Yeah, you know, actually, I'm pretty happy to have gotten that out of you because, you know, people say coming on the show.
I was going to say coming out, but to be honest, we were going to talk about censorship, but it's kind of too hard today to actually come out as a conservative.
I know you and quite a few of your friends have already been banned permanently from the internet for being dangerous individuals, as we've heard recently.
But of course, being gay is cool.
And it used to be a scary thing, but actually, I think we could invoke some gay privilege here, maybe some trans privilege, which is what I use every day to exist in this planet.
Yeah, that's what we have to do now, actually, if we kind of have like bookends on the end of your broadcast.
So we can start the broadcast off by saying, you know, you're a gay black woman.
I'm a trans Olympic athlete for the women's national team.
So we can start off like that, maybe pepper in and I condemn Alex Jones.
I condemn InfoWars here or there, stuff like that.
I condemn Trump.
You know, that might kind of anchor you to YouTube here before they want to censor you.
And then before we sign off, too, we'll make sure we condemn Alex Jones again, you know, Orange Man Bad and everything like that.
But now that we've kind of created that bookend, I mean, the censorship is one thing, but you have to say, I mean, you should probably start selling, I think, either orange like wristbands or like the orange ribbon, you know, for Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Because it really is, it's really reaching like new levels every day, man.
I mean, it's crazy.
The more Trump succeeds, the better Trump does.
It seems like the crazier they get.
So I think you need to start profiting off of the campaign that you started, raising awareness for Trump Derangement Syndrome.
And actually, you know, I mean, obviously being the trans athlete and wanting to get that out to the public was the first reason why I wanted to talk to you.
But you kind of brought up the topic that I want to discuss, which is I'm pretty confident.
And when I say this, I don't mean this as a joke, that Trump is going to win in 2020.
And a big point of that is the way that leftists have been responding to all of the accomplishments, which has been, of course, not to thank him, not to be happy, but to scream, to get upset, to yell, to get violent, and also just to basically ignore everything.
And so, you know, first of all, I want to ask you, do you actually think that Trump is going to win in 2020?
I would say right now, unless you have a massive election fraud theme appearing to come up, which I don't really see happening, I think that there's enough control over it, enough mechanisms that they can't just do an outright theft.
You always have to worry about that with an electronic voting system.
But no, I think that you're spot on.
A, I don't see a Democrat right now that has a chance.
I'm not even sure if he's serious.
Ami Horowitz announced he's going to be running for president as a Democrat in 2020.
I haven't had time to look into that past the surface, but that's kind of ironic because he's kind of a conservative.
I guess you could call him a troll.
Not really.
He does professional reporting, but he does kind of go out and do that style reporting sometimes.
So he's announced running as a Democrat.
It's funny because I was wondering this last night when I was going through the most recent comments from Democrats and a great story we had at Infowars where every Democrat candidate has basically called out the Second Amendment as a target of theirs for their campaign.
So I'm sitting here thinking, yeah, there's no Democrat that has a chance.
I mean, they're pushing Joe Biden.
They're claiming he's ahead in the polls.
Those are all fake polls.
That's all fake news.
They're clearly trying to, for whatever reason, maybe it's just in the moment, get Biden up there.
But how could Biden even make it out of the Democrat Party?
His Ukrainian collusion, all the scandals that are coming out of the Obama administration.
I mean, if there's any Democrat that's worth assault, they're going to call him out on all that, not to mention, you know, groping the women and children.
So I think that you're spot on.
In fact, I would say Trump could even set records looking at the 2020 election when it comes to a landslide.
I mean, unless there's some sort of crazy shift in the Democrat Party that we're not expecting, I think Trump wins in a landslide record fashion.
And I see the left and the Trump protesters going even more insane.
I don't know if you've ever seen the similarities between a dying fish and the people who hate Trump, but they have very similar body motions.
You know, like, because I mean, except for the fact that the fish is a little more calm and predictable, because whenever they're about to completely go under, they sort of give this little, like, you know, this little flop.
And I, you know, I mean, a lot of people who watch the show aren't religious.
I could, I might even blame it on like a demonic possession, but of course that immediately turns people off.
But let's turn them on to something realistic.
You know, you've had a lot of experience, especially the last couple of years, with people reacting to Donald Trump in ways that I, quite frankly, just don't make sense to me.
And I think that this is a sign that they're losing because people who are going to win, people who are confident that they're going to win, do things like what Donald Trump's doing, implement policy, make changes.
But people who are fighting for their last breath, they flop around on the table just waiting to be gutted.
And so my question for you is, do you feel like this leftist hysteria and everything that you're seeing today is an example of maybe their tactics to win?
Or do you feel like it's just getting worse because they're going to lose?
Well, I think your analysis is spot on, but I think that I would attribute it to, and there's a lot of other things you can attribute their behaviors to right now.
And honestly, it sounds kind of, it sounds kind of basic and mundane, but I think it's factual.
They're very immature.
I mean, very immature.
We're talking about grown adult men and women that are suffering from serious arrested development.
I think that that's really what this comes down to.
And I kind of have been making this analogy where I think that they want to, I mean, we already know they want to incite violence, but I think it's beyond that.
I think that deep down, really, and you know this, you've talked to these people too.
They're really uninformed and ignorant when it actually comes to politics, you know, the stuff they claim to be out there protesting.
They really don't know much about.
I mean, you simply stick a mic in their face and ask them a simple question they can't answer.
So I think it's really a mass arrested development.
And they're basically like an immature child who's kicking you under the table just to annoy you so that as soon as you respond, they can point the finger at you.
It's like, I don't know if you've had siblings, but it's like you're sitting at the dinner table with your siblings when you're a kid and you're kicking your brother under the table just to get a response so you can, you know, be like, oh, you know, once you get the response, he kicked me.
He's the bad person.
And then try to get him in trouble.
I feel like that's what they're doing right now, but in a weird, like political movement type of way where they go out, act insane, engage an act of violence, and then totally lie about the whole thing, hoping that we'll actually go out and be violent.
And I really think at a certain level, it's a desperate cry for help.
I really think at a certain level, it's a desperate cry for help.
These are very immature people, grown men and women.
And it's, you know, I mean, hey, we do make a joke of them.
And these are silly, goofy people.
And humor is one way to influence people.
So that's why we use it.
But on a very serious level, I think they're suffering from some serious mental illness here, Elijah.
I mean, call it Trump derangement syndrome, call it Stockholm syndrome, but I don't think it's going to get any better.
I think that Trump wins again.
And I think the desperation, like you say, it's like a fish flopping on the deck out of water.
I think it's just going to get crazier when we see another Trump victory.
And I think actually the tech companies know that it's going to get crazier because what I've known is things that you do or other people you work with and a lot of people online is very effective at actually exposing the leftists for what they are.
And I think that in 2016, especially, people online, especially independent journalists, commentators, entertainers, were so effective at showing how mad these anti-Trump people were that tech companies realized in order to try to win the 2020 election, they're going to have to silence and sort of thwart and censor anybody out there possible who might get in the way of them being able to push their agenda.
And I know recently, you know, this is kind of what I'm looking at.
InfoWars has pretty much been the sole and most direct target overall and people associated with this mass censorship.
And I think a lot of people are kind of wondering why.
Well, I think, you know, InfoWars, I think the big reason is we had the biggest influence for, I guess you could call alternative media in the 2020 election.
I mean, let's be perfectly real.
If it wasn't for Infowars, Trump may not get over the Republican hump.
Now, I'm not sitting here acting like we're the sole responsibility.
I'm just saying all the other media out there was not supporting Trump.
I mean, you can go back and watch Fox News archives, Rush Limbaugh Archives, Hannity Archives, all the big name Trump supporters now were not Trump supporters then.
They were Cruz.
They were curious about possibly Rubio and some other names.
InfoWars and Michael Savage and Ann Coulter, if you want to give kind of a broad spectrum analysis, those were the only three names that supported Trump.
So you had Alex Jones, Savage, and Coulter.
Everyone else was either anti-Trump or thought it was a joke and he couldn't win.
So I think what big tech saw was a centralized mothership, if you will.
I mean, during the 2016 election cycle, InfoWars was the top political YouTube channel.
It wasn't even close.
And so I think that they saw that influence.
They saw it was impacting the youth.
They saw that it was impacting what they view as their voter slaves, which are black people and Hispanic people.
And so they saw this major shift.
And InfoWars was kind of at the focal point.
It was kind of a common thread.
So that's why they targeted it because of the massive influence.
And it was also kind of a beta test.
And I'll go ahead and make this prediction right now.
And I actually, I mean, I really appreciate you having me on, Elijah.
I'm not going to lie.
There's some people that won't have me on their YouTube channel anymore because they don't want to be kicked off.
And I understand it, but, you know, this is what we're dealing with.
So maybe that's how we beat it, is we just say we condemn Alex Jones.
But so there's two reasons.
And to finish my point, then I'll get to the next one.
I think that the reason why InfoWars was the big one is because if they do the social media purge, which I think is about to happen, I'll talk about in a second, InfoWars is kind of like the last mothership we have.
I mean, people have made alternative social media accounts, but let's just be honest, they're not as good.
They don't have the technology.
They don't have the bandwidth.
They don't have the servers to take just this mass communication that is needed that Twitter has, that Facebook has, that all these big billion-dollar companies have.
So maybe that's something that changes, but it's not going to change in the near future.
So InfoWars, though, is still kind of a hub where they can erase us off of all these social media platforms, but we still have millions of people that go to InfoWars to find our content.
So it's somewhere where we can still, you know, promote slightly offensive with Elijah Shaver, where we can still promote everything Caitlin Bennett is doing or Will Johnson is doing or all these other people sharing your links because people still go there.
So I think that's why they want to erase InfoWars.
But I'll make this prediction right now.
If nothing stops big tech, if nothing stops Facebook or Twitter or any of these people, Google, and Trump's tweets are not going to do it.
If nothing actually stops them from doing this, they're not going to stop.
And I've set the date October 2020.
It could happen before that.
But I would guess by October 2020, if nothing stops these big tech social media companies from the censorship, you won't find anything InfoWars anywhere.
Yeah, you know, it feels like it's going that way.
And actually, because what's crazy, you mentioned Caitlin Bennett as well.
And she's a smashing success right now on YouTube.
I mean, every video she's getting has hundreds of thousands of views.
She just released that ridiculous reparations video with Joel Patrick where she got grown men to pay reparations, which I have a black friend too.
So I don't know why I didn't think about this.
If we don't ever have money, I'm just going to bring a jar.
Yeah, I will.
I mean, I might not put it on the internet, but I could use the next some extra money, some reparations.
Plus, he doesn't always pay his rent on time since he lives in the same apartment.
So, I mean, I deserve a little bit of those reparations as well.
I mean, that's that YouTube demonetization cash flow right there.
But the reality is, is like, yeah, you know, honestly, I'm not afraid of being deplatformed, but this is a good point you brought up.
You know, one thing that I noticed is the difference in the narrative where conservatives are still infighting and they need to wake up and stop the infighting.
And a good progress on this is I noticed that, you know, we're here at slightly offensive work contributors for Blaze Media, which of course is controversial to people because people don't like Glenn Beck or people don't like this person.
And they don't influence what kind of material that we create.
They don't do anything.
But I noticed, you know, I talked to some of the people over there and when Alex Jones and when this purge happened, even with Prison Planet, aka our good boy Paul Joseph Watson, you know, they came out and they still spoke in defense saying, hey, you know, we've had disagreements over the years, but this is going too far.
It's one thing to get on air and have controversy and disagreements, especially, you know, even conservatives and centrists and libertarians, we all disagree on a ton of things.
But then to come out and to just say that somebody doesn't have the right to express themselves is sort of a way of you showing that you know what people should and should not listen to, that you have the right to determine what opinions people are allowed to be exposed to.
And, you know, and I love that when people find out that I work with the Blaze, I don't work for them, but I work with them.
They immediately, you know, oh, you're a cuck, you're this, you're that.
I go, guys.
I'm still the person I am.
I'm an example that media companies are starting to change because I love Infowars.
I love, well, I disavow Alex Jones.
I disavow Owen Schroer.
I disavow Caitlin Bennett.
I definitely disavow Paul Joseph Watson.
And I disavow your producer.
And she just gets thrown in there.
Screw you too.
So I can't ever say I actually support you.
But I mean, if I did support you, because I support trans athletes, my example is, is that I'm somebody who's aware that we have to be building allies and groups throughout this entire country.
We have to make sure that all the platforms are working together.
Because yeah, I mean, I give it, I think 2020, I mean, that's good if we can make it to 2020.
But I think at least by 2021, especially if there's any sort of coup or loss beyond the Mueller investigation, they're going to completely try to silence our voices.
And so I'm kind of wondering with you, though, do you think it's going to get as bad to the point where they're going to start removing our ability to host and to present our websites in the U.S.?
You know, that they'll probably try to beta test and see if they have to do it.
I think what they'll do first is, and I see this happening on YouTube pretty soon.
You might be grandfathered in, so this might not affect you immediately.
But what I suspect YouTube will do first and then maybe Facebook.
Twitter seems to kind of wait and see where the wind blows when they enact stuff like this.
But I bet is YouTube will stop allowing people to live stream and then Facebook will stop allowing people to live stream unless you have a certain certification or verification or amount of subscribers or you're grandfathered in.
In fact, YouTube is kind of already doing this, but I think it'll go next level.
I think that that's what they're really afraid of because that kind of has the viral potential.
I mean, that's what we were so good at in the 2016 election is whenever news would break, you could break in on social media with whatever headline with the breaking news and we would immediately be the top trending video.
So I think they're going to try to do everything to kind of stymie that.
But, you know, to your point about the infighting, I kind of think that this goes back to even some maturity, you know, amongst our own ranks in the sense that there's still kind of like a popularity contest where you think, oh, if I, you know, attack Alex Jones while he's down or I attack Glenn Beck while he's down or I, you know, say, oh, yeah, that's right.
You know, I support Trump, but we can't have Infowars out here.
You know, there's plenty of people like that.
I don't know if that's them trying to stay on social media or gain popularity or what it is.
But I agree with you.
People need to realize that this is much bigger than their own personal social media account or, you know, getting popular and trying to make a name for themselves because you won't have a platform when it's said and done.
So you got to realize that.
And I choose not to even comment on most of the infighting just because I don't want to give it any fuel at all.
I just wish even when people would disagree, they would understand that you still have to be united in the common enemy, which is the attack on free speech.
And, you know, here's another point too, Elijah, because everybody wants to have the debate about, is it legal for private companies to decide, you know, who's allowed to be on the platform or whatever.
Fine, that's a fair debate.
But what happened to the philosophy of free speech?
What happened to the mentality of free speech?
What happened to the Western mindset of free speech where Zuckerberg or Dorsey or any of these people, like, what goes through their mind?
I'm like, why do you want to censor people?
Like, what's up with that?
Where does that mindset come?
Who is teaching them this?
This is not American.
This is not a Western mindset thing to me.
So I want to know where that comes from.
Is that something they were taught?
Is that something that they organically kind of Orwellianly gained this totalitarian tyranny sense of mind?
I mean, what happened to the philosophy of free speech?
That's what I would like to have these people saying, well, we can't have hate and violence.
Nobody buys that crap.
Nobody buys that.
So I want to know why these people don't have a free speech mindset.
Well, yeah, and you know, it's interesting because about, I think about sometime last year, Jack Dorsey or whatever the CEO of Twitter was saying that, you know, he honestly sees his platform as sort of like a new public square and that he needs to protect free speech, but unless, of course, that free speech infringes upon other people's choice to express their own free speech,
which starts getting to the muddied water where these tech companies have sort of realized, I think, the biggest issue that has happened in the age-old history of humanity, that they have more power than they know what to do with.
And I think it's a scary thing because like, you know, to be honest, when I think about most politicians, you know, my father-in-law, he worked in the government in the parliament or whatever for Australia or whatever you call it, Congress, something.
Not too sure what happens down there.
I heard that Australia was just made up anyways by people who are trying to prove the earth wasn't flat.
But, you know, when I talked to him, he said, you know, a lot of people get into politics because they have a good idea or because they want to help their country or they want to make a legacy.
And then they get into politics.
And then what happens is, is they get the fame, they get the notoriety, they get the funding, and they start feeling like they're God's gift to humanity.
They start feeling like they were called in there for some divine purpose.
And they stop listening to their constituents.
They stop doing what's best for the country and they start doing what's best for themselves and for special interest groups and what they're trying to socially re-engineer in the country.
And that's what's happening in a lot of Western countries.
We've already seen that in the West.
I mean, my father-in-law is an example of somebody who, you know, the government came in and took his weapons.
I mean, that buyback program in the 90s in Australia was really just a raid on citizens' rights to defend themselves and their right to protect themselves.
But these companies are doing the same thing.
What it is, is I think for the first time in history, companies now have more power than the government because they don't even need a military anymore.
They don't need to fight people.
They don't need to take your guns.
What are they going to do?
You can't even start a war if you can't communicate.
They take away the most necessary function that any type of opposition group needs, which is the ability to talk to one another.
And since we're so connected, I mean, I really think it's a matter of time before we start getting dropped by our phone companies.
I mean, JP Morgan Chase is already canceling people's bank accounts.
We're already seeing PayPal, which I think, do they own MasterCard fully?
I'm not sure if they fully, or MasterCard owns PayPal.
I mean, it's a bit of a muddied relationship, but we're seeing these financial institutions already block people.
But I mean, realistically speaking, I don't think Jack got into this with the intention to mind control and destroy the world.
But one thing I got to bring up with this, I got to bring up the kind of money that's invested in these companies, which like a lot of it's actually like Saudi money.
And a lot of this money is foreign investments, which means that we have stockholders and people on the board that are basically influencing foreign elections.
And you also have Saudi money behind the new Newswatch or whatever it is, NewsGuard, the app that they're putting on your phone to monitor what news you're getting.
But there's no doubt the power that you're talking about here.
This is unprecedented power that these social media companies have.
This is unprecedented power that these tech giants have, no doubt.
And think about it too, Elijah.
You know, these people, they scoff at God, right?
I mean, they literally laugh at God.
They don't think that God has any impact on them.
So they think they're bigger than God.
So imagine what type of mindset they have towards humanity.
I mean, I can only imagine the type of mindset a Mark Zuckerberg or a Dorsey has towards any historical figure.
I guarantee you they have such arrogance and hubris right now, they scoff at any historical figure.
They say, but look at what I've done.
I've created a tech platform with billions of subscribers.
I have more power than any dictate ever.
I mean, that's probably what's going through these people's heads is my guess.
And that's why they're behaving, like you said, in such a authoritarian way, because that power has gone to their heads.
I mean, these are weird dudes, too.
I mean, Jack Dorsey is from St. Louis and I've heard some stories, and there's a few degree of separation there.
But you can tell, you know, he's not the type of typical, you know, CEO leader that you see.
I mean, I don't really care.
I'm not the kind of guy that judges people for what they wear.
But, you know, who goes to big meetings wearing scruffy hoodies with unkept hair?
I mean, it's like he doesn't even care.
Same with Zuckerberg.
He walks around in a wrinkled t-shirt half the time, which again, I don't care, but it's just kind of strange.
I mean, this is not normal behavior.
And it's the same arrogance.
They just scoff at everything.
They just think they're bigger than everybody, more powerful than everybody.
So they really don't give a damn about humanity.
So imagine these people laugh at God.
They think they're bigger than God.
So I can't even imagine what they think about fellow humans.
So I think because they have this unprecedented power, perhaps we're looking at even an unprecedented, I don't even know what the word would be, just lust for more power or lust to discover how they can wield this unprecedented power that they have.
And censorship seems to be the number one tool.
And if you're a political ideologue and you think that you can defeat your political enemies via the power that you now have, then I guess you're going to do it.
And I think that that's what we're seeing.
And unless somebody stops them again, and there's other ways.
I guarantee you, I guarantee you there's black contracts with Facebook and Google and Twitter and the United States government where they're getting data.
Maybe it's with the NSA or whoever it's with.
And I guarantee you, you pull up those contracts and all of a sudden you have a totally different set of standards when it comes to them deciding who can and can't speak.
So Trump keeps saying he's monitoring it.
Parscale keeps saying he's monitoring it.
I interviewed him.
He said he's never heard Alex Jones, so I'm not sure how much he can be monitoring it if you don't know the number one centered guy on the internet.
But we'll see what happens.
If they don't do anything before 2020, I don't know if they have enough power to defeat Trump.
And maybe that's why Trump doesn't really care to act on it.
But I think they will.
I think we'll either have to create our own platform that somehow can maintain all the bandwidth and everything, or conservatives, you're just going to be, I'm sorry, you don't get to exist.
You don't get to have an opinion.
You know, go vote and good luck, but we're going to censure you off the internet.
And, you know, speaking of your good point about the CEOs wearing hoodies to important interviews and meetings, I mean, how disgusting and disrespectful is it to put on like a pullover hoodie in an interview on a show?
I have to say that that is probably the worst type of just immaturity.
And I really, I disavow anyone who wears hoodies to interviews or important meetings.
If I had to do an interview on someone's channel, like they were going to interview me and they wore a hoodie, especially if it was like black with like a little print in red and white on the chest, I'd be so offended.
Well, it would probably, it wouldn't even, you wouldn't even go on it because it would probably be like some sort of like LGBTQ coming out show anyways.
And you've been out for years, approximately, so I'm pretty proud of you.
And I kind of want to end on that note with your point there, is that maybe there are things that we don't know.
Because look, I think if the US government thought that these tech companies were really going to be able to pull something off that was going to definitively influence the elections to stop conservatives from voting, because believe it or not, if we really come out and vote in the droves that we are supposed to, we will definitely win with a landslide.
Absolutely.
I think that they would have done something, but I know that we get into the very weird arena still where we don't know what we need to do because we don't want to regulate private companies.
But these companies are not acting like private companies.
They're acting like people who are now beginning to sort of choose the direction that our country is going and the political conversation of our nation.
We've had busts already of trusts, monopolies, of cartels in the history of our country.
This isn't something new.
I don't think conservatives have ever been against the breakup of things that are detrimental to the health and the wealth of our country.
But of course, Mark Zuckerberg, this is where I love Infowars because he looks like an alien.
He does, okay?
He looks like an alien.
And I know David Hogg famously said that, you know, aliens a hate speech word.
But in the midst of all this, it's like, yeah, I think people like you, and this is what pisses me off, actually, and this is where I want to kind of get your thoughts to end the conversation is what the hell are conservatives doing?
You know, I don't want Owen on my show because Owen's been deleted.
And it's like, okay, cool.
Well, then don't ask Jesus Christ into your heart because he was crucified.
I'm not here to not here to call you a savior.
I mean, you're more of a devil in a lot of people's eyes.
But it's like, as conservatives, when did everyone get so absolutely castrated that they, and just pee-whipped, you know, for lack of better words, that they can't just come out and say, look, we're fighting a common enemy.
We have different tactics.
But, you know, it's like somebody told me recently too, at an event, I went undercover as Antifa at my own protest, and they said, oh, what you're doing and your approach isn't good for the movement.
And I said, well, who made you the procurement and the curator of the conservative right-wing movement?
Who decided that you know what's best for the movement?
Isn't the movement just the Constitution?
Isn't the movement just sticking to the rights that we've already always had?
Haven't we gone by other names other than Republicans or right-wing or libertarians or centrists?
Does it matter what people call us, ban us, spin on us, hit us?
No, what matters is what we're fighting for.
And the fact that people are abandoning people and they're so afraid of their reputation that actually, I even saw, I'm not going to say who, but well, maybe, no, I'm not going to say who.
But somebody from a prominent group, after everyone was banned recently, was like, oh, this is the free market at work.
Shut the hell up.
This is a free market at work.
It's your stupid brain at work, you know, or not at work.
And so it's like, what do you think we do moving forward as conservatives to unite to fight this censorship and to make sure that we push through in 2020 to see that Donald Trump becomes or continues to be the 45th president of the United States of America?
Well, anybody who doesn't think your material is good for the movement or doesn't like your material is probably just jealous because they can't move the earth and your content can.
So that's just unbelievable.
But, you know, I think the sad story here, Elijah, is people have their livelihoods invested on these platforms.
And they realize that if they're removed from these platforms or kicked off these platforms and they've got nowhere else to go or they never had some sort of proprietary platform that they could kind of revert to and still have an audience there.
I think that that's what it is.
And so that's kind of the dangerous level here.
Which again, kind of you draw back to independence.
People are dependent now on these social media platforms.
So that's a very, very dangerous thing.
And, you know, as far as what can conservatives do, you know, I don't know.
I mean, like I said, I don't know if there's anything.
I mean, I guess the shareholders for these companies could act.
People could all just drop off and just leave Twitter or Facebook.
I mean, but I don't know if any of that's going to happen.
I think that they're too powerful.
They're too popular.
So there's going to have to be some sort of antitrust.
I mean, there is precedent for this.
I mean, Roosevelt's the famous example with the railroads.
The railroads said they would be shipping for all the companies.
So they got all these sweetheart deals and then they only started shipping with their friends.
And Roosevelt came in and said, uh-uh, you have to let everybody use your railroad.
So, I mean, it's the same type of precedent and principle that I think you can apply here to social media.
But hey, Roosevelt was the president.
He stepped in and he did something.
He didn't have Twitter or, you know, whatever to talk about it.
He wrote legislation.
So I don't know if Trump has any plans of that.
But, you know, when it comes to, we can leave it at this because my favorite, you know, obviously nobody here is comparing anybody to Jesus.
But when it comes to why Jesus was so powerful, it's because he was crucified for truth.
I mean, that's what it's all about.
It's all about realizing that there's something bigger than you.
And for you to sacrifice, the ultimate sacrifice being your life, but for you to make a sacrifice for something that's bigger than you as an example, that's the total victory.
That's what Jesus was all about.
So yeah, I mean, obviously, it's not like you're going to sit here and be crucified for having me on your channel, but that's you saying, no, look, I'm going to have Owen Schroy on my channel because I support free speech.
And if you're going to destroy me for it, if you're going to kill me for it, if you're going to take me down for it, then that's on you.
And I want the people to see that.
Just like Jesus wanted to see people to see him get crucified.
So he could say, yeah, look, they're killing me for this.
So that's really what it's all about to me.
But I understand people's livelihoods are invested on these platforms.
And that's why they have to think about it.
And they won't host people that they think will get them banned.
So it's sad that we've become so dependent on these social media platforms.
But I think that that has a big reason to do with it.
So we'll see.
We'll see what happens in the next year.
But I hope that you're still available because I like coming on your channel.
Let's test and let's see what YouTube does with this.
Because after all, I mean, you know, plenty of people, plenty of liberal outlets have Trump on and they hate him.
I hate your guts.
I hope you die.
And that's what I want to publicly say about you.
And I'm still having you on here.
You know, I'm doing a service to the world.
Well, yeah, yeah.
And I'm doing a service to the world.
And I mean, if Game of Thrones, that they could leave a coffee cup in one of the shots and actually make a mistake with Starbucks in one of their films.
Maybe this is my Starbucks moment.
Maybe you are the coffee cup that's sitting on the medieval table that was left in the shot when it shouldn't have.
Either way, I got to thank you so much, Owen.
You are a very beautiful woman.
Don't let anyone ever tell you differently.
You're flat-chested, but breasts are not what make beauty.
I just want to leave you with that wisdom.
Read it in a fortune cookie outside of Panda Express.
Don't ask me why I picked it up off the floor.
Owen Schroyer, ladies and gentlemen, you really can't find him much anywhere other than Infowars.com.
Make sure you check out their store, their merchandise, also their supplements.
I heard everyone's pushing Supermale Vitality.
Before we go, could you leave me and let me know what the hell is Supermale Vitality and why do we need it?
Well, see, Elijah, I got this problem because I like Supermale Vitality because it gives me the extra energy at the end of the day to get to the gym after a long day sitting in front of screens and stuff.
But I got this problem, Elijah.
I shave my beard every morning and then I take the Supermale Vitality and it just like grows back out.
And so, I mean, it's working too good.
Honestly, I'm going to have to go talk to the lab over there at the Infowars labs and say, this Supermale Vitality is working too good.
I've got too much vitality now.
So just be warned, you know, when you take the Supermale Vitality, it could be overwhelming toxic masculinity.
When you said I shaved my b, I didn't know we were going to say beard, and I'm so glad you did because that was going to be, there was something else I thought you were going to say.
But anyways, guys, make sure you like, share, subscribe.
Thank you so much for watching another episode of Slightly Offensive, the new podcast series that is powered by Blaze Media and the independent support of viewers and listeners like you.
Make sure you are also recognizing that there is an audio-only version on podcasts and Spotify.
And of course, if you are still living in the Middle Ages and use Android devices, we are working on getting it into the Google Play Store.
