All Episodes
March 24, 2025 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:36:58
Americans React Angrily To Trump Saying He's Open To USA Joining British Commonwealth - The American Journal Full Show
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
02:13:17
Appearances
a
alex jones
01:03
j
jon bowne
02:21
k
kyle seraphin
04:22
Clips
c
chase geiser
00:41
t
tim dillon
00:18
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
jon bowne
Disney's 2025 live-action Snow White remake is a full-on assault on the innocent 1937 classic.
unidentified
I know that you've told me before that your version of Snow White is different, and it's more of a 2022 version of Snow White.
What did you mean by that?
I mean, you know, the original cartoon came out in 1937, and very evidently so.
There is a big focus on her love story.
With a guy who literally stalks her.
Weird. Weird.
Super weird.
So we didn't do that this time.
jon bowne
Rachel Zegler, a Colombian-Polish actress as Snow White, crushes the perceived racist, skin-as-white-as-snow German fairy tale for a go-woke, go-broke, anti-white, diversity, occultic... Power Trip.
The prince and his hetero true love narrative is sidelined for the chronically mentally ill feminazi crowd.
unidentified
She's not going to be saved by the prince and she's not going to be dreaming about true love.
She's dreaming about becoming the leader she knows she can be and the leader that her late father told her that she could be if she was fearless, fair, brave and true.
jon bowne
It's Disney once again with another $270 million diversity gamble after going in the red from the DEI Little Mermaid.
flop. Seven dwarves replaced by magical DEI hires and then due to massive backlash restored with CGI.
unidentified
Because you have Rachel Zegler who's in Hamas and Gal Gadot who's in the IDF.
tim dillon
They're stars of the movie and they're on both sides of the Middle East and both sides of the Middle East are conflict and there's no ... dwarfs, because Peter Dinklage from Game of Thrones opened his mouth and said, this is f***ed up having dwarfs in the movie called Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.
unidentified
So now we got a lot of pro-Palestine, a lot of pro-Israel, and no f***ing...
alex jones
You can't just murder hot chicks because you're an old hag.
That is inappropriate.
jon bowne
New sweat.
unidentified
Yay. We're no strangers to evil plots by disgusting freaks.
chase geiser
Welcome. Zin is total BS.
However, if you'd like to relax in a huge way...
unidentified
Heavens to Betsy, young lady.
Get in the house, warm yourself up, and let's draft up a plan to absolutely wreck your idiot stepmom.
Magic Mirror, show me the biggest smoke show in all the land.
Hey Nancy, you lose, get over yourself.
jon bowne
But the one thing that remains and is amplified is the occult roots.
Fast forward from the 1937 version to 2025, and Gal Gadot's Sorceress ramps up the CGI occultism as a centerpiece aimed at further perverting the original.
1937 classic and in the process, the minds of 2025's children.
The original music from the 1937 classic Snow White are now American standards, while the 2025 music makes reference to the Communist Manifesto, where Snow White's parents ruled a kingdom for the free and fair, where the bounty of the land belonged to all who tended it.
And oddly, there is no mention of Snow White's hairy back in either version.
But that didn't stop Rachel Zegler from sharing hers.
Would it be too much to ask these twisted satanic pedophiles running your brand into the dirt to read the writing on the wall and just take their ball and go home?
Why is there softcore porn and inappropriate dialogue for children on the Disney Channel anyway?
Well, because it's all part of the plan.
You want diversity, Disney?
Fine. Write another classic in the style of the Grimm Brothers, if you are able.
But leave your bread and butter and these iconic American classics alone.
John Bowne reporting for InfoWars.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
4wars.com forward slash go.
harrison smith
welcome to the American I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live this morning from the Infowars headquarters here in Austin, Texas.
Glad you're here with us today.
We've got a lot to talk about over the weekend.
Tesla protests, war in the Middle East, peace in Eastern Europe, and insanity from the left, as always.
So we'll get into all of it.
Looking to take your phone calls as well.
Stay tuned for that.
Lots of videos to show you.
Let's just get into it.
Here it is, your daily dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Monday, the 24th of March, 2025.
Donald Trump suggests U.S. could join British Commonwealth.
And if you've been tuned in to Infowars at all this weekend, you're very familiar with this, I imagine.
President Donald Trump suggested that the United States could join the British Commonwealth on Friday in a post to Truth Social, his social media platform.
The president shared an article from the British tabloid The Sun reporting that King Charles III was making a secret offer to the White House and the plans are in progress for the U.S. to become an associate member of the international organization.
Quote, I love King Charles, sounds good to me, Trump wrote in a response to the post.
The Commonwealth is primarily composed of former British colonies or dependencies.
Born out of the breakup of the British Empire in the mid-20th century, joining such a group could be seen as a different tact to Trump's other messages on groups such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the United Nations, which he has been skeptical of.
The king is expected to make the offer to the U.S., the 57th member of the Commonwealth, at a time when America's relationship with the European Union has been strained over Ukraine and its ongoing war with Russia.
The offer is being seen as a way to bolster the U.S.
and U-9 Kingdom's so-called special relationship.
Yes, I think I've heard of that.
The two countries have frequently worked together on foreign policy in the 20th and 21st centuries.
Might I add that America and Britain have worked together very exclusively or very effectively in the last century to Utterly destroy both countries and the world.
So I don't know if that's such a good selling point.
I don't know if America and the UK cooperating with each other, all carried out, by the way, by massive, well-funded and fully public, at this point, intelligence operations to sway the American public against its inclinations and towards war on the continent.
Two absolutely devastating effects.
To the point at which both countries are now teetering on the brink of absolute collapse.
So, yeah, not the best-selling point, our track record of cooperation with His Majesty.
So, it's going to be a no from me, dog.
Meanwhile, California AG urges 23andMe users to delete their data in grim warning about the biotech company.
An attorney general issued a chilling warning to the millions of customers of California-based 23andMe.
Urging them to, quote, delete your data immediately as the company faces impending bankruptcy.
23andMe, a biotech company offering genetic testing through saliva samples to provide personalized health and ancestry reports, has been tracing the threat of closure, has been facing the threat of closure after its stock value sharply declined in 2021.
Attorney General Rob Bonta is now urging the company's 15 million customers to delete their genetic information as the fate of this vast, sensitive information remains uncertain if the firm shuts down.
Given 23andMe's reported financial distress, I remind Californians to consider invoking their rights and directing 23andMe to delete their data and destroy any samples of genetic material held by the company, Bonta said in a statement.
The statement, released Friday, reminded state residents to invoke their right to privacy under the Genetic Information Privacy Act and the California Consumer Protection Act.
Or you could just listen to Infowars and not do any of the things that the authorities then have to frantically warn you to try to undo.
There is that.
If you just don't trust this stuff from the outset, it turns out you never have to worry about the company going bankrupt and selling all of your genetic information and your very genetic code to somebody, to anybody, to foreign actors or domestic.
It's just, if you don't ever give them your DNA, there's nothing for them to sell.
It's actually pretty simple that way.
But good luck, everybody who fell for it.
Meanwhile, over 3 million applicants' data leaked on NYU's website.
This is a crazy story, and we'll tell you all about it, and we'll elaborate on it and look at the way that this is obviously not just NYU dealing with this.
A hacker accused the university of continuing to use illegal race-sensitive admissions.
The redirected homepage to NYU was hacked and linked files revealing names, test scores, and personal information of applicants since 1989.
NYU's website was hacked for at least two hours on Saturday, revealing private information of students and applicants over the last 30 years.
A hacker took over NYU's website for at least...
The entire data set was actually graphed out and graphically represented in pretty interesting ways, giving us very detailed insight into the applications and acceptance or rejection of NYU.
And we'll bring you some of what that means exactly.
This is the action of what I would consider a white hat hacker, which I think we could use more of, quite frankly.
This is the one, the chart that's been going around.
It's the SAT scores by race.
NYU average admitted SAT score, 2024.
With Asians, it was almost near a perfect score, actually, over 1,400.
You also have...
White slightly lower than that, Hispanic slightly lower than that, and Black at just 1,289 being their average score.
Meaning, of course, that not that the Black applicants to NYU were stupid, obviously.
Still very good SAT scores, just not really Harvard level.
That might explain why now Harvard has remedial algebra classes, because they're accepting people.
That shouldn't go there based on their merits, but instead are given a leg up based on their race.
In order to accomplish that, well, you've got to lower standards.
Diversity is our strength, so let's lower standards across the board.
Again, we'll get back into that later, but not exactly a surprise.
But again, we'll tie it to other universities around the country, and we'll show you the plight of extremely accomplished and hardworking students.
Being rejected from every school because of their skin color in what is, in my interpretation, a deliberate attempt to destroy the intellectual capability of the United States.
But again, more on that later.
U.S. Envoy Witkoff, optimistic about Ukraine talks, says Putin wants peace.
So talks began yesterday, March 23rd.
U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff expressed optimism on Sunday ahead of a high-stakes talk in Saudi Arabia over the war in Ukraine and said he believed Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to end the three-year-old conflict.
I feel he wants peace, Witkoff told Fox News Sunday.
So essentially what we have now is Ukrainians and Russians both in Saudi Arabia.
As I understand it though, they're not actually involved in talks together.
Instead you have Americans in talks with Russians, Americans in talks with Ukraine trying to bridge that gap.
And again, we'll touch on that later, especially Europe's reaction to this, which is hysterical in more ways than one.
Hysterical in the colloquial sense that it's very funny, but hysterical in the medical sense in that it is some sort of insanity brought about by biological failure.
I don't know what else to call it other than just pure...
Outrageous Orwellian doublethink gaslighting going on in Europe, and we'll look into that momentarily.
Finally, we have this Snow White remake.
Completely missed the mark.
Misses the mark.
You saw that five-minute video by John Bowne.
Share that at Infowars.com, band.video, and of course, on X. But it's like worse than anybody could have thought.
And again, there's something almost symbolic about it.
Snow White, the movie that It's almost appropriate that it is the final nail in the coffin of the Disney live-action remakes as just about everything that could have gone wrong with this production went wrong in terms of woke insanity, woke nonsense.
The actors and actresses both being extremists on either side of the Middle East conflict.
The actress being an outspoken moron.
The CGI being disgusting.
Peter Dinklage and the dwarf thing.
It's just really sort of the final collapse of whatever this is.
Of whatever this is or whoever it's for, whoever thought this was ever a good idea, it's over now.
We tried it.
It destroyed everything.
We'll never recover.
Maybe if you leave us alone, we can pick up the pieces and make good movies again.
Because that, at the end of the day, is the point of all of this, is that the ideology that they are enslaved by is incompatible with creating compelling Human stories.
It literally doesn't work.
It comes across as pure, unrepentant propaganda and nobody falls for it.
Or you could just make something nice and sweet and beautiful like the first one that wasn't propaganda but instead spoke to millions of people and created probably America's most powerful and enduring cultural output being Disney itself.
Princess movies, Mickey Mouse.
Disney World, everything else that America is known for, all created.
Not because Walt Disney set out to create propaganda to argue in favor of the patriarchy, but because when you set out to tell a nice story with good morals, that tends to be the story that you tell.
Because it's natural and good.
So that's your Daily Dispatch.
Of course, we'll be revisiting all of these stories and more, but I want to go to a video now.
It's a little bit longer of a video.
But I think it's worth it.
Because it has to do with everything we're interested in.
It has to do with the FBI corruption that's been rotting at the heart of our government for the last several decades.
And it has to do with the attacks on Infowars that makes our jobs just that much more difficult.
Despite the fact that all we do is sit here and read mainstream media headlines and then tell you what they're lying about.
It's put us on the enemy list of the FBI.
And for about the last decade, we have been under constant surveillance as a white supremacy organization, despite the fact that being against white supremacy is one of our defining features and one of the things that we have to insist upon and reestablish on practically a daily basis.
It doesn't matter the people in charge who simply need an excuse.
To go after their enemies, that is the people that are telling the truth about them.
So let's go down to clip number 20. This is from yesterday's Sunday Night Live broadcast with Chase Geiser.
FBI whistleblower Kyle Serafin explains why the FBI has been conducting an intelligence investigation on Infowars for over a decade.
Let's watch.
chase geiser
Holy cow.
They classified us as a national security threat and they're allowed to follow us around in public.
And as far as I understand, this kind of complicated document that I'm looking at as a layman, they have to reevaluate us every 30, 60, and 90 days to keep us in this status.
So that means that there's got to be tons and tons of documents.
And I don't understand whether we had to go through a one assessment into a two assessment to get to a three assessment.
I don't know any of this infrastructure.
All I know is what I was able to research for like an hour and a half after I got these documents.
So can you tell me and the audience what the hell a Type 3 assessment is, please?
kyle seraphin
Absolutely. So a type 3 assessment is the lowest level of investigative activity that the FBI is able to authorize certain types of files being stored.
So that means that there actually is an investigation.
It's referred to as an assessment.
And above an assessment is a thing called a preliminary investigation.
Beyond that, you'd have a full investigation.
Usually what happens is assessments generate full investigations.
You can have single assessments that carry on for years.
Maybe even decades.
They can be on domain level threats.
So all the types of this kind of thing that happened in the city of Boston or, you know, drug activity that is subsidized through gang members in this area, right?
So you have very kind of nebulous terms.
And because it's the lowest level of an investigation, they have the lowest predication required.
That's the sort of how we articulate what it is that we are going to do.
So a type 3 assessment, there's multiple types.
I think there's six different types.
And they don't actually follow sequentially.
They actually break off.
So as I recall, and they're not all things that I used because assessments are almost too low level for most FBI agents to use.
They're generally a tool that we find the intelligence sphere using, which is going to be the intelligence analyst.
And so people understand the FBI is kind of this bifurcated animal.
It's a criminal organization in so much as it is investigating criminal activities.
It also does some criminal activities from what we can tell.
But they're actually investigating criminal statutes.
And then they're also doing this national security work.
Because the FBI lists itself, and you alluded to it a moment ago, the field manual.
It's called the DIOG, which is the Domestic Investigations Operations Guide.
Interestingly enough, a new version of that was actually published in February of 2024, after years of not being able to see them.
And so people can actually go read.
What is it that the FBI does, and how do they do it?
What are they doing with your $40-plus million?
I'm sorry, your $11 billion a year.
40-plus is what they spend on the tactical operations.
So the crazy thing is...
You guys were opened up, as I'm looking at the file over here on my other screen, white racially motivated extremists.
That's actually an old term.
They don't use that term anymore.
When I went and revealed to America, writ large, that they were investigating Catholics, they used the brother of that particular acronym, white-rotivated...
White, racially motivated extremists is now known as racially motivated violent extremists.
They've added the word violence in there because they've escalated the type of discussion that's going on.
So RMVE is the new term for white supremacists.
And it almost always means that.
You could theoretically be a black supremacist.
You could be something else.
But RMVE, racially motivated violent extremists, almost always refers to white supremacists.
And that's the same thing that they had categorized or at least thought they were going to find Catholics.
Who likes the Latin Mass.
So you're in good company as far as that goes.
TLM Catholics tend to be pretty nice people if you like going to Latin Mass and Gregorian chant.
You're usually not the kind of terrorist that people are looking for.
Infowars in the same sort of category there.
So you can tell how broadly they can categorize it.
The Type 3 just means that they were authorized to use certain techniques.
What we call Pfizer, which is physical surveillance.
Various types of national security letters could be queried, which is a subpoena that is not signed off on by a court.
It's actually signed off on by an FBI supervisor, like the head agent at a field office.
And then what they do, it's almost like the just trust me bro sort of situation.
They'll send it off.
And they send off a letter.
So it sounds very ominous.
They'll send it to your bank so they can get your bank records.
They'll send it off to your telco company so you can get your phone records.
chase geiser
So under a type 3 assessment, they can get our phone records and our bank records if we work here?
kyle seraphin
Yeah, and what it's not going to usually be, it's not going to be content.
It's going to be who you've been calling and the length of the call and where that call originated from, that kind of stuff.
So they'll get tower information generally.
They won't actually get the words that you were saying or the text message you were sending.
But it kind of varies depending on how...
That particular company, like a T-Mobile or a Sprint or a AT&T or Verizon, however they decide to interpret it.
And they literally get a letter that's called a national security letter that just says, because of national security, we are asking for this stuff.
The reasons of it are classified, so we can't share it with you why we need it, but we need it.
So please respond with the following documents that we're looking for.
And it's really good for getting bank records.
You can get hundreds and hundreds of pages of bank records from people on a regular basis.
So that's what they were doing.
harrison smith
So there you go.
You can find and share that at Real Alex Jones.
The story on band.video.
Breaking exclusive Alex Jones of Infowars has been the target of secret FBI espionage investigation for 12 years.
And of course, the process he's describing is parallel construction.
You apply a label with no judicial oversight needed.
We didn't have the ability to...
We weren't told, like, we're going to put you under a terrorist watch.
We got to present evidence to the contrary.
That doesn't happen.
So they just get to arbitrarily apply a label to you, then send in spies or co-opt people looking for something, looking for some misdeed that they can then use to get further warrants and take us down, basically.
It's just a strategy.
It's a tactic that they use, parallel construction, and they're quite open about it.
It's just not the right way if you actually want to try to solve crimes.
Now, But none of it's good.
And like I said, we have a lot to talk about in that regard.
We have a lot to talk about in other regards as well.
But that's just a little update for you as to the relentless attack InfoWars has been under for 12 years.
And you have to ask yourself, why?
You have to ask yourself why.
Considering the fact that Alex Jones has done absolutely nothing but sit behind a desk and tell people what's actually going on, express his opinion in some cases, and let you know, this is my opinion, but here's the facts.
Lays out the facts, talks about history and international intrigue, things that at this point everybody acknowledges are true.
And I've answered my own question, right?
That is exactly why we're dangerous.
That's exactly what you have to do to defeat these people.
Expose them.
Explain not just what they're up to but their motivations behind doing what they do.
And when you do that, people realize that all of the lip service they pay to democracy or human rights or any of their other favorite buzzwords mean absolutely nothing because these people are just Sickeningly, revoltingly, ceaselessly evil.
And that really is the end of the discussion.
Like, that's the ultimate understanding that you need to come to.
And we'll explain that throughout this show.
When we come back, I'm going to talk about a story from The Atlantic, written by none other than Ann Applebaum.
Not sure if you remember her name, but basically the person almost most responsible for The rise of censorship in this country.
Wrote an article called The Rise of the Brutal American.
This is how bad guys act.
Yeah, the bad guys.
And of course they have the flag.
The image there is America and Ukraine.
Because their strategy now is to try to portray, and this is as Orwellian as it gets, war as peace.
America coming in and demanding peace in Ukraine is actually brutal.
That's actually a brutal thing to do to stop war.
I see a lot of people online embracing this, right?
Just taking the ironic tack when they say there's a new type of American, the brutal American, trying to fearmonger about Trump and just basic populist politics.
They're so brutal.
They're so brutal and uncaring.
And people, of course, very understandably embrace this and go, yeah, you know, we are the brutal Americans.
We're the brutal Americans like our heroes, Andrew Jackson and George Washington and all the other brutal Americans that had to be brutal to bring us the peace and prosperity that we know today.
And I get why you would embrace that.
It's sort of what we do now to show them that their words have no meaning.
But at the end of the day, I think it's wrong.
I think...
There's nothing brutal about anything being done here.
And in fact, the brutal thing is to allow criminals on your street to victimize innocent people.
The brutal thing is to allow a war to go on unceasingly for years on end with millions of people dying with no end in sight.
That is brutal beyond description.
It's brutal to send people to prison for memes they post on the internet.
That type of brutality is shocking to an American.
And standing up against it is the opposite of brutal.
It's actually...
The least brutal thing you can do.
So they're trying to present a completely inverted view of the world.
We're here to adjust the settings back to the way things are supposed to look, reminding you that there's nothing brutal about sovereignty.
That's normal.
Brutality is getting rid of it.
We'll be back on the other side.
Stay with us.
unidentified
Welcome back, folks.
I want to continue today's show with this story that...
harrison smith
Certainly taken X by storm.
The Atlantic has the article, The Rise of the Brutal American.
And I was just seeing it trend on X with the discussion.
You know, American culture, something like that.
The Brutal American.
And of course, people responding to this very positively on the right.
Saying, yeah, get used to it.
Get used to it.
We're brutal now.
And we have to be.
You made us like this.
We were fine being nice, but then you took advantage of us, so now we have to be brutal.
And we always could have.
We never wanted to, but here we are.
And I get it.
I understand the impetus.
I understand the reasoning behind it.
At first, I was a little bit in favor of it, but then I actually read the article and actually looked into what the claims were that made us so brutal.
And the fact is, it's...
This article, it truly is something else.
It's impossible for me to express without getting into it and showing you examples just how utterly nonsensical this whole thing is.
And I'll have to show you, but I mean just literally none of it makes any sense at all.
It's all very, very Intense gaslighting.
I think you'll see what I mean when we read it.
But before we read it, let's do some critical thinking.
Let's do some critical reading of this.
And this actually came out at the beginning of this month.
So it references the meeting between Zelensky and J.D. Vance and Donald Trump.
And it says, you know, last Friday, of course this was written a couple weeks ago, apparently went under the radar and then just picked a bunch of traction on X over the weekend.
But it's worth it to look at this article to, again, just examine the psychological operation at play here.
The person who wrote it is Ann Applebaum.
And as Mike Binns points out, Ann Applebaum's credibility should be nuked to zero after she got caught red-handed serving as a secret inter-cluster cell member of a busted British intelligence operation set up for covert censorship and political warfare operations known as the...
Integrity Initiative.
It's the Integrity Initiative.
Because I think these people go out of their way to make their labels Orwellian.
Double speak.
The Integrity Initiative.
On the 4th of January 2019, the hacking group Anonymous published a scanned copy of confidential documents confirming the existence and activities of the British data project Integrity Initiative.
The network operates under the name throughout Europe and mainly spreads disinformation about Russia.
Altogether, Anonymous published several dozen documents about the secret British action group's activities in Great Britain and many other countries.
According to the documents, Integrity Initiative aims to sabotage, quote, pro-Russian opinions and information while also starting and encouraging anti-Russian campaigns in order to isolate Russia politically.
They also point to the creation of anti-Russian cells throughout Europe and the rest of the world and so-called clusters being set up in nine countries in Europe alone, Spain, France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Lithuania, Norway, Serbia, and Italy.
The Integrity Initiative's program was launched in 2015 by the Institute of Statecraft, a charity founded by the employees of the British Intelligence Services.
It's funded by the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, NATO, and the U.S.
Department of State and Lithuanian Ministry of National Defense.
Wow, talk about brutal.
Talk about brutal.
These people set up an initiative to go around spreading pro-war propaganda.
In 2015, planting the seeds for chaos and destruction that wouldn't sprout until seven years later.
And I won't get distracted getting into history, especially because I read it like two weeks ago.
But you should all look at...
Things like the British Intelligence Center that was set up in the Rockefeller Center in New York City just prior to World War II, where again you had British intelligence cooperating and collaborating with the forerunner of the CIA, the OSS, or establishing the OSS or its forerunner, as well as mainstream media here in America to sway public opinion towards war and away from peace.
And non-intervention.
And of course, I don't think I need to tell you they were hugely successful in that initiative, which brought us into World War II eventually, despite, for most of the conflict, Americans being dead set steadfastly against another incredibly disastrous war in Europe.
So, this is not a new practice.
This is not...
Untested waters.
This is standard practice as far as it goes for the New World Order or whatever you want to call it.
The enemy to create the conditions where war can happen.
That's what they do.
And so, again, the story ties in a lot of stuff, right?
We're talking a lot about the seemingly flippant but very disturbing...
Statement by Trump about joining the British Commonwealth and the British intelligence agencies and their position as sort of the main hub of the intelligence, the international intelligence community, pulling the strings of conflicts around the world.
But it also ties into the war in Ukraine, and this article is, of course, perfectly in line with, and no doubt...
A policy program of the Integrity Initiative attempting to sort of turn America's own inclinations against itself.
I'll read the articles and I think you'll get what I'm saying.
But this article is so bafflingly nonsensical.
It boggles my mind that something like this would actually get published in An organization like The Atlantic, I mean, not really because we know The Atlantic, but in terms of like a major national news story, you would think that just it should survive the scrutiny of basic elementary logic, but it really doesn't.
It really doesn't.
So from Atlantic, the rise of the brutal American, this is how the bad guys act.
And of course, it's all about Ukraine and America, the Ukraine and American flag standing next to each other.
And again, this is what it's all about.
The Integrity Initiative has been campaigning relentlessly for, at this point, 10 years.
Trying to first start, then worsen, now extend the war in Ukraine for mysterious and largely unspoken reasons.
And that's what this whole article is about.
It's just the questions like, what is true?
What is actually happening?
What is reality?
What's actually going on?
Those questions never entered into the mind of the author of this.
Everything written, it was written solely with the question of how do we get the war in Ukraine to keep going?
How do we stop impending peace from finally dropping on our heads?
There's Ann Applebaum.
That's actually the perfect picture.
You'll see, as we write this, they're trying to portray just basic nationalism as...
As brutal.
And basically their whole issue is that the things Trump and Vance are doing, they aren't doing with this loving, head tilted, I'm just an academic.
I'm just a sweet lady.
Now, war!
War! Kill the Russians!
Kill them all!
Because Trump and Vance are just straightforward, forthright, not layering everything they do behind the facade of caring and humanitarianism, That scares the people like Ann Applebaum.
Not really.
She's just, you know, playing this role.
So what it says is this.
And it's just like, I mean, I'm going to try to get through this article, but I would like to stop after every line and talk about what psychological imperatives are being displayed.
It's called The Rise of the Brutal American.
The other title, Trump and Vance shattered Europe's illusions about Americans.
A book festival in Villeneuve, meetings with friends in Warsaw, a dinner in Berlin.
I happened to be at gatherings in three European cities over the past several days, and everywhere I went, everyone wanted to talk about the Oval Office performance last Friday.
Like, okay, well, I have nothing in common with you then.
All I know about...
You or about this or about this whole situation is somebody who gallivants around Europe, you know, meeting in capitals to drink champagne with friends.
Berlin one day, Lithuania the next.
Yeah, I don't know anything about you and you don't know anything about me.
Our lives are completely unrecognizable to one another.
And you seem incapable of even trying to understand the view.
From ground level, you're too busy pontificating in ivory towers with your international cohorts.
In other words, Germans usually have something in common with other Germans.
Americans have something in common with other Americans in their neighborhoods or that they grew up with.
These people have everything in common with the other elite globetrotters from around the world.
That are likewise engaged in the manipulation of these national structures to achieve their international goals.
So, again, that's what, it's just like, it starts off just like, well, when I was getting drinks in Villeneuve with the prime minister and the prince of Lithuania, we were discussing how the rabble was getting uppity.
You know, it's just like, well, okay, great.
Great start, lady.
No, I'm very interested in what you have to say.
She says Europeans needed some time to process this event, not just because of what it told them about the war in Ukraine, but because of what it told them about America, a country they thought they knew well.
I thought we knew America.
I thought we knew how hard we could beat the dog before it bit back.
Yeah, you don't know anything.
What do you mean you thought you knew America?
You thought you had America under heel.
You thought you had America on the leash.
And now you're frightened because...
They're not sitting when you say sit.
That doesn't mean you don't understand them.
It means that we understand you now and aren't listening to you anymore.
In just a few minutes, the behavior of Donald Trump and J.D. Vance created a brand new stereotype for America.
Not just the quiet American, not the ugly American, but the brutal American.
So it's like, okay, what are these stereotypes exactly?
The quiet American?
Well, that's not a thing.
What do you mean the quiet American?
What is the quiet American?
What stereotype is that?
I think they tried to put in one because they didn't want to just list three negative stereotypes about Americans.
But that's how these people think.
Like, if you ask Ann Applebaum, like, say some American stereotypes.
Like, if you tell me that, I'm going to be like, I don't know, cowboys, hard-working, church-going, you know, stereotypes about Americans.
That you picture when you picture Americans playing baseball, spitting tobacco, like, you know, to me, positive stereotypes.
These people, you ask them, like, what's a stereotype about America?
They're like, loud, obnoxious, brutal, stupid, ugly, right?
That is literally how these people think.
Again, then they project that, and they're just like, these are just the stereotypes.
Like, no, lady, this is what you think about Americans because you hate them.
It's not a stereotype, actually.
So, I don't know.
They say quiet Americans because they're like, let's come up with a non-existent stereotype so we don't just list three negative things in a row.
Because the point of this article is supposed to show how the old stereotypes were good and now they don't exist anymore.
Anyway, quiet Americans, not a stereotype, doesn't exist.
Ugly American.
I don't even know what that means.
I guess that's a stereotype.
But Americans are far and away the most beautiful people on Earth.
So what are you talking about?
Have you seen British people?
No offense, British people.
Come on.
But guys, ugly, really?
No offense.
No offense, but you're ugly.
That's my brutal American coming out.
Whatever illusions Europeans had about Americans, whatever images lingered from the old American movies, the ones where the good guys win, the bad guys lose, and honor defeats treachery, those are shattered.
So first of all, those aren't illusions about Americans.
Those images are just like...
There's some sort of phenomenon.
There's got to be an academic term for it.
But these people cannot make arguments without invoking Hollywood.
It's very weird.
It's very bizarre.
No matter what the conversation is, I've seen so many things that are people...
Like, people questioning the Holocaust and being like, show me some proof of the Holocaust.
People are like, um, ever seen Schindler's List?
And it's like, that's a movie.
That's not real, lady.
That's a movie.
That was fake.
Those were actors doing that.
Maybe parts of it were real.
Maybe it was based somewhat off a true person.
I don't even think it was, though, really.
The whole thing is sort of shrouded in mystery.
But to me, there's like something very, it's like, I get that people understand the world through movies, like they learn about things through movies.
Do they not know that those things aren't real all the time?
That like, they're often fake or played up as propaganda?
And you understand that what they're describing, what she's describing here as heroic, as, you know, amazing, honor-defeating treachery.
You know that was us being incredibly brutal, right?
You understand, too, the Nazis who watched an old World War II movie, we weren't exactly nice.
It wasn't exactly a polite thing that we were up to in Germany.
And this, I think, is an important distinction because she is talking about brutality.
Americans are so brutal.
And then she's like, not like the old days when they came here and stomped the Nazis into the dust.
It's like...
Don't you understand that that's a very brutal thing that we did and you're in favor of it?
So brutality isn't really the issue that you have.
The issue that you have is that we're just not doing being brutal for you anymore on your behalf or for your ends or towards policies and programs that destroy us.
So yeah.
Sorry, sorry we're so effectively brutal before and now we're not.
And again, I'm not kidding.
If a Nazi is watching a World War II movie, they're going to think that Americans are being incredibly brutal and unfair, etc., etc.
Now I'd argue that's because they were brainwashed by a totalitarian government that controlled all their sources of information and all they knew was what they told them and to a mind like that, the actions of American GIs in Europe, Would seem incredibly brutal.
We're dealing with the same situation here.
The Ann Applebombs of the world are the Nazi propagandists that are convincing an entire continent that basic justice is brutal.
Basic justice is brutality, and that should be resisted.
And that freedom of speech is somehow dangerous, and that war is necessary for peace.
And there's Applebaum with Zelensky.
That's all this is, is a piece of pro-war propaganda in the most dishonest and sniveling way possible.
I'm not even against pro-war propaganda if it's legitimate.
If you're trying to show me what's actually going on, say, hey, we've got to fight this.
We need concerted efforts to, you know, military action to prevent this.
There are lots of things that military action is necessary for.
When you're sitting there going, not fighting a war is being mean and you're bullying now.
You're bullying us by not giving us infinite money.
Like, you people are sick.
You people are sick.
So they say, whatever fond memories remain of the smiling G.I.s that marched into European cities in 1945.
Smiling G.I.s marching into European cities.
Nothing brutal about that, right?
Just... Banners waving and confetti falling and smiling GIs marching into European cities.
Ignore the crushed skulls and lakes of blood, please.
Again, these people are insane.
Of the speeches that John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan made at the Berlin Wall.
Again, pretty ballsy thing to do.
They weren't pussies.
They weren't weak.
Being pulled this way and that by interests outside of their own.
They wanted something.
They went and demanded it.
And they threatened violence and they didn't get it.
Pretty brutal stuff.
But it was for the liberal world order that this woman is a priest of.
And so she likes it then.
It was good brutality.
I'm telling you, I could go through every line in this.
But they say, apart from their politics, Trump and Vance are rude.
They're cruel.
See, they don't do this.
When they take pictures, so they're bad.
Right? If you do this, when you take your picture, then you can advocate for war, and you can overthrow governments, and you can slaughter a million people for uncertain gains, but you're smiling and your head is tilted.
And so, you know, that's not bad, then that's good.
That's not brutal.
So when you say things directly, that's rude, and that scares an Apple bomb.
Okay? So it has to be stopped.
It's too brutal.
They're rude.
They're just so rude.
When we're there trying to steal billions of dollars, they stop us in a very rude fashion.
So much of this, I mean, it's like constant.
It's like a constant thing with these people.
They demand the most insane nonsense.
They are basically extorting the American people for everything we're worth.
And then resisting that, they portray, is very rude.
They're very offended that we would stop them from stealing billions of dollars from us.
They berated and mistreated a guest on camera and then boasted about it afterwards as if their ugly behavior achieved some kind of macho win.
This is how a loser justifies their loss.
I didn't lose.
They're just ugly.
Their behavior is ugly.
They announced that they would halt transfers of military equipment to Ukraine and hinted at ending sanctions on Russia, the aggressor state.
In his speech to Congress last night, Trump once again declared that America would get Greenland, which is a part of Denmark, a sign he intends to run.
Yeah, deal with it.
I mean, I'm literally more sophisticated in this when explaining the plot of movies to my...
Four-year-old son.
And he's like, is that the bad guy?
I'm like, well, I'm like, eh.
I mean, he's bad, but he's got a good motivation, though.
It's just that, you know, the heroes are these guys that, like, it's a little nuanced.
It's a little bit nuanced.
See, the Fire Nation is, no, but seriously, it's like, have you ever heard something more, I'm trying to think of the right word, childish almost is there, but petulant might be more accurate.
Because it's childish with a purpose.
It's childish in order to keep the person receiving the message in a childish state of misunderstanding.
These are the actions, not of the good guys, but of the bad guys.
Wow. Really striking political analysis from Ann Applebaum.
unidentified
Trump is actually like the bad guy from a movie.
Okay. Trump is actually Thanos, like in the movies?
harrison smith
Great. If Reagan was a white-hatted cowboy, Trump and Vance are the mafia dons.
The course of Republican leaders defending them seems both sinister and surprising to Europeans, too.
I never thought Americans would kowtow like that, one friend told me marveling.
This was a sentence that I was talking about in the beginning, where I'm just like, no, literally none of this makes any sense.
Like, it's so baffling and nonsensical.
To kowtow, the Chinese saying, is to submit, is to be weak and to bow down and kiss the feet of somebody stronger than you.
This is the opposite of what happened in the Oval Office.
In fact, what should have happened is that Zelensky should have been doing a little bit more kowtowing.
He should have been kowtowing a bit to his imperial masters and know his place in this arrangement, in this little relationship that we have going.
I never thought Americans would kowtow like that.
Do you understand how completely inverted, total opposite of reality this is?
She wrote an entire article complaining that America is not kowtowing to the liberal world order, the international rules-based order, that the American Government is now actually prioritizing Americans, insisting on American interests being superlative, and not kowtowing to the demands of non-Americans or people who hate us.
And so to make that argument, the crew bring up another article by Ann Applebaum, again from The Atlantic, the only way the Ukraine war can end, Russia has to stop fighting.
They're just too brutal.
They're too brutal.
They're too brutal in their insistence that Ukraine not eradicate its Russian-speaking population.
How brutal are they that they demand that the senseless reign of terror the Zelensky government waged against people in the east provinces of that country come to an end?
It's not brutal to want peace, you idiots.
unidentified
Where I should go from here.
harrison smith
We're going to talk.
We just have so much to talk about.
We're going to talk about the NYU hack that happened.
We're going to talk about the suggestion that America joined the Commonwealth, the British Commonwealth, undoing the 1776 revolution.
It's just totally absurd.
I think I'll play.
I won't be able to get to the whole thing, but...
But this guy, he sort of came out of nowhere.
I hadn't seen him before about a month ago.
Everything he's come out with so far has been hilarious.
I don't even know what he looks like.
Because he's a puppet.
Because he's a puppet named Edgar, I'm pretty sure.
Clip number three.
Edgar the Puppet.
That's his name, right?
He was on Alex's show.
It was one of the funniest interviews I've ever seen Alex Jones do.
Especially when Alex Jones is puppeteering the frog, going, do not make me destroy you.
It's very funny stuff.
Edgar went to NPR to ask them about their liberal bias, and it's just some classic trolling.
Let's go to clip number three.
unidentified
NPR has a huge liberal bias.
Desperate to keep government funding, they got Sesame Street to help.
But isn't it about time to expose my fellow Muppets for their crimes against humanity?
Elmo, are you a globalist?
Are you a globalist?
Big Bird!
Why were you on Epstein Island, Big Bird?
Answer me!
Or are you yellow?
Count! Excuse me, count!
Wait! I want to talk to the Count!
Get out of the way!
Count! Count!
Count! How many abortions have you made Abby Cadabby have, Count?
How many abortions have you forced Abby Cadabby to have?
Can he count?
Why is Abby- Ask him to count!
Can he count?
Yes! You forced your lover, Abby Cadabby, to have?
Why did you have sex with her under the tiny desk?
Come on, Count!
Fess up!
Elmo! Elmo!
Shut up, lady!
I'm talking!
Bitch, wait!
Elmo, why are you a globalist?
Elmo, why do you propose the Diddle Me Elmo doll?
Big Bird, did snuffle up against Strangle Jeffrey Epstein?
Tell me now!
Don't run away from me or you're yellow!
Answer me now, Elmo.
Are you a globalist?
Have you ever been to Epstein Island?
Big Bird, did you commit atrocities in Nigeria?
Were you part of a genocide, Big Bird?
Do you renounce jihad, Big Bird?
What is your body count?
Literally, Big Bird.
How many people has Big Bird murdered?
I want to know!
Don't run away from the free press!
Wait! You're supposed to be part of public media!
Why are you running away?
You are one fertile vampire!
And you!
You've been to Epstein Island!
You're on the flight logs!
How dare you!
You're a globalist, Elmo!
Shame on you!
So indeed!
Don't you touch me, old lady!
Don't you touch me, that's assault!
Get the hell!
Oh look, hey!
Why is NPR populated by wine moms?
Wine moms with Trump derangement syndrome!
Look, there's Examin-A!
Hi lady!
Don't touch me, bitch!
Get off my camera lady, you infertile myrtle!
She's laughing!
That means she's taking a joke!
How dare you assault the free press?
This is standard NPR practice!
This is standard NPR practice!
Repress all few points!
Put your own!
There's no such thing as diversity of opinion!
Run, you rapist!
Oscar the Grouch is a rapist!
Why are you running cover for him?
You can run, but you can't hide!
You're yellow, Big Bird!
You're yellow, I tell ya!
Stand up and fight!
Oscar the Grouch is a rapist!
Yes, you get in your car back to Epstein Island!
Right now!
Can we chat with you?
harrison smith
That's Ask America with Edward.
Bring it out a little bit.
unidentified
Oh my god, that's the funniest thing I've ever seen.
harrison smith
New video alert, confronting Elmo at PuppetEdgar on X. Holy crap.
unidentified
There's something so hysterical about one puppet chasing others.
harrison smith
Amazing. To me, the best part of it is, did that not sound like liberals questioning...
Republicans, like, as absurd as that was, is that not the exact type of questions that you get when right-wingers are just like, why are you in favor of rape?
Are you in favor of rape because you voted for Donald Trump?
Do you love rape?
It's like, yeah, give them a little taste of their own medicine.
See how absurd it sounds?
Welcome back, folks.
So I knew I was going to move on from the Ann Applebaum story.
I thought I'd play a five-minute video on this first segment to get the articles in order.
Or plot out the roadmap for the next segment.
But then that video was too funny.
I just kept watching it.
I just kept watching it.
unidentified
It's too good.
harrison smith
Yeah, Puppet Edgar.
We gotta get that puppet on.
I wanna talk to that puppet.
Very funny stuff.
We're gonna get into some more not fun information here in just a second.
But before we do, And while we're at it, there have been lots of claims recently that Alex Jones has been replaced by a clone.
Alex James, some are calling him.
And so in order to dispel this rumor, the people over at Infowars put a little time lapse together of Alex Jones' transformation over about a year.
As if we're going to fall for it.
As if we're going to watch this and just say, oh, well, I guess it's the same person.
I guess he just lost weight.
I guess you can see it bit by bit over a long period of time.
Each change being imperceptible, but the end result being utterly entirely different from the beginning.
The slow, natural transformation of hard work and weight loss.
Like, we're going to fall for that.
Okay, I got a couple theories about this.
I'll present them to you on the other side.
Here's the time lapse of Alex Jones' miraculous and to some suspicious weight loss over the last year.
Let's watch.
Okay, so there he was originally.
Pretty overweight.
Not looking great, but the Alex that we knew and loved.
The real Alex Jones.
And then all of the sudden, without warning, he's changed into a clone.
Can you identify?
When he's changed from a clone?
I think it was about 30 seconds into this video.
I think about 30 seconds into this video right there.
There it was.
That was it.
That was the change.
Now he's a clone.
From this point forward, he's a clone.
Keep it rolling.
It's got to be one of these, right?
There's got to be one of these days.
He was Alex Jones one day and somebody else the next, right?
Because he's a clone.
Because everybody keeps telling me he's a clone.
It might look like that he's just getting fit and losing weight.
Over a long period of time, day by day, bit by bit, imperceptibly changing until he's unrecognizable.
But I'm not going to be fooled by a montage, by a simple montage.
I have my own theory.
My theory is that when clones are defrosted and activated for the first time, they go through a period of rapid weight loss.
So I think they changed Alex Jones with his clone before the weight loss, knowing that the weight loss would happen because he's a clone.
And incorporated that into the non-clone story.
Do you understand what I'm saying?
Do you understand how deep this rabbit hole goes?
They've thought about all of this, folks.
They've thought about all of it.
unidentified
And they've set us up.
harrison smith
They've set us up once again.
It's one of those things that, like, look, I'm glad more people are questioning things.
I'm glad more people are...
Looking a sconce at some of the official stories that we have out there.
People are being skeptical.
They're asking questions.
They're not taking everything they see at face value.
That is a good thing.
If it's tempered by research and genuine curiosity about the reality of the thing that you're noticing.
In other words, if I just showed you a picture of not fit Alex Jones, a picture of overweight Alex Jones, and a picture of fit Alex Jones, and I say, look at this.
These aren't even the same person.
And what could explain this?
I could understand if that's all the information you have before and after and going, yeah, this happened in a matter of a few weeks.
And you go, okay, then maybe she's probably taking Ozempic.
Probably taking Ozempic or he's a clone or something else.
Yeah, the story, by the way, Alex responded to this.
Alex Jones has been, has Alex Jones been replaced by, almost slipped up there.
I almost said Alex Jones has been replaced by a clone, and that would be in violation of the NDA I signed about this exact topic.
No, it says, has Alex Jones been replaced with a clone?
Joe Rogan and the suspect clone himself respond to these claims.
Again, look, if I show you a picture of Alex when he's big, a picture of Alex when he's fit, I say they expect us to think they're the same person.
I get why you would go, there's something they're not telling us here.
There's something suspicious here.
I understand why you would say, here's a mystery, let's try to find an answer to this.
But then if you were to go, but then the next step shouldn't be to then go on X and spout this as if it's true.
The next step should be to, in some way, try to test your hypothesis.
In some way, say, is there an explanation to this?
And if so, what is it?
And that thought process would have led you to looking at the time lapse, looking at the before and after, looking month to month.
See what he looked like exactly.
Then it would be abundantly clear, especially from the daily videos of Alex Jones working out every single day, going on hikes every single day, every single day, working up a sweat in the gym.
Then you would notice that there's no explanation necessary.
There's no mystery here.
There was no before and after with an inexplicable change that took place.
You would go and you would look.
You go, gee, I remember Alex Jones being way too big, being a big old guy.
And now look at him, he's jacked.
There's something I don't understand here.
And then you go and look and say, did he lose weight through exercise and hard work?
Oh, he did?
Okay, then there's no mystery.
Okay, then there's no conspiracy.
You don't need to come up with fantastical theories about what caused the change when the change caused the obvious, just obvious, just right there in your face with all the evidence you could find.
You could possibly...
I'm not turning around.
I'm not turning around.
I don't know what's behind me, and I'm not turning around.
unidentified
Yeah, it's just one of those things.
harrison smith
That's like, yeah, I'm glad people are asking questions and not taking anything for granted, but, like, you can't just become a conspiracy theorist overnight.
You gotta learn the skills.
You gotta actually do the research, because there are a lot of things in this world for which the...
The standard explanation, the common explanation, is not sufficient, and so it demands that it be explained.
And so then, in that case, speculating, theorizing is perfectly valid because the official story simply isn't true, and it's obvious it isn't true.
In our case, the official story is Alex Jones quit drinking, started working out.
Kept on the supplements and introduced new, incredibly powerful supplements to his routine and got fit through hard work.
That's the official story because it's the truth and you don't need to speculate if you actually just look into it for a second.
It's pretty obvious how this happened.
You too.
You too can go through a transformation like this.
It's not impossible.
You don't need spectacular science fiction level explanations as to how to lose weight.
It's pretty simple.
It's hard work and it's diet.
We can't help you with the hard work thing.
That's on you.
We can't help you with the diet.
We can't help you with the supplementation.
We can't help you have the energy and drive that you need to do the hard work, but that's got to be inborn and you got to have the desire to do that in the first place.
But if you do desire to get healthy, to get fit, to be the best version of yourself, To transform in a way so spectacular that people around you will start to speculate that you've been cloned or on Ozempic, then go to thealexjonesstore.com.
Then go to thealexjonesstore.com because I don't know how many times I have to say it.
We're not the liars.
We're not the ones engaged in bizarre hidden activities.
We are very upfront about everything that we do and we've made our entire business model out of exposing everybody else.
So it'd be kind of silly for us to then start to engage in the exact type of behavior and activity that we've made in a career and changed the world calling out.
So go to thealexjonesstore.com, get some of the supplements, get some of the Shilajit or the Atomic Defense or the MKUltra or any of the other incredible Supplements that we have on offer.
New ones coming out on a daily basis, practically.
And of course, there's so many other reasons.
The incredible merchandise, the Patriot gear that we have there.
And currently on is the Alex Jones Store Super Sale.
You can also get that classic trench knife dagger.
Probably, in my opinion, the coolest dagger we've ever come out with.
We've come out with cool knives, for sure.
I have several of them.
But this one has to take the cake for me.
With the imagery.
Of the Spartan, with a spear out, tip of the spear, being InfoWars' now widely acknowledged role in this global awakening, leading the charge, taking the brunt of the defense, taking the brunt of the attack against us, and continuing to drive forward regardless.
With the come-and-take-it-with-your-shield-or-on-it mindset of our Spartan forefathers, the Spartan limited edition classic trench knife.
Now, my suggestion on this, they didn't take.
They didn't take my suggestion.
I thought it would have made it a little bit better.
Make it a bayonet.
I wanted them to make the knife a bayonet so it could literally be the tip of a spear.
Apparently, they don't make bayonets very often anymore.
Apparently, people aren't using muzzle-loading or front-loading muskets anymore, so bayonets aren't that popular.
But I think you can still make it a bayonet and have it be the real tip of the spear.
Regardless, it's got the incredible guard on it, which is necessary.
The reason that Jim Bowie, the founding father of Texas, created the Bowie knife and got famous for it was because it was a fighting knife.
It was a combat knife.
In other words, knives for daily use, they didn't have the finger guard.
And so if you were in a fight and you were stabbing somebody to death, like an Indian or a Catholic...
I'm just kidding.
Jim Bowie was kind of crazy.
He was a little bit nuts.
You ever want some entertainment, just search Jim Bowie's Wikipedia for The Sandbar Fight.
It's just reminding you that our countries were founded by people who literally engaged in things that are better than Hollywood action movies.
Just the...
Wikipedia recitation of the facts about the sandbar fight.
Jim Bowie, where he fought like seven guys, was stabbed and shot, bludgeoned over the head, and still won.
These guys were so badass.
And so if you're in a fight like that, if you're fighting some doctor over an insult, and you go to stab him, your finger's going to slip, and you're going to get your fingers cut on your own knife.
And that doesn't work for a fighting man.
So Jim Bowie, I think it was his brother or a friend of his, He commissioned a knife that would have a sufficient guard so that you could stab your enemy and not have your fingers cut on the blade.
And so that's what we have.
It's a trench knife.
And it's got that protective barrier, hand guard.
I know the word hand guard.
Couldn't think of it at the time.
unidentified
I know what word you were thinking of, but it's not those.
Those are illegal.
harrison smith
Well... Well, because they're like brass knuckles, kind of?
unidentified
No, they're paperweights, is what we call them.
harrison smith
Yes, I mean, the stylish paperweights here.
But anyways, it's a beautiful knife, and I think it's our most beautiful self ever.
I think it's the most beautiful knife Enforce has ever come out with.
It's functional.
It's powerful.
I don't suggest stabbing anybody with it personally, but if you needed to stab somebody, this would be the knife you'd want to use.
But for daily use, for utility.
You're not going to beat it.
It's incredibly sharp.
It's incredibly powerful.
And with a little bit of engineering, you could definitely attach it to the end of a spear and have it be a real tip of the spear.
All right, let's get back into the news now.
Let's get back into the news.
Oh, my God.
Yeah, there's just so much.
There's so much absolute insanity across the board.
And let's talk about...
Let's talk about the story that Ann Applebaum was trying to gaslight you about, that is the war in Ukraine.
The ongoing senseless and horrific slaughter of millions of Russians and Ukrainians for no discernible purpose other than the ambitions of the globalists in control of Western powers.
U.S. Envoy Steve Witkoff is optimistic about Ukraine talks, says Putin wants peace.
Steve Whitcoff is the U.S. Special Envoy.
He expressed optimism on Sunday, head of high-stakes talks in Saudi Arabia over the war in Ukraine, and said he believed Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to end the three-year-old conflict.
Quote, I feel he wants peace, Whitcoff told Fox News Sunday.
And he has to.
And it's one of the things, I mean, we've talked a little bit about it, but if you're, you know, an authority waging war, You know, on behalf of your country, like Putin is, obviously you're going to have a bunch of different concerns.
You have to weigh their importance, etc., etc.
But I have a friend of mine who just got hired by a Russian company.
It's a Russian AI company.
And I was like, oh yeah, Russia.
So are you going to be going to Russia to visit?
And he's like, well, they're all Russian, but none of them live in Russia.
One of the guys is in Berlin.
One of them's in wherever.
One of them's in France.
They're all in different capitals of Europe because they all fled Russia because of the war.
Because they're all young men that could very well be conscripted if they stayed.
And so they took their technological genius and fled the country.
And you have to think, obviously Putin knows this, and obviously this is a natural effect of war, and Ukraine is probably suffering even worse than this from Russia.
You have to think, if you're the leader of a country waging a war on...
On behalf of your state, you have to weigh the pros and cons of going to war, and obviously to Russia and to Ukraine, the con of having probably millions of your best people flee your country because they don't want to be involved in your war, that has to be taken into account.
And for somebody that actually wants their country to...
Do better.
You would be trying to end the situation as soon as possible to get those people back into your country and providing for the prosperity and power of your nation again rather than Europe taking advantage of that.
And so it's just another reason why you look at these talks and it makes sense.
Putin wants peace.
Putin wants peace because it's not easy to be at war with the entire Western world.
It's not easy.
Sending half a million of your men to die on the front lines of some conflict.
But you have to weigh that against the threat of not going to war.
And to Russia, that was an existential threat.
In their interpretation, disagree with it all you want.
To Russia, there was an obvious encroachment by NATO going on with the threat of regime change in Russia being a very obvious possibility.
And so they weighed the pros and cons and said, look.
It's going to be tough.
It's going to be hard.
But we have to do this because the other option is to not exist anymore.
And so they went ahead and did it.
So what is the explanation for places like Ukraine that have seen brain drain of astronomical levels, young men fleeing the country in mass, going to every other country in Europe, never intending to return?
I mean, entire swaths of their population have fled the country.
Which, again, is going to bleed it dry.
It's one of the reasons why we are spending billions of dollars to pay for their quotidian government activity.
But they don't want the war to end.
Who doesn't want the war to end if it's causing such a massive economic drain on your country?
It, again, just makes you think, okay, the people that want this to go on forever.
The Ukrainians or the German intelligence minister who was just saying this will go on for five more years if we can get the funding together.
I think it's pretty simple to understand they don't care about Ukraine.
They genuinely do not care about Ukraine, about its prosperity, its capabilities, its people.
They don't care.
You are a useful frontier for them.
You're a useful barrier to Russia.
You're a weapon to be used.
And it doesn't matter if your people are being slaughtered like dogs in the trenches.
It doesn't matter if most of the people in your country are fleeing never to return and the people that aren't fleeing are being rounded up in vans and hauled away at a moment's notice never to see their wife or children again.
One side of this conflict seems to at least in some part care at least a little bit about the country.
That they're in charge of, and that's Russia.
Zelensky and the entire Western world seems to genuinely never even consider the actual prosperity or safety or peace of Ukraine.
It doesn't even enter into their mindset.
It's a sacrifice they're willing to make.
You and your family and your country.
And I believe I have a video of Zelensky again making insane demands.
Clip number 14. I mean, this whole peace process has been a rollercoaster back and forth.
Zelensky wants peace.
No, it actually doesn't.
Russia wants peace.
Actually, they're making these demands.
So here's the latest from Zelensky.
Here's the latest demand of his.
When the demands from America are very simple.
Hold elections.
Have peace.
Give us your minerals.
Also, give us your minerals.
And we can negotiate on that one.
But we do want something for the hundreds of billions of dollars we've poured into that particular black hole.
The demands from Ukraine are just completely unachievable nonsense designed exclusively to prolong the war.
By making impossible to meet demands.
Here's Zelensky making another impossible to meet demand.
unidentified
I'll just tell you what he says.
harrison smith
I'll tell you what he says.
Zelensky is demanding to join NATO.
Explaining that if they don't let them join NATO, then Europe will have to support Ukraine financially forever.
As if those are the options.
The options are...
Let Ukraine join NATO or just endlessly fund the NATO military project, which is, again, very stupid.
It's just a false dichotomy.
It's not true.
It doesn't have to be true.
I don't know how much longer they can keep this kabuki theater going.
I really don't know how much longer they can put off peace because that's all they're doing.
They're like, at this point, They're trying to just like, if we can just delay it another week.
Delay it another week.
We have to keep pushing peace backwards and it keeps encroaching closer and closer.
Whatever demands we can make to throw things off.
Maybe we'll have a big discussion and talk and we'll come to all these agreements and then we'll change our mind at the last minute and just scuttle things overall.
They're doing everything they can to just get another week of war.
Get something going.
Get a bomb in a nuclear power plant.
Set off a nuke somewhere you can blame on Russia.
Maybe something will really pop off with Iran and I'll be distracted by that and they can keep waging war in Ukraine and peace.
Part of me wants you to spend the whole article on that Ann Applebaum, the whole episode on that Ann Applebaum article and just lay out the propaganda methods.
Of the elite to try to get this war going and exposing the brutality of what they call peace.
But I think at the end of the day, it's better to just assert the reality.
The Ukraine war is a senseless mass murder caused by the West, caused by America, on purpose, who had a million different chances to get us off the path towards war.
And every time, on purpose, chose the path of destruction, conflict, and chaos.
It has to end.
Zelensky has to be removed.
Peace has to reign between America and Russia for our mutual benefit.
And Europe is suicidally trying to bring us down with them.
That's all you need to know.
unidentified
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
*music* You're watching American Journal on Infowars.com, band.video, streaming on X and Rumble and a thousand other places.
Thank you so much for finding your way around the firewall, through the censorship, over the anti-free speech barricades, and here to the home of truth.
We're going to talk about Europe.
And we're going to talk about the attempts to draw America.
Into some sort of new European world order, for lack of a better word.
And I guess before we get to that, because I've got a big article about it, but combining all these topics, you've got Ukraine, you've got the Middle East, censorship overall.
Let's just take a brief little perusal over some of what Europe is up to.
You know, it's obviously what they're up to is better and more loving and generous and beautiful than us brutal Americans.
We're so brutal it just baffles the Europeans' minds.
Meanwhile, you have things like this.
Syrian government-aligned forces captured a reveling in massacres of minorities in coastal town.
And this is still going on, by the way.
I know there was that big attack on Alawites a couple weeks ago.
And that's where this story is from.
It still continues at a pace.
It actually hasn't slowed down really much at all.
Syrian government forces kill 72 Alawites in new wave of sectarian massacres.
Thousands still missing after Syrian coastal violence.
You started this attack on Alawites in Syria.
Highlight deep divisions.
That was from yesterday.
The attacks are still ongoing.
Just absolute brutality.
And there are these images of Bashar al-Assad and his wife.
Looked totally European, actually.
And then the current president, and he's standing there.
Big Islamic beard, about five feet away, is his wife in a full head-to-toe, everything covered but the eyes.
Burka get up.
And it's like, thank goodness, democracies return to Syria.
Right? Because they got rid of the moderate Islamic leader and replaced him with brutal ISIS terrorists who are at this moment and continually since their, you know, rise to power.
Have been brutalizing and massacring Alawites and Christians and other minority groups all throughout the country.
Now, it might seem a little bit hypocritical that America is so concerned about brutality of the Assad regime turns a blind eye to the even greater brutality of the terrorists.
That might seem hypocritical, but that ain't even...
That and even the majority of it, I mean, it's just that's nothing, because actually, what we're actually doing is not turning a blind eye to it, but actually funding it in total.
The EU and its partners pledged 5.8 billion euros, that's 6.3 billion dollars, for Syria and its neighbors.
This published literally on exactly the same day, March 17th.
As this story, Syrian government-aligned forces captured reveling in massacres of minorities in coastal town.
Okay, so beautiful.
This is all just like prelude to what I'm about to cover about how European values are superior to American values and therefore should be forced on Americans through technocratic demand.
Well, the European values that they're championing are things like giving 6.3 billion euros.
To the regime currently massacring Christians and moderate Muslims throughout their country.
So, Cisna, oh, we didn't know this was going.
No, no.
They pledged this money on the 17th of March.
Let's say eight days ago.
That was after the massacre started and as the massacres were ongoing with stories published that very day about the forces not just...
Dealing with rebel factions, but reveling in the massacres of innocents.
Okay, so just again, laying groundwork here, when Europe talks about its own principles, when we're talking about European values, understand that they are non-existent or horrible.
It's one of the two.
As far as I'm concerned, European values are non-existent because a value is something that persists regardless of the input.
In other words, I have a value of free speech that I pretty much stand on, even if it's speech that I disagree with.
My value of free speech supersedes my concern about what is being spoken of.
That's not how it works in Europe.
In Europe, they don't have values.
They have intermittent and arbitrarily applied sneering.
That's all they have.
They have condescension and talking down to anybody who happens to disagree with.
The way in which they want to deploy governmental power to shut down their enemies or fund the massacres of Christians in the Middle East.
Their value of democracy falls to the wayside when there's a big war in the offing and they get to cancel elections on that basis.
Their value of democracy tends to be disregarded when the process results in a demand by the people that mass migration be ended.
Then democracy is not a superlative and must be upheld value.
It is instead a danger.
What else is going on in...
Britain. Well, a man took a pressure cooker bomb into a hospital in an attempt to blow it up, and he's now been jailed for life.
His name was Mohamed Farouk, in case you can't recognize patterns.
Farouk, who was a trainee nurse, was found guilty after his trial last year of attempting to launch an Islamic State-inspired suicide attack using a homemade bomb on the hospital where he worked in 2023.
Your NHS at work, by the way.
By the way.
The NHS that Britain is just so proud of.
Also bringing in people to work there who are radical terrorists and will try to bomb the hospital with kitchen devices.
A man who took a viable pressure cooker bomb into a hospital in Leeds, intending to kill as many nurses as possible, has been jailed for life.
Mohammed Farouk was sentenced to a minimum term of 37 years at Sheffield Crown Court on Friday.
Farouk, who was a trainee nurse, was found guilty after his trial last year of attempting to launch an Islamic State-inspired suicide attack using a homemade bomb on the hospital where he worked in 2023.
He was also jailed for plotting to attack RAF Mintwith Hill in North Yorkshire.
Sensing Farouk, Ms. Justice Chima Grub, that's a name, Chima Grub, praised the actions of Nathan Newby, the patient who talked him out of exploding his homemade device.
so I'd like to I can't wait to see the uh Common sense pressure cooker bomb control.
I can't wait to see the Netflix movie starring a 13-year-old white boy about wanting to set off a pressure cooker bomb because of misogyny.
And then maybe we'll see a nationwide British response to the threat of Andrew Tate radicalizing young white boys to set off pressure cooker bombs.
As that is literally exactly what's happening with this series or movie that came out in Britain where they took...
A real-life event that was an asylum seeker, the child of asylum seeker, African kid, stabbed a white girl.
And they race-swapped the actor, put a 13-year-old white British kid in the starring role and said it was all about misogyny.
And now they're like showing that movie in Parliament.
And there's people posting online like young white English kids going, yeah, my parents are making me watch this movie.
Or they're showing it in my school to try to spark a conversation.
They're already passing laws on the basis of this totally fake movie completely destroying and covering up the actual circumstances around the actual violence that actually occurred instead of replacing it with a libtard fantasy that they're now all crying about and passing laws over.
Totally insane.
So they're doing that.
That's great.
Cambridge slammed for chilling ban on pro-Gaza protest.
The University of Cambridge has been condemned by activists and rights groups for obtaining a high court injunction that effectively bans pro-Palestinian protests on campuses until the 26th of July.
And what critics have described is a chilling attack on free speech.
The ruling, coinciding with the final graduation ceremony of the academic year, was issued by Mr. Justice Sewell, sparking widespread condemnation amongst activists and human rights groups.
The university had initially sought a more long-term injunction requesting a five-year order to block protests related to Israel-Palestine conflict on its grounds.
However, last month the judge rejected this bid, citing its overreach.
In a second attempt, Cambridge University returned to court mid-March to seek a four-month order to prevent disruptions during key graduation events.
Again, it's like, okay, your problem is not pressure cooker bombs.
Your problem is not protesters.
Your problem is the millions of foreigners that you've flooded your country.
And it's just what we've said the entire time.
Like, if you want to get rid of rights, you have to have an excuse to do that, right?
You need to bring in people who are violent and insane and commit violence so you can point to that violence and say, see, this is why we need This is why we need to stop free speech, because this guy was radicalized by this thought.
Therefore, the thought needs to be illegal.
And they're doing something similar here.
Of course, I don't have too much to talk here, because Britain, without actually having the First Amendment and free speech, even though it should, historically, was developed there in the first place, and we'll get to that in just a second, as they talk about European values and seem to forget.
That practically the entirety of European history is a sequence of rights being obtained by the people through bloodshed and chaos and strife and putting an end to those conflicts by establishing principles of free speech and liberty that first were born and then came to fruition in America but are European in their creation and aspect.
Regardless, we'll get back to that.
I guess I don't have too much room to talk, though, because it's just because they don't have the First Amendment.
Britain is able to do things like this, just have high court injunctions where they're just like, we want to make these protests illegal.
And the judge is like, sounds good.
Clack. You're now able to arrest protesters.
Go for it.
In America, we have to go through.
We have to jump through a few more loops.
We have to claim like, well, it's not just a protest.
This guy is leading a protest for terrorists.
Therefore, he's terrorism.
Therefore, he's a foreign terrorist agent.
Therefore, we can.
Deport him, and maybe that'll have a chilling effect on the protest.
We just have to jump through a couple more hoops, go through a little bit more rigmarole, but it is nice to know, at the very least, Britain is capable of actually imposing law and order on its population of hostile migrants.
It is possible.
They can do it if it's for the sake of Israel.
If it is for the...
Continuing genocide in Israel, then absolutely they can shut it down.
They can put the boot to these Muslim protesters.
Now, if it's Muslims going out on the streets with bars and bats and hammers to attack white people protesting the brutal stabbing murder of several little white kids by an immigrant, then there's nothing they can do.
It's hands off.
Can't even broach the subject trying to, you know, tamp down on those activities of the Muslim gangs wandering through parts of Britain and beating up every white guy they see.
That's free speech.
They have a sacred duty to allow that to continue.
But if it's college protesters camping on the lawn to protest an act of genocide, then the high court will issue an injunction and the whole thing will be put a stop to.
So it's just nice to know that they could do it if they wanted.
You just have to frame your argument for the sake of Israel, and then everything is possible.
What else is going on in England?
Oh, look.
More insane racial violence.
Terrifying moment children run and scream after an event hosted by primary school is crashed by, quote, group of youths armed with knives, leaving police hurt and two teenagers with stab wounds.
Ah, England.
What a typical English headline we have here.
Terrifying moment.
Children run screaming after a event hosted in primary school.
It's elementary school for us.
Crashed by a group of youths armed with knives.
It's been reported that more than 50 youths armed with knives and machetes ran into Elm Park Primary School Hall in Havering, Essex around 9 p.m. on Saturday.
The fighting allegedly lasted until 11 p.m. when three teenagers were arrested on suspicion of assaulting emergency workers.
The police also confirmed that two teenagers aged 19 and 16 were taken to hospital with non-threatening knife injuries.
While officers clashed with the youths, they were treated at the scene by London Ambulance Service.
Footage from the scene shows dozens of children fleeing the hall, screaming as individuals at the back of the room can be seen raising weapons above their head.
This, I guess, is the Europe we're supposed to emulate.
I guess when they talk about European values, it's the type of values that lead to hostile foreigners raiding your elementary schools with machetes in massive gangs of 50-plus people.
I thought I'd download that video, but if we can...
I guess we can just play the B-roll here in the background.
I'll go ahead and mute it, but it's all blurred out because, again, English censorship, you can't show...
You know, people fulfilling stereotypes.
That's illegal.
Hate speech is when reality matches the stereotype.
See, there's a stereotype that the migrants to England, the African and Muslim immigrants, commit vicious violence in massive groups against innocent people.
And when that does happen, that of course is hate speech because you're fulfilling the stereotype.
So they blur it all and you can't see it all.
But it's pretty clear regardless of what actually is happening here.
So, just to review, just to review, we've got Europe funding the jihadi massacres of Christians and Alawites in the Middle East to the tune of $6.3 billion being funneled directly to that murderous and genocidal regime.
Well done, Europe.
You've got...
Of course, the war in Ukraine, continuing in Europe, doing everything they possibly can in a desperate attempt to prolong that senseless and brutal conflict, going so far as to issue warnings in Germany and France to all of their citizens to be prepared for nuclear war with Russia, imminent nuclear war with Russia, because they'd rather commit suicide as a continent than let Vladimir Putin exist.
Great. Then you've got insane violence breaking out constantly.
You've got the media completely perverting and distorting the story of the violence in order to progress the exact agenda that led to the violence in the first place.
It goes on and on and on.
And then, of course, you have this.
Nigel Frosh, Heathrow Airport had no diesel generator backup.
It was removed as part of their drive to net zero.
Dubai Airport and many military bases do have diesel generators, and their aircraft would have continued flying.
The truth about this disaster is being withheld.
Now, we were probably the first to report on this from Sky News.
Sky News, I believe it was Sky News, had the statement that we showed last week when this disaster first started, saying in no uncertain terms they had a diesel generator.
They had a generator that would have been more than capable of handling the emergency backup power necessary to continue Heathrow Airport operations.
And it was removed.
It was dismantled and replaced with a biomass generator that burns trees cut down from British Columbia.
None of this makes any sense.
I mean, I'm explaining to you what actually happened, but don't think for a second that any of this makes even a lick of sense in any possible angle.
But that is what they're doing because they're all...
Psychotic, suicidal idiots, I guess, in charge over there.
All of them, apparently.
It's madness.
It is utter madness.
And we'll be talking a lot about this this week.
We're going to be joined by several UK right-wingers this week in studio.
As NatalCon goes on, we'll be joined by Carl Benjamin and Raw Egg Nationalists in studio later this week.
And we'll be getting into everything having to do with the UK.
And again, all this is just sort of laying down the groundwork of just the state of utter collapse that Europe is in right now.
I'm trying to just give you some specific stories.
All of these are from the last few days.
We could take a wider angle view and we could show you videos from literally every single capital in Europe being absolutely overrun with foreigners, doing absolutely nothing.
But hanging out, collecting welfare, with the occasional bouts of horrific violence.
So, I mean, I shouldn't need to explain to you just what suicidal insanity Europe has been up to for the last little while.
But just sticking on this for a moment, Nigel Farage comes out and says, you know, net zero led to the removal of this diesel generator, which is why Heathrow Airport had to shut down, and that other airports around the world wouldn't have this problem.
Because they still have their diesel generators.
The response to this from Thorley was, this simpleton thinks a diesel generator can keep an airport the size of a small city going.
unidentified
Thank you.
Thank you.
harrison smith
Where do these people think energy comes from?
I genuinely want to know.
This is the net zero climate change equivalent of the person that says you don't need to hunt.
Get your meat at the store.
It's wrong to kill animals.
You should just get your meat from the supermarket where it comes from.
Like, where was it before the supermarket?
Have you ever thought that far?
Have you ever reasoned out the next step of the supply chain right before it gets to the store?
What was happening with the meat?
Where the meat came from?
Where do these people think energy comes from?
A thinking, intelligent, conscious person say something like, a diesel generator couldn't power an airport.
Where do they think the energy to power the airport comes from?
Do they not realize that we burn fuel to create energy to power electronics?
Do they think it's just summoned from thin air?
I mean, genuinely, I mean, it could be.
I mean, let's not get, don't get me wrong.
Energy does exist in the thin air, and we could activate it, we could harness it, and it would be incredible, and we're on the cusp of that, but that hasn't happened yet.
As of now, you burn fuel like diesel or coal or trees that you cut down in British Columbia, create heat, heat spins, turbines, turbines, power, electricity.
It's not that complicated, but these people are like so disconnected from basic reality.
They're just like, a diesel generator?
That's impossible!
What are you talking about?
So, that maybe has less to do with European values, unless you frame it as like education is a value, and theirs is lacking entirely.
They're a continent of the most propagandized, censored, suicidal, insane people you've ever seen.
And I say this not with relish.
Europe had a very different destiny prior to the World Wars.
We could have been a great thing, Europe's continuing expansion, spreading genuine European values to people all over the world, changing the brutal and tribalistic nature of the cultures they came in contact with, not through brute force, but through example.
And the proof that enlightened, enlightenment, forward-thinking ideals are actually better and more beneficial for the people that adopt them.
That could have been a great thing.
Instead, they've gone down the path of censorship, destruction, death, chaos, misery, depopulation, and genocide of their own people on the altar of non-existent global utopia.
And now they're trying to drag us into it.
And now they're trying to seize our heels and pull us into the freezing water so we can all drown together.
And I'm going to go over this story in detail in the next hour.
A new world order with European values.
The unholy union of globalism and anti-free speech measures.
About a new confab they have.
A new manifestation of the globalist technocratic control grid.
World Economic Forum wasn't enough, I guess.
The CFR and the OECD and the big banks and the World Bank and the IMF and the Bank of International Settlements and the innumerable semi-governmental control programs they have worldwide weren't quite enough, So they've come up with a new one called the World Forum.
And Jonathan Turley lays out how its stated purpose is a, quote, new world order of European values.
The values, I remind you, that led to everything I've talked about in this segment.
The terrorism, the chaos, the misery, the violence, the death.
And now they wanted to spread it worldwide.
I'll tell you how.
Welcome back, folks.
Third Hour from American Journal is on.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
I am going to talk about this article from Jonathan Turley.
We're going to get into the threat of the World Forum in just a second.
But I spent the whole last segment telling you about all these different horrible things going on in Europe.
I forgot all the videos I have.
I forgot all the videos I have about those exact topics.
Let's go to some of those, shall we?
Let's go to first, clip number 24. This, again, just gives you one bit of insight.
Of just one of the innumerable programs, clearly, obviously, exclusively designed for the dispossession and destruction of the British people, the European people, by its own leaders.
Here's a hotel owner talking about the method by which...
Not even a hotel owner, actually.
He owns a castle.
I'm sorry.
This is a castle that operates a hotel.
Historical heritage site in the UK that the UK government...
Try desperately to take over in order to house the endless stream of illegal migrants that are currently destroying that country.
Let's watch.
unidentified
You refused a request from the Home Office to house migrants.
What did they offer you and why did you turn it down?
Well, it was a considerable amount of money, Beverly.
It was probably double what we would normally make on a good year because they offered full occupancy on a rolling contract for a year.
So how does that work?
Somebody literally just picks up the phone to you, or do they send you a letter?
They sent us a letter first.
Right. And to be honest with you, I thought it was a joke.
Because of the amount of money they were offering.
I just couldn't believe that the government wanted to put, you know, illegal migrants up in four poster beds at Camelot Castle.
I mean, it was absolutely remarkable.
It would have destroyed the village, because one of the things they said is to lay off all the staff.
And all but two, because they do meals on wheels.
You clean the rooms once a week.
You're probably a big employer in the village.
Well, a major employer in the village, and locally.
And, of course, those jobs in a village like Tintagel, they wouldn't be replaced.
No. But also, they would have stacked the place up with about 300 people.
And, you know, you then have those people...
I don't know whether they intended to contain them or whether they would be allowed out and about.
I know in other areas, certainly hotels in Newquay have had some serious problems because there were a few hotels that did take the migrants there.
Presumably people who stay at your hotel then spend their money in the village?
Well, of course they do.
They do spend their money there and it would have destroyed the local economy.
It's hard to say how many hundreds of thousands of pounds our guests spend in the village, but certainly...
A fair amount.
But it's also the cultural degradation that goes along with this.
harrison smith
I mean it's impossible to justify these programs.
Period. I mean it's impossible to justify these programs.
The only possible reason why anyone would suggest anything like this is because they Have a genuine, deep-seated desire to destroy the British people.
I mean, that's the only reason.
I mean, you've got a castle that runs like a hotel thousands of people visit with a village relying on it.
The British government comes in and says, fire everybody who works at the castle, so destroy the village economy that way.
End this as a tourist draw, bringing in hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Fill your...
Historic heritage castle site up with hundreds of illegal migrants and we're going to pay you double the normal rate to do it.
And like, you know, thank God this dude wasn't desperate for money and is a genuine British patriot.
You know, I guess they hadn't gotten to this castle yet.
They hadn't gotten to this hotel yet.
But this is the feedback loop that went right now where you're going to have Foreign conglomerates coming in, buying these hotels, and then either the corporate manager handling the hotel or the foreign owner has no qualms about bringing in thousands of people that look like him and are from the same place he is, destroying the British town.
To them, it's not destroying the British town.
It's taking it over.
It's conquering it.
It's replacing the people there with themselves because it's an act of cultural aggression.
There's no way to justify this other than evil.
They want to destroy Britain.
unidentified
All right, welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
Again, I know this is American Journal, but today is more like the American perspective on Europe Journal because we're going to continue to talk about Europe and how it is a bellwether, a warning sign for what they're attempting to impose here in a variety of different ways.
That's Trump flirting with joining the British Commonwealth.
It's just like boarding the Titanic after it hit the iceberg.
It just makes no sense.
This is just insanity.
Pure, unrepentant, unrestricted madness.
But I got some more videos to go to.
Just on the topic that we started with, clip number 11. Here's Ursula von der Leyen.
Head of the EU Commission.
Talking about Syria, this again has to do with the $6.3 billion that Europe just sent to Syria, despite the fact that the ISIS regime that just took the country over is actively involved in massacres against their minority populations.
Here's what Ursula van der Leyen says European values compel her to do.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Can become a country where everybody can speak their mind?
With equal rights and representation for all?
Men and women alike?
Beyond faith, ethnicity and ideology?
A country with no place for sectarian violence?
The future of Syria is for all Syrians to build.
harrison smith
Syria could have been a diverse country, all these different viewpoints.
Yeah, it could have.
No, it could have, but then you waged war against the moderate leader of that country, and now it's in the hands of violent sectarians that are carrying out massacres against their minority population.
So the thing I'm coming away with is the only European value that even exists is a sort of...
Delusional and misplaced compassion.
That's really, that's all they got.
They have compassion, but only and exclusively for the worst people in the world.
Their own people that are being killed, their own people that are being dispossessed, displaced and oppressed.
Not even the remote hint of compassion for them.
They are demonized and jailed for merely expressing their Displeasure at being replaced in their own country.
Brutal, hard-hearted viciousness when it comes to the European people.
Endless, senseless, baseless, hypocritical compassion for everybody else.
That's the only European value I can identify at this point.
Which is not great for a continent that is...
Driving headlong towards their desired global conflict over Russia and Ukraine.
In fact, there was a tweet today going around.
I think it was the cover of a magazine.
And it was like, is Germany ready to go to war?
And it was a picture of a German kid who was white.
And, you know, it's just the most cliche thing ever now.
But you watch media and it's like, What is it like to be a British person?
And it's just like, you know, some African lady who can barely speak English telling you what it's like to be British or German or Swedish or whatever it is.
But then when it's time to wage war, when it's time to fight and die, all of a sudden all of that race-swapping propaganda gets shoved to the side and it's image after image of Young white European kid.
Suddenly they realize what a German looks like when it's time to Photoshop him into an army uniform and tell him it's time to do his duty and go die for his leaders in Ukraine because Russia bad.
Again, hard, hard with mere words to express just how truly brutal and inhumane the entire European establishment is at this point, but I think this guy does a pretty good job.
Clip number 26. There's a smart young man.
Yeah, there's the cover, man.
This crew is so good.
Would you fight for Germany?
It's a magazine cover.
And oh, look, a young white German boy.
Hey, representation, finally.
Would you go to war for Germany?
None of us wants war, but we must prepare for it now.
Would you fight for Germany, it asks.
Yeah, well, I have a feeling that most German people probably feel like this kid.
Clip number 26. Let's watch.
unidentified
When I stand at the top of the Kent Downs near where I grew up and I look out across this grand patchwork that is England that my forefathers built and cultivated and handed down to me for preservation, when I stand in a Norman or Anglo-Saxon church and feel not just the presence of God but of my forefathers there as well, the feet that stood there before me, when I go to the pub and I, you know, interact with my countrymen, when I hear the music of Elgar and the Beatles and Oasis and all the rest of it, I know in my heart that I would fight and die.
This country, right?
But that's not what this is about.
What I'm saying is, you know, I'm not prepared to go to war, to go abroad, to be sent abroad by this utterly corrupt, morally bankrupt political class that has sold out this country, sold out my generation, sold our future down the river, you know, on the altar of things like mass migration, net zero, deindustrialization.
And so when I am, you know, when the prospects of conscription is raised, the idea of being sent to...
Ukraine or to Gaza or to wherever else.
The idea of dying, fighting and dying for what amounts of British and American foreign policy interests is just outrageous to me.
It's an outrageous proposition to die on the altar of, you know, essentially the military-industrial complex.
harrison smith
And if only it was just that, if only it was just the military-industrial complex.
Like, it's gotten so bad that, again, I don't need to reiterate myself, but the, you know, the idea that You can even call what's happening American and British foreign interests.
Like, this has nothing to do with American or British interests.
This has everything to do with the utter destruction of America and Britain.
It's all on purpose, but I think it's very powerful what that young man said.
And we have a video to sort of perfectly sum up the UK as exists right now.
And, uh...
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
I mean, it's very offensive, the stereotypes that are being fulfilled in this clip of reality.
Let's go to clip number 22. This video perfectly sums up the UK.
I'll try to narrate along and tell you what we're seeing here, and we can keep the audio kind of low because there's a bunch of people shouting.
But let's watch, shall we?
Here we have a large black man aggressively approaching a British police officer who looks like a tiny Indian woman who is frantically backing up as fast as she can.
Oh, until your average white guy steps up and does the job the police were incapable of doing.
And she's literally like walking backwards, shouting into her walkie-talkie.
unidentified
Please, please, I need help!
I need help, please!
harrison smith
That's the cop.
That's the cop saying that.
And the new Britain here clearly doesn't have a lot of respect for law and order, I guess you could say.
Doesn't exactly fear the tiny Indian woman with the handcuffs.
And instead, we have to have an equally large, bald British white guy step in.
Average dude.
Bring some order to the situation.
And I know Canada isn't the UK, but they might as well be.
And the story that you'll hear from this woman is one that you hear over and over again in the UK.
As long as it's expressed in a way that they will let you express and don't deem illegal.
But obviously, if you ask the UK what they have that America doesn't, what they do better than America, they'll almost...
To a man, answer the NHS.
They're so proud of the NHS, despite the fact that the cost of the NHS is so astronomical that it is the driving engine behind the economic woes that gave the justification to the migration, the migrants who are now clogging up the NHS and causing the problem to get even worse in a cyclical, in a cycle of feedback loop of just causing the problems that you're trying to solve.
unidentified
And then...
harrison smith
Solving those problems by creating a whole bunch of other problems and not actually solving the original one.
It's very obvious how this is going.
The NHS is a total horrific failure, obviously, in a variety of different ways.
Canada is a little different.
Let's go to clip number 19 now.
Canada Healthcare.
Here's what it's like.
Needing an urgent MRI scan to treat a tumor growing in your brain.
The best we can do is six months from now.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Today on How Fucked is Canadian Healthcare, I need an MRI to see if I have a fucking brain tumor.
harrison smith
Alright, I gotta pull this out of this.
Darn it.
Sorry. I forgot to have that censored.
We can censor that and go back to it later.
But all of this is, again, just foundation.
Just a little laying the groundwork so we can get into this story.
Because before we talk about European values, we need to lay out how either non-existent, stupid, inverted...
And hypocritical, these so-called values truly are.
From JonathanTurley.org, a new world order with European values, the unholy union of globalism and anti-free speech measures.
He says a new world order with European values emblazoned across banners and signs.
Those words met the participants at this week's meeting of the World Forum in Berlin.
So again, not us.
This isn't us saying there's a new world order.
This is them saying it, just like it was always them saying it.
We never came up with the term New World Order, something that George H.W. Bush said in speeches.
It was the international rules-based order, the one world government run by technocratic neoliberals with the promise of ending war when in reality pitching endless war against anybody not under their control.
The New World Order has always been their term.
It's what they call themselves.
Now, we started referring to them as that out of a sense of accuracy.
And now you get called a conspiracy theory if you talk about it.
Conspiracy theorist if you talk about it.
Each year, leaders, executives, journalists, and academics gather to address the greatest threats facing humanity.
This year, there was little doubt about what they view as the current threat.
The resurgence of populism.
In fairness to the forum, a new world order likely sounds more ominous for some civil libertarians than intended.
While the European Union is a transnational government stretching across 27 nations, the organizers were referring to a shift of values away from the United States to Europe.
As one of the few speakers at the forum who was calling for greater protections for free speech, I found it an unnerving message.
Even putting aside the implications of the New World Order, the idea of building a world on today's European values is alarming for free speech.
Free speech is in free fall in Europe, with ever-expanding speech regulations and criminal prosecutions, including for having, quote, toxic ideologies.
The World Forum has a powerful sense of fraternity, even in intimacy.
Among leaders who often see each other as a global elite, a cadre of enlightened minds protecting citizens from their own poor choices and habits.
There's long, and okay, let's take a look at that, shall we?
I think that's an extremely accurate way to put it.
And it relates to, you know, the article we were talking about earlier, Ann Applebaum.
The Brutal Americans article.
She's like, I was gallivanting around Europe, meeting like-minded people in Berlin, in Lithuania, in Paris.
And we were talking about how scary it was that the underlings are rising up.
And it's just, you just have to understand, there is a shared sense of camaraderie.
Intimacy, they see themselves as above and apart from us lowly peasants tied to things like family and history and the land that we were born on and our forefathers fought and died for.
They have none of these backwards attachments, right?
That's how they see it.
They see you as a hillbilly, as just low down and unsophisticated and unenlightened.
When you care about things like your culture, your nation, your neighborhood, your friends and family, they're above all of these attachments.
They're so enlightened they aren't concerned in the slightest with preserving any of the things that were built before them.
They're eager to sacrifice these things in pursuit of some impossible utopia of apparent racial diversity To be achieved some point in the future, just as soon as they outlaw pressure cookers to stop the terrorism from taking place.
Or ban, you know, publishing races in newspapers.
So the increasing and monumental rise in violent crime, especially sexual crime, isn't correlated to the rise in migrants on that continent.
These people have a different morality than you and I. Which might not be an accurate way to put it.
See, we have morality.
They have something else.
They have something else entirely.
They have a moral structure or a philosophical underpinning that is just evil.
It's just evil.
It's the only word for it.
They are the enemy of humanity, of themselves, of all of us.
They're the enemy.
In a word.
The enemy.
So he's right when he says, you know, they see themselves as this cadre of enlightened mind protecting citizens from their own poor choices and habits.
And I'll be honest.
That type of construct is possible.
When you have a culture that is like mired in endless suffering and tyranny and misery.
It's actually possible to have people from another culture that is more enlightened, that is more advanced, that is more reasonable or whatever else, come in and actually change the culture for the positive.
The way that you tell whether or not that's going on is by the outcome of the policies.
If these people gallivanting around Europe...
You know, interacting with and interfacing with people from all different countries, all in this globalist confab.
If the outcome of that was that Europeans were prosperous and happy and growing and not dying a slow and painful death, then you could actually make the argument for this.
And I might agree with you.
I'd say I'd agree with you.
Instances throughout history of this type of thing happening and it having an actual, tangible, positive outcome.
Some African colonization was brutal and horrific and hugely damaging.
King Leopold in the Congo is pretty unforgivable.
But there are lots of other instances of countries just in the most degraded and violent state being taken over by Europeans The prosperity going up, the birth rate going up, the food supply going up, the infrastructure being built, and actually good things happening for the people on the ground.
And when that type of thing happens, typically people on the ground would actually be pretty appreciative of it.
It's how England conquered the world and had this massive empire on which the sun never set without ever deploying giant armies overseas.
You know, look at the formation of America, North America versus South America.
North America, you had British people come, they set up their little colonies, set up their little settlements.
There was sort of an ongoing low-level combat going on constantly between the Native Americans and the British.
It was a very different situation than the Spanish coming into South and Central America where there were these big empires where the Spanish took it over and, you know, enslaved or incorporated.
The populations of natives there.
It's a very different activity, different construct.
If they were making the argument, look, the European people, if they're left to their own devices, they choose things that are destructive to themselves and their nations.
And here we come in and we're going to override populism, we're going to override the democratic will, and we're going to impose on them things we know are good for them.
And then the result of that...
With prosperity and happiness and growth, then I'd say maybe have an argument here.
Maybe there's something to this.
Maybe they do need somebody.
But I don't, I mean, I've spent the last hour telling you how the programs being insisted upon by these people, being imposed by these people, universally and really without deviation, do nothing but destroy the European people.
Absolutely no positive effect has emerged out of the importation of migrants, out of the censorship that's taken place, out of the economic destruction, the deindustrialization that's gone on because of the Green New Deal, climate change bullcrap.
Everything these people impose on Europeans is exclusively designed to destroy them.
Their nations, their race itself, I mean everything has been calculated.
To destroy Europe in the most efficient way possible.
Okay? You don't need to speculate about that.
There is no argument on the other side.
Nobody in their right mind can look at Europe in the 80s and Europe today and say the last 45 years has been successful for Europe.
You cannot find...
The 80s might be going back a little bit far.
I mean, the destruction has been rapid.
It has been devastating.
It has been purposeful, widespread, ubiquitous, and again, without deviation.
As in, there's no point where you can go, well, look, this place was dying, and they brought in a bunch of migrants, and now they're doing better.
It's never happened.
It does not happen.
You cannot claim that it happens.
If you do, you are delusional or lying.
Those are the only options.
So these people, when they come together as this international cabal to impose upon Europe things that the populace is against, those things that they impose have exclusively been to bastardize, disadvantage, disenfranchise, and destroy the European people.
I don't know why I have to explain this to the European people.
They see it every day in their own lives.
They're just imprisoned in a mental cell that prevents them from actually saying that.
And if you can't say something, it's not too long before you can't even think it.
The reason they control language or the expression of these ideas is because they're trying to kill the idea itself.
If you can never make the argument that migrants are bad for Europe, then you're going to raise a generation of kids who have never even considered that possibility.
To whom the continual recitation of diversity is our strength, diversity is our strength, Europe bad, everywhere else good, replacement migration.
When they're hammered that in, I mean, it becomes as real to them as the sky is blue because it forms a fundamental part of their Interpretation of reality.
So that's what we're trying to break through here.
That's what we're trying to break out of.
Because there's still, for the time being, even though this time is vanishing, there are still enough Europeans in Europe, if they're activated, if they were enlightened or educated about the actual effects of the policies that they...
And, you know, to undo the underlying philosophical trap that they've fallen into, there's still time to do that.
Go forward 10 years, and there's not going to be anybody left in Germany to make the argument that Germany should exist.
unidentified
Welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
Final segment of today's broadcast.
Still a lot to talk about.
We haven't even gotten to yet.
This just broke.
Trump is going to hold another cabinet meeting with Elon Musk in attendance.
I'm not sure if this one will be broadcast like the last was.
If it is, we can go to it.
I would like to see that.
It is a fascinating look into these cabinet meetings.
President Donald Trump will gather his cabinet secretaries for a third known meeting Monday morning with Elon Musk expected to attend, according to senior administration officials.
The official described the 11 a.m. gathering as a follow-up to the last Doge meeting in reference to a meeting on March 6th where Trump placed limits on the billionaire tycoon's authority amid backlash to new cuts by the Department of Government efficiency.
Trump said secretaries will be very precise in who they choose to cut from their departments, adding, we say the scapel rather than the hatchet.
But Trump indicated that Musk would intervene if the partnering leaders didn't make sufficient cuts.
If they can cut, it's better.
If they don't cut, then Elon will do the cutting.
We are awaiting, I guess, a cabinet meeting with Musk and Trump later today.
The first one did have cameras live in the meeting.
We're not sure if this one will as well.
If there is, I'm sure we'll pull it up for you.
But I want to continue with this Jonathan Turley article just for a minute more.
Because again, it ties into a bunch of other stuff that we're talking about today, whether it's the Ukrainian peace talks that are happening in Saudi Arabia, where you apparently have Russia, a Russian team talking to America, and a Ukrainian team talking to America, but they're not talking to each other, but the desired continuation of the Ukrainian war, as well as the push by Trump, apparently, to join the British Commonwealth.
Nonsensical. Turley continues, The problem is that this vision for a new Holy Roman Empire lacks a Charlemagne.
More importantly, it lacks public support.
The very notion of a New World Order is chilling to many who oppose the rise of globalist class with the rise of transnational governance in the European Union and beyond.
This year, there's a sense of panic amongst Europe's elite over the victory of Trump and the Republicans in the U.S., as well as nationalists and populists in European movements.
For globalists, the late Tip O'Neill's rule that all politics is local is anathema.
The European Union is intended to transcend national identities and priorities in favor of an inspired transnational government managed by expert elite.
The message was clear.
The New World Order would be based on European, not American values.
To rally the faithful to the cause, the organizers called upon two of the patron saints of the global elite, Bill and Hillary Clinton.
President Clinton was even given an award as leader of the century.
The Clintons were clearly in their element.
Speaker after speaker denounced Trump and the rise of what they called autocrats and oligarchs.
The irony was crushing.
The European Union is based on the oligarchy of the ruling elite.
The World Forum even took time to celebrate billionaires from Bill Gates to George Soros for funding open societies and greater transnational powers.
The discussion focused on blunting the rise of far-right parties and stemming the flow of disinformation that fosters such dissent.
Outside of the rarefied environment...
The Orwellian language would border on the humorous, protecting democracy from itself and limiting free speech to foster free speech.
Yet one aspect of the forum was striking and refreshingly open.
This year it became clear why the transnational governance gravitates towards greater limits on free speech.
Of course, all of this must be done in the name of democracy and free speech.
There's a coded language that is now in vogue in the anti-free speech community.
They never say the word censorship.
They prefer, quote, content moderation.
They do not call for limiting speech.
Instead, they call for limiting false, hateful, or insightful speech.
As the rise of opposing parties and figures, they are referred to as movements by low-information voters misled by disinformation.
Of course, it is the government that will decide what are and aren't acceptable viewpoints.
The code was broken recently by Vice President J.D. Vance, who confronted our European allies in Munich to restore free speech.
He stripped away the pretense and called out the censorship.
With the rise of populist groups, anti-immigration movements, and critics of European governance, there is a palpable challenge to EU authority.
In that environment, free speech can be viewed as destabilizing because it spreads dissent and falsehoods about these figures and their agenda.
Thus far, quote, European peace has come at the price of silencing many of those voices, achieving the pretense of consensus through coerced silence.
I think that's a pretty brilliant way to put it, but it's the same throughout the world and for a number of different topics.
Same thing occurred with COVID.
Obviously, the appearance of consensus, when in reality it's because those who are not part of the consensus were censored.
So you didn't hear their voices.
It's pretty easy, actually.
All scientists agree.
Well, what about that scientist?
Well, cancel him.
He's out.
He's not a scientist anymore.
Now, all scientists agree.
Well, what about those hundred scientists?
Well, those don't account either.
They're disinformation.
They're bigots.
They're hateful.
They're racist.
Conspiracy theorists.
So now they're not scientists anymore.
So now all scientists agree this is the point, right?
Very simple.
You just silence people who disagree with you and you can act as though you have the consensus.
We've seen it over and over and over again.
They hold plebiscites.
They hold giant nationwide votes on a topic.
And if they vote the right way, they act as if they have the mandate of democracy and they have to do it.
After all, we had a vote.
We've been demanded by the people.
Here's what we have to do.
Increase migration.
If they do the opposite, people vote against what they desire, then they literally just ignore it.
They either just pretend to do it and don't do it, like Brexit, or they ignore it outright, and they make people vote over and over again until they get the answer they want, which is how they opened up Ireland to the mass migration, assault, invasion, war against the native people of that island.
Transnational governments requires consent over a wide swath of territory.
That means the control of cooperation of media and social media is essential in maintaining the consent of the governed or the manufactured consent of the governed.
Again, it's just they don't even operate on the pretense that they have the consent of the governed.
They literally have moved on that.
Moving on from that at this point, and like Jonathan Turley is saying, they're now openly dismissive and just unreactive to the actual views of the populations that they rule over.
This is why free speech is in a tailspin in Europe with ever-expanding speech regulations and criminal prosecutions.
Yet it is difficult to get free people to give up freedom.
They have to be very afraid or very angry.
One of the speakers was Maria A. Ressa, a journalist and Nobel laureate.
I admire Ressa's courage as a journalist, but previously criticized her anti-free speech positions.
Ressa has struck out against critics who have denounced her for allegedly anti-Semitic views.
She has warned that the right is using free speech and declaring, I will say it now, the fascists are coming.
At the forum, Ressa again called for the audience of powerful leaders to prevent lies and dangerous disinformation from spreading worldwide.
But the free speech movement has shown surprising resilience in the last few years.
First, Elon Musk bought Twitter and dismantled its censorship apparatus, restoring free speech to the social media platform.
More recently, Mark Zuckerberg announced that Meta would also restore free speech protections on Facebook and other platforms.
And a shock to many, young Irish voters have been credited with killing a move to further expand the criminalization of speech to include xenophobia and, quote, public dissemination or distribution of tracks, pictures, or other material from viewpoints barred under the law.
Anti-free speech forces are gathered to push back on such trends.
Indeed, Hillary Clinton has hardly been subtle about the dangers of free speech to the New World Order.
After Musk bought Twitter with the intention of restoring free speech protections, Clinton called upon the European Union to use its infamous Digital Services Act to make Musk censor her fellow Americans.
She also adjusted arresting those who spread disinformation.
The European Union did precisely that by threatening Musk with confiscatory fines and even arrest unless he censored users.
When Musk decided to interview Trump in this election, EU censors warned him they would be watching for any disinformation.
These are just words.
These are just pointless, meaningless words that they apply to anything they don't like.
Until we can get through that defense.
We can't keep arguing on the basis of their framing.
There is literally no meaning to disinformation.
There is literally no meaning to the term misinformation.
It is only, exclusively, it is simply a label that the powers that be apply to language that opposes them.
That's it.
That's all it is.
Disinformation doesn't have to be false.
Misinformation doesn't have to be false.
So it doesn't mean true.
It doesn't mean false.
It means nothing.
It means absolutely nothing.
Even acknowledged, deliberate, state-sponsored psychological operations to spread false facts, lies, in other words, to people for an intended political purpose.
The actual textbook definition of disinformation will never come under the label disinformation from these people.
Best example, out of an infinite number, but let's take two.
The dis and misinformation about the vaccine leak.
Not only was it true that it came from the lab, But all of the lies that were spread to diminish or disguise that truth are in fact a dictionary definition of disinformation.
But that was the campaign carried out by the very people who are now trying to use the term disinformation to impose further censorship in a whole variety of topics.
The Hunter Biden laptop, the 51 intelligence agents signing the letter saying it was Russian disinformation, is in itself...
The most blatant and obvious act of disinformation the modern world has ever seen.
And it's actually appropriate that the lie was that the laptop was disinformation.
The disinformation was to call real information disinformation.
So let's just stop using these words.
They literally don't mean anything.
Just call it forbidden speech.
That's what disinformation means.
That's all it means.
Forbidden speech.
Those on high...
Have decreed that you're not allowed to say it, and that's all that means.
Just to be clear, because these words, these meanings, have incredible impact and power, and when you treat them with any respect at all, you're making an existential mistake.
So Europe wants us to be a part of their new world order.
Trump's talking about joining the British Union and they're trying to differentiate between European and American values.
And I guess it would have been nice to know about these European values and how different they were than America before like World War II.
I was under the impression that America and Europe had shared values about freedom and liberty.
Free speech and all of these things.
And it was the destruction of those values wrought by the Nazis that compelled America to get involved to support American-slash-European values in the continent where they were first formed.
It turns out that the Nazis actually had the European values all along.
Censorship, repression.
Using governmental powers under the guise of benign humanitarianism to actively destroy whole swaths of their population.
I mean, it turns out, fools that we are, we thought we were supporting European values by fighting the Nazis.
Turns out those were the European values and American values are actually something different, separate, not related.
That's what we're learning now.
Which isn't actually true.
Again, I mean, everything ties into this.
I don't think I need to quote Orwell here in saying the greatest way to destroy a nation is destroy its understanding of history.
If you don't understand history, then maybe they can pull the wool over your eyes and convince you that free speech is not a European value.
It absolutely is a European value.
It is a core.
Of European values overall.
Again, I've tried to explain this ad nauseum, but like the American Revolution was not anti-British values.
It was actually the logical fulfillment of British values.
From the Magna Carta to like the Civil Wars in England in the 1600s.
Every step of European development for the last millennia has been the building up, the creation of individual freedoms.
That's what's being thrown away here.
They're not rejecting some newfound concept that America just came up with, free speech.
And they're like, we've never heard of that, and we reject it because we've been doing things without that forever.
And they don't have free speech like we have free speech.
They don't have it in the First Amendment.
They don't have it as a core, intrinsic, defined value.
They have it as more of a milieu, a vibe, a sense of self.
That you're allowed to speak up.
You're allowed to oppose the tyrants, even if they're your king.
What the Magna Carta was all about back in 1200.
And since then, Those freedoms that were, by the way, won from the king through violent bloodshed and threats.
People fought and died so that they didn't live in a country where the authorities got to arbitrarily dictate what was and wasn't true, what ideas were and were not worth expressing, crush anybody opposing the destructive and suicidal programs of their elite.
Century over century over century through blood, sweat and tears and a lot of very high philosophy built these concepts and had to fight through feudalism and I mean it's just what they're losing right now is invaluable.
Impossible to even calculate the preciousness of European freedom.
That is all but destroyed at this point, and they're really just stepping on the gas and trying desperately to psyop the European people into thinking it's somehow bad and a foreign idea, some sort of American insanity to allow free speech.
It's literally their entire history.
At large.
And, you know, this video sort of ties into all of it.
We'll go to clip number 13. I've talked about this video before, but it was going viral again, or at least there are a few of these types of videos, because you always get the same results.
It's a man on the street video asking people if they know what percentage of the world would be considered white.
Let's see what they say.
unidentified
What percent of the world's population is white?
60%?
40%?
40%?
30%?
harrison smith
35%?
unidentified
35%?
35%?
30%?
35 Come on, guys.
We are, if people don't know, white people are a minority.
It might seem like we're everywhere when you're in a white country, but if you ever leave these countries, you'll see how few of us there are.
To give you a perspective, there are more Indians than all white people combined.
And it's not really close.
There are 400 million more Indians than all the white people in the world.
And that's just India.
That's one group of people.
I remind the Chinese.
All of Asia, Africa, Nigeria has 230 million people, which is like a quarter of all white people.
That's one country in Africa.
harrison smith
Do people not know this?
That always blows my mind.
I can't even understand some of the stupidity that you see.
In fact, I think I have another video that we could go to.
Spring break.
People on the beach being asked really simple things like, who did America declare independence from?
And they're like, Spain.
And it's like, okay, you don't know history.
You don't know how much quarter is worth or that Utah is a state or how many moons the world has.
It's like, okay.
I guess you've never been to Utah.
I don't know.
But how do you not know?
That white people are minority.
People think 80% of the world is white.
I don't believe that.
I mean, how could you believe that?
How could you possibly think that?
And I mean, it's good to know that this is what, because like so much of the anti-white stuff is so baffling, but it's like, okay, these people are under the delusion that white people are like the majority of the world.
And that's asinine and insane, but at least it does explain a little bit of, it justifies a little bit of what they believe.
As this person, Oz Integrity, QBCC Integrity on X says, White people represent just 7-8% of the population of the world, a dwindling minority.
White males, just 3% of Earth's population.
So why are white people excluded from DEI programs in their homeland?
Why do the world's largest brands replace white men but not white women in their commercials?
That's to impose miscegenation, miscegenation, whatever that word is.
Which is why women are still there.
But yeah, you really got to think about that.
You really got to think about the fact that no non-white countries have benefits for white people.
And then white countries now, pretty much every white country, has very explicit programs designed with the sole intent and purpose of Disadvantaging white people, especially white males.
Maybe white males wouldn't be so blase about this.
They knew there were 3% of the world's population being discriminated against and actively disadvantaged by the 97%.
Pretty crazy stuff, if you ask me.
And that relates to the story that I haven't really been able to get into, but you can sort of get everything you need to know from this one.
This one's a little better.
But 3 million applicants' data was leaked on the NYU's website.
It was hacked for at least two hours on Saturday.
And they basically got all of the admissions information to prove that New York University continued to discriminate and impose so-called affirmative action despite the Supreme Court.
Cracking down on it in 2023, quote, NYU continued anyway, showing that the average admitted test score for GPAs for Asians and white applicants were higher than those who identified as Hispanic or black.
The page, first reported by a user on Reddit at around 10.30 a.m., included four accessible CSV files revealing NYU admissions data since at least 1989, including over 3 million admitted students' applications, demographic data, city and zip codes, and citizenship status.
The files also show common application data, which shows details of financial aid, rejected students, and how many students applied to early decisions, stuff like that.
So you end up with seeing that, on average, Asians were allowed and accepted to NYU with the average score of 1485 compared to Black's average score, 1289. So again, 1289 is not a bad score.
It's a good score.
And if these students were not given a weighted application, a weighted admittance to these schools, then they would thrive and be very successful in anywhere except for NYU.
But in order to boost the numbers, to make it look like they have a diverse student body, cover up the discrepancy in test scores, They are actively, massively disadvantaging the very people that they claim to be supporting.
And they're engaged in affirmative action, even though it's been declared illegal.
Leading to stuff like this from Reddit.
What did I do wrong in high school?
This person says, I took 15 AP classes.
I got straight A's in all of them.
My SAT score is 1570.
For extracurriculars, I volunteered at an air and space museum, did robotics, volunteered at a political campaign, and used other ECs, extracurriculars.
I got denied from UC Davis, UCI, MIT, and USCD so far.
I guess my ECs are weak, maybe.
I guess I didn't do enough extracurriculars.
Edit and UCLA and JHU denied me more rejections.
So this kid from California cannot get into any Californian schools despite having straight A's, 15 AP classes.
And a damn near perfect score on his SAT.
Not getting accepted.
And the poor delusional high schooler is like, maybe I should have done more extracurriculars.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
It doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter.
They're not interested in providing a pathway to success for the most hardworking and capable students.
They're interested in manipulating statistics to achieve demographic decline in white people and Asian people in order to bring down the most high achievers to the lowest common denominator.
And their relentless pursuit of impossible equality, their utopian delusion that is actually in effect and in actuality massive global slavery of everybody being too dumb to rise up against the powers that pay for.
unidentified
So there you go.
*music*
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now.
Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
Infowars.com forward slash show.
alex jones
Quite frankly, I didn't develop Optimal Human when Bigly came on as a big sponsor.
And I told them the supplements I wanted from the companies I wanted.
They went out and did what I wanted.
People love them and they're incredible.
The turmeric, the shilogy, the irish sea moss, all of it.
But they'd had this out for years and I thought, my green caps are great.
And this other company I use is great because green superfoods are amazing.
And then I finally took it, and Harrison Smith took it, and I was like, my God.
And by then, we've been selling it for five months, and it was already a top seller.
The problem is there's so many ingredients, and it's so hard to source, and it's so clean, high standards, that it's sold out most of the time.
We finally got a decent shipment of it in, but we never offered it for subscription because we just couldn't keep it.
When you subscribe at TheAlexShowStore.com, and then they keep it back for you so it never sells out.
So go to TheAlexShowStore.com and get your Optimal Human and so many other incredible products today.
Check out all the great Patriot apparel.
Make your life more healthy and enriched and help keep us on the air as we take on the deep state.
Export Selection