Rex Jones and Tim Tompkins dissect Sydney’s Hanukkah shooting—two attackers (Sajid Akram, 50, and his son) armed with military-grade weapons, targeting Jews for 15 minutes despite Australia’s strict post-1996 gun laws—debating whether radical Islamic doctrine (e.g., Quranic "sword verses") or systemic failures enabled the attack. They contrast extremist interpretations with moderate Muslim practices, warn against false flag theories like New Groyper In South’s claims of coordinated shootings in Providence and Parkland, and critique rapid censorship pushes as potential "green flags." Ultimately, they stress nuanced analysis over broad generalizations while promoting their health supplements and research-funding efforts. [Automatically generated summary]
And this is something as to where very desensitized to it here in America because we have the most guns.
And like, I'm very pro Second Amendment ultimately to the end, basically, like repeal the NFA and all that stuff.
But like we have a ton of gun crime here and it's something that we're used to, but these populations that are completely disarmed, like it's like shooting fish in a barrel, basically.
And the cops, I hear, like, I watched my dad's program today and he's like, they had firearms, but they're, they, they don't know how to use them.
They're just issued them, whatever.
And then the way that these like Western, like European or like, you know, like British colonial descendant countries like Australia, the way they operate is they have like special cops that have the guns and know how to use them, like SWAT, like a SWAT team, basically.
But a SWAT team is just like a normal police officer, basically.
So like you're, you're helpless and your government is not going to protect you in this situation.
We've got all the important, like relevant data.
Like me and Tim did a mini deep dive on this and like we've got the rifle that was used.
We've got the some of the shooters ideology possible and speculative motivation.
We're looking into that, you know, why exactly events like this do happen just in general.
Like, these people wouldn't carry out this act of violence if they had that threat on the ground, but they're not worried about the police.
They're not worried about civilians having guns.
They're just saying, like, this is, we know we're going to get stopped eventually by somebody, but we basically have like 30 minutes to an hour to do whatever we want.
Right?
Because then the cops show up and you hear the sirens, which is the most ridiculous part of the video.
The police are there.
Like, that's why it's not getting further or going away.
sure yeah yeah yeah you're right you're right i think he does shoot rabbi though i think one of some someone does walk up and he like guns him down waiting for that to happen well it sucks because i wish i saw the angle of that way towards the left i'm not seeing any footage of i think more has come out that's i think like i think we'll see more of it this is all i've seen as of today What do you guys think about this in the comments?
Even I do this myself where I give hypotheticals of what I would do in the situation.
But in a something like this, where your adrenaline is like at 100 and you're just like, everything's happening at once, it is not the hardest thing to imagine people like freezing up and not knowing.
Number one step is like it's fight or flight or freeze.
And you need to at least run, right?
Like you got to run away from the situation.
I applaud everyone when they are over the bridge firing the other way, like booking it out of there because a lot of those people are probably still alive because they did that, right?
Like it's most of the country, and I say it like 51%.
Like that, that is the law of the land.
So, like, it seriously is like that.
You could not do, you could not do something like this here without getting shot or being under fire immediately.
I'm not saying you can't kill people because, of course, you can kill people if you have a gun, but they did this because they knew they'd be successful.
So let me give guys a little breakdown of what happened in the timeline because obviously the video is only going to show you guys the shooting.
So of course, everybody knows that this happened today.
But Australia's time zone difference, I'm not sure exactly how far, but they're very far ahead of us.
So, this would have happened super early in the morning for us, but it happened at 6:47 p.m. local time.
So, at 6:47, the emergency calls came in where there's active gunfire at a Hanukkah event.
The two armed men that you see in the videos that we're watching, they're at the elevated position near the pedestrian bridge, and they're overlooking the park and the beachfront.
So, this is why I said I wish I could see the left side because you can't really see where they're shooting at.
But 6:47 to 6:55, panic spreads through the crowds.
You've got people fleeing nearby streets and restaurants, and then the witness report the sustained gunfire that we've been watching.
And then the police at 6:55 to 7 p.m., the tactical units arrive within minutes.
The officers confront the shooters, is what we're seeing at the end of this.
And then, one attacker is shot and killed by the police as we saw this.
When the guy, the guy at the beginning, when he went down, right?
You saw he went down and the other guy was staying up there.
That is that was the guy who went down.
He got that was the father.
He got the gun taken away from him.
As soon as he got the gun taken away from him, and maybe I'm missed in a situation, that's probably why he went back up and grabbed another weapon, right?
That's the only scenario that I can piece together in my mind for this situation.
So, uh, the second was uh shot and then disarmed and taken into custody.
So, at 7:05, uh, the paramedics, they begin like the bridge, uh, they begin a triage.
The multiple victims are treated, uh, and people are taken to the hospital.
So, right now, the casualties sit at 15.
It could, it definitely can go up from here.
I've seen, I'm seeing 16 now, uh, 40 plus injured, including children, uh, and one attacker that was killed during the police response, which was the father.
So, the involvement, as you guys can see, is these two guys.
You had uh, Sajid Akram, 50, who's he's 50 years old.
He's the father.
Um, he's a resident of Southwest Sydney, he's a licensed firearm holder.
And we did say, uh, we did see that it was, oh my God, yeah, this is what I was looking for.
But what you should know about this is the education, he studied at three different places, Central Queensland University, which is like a normal school.
And then you had he studied in Pakistan as well at Hamdrad University in Islamabad.
And then he also attended Al-Murad Institute, which is an Islamic educational institute, right?
Right.
And he's actually been previously known by the Australian Security Intelligence Organization.
So they have clocked this guy before.
This is not the first time that they've known, but they let him go.
They kind of was, he's probably on some type of watch list, but low priority.
I think probably what these things put you on the thing is the fact that he went to Pakistan and he's going to these schools specifically.
But then also, I saw some pictures and videos of like, he just looks like a normal guy celebrating going to a cricket match and he's India versus Pakistan.
But, you know, and I hate to say this because I don't want to back up the Australian censorship regime, like is like one of the worst on the planet, especially what they did to people during COVID.
But I bet they're able to do a pretty tight personal assessment, right?
Like, I, I think, like these countries where you don't really have digital rights, we have, they just introduced digital ID, right?
For everyone, like, oh, like even the people, of course, over 16, like you have to prove that you're not, right?
Even if you're 82 years old.
So they have a means to track and catalog everybody.
They definitely like, here's the thing, like, this is a horrible, horrific mass shooting that was carried out by these two men because of this thing.
But the thing you have to consider is, you know, oftentimes, even with mass shootings here, it's just like, well, the person had seven prior indications of like malevolent violence, but we ignored it.
Now, I will say I am grateful for the level of intelligence.
I know FBI can be sometimes a broken system, but there's a lot of stuff that we don't.
There are a lot of stuff that we never see that come into the news of active prevention of people that would have committed terrorist acts in which they've already clocked these people.
They've already hacked and they already stopped these people before the broader audience of public even know.
Like they're everywhere tracking the smallest details.
And like their personal privacy concerns and I have those.
I'm not a fan of those big government organizations just in general.
But talking about law enforcement, which should be the government's job, like without some of these higher level, like, I mean, the thing is, I get back to the police officers, right?
Like their SWAT team that they waited like the five to 10 minutes or how, will you look up how long this thing was actually in progress for?
However long it took, when their SWAT team people showed up, it was just like a regular police officer.
Here's you can laugh at the American cop, you call him fat or whatever.
The American cop knows how to shoot real well.
And I guarantee here you have at least you've at least halved a response time if no civilian uh returns fire.
I think a civilian will return fire in under a minute, at least here in the south.
You got like a 10 minute situation because the camera guy definitely didn't go immediately like, oh, like, no, he pulled that up at later.
Yeah.
So let's just call it 15 minutes response time.
And like, I'm not cool with that.
And the Australian people that are dead, I mean, like, they don't have a voice now to say anything about it.
But I think, I think ultimately, a society that's disarmed is a society that has a human rights violation.
And I believe that these people should have had guns because the bad guy's going to get guns anyway.
The guy's going to run over people with a car or make a bomb and blow them up or something.
I believe in a civilian right to self-defense because I know that at least if something bad like this happens here, I have options that a person living over in one of these countries where they're disarmed doesn't have.
And these people's governments are able to enact all sorts of controls on them.
But when it comes down to protecting their citizens, it takes, you know, 15 minutes for them to show up.
And when they show up, people are already on the ground.
They blunt them and they make them shorter and they go further and further.
And why is that?
Because people are always going to find a way to kill and their violent crime rate is actually higher than ours.
Sure, people die over here with the gun being used as the weapon of choice because it's available, but people, you can't take cars away from people, can take baseball bats away from people.
No, I'm saying if it was even if it was even my point, no, no, no, you see what I'm saying, but you forgot what I see where you're going through the lot, you're going through the logic trap.
I was just saying, if even the bad guys and everybody didn't have access to the weapon itself, you deserve a giant firearm and a giant magnet you can just dump into someone trying to kill you.
Yeah, but the whole purpose of the Second Amendment during that time period was because America did not have a centralized government or a system that system to protect from the outside forces in that aspect.
That's that's the thing that they wanted to do for that particular reason.
But like, there is something magical about like two dudes at a bar will be about to like scrap, and the girl will come in and be like, Yeah, she needs to be protected at that point.
And ultimately, like, I don't care how much training you do, especially like, even especially in the military, your first time actively firing on people.
It's got to be crazy, right?
Like, you're like, you're actually killing people for the first time.
It's not like to our knowledge, they went out and did practice runs.
Like, maybe he killed a bunny rabbit by strangling it.
And he's like, I am ready now.
I could do it.
But this is a completely different situation than killing like any animal or like any simulation of like a war game could be.
You're out there with a gun, like gunning down innocent people.
I mean, like I said, we went over the fact that he attended these Islamic schools, which teach the practice that's in the Quran.
Now, we did do the deeper dive on it, and we'll cover this specifically in a moment here about what type of practice that they actually teach and some of the things that are in the Quran and what Muhammad believes and some AI bias and some AI bias.
But, you know, it's just get into the guy because he had he had very specific, you know, upbringing and Muslim tradition.
And we get into a little bit of the differences of Sunni, Shia, Salafi.
And when we, when you talk to the AI about these different sects and groups, it'll tell you, especially about like the like radical like Salafi group, it'll say, oh, it's peaceful.
Is what they, this is what they practice, but the vast majority of people, it's fine, and we'll get into the point even more of just saying like yeah, you can say vast majority peaceful, but if you have like two billion people he did yeah, if you have two billion people, even having a few percentages, is like world ending.
It is basically you, you can't do it.
You, you just, it doesn't work that way.
100 and like.
People are people and people are human beings and people deserve respect and people ultimately like, no one has a right to tell other people how their children should live or how they should raise their kids or live their life or whatever.
But when it comes down to it, this is the religion.
That actually is like yeah we, actually we do have a say in this.
You pay us tax to stay alive and that's only if you're a Muslim or Christian and it's a holy war.
Just to, to highlight the point that you were saying before, uh-huh with the majority, because this is the bias, the availability bias, like we were talking of before, even if a majority are not committing crimes, like he said, because of the proportion of it and the fact that it's enough people that it's causing a significant issue, it has to be addressed.
It has to be something that we go out and not condone these types of activities, because when you have it on and this is why you see these events and this is why a lot of these countries are scared to to have the overtake of this particular religion they don't say the same like okay, Jewish people in the, in Judaism gets some, but people aren't afraid of like Jewish people going out and committing like mass murder because the the TORA, doesn't the tornado.
Right, and ultimately, like the Jewish holy writings excluding like the modernist stuff like the Kabbalah and like the Talmud and stuff like that, which is essentially just rabbis arguing with each other and some of it is like really whacking, crazy and evil, but like the fundamentalist Jewish doctrine that most Jewish people living in the West subscribe to, is one of like you're not allowed to martyr yourself.
Yes, and it's the same with the Christians right, like a Christian cannot martyr themselves.
A Christian has to be like.
You have to be told, hey, renounce your faith.
Like the Romans would say, we're going to put you in the Coliseum and the lion's going to eat you, and then you say no, and then you become a martyr.
That way, becoming a martyr in in Islam is fighting the jihad, is fighting for the faith.
Uh, it's literally because the school that he goes to has Islamic teachings and they teach them specifically about uh, the teachings of the Quran, and so the whole issue is, is i'm not sitting here trying to blanket and be like, oh well, all the people who go to this school are now becoming murderers, Murderers?
But it definitely has an impact when you read things.
Well, and the whole aspect of why the Quran is so controversial is because of like the school does teach the classical teachings.
And some of these classical scholars, they're going to interpret these as legal guidance for how the people should live their lives and what they should do.
And like Rex is talking about, there are literally, just like you said, Al-Qaeda and these other groups literally take those as their Bible.
And so read some of these things that are in here because I was like, wow, this is what's being taught.
And the common English of what 929 interprets, fight for those who do not believe in Allah or in the last day, or who would not consider unlawful that Allah and his messengers have made unlawful and do not adopt the religion of truth from those who are given the scripture until they give into what did you say?
That word is the jizya willingly, and they are humbled.
And then the key terms, what they're talking about is fighting.
Uh, they're talking about being humbled, and so that that is exactly what you're talking about.
It means being conquered, like, and then I, like the AI is like, I have to be nice to all religions and chat.
GPT isn't even as bad as GROK.
I have issues with that, but we went to GROK thinking that we would get like a pretty, like uncensored take and it's the most neutered one ever.
I'm gonna pull it, pull that up right here to the last, to the right okay, all right, check this out guys.
All right, what the Quran and prophet Muhammad really teach classical Sunni view, big ideas, be Be kind, honest, help poor people, forgive others, and make peace.
Prophet Muhammad, who is he?
A gentle leader 1,400 years ago who taught one God, Allah, sharing, controlling anger, and treating everyone fairly.
Yeah, treating all the Muslims fairly under his weird sick Sharia law system and then making everyone else who's not a Muslim and doesn't submit pay the blood tax to stay alive.
Like, I'm not saying that the Bible and Christianity and these other religions haven't created a certain violence around the religion itself.
It's just not in the day-to-day practice.
Like people go and fight for a particular reason around a specific issue, and it's not the agenda of the day-to-day for you to go out and just make sure that you're going to go and kill people who aren't practicing.
Because imagine if Christians did that, which is the largest religion in the world, right?
And imagine all the Christians, if you don't practice any other religion, because Christians, I feel like, are very tolerant of other religions and the preachings.
You go to church and you're not a believer in church.
Kill the unbelievers, strike terror into them and kill the people of the book until they pay the blood tax.
Treatment of non-Muslims.
Muslims are considered superior in governance.
Non-Muslims may live under Islamic rule, but not as equals.
Conversion away from Islam is treated harshly in later law.
They really don't like it.
It's called apostate.
That's called being an apostate when you leave.
Relevant verses, Quran 3, 100, Muslims described as the best nation.
Quran 9, 29, Jizya and subjugation.
We've gone over that.
And then Quran 98.6, unbelievers described as the worst of creatures.
See, it's not very, the thing I like about Christianity and the Old Testament as well, because it's the Beatitudes.
It's all the same stuff.
Or Theophanies, excuse me, not Beatitudes.
Man is created in the image of God, and there's something holy about man.
And man is not like disgusting creature pig, but like anyone who does not follow the supreme entity that this guy declared in like the late fifth century.
That's always, you know, it's funny when you see people that are like super left wing.
And I like to watch people like do dissidents and whatnot, but like if you back this at all, like I have, I have three sisters.
Like seriously, like not to any of those people, but to anyone that like wants my sister to have to wear like a trash bag to go outside, like genuinely fuck you.
And, you know, there was a movement where they try, like they've killed women that try to like make a movement against wearing these things and covering up.
So I have cousin, really like uncle, someone that I'm related to lives out in East Texas over on the land that we have over there around that area.
And he is like a 30-year military veteran.
He's an incredible badass.
I'm very proud to be related to him.
But he told me all about his time or a lot about his time, not all about it, but a lot about his time over there in the Middle East, right?
Like being a part of Desert Storm and stuff like that.
And he said that one of his first experiences over there in the Middle East, just like culture shock moment, I think that's what I asked him is like, when did you have a culture shock was when he was on the street just as a young, like, you know, like good looking American soldier.
And then he sees a woman across the street and she like looks up at him or something or like made maybe waves, just some brief gesture.
And hubby comes in with the fucking pipe and just starts going to work.
Damn.
Because you don't do that shit in my house, bitch.
Like that's what they believe.
And that's the religion of peace.
Right.
And that, that's, that's what we all have to tolerate and accept.
And it's good.
And it's coming to a place near you.
And that's the thing of like it, it is, it is perfectly designed to make you angry, but like this is a violation of everything we believe here in the West, right?
Like to even think that just looking at a woman on the street and raising your hand and her, she raised her hand just to say hi.
And then the husband comes in with the fucking pipe and just the word.
The reason why I've had so many conversations with people, and they're like, Well, why can't you just allow like if Muslim people just want to live in a specific place?
I'm not sitting here targeting everybody.
It's specifically the it's not the modern ones that aren't religious and have nothing to do with this.
Unfortunately, there's a large population that do follow this, right?
It's not all of them, but it's specifically like there's Christian Muslims.
I'm not lumping those, there are Christian Muslims.
Uh, that doesn't work like all Muslims believe in Jesus as a prophet, but they don't believe in him as God because to be that's not Muslim, but it's monotheism.
I'm just saying, like, in general, there are people who are in the Middle East, like Arab, Arab Christians, yeah, Arab Christians, yeah, not the religion, but Arab Christians.
What I'm saying is, as far as the ethnicity, I'm, I'm, I'm kind of, no, I understand.
Yeah, I'm just saying, in general, combining the whole concept of, look, there's a reason why there are countries and there that literally ban Islam, right?
If you go to China, you can't, no, no, no, like concentration camp, they have the Uyghur motivation.
I'm telling you, you're, you, you can do the soft version of Islam and practice the things, but they don't allow you to do like 90% of the stuff that's in this book because they understand the danger behind it.
And my point with that is that in Britain already, they have places where the call to prayer, it's five times a day.
It's loud as hell.
Everyone gets out and prays on the street.
You can't walk in between them or do anything.
That is an act of that.
That's taking over.
That's taking possession of the area and going, you submit to us being in your space, right?
The shared public space is our space now.
We're sharing it with you.
And then you go down a couple of decades or not even maybe that, and you're paying them money to live.
And it's just like, oh, it's the new puppetity tax.
And, you know, it's really good because, you know, ever since our community came under indigenous leadership, or they'll probably call it something like that.
Literally.
Like, you see what I'm saying?
Like, it'll be the thing that you do.
They make sure our community remains strong and it's a good thing.
No, not the, not the protest, but in Dallas, they started trying to, there are people that are Islamic that were trying to get their own special like zones where they could create their own like, basically, like not villages, but like their own eco-cities.
But here's the thing: with that being said, I said this to you a long time ago.
And do you remember this conversation where I was like, the tolerance doesn't go both ways, in which, like, if you were to give some of these places, like, you know, like the Hezbollah, or some of them because they have this preaching and this laws and everything that happened in Gaza believes that go ahead.
Well, specifically, maybe the radical Muslims, the radical Muslims, specifically in Gaza, that hold the majority, they practice this level, and their doctrine literally says we will eradicate anyone for this particular reason that we read in the Quran.
And the only thing is, they just don't have the firepower to eradicate all of Israel and their neighbors.
My argument is that wasn't happening before when it was a thriving city with great infrastructure and the people were functioning, getting on.
They were living under Sharia law.
The reason why they're living under what they're living through now is because in a time of war, when you're invaded and everyone dies, people become more radical.
I always blame the whole mess of this negative feedback loop between Israel and Palestine because of the British, right?
Because of the fact that they decided they're going to go in there, arbitrarily promise this land to one side, and then also say, We're going to promise it to this other side at the same time.
And we're just going to make a deal that works for us because we're tired of occupying this region and we're just going to let you guys do it.
And they just withdraw and let them fight it out.
And that's what ended up happening.
All I am saying is, irrespective of how that negative feedback loop started, in the circumstance, one group wronged the other.
I would just say, I would say both groups are wrong ultimately.
And this is the thing that we talk about all the time on the show, like Russia, Ukraine.
People want to be like, oh, the hero Zelensky, the noble lion fighting the evil Putin.
And she's like, well, both of them are trying to preserve and work for their own interests.
Right.
And like, it doesn't have anything to do with like being good or evil.
And when you make it like that and you can, you declare someone good and you declare another person evil, it actually makes the person that you declare to be good, in fact, evil.
And it kind of reverses it for the other person.
Because at that point, those terms don't mean anything anymore when they're both doing the same kinds of crimes and violent actions and actions against their people.
When I would say, ultimately, you know, that's not being gracious enough.
But then, specifically, surrounding the issue of Hamas and what's happening, part of it, I don't want to sit here and defend the mass killings that have happened in Gaza.
But one of the biggest issues of why they're going to go there is because they know that the moment they just completely let the reins loose, because these people believe these people are evil, I'm going to go after them.
They have to, they're trying to, it's so, it's such a complicated issue.
I would say that it does come down to a problem with how Islam teaches that.
Now, if you didn't have Hamas in control, you had the Muslims that aren't practicing this shit, then that's a different story.
And I could see that two-state solution in which it would work for the specific Palestinians that actually want to live there in peace.
I just think at the end of the day, all this stuff is done by design because ultimately the rich, powerful people, they don't care about the people on the bottom getting killed.
And ultimately, like a terror attack on the Jewish population, although horrible and abominable and despicable and should be roundly condemned.
At the end of the day, like it's just like anti-Semitism, anti-Semitism.
Everything's anti-Semitism.
Look how we were just killed with anti-Semitism.
So it serves them to live in a more violent world.
And talk about the elites, the people in the government in positions of power.
It serves them to have a chaotic, violent, and angrier world.
And it is kind of dangerous sometimes when you let anger be unchecked specifically around a narrative.
Now, I don't believe in them going around doing the whole censorship where they're on stage trying to like do the Ted Cruz missile and be like, okay, well, this is why you should bow down to Israel and those types of things.
But I do think that you have to have a certain threshold at which you don't give these radical people the platform to go out there and have the justification to prove why we want to attack these people in the first place and why we should kill these people because you enfranchise those.
And when you leave the reins loose, situations like this can happen.
And it doesn't well, I mean, here's my thing: it's the same thing with all these modern like deaths, assassinations, the Kirk thing, whatever.
It's just like, oh, like we fucked up basically.
Like, oops, like our bad, like the government let someone go, or a person never gets like charged when they're under suspicion, or a person that's been looked at half a dozen times goes out and commits like the worst possible act.
And I just look at it and I'm like, if you put billions of dollars into building a system to like stop these kind of events from happening, you would think that there would be a much higher success rate.
And I get like you giving credit, and I agree a lot of credit has to be given to law enforcement because they do stop a lot of stuff that we don't see, right?
But a place like this where you're under mass surveillance and the dad and the son are both under suspicion, right?
And then also you don't have like the ability to go into every person's mind.
So when a person starts acting normal for a long period of time, they're going to go focus on the guy that's acting crazy too.
And it's like, you're not always going to sit there and watch an eye on the guy who's like just going to a normal cricket game, having fun, enjoying because he's not seeing looking up bombs and shit.
You're going to go to the guy who's like literally has just came back from Iran and you're going to keep eyes on him and you only have but so many eyes to keep track of.
So you're just going to go and focus on these particular people and those are your priority ones.
And then you have to rely on technology and AI, which is why they're trying to have Palantir come in to help offset the data.
But it's designed to take the data of the mass data that they have from like where they can listen to you on your earpods and they can listen to your microphone on your Alexa and take the information because there's so much information they just don't know how to shift with it.
I'm not even sure if we were on air when we talked about it.
Yes, we were.
We were just talking about it.
Like if people are not divine or created in the image of God or don't have like this worth, right?
Then they're the worst of creatures unless they believe in the deity that Muhammad made up in the fifth century.
You're worse than a slug.
You're worse than a dung beetle.
You're worse than a fire ant.
You're worse than like a dust mite if you do not believe in the Muslim monotheistic God, right?
So that language isn't used in Christianity.
It's not even used in like the Old Testament, where there is harsher language used in all kinds of wars being declared all the time, of course.
But the difference is the Old Testament occurred three to 4,000 years ago.
This is this is like way after 500 AD, getting into 600 AD.
So this is at a time where the Roman Empire is already fallen.
This is at a time where Christianity is already widespread.
And this religion comes along and it declares all these things about itself being the best and everyone must submit.
And really going back to real primitive practices, because it's written as a doctrine of war and conquest, right?
Like if you practice this religion, you go into a new area, you infiltrate the area, you become the majority population in that area, and then you make everyone pay the tax or you kill them or you just go and invade anyway.
And like that's how it was practiced.
I mean, they took over Spain for like 400 years and just lived there.
Well, in general, if you look at the prophet Muhammad and his background, he led dozens of raids and battles and approved killing of enemies during war, which there are people who are supporters that say it's I thought he was a gentle leader.
Exactly, because who knows to say, like, who goes to say, like, if I wasn't born in China, like, they think Christianity is dumb and like, you know, these things about Jesus.
But I digress on those things.
I'm just saying in general, one thing I do know without going into specifics about being with a six-year-old, not okay.
And, you know, when the Romans come for Jesus, when he's in the garden of Gethsemane and Judas has betrayed him, you know, Peter is there and Peter uses his sword and he slices off one of the guards' ears.
And Jesus says, put away your sword.
And he heals the man on the spot.
And Jesus is someone, this is why the symbol of the cross is so powerful.
That was the scariest symbol for hundreds and hundreds of years.
Romans are like, look, if you disobey us, we're going to put you up on a giant piece of wood with your arms stretched out.
You're going to be nailed to it.
And we're going to stab you and let you bleed out and die.
But, and a lot, a lot of a lot of those eastern religions, like they'll have an ancestral spirit or something that like protects the house, and like that that goes back to Norse tradition, that goes back to Celtic tradition, like there's there's a lot of these common threads through religion.
None of them are like okay, blueprint to take over conquer.
Like we're moving in, you pay the tax, you're gonna die.
Like this is very clearly done for one specific purpose.
And you know, if someone tells you something like they go, we're the religion of peace, that's like almost scarier than being.
We're the religion of war.
Yeah, it's like it's an inherent deception.
And look, look up, it's takiyah.
It's the process of you're allowed to lie in Islam if it furthers the jihad.
You look up that.
It's t-i-q-y-a, I believe.
Or maybe I a t-i-what uh Takia, i'll just look up t-a-q-y, I don't know.
Yeah Takiya, maybe someone in the chat can and can spell it.
Yeah, like I, i'm a Christian, I believe in Jesus Christ at the end of the day.
But just to clarify, it's not like it's saying if you are in danger or harm from being Muslim, that's what they're talking about, not necessarily like, go around, lie to people.
It's concealing their intentions, because they know, if their intentions were revealed, that they would be ostracized for having these fundamentalist positions, when in fact they hold them.
It's, it's deception, right and like.
This is the problem is, this doesn't exist in any other religion.
This is unique to Islam and yet this is the one.
It's just really weird.
They call it why that's spreading the host and they call it the Red green Alliance because it is interesting and i'm a Pro-Palestine person and I've made that very clear on the broadcast, and me and Tim disagree on a wide number of things on that perspective.
But there is a definite, really weird factor and I hear the Pro-Israel people say this all the time.
I hear my dad say it all the time, quite honestly, it's true why do the people that have like the pride flag and like the furry outfit I've seen this.
They are like, the most pro like Muslim immigration, the most pro, like I get being Pro-Palestine I really do but like like, like you're, you're wearing like furry boots and you have a pride flag and you're calling for a global intifada.
They don't read this, they haven't read this version, they don't know what's in the Quran, they don't know about these radical practices and what they're preaching for.
First of all, they step foot in Gaza.
Hamas is executing their ass.
Okay that's, that's not even permitted.
So they're like, yeah, let's support uh, Hamas and those types of things when they're not even part of that.
All I am saying is uh, With the furries and everything, part of it is that ignorance, and then there's also literally Muslim groups that are out there pushing a specific propaganda and they're playing a long game.
Like, you literally have like Qatar that buys up resources here in America and pays our politicians and goes and gifts us a you know a billion-dollar jet basically for us to go ahead and fly around.
And they're playing the strategic, they have their own news channels and things in which they push whatever narrative that they want to push, you know.
So like, I guess that's just like a breech barrel where you literally click it and then shoot and you get two shots.
But I don't get why he's got all that.
He's got bird shot and buckshot is what I think that is.
I don't get it.
It's really messed up to be like, I'm going to torture people and like shoot bird shot in their face once they can't move around anymore because that wouldn't kill a man.
On Saturday evening, on Saturday evening, a gunman fired over 40 rounds in the Barus and Holy Engineering building, killing two students and injury nine others during a final exam review session in Providence, Rhode Island.
Seven injured students remain hospitalized in stable condition, one in critical condition, and one has been discharged.
Police detained a person of interest, 24-year-old Benjamin Erickson from Wisconsin at a nearby hotel as the campus locked down last night and canceled all fall semester finals.
Like, I used to be a big fan of Andrew Tate for like just speaking against like the mainstream and the crazy wokeness that was going on with transgender.
I watched a video of Sneeko when he got his thing on band and he talks about how he denounces the red pill community.
He's, he didn't, he didn't say explicitly he was sorry, but he was basically like, I'm sorry that I took this position and I was brainwashed like the rest of them.
But then he'll still stand by the Islam and Allah and Isha'Allah.
And you know what's crazy?
Look, you guys don't know this.
Sneeko was one of my like best friends growing up.
Well, it's just almost like if you're like a conquering warlord, it's a great system for you, right?
Exactly.
And you know, you know, the Arabic word for hashish for like concentrated weed product.
And I heard Michael Savage go over this and I thought it was like a real hard rant from an unknown.
I was like, ooh, I didn't know this.
Like this is fucking cool.
So the word hashish, like the concentrated marijuana, it means assassin.
Okay.
In Arabic.
And basically what they would do is they would take a guy, like, I don't know, like a version of you where you're 17 and you don't know what electricity is.
And like you, you live in this area and you're just, you're, you're just a guy.
And they come up to you and they go, look, come with us.
And they give you this drug and they take you through like this magical, like literally like a theme park experience of like the beautiful women, like the meet, the music, all this shit.
And so, literally, for this reason, this is why I have a massive issue with it.
When you are young and you are moldable, you have to be very careful who has a platform and who can speak about certain things and push certain things.
I'm talking about the same point I was making about Andrew Taylor.
It's not making Islam making Islam cool for a 15-year-old who has no idea what the Quran actually says and just thinking, like, let's go to Dubai, bro.
As I'm talking about these things, these things, and as we are bringing them up here for you guys to see about the Quran, it does not mean that like you go out and you see a brown person and a Muslim person, and then like they're suddenly like they're an extremist or something, and you should hate them.
There is a part of the Muslim community in which there's a modern version where they do not practice these things.
And the best examples I can show are like places like Dubai, places like Qatar and Saudi Arabia that have their culture or whatever, but you can go in there and there's like a Western like feel or influence to it.
And they're, they're, they're tight on like crime and like they'll still probably cut your hand off if you try to go and rob a store, but they're not sitting there.
The American that's in the bar drinking it up with his girl there.
They're not going in there shooting him because he's practicing and I hear you, but ultimately, here's my position is like even the moderate version and whatnot, it's not compatible with our culture, right?
And this is this is the thing.
You have this blueprint and then the people come over here and they say, we're not, we're, we're moderate, we're, we're doing this, we're doing that, we're doing the other thing.
I can believe that and buy into it, but I've read your book.
I'm talking about communities overseas, which bring in a lot of these outside countries in Western, like a Dubai, which have all these super cool projects going on and things that they're trying to incentivize business.
They don't make it a religious thing, which is why I can't just be like, all right, well, we need to get rid of all the people who look like them and are brown because it's not all this.
And we were talking about this before we went live.
And it's an interesting observation, I think.
You know, you're from New York, right?
And there's a saying down here.
We call it Elvis Country, right?
Where you got three groups, you got white people, got black people, got Mexican.
And, like, if you're Asian or whatever, like that too.
But, like, it's pretty much like you are what you are.
But up north, it's like Puerto Rican, Greek, you know, Dominican.
You could be from any one of these numbers of places.
I think they speak like 114 languages in the five bros.
So, like, there's not necessarily a concept of like someone walking down the street, like being perceived as being like a Jew or something like that, right?
Whereas in New York, like, if you're like, oh, like, that guy is like eating a bagel with locks, and he kind of like, even if he's not wearing the thing, you're like, kind of like, okay, I kind of make an assumption just by looking at the guy as to what he is.
The same with Zora Mamdani, right?
Like, Zora Mamdani said that he smokes weed, which is not a Muslim thing to do.
And he doesn't, his wife models, right?
So, like, that's against the stuff that I've read in the Quran, right?
But he, his identity, what he associates with, and what people associate him with, is being the Muslim mayor, right?
But that's because more an ethnic identity that's now kind of married to that religion because of the American perception of brown equaling Muslim.
And ultimately, like, everyone's gonna be perceived a certain way, right?
And it just comes down to people being people.
And ultimately, like, we're trying to rise to a higher level, but people are tribal and people make judgments, you know, and we talk about this in the gray area, right?
Like, I don't want to say because someone is a Muslim that I'm not going to, you know, look at them with respect and kindness and treat them with all the dignity that a human being deserves.
But what I am saying is, you don't get to tell me that your religion is the religion of peace and that, you know, like ultimately, it's good.
It would be more moral for me to do what you do when you want or you're fine with like my eight-year-old sister getting married to somebody.
Yeah, ultimately.
And even if you're not fine with it, you go, oh, no, no, that's the ancient time.
It is what it is.
You worship or pay respect to the guy that did that.
And like, my God didn't do that.
Jesus didn't do that.
As far as I understand from what they say, the Buddha didn't do that, right?
These guys know we can either cooperate with the rest of the world, cooperate with these other religions, get super rich, have great lifestyles, or we can be like Afghanistan, or we can be like Iraq, or we can be like the fundamentalists that they see it, they see it from a perspective as to where it's the moral imperative.
They're not making the value judgment because, I mean, look at the video of the guy.
It's literally the worst thing you could do in the world is get a gun, go to a public space and start gunning down people.
I don't think you could find a worse thing to do besides like Jeffrey Epstein or something, right?
And maybe even that, like just immediate casualty, death, like immediately, the worst action you could take in the shortest amount of time would be that, right?
All we did at the end of the day was we created a new ISIS, created a new radical group and gave them reason for them to rally behind something that is as bad as these negative practices that happen.
Like you have these incentives for gaining control, right?
Like ultimately, like if you don't have a moral compass in the sense of like you consider yourself to be superior and able to enact violence on others, this is a great system.
You get to praise God by taking over an area.
You get to have four wives.
You get to have child wives.
You get to beat your woman if she speaks out of line.
You get to make the people that don't believe what you believe pay tax.
And it's things like I've seen plenty of Imams talk about this stuff.
We should go into it and deep dive in the future because it's a fascinating topic.
Like in Sharia, like you walk in the street and the Muslims walk in the other way, you got to like get off the street.
You got to like obey, basically.
And like your children, I think they must be educated in a Muslim school.
Like you're not homeschooling or anything like that.
I don't want the community to come after me, but I'm just saying for an example, imagine we took a random Austin guy off the street, a homeless guy, and we made him like a deity and then said thousands of years ago, we allowed to create this whole narrative.
And then we have a whole religion that's built off of this homeless guy.
And no one knows who he actually was and what he believed in at that particular point in time.
Not equating the two together.
I'm just giving an extreme example.
So people don't really know what this guy was really like when the religion was basically founded off of them.
And they don't even know if he would have actually been nice to them or actually supported them.
And maybe he would have actually done some really messed up stuff for their family.
So, so last show, a couple of things that stuck out.
One, I think it's pretty clear that, Tim, I think at least you, you probably haven't watched like a whole episode of Nick's show.
There were some generalizations made there that just weren't in aligned with what Nick said.
For example, about him being racist, right?
Like, that's like the line of thing that Piers Morgan said.
Well, if you would want, if you'd watch his show, he says things like in sarcasm, and it's kind of a rebuttal because it's like nobody's going to understand his point to begin with.
Yeah, I want to say, I don't think he's actually racist, New Graper.
I think if I met Nick in real life and I were to have a conversation with him, he would treat me just fine and we'd have a conversation.
And he kind of like reminds me sometimes of like, it's an Xbox lobby and me and my joke, me and my friends say some hilarious racist shit that doesn't mean we're racist.
So I give some of those things.
The thing I didn't like what Pierce did was he tried to formulate the questions into traps in which he got him to basically say what he wanted him to in order to create a narrative.
Yeah, well, it was the same thing that Candace tripped pulling.
And it's like, when he's talked about race, he's not a racist because he doesn't view any one race as being superior.
But he does, he does, he is like, his stance is that he's a racialist, essentially, which is that there are distinct differences amongst the people groups, which is observable in reality.
I mean, it's not that one's better than the other, but you know, even DNA, the DNA is.
Like people, people and nations and people groups have always existed and they've always been distinct, which is why, I mean, there's why you can take a DNA test and it determines where you're from.
So, so, and what he, what, what his whole point is, is that there are differences.
And like, you know, some people say that he's racist because he recognizes pattern recognition.
And pattern recognition is something that's been ingrained for humans for thousands of years.
It was a survival instinct that we had.
You know, and so it's, it's like, if we're going to, if we're going to represent, you know, like take a look at what he's saying, we have to understand the nuances of what he's saying because the problem is, is that people, when they hear a clip here and a clip there, they don't even clip it, right?
And here's one other thing I want to clarify for you, New Groyper.
You said something about like the whole like race thing.
When I make my points, and I talk about what this with Rex off air as well, my biggest contention with all of this is the fact that race is so involved.
You said like he's understanding the differences between humans, I mean, between different races and people are different.
Just objectively speaking, by the way, if you go look it up, you can fact check me, but humans are like 99.8, 99.9%.
I'm going to tell you where the differences come from.
They don't come from a biological standpoint.
They come from a culture and where you were born and assimilation based off of whatever rules and formation of ideologies.
All I said to Rex.
Well, that's fun, but like, well, let me finish my point.
Hold on.
Let me finish my point.
I said his arguments on certain things sometimes just boil down to just the race, whereas he should be attacking the culture of whatever is being brought in.
Because, for example, I may be black, but I have more in common probably with other races in terms of who are just living a suburb normal lifestyle because that's what I've been brought up in, more than just being black and being associated with that.
And I say like when he says, like, he's joking in jest, like, oh, when you see a black person, you should go and turn the other way.
It's not really the race.
It's mainly because the dangerous black people that have created the crime.
But ultimately, there are things that like that Irina lady, the Ukrainian lady, she didn't understand the inner city violent crime problem.
She didn't understand, you know, what exactly to look out for in regards to that.
And then she gets knifed in the neck, right?
And if she had been rude or mean or profiled, even if it is rude or mean, maybe she's alive.
And like, this is, this is, this, this is the point.
And this is why Nick makes the points that he does is because we're not willing to concede that point because like it's, it's better to be rude and be alive than it is to like, oh, the socioeconomic factors of being stabbed in the neck.
Yeah, but I also want to make a point specifically around exposure.
His upbringing, he's, he tries to point to Chicago, but he was not like he wasn't in the inner cities like that.
I've grew up in the inner cities.
I know all of these particular things.
If you're actually in the hood for the most part, you can walk just fine without having something, unless you're like going at a specific time of night where like the real crazy people come out and there's like real bullshit that happens.
And that might see as someone else, I'm not saying that just for me.
I'm saying even when I've taken my white friends in those areas, it's common sense that comes out of, but again, when you see the news, they have to show you the tantalizing thing.
It doesn't mean that those people aren't committing crime.
I'm just saying the day-to-day looks a lot different than what's being represented on the main stage.
The issue is fought over, and I want to get New Greper's take on this.
The issue is fought over and not conceded here specifically because of how these European countries treat the people that actually commit the crime, right?
Like they don't lock them up or they release them on early jail or whatever.
And then if you tweet about it or you say something about it, they put you in prison, right?
And this is what we see.
So this is why this is why people are willing to die on that hill, in my opinion, is just because that can't happen over here.
We can't reach that point to where, you know, to be nice to the criminal exceeds their desire to actually protect the citizen.
Like there is, you know, I think it goes beyond just cultural, but I mean, like, there are genetic differences between, like, even between black and white.
The guy who found, like, figured out DNA, he came out and said he believes at like studying it his whole life and as the guy who kind of wrote the book on it, that he, he, you know, that he believes that there's a difference between races on a genetic level.
Well, but there's enough science to refute what he's particularly saying.
Like, I know you're taking the circumstance, but there's a lot of people that don't have like a political leaning and you look objectively at the science.
It comes down to this is that you can't you can't look at a group of people and make a judgment about them because ultimately individuals are individuals and to do that to any one group, I believe is wrong and it's not a Christian thing to do.
I understand the points that both of y'all are making and I would just come at it and say all people have equal value and deserve equal rights and opportunities.
Oh yeah.
And like, I just, here's the thing.
If we if we all hate each other for various reasons or various differences and whatnot, the people that agree on everything because of their religious system, like these Muslims, they don't have this problem.
No, by the way, Nigro, there are literally white people in, like, who are actually Muslim.
And who are like, I'm saying white.
When I say white, I'm talking about like pigmentation-wise, but like have that.
No, even European, but also like who are Middle Eastern, but are actually like fair, white-skinned people because of the literal Asian.
Right, exactly.
We prescribe the word white, right?
Here's the issue.
We say race because we've we've created that, right?
We've created the system where on a sheet of paper, you have to check whether you're white, black, Asian, or Hispanic, right?
We've created that system, but from a genealogy standpoint and from just an earth in the ground standpoint, nature doesn't care about that shit.
Okay.
Really, you're just looking at the pigmentation difference.
And if I were to line up like five Middle Eastern people that look white just off of pigmentation, they're culturally different because of the specific things that they learned there.
Now, if there's a Muslim person who has a background of who's like, I don't want to say Muslim, who's Middle Eastern, who is born in America and has never been exposed to Islam, more likely he's going to be like, if he's like lived like you in, you know, having a lot of land being here in America, he could be, he could be Christian and he would just be culturally the exact same as rest.
I know like one of my best friends in high school, Seamus, phenomenal guy, half, half Arab, another phenomenal guy, Horace, works for my car, phenomenal dude, great friends of my roommate.
I consider him to be a good friend as well.
Also an Arab guy, right?
And I don't, I don't discredit anyone based on skin color and make a value judgment.
My thing, my thing is around the whole subject is you talk about being nature doesn't care.
I would say God doesn't care ultimately.
Right.
And that would agree.
Yeah.
That's what that's what I would say.
And everyone has a purpose and everyone has value and everyone deserves to be here.
And at the end of the day, I'm against things that are anti-that message.
It's why I'm against the globalist and all that anti-human transhumanist garbage, right?
Of leaving the human race behind and merging with the computers.
It's also why like on both sides of that curve, I'm against like the caveman culture of raping the six-year-old.
And so like, I'll let you get your point out in a second here, New Grip.
I just want to preface one more thing.
The only issue I have with Nick is not like the funny jokes that he makes because when he was like saying the me mom, me mom, like I was dying laughing.
Like I was pretty funny.
I was like, he's like, it was, it was funny because he was, he was egging him on.
Where I have the issue is, it's like Nick is a well-informed and educated person, but not everybody who watches Nick's knows the nuances to specific things and they will listen to him and take whatever he says as a resource and as a specific, like specific matter of fact.
And if you watch the last show, I specifically said there's an availability bias where Nick can get something wrong on paper and just give you a factoid and then people go and take that fact.
Or a bigger example is when you create just a blanket statement, there are specifics, even if he has nuances to how he feels, there are other people that are like galvanized by this.
And like they're like, remember that thought process I told you?
You go on X, it's one community and the echo chamber happens there.
You go on TikTok, you're going to get, and it's the same like with TikTok and Instagram.
And there's a black community of people that like, I have to sit there and pull them out of their brainwash and how they feel about white people and stuff like that.
I mean, I can see like, definitely, some of the clips and some of the full shows I've seen, I understand the jokes in the context, but I also understand like he's saying black people should be in prison for the most part.
Like, number one, like, I'm like, I, get it's, it's humor and whatnot, but that's a position.
Like, ultimately, if you're trying to make a movement attractive to like the normie or whatever, they're going to see that and they're going to go like, you are Hitler.
But I will say, I have watched quite a bit of him as well.
And I will say he doesn't, he makes the jokes, but he doesn't actually often give context.
He's just in a flow state to where he just kind of like says whatever's on his mind, right?
Because he's like, he's just very powerful with his words.
I am saying like in those circumstances where he has to make the blanket statement and say a specific thing, there are people that like, dude, the default human doesn't normally critically think because it takes a lot of brain resource power to do that when you're watching so much media every single day.
So I would say that the average intelligent person is not doing that.
I don't even do that all the time.
And I had to start forcing myself to do that as I start doing these deep dives and the research because it takes a lot of energy to do that, man.
Yeah, no, I think that obviously we have an obligation to do research.
The problem with the show, with long-running, it's the same thing that happens to Alex Jones.
People jump in and there's a lot of context that is derived from previous episodes and things of that nature.
And I think that people don't get that and they don't take the time to go look at it and they don't like, okay, well, what does he mean by this to go look at it?
And I think that that's where, like, with podcasts, that's where the problem can be.
Like, you know, I think, you know, you know what I think a good idea for you guys would be if you're open to it when you do deep dives on stuff.
And that's something like, that's why we'll do a quick little mini plug with that.
Like, hold up the products if you would.
Like, if you go to goprimalcore.com and you buy phenomenal ashwagandha for us, reduces cortisol, raises testosterone.
And if you get the elemental drive, which is really the ultimate nootropic physical boosting capacity mineral formula available on the market, if you go check out the benefits on these and the price point on these, you'll be pleasantly surprised.
Go buy these to support the show so we can actually do stuff like that.
Because right now, like me and Tim are operating off the limited bandwidth of what we can do.
And we especially appreciate you, New Groyper, as someone who is taking the products.
You know, I wouldn't say a major difference right now because I'm guessing the you're I'm guessing these minerals and stuff, it takes a while to balance out your deficiencies.
But I have noticed a difference.
unidentified
It's like I'm less sluggish, I guess would be the best way to cool.
And it's like you said, if it killed you, you'd come back and haunt me and Tim.
And I don't think that's going to happen.
It's not as of today.
We're doing good.
I'm glad you say it's made you feel less sluggish or sluggish.
And if you go to goprimalcore.com and you use the code that's available, you can get 25% off with code 25 or core 25.
That's core 25.
Use the code.
It's a good deal, especially on this male multimineral.
I'll tell you, the products I've designed at Infowars Life and then now into the Alex Jones store with the Bigley guys, I have used a reduced version of this mineral form in multiple formulas.
And usually what I just put in there is boron and zinc.
We've got a ton of other things in there that balance it out, especially for long-term supplementation.
It's very important that you take a zinc product that also has a copper in an ideal ratio so you can absorb both and not be deficient in either one and have optimal levels of it.
And we have that here in this product.
We've got selenium, which is essential for fertility and male health.
We've got magnesium, essential for 300 enzymatic biological processes within the body.
And we've got the boron and the zinc to raise overall testosterone and free testosterone.
Like I want to do that in the future, but I want to do it right.
The only reason why I haven't done something like that is because it does require a huge amount of energy in order to like, I want to make sure all that stuff is on there properly, chronological to the thing.
And there's a lot of people.
Yeah, we need another person.
We need a guy in order to like help me with doing things like that because there's a lot of other guy switching too.
I was always, you know, I've had my issues with Crowder over the years, just like as a talking head or whatnot, but I always thought that it was honorable that he did that.
And it helped me in a lot of gun control debates early on with liberals talking to them about stuff being like, hey, like you're using 37,000 gun deaths.
You know, there were like 500,000 to over 3 million defensive uses of a firearm in the same year.
So like having factoids and stuff available, especially, you know, if people are getting real value out of our deep dives or taking something away from our deep dives, being able to index that and reference that, I think that is super important.
Yeah no yeah so um, i'm just gonna, i'm gonna say it here and you heard you probably didn't hear it here first, but you'll hear um, this whole thing in Sydney, it's a false flag, not not in the sense, not in the sense that it didn't happen right, but in the sense of it's being used for a specific purpose.
And I think it like like, first of all you, let me, let me just think about this, right the the, the police station is within viewing distance of the shooting okay, and it takes that long to get there.
Two, the shooting is done by got somebody who's clearly trained he he the, the owner of the guns in a gun restricted nation.
That's like, basically like super hard to get, somehow manages to squeak through, and then he's also on a watch list, but somehow they let him have a gun, the watch this thing.
Then, on top of that you've you've, you've got a perfect video of the entire shooting.
And here's the thing that catches me, uh, it happens to be a guy that just happened to be standing there.
And two, look at the cam like, look at the quality of the shot, of the video.
If it's taken by hand, on a, on a, like an iphone or something the camera would shake, especially if there's adrenaline.
You know, like if somebody's shooting and you're within eyes distance of it and you know they can turn and shoot you if they wanted to, that that's going to make adrenaline flow and that's going to make your hands shake.
unidentified
And the video is perfectly still and professionally recorded.
See that you can get into the weeds with things like that without us all knowing the context, which is why I try not to speculate.
But with that uh, he can easily have his phone rested to where it's sitting on the ledge and he's ducking behind cover for something right, like that's easy, that's an easy and that's what i'm saying.
Well, here's another aspect: the shooting in Brown University happened at the same time around within a 24-hour period, and it targeted apparently some professor of Judaic studies, Judaic studies.
And they had a bunch of people, a bunch of Jews out there crying about anti-Semitism on the news.
And what's really interesting is that some of the victims that were tied to that Brown shooting were also victims of the Parkland shooting, the high school shooting.
Now, your statistical chance of being caught in a school shooting are minute, probably like less than 1%, if I had to guess, right?
With all the schools every day, you getting caught up in it is this is expensive.
I'm sure there's going to be some people watching this that will agree with you.
And there's going to be some people like me who are kind of just like who are just like probably more middle ground about this thing.
I'm not going to sit here and be like, oh, you're completely wrong.
There's any number of combinations that could work for this equation, but I'm rooted in probability, right?
The probability, like we've had back-to-back school shootings in certain situations where there have been like within days of each other and those types of things, where it's just it's all about where the explosion of the energy is.
Right now, we're at a very heightened state of conflict within with around these topics about Judaism, uh, uh, Islam and Christian, and it's it's at its peak, right?
So you're going to expect probabilistically that there's going to be more events centered around where there are people who are angry in the background that have heated the conversations about what they should be doing in X, Y, and Z, where you can have multiple events occur across the world.
Because if you're talking about 8 billion people, the chances that I'm with you, the chances that two events that happen in two different places, it's not quite that the probability that it's coordinated is lower than the chance of them actually happening, right?
Either that person has the worst luck, and then we need to put them in like a concrete bunker until the end of time because He's saying that someone at the Rhode Island shooting was also a parent victim at the Parkland mass shooting that took place.
I'm saying when you correlate the thing that's happening in Australia to something that's happening in Rhode Island and that the fact that they're happening on the same day and then tying Israel and then tying it's too many iterations of connections of stream to line where the probability literally drops off a cliff as far as that being like a scenario that clearly is tied together.
I'm just saying the probability that they happen independently of each other because of the fact that there's more heightened emotions is higher than the first scenario.
You remember when that there was some peace deal in Gaza that this is while the war is still like, I know it's still going on and whatnot, but this is while it's still going on actively.
And this is maybe, it's crazy how time flies.
I want to say this might be even as far as a year back or something like that.
There was that embassy shooting.
And I forget where it was, but you remember it was the two people and they're like good-looking people and they were like dating each other or something.
And then they both die at this embassy.
And then the guy is like a radical jihadi, like just kill the Jews type of Muslim character, whatnot.
And that happened at a very auspicious time for the peace negotiations.
So an event like that, I can clearly look at it and go, okay, this is really suspect.
But this thing in Rhode Island, there's just not enough data to make that claim.
And I agree with you, Tim.
I'm just not there, even if the parking person is there.
The thing about it for me is like the reason why I'm so suspicious was the immediate response both by Israel's government on this and political figures both in Australia and America.
They were all like, it was like they all came out at the exact same time.
And it was like, we, the answer to these problems was we need to censor social media and specifically the algorithms to where anti-Semitism just gets wiped from the algorithm.
And basically any, basically, any critique of Israel or Jewish power or anything of that nature, they want it to where it just doesn't show up.
I'm not saying that like they're not using it as an opportunity to push a specific agenda, right?
Here's the thing: when you're at a state where the world is so chaotic right now, as is, and there's heightened tensions around, it doesn't take a whole lot for you, or you don't have to wait a whole lot of time.
Like, for example, with a school shooting, as sad as it is for me to say this today, I don't have to wait very long for if I had like an anti-gun agenda for there to be another school shooting for me to say every time, every time.
Like the time periods at which those events are happening is frequent enough to where like I don't have to orchestrate a whole thing.
I can let it happen organically to where it does happen because there's enough angry people that are willing to go do that and have the idea to do that.
Right.
So all I'm saying is, is like, be careful.
And this goes to other people, not specifically just to you, when you're tying these threads and realize that there is an area.
Oh, dude, I have to come, I have to figure out this term.
But like, it's essentially where we normally give credit for like, we, we kind of like avoid that there is a still a high probability for randomness in these situations and we tie circumstances together in order to like say like, okay, this is a matter of fact of what it happened.
And it just comes from not knowing and humans need to rationalize.
It's something that we have built into our system, which is why it's very easy for us to draw conclusions for these things.
Well, you know, I'm just exercising basic pattern recognition skills here because I also tie in as well the timing of everything.
Because so first of all, we have the, you know, the Israel versus the right.
That's been the biggest thing.
And they, they've lost that debate.
They try to get people censored.
They try to get people removed from off or removed from institutions and stuff.
And that failed.
And so it seemed to be that there was like an agenda, like a pivoting of, okay, well, these Muslims are bad.
It's like, see, guys, I'm cool.
The Muslims are bad.
And then all of a sudden, we have the shooting, the shooting done by a former CIA contractor who screamed the lock bar and shot the National Guardsman, the two, two of them.
And then we have the school shootings in Australia and in America.
And it was Jihadi John, you know.
It's just, I find it very suspicious.
And two, like, I don't know, like that, that guy who shot them, he knew what he was doing.
I mean, I saw some stuff about the guy from Sydney being an IDF.
I don't buy that.
But what I've been telling y'all for the past couple of weeks, it's spooky season.
It spooks everywhere.
It's like, unfortunately, when our government has had a history of, you know, doing these operations and we're becoming aware of it now, now we have to, like, we have to pose the question.
Like, it has to be asked.
Because, you know, what used to be what we thought was random turned out to be, you know, like color revolutions and things of that nature.
Like, we've toppled entire governments and made it look organic.
So like if we're going to be unbiased, we have to at least look into it.
And it's not there.
Nothing's there.
But I think it's like when you look at the coordinated everything, how it rolled out, and you see the immediate response, and it was very targeted.
It wasn't like, you know, we mourned the loss of these people.
This is bad.
It was anti-Semitism bad.
And now we need to get you all off of social media.
That was the angle.
And it's like, well, this guy was, this guy committed an act of gun violence, but your focus is the social media.
And so are all these other pundits that are the Israel first people.
And they're all like puppeting the same thing.
And then you got, I believe it was the Israeli foreign minister Twitter account posted the exact same thing.
It's just very suspicious to me.
And unfortunately, like I would love to live in a world where, you know, these tragedies, well, we can accept them as just being tragedies.
But if time has taught us anything, it's that, you know, it's like we shouldn't trust what we hear at all.
But then I don't also agree with like taking the opportunity to be like, well, anything that you say about anything that has to do with specifically, like you can't tie anti-Semitism and being critical about just one particular situation, like a genocide, and correlate the two exactly.
There is anti-Semitism when it comes to like, well, it's interesting.
The Islamic people who have these agendas are also doing the same thing, reverse genjitsu, where they're using the they're using the mainstream of these things to push their agenda too, in which you can see what they believe based off of the Quran.
If you don't believe, guys, that there's also another entity out there that also tries to go and tries to like brainwash Americans into like also having the hatred in the other direction, you would be surely mistaken.
And then I have plenty of Jewish friends that I've known over the years who are just like normal Americans and are just like, they're also Europeans and stuff like that.
And so like there's this smaller population, right, that has maybe done some more extreme stuff by going into Gaza and bulldozing and doing a lot of things.
But as a result, you've taken the brush and said, okay, well, the word Jew now corresponds to everything else.
And the Jews here in America should have a target on their back and be worried about it.
So, but where they're where they're trying to do the whole anti-Semitic push and where there should be pushback is not just allowing the narrative to just get out of control to where the whole thing gets lumped in.
Because the same thing can happen with any other race guys.
Like as a black person, I would hate that when I hated when I hated when these Antifa Black Lives Matter people went out there and rioted and broke everything.
Now, had that narrative gotten out of control and there weren't some sort of breaks that were put on that thing, who knows?
This is a very extreme scenario, but let's say like it happened enough that people just got so angry that they were like, all right, fuck it.
All the black people, all the things.
It doesn't matter if you were halfway across the country and stuff like that.
And it comes down to the key thing of they don't want us to be united on a class basis on an economic basis.
So after the Tea Party and after Occupy Wall Street, they get really scared and they start pushing the race stuff really, really hard until or after 2011.
Right.
And the thing I'm pissed about is I feel like I was robbed.
I feel like you were robbed of really that more peaceful time in America.
I think we really did reach a point and people want to go, no, things were never fixed and it was always bad.
It's always been terrible.
I'm not saying people don't act badly to each other, but I feel like in like the like 90s, 2000s era, I think we really reached a point to where it wasn't a big deal anymore.
And then Obama came in and everyone's like, great.
I voted for a black president or whatever.
Racism's dead.
And he kind of makes it his pet issue.
And then going forward to get headlines, to get clicks, all the news organizations, they followed the same blueprint and everything's been racialized.
But in jumping up in conclusion, all I have to say about this whole thing is, look, we can't just let the wheels off and just be like, okay, everybody just go out there and let's just throw haymakers at people who have nothing to do with these situations, right?
And everybody's going to have emotions.
Everything needs to be centered around all the groups of people who are actually executing on the bad things.
That's why I wouldn't say ban get all the Muslim people out of my college.
I don't want them there.
Like, because I know that the ones that like, they're just normal people, right?
So that's all.
I mean, it's just the nuances and we're not doing enough of that.
And I'll just say it again, even though it probably falls on deaf ears.
It is whatever.
It would make our day if you went to goprimalcore.com and you use code core25 for 25% off for you, for a family member, as a gift or a present, or just to use to improve your own life and your physical and cognitive health.
I would go and check out Elemental Drive and Ultimate Oshwagandha at goprimalcore.com.
And that lets us do things like get someone to switch cameras for us, get someone to help us pull out clips.
We don't have to do it all ourselves.
That helps us build a website, which will turn into a repository of information.
You'll be able to go back and quote and find things and studies and information.
And it goes towards just making sure things get bigger and better in the future.
We want to do a lot of cool things, a lot of cool, different interesting projects.
And that's all made possible by the viewer and listener support.
That's why we thank you.
And we humbly ask you if you will go to goprimalcore.com and check out the great deals and use code 25.