June 11, 2024 - Slightly Offensive - Elijah Schaffer
01:35:28
The FAR RIGHT Revolution. LEFT in PANIC MODE | Guest: Chase Geiser
Europeans have had ENOUGH.. From Meloni in Italy, to Le Pen in France, and even recently, FOUR far-right politicians being elected to office in Ireland - is the populist, right-wing uprising finally descending upon the world at large?Show more Chase Geiser joins us TONIGHT on NIGHTLY OFFENSIVE to talk about all this and MORE!
—
➤ RUMBLE LINK: https://rumble.com/c/SlightlyOffensive
__
⇩SUPPORT THE SHOW⇩
➤ JOIN CENSORED TV: Watch this FULL EPISODE ad free + EXCLUSIVE content at https://censored.tv/ promo code “OFFENSIVE” for 20% - Keep free speech media alive!
➤ JOIN THE PRIVATE LIVE COMMUNITY: https://elijahschaffer.locals.com/
➤ NOTICER T-SHIRTS / MERCH: https://slightlyoffensive.com/
__
⇩ SHOW SPONSORS⇩
➤ THE WELLNESS COMPANY: Be prepared for what is coming next! Order your MEDICAL EMERGENCY KIT ASAP at https://www.twc.health/offensive and enter code OFFENSIVE for 10% off. The Wellness Company and their licensed doctors are medical professionals you can trust, and their medical emergency kits are the gold standard to keeping you safe! Again, that’s https://www.twc.health/offensive
, promo code OFFENSIVE.
➤ UNDERTAC: Get the best pair of boxers in America that are breathable, don't ride up, and last the test of time. Plus, they are battle forces tested. http://www.undertac.com
for 20% off with the offer code OFFENSIVE20. Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.
➤ NUTRONICS LABS: Are you feeling drained, experiencing unwanted weight gain, or simply lacking energy?! Introducing Man's Edge from Nutronics Labs, the ultimate solution for low testosterone. With powerful ingredients like fenugreek, NO2 and IGF-1, Man's Edge offers a whopping 46% increase in testosterone levels. Buy one bottle and get any IGF-1 product free with autoship, saving you an amazing 50% off. Visit http://www.tboostnow.com and use promocode SLIGHTLYOFFENSIVE today!
__
⇩ELIJAH’S SOCIAL MEDIA ⇩
➤ X: https://X.com/ElijahSchaffer
➤ RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/c/SlightlyOffensive
➤ INSTA: https://www.instagram.com/slightlyoffensive.tv
➤ TELEGRAM https://t.me/SlightlyOffensive
➤ GAB: https://gab.com/elijahschaffer
__
⇩FOLLOW CHASE GEISER ⇩
➤ X: https://x.com/realchasegeiser
➤ BOOK: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1510781366?ref_=cm_sw_r_cp_ud_dp_XF321AG4W41N51D4WN2G
__
➤BOOKINGS + BUSINESS INQUIRIES: [email protected]
__
⇩EXCELLENT RESOURCES FOR KIDS ⇩
Head to https://bit.ly/teach-freedom for a unique book series that introduces the important ideas that schools no longer teach. Show less
I was thinking about just doing the job for the Muslims and just cutting my own head off because I got a lot of energy today and I'm ready to behead somebody, but for Allah, which makes it okay.
It makes it good, right?
That's totally fine.
As long as we're doing it not for white supremacy, you can basically commit crime.
You can kill white people actually today.
You can stab them in the neck in Germany, and that's okay because you're Muslim.
We need to get back to talking about Islam and the problem that it has in the West.
You know, we'll talk about the Jews a little bit.
We'll talk about the Muslims.
We'll talk about the other problems, including woke white lefties.
But we've got to get into this new far-right revolution that is happening around the country.
You'll see that I'm traveling.
It's happening around the world.
It's insanity.
We got a lot to unpack here.
My name's Elijah Schaefer.
You're watching Nightly Offensive.
I'm traveling, like I mentioned, so I'm in the middle of nowhere.
I am in Alex Jones' basement.
He has me chained up.
I'm his like fetish sex doll for the week.
So that's basically where I'm at.
Anyway, at least he let me record, gave me a webcam.
Let's get into the show, Brian.
Let's start the intro music.
All right, let's jump right into this.
My guest today, Chase Geyser, if I'm even pronouncing that right.
It's meant to be an inspirational book for anybody that is disenfranchised with either political party and just wants to fight for the rights of the people, the interests of the people against a political class.
I just saw the last news I saw is that the courts were liquidating the assets from the studio to pay back the Sandy Hook victims, Sandy Hook victims, and their families, which were definitely not prompted by the CIA to form a lawsuit.
You probably can't mention much, but how are you guys?
Well, right now, the consensus around the office is that there's a 99% chance that we close down before the end of next week.
There's a major court hearing on Friday, and it's a chapter seven conversion hearing for Alex Jones's personal bankruptcy case, as well as a bankruptcy hearing for Free Speech Systems, which is the parent company of InfoWars.
Because I know basically our thoughts and prayers are with you guys.
And I know you're employed by them.
I know how scary it is in right-wing media, but it's not just you guys that they're attacking because they're putting Steve Bannon from War Room in prison up until the election for contempt of the court, right?
For just refusing to testify against his friend.
They're trying to shut down Alex.
And I don't know if I'm wrong on this, but it seems oddly suspicious that they would take this route right before the election.
It seems it's intentional due to his support for Trump, due to his influence in the right wing.
Yeah, there's no way to know for sure, but it definitely doesn't seem like a coincidence that we have Donald Trump being convicted on 34 counts, that we have Steve Bannon being sentenced to prison, and that we have Infowars being shut down all before, just months before, frankly, the election.
And it's been ramping up really.
I mean, this started months and months ago, if not just with the beginning of the Biden regime, but even going back to Tucker Carlson being ousted from Fox, I believe this is all part of some, the same agenda.
I want to talk about this far-right revolution that's happening around the country.
It's happening around the nation.
And when I say far-right, I don't just mean family values.
I don't just mean two genders.
I'm talking about white people getting their balls back and reminding ourselves that it's okay to be called racist.
It's okay to be called a xenophobe.
In fact, everybody says that racists are bad and xenophobes are bad, but they never explain why racism is bad, why xenophobia is bad, because it looks like it's working out pretty well for Japan.
And while Japan, of course, has corrections going on with their housing market.
They have economic issues because the same thing, too many social programs for their aging population, low birth rates.
It's called the natural correction.
We don't fuck up our countries, our housing markets, our social welfare, our retirement, and then correct it by bringing in Alawakbar Bajawanis and, you know, Punjab Pajit Badubis or whatever, where you can smell them from a mile away.
And I think people are realizing this.
Who gives a fuck what people call you today?
This is where I'm at.
Who cares what people call you?
I don't care what you call me.
We've got a country to save.
We've got an entire Western civilization to keep together.
And, you know, calling me a name is the least thing about it.
Have you changed since the last time we talked, Chase, at all?
Are you up for this about this far-right infiltration sort of taking and sweeping in Netherlands, in Germany, not so much in Sweden, but in France and the United States, this rise of this dogmatic 20% of the population saying enough is enough?
Shut down the borders, mass deportations.
Let's figure out what the hell is going on before we continue up with this nonsense.
Well, I think it's totally predictable what we're seeing because the same exact thing happened in Germany during the 1920s under the Weimar Republic with hyperinflation and suffering among the people because of a corrupt political class.
And that's when we saw the Nazi Party take power just years before the Nazi Party came into power in 1933.
Only one in 40 Germans were members of the party.
And the fact of the matter is the more a political class fails its people, the more populist it becomes.
And I'm not by any means an advocate for fascism.
I don't think the Nazis were a good organization or political party.
I think they did some very evil things, but it is totally natural that a people will reach a point where they are totally fed up with the failures and, frankly, betrayals of their political class.
That's what we're seeing happen all throughout Europe.
It was very predictable as soon as the European Union was established that this would compromise the interests and integrity of the individual nations who chose to join the European Union, and that the people who are native to those various nations would become fed up with the influx of refugees and the crime and the rapes and all the terrible things that go along with that.
And frankly, I agree with you.
I think that being called Islamophobic or xenophobic or racist is not what it used to be because these words have been so overused and abused that they lost their power and B, capitulating to these cultures coming into our culture in an incompatible way that doesn't assimilate with Western culture has caused basically every single cultural problem, social problem, social issue, economic issue that I can think of in today's world in every nation.
Well, yeah, and Chase, so we gotta talk about this, though, because I think that there are so many different institutions and power, powerful interests at play that they're not going to allow populism or self-governance or self-rule to actually take shape in the world without a bloody fight.
I mean, look at what's going on with Ukraine and with Russia.
Essentially, what they want is they want an expansion of NATO.
They want a universal one-world government.
They want a competing system to the BRICS financial system that's going on.
And they want to do it all while making us worry Nazis that don't even exist anymore.
You know, I think one of the most instrumental things here is that what we're going to see with France, I want to talk about France here for a second because I don't think a lot of people understand how important what's going on there is to our discussion.
And I want to bring up a couple things that have been going on in the last few weeks.
France, just like the United States, has a independent government.
It has a president that is married to a transvestite.
And Mario Nafal was pointing this out.
This is a little while ago.
He's saying, Has Macron lost his marbles or is he bluffing?
For weeks, the president of France has been warmongering and saber-rattling, claiming that he'll send French troops into Russia and pushing for NATO expansion.
The problem, France lacks the military might to back up his rhetoric.
Europe is struggling desperately to produce enough ammunition for Ukraine's fight against Russia.
France, with a mere 200K active troops compared to Putin's 1 million, is simply ill-equipped to take on Russia alone.
And NATO nations aren't really backing his stance.
I hope he's bluffing.
If not, good luck to us all.
And there was an update that just happened here that Macron was possibly sending 2,000 troops to Ukraine.
According to Russian intelligence, France is already preparing a military contingent.
And in the first place, we'll send a couple of thousand troops to Ukraine to assist with war efforts, source Sputnik.
I bring this up because what seems to be the case in all of the Western nations right now as we head into these elections, they're in their elections right now in many of the European Union countries.
The United States is headed into their election in November.
What happens is that people are sick and tired of watching their governments care more about nations like Ukraine, more about nations like Israel, even risking the safety of Western Europe for Ukraine, which has no strategic value to the entire country.
It has negative strategic value.
Israel has negative strategic value in terms of the problems that they're causing currently, in terms of PR relations, in terms of geopolitical positioning of the United States.
And so as we talk about this, people aren't just sick of immigration.
They're sick of foreign policy.
They're sick of economic policy.
They're sick of the housing market.
They're sick of inflationary issues.
They're sick of crime and they're sick of the shit.
And they realize that even though they keep having elections, it looks like they're all rigged.
And I think that with France, why I want to talk about it with their dissolving parliament and trying to prevent the far right from taking over, aka base motherfuckers who want to get these pieces of shit out of our countries is I don't think they're ready to let go of the power and they accuse us of rigging us of not wanting to give up power.
I sense that from France on, there is a universal global goal to continue these wars, continue to fuck shit up.
And they're quite frankly not ready to let go of that power.
Even if there's an election, they'll find a way to dissolve it, as we saw with France.
And I don't know if you see the same way, but I'm pretty sure we're dealing with powers much stronger than just basic democratic systems.
And I think that when you have nations like France and others who are members of entities like the European Union or the United Nations or NATO, you have a situation in which the leaders of those various nations don't only have their own people to consider as far as constituents, they also have the global international community to consider as constituents as well.
And that's what we've seen is representation of the interests of other nations in these organizations, these globalist organizations at the expense or sacrifice of their own people.
So the people become more embittered.
But since they're so intertwined, these nations from a leadership standpoint, since the political classes of these nations are so intertwined and codependent on one another because of these organizations, they constantly sacrifice the interests of their own people in order to compromise or cater to the political dynamic, which is unnecessarily complicated by these alliances, for lack of a better term.
I mean, we know that World War I is a famous example of the domino effect of alliances and how it can lead to total global war.
Now we have this entanglement where we've complicated all of the world's separate economies so much by entangling them with one another that we have political leaders who have to consider the interests, wants, and needs of other national leaders, other nations' leaders, just as much, if not more than they consider the interests of their own people.
And ultimately, what happens is corruption and then corruption leads to suffering of a people and a suffering people revolt against their leaders.
And I'm just saying we should get into killing people for allah.
No, I'm totally joking.
Like that's, this is the best I could find here.
So I'm in, I'm in like a, I'm like a penthouse thing.
I can't even explain what's going on here, guys, but the government has not been very kind to me in the last several days.
And so I can just going to keep it as saying I am in transit.
And you don't really know where I am and you don't really know what's going on.
But Alex Jones has a big black dildo waiting for me and I can't wait to use it.
No, I'm just kidding.
I actually am in transit though.
And I feel like we're all getting fucked though when it comes to the government right now.
Because what happened in, I want to talk about what happened in France and the dissolving of parliament in this opposition, because this shows maybe what we could expect, Chase, in ourselves.
But I got to remind you guys, check this out.
Before we go any further, do not forget right now to support yourself, your family, support this show by taking control of your health with the wellness company's emergency kits.
Guys, I don't know if you know about this.
I'm going to talk to Chase about this later.
They started egg rationing in Australia.
This is not a joke.
Not only did they take away cash so you can't pull out cash at most major banks, they made it so you can't buy things in cash here.
And now they're doing food rationing, which they're blaming on the fears of the avian flu.
But things are, they're setting the tone internationally for some serious stuff.
And I was reminded with the weird restrictions here on the hospital, they're talking about this triple cocktail of RSV, COVID, and the flu.
Guess what?
Rather than getting your COVID vaccination, rather than going your flu shot, you can treat most infections, even seriously terminal infections, with basic antibiotics like a ZPAX, amoxicillin, and viral infections with ivermectin, which Joe Rogan did.
They made fun of him.
Now, Cuomo from CNN is using the same thing.
And guess what?
This emergency kit has all of that medication right in one spot directly for you, including fluconazole.
You can check out all of the infections.
It's dozens of infections that are common to man that you can fight with these medications at TWC.health slash offensive.
Use my promo code offensive for 10% off.
I just want to remind you this kit is cheaper than the copay at an emergency room, and you don't have to go to a hospital.
Plus, it's just good to have these medications together with you whenever you need them.
So please pick up a medical kit today.
You've always wanted to know how to support your family's health.
You owe it to them to be prepared.
Go to TWC.health slash offensive.
Use my promo code Offensive for 10% off.
Chase Geyser from InfoWars.
He's got his new book out.
You can see it behind him.
You should pick up a copy as well.
I kind of want to talk about, you know, this idea of what's happening in France and the unrest of why people are sick of things.
I saw this video coming out from Poland, and I want to get your thoughts on it.
We think of Poland as being sort of this white, you know, this white Catholic country.
They've been strict on immigration.
They'll beef out the people they don't want there.
But I saw a video just come out with one of these fake asylum seekers.
And I feel like we see this everywhere time and time again.
They're just wreaking havoc on our cities.
They're raping our women.
They're stabbing our police officers.
And quite frankly, they're not welcomed in our nations.
And I don't care if I'm racist for saying that.
I want them to get out.
Check this scene out from Poland.
I guess there's no sound, so I'll just narrate it for people who are listening to the audio-only version.
Essentially, Chase, you got this black guy.
He's tackling a white guy on his scooter, jumping on a vehicle, breaking the windows.
You can tell that he's a twisted teen, a lunchtime rowdy, an unruly, hooded thug, as we call them in Australia, machete-wielding bandits.
He's breaking into cars, slashing their tires.
And I just wonder, are these people talk about the need to fight against demons?
To me, these are demons.
These people are like, they're set in our country by our leaders.
They're the worst people from their nations.
I want to remind people this.
This doesn't mean you hate all black people.
These countries are sending over the worst.
They're sending over the worst people that they don't want in their nations.
And other nations are letting them pass through.
They're sending them to our countries.
Our leaders are letting them in.
And we're noticing, look, we don't want these people in our country either.
Do you think, Chase, this is intentional?
That like, you know, when you see Poland, these nations, the EU is saying, you know, there has to be a quota.
The UN says there has to be 90 million more of these brothers allowed into Europe by 2050.
I think there's a lot of incompetence in leadership that leads to this sort of policy manifesting this way.
But I also do think that there is a concerted effort for some reason or another to push for replacement migration.
Now, we know that it's impossible ever since that famous TED Talk of the guy, the old guy with the gumballs, it's impossible to immigrate the world's problems away.
You can't just import suffering people into a healthy civilization and absorb them and solve the suffering.
What you end up doing is reducing the quality of life wherever it is sufficient or efficient or good.
And it seems to me that what we have is a desire among globalist entities, whether it's the World Economic Forum or the United Nations or NATO.
There seems to be a desire among these elites to erode and eradicate all national sovereignty and cultural sovereignty.
And part of the way you can do that is just by inundating entire regions with refugees who don't assimilate.
They just come in and remain as they are.
And this weakens the national sovereignty of individual nations and forces them to continuously succumb to globalist organizations.
So similar to how Democrats here in the United States advocate and push for welfare programs and the welfare programs themselves seem to perpetuate the problems they claim to solve.
We see here that the globalists perpetuate these globalist policies, which are supposed to solve suffering and solve injustice and have compassion for people in more vulnerable areas.
What that ends up doing is eroding the sovereignty and strength of all these individual nations.
So they become more dependent on the international globalist community.
And once you have that level of dependence, then you can have an international cabal, which controls and dictates all policy worldwide.
This is the conglomeration of power by weakening individual national sovereignty.
But I, okay, maybe I'm just so fundamentally right-wing that I forget what normies are thinking.
But, you know, in totality, I am currently in a very nice area right now of a town, and it is all white.
Okay.
So the entire area is completely white.
And that being said, there's no crime.
The streets are clean.
And I have noticed when I live where I move to areas that are predominantly white, that, you know, obviously there are exceptions in Appalachia.
There are places where industry is left.
White skin is not the only determinant of the health of an area, the health of a nation, the health of a society.
But I just noticed that when countries are more white, they tend to be more at peace.
There's less, there's more trust.
It's higher.
It's higher trust because it's homogenous.
And bringing these people in to me is literally about breaking apart the trust barrier in society and causing us to be divided and focused on tribal politics, you know, grievance politics, rather than be focused on trying to make a better and civil society.
Letting women in to vote, letting all these immigrants and people into the country, it distracts us.
So we're starting to vote on emotion and feelings and reproductive rights and things that do nothing to advance us.
Men just wanted to get together and create policies and govern and manage so that we could advance as a nation so that we can maintain strength, we can maintain power, economic dominance.
And now we have to deal with all this bullshit because black people and women and Jews and Muslims have to be a part of the knowledge.
And whenever I hear them involved in politics, we're not talking about how to make the economy work well universally.
It's all how can it help black people get ahead?
How can we get more grants for the blacks?
And women just want to talk about non-issues and, oh, we're this and that.
It's like, look, call me sexist, misogynist, and racist.
I'm not that cool.
But, you know, one day maybe I'll be as cool enough to earn those titles.
But I'm trying to spit facts here and say, you know, inviting and allowing these people into politics, I think people have had enough.
And it's going, look, I don't give a fuck about your stupid black-owned business or your dumb bitch shit.
My country, I can't own a home.
Okay.
I can't feed my family.
So we have a problem here.
And I, quite frankly, don't care if you call me sexist.
We let you guys vote.
It's been 70 years, approximately, and things have gone to shit.
Too many people are voting.
There's too many interests.
You can't run a country with this many interests going on.
And that's why these white Australia policies, these European-focused pre-1965 American parliamentary immigration pacts, these were not about being hateful.
These were not about saying that black people aren't humans or that people don't have a right to exist.
This is about working in reality.
That if you have too many people's voices competing for power, then really nothing ends up benefiting anyone.
You have no power to anybody.
Everybody's weakened and you end up getting controlled by an outside group.
That's what I see as happening.
And that's why I feel like they're being used as a weapon against us, not because we're racist or we hate them because of how they look, but because they're bringing them in with bad intentions to destroy the ethos of our countries and to make us unable to gain power in our own lands.
And is that is that too extreme or do you have a different perspective on that?
Well, I don't think there's such a thing as too extreme so far as it's reasonable.
So I have no problem with the extreme nature of what you said at all.
But I would say that it may be an oversimplification.
And I mean that very respectfully, because you have to keep in mind that when the 19th Amendment was passed here in the United States, both Democrats, Republicans, all politicians believed that it was going to be a wash because everybody's wives back then voted with them, right?
So if you were a Democrat, you knew your wife was going to vote like you.
And if you're a Republican, you knew that your wife was going to vote like you.
But what they didn't anticipate was that we would go off of the gold standard under the Nixon administration, that we would overprint our money and then inflation would become so rampant that women would have to have careers.
It was no longer possible in the United States beginning in the late 70s and onward, and especially today, for a single income to support a family of four in the way that it was when the 19th Amendment was passed.
And so what happened was you had feminism come out of that as a psychological cope with the fact that men, frankly, were ashamed that they couldn't provide for their families anymore.
And women didn't want to be embarrassed with this.
So they embraced and leaned into this idea of a career.
And then what happened was since women are brought into the workforce and feminism is pushed, they got married later and later and later in their lives.
So instead of getting married when you're 18, 19, or 20 years old, maybe you don't get married until you're 30 years old.
And since women are single for longer, they vote Democrat disproportionately because we know that women in families and the nuclear family is going to be more conservative long term.
And so ultimately, I think that you're right, but I think that the problem is not that women vote.
The problem is that we have massive inflation, which has caused cultural ripples leading to feminazis and feminism, which has eroded and eradicated the nuclear family, which has led to leftism.
So I think what we're seeing here is a manifestation of the fact that our money is fake.
It's a lie.
And I think this goes for overseas as well, because as the dollar as the global reserve currency, being a fiat based off of really nothing except for maybe the petro dollar, manifests in all sorts of different ways throughout the world, in which all these conflicts that we're in, all these globalist entities that form over time are in a way to cope with the fact that our money is a lie and a way to cope with the CIA and the intelligence community wanting to keep the dollar as the global reserve currency for the sake of national security.
And that's why we're always in these wars.
That's why there's always refugees.
That's why there's always the compromise of Western culture.
And we see the erosion of the fabric of our civilization altogether on all sides, my opinion.
I'm like, looking over here, I got the worst setup right now guys, by the way, it's like so ghetto and i'm gonna get the setup black backgrounds, inferior.
Uh well, considering the fact that i'm literally in one of the most precarious situations of my adult life yes um, you're still trying to escape justice for january 6th for that insurrection you did.
I got an erection uh, from just being that close to the smell of Nancy Pelosi.
Listen, i've been drunk on air many times in my life.
I've been drunk on air with Alex multiple times.
Well, with both of us.
I don't even think either of us remembered some interviews we've done together.
But the point is is that, is that retrospectively at least we were upfront about it like yeah sorry, we were wasted and we had to pull that you know interview or something.
But they're politicians, so like, their job is not to entertain us, it's to like get done.
And it's very hard to accomplish real things when you're drunk.
You asked them to leave kindly, then you gave them a nudge, broke a couple windows, and they stuck around.
So what were you going to do?
Exactly.
You were going to just nudge them a little harder, but no, I'm kidding.
That's no, but the thing is, is all I'm saying about the idea of the far-right party is they've separated themselves.
Speaking of Nazis, the AFDA party from Germany, which is the far-right party in Germany.
Yeah.
Geert Wilderss and Le Pen, you know, distanced themselves from the AFD because they wouldn't like condemn Hitler because they were just saying that, you know, the history of Hitler is inaccurate.
And it's, you know, I'm not going to sit around here and condemn Hitler all the time.
Like that's just the dumbest thing.
It's like, it's a trap, right?
Like, like, they're just, and they've separated themselves because the far right is actually controlled opposition of Zionism.
And that's really what it is today is if people will not condemn the Jewish occupation of the United States of America through AIPAC, like if they won't.
Because all I was going to say is that the right wing, just like the American right, is co-opted by Zionist influence.
And one of the main issues in the West is Zionist influence.
So it's like you're getting 90% of what you need, but you're missing a critical 10%.
It's like you have a meal and 90% of it's made of beef and the other 10% shit.
And someone's like, yeah, don't eat it.
It's mostly meat.
And you're like, yeah, it's not mostly meat and the other 10% are preservatives.
The other 10% is literal ass juice.
So I'm not going to eat it.
That's kind of what politics are today.
It's like you're getting a lot of what you want, but you're also getting this critical factor of Israeli influence, which is, I mean, in many ways, led to the assassination of one of our presidents, at least in part.
So, you know, trying to get rid of this stuff is risky.
And it's politically risky because the chances of you actually winning an election, as we saw with Brandon Herrera in Texas, if you don't back APAC, even if you're pro-Israel and you don't back APAC, you probably won't win your election.
You'll probably get primaried.
It's not that they can control the general necessarily, but they do control the primaries.
That's how they win.
That's my main control.
APAC controls primaries, so they control who gets on the ballot.
I would say, I would say that the vast majority of all of our problems could be solved if we had real money.
And I don't mean to give you an overly simple answer, but if our money was backed by gold and inflation didn't exist in the way that it did, and our fractional reserve banking was not fractional reserve banking or our monetary system wasn't this central bank, fractional reserve, unlimited debt, unlimited printing.
And it was actually backed by gold like it was supposed to be, then I don't think the majority of our problems would exist at all.
And I don't think we would have been in any of the wars that we've been in since World War II.
Well, like, so you're saying you're bringing this down to Jekyll Island and the Federal Reserve, meaning if we could get the Federal Reserve removed and get back control.
Yeah, and I'm not, and I know that's kind of a boring, like Austrian economics versus Keynesian economics argument.
And the solution seems so distant that it's not pragmatic or feasible.
So maybe it's moot to even talk about it, but I firmly believe that if we had actual money, not fiat, that the vast majority of all of our problems, both cultural, economic, and economic, would vanish in time.
Yeah, but see, that's kind of the weird thing is this is this is where I don't allow people to stigmatize me when I about this topic because, you know, there are people that they find a way to just like blame the Jews for everything, which is cool.
And you should do that.
You should, because it's a great thing in life to accept no responsibility for your own life and to always blame somebody else.
Stub your toe, you should blame the Jews.
It's their fault.
You know what I mean?
Because somehow you can trace back your IKEA bed being packed into a square box and that being related on reducing shipping charges because of petrol issues, because of OPEC, because of Israeli influence.
See, no matter what, your bed is shaped the way it is because of Jews and oil.
So I can trace everything back.
Obviously, jokes aside, not everything is the Jews' fault.
And the Jews is also a weird phrase too, because there are breakups between Hasidic and there are these Sephardic Jews.
There are Jews that are anti-Zionist, like the Hasidic, but they are pro-you know, there's an awful lot of cyclo Jews.
Yeah, but they're also just homosexuals and spreading, you know, they spread Zionism.
But meaning like, so it is kind of reductionist to sort of, you know, just say the Jews, because it is different.
But I do agree with you that when you're looking at fundamental institutions and you're breaking down actual groups and what's going on, it does trace back to these people in as much as like BLM is destructive, but then it traces back to the leaders who said that they were trained communists.
And then you trace communism goes back to Jewish influence.
So it does go back really far, but because things have become so complex and interconnected, you have to sort of deal with things at a unit by unit basis.
Like, I guess policy by policy, platform by platform.
And I think you're really fair to say getting back to a real money system is true, because I think usury and crediting has caused such a problem systematically.
You can trace back the broken family, women working, you know, probably a lot of substance abuse issues due to instability in the economy, instability in our currency, lack of homeownership means lack of having children, lack of children means birth rate issues.
You could trace that to immigration.
So yeah, I would say, I would say the Federal Reserve, those who are charged, should be arrested and exiled at the very least.
I'll just leave it at that.
Like, I believe that those who are managing and upholding the Federal Reserve should be forcibly removed from the country by the state, not by us.
I'm not promoting violence, just legally should be prosecuted for robbing the country.
I think usury is one of the worst crimes, perhaps worse than murder, because a lot of murders and crimes can be traced back to usury.
And frankly, man, I don't know what you think about this, but I find it very, very hard to believe that the states actually, legitimately, honestly ratified the amendment to the Constitution of the United States that allowed for income tax.
I mean, imagine how conservative the United States of America was back in 1913.
You really think the people in the United States of America, just 150 years or so after the revolution over a t-tax, were just agreeing by two-thirds state ratification that we should have an income tax in this country.
I find it very, very hard to believe, especially just a couple of decades, a few decades, a handful of decades after the Civil War.
And so I am very suspicious as to the lawfulness in the establishment of the Federal Reserve to begin with, that it was done legitimately and honestly and on the surface on the up and up.
But regardless of whether or not it was legal, what they did, when they did it, the way they did it, it's very clear that all of the major problems one can think of when one thinks of the last 500 years have been since the establishment of the Federal Reserve.
You have a Federal Reserve established in 1913, you have World War I, and you've got the stock market crash in 29, then you've got the Great Depression, and you got World War II, and then every other problem that you can possibly imagine since World War II, which has been endless war, endless debt, endless inflation, endless suffering on an exponentially increasing level.
So I am vehemently opposed to our monetary system, the way that it is set up.
And I agree with you.
I think that this does boil down to usery net.
That's the reason that the Jewish community, the Jewish religion forbids loaning money on interest within its own community.
Now it'll do it outside the community.
And you could say, well, that's kind of unethical that you would harm someone that's just not part of your community.
Maybe it is.
I'm not even trying to argue whether or not that's good or not.
But the fact that the Jewish people themselves and their religion forbid each other from loaning money on interest to one another just goes to show an inherent understanding that it's an unhealthy thing for a culture or a civilization or a people to do to one another.
I don't care about this conflict one way or the other.
I don't advocate for Israel or for the Palestinians, for lack of a better word to describe them, whatever's politically correct.
I don't care, whatever.
And, you know, people debate about who had the land first.
I live in fucking Texas.
You know, if I was going to live my life based off of the principle of who had the land first, then shouldn't this be occupied by Native Americans and Mexicans?
I believe in right of conquest, right by conquest.
And as far as I'm concerned, whoever can conquer the land can keep it.
And it shouldn't be any of our business.
I don't care.
And what really irks me, what really grinds my gears more than anything else is the fact that our politicians, our political class here in the United States, are so self-righteous in their selectiveness of which humanitarian crisis they're going to care about.
So if there's a Christian genocide of Armenians, they don't give a shit.
But then when there's an attack on October 7th, which they knew was going to happen and which they provided the weapons for because they left them behind in Afghanistan, when there's an attack on Israel on October 7th, they act like it's necessary that we save the only democracy in the region, our only ally in the region.
Or when Ukraine literally cancels elections and declares martial law, we act like we have to fight for democracy so hard because we love democracy so much.
And it's just bullshit.
Anytime our politicians use a virtue or a moral argument for what they're doing is just an excuse to do what they need to do for some other reason that satisfies or meets their political agenda.
And so I'm just not going to fall into the trap.
And I'm not saying that you're trying to put me in this trap.
I just mean generally speaking, man, I'm not going to fall into the trap of trying to decide who has the moral high ground in these conflicts when the fact of the matter is the most immoral thing you can do as a leader is neglect the interests of your own people and your own constituents for the sake of a political agenda that is outside the bounds of those people.
So we are being betrayed every time our government gives money to Ukraine or Taiwan or Israel or the Palestinians.
And I mean, we're in a situation where we gave $63 billion to Ukrainian Nazis on Hitler's fucking birthday, man.
And look, I'm a right-wing guy, but I'm not Hitlerian.
I'm not a Nazi.
My grandfather fought in World War II.
I'm opposed to fascists and the fact that my government is giving my money to Ukrainian Nazis, who, by the way, just put me on an enemies list right next to Alex Jones.
Was just placed enemy of the state list in Ukraine by an organization in Ukraine funded by my own government.
So my taxes put me on the enemy list of another country.
So fuck these people.
Fuck these conflicts.
I don't care if the rest of the world burns down as long as my politicians are loyal to my people.
And political extremism, in terms of just the sheer cost of human lives, it's way worse.
But I also, I think the older you get, maturing is realizing political extremism is cool.
But I also think that you realize why political extremism exists because things get, you know, Weimar conditions, Weimar solutions, it's a joke statement, but things get really out of control in these countries.
And so it makes sense why the pendulum swings because once you get extremism paired with corruption and abuse of power, then obviously people are just looking for a solution.
And obviously that can be, you know, one way really hard the other.
But I can tell you this.
I may not be fully on board with the like the whole fascism thing because I don't fully understand it.
But I can tell you this.
I understand, I understand why Germany did what they did now.
Like I didn't get that as a kid.
It didn't make sense.
Whether you support it or disagree with it, it makes sense that it's not just like this, oh, Hitler was a bad guy and hated Jews.
It was like, hey, this is actually a pretty fucked up time in history.
And, you know, you're not talking about good versus evil.
You're talking about competing interests and global hegemony and control.
And I like, this was not this like, there's this bad guy, Hitler, and these good guys in the West, and then they stop the bad guys.
No, when you look at the problem is when people study, when people study Hitler, if they even study Hitler at all, they look at World War II documentaries and World War II movies and they look at Mein Kampf.
And Mein Kampf is probably the least important text to read if you want to understand Hitler and the Nazis and how they came to power.
If you want to understand why the Nazis came to power, what you have to do is you have to read his actual speeches from the early 1920s all the way up to 1933, because the speeches aren't what Hitler thinks.
They are what Hitler thinks, but they're primarily what worked on the people, what resonated on the people.
So if you study the speeches, you can understand the zeitgeist of Germany during the 1920s, what was really happening.
And the fact of the matter is, it's very simple.
They were totally screwed after World War I with the Treaty of Versailles.
It was totally unjust.
Their own political class sold them out, sort of like hopping on an escape pod to just get out of the political friction and problem or challenge or obstacle that was the end of World War I.
And they had hyperinflation and suffered dramatically.
Not only did they suffer dramatically, but they were physically abused by the French and other nations who they owed money, where they would come in.
The French would come in if they didn't make payments, the Germans, and they would literally just slap them around on the street.
There's footage of this.
It's hard to find.
You have to watch fringe documentaries like The Greatest Story Never Told to see it.
But these are people that were abused and suffering because of the unjust negotiations and agreements at the end of World War I. Problem is, they just decided to blame it on an entire ethnicity and they fell prey to the trap that is the idol worship of one's own genetics, right?
They began to worship themselves more than they even worship God.
They began to worship the Fuhrer more than they even worship God.
And that was the idol worship that ultimately led to their demise.
But it makes perfect sense why they were upset.
And oftentimes we see this over and over.
It's sort of a motif where people are incredibly astute as to identifying the problem and then incredibly off base as to identifying what the solution ought to be.
Ted Kaczynski is an incredible example of this.
He famously in his manifesto outlines all of the problems and risks and vulnerabilities and injustices and unsustainabilities of Western civilization very accurately in a very compelling way, but then decides that I'm just going to bomb this building.
So identifying the problem is something that evil regimes and entities and political philosophies seem to do fairly well, but it's finding what the correct solution is or the just responses to the problem that seems to be where humanity fails over and over again, in my opinion.
I sense one of the main issues probably would have been his issue was, you know, the U.S., you know, well, particularly England and France declaring war on Germany, you know, this sort of counterbalance and then getting caught on two fronts and then the U.S. working with the communists and then ending up in the Cold War.
Like if the U.S. had let him just fight the communists and work on the communists, I think we could have been allies with the fascists, even if he didn't want to live in that, even if he didn't want that for America.
I don't think Americans wanted fascism.
I think there was a large Nazi party in the U.S., but I think, you know, they wanted a form of soft, like, I guess it would be called like conservative liberalism at the time.
But, you know, this progressive Jewish liberalism that came in after World War II, you know, this communistic intersectional, you know, you know, stranglehold, which is what we see today, is what I think a lot of people are sick of, right?
Because it doesn't reflect the Anglo-Celtic, the past Christian values that our nations held.
You know, we're not, we may not be Muslims where we throw you off of a roof for being gay, but we never wanted there to be men running around naked, you know, kids getting charged with felonies for making donuts on a pride crosswalk.
Can I also say this too?
Pride crosswalks is an entrapment.
Whoever made those crosswalks should go to prison for being a faggot, but also because a pride, you're painting the street.
You're painting the street in a rainbow and you're mad that people are driving on it, funny.
Like if we put people in jail for driving funny or doing donuts on their scooters on any on streets, every kid would be in jail.
So it's entrapment because also it's just tempting.
Even if you're pro-gay, just doing a donut on a rainbow crosswalk, it's a tempting figure.
That's all I got to say.
And in Del Rey Beach in Florida, they're charging an 18-year-old, 19-year-old for the felony for riding his electric scooter and doing a donut on a crosswalk.
Reminding you, they can't find the January 6th pipe bomber, but they can prosecute a teenager for a felony for having fun on his scooter because the gays need it.
And this sort of globo homo movement, it does trace back to a certain group of people.
I mean, you know, it really does.
But I don't want to get stuck on that topic.
I just think with the Hitler thing, it is interesting to me because, you know, I think if we had not allowed, if we not declared war on him and let him just fight it out with the communists, I think we could have brokered peace.
And so I really do think that he could have had some control.
And I know it would have been competition, but I would have much rather had competing power with a white Western nation, like a German empire, than I would currently with the issues with Russia and China and Iran, right?
I'd rather have a rather have a different kind of issue.
Of course, we would have been fighting Japan maybe too.
So there's also that issue with control of the sea, but I just think that they just scapegoated Hitler.
And I don't think anything we're told about him is true.
Now, you don't have to like him.
You don't have to be pro-fascist or anything like that.
I think the 6 million number that is used, only like 2 million of it is even actually claimed by the academics to be in the camps, as I understand it.
I believe they just count all Jews who died in World War II to add up to the 6 million.
I could be wrong about this, but I believe that the Holocaust happened and I believe that there were people that were killed just because they were Jewish and gas and all that stuff.
I basically believe in the Holocaust, right?
But the problem I have with the Holocaust is that the Jewish people act like it's something that only happened to them.
And even if we're just going with what the general consensus is, the accepted languages and figures are around the Holocaust among academics today.
They admit that, yes, 6 million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, but 5 million non-Jews were killed.
Oh, so it wasn't just something that happened to the Jews.
That's one of the things that bothers me about it because there were Freemasons that were killed in the Holocaust.
Anybody who was a political opponent, anybody who was a communist, I know there was a heavy overlap between the Jews and the communists back then, especially.
But it's not just a tragedy that happened to the Jewish people.
Yes, it happened to the Jewish people.
Yes, they faced things like the ghettos and having to wear the stars and the Kristallnacht and all that stuff is real.
I believe in the Holocaust, but you got to keep in mind that the evil of fascism extends just beyond racism.
And it's not something that only a certain minority can fall victim to.
No, I think a lot of Jewish people are not Jewish.
I think it's just fake.
I think it's just, I think a lot of it's fake.
I think a lot of it's Jewish.
Yeah, I think a lot of, I think there are real Jews out there.
I just think that the current, like, I don't think Ashkenazis are like real Jews.
I don't, I don't, I don't believe in that.
And, you know, and I have a lot of family who's Jewish too.
So, I mean, I don't care.
I tell them the same thing.
And they don't really fight me on it, you know?
Because there's a different like level of Jewry too, where, because what I meant is like, is like, there are people who argue that Judaism is not an ethnicity.
It's not a race.
It's a religion.
And that anyone can become Jewish by converting and following Talmudic principle, which would be like a religio, that's like an ethno-religio type of dances with wolves, like where the white guy after a certain rite of passage becomes part of the tribe.
Yeah, but then, but then you'll, but then, yeah, but, but still, like, I've had people on my show argue against it being, you know, ethnic or genetic or whatever.
But then you'll people argue that Jews are, you know, in their position of power because they're smarter than everyone, you know, like Hasidics will be like, we're smarter than everyone.
Well, if it's a genetic component, you know, if it's IQ related to genetics, then obviously you're talking about racial composition, right?
This is a whole nother argument.
This negates religion, whether you're secular or not.
People say secular Jews.
Well, that doesn't make sense.
If it's a religion, not a race, then why can it be, how could you be a secular Jew?
Then you wouldn't be Jewish.
You would just be an atheist and an American.
You wouldn't still retain your Jewishness.
And then, of course, like, it's confusing too, because I have Jews that go back in my family lineage.
And, you know, then it's funny because then they won't consider you Jewish if your mom's not Jew or if like it doesn't trace back to the woman.
So then it's like, how is that racial?
because racial truly would be genetic from mother or father, right?
So now you're talking about cultural or like some sort of an, that's ethnic, right?
So now you have like an ethnic identity.
So it seems like it's like a cross between genetic, ethnic.
I don't even know what Jewry is, by the way.
I just use that word because I heard it in the movie.
But to me, it's like, it's like a confusing definition to where I've had debates on here.
And I've asked people to define what a Jew is and no one can.
It's like define what a woman is.
What's a Jew?
And it's like, it's like, that's why you can't just like blame the Jews, right?
You can't just go like, oh, it's the Jews' fault because what even is Jews?
You know, and I think that it's, it's, so it's, it's really hard for people like, because Christians care more about Jews than they do Christians.
Like Christians aren't upset about, you know, genocides in Azerbaijan right now.
They're not concerned about Christian, you know, genocides in Somalia going on in Uganda, in the Congo.
They're not upset about Christian persecution going on in China.
Christians are upset about Israel.
They're upset about Jews.
So Protestant Christians in the United States care more about atheist non-Christians than they do about their own people, which I find to be very silly and somewhat ironic.
You know, they don't even know what the genocides are that are going around the world against Christians.
They couldn't even tell you, but they can justify the IDF's military action in Gaza because they will.
So, you know, I don't really understand the full mentality of all of this.
I'm not going to claim to go down into it, but I don't find anything to be really taboo, right?
Like a lot of people are really afraid.
I broke out of the matrix.
My funding doesn't come from big tech.
I don't even make money on X.
I just don't make money on social media.
I don't get paid by tech companies.
I don't work with mainstream advertising platforms.
And I run my own companies and either am a full owner or a partial owner or have some sort of a, you know, a hand where I can't get fired from everything that I do now.
So I just can talk about whatever I want whenever I want without fear of repercussion, besides maybe getting deleted off the internet.
All right, suck my dick.
I don't give a shit.
It's like, you know, if you go down to the end of all of it, I don't even, half the work I do now isn't even on my platforms.
I publish on other people's platforms because I just, I'm setting myself up to even be deleted off the internet.
I want to know what the truth is.
And to me, where everyone gets the most sensitive about, it's like people aren't sensitive about like guys fucking pulling their cocks out in front of kids.
That's normal.
But just asking yourself why like we have a system of creditation and usury is considered like anti-Semitic, it makes me think that that's where the real problems are.
And I don't want to waste my time anymore just like getting mad about like gay guys acting like faggots at parades, because to me, that's all just downstream of a bigger system of what's going on.
And yeah, I don't want that, but like that's not the focus of the show anymore is like looking at like leftism because, you know, even blacks, you know, like black crime, white leftism, like white wokeness, all that stuff is downstream of like this Bolshevik intersectional communist self-divisional platform.
And that's probably more I'd like to go.
And if you tie in Bolshevik communism, you tie in creditors and usury, you tie in geopolitics and foreign influence, it kind of just goes back to the same place, which is why it's like, I get it now.
The older you get, the more you realize the people that were crying in the comments about things were actually right the whole time.
It's like Alex Jones was right, right?
It's like the guy who seemed crazy, who's been yelling for 20 years, he wasn't yelling for 20 years because he was crazy.
He was yelling because he was hoping one day you'd wake up too.
Like that's how that's that's what I sensed in the last year or two.
Uh, in my own personal journey is like, oh damn, the crazy people were right.
I'm not in a position to debate you about this, but i've noticed, in a ramping up from the left and i'm not accusing you of leftism by any means okay, go ahead.
I've noticed a ramping up from the left of associating ideals and philosophies and virtues with.
They're trying to marry those things, these metaphysical things, with our immutable characteristics.
Famously, one of the woke claims is that if you are punctual, it is whiteness right, and really you can be punctual regardless of your ethnicity.
I mean, it's a characteristic that you can choose to adopt and practice and become good at.
And so the problem I have with going back and saying that the the, the Bolshevik problem is, is a Jewish problem, is that you're marrying the ideal with the ethnicity or the immutable characteristic of of someone or person or group of people when the problem isn't the fact that they're Jewish, the problem is the fact they're communist.
You know what I mean.
So I try to attack the ideas and cultures that I think are inferior to Western culture and Western ideas, regardless of the immutable characteristic that they might be correlated most with.
You know what I mean, and so one of the examples you you mentioned earlier when we were talking about refugees coming into our countries and in Europe and things like that and how you know, this black crime is ridiculous and get the fuck out of here.
And I totally resonate with all of that.
But you have to understand that it's not the blackness that makes these, these people problematic that are coming into these countries and vandalizing cars.
It's the fact that they don't adopt Western culture, they don't assimilate with the culture that they're going into.
That creates inherent conflict.
And there are plenty of people that are black who act like regular Western responsible citizens and there are plenty of people who are white who act like degenerates.
And so, although there is a huge correlation between racial groups and behaviors and philosophies, I don't deny that one bit I do think that it is exclusive enough that we have to be careful not to project any prejudice on a person based on their immutable characteristics just because they're so highly correlated with behavior that we don't approve of.
No, I just have to mute YouTube and go on to run Rumble and Censor.
Just reminding you guys, though, before we go over to Rumble, go to rumble.com slash slightly offensive, but watch on Censored.
The easiest way to support this show and support these conversations is to support us at Censored.
We have our own payment processors, our own servers, our own tech, everything.
And it's all encrypted.
We get attacked all the time.
People try to take it down, plant weird stuff on our hard drives.
It happens, but we run it all independently and they're always trying to shut us down.
So make sure you go to censor.tv, promo code offensive, get 20% off the membership.
You've got to join.
I have a big show Wednesday for you guys.
I have a big guest.
You're not going to want to miss it.
It's going to be amazing.
I have some great interviews in the belt too that are coming up.
But make sure you head over there.
Make sure you get that done.
I have Chase guys on.
You can follow him.
Links in the description.
Make sure that you get his book as well if you're on YouTube.
It's the rise of American Populism.
It's vital.
You pick up a copy, buy it for your friends or your family.
It's a great gift this summer.
Read it at the beach.
Stop scrolling TikTok, masturbating, and masturbate to that book instead.
If you need to, if you have to, if you've got a problem, at least let it be this and not something more degenerate.
Anyway, we're going to take a two-minute break and we're going to continue this conversation on what we're talking about here with immutable characteristics and whether or not Chase is correct on the racial question.
We'll see you in two minutes over at Rumble, Censored, and on locals.
Make sure you send your super chats in on Rumble and we'll see you there.
last segment of the show, I'm with my guest, Chase Geiser, Infowars host and author of The Rise Of American Populism.
If you guys are just joining the live stream right now, apologies for my terrible backdrop and setup.
I am currently in transit.
I'm just using that phrase for legal.
Yeah, I'm in transition.
So I have a kind of a terrible setup, and we will probably be having janky setups for the coming several weeks or several months until I get into my new studio and get that built out.
But as you guys know, it's more about the content plus the dick pics that you get when you sign up at censored.tv promo code offensive.
Balls are not included.
It's an extra $10 per year.
Chase, thank you for joining me.
You brought up the question about the immutable characteristics and not judging people.
I want to pick your brain on this.
Okay, we've got about 20 minutes left of you on the show.
So I want to hear where you come from because I come from a neoliberal background.
So a neoliberalism, meaning to those that are unfamiliar, I was not liberal.
I was not progressive.
I was closer to libertarianism of sort of like fiscally conservative.
Like I had transgender friends and, you know, people I hung out with, you know, atheists, worked with atheists and people, but I myself was a little bit different.
Of course, that ended up corrupting me.
I end up becoming trans.
And, you know, long story short, I ended up realizing these people are fucking useless that I was surrounded by.
Like the atheists, you can't trust them.
They'll stab you in the back.
They have no God, no value system.
You know, you're around weak men and these people, they'll gossip and slander you.
You're, you know, these trans and these weird people, gays, and women love to argue and gossip.
Like these are just not reliable people.
And like I mentioned, they're fighting for their own self-interest.
They're not thinking about what's good for the country.
They're not thinking about what's best for the world.
They're living in a fantasy land where you can tuck your dick between your legs and think that you're a woman.
And I realized I grew up.
I used to be gay and then I grew up, right?
So I used to be neoliberal.
It's synonymous.
The word homosexual and neoliberal are the same word in my dictionary.
And so you grow up and now I'm just retarded, which means that I am solutions-based and I'm willing to say things that will hurt my money and my end goal.
And one of those things is the fact that, yeah, I don't think you want to blame people on immutable characteristics.
Like, like, I still have plenty of Jewish friends.
I have no problem with knowing black people.
I'm not doing this.
So I have a black friend thing.
But is it really the black guy not adopting our culture?
Like, is Africa's problem that they're not adapting Western culture?
Because they were given Western culture.
They were given Rhodesia.
They were given Cape Town and Johannesburg.
They were given fully built, functioning cities off the Ivory Coast, and they've ruined them.
It seems like these people have the capability to destroy and not to build.
And that's not, that's just my observation.
That's that's when left in control, that as a collective group, that there for some reason, whether it's genetic, whether it's, you know, generation, because you know, genes and IQ are generational.
It doesn't mean they were always like this.
I'm not saying all are like this, right?
I'm not saying all black people are destined to be this.
But as a collectivist group, they are incapable of self-governance, self-control, and they tend to destroy what they touch.
Am I wrong on my observations universally?
And would you still say that you look in, you know, Rhodesia, Zimbabwe, did Zimbabwe fall apart because the people just refuse to adopt the Western culture?
Or is it the fact that no matter even if you're handed Western culture on a silver platter, there's something about them that it just they want to jump in circles, collect sticks, and tear shit down?
Because that's what I saw.
I've only seen that happen in my lifetime.
And maybe I'm racist and ignorant.
Maybe I'm just stupid.
But like, I'm not trying to be a dick hero or bombastic.
I'm saying that's just what I've observed is when blacks are the majority, things get bad, not good.
And again, there are good black people, plenty of normal, functioning black people that watch the show.
You're not in that group.
But overall, is it wrong to make a stereotypical observation based on 100% of the reality that I've witnessed every day of my life?
Well, I think if there's one thing that we've learned over the last several decades, especially just based simply on the conflicts that we've been in the United States versus the Middle East, where we try to establish democracy.
Remember Operation Iraqi Freedom, where we're going to just give them freedom and democracy, right?
You cannot force a culture upon a people.
And not all people within any group are going to be capable of living up or assimilating to any given culture.
I'm just suggesting that our immigration policy here in the United States, for example, is supposed to be that of a siphoning where you can come here and you can become a citizen if you can assimilate.
And if you can't assimilate, then the system should purge you of it or not allow you in, right?
And so, yes, I would probably agree with you that there seems to be certain cultural momentum in regions for whatever reason, whether it's IQ or whether it's just history and traditions and the momentum of the way things have always been that can catch individuals in the wave despite what they would choose could they transcend that momentum.
But I just don't think that I don't think that an individual's immutable characteristics are married to the absolute limit to their culture, right?
So, yes, it's true that if you have a lower IQ, for example, you're going to be more likely to commit crimes.
You're going to be less likely to live in a civilized way, maybe less likely to adopt Western culture.
It's true that if 40% of the marriages in your region are between first and second cousins, it's going to have a negative impact on the average IQ of the region, like Gaza, for example, and that you're going to have people that scream, I hate you for the sake of Allah, right?
That is a product of incest and bad genetics.
There is something to be said for that.
I'm not one to just totally deny that and disregard that.
I'm just trying to balance the overcompensation for that fact where it's very easy to just dismiss entire ethnicities or people or groups as incapable of something when there are individuals within those groups who are capable of rising up to it and adopting it and assimilating to it.
And it's unfair that they should not be given the opportunity to do so if they genuinely want to.
Yeah, but I, and I, but I think that that's where, yes.
Okay.
Yes.
But it's also, it's just kind of like the idea of, I feel like with having autism, I can't, I, I, I, I, we also just call it brain damage.
Like, I think they're just lying.
They just damage us with vaccines and stuff and then call it autism.
But I think we're just like brain damaged.
I'm going to start calling autism brain rot.
Since I have brain rot, like I walk around and I just have seen time and time again that when you see massive fights in public, not all, but most, when you see random senseless murders, not all, but most, or you hear of terrible social interactions, it is just always black people.
And of course, people like to say, hey, hey, well, don't, don't, don't judge all black people.
And I always go, dude, I hold to the statistical 10% rule.
It might even be a little bit gracious, but I'd say 10% of any group in group would be an out point.
So like, you know, let's just say like, let's just say like, yeah, I mean, it's not 10%, but let's just say that 70 to 80% of gays were molested.
Okay.
Not all gays were molested.
Okay.
You know, you say, oh, you know, most people, gay is a fetish.
They decided it later in life.
Something happened.
No, no, no, there's some percentage that, you know, something happened in the womb genetically or, you know, that influenced them chemically.
Okay, yes, there's always outliers with black people.
Well, you know, they're not a great group of people to live around.
Yeah, but my neighbor's black.
And it's like, yeah, okay, yes.
Yes.
Like, dude, I'm not making absolute points about any group of people.
Sure.
There's a bunch of shitty white people.
And people always say, but what about the woke whites?
And I go, they're great to live around.
I've lived around the woke whites.
It's just when they get into power, their policies end up allowing not only these minorities, but it actually has to do with minorities, the drug issue, which has to do with the southern border, right?
I've been around many of these woke areas, particularly, let's talk about Austin.
Let's talk about Portland.
Let's talk about Seattle.
You know, these are, but if you go to the white areas where white people live, the suburbs, they're actually very clean and beautiful.
It's the inner cities actually where the minorities live in the white areas that are relegated to the drug abuse.
And many of the drug abusers are white, by the way.
But the drug abusers aren't, they're transient.
So, they're doing petty theft, they're breaking into cars for fence, you know, for ICE, whatever it is.
But they're not necessarily like belligerently violent, and you could still take them on, they're not like stabbing children, and they're criminals.
And so, crime is not perceived down to one race, and crime can get out of control.
Organized crime can get down to anything.
But if you see, like, even when you have organized crime in like the Italians, for instance, like the mafia, well, it's not necessarily so black and white with good or bad.
I mean, the mafia obviously filled the vacuum where law enforcement wasn't, you know, protecting businesses.
Obviously, some businesses they were extorting, they were doing some good, you know, they were doing some good.
And a lot of they still have ethics on killings, right?
They weren't just going around shooting people, they would kill you if you were fighting for their territory or competing.
I guess where I get uncomfortable, maybe this is irrelevant, is the law and the policies are supposed to be universal to all individuals.
They're not supposed to be tied or associated with immutable characteristics.
And what we see now is this overcompensation for racism from 100 years ago, where if a just law disproportionately impacts any given group based on its immutable characteristic, suddenly that law is perceived as unjust, right?
And so, I just feel like there's two sides to this coin where it's easy to overgeneralize where the problems are coming from as they correlate to immutable characteristics.
And it's also easy to over-generalize the opposite approach where we end up reducing or loosening or refusing to instill true justice just because we're afraid of hurting people's feelings or being perceived as racist.
And so, I just try my best, man.
And maybe this is just idealistic and naive.
I try my best to only think of people as individuals and pay no mind to their immutable characteristics.
So, for example, I have a major problem with Muslims.
I don't have a problem with Muslims because they're Middle Eastern or Arab.
I have a problem with Muslims because 40% of them marry their first and second cousins and it's creating all sorts of problems.
There's never going to be a successful two-state solution as long as the IQs are less than 85 in the region from this incest.
And their whole entire philosophy and idealism is totally incompatible with notions of Western culture and a constitutional republic and separation of church and state, ideals that I hold dear.
And so, I'm actually opposed to Islam.
I'm Islamophobic, not because I'm bigoted, but because I'm reasonable.
It's the ideas that bother me, not the actual people or their immutable characteristics.
Same thing with like gang culture, right?
It's not the fact that these people are black that bothers me for the most part, whether it's bloods versus crips or whatever.
It's just the fact that they've adopted this philosophy and this approach to life that is totally averse to all reason.
And I know that it's heavily correlated with race.
And I know that it's easy to categorize people based on these groups.
And I know that our minds are designed to put people into groups and to organize things into patterns because that's how we perceive and navigate through the world and through our lives.
But when we're talking about policy, when we're talking about culture, we have to understand the sovereignty of individuals.
Otherwise, I think we fall prey to the mistakes that either the Nazis made where they just lump everybody into one group, or the mistake that the wokeists are making right now, where they just assume that because you're white, you're of privilege.
And so for me with the racial stuff, it's like the same thing with the Jewish dust.
I was like, why do you talk about it?
I go, but why not?
It's not that I, it's like, I mean, we talked about a lot on this episode, not a lot on any of previous episodes we've been doing, but, you know, you can't really talk about the far right in this sort of political power struggle without talking about Zionism.
But it's like, why not?
It is a big issue.
No, you know, I talk about Joe Biden all the time, the Democrats and leftists and things like that.
No one's like, why do you always mention the Democrats?
Because they're a big player in what's going on in the world.
And so in my world, too.
So I will, why would I not, why would I consider how much I'm talking about something?
I'm going to talk about it to the point that it's relevant and to the point that it's involved in what I'm discussing.
And, you know, I would like to never talk about Jewish influence and power for the rest of my life.
In fact, it's one of the most boring topics to me.
Every time I try to not talk about it, though, it's like, is anybody else addicted to this in the chat?
Where it's like, you try not to talk about it and then like you try to ignore it and you try to just like pass it off and then they just force themselves, you know, onto you like Donald Trump in a dressing room at Waldorf Astoria.
No, I'm just kidding.
I don't know.
But it's like, it's like they, you know, they come onto you and you're just like, dude, oh, can you just go away?
Like, I don't want to deal.
It's like Ukraine, right?
I don't want to talk about Ukraine ever again.
I'd like the war to end tomorrow and I'd like to never be involved in this.
Yeah, man, for me to say the best three things is difficult.
The first thing I think that he should do is find a way to end insider trading protections among members of Congress, whether they're in the Senate or in the House of Representatives, make it either illegal or pass some sort of legislation where individual stocks can't be traded by people on committees with certain insider knowledge.
I think that would eliminate a lot of corruption just inherently as a natural outcome of that policy.
And I would like to see him abolish the CIA, especially, probably the FBI, but the CIA especially would be a wonderful thing.
As far as the third thing, if he does those first two, that would be enough for me to be very delighted with him.
I'd have to spend more time thinking about a third thing.
So, in order to set our country back, like what we continue doing are three things that he should so we can like red flags we can notice from his president's like he's going the wrong direction here.
Well, I think if he doubles down on the vaccine stuff, that would be a major problem.
So, anything that's conducive to the success of big pharma.
And we know from the first term that the biggest risk of a Trump presidency is that he surrounds himself with bad people because he is vulnerable to those who flatter him, and bad people know how to flatter him.
I think he made that mistake quite a bit on a number of occasions during his first term.
So, I'm concerned about him surrounding himself with bad people, picking like a wrong VP.
I'm concerned about him doubling down on the vaccine stuff.
I know the pandemic's over, but there's going to be another one and another one and another one.
And to disregard the ale of Operation Warp Speed and what we saw with that, I think is a major oversight.
And third thing that he could do that would be a major mess up that he might be vulnerable to.
Obviously, there is a tendency for all presidents, either Republican or Democrat, to expand the powers of the executive branch.
We saw this under the Bush administration, saw this under the Obama administration, we saw it under the Trump administration, and we've seen it under the Biden administration.
Leaning too hard on executive orders instead of passing legislation, I think sets us up for late-stage Republic problems down the road.
And the more powerful the executive branch becomes, the less free I believe the American people will inevitably become.
So, those would be the three things I would be kind of concerned about.
And on mine, I'm just concerned about the fact that he's taking Adelson money, and which means that he's beholden to foreign interests once again because all that money comes contingent on foreign policy.
I do want to say this real fast as we go.
I'll just read a couple of these comments here that we got or super chats.
What is this?
I guess it's this live question.
Do we get any live questions?
I never know if we get any live questions.
No, we didn't.
All right, but under the under this show, let me go to our page here.
I think we have, I think I learned how to do this.
You go to my channels or something like this, or my content.
Is that what it is?
My count overview.
I always forget how to find the super chats from the show.
Okay, yeah, here they are.
Um, we got two today only, but that's fine.
True Lyso says, Chase is awesome asking if he can talk more about the Masonic order.
My grandfather was a 33rd Master Mason who left because Satanists were infiltrating it.
Because they'll never set, they'll never, they'll never.
That was my plan.
I was like, hey, everybody hates Elijah Schaefer and everybody's always trying to ruin this show because we talk about reality and people always just get mad at me for being sexist, misogynist, racist, xenophobic, and all the rest of the ism.
Chase Geyser, you can buy his book The American, The Rise of American Populism.
You should.
Don't forget to check out our sponsors, Undertak.com for the best boxers in America.
Link in the description.
You should just click the link.
It helps out the show.
You can also check out the wellness company TWC.health slash offensive.
Make sure that you support the show as we are in transition.
But I decided, like, Mike thought we were going to be just taking time off because I was supposed to take this week, a couple weeks off to go build the new studio, but things got complicated.
So I decided to still stream for you guys, even though I am on a celery stick currently in North Korea selling feet pics to Kim Jong-un's slut wives.
So we have problems, but we're finding solutions.
But we don't have the final solution, but we are going to stop talking.
There's so much to cover.
Don't forget to tune into Wednesday's show, 10 p.m. Eastern Time in the United States.
Follow Chase everywhere where you can find him and follow him.
Chase, if people want to connect with you, if they want to find you, if they want to follow you, what's the best social media that they can keep up with your mission?
