Daniel Liszt and Olivia expose the alleged "Deep State" creation of a Disinformation Governance Board within DHS, led by Nina Jankowicz to suppress dissent under false migration narratives. They link this to unconstitutional Continuity of Government plans activated during the 2020 election chaos involving General Van Herk, while accusing the CIA and Pentagon of manipulating UFO files through the To The Stars Academy. The report further details claims of JFK assassination record suppression by the FBI and CIA, alongside a proposed 10% tax on tech giants to fund resistance against what they frame as a digital concentration camp threatening American liberty. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
Dark Journalist Special Report00:06:41
And we are live.
This is Dark Journalist.
What a fantastic crowd we have out there in the ideas room already.
And tonight we're going to do a special report here.
We're going to go in for about an hour on some of the really hardcore things that the Biden regime is pushing along the lines of surveillance and censorship.
And we're going to do it through that new disinformation governance board, the new ministry of untruth, as it were, that they're trying to rifle through while everyone's confused with all of this.
Roe v. Wade stuff that's in the air, and are they repealing that and so forth?
One of the kind of fascinating things that we see going on as well is a lot of firsts.
Like this is the first time the Supreme Court has ever leaked a decision in advance, for example.
So we're in some very kind of strange territory as we get into all these things.
And you can always say that, oh, well, this issue is worth going after, that one's worth going after, but The idea is to compound your attention deficit by overloading you and then rifle things through in the background.
And this is what we're going to get into tonight.
This is a special report, and it's all about the deep state moves in the background and their Ministry of Untruth that they're trying to bring forward.
And right in the middle of that, believe it or not, is the UFO file and the work of the Central Intelligence Agency to consolidate power for international finance groups that are controlling the United States and other democracies around the world.
So, we're getting into that tonight.
And, you know, this is the kind of report a lot of this stuff just couldn't wait with everything going on.
But also, I find it amazing because even though when we do the X series on Fridays, there's so many things that I leave behind because there's just a need for, you know, this incredible updates on a regular basis.
So, here we are.
A couple of things I wanted to get across right away is that there's a bill floating around out there, which is meant to reinforce this whole thing.
Around the Disinformation Governance Board.
And we're going to get into that bill and why it needs to be stopped in Congress and why they keep pulling the bill.
And it's very hard to get news around this bill because they're trying to do it sort of in the darkness of night.
You know, I wouldn't be surprised if they caused a number of kind of radical reactions to this whole Roe v. Wade overturning idea.
And then in the background, they passed this thing through some kind of mega session and then launched the domestic terrorism force.
So, you know, this is how they have us kind of.
Like a hamster on a wheel with all these stories.
First, you're in the COVID op, then you're into the Ukraine emergency.
Soon they'll have a nuclear emergency.
They've been very open about talking about that.
Of course, the UFO threat op.
There's a whole congressional piece that went through today, and I'm going to get into that as well.
Open sessions in the Senate Intelligence Committee, the threat, you know, the UAP threat, and Lou Elizondo giving commentary to disgraced writers at Politico and The Hill.
And it's interesting because one of the things I wanted to note is that one of those writers, Brian Bender, in fact, was one of the guys who gave me a hard time for pointing out all the inconsistencies around the To the Stars Academy, which he helped to launch by being the supportive measure, the supportive factor going on in the background for them.
And it was quite interesting because what happened with that whole thing was wild.
Because as we got into the entire mess around the lies that TTSA sold the public when they came out around the UFO file and the CIA launched this company, It was in fact Bender who backed them up, and then the New York Times was able to run that story and so on.
Now, this very same Bender writer is saying, well, you know, maybe we should have asked more questions.
And, you know, that was a shady outfit after all.
And, you know, all their answers are inconsistent.
So it's funny, you know, they don't go around three years later and come back to us and say, you know, hey, you're right on this.
They just kind of, you know, scurry off in the background when the op goes south.
That's the nature of central intelligence work.
And we need to keep that in mind.
And that's why when we call these things out and we get that big pushback, like, what's the big Problem with having CIA people in the UFO file.
That's the problem, they're masters of disinformation and they leave a lot of carnage and reputations on the carpet.
And I'll tell you, a lot of the reputations of people who were researching in the UFO file have been damaged really badly, and rightfully so, because they were clinging on to this whole promise of entertainment, documentaries, and TV shows and all the rest.
And they let the CIA basically prop up a phony media company.
So, we have to keep that in mind that it's not worth it.
And, you know, there's always that Benedict Arnold factor as well, which is what exactly are you doing by cooperating with groups like the Central Intelligence Agency, whose very purpose is to undermine any kind of rule of law, and who, in fact, act as an extra constitutional agency and, you know, are fundamentally, you know, a beacon of disinformation, just as they collaborate with the Department of Homeland Security and Stepford Biden on creating antidotes to disinformation.
That's why they're the Ministry of Untruth.
Not the ministry of truth.
But of course, we were warned about all this so many years ago by Orwell.
And guess what?
It turned out he was exactly right.
Isn't that fascinating?
How did he know?
I want to say that we're not going to be taking questions tonight.
We don't have the lovely Olivia, but we will have her coming up on the next show and we'll take your questions then.
We do have Kat out there doing a great job in the ideas room.
And I see a lot of great people out there tonight.
And the ideas room is vibrant as ever with the questions.
So Would definitely be getting into that next week.
I wanted to, a couple of things that have been going on in the background, I wanted to point out as these other stories have been so distracting you know, the Met Gala and Elon Musk and Twitter and all these things.
These are very interesting stories for sure, and they do get into the back and forth that's going on.
And yet, I feel like they are deep cover as well for a lot of these other things that are happening.
For example, This story just hit.
CDC Phone Tracking Scandal00:05:02
CDC tracked millions of phones to see if Americans followed COVID lockdown orders.
Totally illegal action.
Newly released documents showed the CDC planned to use phone location data to monitor schools and churches and want to use the data for many non COVID 19 purposes, too.
In other words, we have the cover of the COVID op, we get all the data, and then we use it for something else to track you for other purposes.
For example, to put you on a domestic terrorism hit list.
So that story is being widely covered now in the media.
There's just no way of getting around it.
Right on its heels, the FBI conducted millions of warrantless searches of Americans' data in 2021.
So, the CDC, one government agency overreach, number two, the FBI.
There's another one.
So, what's going on here?
These are all illegal, unconstitutional searches of our information, and yet no heads are rolling.
Nobody's being arrested.
There's no cases for it.
There's not even a hearing about this.
This is pretty major action.
And now we have to wonder, and here's where we're going to get into it.
What is it exactly that they're looking for in this data?
I think a lot of it comes down to who is going to give them a problem because what we're seeing across the board with the deep state takeover of these different countries is they're using people who have very low popularity.
Just look at Stepford Biden, for example.
He's 29% in the polls that favor him.
Okay.
Those are Democratic polls.
And Justin Trudeau, you know, somewhere around 22%.
These people with those types of majorities can't really.
Rule, they can't govern.
It's impossible if you have 20% of the vote to be able to do that.
So they're going to need to rely on emergency powers, and they get most of that through the continuity of government action of September 11th.
The September 11th action for emergency, which we're still under that emergency, is as hard as that is to believe.
We're still cooked completely in that exact same situation.
Even though we've gotten Republican presidents through there, Democratic presidents, you've had Obama, everyone said, hey, Obama's going to get rid of that for sure.
No, no, he doubled down on it.
And every year, when they sign the NDAA, which is the National Defense Authorization Act, boom, there we get all that money again, $800 billion.
As long as you have that emergency signature attached, you're going to get that money.
And that's the way it goes, whether it's Trump, Obama, or Bush, or Stepford Biden.
So they're all on board with that.
And you have to ask why?
Well, because when government gets that kind of ruling authority, they don't like to give it up.
So now all of these bills for domestic terrorism that we're seeing, That are being pushed so heavily by the government and the Biden administration are all coming out of the Department of Homeland Security.
Well, the Department of Homeland Security went from 10,000 employees to 250,000 today.
That's a quarter of a million people.
Think about it.
First of all, that's an extra constitutional agency as well, right off the bat.
And not to mention the fact that the Department of Homeland Security's original designation was to prevent terrorists from entering the country and protect.
The homeland.
And a lot of the idea was to change America from the United States to the homeland and then assign it a different constitution and use a number of different types of techniques, legal techniques, to accomplish this.
So we're finding ourselves right in the middle of that maelstrom.
And here we are 20 years or so after the September 11th attacks.
And these guys are ready.
All the same rules that they rolled out to prosecute extreme Muslims, Muslim terrorists, and extremists.
And all the unconstitutional, warrantless wiretapping and all that are now trying to be, they're trying to codify those into law as they distract us with this hysterical stuff on the side.
The question is, are we going to go for that or are we going to call it out?
And one of the ways we can call it out is by going after two central essential bills.
And on top of that, those are domestic surveillance bills.
And I'm going to get into them right now.
And then on top of that, the UFO threat aspect, which is what's coming on in the layer on top.
And not a lot of people are talking about that one.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Special Report.
It's great to be here with you all.
I'm not in the studio tonight.
I'm just broadcasting from home, and I wanted to make sure that we had this opportunity just to have a special report.
I want to remind everyone to go to darkjournalist.com and sign up for a newsletter.
That's the thing that keeps us in touch, regardless of all the incredible censorship that we've been watching, hands down across the board.
This is hardcore, and we're seeing people getting thrown left and right.
Off these platforms, and we have been for a while.
Shaking Down The Process00:13:19
And, you know, it is funny when Elon Musk went in there and said, I'm going to buy Twitter, everyone was like, All right, that means changes.
And they all start tweeting him, Hey, can I get my account back?
And, like, thank God you're restoring democracy.
And that's funny too, because he doesn't even have the company yet.
You know, I mean, he's getting there, but it takes a while.
And we have to be very careful about that type of attitude that somebody on that upper level is going to do it.
I'm all up for if we can get cooperation on higher levels, but.
Though all those things are controlled, especially when you get to space, you have some of the most controlled people, period.
And so, Elon's whole kind of romp here and like the phony fight with the left and all that can be dismissed pretty quickly as just wanting to get market share back because, um, you know, Getter and Truth Social and some of those other ones they're becoming the ones that are gobbling up this audience because the you know, the conservative audience, Christians, for example, um.
Conservatives, libertarians, that's huge and far outweighs the liberal members of the audience.
But the liberal members of the audience, and you can't even say liberal anymore because liberal, for example, John F. Kennedy was a liberal in his day, but he would call all these liberals fascists for the things that they do in trying to take away others' rights.
So we have to kind of keep our heads wrapped around this.
But in any case, the liberal control over the mouthpiece of social media, The press and all that, which comes directly out of that World Economic Forum control grid.
The deep state has decided they can use the liberals and they worked in them for a long time.
They took certain aspects of their intellect and they tricked them into thinking that they were smarter than the other groups that are in the country.
When you think you're smart, you're in trouble.
We've seen this over and over again.
They're looking down on these other, you know, the deplorables and all the rest.
Oh, what do they know about anything?
We don't need that constitution.
Those guys should all be put in gigantic camps and we'll just run things.
And this is the kind of MSNBC attitude.
And it's been frightening.
I mean, we've seen actual leaders like Justin Trudeau saying, let's make sure we don't tolerate those with views for medical freedom or whatever it is.
And how much hypocrisy can the country of Canada take before they just throw that guy out?
It's hard to say.
It's hard to say.
But they don't.
Even when they pulled the whole emergency powers action, when the truckers were taking over and really giving it to them, you know, that shows really that this is how they run things.
They can't get by without the emergency powers.
In fact, their popularity is so limited, there's no ability to govern.
And that's what we're looking at.
So let's look at some of the bills that they're using to thwart the system of democracy.
And of course, we've heard a lot about the disinformation czar, and she is quite a panic.
I'm going to try not to focus on her so, so much, but boy, what a character.
So, Homeland Security itself, this is how they're portraying this.
Let's start with this.
Department of Homeland Security Internal Working Group protects free speech and other fundamental rights when addressing disinformation that threatens the security of the United States.
I'm surprised they didn't say Homeland.
They don't like to say United States.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is charged with safeguarding the United States.
Hold on, that's the military's job under the Constitution provide for the common defense.
It's not really.
The Department of Homeland Security is extra constitutional in this sense, but anyway, against threats to its security, including threats exacerbated by disinformation.
What they call disinformation is anything that's against the regime.
And this is the nature of the problem.
And there's a certain regime in there that, you know, needs this kind of cover.
And they've thrown out a lot of loyalists and taken on a lot of people during this two decades of power.
And now the people that are embedded in there, a lot of them are Obama people, in fact, and they're all loyal to Stepford Biden for now, while his cognitive decline, you know, doesn't completely take him out.
So we're looking there at what they're trying to introduce with the Department of.
Of Homeland Security with this new Disinformation Governance Board.
And they're claiming that it's related, believe it or not, in here they say, well, Hurricane Sandy, for example, that would have been affected by disinformation.
They're trying to make these connections where there are none.
So if they don't like, for example, the way that I talk about the UFO file and the phony CIA threat around the UFOs, then that's disinformation and it's dangerous.
It's just as dangerous as Ukraine Russia war propaganda.
So, in fact, the country is based and has it ensconced in the Constitution, free speech.
It's right there.
It's the First Amendment, it's the number one most important thing.
So, this the founders understood and discovered, and they realized that without free speech, you don't get anywhere.
That's how the king locked people down.
So, by creating this system, they created this great leveling where the average person would have the ability to influence the government and could tell his fellow citizens what was going on.
Now, what we're looking at, they need to get rid of that mechanism.
And we've seen them squelch stories that were important, of course, in the last election, the Hunter Biden laptop story.
Now that's come out.
And this has been absolutely crucial data was left on the cutting room floor because Twitter and Facebook blocked it.
And so we got into a real crisis there of the Constitution.
That was a real red line when they prevented the New York Post from publishing the story on these platforms.
We didn't take the message then.
And now we're stuck with this.
Situation.
And now it is kind of a fight on a level that can be very dramatic because these people are desperate.
I believe that in their psychosis, they thought with the COVID op and the Ukraine war, they just take over.
And I think that's what's in the back of their minds.
But the problem is that all of them have sworn an oath to the Constitution.
And every aspect of government, from judges to presidents to senators to congresspeople, swear an oath to that.
Constitution.
So they have to change the meaning of free speech in these documents.
That's what they're going to try to do.
Let's look at some of the articles covering this because even the people that are on their side are shocked and dismayed at the arrogance of the push to just take away the ability for free speech so openly.
This one Biden establishes a ministry of truth.
This is out of the Wall Street Journal.
The Disinformation Governance Board already looks like a partisan instrument.
Yeah, it's a lot worse than that, but that's a good start.
Department of Homeland Security has announced the formation of the Disinformation Governance Board, charged, according to Politico, with countering misinformation related to Homeland Security.
See how this is how we can bring in Homeland Security.
Quarter of a million people doing illegal actions, doing surveillance on average citizens, moms who are complaining to teachers that they don't want their kids taught certain things, they're showing up on domestic terrorist lists.
This is how far these people are going.
And if they're not stopped, They're going to get down to basic levels, like, you know, having people in the grocery store spy on you.
Believe it or not, there's a plan for that.
I mean, as absurd as it sounds, it's true.
Department of Homeland Security has announced the formation of the Disinformation Governance Board, charged, according to Politico, with countering misinformation related to Homeland Security, focused specifically on irregular migration and Russia.
These are weird tricks.
They need, in order to pull in the Department of Homeland Security, immigration to somehow be related to it.
The next piece they need is, oh, Russia disinformation.
That way they can say, oh, we're protecting the homeland by shutting you, the average American citizen, up when you disagree with the policy of the Biden regime.
All right, next up.
In a twist too implausible for fiction, the abbreviation is DGB, one letter off from KGB.
Excellent point.
The stated goal of combating mis and disinformation is framed to seem unobjectionable.
Who objects to truth and pines for falsehood?
The DGB experts will guide the way, separating the informational wheat from the disinformational chaff.
But there's one small problem with empowering truth experts.
Experts are people.
Yeah, and in this case, fascist people.
People respond to incentives, therefore, experts respond to incentives.
And so on they go in here.
There's a couple of really good points in here.
The dangers of the DGB will be amplified if it becomes a tool of partisan political actors, and it already has.
Executive Director Nina Jankowitz, who You know, is showing up as the bimbo of the century.
But, you know, I think in a way they want that, you know, in a strange way, because then she can be the face of it.
Haha, you know, musical theater, scary poppins, and all these kinds of things.
And it's true.
She is a bizarre individual, but the thing in her background that fascinates me the most is that she was an aide and an advisor to the Ukrainian government.
Everywhere we go around major moves right now, we're seeing the Ukraine involved.
What is the meaning of that?
And how ensconced was.
The Biden political family with Ukraine, that every major move seems to be their power base is coming out of Ukraine.
That is very disturbing, as is the loose nuclear talk and the lack of a peace process from this government.
They're not interested in a peace process, and that's a really big problem.
Every single time you get into war situations, there's a massive peace process involved.
And, you know, look at the Palestinian war, and, you know, we've paid governments off before.
Let's think of Egypt.
You know, okay, we'll give you $5 billion.
Just stop getting into it with Israel.
Okay.
So Jimmy Carter goes over there, everybody shakes hands, and that's that.
And we continue to just dole out money to both sides.
All right.
For some reason, you know, bankrolling that situation for peace, that's one way to spend your money.
This is a little bit different.
And, but there's always a peace process involved.
You know, the Palestinian Israeli thing, as long as that's gone on, there's still a process.
With this war, they have incentives to keep it going.
And they want the emergency powers, one.
They want to weaken Russia.
This is their new policy through Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.
So these are all very disturbing factors just lingering in the background as we're doing this.
And then you're looking here at the disinformation czar and you're looking at this new office, which is supposed to crack down on dissent in the United States.
And you wonder to yourself, what's going on with this?
These are the same people who created this idea that the extremists and the Al Qaeda will put them on Gitmo and all that kind of thing.
But now the citizens of the United States are supposed to be stripped of those rights.
And so that we can be kind of put in our own little personal gitmos and the digital concentration camp and things of this nature.
So now the domestic terror bill takes its aim, you know, kind of directly from taking its cue from the 9 11 domestic terror acts.
And, you know, so now they're changing the Arab terrorist extremist into the citizen of the United States.
Now, a United States citizen, boom, forget it.
You are Al Qaeda.
And, you know, so that gives them the ability to do all these illegal searches that I referred to earlier.
This is really.
You know, those people that were engaged in those searches have to be prosecuted.
The Senate Intelligence Committee needs to stop all the work that they're doing, including the phony UAP threat briefings and all that, and say, who are those people that were facilitating those types of illegal searches of United States citizens?
And that's what needs to be prosecuted and moved forward.
And then when you do that, you're going to reveal the House of Cards that's trying to push this domestic terror bill.
So it's actually a race between can people get the knowledge?
In time, around who's been going into their private data from the CDC and from the FBI.
And can we prosecute those people before the domestic terrorism thing gets thrown into law because you have the Democrats running it?
And the Democrats have gone completely insane.
Now, I like to be independent on this program from Democrat or Republican.
And, you know, there's a lot of room in between, but those parties are dominated by warlike factions.
Mystery School Connections00:02:48
But the DNC is just becoming so close to the CCP.
And has such an influence of China that I consider them an enemy of the United States at this point.
So that's where we are with it.
So that's why we need to shake down that process.
Everyone, you're here for the special report of the Deep State.
And we're looking closely at the Deep State and the Ministry of Untruth that they're pushing with this Disinformation Governance Board, the DGB.
We're not taking your questions tonight.
We're going to go about another half hour here with everyone and just get some of this in.
It's really terrific and It was great being with everyone on Friday and doing the Mystery School show.
I'll tell you what's interesting is, and you guys all had great questions there.
What's fascinating to me is whenever we get around the Mystery School stuff, I find over and over again some of the main players on the political stage and the political establishment keep showing up directly related to those Mystery Schools.
And I think one of them that I didn't get around to last week.
Actually, it was Steve Bannon.
And Bannon's relationship to the Gurdjieff work is really fascinating.
And I think as we get more and more into these groups and which mystery schools and secret societies they're associated with, and remember, I think the majority of the mystery schools have it in mind to move the culture forward dramatically.
And I think that this is an important thing that separates them from the left hand schools and the secret societies who have a totally different purpose.
So, we have to be able to look at some of those groups that operate in a clandestine fashion in a different light than others.
And so, it really helps when we start to figure out who's who.
But it is fascinating to me because over and over again, I'll find, oh, this person's connected with this end of the mystery schools, you know, just like we found all the Podesta Crowley connections.
And that's all the left hand school side of things.
And you're going to find a lot of that operating in government as well.
Rudolf Steiner in 1919.
Actually, said that the political process at that time was basically the same players who were involved in all the mystery schools on the right hand path and on the left hand path.
So, you're getting people with this very sophisticated, almost supernatural occult knowledge, but some of them are operating to move the culture forward, and others are basically trying to make the world one big occult trap.
And with things like the Met Gala, it seems like they just parade those symbols out there loudly.
It's almost like they want to be called out for it.
Right Hand Path Players00:15:41
It's getting pretty strange, let's face it.
All right.
I want to remind you also to go to darkjournalist.com and sign up for our newsletter.
Because that keeps us in that communication.
That's a free newsletter.
You get it in your email basically, mostly once a week.
And this is going to let you know what incredible shows and interviews and documentaries that we have coming up for you here in May.
It's going to be a stellar month with some big surprises.
So make sure that you stand up and be counted and make sure you're on that list.
Okay.
I couldn't resist the Scary Poppins shot of Nina Jankowicz, but there she is.
I know that in some ways, This doesn't really go to individuals.
And I'm not going to make it a habit just to hang around and to make fun of Nina Jankowicz because it's going to be too easy.
But I do want to say that when you get this 33 year old person who's been working with the Ukrainian government and who says that there is no deep state, I mean, that's ridiculous.
Look, get to work, do some homework, Nina, study the work of Professor Peter Dale Scott.
By the way, he's a left coast liberal.
So it's not exactly like you're talking about a conservative here.
He's the one who invented the term for deep state.
Okay, so for sure there's a deep state.
Where are you getting that?
And the kind of brainwashing inside that Biden administration is beyond absurd.
But also, let's face it, that administration is going down.
It's one of the most incompetent of all time.
Some of the worst players I've ever seen Secretary of State Blanken, who oversaw the disastrous route running out of Afghanistan and the Russian route of the Ukrainians rolling in.
So these are people.
Who were political hacks and political insiders and wanted to get into the feeding trough of all this money circulating, but they don't have the chops to deal with the real foreign policy of the United States.
And it's getting to be a very dangerous situation with the likes of Lloyd Austin, for example, who's more interested in what religion that his soldiers practice than protecting the country.
And frankly, it's none of his business if a soldier has a particular Christian identification or identifies with a different religion.
It's just none of his business at all.
And we need to keep that in mind.
But yeah, you know, a disinformation czar, terrible idea.
And the idea that we have this like weird musical theater flunky who has visions of fascism and sucking up to this fascist administration, it's a pretty bad scene.
So we need to smash the Disinformation Governance Board.
Every congressman, every senator needs that letter.
And let me tell you, in Washington, there's one thing I know they all read their mail.
So, send that letter and just tell them you're out.
But it's already starting to collapse because this is an interesting thing, too, because as the Biden administration is going down in the polls, they're doing more and more things to pull the attention into different places.
You notice that they reinstated the press dinner, and they went up there into this kind of terrible routine of hanging out there and ignoring and making jokes about the inflation and people getting thrown out of their homes.
I mean, this is the most tone deaf organization and administration I've ever witnessed in my lifetime.
Been following politics at least a couple of decades here.
So, you know, this is really a serious situation, and we're in some pretty bad hands.
And the best way that I think we can stop them in their tracks, basically, is to get the word around.
They're trying to slip in this domestic terror bill in the background.
Let's go to the domestic terror bill.
Now, there was a guy out there, a senator from Tennessee.
And one of the points that he made is really fascinating Disinformation board may be illegal and require a vote of Congress, Senator Tails, Department of Homeland Security.
Yeah.
That's the Congress.
That's actually the Constitution, okay?
The Biden administration's new Disinformation Governance Board, the DGB, may be illegal and subject to a vote in Congress.
A Republican senator is warning Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.
In a letter to Mayorkas Monday, Senator Bill Haggerty outlined a legal critique that could set in motion the board's undoing.
It should smash that board.
We need to get rid of that board immediately.
As the White House sought to tamp down public concern about Big brother like panel and its controversial head who has her own past of spreading disinformation.
Exactly.
Nina, the joke, Scary Poppins, she's also been guilty of pushing misinformation, including saying, hey, you know, all the Russian disinformation of the laptop, the Hunter Biden laptop, has been confirmed by 51 intelligence officials, including all of these CIA directors.
Well, they were really hardcore to do that because they wanted to do anything to get President Trump out.
And That whole piece is a huge scandal because all of those 51 CIA officials are still on record saying that the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation.
But even the New York Times and the Washington Post is like, well, no, really, it was the real thing.
So those people never came back and apologized.
And there's no accountability.
This is the problem in society now.
It's just like people say crazy stuff and that's it.
They retreat.
Pay them off.
Bring John Brennan in here.
Here's a million dollars.
Just say some nonsense.
BS about this and put it on the record.
And we'll quote you.
And then when you prove to be wrong, there's no process inside that media for saying, hey, this guy lied in public, shouldn't be trusted again.
And we don't want to see him show up on MSNBC or wherever else somebody like that can get a show.
Not that anybody even watches MSNBC except brainwashed people around here in Cambridge do.
And, you know, it's unfortunate.
It's very unfortunate.
Haggerty wrote that the board may violate the Anti Deficiency Act.
Which says the executive branch can't spend money unless Congress authorizes it and that its creation also may be subject to the Congressional Review Act.
Absolutely.
He nailed it.
This thing's illegal.
No congressperson should vote in favor of it.
If they do, then pretty much every congressman and senator should know that their neck is on the line for the vote in November 2022 and that they're going to go down.
They're going to lose votes as a result of that.
And then maybe they'll look at this and they'll say, you know, Stepford Biden is in the 20s in the polls anyway.
Why should I get behind this ridiculous Big Brother thing?
The DGB, this Disinformation Governance Board, likened by Republicans and also some left wing and libertarian critics, I want to point that out.
The Glenn Greenwalds and the Matt Taibis, they know that this thing is BS too.
So, this is not a right left issue.
This is free speech versus a psychotic Orwellian organ that's going to walk around and make sure that Facebook gives all that information, all of the things that you've been posting.
I'm sure they already are.
The board would be led by Nina Jankowicz, a disinformation expert.
How exactly do you get to be a disinformation expert?
Who repeatedly cast doubt on the Post reporting on documents from Hunter Biden's laptop.
She was clearly wrong.
Washington Post and the New York Times belatedly have verified the Post story about the Hunter Biden laptop.
She has also come under fire for her own postings on social media, including a TikTok in which she jokes about free speech and fake news in a parody of the Mary Poppins classic, Supercalifragilistic Expletosis.
So she's really, you know, this is somebody in way over her head, right?
She's a 33 year old.
And, you know, she could be somebody that with the right background, if she understood that there's a deep state and all this other stuff, sure.
But instead, she's just a bubblehead, somebody that they grabbed out of musical theater school and, you know, somehow got her on this track.
And now the Biden administration is using this kind of, you know, bimbo factor and they go in there.
And so they've got, you know, and Blinken's a bimbo too, don't get me wrong.
And Lloyd Austin is a bimbo.
This is just the entire administration is just.
A complete, you know, it's one of the worst administrations I've seen.
And you can't, you try to look down the line to find who's holding the line in this administration.
You can't find anybody.
It's certainly not Jen Psaki.
I think that she's been running the organization of the administration for a long time.
But even she's going to jump ship because how long can you stand up there and just lie to defend this ridiculous administration?
And, you know, you look to the vice presidents, you look to the transportation secretary, Buttigieg.
I mean, come on, this is some of the worst characters that we've ever seen in government.
So, but this board would be really a bridge too far.
It would take us really into the dark ages, and we have to really make sure that this doesn't happen.
Quote, establishment of this board will significantly impact Americans' free speech and rights and cuts across numerous areas of government and society, Hagerty wrote to Mayorkas.
Hagerty gets it.
Hagerty has it on spot.
And the Department of Homeland Security head, Mayorkas, this guy is just, you know, he wants to see, he's got a quarter of a million troops out.
There.
This guy is getting delusions of grandeur.
He wants more and more power, more and more control, more and more of a seat at the table at Davos.
So these are the types of people that need to be cut off by the fact that there's no public support and that the public is calling them out.
And when the politicians see their polls going down over this, they're going to jump ship on it.
And Stepford Biden is going to be sitting there with his 20% approval and he's going to be sitting there with his weird delusions over Orwellian grandeur and he's not going to be able to pull it off.
This is a crucial factor.
It will also substantially increase administrative costs for the number of different.
Federal agencies engaged in this effort, which will impose increased costs on American taxpayers.
Look, you've got housing costs that have risen 24%, which are putting people in the street.
We've just sent $33 billion more to Ukraine, which, let's face it, is not a country where we have a strategic interest and probably is a country where by trying to force NATO in there, we provoked a reaction from Russia.
And I don't approve of the actions of Russia in Ukraine.
And I think they should get out and there should be a deal on the table for them to get out.
But at the same time, you know, even the Pope, all right, this Pope, who we know has really been in the tank for the New World Order, he knows also that this is going on too long and there needs to be a peace process.
Look at this.
Pope says NATO may have caused Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Even this Pope is catching on to that.
Okay, so this is just, you know, that end of the war is a disgrace, as is making Zelensky a hero.
You know, Zelensky is just an actor.
This guy's worth $500 million.
I mean, this is insane.
And, you know, they just threw him into office.
We knew also that in 2014, the CIA went in there and the Central Intelligence Agency.
What is it that they're good at?
They're good at causing coups.
They did it here in 1963.
Remember John F. Kennedy.
I'm going to get to something new that came out about President Kennedy, but he was taken out of office by the Central Intelligence Agency.
It's 60 years later.
This is still what these guys are good at.
So, and they're also great at getting us into trouble.
Let's not forget weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
Well, where did that really come from?
George Tenet.
And what did he say?
Oh, that intelligence is a slam dunk.
Well, did we ever find any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?
No.
So we sent all those people in there, spent all that money, all those American lives, over 4,000 soldiers, American soldiers died in that war, untold Iraqi civilians.
For what?
Because the CIA had a relationship with the oil companies.
This is the nature of the government aspect, why we need to understand the deep state and go in deeper.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Special Report.
Great crowd, unbelievable crowd here for a Tuesday night.
And there's so many things in this report that I'm glad we have the opportunity to do this.
And I want to remind you while we're here to go to darkjournalist.com and sign up for a newsletter that keeps us in touch.
And it's a free newsletter and it allows us to have that update back and forth and feedback loop back and forth with you guys, just in case the social media companies, which have shown that incredible fascist censorship tactic, if these guys get You know, in mind, if it starts to boil down to, oh, the Ukraine thing's failing, the COVID thing is failing, and all the rest, then they're going to get rid of any dissident voices.
We've seen all kinds of things about the social media companies deplatforming people, you know, consortium news, their payment processor took them out.
You know, that was something that was founded by Robert Perry and a lot of the people who questioned 9 11.
And this gets us into some of the fundamental rules about dark journalism that I've pointed out over and over again.
One of them is, That you have the official story in the case of 9 11.
These hijackers got on a plane with box cutters and took down an air defense system that had been set up to avoid nuclear war.
That's the United States air defense system had been set up during the Cold War.
That means you couldn't thwart it with some hijackers.
It wasn't going to happen.
But the official story is that some guy in a cave controlled these people to do that.
All right.
And took down the biggest military in the entire world.
So, and we know, in fact, there are so many inconsistencies 20 years later around that story.
It just doesn't hold up at all, the official story.
The secondary story a lot of professors, including Professor Peter Dale Scott, a lot of writers, researchers, credible people went into it and said, here's a lot of the things that actually happened, including a lot of weird stock movements in the background while this was going on relating to airlines and Homeland Security.
Style equipment because they created Homeland Security directly out of the 9 11 attacks.
And it's relevant now to speak of 9 11 because Homeland Security is the ogre in the room that just keeps growing and growing.
It's like Jabba the Hutt.
And it's got a quarter of a million employees.
It's getting fatter and fatter.
Now it wants the disinformation board.
You know, this thing just, they want to basically control the United States through the idea of protection and that you'll be safe.
We will protect you.
So, over and over again, we need to step back and take a look and say, well, how did we get into this?
What is it exactly that took place here?
And the Department of Homeland Security is a good place to start.
Fundamentally, conversations like the one that we're having here is what they're trying to stop.
And we have to remember that and keep that in mind.
So, yeah, definitely the newsletter helps because it creates that flow without worrying, oh, you know, is this company going to shut me off?
Government Mistakes Revealed00:16:20
You know, is this platform going to be here?
And people are always amazed.
They're like, wow, it's amazing we can still find you.
Well, look, my way of looking at it is I'm going to keep doing what I do.
And the platforms, you know, I think fundamentally, you know, They eventually are going to have to wake up to the fact that people, especially Americans, Americans founded, okay, on free speech.
And, you know, other countries follow our lead on that.
But Americans in particular have a thing about it because it's in the Constitution.
It's how the revolution started, in fact.
So when you get down to that really core point and you're looking at it and you say, look, You know, free speech is fundamental.
What is it these social media companies have tried to do?
Twitter tried to deplatform everybody who was talking about, you know, alternative medicine and who were talking about alternative political scenarios and all the rest.
Get rid of this person, get rid of that person.
Facebook does the same thing.
Plus, they take all your data and they give it to the FBI and they give it to the CDC illegally.
Those are illegal actions.
Eventually, there's going to be some kind of class action lawsuit.
So, we're already seeing a lot of the stories that they've been laying out there.
So, it's a kind of a race.
The idea is, Can they get their system in place with a very small portion of the public?
Again, I know that people think, oh my God, everybody's gone crazy and all the rest.
Actually, I believe that the numbers around 25% of support for this administration reflect more of what's going on there, just like Justin Trudeau 22%.
These are very small, small controlling numbers.
And what they're trying to do is get a system in place so that.
They can't be touchable.
And the way that you do that, as we've laid out so much on this program, is the continuity of government rules, especially in America.
But the continuity of government rules can go global, as we've seen.
They've talked about instituting continuity of government in Ukraine and in Canada.
So they like this idea.
And fundamentally, just to reflect quickly on COG look, COG was put in place to create a gigantic underground establishment of a government in the event of a nuclear war in the 1950s.
Now, when we take that infrastructure over time, what happens is it gets out of the way of responsible leadership under the presidential umbrella and it gets into clandestine hands.
And the way that it shows up is that every time there's a deep event, which is something that Professor Scott has pointed out, whether it was Watergate or Iran Contra or 9 11 or even the coup of 2008, people associated with continuity of government always show up in the middle of it.
That goes all the way back to the Kennedy administration.
So that group has its representatives.
And for a long time, you couldn't even say the word COG in Congress.
And then sometime around 2020, during the COVID thing, they started to love this.
Nancy Pelosi was talking about it every day.
I had a quote here, which was from 2020, because somebody had mentioned to me, because I said Nancy Pelosi was talking about COG being in place.
And they said, Where did you hear that?
So, I have about 14 different sources.
I'm going to show one tonight.
This news article is Nancy Pelosi says continuity of government in place after Trump tests positive.
This story, I'm telling you, this is what took place there in October of 2020 is that they wanted, when Trump supposedly got COVID, they wanted that to be continuity of government takeover.
They weren't sure that the election chaos idea was going to work.
They wanted this other thing.
And they had installed this other figure.
Who General Van Herk, who they felt was a better make.
And what's interesting is the defense secretary at the time, Mark Esper, he was somebody that Trump fired after the election.
This is a very unusual thing.
Why would you fire a defense secretary after an election?
Well, this guy was involved with that plot to organize and activate continuity of government.
And that continuity of government was supposed to put Van Herk in charge of Northcom in case they just could not pull off the other things to remove Trump.
And you remember.
Even when they said, oh, well, Trump lost the election, we're doing this recount and all this other stuff.
When that was happening, you had figures like Brennan and all the rest coming out and saying, you know what?
In fact, we should call the 25th Amendment on this guy because we have to get him out.
He might do something dangerous between here and January 20th when he's supposed to leave.
And that was interesting because General Milley, in a quite anti constitutional fashion, he called up China and he was like, don't worry, we'll prevent Trump from doing any bad things.
So, don't you worry about it, okay?
I mean, what kind of a general does that?
There's something weird going on at that level of the Pentagon.
You may have recently seen the Pentagon spokesman crying over Ukraine.
Look, there's laws to cry about over Ukraine.
But as the Pentagon spokesman, I don't think that's a good image to reflect out to the world of a teary eyed leader of the press conference.
And we're kind of looking at a situation where this government.
Looks like they've been co opted.
And I think we're getting closer and closer to seeing those factors.
And there's no question that the DGB, this Disinformation Governance Board, these people don't want to be called out.
They want to get rid of independent media.
They want to get rid of this conversation, in fact.
And that's a fact.
One of the interesting things about that as well is all the things that I mentioned about Consortium News and Mint Press News and all these other groups.
And now they're going after payment processors.
Remember, they did this with WikiLeaks.
That's how they got WikiLeaks in trouble in the first place.
And then about three or four years later, they took him and physically put him in prison.
But the first thing was shut off the money.
Well, no wonder we don't really trust digital money.
And no wonder the Solari group is so interested in Cash Fridays because when you or I lay that $100 down, it's worth $100.
But if you're a political dissident, you have digital money, you're out.
And if they don't want you to buy pizza, you're not going to buy pizza.
So those are the political realities while we're under the Stepford Biden regime.
We can get rid of this regime ultimately.
And certainly, I do think, although a lot of people are saying, look, elections don't matter and all the rest of it, I understand that.
And I understand the cynicism around it too.
Don't get me wrong.
However, I do think that a change in leadership into 2022 would be huge.
And that's what we need to shoot for.
Okay, more.
Now we're going to go into the UFO threat aspect of this.
And let me tell you if you think the news has been weird on the Supreme Court side, wait till we get into the Senate intelligence briefing on UFOs.
I already mentioned that Brian Bender, who was the one at Politico who facilitated the TTSA story through the New York Times by confirming it by checking in with a corrupt official at the Pentagon who had been thrown out of the Pentagon afterwards for being bribed, bribery.
Okay?
That's the way that string went.
That's the backstory behind the New York Times UAP Lou Elizondo TTSA story.
It's CIA placing corrupt officials and using.
Journalists, you know, and saying, Here, I'm giving you this big lead.
And then those journalists saying, Well, you know, you sure I can trust this?
And they're like, We're the CIA.
And also, when we do the TV shows, guess what?
You're going to get a big part.
And so they did that with a lot of those journalists that supported that original story.
That story had so many holes in it about, you know, this disgruntled guy named Lou Elizondo, and he's come out of the Pentagon.
And even though he's a former CIA guy, you can still trust him, and, you know, he's going to give the word on UFOs.
That whole thing in the Pentagon story, which came out December 16th, 2017, about UFOs, and the New York Times finally said, Aha, you know, we're going to go forward with this, was because they had something in place for a UFO threat operation.
And that operation was supposed to be pulled off under Hillary Clinton, President Hillary Clinton, believe it or not.
What a terrible ring that has to it.
They weren't able to pull it off.
That's the thing.
Now we have Hillary's understudy, Kirsten Gillibrand, the senator from New York, whose family is very close with British Aerospace One, BAE, and then the Nexium cult as well.
Keith Bernier, who went to jail for 40 years in prison for his bizarre sex cult and all the abuse of all the people that they pulled in.
And they pulled in a lot of Hollywood people and politicians and all the rest.
So, a lot of questions around Gillibrand and her ability to be blackmailed.
Her partner in this is a Republican, Rubio, who we also know at times there are a lot of weird stories that come up about him.
So, in fact, what you're looking at are maybe two of the most blackmailable senators on the Senate Intelligence Committee.
And that's a problem.
That's a real problem.
Okay.
Let's take it from here.
UFO briefings on Capitol Hill have begun.
Lawmakers aren't impressed.
Okay.
That's the story today from Politico.
And it is, in fact, Bender, who, again, He was the one who initially confirmed the New York Times story.
That's how that whole thing got rolling.
And remember, it was only as I started the show off, it was only two days ago that Bender said, You know, we probably should have asked more questions.
TTSA, Yeah, we should have asked him more questions.
You know, it turned out a lot of things they said were misleading.
Oh, gee, wow.
A lot of people who pointed it out at the time got a lot of flack for doing that.
So I guess guys like Bender now should go back and apologize.
Okay, lawmakers receiving the latest secret briefings on UFOs say national security agencies still aren't taking seriously the reports of highly advanced aircraft of unknown origin violating protected airspace.
Now, look, they take UFOs seriously.
They just don't want to talk to the public about them.
That's the position of the government.
They're behind a wall of secrecy.
They've been working with this stuff for years.
They certainly take it seriously.
The idea that, oh, there's this group and they're freedom fighters.
They want everybody to take things seriously for UFOs is to rally a group of people that they've measured out there.
Because in 2018, the top search on Google was UFOs.
And they figured out we can utilize that demographic.
How do we do it?
Because only a few years before that, they were looking at the situation and they were saying, oh, no, there are no UFOs.
In fact, the CIA made that stuff, you know, and they were putting out their own press releases.
That's one of the first tweets by the CIA was that we did it.
We were the ones who did it.
We're the ones who made UFOs.
And then it all changed.
Then the whole track changed, and we got this thing.
And we have a really weird group.
Originally, it was the UAP task force.
And the idea was oh, there's a terrible threat.
We need money to combat the aliens.
And that didn't fly so well.
And their report basically went over badly.
Then you've had Lou Elizondo, who comes out of this op, and he's been floundering around.
You know, he has a book deal now and he's had shows and stuff like that, but he's been floundering around.
He's been making a lot of mistakes.
And so I think now they're trying to think can we do this more official thing with Gillibrand and Rubio and really pull this over, pull this UFO threat aspect?
And a lot of this was being pushed during the COVID piece.
So let's remember that too.
While you were locked down in your house, you were supposed to be fed this steady diet.
And they wanted to get the marketing data on what was going on with these people.
What were they thinking?
Hmm.
You know, are we in trouble on this UFO thing?
Can we actually scare people with the UFO threat idea?
This is kind of important.
Members of the Senate Intelligence Committee and Armed Services Committees received classified progress reports in recent weeks on a series of new data collection efforts.
The Pentagon and spy agencies are now required to pursue to more rigorously investigate reports of UFOs.
Three people with direct knowledge confirmed.
Yeah.
I mean, whoever you're talking to, they're the same people who said TTSA was legit.
So come on.
It's not exactly like you have any credibility left, Mr. Bender.
One of those lawmakers is Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a member of both committees, who's called the phenomena an urgent issue.
Why is it an urgent issue?
Do you have some background, Senator Gillibrand, in UFOs?
Is it because your husband's dad was in British airspace intelligence?
Does he know something?
Is that why?
Like, what makes it urgent?
Exactly.
I mean, we on the ground know that all of these UFO cases have been going on for years.
It's you guys that have ignored it.
But what is it?
That is making you guys UFO experts.
What makes Senator Rubio a UFO expert?
What makes the UFO threat so attractive to these people?
This is what I want to get at.
And it's really becoming very important to figure out what is it that they're getting out of it?
Why are suddenly these yo-yos who are in the Senate and Congress fascinated by UFOs when they never said anything about it until a year or two ago?
What's up with that?
Gillibrand believes that the DOD needs to take this issue much more seriously to get in motion, said one of her aides.
They've had ample time to implement these important provisions.
And so, you know, it goes around in this big circle.
One of the couple of things that are interesting in this article, though, is there's a movement away from this TTSA version of the threat, and they're trying to move into a Senate Intelligence Committee version of the threat.
So I think that the Bobo aspect of like the Tom DeLong, And the way that intelligence uses these people.
They're ready to cut strings on that.
They're still looking at Elizondo and thinking, oh, this guy, you know, he's making a lot of mistakes.
Maybe we don't need him either.
The office, which is supposed to, this is the.
They created two offices for this.
One of them, which is the most ridiculous name in the world, the ASRO is the Anomaly Surveillance and Resolution Office.
Okay, that's just basically a way of saying, look, you know, we'll have a way to say to the public that we are keeping up with your concerns.
But then in the middle of that, they came up with AOIMSG.
And, you know, it just.
It's like this weird thing.
Whenever you try to get into the UFO file, look, the UFO file is the biggest secret of the U.S. government.
There's no question about it.
And it's because of the X technology that's involved.
They've been keeping that secret for over 75 years.
And the Central Intelligence Agency, in fact, was born in post war conditions largely around the idea that we can contain this information and keep it secret as well as dealing with international finance.
That's where the Central Intelligence Agency's main protocols came up because.
Originally, when the UFO file aspects hit, a lot of the government people didn't know anything about it, but there were groups that understood about it because they'd been tracking this stuff.
UFO Threat And X Tech00:05:47
There was a major crash actually in Missouri in 1941, and Harry Truman was the senator that oversaw that entire case.
So they knew it was up long before our friend Kenneth Arnold came in and said, I saw these crafts, which, by the way, look more like boomerangs.
They don't look like saucers, but somehow that saucer thing stuck.
And that's the way it goes.
Arnold's sighting was legit, and what he was watching were these advanced crafts.
And some people can say, look, you know, the advanced craft aspect, we might be looking at this, you know, it could be off world, sure.
But let's face it, we have the X technology in house as well.
And so we have the ability to put forward these things and make them, you know, seem like they're otherworldly.
So you're always dealing, when you're dealing around these things, Is it ours or is it theirs?
And for sure, I think that we can confirm there's off world aspects to this, but there's so much X technology that we possess that a lot of these craft could, in fact, be things that we're making.
Let's go a little bit further with this because this just came out today and it's all about the Senate Intelligence Committee briefing on UFOs.
The office, which is supposed to be fully operational by June, was granted the authority to pursue any resource, capability, asset, or process to investigate unidentified.
Aerial phenomena.
Some of that language is strange too.
Really?
Any resource, any capability?
Is that part of that surveillance that they've been going there, the illegal FBI surveillance we cited earlier?
The Pentagon office is supposed to be developing an intelligence collection and analysis plan to gain as much knowledge as possible.
And, you know, they have their traditional thing oh, we're looking for this and we hope to be sharing some exciting facts with the public and all the rest.
In fact, what we're seeing is they've been trying to build a UFO threat.
They've been trying to build a funding corridor for that UFO threat.
But for some reason, with the failure of the COVID op and with the Ukraine situation, positioning that UFO threat has become difficult.
That and the fact that the people they had relied on, like the to the stars academy people, Jim Semivan, and all the CIA people, were supposed to carry this across the front line, you know, across the goal line.
And what happened was instead, DeLong and Elizondo, a lot of people really started to look at them and say, you know, these people aren't playing with a full deck.
And so that part of the op has stumbled a lot.
So now they're fractioning off the op in a few different directions.
However, the UFO threat op is extremely dangerous because they have the technology to fake an alien threat.
And I don't think that there is any threat from off world visitors.
You can't say that in the world of galaxies there aren't any threats out there, but we haven't seen any threat from the craft that we've been observing, I'll put it to you that way.
And so this idea of overlaying it with an extreme threat aspect or with this idea that, hey, you know, these saviors are coming in to save our environment.
Which is the Avi Loeb trip.
You know, Avi Loeb's little astrophysicist lab is like five minutes from here.
And this guy has been putting forward, he's a member of the Israeli version of the CIA.
Okay.
And so he's always been working under that intelligence window.
But his fundamental idea, and he's been given a lot of credence, is that things like Amua Mua that have floated into our solar system are alien craft being piloted by AI.
And that we need to get our own AI up to snuff so we can communicate with that.
And you can just imagine how that would go.
The probe would say, You're destroying your environment.
You need to tax everybody with a carbon tax.
And I'm all for cleaning up the environment.
I've put this across over and over again.
But the idea that this is something that the corporations aren't responsible for look, they're the ones who made the incredible profits from it.
And there's a whole ridiculous thing around Tesla and SpaceX as well.
And all the things, the incredible destruction to the environment from those companies.
And then you've got Amazon and all the rest of it saying, we need to like fix the environment.
You know, you guys destroyed it to become billionaires and you've sold it to us that way.
So I think we should call out the thing about the environment.
I think over and over again, we see on the alternative side, whenever we get around the environment or, you know, climate change and all the ops that they've put in, but we get, Away from the idea that some of this stuff is real for sure.
I mean, look, they've done nuclear testing in the atmosphere.
Has that not damaged the atmosphere?
Yeah, but who was responsible for those tests?
And the corporations that have sold and made these mass profits and all the rest of it, and they went to China, you know, because they could get away with all these regulations being thrown out the window and getting slave labor.
I mean, who's responsible for this destruction and who has the money to pay for it?
It's real obvious.
Those corporations.
Have that.
I mean, Apple has $40 billion on their balance sheet sitting there, not doing anything.
It's not reinvested.
And, you know, you think about that and you think about the massive impact that these companies have had on an environmental level, those are the people who should be paying for it.
I'll tell you what 10% tax on all of those super corporations, especially the tech ones, Facebook, Apple, and all the rest, they've made the environmental problem get them to pay.
Corporate Tax Proposals00:04:45
Then I guarantee you they'll shut up about it really quick.
And the idea of a carbon tax will.
Disappear very quickly.
By the way, so many breakthrough energies have been available that a lot of this discussion is absurd because they've just been creating this environmental problem by hugging that whole oil economy.
And that's just not an economy.
Look, if you really go back into it and if you look at Tesla's grasp and what he said he could beam wireless energy the way you can beam wireless communications, we wouldn't have any of these problems.
So it's them wanting to maintain this hegemony and that dominant position in society.
That's been the major problem.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Special Report.
We've been going deep on Biden's DGB, and this is the Disinformation Governance Board.
Sounds a lot like the KGB, doesn't it?
They're trying to rifle this through with their low approval ratings and just hoping that through emergency powers and domestic terrorist bills and all the rest of it, they can get enough power to accomplish the aim of locking down society.
And in the background, there is a big push saying, you know, even on the inside of that establishment, they're like, I'm not so sure this communist part is going to work anymore.
Let's go out there with Musk and drum some.
Different thing up.
Let's create this idea that there's somebody really interested in free speech and get people to latch onto that and somehow figure that aspect out.
I think there's a real, honest to goodness, genuine split in there.
And I do believe that all those groups believe in that kind of dominance aspect, but I feel that they have different ways of accomplishing it.
And I think that the COVID group has embarrassed them, and the Fauci types have embarrassed the upper establishment.
I also think that they're ready to cut some of those people.
And so either they retire or, you know, they could kind of be in line for some kind of an accident happening.
You know, just it's one of those things.
Wouldn't it be unfortunate if you or your family would have some kind of an accident, Mr. Fauci?
So that's New York language.
I'm sure he understands that.
All right.
A couple of interesting things on the domestic terror bill.
And I want to identify this bill and how we can help.
Oppose it.
House Judiciary Committee Republicans vote against important domestic terror legislation.
Yeah, it's important to Chairman Gerald Nadler.
Okay.
And a lot of these guys are deep in the soup.
They need to get this domestic terrorism thing across.
With a chance to confront the rise in domestic terrorism, Republicans talk tough but act soft.
And then they go into a whole bunch of BS around the J6 thing.
But what's interesting about this is Chairman Nadler says, Republicans have once again showed their true colors when it comes to domestic terrorism.
Look, I don't think, I think that the Republicans generally, just the fundamentals in the background, their actual voter demographics believe in the Constitution.
This is the nature of what Republicans are about.
And so I think that even if it's a cynical move on the part of some of these Republicans, they're much more inclined to go with what the Constitution is about.
And that's a huge split from this group, the DNC group, which has been taken over by this Chinese communist influence.
They want to throw and get rid of that and put in the social credit system.
That's the new constitution for them.
And that's the kind of control wave they think they can do here.
Trying to do China in the United States doesn't fly.
You might make it fly in certain cities, and certainly they've created a lot of problems, but they're not going to be able to make that fly in the country.
At large, because the country is fundamentally set on the Constitution.
It's been bent, it's been broken.
There's been so many rules that have been, you know, and laws that have been disobeyed.
But fundamentally, this is a constitutional republic.
So, therefore, trying to roll in these domestic terror bills, which are completely unconstitutional, if they're found out and exposed, then those people who swear an oath to uphold the Constitution are in a They're in a problem, they're in a quagmire, and that's what we need to be able to push that across.
Challenging Redacted Records00:09:53
And Nadler, for sure, is somebody who's deep on that.
But let's see.
You know, I had one other thing about this bill.
Hang on just a second.
You're watching the Dark Journalist Special Report, everybody.
It's a great crowd out there tonight.
And we have Kat running the ideas room, doing a great job.
We'll go about five more minutes here.
All right, I'm going to get briefly into this a couple of interesting, very interesting things that came up.
Around President Kennedy.
Now, there's somebody out there, a very interesting lawyer, who is actually suing the National Archives now.
This is an interesting thing.
JFK assassination records lawyer sues National Archives working on a complaint against President Biden.
Watch how this rolls.
A lawyer has filed a lawsuit against National Archives in an attempt to obtain the underlying correspondence and memos relating to the decisions of Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden to postpone the release of the JFK records six decades after the event.
Obviously, there is something in those records after all.
Judge Napolitano confirmed in his conversations with President Trump, who he was friendly with at the time, that there's something very explosive in those records, oddly enough.
The one spearheading this attempt to gain information about the national security threats that these records allegedly pose is attorney Larry Schnapp, who has been interested in the assassination since he was a child.
Schnapp told the Epoch Times that in February, the government singled out 5,700 pages relevant to his request and will be sending them to him.
in 250 page batches.
Now he is actually moving this, going around the official process somehow and getting this.
And what's interesting is it is RFK Jr. that's backing him up in the background, um, which I find extra interesting because, of course, RFK Jr. knows full well that the Central Intelligence Agency was behind not only, uh, his uncle's murder, but his dad's.
Schnapp told Epoch Times, uh, he received part of the first group of documents last week.
Some of it's redacted, and he plans to challenge that illegally.
Quote The files released in the first tranche pertain to President Trump's October 2017 decision to postpone disclosure on the assassination records for six months.
These documents show that the National Archives disagreed with postponement requests of the CIA and FBI and how the rationale for the temporary six month postponement was orchestrated.
RFK Jr., nephew of Democrat President John F. Kennedy, is in favor of the efforts by Schnapf and said, I support the suit.
It's a 60 year old crime.
There's no excuse for not complying with the law and releasing the records.
In addition to this lawsuit, I submitted the attached letter to the archivist on behalf of a team of lawyers I've assembled requesting that the archives follow up on a number of search requests tendered to the Central Intelligence Agency and the FBI by the Assassination Record Review Board in 1998 that remain outstanding.
They were required by law to give those records up in 1998, they didn't.
2017 was their last deadline, and they got it kicked up to 2021.
And Stepford Biden said, eh, 2025.
How's that sound?
So these guys will just, they'll never let those records out.
What's interesting, however, is that they still are holding on to such a passion to keep those records out of the mainstream.
And you have to ask after 60 years why.
And you might also say, look, there's not going to be any smoking gun in those documents.
However, it is unusual.
That President Trump, in talking in private with Judge Napolitano, which just got revealed in December, and which we reported on this program, that he said, Look, you know, Andrew, if you saw what was in those files, you couldn't release it either.
So, where does that take us?
You know, I mean, it couldn't be, hey, the CIA assassinated President Kennedy.
Pretty much everyone knows that.
So, it has to be something else.
Everyone, you're watching the Dark Journalist Special Report.
We're getting deep here, and we went into the Disinformation Governance Board and the domestic terror bill, which they keep keeping behind the scenes and they keep rolling that vote because every time the vote comes up, strange questions get asked about it, like, what are you guys doing?
And then it disappears, and the press doesn't report on it, and then it shows back up.
But there are a lot of unusual stories around JFK this week that came out.
I'm going to get into a couple of them.
One is that the Chicago Secret Service agent, Abraham Bolden, The first Black Secret Service agent on a presidential detail, pardoned by Biden nearly 60 years after conviction.
This is big news.
And I've spoken with Biden, I'm sorry, with Bolden online before, and I haven't had him on the program for an interview, but he pointed out he was the first Black Secret Service agent and he was involved.
He wasn't on the detail that went into Dallas, but he had worked with those guys in Chicago.
And he had called out a number of unusual things and also had suggested that there were deeper aspects involved in the assassination.
They couldn't have that, and they set him up on a phony bribery charge, which he eventually got cleared of, but it never got sponged off his record.
So he wasn't in prison all this time or anything like that.
He led a full life, but he'd been put into prison and his whole life had been destroyed basically by those forces inside the Secret Service.
And he'd been on Kennedy's personal detail.
You know, Kennedy had talked.
With him and others about potentially being ambassadors to Africa and things like that.
And Bolden had said that Kennedy was keenly aware that there was an assassination threat, and that the person that was helping them in Chicago, and this is what they've left out of a lot of the news stories about this, but that it was an informant named Lee in Chicago that helped them thwart the assassination attempt only a few weeks before President Kennedy was killed in Dallas.
Is very unusual because we think about Lee Oswald and this double role that he was playing.
That very well could have been him, but there he is, Abraham Bolden.
And congratulations to you, sir.
That was a group of pardons that out of 73 showed up under President Biden.
And it's truly remarkable to see that happen under any circumstances.
Here's another weird story that came out around this, too, though.
Actually, There's so many weird ones, I'm never going to get out of here.
Okay.
FBI released report on Pelosi's father, originally ordered by JFK.
Are you with me on this?
FBI released report on Pelosi's father, originally ordered by JFK.
But way back there in 63, her father was doing this quasi role between the mafia and the government, and he actually had a position in government.
While the attention of the entire planet was directed to the storming of the Capitol on Jay 6, the FBI quietly released to the public a report which had been ordered by historical President John F. Kennedy into Thomas D. Alessandro Jr., father of current day Speaker of the House of the U.S. House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi.
It's unclear what exactly prompted the FBI to release this report at this time.
There's no question that they put it out there in the world that, you know, It wouldn't get any press attention.
And that was kind of the good time to do it.
The report carried a few interesting revelations.
For decades, rumors had existed that D'Alessandro Jr. was entwined with Italian mafia activity.
It was only confirmed the fact in 2018 in the Federalist Papers.
That report by the Federalist Papers referred to an FBI report made into Mr. D'Alessandro Jr., requested and presented to President John F. Kennedy.
Report available until J6.
Some of the before unknown revelations brought to light, though, were that Pelosi's brother, Franklin D. Alessandro, was charged with rape of two underage girls.
Franklin D. Alessandro was among 12 young men tried for this crime.
However, notably, he was the only one of the 12.
He was the only one of the 12.
These charges were dropped in 1953.
One additional revelation revealed in the report was apparently Thomas D. Alessandro Jr., in addition to alleged mob ties, was known to have been involved with several communist groups in the 1940s.
It's really a big story.
They have a shot there of Alessandro with a very young Nancy Pelosi.
But wow, you know, we're getting into some seriously deep territory.
And there's a reason why Kennedy ordered the FBI to look into this.
Think about that.
And so this kind of You know, mob control on the part of Pelosi, her family, and all the rest.
That's been going on for a heck of a long time.
Kennedy Library Archives00:03:40
One other weird JFK piece.
This is very strange.
And I'm going to investigate this one deeper, but watch, just watch some of the moves on this.
And this one actually Kat Goita sent to me.
Thank you, Kat.
Kennedy anniversary update settlement over loss of JFK photo archive in 9 11.
The estate of President John F. Kennedy's personal photographer, Jacques Lowe.
Has accepted an undisclosed sum from JPMorgan Chase Bank over the loss of 40,000 negatives in 9 11.
Jacques Lowe's treasured archive has been stored in the safe deposit box housed within the vaults of Five World Trade Center, a building next to the Twin Towers destroyed in the terrorist attacks of New York City.
The pictures represented almost all of the photographer's Kennedy images, and most had never been published, many capturing historic moments of President.
John F. Kennedy at work and at play.
So, this archive was kept then in this building.
And for years, it was rumored that the archive still existed.
And so, somehow, JP Morgan had access to the archive.
And this was the estate suing them to get it back.
And finally, JP Morgan was like, all right, we're tired of it after two decades.
Here's your money.
But, you know, I can't help but think with this guy's 40,000 pictures and the fact that the Building wasn't directly struck by this, then it was kind of one of those after effects.
It's very strange that this got eliminated this whole 40,000 Kennedy negatives that were in the vaults of this New York bank.
He could have never foreseen the tragedy, this photographer, more from the article.
He could have never foreseen the tragedy that would strike his treasured collection 11 years later.
For the location of the deposit box just down the road from the photographer's office was number five World Trade Center, a building adjacent to the Twin Towers, which were destroyed.
I wonder a lot about that vault of photos and what there may have been in there.
I want to point this out too.
When the Boston Marathon, Bombings occurred.
And this happened live, and I was a witness to it.
What I'm about to say is that the Kennedy Library went on fire, and there was an explosion there.
And a lot of news, this happened at exactly the same time.
And all these news crews went over there.
Channel 4 in particular did an interesting interview.
And they went in there and said, Look, what happened here?
It's a huge explosion.
Did you figure it out?
And this woman comes out who was like, one of the directors, and she said, Nothing's going on here.
Everything's fine.
You know, like it was just a little in house fire, it was nothing.
And the guy pans the camera over, and this huge plume of black smoke going there, you know, over UMass.
And so it was very strange.
Shortly after that, we got the Carlisle group taking over the Kennedy Library.
And it's interesting because, you know, it had been said that the Kennedy Library tapes that Jackie Kennedy had left, which were supposed to be revealed 75 years after the assassination.
Or after both of her children were deceased.
And so there was a lot said about the possession of those tapes and what were on those tapes and what Jackie knew about all this and had put there as a kind of insurance policy that, like, you know, if you try any more of this, you know what's going to happen.
Clandestine Intelligence War00:07:24
So this thing that's gone on behind the scenes, this clandestine war between these forces that want a more open America and these fascist forces that have come in through NASA, you know, and through that.
kind of paperclip influence on intelligence sources, the whole Galen setting up of these intelligence networks, that post war Nazi thing that Dr. Farrell talks about so much seems to be playing out, you know, even after all this time, that war that goes on in the background.
And for sure, this DGB, the disinformation governance board is a way again to silence dissent and make sure that these people never get found out.
And believe it or not, that fight, that struggle goes that far back.
And with that, I will leave everyone.
I'll do a couple of shout outs before I go.
And thank you so much for being with me here tonight.
There's more to get to, but I'll do it in another report.
Let's see who we got out there.
Fantastic.
Meta Faith, connecting the dots and intuition.
Love hearing you speak, Daniel, your wealth of knowledge.
Thank you.
It's so great to see you out there.
Wow.
Amazing.
Najat, so good.
Thank you.
Thanks for coming out.
And it's great.
You know, I always read the chat afterwards and the amazing things that you guys share.
I do try to do a lot of following up on, along with the great emails that you send and the documents and stuff.
You're such an incredible resource for me and all the work that I do.
And so I thank you very much.
I want to thank Kat out there for running the ideas room tonight.
Ed, you can always watch the replay.
There you go.
Nick Malone, the Biden regime.
Indeed, the Biden regime.
Let's not forget.
Good show.
Page Wizards.
Sally.
Thank you, Daniel.
Thank you.
I appreciate it.
Greetings from Mexico.
Love, love Mexico.
Incredible, incredible things there in Mexico.
Gigi's here.
Hello, Gigi.
Fantastic to see you.
Wait, Kat, I lost your.
Who else is here?
Dr. Farrell's here?
Hello, Dr. Farrell.
Wow, fantastic.
Thank you so much for being here.
Of course, Joseph's been doing incredible things, and we're all very happy also that he's recovered so, so well.
And we're going to have you back on here shortly because we have so many things to go over.
It's an honor to have you out there, sir.
And Gigi, of course, we're doing an interview with Gigi shortly.
And watch out because she's been doing incredible things.
You have to go to Gigi Young's YouTube channel for the incredible series that she's doing on Mars and other things.
But whoa, just off the charts, blowing us all away.
I know Kate's out there.
Kate, it's great to see you.
I'm sure that says Foo You.
Joseph Farrell, I'm here thanks to nitroglycerin.
What's amazing to me is, you know, and that's some very serious health things that you've been through on this, but getting back to work the way that you did, it's interesting to me because I think I'm very much the same way, which is work is, you know, so important to me.
And so I know that with your work, that's a big kind of incentive for your health to come back.
And so we're so glad that you're feeling better and your work is so important to all of us, sir.
You got to have heart.
That's it.
Gigi's out there.
Hey, if you can get Gigi to laugh, that's a big deal.
Fantastic group out there tonight.
Caritas Tarot.
Yeah, you know, I wanted to mention I got a lot of feedback when there's Kate out there.
I got a lot of feedback when I mentioned that there was going to be an astrology show.
And a lot of people said, you know, this or that person would be good for it.
That's great because I can use all of the different suggestions that you have.
So please, anyone that you think is good on that front, I had some very interesting conversations with Susan Miller.
I met Susan Miller, I thought she was a really excellent astrologer.
She's somebody that came to mind immediately, but there are so many and so many good ones that if you have recommendations, you know, I'm really big into astrology.
And I think it's kind of the time of astrology.
Like people have finally caught up to all that.
And of course, it's a great tool of the mystery schools.
Politicians use it, we know that.
And I knew quite a lot of Wall Street people who used it as well.
So it's just an all around good tool for us.
And so we'll do something special on that coming up in the next couple of weeks.
Like I said, May is going to be off the charts.
And of course, we'll have some great people like Gigi and Joseph Farrell here.
Of course, Catherine Fitz is coming up.
And we have some surprise guests as well.
And some people returning just off the charts.
I mean, it's amazing.
And the X series episodes we have coming up for you are going to be mind blowing.
We will see you on Friday.
And everyone have a very safe and healthy and happy Tuesday night.
It's been great to be here with you.
Moon in Aquarius, Roosevelt.
Moon in Aquarius.
I hope that's helpful.
Yeah, Sun in Taurus, Moon in Aquarius.
Kat Goida.
What do you got there?
At Eugene.
It's up to you.
YouTube.
I've put up Twitter.
Okay.
Okay.
All good.
I like Gypsy Moon.
Thank you so much.
We love you too.
It's great.
It's great to have everyone here.
We will see you all on Friday and have a great week.
And we'll get this disinformation governance board outed and then we'll destroy it and get rid of it because it's a totally unconstitutional agency and we'll apply a lot of political pressure to make that happen.
And that's something that we can all do together.
It's going to be very helpful.
And Nina's going to look for a new job, but hey, look, you know, she's not half bad at the musical theater thing.
And I'm sure she can do scary poppins sometime.
It's going to happen.
Good luck, Nina.
I really mean it.
All right, everyone, have a great night.
And thank you so much for people who've contributed in Super Chat.
Wow.
You know, it's just been really great.
I really appreciate it.
Nathan Allen was somebody up there and said, DJ, you're a gentleman and a scholar, strength and honor.
Thank you so much.
And for your support, really, really appreciate it.