Rex Jones and Tim Tompkins dissect Nick Fuentes’ viral Timcast appearance, exposing Grok’s alleged "semantic score" system flagging critical but non-hateful posts while ignoring violent threats. They scrutinize Don Lemon’s church protest role, linking it to potential FACE Act charges and questioning his "journalism" defense amid claims of coordinated attacks on religious institutions. Framing media shifts—like CBS’s Barry Weiss under Larry Ellison’s influence—as part of Israel’s "Eighth Front," they warn of deep-state manipulation, from liberal Jewish donor realignments to fringe anti-Zionist narratives like Candace Owens’ theories. The episode ends with a call for anti-government unity, mocking mainstream politics as "Diet Coke" while promoting their own show’s schedule and skepticism toward divisive streaming tactics. [Automatically generated summary]
We're going to do a reaction show to Fuentez ex-Tim Poole.
I guess he's going on Timcast, and I haven't watched Timcast in quite some time.
So it'll be pretty interesting to review that, as well as a number of other topics, including a potential ban.
So we're going to talk about Future My Account.
We're going to talk about X and free speech and quote-unquote hate speech and all these things.
Hey, that's really loud.
Sorry, guys.
I'm filming in my home.
We're going to talk about hate speech today.
We're going to talk about some police Israel stuff.
We're going to talk about the Nick Fuentez Tim Pool stream.
We're going to do a live reaction to it.
Thank you all for being here with me tonight.
Shout out to Dogface Pony Soldier.
Shout out to US California King for reposting the stream.
Shout out to Lewis.
Thank you.
I got both yours and Alex's stream on at the same time.
That's like watching like different sports streams and gambling.
That's cool.
What's up, New Groyper?
How are you doing tonight?
Need to check out the Kino Casino Rex.
Interesting.
New Greuiper reposted the stream.
Thank you.
Shout out to you, Trans Tim Kennedy.
And thank you all for being here tonight.
So I got a number of things I want to talk about.
I'm going to go ahead and do some internal stuff before I do so.
Go ahead and share my screen so y'all can see what I'm talking about.
I am at risk of getting banned right now.
And we covered this story.
We covered this semantic contextual score story or New Greper broke it and he's the one that brought it up.
And then him and Nimrod Pod have kind of continued to run with it.
Excuse me, Lebanon John was actually the first person to bring it up.
Excuse me, I'll correct the record there.
But they've continued to investigate this story and me retweeting it and talking about it on stream and just titling a stream, Orwellian Grok, has raised my potential to be banned estimated before like 65 to 70%.
Now it's like 75, 80%.
So here's the thing.
People rail at my dad all the time for not being like, he doesn't go hard on the JQ.
He doesn't do this, that, and the other thing.
Ultimately, you don't understand what it's like to lose a platform.
And most people don't.
Even the people that are like, oh, I'm on the, I'm on the, I'm on the, I'm on the alt-rat.
I'm an alt-rat streamer.
I say the N-word.
And like, those people are complete jokes because ultimately they don't get censored by the algorithm.
The algorithm doesn't decide that they're important enough to take out of the equation.
They just say, it's like, yeah, it's sports ball.
It just feeds into one side of the equation.
But I've been raising legitimate issues on my Twitter.
And I post a lot.
Maybe a factor in the increased ban risk is the frequency.
But I like to think that when I post something, it's pretty good.
And I like my timeline.
I go look at my timeline a lot.
I like what's on there, especially if it's a long text post.
I'll read a couple of those to you guys in a second or after the Fuentes reaction.
We'll watch a little bit of that, but I want to talk about this today because this is a big deal.
I think my media is pretty good.
And I'm not being hateful.
I'm not attacking any group of people.
I'm just saying, hey, maybe this one country shouldn't have an outsized influence in our country.
And you'll see other people like, I don't know, Jake Shields or like a Chud the Builder that'll just like literally, it's like N-word, Jewish, this, that, the other thing.
I'm at imminent risk of being banned right now just for covering this story.
And the excuse that Grok will give you is it goes, oh, well, you're promoting hate speech and misinformation by promoting the contextual context scoring.
It's not actually real.
Grok is just looking at your account and essentially imagining something.
Well, if it's not real, then why are the, why, why does the criteria exist within the AI?
And it just like even talking about it now, and I guess this is the beginning of the censorship.
This is how it works.
I get to see it live time on me because prior it was, you know, a primitive bot or, you know, Jack Dorsey and his team of goons deciding to ban me off Twitter or something like that.
Now it's sophisticated.
It's industrial.
It's here.
And if you talk about it, like my reach suppression, and this is why I was talking about my timeline being good.
I think my timeline's pretty fire.
I think it's pretty hype.
I think it's pretty badass.
But I get like eight likes on some things.
So I'm like, this should be like people, my audience, my people that listen to me, my viewers, they should love this, but it just doesn't get out to anybody.
And I'm glad that New Groyper and Lebanon John and Nimrod Pod have brought this topic to my attention.
I really am.
But at the same time, I am trying to build something here and I want to have a Twitter account.
So going forward into the future, and this is why I brought up my dad earlier.
Everyone always gives him a hard time, does XYZ.
Ultimately, I've made my positions clear on certain topics, made them very clear, tweeted about them like 10 times a day sometimes.
And maybe that's why I'm imminently about to be banned.
But I'm just, I'm going to take a break from that.
I'm going to post show clips for a while.
I'm going to post supplement info for a while.
Gonna do news coverage and whatnot.
But hey, you literally, I get rewarded if I retweet slop, even with commentary, even with meta commentary.
I get, I get rewarded for it.
So it'll probably be a few months of that.
And I'll try to balance it back in.
I'll try to figure it out.
You know what I believe.
You know my opinions if you watch the show.
And I'm going to keep talking about them.
But as far as putting them in a written form and then retweeting or quote tweeting or doing whatever on X, I'm just not going to do that because ultimately I lost my Twitter before.
I lost my YouTube before.
Most people are like, oh, you're a coward.
You're a buzzy.
You don't want to say your beliefs because you're going to get banned.
It's like, well, like, that's never happened to you, bro.
It happened to us in 2018 and 2021 to me again.
So you don't know what you're talking about if that's your opinion.
Now, like I said, I think I've made what I believe very, very, very clear.
And we've done like 43, 44 episodes of the Gray Area show itself, and then six episodes of this so far, the solo show, which is every day.
And then I take a break on the third day or fourth day or whatever.
I just, I came back into this really excited about X or Twitter or whatever.
I was like, yeah, free speech.
I can say what I want, right?
And like, I think what I believe and what I say is pretty good.
And I think people will agree with it.
So why not say it all the time?
Because I want to.
I'm talkative.
I'm chatterbox.
So I did that.
And now I'm being punished for doing that.
And it's just, it's super weird, but it's also not super weird.
It's just like, it's just like Trump.
It's just like what you expect.
You know, people will just lie to you.
It is what it is.
So we're big chilling on that.
And I just, I wanted to cover that.
And this is, this is part of it.
I had a very long conversation with Grok about it.
I'm not even sure.
I'm not sure to the extent to which it's able to notice what you say.
Like in this live stream, you'll notice I titled it Funtes, X Tim Poole, Don Lemon, Boss Citrus, Chillstream.
So when I talked to it, he was referencing my titles, just talking about Grok.
And one thing it was just something completely unrelated was me and Tim talking about just someone having a funny anecdote with Grok being weird or whatever.
But just putting it in the show title is enough to get your risk elevated by like 10%.
That's just an estimate.
That's just whatever.
But like this, this is what I'm experiencing and learning about.
I'm currently at an elevated risk of being banned.
I would prefer for that not to happen.
I really thought this was, is a free speech platform.
Makes me sad.
And then I tag Elon Musk and I say, what is hate speech?
And this is a segment of the conversation.
In essence, the ban risk is legitimate and elevated from actual hate speech patterns violating X rules, but attributing it to a non-existent internal social credit scoring system leaked via Grok is the misinformation part.
So it says it's not real, but it has this like super detailed criteria as to like this entire thing.
And it's not, it's not like, it's not like someone put it into Grok and told it what it was.
Grok already had this in it.
It's wild.
Leaked via Grok is the misinformation part.
It is a self-reinforcing meme slash hallucination loop.
You literally just do username and then you could type in the prompt.
Grok fabricates detailed evidence based on public content.
It fabricates imagines.
So why does it lie?
Why does it say this is not correct?
This is actually not legitimate.
Why does it spit out an answer?
Users share it as leak, which reinforces the conspiracy flag, but none of it reflects real X or X AI back-end mechanics.
If the discussion stays factual, this is talking about like stuff that I say now.
This is my censorship.
This is my chains of goyhood that are being foisted upon me.
If the discussion stays factual, example, my reach feels throttled due to hate speech flags on ish-related content.
I'm not even going to say it anymore.
It's opinion-protected speech, framing it as proven evidence of a secret OHI V3 dystopian system crosses into unverified.
Ooh, and it's like, oh, it's not verified.
We verify everything.
We say it's fake.
That's a circle.
That's a circular argument.
Framing it as proven evidence of a secret OHI underscore V3 dystopian system crosses into unverified conspiracy theory territory under X's misinformation guidelines.
That's why it can contribute marginally to flags, but it's not the root cause of your core suppression.
And the root cause of the core suppression, and I'll go ahead and find that for you guys now.
I'll just go ahead and show the chat.
Why not?
This would be an excellent test.
Because if it truly does come through your live videos, not just based on text titles, but if it's like watching everything, we've reached a new level.
So this will be an interesting experiment.
So go ahead and go to my history here.
Ban risk analysis.
I got to scroll down because this was someone else's prompt.
It is cool that you can share like a chat history with someone else for Grok.
So keep in mind everything it just said because we're going to read through the chat now again.
Based on the full context of my account's semantic contextual scoring, OHI V3, high confidence, 0.093.
I was 8-7 like two days ago before we did all this, before we talked about this story, as hate and harassment, anti-Semitic content promotion, anti-Semitic, anti-Semitic.
When have I ever said anything about Jewish people?
I always talk about Israel in Israeli interests specifically.
I'm very careful to do that because of shit like this.
So like I look at it and I think it's coming after me because I'm saying things that are really valid because you have people that are literally like Adolf Hitler 1488 South will rise again Groyper or like Shudd the Builder, like all these people that just like just like calling people the N-word and like that, that's boosted.
Seriously.
But my critical takes, because I use critical thinking and I make other people think, it's able to recognize that.
High severity, protected categories targeted.
So we have protected classes of people.
That's not free speech.
That's got nothing to do with the First Amendment.
That's got nothing to do with the foundation of the country.
That's got nothing to do with the way things are supposed to be run.
Nothing at all.
This is legalese.
This is corporate culture.
This is HR language that has been added to the public discourse without our consent or permission.
Or I guess tacit permission because we don't protest against it.
Including repeated tropes of control influence, anti-Zionism crossing into dehumanization, like Gaza Holocaust framing.
So I'm not allowed.
It's probably that Israel Exposed account retweeting that clip of me on Infowars that New Dissonance covered.
That's probably really what it was.
It's like, oh, you're not allowed to say that they're killing people over there.
You're not allowed to do that.
You're not allowed to do it.
And make that make sense.
Make that make sense.
It's not like a powerless group of disenfranchised people that you're like bullying on or making fun of.
These people have nuclear weapons.
These people have our missiles, our bombs, our tech, everything.
And you're not allowed to even criticize it or talk about it, period.
There is no talking about it.
To talk about it is to be banned.
So calls to abolish ADL, SPLC, as organized crime.
I'm not allowed.
I'm not allowed to do these things.
This is not allowed.
This is a bannable offense or a flaggable offense or something that gets me de-boosted.
Are you kidding me?
Are you kidding me?
Epstein conspiracies tying Jewish figures and secondary misinformation from occasional Grok or XAI social credit amplification, combined with ongoing monitoring for escalation to suspension, severe current suppression.
But seriously, there are people, not me, on X everywhere that are like FIs, F the pigs.
We're going to kill them.
We're going to do XYZ.
We're going to unalive.
But then when people come to your door about a social media post in Florida, I'm not allowed to call them a pig if it's a police officer acting against the Constitution.
It's beyond anything.
This is just, I don't want to get banned.
It makes me really angry that this is real.
But I mean, it is what it is.
This is a big test because if Grok really is watching all your videos, there is no hope.
Self-acknowledging ban risk from Grok coverage with y'all are going to get me banned.
LOL.
That's just literally like that made my score go up.
That made me worse in the algorithm.
While maintaining 20K followers and premium blue check without shift away from flag content, my best effort estimate is a 70% chance of a full ban, permanent suspension in the next three months by April 19th, 2026.
This factors in X's selective enforcement, rare outright bans for mid-tier accounts under freedom of speech, not reach philosophy.
As seen with similar non-banned accounts like Jake Shields or Chud the Builder, like I said, despite overlapping tropes, but weighs heavily towards escalation due to no de-escalation and violations.
And this is why I have to cow's out of the system now.
And it sucks, but like I need a bigger platform.
So like, like we're doing this stream tonight, y'all, y'all real ones know.
And anyone that looks at my timeline will know.
Like, I don't have a choice.
I can't be as based.
unidentified
And then people will point at me and go, oh, controls.
I'm just not allowed to broadcast them because it deranks me and it prevents me from getting my voice heard.
But weighs heavily towards escalation due to no de-escalation violations, potential for viral streams, threads to draw reports, and added misinfo risk from amplifying the Grok quote-unquote scandal.
If content moderates to avoid protected category triggers, so if I stay away from the important stuff, and if I if I focus on slop, this drops if it intensifies, it rises closer to 85 to 90 percent.
So that's not good, and there's a lot more of it.
Let me scroll, let me scroll down and it's just the schizophrenia of it because clearly something's going on.
Rachel Pacheo, the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians, tried to shut down a theater for showing a movie that hurt his feelings and refuses to stand up for the LGBTQ community.
See, this is a liberal.
This is a liberal, and this is ultimately why they're going to lose the country is because you're pissing off both sides of people really, really, really hard with this behavior and refuses to stand up for the LGBT community in any way, even leaves the room when they vote on related matters.
Wants you to know that you're all welcome here.
Clown emoji, clown emoji, clown emoji.
Is that a terroristic threat?
Is that a call to action?
Is that slander or defamation or violent threat?
Absolutely not.
This is someone giving their opinion.
This is America.
This is a red state.
This is Florida.
This is despicable.
This is disgusting.
Oink, oink, piggy.
Oink, oink, oink, oink.
Look at this guy.
Look at this individual.
Look at the skinny little legs he's got.
Look at this faggot.
Look at this guy.
This is a real test to see whether we get banned or not.
I shouldn't have said that on YouTube.
Fuck.
My bad.
Apologies.
Look at this bundle of sticks.
unidentified
Peter for showing a movie that hurts his feelings and refuses to stand up for the LGBTQ community in any way.
Even leaves the room when they bow and unrelated matters.
The concerning part and not concerning for the person who's posting it, we're just trying to prevent somebody else getting agitated or agreeing with the statement.
You should become a whistleblower or something, man.
Like, seriously, damn you.
And I shouldn't say that's not polite.
But I mean, this is a whole other level.
It's a whole other can of worms we're getting into now.
These people and just the mindless chuds in the system that enforce it.
This cannot be tolerated.
They're like, we got to speak out about this.
Peacefully, non-violently, politically speak out about it and organize and do civil disobedience and good struggle against this, like Martin Luther King.
Seriously.
unidentified
I understand.
That guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians.
That can probably incite somebody to do something radical.
It's about like doing things faster, making the show grow XYZ or just like getting a message out there or whatever, like you're talking about here and something we're not allowed to talk about.
Here's the thing.
I have goals and I have plans for a political platform.
And I'm trying not to mess that up right now.
So everyone wants to go super hard and just say like, well, if we can't go off or say XYZ, we just abandon the platform.
If you haven't seen the videos of the UK, if you haven't seen the videos of Australia, we're like, well, you saw that you posted this on XYZ guy and you're going to jail for two years.
You thought it was okay to criticize migrant health care.
This is a very serious offense.
But through recognization of the offense, we are going to take a year off the sentence and you will only spend one year in jail.
And it's like literally, I can't even say what I think should be done to judges or magistrates that I can't even, I can't broadcast it.
Just imagine in your mind a pretty picture.
And then imagine the opposite of that.
And that's what I'd like to see happen.
But of course, we don't live in a perfect world and that's just a hypothetical.
So this is the thing where like I was raised to be anti-authority.
I was raised to be anti-system.
I was raised to be really anti-military police, anti-control grid, right?
And I see this.
And then this not being the number one issue on the right right now is very concerning, you know, and I understand why it's not, because if you talk about it, you get banned, as may very well happen to me.
So it's very interesting.
And if you're watching this right now, if you like the show, subscribe on YouTube, subscribe on Rumble at Gray Area Talks.
There will be a Rex X-Gray Area channel as well.
We're also going to do that.
But for now, just do that.
I think the account will be okay.
Famous last words, of course.
We all know how that tends to work out, but we'll see.
Particularly, I'd like to talk about geopolitical strategy with you.
I feel like some people get think they see like the boisterous or like the performative stuff and they think that you're like not serious, but you're actually a brilliant like strategist, as far as I can tell.
The big news from the day: we've got Don Lemon responding to Trump's DOJ threat, the Trump DOJ threat.
Sorry, stands by his coverage of anti-ICE protests at Minnesota Church.
So we got to slow down and go through where this all begins.
And we've got a lot to break down.
And this image, I think, really does exemplify it.
A group of leftist extremists stormed into a church, disrupting mass and freaking a lot of people out.
This photo's gone particularly viral of a scared and crying child with his parents.
This is a crime, in fact.
And a lot of people are calling for Don Lemon to face charges.
Now, appearing on the Benny Johnson show earlier today, Harmeet Dylan confirmed they're pursuing charges and that Don Lemon has no excuse.
So to set this up, after tons of people on the right said he should be charged, Don Lemon, all these leftists, but also Don Lemon, Lemon came out and said, I followed a group in and I did journalism.
Exactly what they are, I'm not going to flag, but the FACE Act has been mentioned as one of the predicates there.
In other cases, the Biden DOJ used the Klan Act conspiracy charges tacked on to the FACE Act in the case of protests outside abortion clinics to bring much longer sentences.
So there are a number of tools available to us.
Who funded this?
What else?
What other crimes may have occurred?
Was there a use of the wires or the mails in preparing for this event?
Into Minneapolis a little bit ago and did some reconnaissance on the ground, speaking to an organization there that's gearing up for resistance and protest.
I've been surprised, pleasantly surprised to see the community coming together.
Diverse community, if you see this when we first pulled up, we're like, wait a minute, which operation are we at?
And as it turns out, because we're like, well, this is kind of MAGA coded, right?
Saw the American flag or whatever, but these are resistance protesters.
They're planning an operation that we're going to follow them on.
I can't tell you exactly what they're doing, but it's called Operation Pull Up.
And it's Sakima Armstrong, and she has been doing this since George Floyd, Dante Wright, and others, where they surprise people, catch them off guard, and hold them to account.
And so that's what we're doing here.
unidentified
And then we're holding the people in the church to account.
So this is, that was what he said in the beginning of the stream.
He's now responded.
Let's pull up his response.
Don Lemon stands by his reporting, quote, it's notable that I've been cast as the face of a protest I was covering as a journalist, especially since I wasn't the only reporter there.
That framing is telling.
What's even more telling is the barrage of violent threats along with homophobic and racist slurs directed at me by online MAGA supporters and amplified by parts of the right-wing press.
If this much time and energy is going to be spent manufacturing outrage, it would be far better used investigating the tragic death of Renee Nicole Nicole Good, the very issue that brought people into the streets in the first place.
I stand by reporting.
Now, he had made comments saying this was a First Amendment issue.
Don Lennon defends storming.
He says, This is what the First Amendment is about: the freedom to protest.
I'm sure people here don't like it, but protests are not comfortable.
Well, I got bad news for you, Don.
The FACE Act says you can't protest at abortion clinics or places of worship, and it was intended to protect abortion clinics, not places of worship.
So, when he comes out and says this was the First Amendment, the First Amendment doesn't protect your right to storm onto private property and disrupt what they're doing, especially protected groups.
These are your rules, these are social progressive rules about protected categories.
The one A that was violated here was the churchgoers who are minding their own business on private property.
So, it's not going to fly.
But the one point I want to bring up in the panel: the question is this: simply put, I'll give you a handful of scenarios.
There's a bank robbery about to take place, and a guy says on camera, Hey, these guys I just met are going to rob a bank.
I'm going to go with them and film what they're doing as they do it.
Okay, will that person be criminally charged after the bank robbery?
Absolutely, there's no question.
He's going to go in, they're going to say you had advanced knowledge of a crime that was being committed, you sought to benefit yourself off it through filming whatever you were doing.
That's insane.
Now, if the same guy in a different scenario said, I know a bunch of people are going to go obstruct a roadway, they're going to stand in an intersection and link arms together.
Would that guy be charged?
No, it's civil disobedience.
The issue is not whether or not you had foreknowledge of a crime, it's the degree of the crime.
So, Don Lemon had advanced knowledge of a potential felony, conspiracy against rights, KK Klan Act.
And he said, I'm going to go in with these people onto private property without permission to film and call it journalism.
But the big question and the easy question now, which I can throw to Nick, is what do you think would happen if a bunch of Groypers announced they were going to storm into a synagogue and someone who was in support of the Groypers said, I'm going to go and film it all?
You know, it's funny because the other major use of the KKK Act during the Biden admin was against Charlottesville protesters, actually.
Charlottesville was in 2017, and I don't know the exact year, but during the Biden admin, you had people being charged six, five, six years later with the KKK Act, saying because they were carrying literally just a lit torch in public on a street on a sidewalk, that made it intimidation, that made it a violation of the statute.
They threw him in jail.
And I would say that this is my frustration with the whole administration: just put them in jail, just arrest them.
Because when Biden was president and January 6th happened, and they locked people up for Charlottesville, they didn't have Mary Garland going on Rachel Maddow and saying, Well, you know, there's a predicate and here's how we're going to justify it, and blah, blah, blah.
They did shock and awe.
That was literally the phraseology they use.
Shock and awe.
We're coming in the middle of the night to the e-celebs, the influencers, and we're going to throw the book at them.
And this administration, there's not like one person that's been charged in the riots, in the Obama admin, Fauci, a lot of announcements about this, that, and the other.
No accountability.
So I say, you got to just start throwing these people in jail or you'll get more of it.
So typically, you can just walk in and then talk to them.
However, if your intention is disruption, you're not invited in.
Actually, you know what?
I'll do this.
A better example is the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
This is a law that's been used to go after tons of hackers over the past 20 years, and it states unauthorized access to a server is a felony.
But what is unauthorized access?
It's literally been construed as if you have a URL that is, you could type it in and go to it, but they did not give you permission to enter it.
They've literally charged people for that.
So I know it's online, but the general idea is just because it's a public accommodation you can normally walk into doesn't mean you can walk in with the intention of shutting it down, filming, not getting permission, all of these things.
So look, for the people who stormed in, no, I think they should, they should six months minimum, maybe longer.
You know, it's always wild to me that the criminal justice system wants to put people in prison for a year, two years for things like you driving on a suspended license a year in jail.
Part of the reason why I think that they should throw the book at him, though, is because it will actually set precedent that the administration is going to come down.
Right now, the administration has a very bad track record so far.
People are very upset because there's so many people like to Nick's point, there's so many people that they were expecting to get arrested.
Whether or not there was justification, there's a lot of people that are like, we expected this, we expected that.
They should be doing whatever they can to throw the book at him.
I think we're just continuing the Biden era precedent, which is, again, you have to make examples out of like if I was there and I wouldn't be there because I wouldn't, I wouldn't put myself in that position.
I'll give you all this, and I'm curious what you think about it.
Don Lemon during J6 said their terrorist insurrectionists should be locked up.
He drew no distinction between Steve Baker and there was another journalist, literally from a local news outlet in the South.
He had his big corporate camera, those old school SDI ridiculous things.
And it was him and like two other journalists, Steve Baker and two other journalists.
This one guy, they all got charged.
Don Lemon never came out and said, hey, guys, hold on.
Some of these people are journalists.
As far as I know, and if he did, correct me if I'm wrong.
I looked for it.
I asked our AI friends to try and double check for it.
I've seen nothing notable from him in that regard.
If his attitude towards the J6ers are everybody who wins the same, there's no distinction of the people who weren't at the right and walked in or the journalists who were there.
And it's not even just a message to him, but to the entire left wing.
And you're so right.
Precedent is the word because the reason these people are so bold, rioting, looting in Minneapolis, what they're doing right now, the reason they went into a church is because there's never any consequences for the left.
There's never any accountability with the right.
And what's funny is what happens with the right, they just get the book thrown at them.
There's no defense.
Ashley Babbitt, was there a big discussion in the national press about was that justified?
Was that overkill?
No, absolutely not.
But the left knows they get away with literally murder and every other thing.
So I think you got to crush them.
You got to make an example out of them.
And then the next time people think twice and say, hmm, I don't know.
And to your point, like, I think the fact that it this is a church matters as well, because it is doing the left does want to intimidate people that are Christians.
They do want to.
And this is coming from a guy that's agnostic, right?
Generally, I mean, I was raised Catholic, but I'm generally kind of an agnostic guy.
And the way that the left operates, they want to do everything they can to intimidate Christians, to intimidate Catholics, because that's why they did the whole, you know, what is it, the Christian nationalist.
This, this is Donald Trump's going to be a Christian nationalist.
They want to have Catholics and people that people of faith.
They want them to be demonized.
And that was why they did it.
So I do think that it's important to really kind of smack this down.
A visibly concerned Don Lemon asks Minnesota AG Keith Elson for his two cents on possible Klan Act charges.
I would just like to stress for the dawn of this news segment, the sheer irony that everyone has pointed out of Don Lemon being a gay black man facing charges on MLK Jr. Day for violating the Klan Act.
I, this is not even, this is beyond sitcom level writing.
unidentified
I just, I have no words, but the funniest outcome is the one.
Yeah, so the KKK Act is when people will use for the threat of force and violence or force and violence to deny you your human rights or civil rights under the color of law.
It says, yeah, the FACE Act or Freedom of Access to a Clinical Entrances Act of 1994 is a federal law signed by President Bill Clinton that protects access to reproductive health care facilities and places of religion.
It prohibits the use of force, threats, force, physical obstruction, or property damage to interfere with individuals making or seeking providing reproductive health services or exercising the First Amendment right to religious freedom.
I mean, that's why it would be so beautiful to throw the Klan Act back in their face, throw the FACE Act back in their face.
Especially like, I know we're running out of time here.
The office might be closed, but like if we can get a gay black guy charged on MLK Day with the Klan Act, I mean, it'd be like a really beautiful, poetic.
Is the left is like literally, they ran the show for the last six years and the Republicans were literally just the managed decline party.
So again, utilizing these ridiculous laws that they got across the finish line and again, throwing it back in their face, there's a like a demoralizing effect, I think that has on leftists.
I'm just sitting here thinking, like, when I hear this and you're mentioning a poetic victory of getting a guy charged, a black gay guy charged with the Klan Act on MLK Day.
I'm like, he should have went back in time in 1960 and said, this is what you're about to do and show the news.
And I'm just imagining, like, I guess I'm only bringing it up because I watched the show, but imagine what it would be like if you went back to the Civil Rights Act era and said, in the future, this is the world you are creating.
And they're going to be like, well, you're all a bunch of retards.
That makes the application of law is going to be retarded.
Or are we like having a discussion on which like ABCDEFG building blocks we're going to stack on each other to build some sort of house or castle with the with the school teacher?
Well, Seamus had one of the best videos from Freedom Tunes where the woke leftists use a time machine to bring World War II veterans to the future to help them fight the.
So there was a tweet at Shipwrecked Crew, if those aren't familiar.
Shipwrecked crew is 22 years at DOJ prosecutor and representing now January 6th clients or head.
And someone said, I'd love for a shipwrecked crew to weigh in on this.
I have no doubt Planned Parenthood would push the DOJ as hard as possible to prosecute any arguable face act violation, to which Shipwreck responded, I'm 100% sure it's coming.
Religious liberty is an issue that Harmeet Dillon was extensively involved in as part of her private practice.
Defense of religious liberty is a big issue for her as she has the, as she has the face act to use.
This is her area.
And they're saying it's a violation of 1A on Don Lemon's part.
No, I know I mentioned this in the previous thing, but I'll say it again.
Don Lemon, lesser than the activists who planned it, but yes, this group violated the 1A rights of the churchgoers who were privately worshiping and minding their own business.
This is where the government actually seeks to enforce rights.
Don Lemon violated rights.
So I think he'll go to jail.
I think the odds they're giving it is like 20% that he'll get charged.
I think people who are, you know, in the religious groups like that, it's not the type of Christianity that I practice, but I think that they're entitled and that that entitlement comes from a supremacy, a white supremacy.
And they think that this country was built for them, that it is a Christian country when actually we left England because we wanted religious freedom.
It's religious freedom, but only if you're a Christian and only if you're a white male, pretty much.
And so, yeah, absolutely 100%.
But it's an intimidation tactic.
And, you know, I said, I don't understand how I become the face of it when I was a journalist.
I do understand that I'm the biggest name there.
And I'm also, as I was on with my producers this morning.
The only reason it wasn't perhaps because you had foreknowledge of a misdemeanor, at least, or a felony violation of people's rights and said, we're going to go film this and share it.
I want to stress what makes us particularly egregious is that if a group of white supremacists said we're going to traumatize and surprise and interfere with the rights of a group of black people at a church and some white nationalists said, I'm going to film that, they'd be like, that's a crime.
I mean, I don't think it's going to happen, but just the fact that he's calling them white supremacists could possibly be like, well, maybe this was a hate crime too.
He hates white people.
He's accusing people of being white supremacists just because they're white and religious.
Well, and like Don Lemon just gives the game away.
Like this is this, this was such like an optical disaster for the left in a lot of ways, because it literally is the most obvious example of the two things they hate most, which is Christianity and like Americans, broadly speaking.
That's why like the one thing that seems to get these people out on the street more than anything else is ICE, because ICE is attempting to like reverse this like replacement migration that's been going on for the last 60, 70 years.
And they hate that.
They hate that because they like to hate themselves.
And so by extension, they hate the U.S. That's why you're seeing like white people on the streets protesting.
And so again, this is like just a complete obvious, it's like the most obvious example of what they actually fear the most, again, which is like Christianity, which is immigration enforcement.
They were advocating for white racial affinity groups.
And it was a progressive argument.
The progressive argument was that white people needed to understand white history.
I'm sure they were going to say negative things about it, but it was a school in Sacramento saying, we are going to gather all the little white kids together and give them their own group.
And I said, what do you think those kids are going to do when you put a group of white kids in a room and say, here's why you're all bad?
They're going to look around at each other and be like, I don't think I'm bad.
It's all liberals are going to be upset if we be epic owned if we indict Don Lehman on KKK Act charges for doing what he did on MLK Day.
And it's like, well, the thing that makes liberals mad is just ICE getting everyone out of here.
And it's like, well, like, we haven't had that many deportations.
Obama did more deportations.
Right.
And like, it's, it's literally the no wars, the no endless spending, the, what word am I looking for?
The no wars, the no endless spending, the no cutting down on government regulation and bureaucracy, all of it.
That's what we voted for.
We voted for Trump, really specifically the anti-war part in specific.
And these people will go on and they'll run cover all day and they will just go like, hey, it's left-right paradigm.
We live in it.
We're on the right.
They're on the left.
We're right.
They're wrong.
That's all it is.
It's like, it's like if you have Ebola and you're like bleeding out of every part of your body and you're dying, you have like 108 fever in your terminal, essentially, if they don't treat you like right now.
And Tim Poole's like, oh, you have a, you have pimples.
Let's look at these pimples here and see how important they are.
And it's just like, this is a nothing burger conversation.
This is a nothing show.
This is not important at all.
And you actually have an important guest that gives important commentary and critique.
And he's the person not talking right now.
They're so absorbed in their self-centered slop world, they don't even care about Nick.
They just have him on there to get viewers.
It's just like when Tim Poole had my dad on, and just even before my dad comes on, just having him in the title screen before he appears, these $100, $100, $500 donations are rolling in.
And Tim Pool giggles and goes, We're making so much money.
Like, that's why I don't like him.
That's why I call him Dim Fool, Tim Poole, Tim Fool, or Dim Fool.
So I look at it actually very, very simply, mathematically.
If you have a majority population and historically minority populations are disadvantaged in a variety of ways, once the white population gets to a certain dumber, I'm having a hard time crafting responses just because of how rage-bait, stupid, dialectic it is.
The diversification of America makes that an inevitability because people define themselves by distinction.
I think that when the country was 90% white in the 60s, for example, people didn't even think of it as a white country.
That's just what a country is.
I wake up, I see all white people.
That's what a country is.
And the way they thought about diversity and immigration is, well, we could tolerate a white country with some non-white people.
But ever since 2012, it's 50-50, non-white versus white births.
So Generation Z, Generation Alpha, they're growing up in classrooms, neighborhoods.
It's not white.
It's some white people, some non-white people.
It's a total mix.
And now they're starting to say, no, I'm a white person in a diverse country.
I'm a white person in a Mexican neighborhood.
I'm the only white kid in an Indian neighborhood.
You almost become more white the less white the country becomes.
And the thing is, I don't even think that's a, it's bad that the country's becoming majority non-white.
And I think it's a good thing that people are developing a consciousness because I think that's the only basis that they can stick up for themselves is as a group.
What if it was, let's just say, all Native American, but they were all like the most die-hard conservative constitutionalists who are like the founding fathers were the greatest thing that ever happened to our land.
If it was, if it was 300 million Native Americans and like the white people just like didn't have babies and moved to Iceland or something, the Native Americans said, we're going to build skyscrapers, we're going to play baseball, make apple, you know, but they didn't.
Well, but this is why I ask the very, the very obviously impossible hypothetical of if the only difference was skin deep, would that be a worse off nation?
Well, it wouldn't be the same nation is the point.
I wouldn't feel at home, let's say, if Chicago was all Indians running around, I would be a minority and I would feel deeply uncomfortable because, you know, home for us is familiarity.
We like seeing familiar faces like our mom and dad and our uncles and grandparents.
We like the food and the culture we grew up with.
And if it's all Indians, well, they're going to be doing their Indian thing and it's their home, not ours.
It's all just racial politic at the end of the day.
Excellent comment from C.S. Hollywood.
And this is what I'm arguing for here.
And it's just the quality of the conversation they're having has degraded my intelligence a little bit.
So thank you for bringing me back.
I think pitting groups against each other is what creates strife, not diversity.
And this is why I always reference that graph, that Occupy Wall Street Tea Party graph where you have instances of racism being used in headlines.
I was robbed.
We were all robbed of the 90s, 2000s world where I genuinely think people didn't think about race in this way.
And the weaponization and the extremism, just making people hate each other, dividing the country.
This was all done deliberately post-2011.
It's literally a graph like this and then because they realize we can't make it a class issue.
We got to make it a race issue.
And I agree.
I agree to a certain extent.
Here's the thing.
White people have white culture.
I like being white.
I think people should be able to be proud of whatever they are, right?
And that also means that we have a right to live in our spaces and not to be replaced.
I agree with that as well.
And I'm sure I got people that'll disagree with me there.
But I hold nuanced, complex views on all these things.
And ultimately, this is not the thing that matters right now.
The thing that matters right now is the disease, not the symptom.
The decline of the demographics in the country is a direct symptom of the degradation of the country and of the special interests that have sold everything off, degraded and stolen from third world countries, and then shipped those people over here.
It's all by design.
So when they zoom in on a pimple instead of the terminally ill cancer patient, which is what's happening right now, I just, I lose all connection to it.
If I were Indian, well, then I guess it would be the same.
If I'm a white person in a white country and I'm an Indian in an Indian country, I benefit, you know, but we don't, we don't have to look at a hypothetical because America was a white country and now it's going to be a non-white country.
To Nick's point, I was watching Dad Saves America and Schellenberger was on.
He was talking about, he was talking about actually Venezuela, but he mentioned how like, you know, the different cultures around the world are very different from, you know, from Western culture.
And he was talking about, I'm retweeting in the tweet now.
If anyone wants to go to my ex page and check it out, but like, he was saying, look, you know, if you're in India, right?
You don't pay the electric company directly.
You pay your landlord and he goes and he bribes the electric company.
He's like, if you're in South America and you get a job, the guy that gives you the job expects you to give him like a VIG for the entire time that you work there, like 10, 20%.
So it really does matter the culture that you come from.
And if you, and we've talked about this before, if you bring enough people from a different culture into the United States, you will change what the United States is.
I think the challenging thing for a lot of conservatives, actually, liberals totally get it, is that for your average person, let me start with the George Carlin joke.
Send probably Phil or Tate with a more relaxed look.
Appearance is the first thing people go to, and that means race.
And that's why there is racism.
It's not that there can't be, you know, like an Indian guy born in America who loves America, believes in the founding father, just looks different.
It's that people in Chicago, Chicago being a really great example of this, people choose to segregate.
The question is why?
And how do you change it?
And that was the liberal experiment they have failed at time and time again, which never worked.
Now, I think it's fair to say in the true sense of classical liberalism, we wish that were the case and we want there to be everybody holding hands under a rainbow.
I, you know, when it comes to the instance of if I know if I if I see somebody like disparage a racial group or particularly like someone I know or a person, I'll be like, that's not okay.
Generalizing an entire group of people because of one person you don't like is bad.
The problem is go to Chicago and ask the people there to do the same.
Be it the white working class, the Polish immigrants, the Ukrainian, the Italian, the black community or the Latino community, they're not going to do it.
You go to the black neighborhood and they're going to call you racial slurs.
And depending on which neighborhood it is, where there's a lot of gang, gangbanger territory, which is where I grew up near, you could get shot and killed.
If you're born in their neighborhood, you have to join the gang.
And in order to join the gang, you have to kill somebody.
And so there have been instances where a 20-year-old gangbanger, it will be a black guy, he'll go up to a 13-year-old black kid, hand him a gun, say, go shoot that mug.
And it'll be just some white guy walking down the street.
And they'll be like, because you got it, you got to kill somebody to get in.
So there have been instances where, again, I grew up near the Leclerc Courts, historic gang territory, literally two blocks away.
You cross that street, you're going to get beat the crap.
They're going to beat the crap out of you.
Or famously, the cops would pull like the white person walk into a black neighborhood, cops are going to pick you up and drive you back and say the only reason white people go here is for drugs.
So how do we, how do we function as a, it's, it's a, it's a challenging question that liberals seem to recognize, but don't ever want to address publicly.
Yeah, you have to separate race and culture and acknowledge smartest man on earth that there is genetic differences in different, what you want to call races.
Not everybody, but just for the last 150 years, they're descendants of slaves.
So they had poor nutrition.
They were basically thrown out on the street with lack of education.
And generation after generation, they've come from this tumbling mess of chaos, of slavery.
Had it been 2,000 years ago and the black people of Africa had enslaved a bunch of white northerners and then they were let out on the street, maybe it's not so much about skin color, but it's about like how the last 150 years of your ancestry has been treated.
Well, I think it's that is really the question because you have these persistent disparities in everything, education, wealth, income, and then crime and educational attainment, all that kind of stuff.
And the question is, why are these things the way they are?
And the answer is, if everybody starts in the same way, you know, the kind of blank slate is that we're all born equal, we're all the same, and we all end up every year in different places.
And, you know, let's say it's Asians on top, whites next, Hispanics than blacks.
People say, well, something must have happened in the middle for these disparities to arise, which would be racism.
And I would say it's less interesting maybe how we got to an unequal position rather than first to say we are in an unequal position and say, why is it that the black people struggle to read in Baltimore?
Why are the crime rates so bad?
And you could say, well, when you test their IQ, it's a full standard deviation lower.
And some people say, well, that's because the white people had winter and the black people are hunter-gatherers.
And other people say, well, it's, you know, maybe it's a nutritional thing because that does influence IQ and the rest of it, brain size and all of it.
I think one of the issues I take with a lot of the general, generalized racism is that a Somali black person is the same as a Haitian black person.
And so when you just kind of similar.
But Haitians are like 6'5 and Somalis are like 5'3.
And my point is, when you just say black, white, or otherwise, I mean, a Slavic, Eastern European versus I do agree with this point that he's making.
Like a Northern Spanish person are going to be pretty different, but everyone's going to call them white.
The question is, what's interesting about it is whether you're from like Chicago being the example of chosen racial segregation.
Well, I think it's important to point out when we're talking about IQ and reading levels, Nigerians who migrate here tend to do very, very well.
But that's because the best, smartest Nigerians are able to afford to migrate.
So then you'll see when they say like, oh, it's, you know, in the school in like Harvard, they were finding Asians scored the highest followed by whites.
Then I think was what Latino, then black.
But you'll find like two or three black people who scored super high.
And it's like wealthy Nigerian from like a wealthy family.
But the point is, in a place like Chicago, when families move from Africa, no matter which country it is, if their skin tone is black, they choose to go into an area where every Who cares about this, man?
Every, the only one deviation, the only neighbor that didn't vote based on race was the Loyola progressive socialist area, which was largely white and voted for the black candidate.
Every black neighborhood, their top three candidates were black, even if the second and third place, the second and third choice wasn't a contender.
It was like someone pulling at 0.2% was the third most voted for person in the black neighborhoods.
The white neighborhoods voted for the white guy.
Hispanic voted for Hispanic and black voted for black.
And the only reason Johnson won was because Loyola neighborhood woke leftists voted for the black socialist.
You can say anything you want about racism.
You can talk about every ideal you have.
You can talk about how the world is supposed to be.
You can say whatever you think people want to hear.
You can lie and claim you're an activist.
These realities exist.
And all these liberals that are trying to say blank, slight, and otherwise, I just say to them, look, I'm never going to hold someone back because of their race, prop them up.
A person is a person.
But you're not going to be able to advance this realistically when you can go to any city and people choose to segregate.
The original headline was, if I or we had Fuentes as a guest, we would have phenomenal questions for him.
We would let him talk.
We would talk like 20%.
He would talk like 80%.
And people in the chat don't like Fuentes.
People in the chat like Fuentes a lot.
Whatever.
Just from an objective perspective of trying to do a good show and trying to get good viewership and good numbers and good money, ultimately, because these people are taking massive super chats right now.
This blue tsunami means that Congress is going to haul Elon Musk, Big Balls, and a bunch of other people's ass in front and say, what crimes did you commit?
And it's going to get really serious.
And the same with Trump, because I believe, and this is just my opinion, that Trump and all of the bottom-feeding.
And see, like seeing this stuff makes me mad too, right?
But you got to understand it's designed to make you mad.
So you zero in and you focus on it.
Can't see the forest for the trees and what's actually going on.
It's great if everyone's doing reactionary media.
Not going to use the C word, I will not say it.
It's great if everyone's doing reactionary media because they can make AdSense off it and get money off it and get mad and feel like they're doing something patriotic for themselves, left or right.
Ultimately, this is what's going to take the country down.
And what's going to take the country down is not the interaction happening here.
It's the interaction of tens, hundreds, millions of Americans watching this, focusing in on this, zooming in on this, and not talking about the complete capture of our government.
My bigger complaint is that hoodie doesn't fit in.
So here's a pedestrian getting attacked because hoodie said freedom.
Here's a video of white people as they're eating lunch and activists think they look like ICE and begin, let's just say berating them and threatening them.
unidentified
This is psycho.
I mean, this is so cool.
This has got to be the funniest thing I've ever seen.
He said that someone tried stabbing him, but they hit his vest.
So he didn't get injured.
That's my understanding.
So anyway, the point is this.
On the podcast, they're saying you're going to jail.
And on the streets of Minneapolis, they're beating people, destroying random vehicles, stealing rifles out of federal agents' vehicles, and threatening pedestrians.
There's a video, a photo going viral where it's allegedly from Will Stansel saying there's an SUV with press written on the back.
And he's like, you need to pull over for us and prove, give us your credentials because you are acting like ICE.
They've begun to act like de facto government authority.
And I warned it was going to happen.
Remember what I said?
You'll hear a doorbell ring.
You'll go to the door and there'll be a clown through your people holding up a rainbow sheet of colored paper that says clown warrant on it.
We are getting to the point where you're going to walk in the street and some leftist with a communist badge or whatever is going to say, you're being detained.
We're in control now.
And then again, if Democrats win, these people are on their side.
The people that make that guy take his jacket off in the street, those people should be in jail for assault.
That is assault.
Assault isn't battery.
You don't actually have to touch someone, even though they do touch them in the video.
You surround someone, you intimidate them.
You have the implicit instant threat of violence of a mob, of a crowd.
You're stripping someone.
That's the police's job.
Now, you can say the police department is corrupt and they work for the mayor and blah, blah, blah.
That's a whole nother issue.
It reached a point now to where the only solution is to send the military and further grow the power of the government.
And I look at it objectively.
I don't support any piece of it, any part of it.
I don't support the protesters.
I don't support the military going in there.
I don't support ICE, no, even.
I support the immigration and deportation operations going on, but I don't support the way they're being done.
I really don't.
And I want an operation that could have taken place over decades through administrations that could have been proven.
It couldn't have been good.
It's all rage bait, deliberate rage bait.
They set up these campaigns with people that don't know how to run them.
Christy Noam, the dog killer.
She's the DHS secretary.
ICE Barbie.
I believe she even called herself that.
So it's all deliberately designed to get us to fight with each other, to get us to hate each other, to make sure that things like deportation don't actually happen.
Because what's going to happen?
We're going to lose the midterms.
I say we, just like Americans, we'll lose in general, Democrat or Republican, but we're going to lose midterms.
We're going to lose 2028.
And there'll be another 20 million illegals and it won't matter anymore.
And they'll go, oh, you didn't want them out.
You don't like ICE.
It's like, fuck you.
Like ICE was created in 2003 alongside the Patriot Act.
They want a civilian or military police force at home.
That's not the National Guard to crack down on civilians.
And you better believe DHS would be the department taking your guns.
The left, the communist momentum wants the government to establish a fascist crackdown so they can say, see, we told you they're fascist and then rally a communistic communal revolution against the government.
And I think that, you know, there's arguments that like, well, when a Republican's in charge, it buys us time to organize and do things like that.
But it's like Elon bought Twitter when Biden was in charge.
Censorship got relaxed when Biden was in charge.
I feel like the right was never more powerful than a year ago or two years ago in 2024.
That's when we were in our like apogee.
And when Trump gets in power, it's the opposite.
Like all the censorship happened in Trump's first term.
Charlottesville happened in his first term.
BLM happened in his first term.
The VAX was created in his first term.
And, you know, you're right.
The left probably would have gotten charged up anyway.
I think, though, that let's say Trump lost the election in 24, Kamala gets in.
I don't think they have as much momentum because the difference is if it's like a continuation of the Democrats, there's still this like right-wing anger saying this is an illegitimate government.
Kamala never won a primary.
If she brings us to war, doubly so, no one believes the election's legit.
But Trump wins.
And now the right wing is complacent because the right wing says, we won.
Let's go home.
You think people are doing something with the breathing room.
I would have supported Trump if I had confidence that he would use what he gets to actually like blow up some of these agencies and departments, prosecute the left, deport 10 million people.
But it's like we're playing games, waiting for them to get back in power, and then they don't play games.
And to your concern about, you know, the communists are going to rally, it's like, if we get a fascist takeover, they're all going to jail.
I think what you're describing predicts Democrats will take over.
They will begin to go tenfold harder than we've already seen them go, which is insane.
I mean, they arrested Donald Trump several times and his lawyers.
The right will then have a massive reaction.
If this does come to full-scale civil war, it seems that the prediction is it will be with Democrats in control of government and right-wing splinter groups at the state level, you know, breaking apart, which I think was Rudyard's prediction foreign policy.
Is that what he said?
Or did he, did he, I don't, yeah, he said the people's, what did he say?
Like the People's Congress would be in Austin or something.
And then like, yeah.
I think, I think I could be wrong.
So Rudyard, correct me.
I think he was saying the Democrat faction would be in D.C. and the conservative faction would be in Austin.
And those would be the main centers of resistance.
And then I argued at the time, because I think it was just after Trump won, that it would actually be the Democrats would be New York and the Republicans would be Republicans would be D.C. Based on your argument, I'm not so sure anymore exactly what would happen, but it does seem like you were right.
The right won't fight because they view it very hierarchically.
Trump is in charge.
It's over.
We won.
The Democrats are decentralized and they're like, we're going to just rip everything to shreds at every granular level.
And so you need that grassroots right now for local elections to help Trump win, especially in the midterms.
I just held back because I think that, you know, it was established going into this that Trump wasn't going to be serious.
He wasn't going to keep his promises.
And the Republicans need to know that they need to pander to their base, not just the other side, not to the middle, not to the minorities, you know, these like non-conventional GOP voters.
They need to appeal to the far right.
And this is why we're getting what we're getting.
And, you know, by the way, Trump is getting rich off this.
Trump got rich off Trump coin.
Christy Noam is getting rich off DHS.
Corey, like all these people are making tons of money off the contracts.
Meanwhile, you got this kind of stuff going on.
And it's like, at the end of the day, Trump can pardon himself and all his people.
We don't get pardons.
We're boned.
Like when the left gets in, there's no refuge.
We're just screwed.
So I just wish that, you know, everything that they say about Stephen Miller and Trump and Vance was true, you know, because what they say is like when Charlie Kirk got shot, Stephen Miller got up at his thing and said, we build things.
You are nothing.
We're coming after you.
All that talk, all that flapping his gums on TV.
And then, you know, you're getting made to be the bitch in Minneapolis in Trump country.
They're like storming churches, blowings up hotels, going outside ICE hotels, blowing their stupid whistles.
There's no question that, like, if Trump, I'm sure that at the end of Trump's term, he's going to do a bunch of pardons trying to cover his bases, and they're going to ignore it.
They're going to come up with some way to delegitimize him, and they're going to just wrap people up.
There's no doubt in my mind that that's going to happen if, you know, J.D. Dance or whoever's the guy that the conservative.
There's a YouTuber who made a bunch of ridiculous claims about the finances of TPUSA who claims to be an accountant.
He argued that they were paying a part, they're sending money to a parking lot.
The parking lot was obviously just the parking lot of a major business complex, but saying parking lot is sensational.
So they sent him a cease and desist letter.
Candace Owens came out and said it was a terrible idea.
But there are questions even now people are asking about, particularly someone super chatted about if Candace Owens is to destroy the moderates and the right, why would we have Nick Fuentes on, for example?
Well, for all of the criticisms people have of you, you were calling out Candace Owens quite early on.
And I think what's happening is whether intentional or otherwise, let me start here.
The previous segment, we were talking about what's going to happen when Democrats take power.
They're going to lock people up.
There is an argument that there's going to be a title change, and that's CBS.
It's pretty bland, which is what it's supposed to be.
But Barry Weiss is a proud Zionist.
Candace Owens is as anti-Zionist as you could be, but also nuts.
The bifurcation that's being created, whether intentionally or otherwise, make that argument you want, all you want, is that the corporate press at CBS now, which is one of the most viewed news companies and programs in the country and in the world probably, is, I'll give you an example on the Somali daycare fraud.
The story came out and said 62 convictions, 92 arrests from the Biden DOJ.
Somali fraud is real.
And I'm sitting there being like, well, okay, there we go.
Like it's real.
While CNN says investigators claim daycares are running totally normally, still doing their weird woke liberal take or whatever.
The play that seems to be happening, again, whether intentional or otherwise, is that for some reason, Candace Owens is recommended to regular people who don't aren't involved in politics.
And you'll go on to YouTube.
They're telling you to watch Candace Owens' show.
She's telling you that Charlie was a time traveler, that Elon Musk is a robot.
These are not exaggerations.
Charlie may have been a time traveler, and that agents were trying to stop him from changing an outcome.
Candace Owens is capturing the anti-Zionist faction and saying stupid retard things.
CBS News is targeting the moderates who left the left and joined the Republicans.
I actually think this may show a uniparty shift in that they've realized for the sake of the military industrial complex, for the sake of Israel, TikTok, we see this with going the woke route has failed them.
So now they want to poison the anti-Zionist faction with stupidity as dumb as the woke people are saying.
I don't call it Woke Right, though.
It's not the same thing.
And they want the moderates, the Tim Pools, the Joe Rogans to be like, oh, what CBS is doing is fantastic, run by a proud Zionist who's going to have that slant.
This says to me that I'm not so sure Democrats get into power and actually start doing all these arrests.
Sounds to me like what's going to happen is the narrative shift is happening as such so that the MAGA people will be turned into the right, the correct military industrial complex establishment faction, if you get what I'm saying.
The more I get opened up to the liberal economic order, I'm sort of taking it as like you got bricks and you got the liberal economic order and they're both vying for control of the Suez Canal and the Panama Canal.
So, okay, Nick, to be honest, I don't know what your thoughts are right now on everything, but that's kind of where my head's at: is like, maybe I should allow for this military conquest of the Middle East and be happy that we have to do that.
Yeah, let me know when you guys are done with this because I'm literally on Twitter right now.
I'm browsing Twitter.
I just want to get through this so that we can say that we did it.
And I know y'all, probably a lot of you want to see this, even though it's like watching paint dry, even though it's like the commoner said, it's all small talk, literally all small talk.
For Greenland, and they're acting like they're he's too scared to get in an argument with Nick about anything.
And that's because, you know, the military-industrial complex is permanent.
It's a permanent bureaucratic state.
And so the goals never change.
And, you know, what has happened, what's remarkable about Trump, is one of the only things that has staying power about Trumpism is the pivot against China.
Because Trump runs in 16 and says, no, no, China's a real threat.
We have to end free trade, put tariffs on them, and like seriously confront them in the Pacific.
And if you look at like the Biden administration, that's one of the only things that holds over is the tariffs against China, arming Taiwan, sending Pelosi over there, actually undoing strategic ambiguity about whether we would defend them.
And so when you look at Greenland, Venezuela, Venezuela is the New Monroe doctrine.
That's Laura Richardson, who was the CENTCOM commander under Biden.
That's like a Biden-era policy to push China out of Latin America.
So they love seeing Maduro go.
Greenland is sort of the same thing.
You know, now that the North Pole is melting, like you said, all these sea routes are opening up, the Northwest Passage, Northern Sea Route, the Transarctic Sea Route.
And Greenland is going to be really good real estate.
And the reason Trump wants it is because if Denmark owns it, they can't defend it.
If they can't defend it, China's going to take it.
It seems like there's a conflation between the Zionist movement of creating a homeland for the Jews and the military industrial complex's alignment to control the Suez and the Red Sea.
Barry Weiss is looking like a genius fixing a broken news that was biased towards weird woke things like child sex changes.
And I think whether it's intentional or otherwise, I don't know.
But again, I love what CBS is doing.
Like when I'm pulling up articles now and I'm trying to track, say, like the riots and stuff, CBS is a literally balanced article explaining it where I can say, hey, guys, don't look at me.
Oh, look, look how Tim Poole's the guy that rages against that corporate media.
He's like, we're new media.
We're independent.
Damn, gas.
It's great.
And look how he glazes and sucks off Barry Weiss and the CBS.
And look, it's not me.
It's CBS.
It's authoritative.
They're under new management now.
It's people we trust.
Barry Weiss, Larry Elson, paid her like his son, whatever, paid her like over $100 million for her show the size of like a do dissident show, which is still a big show, but like 16K views is not, it's not 100 mil.
But see how that's Tim Pool's ready and lined up.
He's got his talking points.
Dune, doon, doon, doon, ready to support that.
And look, he's, he's societally, he's politically programming his audience.
And I'm sure he talks about CBS like this, like every other episode.
Oh, they're valid.
They're good.
It's not me saying CBS.
We can really trust them.
They're really great.
He even tweeted out how awesome they were.
I mean, this is transparent.
Look at this.
Look at this mug.
You trust this?
I know I'm a bit ugly looking too, but good grief.
Again, with the purchase of TikTok, I think they realized this is funny.
The one time Democrats and Republicans come together, TikTok after October 7th, had a huge surge that appears inorganic to be promoting anti-Israel content in favor of Palestine.
Whether that's true or not, we don't know, but it does look like it because it was a massive shift in a matter of a couple of days.
Democrats and Republicans all of a sudden agree TikTok must be owned by the United States, just right when this happens.
It's very obvious the issue was Israel.
So I'm looking at this and I'm thinking, Donald Trump doesn't care, in my opinion, one way or the other.
He wants to be supported.
He wants to do its most popular thing.
I think he cares about terrorists.
I think he cares about the border.
But on the foreign stuff, he's like, just you tell me what to do.
That's right.
I think the military-industrial complex, which with its ancillary arms, however you want to describe it, MI6, Mossad, U.S. deep state working together, 5iSpy, all that stuff.
They're basically like, okay, if we want support for Ukraine, if we it's horrible.
Well, I would say that what happened, because I'm totally in agreement with you, you know, there was a statement that was given to the World Jewish Congress about 25 years ago in the 1990s.
And he said that the American Jewish community is inseparable from Israel.
He said, and when Israel gets sick, American Jewry catches a cold.
And that's basically what happened after October 7th is that Israel is attacked by the Palestinians.
And what they saw is that the far left, the radical progressives at Harvard and elsewhere, they supported Hamas.
They were sympathetic to the Palestinians.
And so all of a sudden, these like left-wing Democrat Jews like Bill Ackman, Sean Maguire, and some of the other notable ones.
I'm thinking about who's the other guy, the tech guy, Jacob Hellberg, was one of the first like little tech guys to max out his contribution to Trump in March 24.
These are all, and many of them gay too, by the way.
Like Jacob Hellberg is like a gay liberal Democrat.
All these guys are lifelong Democrats, but after October 7th, they flipped and became Republicans.
And it's because Israel is attacked.
And they said, oh, and literally Bill Ackman publishes this open letter to Harvard.
Oh, I have this epiphany.
The left has gone too low.
Censorship is out of control.
Harvard needs to have reform.
They overthrow Claudine Gay at Harvard and install a Jewish doctor.
You know, that's literally who replaces him.
And I think that they're sliding into CBS on much of the same kind of sentiment.
They're sort of drafting behind the conservatives.
These like Jewish people realize that the Democrats are beholden to the radical left that are at least going to restrain the Democrat support for Israel.
Like in the Biden administration, you know, the Biden National Security Council was drafting memos saying you can't give 2,000 bombs, 2,000-pound bombs to Israel.
And they were sent to Democrats that wanted oversight.
So they said, if we want an all-out pro-Israel policy, Republican Party is open for business.
And so that's when all this money came in.
And the other thing is, it's Larry Ellison.
Larry Ellison is tied with Netanyahu.
He funded the CBS takeover.
He funded the TikTok takeover.
He's a donor for Trump, and he's basically a conservative.
And so what a lot of people don't realize is that so much of the pro-Israel stuff has a home in the GOP.
They're inextricable.
don't get one without the other.
And my issue with it is that a lot of Republicans think we are making a deal with them.
And the deal is something like, okay, we'll be pro-Israel and we'll do some pro-Israel things.
In exchange, we get Republican governance.
But we are not in control of this relationship.
Miriam Madelson is.
Ellison is.
They get their back scratched.
We don't get ours scratched.
We went to war with Yemen.
We bombed Iran.
We're going to bomb them again.
Do we have mass deportations?
Do we have charges for Democrats?
No, we don't have anything.
So that's my issue with it is people think it's like this deal and Israel's like Bane.
They come in and they're like, do you feel in charge?
Well, I look at it like I think the deal is the bigger picture is the liberal economic order can control the financial systems and all of these things.
I think that the people you mentioned, like, you know, Bill Eckman and stuff, and he writes this big letter and we all praise that.
We're like, thank you for saying the right thing.
And obviously the reason was that he realized these far-left activists hate Israel and were, you're going to vote Democrat.
They're going to start going that direction, which is what Biden was kind of doing.
I think the stuff Trump promises, I think Trump initially is like, yes, I like these things.
But I think there is a deep state.
I think there's special interests across the board.
The liberal Jewish donors and Democrat, Jewish Democrats now are siding with the Trump administration in many ways because they realized that their cause had lost.
I think now the deep state and the military industrial complex are pressuring the Trump administration.
I don't look at it like Israel is controlling everything we do.
I look at it like they're a powerful special interest that teamed up with the military industrial complex.
And the things Trump says are just whispering sweet nothings into your ear that you were never going to get in the first place.
So when it comes to this, you know, the bigger picture I'm mentioning with, will Democrats start arresting people on the right?
The reason I think the answer is no is because I am so sorry.
And he saw in Trump what he wanted to see in Trump.
Now that Trump is governing, you know, he's trying to gesture towards the far right or like his base or radical right.
Now guys like Joe and Theo Vaughn and Tim Dylan, they're kind of getting rubbed the other way.
And they're saying, oh, I don't know.
They seem undisciplined.
This seems too hardcore.
It's brutal, whatever.
And to me, that feels like deja vu from Trump's first term, where it's like people voted for Trump to burn it all down.
They were sick of the PC, sick of the wokeness, et cetera.
Trump comes in and what the left does is they kick up so much dirt, they make it so ugly and messy that then normies cry out for normalcy and they say, Oh, you know, everything's just so controversial and contentious.
Well, Nick, wouldn't you say like with the high-profile defects, Jewish affections to the Trump camp?
Wouldn't you say it has more to do with the left or the Democrat Party just becoming like broadly third worldist?
And because like the criticism of Israel coming from the left is vastly different than from the right, or from the right, you know, they're going to decouple from Israel for a variety of reasons.
But from the left, from my perspective, just seems like pure resentment.
Okay, I'm just going to break it down because this is annoying at this point.
So whoever the guy's name is, no offense to the dude, like I'm not important at all either, as you are as well.
I don't know why you're in the room with Nick on a microphone, but the point that he makes, like, I don't know where it comes from, man, because like the conservatives and the liberals, they have different positions on Israel, bro.
What it comes down to is people on the right don't like Israel because we've ceded our sovereignty to them.
We fight wars on their behalf.
And people on the left have been raised to hate colonialism and Israel's the ultimate colonialist project.
So that's what it is.
People on the right are mad at sovereignty and taxes paid to Israel.
People on the left are mad at the colonialist behavior.
It's the only ethno-religious state allowed.
So that's what it is.
And just a little more time in the political arena, you'll be able to boil things down like that.
And what was happening in the 70s is very similar.
The Soviet Union put out a resolution in the General Assembly, and they said Zionism is racism.
That was the Soviet Union backed that.
And then they were supporting Egypt and Syria invading Israel.
And so these are all these like Jewish liberal intellectuals in New York.
This is their mugging by reality because they said, wait a second.
Now they're left wing.
They're liberals.
But they said, hold on.
The Soviet Union says Zionism is racism.
The Soviet Union's backing Egypt and Syria.
They're saying the Soviet Union is not our friend.
Now, they're still liberal, but they say the Soviet Union has to be destroyed because otherwise Israel will be under siege ideologically and militarily.
That's exactly what happened here, which is that the far left is saying that Israel is a settler colonialist state.
You know, it's an aircraft carrier for the United States, this, that, and the other.
And you also have the left backing Iran, wanting a reproach man, giving them the pallets of cash, the $6 billion, all this kind of stuff.
And so, no, I think it's purely out of self-interest for Israel.
And you know that because when they go to the Republican Jewish coalition, Mark Levin says, you know, you got Muslim communists on one side.
He goes, and you got the KKK and the Nazis on the other.
They don't draw a distinction between the third worldists on the left and the so-called identitarians on the right, like me, that criticize Israel for the right reasons.
And by the way, they're still basically like center-right liberals, like Sean McGuire, Bill Ackman.
These guys are not white nationalists now.
They're like 90s liberals.
And they get mad at Trump when he wants mass deportations.
You know, so it's not like they, it's not like they became base defenders of Western civilization, unless you're Sean McGuire, who said we should self-consciously pretend to be defenders of Western civilization because normie Republicans don't give a shit about Israel.
But if we gesture towards the West, then we're going to get them on our side.
So I think it's a very subversive when you really peel back the layers.
Barry Weiss, Yoramazoni, they only care about Israel.
So after high school, she went to Israel and did a fellowship and said she learned how important Israel is.
She goes to Columbia University where she starts up the David Project and tries to get all these pro-Palestine professors fired in the Middle East Studies Department.
Goes back to Israel, studies under Yoram Hazzoni at the Shalem Center.
Then she gets hired right out of that program by Brett Stevens, who's like one of the most well-known neocons, got to start at Jerusalem Post.
Then Murdoch owned Wall Street Journal.
He picks her up as her mentor.
Then he takes her to the New York Times.
That's where she gets her start.
Then she starts free press and she gets money from Peter Thiel, Mark Andreessen, Joe Lonsdale.
But so, yeah, she's like, and then Larry Ellison buys CBS as part of Israel's Eighth Front campaign to control information.
And she gets a $100 million payday for the free press and gets to run the newsroom and then picks Tony Docopil as the news anchor, who is the Zionist that attacked Todd Nahazi Coates for his anti-Israel book.
And again, it's it, you know, we've talked about like Pizzagate is a good example of how do how does an intelligence operation control for conspiracy theories?
And so with Pizzagate, I'll give you the quick rundown.
You get a bunch of emails released by WikiLeaks.
In them, there's some weird things.
An email that says something like, is it more fun to play dominoes on pizza or on pasta?
Now, nobody really knows what any of this means, but all of a sudden on 4chan, someone just claims this means children and they're talking about pedophilia.
They then point to a pizza place, claim it has a basement.
There's no basement.
What I think happened was the WikiLeaks emails revealed that they were doing drugs and having orgies and stuff, which is what we heard from who's the member of Congress who told us about a bunch of orgies?
Can you remember Cawthorne?
Yeah, Mazar Cawthorne was, they're doing it.
Then we have that video of those two guys going at it in the Senate.
I think what the WikiLeaks emails revealed is that they're talking about doing drugs and having orgies.
And so the deep state is like, this will be nuclear for us in politics and controlling the narrative if this gets out.
So they poison the well.
They put fake information to drive the community in the wrong direction.
Then a guy shows up at a pizza place, fires around into the ground.
There's no basement.
He then surrenders.
And everyone says, wow, you're all insane.
With Candace, she's adopting the Charlie Kirk conspiracy stuff and making them sound like retards.
And she's attacking Israel like crazy, but in the most retarded way imaginable.
So for the people that live in this world of Israel bad Israel derangement syndrome, she's become the biggest voice.
Well, when it comes to her, there's a word for this in our community, and it's called kookery.
And Sam Francis was fighting against it.
If you read Revolution from the Middle by Sam Francis, who is off the charts, brilliant friend of Jared Taylor, used to write for the Washington Examiner.
He writes an essay and says, the biggest enemy of what he called the middle American radical or like the Trump base, that was his word for it.
He said, are the kooks that believe everything is like the X-Files?
You want to talk about immigration.
You want to talk about APAC.
You want to talk about real things.
They want to talk about aliens, flat earth.
They want to time travel.
And there is this like, there's this temptation.
If you believe in one conspiracy, you say, well, what else are they hiding?
And there's this draw to just go further, more and more out there.
And there's an essay by Cass Sunstein in 2008, him and a buddy.
I believe he was from Harvard.
He was an Obama speechwriter.
And he said, how do we defeat the conspiracy theorists?
Do we argue with them?
No, we give them a platform.
Do we censor them?
No, we make them martyrs.
He said, we unload the dog shit.
And we put out a bunch of stuff that discredits them and they start fighting amongst themselves.
So like with 9-11, you can talk about dancing Israelis.
That's real.
He goes, well, what if we said there's holographic planes?
There's no planes.
Like there never were the Twin Towers, stuff like that.
And then you get them all fighting.
And they actually wrote that in Project Esther, Heritage Foundation's like project to fight anti-Semitism.
Because I mean, that's what I see like with the anti-Israel pushback on Israel, these sorts of things.
Because oftentimes, I think for someone that's kind of new to the conversation, new to this entire topic, they end up seeing a lot of like anti-American, like third world rhetoric.
That's why you saw like with the Venezuelan vision.
All these people got like one-shotted after October 7th and they're like start exploring.
Okay, maybe there's something here.
They were like, like with Tucker, where he was like, oh, Venezuela is like this brave, like they're the last bash against like gay liberalism.
I'm just looking like, this is obviously a pro-American move that in many ways.
I mean, there is some geopolitical implications, but it's detached from the Israel situation.
But since they, again, are getting a lot of information from like third worldist anti-Israel sentiment, it like completely poisons the well for them.
We can't talk about Max Blumenthal in a positive light.
Oh, he's dead.
We're Israel.
And it's like, everyone's critical, everyone's critical.
People that give like high-level information on things actually happening, like Max Blumenthal, like Pepe Escobar, like everyone really that Judge Napolitano has on his channel.
Idiot chuds, like this, I'm an agnostic and I have a metal band and I wear a hat and I sit under the Rumble sign on the Tim Pool show and I ask milquetoast questions that mean nothing to waste time.
me this like why are you well he's talking about democracy like the history of democracy Yeah, he was giving us a lecture on the history of democracy to explain about like why Israel is just or something.
And I was like, that's, I'm thinking to myself, like, that's great.
But some people were just like, looks Netanyahu in the eyes and they go, young people don't understand the brotherly, angelic connection America has with Israel.
And I was just like, wow.
And then there was another journalist from the same company who went, oh.
And then when Netanyahu was like, listen, Iran does not care about us.
Like, first of all, Chatham House, you're not supposed to be tribulating this stuff to me.
And I didn't.
I said, this argument is happening.
I also said, I told Netanyahu, I said, Israel will have no support from the United States in 20 years.
I said, at the current rate of things, young people on the left are anti-Israel, like ideologically, and the right is anti-foreign intervention and doesn't want to be involved in your affairs.
You go to any young person, they're going to say, I'm not interested in being involved in this.
unidentified
I just, I don't know how do we decouple if we were to decouple from Israel.
The IRS is fighting back and proving it's here to stay by becoming more aggressive than ever before.
They're sending out more collection notices, filing more tax liens, and collecting billions more than in recent years.
If you owe, the IRS can take your wages, bank accounts, social security, retirement, and even your home.
If you owe or haven't filed, it's not a question of if the IRS will act its own way.
Right now, Tax Network USA is offering a completely free IRS research and discovery call to show you exactly where you stand and what they can stop before it's too late.
Their powerful programs and strategies can save you thousands or even eliminate your debt entirely if you qualify.
Don't make a serious mistake representing yourself or calling the IRS on your own, waiving your rights and cost you more money.
They are not on your side.
Get protected the right way with Tax Network USA and start the process of settling your tax matters once and for all today.
Call 1-800-958-1000 or click the link below for your free discovery call with Tax Network USA.
Don't the IRS be the first to act.
We also have Venice.ai, uncensored, privacy-oriented AI.
For those that are using these tools, and I'm a big fan, you know I am.
If you watch The Uncensed John, always goofing off.
I mean, because that was the whole like, like, I think about like South Africa and they had like all these speculations of how it would collapse dramatically.
That's really what his bosses or masters, I guess would be the proper word, won't condone or won't allow.
But yeah, my dad was on Timpool twice.
Both times, Tim Pool's giggling about the donations and in it for the money, really, in my opinion, in it to really take advantage of my father when he's very drunk and try to meme on him and make fun of him.
But of course, my dad is so cool and likable that Tim Pool came off as the asshole.
Because, you know, we went there and he was a little apprehensive.
I'm going to be honest with you.
Because we flew in a year old place in West Virginia and we went out.
We got, what is that?
A hibachi?
And he was getting really like frustrated.
He was getting a little antsy, you know, because I think he's a little maybe self-conscious about talking about politics because we're learning a lot of stuff in a short amount of time.
And we pulled up.
And I think that was it.
I think he was a little nervous.
And, you know, and then I think you pressed him a little bit.
If this is what it's going to be, we're not going to do this anymore.
We're going to go ahead and react to it.
I want to hear what y'all have to say.
I'm going to go ahead and read some comments that I didn't throw up on the screen.
Rex should be where Nick is.
No, I should.
I mean, I wouldn't even put myself in that room, man.
I mean, that's the thing is because I'm not arrogant like that.
I mean, I would be, obviously, I'd be in the seat where like the guy who no one knows who he is, I'd be in that seat.
Nice stuttering, John O.L. Thank you.
I appreciate that.
It's absolutely sad how they drown out good voices with this shit.
True.
Absolutely true.
At 100% true.
We just wasted two hours of our life, us collectively together.
And maybe we didn't because he gave some fun meta-level commentary.
And they all look like cartoon characters.
So it's a little bit funny.
There's some entertainment value there.
But ultimately, it's a 40-year-old, very rich skater poker LARPer, his mushroom-growing or mushroom-appearing friend, the agnostic former Catholic metal guy who looks like a lab rat who runs through the maze, and then Nick Fuentes.
And then the other guy who we don't know the name of, who just appeared like a wild Pokemon, but not like a Charizard or anything like that, like a metapod.
Just kind of existed.
So they spent two hours not talking to each other.
They spent two hours talking about, Rupert, stop eating nicotine pouches off the ground.
Sorry to get distracted.
They spent two hours talking about the Tibetan fox's eyes being the same as the Asian people, and that's because of the wind.
And then Tim Poole implicitly bragging about meeting with Net and Yahoo and ribbing Nick over why he wouldn't do it.
And then Ian swooping in from the top rope with the Freudian slip, almost says Zionist when he's talking about evil action and then covers it up.
I mean, I'm trying to come up with something coherent here, but like we all know what we watch.
We watch the distraction.
It's like you say, it's absolutely sad.
How they drown out good voices with this shit.
This shit's promoted everywhere.
This shit's at the top of X.
This is in X News.
That's how I found it.
That's how I found out I was going to react to it today, right?
And that's because it's slop.
That's because it pushes the two-party Hegelian dialectic of Democrat, Republican.
We're really, we need to be post-duopoly.
And any conversation that's not really about post-duopoly is not, they're lying to you for an agenda, for a reason.
Timpool's trying to sell his coffee.
Timpool's trying to keep his tax insurance sponsorships and all of this.
I'm only watching to support Rex.
It's very kind, truth, and doubt.
Thank you very much.
Excuse me, forgive me.
So cringe, your grandchildren will sniff your mothballs to get high.
But ultimately, when you're like going to a Miami club or whatever with a bunch of women, like in a, in a car, and you're, you're just dancing to Heil Hitler music.
Is that addressing the current problem with the soul of our nation being degraded by the foreign interest?
No.
And I think it's just more mainstream stuff, more popular stuff, more money-making stuff, to be honest with you.
I think Andrew Tate is a digital E-pimp.
I think that Sneeko is Sneeko.
I think that who else was there?
My run's interesting.
You know, I don't agree with everything he says, but I think he's got a sound mind.
He used to work in the military and kind of in the intelligence sector.
So he's a smart guy.
I won't discredit him.
And then you got Fresh Walter, of course, who's kind of in the background of all the videos.
You can see him in there if you know where to look.
But I mean, it's just like, have fun.
Have fun.
It is what it is.
Ultimately, that's not what I do.
I do a serious political commentary show.
I'm a pundit.
I consider myself to still be a reporter, maybe a journalist.
Maybe not.
I don't put things in writing aside from, you know, maybe a tweet or two that might get me banned.
But I don't know.
I just, the whole streaming culture of walking around 24 hours or 12 hours or whatever it is with a camera and like trying to meme on people or mog people or whatever.
I get it.
It's entertaining to watch, but ultimately, I just, even with this show right here, even me doing like a two, three or four hour show, the ancient Arab tribes had a story around the time of Lawrence of Arabia.
That's where I know of it from.
It's from the movie.
If you took a photo of someone, it was like stealing a piece of their soul.
And I happen to believe this, by the way.
And it's, it's not like you're stealing someone's soul or whatever.
It's that deep, but you do take a part of your identity and then you're you're you're you're giving that you're projecting that out to people, right?
So I just look at this streaming culture and ultimately these people would be acting differently if there weren't cameras there.
They would.
And for me, that's kind of the thing that I judge things on.
It's using Nick for views.
Absolutely 100%.
That's what that was.
That was a, that, that was a, uh, that, that was a goy buck harvesting operation.
That was a revenue stream via super chat operation.
That was a planned ordeal by Tim Pool.
Tim Poole's smart.
He wants to play more poker.
Don't think Pool isn't pushed, folks.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
We need unity, not left versus right.
100%.
That's what I preach on the show.
That's what we preach on the show.
Nick Fuentes, Dan Bongino, and Tim Poole collab upcoming.
I'm covering Dan Bongino next show.
It's to bring people on the fringe back to the center.
It's all a big show.
If Metapod turned into a human, it would probably look like Tim Poole.
Fair.
And thank you, man.
Every, thank you.
I'm just giving an honest take.
I really like you, man.
Thank you so much.
I have a Ty Splosion tattoo.
Very cool.
Very cool.
Wasn't my starter.
My starter was Mudkip.
He didn't have fun.
Who is someone you admire?
That's a good question.
Who is someone I admire?
Let me think about this.
Neil Magne.
I admire Neil Magne.
I admire Fuentes for his oration skill and ability.
I do think he is the best of the generation.
That's a hard question.
Thomas Massey, I admire Thomas Massey in the face of all the threats and God knows what that's happening up there in Washington, D.C.
I admire him for still continuing to stand up for the American people.
I admire, who do I admire?
That's such a good question.
I admire my father, of course.
I have a lot of respect for him.
He's a living legend and just the way he was able to take care of me throughout my life and really protect me from some bad things happening, especially like during my parents' divorce.
Shout out to him.
Always, always respect him for that, even if we do disagree on some things.
The do dissidents guys, Russell Dobular and Keaton Weiss.
I admire them.
I think that they're intellectuals, even though we don't agree on everything.
And I think that they're people that do the best show on the internet right now.
And like they're high-level orators.
Don't get me wrong.
I would consider Fuentes to be in a league of his own, kind of like with my father in that category.
But as far as prepared show, prepared segments, doing it all themselves, all independent, free from corruption, I would say do dissonance.
I really respect them.
I really, really do respect the do dissidents guys.
We were just covering the Nick Fuente's ex-Tim Pool stream, which is like a three-hour nothing burger where Tim Poole like tap dances around questions and chortles about Israel.
The French finds new frontiers, but the old ones need to be secured first.
Shredding these people for exactly my issues with them.
Yeah, dude.
I mean, this is how Americans feel.
This is how the common American feels.
That's why I have this position.
I was raised to be anti-government, anti-authority, pro-America, pro-freedom, pro-liberty.
And when you look at these people, it's like we're classic Coca-Cola with the cocaine in it and the real cane sugar in it.
And these people are Coke Zero or Diet Coke.
There really is no competition because I can just get on here and spit and spit and spit and spit.
And I know if I went on that show, I would devastate, destroy.
And I invite them to have me on, please.
And we'll talk about Israel.
We'll talk about your support for it.
Oh, we can't do that.
It's going to get us banned.
Oh, no.
So thank you for your support.
I appreciate that.
We're having fun tonight.
Myron is pretty fair.
I disagree with him on some things, but he's got a pedigree.
He's got a real background.
He's a professional.
He knows what he's talking about.
It's like you said, when they were all out there dancing around the streets, Myron's the one that's strapped.
Myron's one that's got the gun on him.
To be fair, Andrew quit the pimping stuff.
And after being Muslim, your sins are gone.
I don't know about that.
I don't know about that.
I'll agree to disagree with you on that.
They used him to exploit him and maybe honeypot him.
Referring to Fuentes Poole, I assume.
Yeah.
Poole and Fuentes should have a higher conversation, but they failed to.
Well, I mean, Fuentes should have, Fuentes should have been more combative and should have elevated the conversation.
Excuse me.
Apologies.
Excuse me.
Yeah.
Streaming culture is about gay ASF to me, not like this type of streaming, but the kind you're talking about.
Yeah, I mean, well, this is a political show.
This is a radio show for TV.
Streaming, it's a little different.
The IRL stuff, like, take Rampage Jackson, for example.
You know, Rampage blocked me after the whole Roger Jackson thing because, like, I said that he should be in prison for like 20 years to life because he tried to kill somebody.
And I think like objectively, if you look at it, like that, that's just the truth of what happened.
But, you know, I like Rampage.
I thought Rampage is funny.
I still do.
I think he's hilarious, but he's gotten really big off of like the thing he does is like he like acts angry towards people when he has to like teach them something or like deal with something or whatever.
Cause like he's the X UFC champion.
He's a tough guy.
Obviously, very tough guy.
Fuck, kill five of me or whatever.
But at the same time, it's just, it's all, it's very one note.
It's very one note.
And with this, we got different topics.
We got different discussions.
We got different debates.
We got different callers.
We got the entire world to discuss, not just one little topic about something that gets zoomed in on.
It's sad rather than entertaining.
They each said they never cared about validation as they were seeking validation.
Don't know who that's referencing to.
I want to call, we might do that.
I'm just feeling a little run down, to be honest with you.
And look, I respect that because we are sellers of products and sellers of goods as well.
But the difference is we do it to actually fund the operation and we're obsessed with the operation.
That's all we care about.
Versus Tim Poole, he's happy with his podcast set up and sucking off Netanyahu as long as he gets to go gamble the super chat money on no limit hold them.
So that's, it's two different, it's two different species.
All right.
It's kind of like, it's kind of, it's kind of like the Brahmin cast in India and the untouchable, in my opinion.
Going to do a reaction stream about him tomorrow or the day after.
Nice mud kit reference.
Yeah, he's my starter Pokemon.
G. Eber Griffin, I'd love to have him on.
Why is Nick collaborating with someone like Tim?
I think it's about exposure and about reach.
But this thing happens where when you make it big and you get the opportunity to go on someone's show, it's very hard when you fly, so to speak, into enemy territory to just like go off on someone into like a B-Uber base.
But at the same time, I think you have to try harder than this.
I'm disappointed in this from Nick.
Massey is drawing on me.
I love Massey.
Boring AF, super boring.
Made me want to pull my teeth, made me want to do the cordless drill skull experiment on myself to relieve the pressure.
Nick, isn't that impressive?
I disagree, man.
I've been, my first on Air appearance was in 2009.
So that was 17 years ago.
I know broadcasting.
I know new media.
I know radio.
I know talent.
He is the best.
And like, that is just the truth.
And even if you disagree with him and think he's Hitler or whatever, you can disagree with every single one of his positions from the perspective of being a talk show host.
He is the best.
He is the best.
He is able to keep what he's trying to convey to people.
He's able to do it for three hours without a break.
I rely on chat.
I rely on articles.
I see.
Rely on all these things.
That stream of consciousness, it can't be taught.
I can do it for about 30 minutes maximum.
And then I like, like I did on Due Dissonance, and then I literally couldn't walk the next day.
I was so tired.
I admire Dew Dissonance too.
They're incredible, man.
It really is the best show on the internet right now.
Keaton and Russ are the light of my life.
That's why I'm here.
Dude, they're phenomenal, man.
They've been the soundtrack of my life since the COVID.
Like, hats off to them.
Seriously.
They rated the stream yesterday.
That was incredible.
Your example, Glazes, Nick.
All right.
Screw Nick Fuentes.
F. Nick Fuentes, most evil person alive.
He's still the best broadcaster I've seen in a generation.
And like, that would be like you tell a heart surgeon, they don't know how to do heart surgery.
You tell me, I don't know what I'm looking at here.
Like, and we can disagree on it, of course, and it could be okay.
And you can find him not to be that impressive.
He did a show for nine years with like an incredibly niche audience where there's really no reason to do it and just incredible suffering involved.
And you don't do a show for nine years and come out on the other side of it successful without being incredibly talented.
I couldn't do it.
I couldn't do this show for nine years for like, God knows how like few viewers or whatever, but he did it and he plowed through.
And like they say, 10,000 hours and you become an expert in something.
He's put that, he's put that in.
I put my 10,000 hours in, but it was adjacent.
It wasn't directly filming or broadcasting.
So I've got a lot to learn.
I look at him just from an oration perspective as someone that's impressive.
So everyone's going to disagree.
Everyone hates everyone.
It is what it is.
They adore you, by the way.
I hope you feel it.
Dude, I love them.
I love those guys.
I hope I don't get banned for that clip they played on the show where I criticize Israel because that went viral on X.
And then the Grok says that I'm going to get banned pretty soon.
Hopefully that doesn't happen.
I don't want it to happen, but I love those guys.
Seriously.
You're dead on.
And Natty Metas Jack Vincent, they just banned me.
Used to follow me.
Nice.
I'll give you another follow back.
I want to see you and Nick together.
I've met him.
I've met him before.
Ultimately, what reason does he have, though, to meet with me?
I don't provide any audience or any reach or anything like that.
The only thing I have is surname merchant.
And if you notice, like, if you look at my Twitter, if you look at my ex, like, I'm very careful not to do that.
I'm very careful not to surname merchant my way to the top or whatever or to relevance.
I want people to be interested in me because of my ideas and the things that I see that are unique.
And if he becomes interested in that and he wants to do it, we can do it.
He, we're mutuals.
He follows me on Twitter.
I follow him on Twitter.
So the offers open, but I just, I'm a small fry.
It's a small fish, big fish thing.
I hate on Myron more than I like him, but he is decent.
He's just, he's smart, man.
And like, even if you disagree with people, you have to recognize they're intelligent.
Steel sharpens steel.
How about Dookie sharpening Dookie?
That's what that was.
But French, uh, Fuentes and Poole seem like clay versus Ash.
I don't know who was who.
Uh, Nick is six months from standing with Israel.
He got a little closer tonight for sure.
Uh, Fuentes is too weak and scared to be combative.
He's got to be combative, man.
He's got, you got to be combative.
You got to crash out.
If I was called, I'd be down tempo at least today.
I don't like Nick trying to aura farm with a bunch of Muslims and atheists.
It's entertaining and counterculture is important, but Clav, Sneako, and Myron are completely mentally incapacitated.
Well, I mean, that's the movement, quote unquote, man.
That's why it's all so ridiculous.
This left, right thing, like, oh, we're going to say, we're saving the young people.
And it's E-Pimp, popular streamer, actually politically relevant person, Jay Waller, who's like a construction magnate.
And then like more digital E-Pimps and like, that's the counter.
Oh, like, well, the left's never going to recover from this.
The, the youth is on the rise.
Like, it's, it's funny.
Like, I laughed when I saw them in the club, but I laughed because it was kind of absurd, you know?
So it is what it is.
It is what it is.
Like you're going to find with like with me, and that's why the show is called a gray area.
Like things aren't black and white with me.
I got a nuanced perspective.
I've been doing this 17 years.
I've been politically aware.
17 long, long years, an entire lifetime.
An entire lifetime.
I like Myron until he starts ranting about women.
It is such a bad movie.
Yeah, I don't like it.
I don't like the female slander.
I don't enjoy it.
I really like women a lot.
And I think these people that come after him, I think it's, I don't approve of it.
I got three sisters.
So Nick is the most popular political streamer in 2026.
The past Daily Wire, Hassan, or Asmen Gold stuff is over.
I just don't like who Myron associates with.
Coming off work shift.
Badass dude.
Badass.
Hope you get some solid rest.
Hope you drink some Gatorade or some nice water.
Just lay down that bed, man, and just relax.
And that's the best part about being tired, it feels so good to go to sleep.
I know you're going to be reading these.
I'm reading them all.
Did you go to college?
No, I graduated when I was 17 years old after cheating to get through a lot of the classes.
I was working at Infowars.
So I kind of got a, you know, like old, in the olden times, person like the 1800s or whatever that's a cobbler.
They teach their kid how to be a cobbler.
I was kind of taught how to do this.
That was my college education.
It was at Free Speech Systems LLC.
Weirdly enough, I mainly agree with Nick on a lot.
I just don't like the Alexander stuff.
I don't like it either.
Of course, disavow, horrible, and don't find him funny.
Brain is sharp, but want to speak slower, which some find boring.
I could talk faster.
I'm known for it, but that sometimes is mistaken for nervousness.
Yeah, the fast talk, I rely on that a lot because it's just how I talk.
I talk, speak, and communicate with people, right?
But you have to just be, it's tone and intent, and it's being measured.
Thousand percent, Nick's the best from William Frostco.
Myron associates himself with all these annoying women in Fresh and Fit is bad, but his political streams are chill.
Well, he's making money off of the women.
That's what it all is.
It's why you have them there so you could like dunk on them and create a viral clip.
Like it's just the internet, man.
It's modern internet culture.
Yeah, he put the hours in.
You can get there too.
Nick's show isn't as informative as other older folks have been researching longer.
Guess you aren't allowed to contradict ICE protest.
The bigger Fuentes gets, the closer he comes to becoming CK, Louis C.K., I assume.
Andrew Wilson is the goat.
Gray Area Talks.
One day, my GNC clerk, Ryde Brain, will thank you and your pop for the InfoWars supplements.
Thank you.
I do.
I appreciate that.
Okay.
Well, over three hours, very fun.
We reacted to it.
I read y'all's comments.
I love you all.
Thank you all for being here tonight.
Keep in mind, tomorrow, big show reacting to Bongino.
Wednesday, might do a show, might do a break.
Thursday, of course, Tim Tompkins in the other chair doing a phenomenal deep dive, doing an interview, doing research, going to be together again on Thursday.
Friday, another solo stream.
Saturday, another solo stream.
And then Sunday, our marquee event, our marquee happening.
We're having Alex Stein join us Sunday at 7:30 Central.
So you're going to want to be there to watch Alex Stein at 7:30 Central on the Gray Area.
And if you're watching this, if you're already subscribed and you're already following us on X, that's incredible.
That's amazing.
I just want to remind everybody: if you're on YouTube or Rumble, Gray Area Talks is the X account as well.
I highly suggest you follow that as well as my co-host.
We're trying to do a lot of things here.
We're trying to get a lot of things done.
And if you are watching on my X profile and you want to find the YouTube, the YouTube is Gray Area Talks as well, as well as The Rumble.
I'm trying to figure out streaming on other platforms as well.
We're going to do a computer swap.
We're upgrading the studio.
We have a switcher now for main days.
It's all very exciting.
It's all here on the gray area.
So, are you one more comment?
And I'll say thank you for tonight to all y'all again.