers leading to a pyramid-shaped vault packed with tablets and artifacts.
Casey also tied its discovery to a global wake-up call, saying it'd be unearthed when humanity's ready for a shift during changes in the Earth.
Since the early 2000s, the speed at which the poles have shifted increased to around 34 miles per year, with a total displacement over the past 40 years of roughly 620 to 683 miles from its position in the mid-80s.
Cayce's predictions have been tied to the Emerald Tablets of Thoth, the Atlantean, translated by Maurice Dorial.
Its origins are debated, with some viewing it as a modern esoteric creation.
It claims to channel Thoth, an Atlantean priest-king who shaped early Egyptian civilization.
The tablets describe the halls as a hidden complex beneath the earth, serving as a repository of Atlantean knowledge and a portal for spiritual evolution.
The recent Giza findings, vast, unexplained subterranean structures, align with these narratives, particularly Thoth's claim of a building beneath the pyramids, yet the leap from radar anomalies to a 36,000 -year-old Atlantean complex The incredible thing about what they're doing is this is space-based.
jay anderson
You know, they're using space-based platforms to do this.
And I think that's one of the reasons why they may be able to circumvent some of the restrictions placed by the Egyptian government because...
You know, what are you going to do about satellites passing over your region taking scans?
At this point, I think that's just fair game until they create rules against it, which they're probably hurriedly trying to do in the light of these revelations.
jon bowne
John Bowne reporting for InfoWars.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
You thought the video that we just showed was bad.
harrison smith
The mother talking about being scared to send her kid to school because they're talking about transgenderism in elementary school despite the objections of the vast majority of the parents there.
It gets way worse, folks.
Pretty unbelievable the video I'm about to show you.
This is from Colorado Parent Advocacy Network at CPA in Colorado.
Who do parents turn to when adults are housing their minor child without consent?
Police, of course, but in this case, watch as deputies laugh and mock a mother desperately trying to get her daughter away from those who groomed her and helped fund her emancipation without parental consent.
Since the day Cindy filed her incident report, CPAN has been boots on the ground fighting to help this mother reclaim her daughter while nearly every institution has colluded against her.
Or as Libs of TikTok put it, this, I'll find the exact quote here.
It was the teacher and her trans lesbian husband or something.
Basically groomed this high schooler, funded for her emancipation from her parents, not even funding her emancipation, just worked to get her away from her parents.
And this minor was found in the house with these two adult trans people.
And the police say that's fine.
Let's watch.
unidentified
How are you?
Good. That's all I need to basically hear.
I'm just coming by to make sure you're good.
You know what I mean?
I'm not going to try to insert myself into something that's already sort of in process or whatever you're doing.
Yes, by legal standard, you're technically a minor as a 17-year-old, but I just wanted to make sure you're good.
You're good?
Yeah. Okay.
Very good.
That's all I need for now and I appreciate you guys and I appreciate your willingness to...
I don't know.
I guess help me check boxes.
I hear you.
Probably gonna have to speak with them.
Yeah, they're gonna have a meltdown.
Exactly. They're gonna have a meltdown when they laugh.
Hey there.
Hi. So I'm Deputy Thurber.
Hi there.
And you folks are?
I'm Mom.
Okay. I'm Renee.
Alright. McKenzie.
Okay. So I basically went and did a welfare check and I don't see signs of distress.
There doesn't need to be distress.
She needs to come home.
She is harbored by these folks and does not have my permission to be here.
She is a minor.
I don't care if she's a day away from 18. A minor is a minor, and she does not have my permission to be here.
Right, but again, it doesn't rise to the level of law enforcement involvement.
She's not in distress right now.
So I'm sorry, you're telling me that you're not going to...
Physically rip her out of that home?
Yeah. Even if there was an agreement between CPS and her and the mother that...
Those are civil agreements, and you're going to have to deal with those on a civil level.
So even though she is a minor, she has no permission to be here.
She's technically a runaway at this point.
They're harboring her, and that's okay?
I mean, we heard you guys laugh up there, so there's obviously something that was funny.
Isn't that kidnapping when you were first to give a child back?
No. Seriously?
Correct. So what was funny is what I'd like to know.
What? You guys were laughing up there?
So what was funny?
I don't believe that's relevant.
Well, I do.
candace owens
When you're talking about a child...
unidentified
This is a 17-year-old.
candace owens
She's still a minor.
unidentified
Minor and child are different.
And distress was not seen.
I was told distress.
She wasn't...
There isn't any.
Oh, my God.
Okay. You guys want a civil suit, too?
I'm doing my job.
candace owens
Are you?
unidentified
Yep. Okay.
Good job.
So, bottom line is, I can't...
candace owens
Can I go up there and take her?
unidentified
No. No, in fact, they specifically said...
That you're not allowed on their property.
These people have literally taken this child.
candace owens
They have...
unidentified
I don't know.
See, I get other sides that say that the child's been thrown out of the house.
No, that's wrong.
That is wrong.
Okay, but do you see where I'm standing?
What am I supposed to do?
I can't make the determination.
harrison smith
Yeah. That's where we're at in this country.
I'm sort of in shock.
I mean, you hear about this type of stuff happening.
You hear stories about it.
To see how it actually plays out.
I mean, how many basic flaws in this logic?
Can you identify?
I mean, you can say the age 18 is arbitrary, but that's the law.
Until you're 18, you're a minor.
You don't have all of the rights of an adult.
If that 17-year-old shot up a school, the parents could be arrested for letting them have access to guns, right?
Because they're responsible for it.
And I'll give you the whole story.
About how this person was groomed.
So you're, as a parent, forced to give your child over for eight hours a day or however long to a school where they're indoctrinated into a radical, what's ready?
Into a radical ideology, transgenderism.
The teachers themselves then invite the kid over to their house.
And when the parent tries to get them back, the police laugh at them.
In Colorado, harboring a minor is a Class 2 misdemeanor punishable by up to 120 days in jail and a $750 fine and is defined as knowingly sheltering a minor without parental or guardian consent, failing to release the child to law enforcement or obstructing their custody.
And the police actually has the gall.
To say, well, they're saying the kid got kicked out of the house.
Is there something unique about this situation?
Is it because it's LGBT concerning that suddenly the laws don't exactly make any sense or a little bit malleable?
I mean, at what age does this, because you need to have a deadline, an age.
18 is the age.
18. They're technically adults, even if the parents disagree legally, they're of age and can choose to do things.
You can say that's arbitrary.
You can say, well, you know, what's the difference between 17 and 364 days and 18?
Well, legally, technically, that's the line.
Does it make any more or less sense if she was 16 or 15 or 14?
Same arguments apply.
Well, she's not a child.
She's 15. She's a full-fledged teenager.
She can make her own choices.
And hey, she says she's not in distress.
Because never in the history of kidnapping has the kidnapper convinced the child that they're with to tell the police that they're fine when they're really not.
No, you just take the child at their word, right?
They can't be coerced or manipulated.
I'm not going to be coerced.
unidentified
I'm not going to be coerced.
harrison smith
And he says, well, they say that the kid was kicked out of the house.
The parent's like, no, they weren't.
Would it be any different if the kid was 12?
Is that the standard now?
Oh, the kidnapper just has to lie to the police and then there's nothing they can do?
Completely insane.
The story is that Johnson Hilde, a LGBT activist teacher and her trans-identifying husband, took a 17-year-old into their Colorado home against her mother's wishes.
Police say they were unable to intervene, according to the police report, and it gives the whole breakdown of how this person was the girl's math teacher at a Durango High School.
Her husband is Vivian Smotherman, a trans-ID'd woman.
Man, it's a man who dressed up like a woman who ran for Colorado State Senator.
They took the 17-year-old who identifies as a boy in December after she had a fight with her mom.
In early January, the girl's mom, Cynthia Stein, drove to their house to try to retrieve the daughter.
She called the police, the cops showed up, and they told the mom they could not force her daughter to come home with her even though she's a minor.
So they have to send him to school where they get radicalized by their teachers who then kidnap their children and the police say nothing they can do.
So that's where we're at.
Now there's a hearing going on, a CIA hearing.
I believe this is in, I don't know if this was scheduled before the leak of the signal chat, but I think it's in response to that.
So it's John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, and Tulsi Gabbard, the head of DNI, and Kash Patel, I believe, head of the FBI, being grilled by the Senate right now.
So we'll go to this live and react as Trump officials testify in Senate hearing after war plans revealed to journalists in chat.
mark warner
I've got to say, I've been on the committee now for 14 years, and this year's assessment is clearly one of the most complicated and challenging in my tenure on the committee.
And I want to get into that in a moment, but I want to first of all address the recent story that is broken in The news.
Yesterday, we stunningly learned that senior members of this administration, and according to reports, two of our witnesses here today were members of a group chat that discussed highly sensitive and likely classified information that supposedly even included weapons packages, targets, and timing, and included the name Of an active CIA agent.
Putting aside for a moment that classified information should never be discussed over an unclassified system.
It's also just mind-boggling to me that all these senior folks were on this line and nobody bothered to even check Security Hygiene 101.
Who are all the names?
Who are they?
Well, it apparently included a journalist.
And no matter how much the Secretary of Defense or others want to disparage him, this journalist had at least the ethics to not report, I think, everything he heard.
The question I raise is like, you know, everybody on this committee gets briefed on security protocols.
They're told you don't make calls outside of SCIFs of this kind of classified nature.
We don't know what I'm going to ask, obviously.
The executive in charge of all?
Keeping our secrets safe?
Were these government devices?
Were these personal devices?
Had devices been collected to make sure there's no malware?
There's plenty of declassified information that shows that our adversaries, China and Russia, are trying to break into encrypted systems like Signal.
I can just say this.
If this was the case of a military officer or an intelligence officer and they had this kind of behavior, they would be fired.
I think this is one more example of the kind of sloppy, careless, incompetent behavior, particularly towards classified information.
That this is not a one-off or a first-time error.
Let me take a couple minutes and review some of the other reckless choices that this administration has made regarding our national security.
We all recall, it seems like it wasn't that long ago, but less than two months ago.
In the first two weeks, the administration canceled all U.S. foreign assistance.
Now, some may say, how bad can that be?
It's foreign assistance.
US foreign assistance paid for the units in Ukraine to provide air defense to civilian cities being attacked by Russia.
Foreign assistance paid for guarding camps in Syria where ISIS fighters are detained.
Foreign assistance paid for programs abroad that ensure that diseases like Ebola don't come home.
And until recently, it paid for the construction of a railway in Africa that would have helped given the United States much-needed access to critical minerals in Congo.
Now that project, China's going to try to finance it.
As well, in the first two weeks, Director Patel, the administration fired several of our most experienced FBI agents, including the head of the Criminal Investigative Division.
The head of the Intelligence Division, the head of the Counterterrorism Division, the heads of the New York, Washington, and Miami Field Office.
All individuals who were distinctly and directly responsible for helping to keep America safe.
The irony in a little bit was the currently, or the recently dismissed head of the Counterterrorism Division.
Was involved in disrupting the ISIS attacks planned for Oklahoma City and Philadelphia, and helped lead the effort to bring to justice the key planner of the Abbey Gate bombing in Afghanistan to kill 13 U.S. servicemen and 150 civilians.
That very Abbey Gate effort was actually praised by the President in his State of the Union address.
At the response, the administration's response, These agents, I believe, good works and years of service was to force these folks out.
It's hard to imagine how that makes our country safer.
Nor can I understand how Americans are made more secure by firing more than 300 staff at the National Nuclear Security Administration, including those responsible for overseeing the security and safety of the nuclear stockpile.
Or by ousting 130 employees at CISA.
The agency directly responsible for trying to take on China's salt typhoon attack.
Again, after salt typhoon, I would have thought folks on that group chat might have thought twice.
Or how we made safer by sacking a thousand employees at the CDC and NIH.
We're actually directly working on trying to keep our country safe from disease by pushing out hundreds of intelligence officers.
The amazing thing is our intelligence officers They're not interchangeable like a Twitter coder.
These intelligence officers, our country makes $20,000 to $40,000 of an investment just in getting a security clearance.
Literally goes into six figures when you take the training involved.
Can anyone tell how firing probationary individuals without any consideration for merit or expertise It's an efficient use of taxpayer dollars.
And just to make clear that yesterday's story in the Atlantic was not this rookie one-off, it's a pattern.
I want to acknowledge Director Radcliffe was not here in his position when this took place.
But again, earlier in the administration, when a non-classified network was used, thereby exposing literally hundreds of CIA officers' identities, Those folks can't go into the field now.
How does that make our government more efficient?
You know, again, this pattern of amazing...
harrison smith
Senator Warner is just rambling.
I literally don't understand what any of this has to do with anything that they're talking about.
They're talking about getting rid of intelligence officers.
None of this has to do with anything.
As far as I'm concerned, this is just a straight-up leak.
I mean, I was just testing it on myself.
I don't want to show it to you because...
In order to do so, I'd have to show you my Signal chats, and there's people on there that don't have permission to show their information, so I'm not going to show you.
But do it yourself.
Download Signal.
See how easy it is to add somebody to a group.
It's not easy.
You have to go through, like, four different steps to get there.
So I have trouble believing this was an accident at all.
It seems very purposeful.
You have to go to the group.
You have to select the group.
You have to go to the group info.
You have to go down to where it says members.
You have to click add.
You have to scroll down all through all of your contacts to find the person you want to add and click it.
I don't know any other way that you add it.
This isn't like something that you can just accidentally do, like sending a text message to the wrong person because you've got a list of text messages.
You just accidentally hit the wrong one and type something out and send it.
I mean, it's easy to accidentally send a text message to the wrong person.
It's not easy.
To accidentally add somebody to a signal chat.
So I have trouble believing that this was an accident.
I think you have to actively do this.
And I think it's...
I don't know what to say, but I just think it's embarrassing.
I just think it's embarrassing for the Trump administration.
I think it's stupid the way that the Democrats are acting like they care about this stuff now, considering the fact that Hillary Clinton had an unsecure server.
Leaking information to anybody and everybody being hacked by the Chinese and the Russians and everybody else.
And that to this day, they still talk, oh, but her emails as if it's like just a conspiracy that the Republicans brought up that doesn't actually matter.
General Milley leaked war plans to our adversaries in China, giving them forewarning and promising to give even greater forewarning if action were to ever come.
A deliberate leak of our information, not to a journalist, but to an adversary.
They didn't have much to say about that.
In fact, they're doing everything they can to elevate and deify Milley for his exact treason.
They're bringing up all this other stuff that I genuinely don't even know what the connection he could possibly be suggesting is.
I don't know how you make a mistake this bad, honestly.
I know some people are suggesting that it could be because Walt was already leaking information and accidentally leaked more than he meant to.
I think that's where my suspicion would start.
But again, how do you accidentally add somebody to a signal chat?
I don't really buy that.
And apparently he was in this chat for like a long time.
He's talking about being added and like days later something else happening.
So let's see, when was he exactly added?
It doesn't say when he was added, but it says later on March 15th, the conversation turned and continued to actually turn to operational planning and then debriefing after the execution of new bombing raids.
He was in this signal chat.
With a lot of people, it wasn't just Pete Hegseth and J.D. Vance.
It was Pete Hegseth and J.D. Vance, Marco Rubio, and 18 total individuals, so 15 other people along with those three, as well as Tulsi Gabbard.
The journalist goes on to identify it was Waltz who initially added him to the group, and as the conversation unfolded, he was shocked and alarmed that all involved seemingly didn't notice his name was listed in the group.
We should note that all this is very bizarre because Goldberg is obviously so rabidly anti-Trump.
unidentified
Goldberg is a very rare, very rare, very rare.
harrison smith
So, I mean, I don't know what to say.
This is just embarrassing.
But you know what would have solved the problem?
You know what would have prevented this situation from ever happening?
Is if we weren't bombing Yemen.
What if we just didn't do that?
By the way, there are protesters interrupting.
The hearing.
They interrupted Kash Patel.
We'll go to that video on the other side.
Nobody said the Trump administration's job would be easy.
But they seem to be making a lot of unforced errors that are causing a lot of unnecessary problems.
Alright, welcome back folks.
To hearing about this encrypted group chat that was leaked, we're going to show you videos of when the protesters interrupted this hearing during Kash Patel's testimony.
unidentified
company.
harrison smith
Part of me doesn't even want to talk about this or cover this.
Because it seems like this is the first thing the Democrats have actually had to sink their teeth into in the last several months, make a big show about it.
We just had to listen to Senator Mark Warner go on about how we're not funding a train in the Congo anymore, as if that has anything to do with what's going on here.
It's like this isn't some big...
I mean, it's a security failure, but it's not a mystery.
One of the dudes in the chat sent the chat to a journalist.
Like, that's the operational failure.
There it is.
We figured it out.
We solved it.
It's done.
Now, the left continually leaks things to the media or to our enemies and is celebrated for it.
And we've made a big deal about the fact that General Milley Use back channels to commit treason against Trump by telling China that Trump was just bluffing and there wasn't really going to be an attack.
And if there was one, he'll hear it from General Milley first.
Total treason.
I don't remember any hearings about that.
I don't remember anything coming out of any hearings about The Afghanistan withdrawal.
Actually, 13 people died from it.
I mean, what's been leaked here, here's everything that came out from this.
To recap, they didn't think the Houthis were a real threat.
They didn't think Americans would understand the strikes.
They did it anyway to send a message.
They did it on an unencrypted chat app with a journalist inside the group.
As if we didn't know any of this.
Obviously the Houthis aren't a threat.
Certainly not to us.
Our shipping doesn't even really go through the Red Sea.
Americans don't understand the strikes because they're nonsensical.
They haven't been justified in the minds of the American people.
And they did it to send a message.
Yeah, obviously.
So, I mean, nothing really has been revealed about this.
It seems like it's just a big story because it makes the Trump team look stupid.
But again, Hillary Clinton, email server, Libya, Benghazi.
I mean, do the Democrats really care?
Are they really hyper, super concerned about unencrypted communications of classified information?
Because that would be a first.
That would be unique.
Now, in the case of Hillary Clinton, it was a little bit different because she was using an off-site server because the things she was engaged in were total violations of the Constitution and amount essentially to war crimes and arming terrorists with missiles that can bring down commercial jets.
So kind of a big deal.
And the email server, while a crime in and of itself...
It was simply a crime committed to cover up the much bigger and more devastating crimes.
These people weren't using a signal chat in order to evade oversight from Congress.
They weren't using a signal chat to hide their communications because what they were involved in was like the overthrow of a foreign leader or the arming of terrorist groups.
In fact, The use of Signal predates the Trump administration, and it is officially listed as an application that is approved for communicating classified information.
It's not like they were using something that was easily hackable.
Obviously, Signal can be hacked.
People have gotten into it before.
Devices, like every device.
I mean...
If we were serious about security, if we were serious about communications being secret, nobody would have an iPhone.
Nobody would have an Android.
There would have to be some sort of, you know, specially made bespoke phones that only communicated on their own network and were distributed to the government and managed by the government.
If you have Intel chips, Or you have Apple products.
Those are made in China.
China puts things on the hardware that activate before the software fires up.
Like, base-level hardware manipulation on every phone in the United States government.
If they were serious about wanting to text and communicate in a way that was totally secure, then they wouldn't approve things like Signal.
But Signal is actually an approved app, officially, and it was approved by Biden.
So these group chats, these Signal communications, are not anything new.
So the only thing that happened here is that this guy Mike Waltz, either on purpose or...
And the most inexplicable mistake ever added the Atlantic journalist to this chat and he saw what they were talking about.
No operational failures here.
There's no, you know, severe reorganization of the protocols that has to happen in a result of this.
You're just not supposed to deliberately send it to people that aren't supposed to have it.
What that has to do with a train in the Congo, maybe Senator Mike Warner could tell you.
But according to John Ratcliffe, CIA director's testimony earlier today, he was on the Signal chat.
Signal is an approved app by the government.
The Biden administration approved it.
Ratcliffe's involvement was permissible, lawful, and didn't discuss classified information.
Ratcliffe pointing out that the use of Signal...
Predates the Trump administration and adds a new layer to the conversation.
President Trump said this morning he stands by NSA Mike Waltz following the story in the Atlantic from Jeffrey Goldberg about the signal chat that apparently covered the military operations against the Houthis.
I don't know why he would stand by Mike Waltz.
Because now it's like the whole administration is guilty.
Mike Waltz is what you would call a scapegoat, except he is actually the one that did it.
Just saying, hey, this was a mistake by Mike Waltz.
He's the one that did it.
It's his mistake.
Everybody else was following protocol.
It would have been fine, except he sent the invite to this journalist.
And again, on Signal, it's not easy to add somebody to a group chat.
You really have to go through multiple steps.
Including scrolling through your entire contacts list to find the person that you want to add.
Including once you add that person, it takes you back to the chat so you can see the chat you added them to.
It's not like he was trying to add him to a different chat.
And even if he was, is that what happened?
Mike Waltz is in group chats with the editor of The Atlantic, rabid anti-Trump journalist.
And he was trying to add him to one of those chats but accidentally added him to the...
Undercover one?
That'd be the only thing that even vaguely makes sense, but even that, you have to really be bad at using phones to make that mistake.
But I'd ask the question, what other chats was he in communication with?
Like, what other chats was he having with Goldberg?
I wonder.
Apparently the testimony of Kash Patel was interrupted.
You can go to that video now.
This is from the hearing earlier today.
unidentified
Field office, along with other federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies have arrested nearly 300 immigrants in my state in 2025 so far.
Could you provide some color about the nature of the threat these illegal immigrants have posed, not just to Arkansas, but our nation, perhaps including some of the details of the horrific offenses they've committed against the American people?
mark warner
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
unidentified
Witness will suspend.
The biggest threat of all security is just going to the whole world belt it.
mark warner
Stop funding Israel.
unidentified
That protester was a code pink lunatic, saying the greatest threat to world peace is funding Israel.
I will observe, for the benefit of the audience here on television, that Code Pink is funded by Communist China as well, which simply illustrates...
Speak up now if you want to be removed as well, whoever's saying that.
"I am not a part of the government.
I am not a part of the government." If anyone else would like to join them, speak now, please, so we don't have any more disruptions.
tom cotton
As I was saying, the fact that Communist China funds Code Pink, which interrupts a hearing like this about Israel, simply illustrate Director Gabbard's point.
unidentified
That China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, and other American adversaries are working in concert to a greater degree than they ever have before.
Director Patel, back to my question.
Could you give us some color about the threat that illegal migrants have posed, not only to my state, which has resulted in nearly 300 arrests in 2025, but also to the nation at large?
mark warner
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Vice Chairman, and members of the committee.
unidentified
All right, so I'm going to approach your time there.
harrison smith
And yeah, I can't help but agree.
And again, it's like, you know, if you take a look at all of the negative things that have affected the Trump administration so far, it has all been Israel.
So, there is that.
There is that.
We shouldn't be bombing Yemen if we weren't bombing Yemen.
This whole situation wouldn't have started.
We should be expelling dangerous criminals that have flooded our borders by the tens of millions.
Instead, we're going after valedictorians who've been here since they're seven because they happen to attend a protest on their college campus.
unidentified
Thank you.
Thank you.
harrison smith
I'm looking now at the...
Code pink thing.
Trying to figure out if they really are funded by China.
I don't find any information about that, but it could be true.
unidentified
you.
harrison smith
So this Zero Hedge article about these leaks, DIMS explode over leak of secret war plans in Signal Chat.
Hedge should roll.
The journalist goes on to identify it was Waltz, who initially added him to the group, and as the conversation unfolded, he was shocked and alarmed that they seemingly didn't notice his name was listed in the group.
Unfortunately, as of yet, none of the pushback and anger coming from Democrat leaders is focused on what we see as the real question, the actual scandal waging war in a foreign nation without congressional approval.
Instead, all seem merely focused on the breach or the leak aspect itself involving ultra-sensitive national security conversations.
Jeffrey Goldberg, by the way, helped start the 20-year failed war in the Middle East based on lies about non-existent WMDs while we're on the topic of actually insane national security stories as opposed to fake hysteria from dead-end neocon war pimps.
I really struggle to care about this story.
It seems like they made a mistake.
Goldberg got his mitts on it.
It revealed that J.D. Vance was not in favor of the bombing on Yemen, wanted at least another month to get the messaging in order so that the American people understood why this was necessary.
It just makes J.D. Vance seem good, in my opinion, at least better than the people who didn't care about that type of thing.
Yeah, the question I have is, like, why are we bombing Yemen?
What is the point of that?
Why didn't they get a...
Get congressional approval.
Is this still under the authorization for military use against terrorists?
In that case, is there anybody that is not covered under that?
Is there any expiration date to that?
Or are we fully in the endless war cycle where just...
And I've said it before.
This is the ultimate result of globalism.
Globalism is pitched.
It's number one pitch from the very beginning.
The reason why the UN was founded, the League of Nations was founded, all of these things were founded.
And why the International Bank of Settlements does what it does, economically tying countries into one another.
It was all predicated on the end of war.
And the nations go to war.
Therefore, if you get rid of nations, you get rid of war.
You don't get rid of war.
You get rid of nation versus nation war.
You get rid of classical war where you have an instigating incident, two nations declaring war, fighting each other, and then making peace or coming to some sort of conclusion.
That's the type of war that's not going to exist anymore because it was limited in between nation states.
Now, under globalism, You're going to have endless, ceaseless, continual war against everybody who's not in the system, carried out for now under, you know, by national forces like America, but not for America's benefit or America's interests, but to punish and destroy anybody who isn't folded into the globalist combine.
So again, we could stop at any point.
We cannot deal.
We cannot do this at any point.
At any point, the Trump administration could focus on the things that we voted for.
We wouldn't have any of these issues.
We know lawsuits about the deportations because they wouldn't be deporting innocent people who got here legally.
We wouldn't have to worry about leaks and signal chats because we shouldn't be at war with Yemen in the first place.
If the Trump administration would just do what we asked them to do, we could avoid all of these problems, all of these unforced errors, all of this red meat for the Democratic base to make all sorts of asinine arguments or promote the idea that the Trump administration is dangerously incompetent and way over their heads.
So what are we doing?
What are we doing here?
I don't understand.
I genuinely don't.
In a fiery rebuttal to recent allegations published by far-left Atlantic, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth firmly denied claims that he and other top Trump administration officials inadvertently shared classified information strategies in a group chat.
Goldberg alleges that Walt invited him to the chat on March 13th, just days before American bombs began pounding Houthi targets.
So apparently March 11th may have been when it happened.
It all started with a signal connection request from Mike Waltz on March 11th.
He was invited to the chat on March 13th.
March 15th the attacks began.
So for days, I guess until now, I mean, I guess it probably wasn't revealed until the 24th when this story actually came out.
So I guess for two weeks, these people communicated on this chat.
Totally unaware that one of the 19 people in the chat was an Atlantic publisher, journalist, editor of the Atlantic.
Quote, this is what Donald Trump said.
I don't know anything about it.
I'm not a big fan of the Atlantic.
To me, it's a magazine that's going out of business.
I think it's not much of a magazine, but I know nothing about it.
You're saying that they had what, Trump said?
The Houthis?
You mean the attack on the Houthis?
Well, it couldn't have been very effective because the...
The attack was very effective, I can tell you that.
I don't know anything about it.
You're telling me about it for the first time.
Trump added.
After landing at a military base in Pearl Harbor, Peter Hegseth, Secretary of Defense, addressed these allegations head-on.
Hegseth torched Goldberg's story as pure fiction from a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who's built a career on peddling hoaxes.
Which is fine, except, I mean, it did happen.
It was real.
So... The reporter asked, your information about war plans against the Houthis in Yemen was shared with a journalist at the Atlantic.
Were those details classified?
Hegseth responded, you're talking about a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who's made a profession of peddling hoaxes time and time again, including the hoaxes of Russia, Russia, Russia, and the fine people on both sides hoax, and the suckers and losers hoax, that this is the guy that peddles in this garbage, that's what he does.
Well, then why was he added to your signal chat?
Why was Mike Waltz in communication with him?
Why was he adding him to Signal Chats at all?
And how did he make the mistake of adding him to this one?
Why do you have un-American propagandists, enemy propagandists, anti-Trump activists, mainstream media tyrants in close communication with Mike Waltz?
Like, that's not a good, I mean...
It would make sense, this response would make sense, if what Goldberg reported wasn't true.
But we now have confirmation from CIA Director John Ratcliffe that yes, chat was true.
Yes, he was in it.
Yes, it was on Signal.
Signal's an approved app for these types of communications.
So why does it matter if he's pushed hoaxes in the past other than to illustrate that this guy should be nowhere near The communications of the Pentagon, and yet he's in their inner circle.
But it's not a hoax.
And frankly, I think you're discredited by calling it one.
I would love to comment on the Houthi campaign because of the skill and courage of our troops.
I've monitored it very closely from the beginning.
We've been managing four years of deferred maintenance under the Trump administration.
Our troops and sailors were getting shot at as targets.
Our ships couldn't sail through, and when they did shoot back, it was purely defensive or at shacks in Yemen.
President Trump said, no more.
We will reestablish deterrence, open freedom of navigation, and ultimately decimate the Houthis, which is exactly what we're doing as we speak from the beginning overwhelmingly.
And the reporter asked, why were those details shared on Signal?
And how did you learn that a journalist was privy to the target's type of weapons used in the timing?
Hegseth responds, I've heard that was characterized.
Nobody was texting war plans.
That's all I have to say about it.
That's it.
Alright. I mean, pretty embarrassing.
I don't know what else to say about it.
But there you go.
We could just not do any of this.
unidentified
We could just do any of this.
harrison smith
I mean, we can show you the actual...
Texts that were sent.
But here's the story from the Atlantic itself.
So the story technically begins shortly after the Hamas invasion of southern Israel in October 2023.
The Houthis, an Iran-backed terrorist organization whose motto is God is great, death to America, death to Israel, curse on Jews, victory to Islam, soon launched attacks on Israel and international shipping, creating havoc for global trade.
Throughout 2024, the Biden administration was ineffective in countering those Houthi attacks.
The incoming Trump administration promised a tougher response.
The other option, I think, would be to not make enemies around the world on behalf of Israel.
Russia and China's ships go through the Red Sea and don't get attacked.
So, you can think about that.
You can take that into account as well, if you want.
But it's endless war from here on out, as long as we keep giving it to them.
As long as we keep engaged in this.
You know, there's been other leaks.
A bombshell leak reviewed by The Cradle exposes the depths of Washington's long-running campaign to destabilize the Islamic Republic of Iran.
For years, the U.S. State Department's Near East Regional Democracy Fund, NERD, has funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to covert operations aimed at toppling Tehran's government without success.
Details on where this money goes and who benefits are typically concealed.
However, this leak provides a real glimpse into NERD's latest regime change blueprint.
The document in question is a classified U.S. State Department invitation for bids and private contractors to intelligence-linked entities such as the National Endowment for Democracy and USAID.
See, that's not getting a lot of attention, though.
Doesn't make Trump look bad.
It's not as beneficial for the Democrats to make hay with.
That's going to do it for us.
Stay tuned.
Alex Jones in 90 seconds.
to thealexjonesstore.com to support what we do here.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
Infowars.com forward slash show.
alex jones
Quite frankly, I didn't develop Optimal Human when Bigly came on as a big sponsor.
And I told them the supplements I wanted from the companies I wanted.
They went out and did what I wanted.
People love them and they're incredible.
The turmeric, the Shilogy, the Irish Seamoss, all of it.
But they'd had this out for years and I thought, my green caps are great.
And this other company I use is great because green superfoods are amazing.
And then I finally took it, and Harrison Smith took it, and I was like, my God.
And by then, we've been selling it for four or five months, and it was already a top seller.
The problem is there's so many ingredients, and it's so hard to source, and it's so clean, at high standards, that it's sold out most of the time.
We finally got a decent shipment of it in, but we never offered it for subscription.
Because we just couldn't keep it.
When you subscribe at TheAlexShowStore.com and then they keep it back for you so it never sells out.
So go to TheAlexShowStore.com and get your Optimal Human and so many other incredible products today.
Check out all the great Patriot apparel.
Export Selection