| Time | Text |
|---|---|
|
Route Four Protocols
00:02:13
|
|
| I'm working with Dr. Justice Hope, that's his pen name, he's written a book on cancer, to figure out the best prophylactic protocols to prevent cancer, both in people of low risk, moderate and high risk. | |
| The higher the risk reduction, the more nutraceuticals and drugs you need to take. | |
| Which would also depend upon your risk. | |
| So if you're particularly low risk, maybe you'll take three or four. | |
| We call it the route three, route four, route five. | |
| But if you have a... | |
| BRCAG and you take the Root9, which has more extensive medications and nutraceuticals. | |
| So we're busy working on this. | |
| It should be available on our website soon. | |
| The most effective nutraceuticals, the first most effective is green tea. | |
| EGCG is very effective in preventing cancer. | |
| Primarily because of its effect on cancer cells, but also the tumor microenvironment. | |
| So it's very effective. | |
| And then we have curcumin, which acts on multiple biological pathways. | |
| We then have vitamin D, which as we spoke this morning, is a very strong association between vitamin D deficiency and cancer. | |
| And then number four is omega-3 fatty acids. | |
| Which was in that original study. | |
| So our basic protocol, we call it Route 4, are these four drugs. | |
| They're reasonably cheap, they're safe, there are no side effects, and so that I think people over the age of 60, even if you're healthy, should consider taking these drugs, because it will significantly reduce your risk of developing cancer. | |
| Obviously, it won't completely eliminate it. | |
| But think how cost-effective this is because we know the cost of treating a patient with cancer with conventional chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors runs into the millions of dollars, let alone the lost time of work-related activities and lack of productivity. | |
|
Cost-Effective Approach to Public Health
00:00:15
|
|
| So it's a highly cost-effective approach. | |
| And you would imagine that it would be an approach that public health would be interested in because it's public health. | |
| We should be preventing diabetes, obesity and cancer. | |