All Episodes
Feb. 14, 2021 - Epoch Times
12:22
Larry Elder Debunks the 2020 Election Voter Integrity | Larry Elder
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Let me get this straight.
We're crazy for raising legitimate concerns about the election.
We're crazy for raising concerns about deadlines blown through, about irregularities, about signatures not matching, about the Wisconsin case where three of the members of the Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice, felt that they should deal with this on the merits and not ignore it based on procedural basis?
We're crazy?
They want us not to believe what we see with our own eyes?
Charlie!
What?
What are you doing?
Where?
There!
With her!
Who?
Her!
Oh, and now they're saying, well, the election wasn't really even close.
Joe Biden won by 7 million votes.
Joe Biden got more votes than any other person ever to run for the office.
40,000 votes in three states.
The election goes to Trump.
Don't take my word for it.
Take the word of Steve Karnacki of MSNB Hee Haw, that left-wing I hate Trump network that I watch so you don't have to.
If about 40,000 votes in three states, a fraction of a point in each, had flipped, Donald Trump could have won the presidency.
Is George Washington law professor Jonathan Turley, who twice voted for Obama, a nutcase?
Here's what he said just a few days after the election.
Just as some of us remain skeptical of these claims of fraud, it appears as implausible that this untested form of voting was used across the country without major glitches.
Officials in cities like Detroit and Philadelphia, with histories of election violations, said that the counts of mail ballots were almost flawless, a claim difficult to rebut without review.
We need a review of counts in critical states to resolve this crisis of faith.
A recent survey found nearly half of all Americans lack confidence that their ballots will be counted fairly.
A Harvard study also found that under half of young black voters believe that their ballots are even counted.
This lack of faith in the electoral process has been fueled by the shift to mail ballots, but builds on increasing distrust of our political system." Is Ken Starr a lawyer who was once respected by both Republicans and Democrats?
A nutcase, too?
I want to make a comment about Philadelphia, unless you want to go there separately, but here's a key point.
Philadelphia does indeed have, sad to say, a very, very sorry history of voter fraud.
Simply look it up.
Voter fraud convictions in Philadelphia.
Over a century, we're not talking about rhetoric now, we're talking about facts.
And the facts are that as recently as this year, there's been a conviction in Philadelphia for voter fraud.
The former state senate majority leader went to jail for voter fraud in Philadelphia.
So anytime a voter fraud, whether it's Nevada or Philadelphia or wherever, is made, it should be taken very seriously and not dismissed.
And what about Alan Dershowitz?
Again, a left-wing guy who twice voted for Obama, he predicted and thought that the Supreme Court should take up the Pennsylvania case.
I do think that Trump will win the Pennsylvania lawsuit that you discussed before I came on the air, namely the lawsuit that challenges ballots that were filed before the end of And is this Republican Michigan election official a nutcase too?
Ballot harvesting in Detroit, Flint and Pontiac has been going on for decades.
It's a misdemeanor to give your ballot to anyone not allowed by law to receive it, and it's a felony to take that ballot.
People have been prosecuted in Michigan over the years as a result.
Ballot stuffing, ballot curing and complete fraud in the issuance, handling and processing of ballots has not been addressed and no election after 2020 should be considered fair unless we get this right this year.
The complete hate, disdain and apathy for Republican poll challengers is but one way of how elections are stolen in Michigan.
Before COVID-19, and I'm talking to the Democrat in the House, and in every election in the last 25 years, Republican poll challengers were removed by the police, especially in Pontiac.
MCL 168.733 says the election inspectors and other election officials on duty shall protect a challenger in the discharge of his or her duties.
Shall protect is not an option.
Shall protect.
It is never done in the urban areas.
Never, never, never in the urban areas.
In the 34 years I've been working for the state of Michigan, And certainly not the 29 years I've been working at the Secretary of State.
It also says in subsection 4, a person shall not threaten or intimidate a challenger while performing an activity allowed.
You shall not threaten or intimidate.
It is a misdemeanor for what they have done, these inspectors, to continue to intimidate and throw out Republican poll challengers.
It has been going on too long.
71% of Detroit precincts, our largest city, cannot be recounted.
As always expressed as minor clerical errors, these are not minor.
There are touch points in the process for these ballots to be and the accounting to be done, those ballots to be opened.
In order for this fraud to be corrected, we need a complete audit.
You need to have optics on it.
This has always been done in communities of color.
It needs to stop.
Enforce the laws and ensure.
Bring in independent inspectors.
And I'll be happy to answer any questions.
This brings us to Wisconsin, where the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 4-3 against taking up Team Trump's challenge.
They dismissed the case based upon procedural grounds.
But there were three dissents filed, including by the Chief Justice of Wisconsin Supreme Court, all of whom felt that the case should be litigated based upon the merits and not dismissed.
Let me read you some of their dissents.
The Chief Justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, Patience Drake Roggensack, said, and I'm quoting,"...in the case before us, a significant portion of the public does not believe that the November 3, 2020, presidential election was fairly conducted." Once again, four justices on this court cannot be bothered with addressing what the statutes require to assure that absentee ballots are lawfully cast.
The Milwaukee County Board of Canvassers and the Dane County Board of Canvassers based their decisions on erroneous advice when they concluded that changes clerks made to defective witness addresses were permissible.
And the Dane County Board of Canvassers erred again when it approved the 200 locations for a ballot collection that comprise Democracy in the Park.
The majority does not bother addressing what the Boards of Canvassers did or should have done, and instead four members of this Court throw the cloak of latches over numerous problems that will be repeated again and again until this Court has the courage to correct them.
The electorate expects more of us, and we are capable of providing it.
Because we do not, I respectfully dissent." Lachey's L-A-C-H-E-S means that the Trump team took too long to file the claims.
In other words, as soon as these mail-in ballots things were changed, regulations were changed, the Trump team should have protested right then and there.
The argument is that they waited too long.
Here's what another dissenting judge said about applying latches in this case.
Justice Annette Kingsland Ziegler dissented and said,"...the majority's decision not to address the merits suffers from an even more insidious flaw.
It places the will of this court and the will of the Wisconsin Election Commission above the expressed intent of the legislature." The majority ignores that the legislature specifically set forth a remedy that absentee ballots cast in contravention of the statute not be counted.
When the law is not followed, the counting of illegal ballots effectively disenfranchises voters.
The majority's application of latches here is unfortunate and doomed to create chaos, uncertainty, undermine confidence, and spawn needless litigation.
Instead of declaring what the law is, the majority is legislating its preferred policy.
It disenfranchises those that follow the law in favor of those who acted in contravention to it.
This is not the rule of law.
It is the rule of judicial activism through inaction." End of quote.
And there was another dissent also addressing the issue of latches, whether or not President Trump's team waited too long.
Justice Rebecca Grasso Bradley also dissented and said, having neglected to identify any principles guiding its decisions, the majority leaves Wisconsin voters and candidates guessing as to when exactly they should file their case in order for the majority to deem them worthy of the court's consideration on the merits.
The majority's failure to act leaves an indelible stain on our most recent election.
It will also profoundly and perhaps irreparably impact all local, statewide, and national elections going forward with grave consequence to the state of Wisconsin and significant harm to the rule of law." So please don't let them make you think you're crazy for raising legitimate concerns about how this election was conducted.
Now, let's file this under the category of want to get away?
Madam President, today is Tuesday and time for the flag salute.
Mr.
DeLeon, can you please lead us in the Pledge of Allegiance this morning?
Thank you very much, Madam President.
It would be an honor.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
Uninvincible.
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America.
God bless.
Thank you.
For which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
I love the way you've decorated in here.
Wanna get away?
Hey, he rubbed some dirt on it, got back in the game.
Now I've got some good news for you.
YouTube has demonetized all of our Epoch Times channels.
Why is that good news?
Because now you can get Larry Elder on demand whenever you want, uncensored.
Just go to LarryTube.com.
That's simple.
LarryTube.com.
Support us.
Did I mention LarryTube.com?
Now, I'm Larry Elder, and we've got a country to save.
Export Selection