All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 11, 2018 - Get Off My Lawn - Gavin McInnes
42:04
Ep 168 | Trump Derangement Syndrome | Get Off My Lawn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, that's kind of mean that I turned it off there, right?
Put it back.
That was very good.
Love isn't always on time.
Love is not always on time.
I don't know what they're talking about.
I guess they're saying you can't choose who you love.
Is that a guy justifying divorce?
I think maybe he's grumpy that love came at the wrong time or it never came at the time.
Wait, you've got to switch to your camera.
Oh, yeah.
So maybe he's a disgruntled lover.
Disgruntled lover.
That's my new nickname for you.
That's MC Disgruntled Lover.
Hi, welcome back to the show.
I'm here with my co-host, Disgruntled Lover.
And we've got a fun show for you today.
We've got Michael J. Knowles on the show from Daily Wire.
He's a very, very charming, cool guy who can't be an actor in Hollywood anymore because someone got the word out that he's not a liberal.
And that was the end of his acting career and friendships and all that.
So it's sort of like me.
He's pushed over to the right, the ghetto, the right-wing ghetto, and he's making a name for himself there.
I didn't like that intro at all.
Anyway, we have him on the show all the time.
We get along great.
I'm annoying myself.
But before we talk to old Mikey, I want to show you this video Vox is pushing.
It's an old video, but they're rehashing it.
And it's all about why we need to deplatform the YouTube right.
Now, I'm included in this, and I'm not on YouTube anymore.
I'm at CRTV.
I don't know if you've ever heard of it, but I've been included in this.
And the arguments for it are bizarre.
The arguments are, I feel unsafe as a gay man or a minority or whatever, so we have to get these guys off because they're creating a breeding ground for extremists.
No, dude, the problem here is that you've created this boogeyman, this evil Nazi Hitler II in your mind.
So you think that we are that thing and we have to be banned.
It's your boogeyman.
You know what I mean?
It's like they've turned you into, it's like witch hunts, where they've assumed that you know black magic and you can kill people.
So they're saying, how should we get rid of witches?
And we're saying, I don't know, but we're not witches.
So why are we having this discussion?
Their obsession is basically Bigfoot chasing.
Anyway, I really want to get into depth on that.
So that's going to be a doozy of a vid.
And then we'll talk to Mike.
Let's start it up.
It's not just Alex Jones, says Vox.
That's a site that was started by the guy from Daily Coast and Ezra Klein.
Clearly just funded by some far-left zillionaires who want the millennials to stay brainwashed and don't like this conservative wave we're seeing with young people.
So they liberal splain everything.
And the liberal splaining for this latest trend in deplatforming is Alex Jones is just the tip of the iceberg, which is kind of what we're saying too, but we're saying it as a bad thing.
They're saying it as a good thing.
And they're like, you can't just start, you can't stop with Alex Jones.
Deplatform everyone.
And the evidence they have is some people have opinions that I don't like.
So this is kind of an old video, I believe, but they brought it back after the Alex Jones thing to make the case for banning everyone.
And they couldn't have made a worse case.
Here's how you make a case about banning speech.
You go, this guy said this, like, what do we want?
Dead cops, when do we want them now?
And then five cops were killed in Dallas.
So that person's speech led to five deaths.
That's an argument.
It's a tough one to make because I don't know how you stop people from chanting in a protest.
But that's an argument.
This, they're so far left that they just show you a right-wing sentence and go.
I mean, can you believe that?
That person said that.
So they obviously should be banned.
Watch.
Search YouTube for videos about immigration, and eventually you'll find this.
Mass immigration is not the rainbows and unicorns that our politicians portray it as.
is in fact a tragedy for videos about Why don't you refute that?
She just shows that, and she says, mass immigration isn't rainbows and unicorns.
That's not controversial, by the way.
Rainbows and unicorns are a very, very high bar that they don't seem to make.
And then she said, it's a serious issue.
It's a catastrophe.
Mass immigration is a catastrophe.
And I'm happy to sit you down and explain.
She didn't say there should never be immigrants.
She didn't say there has never been immigration or there should be no more immigration at all.
She's talking about post-1975 waves and waves.
It used to be open borders, closed borders.
Open borders, closed borders.
Since around 1975, we opened the gates and broke off the hinges and it's just been ever since.
I'd like to see you defend that.
Anyway, go ahead.
Islam and you'll find stuff like this.
By its very nature, Islam is an intolerant, radical, extremist belief system.
Search for feminism.
Stop, stop.
Isn't that Glockenspiel in the background irritating?
I'm telling you facts, and you're a kindergarten student.
That thing about Islam, I don't understand what his point is too, and he'll get to It but if you look up Islam on YouTube, you will see heaps and heaps of Muslims talking about how it's a religion of peace, and you'll see videos about rock and the hijab, rock, rock and the hijab, cool Muslim voices.
There are both sides to this.
Now, I'm on the side that I think Islam is a scourge, and I think it's a unique religion that's unassimilable in the West.
And I think a disproportionate number, upwards of 50% or more, think that suicide bombing is sometimes or often justified.
I don't like any of those numbers.
Even in America, about one in four 18 to 25-year-old male Muslims think that suicide bombing is sometimes or often justified.
That's way too high.
But you can't have that.
All right, let's see what feminism, this is a good one, by the way.
I've just watched this.
And yeah.
Newsflash, everybody hates feminism.
These videos are all products of what New York Times magazine calls the YouTube right.
A growing collection of right-wing vloggers, media operations, conspiracy theorists, and activists who built sizable followings on YouTube.
They warn about mass immigration, decry political correctness, and mock out-of-control social justice warriors.
Why am I on camera for this?
also represent a fascinating challenge for YouTube.
A company that wants to make These millennials who preach to you, I call it millennial explaining, but they're so confident that they tell you about the world in a really patronizing way.
And you can tell they're not convinced, which is why his shoulders have to slam down on every single point because he has to overconvince you because he's overconvincing himself.
Go ahead.
Make money off of ads on cat videos.
And now finds itself at the center of a huge debate about censorship and hate speech on the internet.
Absolutely vital that we red till the next generation.
One of the YouTube writes' biggest success stories so far is Lauren Southern.
She's an activist who went solo after making a name for herself on a conservative site called The Rebel.
And her YouTube videos...
You're scared of a 100-pound, sweet little blonde girl because she doesn't like feminism or immigration.
Nice problems, you complete pussy.
Regularly get hundreds of thousands of each of them.
I got involved in YouTube sort of during the gamer gay anti-feminism phase of the internet.
Since then, I've just been commenting on all the world's craziness.
Southern videos reflect a lot of the core ideas of the YouTube right.
She criticizes political correctness, warns about the threat of refugees and immigration, and even made a whole video criticizing gay pride parades.
If you ever want to spur some homophobia in reasonable people, just take them to a pride parade.
This is the thing I've noticed with the left.
If you criticize minorities or gays or anything like that, you're a racist and a homophobe, and we have to stop it.
The actual criticism gets zero analysis.
So if I, I've noticed this when people accuse me of racism, they'll bring up examples of me, you know, mocking Corey Booker or Neil deGrasse Tyson or a bunch of black people.
And you'll go, why'd you choose five black people that I criticize?
What about the 500 other white people?
Why did you focus on that?
Because they see blacks as special, delicate little flowers.
So you don't criticize them the way you criticize other people.
Naomi Schaefer Riley was fired from an education site for pointing out that black PhDs tend to be half-assed and ridiculous and all about racism, racism, racism.
And it's amateur hour at the Apollo for these black PhDs.
And she provided a heap of examples.
Instantly fired.
No one said, geez, we hadn't checked out these dissertations before.
They are terrible.
They're ridiculous.
They read like high school rants.
They just fired her because she criticized a black thing.
And this guy is freaking out that she criticized gay pride.
Have you been to a gay pride parade?
In New York City, it's lesbians brawling and gays diddling each other.
In San Francisco, they're all having anal sex on the balconies as you walk by and people bring kids.
It's not a celebration of homosexuality.
It's a celebration of gay sex.
And it's really gross.
And there are plenty of gays who feel the same way.
Talk to Chadwick Moore about gay pride parades.
They're a mess.
Obviously, I wore my gayest possible outfit for the interview.
So, Lauren, why YouTube?
For left-wing content, you can get that in real life.
You can get that in person.
Your professors, your teachers, your newspapers, left-wingers don't need to go to the dark places of the internet to find their opinions.
Did you catch that?
They place all of this prejudice on you.
So he thinks he's talking to Satan incarnate.
He thinks he's talking to the head of the KKK in the queer bashing division.
So he wears a shirt that says queer to blow her mind, throw her off her game, make her blood boil.
Because she criticized the gay pride parade.
Ergo, the word queer, and anyone gay must give her a conniption.
She couldn't care less.
That's the whole thing with all these people being offended.
You're assuming I care about your feelings.
I don't care about you.
Go live your life.
I'm just telling you a bunch of facts.
That's like what they do with this Trump stuff, where they have Trump making out with Putin, or they do a picture of Trump with a small penis, or they smash his star on the Hollywood fame, or they go to his house.
They go to Mike Pence's house, and a bunch of gay people dance in front of his house like he's going to be going, no, I hate gays dancing.
I don't care if you dance.
Go ahead.
As right-wingers do, YouTube has kind of become this outlet and this way to communicate with people you agree with.
In Southern's view, YouTube is a great equalizer.
A place where people can go to express far-right views without having to worry about being politically correct.
It is time to talk about some inconvenient truths.
And she's right.
The beauty of YouTube is that there's basically no barrier to entry.
All it takes today is having a regular cell phone and you can just film with that.
Anyone can pick up that camera and make a video.
Yeah, I guess anyone could do that, huh?
Yep, any idiot.
By the way, can you just pause it here?
Have you noticed we've been traipsing through this?
We're what, halfway through?
Oh, I'm not going to make this entire thing.
Jesus Lord.
And there's been no point made yet?
We haven't had a salient point yet.
In fact, the only thing of substance came out of Lauren's mouth during his interview with her when he wore his controversial queer shirt.
Low barrier to entry means that YouTubers are afraid to say things that would be too taboo for even Fox News or talk radio.
Talk radio is supposed to be super edgy.
It was supposed to be the craziest opinions on earth.
But now it's YouTube.
You'll have people that are willing to touch topics that other people aren't.
People that aren't worried about being kicked off a network.
They'll just blurt it out and it's there on the internet.
That might sound like an exciting free speech paradise for Southern, but it's created kind of a nightmare for YouTube.
Because it turns out, YouTube is a really good breeding ground for things like extremism.
No offense, but f the Pope.
Hate speech.
They have less crime than other towns.
Yeah, because there's less blacks and conspiracy theories.
Well, the left's been saying they're going to start killing all the conservatives.
One, it's a click-based market.
So creators are Just pause here.
Sanctuary, I was talking about sanctuary cities, and they always talk about how there's less crime there.
And they'll compare it to a densely black-populated place like Detroit or the south side of Chicago.
And you go, yeah, I guess so.
But you don't have the kind of crime you have in sanctuary cities because you don't have the black population.
And in modern black populations in America, they tend to be fatherless.
They tend to have a bad history with prison, a whole bunch of other things.
I blame the left, but if you check the data, densely populated black areas tend to have crime.
So you can't use that to tell me that illegal aliens aren't crime.
And by the way, those sanctuary cities do have more crime than other cities that are the same size, that have a similar background, that aren't Detroit, that aren't the south side of Chicago, that aren't Baltimore, that aren't East New York.
So it was a very good point.
And it was not extremism.
And this whole idea of breeding ground, they think that ideas are some sort of evil plague.
Why are you so scared of words?
And if I'm wrong about the sanctuary cities, please lambase me with a rebuttal.
I would love to hear it.
Then I'll be smarter.
I don't see ideas as bacteria that fester in a Petri dish.
I see it as the gym.
Your brain is working out.
And if someone proves you wrong about something, that's great.
But all this guy does is list things that shock him and assume that you're going to go, well, that's terrible.
That should be banned.
And F the Pope.
Is that too right-wing for you, sir?
And finally, Alex Jones saying liberals are saying they're going to start killing people.
They did say that.
Look at all the signs at these rallies.
Look at kill all white men.
Joe Bernstein tweets that out.
They say that all the time.
White men need to die.
We need to exterminate whiteness.
All again and again and again.
Tim Weiss had a big essay about conservative white males and how they're going to be extinct.
And unlike rare jaguars and other animals, it's good that they're extinct.
The world will be better off with them.
So all of this is just factually true.
Sorry.
Sorry you find these truths to be inconvenient.
Incentivized to be as sensational and inflammatory as possible to get the attention of viewers.
With normal vloggers, it's clickbaity thumbnails and headlines like, my Uber driver is in love with me.
With right-wing YouTubers, it's videos like The Left and Islam Unholy Alliance or Hillary Tied to Bizarre Occult Spirit Cooking Ritual.
Pause it there.
This is clearly a gay man who has no depth.
So when he does videos about what he really likes, it's my Uber driver's in love with me and the worst pants on earth and what is with top buns.
And then he goes over and compares that to political people focused on Islam like Jihad Watch or Paul Joseph Watson or something and says, these guys are evil.
I'm nice.
No, these guys are political and they're discussing uncomfortable concepts.
You're silly.
You're a babysitter.
You're a Miley Cyrus fan.
Independent bloggers also have zero obligation to fact-check themselves, provide evidence, or face debate.
Unlike Fox News or Talk Radio, YouTubers don't require broadcast licenses.
So they're immune to FCC rules prohibiting them from distributing obscene or false headphones.
If you want to lose young people, keep talking about rules and how we need more rules and regulation.
The government has to get involved in YouTube.
What is the problem with someone saying something on YouTube that hasn't been fact-checked that you don't like?
Why must we regulate that?
If you're going to make this argument, you have to show negative consequences.
This person said that the Parkland shooting never happened and this kid got so hurt he killed himself.
There's an example of speech hurting someone, but you haven't provided that yet and we're more than halfway done this stupid video.
Five of the 10 most viewed videos about the Las Vegas shooting are conspiracy theories.
This is from high-level CIA.
Right here.
You know I don't make sources up.
YouTube also pushes people down.
I have a real problem with the whole word conspiracy theory.
It's a theory about a conspiracy.
What's the matter with that?
Why do we have to ban conspiracy theories?
What about when they turn out to be true?
We've had tons.
Remember that we there was a conspiracy theory that the government was flooding the hood with cocaine?
That's a common theory.
You still hear it in Harlem, black people talking about it, how they, there's all kinds of rhymes about it too, like the FBI brought us crack and then threw us in jail, blah, blah, blah.
That theory turned out to be relatively true.
They wanted to fund Nicaraguan freedom fighters and they couldn't do it on government money.
So they had a politician who was working with drug cartels and he was using the Coke money to send it to these anti-communist fighters In Nicaragua.
That was a true conspiracy theory.
And now we're shocked by it.
And there was a journalist who started to research it, and he was killed.
Murdered.
So I love conspiracy theories.
And as far as the Las Vegas shooting goes, I've talked to FBI dudes, and they say, I spoke to one guy, I'm not saying if this is true or not, I cannot validate this, no fact-checking here, but a guy involved in the FBI told me that he has intel, that Islam, ISIS, was involved in the Vegas shooting, and there was more than one shooter.
ISIS did take credit for that shooting.
We all seem to have conveniently forgot that.
And isn't it bizarre that every other shooting, Sandy Hook, the Quebec Mosque, every other shooting, actually the Quebec Mosque is a bad example because as Faith Goldie covered, we got all kinds of conflicting data on that.
And there was also talk of two shooters in that shooting.
But for almost every other shooting, you get tons of information in 24 hours.
We still have no idea what's going on with the Vegas shooting.
So yeah, theorize.
I want you to theorize about conspiracies.
The government, big business, they conspire all the time.
They just conspired to shut down Alex.
Big business and big government deplatformed Alex Jones.
That's a conspiracy and it's true.
Down ideological rabbit holes.
The site is designed to show you more of what you just watched.
So if you click Warren Southern video about immigration, the next video that auto plays is about white genocide.
And from here, it gets a lot worse.
Normally, the check on this kind of garbage would be advertisers.
Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh can be jerks all they want, but at the end of the day, their bosses have to worry about corporations freaking out and pulling their ads.
But YouTube is users rarely know what videos their ads are going to show up on.
For the most part, YouTube manages that relationship, assigning ads to videos and paying creators accordingly.
So if Southern is getting money from a Wix ad playing before her video about the end of white people, she never even has to talk to them.
And they likely don't know she exists.
Sir, I'd love you to know something.
No one conflates an ad on the internet with the content that follows it.
If you have an ad for Pampers and it's at the beginning of a story about a pedophile who murdered babies or something like that, no one goes, why is Pampers advocating for the murder of babies?
Aren't babies their bread and butter?
When you watch some horrible thing on the news on CNN and it's say the pulse shooting and then they cut to a commercial, you don't go, well, how dare Gatorade advocate for the murdering of gays?
That's not how ads work.
We are adults and we're able to separate that and we know it's just algorithms and computers doing that.
Everyone knows that.
But that relationship between YouTube and creators is changing.
In March this year, a group of 250 brands pulled back from YouTube after reports that their ads were appearing before extremist content, including white supremacist videos.
As a result, I remember when that controversy happened, and I looked up things like the N-word and really horrible things like N-word's got to go back to Africa.
Or, you know, you type it the worst thing you can think of, and those videos, they don't exist.
YouTube takes those down.
So whenever you type that in, the N-word, for example, you get rap or some black kids making a joke or a comedy video.
There isn't this massive influx of white power videos.
And if you see white genocide, it's usually a relatively balanced look at it.
There isn't a bunch of Ziegheiling Nazi skinheads on YouTube.
It gets pulled down.
And the fact that you were able to scare, you being liberals, were able to scare a bunch of corporations away from YouTube, you lost YouTube millions, you lost the companies millions, you lost innocent people millions, but you also pushed more people to the right because you said, I'm a killjoy.
I want more rules.
I want more regulation.
I want less fun.
I want less adventure.
I want less excitement.
That's not a good way to ingratiate yourself to millennials.
It's a good way to look like a wimp.
Explanation.
Political content creators, including ones who weren't peddling hate or conspiracy theories, were affected by it.
We were basically making nothing on YouTube existential threat to the show.
And people freaked out.
They called it the adpocalypse.
Adpocalypse.
Adpocalypse.
Most people that are in politics in general, I'm talking left-wing and right-wing, their salary has been halved just because of the whole adpocalypse situation where adpocators don't want to touch anything remotely controversial.
And it wasn't just demonetizing.
In August, YouTube announced new guidelines for how it would deal with hateful content, stating that these videos, quote, won't be recommended, won't be monetized, and won't have key features including comments, suggested videos, and likes.
Southern calls that shadow banning is happening.
These moves have gotten blowback from basically everyone.
They're trying to censor conservative media, nationalist media on YouTube.
Telling the truth is just not advertiser friendly.
And that's because there's really no good way to regulate this stuff.
YouTube sees about 400 hours of video uploaded every minute.
It's impossible to monitor that much content with any kind of precision.
But even if it wasn't, it's really tough to figure out what counts as hateful speech on YouTube.
Southerns'video about gay pride parade, I don't like it, but it sounds...
This guy just keeps showing us his point-form notes on the story without going anywhere with it.
Yeah, I know all this.
I know that the adpocalypse was a mess, and I know it's hard to regulate speech, which is why I am against any regulation of speech.
If you are for regulation of speech, then present to me an argument where it's dangerous.
All you've done is shown things that you don't like.
That's nice.
I care.
Sounds like pretty typical right-wing talk.
It got demonetized.
Southern's video about immigrants replacing white people, that feels a lot more like white nationalist stuff, but there's still an ad running on it.
It's tough for creators to predict what YouTube will deem as too toxic for advertisers.
So I asked Southern, where should YouTube draw the line?
The people that I'm seeing censored A lot of the time are people that are sitting down and making legitimate arguments.
And I'm sure you've seen Jared Taylor was the first one to have his videos totally sandboxed.
Timeout.
Jared Taylor, the white nationalist who thinks whites are genetically superior to blacks and Latinos.
And I would like to talk to you about racial differences in intelligence.
That's what he said.
Yeah, you can pause it there.
Jared Taylor believes that IQ tests reveal Asians to be smarter, Jews, I think it is, whites, maybe Indians, and then blacks, as far as general patterns go.
He also believes that segregation is natural and blacks would rather be with blacks and whites would rather be with whites.
Those are his beliefs.
I don't agree with that belief.
I think ideas are much more important than race.
But what the hell is the matter with that?
Why are you so why do you why is there a record scratch when someone says anyone's name?
Again, Professor Griff from Public Enemy.
He wants there to be states that are all black.
I'm not included in that utopia, by the way.
I don't care.
That doesn't affect me.
When they start and New York becomes one of the black states that Professor Griff gets, and I'm told I have to move and find my kids a new school and a new place to live, well, then I'll care.
But that's never going to happen because it's just a silly idea.
Disagree with what he's saying.
But he wasn't sitting there just spewing hatred.
That's the thing.
As a social justice warrior, I think this stuff plainly qualifies as hate speech.
But a lot of people don't.
And YouTube has to make that call for a staggering amount of content.
Cast the net too wide, and tons of creators get punished for even mentioning politics.
Cast it too narrowly and risk another mass advertiser boycott.
These two groups, advertisers and creators, need wildly different things from YouTube.
Creators need it to be.
I thought it was interesting that he says, and cause another massive advertiser boycott.
He acts like the massive advertiser boycott was some sort of natural market wave that just happened the way the market moves organically.
It just, we had one.
It was like that red tide you get in Florida now where there's all this toxic algae killing fish up and down the coast.
Yeah, that just is a natural evolution of nature.
No, it was a hysterical mob shrieking and harassing corporations and them being wimps and going, oh, okay, well, get rid of it.
Will you shut up now?
This is what I keep trying to get across on this show.
It's not about the free market.
It's not about the government.
We have a cultural problem here.
And the cultural problem is an ignorant, crazy, shrieking ex-girlfriend mob who harasses people.
So the example I like to use is, say you get a job at a law firm and you're doing well, but your crazy ex-girlfriend shows up and she smashes the front glass of your office and they pay $1,500 and have it replaced.
Then she shows up again and she smashes it and she gets arrested and blah, blah, blah.
And your boss goes, sorry, man, you're a great lawyer, but replacing the glass every day, I mean, it's scaring the other people who work here.
You just, you got to go.
And then they would say, well, that's the free market.
You got fired.
No, dude.
The problem is this crazy bitch who keeps throwing rocks through the window.
These people are a hysterical mob with pitchforks and they're ruining American culture.
And more importantly, they're ruining fun.
Open space where they can speak their minds and test ideas without fear of a corporate overlord.
But advertisers need to see that YouTube can rein in the platform's worst excesses.
That it can avoid being exploited by demagogues and conspiracy theorists and people making yet another makeup haul video.
I get it.
You bought more foundation.
Leave me out of this.
Sorry, that took me off guard.
Go back.
That it can avoid being exploited by demagogues and conspiracy theorists.
Exploited by demagogues.
Stefan Molignya is a demagogue who's exploiting YouTube.
I dare you to take that out of context.
What a crazy position that is.
Should we start censoring lunatics who see Stefan Moligna as a demagogue?
What are you talking about?
Stefan Molignyu's arguments are rock solid.
In fact, he invented the whole saying, not an argument.
And you just made not an argument at the founder of the not an argument argument.
What are you doing?
How is he a demagogue?
And say hypothetically he was.
What are you so scared of?
What's the matter with a demagogue?
And then secondly, sorry to repeat myself, but Alex Jones, conspiracy theorist.
So?
What's the matter with having a theory about a conspiracy?
That's called being curious.
That's called journalism.
That's called learning.
Conspiracy theorists and people making yet another makeup haul video.
I get it.
I can't joke about it.
You've got more foundation.
Leave me out of it.
The rise of the YouTube right is scary, but it's helping the world's biggest video platform to figure out what it wants to be.
Wow.
The YouTube right is scary.
Why are you so scared of an idea?
And you know what this guy accidentally proved?
He showed that he has no idea what to do, no idea how to fix it.
And that is the alt left.
That is the social justice warrior in a nutshell.
They want to tear everything down.
They want to shut you up and quiet this person.
They want to regulate everything.
They want to play God, but they have no idea to do it.
They say there's not two genders.
And you go, okay, what?
How many is there?
There's three.
Oh, really?
How much did you say?
Me?
I said there's five.
What?
Are you talking to me?
Yeah, there's 72.
And they keep going and going and going with it because they have no idea what they're doing.
They only want to wreck stuff and they have nothing to replace it.
Michael, are you there?
I'm here.
How you doing?
Good to see you, Gavin.
It's good to see you.
Now, you always seem to be the voice of sanity in a world gone mad.
And is it just me or is this the craziest past few days?
We've got Candace Owen getting screamed at and attacked with Charlie Kirk.
We've got Tommy Robinson banned from Instagram.
And we have Infowars banned from everything.
What is going on?
I don't know which one is crazier.
The thing I can conclude is that the frogs are only Going to get gayer from here on out.
We know from Candace, for people who haven't seen the video, she's out there, she's at a restaurant, and this gaggle of blue-haired white girls start screaming F-white supremacy in her face.
The way to stop white supremacy is scream through a blowhorn into a black woman's face because she doesn't behave the way you tell her to behave.
Well, the far left's rebuttal to that is, no, no, they were mad at Charlie Kirk.
I don't know why the bullhorn kept going into Candace Owens' face then.
Did you hear one of the whistle right in her eardrum?
Right.
Yeah, yeah.
She had to push it away from her face.
One of the quotes I heard on the bullhorn was, because Candace goes, I hate big government.
And she goes, oh, yeah, you hate big government?
Or is that because part of what big government does is that's all.
My favorite part was when they ditched the big government is big government is big government.
They ditched the F-white supremacy and they just started shrieking, just guttural screams like demons mawing in hell.
They really did.
You're not exaggerating.
I think what's really going on here is they know, it's sort of like a crazy girl who knows she's about to get dumped because she's so crazy.
And so she keeps getting crazier and crazier and smashing the windows in your house and burning your clothes.
They know Trump's going to win.
So they're trying to shut down social media and scare everyone from going outside, which is ironic because it just gets Trump more elected.
They have to shut it down.
I mean, this whole F-white supremacy thing is so important because Donald Trump's support among black voters has doubled in just the last four or five months.
But they have to shut it down because, for instance, with Alex Jones, right, he's an easy target.
And there are some sort of, you know, sophisticated conservatives who sip Chablis who they won't defend Alex Jones because Alex Jones is very kooky and frequently doesn't wear a shirt and talks about all the gay frogs.
So they won't defend him.
What they don't realize is that taking down Alex Jones is just the first step.
It's establishing the principle to censor all the rest of us.
They didn't take him down for spreading fake news about gay frogs or whatever.
They shut him down for hate speech about Islamophobia and transphobia and illegal immigration.
That's what they shut him down for.
And they're going to come for us on the exact same principle before the midterms.
Oh, yeah, we're all doomed.
And CRTV is going to get attacked.
You guys, Daily Wire is going to get attacked.
Daily Caller is going to get attacked.
Remember, there was a Daily Caller reporter.
I had him on my show, Sager.
He got a normal question where he said something about Deport.
I can't remember what the question was.
It was a perfectly normal question.
And the outrage was that Trump would dare call on the Daily Caller, clearly a white supremacist publication.
And you go, the Daily Caller?
You guys have lost.
I'm kind of middle of the pack here.
You know, this is not fringy exactly.
No, everything centrist, everything slightly to the right of Bernie needs to be physically attacked, shut down, deplatformed, and then just screamed at.
You know why?
It's because they can't use language.
They actually, and this gets to all of this, that they can't use logic, facts don't care about your feelings, that whole thing.
They can't use language.
It's all just personal interests and like, you know, red faces and steam coming out of your ears.
And it's just this.
And they can't do it.
And we can just laugh at them.
I mean, we are just laughing.
The more they double down, Trump's going to jail, Trump's going to this, they're going to throw Paul Manafort in jail for wearing nice suits.
They've got nothing.
They've got absolutely nothing.
They get them on this Russia meeting, the Trump Tower meeting with Don Jr.
If they say that that was criminal, then we know that buying the dossier by the Clintons was criminal.
They cannot win.
They are just losing left and right, and so they have to scream.
I would scream if I were them, too.
Well, they demand this world of intense scrutiny where you're responsible for everything you've ever said, taken out of context.
And we say, okay, your pedophile jokes, you taking the nomination from Bernie, you colluding with Russia, you selling uranium to an enemy of ours.
I mean, it keeps going on and on.
We say, you started this crazy game.
But that was the past.
With the Clintons, that's always, it's the past.
That's old news.
Now, if you're a conservative, your tweets from 50 years ago, you know, 40 years before Twitter existed, that's not old news.
That's very important.
But the Clintons, no, no.
Hey, come on.
What?
You're still in there with Monica Lewinsky.
Now, it's old news.
She walked in, what, 10 minutes ago?
It's old news.
I think the only thing they have is the following motto.
Hate has no home here.
And they're selling them as lawn signs on the Democratic website and the DNC's website.
And you go, yeah, I agree.
What?
You're anti-hate?
I hate hate too.
I hate Mondays.
I hate it when it rains on my birthday.
I hate Mondays, you know.
I hate having whistles blown in my ear for one.
I know.
Well, it's like the Love Trump's Hate was my favorite one because they actually wrote us a campaign slogan.
That's obviously a pro-Trump slogan, isn't it?
Love Trump's Hate.
They didn't figure that one out.
I'm telling you, I mean, you helped me find the humor in it, but I'm genuinely concerned about the day after the election.
I think I'm going to be out of the country because they're going to just start throwing things through windows and screaming at the top of their lungs and driving their cars into buildings.
It's going to be crazy jihad.
Well, you know, the trouble is when they start the Civil War, you hear all the talk about the Civil War, we do have all the guns, which does make me feel a little bit safe.
But still, I mean, in the short run, look, I think this bodes very well for us.
Historically, we should lose the House.
We should probably lose the Senate.
Things on the electoral map are looking much, much better for Republicans because of all the successes of the administration.
So in the short run, good.
Run your socialists, censor every conservative in America.
That's fine.
In the long run, it is a little scary because they are just mainstreaming socialism at this point.
The Democrat Party ran away from socialism for 100 years.
Now they are embracing it.
The head of the DNC, Tom Perez, is saying the future of the Democrat Party is socialism.
It's socialist candidates like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
That's a word of it.
Ocasio-Cortez is pronounced.
That's all.
I got to work on my pronunciation.
Michael Starring.
you're totally right.
The sanest they get is this socialist talk, and then the craziest they get is downright homicidal.
We're out of time, but thanks for coming on the show and delivering some sanity.
Gavin, good to see you.
Cheers, buddy.
And that's the show, my friend.
That's the show for the week.
It's now your weekend.
It's time for you to put on a Hawaiian shirt and go drink a frosty blackberry margarita with a large water.
But before we go, I wanted to show you something.
I was surprised to see not only is Ryan, or aka disgruntled lover, a great engineer, an asset to the show, he's sort of bringing comedy back into the show with all his adorable imitations.
But what I find fascinating about Ryan is there's so many layers to him.
Like, I didn't know that he was an alcoholic with crippling cerebral palsy and a gift when it comes to martial arts.
But I discovered this video and was pleasantly surprised.
So there he is.
Chugging.
I assume that's alcoholic.
What did you say there, Ryan?
I don't want to ruin this, but that's not...
Oh, I apologize.
That's not you?
No, we look real different.
By the way, that hand chop, just to abandon the bit and get serious for a second, appears to defy physics.
I didn't, like, you must have been traveling at 150 miles an hour to smash that.
That one's more like it.
No, no, no.
Have some faith.
Oh, you're right.
That's not you.
What am I talking about?
Look at that.
Smashed a brick.
This is mean.
No.
We are celebrating him.
We're not laughing at him, and we're impressed.
Okay, if he can do this, I'll be impressed.
When do you get to use a skill like this?
Ow, dude.
Not bad.
Well, that ruins it.
I was under the impression that was you.
I am sorry about that.
You don't want to watch this last one?
Okay, let's watch the last one.
Why does he have to...
There he goes.
Well, he's having a blast.
I don't understand that addition to the trick.
Get wet first so I can't see.
Okay, if he does that without something to brace it, I'm going to poop my pants.
I'm going to wet my panties.
He's got his bracing stone?
Okay, good.
He has a bracing stone.
Alright.
And this first one hurt me a lot.
I mean, and what him?
Wow.
Wow.
Tough guy.
▲
Export Selection