Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
So used to being lied to, thinking that, oh, we're never really going to get what the FBI has on the Epstein files. | ||
And we'll never get it all because the bad guy's been in control for decades, and most of it's probably been destroyed. | ||
But 14 terabytes were retrieved three weeks ago when Pam Bondi and Cash Patel raided the FBI headquarters in New York and made the head of it step down, who was covering it up. | ||
And then she said, we've got truckloads of it. | ||
It'll take a few weeks to go through it. | ||
Well, she came out yesterday and said, We've identified hundreds of new victims. | ||
It'll take down the process. | ||
We've got to take out their names, but we're investigating now, and those involved will be prosecuted. | ||
Then, Kyle Serafin was scheduled for weeks on my show about the FBI files that got released a month ago, where I was the target of a national security investigation under Obama that went through the Trump administration and he didn't know about it. | ||
But when I learned this new information, it's a side note from him today, before it went live, I said, let's forget about me being prosecuted. | ||
Let's talk about... | ||
Well, you just told me. | ||
He goes, well, here, I'll just show you. | ||
So he showed me the text messages the last few days and today from the D.C. field office, told me the guy's name, said they're patriots, just don't say their names, but they were happy for me to know, they're listeners. | ||
And we're talking the FBI field office, you know, in there, around the country, but also the D.C. headquarters. | ||
It was also field offices, showed me those around the country. | ||
And they've been given 14-plus terabytes. | ||
Video, audio, files, just horrible stuff. | ||
They're having to get volunteers. | ||
That's how it works to go in and actually watch it, because it's, you know what it is. | ||
Serious, serious crimes against children. | ||
And they've been ordered. | ||
And it was in the news, Pambani said, I've got a task force that's top priority 24 hours a day. | ||
It's our main focus to go through all this. | ||
And what we got in the truckloads that the deep state and the Democrats were hiding in New York, where they were running it with Comey's daughter that ran the investigations, the cover-ups. | ||
And for people that don't get this, let me explain this to you. | ||
If Trump was going to use that for blackmail in the deep state or a cover-up, he wouldn't distribute the files to the FBI field offices across the country. | ||
Like, here's the full file. | ||
Go investigate. | ||
Bring us cases. | ||
And that's the order. | ||
So when you're centralizing something, you run out of D.C. No, they've given it to the field offices. | ||
So they've given it to the field offices. | ||
That's the first level of the cover-up falling. | ||
To give it... | ||
Because there's some good FBI agents, you know, quite a few, but they're compartmentalized. | ||
Around half, I would say, according to my sources and experience, are good people. | ||
They do bank robbies, kidnappings, you know, real stuff, money laundering. | ||
And the others at the top are political. | ||
So I'm going to say it again. | ||
They got the files in a raid three weeks ago. | ||
And now in the last few days, they distributed them. | ||
And so many agents got on it that it crashed the servers. | ||
But it's back up. | ||
So Trump has released the files, released the hounds. | ||
Like when they release... | ||
You know, beagles or whatever, foxhounds to go after the fox. | ||
Trump has cried havoc and loosed the hounds of war, William Shakespeare. | ||
Okay? So, he has set them loose to bring the cases to the DOJ that's been told go after it. | ||
So, this is seismic. | ||
This is massive. | ||
This is historic. | ||
This is huge. | ||
Do you understand? | ||
They got the files, the hidden stuff, what they got. | ||
Importantly, it's insane. | ||
They already found hundreds of victims, so there's real stuff in there. | ||
And I guess the FBI had saved some of the videos and hard drives they got from Epstein's Zorro Ranch and New Mexico and Little St. John's and the Caribbean and his New York thing and all of it. | ||
So this is insane. | ||
All Trump's actions today were to war. | ||
Cutting the whole thing to Planned Parenthood, releasing Crossfire Hurricane, on and on and on, going after the election fraud with executive orders. | ||
They're so powerful. | ||
I mean, this is incredible. | ||
I mean, day 63 is amazing. | ||
I mean, Trump has released the files to all the FBI offices. | ||
Total decentralization. | ||
They never do that. | ||
Hoover kept his blackmail files in a safe in his house. | ||
This is the complete opposite of that. | ||
This is revolution. | ||
This is the info war. | ||
The globalists tried to destroy America, tried to kill Trump, tried to destroy me, tried to destroy you. | ||
They fucked around and they found out. | ||
you All right, folks, that's the ladies from Alex Jones. | ||
Find and share that video at RealAlexJones. | ||
We'll be talking about the Epstein file list. | ||
What's been released, and if you thought day 63 was good, it only got better. | ||
We'll go over some of the incredible number of executive orders Trump is signing about voter security, about Planned Parenthood, and about a number of other topics. | ||
Doesn't seem like he's messing around anymore, and it's very good to see. | ||
A lot of big news coming up. | ||
Stay with us. | ||
unidentified
|
It's Wednesday, March 26th, in the year of our Lord, 2025. | |
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
I think it's time to blow this scene and get everybody in this stuff together. | ||
Okay, three, two, one, it's jammed. | ||
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
I'm I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live this morning from the InfoWars headquarters here in Austin, Texas. | ||
We've got a big show for you today, lots of videos to show you. | ||
Trump is on the warpath, signing a number of different executive orders with very powerful implications. | ||
We'll get into all of that. | ||
We'll do a little bit of follow-up to the story that dominated yesterday, the Signal chat leak. | ||
There has been some conclusions in that regard. | ||
We'll also be joined in the third hour by Edgar, the puppet. | ||
So very excited to talk to him as well. | ||
Like I said, lots of videos to get to, lots of stories to cover. | ||
So let's just get into it. | ||
Here it is, your Daily Dispatch. | ||
All right, here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch. | ||
For Wednesday, the 26th of March, 2025, Trump signs executive order requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote. | ||
Well, thank goodness. | ||
President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed an executive order aimed at preventing fraud and meddling in national elections, mandating proof of citizenship for voter registration, and requiring all votes be cast and received by the end of Election Day. | ||
The Preserve and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections executive order mandates the Election Assistance Commission to ensure voter registration forms are updated to require documentary proof. | ||
of United States citizenship. | ||
Quote, despite pioneering self-government, the United States now fails to enforce basic and necessary election protections employed by modern developed nations, as well as those still developing the order states. | ||
Adding that while countries like India and Brazil require biometric voter identification, the U.S. | ||
quote, largely relies on self-attestation, So again, just a very basic and necessary protection for the legitimacy of our elections. | ||
Yeah, totally necessary. | ||
We're not going to be a country if we can't trust the results of the election. | ||
So, long overdue, and it's good to see that executive order signed. | ||
Just one of a number of massive executive orders that he signed yesterday that we'll get into, including this one. | ||
Trump admin ends taxpayer-funded housing for illegal immigrants. | ||
The Trump administration on Monday announced that it would be ending taxpayer-funded housing for illegal immigrants. | ||
Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner and Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem revealed a joint partnership to curtail what they described as an exploitation of the country's housing programs. | ||
As Rachel Lasanis reported for Epoch Times, Turner and Noem together signed the American Housing Programs for American Citizens Memorandum of Understanding, saying, quote, We're here signing a partnership to ensure that the wasteful misappropriations that have been going to assist the illegal aliens in our country no longer go to assist them, but instead assist the American people. | ||
Again, extremely good to see. | ||
Extremely welcome development. | ||
Extremely overdue. | ||
And this is what we voted for. | ||
A return to just basic normalcy. | ||
No American taxpayer dollars should not be going towards paying for people whose sole relation with the country of America is to break its laws. | ||
That is insane that it ever happened. | ||
It's good it's being undone. | ||
Yes, people need to actually show they are who they are when they go to vote. | ||
No, it shouldn't take two weeks to count a thousand votes from Sacramento. | ||
Good to see these things get done, but they never should have been a problem in the first place. | ||
But thank God. | ||
Thank God we're just getting back to some semblance of irregularness. | ||
It's just everything's been so crazy for so long. | ||
These seem like miracles. | ||
Meanwhile... U.S. National Security Advisor Waltz takes full responsibility after Atlantic Editor was added to that war group chat. | ||
U.S. National Security Advisor Michael Waltz says he takes full responsibility after a journalist was added to a group chat of higher-level Trump administration officials discussing a planned military operation in Yemen earlier this month. | ||
Mr. Waltz, who leads the White House National Security Council, added Atlantic Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg to a group chat on the messaging app Signal with the embarrassing error triggering widespread concern in Washington. | ||
about the sharing of confidential information and the use of a commercial app to share potentially classified information. | ||
question. | ||
Waltz has said that a staffer was not the person responsible, saying, quote, I take full responsibility. | ||
I built the group. | ||
My job was to make sure everything is coordinated. | ||
Earlier on Tuesday, local time, U.S. President Trump defended Mr. Waltz, saying, quote, he learned a lesson from the, quote, glitch. | ||
Again, I have my questions about this. | ||
It's not easy to accidentally add somebody to a signal chat. | ||
And I'd still like to know exactly how he made that mistake, since he has apologized as far as I know. | ||
It's like, we've got the best technical minds looking at how this happened. | ||
Like, well, your finger pressed a button. | ||
That's how it happened. | ||
The way it happened was you went through the five or six steps necessary to add somebody to a signal chat, and that's what happened. | ||
This, again, is one of those things where there's all this discussion about, like, security and protocol and... | ||
Classified communication. | ||
There is no system in existence capable of being secure against one of the people in the group sending it out to everybody else. | ||
If it was paper and pen, it would be just as possible that somebody takes the paper and gives it to somebody that's not supposed to have it. | ||
There is no technical or technological process that is Safeguarded against somebody with access to files deliberately and personally sending those files to somebody else. | ||
There was a human error. | ||
There was nothing technical about it, as far as I'm concerned. | ||
Meanwhile, judge orders U.S. to stop attempts to deport Columbia undergraduate. | ||
The administration has been seeking to arrest and deport Yuncio Chung. | ||
... | ||
after she participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. | ||
A federal judge on Tuesday ordered the Trump administration to halt its efforts and arrest and deport a 21-year-old Columbia University student who participated in those demonstrations. | ||
The administration began seeking to arrest the student, according to a lawsuit. | ||
The judge, Naomi Burkwald, something, said during a hearing in Manhattan federal court on Tuesday that, quote, nothing in the record indicated Ms. | ||
Chung posed a danger to the community or a foreign policy risk. | ||
Or had communicated with terrorist organizations. | ||
She's a legal permanent resident. | ||
She was not a prominent participant in the demonstrations. | ||
She was arrested along with several other students this month at a protest at Bernard College, the Manhattan University's sister school. | ||
A high school valedictorian who moved to the United States from South Korea when she was seven. | ||
She has not been detained by federal agents and her lawyers have declined to comment on her whereabouts. | ||
She's on the run from the feds for protesting against Israel's actions. | ||
We're on this girl's side. | ||
I'm glad. | ||
You know, this is one of those situations where, well, half the time or more than half the time, judges interfere with Trump's prerogatives and it's infuriating and makes you just want to throw out the whole checks and balances thing so you can actually do things to tangibly approve conditions in this country. | ||
But then a situation like this crops up where clearly the executive branch is overreaching. | ||
They are engaged in something that is unlawful and that is Potentially destroying the lives of a person who has not been charged for a crime for which they're being punished. | ||
So, yeah, the judge has to step in and stop this. | ||
So, again, if the judges out there could stop putting holds on things that Trump is obviously allowed, and in some cases obligated to do, and maybe in exchange and in return the Trump administration can agree to stop doing things that are so obviously anathema to the constitutional principles, That our country was founded on. | ||
We could all get along together. | ||
We could not have to waste all of our time and money and resources fighting giant battles in court trying to do something that is clearly disallowed by the course of law. | ||
So again, we can touch on that more later. | ||
I really liked Owen's coverage of that in the third hour. | ||
He got a little fired up about it. | ||
Especially comparing it to the way that we have at this point. | ||
Probably millions of truck drivers have been fast-tracked through the immigration system, possibly never driven a car before, and are now piloting these trucks around American highways, weighing tons, killing people, crashing into them. | ||
Can't even read English. | ||
I gotta say, it's not exactly trust-inspiring to have a bunch of people who cannot read road signs driving semi-trucks around here. | ||
Not a national story. | ||
The Trump administration going after a Korean girl who's been here for her entire life and has no family in Korea and did nothing wrong being deported for the sake of Israel. | ||
That is a national story. | ||
Our priorities are completely out of whack, nonsensical. | ||
Our energy is being wasted. | ||
Our time is being fittered away. | ||
And the problems that we actually need to solve are going Unapproached, undealt with. | ||
Finally, we have this. | ||
Russia and Ukraine agreed to eliminate the use of force in the Black Sea, the White House says, following talks. | ||
Following separate talks of the United States and Saudi Arabia this week, Russia and Ukraine have agreed to eliminate the use of force in the Black Sea, according to readouts from the White House. | ||
Russia and Ukraine, quote, have agreed to ensure safe navigation, eliminate the use of force, and prevent the use of commercial vehicles for military purposes in the Black Sea, according to the readouts. | ||
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky referred to the agreement as a ceasefire in the Black Sea during a press conference on Tuesday. | ||
Baby steps. | ||
So we're taking baby steps towards peace. | ||
Trump is interesting. | ||
This is sort of the opposite of the Alexandrian approach. | ||
Think about the Gordian knot. | ||
This massive, ununtanglable knot. | ||
And the story, of course, is that Alexander... | ||
Takes a shortcut and just slices the thing in half with a sword. | ||
One fell swoop and the problem is solved. | ||
Trump's taking a little bit of a different tack. | ||
We have the Gordian knot of American foreign policy and the various wars that we continually encourage and sprout around the world. | ||
And instead of taking a sword to it, Trump is taking a pair of tweezers to it carefully. | ||
So now one thread of one rope has been... | ||
Undone from this Gordian knot. | ||
And now we'll move on to the next one. | ||
As long as it works, I'm not complaining. | ||
Now, we have a lot of executive orders talk about Trump signing yesterday and today. | ||
Absolutely massive ones. | ||
Crossfire hurricane, voter security, Planned Parenthood. | ||
I don't know what happened, but it seems like 63, 64 days into Trump's administration, he has shifted into second gear and has moved on to phase two of the operation. | ||
We'll touch on that here in just a second. | ||
Part of that, however, is of course the fact that he is still systematically rooting out the stay-behind networks, the deep state operations that have been hamstringing his administration and his previous one. | ||
And part of that is centralized on the Epstein documents. | ||
And of course there's been a saga that has been rather disappointing so far. | ||
A lot of false starts. | ||
A lot of tantalizing falsehoods about the release of this information. | ||
Trying to determine who knows what, who's telling the truth, who's actually trying to do something, who's just pretending to has been a bit of a guessing game. | ||
After all, you've got Pam Bondi saying, oh, I've got all the files on my desk. | ||
They'll soon be released. | ||
And then it doesn't happen. | ||
Now she's getting truckloads. | ||
We haven't seen anything from that. | ||
And, of course, it just begs the question, like, okay, does Pam Bondi think she has the documents and then realizes she doesn't? | ||
Is she the one lying? | ||
Is she being lied to? | ||
Is it the Southern District of New York and James Comey's daughter running the cover-up? | ||
How effective is that being? | ||
Are the files even existent anymore? | ||
Or have they all been controlled? | ||
Or are they all being kept on some offline server and some FBI agents? | ||
You know, shadow leadership. | ||
A lot of questions, not a lot of answers. | ||
Until yesterday, when FBI whistleblower Kyle Serafin went on with Alex Jones and gave some very interesting inside information from a number of sources in the FBI. | ||
I recommend you go watch the whole thing, but we're going to play at least just a part of it. | ||
We, of course, played Alex Jones' announcement from Twitter in the first five minutes of this show. | ||
You can go and watch that on... | ||
His Twitter, at RealAlexJones. | ||
But I want to play at least a few minutes from Kyle Serafin yesterday. | ||
Absolutely bombshell newsmaking interview on The Alex Jones Show. | ||
You should go watch the whole interview. | ||
The whole video is like two hours long. | ||
It's really bombshell stuff. | ||
But we'll watch a little selection of it here. | ||
Clip number three, Kyle Serafin on The Alex Jones Show yesterday. | ||
You hear stuff from the Trump administration right now. | ||
There's two things that are happening. | ||
We're seeing actions. | ||
We're seeing executive orders where people are making, you know, statements. | ||
They're going out. | ||
He's signing the document and saying this is what's going to happen next. | ||
But then you've also got this other piece where you go, yeah, but is it really going on? | ||
We were told we were going to get the Epstein binders day one. | ||
We were going to all see all the information and it didn't come out. | ||
So we're kind of in this like now we need verification. | ||
I just listen to what people say and then I go and see if folks can actually validate that. | ||
I've got friends that are working at headquarters. | ||
I got a couple of them at this point. | ||
There are friends of mine. | ||
It turns out when you become an FBI whistleblower, less and less people talk to you. | ||
They just don't want to get involved. | ||
But a few of them that are not scared, that are courageous and said they'd be happy to both lose their job and shut this agency down if it had to be done, they've gone out and proactively told me, he's like, look, we've broken servers. | ||
We've had so many people accessing them to do this work. | ||
We've been working through the- You just showed me this. | ||
Yeah, no, I'm literally showing you. | ||
The people that we're talking about here, they've reached out to me and said, yeah, we have all hands on deck. | ||
I meant to go do something because he was going to go meet one of my friends. | ||
Wasn't able to do so. | ||
And he's like, look, dude, I got stuff going on. | ||
I can't because we have all hands on deck meetings talking about Epstein files. | ||
We are doing the redactions. | ||
We are doing the things that were said. | ||
And then completely independent of that, I got another buddy who's... | ||
Much further to the west of Washington, D.C., and I'll just leave it nebulously at that. | ||
He reached out and said, I was looking for a printer. | ||
I was on my network. | ||
And they must be so actively trying to steelbox this up. | ||
Because when you start having too many people touch the exact same files on government computers, we had a joke, Alex. | ||
When you were working on FBI computer systems, we would always say that the motto of FBI AT... | ||
Is yesterday's technology tomorrow? | ||
They're just crap. | ||
They're just the worst computers you could ever have. | ||
And so apparently they crashed them all. | ||
And my guess is, is they started moving to more and more stable servers and accidentally opened up the permissions to people, including another buddy who had nothing to do with it. | ||
And he was like, oh yeah, I just saw there were like 14 terabytes of Epstein file. | ||
And you were showing me they're saying more victims than Bondi even said. | ||
I mean, this is like just massive. | ||
Yeah, I think the information will continue to roll out as they can. | ||
But at the end of the day... | ||
They're shocked by how... | ||
When you say terabytes, they're saying it's massive. | ||
Yeah, like 14 terabytes. | ||
So it's not a couple hundred pages like they gave Bondi. | ||
Correct. No, that was always going to be nonsense. | ||
So it appears from this information that you actually showed me the information on your phone. | ||
This is real. | ||
It's very aggressive, like she says. | ||
I think there's no reason not to think that. | ||
I mean, look, it's one guy sitting in headquarters and one guy sitting outside in the field. | ||
That's two sources. | ||
Is that enough for me to say, yes, there's a massive operation? | ||
Probably not. | ||
But I would say it leans that way. | ||
It makes me believe that the things that we're seeing. | ||
Well, I mean, it means they got files like she said. | ||
They have things to work with. | ||
And they're going over it. | ||
Absolutely. How many terabytes? | ||
I don't know, 14, 15, something like that. | ||
I mean, that's a lot. | ||
That's a lot of files. | ||
Alright folks, so that's just sort of the intro stinger to a longer video you can find at RealAlexJones and on band.video and Infowars.com, breaking exclusive DCI-FBI headquarters task force now investigating over 14 terabytes of new Epstein information that the New York FBI attempted to hide from Kash Patel and Pam Bondi. | ||
14 terabytes of information, which to me means that there pretty much has to be Massive amounts of video. | ||
I mean, if you're talking about 14 terabytes of documents, you're talking about every book ever written in every library and then some, right? | ||
It's like almost impossible to come up with 14 terabytes of text data if you're not literally just creating giant text chains 500 pages long on a regular basis. | ||
So if you have video, if you're Copying all of the video stored from multiple houses, rigged up entirely with audio-visual equipment, then you can get up to 14 terabytes pretty quick, actually. | ||
So I have the feeling that the Epstein files, whether they get released or not, the ones currently being surveyed by the FBI task force, probably lots of video, lots of photos. | ||
Apparently a thousand FBI agents have been assigned. | ||
To go through these files, I would assume by just going through and taking out the names of victims, I can't imagine that that takes a thousand people or how long it would take them. | ||
I still have some questions about this. | ||
I guess if they're going through the video and blurring things, that might be something that would take a lot of manpower and effort to do. | ||
But as far as we know, things are still proceeding behind the scenes to get us this information. | ||
And if we had a full understanding of the Epstein network, I think it would go a very long way towards not just explaining the blackmail networks that control our politicians, but it could be down to the individual decisions. | ||
I don't doubt that if you get a giant timeline of who is being blackmailed when... | ||
I bet you would find some pretty interesting correlations. | ||
You'd probably be able to find some people who changed their positions inexplicably, and then you could probably cross-reference that with the calendar of their visit to Little St. James or others. | ||
And you could probably find some pretty interesting correlations and derive some pretty in-depth analysis from that type of stuff. | ||
So hopefully it gets released soon. | ||
Again, that was the interview with Kyle Serafin, FBI whistleblower, still has multiple connections, and he was operating from sources, two different sources, one in the headquarters and one out in the field. | ||
And that whole interview was absolutely fascinating. | ||
And it's not just that. | ||
We're also going to be apparently hearing about the inside information of Crossfire Hurricane with Trump declassifying that investigation. | ||
We'll go into that in the next segment. | ||
I'm just going to go through all of what Trump is doing. | ||
But just to give you a little overview of it, he signed an EO, an executive order, declassifying Crossfire Hurricane, an investigation into the cop who murdered Ashley Babbitt to demand secure elections and proof of citizenship at time of voter registration. | ||
He's launched an investigation into Planned Parenthood and is removing the vast majority of their funding across the country. | ||
He is seriously on the warpath. | ||
Oh yeah, and ending the taxpayer-funded housing for illegal immigrants. | ||
Again, I don't know what timetable Trump is working on exactly, but clearly yesterday was some sort of checkpoint. | ||
And we've now shifted into second gear and he's moving even quicker. | ||
And of course we'll call him out when he does things we don't like, but... | ||
Today is a day for celebrating the incredible things he is doing. | ||
And I want to remind you that everything we do here is brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com and TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
And InfoWars as a brand might not be here for that much longer, but we will always continue to do what we do, which is lead the world in news coverage from a right-wing perspective, dedicated solely to the truth and nothing else. | ||
And I'd like to go to clip number 14 now because this is a White House faith leader, and I think she can teach us a thing or two about marketing. | ||
So I'm trying to sell some supplements here, and I need the will of God behind me on this. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's go down to clip number 14. And I believe that when you honor God on Passover, starting on April 12th at sundown through Good Friday on the 18th and concluding on Easter Sunday, you can receive these seven supernatural blessings for you and your house. | |
According to Exodus 23, God will assign an angel to you. | ||
He'll be an enemy to your enemies. | ||
He'll give you prosperity. | ||
He'll take sickness away from you. | ||
He will give you long life. | ||
He'll bring increase in inheritance. | ||
And He'll give a special year of blessing. | ||
You're not doing this to get something. | ||
But you're doing it in honor to God, realizing what you can receive. | ||
For your special Passover offering of $1,000 or more as the Holy Spirit leads, you will also receive the beautiful 10-inch Waterford Crystal Cross. | ||
Oh, Crystal Cross. | ||
unidentified
|
$1,000 for seven supernatural blessings. | |
You know what? | ||
I'm going to beat her offer. | ||
I'm offering eight supernatural blessings for $500. | ||
$500 at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
Eight supernatural blessings and a miracle. | ||
I'll throw in a miracle. | ||
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back. | |
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm Harrison Smith. | ||
You're watching the American Journal on Infowars.com. | ||
We're going to talk about what Trump has been up to. | ||
Like I said, 63, 64 days into his administration, and he's kicked it into high gear, or at least into second gear. | ||
Signed a number of very powerful executive orders yesterday. | ||
We'll go through some of them here, including... | ||
Things that we've wanted for a very, very, very long time. | ||
Trump admin ends taxpayer funding housing for illegal immigrants. | ||
An obvious and necessary change. | ||
It's ridiculous that this was ever the case. | ||
But yes, we have been using our taxpayer dollars to pay for the housing and food and care and maid services and breakfast and just literally everything for millions of people. | ||
We've contributed nothing to our country. | ||
Their only interaction with America was to break our laws, and yet we are funding them to the tune of just thousands of dollars a month. | ||
Totally ridiculous. | ||
Good to see that undone. | ||
That, I'm sure, will go towards encouraging self-deportations as well. | ||
He's also signed an executive order requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, blocking states from accepting mail-in ballots after Election Day. | ||
Another very good thing. | ||
He signed an executive order to fully declassify Crossfire Hurricane, the investigation predicated on the fake Trump-Russia dossier from Christopher Steele that first tried to destroy his chance to become president and then undercut his first administration so severely. | ||
He's also called for an investigation into the cop who murdered Ashley Babbitt. | ||
He's called for an investigation into Planned Parenthood for allegedly harvesting baby body parts. | ||
He's also canceled funding for Planned Parenthood. | ||
The Trump administration plans to freeze millions of dollars in grants to family planning organizations in order to investigate whether the money went to diversity initiatives. | ||
The Wall Street Journal reports that $120 million in funds is set to go to organizations like Planned Parenthood this year. | ||
Now on hold, citing unnamed sources. | ||
Pregnancy testing, providing contraception, treating sexually transmitted infections, and infertility evaluation and counseling are among the services threatened by the freeze. | ||
But, of course, their primary service is, of course, abortions. | ||
And that's what's actually being curtailed here, which, again, is a very good thing. | ||
So, again, Trump is really kicking things up, kicking things up a notch, and just seriously going after... | ||
His enemies in a way that they have feared for so long. | ||
Not for retribution or vengeance, but for pure, unadulterated justice. | ||
In the platonic sense. | ||
So let's go to some of these videos. | ||
Clip number four here. | ||
This is President Trump signing that executive order to fully declassify the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
Next, sir, we have a presidential memorandum for your attention. | ||
This memorandum requires the immediate declassification of all FBI files relating to the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. | ||
This was obviously one of the instances of the weaponization of law enforcement, powers of prosecution against you and others. | ||
We believe that it's long past time for the American people to have a full and complete understanding of what exactly is in those files. | ||
Which gives the media the right to go in and go and check it. | ||
You probably won't bother because you're not going to like what you see. | ||
But this was total weaponization. | ||
It's a disgrace. | ||
It never happened in this country. | ||
But now you'll be able to see for yourselves. | ||
All declassified. | ||
Is that correct? | ||
Yes, sir. | ||
All declassified? | ||
Yes, sir. | ||
Everything? The FBI filed with a... | ||
There's a classified annex. | ||
But other than that, we'll put everything in the public eye. | ||
Is anybody going to look? | ||
unidentified
|
What about you? | |
Are you gonna look? | ||
And frankly, the FBI should be ashamed of themselves. | ||
And so should the Department of Justice. | ||
And so should Biden. | ||
And Hillary and Barack Obama, since it all happened under his FBI, they shouldn't just be ashamed of themselves. | ||
They should be given a good, good long time in a concrete box to think about what they've done. | ||
These people need to be arrested. | ||
And in case you need to be reminded why, we'll go now to a video of the questioning, clip number eight. | ||
The questioning of Special Counsel Durham following the, you know, crossfire hurricane investigation and then the investigation of the investigation. | ||
These people have still not been held to account. | ||
They've still not been adequately punished for the crimes that they committed. | ||
Which include the very ones that they accused Trump of. | ||
After all, the claims that the Trump campaign was colluding with a foreign state was actually a claim made by a foreign agent who was colluding with the Clinton campaign that they all knew was fake and that they used regardless to get the warrants to spy on the Trump campaign. | ||
Thinking for sure, thinking absolutely, certainly Trump has something on him, right? | ||
Somebody near Trump. | ||
Must have some dirt on him, and all we have to do, come up with some excuse, get access to the documentations, get access to the communications, and then we'll have all the time we need and all the evidence we could possibly handle to frame him as some sort of foreign agent or criminal in some other regard. | ||
And we talked about this, Kyle Serafin was on yesterday talking with Alex, but he was on Sunday with Chase talking about the FBI investigation into Infowars. | ||
And describing the parallel construction methods that are used, which is exactly what they did here, exactly what they did to Trump, and just like with Trump, here at Infowars, they've spied on us for 12 years, been able to gather our information, gather our communications, spy on us with actual in-person agents, have agents infiltrate our organization, knowing that we didn't actually do anything, but thinking if they had access to our stuff, they could find something to bring a charge on. | ||
So they get a warrant by saying we're a white supremacist organization because you don't need any evidence for that. | ||
You can just say it. | ||
You can just assert that. | ||
Even if all the evidence in existence is contrary to the claim, you can still get a warrant based on that. | ||
Then you use that warrant, spy on the person, find something that they've done wrong, launch an investigation or an indictment. | ||
Either towards the organization or towards an individual. | ||
Then you go to the individual and you say, we don't really want you. | ||
We want the organization. | ||
So why don't you give us some inside info? | ||
But all of it falls flat when the organization you're investigating or the presidential candidate you're spying on is actually clean and actually doesn't commit crimes and actually isn't involved in a foreign entanglement or conspiracy. | ||
Then it turns out all you've done is get a bunch of warrants based on false information. | ||
Found nothing. | ||
And now you're the one on the hook because you're the one that committed the crime. | ||
So they've still never been held to account. | ||
Even the people who were admitting this in text messages, Lisa Page, Peter Strzok, insurance policy. | ||
I mean, all of this is known. | ||
All of this has been out there forever. | ||
It just has never been treated appropriately or dealt with in the way that we're sort of legally obligated to deal with these things. | ||
So let's go to clip number eight now. | ||
This is from several years ago. | ||
The testimony from Special Counsel John Durham into Crossfire Hurricane and the inverted nature of the claims. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
The central charge in the Russian collusion hoax was that Trump campaign operatives were in contact with Russian intelligence sources. | |
Were Clinton campaign operatives in contact with Russian intelligence sources? | ||
That's beyond the scope of our report. | ||
I can only speak to the former, and the former is there was no such evidence. | ||
As we report in the report, there was... | ||
Was Danchenko a Russian intelligence source? | ||
Mr. Danchenko had been investigated by the FBI for espionage. | ||
They closed the case when they mistakenly thought he had left the country. | ||
Mr. Danchenko... | ||
Status and connection with that espionage matter was never resolved by the Bureau. | ||
The Bureau, in fact, never opened it. | ||
And he was the source for much of the Steele dossier? | ||
He said that he was responsible for 80% of the intelligence in the dossier. | ||
And who commissioned the Steele dossier? | ||
The Steele dossier was done by Fusion GPS, who was hired by Perkins Coie, who represented the Clinton campaign. | ||
So what role did the Clinton campaign play in this hoax? | ||
I'm sorry, did they play? | ||
What role did the Clinton campaign play in this hoax? | ||
The Clinton campaign funded the work, the opposition research that was done by Fusion GPS and GPS paid Mr. Steele for the dossier. | ||
And who in the Clinton campaign approved that relationship? | ||
Well, we lay some of that out in the report. | ||
I think it was Mr. Elias, who was general counsel to the campaign, who engaged the services of Fusion GPS. | ||
Mr. Jordan referenced the Clinton plan intelligence. | ||
Exactly what was the Clinton plan? | ||
Based on declassified documents in the public record, there was intelligence information that was received at virtually the same time that the information came from the Australians, I mean, within a day or two. | ||
That intelligence included information that there was a purported plan designed by one of Mrs. Clinton's foreign policy advisors. | ||
To create a scandal tying Donald Trump to the Russians. | ||
That's the essence of the intelligence as contained in the declassified information. | ||
Did the president receive this intelligence? | ||
On August 3rd of 2016, then director Brennan had briefed the president, vice president, director of national intelligence, the FBI, the attorney general and others. | ||
When you say the FBI, you mean Mr. Comey? | ||
On August 3rd, it was conducted at the White House. | ||
It was Director Comey himself. | ||
So Mr. Comey knew about this. | ||
President Obama knew about this. | ||
Vice President Biden knew about this. | ||
But it wasn't provided to the agents on the case or provided to the secret FISA court. | ||
Is that correct? | ||
That's correct. | ||
Why wasn't it? | ||
We can tell you what the facts are. | ||
People can draw their own conclusions from that. | ||
I'll draw plenty of conclusions. | ||
I have one conclusion, actually. | ||
There was a cabal of treasonous psychopaths that were abusing their authority to try to rig the American election, and none of them have paid the price for it. | ||
And then they did it again. | ||
And then, by the way, they did it in 2020 because it was the exact same people who signed the letter calling the... | ||
Hunter Biden laptop story, Russian disinformation. | ||
So I don't know if it's a tactic of these people, some sort of psychological lever they're manipulating. | ||
But I think it just confuses people even more when it is literally an inversion, like a one-to-one opposite funhouse mirror version of reality. | ||
They use foreign agents. | ||
Information to claim Trump is working with foreign agents. | ||
They sign a letter that is in and of itself disinformation because it's saying that real information is Russian disinformation. | ||
It can get a little confusing. | ||
So just as a rule of thumb and to simplify it, everything they say is the opposite of reality. | ||
It's not just wrong. | ||
It's not just a lie. | ||
It is a perfect mirror image photo negative opposite of reality. | ||
They all need to pay the price. | ||
Trump is in the opposite position as them. | ||
See, they hated Trump and wanted to get him, even though he never committed a crime. | ||
They launch all these fake investigations based off of fraudulent evidence going after Trump, trying to find some crime to stick on him. | ||
Throw the book at him, see what sticks. | ||
Trump has the opposite issue. | ||
Where he's got all these people that are all involved in multiple, it's like he's got to pick which crime he wants to go after them for, or all of them at once. | ||
But the point is that all these people, Brennan, Comey, Obama, Biden, they were all in on it. | ||
They all knew this was going on. | ||
They tried to rig the 2016 election, and we can't let them get away with that. | ||
Honestly, Obama should be in prison. | ||
The Democrats would be asking for nothing less if Trump was caught doing something similar. | ||
If Trump was caught, and this is the funny thing, the FBI has been weaponized. | ||
It's like, how weaponized do you think it was by 2016 that they launched Crossfire Hurricane? | ||
The FBI is weaponized, has been weaponized, was weaponized decades ago, was deployed against Trump as a political threat to the ruling order. | ||
They tried to destroy him. | ||
He won regardless. | ||
But all of the talk about Trump's going to weaponize the DOJ, it was weaponized against Trump in 2016, and justice has never been achieved for that. | ||
So, good to see Trump at least declassifying this information. | ||
The next step is to use that information to punish people that so egregiously abused their power and threatened Literally threatened democracy, not in a January 6th threatened democracy lie, but actually threatened democracy. | ||
Clip number nine here, Trump also has announced an investigation into the cop who murdered Ashley Babbitt. | ||
Another just shocking event in the annals of American history where you have a peaceful protester murdered at point-blank range while she was within arm's reach of a cop. | ||
Cops who had just moved out of the way to let her pass. | ||
As soon as she passes them with permission, she's shot from a guy hiding behind a pillar. | ||
The only part of him you can see is the gun point out as he fires not a warning shot. | ||
There's the police preventing them from moving forward. | ||
They apparently get an order to let the people through. | ||
They move out of the way. | ||
Then the cop lying in wait on the other side. | ||
Guns down Ashley Babbage. | ||
Just one of the most horrific, senseless murders by the American government on American soil in history, really. | ||
And yet the person who did it was then lauded and celebrated and given a medal for it and given a primetime interview slot. | ||
So we got to cry about how scary it was to have this unarmed 5'4 patriotic woman. | ||
Looking down, both of her hands engaged and trying to climb through a window that she was just allowed to go through because the cop is right there, could have prevented her at any time, and didn't. | ||
Instead, they decided to shoot her in the chest at point-blank range. | ||
Okay, just reminding everybody, because there's so many just outrageous crimes committed by this government in the last 10 years, sometimes you have to revisit it to remind yourself, oh yeah, this was truly as... | ||
Demonic as I remember it. | ||
Let's go to clip number nine. | ||
Here's Trump about Ashley Babbitt. | ||
unidentified
|
About Ashley Babbitt. | |
It was a bad shooting. | ||
My father can tell you that. | ||
Terrible. Anybody. | ||
It's a terrible thing. | ||
I don't know if you know this, but the Department of Justice right now is still kind of fighting that case. | ||
The family of Ashley Babbitt is suing the government, wrongful death. | ||
The DOJ right now, officially, is still opposing that lawsuit, trying to justify it. | ||
Shouldn't that be something that can just be settled? | ||
Well, I'll look into that. | ||
I mean, you're just telling me that for the first time. | ||
I haven't heard that. | ||
I'm a big fan of Ashley Babbitt, OK? | ||
And Ashley Babbitt was a really good person who was a big MAGA fan, Trump fan. | ||
And she was innocently standing there. | ||
They even say trying to sort of hold back the crowd. | ||
And a man did something to her that was unthinkable when he shot her. | ||
And I think it's a disgrace. | ||
I'm going to look into that. | ||
I did not know that, no. | ||
unidentified
|
And the officer who shot her, Michael Byrd, is still on duty. | |
They gave him a raise and they gave him a medal and I believe a promotion. | ||
I think it's a disgrace. | ||
unidentified
|
He's a federal employee. | |
Would you or could you do something like that? | ||
I'm going to take a look at it. | ||
I'm going to look at that too. | ||
His reputation was... | ||
I won't even say. | ||
Let's find out about his reputation, okay? | ||
We're going to find out. | ||
But I watched that and I saw that. | ||
And by the way, she was killed. | ||
But nobody else was killed. | ||
And, you know, the people that went down there, they had no guns. | ||
They didn't have guns. | ||
There was something to do with the FBI. | ||
There was something to do with Antifa and others, and it wasn't mentioned. | ||
And there's never been a group of people, I think, with the exception of maybe over the years, a couple of groups were treated pretty harshly, but essentially never treated so badly. | ||
And as you know, I let them out. | ||
With pardons, I know you were very happy. | ||
I watch your show all the time. | ||
You were extremely happy about it. | ||
Plenty of other people were, too. | ||
People don't realize this whole movement that we have is just a very inspiring thing, what's happened to our country. | ||
These people are incredible people. | ||
They were treated so unfairly, so horribly. | ||
Some of them didn't even go into the building. | ||
So that's Trump talking about the Ashley Babbitt murder. | ||
Apparently he is launching an investigation into that. | ||
I mean, Trump has so much on his plate. | ||
He's like dealing with so much. | ||
I don't necessarily blame him. | ||
He's got some facts wrong there. | ||
He's got a little bit of facts wrong there. | ||
Here's the headline. | ||
Trump promises to look into Ashley Babbitt's shooting death on January 6th. | ||
He's talking about it like he's never seen the video. | ||
Has he never seen the video of Ashley Babbitt? | ||
I know people close to Trump watch this show. | ||
Can you show him that video for us, please? | ||
Can you? | ||
Can you show him the video of Ashley Babbitt being murdered? | ||
Can you also tell him about the four other patriots who died that day? | ||
He said nobody else died that day. | ||
Of course, what he's talking about is he's contradicting the claim that's constantly made that five police officers died when that's just absolutely not true in the slightest. | ||
Nobody, no police officers died that day. | ||
Nobody from the Capitol died that day. | ||
Nobody from the Capitol died from injuries they received that day. | ||
That didn't happen. | ||
Never happened. | ||
However, Roseanne Boylan, Ashley Babbitt, and a number of other protesters died on January 6th. | ||
It was not just Ashley Babbitt. | ||
It was several others. | ||
So Trump got that wrong too. | ||
Again, I can't exactly blame him. | ||
He was the president of the United States and was being by Attacked more than anybody over January 6th. | ||
But still, it's like... | ||
Has he never seen the Ashley Babbitt video? | ||
That's weird. | ||
That's weird if that hasn't happened. | ||
And I think he should be shown that. | ||
Regardless, he has launched that investigation. | ||
And that guy, Michael Bird, right? | ||
He is extremely suspicious. | ||
He was clearly a kingpin in the whole January 6th operation. | ||
He was the one that went and announced that... | ||
There was a bomb that was found and gave the order to shut down proceedings and evacuate the building. | ||
He was the one that killed Ashley Babbitt. | ||
He was clearly a leader in this entire operation. | ||
And he's been celebrated and lauded and feted by the left wing for his role in murdering an innocent Trump supporter because they love that type of thing. | ||
Let's go to clip number 10 now. | ||
Here is Trump talking about the... | ||
Secure elections that he has just signed an executive order to guarantee. | ||
Trump signed an executive order requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote and blocks states from accepting mail-in ballots after Election Day because there is no legitimate reason to accept ballots several weeks after Election Day. | ||
That is absurd. | ||
Totally unnecessary. | ||
Exists solely to provide for an opening to commit fraud. | ||
It's the only reason why you'd possibly have a situation like this. | ||
Let's go to number 10 now. | ||
And it's so easy to do it. | ||
And we should go to paper ballots. | ||
We should go to one day voting. | ||
We should go to voter ID and just one other thing. | ||
Proof of a thing called citizenship in the United States. | ||
Wouldn't that be nice? | ||
How simple does that sound? | ||
ID, one day voting and paper ballots. | ||
You know, paper ballots are very secure. | ||
They have watermark paper. | ||
It's very, actually, it's very intricate stuff. | ||
It's very technological. | ||
Technologically advanced, even though it's paper. | ||
And you'd have no trouble. | ||
You wouldn't have dishonest elections. | ||
And you'd have them all done by 10 o'clock in the evening. | ||
You know, France went to that. | ||
And not that I want to copy anybody, but many others have also. | ||
And they had 38 million votes. | ||
And it was all done at 10 o'clock. | ||
They had a winner. | ||
They had a loser. | ||
That was it. | ||
Nobody was complaining. | ||
And they had it backed up with paper. | ||
And it's... | ||
It's so easy to do. | ||
The other thing, you'd save about, this would cost you about 8% of what the machines cost. | ||
So the paper would be much less expensive. | ||
So if you're looking to save some money, that's a good way to save it. | ||
So it's a shame that we've gone through it. | ||
We've gone through a bad election, a really bad election. | ||
The election was so bad. | ||
And think of it. | ||
You wouldn't have had the October 7th disaster. | ||
Yeah, we would not have had a lot of stuff. | ||
Trump signs the executive order requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, block states from accepting mail-in ballots after Election Day. | ||
On so many things in the conspiracy world, all you have to do is ask why. | ||
All you have to do is ask, like, why would it be necessary to connect voting machines to the Internet? | ||
And if there's not a legitimate reason, which there isn't, it's not faster or more efficient or safer. | ||
Then there's probably some other reason that we're spending millions of dollars doing it, and you have to ask yourself why. | ||
What could be the real motive behind getting rid of paper ballots and bringing in electronics machines that work even less than the paper ballots? | ||
And the answer is because people imposing this are cheating. | ||
They're cheating in the elections. | ||
More on the other side. | ||
I'm not done covering Trump's executive orders just from yesterday. | ||
They keep going. | ||
unidentified
|
right, we'll be back, folks. | |
We're talking a little bit more about the... | ||
The incredible stuff Trump has been up to. | ||
If you're just joining us, we're 64 days into the second Trump administration and apparently that was some sort of deadline, some sort of checkpoint that we've passed and we have now shifted into second gear and he truly does seem to be on the warpath signing executive orders for a number of different policies that are long overdue. | ||
And totally necessary for the continuing existence of our nation. | ||
Neophyte at 0xNeophyteOnX said this over the break. | ||
I checked the messages. | ||
In my opinion, executive orders are good for short-term only. | ||
As we saw with Biden, he rescinded all of Trump's EOs. | ||
Shouldn't the president be focused on working with Congress and passing legislation, especially election integrity and term limits instead? | ||
Yes, absolutely. | ||
I completely agree. | ||
And there is some movement on that front. | ||
Congressman Corey Mills introduces the Parent Act. | ||
Congressman Corey Mills introduced the Prohibiting Automatic Rights to International Territory Act, which ensures birthright citizenship is granted to those born in the United States to at least one parent who is a citizen or lawful permanent resident. | ||
Backing up Trump's movements, attempting to get rid of so-called birthright citizenship. | ||
That law being used in a way which it was never intended. | ||
Trump has talked about that and has taken executive orders to counteract that. | ||
Now you've got congressmen backing him up with a bill in the House. | ||
That does need to happen. | ||
We need to see more of this. | ||
This is a very good thing, and we are seeing more of this. | ||
We're also seeing Congress get involved in trying to counteract the backstop the Democrats have erected in the judicial capture that they've been able to achieve. | ||
After all, these judges, in my opinion, have no standing to even be a judge in the first place, let alone making these decisions. | ||
A third of all D.C. district judges are foreign-born. | ||
A third of the judges in the Washington, D.C. district were not born in America. | ||
Of all the judges in the U.S. alive, five foreign-born judges of the D.C. court managed to get their fingerprints on controversial Trump cases. | ||
The United States District Court and the District of Columbia, the source of many cases interfering with President Donald Trump's authority, has 15 judges, counting Judge James Boasberg, and five of them were born outside the United States. | ||
While country of origin doesn't come up in most jobs, it's worth asking if judges with ties to foreign nations and cultures are the right ones to make decisions. | ||
The concept of foreign-born judges is a newer phenomenon in this district. | ||
In addition to the 15 main judges, the district court has 10 older senior judges who still occasionally hear cases in the district. | ||
This group, nominated as far back as Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, were all born in the U.S. But starting in 2014, former President Barack Obama appointed Judge Tanya Sue Chutkin, born in Kingston, Jamaica. | ||
She was in the U.S. by 1979, attending George Washington University before sitting on the federal court. | ||
She had no experience as a judge. | ||
Chutkin is now overseeing the legal challenge to Doge's work to slash excess government spending. | ||
Obama also appointed Judge Ahmet P. Mehta to the D.C. court. | ||
Mehta also had no previous experience as a judge. | ||
Mehta was born in Patan Gujarata. | ||
Sorry, I'm going to try to pronounce this right. | ||
Jujarat. Patton Jujarat, India. | ||
Ah, yes. | ||
Down-home country Jujarat. | ||
Take me home. | ||
Yeah, it's just total foreigners who are ruling over our country despite having absolutely no experience as judges whatsoever. | ||
Like, America was set up... | ||
To be at least some way like Rome, where you had a courserous honorum, you had a course of honor, you had a series of positions you had to hold before you were trusted with the highest authority. | ||
We don't have that exactly in America, but there is this idea that if you're going to be a judge on a district court with the power to block the president's orders, maybe you should have handled some parking tickets first. | ||
Maybe you should have some experience in this. | ||
Or you should at least, at the very least... | ||
Be truly and fully American. | ||
Welcome back, folks. | ||
unidentified
|
We're talking about Trump's executive orders. | |
And there's a lot of differences between this Trump administration and the last one. | ||
Clearly, he hit the ground running this time. | ||
Not a lot of waffling about, not a lot of glad-handing with the deep state. | ||
But hitting the ground running and forging the warpath. | ||
Right off the bat. | ||
Very good to see. | ||
These executive orders are, again, another example of the fact that Trump is not messing around and is confronting the biggest issues that we have. | ||
And as I read earlier the comment, you know, a little bit worried about executive orders because they can be undone by the next executive. | ||
But that's why these executive orders are being put into place, right? | ||
You do the executive order to make sure the election is secure. | ||
Then you massively increase the likelihood that you win the next election because you stop the Democrats from cheating. | ||
So he's got to do these executive orders to make sure that they don't cheat in the next round to get their executive to undo the executive orders. | ||
But you also have to have Congress backing them up. | ||
We are seeing a little bit of that with things like Representative Mills putting forth a bill to Basically undo or at least severely limit birthright citizenship, the Parent Act, again in line with what Trump wants. | ||
And this was always the intended role of the president, just like we read with the State of the Union address. | ||
How that was referenced in the Constitution was that occasionally the president will address both houses of Congress in order to provide them The idea is supposed to be that, like, as chief executive, he doesn't pass the legislation, but he does have a big say in the legislation. | ||
The president is supposed to sort of set the agenda, and then Congress is supposed to help him with the nitty-gritty making of the sausage and codifying into law the designs that originate from the president. | ||
That is the original intended construction of our government, and that does need to happen. | ||
We need to get back to that. | ||
Trump can do these executive orders almost as stopgap measures to make sure something is being done, but following that needs to be the congressman supporting his agenda and vision and writing the laws that bring these policies into fruition. | ||
So it's good to see that that's happening. | ||
It needs to happen even more. | ||
But this is the big difference between Trump's first administration and this one, is that this time he actually has at least some allies in Congress and the Senate helping to move his agenda forward. | ||
Even if it's just for their own, you know, career ambitions. | ||
They don't necessarily, they aren't necessarily MAGA, but they do recognize that that's the way the wind is blowing, and so they have to get on board or get run over the Trump train, and that's what they're doing. | ||
So, again, just to recap, securing elections, birthright citizenship. | ||
And all the others, just all the other ones. | ||
I just can't even remember all the ones that we've already covered even today. | ||
Crossfire Hurricane, Ashley Babbin Investigation, who's already done all the ones about transgenderism and all that stuff, but a lot of that has been blocked by judges, many of which are foreign-born, all of which almost are foreign-born. | ||
Mehta was born in some backwater in India. | ||
He's the one who... | ||
Was overseeing the January 6th civil cases that aimed to blame Trump for injuries. | ||
He also stepped in and put holds on some of what Trump's doing with Doge. | ||
Chutkin, also foreign-born from Jamaica, never had experience as a judge before pointing to this second-highest rung on the judicial ladder in America. | ||
She's the one who put a stop to Doge's work slashing excess. | ||
Government. Three other foreign-born judges were nominated by Foreign President Joe Biden. | ||
Judge Ana Cecilia Reyes was nominated in 2021, also with no prior experience as a judge. | ||
She was born in Montevideo, Uruguay and moved to Spain while still a child, then moved to Louisville, Kentucky, where she grew up. | ||
She's the first openly LGBT Latina to be appointed to this court. | ||
She presided over an objection to Trump's executive order declaring gender dysphoria as inconsistent with the high standards for troop readiness. | ||
As the federal's Sean Fleetwood reported, Reyes blocked Trump's order with a preliminary decision. | ||
Again, another foreign board judge, this time with a personal identity that biases her decision about that in particular. | ||
Amir Hatem Mandi Ali was born and raised in Canada to Egyptian parents. | ||
According to his questionnaire for judicial nominees, Ali was not required to register for the U.S. Selective Service. | ||
That's because he was not a citizen until 2019. | ||
He graduated from the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada. | ||
He graduated with a law degree in 2011. | ||
He worked as a volunteer in Biden's 2020 transition team and for a phone bank in support of President Biden's presidential campaign. | ||
He worked at some non-profits but never served as a judge until Biden appointed him in 2024. | ||
Amir has written extensively and negatively about Trump's so-called travel ban, a 2017 executive order which restricted travel to the U.S. from seven predominantly Muslim countries for 90 days. | ||
He said prejudice and intolerance were the very hallmark of Trump's campaign against Muslims. | ||
Before he was a judge, Ali spoke at the National Press Foundation and gave tips to reporters on how to cover the courts. | ||
Never served as a judge, but was a political force for President Biden. | ||
So, both Biden and Obama appointed multiple... | ||
I mean, the dude wasn't a citizen until 2019. | ||
You have people who are foreigners, no citizenship until 2019. | ||
By 2024, they're a judge on the second highest court. | ||
In the country. | ||
That's not how you run a nation. | ||
That doesn't make any sense, actually. | ||
The newest judge on the district court is also foreign-born. | ||
Before slinking out of office, Biden and his handlers got Judge Sparkle Suknanan confirmed. | ||
No, I'm not kidding. | ||
I'm reading that verbatim. | ||
Judge Sparkle Suknanan. | ||
Okay. Sounds like the name of a performer that liberals want teaching your children how to twerk. | ||
Sounds like a bad drag name, but... | ||
Sparkle Suknanan was sworn in January 2nd, 2025. | ||
Born in the dual island nation Trinidad and Tobago in 1983. | ||
She left her home country at 16 to pursue college and graduated from Brooklyn Law School in 2010. | ||
She was a law clerk for Sonia Sotomayor. | ||
And during the Biden administration, she was principal deputy assistant attorney general in the Civil Rights Division for the Justice Department before Biden tapped her for the first ever judge gig in the D.C. court, according to her questionnaire for judicial nominees. | ||
So, let's not beat around the bush. | ||
Biden and Obama both appointed multiple judges, and this is just five from the district court in D.C., but they had a habit of appointing people with absolutely no experience as judges, To these judgeships. | ||
No experience, but they are activists. | ||
So they were just appointing radical partisan activists to judge positions. | ||
Those judges are now the ones hamstringing all of Trump's agenda. | ||
So this is the conspiracy. | ||
Call me a conspiracy theorist. | ||
This is the conspiracy. | ||
This is how they're doing this. | ||
They don't have to win elections for presidency if they just appoint political activists and their own clients, political clients, to positions as judge and then coordinate with the non-profits to file lawsuits following executive orders to give some vague justification for the interference that these judges then engage in. | ||
They didn't, I mean, I'm going to tell you, they didn't choose the best people. | ||
They didn't choose the most experienced people. | ||
They weren't making decisions in an objective interpretation of what is best for the country. | ||
They appointed radicals with specific identities who were partisan leftist activists and would use their undeserved power to achieve political ends. | ||
Regardless of what the law would dictate or would be best for America. | ||
They packed the court with their activists, with their own personal volunteers, people who volunteered for Biden's transition suddenly became judges despite having never heard so much as a traffic citation hearing, let alone a trial or any substantive legal discussion. | ||
In the position of judge. | ||
There are law clerks and activists that they appointed to the District of Columbia so they could be the backstop preventing Trump from doing what he wanted. | ||
I say throw them out. | ||
I say impeach them all. | ||
I say impeach them all. | ||
And there is some talk about this. | ||
Again, all of this relates to the fact that now Congress actually Seemingly, and in parts, they have Trump's back and are doing things to help facilitate his administration rather than undercut and undermine it. | ||
Speaker Mike Johnson floats eliminating federal courts as GOP ramps up attacks on judges. | ||
They're not judges. | ||
They're leftist activists in judge robes. | ||
The attack on the judiciary was the Biden administration and the Obama administration So it's not an attack on the judiciary. | ||
The judiciary has been destroyed, undermined, subverted from the inside, and has been thoroughly destroyed. | ||
This attack is on the parasites now occupying the dead and decaying husk of what once was a judicial system. | ||
So they need to be kicked out, removed, defunded, at the very least. | ||
Republican lawmakers are setting their sights on the judiciary following court rulings that have halted Trump's agenda. | ||
Facing pressure from his right flank to take on judges who have ruled against President Donald Trump, Speaker Mike Johnson on Tuesday floated the possibility of Congress eliminating some federal courts, which of course they absolutely should. | ||
They should. | ||
Quote, we do have authority over the federal courts. | ||
As you know, we can eliminate entire district courts. | ||
We have the power of funding over courts and all these other things, Johnson told reporters on Tuesday. | ||
But desperate times call for desperate measures and Congress is going to act. | ||
Johnson, a former constitutional attorney, later clarified he was making a point about Congress's broad authority over the creation, maintenance, and governance of the courts. | ||
Article 3 of the Constitution established the Supreme Court but gave Congress the power to ordain and establish lower federal courts. | ||
Congress has eliminated courts in the past. | ||
In 1913, for example, Congress abolished the Commerce Court and its judges were distributed to the Federal Appeals Court, according to Congress.gov. | ||
And in 1982... | ||
Congress passed legislation abolishing the Article III Court of Claims and the U.S. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals and established the Article I Court of Federal Claims and Article III U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. | ||
House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, who plans on holding a hearing focused on Boasburg and the district judges next week, said he's speaking with the GOP appropriators about what is called legislative remedies. | ||
So good. | ||
Get on it. | ||
Yes, do it. | ||
Absolutely do it. | ||
And while you're at it, Add three new Supreme Court justices and let Clarence Thomas pick them. | ||
That's my advice for the GOP. | ||
If the GOP wants to stop being just a road bump in the leftist trip towards communism, then they can act. | ||
They need to act. | ||
And for the sake of America, have to act. | ||
They do need to defund whatever courts they can. | ||
Through whatever process is available to them. | ||
They need to impeach judges in an extremely rapid rate. | ||
As we know, these people are not qualified judges. | ||
They're activists who are making decisions based on their own personal proclivities or internal biases rather than the rule of law. | ||
And they need to pack the Supreme Court because that's what the leftists are going to do if they ever get a chance again. | ||
If the Democrats ever God forbid, if they ever get power again in this country, they're going to pack the Supreme Court faster than you can blink. | ||
Okay, so why don't you just do that? | ||
Why don't you do that? | ||
Why don't you do the thing they keep threatening to do? | ||
Because clearly they think it's a viable policy. | ||
They think it's an appropriate thing to do since they keep talking about doing it. | ||
So they really have no argument against it. | ||
They have no right to say you're not allowed to do this. | ||
Because we have pretty much every major Democrat on record, on video, encouraging Biden to pack the Supreme Court when he was president. | ||
So I say do that. | ||
I say add three new Supreme Court justices and have them all be literally picked by Clarence Thomas. | ||
Say, Justice Thomas, the floor is yours. | ||
Who would you like to, A, replace you, and then B, can you pick three? | ||
Can we clone you four times? | ||
Can we make you the Supreme Court itself? | ||
Because then we wouldn't be in many of the messes that we're in right now. | ||
But let's continue on with what Trump has been up to. | ||
Because he is signing all these executive orders, which are very good. | ||
He's getting backed up by the Congress now, which is wonderful to see. | ||
One of the things that he is involved in is the Defunding of Planned Parenthood, which again is long overdue. | ||
And just to remind you why this is long overdue, let's go to clip number 21. Here's just a little collection of just a few of the times that the executives at Planned Parenthood have been caught on camera laughing about how much money they're going to make selling the dismembered body parts of unborn children. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. | |
where it's like maybe only like an arm. | ||
I would imagine it. | ||
Yeah, they're talking about clothes. | ||
With the corpse of babies that they kill, it's pretty revolting. | ||
And of course, that's not the only one they've got. | ||
They've got Planned Parenthood talking about, I'm going to buy a Lamborghini with all the money I make. | ||
And I've said for a while, I mean, I don't know if people realize. | ||
The reason they want late-term abortion is because they chop the babies up for parts and sell them. | ||
You get that, right? | ||
That's why they're pushing for late-term abortion. | ||
There's no reason. | ||
There's absolutely no... | ||
Have you ever seen a woman go through pregnancy? | ||
Do you know how hard pregnancy is on women? | ||
You're going to go through that for eight months only to kill your baby when it's already fully viable. | ||
Literally without any medical intervention. | ||
Or in some cases, partial birth abortion. | ||
The only reason that would be justified. | ||
Or that you would have an excuse. | ||
The only reason behind that is because they're selling... | ||
The body parts of the children. | ||
It's the only reason. | ||
It's disgusting, but it's true. | ||
I mean, it's such a sickening topic that it's like, I don't want to make a skit about it necessarily, but like to sarcastically write a bill or something that says, yeah, I want a Lamborghini. | ||
It says like, hey, you know, these women who are having abortions, If the fetuses, the babies, are being chopped up and sold for a ton of money, they should get a chunk of that money. | ||
This could be a side gig for women. | ||
You get pregnant, you stay pregnant for eight months, and then you sell the meat to a scientist. | ||
Don't women deserve a chunk of that change? | ||
If they're having a procedure that results in hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of Precious body parts being sold off on the open market, don't they deserve a piece of that? | ||
Just to try to emphasize how disgusting this is. | ||
But I don't even know if that'll work. | ||
I don't know if the idea of women literally selling their babies for parts like meat, like butchers, you know, I would hope that would get through to some people, just how sickening and inhuman this whole practice is. | ||
I don't even know. | ||
I think it's a dangerous thing to suggest because some people might actually just think it's cool. | ||
A lot of people in this country would actually be like, oh, I could do that. | ||
I could make $100,000 just getting pregnant and selling my child to a butcher? | ||
Kind of like a... | ||
What's the Swift, Thomas Swift? | ||
The modest proposal. | ||
Yeah, just a little modest proposal for me. | ||
If you're going to be selling baby body parts... | ||
Shouldn't the mom get some of that? | ||
She did all the work after all. | ||
Disgusting. Absolutely horrific. | ||
And Trump is looking to investigate that and look into it. | ||
I was planning on moving on to other stuff, but there's so much that Trump is doing. | ||
I have more videos about his actions over the last few days. | ||
What we can do is go to clip number six. | ||
Sorry, we're sort of jumping back and forth here. | ||
But this is Mike Johnson talking about defunding these. | ||
Federal courts. | ||
Let's watch clip number six. | ||
unidentified
|
Getting pretty ugly. | |
House Speaker Mike Johnson issuing an open threat now, saying that Congress has authority to stop providing funding to federal courts. | ||
Listen to what the speaker said just a little while ago. | ||
We do have authority over the federal courts, as you know. | ||
We can eliminate an entire district court. | ||
We have power funding over the courts and all these other things. | ||
But desperate times call for desperate measures, and Congress is going to act. | ||
So stay tuned for that. | ||
All right, Jay, let's get right to it. | ||
This is all centered around the Alien Enemies Act and whether deportations fall under the president's Article 2 powers. | ||
So what's the reaction in Congress now to what the speaker just said today? | ||
Well, there are Republicans up here on the Hill, Kira, who want Johnson, frankly, to go further and support impeaching judges who politically have shown that they, or not politically, rather, but legally show that they disagree with the administration. | ||
The accusation from the administration is that these judges are acting politically, but these judges and other judges all the way up to... | ||
The only thing I worry about is that, you know, these judges are so corrupt. | ||
It seems like a great excuse to usher in AI judges. | ||
Go, yeah, it's these people's personal biases. | ||
It's their own identities that are warping their view. | ||
They're immigrants, so they side with immigrants. | ||
They're transgenders, so they side with transgenders. | ||
So maybe AI can make a more objective decision here. | ||
So let's not fall into that trap. | ||
Let's just get normally good judges. | ||
Go further. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
This is the American Journal. | ||
We're going to be joined in the next hour by Puppet Edgar from Ask America with Edgar. | ||
A brilliant new face on the scene. | ||
Very excited to talk to him. | ||
Specifically about his attempt, his journalistic attempt to get to the bottom of Sesame Street. | ||
Very, very exciting stuff. | ||
Very excited to talk to him. | ||
Stay tuned for that. | ||
Of course, support us at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
So many different reasons for you to support us, not the least of which we wouldn't be here without your support. | ||
Of course, it's not just your generosity we rely on, despite the fact that our audience is so generous. | ||
We give you an incredible product in return. | ||
Many incredible products. | ||
The Shilajit. | ||
Absolutely incredible. | ||
Mythical powers. | ||
Literally oozing out of the Himalayan mountains. | ||
It's an incredibly powerful supplement, but if you don't get the right grade, it can have heavy metals and other contaminants. | ||
Ours is the best on the market. | ||
We've sent it to independent labs to have it thoroughly tested to guarantee that our processes are removing all of the heavy metals, all of the contaminants, and all you're getting is the purest and most powerful Minerals, vitamins, and supplements that Shilajit not just packs in, but also maximizes because they work together to a really, really powerful effect. | ||
And again, Shilajit's amazing. | ||
And a lot of things you could get somewhere else and it'd be just as good, but like ours is the best. | ||
When it comes to Shilajit, I say not to trust the other brands. | ||
If you can even find it, I mean, it's extremely rare, but if you can find Shilajit on the shelf, I would hesitate. | ||
But Shilajit Complex from thealexjonesstore.com is absolutely guaranteed to be free from contaminants, free from heavy metals, and only have the finest and highest quality Shilajit available in the world. | ||
Because we need you coming back. | ||
Because we need to sell good products. | ||
Because we rely on your continuing... | ||
Custom at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
Go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison to let them know who sent you. | ||
Let's continue. | ||
Let's continue with what Trump has been up to. | ||
And again, I expected to cover this for an hour, but it's going to take all two hours because he's doing just so much and it involves so many different topics. | ||
Let's go now to clip number 22 here. | ||
This is an executive order. | ||
Or he said he may be signing an executive order to end sanctuary cities as a concept. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
We're looking at one, I will tell you right now, that I think perhaps will be controversial, but not with the people. | ||
And that's sanctuary cities. | ||
We're going to end sanctuary cities for some of these jurisdictions that aren't cooperating with law enforcement. | ||
They're guarding criminals. | ||
They're taking... | ||
The rights away from the citizens of this state and their city. | ||
And we're going to be ending sanctuary cities if we find it necessary to do in certain major areas. | ||
And we may just end the entire thing altogether because it's just a way of protecting criminals. | ||
And nobody else is benefited by that. | ||
And for some reason, Democrats want to keep and they want to shield criminals from being sent back to their countries or being sent to prison. | ||
And in the meantime, the crime rate has gone through the roof. | ||
Under Biden, it was through the roof. | ||
It's starting to come down, but we're taking a lot of people out of here. | ||
So we may be presenting you very shortly with a executive order ending sanctuary cities. | ||
So, yeah, needs to happen. | ||
Needs to happen. | ||
And if those cities or those states, I mean, California, you know, put towards like a billion dollar budgets towards. | ||
Defending California policies. | ||
I mean, they talked about secession, and it's like, okay, if you want to ignore federal laws, I guess it's Civil War time. | ||
I guess it's Civil War time, because that's how it started the first time, right? | ||
States deciding that they weren't subject to federal jurisdiction, and the federal government having different ideas. | ||
So yeah, these local cities don't have a right. | ||
To spend their own people's money to violate federal law and to protect criminals from law enforcement. | ||
Yet another thing that it's like shocking that it ever existed is long overdue the reaction and the undoing of this. | ||
Now something else Trump did yesterday had people scratching their heads asking questions. | ||
I think this is a case of I think this is a case of things are not quite as they appear. | ||
Because Donald Trump signed a pardon for Hunter Biden business partner, Devin Archer. | ||
And there's a lot of stuff that Trump is doing that, you know, I covered it all yesterday. | ||
I'm not happy with. | ||
I don't think it's smart or in line with the America First agenda. | ||
And sort of just boggle your mind that he... | ||
It's like bombing Yemen and deporting people that aren't even illegal aliens because they were anti-Israel. | ||
Stuff that's just like, there's no excuse for this other than serving a foreign state more than America. | ||
That's outrageous. | ||
In this case, however, I'm holding out judgment. | ||
I think this is not out of step with his designs and his espoused America First agenda. | ||
I'll explain why on the other side. | ||
But first, here's Donald Trump signing the pardon for Hunter Biden business partner Devin Archer. | ||
First, we have a pardon for Devin Archer. | ||
Devin Archer was a former business partner of the Biden family. | ||
He was prosecuted relating to a fraud investigation, but notably the tone and tenor of that prosecution changed dramatically after he began to cooperate with congressional investigators and serve as a witness against Hunter Biden and the Biden family. | ||
We believe that was an injustice, and therefore we're asking you to pardon him. | ||
And many people have asked me to do this. | ||
I think he was treated very unfairly. | ||
And I looked at the records, studied the records, and he was a victim of a crime, as far as I'm concerned. | ||
unidentified
|
So we're going to undo that. | |
There you go, pardoning Devin Archer. | ||
Again, people are going, what the hell is going on here? | ||
He's pardoning... | ||
You know, to a lot of people, this sounds like you're pardoning Hunter Biden. | ||
And it's like, why are you pardoning the business partner of Hunter Biden? | ||
Well, like Trump said, Devin Archer was treated very unfairly by the Bidens. | ||
Trump signs pardon for Biden crime family whistleblower Devin Archer, who was wrongfully imprisoned for the crimes he exposed. | ||
Now, he has been sentenced to, I think, a year and a half in prison, but he hasn't gone to prison yet. | ||
Certain people operate at a different rule set than the rest of us. | ||
I was kind of confused because it was like he was sentenced to a year and a half in prison. | ||
And then he met Trump at the NCAA wrestling event this weekend. | ||
And it's like, okay, so he must have already served. | ||
And it's like, no, he hasn't served yet. | ||
Somehow he's delayed actually serving his prison sentence, even though he's been sentenced. | ||
Hasn't actually been carried out. | ||
I guess they're going through appeals. | ||
I guess that's what you can do when you have types of lawyers that I'm sure. | ||
The Biden associates can afford. | ||
But again, I think this signals that Trump is not taking Joe Biden's preemptive pardons seriously. | ||
Joe Biden signed pardons for not just his son, but his brother and a number of other family members for any crimes known and unknown for 11 years back or 3 years into the future. | ||
Just some ridiculous, totally unprecedented Future potential pardon for crimes that haven't even been discovered yet. | ||
That's crazy. | ||
That shouldn't exist. | ||
And I think there's some very legitimate constitutional questions about whether that should exist. | ||
And it looks like Trump is maybe not feeling too bound by those preemptive pardons of the president's family and instead working with the very people who helped to expose the Biden crime family criminal network. | ||
Bringing them in, pardoning Devin Archer, and probably getting his cooperation in going after the Bidens, after all. | ||
That is what Devin Archer has been involved in. | ||
Hunter Biden confesses partnership with China's spy chief fumes as he and Joe named his criminal witnesses. | ||
So it was Devin Archer who named Joe Biden and Hunter Biden as criminal witnesses in this. | ||
So again, this is not so much... | ||
Trump pardoning somebody who is in league with the Bidens. | ||
He's pardoning somebody who has the dirt on the Bidens. | ||
So that was Devin Archer who named Hunter and Joe as both participants in this corruption. | ||
Hunter Biden sold, quote, illusion of access to his father, former business partner tells Congress. | ||
So he's already testified as to the corruption that Hunter and Joe Biden were involved in. | ||
In cooperation, he has all the details. | ||
He was his business partner. | ||
He can provide the information necessary. | ||
Two-level charges against Joe Biden, and that needs to be done. | ||
So I think that's all I got. | ||
I think that's all I got from Trump. | ||
It only took me an hour and a half to go through it. | ||
And there is more that we could get into. | ||
But Trump's very much on the warpath, very much doubling down on his attempts to fulfill his Promises on the campaign. | ||
And of course all of this also involves the release of classified documents like the Epstein files. | ||
And of course you can get a full rundown by watching that Kyle Serafin video that Alex conducted yesterday. | ||
I'm just pausing before we move on to the next thing because I have more to talk about but I want to make sure I don't miss anything that Trump has been up to. | ||
I think I've covered it all though. | ||
I think I've gotten all of it done. | ||
So now let's talk about what happens if Trump is not successful in his attempt to rescue America and patch up the holes in the bottom of the boat here. | ||
Because the Democrats are not shy about admitting what they're up to. | ||
Oh, here it is. | ||
I remember. | ||
I knew there was something I forgot. | ||
I knew there was something else awesome and great and good. | ||
Powerful that Trump did that I wanted to mention, Dr. J. Bhattacharya confirmed as NIH director. | ||
Bhattacharya was one of the main doctors who crafted the Great Barrington Declaration, which opposed lockdowns during COVID-19 pandemic. | ||
On Tuesday, President Donald Trump's nominee for director of National Institute of Health, which is the position that Anthony Fauci used to hold, was J. Bhattacharya. | ||
No. Don't know if I've ever pronounced that correctly, but I do love this guy. | ||
He was one of the main and most well-spoken and well-publicized doctors standing up against the madness of coronavirus, being one of the main doctors who crafted the Great Barrington Declaration opposing lockdowns. | ||
And this seems to be the flip of the coin of who he appointed for CDC director. | ||
We talked a little bit yesterday about his appointment for CDC director and how she's tied into Bill Gates and all these vaccine initiatives. | ||
And so the pattern continues that we identified very early on in Trump's second administration of like everything he does has kind of a shadow of the same thing, right? | ||
We get one appointment that's really good and one appointment that's not so good. | ||
I don't know why that's the case, but that's been the case. | ||
So CDC director, not great. | ||
NIH director. | ||
Super great. | ||
Really good. | ||
Jay Bhattaracharya is exactly the type of person that we need replacing Anthony Fauci in this role and actually considering what's best for the American people and our health, not what's best for your insane, evil, mad scientist scheme to enslave the planet by injecting them with nanotech. | ||
Okay? So good to see Bhattaracharya in that position. | ||
Another powerful thing Trump has done. | ||
And that's the final thing I wanted to point out today from Trump. | ||
Just a ton of really great stuff. | ||
And now let's talk about the left because they're increasingly insane. | ||
There is now, it has been officially announced that the FBI is investigating the terror at the Austin Tesla showroom that we went and covered live on Monday. | ||
The FBI is investigating multiple incendiary devices found at a Tesla dealership in North Austin on Monday. | ||
This comes as recent protests against Tesla vehicles, charging stations, and showrooms have spread across the country in opposition to the electric vehicle company's CEO, Elon Musk. | ||
The incendiary devices were found at the same Tesla dealership, where protesters have gathered two weekends in a row to express their displeasure with Musk and President Donald Trump. | ||
However, police have not said Monday morning's incident was related to this protest. | ||
But I'll go out on a limb here. | ||
Yeah, they were. | ||
No, they were definitely related. | ||
And, of course, we have the video of Alex Jones at that protest saying these people are going to come back and plant a bomb here, which is exactly what they did. | ||
The FBI is not sure, though. | ||
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton responded to the news on social media, writing, I stand ready to assist in any way to bring these perpetrators to justice. | ||
It has to be done. | ||
These people have to be treated like domestic terrorists. | ||
Again, it's one thing if you're protesting. | ||
That's legal. | ||
That's fine. | ||
Do what you got to do. | ||
Then they're vandalizing cars. | ||
Okay, that's a step above. | ||
That's illegal. | ||
That's damage of property. | ||
That can be a form of terrorism. | ||
Then there's the firebombing of the dealerships while they're closed. | ||
Another step up of violent vandalism, destroying property, but still justifiable in the minds of these leftist lunatics who think the property is some sort of collective need and you have insurance, so who cares? | ||
Planting a bomb at a dealership that's discovered by the dealership workers. | ||
Who, thank God, happened to be suspicious and call the police, have them come look at it and discover, yes, in fact, this was a bomb. | ||
If that chain of events had been different at all, there'd be a crater where the Tesla dealership is and there'd be dead bodies strewn about the streets of Austin. | ||
So this has to stop now before it gets to that point. | ||
Because the next big thing that's going to happen is there's going to be somebody killed over this. | ||
Unless the FBI steps in, finds these people, rounds up the networks, indicts their funders, and makes an example out of them. | ||
Because they are getting more radical. | ||
And again, we've reported on this a lot. | ||
Simultaneously, the moderate corporate Democrats are flailing, failing. | ||
They're ridiculous. | ||
Their support has absolutely collapsed. | ||
And while that's a good thing on the surface, all that means, it doesn't mean that these left-wingers have all been totally demoralized and have given up. | ||
Have now become Trump supporters. | ||
It means they are radicalizing under the surface. | ||
It means they're not supporting the corporate Democrats. | ||
They're not responding to, you know, polls conducted by CBS News about how they feel about the Democrats. | ||
They're unhappy with the Chuck Schumers and the Nancy Pelosi's and the Kamala Harris's and their party. | ||
They are being radicalized to a extremely disturbing degree, though, including physical assaults with deadly weapons. | ||
Like the case of a TPSA chapter president violently assaulted by leftists wielding a bike lock on Texas campus. | ||
Quote, our chapter president Paige Newman and her secretary Grace were just assaulted while tabling at the University of Texas at Dallas. | ||
The University of Texas at Dallas campus police have arrested the suspect involved in the attack on the TPSA chapter president Paige Newman and vice president Grace. | ||
TPSA CEO Charlie Kirk confirmed the arrest on social media, stating that the individual has been placed in jail. | ||
According to information on the Collin County, Texas Police Department website, the suspect listed as Liam Than Tam Nguyen is a biologist. | ||
Oh, so another example of transgender violence. | ||
I'm telling you, we've got to do a study about this. | ||
We've shown you sort of anecdotal evidence of this. | ||
At this point, like, I'm pretty sure, like, I mean, three out of four of the protesters arrested under terrorism charges for firebombing Tesla dealerships, four people arrested, three of them transgender. | ||
You now have a college girl getting bashed on the head with a bike lock by a man dressed up like a woman, another transgender person. | ||
I spent, like, the whole show on this on, like, I don't know if it was last week or Monday. | ||
But trying to express like there is this undercurrent of violent insanity that's cropping up. | ||
It's just starting to bubble to the surface. | ||
The tea kettle is shaking. | ||
It's about to like boil over. | ||
And it's the combination of the imposed madness of leftism, like transgenderism, which is distorting people's field of reality. | ||
And the extremism being cultivated online and by socialist, communist, civilizational arsonists that think America is evil and think a violent overthrow is necessary and they're tricking the most vulnerable in their population, that is the insane people, i.e. | ||
transgender people, into doing violence on their behalf. | ||
UTD Campus PD has just contacted our chapter leadership and confirmed the attacker is arrested and placed in jail. | ||
Our chapter president, Paige Newman, and her secretary, Grace, were just assaulted while tabling at the University of Texas. | ||
The attacker took a metal bike lock and slammed it against Paige's head, hitting her so hard that it basically her skull. | ||
It completely shattered Paige's phone. | ||
It's unclear if the perpetrator is female or trans. | ||
They're, in fact, a male who identifies as female. | ||
Okay. Thank you. | ||
So, we're going to see more and more of this, because the people in charge are not exactly... | ||
Counter-signaling it. | ||
They are instead acting like it's a big joke. | ||
And it's up to the federal government to take care of this so we don't have to. | ||
But it's not just that. | ||
You have things like this. | ||
Clip number 25. This is Hakeem Jeffries who's like second in line to replace Chuck Schumer if he's ousted for being too corporate. | ||
And this clip is like really kind of, it's kind of the perfect Summation of what's wrong with the Democrats, why and how their mindset is so thoroughly demented. | ||
It's about gerrymandering. | ||
And it's Hakeem Jeffries openly stating that if they are able to achieve power, I believe in Wisconsin, then they will deliberately gerrymander, like reorganize the map and gerrymander specifically to get outsized representation for Democrats. | ||
I'll explain how this is just a The perfect, like, the image of the Democratic Party. | ||
The best example of, like, how their minds work and what makes them evil. | ||
Let's go to Hakeem Jeffries. | ||
unidentified
|
In Wisconsin, that's a 50-50 race. | |
Because we know Wisconsin's a 50-50 state. | ||
And we have a strong Democratic candidate. | ||
Whoever wins is going to determine who has the majority in the Wisconsin Supreme Court. | ||
Why is that important? | ||
Because there are gerrymandered congressional lines right now in Wisconsin. | ||
Wisconsin's a 50-50 state, as I mentioned, but there are six Republicans and only two Democrats out of an eight-person delegation because the lines are broken. | ||
And as soon as possible, we need to be able to revisit that and have fair lines. | ||
The only way for that to be even... | ||
A significant possibility is if you have an enlightened Supreme Court. | ||
And so, you know, I think that's an incredibly important race. | ||
That's what I mean. | ||
It's the language that they use, right? | ||
It's not hard to figure. | ||
What he means is a corrupt Supreme Court. | ||
What he means is a Supreme Court that will do our bidding. | ||
But he's serious. | ||
They see that as enlightened. | ||
Enlightened to them is willing to rig it for the Democrats. | ||
That's what it means to them. | ||
And it's this basic, I don't even want to call it a misunderstanding, but it's like, why should Wisconsin be split between the Democrats and the Republicans? | ||
If there's more Republicans in the state, then you're going to have more Republican representatives. | ||
There's nothing unequal or unfair about that. | ||
But to these people, they see lines being drawn on a map. | ||
To try to identify, like, well, there's kind of this type of group of people over here. | ||
There's this group of people over here. | ||
You know, these people need representation. | ||
These people need representation. | ||
They see that, well, it looks like there's more Republicans than Democrats, so there's more Republican representatives than Democrats. | ||
They impose upon that. | ||
They read into that and project onto that, this must be rigged. | ||
It must be rigged because it's unfair, because there's more Republicans than Democrats. | ||
But you're talking about Wisconsin, okay? | ||
It's not unfair. | ||
It's reality. | ||
There's more Republicans in Wisconsin than Democrats. | ||
So they say, well, we just need to get elected so then we get to appoint the Supreme Court so then we can have the majority on the Supreme Court. | ||
Then we can gerrymander and reorganize and steal some of the Republican representation, carve out pockets of Democrat representation, and then it will be more fair and equal. | ||
So it's the same thing that they do over and over again where, like, Republicans, the conservative mindset, just wants to do things right, just wants to get things done. | ||
For some reason, I'm just thinking of Snow White, where it's like, Walt Disney just wanted to make a good movie. | ||
He wasn't thinking, like, how can I propagandize the world into thinking that the patriarchy is superior and white people are the best? | ||
He's just like, I'm just going to make a great movie that kids will like. | ||
Then the Democrats interpret that as propaganda, so then when they... | ||
Try to counteract that with their own version of Snow White. | ||
It's just pure, unadulterated, unrepentant socialist propaganda. | ||
And it sucks. | ||
Nobody wants to watch it. | ||
They cannot imagine a world that is not dictated by someone's personal, deep-seated, seething biases. | ||
Their hardcore racial hatred defines and dictates all of their moves. | ||
So that's what they assume Republicans are doing. | ||
So if they get into power, they're not, like, shy about it. | ||
They're like, we're going to gerrymander. | ||
We're going to disenfranchise you. | ||
We're going to pack the courts. | ||
I got more examples, but we're going to welcome Edgar on the other side. | ||
Stay with us. | ||
Stay with us. | ||
On the rising tide of human awakening, thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison. | ||
I'm about to welcome my guest, Puppet Edgar, somebody I'm very excited to talk to. | ||
He does man-on-the-street interviews, Ask America with Edgar. | ||
The name of his program, his show, the videos that he puts up, and how you can follow him on X at Puppet Edgar. | ||
And, you know, he usually goes to political events and asks very insightful, incisive questions, getting to the root of what's going on. | ||
Around the country. | ||
And in some cases, making leftists expose themselves, looking like fools. | ||
Some cases getting some very funny answers from right-wingers. | ||
But usually very insightful and political and pertinent. | ||
But I'm going to show you a video of him talking about feet pics. | ||
But before we get to all that stuff, here he is at, I believe he's at CPAC in this video, asking all sorts of right-wing influencers. | ||
About pictures of feet. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. | |
I don't know. | ||
That's weird. | ||
Feet gross me out. | ||
Yeah, me too. | ||
That's why I don't got none. | ||
Do you get unsolicited feet pics a lot? | ||
I get some funny pictures. | ||
We do tend to get that, yeah. | ||
Have you ever requested a feet pic? | ||
No. The night is still young. | ||
Have you ever solicited feet pics from anyone? | ||
unidentified
|
No, never. | |
How do you do it in an inoffensive manner? | ||
You have the most beautiful French manicure, but I notice one foot is larger than the other. | ||
You better send me pictures of both so I can verify. | ||
Is there an inoffensive way to ask for feet pics? | ||
unidentified
|
You could just ask to rate any new shoes they're considering buying. | |
Can we discuss your shoes? | ||
Oh, my God. | ||
Whoa. Behold, the magical shoes here. | ||
Wow. For what? | ||
Feet pictures. | ||
unidentified
|
No, no. | |
Is there an inoffensive way in which to ask for feet pics? | ||
I don't think so. | ||
You can always accuse her of being anti-Semitic and then tell her. | ||
I mean, it's true. | ||
unidentified
|
It's like the one golden rule. | |
How many people ask for feet pics from you so far? | ||
Too many. | ||
What is the most inoffensive way someone, not me, could ask for feet pics? | ||
unidentified
|
I think just asking for feet pics is kind of like already over the line. | |
Will you send me some feet pics? | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, oh, shame on you, Edgar. | |
Have you ever demanded feet pics? | ||
No. Should foot fetishists be on the LGBTQIA+ alphabet? | ||
As an IT specialist, do you see a lot of feet pics coming your way? | ||
unidentified
|
Feet pics? | |
Feet pics, pictures of feet. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm not a feet kind of guy. | |
You're not a feet guy? | ||
unidentified
|
Not at all. | |
I want to know. | ||
This is for science. | ||
Is there ever an inoffensive way to ask for feet pics? | ||
unidentified
|
I think that the very premise of that is it's a little offensive. | |
Well, I'll talk to my editor who demanded I ask this question. | ||
I got another foot question. | ||
unidentified
|
In order to ensure peace in the Middle East, would you suck Whoopi Goldberg's toes? | |
No! Why not? | ||
Don't you love peace? | ||
It's like a crime against humanity. | ||
unidentified
|
I'd still be committing something bad. | |
Would you suck Whoopi Goldberg's toes if it brought about peace in the Middle East? | ||
unidentified
|
I just take her with me and say... | |
Take her with you where? | ||
unidentified
|
It's a climax. | |
Would you let Whoopi Goldberg suck your toes for... | ||
unidentified
|
Ew, that is so gross. | |
... | ||
to save for peace Middle East? | ||
Absolutely not. | ||
What's it going to take to do one toe? | ||
unidentified
|
No, not Whoopi. | |
You'll be over in five seconds. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay, I'll take one for the team. | |
One toe. | ||
One toe. | ||
Just rolling around in your mouth for like five minutes. | ||
unidentified
|
Which toe? | |
The pinky. | ||
unidentified
|
We'll talk. | |
I think it would take more than sucking those nasty toes to bring peace to the Middle East. | ||
What if they were decapitated and in a jar of fruit juice and you could just roll them around your mouth and then reattach them with surgery? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. No, I just picked a little in my mouth. | |
For peace in the Middle East, would you suck Whoopi Goldberg's toes? | ||
All of them, one at a time. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm not a toe girl. | |
What kind of girl are you? | ||
Are you a Muppet lady? | ||
I might be. | ||
Are you uppity for Muppity? | ||
Yeah, for world peace. | ||
Yeah? Okay. | ||
unidentified
|
Would you do like a thruple with Joy Behar as well? | |
For world peace? | ||
Yeah. I mean... | ||
This is a man who knows weights and measures. | ||
He knows how to compare benefits to costs. | ||
unidentified
|
You will endure abject sexual humiliation from Whoopi Goldberg in order to ensure peace in the Middle East. | |
What does this have to do with politics? | ||
I guess we'll have to ask Puppet Edward... | ||
unidentified
|
Puppet Edgar, rather, and find out. | |
But either way, it's very funny. | ||
And sometimes that's the most convincing stuff. | ||
Not beating you over the head with politics. | ||
unidentified
|
You're watching The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
Watch live right now at band.video. | ||
Alright, welcome back. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, he is here. | ||
unidentified
|
American top hat on top of the pink kitty hat. | |
It's puppet Edgar. | ||
He's much more than a talking head. | ||
He is a virtual field guide taking audiences on safari amongst crazed leftists for the noble pursuits of both science and comedy. | ||
Although he is technically a DEI hire for The Daily Caller, he's here to prove that anything is possible, no matter what color your felt is. | ||
Beauty is more than felt deep. | ||
At PuppetEdgarOnX, and you can follow him on YouTube at Ask America with Edgar. | ||
Edgar, welcome to the show, sir. | ||
Well, hi, Harrison. | ||
How are you, buddy? | ||
I wore this hat in honor of your program, American Journal. | ||
I'm very... | ||
Man, I'm excited and I'm a little nervous. | ||
This is live. | ||
I could say some crazy crap. | ||
You could. | ||
By accident. | ||
I could ruin my career. | ||
I hope you do. | ||
I hope you do. | ||
I lost the country. | ||
Sorry. Would you explain what's with the hat? | ||
You got the little pink hat under there. | ||
Yeah. I like the other one a little better. | ||
Yeah, yeah, sorry. | ||
It just won't stay on because my cruddy intern, Cindy, is disobedient and borderline autistic and is really incapable. | ||
Sorry, I told her to pin it to me. | ||
She took a barbecue skewer. | ||
I've only just retrieved it from my brain case. | ||
Ugh. All right, let's tell you. | ||
Okay, this pink hat, I went to the Women's March several weeks ago and some activists glued it onto my head. | ||
unidentified
|
And I've been insane ever since! | |
This is my season two outfit. | ||
I was wondering, I mean, you know, you do these, you're, tell us what you do. | ||
You go around, you ask people questions, right? | ||
Ask America with Edward. | ||
Do you have your own position or are you just out there? | ||
Ask America with Edward. | ||
That's okay. | ||
You said Edward. | ||
That's some sort of weird name. | ||
unidentified
|
I don't know. | |
Okay. That's okay, Johnny. | ||
Anyway, so I have, I conduct almost weekly. | ||
Weekly, sometimes twice a week safaris into the liberal kingdom of Washington, D.C. I like to talk to liberals and leftists there mostly, though I do talk to everybody and, you know, see how the animals react. | ||
We like to cause cognitive dissonance, cognitive dissonance, and we like to cause joy as well because, baby, it's a rough world out there. | ||
We need to laugh. | ||
We need to save America through laughter. | ||
Absolutely. And laughter is that sugar that helps medicine go down. | ||
It's easier to tell somebody things when they're laughing at you. | ||
And I wonder what the effect is on the people that you're asking the fact that you're a puppet. | ||
It matters. | ||
Identity matters. | ||
People will say things to somebody they think is on their side. | ||
If it's a liberal girl with rainbow hair, she's likely to get better answers than somebody that's clearly a Trump supporter. | ||
As a puppet, how do you see people react to you, positive or negative? | ||
Well, let me tell you, initially, it was with great friendliness. | ||
They couldn't wait to talk to this puppet. | ||
It just disarmed them. | ||
But now, now, buddy, man, it's rough out there. | ||
Word on the street is, do not talk to that puppet. | ||
Do not talk to that puppet. | ||
He's a right-wing puppet. | ||
How dare you? | ||
And these people, when they find out, oh, I don't share their opinions, they immediately do a 180, and they march right off because they can't handle it. | ||
But, however, you know what? | ||
Sometimes they think that they can best this puppet, and I love that, because those bitches is wrong. | ||
I've never seen it done. | ||
I've never seen it done. | ||
Watch my show! | ||
I do it all the time! | ||
I've never seen them beat you, I'm saying. | ||
I've never seen you defeat it. | ||
I've watched a lot of your videos, and you seem to come out on top every time. | ||
Well, I do at the end, but listen, buddy, this latest adventure where I tried to confront Sesame Street... | ||
I had some old hags beat me with their signs that were calling for freedom of the press, and they were beating me, an innocent reporter, trying to get to the truth. | ||
But they're activists, buddy. | ||
They're activists, Harrison. | ||
They don't want me asking these awkward questions. | ||
Oh, yeah, there they are. | ||
I see it. | ||
Yeah, we have this video. | ||
We played this video a few days ago, and it is hilarious. | ||
I have to ask, when you were doing this video, you were going to talk to NPR and talk about their liberal bias. | ||
Were you going there with the intention of Being as obnoxious as most liberal reporters, that's what I noticed, is the questions you were asking were very similar to the questions that Donald Trump gets asked by liberal reporters. | ||
Things like, do you support rape? | ||
How many children have you raped? | ||
Things that you might think are ridiculous, but to these people are very serious. | ||
What was your strategy going into this NPR investigation of yours? | ||
My strategy was to expose and let other people know that these Muppets can't be trusted. | ||
I know my kind, Harrison. | ||
We talk with each other. | ||
We know what they do behind closed doors. | ||
Oscar the Grouch is a rapist. | ||
It's true. | ||
And Big Bird, well, we can watch the video if you want to go point by point. | ||
Now listen, buddy. | ||
If I say, hey, pause, because I want to make a point, can you pause it? | ||
My crew is on it. | ||
We got the best crew in the business. | ||
They will be beaten if they don't, yes. | ||
Wait, wait. | ||
I'll go like this. | ||
I'll raise my hand and go, pause! | ||
I'll show my pause. | ||
Get it? | ||
Dan's on it. | ||
Yeah, Dan, get on it. | ||
His finger is hovering over the pause button. | ||
So let's go to this video. | ||
This is one of the latest, not the latest, but one of the latest from Ask America with Edgar. | ||
I'm never going to get that wrong again. | ||
I apologize. | ||
That's okay. | ||
I still love you. | ||
I still love you. | ||
I love your goofy glasses, too. | ||
That's some cheap crap. | ||
They make you look smarter. | ||
You should get some. | ||
They work. | ||
Let me tell you, your glasses kind of intimidate me. | ||
I think, man, a man that brave to wear those cheap-ass pair of glasses has really got it going on. | ||
Kind of intimidated. | ||
I wish these were cheap. | ||
No, I can't wear my cheap ones. | ||
What? You paid a lot of money for that? | ||
Yeah. Believe it or not. | ||
I'm on the tip of the spear of fashion, Edgar. | ||
That's what that's called. | ||
Let's go to this video. | ||
Here's Puppet Edgar, at PuppetEdgar on X, going to NPR to protest the down-low, dirty, Democrat Sesame Street characters. | ||
Let's watch and throw your hand up and pause whenever you want, Edgar. | ||
You got it. | ||
unidentified
|
NPR has a huge liberal bias. | |
Desperate to keep government funding, they got Sesame Street to help, but isn't it about time? | ||
Look at their signs. | ||
I wasn't ready for a pause that quick. | ||
Hold on. | ||
You threw me on there, Edgar. | ||
Oh, yeah. | ||
Oh, you took a coffee break. | ||
I thought Dan was on the case. | ||
Dan, are you on the case? | ||
He's too much on the case. | ||
We cut to Edgar when he says pause. | ||
Sorry. Very, very embarrassing. | ||
Dan? Dan, you're fired. | ||
Just out of here. | ||
unidentified
|
Don't fire Dan. | |
No, we're not firing Dan. | ||
He's too valuable, Edgar. | ||
Do not fire my director. | ||
He gets your coffee, doesn't he? | ||
No, he doesn't, actually. | ||
unidentified
|
No, that's my job. | |
Yeah, that's Matt's job. | ||
No, he's walking away. | ||
No, come back, Dan. | ||
We literally can't do the show without you. | ||
Everything's falling apart. | ||
Dan, it's over. | ||
Get back in here. | ||
Get Dan back in here. | ||
Give him a raise. | ||
Get him back in here. | ||
Sean's been promoted. | ||
Sean has now been promoted. | ||
Yeah, get Sean in there. | ||
Put Sean in, coach. | ||
Okay, you were pausing it, though, because you want to show these signs. | ||
What are the signs that Big Bird... | ||
Let's read the signs. | ||
Let's read the signs. | ||
Protect press freedom and don't mute the media, which is exactly what these bastards did to me while I'm trying to expose the truth. | ||
It's all hypocrisy. | ||
It's all hypocrisy. | ||
Okay, play the video. | ||
Let's go back. | ||
unidentified
|
To expose my fellow Muppets for their crimes against humanity. | |
Elmo, are you a globalist? | ||
Are you a global... | ||
Big Bird! | ||
Why were you on Epstein Island, Big Bird? | ||
Answer me! | ||
Or are you yellow? | ||
Count! Excuse me, count! | ||
Wait! I want to talk to the count! | ||
Get out of the way! | ||
unidentified
|
Count! Count! | |
Count! How many abortions have you made Abby Cadabby have, count? | ||
How many abortions have you forced Abby Kadabi to have? | ||
Can he count? | ||
Why is Abby... | ||
Ask him to count. | ||
Can he count? | ||
Yeah, can you count one, two, three abortions you forced your lover, Abby Kadabi, to have? | ||
I gotta pause it now. | ||
Now I'm throwing up the pause hand. | ||
Okay, okay, go ahead. | ||
And I gotta say, in total honesty, when I first saw you come across the timeline, because how long have you been doing this, Edgar? | ||
How long have you been out on the streets? | ||
Oh, man. | ||
Well, you mean like living in a cardboard box behind five guys? | ||
Age is a baby. | ||
But I've been dutifully employed as the DEI hire for the Daily Caller for about a year. | ||
But I've only just now been making my mark. | ||
Because they finally let Edgar be Edgar, the perverted blue puppet that needs to seek the truth. | ||
They let Edgar off the chain. | ||
unidentified
|
They let me off the chain. | |
They said, Edgar, you know, these pedestrian questions we're giving you really aren't cutting it. | ||
Let's get dirty. | ||
Oh! Oh my god! | ||
unidentified
|
Get them off the screen! | |
Oh no! | ||
What are you doing? | ||
Get them off the screen! | ||
What's up with the feet, man? | ||
This is a feet-heavy episode today. | ||
But I gotta say, I've seen other puppets do Man on the Street stuff. | ||
In all honesty, it's not my style. | ||
It's not my jam. | ||
I sort of thought, oh, it's a puppet. | ||
He's probably playing on being a puppet, trying to get the DEI angle going. | ||
But I've watched your videos, and they're actually genuinely hilarious. | ||
Like, it's not the type of thing I normally watch, but it's a credit to your challenging capability as an investigative reporter that I cannot help but die laughing with every one of your videos that I see. | ||
And I'm not the only one, by the way. | ||
I don't know if you've noticed in that video, the guy behind... | ||
The abortion provider, black guy holding a sign, he's laughing too. | ||
He can't help it. | ||
He's cracking up also. | ||
He just can't help but think it's funny. | ||
Actually, I think what they were doing is they're laughing at our utter inability to bring these criminals to justice. | ||
unidentified
|
This is the sinister laughter of like, you can't touch us. | |
We're NPR. | ||
And these Sesame Street criminals are going to walk. | ||
Did you ever get an answer about the abortions from the count? | ||
Well, listen, I have cradled poor Abby Cadabby three times in a row. | ||
She's actually on her fourth abortion now. | ||
This is old footage. | ||
The count has impregnated her four times. | ||
She keeps falling for it because she has short-term memory loss. | ||
It's terrible. | ||
He's abusive. | ||
You know what he's like? | ||
He's like the undead version of Harry Sisson. | ||
Really, he's such an abuser. | ||
Oh, Lord. | ||
Well, that's very disturbing, and that's a whole other scandal. | ||
Yeah, don't sue me, Harry. | ||
I'm just kidding. | ||
That's a whole other scandal we're getting into. | ||
Let's go back to the video. | ||
So again, look, people see this and they go, is this guy just screaming crazy accusations at somebody? | ||
And it's like, hey, if they can do it in the press briefing room to Trump and ask him if he supports slavery, I don't think it's ridiculous to ask the count from Sesame Street how many abortions he's forced his ill-fated lover to go through. | ||
It's all fair and love in investigative journalism. | ||
Yes. You're absolutely right. | ||
You know, the Count's crimes are light compared to everyone else's crimes. | ||
Really. Big Bird and Elmo have done unspeakable things. | ||
And they're teaching our children and they're corrupting our youth through this. | ||
Let's go back to the video. | ||
They are. | ||
All right. | ||
Yes, sir. | ||
Elmo! Elmo! | ||
Shut up, lady! | ||
I'm talking! | ||
unidentified
|
Bitch, wait! | |
Elmo, why are you a globalist? | ||
unidentified
|
Elmo, why do you propose the Diddle Me Elmo doll? | |
Big Bird, get snuffle up against Strangle Jeffrey Epstein! | ||
Tell me now! | ||
Don't run away from me or you're yellow! | ||
unidentified
|
Answer me now, Elmo! | |
Are you a globalist? | ||
unidentified
|
Have you ever been to Epstein Island? | |
Let's pause it. | ||
Listen, I just want to say on behalf of all nosy Lois Lane reporters, I apologize for my harsh language to the blonde Lois Lane trying to, you know, bogart my interview and take it over. | ||
You know, sometimes when you mess with really good journalists like myself... | ||
There's collateral damage. | ||
Sorry, hon. It's a rough and tumble business out there. | ||
My question is, when is Trump going to release the Elmo files? | ||
When are we going to get the Elmo files and really find out what he's been up to? | ||
You know what? | ||
Frankly, I think Elmo is red just because of so much consumption of adrenochrome. | ||
It's really horrible. | ||
But listen. | ||
I love this video so much. | ||
I think we caught lightning in a bottle here. | ||
I don't know if we'll ever equal its surprise. | ||
It's just like chapter by chapter descent into madness and hilarity. | ||
But yeah, we caught lightning in a bottle here. | ||
But let's go on. | ||
But I do apologize to Blondie. | ||
But yeah. | ||
The accusations I level against Elmo and Big Bird being on Epstein Island, well, we're waiting for the files. | ||
There are several terabytes of horrible, horrible footage of Big Bird doing unspeakable things with his beak. | ||
I don't think children should see it. | ||
Yeah, look, you don't want to know what goes on in the trash can, right? | ||
You think it's just trash. | ||
It's a whole temple. | ||
There are pools. | ||
Yes, the number of children's television workshop interns he has bent over his trash can is at least five. | ||
It's disturbing. | ||
It's disturbing. | ||
Yeah, it's horrible. | ||
Today's letter is F. Let's not talk about that right now. | ||
Let's go back to the video. | ||
For fascism! | ||
Fascism, yes, that's the word. | ||
Let's go back to... | ||
unidentified
|
We're the number one fascist puppet show in all of D.C. Wow, that's heavy competition. | |
Heavy competition for that? | ||
Yeah, yeah. | ||
I'm the best, baby. | ||
I think, I don't know, you got some pretty stiff confidence. | ||
I guess now that Biden's out of office, you're sort of the puppet in town. | ||
Dude, I almost did one of those things that Elon did occasionally. | ||
It's my accident. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm sorry. | |
It's a fashion puppet show. | ||
Oh, it's a reflex. | ||
I'm sorry. | ||
You will be thrown into puppet prison faster than you can say hail. | ||
But Muppet Prison has bendy bars. | ||
I will snap right out of there, no problem. | ||
Wiggle right out. | ||
Alright, let's go back to this video because it gets even better. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
Do you commit atrocities in Nigeria? | |
Were you part of a genocide, Big Bird? | ||
Do you renounce jihad, Big Bird? | ||
What is your body count? | ||
unidentified
|
Literally, Big Bird. | |
How many people has Big Bird murdered? | ||
I wanna know! | ||
Don't run away from the free press! | ||
Wait! You're supposed to be part of public media! | ||
Why are you running away? | ||
You are one fertile vampire! | ||
And you, you've been to Epstein Island! | ||
You're on the flight logs! | ||
unidentified
|
How dare you! | |
You're a globalist, Elmo! | ||
Shame on you! | ||
Diddle me, Elmo, indeed! | ||
Don't you touch me, old lady! | ||
Pause. Okay, listen. | ||
Here is where we enter the chapter, Attack of the Bitches. | ||
This is where these... | ||
Sorry, sorry. | ||
Can I say that word? | ||
You already did. | ||
Let's move on. | ||
I'm sorry. | ||
This is live. | ||
I forget. | ||
I'm sorry, children. | ||
Okay. Female dogs. | ||
unidentified
|
It's a farmyard animal. | |
Well, no, no. | ||
Well, I meant evil harpies. | ||
They are sent to defend the narrative. | ||
I spent too much time yelling and not enough time watching my six Harrison. | ||
They waddled up to me. | ||
They caught up to me, grabbed me by my little shirtie-poo, and started to harass me and abuse me and slap me with signs and be smelly and old. | ||
And you might just catch an up-close glimpse of one of their horrific faces. | ||
It looks like that person who fed the apple to Snow White. | ||
Anyway. Hey, let's enjoy. | ||
unidentified
|
Go on. | |
That's assault. | ||
unidentified
|
Get the hell. | |
Oh, look. | ||
Hey. Why is NPR populated by wine moms? | ||
Wine moms with Trump derangement syndrome. | ||
Look, there's Examin A. My lady. | ||
Don't touch me, bitch. | ||
unidentified
|
Get off my camel lady, you infertile myrtle. | |
She's laughing. | ||
That means she's taking a joke. | ||
How dare you assault the free class? | ||
This is standard NPR practice. | ||
This is physical violence against your reporter. | ||
unidentified
|
There's no such thing as diversity of opinion! | |
Run, you rapist! | ||
I was gonna crouch as a rapist! | ||
Why are you running cover for him? | ||
You can run, but you can't hide! | ||
unidentified
|
You're yellow, Big Bird! | |
You're yellow, I tell ya! | ||
Stand up and fight! | ||
I was gonna crouch as a rapist! | ||
I have to say, the irony of beating... | ||
Reading a puppet, a puppet with a microphone. | ||
Get a hold of yourself, man! | ||
I mean, my God, with a sign that says Free Press. | ||
They're actually using the sign that says Free Press to block your camera and beat you. | ||
This is some harrowing footage of a physical attack against an innocent reporter trying to get some answers. | ||
These people are not sincere about press freedom. | ||
We see these activists all the time. | ||
NPR couldn't even summon enough employees to come out. | ||
These are like paid protesters. | ||
With their rancid, rabid Muppets. | ||
Here's what I'm wondering. | ||
How do we know this is the real Elmo and Big Bird? | ||
I think they might be body doubles. | ||
No, no. | ||
I could tell by the scent of fentanyl that it was the real deal. | ||
Yes. That makes perfect sense. | ||
There was cocaine on the tip of Big Bird's beak as well, which is a surefire indicator that it's... | ||
Yeah, that's the guy. | ||
They're a mess. | ||
You can clearly tell Big Bird's depressed because he knows justice is coming. | ||
You know, if he didn't know before, he sure as hell knows now. | ||
And look, I don't know if you remember, I think it was Project Veritas or James O'Keefe video where they actually caught PBS executives saying these Trump supporters, they're raising their kids wrong. | ||
We just need to get them in a room. | ||
We need to take their kids from them and brainwash them with Sesame Street. | ||
What is it about Sesame Street? | ||
What are they brainwashing our kids with? | ||
Why is this such a powerful force for them that they think it could cure Trump supporters of their insanity by forcing them to watch Sesame Street? | ||
I mean, what's that about? | ||
They've gone power mad, Harrison. | ||
It's gone to their heads. | ||
And you can tell they have never, ever been confronted, honestly. | ||
You're going to see this soon with a lady with a green hat. | ||
I ask her all sorts of questions. | ||
I'm trying to raise genuine points with what she's saying, but she keeps repeating the same. | ||
NPC lines over and over again. | ||
They're drunk with power. | ||
They don't care about what we think. | ||
They don't care. | ||
And the Muppets are just a gateway drug to their dominance. | ||
Get them while they're young. | ||
But I use that against them. | ||
I get them to talk to me because I, too, am a Muppet. | ||
unidentified
|
So, you know, they're weapons. | |
Yeah, live by the Muppet and die by the Muppet, man. | ||
There's magic in this puppet hole. | ||
You say so. | ||
unidentified
|
If you say so, I believe you. | |
Sorry. No, but look. | ||
Oh, stop it! | ||
Hey, hey, watch it, Elon. | ||
Watch it there, Mr. Musk. | ||
Sorry, sorry. | ||
I'm just joking, man. | ||
Look, they call me a fascist all the time. | ||
It's just starting to rub off. | ||
Like, geez. | ||
You know what? | ||
Apparently, humor is fascism. | ||
Laughing is fascism. | ||
What is it about the Democrats that makes them so humorless? | ||
And why is right-wing humor so powerful? | ||
I think right-wing humor is like the number one reason why. | ||
Our culture is taking over. | ||
We're the ones who are dominating podcasts, everything. | ||
What is it about humor that is so right-oriented, the left just doesn't get it? | ||
Why is that? | ||
Because even when we were out of power, even during those four years in the wilderness, we didn't forget how to laugh. | ||
Even perhaps bitterly at the situation, we laughed. | ||
These people have forgotten how to laugh, Harrison. | ||
Take a look at Rosie O'Donnell. | ||
You ever see such pronounced frown lines? | ||
That dried-up old windbag hasn't smiled in decades. | ||
It's just these creases, this bitterness. | ||
And same with Ellen DeGeneres, too. | ||
Like, man, these people haven't smiled. | ||
And I feel bad for them. | ||
We're going to bring laughter to everyone. | ||
We're going to save America with laughter. | ||
Yeah, they're going to laugh whether they like it or not, just like the people in that video. | ||
You know, you'd expect them to be mad that you're making a scene, but instead they can't help themselves with a laugh. | ||
It really is the medicine that, or the sugar that helps the medicine go down. | ||
What is your goal, Edgar? | ||
Here in the last two minutes that we're talking with you, what are you looking to achieve? | ||
I mean, is there a political future? | ||
Do we need to change the Constitution to allow for, no offense, your kind to run for president? | ||
I mean, what are we going to do about this? | ||
No, no, no. | ||
Baby, my goal is for you to play the rest of this video, because I've got to pause it one more moment. | ||
Alright, let's go. | ||
We only have two minutes left, so let's get back to the video. | ||
Hurry. Let's go. | ||
You get in your car back to Epstein Island right now. | ||
unidentified
|
Dick rider for billionaire. | |
Can we chat with you? | ||
You are fine dick riding, George Soros. | ||
unidentified
|
No, I don't have a dick to ride. | |
I do not have a dick. | ||
Do not discriminate against the dickless. | ||
You are not dick riding. | ||
You are dick riding. | ||
I'm not the dick rider. | ||
You are the dick rider. | ||
How dare you? | ||
unidentified
|
I don't have a penis. | |
You're giving me PTSD. | ||
unidentified
|
PTSD! Oh, hi, how are you? | |
I'm good, how are you? | ||
I'm good, my name's Edgar. | ||
This is my show, Ask America with Edgar. | ||
unidentified
|
Your fellow puppets, they are sponsored by HBO. | |
I'm a puppet? | ||
Yes, they are. | ||
unidentified
|
And not PBS, but they're out here right now. | |
They're angry that... | ||
PBS will no longer have to rely on taxpayer money to promote propaganda. | ||
First off, I would like you to clean the salivary collections from the corners of your mouth first, because I'm getting a little grotty, okay? | ||
Check that out. | ||
Sorry. Pause. | ||
They're literally foaming at the mouth. | ||
Yeah, yeah. | ||
You know what? | ||
Earlier, sir, I said that we caught lightning in a bottle, and let me rephrase that. | ||
I think we caught rabies in a bottle with this video. | ||
Oh, no. | ||
You think it's—I didn't realize until I went to—we went to a women's march in New York, and I'd heard the term foaming at the mouth. | ||
These people were foaming at the mouth. | ||
They were so angry. | ||
They are rabid. | ||
You're exactly right. | ||
Yep, yep. | ||
All right. | ||
You want to play the rest of it? | ||
It's up to you, buddy. | ||
I can talk. | ||
I can watch. | ||
Whatever you like. | ||
We got 30 seconds left. | ||
We'll play the rest of it on the other side. | ||
I just want to thank you, PuppetEdgar, at PuppetEdgar on X, YouTube, Ask America with Edgar. | ||
Thank you very much. | ||
You're brave. | ||
You're a patriot. | ||
Incredible stuff, sir. | ||
I threw my heart out to you all, just like Elon did, but it really looked wrong. | ||
I'm so sorry, but we are the number one fascist puppet show, so I've got to live up to it. | ||
Sorry. It's just a joke, people. | ||
I love America. | ||
I love democracy. | ||
Living up to it and more, Puppet Edgar. | ||
All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
Very fun guest, Puppet Edgar. | ||
Ask America with Edgar. | ||
Go follow him on it at PuppetEdgar. | ||
After all, what we're waging here is not a traditional war. | ||
It's a psychological war. | ||
It's a spiritual war. | ||
It's an information war. | ||
And humor is not a distraction from our goals. | ||
It is a primary weapon. | ||
That we can deploy against our enemies and keeping morale up, spreading ideas. | ||
More people have probably been convinced about the real state of the world, the facts about globalism, the importance of nationalism. | ||
The MAGA agenda has been spread more through humor and memes and skits and funny on the street videos than all of the political speeches in the world combined. | ||
One of Trump's great appeals is the fact that he is simply funny. | ||
And people tend to like him, even when they don't want to. | ||
So this is not some small thing. | ||
It's like a key component of this battle that we're waging. | ||
And I hope you can support us in this battle by going to thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
And you get incredible products. | ||
You support this singular outlet. | ||
There's new products practically every day at this point. | ||
Even more coming out in the very near future. | ||
Even just this week, we've released a coin, we've released a knife, we've released new t-shirt designs, hat designs, practically every day. | ||
And there's a constant chance to win one of a variety of awesome cars, trucks, SUVs, worth upwards of $100,000. | ||
The new InfoWars coin is in limited stock and 25% off right now. | ||
I'm sorry, 20% off right now. | ||
You can secure that limited edition Infowars veteran silver coin today as a memento and as a little piece of memorabilia you can pass on to your children and grandchildren to remind them of your participation in this all-important rescue mission for the human race. | ||
We got some updates. | ||
We got some updates to the story yesterday. | ||
There's a new Atlantic article. | ||
And I didn't really get into it. | ||
I'm glad Alex did after my show. | ||
Because some of these things, again, it's one of the problems working at Infowars for so long is like you, I don't know what to cover and what not to cover. | ||
When I say the Atlantic, I kind of just assume everybody listening knows what I mean when I say the Atlantic, right? | ||
I was even watching the show back, and I'm like, The Atlantic. | ||
And I say it as if you know. | ||
Maybe you don't know. | ||
If you don't know, you need to watch Alex Jones' show. | ||
He talks about Steve Jobs' wife, very good friends with Ghislaine Maxwell, running The Atlantic. | ||
I talked a little bit about this guy Jeffrey Goldberg. | ||
Alex got even more into that. | ||
So I apologize for not doing the background information on this. | ||
But it is one of those things. | ||
If you're new to InfoWars, you've got a lot of back-reading to do. | ||
You've got a whole backlog, 20 years of fighting this war, get caught up to the fact that places like the Atlantic, you just have to know. | ||
It's like a prerequisite for understanding what we're talking about here. | ||
Certain organizations are just synonymous with intelligence agencies, with manipulation, with lies. | ||
They are propaganda outlets. | ||
And there's a story at Infowars.com. | ||
Learn how the publication The Atlantic is at the epicenter of an international spy network heavily connected to Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
And Alex Jones went through that in great detail. | ||
Now there's a second article from this propaganda outlet. | ||
And I can't help but feel like I don't want to, you know, I'm not out here trying to criticize Trump when I know how much they're doing for us. | ||
Or the Trump administration. | ||
But it feels like they're falling into traps a little bit. | ||
After all, they released a few screenshots from this signal group that Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally allowed into. | ||
And we can speculate about how this came about as well, because there's been no answers other than Waltz, Michael Waltz, saying it was him. | ||
There was some talk yesterday. | ||
People were getting mad at me on Twitter because I said it was Waltz that did this. | ||
Everybody was saying, no, it was one of his staffers. | ||
And it's like, well, not really. | ||
Actually, it was Waltz himself. | ||
And he said, I did it. | ||
It was an accident, you know, major oversight. | ||
And thank you. | ||
And so they said over and over, we didn't discuss attack plans. | ||
I even reiterated it. | ||
Because I was saying that, well, what Pete Hexeth is saying here is we didn't discuss attack plans, meaning I didn't share documents from the Pentagon with specific details about the attacks that were happening. | ||
And again, I was pointing this out as kind of like, that's not fully true. | ||
It's not fully true. | ||
They were talking about the war. | ||
They just weren't sending actual war plans. | ||
Here's the problem. | ||
They were sending those war plans. | ||
Jeffrey Goldberg was in this group for weeks. | ||
That's the only thing you have to realize. | ||
This wasn't him getting in, screenshotting a bunch, and then getting out. | ||
He was in the group for several days before the attack happened, logging all of the conversation, documenting all of the conversation. | ||
I believe he remained in that group until he published the story yesterday. | ||
So I believe the day he was actually brought into the group was like March 11th. | ||
It was March 15th that the actual attack took place. | ||
The story's not published until the 24th. | ||
So they know, and the people in this group knew that, so who's this? | ||
Who's saying this? | ||
Caroline Levitt says, The Atlantic has conceded these were not war plans. | ||
The entire story was another hoax, written by a Trump-hater who is well-known for his sensationalist spin. | ||
That was about the first story. | ||
Right? Or no, that was about this story. | ||
That was about this next one. | ||
Okay. But the point is, what I'm saying is, I feel like, The Trump team fell into a trap because if they were sharing war plans, which that is how I would describe what was being shared. | ||
We have the images we can show you. | ||
Things like this from Pete Hegseth. | ||
Team update. | ||
Time now. | ||
1144 Eastern Time. | ||
Weather is favorable. | ||
Just confirmed with CENTCOM. | ||
We are go for mission launch. | ||
1215 Eastern Time. | ||
F-18's launch. | ||
First strike package. | ||
1345. Trigger based. | ||
F-18. | ||
First strike. | ||
Window starts. | ||
Terrorist. Target. | ||
So to me, as a layman, yeah, those are war plans. | ||
Those are the dates and times and exact actions to be carried out in war. | ||
Those are war plans. | ||
So why would you say there are no war plans if you know that he's got text messages that he hasn't released? | ||
It seems like they played right into the Atlantic's hand here. | ||
Because they wrote that article. | ||
It was a big bombshell, dominated news coverage. | ||
By the way, that itself was timed in a particular way. | ||
And this is one thing that I think a lot of people were confused about, myself included. | ||
The hearings yesterday that are continuing today, and they're going on right now, and we'll go to those in just a second. | ||
Those hearings were not called in response to this story. | ||
Even though that's all they talked about in the hearings, those hearings are annual events. | ||
That were going to be held yesterday and today for a long time. | ||
So the Atlantic very carefully held on to this story, releasing it at just the right time to make the biggest splash the day that all of the people in that chat were already scheduled to go on to Capitol Hill. | ||
So again, this is not... | ||
You can tell when an organization is just like... | ||
Legitimately dedicated to the truth, and it's just doing things to get stuff. | ||
But when the releases are timed to coincide with hearings, to make it a big news story, to cause embarrassment for the Trump administration, I mean, this was a political hatchet job at the end of the day. | ||
But they release a few screenshots. | ||
They even say in the article, we have more. | ||
There's more information that was shared, but we're not sharing it. | ||
And then you have the Trump administration come out and say there were no war plans, nothing classified or sensitive was ever discussed. | ||
You're almost guaranteeing that the Atlantic would come out with the next story showing all that information. | ||
I don't know if they thought like, well, the Atlantic will never release that information because it is classified and they could get in trouble for releasing it. | ||
I don't know what they're thinking. | ||
But I feel like they fell into a trap here. | ||
I feel like the Atlantic... | ||
Played this in a very sophisticated way, where they released select information, waits for the Trump campaign to say, well, there wasn't classified information or war plans shared, knowing that they've got the war plans and classified information in their back pocket, and they go, actually, it was. | ||
And now that you said that, I guess I have to write another article. | ||
This is all planned. | ||
This is all organized and orchestrated. | ||
But now that we know that Mike Waltz... | ||
Michael Waltz has admitted that he was the one that invited Jeffrey Goldberg to this chat. | ||
There needs to be more explanation to that. | ||
There needs to be greater transparency as to how exactly that happened. | ||
Because, like I told you yesterday, to add somebody to a signal chat, you have to go to the chat, you have to go to add, you have to go to the settings, you have to click add person, then it just gives you your contact list. | ||
You have to scroll through your contact list, find the person that you wanted to add. | ||
Then it sends out a notification confirming that the person was added. | ||
Then it takes you back to the chat you were just on, meaning that to get that wrong is very difficult. | ||
But that to happen by an accident is very difficult. | ||
Sending a text message to somebody you didn't mean to, very easy. | ||
You click the wrong button, you type a message, hit send. | ||
Oh, crap, that's not the right person. | ||
That's easy. | ||
That's one button, accidentally press it. | ||
It can be a mistake. | ||
What is the explanation for how this guy got added when there's four or five steps? | ||
What I can say is that you don't accidentally add somebody, like, as an action. | ||
But you could accidentally add the wrong person. | ||
You could be going through all those steps thinking you're adding Jeffrey Goldberg from the Pentagon, not checking your contact list closely enough, and accidentally adding a different Jeff Goldberg, because that to me would explain why nobody balked at the fact that there's a... | ||
Atlantic editor in the group chat, right? | ||
You can see the names of everybody involved. | ||
Jeffrey Goldberg is there. | ||
Well, that wouldn't cause any suspicion or, you know, raise any questions if there was supposed to be a Jeffrey Goldberg, right? | ||
Or even somebody with the initials JG because that's what it shows on Signal. | ||
So again, this is all speculation, but I'm just wondering how it's possible that it goes so wrong. | ||
The other possibility would be... | ||
Michael Waltz is in communication with the editor of The Atlantic, is trying to add him to a different group chat and accidentally adds him to the military planning group chat. | ||
But one of the things that is, in my opinion, not true about this is the idea that these communications were by their nature or technically Insecure to a greater degree than any other system would be. | ||
And again, we repeated this yesterday as well. | ||
Phones are not secure. | ||
Phones made by Apple. | ||
Phones made by Android. | ||
Electronics that connect to a network are not secure. | ||
Pretty much flat out. | ||
Point blank. | ||
They can spoof your sign-in. | ||
They can get into your phone. | ||
They can access it remotely. | ||
They have hardware on the chips itself allowing them backdoor access. | ||
While the phone is still off in some cases. | ||
So there is no totally secure phone communication. | ||
Encrypted chat is sort of what you got. | ||
But at the end of the day, unless this was a CIA hacking job, which I think to hack signal to the level that they did would require something like state-level resources to access. | ||
But assuming that wasn't the case, assuming this was... | ||
You know, an accident and not personal that this happened. | ||
Regardless, it wasn't a technical limitation. | ||
It wasn't that these weren't encrypted properly. | ||
It does not matter how secure your system is if somebody with access to that system gives it to a third party. | ||
Right? Because that's what happened here. | ||
So, email, hard copy paper, like... | ||
If you take a piece of paper from a briefcase and give it to a journalist, there's no communication security that can prevent that. | ||
So that's all that happened here. | ||
This was a human mistake. | ||
Human behavior caused this. | ||
So again, it does seem that there was at least more detailed information spread about this. | ||
Here's what else was published by The Atlantic today, these further text messages. | ||
Joe Kent was in this group. | ||
He said, John Ratcliffe, | ||
head of the CIA, responds, From CIA perspective, we are mobilizing assets to support now, but a delay would not negatively impact us, and additionally, it would be used to identify better starting points for coverage on Houthi leadership. | ||
Pete Hegseth addresses this to Vice President J.D. Vance, says, quote, I understand your concerns and fully support you raising with POTUS important considerations, most of which are tough to know how they play out, economy, Ukraine, peace, Gaza, etc. I think messaging is going to be tough no matter what, no matter who, nobody knows who the Houthis are, which is why we need to stay focused on, one, Biden failed, and two, Iran funded. | ||
Waiting a few weeks or a month does not fundamentally change the calculus. | ||
Two immediate risks on waiting. | ||
One, this leaks and we look indecisive. | ||
Two, Israel takes an action first or Gaza ceasefire falls apart and we don't get to start on this on our own terms. | ||
We can manage both. | ||
We are prepared to execute, and if I had final go or no-go vote, I believe we should. | ||
This is not about the Houthis. | ||
I see this as two things. | ||
One, restoring freedom of navigation, a core national interest, and two, reestablishing deterrence, which Biden cratered. | ||
So again, this is not necessarily messaging about the attack. | ||
I mean, it is obviously about the timing of the attack, but the concerns they're taking into consideration are not about the battlefield reality. | ||
It's about the awareness and consciousness of the American media. | ||
The American people and the media landscape. | ||
So that's what they're concerned about. | ||
That's what they're trying to take into account. | ||
Do we need an extra month to sort of soften the playing field? | ||
See the reasoning for why we're going to be doing this? | ||
Pete Hegseth is saying, well, if we don't do something, Israel might do it and then we'll look like we're not the ones in charge of this, which I hate to say it. | ||
You're not looking like the ones in charge of this. | ||
It continues, but we can easily pause if we do. | ||
We'll do all to reinforce 100% OPSEC. | ||
I welcome other thoughts. | ||
Mike Waltz responds, the trade figures we have are 15% globally and 30% of container. | ||
It's difficult to break that down to U.S. specific because much of the container either going through the Red Sea still or around the Cape of Good Hope are components going to Europe that turns into manufactured goods for transatlantic trade to the United States. | ||
Whether we pull the plug or not today, Michael Waltz continues, | ||
as we stated in the first PC, We have a fundamental decision of allowing sea lanes to remain closed or reopen them now or later. | ||
We are the only ones with the capability, unfortunately. | ||
From a messaging standpoint, we absolutely add this to horribles on why Europeans must invest in their defense. | ||
I've noticed what is absent from this discussion seems to be another possibility of ending, if that's their concern. | ||
They're concerned about shipping. | ||
So what they're saying is 13% of shipping goes through the Red Sea, 40% of Europe. | ||
I think the thing I heard yesterday was 3% of American shipping goes through the Red Sea, but a lot of the goods that go to Europe are manufacturing goods that then get manufactured and shipped to the U.S. So you could count that in the percentage of goods going to the U.S. that at one point a component of theirs traveled through the Red Sea. | ||
If that's the point of all of this, if the problem is that Shipping is in danger and the economy is under threat and that America is the only one with the capability to stop the attacks. | ||
I do have another option. | ||
I do have another option. | ||
And that is to look at what is motivating the Houthis to carry out these attacks. | ||
What's motivating the Houthis to carry out these attacks against Europe and America is the fact that it's European and American weapons that are being dropped on Gaza. | ||
facilitating Israel's ongoing genocide. | ||
So there is a possibility that if the inclination ever entered into the minds of the American administration to no longer supply the endless weapons necessary to carry out the genocide, the genocide would stop and the attacks would stop on the shipping. | ||
Russian and Chinese ships aren't being attacked because they're not collaborating with Israel. | ||
Our ships are because we are. | ||
So we could stop that. | ||
And again, not to even speculate about coordination or control of America's actions by Israel. | ||
The fact is that American decisions are made as if our support of Israel is a foregone conclusion that it doesn't even enter into their mind that this would be a possibility. | ||
Never even enters into discussion as far as we can tell that we would ever do anything in terms of no longer supporting Israel's relentless, ongoing, senseless, murderous, genocidal attacks against Gaza. | ||
So, like, we're missing the obvious solution here. | ||
All of this problem, all of the chaos, all of the hearings today and yesterday, all of the bad press that they're getting, the amateur nature that it now appears the Trump administration... | ||
It appears in. | ||
It's all because we refuse to even for a moment consider the possibility of not being the weapons supplier for the genocide. | ||
Michael Waltz continues. | ||
Team, you should have a statement of conclusions with tasking per the president guidance this morning in your high side inboxes. | ||
State and DOD, we developed suggested notification list for regional allies and partners. | ||
Joint staff is sending them. | ||
This AM, a more specific sequence of events in the coming days, and we will work with DOD to ensure COS, OVP, and POTUS are all briefed. | ||
JD Vance says, team, I'm out for the day going, and this is one that was released yesterday, right? | ||
43% of the U.S. trade runs through Suez, 40% of European trade does. | ||
There's a real risk that the public doesn't understand this or why it's necessary. | ||
Well, I understand why it's necessary from a European perspective. | ||
I don't understand why it's necessary that the war in Gaza keep going. | ||
That's what's behind all of this. | ||
That's what's causing all of this. | ||
J.D. Vance says he is sick of doing Europe's bidding. | ||
Is he sick of doing Israel's bidding? | ||
Is that not the real reason behind this? | ||
Yes, we're having to do this because Israel doesn't have the capabilities to deal with the weapons the Houthis have. | ||
But they're only being deployed because of Israel. | ||
So does that ever enter into the conversation? | ||
I wonder. | ||
Again, it feels like they a little bit fell into a trap with this. | ||
As Jeffrey Goldberg basically says, hey, they tried to downplay this and it was a lie. | ||
So now I had to relate this. | ||
They said at the Senate hearing yesterday, the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, and the director of the CIA, John Ratcliffe, were both asked about the signal chat. | ||
To which Jeffrey Goldberg, the editor-in-chief, was inadvertently invited by NSA Michael Waltz. | ||
There is no classified information that was shared in the Signal chat, Gabbard told members of the Senate Intelligence Committee. | ||
Ratcliffe said much of the same. | ||
My communications, to be clear, in the Signal message group were entirely permissible and lawful and did not include classified information. | ||
Donald Trump said something similar. | ||
These statements presented us with a dilemma. | ||
In the Atlantic's initial story about the Signal Chat, the Houthi PC small group as it was named by Waltz, we withheld specific information related to weapons and the timing of attacks we found in certain texts. | ||
As a general rule, we do not publish information about military operations if that information could possibly jeopardize the lives of U.S. personnel. | ||
That is why we chose to characterize the nature of the information being shared, not specific details about the attack. | ||
And like, you know, I don't think I need to tell you. | ||
They're not having a crisis of conscience, right? | ||
They're like, this presents us with a dilemma. | ||
As if they're like, oh dear. | ||
Oh dear, the Trump administration is lying. | ||
No, they're like, haha, yes, they fell into our trap. | ||
They're like, yes, we have all this information that looks an awful lot like war plans. | ||
We didn't release it. | ||
We got the Trump administration to deny that they sent that, but we've got it the whole time, and now we can release the second article claiming that, oh dear, we try never to harm American ambitions, but here we felt compelled. | ||
By virtue of our high standards and journalistic excellence to publish this material that, if it was up to us, would never have gotten out. | ||
It's like, shut up, you liars. | ||
You despicable, lying, cut out for the CIA. | ||
We know exactly what you're up to. | ||
And I guarantee you the stuff they still haven't published, I guarantee you they have stuff that they haven't published still, probably a lot. | ||
More damaging for the military-industrial complex than anything here. | ||
This was highly designed to implicate the Trump administration exclusively. | ||
Leave egg on their face. | ||
It was timed perfectly to come out the day before this already pre-scheduled hearing was going to happen, making it look like this hearing was a big scandal hearing for this exact event, when in reality, this exact article was published to make that appearance. | ||
Come across. | ||
So, you know, I think we can move on from this. | ||
It was a human error that any system is vulnerable to. | ||
There's nothing you can do about it. | ||
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
InfoWars.com/show. | ||
Here's where all eyes now are on gold and silver. | ||
Because gold went over $3,000 an ounce, it's at an all-time high. | ||
That's a very strong technical and psychological threshold number, that $3,000. | ||
So now that the world is looking at gold, the world is also going to be looking at silver. | ||
So even the massive growth that we've already seen... | ||
I'm guessing it's just the beginning. | ||
Gut level, where do you think gold is in a month? | ||
3,100 in a month, like in the next three to four weeks. | ||
And then I think it gets to 3,200 by the beginning of the summer. | ||
And we could literally see 4,000 as momentum starts to gather and as the eyes of the world get on it. | ||
And then silver, you know, probably 50 to 75. People need to call you, do a free consultation, leave your name and number, 720-605-300-KEPM.com forward slash gold. | ||
Do the form. | ||
They'll call you back. | ||
They'll do a free consultation. | ||
They can roll over your IRAs, 401ks. | ||
Do it now, folks. | ||
Dr. Kirk Elliott, thank you so much. | ||
My pleasure. | ||
unidentified
|
See ya. | |
It's good to be right, isn't it? |