Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 21, 2023 - Sebastian Gorka

02:29:31

Sebastian Gorka FULL SHOW: The best strategy for Trump's defense team

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	No No.
	No.
	No.
	I tried to follow your report.
	Mr. Donald Trump Jr.
	would have called it a nothing burger.
	You got no convictions.
	You got nothing.
	It was all set up to hurt the Mueller report, which was correct and was redacted, to hurt the Bidens and to help Trump.
	And you were a part of it.
	You have a good reputation.
	You had a good reputation.
	That's why the two Democrats supported you.
	But the longer you hold on to Mr. Barr and this Report that Mr. Barr gave you a special counsel, your reputation will be damaged.
	As everybody's reputation who gets involved with Donald Trump is damaged, he's damaged goods, there's no good dealing with him, because you will end up on the bottom of a pyre.
	I yield back the balance of my time.
	Sure.
	Can we presume the gentleman's undecided on how he feels about the former president?
	Gentlemen, witness can respond.
	Yeah, my concern about my reputation is with the people who I respect, and my family, and my Lord.
	And I'm perfectly comfortable with my reputation with them, sir.
	All said, God bless you.
	Stephen Cohen at the beginning, John Durham in the middle, and Jim Jordan at the end.
	Greetings, welcome, dear friends, to the Post-Durham testimony show of America First.
	That was earlier today on Capitol Hill.
	Yes, he has a voice!
	He speaks!
	Took him five years to come out in public and say something after he dropped his 300-odd page report.
	He was, of course, tacked there by Congressman Steve Cohen, he of the Kentucky Fried Chicken Box incident.
	An individual who said something Most people probably don't know what it is.
	You will find yourself at the bottom of a pyre.
	What is a pyre?
	Let's see if our team knows.
	Alex, what's a pyre?
	Isn't it where you burn something?
	Yeah, a very special kind of something.
	Eric?
	Isn't that where you burn people, as in at the stake?
	It's a funeral pyre, yeah.
	It's where you burn human people, human bodies.
	Like in India, the sati practice of burning the living widows of dead men.
	So what is Stephen Cohen saying?
	You, John Durham, will be found burning alive on a funeral pyre?
	Is that a threat against a federal official?
	It doesn't matter, he's a Democrat, like Hunter Biden, who can lie on the background form, the check, to purchase a handgun, and walk away with, what, not even community service?
	who can forget to pay $1.2 million worth of taxes in 2018 and what, get a fine?
	What would happen to you, dear listener, if you lied on a background check?
	If you failed to pay over a million dollars worth of taxes?
	And, more importantly, what was he earning that money for that he forgot to pay taxes on?
	What were the services he rendered?
	I'm so curious.
	What do the Bidens make their tens, their hundreds of millions of dollars on?
	What about the Durham testimony?
	He's good with his family and the people he respects and with God.
	Well, maybe he shouldn't be.
	John Durham had this to say about the people he spoke to in the FBI regarding the years-long quote-unquote investigation of quote-unquote Russian collusion by the Trump campaign and Trump administration.
	Cut 16.
	Well, let me give you some real life views on that.
	I have had any number of FBI agents who I've worked with over the years, some of whom are retired, some are still in place, who have come to me and apologized for the manner in which that investigation was undertaken.
	I take that seriously.
	These are good, hardworking, majority of people in the FBI, decent human beings who swear under their oaths to abide by the law and the like.
	I think that exemplifies the concern here.
	There were investigative activities undertaken or not undertaken here, which raised real concerns about whether or not the law was followed, the policies in place, the FBI were followed.
	Now that's kind of Washington weasel language, but let me translate it into English.
	FBI agents involved in covering up the Clinton email investigation, the crimes by Hillary, the destruction of thousands of subpoenaed emails, and the FBI agents who were involved for years in the Mueller probe, etc., in Operation Crossfire Hurricane, to surveil on and investigate President Trump, his campaign, and his administration.
	apologized because laws weren't followed. What's, Eric, can you help me out? What does it mean
	really when you, a law isn't followed? What actually happens if a law isn't followed?
	I think that's what we call a crime.
	Thank you!
	Yes, give that man the magic decoder ring for Washington Weasel speak.
	Not following a law isn't like, you know, not following a trail of Reese's Pieces, like in E.T.
	Not following a law is called committing a crime!
	Oh, so FBI agents were sorry, told you, oh sorry, Mr. Johnny Durham.
	We really didn't mean to create crimes, to commit crimes by covering up Hillary Clinton's felonies and making up illegal, illegal surveillance warrants against President Trump and his team.
	We're so sorry!
	Oopsie!
	Won't do it again!
	You're the special counsel.
	Oh, you didn't know that you have to actually charge those people?
	An FBI agent commits a crime, but he apologizes to you?
	Oh, well then you've done your job, haven't you?
	You can just take a federal paycheck for another four years.
	And then kill a few trees with your report.
	You're a coward, John Durham.
	Your job was to investigate and charge.
	not report apologies from those really decent chaps who didn't mean to commit crimes
	while wearing a badge and carrying a gun.
	Worse than any Democrat.
	You really are worse than any Democrat.
	Cohen can threaten you with, you know, ending up on a funeral pyre.
	But he's a stinking Democrat.
	He's a scumbag.
	But you're supposed to uphold the law.
	You work for the Department of Justice.
	You're a special counsel appointed by the Attorney General to uncover and prosecute crimes.
	And what did you do?
	You defended the FBI!
	You defended the DOJ!
	One low-level lawyer, who actually committed a felony by forging a CIA document, literally gets a slap on the wrist and a fine, and he's already back in the DC bar.
	You didn't even interview Comey, the architect!
	You didn't even subpoena McCabe or Stroke!
	You are part of the cover-up.
	You're worse than the criminals because you're helping them escape John Durham.
	I'm good with my lord.
	I'm good with the people I respect and my family.
	You are a coward.
	And by dint of the cover-up of those who committed crimes, you too are a criminal, John Durham.
	I'm good with my lord.
	Yeah, I'm not so sure he's good with you.
	I'm Sebastian Gawker.
	Why do I always have to take deep sighs after some of these monologues?
	I think you know why.
	Make sure you never miss any of our deep dives.
	We have an incredible third hour today with Joe DeGeneve, Victoria Tunsing.
	Subscribe on your favorite podcast platform to America First.
	Just plug in my name, leave us a five-star review and share the links with your friends.
	And if you agree the FBI has become a Gestapo, get the t-shirt today.
	Jointly released with Chris Platt, we have the FBI Fascist Bureau of Intimidation t-shirt.
	We have the FBI Biden's Gestapo mug and t-shirt.
	go to SebGorgestal.com www.SebGorgestal.com
	www.SebGorgestal.com www.SebGorgestal.com
	www.SebGorgestal.com Alright, you saw the text from David, right Jeff?
	Yeah. Okay.
	American first.
	Blake Cutty.
	Cut eight.
	I think that love him or hate him, and I'm gonna go bring this back to Trump.
	He was a kind of outside all of this in a way, and I think that's why he was such a lethal risk.
	He wasn't an elite.
	He had no relatives in power.
	He was the anti-hunter.
	So he didn't have friends in high places.
	He didn't have any relatives that were in politics, and he was already rich.
	So no wonder he was a target for destruction.
	He was a threat.
	Coming in with six.
	one minute.
	I'm going to go to bed.
	He forgets to pay $1.2 million worth of tax in 2018 and then five years later he gets a slap on the wrist.
	Anybody watching this show, anybody watching this show has lied on a federal...
	...state.
	♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
	♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
	♪♪♪ ...
	you The big takeaway I had from that document was the Foreign National uses the term, the big guy.
	And this is the second time we've heard that term used.
	And I have a, just a fundamental question.
	If Joe Biden's not the big guy, who is?
	Yeah, that is the question.
	Multiple people have said the big guy gets a cut of the millions.
	Um, who's the big guy?
	And if you're emailing Hunter Biden, and you're using the phrase with him, Don't forget, 10% for the big guy.
	I think you know who it is.
	If you, dear friend, have a phone, a cell phone, would you consider funding those who hate America every time you make a call and send a text?
	Crazy, right?
	But guess what?
	If your phone is linked, if you're subscribed to one of the big cell phone companies, that's exactly what you're doing.
	The big companies have funded Planned Parenthood to the tune of millions of dollars, gun control organizations, organizations that like to censor conservatives.
	Why would you fund them?
	That's crazy.
	There's only one conservative Christian cell phone company in America.
	It's the one I use.
	It's called Patriot Mobile.
	They have the same nationwide 4G and 5G networks.
	They have a performance guarantee, discounts for veterans and first responders, and free activation with my name.
	Keep your old number, switch today, and join the good guys.
	It's very simple.
	Yeah, imagine talking to an American in America.
	Wacky, right?
	No, it's true.
	878-PATRIOT.
	Yeah, imagine talking to an American in America.
	Wacky, right?
	No, it's true.
	878-PATRIOT.
	That's 878-728-7468.
	Or just go to patriotmobile.com slash G-O-R-K-A.
	He's done it again.
	He's released a new episode.
	Fox may have told him to cease and desist, but you can't keep a good man down.
	What is it, Eric?
	This is all like episode 6 or 5?
	It's like... It's either 5 or 6.
	I'm not sure which.
	Yeah, he's been a busy bee.
	Here's a little clip from Tucker on the DOJ and somebody called Biden.
	Bank records show the Biden family, their business associates, and their companies, their many companies, received over $10 million from foreign nationals and their related companies, the committee wrote.
	Investigators had, quote, identified payments to Biden family members from foreign companies while Joe Biden served as vice president and after he left public office.
	So actually there was something there.
	It was a scandal.
	Racketeering, money laundering, wire fraud.
	Those are some of the crimes that Biden seemed to have committed.
	In addition, of course, to selling out the United States for cash.
	So what would happen to them?
	Well, Donald Trump had an idea.
	Trump wrote that about two weeks ago.
	And it turned out those were prescient words.
	This morning, Hunter Biden pleaded guilty to pretty much nothing.
	Biden pled to two misdemeanor tax evasion charges, then entered a diversion on a federal gun charge.
	That's it.
	As far as Merrick Garland's Justice Department is concerned, Hunter Biden is done.
	There was no pre-dawn raid carried live simultaneously on CNN.
	There was no perp walk, no handcuffs, no press conference.
	Above all, there was no felony.
	Hunter Biden, who broke federal gun laws, can still carry a gun.
	It's like it all never happened.
	In fact, the Justice Department just baptized Hunter Biden.
	A lifetime of sins washed away in an instant.
	Yeah, it's incredible.
	President Trump predicted it.
	Oh, they'll just slap him on the wrist and it'll make raiding my home and arresting me and charging me with crimes that could lead to 400 years in prison look reasonable.
	He predicted it.
	You got it right, as usual.
	Let's go to your calls, 833-33-GORKA.
	Number one, Phil in Philly.
	I was in your neck of the woods last night.
	That's why I wasn't hosting the show.
	I heard it was fantastic.
	I was listening to Chris this morning.
	Why didn't you come to the Cigar Bar to the Cigar Republic, Phil?
	I had some previous tie-ups with my grandkids.
	I just want to point out that under everybody else's nose, Mexico slow-walked from the 1846 Mexican-U.S.
	All right, Phil, next time.
	Yes, sir.
	I just want to point out that, you know, under everybody else's nose, I mean, Mexico slow-walked
	from the 1846 Mexican-U.S. war to win the war.
	I mean, with their allies, China, they collaborated with our government officials, they eviscerated
	our border, reoccupied Texas, reintroduced sicknesses into our country that we killed
	years ago, and most of all, they killed millions of Americans with viruses and fentanyl.
	I mean, they basically won that war, if you look at it that way, from a 30,000-foot view.
	Yeah, and the president of Mexico is saying, oh, no, your kid died of overdoses.
	Well, that's because you're bad parents.
	That's how much of a nice neighbor Mexico is, Phil.
	Oh, my God.
	It's too much out here.
	These kids are dying every day.
	Every day on Kensington Avenue.
	Every day.
	It's a show.
	I love you in Philly, though, doctor.
	Sorry?
	We love you in Philadelphia.
	Well, dude, we gotta find a place you can come to next time, and gotta get a little babysitter for your grandkids, because I gotta meet Phil from Philly!
	I haven't even mentioned it today.
	Jim Hansen did an amazing job filling in for me.
	I spent yesterday in Philly with Chris Stegall.
	We're gonna get him on the show later to talk about the amazing event we had.
	We were packed in the Cigar Republic, and maybe a few cigars were smoked.
	Let's go to Brooklyn, Judy, line two.
	Hi, Dr. G, you have to be quiet.
	I'm in the doctor's office.
	I'm fine.
	I'm at the chiropractor.
	Is it a good chiropractor?
	Because a good chiropractor is like worth gold.
	No, he's great.
	He's great.
	He keeps me straight.
	I'm kidding.
	I'm kidding.
	No, listen, listen.
	That monologue was phenomenal.
	I want you to know.
	No one does a monologue like you do and it was just fantastic because you are just so straight to the target.
	Straight.
	It took me hours to write and rehearse.
	How long, Jeff, did I work on that monologue?
	What was that today?
	A few minutes.
	A few seconds.
	Oh my God.
	Thank you.
	Oh my God.
	I want to tell you something.
	They should make an example of Hunter because with the gun thing, they're so against guns and all.
	He should have the penalty of staying in jail for 10 years just for that.
	Never mind me.
	Well, hang on.
	You know, there's a rapper who did the same thing and he got 46 months, Judy, for lying on a background check.
	46 months in jail.
	Yeah, well the Dems, they're so busy against guns against guns and there you are and whatever and why, he should be put in jail.
	Hello?
	Practice what you preach, guys, Democrats.
	Maybe it's a function of white privilege.
	I mean, the rapper's black and Hunter's white.
	Maybe he's just got too much white privilege and, you know, smoking that white parmesan cheese.
	It could be that, Judy.
	You know what?
	I can't, like the way you say, I can't figure any of them out.
	They're just insane.
	They're evil.
	They're evil.
	They're just evil.
	And you know what?
	God bless you.
	God bless you.
	You just keep it up.
	You're fantastic.
	One of the best shows ever, ever.
	You're the best radio host.
	God bless.
	God bless.
	Thank you, Judy.
	All right, let's continue the cuts.
	James Comer.
	This is shocking news.
	This wasn't mentioned in his first presser.
	It's just another example of amateurism.
	You know the letter the FBI let them read about the $10 million for Hunter and Joe Biden?
	What's the truth about that letter?
	Cut 17.
	I would say over 50% of the documents were redacted, so there really wasn't anything to talk about.
	It was over 50% redacted.
	All I know is it mentioned Hunter Biden, Burisma, and there was some type of investigation with respect to fraud taking place, but there was so much redacted, you really couldn't tell anything from the 1023s.
	So you're the chairman of the oversight committee and the organization you're supposed to be overseeing blacks out half of the letter.
	What do you do about it?
	Hold a press conference?
	We're so impressed.
	Follow us on all social media so you never miss any of what we have to share with you.
	Follow us on Truth Social, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Parler, Getter, Telegram.
	You can watch us on your television through your Roku, Fire Stick or Salem News Channel app.
	And my Substack!
	It's weird, it's my name.
	SebastianGorka.substack.com.
	But back in a moment...
	What's so weird?
	What is he doing?
	I mean, standing on a camera doing this?
	Scratching his neck like he just got a talking to in the back room or something.
	Weird.
	That was weird.
	What was his reputation before this?
	Because I'd never heard of him.
	I hadn't heard of him either, Geoff.
	Geoff says nothing either.
	Goodness.
	So what?
	Is he just like, comes from nowhere to be a chairman?
	He was next in line, yeah.
	I guess that's kind of how it works.
	or read the book any let's just put their life so back in charge of a man
	Yeah, how come he's, like, not very visible?
	I don't know, I mean, maybe it was because he left and came back again, I don't know.
	Yeah, I wonder how that affects your seniority.
	Yeah.
	Three minutes, and... Mic's on, we've got him.
	Greg!
	Seb, how are ya?
	Good, thank you for squeezing us in today.
	No problem, happy to do it.
	Eric, make sure we've got Trial of the Century, the image.
	Yep, I've got it.
	And then I'm going to send you Greg's newest article, if you can just quickly make a buffer for it to put on the screen.
	I had to remind myself it's just Trial of the Century, not The Trial of the Century.
	All right, I sent it to you.
	What the heck?
	This John Durham guy, he criticizes the FBI for not interviewing enough people concerning the Russia dossier.
	And then he doesn't interview Comey, Stroker, McCabe.
	Yeah, it's a joke.
	It's disappointing all around.
	I mean, I do still, you know, focus on The overall import of his 300-page report, which is that the FBI never had enough credible evidence to investigate, and they knew that the evidence that Hillary Clinton had given them was bogus.
	I don't think he acquitted himself all that well today, but he is what he is.
	Yeah, just another establishment guy.
	Yeah, I think so.
	And to take four years?
	Yeah, that was way too long.
	And you know, his only choice in bringing the cases he did was to bring it in Washington, Virginia.
	Well, in a politically charged case, you can never get a fair trial.
	Right, right.
	Got it.
	Great, yeah.
	Hunter Bayer Case Uncovers New York.
	Okay, perfect.
	Perfect, okay.
	Alright, we'll mention the book, we'll mention the article, and I'm gonna ask you for your take on what we've seen so far from Mr. Durham.
	Okay.
	Alright.
	You'll probably mention the book first.
	Um, yes, I'll mention the book first.
	Alrighty.
	Forty-five.
	Wanna come in with something?
	Uh, let me have a look.
	Is there anything super short?
	We've played the two Durham cuts already.
	Yeah, those were long.
	Maybe the Gutfeld one?
	No, I'll use that later.
	30 seconds.
	Mm hmm.
	Mm hmm.
	And this is the second time we've heard that term used.
	And I have a just a fundamental question.
	If Joe Biden's not the big guy, who is?
	James Jordan, Chair of the Judiciary Committee.
	Who is the big guy?
	Very good question.
	America wants to know.
	If you enjoy our show here, please support those who make it possible.
	Great patriots, friends of President Trump like Mike Lindell.
	He's under the gun.
	The FBI even harassed him because he's a friend of the President's.
	Walmart have gone woke and have banned his products.
	Go straight to the source.
	He's just launched the 2.0 MyPillow.
	And right now if you use my name you'll get up to 66% off his more than 150 other products at his webpage mypillow.com or call 800-829-8468.
	Don't go to Amazon.
	Don't buy garbage from China.
	Call in today 800-829-8468 mypillow.com promo code G-O-R-K-A.
	You know how cool it is to have friends who are just at the top of their game Text you a really cool thing they just wrote.
	And then I say, hey, can you come on this show to talk about it?
	And he says, well, I'll be getting off a plane and maybe and whatever.
	And he said, yeah, yeah, I could do it.
	Well, that's Greg Jarrett.
	He is the legal political analyst par excellence for Fox.
	He's the author of the new book.
	You've got to get it right now.
	Trial of the Century.
	And he's just written a piece for Fox News.
	Let's put it up on the screen.
	The article, Hunter Biden Case Uncovers New Unequal Justice in America.
	Greg, thank you for joining us today.
	Hey, I'm happy to.
	Thanks for having me on, as always, Seb.
	All right, before we get to your new article on the snap on the wrist for the President's son, I know you're following what's happening on Capitol Hill today.
	Are you displeased?
	Are you satisfied?
	What's your take on what we've heard so far from this individual who's rather quiet, usually, Special Counsel John Durham?
	Yeah, you know, it is totally against everything in his career For him to be in front of television cameras in front of a committee.
	I mean, this guy is a very serious, sober, and I think totally fair prosecutor.
	He spent a career going after bad guys and exposing corruption, which is what he did in his Durham report, in which it is a withering condemnation.
	Of the misfeasance, malfeasance, and corruption at the FBI under James Comey.
	And, you know, I invite people to read the report, but of course, you know, when you get people in a committee like Adam Schiff, the biggest hoaxer of all time, and a prolific, prodigious liar, you know, questioning Durham, of course there are going to be fireworks, but I think that Durham acquitted himself Pretty nicely and made Schiff look like the fool that he is.
	But the fact that after four years he never even interviewed Comey or Stroke or McCabe, it's not really a special counsel's report.
	It's a cover-up, isn't it?
	Well, I cut him a break because Comey would never have agreed to an interview and then you would have had, you know, a court battle over that.
	And besides, you know, Comey's the guy who, you know, under oath in front of Congress said, I don't recall, what, 234 times?
	234 times, yeah.
	Yeah, I mean, the man suffers from chronic amnesia only at his convenience.
	You know, James Comey did more to ruin the good name and reputation of the FBI than anybody in its storied history.
	and you know he's a big glorious arrogant and bug ish figure
	uh... who will never take responsibility for you know what he did
	along with his cronies uh... you know andrew mccabe peter struck lisa page jim
	baker the whole gang of misfits and miscreants at the fbi
	thankfully they're all gone The book is The Trial of the Century.
	Get it right now from our friend Greg Jarrett, TheGregJarrett.com.
	We've only got a minute left with you, Greg.
	Give us the elevator pitch for your latest piece on the Hunter Biden slap on the wrist.
	Should Americans be disgusted?
	Yeah, they should be.
	Equal justice under law is dead.
	You know, the preferential treatment for the President's son makes a mockery of the law.
	The evidence against him was clear and convincing.
	He evaded taxes on millions of dollars.
	People get prosecuted for felonies and thrown behind bars.
	You know, and I could name a dozen such people, including a dear friend of mine, who, you know, did exactly the same thing.
	Didn't pay taxes for two years.
	should have, ended up in prison for several years, got out, his health was ruined, and
	he promptly died.
	But no, Hunter Biden gets preferential treatment because Joe Biden and Merrick Garland are
	running a protection racket, and their larger crimes are being ignored by the DOJ.
	This is the real issue, the larger crimes.
	It's not the gun form or the not paying taxes.
	It's everything else.
	It's the pay for play.
	I wonder what Wesley Snipes thinks of this man walking after evading tax payments.
	Follow this man at Greg Jarrett on Twitter.
	TheGregJarrett.com.
	Thank you for squeezing us in today.
	We are broadcasting to you from the ReliefFactor.com studios.
	Relief Factor.
	Pain relief that works.
	Pain relief that's real.
	Pain relief that's liberating.
	Half a million Americans across the nation right now.
	Find out for yourself by ordering the three-week quick starter pack for just $19.95.
	It'll be at your door in three days or less.
	Take it morning and evening like I do.
	And I promise you, Dr. G's guarantee, by the end of those three weeks, you will know whether it works for you like it works for me and 500,000 of your fellow Americans.
	You deserve to know.
	Ask yourself a very simple question.
	What have you got to lose?
	If it's nothing, if it's only the pain, you know what to do.
	800-583-84 reliefactor.com Music
	End Alright, you gotta come in with cut 14.
	Alright.
	He's not gonna be ready until, like, right before the segment.
	Okay, that's fine.
	Too good.
	Too good.
	Oh, play me, um, 11 and 12.
	Oh, hang on, hang on.
	Stop, stop, stop, stop, stop.
	Gimme line 2.
	Mic's on.
	Mhm.
	Hi, who's this?
	Hi, my name is Bogdan.
	Hi, Bogdan.
	What's your comment?
	What's your question?
	I just want to talk about I was born in the Ukraine.
	I came here, my family moved here when we were when I was very, very young, but I've been back a number of times.
	And the corruption my father tells me about and some of the things I've seen there, I have no difficulty believing that they were paying off Biden and doing the things that they did.
	Thanks.
	We know Ukraine's corrupt.
	Is that it?
	No, I'm trying to think what else I could bust your balls about.
	Well, you can't because you're a cretin who we know immediately who you are, so you're a little cuck boy.
	Run home to mama now.
	All right, cut 11.
	I mean, the Republicans have made lots of major allegations against Biden, against President Biden.
	You know, they call it the Biden crime family.
	They claim they've traded off their name, that they've gotten money from foreign entities illegally.
	None of that's been proven.
	There's no evidence of that.
	And 12.
	So, with Beijing, the balloon incident is over.
	Water under the bridge?
	We did what we needed to do to protect our interests.
	We said what we needed to say and made clear what we needed to make clear in terms of this not happening again.
	And so, as long as it doesn't, that chapter should be closed.
	He really is.
	I'm not surprised he did music out of his garage back in the day.
	30 seconds.
	Patriot Supply coming in 14 here.
	Nels.
	Sheriff Congressman Nels.
	20 seconds.
	♪♪♪ ♪♪♪
	You want to irritate the suburban mom at home five months before an election?
	Tell them the Republican leading candidate is peeing on prostitutes.
	We are aware of the member of this committee having an alleged affair with a Chinese spy, I refer to as YumYum, but this is a new law for anyone and I would hope Mr. Swalwell would agree with me.
	Imagine if somebody would have said and taken it a step further, Mr. Swalwell was peeing on YumYum.
	It's amazing.
	Troy Nails is just, he's worth every second.
	And not only that, did you see, if you're watching, you've got to look closely at him.
	I thought he only does that when he comes on the show with me.
	That he has these, not only is he smoking a cigar in his congressional office, he's also got a couple of cigars stuffed in his top pocket of his suit jacket.
	He's even doing that in that testimony, in that hearing in Congress.
	He's sitting there with the cigars in his pocket, ready to pull one out and light it up.
	And talking about Yum yum!
	Fang Fang in Swalwell.
	And Jeff, he was in the... Swalwell was in the chamber there, wasn't he?
	Yes, he was all the way on the end.
	Was he the guy shouting in the background?
	Probably.
	Too much fun, too much fun.
	Alright, let's go to your calls.
	Alicia, line 4, San Antonio.
	Hello, Dr. Gorka.
	Hey.
	I'd like to give you some good news and have an invite for anybody in the San Antonio area.
	We're going to reject pride again, but here in San Antonio, we're having a Sacred Heart March for Marriage and Life, and we're rejecting pride.
	We'll be marching from the Cathedral starting at 1 p.m.
	all the way to the Alamo at 3 p.m., and we'll be guided by the San Antonio Police Department.
	We'd also like to let everybody know that we're going to have a wonderful guest speaker.
	Her name is, if you might remember her, she was testified before Congress recently about her two sons that died from fentanyl.
	She was castigated.
	That's Rebecca Kisling, and she's going to be there.
	She's a pro-life warrior.
	She herself was actually, she actually survived two attempted abortions by her own mother.
	Wow.
	So where does this begin?
	Where can people join you and at what time?
	Okay, it's from 1 to 3.
	There will be speakers starting at about, at San Fernando Cathedral.
	That's in the heart of downtown San Antonio.
	And which day?
	That'll be this Saturday the 24th.
	Fabulous.
	Thank you.
	We love hearing from people who actually decide to get engaged.
	It's the only way we're going to take back our nation.
	Let's go to Tom in Cleveland, line one.
	Dr. G. Yeah.
	I love your show.
	Thank you.
	What's your question?
	What's your comment?
	My comment is, when are we going to hear from the legendary, historic figure who speaks for the White House, who I have named Chia Jean-Pierre.
	Chia?
	Why Chia?
	Chia Pet.
	Oh my gosh, that's good.
	That's good.
	What would you like to hear from the woman who calls herself a historic figure?
	Well, I think she should have some kind of brilliant statement about what occurred in the last couple days, you know, because we just... Today was the hearing of the century, wasn't it?
	Well, I'm not sure about that.
	If you want to label a coward demonstrating his cowardice, yeah, but... It was sarcasm, Doc.
	Oh, I know.
	I know it was.
	I went to a British school, OK?
	We have sarcasm running in our veins.
	But I'm not going to hold my breath from a woman who actually... I don't think I've ever seen anybody... I don't think even George Patton said, I am a historic figure.
	But yeah, Karine Jean-Pierre, those are the kinds of people working in this White House.
	Thank you, Tom.
	Let's go to Klaus in California.
	Hey, Dr. G. Sorry about if you hear any wind in my microphone.
	I'm near the coast.
	But hey, I just want to give a shout out and praise to all the protesters at Miami when Trump unjustly had to go in to the courtroom.
	Give a shout out to the parents of Glendale School District fighting against children indoctrination.
	I wanted to get a status update on that idea I proposed about a month ago about a large weekend town hall of the greatest conservative minds, young and old, of our country.
	No, no update but I still think it's a great idea and I know that next year we have our battleground tour so Salem puts all of us national hosts on the road and I think that will be the right time to think of something of that ilk where it's not just, you know, the established names, the national broadcasters that cover the day for you on Salem across the nation but those Younger individuals as well who are on the cutting edge like Charlie Kirk.
	So the idea is still a superb idea and we are going to... I don't know.
	Let me keep working with the higher-ups to see if we can build that into our town hall event next year for the election.
	But in the meantime, please listen to what that lady just told us a few moments ago.
	She's getting engaged.
	She's pushing back in a month of pride in perversity, and that's what it is.
	It's pride in perversity.
	Those who understand the root of this, the evil heart of the transgender movement, they're taking action.
	They're organizing prayerful vigils.
	It's important to get engaged.
	If you can be part of that, you can do it anywhere.
	Even if you just organize to go to a school board meeting.
	You don't even have to run for school board.
	If you support somebody else and if you show up in numbers, That's what the left has done.
	Remember, the radicals, the vocal extremists, are in the minority.
	They just make a lot of noise to make it look as if they are in the majority, and they're not.
	If we stand up to them, if we show them that the courageous amongst us are not alone, well, that's how things Tip the balance.
	That's how the correlation of forces changes.
	And those who keep their head down, think that it's somebody else's job to get engaged, understand that it is all of our responsibility.
	If not you, then who?
	If not now, then when?
	Who's going to do it if not you?
	Are you going to wait for your children or your grandchildren to have to fight for their freedom?
	Or are you going to be part of the solution now?
	I'm Sebastian Gawker, this is America First.
	Next up, John Solomon of JustTheNews.com.
	He'll be giving us his take on what we witnessed this morning on Capitol Hill with Special Counsel John Durham.
	In the meantime, we are coming to you live from the ReliefFactor.com studios.
	Relief Factor, pain relief that works, pain relief that's real, pain relief that is liberating half a million Americans across the country.
	Right now, me included.
	Yes, I had a lower back pain issue that plagued me for nine years, almost a decade.
	Then I took Relief Factor, and two weeks later, I was pain-free, and I'm still pain-free more than four and a half years later.
	But it's not just me.
	It's people like Debran from Massachusetts.
	This is Debran's story.
	I just started taking Relief Factor four days ago.
	My hip pain is gone.
	I had a horrible time sleeping because of the pain.
	I absolutely love how I am feeling.
	Thank you, Relief Factor.
	Whether it's your hip, your back, your knee, whatever it is, order the 3-year quick starter pack right now for just $19.95 at relieffactor.com.
	It'll be at your door in three days or less.
	Take it morning and evening like I do and I promise you, Dr. G's guarantee.
	By the end of those three weeks, you will know whether it works for you, like it works for me, Debrin, and 500,000 of your fellow Americans.
	Call today.
	What do you have to lose?
	Apart from the pain, nothing.
	800-500-8384.
	ReliefFactor.com.
	That's 800-500-8384.
	800-583-84 reliefactor.com.
	That's 800-583-84 reliefactor.com.
	So far from the testimony.
	Ways and Means will declassify or release the IRS whistleblower, it is going to blow up the Hunter Biden deal in a very big way.
	So if we can mention that.
	Former DOJ attorney texted me this morning.
	He always follows my hits and then he texts me afterwards.
	The amount contained in the two misdemeanor tax counts is just what he admitted to.
	My old shop, meaning his colleagues at DOJ, were looking at eight years of unreported income.
	Yes.
	It's not only true.
	But is that connected to tomorrow?
	Yes.
	When the IRS whistleblower talks, he's going to reveal that the statute of limitations on a large number of crimes that were allegedly committed on tax evasion going back to 2013 was allowed to expire.
	And then the FBI kept the IRS in the dark on two crucial pieces of evidence.
	So I can set that at the table for you.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	All right, stand by.
	It's in the story I have up right now.
	I'll text you the story, too.
	OK, great.
	Got a ton on mind for the Jared segment.
	Um...
	I'm going to be doing a lot of commentary on the Jared segment.
	So, I'm going to be doing a lot of commentary on the Jared segment.
	you you
	A man.
	A legend.
	A legal immigrant.
	Dr. Sebastian Gorka.
	Stop talking about a two-tiered justice system, as a very wise person said on this show.
	If you have tiers at all, if you have more than one tier in a justice system, you don't have a justice system.
	If you understand what's going on, you should be wearing this.
	It has been proven in just the last few days.
	The FBI is the fascist Bureau of Intimidation.
	The t-shirt jointly launched with Chris Plant.
	And then don't forget the flag you should be flying this Pride Month with the Stars and Stripes is the I Stand With 45.
	We only have a couple of minutes with him, but he's such a great supporter of the show.
	You should be watching him.
	It's just the news, not noise, and justthenews.com.
	John Solomon, welcome back to America First.
	Your reaction to what we've seen so far on Capitol Hill today?
	Yeah, listen, John Durham put it out there very clearly.
	There is a dual system of justice.
	The FBI refused to acknowledge or look at the possibility that Hillary Clinton had set up Donald Trump with a fake Russian narrative and they proceeded to investigate Donald Trump and try to prosecute him without any evidence of wrongdoing and with the full knowledge that the U.S.
	Intelligence Committee believed that Hillary Clinton had invented the allegation to get rid of her email problems.
	There isn't any more clear declaration that a dual system of justice.
	He said it flatly.
	The two campaigns were treated differently.
	You said in the break that something big could happen tomorrow.
	Which committee is it concerning and can you tell us what to expect?
	Not the one we normally watch for when it comes to scandals, but it will be tomorrow.
	The House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith of Missouri has scheduled an 8 a.m.
	vote tomorrow.
	At that vote, they will vote out the whistleblower testimony and accompanying documents that have been provided by an IRS whistleblower named Gary Shapley.
	Gary Shapley ran the IRS team that investigated Hunter Biden.
	They were looking at tax violations going all the way back to 2013-2014.
	And his testimony is going to make three bombshell revelations.
	The first is the Justice Department let the statute of limitations on the most serious and largest tax evasion allegations Expire without the IRS knowing.
	Secondly, that the FBI kept from the IRS the knowledge that it had emails showing that Hunter Biden admitted in emails and was discussing in emails that he hadn't paid $400,000 of income taxes on, $400,000 of income he got from Burisma.
	Yep, the Ukraine company, the one that we were told there was no scandal about.
	And then third, that the FBI also didn't tell the IRS that they had a confidential human source saying that this money from Brisma may have been connected to a bribe to Joe Biden.
	The IRS had both hands tied behind its back so that it couldn't get the full force of the law against Hunter Biden.
	That's what the testimony That they're going to vote out tomorrow is expected to show.
	And can we find more on that at justinews.com?
	I do.
	There's a story right now at the top of the site.
	Hunter Biden escapes serious legal jeopardy, but his father's political peril just got worse.
	All right.
	That's up right now.
	Go right now.
	Bookmark it.
	Justinews.com.
	Follow him at Jay Solomon Reports and check out his book as well.
	If you go to wherever you get your books, Fallout, Nuclear Bribes, Russian Spies, and The Washington Allies that Enriched the Clinton and Biden Dynasties.
	God bless you, John.
	We will have you on for longer next time.
	It's a crazy day.
	Sebastian Gorka, America first wherever you are whatever you're doing don't touch that dial.
	Subscribe to our channel for more of the romance and drama from Becca's season of The Bachelorette!
	Welcome to the second hour of America First with me, Sebastian Gorka, your one-stop shop for all of the biggest topics of the news cycle today, without the bias of the mainstream media or the censorship of big tech, whether it's the culture war or educational indoctrination, the immigration crisis or gun control, or the threats to the Second Amendment.
	We have the true experts and the best guests on every subject.
	Members of Congress, truth-tellers extraordinaire, warriors for the truth.
	Stay tuned for the second hour of America First with me, your host, Sebastian Gorka, on the Salem News Channel.
	The Doctor is in America first with Dr. Sebastian Gorka on Salem News Channel, the antidote to the mainstream media.
	taste in movies.
	I'm pretty sure, Seb, it's Ferris Bueller.
	He's a pretty good producer.
	Pretty good producer.
	But he has no taste in movies.
	Can we maybe compromise?
	What about TV shows?
	Are there TV shows you guys might like together?
	Probably.
	Probably.
	Did you like, uh, Narcos, Geoff?
	I did, but... No, it was good.
	They should've just done the whole thing in English.
	They had to go back and forth.
	Then it would have been great, but I enjoyed that show.
	I made it through the whole thing.
	I've watched all of them.
	It is pretty, yeah.
	It's pretty tough when half of it's... What do I do, Jennifer?
	I love movies, and this is my producer.
	What do I do with him, Jennifer?
	What about this?
	I don't know.
	You guys are like yin and yang, and I feel like half my shoulder's missing, so I'm calling to see what I'm missing.
	We were talking about this yesterday.
	Would you have gone on that Titanic thing, sightseeing thing?
	Me?
	Yeah.
	Abso-frickin-lutely not!
	What kind of idiot would go in a little vitamin capsule to go down to see the Titanic?
	I can see it on a movie screen.
	That's what I said.
	I don't even know what you're looking at.
	It's basically a junkyard at the bottom of the ocean.
	I wouldn't use it.
	I wouldn't walk across the street to go look at the Titanic.
	No!
	Jeff's exact words.
	Has anybody ever called you a romantic?
	And clearly you like the movie Titanic, right?
	Never saw it.
	Too long.
	Three hours for a movie that I know how it's gonna end.
	Not gonna watch.
	Jeff's exact words when we first brought this up with Jim Hansen yesterday.
	It's like, why would I go see the Titanic?
	It's just some boat.
	It's some boat.
	Just some boat.
	That's what I wanted to find out.
	Rough stuff.
	I know.
	America First Magnificent How will we continue?
	Thank you.
	Geraldo Rivera has left the five.
	Can we go on?
	Is there meaning left to the universe?
	Let's ask somebody who may have an answer.
	My West Coast warrior princess, the hardest working lady in radio, Jennifer Horne!
	How can we go on?
	I just don't think that I can today.
	I'm sorry.
	Bye-bye, Jerry Rivers.
	Bye-bye, Jerry.
	Bye-bye.
	Is anybody going to be worried about Geraldo Rivera?
	Maybe we need to open up a tomb and see if we can find somebody.
	How is this?
	I have it in my pile here.
	It's actually an article by the Daily Call.
	Why is this news?
	I don't know.
	And it's only the five.
	He's not even leaving Fox.
	And then did you see why he's leaving the five?
	No, no, no, no, no.
	Tell me.
	He said it's because it's really hard to be outnumbered all the time.
	You know, Geraldo, come to California and hang out with me for a little bit.
	It is it's not easy to be outnumbered, but you start to feel a sort of like, you know, vindication when you are.
	Just fight for it, pal.
	And when, by the way, did Geraldo go from like Trump supporter to like wild man now?
	Have you noticed that?
	Well, I just, whenever I think of him, I can't but think of him bare-chested at age 74 in front of the mirror.
	It's like, makes me want to puke.
	I actually, I'm sorry that you said that, because I had actually purchased a print for you for your birthday.
	It's coming up.
	And, you know, I know you like James Bond, but I saw that Geraldo picture and I was like, you know, this would look great over some fireplace.
	You think it should be the next Bond, right?
	I absolutely do.
	Forget, you know, Daniel Craig.
	Forget all of this nonsense.
	Bring on Geraldo Rivera and that mustache.
	Come on.
	All right, Jennifer Horne.
	Follow this lady right now at Jennifer Horne.
	More importantly, as we were discussing in the break, what do I do?
	As a guy who loves movies, who reviews them every week on my show, and I have a producer who has the worst taste in movies and likes nothing I like.
	What do I do?
	How do I go on?
	Forget about Rivera.
	How do I go on?
	Yeah, you've got a bad situation.
	You know, I've known Jeff enough now to know that he doesn't like much of anything.
	I know it's a very limited, like there's a very small field of things that make him happy.
	I've learned this in like, you know, over the years.
	It's two things.
	It's two things.
	It's golf and cigars.
	It's golf and cigars and maybe some politics.
	A little light tweeting every once in a while, I think.
	But I've learned that he doesn't like movies or TV shows that were before him.
	So we can't have anything PG.
	They can't be made before he was born.
	What kind of a rule is that?
	It's a bizarre rule, that's for sure.
	Because you're missing out on some good stuff.
	Yeah.
	I know he doesn't like science fiction.
	I know he's not really, you're not into the mob stuff, which I gotta, we have to talk about that because I like mob stuff.
	I don't know.
	I'm not interested in stories about, you know, criminals.
	You know, bad guys.
	I like it when your Dirty Harry plugs the bad guy.
	That's what I like.
	You don't want to root for the FBI, I know about you.
	You don't want to root for the FBI right now, that's the problem.
	Maybe if they can clean up we can get you back into mom movies.
	But I guessed, when you said what movies, I was just asked this question off the air, you said what movie would both Dr. G and the G-Man like?
	And I went through my repertoire.
	And I said, what about Pretty in Pink?
	What about Ferris Bueller?
	And I think I named, I nailed it because you both like Ferris Bueller.
	We do, we do.
	But Jeff, you're not a big fan of Ferris Bueller.
	I mean, I gave it an 8 out of 10.
	It's pretty good, especially for one of the movies that you like.
	It's amazing that you like that.
	Is it because it's a Chicago thing?
	Is that why?
	No, it's just a normal movie.
	It's, it's fun.
	It's not about like the thing that we're wondering that's around the, uh, Jungle that we need to get the military involved in.
	Predator!
	One of the greatest movies ever made.
	Oh, I have one.
	What about True Lies?
	What about True Lies?
	Yes!
	True Lies.
	That's a great movie.
	Schwarzenegger.
	Jeff.
	I liked it.
	That was decent.
	That's kind of when I started watching it.
	You know what?
	Hire me to be your mediator.
	What just happened?
	It took four and a half years and it took her three minutes.
	She did it.
	I need to figure this stuff out.
	You just need the ladies touch around here.
	There's too many men in that room.
	Too much testosterone.
	Yes, yes, I know.
	In general at Salem, there's far too much.
	In general.
	You know, we might have to review that.
	Trivia, trivia.
	I'm gonna catch you now, Jen.
	You may have found a movie that we both like, but did you know what the genesis of True Lies was?
	I don't.
	It's a remake of a French movie.
	Really?
	Yeah, yeah.
	Who would watch a French movie from France?
	You sound like Jeff!
	I know!
	That's why I have like a soft spot for Jeff.
	A movie made by French people in France?
	Why would you?
	Why would you?
	I mean, seriously.
	What is the French movie?
	Do we know?
	True Lies.
	Like that.
	Avec Fromage.
	Okay.
	I did not know.
	I did watch the TV show though of True Lies this year.
	What?
	Did you watch it?
	What?
	Are you kidding me?
	They did a reboot of sorts on CBS.
	With who?
	Who's playing Arnie?
	Steve Howie, who used to be in Reba, actually.
	He was pretty good.
	How did I not know this?
	The wife was a little annoying.
	I hate to say that because, you know, I like to be rah-rah women, but she's a little annoying.
	So she wasn't like Jamie Lee Curtis?
	No, because Jamie Lee was great in that movie.
	Oh yeah.
	And it's really sad because the show, I watched it all the way through the first season.
	The show was pretty slow, but the last episode, do yourself a favor and watch it.
	It's two hours.
	It's like a movie.
	Is it good?
	That was the best episode of the season, and then I found out it was canceled.
	But watch the finale of True Lies.
	How did I not know this?
	I thought I was showing off my knowledge of trivia, and then she just like checkmates me.
	Just boom, like that.
	Hey look, I gotta bring something to the table when I come to The great Dr. G's show.
	I have to bring a little something.
	Please.
	And you do.
	She always delivers.
	She keeps LA sane.
	AM 870, AM 590.
	The answer.
	All right.
	We've got four and a half minutes in this segment.
	All right, let's get serious.
	John Durham, yes or no?
	No, seriously, that's the question.
	So I listen to my buddy.
	It's how I cheat.
	It's how I do show prep, is I listen to Bongino in the morning.
	I listen to Chris Platt.
	And Bongino, and God bless him, he went on this jag saying, stop giving, you know, this issue such a hard time you know John Durham failed us and blah blah blah he said you know you got I'm long on America and you know things are coming out don't give up don't give in now I don't give up and don't give in but I just I didn't prep for the monologue I just unleashed for about 11 minutes yeah and I said Durham you know that that response to Cohen I'm okay with my family and before the Lord
	Oh, is that really why you didn't even have the balls to interview Comey, McCabe, or Stroke?
	It's like, you are an utter failure.
	So I need a sanity check from the feminine side of Salem.
	How do you react?
	Well, I will tell you that I am with you in the fact that he was definitely, he did not pursue The investigation hard enough.
	He was not aggressive enough.
	And this is not about serving Trump or serving any Republican.
	This is about the basic sense that we need to trust our justice system.
	And so I was disappointed in John Durham.
	But there were a few interesting moments that I watched today.
	We carried some of it live on The Morning Answer this morning.
	And one of the things that I think I was probably most shocked to hear is that he had FBI agents coming to him and apologizing for the way they screwed up the investigation.
	How he said laws were not followed.
	And I said, that's called a crime, Durham.
	They were broken and that's a crime and that's why that's where the frustration comes in, right?
	But we heard FBI agents are apologizing.
	We heard one FBI agent was so upset that he had to leave the room with his lawyer because he was so upset about the information that he was that was held back from him as part of the investigation and That one of these honest whistleblowers, I mean, it shows you what's going on in the FBI.
	So that's what we can use this for, right?
	Where one woman who says, hey, wait a second, I'm gonna blow the whistle.
	This doesn't feel like it's right, says something about how this investigation seems based on nothing and that it's highly political.
	And what happens to her?
	She gets reassigned.
	But before she goes, She leaves a note in the file, and that was how it was even revealed.
	So look, I'm so tired of conservatives promising tapes, and I'm tired of conservatives saying we've got the evidence.
	I'm tired of all that.
	I'm ready for people who are ready to put up or shut up and fight because our country's on the line.
	But in the meantime, while we have John Durham sitting there, we might as well learn what we can.
	And if this doesn't give you fodder for firing Christopher Wray, I know they're talking about the FBI under James Comey, but he has done nothing to clean this up.
	He should be fired.
	We need to figure out ways that we can prevent funding to the highest levels of the FBI.
	We need to start fighting.
	And the only way we can right now, Republicans in Congress, we have the House of Representatives, they hold the purse strings.
	So that's where our place of power is.
	It's the only thing we can do in the moment.
	Let's show up.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Well, we have to make as much as we can out of a bad hand dealt to us.
	My issue is I just don't see anyone with the strategy.
	I talked to people on the Hill who have a strategy, but they're in junior positions.
	They're not, for example, chairman of the various committees.
	And I've had it.
	I mean, seriously, stop.
	As one congressman told me, stop firing a BB gun at the Death Star.
	Let's get serious.
	All right, crntalk.com.
	Follow her right now, at Jennifer Horn.
	If you love the deep dive, we're going to have an amazing third hour today on all of this with Victoria Tunsing, Joe DeGeneva.
	Make sure you are subscribed.
	Go to your favorite podcast platform.
	Plug in my name, Sebastian Gawker, America First.
	Do leave us a five-star review.
	It helps with the algorithms.
	And then share the links with your friends.
	Now more than ever, you know it's true.
	The FBI is the Fascist Bureau of Intimidation.
	Get your t-shirt today, jointly released with Chris Platt, at SebGorkerStore.com.
	And then in this Pride Month, remember, everyone should be LGBTQ, meaning let's get Biden to quit!
	Get your t-shirt, get your mug, SebGorkerStore.com.
	Go now!
	Alright, you sent us some stories.
	I just sent you one.
	Unbelievable.
	All right.
	Guy convicted of involuntary manslaughter, let out of jail the same day as his sentencing.
	His excuse was that he was drunk, too drunk to realize he stabbed and killed two people.
	And then what about Dana Rivers, this transgender activist?
	That's in your neck of the woods.
	Jen, can we reconnect the sync stuff out?
	Yeah, let's dial you back.
	Yep.
	The True Lies show came out just this year by the way.
	It's just one season, that's it.
	Oh, okay.
	But just watch the last episode, you'll love it.
	Oh, hold on.
	It's on Paramount now, isn't it?
	Is it?
	It's a CBS show, so I don't know where they have the streaming.
	It is a pretty fascinating rabbit hole to look at shows that got canceled after one season and to see like, oh, maybe this could have been something really cool.
	Like they did that with a show that was based on Training Day.
	Yeah, they bring him up.
	I actually, I liked that one enough.
	I mean, Bill Paxton largely carries the show, but it ends on a cliffhanger too, so I'm like, I kind of wanted to see that.
	Bill Paxton's in the, in what?
	A TV show based on Training Day, you know, the movie with Denzel Washington.
	Are you kidding?
	They made a TV show out of that?
	They do a lot of those.
	Yeah, it was a distant sequel.
	It aired, he died while it was airing.
	It was the last thing he did.
	So knowing that, with that in mind, that he was basically dying as he was making the show, Impressive effort on his part.
	God bless him.
	He does carry the show.
	He was the nicest man.
	He came to the studio to meet Robert Conrad.
	No way!
	Nicest man.
	Such a fan of Robert Conrad.
	Robert Conrad totally outfitted him.
	Was not nice to him at all.
	What?
	He used to do that.
	I don't know why with men he would do that.
	But Bill Paxton was incredible.
	Is that the actor?
	Robert Conrad, yeah.
	He was in the Wild Wild West.
	So he's a dick?
	Well, he's dead now.
	He used to do a show here, and he wasn't always like that.
	But with men, I think he was a smaller guy.
	And I think when men would come in, he would just get weird with them.
	And he was weird with Bill Paxton, and it made me feel so sad because I really thought he was a nice man.
	And Robert Conrad was mostly nice, but there were just these moments where he'd do weird things like that.
	Oh, and then the other thing I can tell you about is the Glendale Unified School District, because they had another protest last night with another arrest, the parents.
	Can you give us an update on the Dodgers, how that went?
	Absolutely, that was great.
	That turned out really great.
	Okay, good.
	Got a title in mind for Solomon?
	What was the main angle?
	Oh. Well, towards the end you hinted at the tax stuff.
	Um...
	The real IRS news about Biden breaks tomorrow.
	Mm-hmm.
	Right.
	Thanks.
	Yep.
	Awesome.
	Thank you.
	None of them protested two weeks before the 2020 presidential election when Donald Trump ordered his attorney general to arrest Joe Biden and Joe Biden's family.
	Nothing ever happened like that before in American history, where a sitting president is behind in the polls and he orders his attorney general to arrest his opponent and his opponent's family.
	That's really weird.
	Joe Scarborough thinks President Trump ordered his Attorney General to arrest his opponent and his family.
	If that were true... Hey, Jen, if that were true, wouldn't that be, like, on a loop on CNN, like, 24 hours a day?
	And you'd probably play the clip and then comment on it, but the clip doesn't exist.
	I don't know.
	Is that a deep fake, Jennifer?
	What's going on?
	It feels really fake, and it feels really strange, especially when you put into juxtaposition that the President of the United States just had his Department of Justice and his AG indict President Trump on 37 charges about classified documents, which he himself is holding on to.
	I don't know.
	It is like we are in an alternate universe.
	I wish I could explain it.
	It's just all bad and crazy.
	It is insane.
	But it's Joe Scarborough, sir.
	That's par for the course.
	All right.
	So much to discuss.
	Can you give us an update?
	Because I'm hearing conflicting stories about what happened at the Dodgers Stadium last week.
	That there was a low turnout of the fans.
	But no, that's not actually true.
	They did go to the game.
	There was a high turnout of the protesters against this blasphemous group of You know, transgender nuns or whatever.
	Can you tell us what actually happened?
	Because you know the organizers.
	Yes, and I'm going to tell you that there is a lot to celebrate here.
	Because keep in mind, if you have not been to Dodger Stadium, it's not the easiest place to get.
	Because you sit in traffic for a long period of time before you can actually get into the stadium on game days.
	And so they have this lot, Lot 13, set up.
	for this rally, which was peaceful and prayerful.
	No arrest.
	They had police out there, but the organizers had no problems whatsoever.
	You had all kinds of people from all different faiths coming out to support the fact that we should be respected as people who are Catholic or Christian or whoever wants to practice their religion should be respected.
	And you had Jack Buscevic, you had Sheriff Villanueva, you had a whole bunch of spiritual leaders.
	Bishop Mendez was out there.
	And it was incredible to see at least 2,000 people show up to this protest.
	That's huge for LA on a Friday night, again, at Dodger Stadium.
	Because, you know, our protesting begins and we don't have to sit in traffic.
	So the fact that people did that is absolutely amazing.
	I did hear the information about the game and a lot of people were showing empty seats.
	There were empty seats when the Dodgers chose to acknowledge the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence.
	So the Dodgers knew they stepped in it.
	They knew they made a bad mistake.
	They knew they handled this incredibly wrong.
	So they honored the Sisters way before the game.
	I think at 5.30 or 6 o'clock game time wasn't until after 7.
	So the stadium was pretty much empty.
	Now you did hear like some boos coming from the stadium from the people who were in there, but it was empty at that time.
	Every other group that was honored by the Dodgers, they were honored in between innings.
	The Dodgers did not do that with the sisters because they knew they stepped in it.
	Um, as far as the game attendance goes for a Friday night, they have fireworks.
	It's the Giants, which is the Dodgers sworn enemy.
	That's our rival.
	Aside from the Astros, you would expect a sellout crowd.
	They were at 41,000, which is short of a sellout.
	Sellouts over 50,000.
	So there were fewer people in the crowd.
	Was it empty like that for the entire game?
	No, but there is a success story to tell here that we got a couple thousand people in Los Angeles to show up on a Friday night to tell the Dodgers that they shouldn't do this again.
	And I think I mentioned to you before, Seb, with a sports team, it's really hard to imagine that they're going to feel the hurt like Target or Bud Light because people are really loyal to their sports teams.
	But it was important for conservatives and people of faith to send a message.
	And they did, and it was loud and clear, and there was news coverage, and the Catholic Church, the Archdiocese in Los
	Angeles had masses dedicated through this all throughout the city and all across the country.
	The Dodgers heard this message, and I will be surprised if they make the same mistake again.
	But they're not going to apologize, are they?
	Oh no.
	And I don't expect that.
	I expect them to walk away from this very quietly.
	And now their focus is going to be all on their Christian night, their family night, which is coming up in July.
	Really?
	And that was the mea culpa, essentially, because they have many of the Dodger players are Catholic or Christian.
	Clayton Kershaw.
	He's an outspoken Christian.
	And he went to the media and said, hey, I've now forced the hand of the Dodgers to expedite this family night, which is about the faith-based community.
	So they're going to be welcoming in Christians primarily in July.
	I can't remember towards the end of the month.
	And so now their attention is going to be on that.
	So they're going to back away slowly from this.
	I doubt you will ever hear the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence again at Dodger Stadium.
	And we'll see if the fans are going to be forgiving, but the Dodgers were cursed all weekend.
	I don't know if you saw this.
	No, no.
	What happened?
	So Friday night, the night of the protest, I don't know.
	We don't believe in curses, right?
	But it was some bad juju.
	You don't want to make God mad.
	You don't want to make the big guy mad.
	You don't have to blame the big guy.
	If you let the dark one in, bad stuff happens.
	There you go.
	I like that even better.
	So on Friday they had a brand new kid.
	First game.
	Pitching a no-hitter through seven innings.
	They overmanage.
	They take him out.
	They go to the Dodgers' struggling bullpen.
	They blow the game.
	They had a no-hitter going.
	Saturday, they were blown out in a historic fashion.
	Not since 1910 or something had someone been blown out at home 15 to nothing on Saturday.
	And on Sunday, they blew the game.
	So they did not have a great weekend after they let the dark one in on Friday.
	Alright, we've got a couple of minutes left.
	Please follow this lady at Jennifer Horn.
	There's real news we have to talk about.
	Shocking news beyond blasphemous transgender freaks and perverts.
	Tell us about this latest story that I'm sure the mainstream media is covering in depth.
	This story out of Ventura County is incredible.
	I had to read it three times today to make sure that it's right.
	Very simple to understand, but absolutely insane.
	This guy, 29 years old, goes to a house that he used to live in, kills the mother and the daughter living there, an 80-year-old and a 50-year-old, stabs them to death, leaves them behind.
	The next morning, he is arrested for the crime.
	There's no doubt that he did it.
	But he was drunk, doesn't remember doing it.
	So that becomes his defense.
	And in California, this guy who sat in jail from 2019 on, had his trial and was convicted of involuntary manslaughter, even though he intentionally stabbed these two women.
	But in California, apparently, if you were unconscious while you're committing an act, that makes you eligible to get an involuntary manslaughter charge.
	Which is what the DA in Ventura County threw at him.
	So at his sentencing yesterday, the judge had to let him out of jail on the day she sentenced him for involuntary manslaughter of two people because he had already served enough time under California guidelines for involuntary manslaughter.
	Because he came up with the excuse that he was too drunk to remember killing these two individuals.
	So apparently this is great news for Hunter Biden.
	He can just get super hammered and do whatever he wants in California.
	But it'll be a great defense for the president.
	I mean, sadly, he doesn't drink any alcohol.
	But if he just says, oh, what documents?
	I was drunk.
	I mean, it'll be the great defense, right?
	I get it.
	You send a naughty text message, you send a bad email to your boss, but you stab two people and we're going to let you out of jail in California?
	Unbelievable.
	Naughty craziness.
	But she keeps us sane.
	Listen to her every morning.
	The Morning Answer with Jen and Grant.
	I'm Sebastian Gawker.
	This is America First.
	Follow her at Don't forget to follow us.
	We are everywhere that matters.
	Truth Social, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Parler, Getter, Telegram.
	You can watch us on your television through your Roku Fire Stick devices or on the CelebUse channel app.
	And don't forget my Substack.
	It's weird.
	It's my name.
	There's one word.
	SebastianGorka.Substack.com.
	SebastianGorka.substack.com They're quite keen.
	No.
	No?
	No.
	In fact, they had done it before, pre-pandemic, I think.
	And they were going to bring it back.
	I think there were plans to bring it back.
	But Clayton Kershaw went to the media and said, we're doing it.
	And we're doing it in July.
	And here's the day.
	Because he wanted to have it in response to Pride Night.
	Good.
	I like your glasses.
	Thank you.
	I can see.
	Are they reading glasses?
	What are those?
	Oh, no.
	They're distance glasses.
	Oh.
	And they're awfully dirty right now in this lighting, holy smokes.
	Yeah, no.
	Ever since that detached retina thing, it's like I need it for clarity, you know?
	Sharpens it up.
	What about when you're driving?
	Oh, yeah.
	All the time when I drive.
	I mean, I can try, but it's like Mr. Toad's wild ride.
	It's Mr. Magoo.
	Exactly, exactly.
	I used to love Mr. Magoo.
	He's funny.
	He was fun.
	I loved him.
	All right, you guys.
	Thanks, my dear.
	Bye-bye.
	Okay, bye.
	Mr. Magoo!
	Mr. Magoo!
	Title for that, though, one.
	Something about the Dodgers, probably.
	If you want to go fun, then movie talk.
	If you want to be news, then probably Dodgers.
	What would the movie title be?
	Oh, we need some photographs from last night.
	I don't think I have any photographs from last night.
	I got the promotional image.
	Okay, use the promotional image.
	Oh, I got a couple of funny photographs.
	The quest for the movie both Dr. G and Mr. G like.
	Yes.
	G-Man!
	We gotta call him G-Man from now on.
	I dig that.
	The G-Man.
	And listen to the help of the rumble chat too, and someone suggested The Matrix, and Geoff said he's actually not totally against the idea of The Matrix.
	Are you kidding?
	It's science fiction!
	It's- He has the same rule as a friend of mine, that she generally doesn't like science fiction, unless it's science fiction technology that's theoretically possible in the near future.
	Like, she likes Black Mirror, Which, that's kind of a creepy show, but there's some stuff in there that's like, ah, I didn't see it.
	So Geoff thinks The Matrix is possible.
	It's more possible than other stuff.
	I can't believe that you give me crap about science fiction and then you think The Matrix is possible.
	What's your favorite movie?
	Blade Runner.
	And what is that about again?
	Uh, androids.
	Androids, yeah.
	From what?
	What do you mean from what?
	From, like, how far in the future is that?
	Uh, 20... 40, uh, 2020.
	Like, now.
	Oh, man.
	And that was done, what, 50 years ago?
	40 years ago.
	There we go.
	Hmm.
	Androids probably aren't too far off if we're being realistic.
	All right.
	I don't think so.
	I hope not, but, yeah.
	I don't stink so.
	I don't think so.
	Wanna come in with something?
	Oh, we've got so many flipping cuts.
	What have we got here?
	CHD... What have we got?
	Coming cut to... Coming cut to... No liner.
	to preview please thanks coming cut to cut to no liner president
	you to cut to no liner president please thanks coming cut to
	cut to no liner president please I gave the governors the options.
	For instance, Henry McMaster of South Carolina.
	Governor.
	Great guy.
	Great governor.
	He didn't shut it down.
	Tennessee didn't shut it down.
	South Dakota didn't shut it down.
	Georgia shut it down for a little while, but not much.
	They did a good job.
	Six states that didn't shut down.
	It's a federalist system.
	I told all governors, you do what you want.
	You can shut it down or not.
	Florida, by the way, he shut it down tight.
	No highways, no beaches, no this.
	Just a little reminder from the 45th press about what really happened under COVID and what DeSantis did in Florida.
	That's part two of the Bret Baier interview.
	We've got more cuts from that for you if you missed it.
	But first things first, summer is upon us.
	Are you a little bit bashful when it comes to going to the beach?
	You're going to be hiding yourself under a big moo-moo, a big banana shirt, a safari jacket?
	Well, maybe you could lose some of that weight instead.
	Do what I did!
	My PhD weight loss, the best in the business.
	I lost 42 pounds with Dr. Ashley Lucas and her amazing team.
	Find out today about this system that lets you eat five times a day, a diet that burns the fat off, if I can do it anyway.
	Anyone can.
	864-644-1900.
	That's myphdweightloss.com.
	864-644-1900.
	Myphdweightloss.com.
	All right.
	Let's have some fun with the mooch.
	I'm going to be doing a little bit of a workout.
	I can't even remember, was it... Eric, what was it?
	Seven days?
	Or did he make it to eight days?
	I believe it... I thought it was ten days.
	Ten days?
	Let's give him ten.
	Well, let's say nine.
	Let's say nine days The Mooch got.
	And this is his deep level of analysis right now on CNN with regards to the man who fired him after... All right, let's give him ten.
	Ten days.
	And you saw him starting to unravel.
	I mean, I don't know what he's doing with his hair, but he's got to get a new hairstyle or something.
	Really?
	You see something has changed in his hair?
	Oh, come on.
	He's, like, physically unraveling.
	Just take a look at him.
	Go back to the Bret Baier tape.
	Yeah.
	What part is unraveling?
	Well, I mean, he was probably using six cans of hairspray during the campaign.
	He's probably only using one now.
	He's got to straighten this out.
	Wow.
	This is the meter that you're using.
	I like it.
	He's a very image-conscious guy.
	I mean, there's not enough hairspray going on on that raccoon nest.
	You know, I mean, just being honest.
	So you can tell that he's unraveling.
	You know, people that really know him, Can tell that this thing is starting to come undone on him.
	Hey Jeff, do you think, do you think, do you think Scaramucci's a little bitter?
	And it doesn't even make sense.
	He's saying he's unraveling physically, that he's making a joke about not using enough hairspray.
	Doesn't even make sense to either one.
	Well, as he's sitting there on a set in CNN with dyed hair.
	And dyed hair that would not move.
	It looks like it's all one piece.
	There's so much hairspray in his hair.
	And then the host.
	Who's that woman?
	Who's that fake journalist?
	Was that Camerata, right?
	Right.
	Camerata says, I don't know what do you mean?
	At the beginning.
	And then she says, oh, I like that metric.
	Yeah, she was very excited about that.
	Very, very excited.
	And then I guess he looked so unraveled.
	That's why he destroyed CNN on the CNN town hall.
	Scaramucci, you're very funny.
	You're like Scaramucci the clown.
	Let's go to your calls, Line 1, Joe, Illinois.
	Doctor Gene.
	Yeah.
	I will vote for Trump, no matter what, but in a state like Illinois, would it not make sense for people to vote for RFK Jr.?
	Why?
	I mean, to try, well, to try to get rid of this guy any way possible.
	No.
	No.
	No?
	No, because he's a lunatic.
	Don't vote for a lunatic.
	Don't vote for a guy, Joe, who says if you doubt climate change, I'm going to put you in prison.
	We don't reward people like that.
	We don't reward people who said the Second Amendment has to be dissolved and then a week ago says, oh no, it's non-negotiable.
	We don't reward people who lie and who are crazy.
	Just don't do it.
	This is so dangerous.
	If you open the door to that, then who else is going to vote for a Democrat?
	No, we never give in.
	Look, I'm going to talk to you about what I did in Philly yesterday.
	We're going to have Chris de Gaulle, the host from 990, and if the people in Philly get it, if the people in Pennsylvania get it, I don't care where you live, it's so important.
	Why?
	Because even if it's just at the local level, you send a message.
	You send a message to these people that know.
	So, the RFK can be a spoiler for Democrats, not for us.
	Let him be a spoiler for Democrats.
	Let 19% of Democrats support him.
	And even so, Joe, he's not going to get close to it.
	They're not going to allow him to primary the president.
	It's not happening.
	Remember what they did to Bernie, Joe?
	They destroyed Bernie by how?
	The super-delegates who get more votes than the regular delegates.
	They stole it from Bernie.
	Now, he's a Marxist.
	I'm not on his side.
	But they stole it from Bernie for Hillary.
	So, don't even think of that.
	Don't even go there.
	Important call, though.
	Thank you, buddy.
	833-33-GORKA.
	That's 833-334-6752.
	Coming to you straight from the Reliefactor.com studios.
	Reliefactor.
	Pain relief that works.
	Pain relief that's real.
	Pain relief that is liberating half a million Americans across the country right now.
	Me included.
	But it's not just me.
	It's also people like Yvonne from California.
	This is Yvonne's story.
	Both my husband and I are in our 70s and are so grateful to have found Relief Factor.
	We've tried so many other solutions but none of them have given us the freedom of being pain-free like Relief Factor.
	Just those two words, pain-free, should be reason enough for you to order the three-week quick starter pack at relieffactor.com.
	It'll be at your door in three days or less.
	Take it morning and evening like I do and I promise you Dr. G's guarantee.
	By the end of those three weeks, you will know whether it works for you, like it works for me, Yvonne, and 500,000 of your fellow Americans.
	Ask yourself one question.
	What have you got to lose?
	If it's just the pain, you know what to do.
	Call 800-583-84, reliefactor.com.
	883 84 relief actor calm that number again 800 500 83 84 relief actor calm
	you You
	a a
	of and
	of an
	Thank you.
	Hello.
	Hello.
	How are you this fine afternoon?
	I am well.
	Where are you?
	Are you in your hotel?
	I am, and for a couple more days.
	How was your drive home?
	Oh, super easy.
	Super easy.
	We were talking about you this morning, preferring to drive when you could, showing up in your Mustang.
	I said, I didn't actually blame you now that I think about it.
	I've taken that train ride a few times and I suppose it's probably neither more comfortable or an option for you.
	How do I think about it?
	Oh, it's just, it's easy.
	Anything, you know, under five hours is easy.
	It keeps saying video starting.
	I'm gonna hang up and call you back.
	Okay.
	I would take a train ride over a plane any day, though, if theoretically possible.
	Trains are nice, though, yeah.
	They are, yeah.
	And you can do work.
	Oh, yeah.
	There we go.
	We got him.
	There he is.
	Hello.
	Long time no see, Chris.
	Yeah.
	So how's Carrie Lake?
	She's great.
	She was on it.
	She said she was in federal waters, whatever that meant, or international waters.
	So I didn't know what that meant, but apparently taking a vacation of some kind.
	Interesting.
	Interesting.
	Yeah.
	Selling her new book.
	Her new book?
	What's her new book?
	Unafraid.
	Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
	So everybody happy after last night?
	Oh, yeah, they're buzzing.
	Good.
	I'm actually really, really glad we did it.
	That's the first for this place.
	They've never tried it before.
	They've seen others do it, you know, in Chicago.
	And whose job is that?
	Is that Lorenzo's?
	Who comes up with that?
	I said some time ago that I wanted to try it and they've been nervous to try it.
	They've never really done events until they had a live show here, you know.
	So people like Reisman and the guys in Chicago are sort of our I'm going to use cut 8 here.
	they've gently pushed in port i can't get into it
	uh... i'm going to use cut eight here okay and i've got those pictures
	and can handle the truth
	Is reality just too much?
	There's always NPR.
	I hear they have tote bags.
	This is America First with Sebastian Gorka.
	No tote bags, but you may get some good cigars if you hang out with us.
	Especially yesterday, I was in the city of brotherly love.
	And I'll talk to you about that in a moment.
	Yes, I was there with Chris Stegall at a...
	Superb place called Cigar Republic.
	But first things first.
	If you enjoy this show, support those who make it possible.
	Great Americans.
	Friends of President Trump like Mike Lindell.
	The left hates him.
	Even the FBI have been harassing him.
	He's just launched the 2.0 MyPillow with even more updated cooling technology.
	He sold 71 million of the original.
	Get yours today.
	Amazing Bogo Office Plus.
	Up to 66% off his line of more than 150 other products on his website if you use my name.
	Go to mypillow.com, promo code G-O-R-K-A or call and talk to a real person.
	You remember that?
	An American in America.
	800-829-8468mypillow.com.
	That's 800-829-8468mypillow.com.
	So where was I yesterday?
	Was I sunning myself in international waters?
	Was I on a beach somewhere?
	No, that's what people like Carrie Lake do when they're calling into my buddy's show.
	Which buddy?
	The buddy I was having cigars with yesterday.
	He's Chris de Gaulle.
	Chris, are you there?
	Look at that.
	Would you look at that, Hall?
	What do you mean?
	You haven't smoked them since last night?
	That's only about eight cigars.
	What are you waiting for, dude?
	You had three hours of radio today?
	You couldn't puff away in your studio?
	Like Dennis?
	Can you believe those guys?
	How generous they were?
	So we raided, we're at the Cigar Republic with Chris, who hosted this amazing show for 990 The Answer.
	We raid the walk-in humidor when we get there, and then, and I walk around, I love this club, they've got these massive photographs of famous people smoking cigars, of course I did a selfie with Winston Churchill, as you do!
	As you do.
	And then afterwards, we've had this amazing event run by Chris.
	And we're leaving, or I'm trying to leave.
	He's like futzing around for about half an hour inside.
	I'm waiting for Chris outside.
	And then the staff runs out to both of us with bags of more cigars, Chris!
	What's going on?
	It's amazing.
	It's amazing.
	I'm set up.
	I'm actually taking vacation next week, so I've got all I need.
	Perfect.
	What a night.
	Thank you for making the trip.
	I tell you what, this town loves Sebastian Gorka.
	We were thrilled to have you, man.
	Well, it was amazing, and you were a great host.
	I wanted you to do more of the talking than I did.
	I like bloated for a couple of hours.
	But one of the things I recognized you for in front of your massive fan base at the Cigar Republic was I look I've got an excuse to support President Trump because I worked for him he's loyal to me I'm loyal to him but you don't have that excuse and you are fully behind this man let me ask you why but let me just hang it on what Greg Godfeld said which might help you out Greg was just unabashed about who this man is cut eight
	I think that love him or hate him, and I'm going to go bring this back to Trump, he was kind of outside all of this in a way, and I think that's why he was such a lethal risk.
	He wasn't an elite.
	He had no relatives in power.
	He was the anti-hunter.
	So he didn't have friends in high places.
	He didn't have any relatives that were in politics, and he was already rich.
	So no wonder he was a target for destruction.
	He was a threat.
	Is that part of it?
	Because he's the guy who's not part of the swamp, Chris?
	I've shared with you before, and when you've been kind enough to invite me to fill in for you, I've shared with your audience before, and my own audience, that I, in 2015, was convinced beyond a shadow of a doubt that we needed a traditional candidate.
	We needed a governor.
	We needed a senator.
	We needed a doctrinaire conservative.
	And I openly, brazenly challenged everybody, including the late, great Rush Limbaugh, they were wrong about people like Ted Cruz, and absolutely wrong about people like Donald Trump.
	And it was the greatest mistake of my professional career, Seb.
	And I voted for Donald Trump, but I did it grudgingly.
	And four years later, and then watching everything that was thrown at him since, I see the error in my ways.
	I learned from my audience why they saw in a man something that I didn't.
	I was in this hamster wheel of thinking that the only way to go was the Washington way.
	Even I, as someone who thought I really valued the Constitution and conservatism, There's professional Washington on our side, too, and I couldn't break myself of it.
	Trump broke me of that.
	And so now, seven years, eight years later, watching what he's endured, two impeachments, his home raided, his family dragged through the mud, framed for espionage, Russia collusion, and the like, I said to myself, if he's willing to continue to stand through all this and do it again, who the hell am I, Seb, to abandon him?
	How can I?
	I can't, and so I'm not going to.
	And I know it was, you know, your buddies, but it was still Pennsylvania.
	That crowded room, let's show it again, yesterday at the Cigar Republic, that crowded room of your listeners, I think everybody there kind of agreed with you and me.
	I think so.
	I get a fair number of people, maybe there's some in this audience, who just for whatever reason, and I think they're of good will, and I think they voted for Trump twice, but they sincerely worry that, I don't know, the system or whatever is stacked against Trump and that he can't win again, and they've talked themselves into believing that the only way forward is someone else, like a DeSantis.
	I think there are people that honestly believe that.
	I mean nothing against DeSantis or anyone else in the Republican field.
	I just can't, I can't abandon the guy that brought us to the dance.
	You know what I mean?
	And isn't there something that, you know, we don't have to talk in religious terms, but there's a kind of element of, of cosmic justice after what they did to him, raided his home, now arrested him.
	The idea that, you know, he doesn't get a second term.
	It just, you know, there's a word for that and that word is wrong.
	Yeah.
	And then, of course, the Hunter Biden nonsense yesterday.
	It's as though they're just provoking and poking us, daring us.
	Don't you like the game we've got going here?
	We're going to throw your guy in jail for the rest of his life and our side gets to walk scot-free.
	It's a taunt almost now.
	It feels like all of us are being challenged as Americans.
	Do we stand with this man and our system of justice?
	Not two-tiered, as you pointed out, but our system of justice.
	Do we stand with it?
	Or do we not?
	Yeah, I actually opened our VIP event yesterday with just reading Chris's tweet.
	Trump's presidential documents.
	Potential life in prison.
	Hunter, tanks evasion.
	Felony gun buy.
	Plea deal.
	They're taunting you.
	You get it, right?
	That's why we love him, and that's why Philly loves him.
	Please, follow him right now at Cristigal.
	He's off for a well-deserved vacation where he's going to have a stogie or two.
	Cristigal.com.
	Thank you to everybody who made yesterday happen.
	Lorenzo, Heather, everybody at the Cigar Republic.
	The security guys from the state police who looked after us.
	God bless every single one of you.
	The supporters from the CV shooting range and the architectural company who was there as well.
	Thank you.
	It was a great, great night.
	I'm Sebastian Gorka.
	This is America First coming to you live from the reliefactor.com studios.
	If you have one of these things, if you have a cell phone, Please tell me it's not connected to the big cell phone providers because they're woke!
	They're like the Dodgers.
	They're like Bud Light.
	They've given millions of dollars to things like, yeah, Planned Parenthood and gun control organizations.
	Instead, go with the only Christian conservative cell phone company in America.
	It's the one I use.
	It's called Patriot Mobile.
	They have the same nationwide 4G, 5G networks.
	They have a performance guarantee.
	They've got extra discounts for veterans and first responders and free activation if you use my name.
	It costs just nothing to activate your new account.
	You can use your old number.
	You can switch today by talking to one of their U.S.-based customer support team members.
	Isn't that novel?
	An American in America.
	Call today 878-PATRIOT or go to patriotmobile.com slash G-O-R-K-A-N.
	Don't fund your enemies with every call you make, every text you send.
	Join the good guys.
	They love America like you do.
	PatriotMobile.com slash G-O-R-K-A-8-7-8 Patriot.
	patreon.com slash Gawker We did mooch we did gutfeld
	Gold.
	You can block.
	Still need titles for Jen and for Chris.
	Yeah, just play me 9 and 10.
	9 and 10.
	Do you have any idea if Hunter Biden's laptop had anything to do with this investigation?
	Was it used?
	I don't.
	No, I don't.
	Were you ever asked about it?
	I can't recall being asked about it, to be honest with you.
	But there's nothing about the situation that's been filed that has a thing to do with the laptop.
	Why not?
	I don't know.
	You'd have to ask the prosecutors.
	Incredible.
	The statement from the prosecutor's office, from Weiss's office, said the investigation is ongoing.
	This is the statement announcing that criminal charges have been filed.
	It's obviously not the statement about the plea agreement.
	Are you led to believe that that investigation is ongoing, will be dropped once this plea deal is made official?
	I'm not led to believe anything.
	That's Mr. Weiss' statement.
	I think there's going to be a court proceeding.
	I think there are going to be agreements that are going to come out about the court proceeding.
	And I think everyone will see what happens once that occurs.
	Would you make a deal, though, if you thought there were more charges coming?
	Would I make a deal?
	Yeah.
	No, I wouldn't.
	That says a lot.
	Coming with eight.
	Coming with eight, no liner.
	20 seconds.
	♪♪ ♪♪
	Why would I let him, Chris Christie, who's got nothing going except I could be tougher on Trump.
	He's not tougher on anybody.
	He's a slob.
	It's just a statement of fact, isn't it?
	All right, let's go to your calls before we have our amazing one on one guests.
	It's Jim DeGeneva.
	It's Joe DeGeneva and Victoria Townsend.
	Let's go to Tim in Houston.
	Hey, Seth, how are you doing today?
	Long time listener.
	First time caller.
	Good.
	What's your question?
	What's your comment?
	Um, I'm a big mega fan.
	I love Trump.
	But, uh, I was just wondering, I thought he went a little too far with his comments about the, uh, drug dealers and getting the death penalty.
	I was just wondering what your opinion on that was.
	So, um, 110,000 Americans dead last year isn't, uh, isn't a lot for you, I guess, Tim.
	No, no, no.
	Believe me, I know the numbers and I agree with that.
	You know, I would go for, I'd say, like, definitely I do.
	harsher sentences and... But what do you think would happen if we had the death
	penalty? Don't you think there would be a drastic decrease in deaths in America
	from drugs? Because last year more people died from drugs in America than were
	killed in every war we were engaged in since 1945. Don't you think we need to
	stop that drastically? I do. Good. Let me give you a good example. Your buddy and
	I'm wearing my full of slippers.
	He wasn't a drug dealer.
	No, he wasn't a drug dealer.
	Thank you very much.
	Lovely, lovely ad hominem.
	Let's go to Mario, Philadelphia, line one.
	Hey, Sebastian.
	Listen.
	All these issues that everyone talks about, to include Fox, policies, it's all smoke and mirrors by the left.
	The real policy that they have is the little Bolsheviks in that White House that are trying to take away our freedoms.
	And I wouldn't put it past this deep state and all the snakes in it, to include some Republicans, to conjure up something so diabolical to keep this man out of office that I don't even want to say it.
	Well, I know what you're talking about, but yeah, these people are diabolical.
	If you're prepared to trammel over the rights of a private citizen who not only maintains the highest level of security clearance till the day he dies that you raid his home, and then on trumped up charges, threaten him with 400 years in prison, Mario, we know why they're doing that.
	They don't have the cover of COVID for 2024.
	They can't mail out 81 million ballots.
	They have to stop him.
	And they are evil.
	Sorry?
	Realize that this is the people's president.
	How dumb are you out there in Baltimore, Philadelphia?
	Yeah, I mean that's... Wow, that's the real question.
	How dumb are you?
	How dumb are you?
	In Philadelphia.
	In Baltimore.
	In Chicago.
	In Atlanta.
	That you're going to vote for any Democrat?
	Again?
	Mario, you nailed it.
	Stay on the line.
	Let's give Mario a signed copy of The War for America Sold.
	Get yours at SebWalkerStore.com.
	All of my books available there.
	The I Stand With 45 flag.
	The Fascist Bureau of Intimidation t-shirt.
	So much more.
	Go to s-e-b-g-o-r-k-a store.com.
	SebGorkerStore.com.
	We'll be back with your favorites Joe and Victoria here on America First.
	Yes.
	We'll be back one-on-one with Speaker Gingrich after these messages.
	Stay with us for more one-on-one with Speaker Newt Gingrich here on America First.
	You're listening to America First one-on-one with Speaker Newt Gingrich.
	We'll be back in a moment.
	Welcome back to America First One-on-One with me, Sebastian Gorka, and former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich.
	You're listening to America First One-on-One with Sebastian Gorka and Speaker Newt Gingrich.
	Welcome back to American First one-on-one with Newt Gingrich.
	Thanks for watching.
	I'm Newt Gingrich.
	I'll see you next time.
	Bye.
	This is not an espionage case.
	He didn't sell to enemies.
	He didn't hurt the national security.
	This is a documents case.
	And the question is, should you bring a documents case, even if it's a strong documents case, and interfere with the election in this way?
	I think that's a hard, hard question.
	So many important points being made by a man who's not exactly a Trump supporter, not exactly a conservative, Alan Dershowitz, Professor Emeritus of Law from Harvard University, about the case, the federal indictment against the 45th President of the United States.
	Does logic matter anymore?
	Well, let's break it down.
	For the next hour, a very special one-on-one with two of your tip-top favorites.
	The one and only Victoria Townsend and Joe DeGeneva on deck.
	Welcome, dear friends.
	Delighted to be with you.
	Good to be with you, Sam.
	Now, I want to go through the motions of what Dershowitz said, my own layman's analysis of the nigh-on-50-page indictment.
	But first, let's start backwards.
	Is there any point to being logical and actually dissecting this?
	Because this is just a political hit job, isn't it?
	Yes, it is.
	It's a political document.
	That's why there's 31 counts for every document.
	This case could have been done with two documents, three documents, and we can get into that later.
	But it's a political document, as is Alvin Bragg's case in New York, so what's new?
	Jo, your take?
	Should we assault this logically and analyze it as legal scholars, or should we just look at this as purely a political attempt to negate the next election?
	Well, I think it's the latter.
	I don't think there's any doubt that any reasonable Justice Department understanding 250 years of American history would have said, OK, Mr. President, we understand you did the wrong thing.
	We had a little fight over the documents.
	We think you've broken the law, but we're not going to indict you.
	We got the documents back.
	None of them were lost.
	More importantly, as opposed to Hillary Clinton, none of the documents we sought from you was destroyed.
	We got them all back.
	We have them now.
	And so let's just settle this thing, and you and the National Archives can work out whatever documents you have.
	But, you know, this is a reprimand, and the public needs to know that you handled these documents improperly.
	That's the way this should have been handled.
	But this was designed by Merrick Garland to make sure they could figure out a way to tie up Donald Trump in court along with the New York state charges and help to disqualify him politically, not legally, politically in the minds of the American people.
	Can I take you through one logical point?
	Yeah, please.
	That's why you're here.
	Really?
	Legal logical point.
	They should be synonymous, shouldn't they?
	Here's the dilemma that Jack Smith has, and it's a very serious dilemma.
	He needs to have the jury find beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump kept documents regarding the national defense that either helped a foreign country or harmed the United States.
	How is a jury going to do that unless they read all the document?
	And I don't mean read each document, but everything on the page of every document.
	Now, there is a law that deals with that.
	It's called the Graymail Statute.
	Its initials are CIPA, Classified Information Protection Act.
	And there's a process.
	Joe and I have both done cases with this law.
	And here's what it was intended for.
	The defendant comes in and wants to blackmail, that's why it's called graymail, wants to blackmail the prosecution and say, oh, well, if I only had this document, which I know is classified, I could show my innocence.
	So it's a procedure for getting classified information into a trial.
	But what happens when the court works that out, and it all has to go through the court, is that information is either redacted and or summarized.
	Well, you can't do that when the document is the very essence of the case.
	Right.
	Right.
	Let's look at the couple of things that were mentioned there by Dershowitz.
	So we have, and please tell me if I'm missing anything, we have the statutes that are relevant.
	We have the 1978 Congressional Act, Civil Act, concerning presidential records, which is not a criminal statute.
	Yet this indictment relies upon the 1917 Espionage Act, and the regulations and the penalties concerning national defense information.
	Would you address this statement by Allen that no espionage was involved, so therefore why are we even invoking the Espionage Act?
	This is the 45th president.
	This isn't, you know, nuclear spies.
	This isn't Hansen.
	This isn't Aldrich giving classified information to our enemies.
	This is a documents case.
	Well, I think what Alan is doing, he's trying to make an artistic, political, and legal point all at the same time.
	He really wants to say that the judge should instruct the prosecutors that under no circumstances may they use the word espionage in any argument or evidentiary matter before the court.
	Because it isn't an espionage case.
	It's an illegal retention case involving someone allegedly keeping documents that they're not entitled to keep in an insecure location.
	That's not espionage.
	It's just part of the generic espionage statute.
	And I think if I were the trial judge, I would grant a ruling saying that the government under no circumstances may refer to any evidence in this case or any act in this case as espionage, because then that limits it to being a documents case.
	The issue of whether or not the Presidential Records Act subsumes under it the Espionage Act is a complex legal
	issue which has never been decided except for one case involving Bill Clinton which
	really isn't relevant to this case. So I imagine the judge in the case is going
	to have to rule on whether or not the Espionage Act was improperly used by the
	government but we're not there yet. Victoria if the Congress had wanted to
	regulate presidential records with a criminal statute then isn't
	that what they But they didn't.
	Seb, you've got it exactly on point.
	That's what the legal argument is.
	Statutory interpretation.
	The Espionage Act was written in 1917.
	And Alan Dershowitz, and we all agree, has been saying for a long time that it's invalid, it's unconstitutional because it's so vague.
	But put that aside, the Presidential Records Act was passed much later, I think it was 1976.
	I think it was 1976. 78. 78. Yeah. And presumably, we always say in statutory construction that
	78.
	78.
	Congress always knows everything.
	So presumably, Congress knew that there was an Espionage Act and could have said, except for classified information under the Espionage Act.
	Congress did not do that.
	They did not carve out any exception for any kind of classified information when it did
	the Presidential Records Act.
	It's later in time, which is also a really important thing, and it's much more specific.
	So by any statutory interpretation, this indictment should go down.
	Joe, let me ask you, is that reasonable?
	Is that fantasy for the president's team on day one to say, sorry, we want this all to
	be dismissed because the 78 Act.
	He's a former president, and the Presidential Records Act is a civil act.
	We want this to be thrown out.
	Is that just a fantasy ploy?
	No, it's not.
	And I disagree very strongly with Bill Barr and others who say that that argument is irrelevant.
	It's not irrelevant.
	This legal interpretation of what the Presidential Records Act means is central.
	It would be one thing if we were talking about the Secretary of Defense or a Vice President who had these records or a United States Senator like Joe Biden.
	That would be clearly—the Presidential Records Act would not be superseding.
	But here we have a president who was in possession of these records.
	That's the issue.
	The issue isn't a generic analysis of whether you can have a so-called espionage indictment superseding the Presidential Records Act.
	This is a former president who had possession of records.
	The issue of whether or not he legally had possession is determined under the Presidential Records Act, not the Espionage Act.
	So I think the judge is going to have before her a very substantial question of law.
	And the people that say this is a ludicrous argument I have to say, I'm really disappointed in Bill Barr on this issue.
	It's not a ludicrous argument.
	This is a very serious subject.
	We're talking about a former president being charged, not just a regular civil servant.
	The president is Article 2.
	He is the person who has declassification authority.
	And none of the people who have been previously charged under the Espionage Act ever had that power.
	And that's why this is so important, Seb, because... We'll continue in a moment.
	We'll continue.
	We're talking to Joe Genova, Victoria Tunsing.
	Follow them at Vic Tunsing on Twitter.
	They have been fighting the deep state for years now.
	Please support them.
	Go to their GiveSendGo right now.
	It's very easy.
	Put it up on the Chiron.
	GiveSendGo.com slash TheGenevaTensing.
	That's GiveSendGo.com slash TheGenevaTensing.
	We've only just begun!
	I guarantee for yourself you never, ever miss any of our deep dives.
	Subscribe right now on your favorite podcast platform.
	Just plug in.
	My name is Sebastian Gawker, America First.
	Never, ever miss an episode.
	Leave us a 5-star review and share the links with your friends.
	And if you stand with President Trump, don't forget to fly this flag.
	It may be Pervert's Pride Month, but we're going to fly this flag.
	It is the I Stand With 45 Trump 2024.
	Get yours and so much more at sebgorkastore.com.
	That's S-E-B-G-O-R-K-A, sebgorkastore.com.
	If even half of it is true, then he's toast.
	I mean, it's a very detailed indictment and it's very, very damning.
	And this idea of presenting Trump as a victim here, a victim of a witch hunt, is ridiculous.
	Yes, he's been a victim in the past.
	Yes, his adversaries have obsessively pursued him with phony claims.
	And I've been at his side defending against him when he is a victim.
	But this is much different.
	He's not a victim here.
	He was totally wrong that he had the right to have those documents.
	Those documents are among the most sensitive secrets that the country has.
	They have to be in the custody of the archivist.
	He had no right to maintain them and retain them.
	And he kept them in a way at Mar-a-Lago that anyone who really cares about national security, their stomach would churn at it.
	I don't understand how a former Attorney General, I presume he went to law school, uses the phrase, he's toast.
	Not sure that's a classic legal term.
	And also, somebody should introduce Bill Barr to the concept of fact pattern.
	If you admit that there has been political targeting for nigh on seven years, Why the hell, excuse my French, would you believe, as he said, even half of this indictment?
	Let's continue, let's analyze with our one-on-one guest, Victoria Tunsing.
	Your response, I cut you off previously, your response, please continue, and to that cut from Bill.
	Let me address Bill Barr for you.
	Yeah.
	And that, he says, he handled the documents very, he was careless.
	You mean like keeping An unsecured server in your basement?
	You mean that kind of careless?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	I mean, you know, I don't know why Bill's doing that.
	I really don't.
	The point I wanted to make, Seb, was that here's why it's important for our court to decide whether the PRA, the Presidential Records Act, supersedes the espionage statute, because this situation can be used as a weapon by any incoming president against his or her successor.
	Joe, let me ask this question.
	Victoria brings up unsecured servers, such as Hillary Clinton's, which weren't just unsecure, but which were transmitting topped and tailed, to use the colloquialism, classified information.
	So somebody on her team, Likely Huma Abedin went into multiple skiffs, secure facilities for classified information, removed, illegally removed the communications from those secure facilities and then transmitted them to Hillary Clinton on her unsecured server.
	Every single one of those is a felony and we know at least at least of a hundred and twenty documents of secret or top-secret classification that were thus transmitted beyond many many more.
	Is this is this a viable Tactic?
	Or can this not be brought up?
	Can the Trump lawyers say in court, well, look what happened to Mike Pence.
	Nothing happened to him.
	Look what happened to Joe Biden with secret documents next to his Corvette in the garage.
	Look what happened to Hillary Clinton.
	Will the prosecution or the judge say, utterly irrelevant, this is a sui generis case, or is this a mode of potential defense?
	Theoretically, the judge could rule that what happens to other people is not relevant.
	But if you make selective prosecution your defense, if that's going to be the essence of your defense, that you are being treated differently than anybody else, that you were purposely targeted just to prosecute you when others were let go, like Hillary Clinton, like James Comey, Like Peter Strzok, like all the people involved in trying to go after Donald Trump, and you could argue that he was conspired against from the time he was a candidate and make that the entire defense.
	I believe you could argue that.
	And you could argue that it would be the reason that the jury should not find him guilty, because this was part of a process.
	Even the investigation, you could argue, was part of a process, the way it was conducted.
	And you would use his evidence.
	After they searched Mar-a-Lago, Look what the FBI did.
	They took documents that they found in boxes, and they laid them out on the floor, took photographs, and then made it look like that's the way they found them when they came to Mar-a-Lago.
	That is an example of the prejudice by which the investigation was conducted, and they leaked that information, which, by the way, was a violation of law.
	So I think that ordinarily this defense would not be relevant, but I think in this case it is, and I would make it the core my defense. Do you... I would disagree with Joe, which I
	rarely do. What? Hang on, hang on, let me write this date down in my diary. Tunsing, Councilor Tunsing disagrees
	with Geneva. Carry on.
	No, I think the much better argument is not only how do you get to the process of classified
	information, which I outlined earlier, but also the PRA supersedes the Espionage Act.
	I agree with all of that.
	I think you should do all of that.
	Here's my question as a layman, and to use an Italian analogy.
	What is the the way that is usually done or what is most efficacious do you do you throw the whole bowl of spaghetti on the wall i mean do you do you do you mention espionage versus presidential records act do you mention uh the other cases and selective prosecution or do you is is it wise for a defense team to pick one defense policy and then stick on that
	You're entitled to present as many defenses as you want.
	You don't have to have one defense.
	And in fact, in this case, with a jury that's likely to be at least fair in Florida, as opposed to a DC jury, the more defenses the merrier, as far as I'm concerned.
	because you don't know what the judge is going to do to limit your defenses.
	The judge may say, no, you can't argue, Mr. President, that you were singled out.
	This isn't selective prosecution, because at least you've preserved the issue for appeal in case you are convicted.
	Right.
	The PRA issue over the Espionage Act is actually an issue for the judge.
	No jury can decide that.
	The jury has to decide, factually, whether the documents fit the definition of national security, hurt or harm, you know, the U.S.
	or another government.
	That is a factual issue, and you can't get around the jury having to see that.
	So, 12 jurors tried and true, and no background clearances?
	How do you work that out?
	And the Washington Post this morning said, oh, not a problem, they can just read it in the jury room.
	So the jury's going to decide to convict, or not, a president, and nobody in this country is going to know on what basis?
	Well, what about the attorneys?
	What about, you know, we're hearing about the need for the president's attorneys to have security clearance, the president can't access the documents.
	I mean, doesn't this just put a spoke, you know, gum up the works?
	Well, no.
	Actually, it's pretty common to have everybody get clearances who are going to be on the defense team, who are going to see the documents that are in question.
	That's very standard, and it's not a problem, by the way.
	Everybody's making a big deal about this judge's order that was issued saying the president is not allowed to share information with other people after he's looked at it.
	Well, of course he isn't.
	But that goes for every defendant in every case and every lawyer in a classified information case.
	So there's nothing unusual about the order that was issued by this magistrate.
	But let me just say one more time, the jury is perfectly capable of finding,
	if it is allowed to, that Donald Trump was selectively prosecuted
	and find him not guilty because of that.
	That is a legitimate defense, if the judge allows it.
	The question is, will she allow it in these circumstances?
	And in my opinion, along with everything else that Victoria talked about, the PRA, the classification issues, he should argue that to a fairly well.
	Follow them at Vic Tunsing on social media.
	Don't forget to follow us as well.
	We are everywhere that matters.
	Follow us on Truth Social, on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Parler, Getter, Telegram.
	You can watch us on your television through your Roku or Fire Stick devices or get the Salem News Channel app.
	And for my unique content, it's my substack, sebastiangorker.substack.com.
	That's sebastiangorker, one word, .substack.com.
	Are you ready?
	Are you ready?
	Food for everyone!
	Food for everyone!
	Thank you.
	Thank you very much, darling.
	The president right after his arrest and arraignment in Miami, buying lunch for everybody in that peculiarly named Cuban cafe, the Versailles.
	I bring it up because in the background, for those who know him, he was a colleague of mine in the White House, is the president's former butler, Walt Nauta, a man who served with honor in the US Navy, who is now his body man, his bag man, if you will, at Mar-a-Lago.
	I have to bring this up because it's such a...
	I just feel awful for this man, for Walt, who served the president in the White House and now at Mar-a-Lago, that he's the other target of this indictment, Joe, in Victoria.
	Why is this former naval individual, a member of an ethnic minority.
	Does he have to be in the indictment to prove conspiracy, so it's not just the president, that the man who moved
	the documents is somehow this super spy who has to be locked away for 300 years?
	Explain why it's President Trump and Walt Nauta in the indictment.
	Because a conspiracy requires two or more people.
	And since Walt was the only other person actually involved in the moving of the documents, he is the other person,
	and that's the conspiracy.
	But let me tell you a story about Walt.
	And that is, when his lawyer was representing him and met with Department of Justice lawyers, the lawyers said, hey, we hear you're up for a judgeship.
	Boy, it would really be good if your client cooperated.
	And he has reported that, and he's a very well-respected lawyer in Washington.
	So I think it's also a very serious issue.
	But for me, and again, I am the layman here, the idea that that happened, allegedly, that a lawyer who's being investigated as part of this indictment, Absolutely.
	Well I think as part of motions to dismiss this case, that should be one of the motions.
	That there ought to be sanctions against the government.
	indictment be jettisoned?
	Absolutely.
	Well, I think as part of motions to dismiss this case, that should be one of the motions,
	that there ought to be sanctions against the government.
	And one of the sanctions that a judge has available, you know, the judge can limit evidence,
	can exclude evidence, can say this witness can't testify.
	And then the ultimate sanction is dismissing the indictment against somebody like Walt
	And so, yes, that should be done.
	It absolutely should be one of the motions, and I expect that it will be.
	There should be a hearing about this immediately.
	And the lawyer who did it for the Justice Department should be forced to testify.
	You mean a separate hearing by the same judge?
	Or how would that work?
	Well, you file a motion to dismiss.
	In the motion to dismiss, you make these allegations about this threat that was made.
	And you demand a hearing.
	And you demand that the attorney who made the threat be put on the witness stand.
	Now, many times, judges will not allow Department of Justice lawyers to be questioned.
	They'll say, I'll take an affidavit.
	In this case, it's got to be cross-examination, and that lawyer has to take the witness stand.
	This is a serious charge, because it's the White House that decides this judgeship.
	It's a superior court judgeship.
	This is so sleazy.
	It's hard to believe that a Department of Justice lawyer would even mouth those words in a meeting with a lawyer for a target in a case.
	But it shows you what has happened with Merrick Garland in charge of the department.
	The place is out of control.
	But also, again, repeatedly, the so-called evidence of Trump Attorney 1 and Trump Attorney 2.
	It seems as if this whole indictment of boxes being moved around is based upon privileged communication between the President and his lawyers.
	Well, that's certainly part of it.
	I mean, they were forced to testify because Judge Beryl Howell, who is the retiring chief judge in D.C., in the D.C.
	grand jury, said that there was an exception to the attorney-client privilege called the crime-fraud exception, and that it had been proven that the lawyer was being used to commit a crime, and therefore the lawyer could be forced to testify about his conversations with his client.
	I think the judge was wrong in that interpretation of the law and on the factual findings she made.
	And remember, the judge in Florida is not bound by this ruling.
	The defendants can file a motion to dismiss and suppress all of the statements by the lawyers who were put under oath, and Judge Cannon can rule that those statements by the lawyers are inadmissible.
	That is not a binding ruling on the ruling that was made during the grand jury.
	We're talking to Joe DiGenova and Victoria Tunsing.
	This is a very special one-on-one on the indictment of the 45th President of the United States.
	We are broadcasting from the relieffactor.com studios.
	The Biden family has at least 20 shell companies that were created for the sole purpose to launder money to at least nine Biden family members.
	When you create a bunch of shell companies for the sole purpose of laundering money, that's called racketeering.
	And the money laundering, those aren't my words.
	Those are the words of at least six big publicly traded banks that filed bank violations to get the Biden family.
	They said it sure appears that they're money laundering.
	Actually, Chairman Comer, that is not the definition of racketeering, but the fact that the Bidens have 20-plus shell companies to get paid, that's reason enough.
	It seems that every day there are new revelations about the corruption of Joe Biden and his family.
	I want to ask our friends about timing.
	The timing here, let's start with this issue.
	The indictment being announced the day that the DOJ allows Chairman Comer and the members of his committee to read the evidence against the incumbent president, a $5 million bribe to the incumbent president.
	You've been a U.S.
	attorney for the district, Joe.
	Victoria, you've worked on Capitol Hill.
	There are no accidents in this stinking city, are there?
	There are no coincidences, and this was not a coincidence.
	This was done purposely to detract from the information about President Biden.
	And let's remember something.
	Who did this release of information?
	The Department of Justice, which is the same Department of Justice which is supposed to be investigating Hunter Biden and Joe Biden and the corruption and the bribery and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
	So that will give you some idea of how honest The investigation is by the Department of Justice.
	What's going on now at the department is a joke.
	Hey, Seb, you were talking about a pattern in practice.
	How about this coincidence?
	The day that Comer had his first press conference, George Santos was indicted.
	the little, you know, who knows him, congressman from New York on the very same day that Comer had his first press
	conference about this issue.
	Let's talk about timing going forward because a lot of people, you know, conservatives are saying,
	oh, don't worry about it. You know, President Trump will be fine because there's no way that this
	jury is going to be impaneled and the whole case is going to be heard in the next 18 months.
	What is, you, You are the true experts.
	What will be the rhythm going forward?
	Can the DOJ push through a quick conviction?
	Can the President's lawyers say, no, no, no, no, no, slow your roll, slow your roll?
	What is the next year hold for us and the President?
	Well, the President's team has the right to file motions of all kinds and seek hearings and take testimony.
	That's going to take time.
	The person who will determine the speed of this trial is not the United States government.
	It's not the prosecutor.
	It's not Jack Smith.
	It's the judge in the case.
	She will determine at what point this case is ready for trial.
	And my guess is, she's going to be undeterred.
	She's not going to worry about the politics of it or the election.
	Although, at a certain point, if Donald Trump is the nominee of the Republican Party, which it looks like he very well will be, Then, the scheduling of the trial becomes a fascinating political-slash-legal issue for the court, because he has a right to campaign, he has a right to a fair trial, and while he's campaigning, it seems to me he can't get a fair trial.
	And speaking of that, Seb, what about New York with Alvin Bragg?
	There's an interesting thing that's happened.
	Trump's team has filed a motion to remove that case to federal court, and I think it has a very good chance of being a winning motion, but it was filed over a month ago.
	With what argument?
	Why would you want it moved from a local court to federal court?
	Because he's a federal officer, and then just without going into detail, the state court cannot interpret federal election law.
	Well, you want it out of Manhattan.
	Supreme Court because the judge in the case is clearly- Well, for obvious reasons, yeah.
	The legal argument is he's a federal officer and you can't all, whenever he acts- Well, he's running for federal office.
	So here's another question, returning to strategies of defense.
	And again, maybe this is just the layman speaking.
	Is there not an argument to be made Given that it is Biden's DOJ bringing the case against the leading candidate of the opposition, that we can just say this is election interference.
	The whole case is election interference and should be jettisoned for that reason.
	There's no doubt that you can make that argument to the jury.
	It will not succeed as an argument to dismiss the case if you make that argument to the judge.
	But you can make that argument to the jury.
	But why?
	Why not to the judge?
	Because the judge is going to find that if the legal processes were all followed, in other words, there was the proper number of grand jurors, they met, they considered all the evidence that were presented, and did they return this indictment, then the judge cannot use that as a basis to dismiss the case, unless she rules on an omnibus basis that the entire prosecution was ill-founded
	and is a political vendetta by the current president of the United States.
	I think that's unlikely that she would ever rule that, but that may very well be the argument
	that succeeds with a jury in a trial.
	But then don't forget there's Fannie Willis out there in Atlanta, Georgia.
	Yeah.
	What do you expect the timing to be like, Victoria?
	Do you think this will go to trial or will be suspended during the election season?
	Given your experience, what do you think is going to happen?
	Well, I've never experienced this.
	I mean, this situation is... None of us have.
	Yeah.
	Unfortunately, sadly, I would think that it has to be put off.
	I think there's so many issues to be worked out.
	I can't imagine a court, a federal court, telling a presidential candidate he has to stand trial in the middle of a campaign.
	The only reason you want a speedy trial for Donald Trump is to try and get him convicted before the election, which is not a legitimate reason for a speedy trial.
	He's entitled to a trial that's fair and just and to an impartial jury.
	There is no urgency for this case to be trialed before the election.
	Correct.
	No urgency at all.
	They have fought the deep state.
	They were targeted by the Department of Justice to the tune of more than half a million dollars.
	Please support our good friends Joe DeGeneva and Victoria Tunsing at their GiveSendGo.
	It's GiveSendGo.com slash DeGenevaTunsing.
	That's GiveSendGo.com slash DeGenevaTunsing.
	And if you put me back in the White House, their reign is over.
	Their reign will be over.
	And they know it.
	And America will be a free nation once again.
	We're not a free nation right now.
	We don't have free press.
	We don't have free anything.
	In 2016, I declared, I am your voice.
	Today, I add, I am your warrior.
	I am your justice.
	And for those who have been wronged and betrayed, I am your retribution.
	I am your retribution.
	Not going to let this happen.
	My former boss speaking at CPAC, I am your retribution because we don't have justice in this nation.
	And I think we know that's why he's being targeted now.
	Whether it's raids on his home, court cases in Manhattan, or now a federal indictment.
	Joe, Victoria, last question to you.
	Let's posit that, God willing, the President is back in the White House and he is determined to, as he said recently at Bedminster to obliterate the deep state.
	Can we fix what we've witnessed outside of the administrative state?
	We have a problem with the courts, not just the DOJ.
	We have a problem with judges across America.
	Is this fixable in your estimation?
	Well, the answer is yes, but it's going to require a just a powerful response from the American people at the ballot box in November.
	And it's going to require a new attorney general in the Republican administration who is powerful, smart, and a great lawyer.
	And we have to redo the Department of Justice at the same time in the FBI and, of course, replace Christopher Wray.
	This can be done, but this is going to be the heaviest lifting since the founding of the republic.
	And the biggest problem, political problem, is in the U.S.
	Senate.
	Because even if Republicans take over, there are so many of them that are rhinos, that it's frightening.
	Look at the 18 that voted for the big spending bill, and the Mitt Romney, the John Cornyns.
	I mean, it was just disgusting.
	So, I think the Senate needs a new leader, Mitch McConnell.
	It's time to go.
	Well, I think President Trump has been explicit on that, that he will not be able to work with Mitch McConnell, and we need a MAGA Senate as much as we have an America First, or the nascent America First House.
	We've been talking to Victoria Tunsing and Joe DiGenova.
	As ever, it has gone far too, far too quickly.
	Please follow them at VicTunsing, and please support them at GiveSendGo slash DiGenovaTunsing.
	That's GiveSendGo.
	If you enjoy the one-on-ones, please support those who make our show possible.
	Great patriots like Mike Lindell.
	The FBI has been abusing and harassing him as well.
	The left wants to cancel Mike.
	Go to mypillow.com, use my name for up to 66% of his line of more than 150 products.
	And let's show the woke big-box stores whose side we are on.
	We did it with Bud Light.
	We've done it with Target.
	Now let's support the good guys.
	MyPillow.com.
	Call your order in and talk to an American.
	You know, here in America.
	Isn't that crazy?
	800-829-8468.
	That's 800-829-8468.
	MyPillow.com.
	Promo code G-O-R-K-A.
	Wherever you are, whatever you're doing, keep your head on a swivel.
	Watch your six.
	Hold the line.
	Never give up.
	Never give in.

▲