Chase Geiser and Alex Jones dissect the Iran war as a U.S. strategy to protect the petrodollar and counter China's Belt and Road Initiative, potentially involving boots on the ground by 2032. They analyze Trump as an "agent of the empire" whose threats to obliterate Iranian nuclear plants serve Washington's interests rather than American ones. The hosts warn that AI regulation and state-controlled education will erode individualism, creating a Nazi-like dystopia without anti-Semitism, while suggesting mass psychological distress may replace traditional terrorism against algorithmic surveillance. Ultimately, the discussion frames current geopolitical maneuvers as extensions of a deeper imperial agenda. [Automatically generated summary]
We're actually looking for a little bit of advice from you because you're an InfoWars host and we're about to start hosting the American Journal for the very short but foreseeable future.
Well, you get the thing of like, I mean, we're already kind of doing it.
We go live like three to six hours a week plus like routinely.
And then I go live every day.
But when you're doing a show, when you're doing a network show, when you're there, when you're there and you're a part of the ecosystem, it becomes kind of a different animal to it.
And like I wanted to go do the solo show on Friday and I wanted to see how I would do just like that three hour unscripted environment.
And like the thing that me and Tim have noticed, and we talk about this a lot, actually, is over time, like as you get more reps and as you do more practice, the time as you're speaking and kind of going over things or just doing your show, it seems to get less and less and less.
But in your brain, you'll hear the littlest thing.
You'll be like, oh man, I wish we could have done better.
I wish we could have nailed that thing.
But you're doing a damn good show.
Like we're doing a damn good show.
And I think it just comes down to practice.
I think it comes down to motivation, wanting to give people the truth.
And I think it comes down to like love of the game.
I would say this drove my wife nuts, but the first like 20 shows that I ever did at InfoWars, I listened to all of them back.
I stopped doing that toward the end, you know, because I got, but listening back to the first 20 you do, you're going to learn a whole bunch of things that you want to do differently.
And you'll catch little idiosyncrasies, like if you say you know so much or if you say sort of all the time, like you'll catch all that stuff you didn't even realize you're doing it.
Also, always ask the crew how it went and then really dig because they won't tell you until you've asked them at least three times what was wrong with it.
I had a podcast before InfoWars called One American Podcast, and I was able to daisy chain some pretty large guests, even though it didn't have that much of an audience.
I think it had like 25,000 subscribers on YouTube, but I daisy chained guests that start out.
My first guest maybe had 5,000 followers and the next guest, 10,000.
Then it got to the point where I was interviewing the likes of Roger Stone and Steve Bannon, some kind of big names.
And what happened was Harrison had been one of my guests.
And when his wife had a baby, he took a couple of weeks off and I filled in for him.
And after I did two weeks of his show full-time for free, I asked for a job and they hired me.
We're in the process of figuring everything out, man.
Like we're new to all this, even though I grew up around it, taking a very large break.
And I never hosted a show like this.
I did reports and whatnot and things around the office and more things on like the supplement and business side.
So, you know, it's really been like everyone always says, it's a journey, it's a journey, but it really has been a journey.
We're figuring out a lot.
We've really been grateful to the audience and the real love that we've gotten from people.
We really appreciate that.
And just like to everyone watching this right now, thank you so much for being willing to spend the time with us.
And I think what we're discovering as time goes on, as time goes on, as time goes on, is that we really want to be on the cutting edge of giving information to people.
So like we're starting, we're starting like a magazine publication.
We're going to do like interactive global map stuff.
We're trying to find the things.
Tim has really been working hard on this.
Maybe you can speak to it.
Tim has been doing like deep research into the things that other people aren't doing that we could provide value.
I'm thinking about the same thing for my show that I'm going to launch next month.
Like, what are the intros going to be like?
What music do I need to use that's YouTube compliant?
So it's not going to flag copyright issues.
How are we going to do different segments of the show?
So you definitely have to do a lot of pre-production.
But ultimately, there's like two things that matter.
The first thing is that you're providing people with information that they can't find just scrolling through their Twitter profile.
There are other hosts who I won't name, not Infowars hosts, but just other hosts like their show and they stream for two hours or three hours.
It's just like I might as well be reading my Twitter feed.
So provide information in a unique way or a unique analysis that you can't just get from anyone else.
And the second thing is always remember to be as entertaining as possible because you're competing with the fact that basically everyone listening to you can go and watch 2001 a Space Odyssey if they want.
So it has to be better than whatever else they could be watching.
I made a couple changes to my mic settings, so let me know if there's an issue.
Timpool has a very specific niche, which is people who don't have the time to be on social media all day, but want to know what happened every single day.
You can go on legacy.com and pay 250 bucks and write an obituary about yourself.
I'm thinking about doing that just to create a little buzz and then popping out with the first episode, like not saying anything on social media for a month straight.
Well, we look forward to seeing everything that you're involved in.
As far as current news, current topics, current events, we've been basically doing wall-to-wall coverage of the Iran war because that's the biggest story in the country right now.
Before that, it was the Epstein file.
Oh, we forget about that, don't we?
That's not as important anymore.
But what do you think about Trump's actions?
The craziness, it seems, of the United States being willing to kind of crash out in the Middle East.
What do you think of the crashing out going on right now?
So I predicted the Iran war in April of 2025 in a very viral Instagram reel, which is about three minutes long.
And I explained the reason that we want to go to war with Iran actually has to do with protecting the dollar as a global reserve currency and reducing China's competitive edge against the United States in terms of trade and the artificial intelligence race.
And so this entire war with Iran is really about establishing the IMEC corridor to compete with the Belt and Road Initiative and ensure that we won the AI arms race against China and keep the dollar as the global reserve currency.
It has very little to do with Judeo-Christian values, has little to do with whether or not Iran has nuclear capabilities.
It's all about establishing trade routes.
And so like, I don't think that we're in this war on behalf of Israel.
I think we're in this war on behalf of our own fractional reserve central banking system.
And it's just as corrupt being in war for that reason.
But I disagree with everyone who's like, hey, we're doing this just because Israel, you know, Trump's owned by Israel.
But I also, you know, disagree with the people that think it's, you know, like the Mark Levins, I think it's just great that we're going to war with Iran.
It's terrible that we have a monetary system that requires that we do this in order to sustain itself.
Do you think like does that does that logic track for you with the addendum of us maybe trying to make peaceful deals with these countries like Russia or China trying to figure out a way out of this?
Or do you think it was always going to result in this conflict based on the correlation of factors?
Now, Chase, I've been going through these loops in my head of just like, why is Iran so strategically important compared to all of the rest of the countries?
Now, it makes it seem to me like, okay, well, we kind of toppled the Iraq situation.
You know, so I'm just trying to understand, okay, like what is you're you're touching on a specific point, but like, why have we been so interested in Iran?
Is it because of China and Russia being interested as well, or the location of it being because of the Belt and Road initiative?
So the Strait of Hormuz is a huge bottleneck for energy, specifically throughout Asia.
Also, China, I mean, 90% of Iran's oil exports go straight to China, and we're in the middle of an artificial intelligence arms race against China, which one which is heavily energy dependent.
And so basically, the way that I look at the conflict with Israel and Iran is the same way that I look at the conflict with Ukraine and Russia.
Ukraine is the U.S. proxy against Russia, and Israel is the U.S. proxy against China.
Iran is the Chinese proxy against the United States.
So there's actually a conflict happening between the United States and China, not so much Israel and Iran.
Well, land invasion of Iran is very impractical, even compared to like Iraq because of the mountainous terrain.
It would be even worse than Vietnam.
But we don't really have to do a land invasion.
All we have to do is secure the Strait of Hormuz.
And so I think there will be boots on the ground along the Strait of Hormuz, and I think there'll be continuous air assault, but I don't think there'll be a full-scale invasion.
And I do think that the objective will be met, although it will be very expensive for the U.S. taxpayer and it will be drawn out.
And there will be cyber attacks and terrorist attacks and all this bullshit for the next several years.
To protect the dollar as a global reserve currency.
I mean, people don't realize how many deaths there were in the United States of America when the stock market crashed in 1929.
They don't realize how many millions of Americans died of starvation because they don't realize that every 1% unemployment goes up, 40,000 Americans die from stress-related illnesses.
They don't realize that within six months of the stock market crashing, all the wild game had been hunted in all the wilderness in the United States.
So if the dollar collapses, we're talking about almost an apocalyptic event globally.
And so there's not really a number that wouldn't be worth it.
And I hate to say that.
I don't want me saying that to be taken out of context because I do not support this war.
I do not support the reasons for it.
But I do understand that an explanation is not the same as an excuse.
I'm not excusing it, but if I was playing a video game like civilization or total war and I was in a similar situation as the United States in terms of trade and currency status, like the first thing I would do would be just a heartless war against Iran.
Petrodollar, oil, all of that is the main component.
And if you can allow that to continue to have liquidity and have control over the price action and all these different things, at the end of the day, the United States does not want oil to be detached from the actual U.S. dollar.
I mean, they've explicitly said, yeah, we'll open up the strait as long as the oil is traded in yuan instead of uh, in U.s dollars, which just goes to show that it's really about the dollar.
Yeah, and Trump's like, oh nuke yeah yeah, and look, and the problem is like if you're going to justify a military action to the American people, you can't say hey look, we need to establish this trade corridor and the dollar is vulnerable, like the amount of market volatility that would be caused by official leaders as being the official reason that we're officially engaged in this official military operation is asinine.
Like it's just astronomical level of disruption that we created, volatility that would be created.
And so what they do is they just like frame it in this bullshit evangelical Israel has a right to exist stuff, and then what that does is like everybody sees how bullshit that is, so they attack that argument, but they still are diverted away from the real reason, which is just U.s.
Well, the other, on the other unpopular opinion on that is that the reason the Epstein people aren't being prosecuted is because so many of those crimes have passed the statute of limitations.
Right, you know.
So like, what are you gonna do?
You know like, prosecute somebody for a crime that expired seven years ago or 2019?
But then i've also seen that there are certain things that you can still prosecute for.
I I, I don't remember off the top of my head, but they're not going after anything.
That's the problem.
I mean, even if you, you pass the statue of limitations or anything, you can get them on something.
I mean the, the government and the FBI, and let alone the legislation system, has all types of ways in which they can bend the rules to go after whoever they want.
I mean clearly like, we watch this great gameplay and there's a lot of factions involved in it right, and that's why people that always say monolith, like Jews or whatever, like I, don't particularly Particularly subscribe to that.
It's like my dad says, like it is one power block that is trying to run everything just like all the competing factions are.
But at the end of the day, there has to be a head honcho.
There has to be a boss.
We had Simon Dixon on.
He said, I'll tell you who that is.
It's the multi-national or transnational capital interests.
And that's what Trump is really doing is he's ushering in a multipolar world.
What's your take on that?
Because it sounds like you're kind of in the opposite direction.
You think Trump is trying to maintain American hegemony?
Like, I do believe that there's a war for good versus evil, but I don't think there's going to be an aha, like Wizard of Oz moment where we find the man behind the curtain and we're like, you, it was you the whole time.
Like Bibi and Vladimir Zelensky are two like super villains for completely different reasons, you know, but they're still kind of like under the umbrella of the U.S. military industrial complex in our interest because they're both cut us.
But like BB is corrupt for completely different reasons than Zelensky is corrupt, you know?
And it's like, so there's these super villains, you know, like kind of like the antithema, the antithesis of the Avengers.
But it's not like there's one master kind of Thanos level bad guy.
Well, that makes a lot of sense to me, just talking about the devil.
But there clearly is something because you look at these people like Bongino, for example.
And what I said on the show, and I think it's a pretty apt description of what actually goes on, is like they take you into the Oval Office and there's a trapdoor under the desk and you meet the devil basically.
You meet Satan and then you start following whatever protocol it is because it's just too weird.
You look at these people, they're like shell-shocked.
I mean, we saw it with Mike Johnson when he was totally against funding Ukraine and then he went into a skiff and he came out three hours later and he was all for it.
You know, is there any point at which we get to actually push back on these things or is it just one of those things that you just kind of just accept as a reality?
Because people don't seem as upset about that compared to some of the other issues.
Like, we'll go and riot because of, you know, something that happened with Minnesota.
But like this thing is significantly more impactful.
Well, I mean, all the leftist protesters are paid by these NGOs and the World Economic Forum and these other organizations, whether they're Black Lives Matter or whatever, they're all hyper-funded.
Democrats are super organized and they operate with a subconscious understanding of what to do for the good of the hive mind in a way that Republicans or conservatives or libertarians or whatever that isn't left is.
And so like, yeah, I mean, nobody's paying thousands of, you know, college-age or 20-year-old kids to protest on behalf of the fact that we're funding $200 billion for a while.
I think it might be even more simple in the way you guys are describing.
And we've just become desensitized to it.
I think, you know, the Americans have been used to the fact that we raised a debt ceiling, another $6 trillion this year.
And it's like one of those things that you hear, but you don't really process anymore.
You know, not until you get into a situation like 2008 where you got Occupy Wall Street after clearly enough people experienced like job losses as well as housing foreclosures.
Because I didn't see how a Minnesota situation could have just, I mean, maybe it's your Democrat position of like, okay, they had funding to start these things.
But I'm like, come on, this is worse.
This is like 10 times worse.
My gas was like 220 a month and a half ago, and now it's at 379 and we're in Texas.
Yeah, I don't really see, I don't see a way for us to like solve this peacefully.
I think that we just have to, I don't mean to be blackpilled, but and I'm not like an accelerationist, but I think that I think that this whole thing has to fucking fall apart before we can put anything back together.
I just remember being a teenager and the narrative from the Democrats and the establishment Republicans being Trump is evil for asking for $17 billion to build the wall.
And then we just vomit out this money like it's nothing.
We don't take care of our veterans.
We don't take care of our health care workers.
We don't have health care.
We don't have infrastructure.
We don't have any of these things.
China, complete police state, social credit score, all of that.
But they've got high-speed rail.
They've got the best electric cars.
They've got what would appear to be a more modern society than the United States.
How do people in America not learn to take that deal?
Because I think that's what will be proposed kind of in kind with the Chinese deal, what you're talking about with the automation and all of that.
I was listening to a space today and they were talking about they've commissioned a study that will conclude in 2027.
I believe it's the EPA that's done it, where they've put people on credit cards with UBI.
We need to cover this and do a deep dive on it because it's crazy.
They put a track population on credit cards and UBI and they have carbon credits and they're going to track their spending and their environmental impact.
And then when the Democrats come back in power, the study will be there.
Oh, we have to do it to save the earth.
How do we fight against that?
What's the argument kind of from the more right or libertarian perspective?
Yeah, I mean, that's the obvious argument, but I don't think the EPA is ever going to accomplish anything because I think ultimately all the green energy efforts that have taken place in the United States since the 50s have been an effort to subvert the dollar, really since the 70s, have been an effort to subvert the dollar as a global reserve currency.
Because as soon as we eradicate demand for oil because we have some alternative energy source, the entire economy collapses because there's no demand for oil and oil is what props up our currency.
So like this, all this EPA shit, it's cute, but like nobody gives a fuck about the environment.
There's reports coming out that the ozone's allegedly healing.
Do you remember the hole in the ozone in the 90s that everybody was talking about?
Apparently that's gone.
I think the green energy thing lost its muster because nobody gives a shit, man.
As long as we have OnlyFans and Netflix, fuck it, man.
The reason that we've rejected nuclear power, well, maybe in the United States, maybe that's why.
But the reason that nuclear power has been stifled internationally is because the leap from nuclear power to nuclear weapons is actually a very small leap to jump.
And so we've done everything we can to prevent people from having nuclear power in other countries if we don't want to become a nuclear power in terms of militarily.
And it takes like, it could take more than a decade for you to make a return on your investment for that.
But, you know, when we waste, you know, billions of dollars on weapons, it doesn't really seem like it's that big of a difference at that point when I think about it.
And that's what I was touching on with kind of the leftist line of thinking is ultimately when a population is raised to see their government just spend money, spend money, spend money, I think they're going to have a harder time with kind of the rugged individualism argument where like, hey, like we like, just be a free human, don't have to pay taxes, like work for yourself, have your own agency.
I think people are going to be like, well, you know, government has paid for everything my entire life.
And these people are saying they'll make it pay for things domestically instead of the wars.
I think that's how the Democrats are going to win in 2028.
Well, I mean, the left is going to fuck things up so badly and there's going to be massive disruption in the market over the course of the next six years that the right wing that we're going to elect in 2032 is going to be like extreme right.
And it'll be a lot of a socialist component.
It'll be Hitlerian.
I don't know that it's going to blame the Jews, but it'll be like, imagine the Nazi Party without the anti-Semitism, but all the same policies.
Like that's that's ultimately what I'm concerned about.
I've thought about this often and I'm like, okay, you had a, from 2016 and now you're going to go to like 2028, you've had a very tumultuous time period where people have just been upset constantly.
You know, I mean, at some point, the next candidate's got to come in in 2028 and know that like you can't play this game anymore because Trump's first term wasn't the worst, but then Biden comes in awful.
And then, you know, Trump doubles down at this point.
And, you know, the next person that comes in, it's like, dude, we've already gotten it wrong for the last eight years.
We've choked all of their oil supply and they've had a massive brain drain to their population shrunk from like 11 to 9 million because people are willing to leave and risk the Darien Gap and try to find opportunity somewhere else.
I mean, it's the same thing we do to Iran, too.
We do economic warfare on these places decades before we actually put boots on the ground.
It is smart strategy.
The American government is very, very evil, extremely evil.
And, you know, the interests that the national security apparatus or the military-industrial complex try to protect are the macroeconomic interests of the nation with total disregard for the micro interests or rights of the individual.
And so, like, my concern is not so much what happens if we lose this AI arms race with China, this economic war with China, but what the country looks like after it does the things it needs to do in order to win.
And so, you know, we're going to wind up at a situation where it's like, you thought the Patriot Act was bad.
You think just to clarify, are you saying like we're kind of moving towards a similar buildup just like China has with what they're doing to their citizens?
Do you see that happening here with all of the democracy and constitution we have here?
It'll be more like, holy shit, everybody's getting audited and they're all getting caught for the little mistakes they made on accident because AI found it all.
And then like everybody's making deals with the federal government and all this bullshit.
It'll be massive psychological operations on all social media platforms because the AI manipulations of the algorithm and the different social media platforms, especially the publicly traded ones, will be, well, the boards of directors will sell out just like they did under the Biden administration, but this time with weaponized AI, education will be hyper-empowered to brainwash and more and more people rely on public education because it's not economically sustainable to send your kids to a private school and both parents have to work so nobody can homeschool.
So we're going to see generations increasingly raised by the state.
And I think we'll overcome those challenges.
I don't really know how, but it seems that innovation ever so slightly outpaces regulation.
So there will be pushback.
There'll be badass things that happen like the Elon Musk's buying Twitter and turning him into the X and other things.
But ultimately, I think we're in for a very rough road over the next several decades.
I think he got in there and I think he like we heard about the magic money computers and all of this and he said we're going to come in and find $2 trillion and waste.
And then we saw the numbers go down, down, down, down.
I'm not excusing Elon and saying that he's innocent.
I don't like the transhumanist stuff.
I really hate it, actually.
But, you know, people like Anthony Graffio, the person I do Tuesday show with conspiracy talks, me and him talked about it.
And he thinks it's all orchestrated and that there's a master plan.
I understand why I don't think it's crazy to have that view.
But at the same time, I think they kind of broke Trump like a racehorse.
I think it started with the Russia stuff.
I think it started with the media programming.
And I mean, like, I'm Alex Jones' son.
Like, I've seen the hatred my dad has had to deal with and, you know, his character and like a lot of the effects that something like that has for 32 years.
You have people say that you're a horrible person.
I think Trump was overloaded with an attack that no one had really ever perceived before.
And he had a bunch of weaknesses already.
And then we kind of get this agent of the empire as the result.
You know, I think he's really a creature of Washington now.
He's the ultimate politician, which is the irony.
You know, I'm not a politician.
I'm not a politician.
He is the greatest politician possibly to ever live.
I don't think he distinguishes between America and the United States in his own mind.
And so he thinks protecting the interests of the United States as a state, as a nation, is the same thing as protecting the interests of the Americans, which I think is an outdated kind of boomer philosophy, you know, or a Jack Ryan philosophy where the CIA is always the good guy is coming in to bust the terrorists.
You know what I mean?
Like in Hitler, it was the same way.
Like, I'm not trying to say that Trump's Hitler.
I'm just giving an example of another nationalist leader that for some reason was, you know, Germany first, but constantly involved in conflicts in other nations, right?
I mean, everything that Hitler did, he thought he was doing for Germany, but it wound up being like hyper expansionist, hyper external to the actual interests of the German people, ultimately resulting, of course, in the collapse of Berlin.
And so I'm not saying that we're going to have the same outcome here, but I think that Trump believes that his actions in Iran and these conflicts are actually America first because they protect the dollar as a global reserve currency.
I'm not defending it.
I hate our monetary system.
What he should really be doing is gutting the Federal Reserve and pushing for a new monetary system altogether.
But I think he's taken this route of protecting the dollar and he's willing to kill whoever the fuck he has to kill to do it.
Schroer came on the show and he says he thinks Trump is owned, that he's being blackmailed in some sort of capacity where they've got something on him.
I don't know if he was trying to say it in like a defending way, like almost like, you know, they've got something on him, not my president.
There's only but so much that you can focus on at one point.
You've got all of these people that are underneath you.
You've got different agencies, different things that are happening abroad and overseas, right?
So a lot of what I see is there's like a trickle of information that comes to him and he can only process but so much.
And I feel like either you've got people on these lower levels or maybe parallel to him that are feeding him information on, hey, I think we should go do this thing.
And then rather than kind of actually have some agency to think about the decisions, I think he also just like, yep, sounds good.
I think there's certain situations where I could see that happening to where like he's not really processing the actual effects of what it looks like down the line if we do this thing, except for the one thing that he's focused on.
I mean, look at how they set that up with Venezuela, right?
Oh, that went perfect.
He even got the guy that flew the helicopter to come and get the medal at the State of the Union, right?
Like, that's literally picture perfect, everything you want.
And they go, Mr. President, it'll be just like Venezuela.
We'll take out the Ayatollah.
Be done.
And here we here we are.
You know, I, I really like your takes.
It's different than what I hear other people talk about.
I think this is why it's important that you have your own broadcast and that you're independent and just that you go on other shows in general and you being on InfoWars.
Like this is a very refreshing perspective.
It's making me think about a lot of my takes.
Obviously, I joke a lot about make Israel great again.
Where the fuck were you for the past four years under Biden?
It was expensive then, too, and we weren't killing terrorists for it.
unidentified
We're going, oh, my God.
Look, if this shit is still going on in a couple of years, you can, maybe I'll, maybe I'll be on your fucking team fucking two and a half, three weeks in.
And I was going to do a deep dive tonight on, you know, the causality and the trickle-down effect of how this is going to affect you back at home because it isn't a joke at this point.
And everyone's paying attention to gas prices.
And we're talking about gas prices, but the one you need to pay attention to is diesel prices.
That's the one that's going to kick.
We're going to cover this tomorrow on the American Journal.
And if you guys want to catch us in the morning, if you're on your way to commute, on your commute to work, this will be a very good one for you guys to tune into and listen to.
But I'm pretty much going to be breaking down like the economic impact this is going to happen because now we have data from 2022 of what ended up happening after the Ukraine war and some of the situations that happened with that.
So newsletter, want to let people know.
Honestly, I do want to pull up this newsletter because this is something that I wanted to come out with in order to give you guys more value as the gray area because I do these deep dives and there's so much that happens during the week and I'm not able to cover everything, right?
We're only going on like twice a week.
This newsletter is something that you guys need to subscribe to.
It essentially is like a densed down version of like the most up-to-date kind of things that you need to be paying attention to in deep dive fashion that actually allows you to be engaged and understand what's happening in real time.
And we're going to do a ton of different articles weekly.
We're going to have a ton of different contributors.
I'm going to contribute and write supplement articles, geopolitical news articles.
We've got interactive things we're working on as well, working on maps, working on timelines, working on tracking things, things that nobody else really has.
You know, Tim, like a lot of our great friends have really been working on this, and we've got a really cool thing cooked up for you guys here.
And Wes, you can go ahead and click on the subscribe button literally for $5 a month, which is less than a cup of coffee because Starbucks is outrageous these days, even for whatever you're trying to pay for.
You can actually get information to arm yourself and not just that, create a 360 win in which you actually help support the channel.
And I know people do super chats.
I really appreciate that.
But I want to do something for you at the same time.
We want to do something for you at the same time and provide you value in ways in which you can actually learn something every single time.
And Nimrod is just one of the subscribers, but we've got a lot of people that have started to subscribe and I'm getting good feedback.
I mean, we're spending time actually trying to make valuable content for you guys.
And the biggest thing that I am excited for is when we start having contributors, people that you guys actually know that, you know, have something of value for you as well.
Other people, they do a show to sell you something.
We're trying to give you a product so that we can do the show.
And that's what the real nature of all this is.
If you want to help us keep the lights on, if you want to help us develop, if you want to help us hit the street, I mean, I've been doing man on the street stuff for a very long time.
I did my first event, probably in like seven or eight years out on the street interviewing people.
Did that great interview with the boomer?
I'd love to be able to go to places, interview politicians, interview billionaires, just get in their face on the street, go to some of these big events like CPAC or WF.
And the newsletter where you can find the link, if you go to gray area, gray area talks, our X account, you're probably watching on it already or you're watching on Rex's news on feed.
You go to his link in the bio.
You can find Gray Area.
If you click on the link in the bio on Gray Area Talks, you will find the newsletter right there.
It's the first link there.
$5 a month, less than a cup of coffee, and you get great value at the end of the day.
So yeah, there it is.
He's got it pulled up.
Gray Area Talks, you click on the link right there.
They say, like, you know, like Brad Pitt for Fight Club, he stopped smoking, or not, not Fight Club for Shutter Island or whatever the movie was, where he was like an insane person.
They said the acting coach, all they had to tell him to do was stop smoking cigarettes and then he would act like that anyway.
And he did.
When you put on the green goblin mask, when you put on the black Spider-Man outfit, when you put on, when you put on the Trump, you become a little bit Trump yourself.
You can't avoid doing it.
It's true.
If Iran doesn't fully open without threat of the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours from this exact button time, the United States of America will hit and obliterate their various nuclear power plants, starting with the biggest one first.
Thank you for your attention to this matter, President Donald J. Trump.