The House’s 427-1 vote on November 18, 2025, to release the Epstein files—after Trump’s last-minute "I’ve got nothing to hide" reversal—exposes a clash between transparency and obstruction. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massie accuse Trump of betraying MAGA values by shielding figures like donors and intelligence operatives tied to Epstein’s alleged blackmail networks, including Israeli intelligence and billionaire Zionists. The address book lists Trump allies (e.g., Carl Icahn) and victims (e.g., Jill Harth), while Wired’s 2025 data reveals precise movements of nearly 200 minors on Epstein’s Lolita Express plane and Little St. James island, implicating systemic complicity. If the Senate’s 60-40 bill passes, unredacted files may finally surface—but legal loopholes risk burying the truth, leaving Trump’s political survival dependent on whether his base still trusts him over justice. [Automatically generated summary]
And what that is really is a culmination of a lot of different various storylines in the, you know, GOP right-wing, you could say, space of Trump, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thomas Massey.
We have a situation where Trump essentially, he's got to, he's got to bend the knee now.
I think what happens is like, all right, you take it to Senate.
You got a few more.
You got days.
The only reason why he's letting this happen is because they're going to redact everything.
Even though you'll see, and I'll explain, they say that you can't redact certain things unless it's like, you know, national security secret clearance type shit.
But, you know, if it is the same story again, 2.0 as to what you described, which is what happened first when they gave everyone those binders and they go, it's all coming out.
It's all coming out.
And they gave people a bunch of redacted, blanked out information.
And I find it to be just hilarious that it's not just like, okay, it's not like you're searching for like the Da Vinci Code and this stuff.
You just need the names of the dudes, right?
And the women that have been at these rallies and the women that have organized with MTG and others to push for getting the files out, these women, they have accusations, they have names that they agree on.
So, I mean, ultimately, when we talk about these people, you get Marjorie Taylor Greene, who really has supported, and you'll see her say this for herself, really supported and fought for and given her loyalty to Trump for like the past five, six years, you know?
I'm sure real like Epstein heads, you know, people that really like are deeply invested in knowing everything about Epstein, they know what the Lolita looks like.
I didn't know.
And then Tim, you pulled it up and I was like, dang, that's like it looks very cryptic, guys.
I proudly rise today in a bipartisan effort to release the Epstein files finally after five administrations have covered it up.
Earlier today, I attended the press conference where the survivors, they're not victims, the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse and sex trafficking told their stories.
And they told stories about how it started back in 1991, 1996, and they continued on through the decades.
And they told stories about how they told someone.
Well, what he tried to say was he tried to say he's like this brilliant financial advisor where like he doesn't have a secretive trader who would trade exclusive hedge fund where you had to have $1 billion plus, but they didn't have any receipts for it.
They never had any records that this place even existed, but it's pretty clear where he got his money from, which is Wexner.
And, you know, MTG, they've come after her like they've come after Massey just for simply saying like he's a real person that had influence and did these things.
This needs to be publicly available and that the truth needs to come out and we need to know who did these things.
Right.
And to think about it, she says 1,000 women.
All right.
And I know there's things with the Me Too and the whatnot, and people are kind of grumpy about that.
I believe probably most of those women.
You know, like I'm, I'm sure there's a couple Looney Tunes that have snuck in, but like I believe that like an op my point is an operation that's that big that abuses hundreds of people.
It should have been the easiest thing for the speaker of the house.
It should have been the easiest thing for the president of the United States to release all the information, every single file, on behalf of these American women.
These American women aren't rich, powerful elites.
They do not have someone paying for their airline tickets or paying for their trips or paying for their expenses every time they try to do something to get this, get this information out.
So like after Trump gets elected and whatnot, you know, we're thinking like JD, Rubio, like these are the people that make sense.
You know, with the changing atmosphere and a real, you know, disgust that the American public and specifically the Republican GOP, just right-leaning slash Navy Independent base has that voted for Trump.
They hate the swamp creatures.
And I think that they recognize pretty much anyone in this current administration as someone who in part is responsible for the unfulfillment of their dreams and what they voted for.
So with her, I would say I don't think she gets the nomination from the Republicans.
There's too big of a divide as far as the people who do like her and the people who don't absolutely despise her.
I think she gets re-elected in her current position.
I think the populace of the people would definitely vote her back in, but I don't know if she gets the nomination from the Republicans themselves because that's a pretty big thing.
You know, you got to get everybody to agree on that for the most part.
And the president's endorsement is a really big thing too.
Yeah, but it's like, it's only convenient because now she's pushing the narrative.
Here's the thing.
Has been she's right on this, but she's been wrong on some other things, especially when she was in that whole QAnon stuff and she was doing some like these people kids.
You know, here's the thing: not enough people know about Gavin Newsom that it's not totally crazy that there would be a bunch of people that would vote for him.
And you want to know what the Epstein files represent?
The cover-up represents to average Americans.
It represents the failures of the federal government and Congress to the American people.
And that is what people rose up about in 2024.
They wanted and demanded transparency from their government and for Americans finally to be put first.
And today with this vote, we are finally putting these victims and these survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and the cabal of rich, powerful elites that expands not just here in the United States of America, but to other countries as well.
We're putting them last.
And that is exactly what Americans want.
You see, for far too long, far too long, Americans have been put last.
And they're sick of it.
They're sick and tired of it.
This is why they don't trust Congress.
This is why they don't trust the government.
And here's the problem.
All of these women, women who have suffered in shame for years and years and years, women who were terrified, women who were intimidated, women who were threatened, just like Virginia Guffray.
And now she's dead.
And these women should have never faced that for this information to come out.
And we, especially the four Republican members of the House of Representatives, we should have never faced intimidation and threats for us to get this vote to come to the floor.
My point is like, what do these people actually do?
When you vote for them and you put them into Washington, D.C., what do these people actually do?
Do they advocate for you?
No.
They just start to preserve the system.
And yeah, I guess that means American life gets to go on as normal, whatever that means, where it just gets gradually worse and worse and worse and worse.
But these people, they don't actually do anything.
Marjorie Taylor Greene probably doesn't actually do a lot.
Like the system is just designed as to where every year or two or so, they vote for some sort of giant spending package.
They push it through.
They prolong the life of the government.
They have a referendum on the government shutdown.
Well, I will say, I do appreciate the fact that she, the first half of this going to like the three minute mark, everything she said is exactly what I have been hearing online is what we have been saying.
It is what the audience has been saying.
And it's very interesting that you got to understand all these people consume the same social media as us.
So I think, if we continue making enough noise, guys.
Keep rattling the cage, I think eventually maybe um, and maybe this is the light pill on me, but I think one day the status quo will change, especially with the new politicians that are coming in, because at a certain point this narrative wasn't mainstream.
There wasn't a lot of talk like this, back in, you know, 20 right, but here's the thing, we already had this election on this entire thing and it was decided that the American people wanted this right.
So I I totally agree with you.
As you're saying, it's coming, I would say it's already here and the fact that they're not acting on honoring their promise getting into office, I think it's going to drive that change that you're talking about even faster.
As to where you know, we may have seen, you know, a trickle up effect or trickle down effect over the next couple of major presidential elections.
All the liberals are like complaining, they're like me me, Trump dodging, no good.
And then they.
And then Biden gets in, because I was part of the wave of like dude, let's get Trump out, let's get Biden in, bro.
I was a Biden bro for like a hot second only because he was associated with Obama, not really because of Biden himself.
But Biden gets in.
We go from right now we go to left.
Then left took it to fucking extremes.
I started seeing transgender stuff all over my feed and uh, you know crazy craziness and you had the invasion of uh, illegals and all the things that came with that.
But it's super weird because, like I looked at it when Trump won in november of 2024, I was like, awesome, repeat it 2017, it's going to be great, as in like, he's not going to do much negative and that just means life is going to be good in America.
Right, because a real good president is a president that really does nothing.
Right at the end of the day, like no new conflicts, no new wars taxes, but instead what we got was a weird kind of like reverse Biden, you know, and like Superman, like the Flash, like they have, like the bizarro Superman, the reverse flash, like Biden.
You didn't see him.
Biden lived in like a little like cave, like five stories under the White House.
Yeah, he lived.
He lived in some sort of like mausoleum under the White House like a vampire, where you never see him, and it was the Autopin and kind of his administration and the Jill was running that administration.
Jill, all those people, his uh man who is his secretary of state uh Anthony, Blinken people like that right.
It's really all of the things that you have to have because ever since whatever he passed has made everything exponentially more difficult as far as importing products from overseas.
And this is something that's going to help like Americans at the end of the day and keep IV bags and people in hospitals alive and shit like that.
It's not something crazy where I'm importing some cheap thing from China.
But ultimately, with this piece of equipment coming in, man, I tell you, this is such a headache now that this has happened.
I think it's like there's going to be a tariff on top, but then you also need to know not where just the product was made, but go all the way back to where it was smelted and where the raw material and who touched what.
And you have to do back.
It's just, it doesn't work.
It doesn't work because he's trying to prevent people from like China.
And I'll tell you, because I wasn't a Johnny cum lately to the MAGA train.
I was day one 2015.
And there's a big difference in those Americans and those that decided to support President Trump later on.
And I'll tell you right now, this has been one of the most destructive things to MAGA is watching the man that we supported early on,
three elections for people that stood hours, slept in their cars to go to rallies, have fought for truth and transparency and to hold what we consider a corrupt government accountable.
Watching this actually turn into a fight has ripped MAGA apart.
And the only thing that will speak to the powerful, courageous women behind me is when action is actually taken to release these files and the American people won't tolerate any other bullshit.
And that's what we did by fighting so hard against the most powerful people in the world, even the president of the United States, in order to make this vote happen today.
I was called a traitor by a man that I fought for five, no, actually six years for.
And I gave him my loyalty for free.
I won my first election without his endorsement, beating eight men in a primary.
And I've never owed him anything, but I fought for him for the policies and for America first.
And he called me a traitor for standing with these women and refusing to take my name off the discharge petition.
Let me tell you what a traitor is.
A traitor is an American that serves foreign countries and themselves.
A patriot is an American that serves the United States of America and Americans like the women standing behind me.
And I want to tell you that this only became possible today because the American people whom we serve as representatives here in Congress demanded that this vote happen and they put more pressure on every single elected politician in this city than has ever been put on them.
And today you are going to see probably a unanimous vote in the House to release the Epstein files, but the fight, the real fight, will happen after that.
And pull up this next clip because she's right about this whole thing being unanimous.
The House, go ahead.
They voted 427 to 1.
And by the way, with the House, there's only 435 seats.
So this is as unanimous as you can get.
There was one person that said no.
And then I want to say five people that abstained or something like that that said, we're not going to vote on this, but let's go ahead and watch this.
unidentified
427, the nays are one.
Two-thirds being in the affirmative, the rules are suspended.
He basically said something about protection of the victims.
And I'm like, what are you talking about, bro?
Like, this isn't enough for you to vote no.
But I'll find that at some point.
But essentially, all you need to know is this one guy voted no.
All the rest of them said yes.
And then going back to where I was, the original bill, like that was trying to be passed, it was frozen.
So like you had the speaker, Mike Johnson.
He didn't even let this bill hit the floor, guys.
And that's the thing that she was talking about, like leadership not even allowing this bill to go through.
So basically, I think it was Mike Johnson, but then also Trump was saying things to Mike Johnson to also encourage the behavior.
So in order to actually get past something like this, you need what's called a discharge position, discharge petition, which is like a very rare procedural thing that you actually have to use in order to get past the Speaker of the House.
And Republican, the rep Thomas Massey, he basically was the one who broke the stalemate with this discharge position.
And it requires 218 votes, which is the number that you saw her spit out, in order for them to get this petition by, you know, the rest of Congress.
And it forces a vote on the issue.
So only four Republicans were actually willing to sign this position at the time, which was Thomas Massey, Lauren Obert.
You had MTG herself, and then you had Nancy Mace.
So that's literally only four Republicans.
And the other 200 signatures basically were Democrats, showing that this was very much so not a bipartisan issue at this point, even though you see the 427 to one, but that's just because you don't want to be seen on the other side saying no to something like this to the public.
So at the time, Trump's initial position for this, he urged the Republicans to be like, hey, do not support this bill.
unidentified
He said, this is the new scam that we will forever call the Jeopardy Jeffrey Epstein hoax.
As I said on Friday night about Air Force One to the fake news media, House Republicans should vote to release the Epstein files because we have nothing to hide.
It's time to move on from this Democrat hoax perpetuated by the radical left lunatics in order to deflect from the great success of the Republican Party, including our recent victory on the Democrat shutdown.
Okay, I can't do it.
The Department of Justice has already turned over tens of thousands of pages to the public on Epstein.
Man, the way that he puts things in quotation marks and stuff, it throws me off.
It's crazy.
Are looking at various Democrat operatives, Bill Clinton, Reid Hoffman, Larry Summers, et cetera, in their relationship to Epstein and the House Oversight Committee can have whatever they're legally entitled to.
I don't care in all caps.
I don't care in all caps.
All I do care about is Republicans get back on point, also in all caps, which is the economy, affordability, where we are winning big.
Our victory.
unidentified
I mean, you see how I used to add that little ad looking?
Our victory on reducing inflation from the highest level in history to practically nothing, bringing down pieces for the American prices for the American people, delivering historic tax cuts, gaining trillions of dollars of investment into America.
A record.
He's got to do it, man.
They're rebuilding of our military, securing our border, deporting criminal legal aliens, ending men and women's sports, stopping stopping.
If things were cheap, Tim, like, if it was like miraculous, like everything's gone down, like two, three dollars in price, like it truly was cheap gas, like he talks about cheap food, like he talks about, he could sell this, right?
So he releases the moat that he put up because the only reason why they all were like, we're not going to sign this position was because the Republicans have loyalty to their party and they have loyalty to the president.
I had another clip of Massey actually talking about the vote.
I believe this is after it's passed and whatnot.
I just want to play this.
This is pretty interesting stuff right here.
You know, he's another one like MTG.
And you know, I think it's very astute, Tim, that you make the point of like the really angling here because, like, I saw it and I was very happy, but they're saying they're definitely poisoning themselves for future elections.
I mean, after months of fighting, well, the speaker, the attorney general, the FBI director, the president, and the vice president could have saved us all this time and embarrassment, frankly, for our own party if they'd just done the right thing four months ago.
unidentified
Congressman, I mean, for weeks he's been pushing against this.
Well, I'm concerned that now he's opening a flurry of investigations, and I believe they may be trying to use those investigations as a predicate for not releasing the files.
Well, they will, I'm afraid they're going to try to use a provision of the law that allows you not to release these materials if they're the subject of an ongoing investigation and would harm and the release of which would harm the ongoing investigation.
unidentified
So, what are you saying this is all about President Trump?
That right there is the that's the that's the card he's holding in his back pocket, which is why he's left the viewers.
All right, look, I was like, yo, Trump's got to have that Trump card.
He's got to have something that allows him to like allow them to go ahead and do this.
He's playing, he's trying to play 4D chess.
He's not just going to say, Let's go and do this and know that, like, if his name is truly out there and it gets out to the open, he knows that he's got time.
But what he just said there with the fact that you can shut this whole thing down if basically you're making that announcement and releasing to the public actually impedes the investigation itself.
Because technically, this whole Epstein case is still technically ongoing, right?
It's so crazy to see the politicians now, even if it's just Massey, talk about American intelligence and Israeli intelligence and Epstein's connection, all that.
Because that's where this all really is, right?
It's like Epstein was an actor that worked kind of as a cutout for these global intelligence agencies to build the global black mail network and get everyone implicated, right?
And Ghislaine Maxwell's father, Robert Maxwell, was buried with like the absolute like purple heart honors, the highest level honors you can get at the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem, right?
He was given like a hero's funeral by the IDF because of his work with them and with the Massan, right?
So he's got all these ties.
He's got all these connections.
He's connected to a bunch of billionaire and millionaire Zionists, you name it.
This guy, when he dies in 2019, he dies under Trump's watch.
Because he's like, he said, they're going to go and try to stop this still because there's too many people that are implicated that are basically in positions of power and friends.
But the thing that he really hit home with was he was like, look, they'll try to stop it somewhere else, but it'll backfire.
And I mean, I think that I think he was never going to release it, right?
But I think that what I, the answer to your question is, I think he believed his personal magnetism and his cult of personality was so strong could survive anything.
And what we're seeing clearly is that that's not true for a large portion of his base.
I think it's about 30% of people are just like, I cannot do this.
I think the large majority of the Trump people are still the Trump people.
Ride or die.
It's the same cult that the Democrats have in that respect.
But enough of the base has said, nah, like, fuck this.
You're lying to us.
We can't support you anymore.
Like, you ran on this and you betrayed us.
Enough of the base has said no.
And it's radicalized the other side so much as to where I don't see them winning any elections.
Congressman, you obviously had your differences with President Trump in the past, but Congressman Green was one of his closest allies, one of his strongest supporters.
What do you make of the fact that over the Epstein files have prompted this such a public and searing breakup?
lost his understanding of the magazine i i think on uh aspects of fiscal responsibility on aspects of starting wars overseas and getting into regime change and on this case of releasing the epstein files i think he has strayed away from the things that he campaigned on whoo yeah dude Yeah, I mean, that's what I'm right there, dude.
If you change anything on that bill, guys, it goes back to the house to vote again and through all the things.
And here's the thing with this.
The other things that they're trying to say is they're saying, okay, with this, when they release it, all records have to be posted publicly.
They have to be searchable, downloadable, easily navigable.
And there's a database for the general public to access.
This is a good thing.
The release is not discretionary.
It is a legal obligation with a deadline.
So the attorney general can only redact victim identities, minors, sexually explicit content involving the minors, and then info that would compromise active investigations.
And that's the thing that Massey's talking about here.
That's the scary part.
It's like that's very broad and we don't know what that means as far as protecting the ongoing investigation.
There's a lot of wiggle room for that one.
And then there's also another clause in there that says like they're able to redact it if it's a national security threat.
Like, so the uh bill explicitly bans the redactions to protect powerful people.
So there's no withholding uh due to embarrassment, no withholding due to like rep uh reputation and the harm to your reputation, or no withholding due to polent uh political sensitivity.
So that might hit on what you're talking about there.
At least if you're going to tell us that it's a hoax that never existed, well, if you give us some blood, if we're able to get that out of them, then their entire thesis statement is a lie, right?
Because we can say, hey, there's meat on this bone.
You said there was no meat on this bone.
You said this wasn't real.
You redacted a million things.
You still gave us like five or six people.
Like, that just means all the 500 other things you redacted are just like there's more people, right?
So 100%.
I just want to see this go through, not in the sense as of where I think, oh, like this is the true smoking gun.
Like this is the Epstein thing solved.
We're going to know it all.
No, I want to see something come out of this.
And then, you know what?
If they obvious, if they obfuscate, if they hide, if they don't reveal, like, if they don't reveal the real thing behind it, at least we can go and say, hey, like, there's something here that we were shown and that we weren't able to fully investigate because everything was redacted.
Like, I, I, I, I don't have any pie-in-the-sky dreams anymore for what I expect.
Oh, they're going to release it.
Oh, we're going to, we're going to stop illegal immigration.
Now, here's the thing about this: the D this only applies to unclassifying the DOJ holdings.
It doesn't apply to the CIA, FBI, NSA, or State Department to declassify their intelligence and what they might know.
I don't know.
It's all a mess.
I don't know who has what the DOJ has.
I don't know what FBI has.
I don't know.
But like the 30-day clock is pretty rigid.
And here's the reason why that one dude, Clay Higgins, voted no.
So weird.
His core argument was this bill injures thousands of innocent people and witnesses and alibis and family members and abandons 250 years of criminal criminal justice procedures.
This is what he's saying, man.
And he's like, a rapid media will weaponize these names.
Boo-hoo.
And then he also emphasizes that the oversight committee has already released 60,000 plus pages.
Many of the people mentioned inside of those documents have nothing to do with Epstein's crimes.
And then the last thing he says is like, those individuals could not be the individuals who are involved in something could be doxxed, harassed, or falsely implicated.
So he's like, okay, he supports transparency, but with protections.
Now, you guys have heard me talk about this little book, the address book of Jeffrey Epstein and who's in there.
You're going to be shocked by some of the names that are in this book.
And listen and pay close attention to this video.
We won't cover the entire video, but at least the first three minutes has some good meat for you guys to chew on.
So pay attention.
unidentified
This is Donald Trump's phone number in Jeffrey Epstein's personal little black book from the 1990s.
In 2021, Business Insider obtained an address book no one had ever seen before.
Jeffrey Epstein got away with what he got away with because of who was in his address book.
What's interesting for us about this book is a new cast of characters who we didn't previously know had interactions with or did business with them.
While the Trump administration says it won't disclose more files in Epstein, the older address book reminds us of Epstein's vast connections to prominent figures, including Melania Trump's best friend, Christopher Cuomo's wife, and an advisor in the first Trump administration.
Our first thought was to just do whatever we could to verify that it was real.
We've obtained a copy of an address book that we believe belonged to Jeffrey Epstein.
But then at a certain point, he's probably making real money and real deals because now he had enough money to like go into these rooms, have these conversations, strike these deals, and people are paying him to do all types of stuff.
If it comes back and it's not authentic, it's a pretty awesome forgery, I have to say.
unidentified
One of the moments in the public waking up to the magnitude of his crimes was the publication in 2015 of an address book belonging to Jeffrey Epstein.
And what was stunning about it was it contained the names of Donald Trump and Nick Jagger, Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton.
And it sort of woke people up to the fact that this was a guy who had access to our reporting also found about 220 new names that didn't appear in this other address book.
If someone were to concoct a fake book to trick journalists, they would start by taking those names from the other public little black book and putting them in this one.
So we start by sort of correlating the names.
And then we just started calling people in the book whose names have not been previously associated with Jeffrey Epstein.
It's interesting because the black book, look, whether you believe it or not, I think it has enough meat on it.
Now, not everybody who's in that book is implicated, like I was saying earlier, but it just, again, all I needed to see was Bill Clinton and Donald Trump.
I just needed to make sure that those two people were implicated on this.
Even in death, the secrets of Jeffrey Epstein remain tightly guarded.
But earlier this year, I spearheaded a wired investigation that uncovered the data of almost 200 mobile phones belonging to visitors to his infamous pedophile island.
The data was so precise, we were able to map the paths of these visitors to within centimeters, including their neighborhoods, buildings of origins, and the paths they took to get to the island.
These digital trails document the numerous trips of wealthy and influential individuals seemingly undeterred by Epstein's status as a convicted sex offender.
Wired's analysis of the data is ongoing and it raises profound questions about privacy and surveillance.
This is Epstein Island's secret data on the grid.
This is Little St. James, aka Epstein Island.
These red dots on the map represent some of the 11,279 coordinates I obtained.
They were left exposed online by a location data broker with ties to the Defense Department called Near Intelligence.
Between 2016 and Epstein's final arrest in 2019, Near collected data on more than 200 cell phones that visited the island.
We don't know why they did that or which client or prospective client of Near decided to query the data in this way to produce the maps.
But the maps you'll see in this video show where visitors to Epstein Island spent most of their time.
Let's take a step back.
You might be wondering, where is Epstein Island anyways?
Well, it's here.
Little St. James is a private island that is part of the U.S. Virgin Islands, an unincorporated territory of the United States in the Caribbean Sea.
Epstein purchased Little St. James in 1998 for $7.95 million.
It's about 71 acres, the size of 54 football fields.
He made the island his primary residence and soon after began welcoming visitors and throwing infamous parties where he was accused of having groomed, sexually assaulted, and trafficked untold numbers of women and girls.
The maps of the data collected by Nier and which we had wired recreated here indicate the most visited spots on the island.
From the main house here with the pool to the beaches and the large sundial, it's all on display, including the enigmatic hilltop temple site over here, which has been the focal point in speculations about Epstein's mysterious activities on the island.
But the tracking of phones wasn't contained at Little St. James.
Surveillance continued long after the visitors left.
The data reveals the locations of visitors 30 minutes before and after arriving on the island, which shows us the exact routes everyone took to get there.
Some landed here at the Cyril E. King airport on neighboring St. Thomas Island.
With its private jet and VIP terminals, it was the go-to hub for Epstein's 200-seater Boeing 727 plane dubbed Lolita Express.
We see data points clustered at various area beaches, hotels, and luxury resorts, including...
And then here is like all the fucking world leaders plotting to just demise when they got like a little girl on their lap.
Like it's just grotesque.
And then like these people are all, you know, the whole thing that makes this whole thing sick is imagine like all the laughing, all the fun, all the joking these guys did.
Maybe they're smoking here playing card games, and then you've got like a little 13-year-old back here just waiting for you to be done.
And, you know, it kind of just makes you understand like we were talking about last time.
Sometimes the bad people do rise up to the top because they have a little bit of like that psychopath, sociopath to actually do the things it takes to get there.
Well, yeah, and that's, that's the thing, you know, and this is why we pull up the images and we show you the plane so you can visualize it.
We show people the maps like where this place actually was and what it actually looked like for Epstein Island and the temple and whatnot.
People go, oh, like I've seen this before.
I've seen this before.
No, really think about it.
Our political elite and our elite in general, our rich people in the country all partied with this dude, abused children with this dude, hung out with this dude on his island.
And it's like you said, they were all laughing, just hanging out like it was normal.
But you have to have something wrong up here in order to even constitute doing something like this, especially if you're not born into like following the prophet Muhammad and doing all that crazy shit from a young age.
Like most of these people are Christians that were probably raised in Christian households.
All these, these people don't believe in anything, but money in themselves.
That's what these people believe in.
Like full stop.
And people like that should not be leading your society because the society that's not based on people caring and wanting a better future, that's based off money and killing and raping, really, or great.
Like, this is how we ended up to where we were, where America is a war economy.
This is how we ended up where we were, where people really don't have rights.
This is how we ended up where we were, where the president is the king.
It's because over and over and over again, people like Epstein were used by the real power, the real controllers, the intelligence agencies across the world to run our government.
And they can trust in the American people to not visualize the situation and therefore not to care about it.
And, you know, that's what we talk about here on the gray area.
If they shut down this shit in the Senate, if they do anything to basically stop the train on the tracks, best believe we are coming up on this show and we're talking about it like everybody else.
Oh, X is going to have tons of fun if something like that happens.