Obama’s Ex-Canadian Ambassador Shares Zoom Call with Hollywood Elites to Influence 2024 Election
Welcome to The Gateway Pundit’s Week-in-Review with Elijah Schaffer, where he covers the top 5 stories throughout the week in around 10 minutes.
ARTICLE 1: WOW! Barack Obama’s Former Canadian Ambassador Reveals Zoom Call With Hollywood Celebrities and Social Media Influencers To Discuss Undetectable Way To Steal The 2024 Election
ARTICLE 2: WATCH: Fox News’s Sandra Smith Embarrasses Kamala Harris Lackey and Makes Her Implode After Asking Pointed Questions About Harris’s ‘Plan’ to Lower Prices
ARTICLE 3: DEVELOPING: James O’Keefe and OMG Team Detained Near Canadian Border by Vermont State Police Night Before Huge Announcement
ARTICLE 4: Singer Janet Jackson Claims Kamala Harris Is Not Black, Reportedly Fired Representative Who Apologized on Her Behalf
ARTICLE 5: Lawmakers Prepare for ‘Mass Casualty’ Event, Push Constitutional Amendment to Undermine Election Integrity and Control House Vacancies in a ‘National Crisis’
Our top story today from thegatewaypund.com, Barack Obama's former Canadian ambassador reveals there was a Zoom call with Hollywood celebrities and social media influencers to discuss the undetectable way to steal the 2024 election.
We're covering this story and so much more here on the Gateway Pundit's Week in Review.
Welcome back to the Gateway Pundit's Week in Review, where we cover the top five stories of the last 24 hours in around 10 minutes.
My name is Elijah Schaefer, and the top story today comes from thegatewaypund.com.
Patty McCurry reports the undetectable way that Obama is working with celebrities to rig the 2024 election.
Let's talk about it.
Democrats have devised a brilliant plan to steal our election in the 2024 election, and it's really quite simple.
By telegraphing to the American people that they believe the key to winning our election is getting 9 million individuals to vote for Kamala Harris from a pool of 2.4 million eligible overseas in total, according to the U.S. government data.
Democrats essentially remove the shock value when it's announced they only achieved a percentage of their goal when it's revealed they received millions of new overseas votes.
The DNC announces innovative six-figure investment in Democrats abroad to ensure engagement of key voters living outside the U.S. For those determined to decide the outcome of our elections by using every possible loophole, like the United States FVAP website and the Democratic Party Overseas Registration website, where overseas voters can register to vote and request an absentee ballot at the same time, it would seem to an outsider a brilliant plan.
The problem is far from those who concerned about the legitimacy or security of our elections.
The fact that none of the so-called 9 million voters Democrats claim they are trying to recruit will have to prove their identity or even provide a legitimate address for their past or present residence in the United States, leaving America with another significantly flawed election outcome with no way to prove it once the votes are cast.
Now, last week, the Gateway Pundit published the first investigative piece in a series explaining how easily our elections can be stolen without a trace.
You can read the rest of the story on our website.
Now, according to Heather Honey at Verity Vote, the Uninformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act is a federal law passed in 1986.
The UOCAVA requires that the states allow members of the U.S. Armed Forces, their family members, and U.S. citizens who reside outside of the U.S. to register and vote absentee in elections for federal offices in a standardized format.
Other have a process or passed in 2002.
There are numerous projects undertaken to test the viability of electronic voting for the UOCAVA eligible voters.
The 2004 Secure Electronic Registration and Voting Experiment Project was intended to develop an internet-based registration voting system in 55 volunteer countries.
However, the SERV project was canceled before it was deployed due to security concerns.
And now the Democrats are going after these unelected individuals, who may or may not even be real individuals and were not chosen or delegated to cast 35 votes in their name.
But now we may be getting 50 votes, random votes with random names, random addresses.
And these are just individuals that, quite frankly, may not even be real.
Welcome to the new way that we're voting in 2024.
You should be alarmed.
Now, you've got to watch this.
Fox News's Sandra Smith embarrasses Kamala Harris, lackey, and makes her implode after asking a pointed question about Harris's plan to lower prices.
Colin Leinbarger reports.
An appearance on national television proves that Kamala Harris's own surrogates are just as clueless about issues impacting the American people as she is and just as inept at explaining her ideas.
Kelly Hyman, a Florida attorney and Democratic strategist, appeared on the Fox News show Your World with Neil Cavuto to defend Harris's plan to lower the price of goods for Americans.
Oh, she was left completely clueless when Sandra Smith, who was filling in for Cavuto, decided to perform an act of journalism and ask her to specify Harris's economic plan in detail for her viewers.
Hyman first tried to tout Harris's Marxist plan on price gouging and claimed that this would prevent big corporations from taking advantage of American customers.
However, a skeptical Smith responded by asking her whether this was happening.
Hyman first answered no, but then claimed that she isn't certain because she was not privy to that type of information.
Now, this caused Smith to absolutely point out that Hyman was having difficulty, that's a crazy name, explaining Harris's economic plan to voters.
Already humiliated by a prepared Smith, Hyman then imploded completely.
You're going to have to watch the whole interaction here.
We have it directly posted on X by The Vagrant.
Check this out.
Here's the interaction of the Harris campaign.
Watch.
unidentified
Not only does it affect consumers, but it also affects small businesses.
They're going to have those costs as well.
It seems to trickle down.
It seems like you're working off of that.
Okay.
What is Harris's plan?
We're waiting.
Okay.
There's a lot of aspects to it in regards to looking at it online.
So let's talk about lowering the grocery cost because that's something that's brought up.
The viewers can look at this online.
She talks about certain things in regards to advancing the first federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries to set clear rules to the road to make it clear that big corporations can't unfairly exploit consumers as well.
Is that happening?
It's not at this moment.
No, this is her plan that's laid out for the first hundred days when she becomes president of the United States.
Is that currently happening?
In regards to the, I don't know exactly if that's currently happening or not because I'm not privy to that type of information, but there are people costing a lot of money in regards to groceries.
Okay.
And that potentially is a hard time articulating her plan.
I'm not, I'm just honestly that's not true.
I'm constantly being interrupted by you, which as a woman, I think is disrespectful.
When I'm trying to speak, every time I try and speak, you speak over me.
She got caught and she tried to blame sexism or something right there, right?
She's like, as a woman, it's really disrespectful.
Well, you can't blame mansplaining anymore.
And you sure as hell can't blame what?
Sexism, misogyny.
What if women are just having a hard time in this role competing?
Not because women are incapable, but because a lot of women weren't given their positions out of a meritocracy, out of this idea that they earned it.
They're given it because they have to fill diversity quotas.
So then you have people who can't even explain the policy and they're put into place.
And then they're asked what to say.
And then they're used to blaming sexism and misogyny or racism, but you can't do it when the woman just looks just like you.
Speaking of a small story of development, James O'Keefe and OMG team were detained near the Canadian border by Vermont State Police night before a huge announcement.
Christina Lila reports.
You can read the rest of that on our website.
However, it turns out he is okay from what we know and he's going to be announcing his plans at the next Tucker speech.
Make sure you stay tuned for that.
Speaking of two other interesting stories that we'll close out with, singer Janet Jackson claims that Kamala Harris is not black, reportedly fired the representative who apologized on her behalf.
Listen to this.
In an interview, singer Janet Jackson claimed that the Democratic presidential candidate, Kamala Harris, isn't black.
In an interview with The Guardian, the youngest child of the Jackson family shared that she's not black.
That's what I heard.
She's Indian.
Jackson added that her father's white.
That's why I was told, I mean, I haven't watched the news in a few days.
I was told they discovered her father was white, added Jackson.
Shortly after Jackson made the comments, Mo Elmasari, or however you pronounce that, who claimed to be a representative Jackson, issued an apology and shared that Janet Jackson made the comments based on misinformation.
Jackson responded to her remarks and stated that he was not authorized, or his remarks, to apologize on her behalf.
Michael Jackson's sister, Janet Jackson, just came out against Kamala Harris for claiming that she's black.
She's not black.
That's what I heard, that she's Indian.
Her comments have resulted in entire mainstream media screaming and gnashing their teeth.
It's absolutely gold.
You should check out more of the story.
I don't know why it really matters because these people lie, cheat, and steal for a living.
So the fact that they're lying about her race, I mean, that's to be expected.
Now, speaking of the devil, lawmakers are actually pushing for a mass casualty event preparedness.
A mass casualty constitutional amendment to undermine election integrity and control house vacancies is a national crisis or a national crisis.
Check this out.
A political tensions rise in the U.S. Congress is preparing for the possibility of a major mass casualty event that could dramatically change its makeup.
With recent assassination attempts and increasingly heated public discourse, lawmakers are considering drastic steps, including a possible constitutional amendment that would allow for the direct appointment of House representatives in the event of a mass vacancy.
According to the Constitution, an emerging vacancy in the House must be filled through elections, unlike Senate vacancies, which can be filled by appointment.
However, following the events of 9-11, a law was enacted to enable rapid elections if over 100 House seats are vacant, supposedly to keep the government running as smoothly as possible by expediting the process.
But now, with the shadow of political violence looming large, lawmakers are opportunistically pushing for a system where governors can swiftly appoint new members to Congress, fundamentally circumventing the people's right to duly elect these individuals by vote.
On Thursday, during a subcommittee hearing on preparing for the future by learning from the past, lawmakers gathered to discuss the amendment.
Representative Derek Kilmer, a Democrat, a leading proponent of the bill, stated during the hearing that Congress hasn't fully considered the implications of a mass casualty event affecting members and the impact it would have on our ability to function in a time of need.
In other words, they are about to consider, Kilmer is pushing for the bill to be called to the floor for a vote.
Now, these individuals under the proposed legislation, elected representatives would be required to compile a list of potential successors deemed qualified to serve in Congress.
In the event that a House member's seat became vacant due to a death or incapacitation, a state governor would only have 10 days to appoint someone from this list, allowing for a replacement until a special election can be held.
Although indeed a temporary measure until special elections are held, it raises the question of whether unforeseen emergencies could rise, delaying the election, allowing unelected representatives to remain in office longer than elected, and perhaps not answering the question of what it is they would actually do when in office.
Now, would this actually lead towards the press for our government to push mass casualty events in order to install their own version of the government?
It's quite interesting that during MKUltra, our government found out that trauma caused a state of need, and therefore we suddenly have all these mass shootings and terrorist events that are happening every few years.
It's keeping our population afraid and relying on the government.
It almost seems like maybe they're preparing us for something rather than trying to get us to be warned.
Now, if you enjoyed this video and you want to see more like it, don't forget to follow us down below at thegatewaypund.com.
You can also leave a comment or you can sign up for our mug club at thegatewaypund.com.
I'm Elijah Schaefer.
Have a great rest of the week, as always, and may God bless the United States of America.
